HomeMy WebLinkAbout _ 9.1(e)--Establishment of Finance Advisory Committee GI �" Y C� F
� � �- ' � ° � � i � CITY OF REDDING
��
REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
MEETING DATE: December 2, 2025 FROM: Steve Bade, Interim City
ITEM NO. 9.1(e) Manager
***APPROVED BY***
sbade@cityofredding.org
t��,re a �, 7�t l if2{i/242+
sbade@cityofredding.org
SUBJECT: 9.1(e)--Consider establishment of Financial Oversight Committee
Recommendation
Authorize and approve the following:
(1) Authorize staff to draft a resolution formalizing the Audit Committee structure
establishing the composition of inembers, term of inembers, purpose(s) of the committee
(include existing delegation under Council Policy 425), and meeting schedule; and
(2) Authorize staff to draft a resol�ution establishing the Financial Oversight Committee
structure, specifying the composition of inembers, term of inembers, purposes of
committee, and meeting schedule.
Fiscal Impact
There is no impact to the General Fund with this action.
AZteNnative Action
City Council (Council) could provide staff with alternate direction.
Background/Analysis
On October 22, 2025, the Council directed staff to return with an item considering the creation of
a Financial Oversight Committee. Council specified that the committee would be forward-
looking but has not yet indicated the specific scope or function of that committee. Staff has
reviewed models from other cities as well as articles published on this topic and are bringing
those forward for Council's consideration. Staff is requesting further direction as to the scope,
composition, terms, and meeting sehedule. Additionally, staff has reviewed the documentation
regarding the existing Audit Committee structure and is recommending that Council consider
formalizing that committee's role to provide greater clarity going forward.
Report to Redding City Council November26,2025
Re: 9.1(e)--Establishment of Finance Advisory Committee Page 2
Models from Other Cities
Staff has reviewed how other cities have formed and maintained Financial Oversight Committees
and have identified two major categories of committees. First, similar to the City of Redding
(City), many jurisdictions have audit committees responsible for reviewing audits of past
expenditures. These committees may review both internal and external audit results in addition
to setting audit priorities and identifying areas for future audits. In larger jurisdictions, the
internal and external audit functions may be given to separate committees, which work in
conjunction with a dedicated City Auditor or City Controller position. Examples of this structure
include Las Vegas, San Francisco, and San Jose. Presently, the City combines both the internal
and external audit functions into a single Audit Colnmittee, which is a standing committee of the
Council. The City does not have an internal auditor or controller position, these types of duties
have been delegated to the Financial Services Department through Council Policy 425.
Second, several jurisdictions employ a different kind of committee that participate in the
budgeting process by reviewing projections on future revenues and/or expenses. The purpose of
these committees is to provide additional technical expertise that can assist in budgetary
accuracy and transparency. For example, the City of Las Vegas engages a "Financial Advisory
Committee" that includes local stakeholders such as economists, hoteliers, and representatives
from the homebuilders' association. Per that city's budget summary, these members provide
"perspectives into the city's revenue projections and sometimes, expenditure assumptions." By
including representatives from key local industries, this type of committee can provide insight
into local economic trends that will impact projections in revenue. This may present advantages
over the City's current practice, which is to rely on projections from a consulting �rm and
executive staff, as reviewed, adjusted and approved by Council.
These two different types of committees are not mutually exclusive. In the Las Vegas example,
that city utilizes both a Financial Advisory Committee looking at revenue assumptions in
upcoming budgets and an Audit Oversight Committee to review audits of past expenditures.
Each function prospective and retrospective—provides a different benefit. As such, the
committees have different needs in terms of inember expertise, meeting schedule, and structure.
In deciding whether to modify the existing Audit Committee and/or create a committee to assist
in the budget process, the Council may want to consider how the specific objectives of each type
of committee meet the needs and resources of the City.
