The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutMinutes - City Council - 1966-10-03 228 ,City Council, Regular,. Meeting Police 'Dept. , & Council Chambers Bldg. . Redding, C.alifornia � October 3, 1966 7:00 P.M. The.Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag was led by Mrs. Helen Generes. Pastor Robert Mortvedt of St. James Lutheran Church offered the Invocation. The meeting was called to order by Vice Mayor Chatfield with the following Councilmen present: Denny, Doherty, Fulton, and Chatfield. Absent: Mayor Moty , A1so present were City Manager Cowden, Assistant City Manager. and Purchasing Director Stewart, City Attorney Murphy, Finance Director Courtney, Public Works Director Arness, Air.ports IVlanager�IVIcCa11, and Planning Consultant Keyes. , ... . . �. � _ , APPROVAL OF MINUTES MOTION: Made by Councilman Denny, seconded by Councilman Doherty that the minutes of the regular meeting of.September 19, 1.966 be, approved as mailed.to each CounciTman. . The Vote: .Unanimous Ayes.� , WRITTEN COMMUNICATTOIVS Buckeye County Water District A letter dated September 16, 1966 and an accompanying statement was received from Mrs. Howard Heath in opposition to acquisition of the Buck�ye County Water District by the City of Redding. Vice 1Vlay�r Chatfield advised that this letter would be filed in the office of the City ``��`� C1erk with other public documents relating to the.Buckeye County Water District. Robert Frye . MOTION: Made by Councilman Doherty, seconded by Councilman Fulton .approving the request of Robert Frye to cancel immediately the contract �.�( between the City of Redding and Robert Frye re painting house numbers on curbs throughout the City . The Vote: Unanimous Ayes Helen Generes, et al. Communications were received from the following persons concerning recent rezoning recommended by the Plannirig Commission in the Waldon- California Street area (Rz=11-66): , � /y��./ The Mcl�eods, 2481 �Calif. St. - �letter. dated 9-/21 requesting . . � , commercial zoning of their property Francisca Sergi.- letter dated 9/21 requesting commercial zoning of Lots 9 and portion of Lot 10 of Lassen View Subdivision . ,� - Helen Generes - letter dated 9/29 and petition containing 52 signatures requesting that Mrs. Generes property be zoned CO-BR Blanche and Howard Fritz - letter dated 9/29 •�requesting that their signatures be removed from petition circulated by Mrs . Generes Vice Mayor Chatfield stated that the ordinance to be considered for second reading and adoption at this meeting does not concern the rezoning of any of the property referred to in the aforementioned letters. 229 M rs. Gerie re s stated that she had talked to the City Manage r and the City Attorn'ey, and they said she could request Council to re- consider their actiori�regarding rezoning study RZ-11-66. She stated that her property was located within the study area, but was not included in the proposed rezoning, and she added that there was only a six day lapse of time between the Planning Commission's amendmerit to their original recommendation and the time of the Council meeting instead of the required ten day appeal period, and that she was appealing from this action and that she wished her property to' be rezoned as part of this proceeding. {Planning � Commission held a second public hearing on RZ-11-66 on 9/13 after Council referral, and Council continued its original public hearing from 8/15 to 9/19/66). Vice Mayor Chatfield suggested that the four letters listed herein together with the petition be referred to the Planning Commission, since the only action before the Council on RZ-11-66 at this meeting was the proposed second reading and enactment of Ordinance No. 871 which has no effect on any of the property referred to in said lette rs and petitions. Vice Mayor Chatfield suggested to 1VIrs. Generes that her proper procedure at this time would be to institute her own application for rezoning of he r p rope rty with the Planning Depa rtxrient. Mrs. Gene re s objected to this and stated tihat it was unfair for the Council not to include her property in this proceeding before them, and further stated that for her to file her own application would cost her_a _$50,_ filing fee and this she did not want to spend. City Attorney Murphy advised Council and Mrs. Generes that she was mistaken as to the nature of the proceedings. This was a re�oning matter, and� consequently the action of' the Planning -Commission was in no event final and therefore there was no appeal from the recoinmen- ' dations of the Planning Commission to the Council. Upon receiving the recommendation, Council was required to hold a public hearing and then make its own decision as to the proposed rezoning. He furtlier explained that RZ-11-66 was initiated by the Planning 'Corrimission on its own motion and that the Planning Commission's recommendation included no proposed rezoning for any of the property referred to in the letters and petition which are before Council but, instead, included an express recommendation that the existing zoning on these properties remain unchanged. . The City Attorney advised Council that there were three alternative procedures available in regard to' the requests contained in the ` aforementioned letters and petitions: (1) Council could initiate a rezoning study of the- area on its own motion. (2) Council could refer the communications to the Pl�nning Commission, and the Planning Commission could initiate a new rezoning of the area on its own motion. � (3) The parties who submitted the letters could be advised that, as property owners, they may initiate rezoning pro- ` ceedings upon their own applications. � - Planning Consultant Keyes statecl that the property of Mrs. Generes, Mr, and Mrs. McLeod, and Mrs. Sergi had been included in the previous rezoning study of the Planning Commis sion, and was con- sidered at both public hearing"s of the Commission relating to that study. He feared that a new rez'oning study initiated either by the Council or the Planning Commission would result only in more public hearings with no change in results: ' ` ,:, � 230 Councilman Denny stated that he did not favor Council initiating a rezoning study at the request of a property owner, especially when the property was part of the subject matter of a study just concluded. Councilman Doherty agreed with Councilman Denny. Vice Mayor Chatfield advised Mrs. Generes that Council would not at this time initiate a rezoning study of her property, nor would it instruct the Planning Commission to do so. Mrs. Generes�stated that she had been treated unfairly, denied he r legal rights, and that she was going to take the matte r to Court. MOTION: Made by Councilman Doherty, seconded by Councilman Fulton, that the aforementioned letters and petition be referred to the Planning Commission. