Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - City Council - 1950-12-184fa". A City Council, Regular Meeting Council -Chambers,- City _Hall December 18, 1950 $:00 P.M. The meeting was called to order by Mayor Simons and upon roll call the following_,Coun.cilmen were present: Morrison, Swarts and I'riayor Simons. Late: Anthony and Williams. City Attorney -Carlton was also present. MINUTES - PREVIOUS 14EETING 1v10T ON: VjFade by Councilman Swarts and seconded by Councilman -Morrison that the minutes of the meeting of December 4th be accepted as mailed to each.councilman. Voting was as follows: Ayes: Councilmen - Anthony, Morrison, Swarts, Williams and Simons Noes: Councilmen - None Absent: Councilmen - None REDDING CITY BUS LINES Mr. Laurence Carr presented the following application for a renewal of a bus line permit from Mr. John C. Alward: APPLICATION OF REDDING CITY LINES, A TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, FOR RENEWAL OF TRANSPORTATION COMPANY PERMIT TO THE HONORABLE.CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING: 11 I am the transferee from William Taylor Alward, as transferor, of ._the, permit Heretofore issued by yourselves to said William Taylor Alward, authorizing the operation of a transportation company for the transportation of passengers within the. City of Redding. Said permit was granted by Resolution No, 1380 of the City Council of the City of Redding on December 20, 1945. Said permit will expire on the 20th day of December, 1950, being for a maximum of five years as provided in Section 1150 of the Municipal Code of the City of Redding. This'application is being made, therefore, under the provisions of said Section 1150 fora renewal as therein provided for an -additional five. year period. I hereby certify that I have complied with the provisions of Section -1148 of said Municipal Code regarding insurance coverage and that I am presently covered in accordance with the _provisions of said section. I further certify that there has been no change in my qualifications as previously set forth in the conditions for said transf er ' to'. me, and that I meet the requirements. of Section 1119 of said Municipal Code. I am filing herewith a copy of the fares and charges now being charged to'passengers in accordance with the order of the Public Utilities]Commission. Your.immediate attention to the foregoing application for renewal will be greatly appreciated. -Very truly yours, /sf ,John C. Alward MOTIONj Made by'Councilman Morrison and seconded by'Councilman Swarts that the bus line permit be renewed for five years. Voting was as -follows: Ayes.- Councilmen.- Anthony, Morrison, Swarts, Williams and Simons Noes: Councilmen - None Absent: Councilmen - None GRANDVIEW HEIGHTS ANNEXATION City.Attorriey Carlton presented the ordinance for the annexation of Grandview Heights to the City of Redding for its first reading. Polling date: Bebruary 13, 1951 MOTION; Nude by Councilman.Swarts and seconded by Councilman Morrison to waive the first reading of the Grandview Heights Ordinance.' Voting was as follows: Ayes: Councilmen - Anthony, Mlorrison, Swarts, Williams and Simons Noes: Councilmen - None Absent: Councilmen - None FIRE PROTECTION - COUNTY HOSPITAL - The -County Board of Supervisors;returned'the signed Agreement between the City of Redding and the County of Shasta for fire protection to the county hospital. AGREEMENT THIS AGREETIENT, made and entered into this 17th day of November, 1950, by and between the CITY OF REDDING, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as First Party, and the COUNTTY OF SHASTA,_ here- inafter referred to , as, Second Party, WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Second Party owns, maintains and conducts a county hospital and a home for aged, indigent persons south of the city limits of the First Party and which property is generally known as the County Hospital, and such property shall be hereinafter referred to as the County Hospital, and WHEREAS, the parties _hereto desire to' rovide for a standby fire service for such County Hospital through the fire department maintained and operated by the.First Party. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS MUTUALLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED BY AND BETWEEN THE PARTIES HERETO AS FOLLOWS,.TO-WIT: 1. The First Party agrees to furnish a standby fire protection service.to the said County Hospital property to,the'following extent, to - wit: a. That upon receiving a fire alarm,,the.First Party will send one piece of fire fighting equipment, together with a driver of the same, and two regular paid firemen of the city of Redding and such other vol- unteer firemen as may respond to such fire alarm. b. That such men and equipment will be sent from the>.said fire department of the First Party for the.purpose.of attempting to extinguish and suppress a fine on said County Hospital.property. 2. That -in the event any property within the boundaries of the First Party shall be in jeopardy of fire, or in the event that such fire fighting equipment and,personn:el are required to suppress a fire within the boundaries of the First Party, the First Party.shall have the right to abandon efforts to extinguish fire on the County Hospital premises and to return to the city of Redding, and in the event that a fire is in progress in the city of Redding at the time of receiving a fire alarm from the Second Party, the First Party shall not be required to send men and equipment in accordance with the terms of this agreement if the same are needed within the�\ city of Redding. 3. That in consideration of the. standby protection to be furnish- ed by the First Party to,theSecond Party hereunder, the.Second Party shall pay the First Party,the following sum of money, to -wit The sum of §25.00 foreach fire alarm which the First Party responds to here- under at the instance of the Second Party, and an.additional.sum of $100.00 for each hour of fire fighting or portion.thereof after the first hour of such f ire fighting. 4. Itis expressly agreed that either party may terminate this agreement upon -giving thirty.days written -notice to the other, and in the'event the First Party elects to so terminate the agreement, its obligation to furnish standby service hereunder shall cease at the end of such thirty day period. 5. The First Party shall have authority to take such measures as may be deemed proper_f6r the suppression of any fire that it is called to hereunder, and the Second Party agrees to cooperate pur- suant to the direction of the First Party in the suppression of fires. 6. That notwithstanding the agreement to furnish standby ser- vice hereunder, the Second Party hereby -agrees that in consideration of the execution,of this agreement, it hereby waives the right to make any claim for damages in any form whatever because of the failure or alleged failure of the First Party to perform the terms of this agr'eement,land the Second Party further expressly waives the right to make any claim for damages whatever against the First Party by reason of the method of fire suppression or by reason of any conduct of its employees or other persons for whmm it is responsible during. the suppression or attempted suppression of any -fire at -the County Hospital premises or in going to or coming from -such fire. The Second..Party agrees that the waivers herein provided for shall extend to and apply for the benefit of all. officers;-agents.and', employees - of the City .ofl -Redding,, together with any volunteer members of the fire department of the city of Redding. 7. 'The- partie-s-hereto expressly declare that the First Party Would not enter into this contract -,..unless the waivers of damages hereinabove provided for were agreed to by the Second Party.. IN, WITiU�ESS-,WHEREOF,°lthe- parties hereto have caused their names and seals to be hereunto affixed by their officers thereunto duly authorized. CITY OF REDDING. by/s/Wilber D. Simons = . First Party COUNTY OF SHASTA ...by/s/Andrew T. Jensen Second Party PARKING PROBLEM Mayor Simons read 'a communication from'the Redding Chamber of Commerce requesting information as to what action had been taken in following''up-the recommendations made several months ago by the Calif. State Automobile Association concerning the local parking `situation. - At the suggestion of Councilman Williams this -matter was put over until the next meeting when a complete report to the Chamber of Commerce will be given. CHRISTMAS SEASON COOPERATION Herewith a letter received from the Redding Chamber of Commerce: Mr. Phil Storm; City. Manager City Hall;- Redding Dear Phil:' , .