Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - City Council - 1969-07-07 109 City Council, Regular Meeting Police Dept. & Council Chambers Bldg. Redding, California July 7 , 1969 7;00 P.M. The Pledge of A.11egiance to the Flag was led by Pat LaPointe, Shasta C ounty Sizpe rvi s or. The Reverend Robert Balsley, Pastor of the First Baptist Church, offered the invocation. The meeting was called to order at 7:00 P.M. by Mayor Moty with the following Councilmen present: A.nderson, Chatfield, Denny, Fulton, and Moty. Also present were City Manager Cowden, Assistant City Manager and Purchasing Director Brickwood, City A.ttorney Murphy, Finance Director and Personnel Director Courtney, Public Works Director A.rness , A.ssociate Planner Nebon, A.ssistant Civil Engineer Hastings , Traffic Engineer Hamilton, A.irports Manager McCall, Parks Superintendent Blaser, and City Clerk Brayton. APPROVA.L OF MINUTES MO'I'ION: Made by Councilman Fulton, seconded by Councilman Denny approving the minutes of the regular meeting of June 16, 1969 and of the adjourned regular meeting of June 30, 1969, as mailed to each Councilman. The Vote: Unanimous A.yes C OMMUNICA TIONS H. T. Barnard and Rev. A.. L. Thomas In a letter to Council dated June 20th, Mr. Barnard and Reverend � Thomas requested Council to grant a variance re curb and gutter requirements on Lot #4 on Parker Street (Linden Avenue). They also requested that the owner, Mr. James, be permitted �o connect to the sewer for $4.00 per front foot, plus an $85. 00 trunk fee charge for each connection. The City Clerk read excerpts of minutes of the Planning Commission me eting of June T 0 , 196 9 , at whi ch time only the s idewalk r equir ement was waived. The area was shown on the Vu Graph. Mr. Barnard appeared before Council and indicated that Reverend Thomas is out of the City and unable to be present this evening. Mr . Barnard stated that there is no curb and gutter on the entire ��� street and he feels the curb and gutter requirement on this one lot is unreasonable. The Director of Public Works stated that the City will set the grade at no cost to the owner. Mr. Barnard said that Mr. James is willing to participate in an assessment district if and when one is formed. i ' In answer to Mayor Moty's inquiry as to whether Council is em- powered to grant such a variance re curb and gutter, the City Attorney said that under the subdivision ordinance there is power vested in the Planning Commission and Council to waive any of the subdivision requirements. The Planning Commission waived the sidewalk requirement but required curb and gutter. On appeal to the City Council, the Council has the power to waive the curb and gutter requirement if three criteria are met. Mr. Murphy read the three criteria (Redding City Code Sec. 25-8). Councilman Fulton asked Mr. Barnard if he was donating the lot to Mr. Jame s and wa s advi s ed that this wa s true. There was a discussion as to the legality of the lot splits . Councilman Chatfield commented that these are legally sub- divided lots and he doesn't think they can�be unsubdivided. 110 Mr. Murphy said we have to presume it is legal as it is in accordance with the City Code. Several cities have this law . and it has never been testecl in court. Mr . Barnard referred to eight homes that have been built in the area recently that do not have curb and gutter. It was pointed out that in some instance s the City does not have the power to require curb and gutter. Mayor Moty said he would be in favor of waiving the require- ment in this one instance. Councilman Chatfield feels that the agreement to participate in assessment district proceedings . would be reasonable, and he would be in favor of waiving the curb and gutter requirement for this one case, at this time, under these conditions , but thinks Council should impose the condition re participating in an assessment district. Council- man Denny agreed with Councilman Chatfield and Mayor Moty although he said he is generally reluctant to take exception to requirements that would affect other pieces of property and make the City appear to be inconsistent. Mr . Denny thinks the assessment district is a more favorable approach than the piece-by-piece approach. MOTION: Made by Councilman Chatfield, seconded by Council- man Denny that Council waive the requirement re construction of curb and gutter on Lot 4 at this time and the owner be required to sign a letter of agreement to participate in assessment district proceedings when an assessment district is proposed in the area. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes - With respect to the second request contained in the letter of June 20th, Mayor Moty read a portion of the minutes of the Council meeting of A.pril 3, 1967, at which meeting Council adopted the recommendation of the Council Committee; i.e. , "----property owners in. the area to be served by the sewer line would pay all front footage and acreage charges applicable under existing City ordinances and would pay the cost of making their house connection to the newly installed sewer line." The Mayor said that perhaps at that time the $4.00 front footage fee and $85.00 trunk fee charge was in effect; however, the front footage charge has increased to $6.00 and the trunk fee charge has also increased. He stated that the trunk sewer fee is tied to the construction cost index and is revised twice �a year . Mr. Barnard insisted that the $4.00 and $85. 