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes Petition for Assessment District Proceedings A petition for assessment district proceedings was submitted by property owners in the Harrison Tract-Riviera Drive area re a sewer system. Public Works Director Arness said that �,��-- this petition was circulated in conjunction with the petition received last ,meeting from�property owners in the general south city area. The petition was referred to the Department of Public Works for appropriate action. Redding Chambe r of Comme rce An endorsement of the Redding Chamber of Commerce was re- ��jU ceived re the purchase of Kutras Turtle Bay property. T. R. Woods A communication dated 9/26 from T. R. Woods re undergrounding ,��s of utilities in Unit No. 5, Sunset Terrace area, was referred to the Council Committee for Undergrounding Utilities for recommendation. Redding Chambe r of Comme rce . A c:ommunication reeeived f rom the Redding Chambe r of Comme rce - re the proposed sign ordinance was referred to the Planning Commission `��G with instructions that it. be brought back to Council at the time the sign ordinance is submitted for consideration. Legislation . A communication was received f rom Judge B ruce S'umne r reque sting Council support on Proposition 1-A. City Attorney Murphy advised Council that the League of California Cities has gone on record as „1 7�2 supporting Proposition 1-A, the most important item of which is the provision to hold General Legislative Sessions annually rather than every two years as at present. Councilmen Denny and Doherty feel that this is a matter of broad general interest and they do not believe it is a matter on which Council should take any action. MOTION: Made by Councilman Fulton, seconded by Councilman Denny, that Council take no action re Proposition 1-A. The Vote: Unanimous , Aye s . APPROVAL OF CLAIMS AND PAYROLL ` � � MOTION: Made by Councilman Doherty, seconded by Councilmari Fulton, that Accounts Payable Register No. 7, warrant nos, 10117 to 10287, � inclusive, in the amount of $83, 192. 52 be approved and paid; that Payroll Register No. 6, warrant nos. 4991 to 5243, inclusive, salaries in the �J� amount of $63, 338. 96, for the period September 4, 1966 through September 17, 1966 be approved. Total $146, 531. 48 Voting was as follows: Ayes: Councilmen - Denny, Dohe rty, Fulton, and Chatfield Noes: Councilmen - None Absent: Councilmen - Moty 2�1 CLI�IMS FOR DAMAGES - 2nd.hearing ; _ _ Cheryl Ann and Kathleen Marie Ray � , MOTION: Made by Councilman Fulton, seconded by Councilman Denny, that the Claim for Damages filed by Cheryl Ann and j�3 Kathleen Marie Ray on August 3�1, 19,66 be denied, and,.the Ci'ty insurance carrier be advised of Council action.. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes _ _ � � , . Mildred Eileen Larimore � MOTION: Made by Councilman Denny,, seconded by.Councilman Doherty, that the Cl�aim for Damages `filed by Mildred Eileen �� Larimore on August 31, 1966 be denied, and the City insurance carrier be advised of Gouncil action. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes George L. Abbott � MOTION: Made by Councilman Doherty, seconded by Councilman Fulton that the Claim for Damages fil,ed by„George L. Abbott on �`2 '� August 22, 1966 be denied, and��the City insu,rance carrier be advised of Council action. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes Luella Ba rbe rich MOTION: Made by Councilman Fulton, seconded by Councilman Denny that the Claim for Damages filed,by Luella Barberich on /�� August 18, 1966 be denied, and the City, insurance carrier be advised of Council action. The Vote: Unanimous A.yes Claudina Lyon , . MOTION: Made by Councilman Denny, seconded by Councilman Doherty that the Claim for Damages filed by Claudina Lyon on 1z2� September 1, 1966 be denied, and the City insurance carrier.be advised of Council action. , The Vote: Unani�nous. Ayes , ORDINANCE - re RZ-11 -66 , MOTION: Made by Councilman Denny, seconded by Councilman Doherty, that full reading of Ordinance No. 871 be waived, and th.e City Attorney be instructed to scan same. The Vote: U�nanimous Ayes � _ ��y Mrs. Generes requested that adoption of this ordinance be held over until the rezoning of her property has been considered„s,o it could be included in the ordinance. She was assured that adoption of� Ordinance No. 871 would have no effect on her requ'est to have the Planning Commission consider rezoning of her property. � . Mr. Howard Fritz inquired as to,the ,rea,son fo.r_rezoning the McBride property from R-1 to CO-BR and was told that said property was re= zoned from C-3-P to CO�BR, which is more re,strictive.zoning. . .. MOTION: Made by Councilman Denny,, seconded b.y_ Councilman Fulton, that Ordinance No, 871„be adopted, , an ordinance, of tlie City Council of the City of Redding amending Section 30-3 of the Redding City Code, 1959, as amended, relating to the rezoning of certain real property in the .City of R.edding. ` _ Vot ing was as follows: - . Ayes: Councilmen - Denny, Dohe,rty, Fulton, and Chatfield Noes: Councilmen - None „ : , ..,,., __ __. Absent: Councilmen - Moty Ordinance N,o. 871 on file in the office of the. City Clerk. ' 232 ORDINANCE - re Vacations MOTION:.. Made by Councilman Fulton, seconded by Councilman Denny, that full reading of Ordinance No. 872 be waived, and the City Attorney be instructed to scan same. The Vote: Unanimous Aye's �d�� MOTION: Made by Councilmari Denriy;� seconded by Councilinan' Doherty that Ordinance No. 872 be adopted, an brdinance of the City Council of the City of Redding amendirig Article I, Chapter 2 of the �Redding City �U� Code, 1959, as amended, by repealing Section 2-36 and substituting a new Section 2-3.6, pertaining to vacations. Voting was as follows: Ayes: Councilmen = Denny; Doherty, �Fulton, and Chatfield Noes: Couricilmen - None ° � ' � � ' " ' Ab s ent: Councilmen - 1VIoty � �� Ordinance No. 872 on file in the office of the City Clerk. RESOLUTION = Fia.nd Transfe'r ' ' � ` � MOTION: Made by Councilman Fulton, seconded by Councilman Denny, that Resolution No. 3761 �be adopted, a 'resoluti�on of the �City Council of the City of Redding appropriating funcls�for rr�odification of the Public Works Department radio system and authorizing the transfer of funds /��" therefor. . 3�� Voting was as follows: . ` r .. � . • Ayes: Councilmeri - Denny, Doherty', Fulton, and Cliatfield Noes: Councilmen =�None � � ' ` � � � �� Absent: Councilmen - Moty '- ' - ' � - - � � Resolution Noa 3761 on file in the office of the City Clerko : �: - - � RESOLUTION - Application for Grant - Benton Property MOTION: Made by Councilman Doherty, secondecl by Coizncilman Fulton, that Resolution No. 3762 be adopted, a resol'ution of the City�Council�of the City of Redding authorizing the filing of an application for a Grant to acquire open-space land. � � � � � � �/�� Voting was as follows; . y . .. . , , . � � . . : ' Ayes: Councilmen -�Deriny, Doherty, Fulton, and Chatfield --: Noes: Councilmen - None � � ' � � � � Absent: Councilmen - Moty . Resolution No. 3762 on fiTe in'�the office of the �City�Clerk. � f , .. � . � . . , ,, AGREEMENT - Ron Fa rley ' MOTION: Made by Councilman Dohe rty, seconded by Councilman IDenny, approving a temporary water service agreement between the City of �"s�� Redding, �tlie County'of'Sliasta, and Ron� Farl�ey.