- - - , . On behalf of the.Redding.Chamber of Commerce, I wish to take this.means to:sincerely thank you for the very fine cooperation shown 0, by the various city departments in the recent Christmas Season Opening event on Monday, November 27. We are writing the various departments concerned, codes of which are enclosed, but wanted to thank you and the -City: ouncil for all assistance rendered. With very best regards, I am Cordially yours, REDDING CHAMBER OF COMET RCE by Ls/ Jack Mayne Secretary -Manager 11 CIVIL DEFENSE I.ffJTUAL AID PROGRAM City�Attorney Carlton presented a letter from the Director of Civil Defense on the subject of California Disaster and Civil.Defense Master Mutual Aid Agreement urging.the Council'to accept this mutual aid program. IvI0TION: Made by Councilman Swarts and seconded by Councilman Anthony to authorize the mayor to execute an agreement on behalf of, the City . . of Redding. Voting was as follows: Ayes: Councilmen - Anthony, Morrison,.Swarts,, Williams and Simons Noes: Councilmen - None Absent: Councilmen - None PROPOSED. FURCHASE-OF CITY. PROPERTY Mr. Winans. presented a :request for the purchase of approximately ten acres of city land situated on the west side.of the Sacramento River, north of Highway 44, this property to be purchased by the Winan Bros. and Mr. Trisdale_,for a truck terminal, improvements -to be in the neighborhood of :75,000.00. Their.development would require filling the property to level of the highway. Mir. Winans stated they would grant any necessary creek, sewer or street rights of way that might be.required. The Redding city pound -is situated on this property. Councilman Morrison suggested it would be necessary to advertise for bids to secure the most advantageous price should this property be put on the market. Councilman Williams suggested the matter be referred to the Finance and Buildings Committee to give a definite answer at the council meeting of January 2nd. BIDS - DIESEL, STOVE OIL SND, GASOLINE Bids for Diesel Oil, stove oil and gasoline to be delivered in 1951 were opened and read from the following companies: Richfield Oil'Corporation Richfield Bldg., Lis Angeles, Calif. Tidewater Associated 324 W. Broadway Sacramento, Calif: Redding Oil Company PO Box 780 Redding, Calif. Signal Oil Company 811 W. 7th St. Los Angeles, Calif. Shell Oil Company 1024 13th St ., : Sacramento, Calif. Oil Co. E. B.. Hinkle., 1230 .Market St. Redding, Calif.' Shasta Oil & Burner Service PO Box 247 Redding, Calif. The Texas Company 929 S. Broadway Los Angeles, Calif. General Petroleum Corp. 417 Montgomery St. San Francisco, Calif. Union Oil Co. of Calif. 425 1st St. San Francisco, Calif. Standard Cil Co. of Calif. Sacramento, Calif. 1 1 M.� - Mayor Simons referred the -bids to the Finance Committee to work with City Manager Storm for the awards of the contracts. CANCELLATION OF TAXES ON CITY PROPERTY Two letters dated December 19, 1950 from the Department of Public Works, Division of Highways, were received and presented to the Council. They requested cancellation of city of Redding taxes for the fiscal year 1950-51 on Parcel 1,"lot 11 and Parcel 2, lot 12, Block 16 of the original town of Redding as shown on map filed in Book of Old Plats at page 65, together with improvements located thereon. The prop- erty was acquired for the Department of Employment and therefore constitute a public use. MOTION: Tilade by Councilman Swarts and seconded by Councilman Anthony to authorize City Attorney Carlton to draw up the necessary papers for the cancellation of these taxes. Voting was as follows: Ayes: Councilmen - Anthony, Morrison, Swarts, Williams and Simons Noes: Councilmen - None Absent: Councilmen - -None TRAFFIC SITUATION ON EUREKA WAY A report was presented by Councilman Williams on the hazardous con- dition on Eureka Way, particularly at West Street. Councilman Williams noted the difficulties of dealing with property owners involved. There was a general discussion of the real traffic hazards, particularly during the peak hours of automobile and pedestrian traffic. It was suggested if direct negotiations failed, condemnation proceedings would be necessary to secure the land for street improvements. City Manager Storm, City Attorney Carlton and Councilman Williams were requested to.enter into direct negotiations with the property owners for acquiring the property needed, and to make an official report at the next council meeting if possible. It was the suggestion of Go ncilman Swarts that the Chief of Police a r present- eport -to- i'fir Sto m on the condition of the traffic situation at West and Eureka Way, enforce the speed limit and post a traffic .officer if he felt it was required. LINDEN STREET.- `MATER SERVICE Councilman Williams .'ave his report on Linden Street and as no action g p of the council was required to extend water service, Mr. Storm was requested to give this service when.the.pipe is available. i A recommendation had been made at theiprevious council meeting to make Linden Street passable; however Councilman Williams reported the city would not accept responsibility for other improvements on the street until said street is brought up to the necessary require- ments. equire- ments. DRAINAGE - GARDEN SUBDIVISION CityManager Storm reported that City Engineer Hill had no suggestions to make for the temporary relief of the drainage situation in this area, as the Peterson property is the key to draining the low land. Iv1r. Don Wroten said if Gold Street were opened through the Peterson property, the drainage would take care of itself. The question was again discussed as to whether an extension of Gold Street through the Peterson property is actually a dedicated street. City attorney Carlton maintained it would require litigation to prove either side. Mr. "uuroten felt the necessity of all details being taken care-" of as soon as possible, so that work could begin in the Spring. Councilman _ Williams felt that property owners should be notified that nothing could be done for the balance of this wet season, but _the best solution would be the completion of a permanent drainage project. WATER AND ELECTRIC RATES The report --on water rates was presented by Councilman Swarts. He suggested certain increases and the equalization of water rates for the city of Redoing. The electric rates were thought to be adequate, with no decrease in the near future. These matters are still under survey and further reports will be made at a later date, HIGHWAY FROM HYAMPOM TO KORBEL The fo lowing communication from -the -Redding Chamber -of Commerce to the, Board of Supervisors of Shasta ;County was presented by Mayor Simons: December 14, 1950 Honorable Board of Supervisors Shasta County, Court House Redding, California Gentlemen: At a recent meeting, the Board of Directors of the Redding Chamber of. Commerce went on ,record as- being unalterably opposed to any expenditure of funds on -the proposed timber acdess road between Hyampom,.Trinity, County, and Korbel, Humboldt County.- We very definitely feel that the needs of all Northern ,California, includ- ing the provision of proper..timber.access roads, can -far better be,served,by using a comparable;amount of money for the completion of- U. - S. 299- in Humboldt County. A system ,of laterals can then be constructed, wlich will provide access to all,of the areas which would be served by the proposed Hyampom-Korbel road. In addition, many areas, particularly those to the worthward, also.can be easily opened up. We submit this suggestion to you for whatever action you: may care to take. Yours -very truly, REDDING CHAIiBER OF COF1NEi RCE f s` Jack Mame Secretary-Iwlanager A Iv7otion was made by Councilman'Williams and seconded by Councilman Swarts to accept the recommendations of the Redding Chamber of Commerce. Councilman Swarts stated that a unanimous vote was tolee d-esired-on a matter of this,kind, and upon Councilman Morrison's objections to action without further -study, the -motion was withdrawn and the matter held over until a future meeting/.:. A14NUAL AUDIT it10TlO : Made._Lby.'Councilman Anthony and seconded by.Councilman . Morrison to accept the offer of Herrick and Herrick for the auditing of the City of Redding books with the proviso before the bill is paid the audit must be acceptable to the council. Voting was as follows: _ Ayes: Councilmen,- Anthony, Swarts, Morrison; Williams -and -Simons Noes: Councilmen - None Absent: Councilmen' -_None VACATIO14 - CITY MANAGER, A few days vacation.by City I4lanager Storm was acceptable to the council. TRANSFER OF FUNDS MOTIUN'I lviade by Councilman Swarts and seconded by Councilman.Williams to transfer.:'1",000.00 from the General Fund to the Recreation, Fund. Voting Vas, -as follows: Ayes: Councilmen.