As the staff was researching information for this report, a very informative article, printed in
Weste�n City, a monthly magazine provided by The League of California Cities, was located and
is attached for reference. The article states, "These committees, composed of community
members, aim to increase city government transparency and build accountability". It goes on to
warn of the potential pitfalls, highlighting that clear direction is needed to avoid duplicating staff
work, creating competing priorities and workload �or staff, and/or challenging the governance
and authority of the Council. The article recommends establishing clear steps to avoid the
pitfalls, these step include; articulating clear direction from Council on the mission and role of
the committee; setting clear roles and responsibilities, adopt a standing committee resolution or
code of conduct for the committee, provide training and/or orientation to all involved, appoint a
city council member and/or staff liaison; clearly delineate the 1eve1 of committee staff support to
be provided; consider sunset provisions; and regularly review the purpose and mission of the
committee.
Report to Redding City Council November26,2025
Re: 9.1(e)--Establishment of Finance Advisory Committee Page 3
Audit Committee
The City currently has an Audit Committee, which is comprised of the Mayor and Vice-Mayor.
As a standing committee of the Council, the Audit Committee is a Brown Act body with publicly
noticed meetings. Staff did not locate any original organizing documents, but based on the
review of agendas, the Audit Committee meets regularly to consider the results of the City's
annual external audit. The Audit Committee then advances the results of the annual external
audit for consideration by the CounciL The committee also meets and considers modifications to
audit contracts, including extensions, and the selection of new auditors. Additionally, the City
currently tasks the Audit Committee with reviewing all internal audits and setting the priorities
for future internal audits.
Staff is recommending a resolution formalizing the structure and scope of the existing Audit
Committee. Council Policy 425 provides the delegation of the authority for Internal Audits to
Finance and reporting of the results of the internal audits to the Audit Committee. There is no
clear definition or documented role of the Audit Committee besides this mention in Council
Policy 425 and this includes the external audits aspect. This is most likely the result of functions
being delegated to the Committee at different times, but it would be helpful to maintain a single
document outlining a11 of the Committee's functions and structure. Moreover, as a Brown Act
Body, the Audit Committee is required to have a regular meeting schedule, and including that
schedule in the resolution would be helpful for organizational purposes. Prior to bringing
forward a resolution, staff will need to confirm whether the Council chooses to retain the current
Audit Committee structure or wishes to revisit that issue as part of the larger fiscal oversight
discussion.
Financial Oversight Committee
The City does not currently have a committee that provides forward-looking recommendations
on revenue and expense projections to assist in the City's budget process. If the Council is
interested in creating a committee similar to what is used in other cities, staff can draw from
those examples to bring a proposed resol�ution for the Council to consider. These would likely
involve some customization for the City. Once again, using the City of Las Vegas as our
example, representatives from specific industries that drive revenue in their jurisdiction are
appointed to serve. A similar committee in the City may or may not look to the same industries
as a driver of local revenue and economic activity.
Similar issues would be meeting schedule and appointment process. Each city typically uses its
own appointment structure. In the City of Redding, this involves appointments made by the
Mayor, subject to approval of the full Council, with terms staggered in order to allow for a
diversity of appointments. Staff would prepare any draft resolution with this same model unless
otherwise directed by the Council. Additionally, the Council wi11 need to decide on a regular
meeting schedule for the committee, but that may be best decided after the Council determines
how it may change the budget workshop process.
Other Options
The options presented represent the models that staff has identified from other jurisdictions, but
other structures are possible. If these options do not meet the Council's needs, it may be prudent
to start by identifying the policy goals that the Council wants to address so that structure or
alternative proposals can be derived from there.
Report to Redding City Council November26,2025
Re: 9.1(e)--Establishment of Finance Advisory Committee Page 4
Environmental Review
This item is not a project as defined under the California Environmental Quality Act, and no
further action is required.
Council PNio�^ity/City Manager Goals
� Communication and Transparency — "Improve the quality of communication with the
public and City employees to enhance knowledge and increase transparency to improve
public trust."
• Government of the 21st Century — `Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and
challenges of today's residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make better
decisions today."