� The�Vote: Unanimous Ayes SEWER REIMBURSEIVIENT AGREEIVIENT - T. R. �Woods ` ' City Attorney Murphy submitted a substitute agreement between the City of �Redding and T. R. Woods� in�Tieu'of the reimbursement �agreement �� dated October 15, 1962 entered into betweeri the�'City an'd Mr. Woods. y�y Mr. Murphy indicated that this substitutiori agreement is necessary be- cause since the original agreemen.t was entered into, a 'portion of the� tributary area has been included within the Twinview S'ewer Assessment District and acreage charges from these areas cann�t be considered as a source of:funds for reimburserrient. Tliis substitution agreement has been approved by Mr. Woods and the Director of Public Works. MOTION: Made by Councilman Fulton, seconded by Councilman Denny, approving the afo 'rementioned"substitute agreement between 'the City and M,r. Woods. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes SHERIDAN PARK YOUTH CENTER Councilman Denny submitted the report of the�Special Committee re the ��N proposed Sheridan Park Youth Center, dated 9/29. This report presents the facilities incorporated in the proposed building, and the function it would perform. Mr. Denny summarized the provisions of the Grant �33 program which must be met in order for the project to qualify for a grant. "He saicl that'�one' of tHe questions' raised was the possibility of consolidat'ing the proposed 'project with se"veral other neighborliood projects and have one large project to serve the entire community, Mr. Denriy' pointed out tliat one of the criteria to` be�met under this type of grant is that the facility must'be a neighborhood project. It was also brouglit out that the applicant's share of the propos�ed project is one fourth of the development costs; which 'wouTcl'be $22;245, (total cost estimated at $88, 980. ), arid the 'value 'of the three 50 ft. lots owned by th�e City which are proposed as the site of the faciTity cannot be 'applied as pa'rt or all of the applicant's "share. � ' ' � Councilman Fulton rais'ed the questiori re the dieposition of tlie facility in the event it'is no longer needed or used, and City Manager�Cowden said title to tYie facility would be held at all times by the City, assuming the City is�the applicant. " ' ' _ , , .,. ,.P;; „ . , . It was agreed that there are several unanswered questioris to! be �resolved, one of which is the cost of staffing the facility. It is the recommendation of the Committee that staff be authorized to p 'roceed with the preparation of an application for Federal Grant to assist in f'inancing the development cost` of the' Sheridan'P`ark YoutH Center', and t� determine arid report in as'�much detail�as possible 'related commitments and obligations that would be incurred by City and other participating groizps or agencies, and that afte'r con`sideration of such information, Council decide whether or not to file ap�lication and proceed with saicl project. MOTI.ON: Made"by Councilmari Denny, seconded by Councilman Fulton approving the recommendation of the Committee as outlined'above. The Vote: Unanimous Aye's ' . . , � . PUBLIC HEARING - Appeal of Use Permit Application UP-41S-66 and Variarice Application V-11S=66 " ' The hour of 8:00 P. M. having arrived, Vice Mayor Chatfield opened the Public,Hearing on the appeal of U'se Permit UP=41S-66'and ' Variance Perrriit�V-IlS"=6'6 - H�emste'cl Village Co." - 105 ft, sign. , ... , ... , . . � - The following documerits are on file in the offic�e' of the City' Clerk: Affidavit of MaiTirig' - No'tice of Public I�earing �' � ' ,�� ' Planning Department Report dated October 3, 1966, including Minutes, letters, and reports received The City Cle rk 'advised tliat anothe r�com 'munication had`been received f rom Vorida Sirigleton, dated 1'0/`1/66`; opposing 'the 105 ft, sigri at Hemsted Village' �, " ' , � . , ''' . Mr. V. M. Robinson, general partner of the Hemsted Village Co. , ap'peared before Council' arid indicated "that his' Company"was aware of the height limitation of signs in'the City bu"t they'were not con- cerned because originally the�y had planned on a 50 'or 60�ft, sign and knew that va:riances'liave beeri granted in the past for�such signs. However, upon checking, they determined th�.t in'order to be seen from the Freeway, the sign face would have to be a minimum �of� ' 80 ft. in height. ' The additional 25'� ft: -requested is for embellishment of the sign. Mr. Robinson cited the� Taek of"sigris�on or'acljac'ent to the Freeway directirig tourists to food; lodging, or gasol�ine. He also stated he feels the sign should be allowed in order tihat his Company can make the best use possible of the property. �': 234 Vice .Mayor Chatfield asked how fa:r the_.sign would be from the Freeway .right-of-way and was told it_would be approximately 600 ft. � Mr. .Virgil ,Covington, , General Manager, of the Economic Development Corporation of Shasta County spoke in favor of the sign, stating it is his .belief that well designed si,gns_are,.a necess:ity .to_help bring, people off the Freeway and to advise, the.m that,.a certain facility .is available , for them t�o take advantage of. � He cited the fact that othe.r cities are granting such variances on an individual merit or need basis and hopes that Council will give �uch reque.sts economic consideration. Mr, Maurice Finn, Business Representative of the Building Service Employees International Union, Local No. 22, and also speaking on behalf of the Bartenders and Culinary Union, Local No. 470, also spoke in favor of the sign from an economic basis. Mr. Ed Anderson of 508 Grove Street, indicated that although he.does. not s;tand.to gain anything by ;;allowing the sign, he is in favor of high signs to encourage tourists : ' . . _ . ... Pastor poherty of the Bethel Assembly of God, and Pastor Hutcheson of the Church of the Nazarene both said they have no objection to the proposed Hemsted Village sign. Pastor Hutcheson said that a 40 ft. sign would be,.hidden by his church_ and, the church board,determined it was not against the proposed Hemste.d. sign opposite .its.front.yard. MOTION: Made by Co,uricilman Denny,._seconded .by Councilman . .. _. . .. _ Doherty, the public hearing be closed. The Vote; U.nanimous Ayes Councilman Doherty said it is hi.s,_belief that we must have a, vital growing community but, on the other hand, we must have an attractive pleasing appearance as this is a necessity also, and this is the frame- work upon which we must resolve the matter. Councilman Denny said he_fe.els�that..an arbitrary height limit on signs will be a small contribution to the aesthetics of the community. He stated he has tried to analyze the signs in Redding in terms of their beauty; and it is his impression that the.high signs.are.mor.e att,ractive than the low signs; the low .signs a,re poorly maintained and are. very