- Anthony, Morrison,_, Swarts, Williams and' Simons Noes-, Councilmen - None Absent: Councilmen - None There being no further business the meeting was adjourned. APPROVED: Mayo�r�� ATTEST: City erk RESOLUTION 1652 RESOLU`1'ION OF THE CITY COUNCIL of the .City of Redding WHEREAS, EARL WARREN, Governor of the State of California, on the 15th day of November, 1950, executed the California Diaaster and Civil Defense Master Mutual Aid Agreement on behalf of the State of California and all its Departments and Agencies; NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Redding does, by Resolution, hereby -approve and agree to abide by said California Civil Defense Master Mutual Aid Agreeiiient; and the Clerk of this Council is hereby authorized and directed to send TWO certified copies of this resolution to the State Disaster Council for filing with said State Disaster Council. /s/ Wilber D. Simons Mayor ATTEST; /s/ Dorothy C. Blood Clerk I. Dorothy C. Blood, City Clerk of the City of Redding, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true, and correct copy of a resolution duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Redding on the 18th day of December, 1950. /s/ Dorothy C. Blood F"� DEED OF RIGHT OF WAY THIS INDENTURE made the 17thday�of October, 1950, between PLACIDO GUIDO, also known as PETE GUIDO, and OLGA GUIDO., husband and wife, First Parties, and the CITY OF REDDING, a municipal corporation*of the sixth..cla,s's, Second Party, WITNESSETH, -That the First . Parties, in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollar's,(410.00), lawful money of the United States of America, to them-inhand:paid,by Se.cond,,.Party, the. receipt whereof ,is hereby acknowledged, and inconsideration of other valuable considerations, ons, the receipt whereof is hereby acknow- ledged; do by thesd pre 'sents grant, bargain and sell unto the said Second Party, its successors and assigns forever,.a right of way and easement to construct, maintain and use a public street), road and highway.-, ,The right.- of way .herein granted and referred..to is. situate in"the City ,of .Redding,. County :of ,Shasta, State of California, and particularly described .as follows, to -wit: Beginning at the Northeasterly corner of Lot 1 Block 103, of the Garden Subdivision., in the City .of'Redding, Shasta County,,',California- thence from said point of beginning N:._,1,7o40;W-' , 105-34 feet to a point on the South line of Yuba Street extended, said point being mar.ked.by-a 5/$" 'iron pin; thence S. 720201 W., on _and along said South line of. Yuba St., extended .i57.16.feet to the point of intersection with the East line of Verda AVenue,)* extended, said point being marked by a 5/81, iron Pin;,,thence $- 170401 En, on and along said West line Verda.Avenue, extended.10 08 feet to the in 5.A Northwesterly corner of Lot 1, Block 103, of the Garden Subdivision, said -point being marked by'a' 5/8tt.iron pin; thence S. 72019f10ll W., 60.00 feet to the Northeasterly corner of Lot 1, Block 102, of theGarden Stiblivision, said-goint being marked by a 5/81, iron pin; thence N. 17-40' W., on and along the Westerly line of Verda Avenue extended 105.395 feet to a point of intersection with the Southerly line of Yuba Street, extended, said point being marked by a 5/8t, iron pin; thence S. 720201W., on and along said Southerly line of Yuba Street, 140.00 feet to a point, said point being marked by a 5/81, iron Kiq thence S. 170401 E.p 105.425 feet to the Northwesterly corner of Lot 1, Block 102, of the Garden Sub- division, said point being marked by a 5/81, iron pin- thence S. 720191411 W., 20-00 feet to the Northeasterly corner of Lot 8,.Block 102, of the Garden Subdivision, said -point being marked by a iron pin.p thence N. 171401 - W.P 105.43 feet.to a pointon the Southerly line of Yuba Street extended; thence S. 7202OtW., on and along said Southerly line of Yuba -Street extended 134.155 feet,to a point on the Easterly line of the Garden Subdivision; thence N. 170 17' W., on and along said Easterly line to the Southeast corner of Lot 7, --Block 100 of the Garden Subdivision said point being marked by a 611 x 611 concrete monument* thence N. 720201 E., on and along the Northerly- iine of Yuba Street extended 510.91 feet to a point, said point being marked by a �/811 iron pin; thence N. 17040' W., 160.00 feet to a point, said point being marked by a 5/811 iron pin,-, thence N> 720204 E., 22.64 feet to the NE corner of the Oliver Tract; thence S. 1703414611 E . , 325.34 feet to a point; thence S. 72019110" W., 22.14 feet to the point of beginning. AllAron. pins) and concrete .monuments referred to marked R. E. 5438-. The Second Party herein.and its :successors and,assigns shall have the right to do whatever may be requisite or necessary for the enjoyment of the rights herein granted., including the right of clearing said right of way for the purpose of constructing, maintaining, operating, using and repairing, reconstructing and changihg.the site of within said hereinabove described right ofway or doing any other act or thing which the Second.Party may deem necessary essary in connection with'the)cohstruction,.operation or maintenance... of-) said - public street, road) or highway,'. or for any and all: purposes-whatever-as.hereinabove specified by the Second .Party, its successors or assigns).�_) The First Parties agree that they and their successors, administralors, and executors, heirs and assigns, shall never �Iw construct or place.any building, improvements.,..structure, or any form of,'addition or improvement whatever in.or under, said ­right of way and easement, and agree not to. otherwise do anything which will interfere with the use, maintenance, operation,.and repair and exercise of the other rights:,h,ere- in granted to the Grantee with respect to any facilities placed in and on and under said,easement.and,right,of-way by the Grantee, its successors and assigns. The SecondParty shall have the right, in.addition'to the rights here1nabove.specified, to install in said..right of wayanyfacilities it desires for the operati6n of - municipal util*ties. INWITNESS WHEREOF, .the said First -Parties have here- unto set,their'hands and seals the day and year first -herein- above written.- Isl Pete Guido - /p/ Olga Gu do 1 I- RESOLUTION NO. 1651 RESOLUTION CANCELLING TAXES WHEREAS a petition has been made to the City Council of the City of Redding to cancel the assessments and taxes levied by the City of Redding for the 1950-51 tax year on the hereinafter described property, and WHEREAS, such taxes and assessments should be can- celled pursuant to Section 4986.2 of the Revenue and.Taxa- tion Code of California for the reason that the property here- inafter referred to has been recently acquired after the lien date by the State of California, and because of this _public ownership, is not subject to sale for delinquent .taxes, and WHEREAS, the State of California now owns said parcels of property, and each of them and acquired title thereto to each of said parcels on August 14, 1950, and WHEREAS, Daniel S. Carlton, as City Attorney of the City of Redding, has consented that such taxes and assessments, and each of them, be cancelled. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING, AS FOLLOWS, TO -WIT: 1. That all of the foregoing recitals are true and correct; 2. That the assessments and taxes, penalties and costs, and each of them, heretofore levied for the tax year 1950-51 are hereby cancelled, and the City Tax Collector and Assessor of the City of Redding, and each of them, are hereby ordered to effect and consummate the cancellation herein ordered. The parcels of real property hereinabove referred to are situate in the City of Redding, County of Shasta, State of California and particularly described as -follows, to -wit: Lots 11 and 12, Block 16 of the Original Town of Redding as shown on the Map filed in the book of Old Plats at page 65, Shasta County Records. I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was introduced and read at a regular meeting of said City Council of the City of Redding on the 18th day of December, 1950, and was duly adopted at said meeting by the following vote: AYES: Anthony, Swarts, Simons, Williams, Morrison NOES: ABSENT: Dated: December 18, 1950. s/ Wilber•D. Simons City Mayor ATTEST: s/ Dorothy C.. Blood City Clerk FORM APPROVED: s/ Daniel S. Carlton City Attorney City Council,. Regular Meeting. Council Chambers, City Hall, Redding, Calif. January 2, 1951. The meeting was called to order by Mayor Simons and upon roll call the following Councilmen were present: Anthony, Morrison, Swarts, Williams and Simons. City Attorney Carlton was also present. MINUTES -PREVIOUS MEETING OTION: made by Councilman Swarts and seconded by Councilman Morrison that the minutes of the meeting of December 18, 1950 be accepted as mailed to each Councilman. Voting was as follows: AYES: Councilmen - Anthony, Morrison, Swarts, Williams and Simons NOES: Councilmen - none ABSENT: Councilmen - none GRANDVIEW HEIGHTS ANNEXATION City Attorney Carlton presented the Grandview Annexation ordinance for the second reading. MOTION: made by Councilman Swarts, seconded by Councilman Anthony to waive the second reading of the ordinance. Voting was as follows AYES: Councilmen - Anthony, Morrison, Swarts, Williams and Simons NOES: Councilmen - none ABSENT:,Councilmen - none MOTION: made by Councilman Swarts, seconded by Councilman Anthony that the Grandview Heights Annexation ordinance bb adopted. Voting was as follows: AYES: Councilmen - Anthony, Morrison, Swarts, Williams and Simons NOES: Councilmen - none ABSENT: Councilmen - none ORDINANCE SET OUT IN FULL HEREIN: ORDINANCE NO. 393 AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING AND CALLING A SPECIAL ELECTION TO SUBMIT THE QUESTION TO THE ELECTORATE OF THE GRAND VIEW HEIGHTS ADDITION AS TO WHETHER OR NOT SAID TERRITORY SHALL BE ZNNEXED TO, INCORPORATED.IN, AND MADE A PART OF THE CITY OF REDDING, COUNTY OF SHASTA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. The City Council of the City of Redding does Ot-dain as follows, to Wit: WHEREAS, a petition for the annexation of the hereinafter des- cribed territory was filed on the 6th day of November 1950, with the City Council of the City of Redding, County of Shasta, State of California, in accordance with and pursuant to the laws of the State of California, to wit: That certain Act known as the "Annexation of 1913" . WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Redding has found and determined that said petition was signed by more than one-fourth of the qualified electors of said hereinafter described territory as shown by the registration of voters of the County of Shasta, State of California; and WHEREAS, THE City Council of said City of Redding has further found and determined that all of the signers of said petition are actually residing within said hereinafter described territory; and WHEREAS, the signers of said petition have requested that.the following proposition be submitted to the voters of said hereinafter described territory, to wit: WHETHER such hereinabove described new territory shall be annexed to, incorporated in, and made a part of, said City of Redding, and the property therein be, after such annexation, subject to taxation, equally with the property within the said City of Redding, for the payment of any and all of the bonded indebtedness of said City of Redding, out- standing upon the day of the filing of said petition, or which has been theretofore authorized, to wit: 1. City of Redding Bridge Bonds dated August 1, 1931, the original bonded indebtedness which was the sum of $60,000.00 with interest at the rate of 6% per annum and the unpaid balance and portion of such bonded indebtedness outstanding at the date of the filing of said petition for which such -territory shall be taxed as aforesaid, is $4,500.00; 2. City of Redding Water Works Improvement Bonds, dated July 1, 1937, the original bonded indebtedness which was the sum of $200,000.00 with interest at the rate of 3 1/4f per annum and the unpaid balance and portion of such bonded indebtedness outstanding at the date of the „"'filing of the petition for which such territory shall be taxed as afore- said, is $90,000.00. 3. City of Redding Sewage Disposal Improvement Bonds, dated June: 15, 1946, the original bonded indebtedness which was the sum of $200,000.00.with interest at the rates of 1 1/4- 1 1/2- 1 3/4% per annum, andlthe unpaid balance and portion of such bonded indebtedness outstanding at the date of the filing of the petition for which such ,territory shall be taxed as aforesaid, is $160,000.00. 4. City of Redding Municipal Improvement Bonds, dated December 15,, 1947, the original bonded indebtedness which was the sum of $275,000.00 with interest at the rates of 2 1/4 - 2 3/4 per annum, and the unpaid balance and portion of such bonded indebtedness outstanding at the date of -the filing of this petition for which such territory shall be taxed as .aforesaid, is $255,000.00. 5. City of _Redding Municipal 'Light & Power Improvement Bonds, dated November 21, 1921, the original bonded indebtedness which was the sum of $40,000.00 with interest at the rate of 6% per annum, and the unpaid balance and portion of such bonded indebtedness outstanding at the date of the filing of said petition for which such territory shall be taxed, `as aforesaid, is $12,000.00, and WHEREAS there are no authorized bonds of the said City of Redding at the time of the filing of said petition which are unissued and the said request relating to bonded indebtednesses above mentioned pertains to the outstanding bonds of the City of.Redding and the specified portion thereof above mentioned. WHEREAS,a description of the territory proposed to be annexed to, incorporated in, and made a part of the City of Redding, County of Shasta, State of California, is as follows, to wit: Beginning at the intersection of the Southerly Boundary Line of the City of Redding, Shasta County, California with the Westerly line of the Southern Pacific Company RJW as these lines existed in August..1950; thence from said point of beginning Southerly on and along said Westerly R/W line to the point of intersection of said R/W line with the Southerly line of Grand View Heights Subdivision extended Easterly; thence continuing South- .erly on and along said R/W line 310.00 feet; thence Westerly and parallel to the Southerly line of Grand ,View Heights Subdivision a distance of 1,405.17 feet; thence Northerly and parallel to the Westerly line of the.Southern Pacific Company R/W to the Southerly line of Grand View Heights Subdivision Unit II; thence Westerly on and along the Southerly line of said sub- division to the Southwest corner thereof; thence Northerly on and along the Westerly line of said Grand View Heights Subdivision Unit II,.and said line extended to the South line of Laurel Avenue as.shown'on the map of Boardman Addition to the City of Redding on file in the Shasta County Recorder's Office; thence Westerly on and along said Southerly line to the Westerly line of Olive Avenue; thence Northerly on and along the Westerly line of Olive Avenue to an intersection with the South Boundary. line of the City of Redding heretofore referred to; thence Easterly on and along said Boundary line to the point of beginning. AND WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Redding, County of Shasta, State of California, did heretofore on the 6th day of.November,-1950; pass a resolution of intention to call a special election in accordance with the law and submit to the electors residing in the territory proposed by said petition to be annexed.to said City of Redding, the question whether such hereinabove described new territory shall be annexed to, incorporated in, and made a part of,.said City of Redding; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Redding, County of Shasta, State of California, did heretofore pass a resolution of a �:_3 i intention to