Attachments
^City Council Policy 425 - Internal Audit Function
^Finance Advisory Committees_Tips and Traps - Western City Magazine
CITY OF REDTIING, CALIFORNIA
Cl�T.1NCIL POLICY
SUBJECT RESOLUTION POLICY EFFECTIVE pAGE
NUMBER NUMBER DATE
INTERNAL AUDIT FLTNCTION 2006-40 425 3-21-06 1 of 1
BACKGROUND
City management is re���������`'�'o �����ty Council for its performance. Whi1e management is primarily
responsible for the C�������erformance a����S internal controls,the City Council is ultimately responsible for
ensuring that mana����nt fulfills that res���sibility. The quality of the City's control environment can be
improved by estab�����ng an internal audit�`���tion. The internal audit function would help in monitoring the
effectiveness of t�,�x,�ity's policies and �'����edures. Implementing an internal audit function should also
enhance the City's���'�ctiveness in accomplishing its goals and objectives. The internal audit function can be
provided by Financ�P��vision personneL The Finance Division has qualified staff who have supervised,
planned and/or perfo���� ���d����� the ����� �'�'� �ssist the City Council in its responsibility to oversee
management's performan��{������u�arl���'�����g tt�`����rnal controls,the Finance Division will not only report
����,
to the City Manager, but also direc�ly��e Audlt Ct���lttee regarding its internal control procedures.
,
PURPOSE �
It is City Council's desire to establish ��;���������idlt �������� �t�� mternal audit function would help in
monitoring the effectiveness of the City's policies�and�����ures. Qu����"iedpersonnel exist within the Finance
Division to perform some of the internal audit fun�����'�'To improve��� City's internal control struct�ure the
Finance Division is assigned the responsibility o�������ming the in�����1 auc��function as workload permits.
To help enhance the Division's independence�����i����n will re����orm�,;�����o the City Manager and Audit
Committee at least on an annual basis. �� � � �
. �
�.� „ „
POLICY s
��� u,
It is the policy of the City Council of the City of Redding tha�the Fin�����`���'t��n will be responsible for the
internal audit function of the City. Due to the limited sta������'�������e�to work on internal audit items,
priorities will be set by the Finance Division as to the work�t������"eYformed. However, at least annually the
Finance Division will report their internal audit priorities to the Audit Committee and the Audit Committee may
approve or change those priorities. Annually,the Finance Division will also report the results of their internal
audit work to the City Manager and ti�e Audit Committee.
��\��5>� ,....:...
���,n �_ �' r�����
}ti �ir �
'�„��,'rt ������
� ' � . ; � � � ,� �
��� ��� � t ��
t��s� �
� � ����
\�4 tsy
� fi �
•y��r
„
.
,
�
�ts+v
, :_;..„ �
.. . . . . . ,� '_ „_..�h
� � r
�4{ r��ti�� . .
ti zst n: z '� ' .'° ' � 7 �izr��a�i
>. ::::
�.d�t;tat�, „'ss,s.ti .�.� ..,..,.,,,.:.��. .�;t . .. . :�,.,, ":'.:� .;:: '. ,. '� .��:-'.. . ,<„t 3,�s�t h��.��
, . ..,�<r ,,�;� ;,
_; _ , r
� .< , . . .,.�.:... .... .
�
��, �, � `�` � �� ��,t,�, ,��?�' °�,
��� �.,�°�\1`z�``�`^�� � �.���� itr��'ti i��";��Z���`4~,�.a3�, ��� < I1`\������`�`.
\� � �4,�4� ..�„��, ������ , .� n,;,�F.�,��,�...}:.���`�,�ti t � '�.;���,�, .£p,1,���,��
� �,. .�a, ,Jc s��=l.� ,Pn„ >>7,�, 11r ,tF. 4,� i12,. .l'�,u},>u\��5
.1 { .,3 �„R,� ft 7 � .S 4 e u.�?nt i�am 't,.}as:,�}>v,n..,l,ceatl 2 �� 1 l� ,(i�`dr.:}�C.s�i?�z����
1�.U�'� �, ,4 ± 4��
t�
,�i}� :� '�'�.. f .�..sr r�.�...x i.,t z. �i, � l � £ �,s.. �ps�� .i .�.
f3� .1�. 3tr 4,,,, }< },,..:�,ar s .i� 3 ��� � 'ti st 3 �.`s z ��s
,�t �tn: �t r. � 7. 17� 4�. I }5' 1£ }1 r (l ( .1
� c$}t .':i.� Y .I �V f. {�: 4 �t
,t ttt �.:��s:�,. .,::s�,} e t. .i s c s.�t �} � }� .�i .t �� { t 1i ��: t �j�.