numerous, and give a general impression of cluttering the environ- ment. .. Mr. Denny said_.he believes in.developing commercial areas to the maximum in the City,and s.ees no. objection to.this.sign and no objection to the rather extensive enterprise of the rep�resentatives. Councilman Fulton said he was displeased that no one appeared at the public.hearing objecting to.the sign. He thinks ,the, City Manager brought out,a good, point_in his memo.,re�architectur.al,control rather than height control. Councilman Fulton has no objection to.the , Hemsted Village sign. � Councilman.Doherty believes,the,re should,be,a-limitation on s_ign heights with an opp:ortunity .to..vary.it under ver..y..un.usual circum- stances.. He is not certa.in that these circumstances,have been reached with _respect to the pres.ent s.ign. Before approving this particular sign, Mr. Dohert,y would like this matter to go back to the Planning Commission and see if they would approve`something less than a 105 ft. sign; if not; then Council would have to decide. Mr. Doherty thinks policy questions should be determined by _ _ Counci,l, , but not the height of each sign -- this is a Planning Commission function., Vice Mayor Chatfield asked if height is the only variance request and was told that there were three issues before the Planning Commission: ..... . . 23 5 (1) Reguest for exception from the height and area limitations imposed by Chapter �3 of the City Code, which are 25 ft. in , height and 100_ ft. in area. , , _.... _. . . ._ , .:._:s- - ' (2), ,Application,for�a variance from.the height limitation imposed . by the provisions of Chapter 30 pertaining to all structures in the CO-BR zone which provides that the maximum height of any structure shall be� 50 ft. � (3) Request for a variance to permit location of the sign within the .i5.ft. front yard requirement for,the �CO-BR zone estab- lished by Chapter 30.� � Vice Mayor Chatfield agrees ,with architectural. control but points out that there is no such provision under the existing ordinance. Mr. Chatfield can see the possibility of high sign wars becoming a.problem. but does not believe Council has bee.n supplied with sufficient information to make a deci�sion_in this. matter. He does not believe the Planning Commission and Council should be 80 ft. apart -- the Commission recommends denying the applicants request , � � . for a sign I05 ft. in height but makes no recommendation. re a sign of lesserheight.'. .. . , _ .� . . � . - . � ' � - � City Attorney Murphy commented that eyery argument, advanced � . � _, . ... __ . by proponents for this sign can be advanceci by other developers for even higher signs because of topography adjacent to the� Freeway. If Council approves this application based on hardship, Council may have applications f rom othe r land owne rs who have even g reate r hardship. Council will be setting a precedent. � Mr. Robinson objected to Mr. Murphy�s statements on th.e .grounds that the.public hearing was closed. Vice Mayor .Chatfield-advised - Mr. Robinson that it was the duty bf.the City, Attorney to advise the Council on the legal implications of courses of action. MOTION: Made by Councilman Fulton, seconded,b,y, Councilman Denny, disapproving th'e' Planning Commi,ssion recommendation and approving UP-41S-66 and V-11S-66. . _ _„_ . . . . , Voting was. as follows: .� . . , .,. Ayes: Councilmen - Denny and.Fulton , Noes: Councilmen -�Dohe rty and Chatfield , � Ab.sent:. _ .. _ Councilmen - Moty ' .'The .Motionfaiied:to carry.. . . . � . . , . , . � . Further�discussion wa.s held re the best solution to this matter. The possibility of reopening the public hearing and continuing it to a later date was reviewed. City Attorney Murphy.commented_that if this ,we re.done and Mayo r Moty we re p re s ent at,the ,continued hea ring and . , . _ . . , : _ . heard the testimony, he could, vote on this item. . .. . MOTION: Made by Councilman Denny, seconded by Councilman Fulton, that the public hearing be reopened and be continued to Thursday, October 13, 1966 at 7:00 P. M. , The Vote,: Unariimous Ayes,, . Mr. Joe Redmon, Attorney, stated that. p;e,rhaps a joint meeting of the Planning. Commission and Council would.be beneficial in resolving this matter. Councilman Doherty suggested that staff t.ry to work out - . . r . � such a joint meeting. . 23b AG�tEEMENT - Survey of Police Department City Manager Cowde�n subniitted his recommeridatiori that Council � approve�an Agreement between the City of Reddirig and the 'Inter- national Association of Chiefs of Police, Inc.', 'covering a survey of the Redding Police Department, and authorize the Vice Mayor to sign said Agreement on behalf of the City. The"cost of the 'sur= vey will not exceed $8, 075, $2; 000 of wliich was appr'op'riated'�for such a su'rvey during the budget sessioris; -' " � ' " Councilman Fulton questioned the amount of money involved as he feels it is quite c.ostly: He asked if a cost"estimate had b�e'eri �obtained from any closer �source. Councilmari Dolierty� said he had the same feelings as Councilman Fulton and asked if the' Association guarantees to spend a minimum amount of time on the survey. City Manage r Cowderi said he did riot know"of'ariy g'roup as we�ll' � quaIified as the International �,.ssociation referrecl't'o above, ancl they ,, will spend the time necessary to make the survey. Police Cliief � '��'�' Vanderpool�echoed the feelings of the'City"1VIa`nage'r re the qualifica- tions of the'Inte rnational As s ociation.`" � ` � ' ' � ' � MOTION: Made by Councilman Denny,' seconded by Couricilmari ' ' Doherty, approvirig the Agreemerit between the City of Redding'and�-the Inte rnational As sociation of Chiefs of Police, Inc. , ' a`utho�rizing'the Vice Mayor to sign said Agreement on behalf of the City, and instruct- ing the City Attorney to•prepare tlie �necessa"ry� resolution�fo'r trarisfer of funds. The Vote; Unanimous Ayes - � ' - � � WATER UTILITY OPERATION =- Arinual Report ' - ' ' Finance Director Courtney submitted the Annual Report of Water�Utility ��y Operation for the fiscal year ended Jiine 30, 1966. ANNUA�L BUDGET ' � � � ` "' ` ` �� ' �� Finance Director Courtney submitted tlie'printed copy'of the Annual /8� Budget, 1966=67, as adopted�by Council on Jiine 30, 1966,'�by Resolution No. 3716. . . . . . .. . , _� STANDARDS FOR POLICE OFFICER"TRA.INIIVG PR`OGRAIVI- � � - Personnel Director Courtney subm'itted tlie 'p"ropo5e�d 'stanclards�re 'Police Officer Training Incentive Prog'ram, � explairiirig the `obje'ctiv'es �of`tlie program, the initial eligibility requirements,' arid 'the�require'ments for �� maintenance of eligibility. There was a discus"5ion re the requirement of three semester un'its of college annually and whether it would� be �� possible to schedule shifts of the police officer�s so they coul'd ta'ke these courses; and, in this regard, staff was requested to review the section of the standards re maintenance of 'eligibility:' 'It was dete-r- mined that it would be in order to adopt