call a,special election in accordance with.the law and. submit to the electors residing in the territory proposed by said petition to be annexed to said City of Redding, the question whether such hereinabovedescribednew territory shall be annexed to, incorporated.in,.and made a part, of said City of Redding; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Redding, County.of Shasta, State of California, did heretofore pass a resolution in accordance with the law on the 6th day of november, 1950, that upon the 4th day of. December, 1950, atkthe hour of 8 o'clock p.m., said time being not less than fifteen days nor more than forty days from the date of the: passage of said resolution, that at the City Hall in the City of Redding., -County of Shasta, State of California, any person owning real property within said territory hereinabove described and which is proposed to be annexed to said. City of Redding, having any objections to said.proposed annexation may appear before the City,Council and show cause why said territory should not be so annexed as prayed for in said petition; and WHEREAS, persons owning a majority of the separate parcels of property within said territory herein'aUove described and which.is proposed to be annexed to the.said City of Redding did not appear on.said 4th day of December, 1950, at the hour'of eight otclock p.m., or at any other time, to show cause why said territory should,not be so annexed as prayed for in .said petition; and . r -;. . WHEREAS no protest against such annexation was made by any persons owning property in said territory or any other persons whatever at the time of said hearing hereinabove mentioned or otherwise. NOW,aTHEREF.ORE, by virtue of said petition, and pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of -that certain Act known as the "Annexation Act of 1913". Statutes of 1913, page 387,_ as amended, .BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING, AND IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the question of.whether the following described territory to wit: Beginning at the intersection of the Southerly Boundary Line of the City of Redding, Shasta County, California with the Westerly line of the Southern Pacific Company R/W as these lines existed in August 1950.; thence from said point of beginning Southerly on and along said Westerly R/W line to the point of intersection of said R/W line with the Southerly line of. Grand View Heights Subdivision extended Easterly; thence continuing Southerly on and along said R/W line 310.00.feet; thence Westerly .and parallel to the Southerly line of Grand View He ftbdivision a distance of 1,405.17 feet; thence Northerly and parallel to the Westerly line of the Southern Pacific Company R/W to the Southerly line of Grand View Heights .Subdivision Unit II; thence Westerly on and along the Southerly line of said subdivision to,the Southwest corner thereof; thence Northerly on and along the Westerly line of said Grand View Heights Subdivision Unit II, and said line extendedto the South line of Laurel Avenue as shown on the map of Boardman Addition to the City of Redding on file n the Shasta County Recorder's Office; thence Westerly on and along said Southerly line to the Westerly line of Olive Avenue; thence. Northerly on and along the westerly line of Olive Avenue to an intersection with the South Boundary line of the City of.Redding heretofore referred to; thence Easterly on and along said Boundary line to the point of beginning. and known as the GRAND VIEW HEIGHTS ADDITION, shall be annexed to, incorporated in, and made a part of, said City of Redding, and the property therein be, after such annexation, subject to taxation, equally with the property within the said City of Redding, for the payment of any and all of the bonded indebtedness of said City of Redding, outstanding upon the day of'the filing of said petition, and at the time of the giving of the first notice of such election, to wit: The.said bonded.indebtedness and each -of them, hereinabove mentioned, shall be submitted to the electors residing in the territory to be annexed, which said territory is hereinabove particularly described.' . BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the question to be submitted to the electorate at said special -election to be held on.the 13th day of February 1951,.in said territory proposed to be annexed, shall be as follows, to wit: PROPOSITION TO BE SUBMITTED TO ELECTORATE Shall the following described territory, to wit: Beginning..at,the,intersection of the Southerly Boundary ALine.of.the-City of -, Redding, ,Shasta County; .- California - with the Westerly line of the Southern Pacific Company R/W as.,.. these lines existed%in August 1950; --thence from --said point of beginning Southerly on and along said -Westerly R/Wline to the point -of.. -intersection -,of said, R/W line with the Southerly line of Grandview Heights -,Subdivision extended Easterly; thence. -continuing -Southerly on aftd..alongtsaid R/W.-line -310.00-..feet; - thence .,Westerly and parallel to the,Southerly line of Grand View Heights Subdivision a distance of 1,405-17 feet; thence Northerly and parallel to the Westerly line-of.-the,Southern Pacific -,.Company R/W.to,the Southerly line of Grand View Heights ..Subdivision Unit II; thence Westerly on and along the Southerly:line of said.subdivisign to the -Southwest corner thereof; thence Northerly on -and -along the -Westerly lane. of -said .Grand-.View.,Heights Subdivision 'Unit II; and said line.extended.to the -South line of -Laurel -Avenue as shown on the map.of.-Boardman Addition-to.the City of ,..Redding..on file in the Shasta County,-Recordert:s-.-Office; thence Westerly on and along said Southerly -line -to the Westerly line -of Olive Avenue; thence Northerly on and -_along the Westerly line of Olive Avenue to an intersection with the South Boundary line of -the City of Redding here- -tofore.referre'd to; thence Easterly -on and along -said Boundary line to -the point of beginning. and knov4n,as,the GRAND VIEW-HEIGHTS-ADDITION,.be annexed to, incorporated in, and made a part .of, ,said City ofRedding,, and the -property therein be, after.such annexation, subject ,to taxation., equally with the property, within the said City of Redding., for the payment of any and All of the.bonded indebtedness of said City of Redding outstanding on the day of the :filing of said petition., to wit: City .of Redding Bridge Bonds., dated August 1,. 1913 49500-00 City of Redding Water Works Improvement Bonds, dated July 1, 1937 90oOOO-O0 City of -Redding Sewage Disposal 1 , mprovement,Bonds, dated June 15-,,,-1946 160.,000.00 City of Redding -Municipal -Improvement. Bonds,, dated December 15,. 1947 255s000.00. City of Redding -Municipal Light & Power -Improve ment Bonds dated ' November 21, 1921 12,,000.00 BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED, AND,IT IS -HEREBY ORDERED that there are no authorized bonds of said City of Redding at -the filing of said petition ..which are unissued and said request for bonded indebtedness -above mentioned and the said proposition pending thereto pertains to the out- standing bonds of the City of Redding and the specified portions here- of therein mentioned...: - - -, . . . I BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED, .AND IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the polling and /or voting place where electors in said territory proposed to be annexed shall vote on the question to be submitted to said electors at said special election to be held in said territory.proposed to be annexed on the 13th of February 1951 shall be at UOMAR VARIETY STORE 3424 Railroad Avenue., Redding, California and being within said territory proposed to be_annex,d.: BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED,, AND IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Frank Gonseor and Mrs. Luke Mutchie, each of whom is a qualified elector of the voting precinct located at the Jomar Variety Store, shall be judges at said special election to be held in the territory proposed to be -annexed-. on the -13th of - February 195i, andMrs,.,Eugen.e Stuart. who -is a qualified elector of the voting precinct located At the Jomar Variety ' Store., -, Redding, California, shall be inspector at said sp.ecial-,,electionto be held in the territory proposed to be