S).t t..a .C� '^t ✓:. t ss4t.r. .J t i �.�}lt i). t 3'3t1Y ts '.s :t t Yfl'���.
;�i � � 5 � � r i js � � 5 � a s i.� T1 y t �St y y �
"� �..;' .,+ ,,
y
r ,1 . . 'Y i � :� � r, „ :,
s. �'��,��,,� , , ' ; � IQI i �II�� 1 1
�� , .., ,„„.: :. ::' .
d. .. ;t ;, „ .� .:.: :'.
� .;:,„,,..i„ �,,,,. .,,1,�
v , . :: .. , . , „�: ,.,,.,.,. ?
Oetob�r 22, 2018 ; F��t�a��� < by Melissa Kuehne
�i�.�.r��� .A.d.�i��ry- �����stt���� �T"i�� �nc�
�"ra�a�
Melissa Kuehne is communications and development manager for the Institute for Local
Government; she can be reached at ����:�a�°�-�rzc�c��c,�-�l�;ac��°�:�.
In today's environment of the 24-hour news cycle, social media and "fake news," cities
throughout California are working hard to engage their communities and strengthen trust in
local government. Residents increasingly question decisions made at all levels of government
— part.icularly those related to use of taxpayer dollars and financial decisions. To help address
such concerns, many cities are turning to finance advisory committees.
These committees, composed of community members, aim to increase city government
transparency and build accountability. Including the community in the decisionmaking process
beyond participating in elections and city council meetings helps people better understand the
types of decisions made at the local level, the trade-offs to consider and how city councils
arrive at final decisions.
"Involving residents in meaningful, inclusive and responsive ways benefits the city and the
community alike," says Tony Dahlerbruch, city manager of Palos Verdes Estates. "Advisory
committees can serve as a conduit between the city and community, which leads to increased
transparency and trust."
Avoiding Unintended Consequences: Issues to Consider
Finance advisory committees can yield many benefits, but they can also generate unintended
consequences if not carefully designed and managed. Without clear direction and strict
oversight, a city runs the risk of the finance advisory committee duplicating staff work and
challenging the governance and authority of the city council. Such comrnittees are rnost
effective when they are a conduit for residents serving in an advisory capacity to the city
council to share opinions and offer recommendations — and least effective when they
duplicate the efforts of the city's finance director and Finance Department.
Committees that duplicate efforts can also create competing priorities for staff. When the
committee's purpose and tasks are not clearly articulated, cities run the risk of committee
members attempting to direct staff and drive projects. This potentially puts staff in an awkward
situation where the committee issues directions that conflict with council-adopted goals and
priorities and/or the directions of executive staff.
The amount of staff time needed to manage the committee is another consideration. It's likely
that staff will need to respond to questions and requests from committee members and provide
support for additional public hearings and meetings. Depending on the number of ineetings
and the committee's needs, this can significantly strain already stretched city staff.
Another problem can arise if the committee is given the authority to develop or recommend a
budget because the committee may reach a conclusion that differs — perhaps radically — from
the direction that the council deems to be the best option. This creates conflict between the
council and the committee and, by extension, the residents of the community. In such a
situation, if the council opts not to follow the committee's direction, it can undermine the
chances of achieving the primary goal of increasing trust between the city and community.
�'i��
Best Practices ��� ' '��
�
,{
To avoid these potential pitfalls, cities can take the
following steps.
Articulate a clear mandate from the city council about
the committee's mission and role in the
decisionmaking process. This can avoid "mission creep" � ���� : �
;
and support the efforts of staff and the council to keep the � '
committee — as a whole and its individual mernbers —
focused and on task.
Set clear roles and responsibilities. Providing clarity to
committee members on their charge and the decisionmaking process is critically important.
Committees are not in place to direct staff, duplicate staff efforts or make final policy or
operational decisions. Their purpose is to serve in an advisory capacity to the city council,
which in turn makes final policy decisions. If a committee crosses the line into the operations,
activities and recommendations that are the responsibility of the council or staff, the council
risks unintentionally abdicating its role, losing control and creating unnecessary controversy.