these proposed standards and, if necessary, they �couTd be amended�at `a�late'r�date. " � � � � � MOTIOlV: Made by Councilman Dolierty, second'e'd' �by-Councilmari'� Fulton, approving the �P'roposed Staridards re Police Officer 'Trairiing Incentive Program clated September'29; I966. ' The�Vo`te: Unanimous Ayes ASSIS'TANT DIRECTOR OF FINANCE ' � Personnel Director Courtney�reported that many applicat'ions were ��,� received for the position of Assistant Director of Finance and, after reviewing th'ese applications, a selecticsri has been made at the staff �� level: This pos'ition was in.cluded in the recent resolution �(rRe�s'.. No. 3754) 'urid'er tlie classificatibri which provides for rio Compens�.tion for overtime work. Mr, Courtney said that Council approv�.l is requested for this position to be filled at Step ##4 of Range 38 of the Employee Classification Schedule ($801/month). MOTION: Made by Councilman Denny, seconded by Councilman Doherty ��7 that the salary class:ifil ation of Assistant Director of Finance be � established at Range 38 and that the applicant selected for the position be started at Step #4, $801/month. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes DOWNTOWN URBAN REDEVELOPMENT PROGRANt - .. . Planning Consultant Keye s.:submitted a� repor.t 'of'-the Redding �Redevel'op- ment Agency expressing,concer.n. re..the 1ack.of progress which has been made in preparing a Survey and Planning application for fede,ral assistance in a study of the downtown area's needs for rehabilitation and of the feasibility of a mall.: Mr._ Keyes al.so. referred to letters received�from the Greate r Redding Chambe r .of CommP�� .and f rom the Downtown Me-rchants -Retail Division expressing similar' concern. � It was the recommendation of the City Manager that Gouncil approve the expenditure;of $2,, .000 to,employ nece�ssary outside help to work ��3 with members of staff in the preparation�of the a�forementioned applica- tion, and instruct the City Attorney to prepare the necessary resolution for transfer of funds. � , Joe;Redmon�; ,membe r=.of;.the Redding Red�evelopment Agericy,• �concurred with th...e recommendation� of�the�City Mana�ger;_ stating that if the �City Manager is spear-heading this program.he is. confident �it�will be done as promptly.as possible. Mr. Cowden told Council he will have the .applica- tion before thern at ,th•e�second meeting in Noverslber and will have it in San F rancis co two day.s:late r.: � � �. � • � _ � • _ .- . . � . , , . � . � MOTION: Made by Councilman Denny, seconded by Councilman Fulton approving,.the,.expenditur.e of $2,; 000-to :empLoy necessary outside help to work with mernbers. of.staf£.in the preparation of a Survey,and:Planning Application as referred to; above,.-and 'iristructing the City Attorney to - prepare.the.necessary.,resolution for transfer of.funds.. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes ; . � �tEMODELING OF CITY HALL BUILDING _ . . Public Works Director Arness submitted,the..p.roposed floor plan.for ' the remodeling of the Administrative Offices of City Hall at 760 Parkview, and advised Council that the basic floor plan has been -reviewed by the Administrative Staff,and,a. Council Committee consisting of Mayor Moty and Councilman:Chatfield. Architect�Allyn Marzin was present and �/� answer.ed que_stions .raised ,by Councilman: re various-as.pects of the .pro- posed remodeling. It was� pointed,out that a considerable. amount of the �� interior work would be done by City forces. An amount of $70, 000 has been appro,p,r.-iate.d for the' remodeling. - „ , . MOTION: Made by Councilman -Fulton; seconded by Councilman Denny, app roving the plans and autho ri2ing the Depa rtment of_Public W o rks. to call for bids to frame the structu.re. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes� • _.. .., _ � . . . - . DRAIN LINE CONSTRUCTION - Vicinity of Orange Ave, and Eureka Way Public Works Director Arness requested Councii approval for the place- ment of approximately 170 ft. of 36 inch reinforced concrete drainage pipe in an area in the vicinity of Orange .Avenue ancl'Eu.reka ViTay. A property owner has ag-reed to purchase the pipe which will be placed in an existing draina;ge ditch.located-in an.alley: right-of-way. The property �/� owner has requested:that this .pipe be installed by�City forees. Mr. Arness indiea.ted that by the property .owner furnishing the ove'rsize pipe (30 inch pipe is .called�fox.by the Master Plan but 36 inch- pipe -to be- fur- nished by property owner,and -recommended by Director of Public-Works) the cost of installati.on would be about,.$400 by use of City'forces. _ The City eontributed about $40.0 to_the developer.�when he installed the. western 170 ft. of pi,pe; ther�fore, the cost to�the City for both areas would be about equale Also, this,in_stallation wou�ld facili�tate the formation of an alley paving petition. MOTION: Made by Councilman Doherty, seconded by Councilman Denny 238 approving the request of the Director of Public Works re installation of drainage pipe as outlined heretofore, The Vote: Unanimous Ayes AWARD OF BID - Front I:,oader , Purchasing Director Stewart submitted the analysis and recommendation of Bid Schedule No'. 383 - Front Loader, which stated it is the recommen- dation:of'the City Manager and Purchasing Director that Bid Schedule No. 383 be awarded to Blakemo"re Equipment Company of San Leandro on their Basic�Bid, th'e low bidde r.. , .- � . , _ ��,�� MOTION: -Made by Councilman Denny, seconded by Councilman Doherty accepting the recomrriendation of�the City Manager and Purchasing Dir- ector that Bid Schedule No. .383 be awarded to Blakemore Equipment Company of San Leandro on their Basic Bid, at a low bid of $17, 264. 00. Voting was as follows: � � . Ayes: � Councilmen - � Denny, Doherty�, Fulton, and Chatfield Noes: Councilmen - None ' Absent: Councilmen - Moty . AWARD OF BID - Street Light Poles and Accessories Purchasing Director Stewart submitted the arialysis and recommenda- tion of Bid Schedule No. 384.for. street light poles and accessories ` which stated it is the' recommendation of the City Manage r and the Pur- ehasing Director that the �bid'Be awarded to �onsolidated �Electrical Distributors_ of Redding. Mr. Stewart noted that since Consolidated Electrical Distributors are locally based,. 1°jo `sa:les tax is directly contributed to the City of Redding, making them the low bidde r. �/�`j . _. _ . _ . MOTI.ON: Made by Councilman Doherty„ , seconded-by�Gouncilman Fulton; accepting the recorrimendation of the. City Manager and Pur- chasing Director that Bid Schedule No.. 384 be awarded to Consolidated Elect:rical Distributors of Redding on their low bid of $4, 383. 10. Voting was as follows: . . . _- . � Ayes: Councilmen - Denny, Doherty, Fulton, and Chatfield Noes: Councilmen - None Abserit: - .Councilrnen - Moty � . . � ' . ' - , '- = . AWARD OF. BID.- Ei.r_ Pole s i_ � � Purchasing Direc.tor Stewart submitted, the analysis and recommenda- tion of Bid Schedule No: . 