annexed on the 13th day of February 1951, BE IT FUR ' THER ORDAINED AND IT IS HERE ' BY ORDERED that DOROTHY C. BLOOD's Clerk of the City:.of-Redding,. and -DANIEL S.'CARLTON,ATTORNEY FOR said City of Redding, place said question on -the ballots of said special election which is to be held on the 13th day of February 1951, in said territory proposed to be annexed, and that said DOROTHY C. BLOOD, Clerk of the City of Redding, cause due and proper notice of.said election to be given in accordance.with the laws'and statutes made and provided. BE I`1' FURTHER ORDAINED AND IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the whole of said territory proposed -to be annexed, and known and designated as the GRAND VIEW HEIGHTS ADDITION, and more particularly described as follows, to wit: Beginning -at the intersection of the Southerly.Boundary Line of the City of Redding, Shasta County, California, with the Westerly line of the Southern Pacific Company R/W as these lines existWd in August 1950; thence from said point of beginning Southerly on and along said Westerly R/W line to the point of intersection of said R/W line with the Southerly line of Grand View Heights Subdivision extended Easterly; thence continuing Southerly on and along said R/W line 310.00 feetthence Westerly ° and parallel to the Southerly.line of rand View Heights Subdivision a distance of 1,405.17 feet thence Northerly and parallel to the Westerly line of the Southern Pacific Company R/W to the Southerly line of Grand View Heights Subdivision Unit II; -thence Westerly on and along the Southerly line of said subdivision to the Southwest corner thereof; thence Northerly on and along the Westerly line of said Grand View Heights. Subdivision Unit II, and said line extended to the South line of Laurel Avenue as shown on the map of Boardman Addition -to the City of Redding on file in the Shasta County Recorder's Office; _ thence Westerly on and along said Southerly line to the Westerly line of Olive Avenue; thence Northerly on and along the Westerly line -of Olive Avenue to an intersection with the South Boundary line of the City of Redding here- tofore referred to; thence Easterly on and along said Boundary line to the point of beginning, shall constitute one precinct for the purposes of said election and the polling place therefor shall be at the JOMAR VARIETY STORE, 3424 R.R.Ave., Redding, Calif., located in said territory proposed to be annexed and known and designated as GRAND VIEW HEIGHTS ADDITION.and hereinabove more particularly described. BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED that the polls at said election shall be opened at seven o'clock A. -M. on said 13th day of February, 1951, the say of said election, and shall be kept open until seven o'clock P.M., of said 13th day of February 1951, the day of said election, when the polls shall be closed, except as provided in Section 5734 of the Elections Code of the State of California. r I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing ordinance was introduced and read at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of. -Redding on the 18th day of December, 1950 and was duly adopted and read on the 2nd day of January 1951 at a regular meeting of said City Council by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN - ANTHONY, SWARTS, MORRISON,. WILLIAMS, SIMONS NOES: COUNCILMEN ABSENT: COUNCILMEN - Dated: 2nd day of January 1951. s/ Wilber D. Simons Mayor ATTEST: s% Dorothy 0. Blood City Clerk FORM APPROVED: s/ Daniel S. Carlton City Attorney OCCUPANCY ZONING -PROPERTY City 1torney-.Car ton presented a zoning ordinance as recommended by the Planning Commission. This ordinance was presented as an emergency ordinance for immediate adoption. MOTION: made by Councilman Swarts, seconded by Councilman Williams that the ordinance be accepted as submitted to go into immediate effect.. Voting was as follows: AYES: Councilmen - Anthony, Morrison, Swarts.. Williams and Simons NOES: Councilmen - none ABSENT: Councilmen - none 1 F11 ..ORDINANCE -NO. 396 a AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO ZONING AND,AMENDING.ARTICLE,'VII, CHAPTER- - II, . PART - IV, . OF THE - MUNIC IPAL - CODE OF THE - CITY ,.-OF REDDING, RELATING TO OCCUPANCY-ZONING..f- The City Council of the= City of Redding, ;County of Shasta-,! State of California, does .ordain..as follows, to .wits Section -1, "Section 1300b of Part.IV,.Chapter II, Article VII,.of the municipal Code; of- the City of . Redding is hereby amended to -read as.., follows:. Section 1300(b).: a. Each of said Occupancy zones includes such territory o.r portions of said City as -.,are illustrated; outlined,..;and designated upon that certain map now on -file in- the . office of;.the:.City Clerk of. the City of Redding-, said map having been filed in said.office on. -the 20th day of-, January; 1941, -and being, marked and, labelled as the "Occupancy Zone Map of.the City -of Redding,,filed the 20th,day of.January,.1941", which map is hereby designated as the Occupancy zone map of the City -of Redding.for the-application•of the.restrictions contained in'this article. -b. The following described property, territory and area is hereby zoned=as follows, and shall be within the following zones, to wit: 1: That the area east of the alley.in.Block,B,,Shearer.Addition and in line with; the west property line of Court , Str.eet, Block A . , -, . Shearer Addition, is hereby zoned as second residential property.: 2-. -That all of the area known as P.., G. -& E. pole yard be zoned as Industrial property. 3. That all of Highland Addition and including the, Charlott Babbett-property, an un-subdivided.area�north of Highland Addition, be zoned as second residential,property.­ - . 4. That -all of the area within the boundaries of Octavia, Haight and West -Streets be zoned as second residential property., 5. All of the area within the, Park ,View Subdivision and .East of Market Street not now zoned,. be zoned as second.residential. 6. That the -un -subdivided tract East of Leland Avenue and south of the drainage canal and to the southerly city boundary be zoned as second residential property.. 7. That from a point -150 feet East. of Pine Street-, a strip 150 feet wide north of -and adjoining Cypress.Avenue, throughiBlocks 24, 250 260 27 28 and 29, in Olivia.Subdivision, be:zoned as:commercial property. $. That the area West of Lot 1, of the Nock..Meadowsfsubdivision, and between.Locust.Avenue and the alley north of Locust :Avenue, be zoned as commercial property. 9. That portion of:the Nock Meadows Subdivision,.not.now zoned be zoned first residential. 10. That the area 150.feet.north of,Locust, through Blocks 14, 152 16 and 17 of Olivia Subdivision be zoned.second.resident al and balance of said blocks be zoned first residential. The remaining blocks namely Blocks 2, 3, 4, 5,,6, 7; $,and.9 of;Olivia Subdivision be zoned first residential property.. 11. That five parcels of land not apart of Garden Subdivision but within the outer boundaries.of subdivision, be zoned.first residential property. 12. Those portions of Boardman Addition of the City of Redding within the corporate limits not now zoned shall;be zoned-third,;redidential. 