Adopt a standing committee resolution or code of conduct for the committee.
This helps formalize the committee's role and responsibilities and provides a mechanism for
staff and the city council to keep the committee on track.
Provide training and/or orientation for new committee members. Standing committees
are subject to the Ralph M. Brown Act. Thus, it may be wise to provide training to committee
members on the laws governing open meetings, AB 1234 ethics education and/or conflicts of
interest. City officials may also want to consider conducting an orientation for new committee
members that covers:
• The role and responsibilities of the committee;
• Applicable city ordinances and ethics laws;
• Adopted codes of conduct; and
• Staff or council contacts.
It may also be helpful to consider any unique qualifications and subject-matter knowledge or
expertise that may be needed on the committee and to seek those skills in the recruitment
process. When recruiting members for a finance advisory committee, the city may require
applicants to have finance, investment or banking experience; however, such private-sector
experience differs significantly from public-sector finance, and committee members will still
require training and oversight.
"The City of Los Altos Hills provides training and orientation for all new committee members
and has adopted a code of conduct for all appointed commissioners and committee members,"
says Carl Cahill, city manager for Los Altos Hills. "This allows us to manage expecta�ions and
work more collaboratively with our advisory committees."
Appoint a city council and/or staff liaison. This individual can report back to the city
council and/or executive staff, answer questions for the committee and help keep the
committee focused on its mission.
Clearly delineate the level of committee staff support to be provided. Make certain that
adequate staff support will be provided for the advisory committee and be specific about the
limits of such support.
Have a sunset provision or regularly review the committee's purpose and mission. If
the committee has a narrow scope of duties, it may be appropriate to limit how long the
committee exists. Periodically reviewing the purpose or mission of a standing committee is also
advisable. Has its charge been accomplished? Is its purpose still relevant or does it need to be
re-examined?
���,���, ,... .
�
��sl �t } {$�,k
s ���
1, 5
,
�r �
�
I I' il, 4
(
�
� I �
� � , '� PI
; IV, � ,I�
�t. � �
;
� �
�
�� �; '' � : � 't
� ,: ��
_<. , �,
,; � �
� � �.,:�,.,.. �,,,.
..: <�: _.... v., �:
,,�...,, .,t l�s
, , ...........
� �.:�.
�,,3.� ,.. ....... ,. ...,....�,,,�r
Taking the Long View
"In general, it's good to have more community participation in local government through
advisory committees and other means," says Rod Gou1d, retired city manager of Santa Monica.
"However, problems arise when the committees aren't provided the necessary training, clarity
of direction, support and oversight to complete their mission or goals."
When carefully executed and properly functioning, finance advisory committees can build trust
in local government, help a city understand the community's values and priorities and foster
leadership development.
Cities also employ other means of engaging residents on fiscal matters. The Institute for Local
Government offers a number of resources to help local governments successfully involve their
communities in budgeting and finance issues and plan productive public meetings. See "Tools
to Engage Your Community in the Budgeting Process" on page 9 for tips and approaches to
that engagement.
Photo Credit: Erhui1979.
�t
��� ��� November 1, 2Q17 : October 1, 2017 ; � � "���
�� , ,t � � Se
�� ���� � 0°�W,.s M V+.% f k V 8 6 9 �1 6 4r � ��' �.�"b.C.✓4.v�W 4.�VC 4r �,�M��l✓'4r�6.M i f wF � i� , a �Q
2+.�v�.. ..� �
Ir���it��a�� ��r ���� Il�r��,�� ��� � C�er�����€� ; Carolyn � by
�
, °�� � ��;� ,.v 4.t.����, �� ���,_� �������� Da
�c�u�r���e��t� . ��� � Coleman ��'� �,�� ,��
Madeline Henry
�to��iri� the �
e �
Q ° w
.
Increasing pension costs could push
Public involvement in city budgeting cities already in financial distress
increases financial transparency and closer to the brink of bankruptcy.
promotes greater trust. A look at how comr
for an earthquake �
resilience.