385 for fi.r poles which stated it is the recommen- dation of the .City Mana'ge r and the' Purcliasing Director �tFiat the bid be awarded to McCormick & Baxter, 'the low bidder. � - � MOTION: Made by Councilman Denny, seconded by Couneilman Doherty, �� accepting the recommendation of the City Manager and Purchasing Dir- ector that B'id Schedule'No. 385 be awarded to'McCormick & Baxter on their low bid'of'$3, 731. 94, taX included. • Voting was as. follows:' . � ' . Ayes: Councilmen - Denny, Doherty, Fulton, and Chatfield Noes: � Councilmen - None - " �' � ' ' � Absent: � Councilmeri. '- Moty - � � � GASOL,zNE FACILITY AT-POI:,ICE STATION � Purchasing Director Stewa`rt submitt'ed a' staff recommeridation that gasoline facilities be installed at the Police Station for ga'ssing all police �veh�.cles. At� present, police vehicles�are gassed at Fire Station. #3, and it is' estimated that approxirriately' 90 liours per month• are consurned in gassing said vehi'cles at 'the Fire Statiori, which � - �� amounts to app roximately $3, 434. 40 pe r yea r, bas ed on an ave rage hourly rate for pblice officers of�$3. 18. The estimated cost for a � 1, 000 gallon storage tank and dispensing pump at the Police Station is $725, with installation to be made by City forces. It' is proposed- to install the tank and pump at the carport of the Police Stati�on. MOTION: Made by Councilman Denny, seconded by Councilman Fulton 23q approving the .s.taff recarnmendation re:i_nstallation of ga.soline faci�lities at �.the Police Station and instructing. the City. Attorney to prepare.the necess'ary resolution re transfer of funds. The. Vote:. Unanimous Ayes 1REDDING MU,NICIPAL AIRPORT - Te rmite C.ontrol and Repair;of Open . ' .. .. Nose Hangar Building Airports Manager McCall advised Council that during recent preparation for repairs. at Redding Municipal. Airport, considerable termite infes�ta- tion was discovered in the open hose hangar building., -.Delk Pest Control was consulted and it_was determined that the termi� could .be .killed by proper tr.eatment .of the cement and walls at a- cost of $400. The estimate for the repair of the damaged area of the building.is $950. ,. with the total I J� cost of complete termite control and building repair of $1350. It is the recommendation of the City Manager, Assistant City Manager, Building Inspector; and Airports Manager that Council authorize th�e work.to be perfo.rmed as outlined .above at a cost of $1350. . ,. . . � , MOTION: . .Made by Councilman D_enny, .seconded, by Councilman Eu-lton, authorizing the expenditure of $1350. for termite, control.and re,pair of the open nose hangar building at Redding Municipal Airport. The Vote: � Unanimous Ayes . � , , . . - �� RESOLUTION - re.Airport Assistance Re�td:v�mg, Fund .. _ . ..., , , . Airports Manager McCall requested Council.cons'ideration of..Resolution No. 3763 supporting the recommendation of the California Association of Airport Executives, Inc. , re allocation of the Airport Assistance Revolving Fund. Mr... McCall explained that more than. one, million,dollars was available as of July lst far. .alloca.tion;:however,�..the. method of ,a,lloca- tion and to whom it will be allocated has not been determined yet. The California Aeronautics. Division has proposed a polic.y whereby said . .... . ... ......... . .- ... . Division would assume complete control of this moriey. Re,solution-No. 3763 se.ts forth the recommended allocation as proposed.by,the,_Califo.rnia Associ:ation of Airport Executives whic.h, according to�Mr.. Mc.Ga11,. is ��/ a more e.quitable distribution, and the funds..wo.uld go :back,,to..the. people who gene rate this money. . _ . . .MOTION:� Made_by.Councilrnan. D,oherty,,seconded b.y. Coun;cilman.F.ulton that R.es olution.No. 3 763 be adopted;: a-re solution-of the C.ity. Council ;of . the City .of Redding supporting the recommendation .of the. Califbr.nia , Association of Airpor..t Executives,: Inc. , as to the alloca.tion of:the Airpo.rt Assistance Revolving Fund and op,posirig the exi.sting alloca.tion policy. pre- � pared by. the California Aeronautics Division Staff. , ,_ . . Voting was as follows: _ . . _ _. Ayes: Councilmen - Denny, Doherty, Fulton, and Chatfield Noes: - '. Councilmen.:-.None, . . ._' _. _ , . _ . , :. �� : _ . . Absent: Councilmen. - Moty . . � . . . . ;.. . ._', .. . ...,. . ,� �, Resolution No. 3763 on file in the office of the City C1erk.,. . „ .. NOTICE OF COMPLETION - Curbs, ' gutter, .and.Sidewa,lk. -;,South. Stre,et Public Works Director Arness advised Council that.the contractor�has completed satisfactoril'y all items of work on const.ruction of.curb, gutter, and sidewalk on Soutli.:Strfeet,,between California Street and the SPRR Tracks,' Bid Schedule No. 373, and ,.r,eq.uest.s .Counc,il,to_acc.ept the pr.oject and instruct the City Cle rk to file the Notice of Completion. . _ ��f MOTION: Made by Councilman poherty, seconded. by Councilman Denny . accepting the. project re construction of curb,, gutter,r and: sidewalk on. South Str.eet.and the SPRR T�'acks, �and instructing the. City_Glerk to file the Noti'ce of Completion. _.' The Vote: Unanimous Ayes 240 NOTICE OF COMPLETION - Sidewalk Construction - Eureka Way Public =Works�Di�rector.Arness advised Council that the contractor has completed satisfactorily all items of work on sidewalk construction ; on the north side of Eureka Way between Magnolia Avenue and Walnut Avenue, Bid Schedwle No. . 37.6, and requests Council.to accept the project�and�.instruc.t the Cit�y.Clerk to file the Notice of Completion. - , ..� . : . . . . � - ' �� -MOTION.: � Made:by Councilman Fulton, seconded by Councilman• ��-, . Doherty; _accepting the project re sidewalk construction on the north�,: . side� of.Eu•reka.�Way.,between.Magnolia Avenu� and Walnut Avenue, -� , .. and` instructing �the�City.Cle..rk .to file the Notice of Completion. The Vote: . Unanimous ;Ayes, . _.._: . . � � - - � � . � . , . .. . . , , , NOT�ICE .OF COMPL•ETION. - :Water Line �Extension =� Placer Street Publi•c Works Di�rector Ar.ness advised Council that the contr.actor has completed satisfactorily..all .items of work on construction of 1,2-inch water line extension on Placer Street, Bid Schedule No. 377, and re- quests Couneil.to accept the project and instruct the C'ity Clerk to�file , 1�� the Notice..of. Completion, '. � - J .��. .. , . . . MOTION: Made by .Councilman Denny, seconded by Councilman D`oherty, accepting the project re construction of 12- inch water line extension on Placer Street, and in.st'r•ucting the City Clerk to file the Notice of Comple.tion. The::Vote.:, Unanimous Ayes ' �� ` : , PUB;L�I.G �W.ORKS P.,ROG.RESS REPORT - - � • Public..W.orks�.Direc.tor Arness submitted the Public Works Progress �%G � Repor.t for'.the month .of September, 1966. - � � . , _ �.. . ,.� _ ._: ... , . : . .., . : .: _ , - .. . „ , - _ RECORDATION.�OF �REDDING .OFFICIRL PLAN LIN°E.MAPS. �� . . . City��Attorney�Murphy reques.ted Council to authorize�-th�e �Vi�c�e. Mayor - to execute:a lette.r to ,be, sent to the Board of Supervisors`re recordation of Official PLan .Line, Maps._� Mr. .Murphy explained that Section 32-5. 