13. That i all of . the. property . of the .Kutras ; Riverside Addition to the City of Redding, East of the Anderson -Cottonwood Irrigation District canad-and~the-line thereof extended easterly to the Sacramento River be zoned commercial; that all of -the property in,.said;subdivision between Thames Drive on the East and the center line of Block 2 and'7 and the line between Lot 4 and 5 of Block 1 be zoned first .residential; that all property West.of-the,Southerly extension of,the Athens Avenue to the Southerly Boundary line of.the Christ Kutras property shall.be-zoned commercial excepting the Northerly 150. feet thereof which shall,be zoned second residential; that all of the remainder of the_ Kuiras'.. River- side- A-ddition. to, the City of . Redding and, all of the Christ Kutras property-, west of the southerly extension of Thames Drive shall be .. ; zoned second. residential; provided however, -that. the portion of the;, Christ Kutras property East of the southerly extension of Thames Drive shall be unzoned property. C. That all Blocks 1, 2 and 3 of Redding Heights Subdivision be zoned first residential. d. Thatallof Blocks 1 and 2, Unit #1, Benton Subdivision, and Lots 1 to 13 inclusive of Block 4. Unit #3.,,Benton Subdivision and all of the area bounded by U, S. Hoghway 99 and Lots 1., 4and 5 of Block H" Unit #2., Benton Subdivision and the county road; and that area bounded by U. S. Highway 99, and Lots 2 and 3 of Unit #1, Benton Subdivision, and that area 200 feet in -width on each side of Highway 99 from*the county road and the north line of Lot #1, Unit #1, Benton Subdivision northerly to the city limits, be zoned * commercial.. e. That all of the remaining area other than hereinabove specified of that triangular tract east of Highway 99 of the Southeast one- quarter n ' e-' quarter of Section 25s TP. 32 North Range 5 West, M.D.B. & M.., be zoned as commercial. - . I f. That*all of a.traingular tract located in the Northwest corner of the Southeast quarter of said Section 25, the East line of which is parallel to U. S. Highway 99 and the North line is 500 feet along the north line of the -Southeast quarter of Section 25, Tp. 32 Nx R. 5 W., M..D.B. & M; thence southwesterly to intersect Commercial Zone. C, be zoned-as.comm.ercial. g. That all of the southeast one-quarter of said Section 25,, except the triangular tract in the.northeast corner be zoned as first residential. h. That all * of the North one-half of said Section 25, except the portions.hereinabove mentioned in subdivision c to g, inclusive, be, zoned as first residential. i. That Lots 14.to 23 inclusive, of Block 4., Unit #3 Penton Sub- division and all of Blocks I and H, Unit #2, Benton Subdivi-sion be zoned second residential. j. That the balance of Units 2 add 3 other than those portions hereinabove mentioned in Subdivisions c to h, inclusive of Benton Subdivision and all of the Southeast Quarter of Section 26, Tp- 32 14. R. 5 W. M.D.B. & M., except the property owned by a government sub- division or agency or by the City of Redding, be zoned as first residential. k. That all of the City of Redding owned property within the area of the Sacramento River and the North city boundary be zoned as recreational. 1. That.that area south of and adjacent to Sacramento River ' bounded on the north by the Sacramento River., on the south by east by Market Street and on the West by West City Boundary be zoned as second residential. The Building Inspector -is hereby directed to.add to and illustrate the areas, territory and property herein described on that certain.map hereinabove mentioned in Subdivision.(a) of this Section and in the appropriate zones as herein designated. Section 2. Section 1300a of Part IV, Chapter II, Article VII of the Municipal Code of the City of Redding is hereby amended to read as.follows: "Section 1300a: The entire incorporated area of theCity of Redding is hereby declared to be, and is hereby established as, an Occupancy district. Said Occupancy district is divided into Occupancy Zones A.to F inclusive, respectively denominated as follows.: Occupancy Zone A First Residential Zone Occupancy Zone B Second Residential Zone Occupancy Zone C Commercial Zone Occupancy.Zone D Industrial Zone Occupancy Zone E Recreational Zone Occupancy Zone F Third Residential Zone. Section 3. Bection 1300e of Part IV, Chapter II, Article VII of the Municipal Code of the City of Redding is hereby amended to read as follows.: t'Section 1300e -- Occupancy Zone A In Occupancy Zone A, denominated First Residential Zone, the following restrictions shall apply: USE: No person shall use any building or land located in the First Residential Zone for any purpose other.than those purposes included -within the definitions of.Occupancy I and J (Divisions 1 and 2) of the Building Code, or for single family dwellings. Set Backs* No person shall construct or enlarge any building located in the First Residential Zone 'unless the exterior walls of said 'building shall be set at least 25 feet to the rear of the front property of the lot on which said building stands, at least'5 feet-, from and within the side lines of said lot, and at least 15'feet forward of the rear line of said lot; provided that if the rear line of said lot shall abut upon an alley or public way, the 15 feet set -back last mentioned.shall not be required. Lot Size and Coverage: No person shall construct or enlarge any building• located in - the First Residential Zone in any case -within' the effect of ,such construction' or .enlargement would be. to -place, more than one sin' le=family d-4611-kggon any one prescribed lot, or to cause more than 60a of the total area of any prescribed lot to be covered with buildings, whether new or old. Prescribed lot. as herein used shall mean a lot fronting on some -.street or public.wa-y a distance of 50 feet," comprising in area 5000.sq. feet, provided that this•- restrictive ''definition shall not, apply to any lot of lesser frontage or area.,existing as"such in separate -ownership -in the City -of Redding on the -16t day of 114y, 1945, and which has remained continuously there- after distinct in ownership from all contiguous land; nor shall --it apply to any lots defined as such in any subdivision plat approved -by -the planning commission to the lst day of May, 1945• Provided, further, that if -the sideline of said lot abuA s.on a public street, said build- ing ,shall'be set withn'said sideline -a certain particular distance. Said partic'ular' distance shall• be 25 feet from' sideline in subdivisions filed for record after the lst day of May, 1949-- and 15 feet •for , sub- divisions filed for record before Play 1st, 1949." J .. Section 4. Section 1300 f of,Part IV, Chapter 11, Article•Vll of the�Municipal Code of the City of Redding is hereby amended to read as follows; "Section 1300 f. In Occupancy Zone.B, denominated Second Residential,Zone,-the follow- ing restrictions shall;.apply: USES- -9 SE: -9 person shall use or occupy any building or land located in the second residential Zone for-any,purpose other than' -.the purposes permitted in Section-130be hereof or those_purposes included within; -the definitions of- occupancies 1 and H (Divisions 1- and, 2) � and D (Division 2) of the Building Gude, provided that occupancies H (Division 2) and D -(Division 2) shall be included herein without're-spect to -the number of -persons accommodated in'such occupancies. Set -Backs; No person'shall construct or -enlarge any buildings located in'the Second Residential Zone unless the extreme exterior walls of said buildings shall beset at least three feet from and within the side lines•of-the lot ori which said building stands,-and,to the rear of the front property of said lot a -certain particular distance. Said. particular distance shall'.be the average of the distances between the front property and the extreme front walls of all other buildings located on the same side of the street in the same block; or, if there is no such buildings, the; distance of 15 feet. Lot.Coverage: No person shall construct or enlarge any building located in the Second Residential Zone in any case wherein the effect of such construction or enlargement would be to cause-more�than�-66%: of the total area of any lot to be covered with buildings whether new or old. That the distance between separate buildings,on the .same lot shall be a minimum distance of six feet between them. Provided, further, that if the sideline of a lot abuts on a public street, said building shall be set within, -said sideline,a -certain particular distance. Said particular distance shall be 15 feet -from sideline, in subdivisions filed for record after the 1st day of May, 1949, and 10 feet for subdivisions filed for record prior to Play 1st, 1949. Section 5. r: Section 1300 j of Part IV, Chapter 11, Article ill of the Municipal Code of the City of Redding is hereby amended to read as follows:., "'Section 1300 j: In Occupancy Zone F, denominated, Third Residential Zone-- following restrictions shall apply: � - USE: That no persons shall use land within such third residential zone for any other purpose than that permitted in Occupancy Groups of the Uniform Building Code, provided, however, that Groups D-1, E, R and G use shall not be permitted in any land in said Occupancy Zone F. That no trailer camp, auto wrecking yards shall be erected within Zone F,.except where a variance consent is approved by the' City Planning Commission and the City Council'of the City of Redding. A11,occupancies within -Zone F which are within ?5 feet of the existing'sewer shall be connected thereto: That all occupancies served by -the City of -Redding with water but where no sewers are available:shall install an appropriate - water closet -and septic -tank and sufficient -disposal area. All occupancies not.served by City of Redding water and where - no sewer is available may use.a sanitary privy, meeting.the require- ments -of the City Health Officer. Any.buildings constructed -within Occupancy Zone F.shall meet. - at least the, minimum- requirements of the Uniform. Building. Code in.