1 of:•the Redding._City Code requires that the City Clerk record�with-the County Recorder certified copies of all Official Plan� Line Maps� adopted by the City Council. The size of the Plan Line Maps differs from the standard :18X26 inch ma.ps which the County Record'er-customar.i�ly. files, wh-ich has caused a�probleriz inasmuch as it is not economic.ally feasible � �d for �the� �Gi_ty to.adj.ust:the- s•ize of these maps to the 18x26 inch standards. 'Courity. Gouns'el•has•�suggested that the Ci.ty request the Board�of.Super- = visoxs .to, :in turn; ,reques.t the County. Recordes to. acc'ept. the-s,e Redding Official Plan Line Maps for filing, with the City providing bin�de:rs.for same, of a size, shape, and form satisfactory to:the� County-Recor,der, MOTION: Made by Councilman Doherty,� seconded by.' Councilman:Denny, authorizing the Vice Mayor to execute a letter to be sent to the Shasta County Board of Supervisors re recordation of Official Plan Line Maps, as outlined above: The Vote:�-U�nanimous:.Ayes � - . ' : � CONT�RACT - re State Employeesi.Retirement.System � Gi�ty Attorney Murphy sub'mitted for approval the:propos,ed .cont:ract. � between the City of Redding and the firm of Coat'es; H'erfurth and C England, con-sulting actia.aries, providing for_the quadreinnial actuarial "�' l� � valuation•'required under the provisions of�the� State EmpToyees'�. Retire- . _ - ..� ; . ment Law. � , .. . . _ ,, '`MOTION:� �Made�b.y�Counc'ilman.Fulton, seconded by"Councilman Denny approving•the c�ontract �between the C'ity of� Redding._and• �the firm.of Coates, �Herfu-rth and�Engla�nd-r-e State Employees' Retirement System�,� as outlined above, and autho�rizing the Mayor to sign.said. cont'ra�ct on behalf of the City. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes z�� ORDIN�NCES NOS. 873 THROUGH 884 ' _. ;%.f; City Attorney Murphy submitted the following Ordinances for Council consideration and first reading. Mr. Murphy,explained that these ordinances all pertain to the business license s.ections of the Code, _ were r-ecommended by�the City Clerk,:� and.have been approved for. form by the City Attorney. .. '. .•. ' ' _ �- �� - . ��. � �� ORDINANCE - Fees for Card. Rooms� : � j ��' � '. = � - �. - • .. � ; �v cf Councilxnan, Doherty.offered �Ordinarice No. 8'73 for fi.rst reading,r an' ordi-nance:of the City�-C•ouncil-of the City of-Redding amending Article I,{ Chapte..r. I.0'of the Redding.Gity �Code, .1959, .as arnended, by re-. �� pealing Section-l;0-5, and'substituting the.refo.r a�new Section 10-5. ' � � : pertaining to fees for card rooms. . .. � '. - :. .. : � � � ORDINANCE - Licenses for Card Rooms _ _ - _ � � ' "� ' `� �' ' : Councilmari Doherty �offe•red �Ordiriarice�No. 8'�74 �for first.reading, .an ordinance of the City, Gouncil of the City of Redding amending Article I, Chapte.r I0 of the Reddirig Cit,y Code,�'195.9,` as amended, by. adding,, Sections 10-5. I and 10-5. 2 pertaining to transferabili.ty, proration and refund of licenses required under this Chapter for card.rooms..� �-� ORDINANCE - Licenses _ Council�nan Doh�e�rty offered �Ordinance No. 875 for-first reading, -an• ' ordinanc'e.-of�the Gity-Couneil,of, th.e C'ity of Redding��amending Arti�c�le� /%N I, Cfiapter 17 of the-Redding City Code., 1.95.9;.'as, amended, by�repealing Section 1_Z-19 and substitutirig therefor a new�Section��17-19 .pertaining �� to licenses generally. . � ' ' � . ORDINANCE - Licenses .. ' '; _. �..- - � - ' " "'"•� ` : .. � .... .., ,.. .. .. Councilman Doherty. .offe-red•.Ordinance No. 876 for first. reading; .,an ordinance of the�Gity Gouncil of th� City.of Redding amending� Article '' I, Chapter 17 of.the Redding-.City Code, 1959�; as -amend'ed; by repealing Section ,17=20 and substituting therefor a new Section�.17-.20 per.tainings to licenses generally. . '- ' � ' � • � : >i � ORDINANCE - Licenses:; . _ . �- � Councilman Doherty offered Ordinance No. �877.for fir.st�reading, :an ordiriance of the City Council of the City;of Redding amending Article I, Chapter 17 of the Redding City Code, 1959, as amended, by repealing Section 17-2I pe�rtaining �to licenses' g,enerally.. . . . ORDINANCE - Taxicab Licenses . ' ' ' ' ' ' "' ' Councilman �Dolierty 'offer�ed Ordinance No..-8:78 �for fi.r.st reading, an ' ordinance`of'the .City�Council of�the City of. Redding .amending Article II - Chapter 17 of the Reclding City�Code, 1959, as amended,::by repealin�g� Section �17-52'and substituting therefor a new'Section l`7-52 pertaining �`�J to tax�icab licenses:: • '-� � � '� " � ' � " _ _ . . . � ORDINANCE - Taxicab-D,rive rs . , . , � • . , �6� Councilman- Doh'e rty_ offe red•Ord�inance No.� 8`:79 fo�r fi�rst.:reading,:- an� �� ordinance of the City CounciL- of the �City� of Redding ameriditn•g �A.rticle II, Chapter 17 of the Redding City Code, 1959, as amended, by the addition of Seetion�-17-52. l,` pertaining'to taxicab' drivers. � - ' � ORDI�NA.NCE =�Fees for��Vehicle �Stands.�� ` �- :�. - , _ , � ;.:�,,;.; .- - ` ;}; Counci•lman�>D.oli.erty offered'Ordi•narice No:: 880~for°first°reading, 'an ardinanc•e of�tlie� City��Council� of•the�,City of�Redding amendirng:rA'•rticle I, Chapte r 28'of�th°e� Reddin�g� City`.Code; 1959;�' as amended�, � by r.epealing Section 28-4 and substituting therefor a new Section 28-4 per�aining to fees required for vehicle stands. 242 . .i_ ORDINANCE - Ope rato r's Pe rmit . ;= � . � , � � = Councilman Doherty offered.Ordinance No.. 881 for first reading, an ordinance of the City Council of the City, of Redding amending Article I, Chapter 28 of the Redding City Code, 195g, as amended, by repealing „Section 28-:10 and substituting the,re.fo�r a�.�new ,Section.,2.$-10_pertaining.. to the duration of ope rator's pe rmit. � ... _ .. . . : _, _ ._ - __ : . ORDINANCE - Fees for Vehicles fo:r..Hire_ •_.. ..: _..�.: .; , � _:. ._ .; .'. Councilman Doherty offe'red ,Ordinance No. 882 for first reading, an ordinance .of•.the �Gity�Council -of the Ci.ty.o£. Redd'ing amending Article . . I, Chapte�r 2,8, of.the�Reddirig-City .Gode, 1959; -as�arnend�ed., _by;:repealing 5ection' 28=I1 ,and`substitutin.g:a•n'ew Section�28-11 pertaining to fees,for vehicles for hire. . . � ._ .. . . . .. _ . ..,. ORDINANCE - Vehicles for Hi.r:e;:.�r: , , -. ' . , , ,. , . , . Councilman Dohe�rt:y offe�red .Ordinance'No. `8$3 :fo�r.fi�rst; reading, an ordinance of� the>City,C:ouncil -of .the ,Cityr of..Re,dding.amending Artic•1e I, . Chapte,r 2,8�-of the� Redd�ng City,_Code, ..1959;'� as amended, by repealing Section 28-19 and �substituting therefor a new Section,28-19_ pertaining to vehi.cles� for•-hir,e: � ...� „ -. .. :�: . �... ., ,•. ... • . ,� . _•: .. _.-,- . , ., . ORDINANCE - Closing Out Sales . , : , . . •,. : -� ..�_�, Councilrnan� Doherty offered .Ordinanc,e.No. ;884, fo.r fiirs,t,readi-n-g, an, .; . ord'�inance of�,ther City;Council. of..the .Gi_ty�.of;Reddin�=amending�;Chapter ,- 11.A- of� the.