-- effect-at n.-- effect at the time, of such construction -in the -City of -Redding * f -Redding. That'"Set-Backs"-in Occupancy Zone F shall be the same as those existing in Zone B. That no person shall.construct or enlarge any building.within Occupancy Zone F wherein the effect of such construction or enlarge- ment would cover more than 75% of the total area of the lot to be covered with buildings, new or old. Section 6: All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are repealed. Section 7: This ordinance is hereby declared to be an emergency measure necessary for the immediate prosecution of the public peade, health and safety of the City. of Redding and shall take effect -immed- iately. The following is a statement.of facts showing its urgency: The.City of Redding -is presently zoned and this ordinance completes necessary revisions of the zoning system and adds necessary.provi'sions thereto.. It is necessary.in order to protect the existing zoning. system that construction in -the City of Redding be immediately re- stricted in accordance with the regulation of this ordinance. Section 8: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and cause it to be published in accordance with.the law. I hereby certify that the foregoing ordinance was introduced - and read at a regular meeting of.the City Council of the City',of-' Redding on -the 2nd day of January,-1951,,and was duly read and adopted as an urgency ordinance at such meeting of -said City Council by the following. vote: AYES: Councilmen: Anthony, Morrison, Swarts, Williams and Simons NOES: Councilmen: intone ABSENT:Councilmen:_ None Dated January 2, . 1951 /s/ Wilber D:"- Simons mayor -of the;ity of Redd ng ATTEST: /s/ Dorothy C. Blood . City Clerk FORM APPROVED: /s/ Daniel S., Carlton - City Attorney .,,PROPOSED PURCHASE -CITY PROPERTY Councilman Swarts presented a report'-by,the-Finance Committee rec- ommending that the property north,..of:K1ghWay 44, bounded on the East by the Sacramento River and on,the,West.,_by,.the A.C.I.D. Canal.be sold as they could see no future need 6f..,t#is,:-property by the City. .City AttorneyCarlton suggested the prior removal of the dog.pound would permit sale of the property without advertising for bids. Mr. Winans stated his company was in immediate need and requested the entire plat of approximately sixteen acres. Councilm " an '.No ' rrison was of the opinion the tax payers should be informed. .ofthe-City-s.. intention to sell and if interested City Manager Storm could be contacted by them. He also expressed his disapproval of sale -of any river frontage by the City. Mayor Simons directed City Attorney. Carlton,to prepare.a. Notice -of Intention -to sell--:for-.publication._in the'Record-,Searchlight-.;• City Manager :'tohve,,.City,9ngiixeer__­ Hilldetermine the exact acreage and boundari6s,4Lnd..nece.ssary-right,s- of-way. A decision qn,.the sale of this property to be .made at the next meeting. NOB HILL..SEWER.-CONNECTION The following letter was read-, by Mayor Simons: December 26, 1950. Redding City Council, Redding, Calif. Gentlemen: On September 28, 1950, I paid the City,of,Redding the sum of five hundred dollars for the privilege of connecting the Nob Hill Subdivision sewer line into the city sewer system. The extension is at the intersection of Almond Ave. and North -_St., to be used by any lot owner on the streets, and is complete with a manhole and six inch sewer pipe, to city specifications, free and clear of all sewer assessments to said property owners. Upon doing a little research, I find that no,other sub' division, recently or in the past, has paid to connect to, and extend; the city 'sewer, -system'. TheDakin Sewer District, to which I connected, did not pay this fee, nor did the Gar- den Sewer, which was just completed. Some property owners outside of the- city, such as the Standard Oil Truck Depot and others in that district, have been- ~allowed -to-- connect on, a -square foot basis. I, feel that this is no more than right as they do not pay city taxes, but as the Nob Hill Subdivision is in the city and does pay taxes, I think that the -five hundred dollars was collected in error and should be returned, and the enclosed trenching permit cancelled. Sincerely, S/I !qeorge R. Farley... Opinions were given by Mayor Simons and City.Manager Storm that -the $500. was.,.a,reasonable charge for the engineering services involved, and that conditions that applied to sewer assessment districts were not applicable in this section. MOTION: made by Councilman Swarts,seconded by Councilman ­Morrison to deny the request for refund to Mr. George R.Farley.- Voting was as follows-, AYES** Councilmen - Morrison, Swarts, Williams and Simons NOES: Councilmen - Anthony ABSENT: Councilmen - none BIDS-GASOLINE,,.DIESEL & STOVE POTION: -made by Counc-ilman,Swarts-and -seconded-.by- Councilman -Anthony. to .accept the bid. of E. B. Hinkle for Premium -gasoline :.and the. bid of Redding Oil "for regular gasoline,. diiesel and stove oil. Voting was as follows: AYES: Councilmen - Anthony, Morrison; Swarts, -Williams and Simons NOES: Councilmen''- none ABSENT: Councilmen none E. B..Hinkle Distributor The Norwalk Company Redding, Calif City of Redding, Redding, California. Gentlemen; December 18, 1950. We wish to bubmit a bid for the gasoline requirements of the City of Redding , for the . year 1951, the fuel to be delivered in your tanks at the following prices: On Ethyl - 20:0 On Regular - 4.,1990,plus State Tax This bid is -subject to industry, state or federal fluctuation of price. Very truly yours, sl E. B. Hinkle Redding Oil Company Redding, Calif. City of Redding, Redding, Calif. Gentlemen: Bids, Gasoline, Diesel, Stove Oil. Gasoline 4.197 Ethyl Gasoline.12 Diesel $.125 Stove Oil 4:14 Gasoline price exempt federal tax 1 1/2 cents. Diesel and Stove prices f irm. s/ Harvey Gilzean LETTER CHAMBER OF COMMERCE Mayor Simons read the following letter from the Redding Chamber of Commerce: CHAMBER OF COMMERCE December 26, 1950. Honorable City Council, City of Redding, City Hall, Redding, Calif. Gentlemen: On behalf of the Redding Chamber of Commerce and citizens of Redding and Shasta County, I wish to take this means to express to you sincere appreciation for the fine cooperation and excellent job done by the Recreational Department, et al, in arranging the Annual Children's Christmas Party. We have heard nothing but very excellent comments regarding this event and we deeply appreciate all of your efforts. In.closing, may we extend to you the compliments of the season. Cordially yours s/ Jack Mayne Secretary -Manager 1� I BILLS -MONTH OF DECEMBER MOTION: made -by Councilman Williams, seconded by Councilman Swarts that the bills for the month of December be approved and paid. Voting was as follows: AYES; Councilmen - Anthony, Morrison, Swarts, Williams and Simons NOES: Councilmen - none ABSENT: Councilmen - none PARKING PROBLEM Councilman Williams stated the committeets report with definite plans on the parking situation would be presented at the next Council meeting. LIMITATION NUMBER OF DOGS Mayor Simons read a memorandum from City Attorney Carlton dated December 22, 1950, in which it sb'ated that it was legal to pass an ordinance limiting the number of dogs on one property. Mayor Simons suggested the Police Committee report on the dog situation within the City. The.matter would be on the agenda for future discussion. DRAINAGE-AARDEN SUBDIVISION Mr. Donald fro~,on appeared and inquired if there were any further reports on the right-of-way through the Peterson Property. City Attorney Carlton stated that nothing had been accomplished and that Mr. Smith was representing Mrs. Peterson. There being no further business the meeting was adjourned. ATTEST: r City Ulirikk