`Redding:City: C:ode�,, 1.95.9, as:.ainended,,by,,,repealing.:Section 11A�-3�and•�substituting.�ther.efor.a new.S:ecti:on..�11A-3 p,ertaining. to._.. _,. ��y Closing.0ut Sales. . t. ' ,._ . _ . _ ... . . . ��y RESOLU TION - Repai r of Hanga r - RMA - . .. . ,. . � MOTION�: `' Made by Courieilman Denny, �seconded by;Councilman Fulton tha.t.R-esolution No: 37.64. be adopted; a xesoiution of .the.City Council of the _City of Reddi�ng •approp.riatix�g £unds.:for_.�te.'rmite.c.o,nt•rol�and;r.epair; /!� of termi�te,.�darnage �to�the no�se hanga.r at. Re,dding..Municipal Airport and authorizi�ng the transfer of funds therefor. , ,. . .. , . , .. . . . �� Voting was as follows: Ayes: -Councilmen - Denny, Doherty, Fulton, =and_ Chatfield ., ,_ Noes;... .,.. . Counci'lmen ,=, None, ::. . , , . . . - �- . � Absent:' , Cou•ncilmen. =.Moty� .. . . . �� . , :;, . , ; ; _. , . , .- . . , ..., , - , . . . . • . . . • � � - . , . , , ,.. . .� Resolution No. 3764 on file"in•the office of�the �City: Clerk: ;.. . - .. �. EASTSIDE ROAD ANNEX NO. 1 . , , . ,_ . The,C�ty C1erk �advised �Counci�l that�affidavits o.f Willard�Boydstun, � -Ruth:Boydstun, and Ellen Hampton have been filed in her. office; .. . . setting forth'that said��.person's res,ide within the��a��rea propos;ed•to be: y(,/ annexed�to the-Cit,y�.of��Redding in Eastside,�Road •Annex�No.` 1; and � -.• furthermore that they were registered voters resid�.ng;�in_ a:.por.tion,of, General Election Precinct Bonnyview No. 2 located within the area to be annexed. These affidavits further reci�ted,"that,the.`said.persons';did not•-re.ceive :sampl�e ballots• n,o.r did�,they .reeeive.,any -notice. of the.:time. and place of .the annexation election by mail.. . •. . � . . _ _ . . _ _ . ._ , , .. The City Clerk also advised'Council �that�.th'ere'had be�n fil'ed iri.her � office a Ce rtification f rom County Cle rk Richa rd C. B rennan that Willard Boydstun, Ruth Boydsturi, and-Ellen'�Hampton were vote;rs. within ,Gene ral;Election, Precinc.t:Bonriyview;No.' .2,..�xe,sid:ing:a�t;2680.- .� Radio. •Lane; �and �that-�he�:knew of.rio xea'sori:.why,'said persons were not � qualifi�ed to ,vote•at-�the E�.stside.�Road��ri�.exati,on EE1e'etiori. - . � „ _ . . 'f: .:,,., ... . , r� . . . ,. .. . , , - . . - 243 City Attorney Murphy submitted a written,memorandum opinion stating there is a material irregularity in said election,.. since.the :canvass of the election revealed 13 votes cast, 7 against and 6_ in favor thereof, and since the affidavits on file, tog�ther with�a -review of�the .election proceedings reveal that the published. notice bf election establishing trie voting�precincts for said election failed to include the portion of General Election 'P�recinct Bonnyview No:�„2.1'ocated�within the�a:rea _proposed to be annexed, and that therefore'3;"regis.tered vote.rs qualified:to_vote in said election received no notice thereof, either by mail or publication, nor were they,included upon the Precincts Lists of tliose qualified to - +.�; ,. -- --- - - - - vote. " " . . . . . . . . , . ,. .`. - . . . . � � . . ., �.�. . . . � . . .. .. .. . . . ... i � � . .....� . . ..� � . i I... . , .. . A The memorandum also recommerided.that the:.Gouricil:.de:clar.e:.the . election null and void and adopt a resolution of intention to call a special election establishirig:a' date for a new protest hearing, follow- ing which, if a majority protest is not made, a new election should be called. The memorandum stated that this opinion was shared by County Counsel Robert Rehberg and that IVIr. Rehbert had determined that the Attorney, Ge�neral's office agree.d with these opinions. RESOLU TION . . .� MOTION: Made by Councilman Doherty, seconded by Councilman Fulton that Resolution No. 3765 be adopted, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding declaring the Special Election of September I3, 1966 in the Eastside Road Annex No. 1 Area, void because of irregularities. Voting was as follows: . . Ayes: . Councilmen - Denny, Doherty, Fulton, and Chatfield Noes: Councilmen - None Absent: Councilmen - Moty - �tES OLU TI.ON MOTION: Made by Councilman Denny, seconded by Councilman Fulton that Resolution No. 3766 be adopted, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding declaring its intention to call a special annexation election, and fixing a time and place for protest by property owners. Voting was as follows: Ayes: Councilmen - Denny, Doherty, Fulton, and Chatfield Noes: Councilmen - None Absent: Councilmen - Moty Resolutions Nos. 3765 and 3766 on file in the office of the City Clerk. REVISIONS TO CODE - Business License Section The City Clerk submitted a memorandum to Council concerning proposed revisions to the business license section of the Redding City Code and requested that Council review these suggested changes for action at a I�� later date. Action on this item was tabled until the meeting of November 7th. ROUTINE COMMUNICATIONS California Division of Highways Tabulation showing apportion- f� � ments of 1: 04�` funds to Cities, etc. Communication to Bella Vista Water District from Shasta County � %i Department of Public Health Shasta-Cascade Wonderland Association publicity re Whiskeytown Lake - in Sacramento Bee l� � Hunting and Fi shing - Oakland T ribune ICCCNC Minutes of September 20th meeting j77 244 �� PUC Notice of Hearing - re Olinda. Exchange of Hap,py Valley Telephone Company . .. .... . � �� E.conomic Development, Cor,p,: of Shasta County�.= -Minutes..of �`�7 ,. B.oard. of Directors' Meeting-of.:9/1�2/bb . , • � _ - � LAFCO N.otice of_.`Public.H'ea.ring. 10%13./�66�re.•annexation No..,3;0, ..��,j. - . , _ to Entexp:ris,e Public 'Utili:ties-District . .. . , . . , � ' . ��.. ... ' . .. - .� � , ., if:. .. . .13:�_.... ,_ i _ � ., . . i . .. .. . ' ' � ADJOURNMEN.T. : �_i.. 4 :. .�,}_: , � � - - . _ _ . , .., . „ , �..,�, :.. ... . . . ,�. ,,. : ..,_ . . . There being no further business, at the hour of 12:301A. M. , upQn . the motion of Councilman Denny, seconded by Councilman Fulton, the meeting'was adjourned to 7,:00 P.;M..,. Octobe�r 13, �1966.� : . . , , . �.. . .., APPROVED:. , - ; . �:.._ ' : , . .: . . , .. .. � . . . ,. _ ... �,.. ; . :�. ..,, , ,. � - . � : . . . .. Vice-Mayor ATTEST: . . , . , . _.. .. , . ; � ,. � .� ; . � ' . . , - . - : . ,:.. _-- >,_. ... .� .. . . . ' : � � ._. . - . ' City Cle rk � � � � : . � ' , _. . ,, . . , . .. ,s. `,. . . . _ .. � . . _ ... ,,:� . , , . .. �. .. . . . .. . _ . . , � . - . ,.. ,.. _ �, � _ ; . .. . . , .. . : . . - . .__ . . - , , . . � . ,... . � k� , ' . .t. ' . : 3 .., . . . - _t . . ' . - r - . . _ . - � , .- . . . .. . ... . . . ... . . . � . .. � _ ,. . _ � . . . . . . _ . .. `,;�,.,� . ,. . ; . . . , . _ .. .. . . . ,. . ... � .. _ � . .� .. . ! . . . - ' .., i . . . . _ . ' , . . . .. .. . . . . .r . . . _.. , . . . , . � ,.. ' . .. _ . . . � . . .. . . . ` � ., i: ,i . .. � . . .. ' . . . ' . _• . . , .� � , . . ._ . . . . � . . ' 1 . � . . � ' . '. : .� � , - . . . ,._ . ... , .�..i.. .. . .. . . � . � .,