00 charges were agreed upon and, although no one connected, he doesn't feel that Mr. James should be penalized. Mr . Hastings, A.ssociate Civil Engineer, advised Council that the average depth of the sewer line is 8' to 10' with tees provided on both the north and south sides of the street. Mayor Moty advised Mr . Barnard that the only way Council could agree to his request would be to revise the ordinance. No action was taken by Council. James Benson James Benson, owner of A.merican Ambulance, appeared before Council to discuss problems involved with the new ambulance ordinance. Mr. Benson referred to the regulation concerning �1r3 the necessity of an attendant and attendant driver having an Advanced First Aid Certificate. He stated that no course has 111 been given in the area recently and this causes a hardship. He wondered if Mr . Watson, Shasta County Sanitarian might waive this requirement until a full course is given in the area. City A.ttorney Murphy corrunented that license requirements for the City of Redding are enforced by the City Clerk, and the ordi- nance precludes the issuing of a lieense for an attendant or attend- ant-driver who does not have an Advanced First A.id Certificate. Mr. Benson also spoke of some of the requirements re equipment, stating that the A.dvanced First Aid Course does not cover the use of some of the equipment, thus the requirements are super- fluous . Mayor Moty reactivated the Council Ambulance Corru7littee and referred the matters brought up by Mr. Benson to said Committee for consideration. G. A.. Greenleaf MOTION: Made by Councilman Denny, seconded by Councilman � Chatfield approving the request of George Greenleaf for a parade ����.. permit for the Weaverville Chapter of E Clampus Vitus on July 26th, as outlined in his letter to Council dated June 24, 1g69• 'I'he Vote: Unanimous Ayes Federal Water Pollution Control A.dministration A. letter of commendation was received from Richard L. O!Connell, Director of the Pacific Southwest Region of the Federal Water 1�--� Pollution Control Administration, for the significant progress the City of Redding has made in water pollution control. Redding Sof.tball League MOTION: Made by Councilman A.nderson, seconded by Councilman Chatfield approving the request of the Redding Softball League for permiss�ion to sell beer at the Redding Annual Invitational Softball �. "�� Tournament to be held July 19th and 20th at the City of Redding Softball Park. The Vote: Unanimous A.yes A.mbulance Permits Letters were received from the following ambulance companies cur;rently.operating in the City of Redding requesting permission to continue to operate in Redding: Professional Ambulance Ser- vice, Redding Ambulance, American Ambulance, and ABC Ambu- lance. Ordinance No. 999 requires that such requests be filed for consideration by Council. Rate schedules were also filed by the aforementioned companies as required by said ordinance . i � City A.ttorney Murphy said it would be normal to blanket in existing �(�� ambulance companies and then, at the 'tirne of renewal two and a half years hence, to review the public convenience and necessity � at that time and determine whether a greater or lesser number is � required. Mr, Murphy said this raises.the. question of the Redding Ambulance Company which desires to obtain a license for one of their ambulances which operates out of Anderson. Council has the power to blanket it in or the power to inve.stigate•.and defer a decision until all.of the facts are known as to public convenience and!neces sity. Mr. Murphy said that Council must also consider the rate structure and, since Council has no information as to the adequacy or in- adequacy of the rates , it can either approve these rate schedules or gr.ant temporary approval and refer the matter to the Council Ambulance Committee. Mr, Murphy suggested that Council give temporary approval to the rate structure and refer the matter to the. Council Committee, together- with the matter of the Anderson ambulanc e. � � 112 MOTION: Made by Councilman A.nderson, seconded by Councilman Chatfield that Council has determined that the public convenience and necessity require the ambulance service provided by Professional Ambulance Company (2 vehicles); Redding A.mbulance (2 vehicles but not including their A.nderson ambulance; A.merican Ambulance (1 vehicle); and A.BC Ambulance (1 vehicle), that the rate structures of said companies be temporarily approved until the Council Committee has. had an opportunity to review same, and that the need for the A.nderson ambulance to operate in the City of Redding be reviewed by the Council Comrriittee and a recommendation made to Council. The Vote: Unanimous A.yes Shasta Union Hi�h School District . Councilman Denny.abstained from discussion and voting in this matter .' Mr. Koenig, Business Manager for the Shasta Union High Sehool District, appeared before Council stating that the Board of Trustees of the District adopted Resolution 3584 which says it is considering dedication of a portion of Pioneer Drive to the City of Redding, pro- viding a provision is included that there shall be no parking in this area from 10:00 a.m. to 2:00 p,m. on any school day. The purpose of the parking restriction is to provide control of vending merchants who sell lunches and it also would negate student parkimg. ;� Public Works Director A.rness recorru7lended that portions of this � � street now owned by the Di strict b.e=posted "No Parking at any Time" . I � A. Vu Graph was shown illustrating the parking limitations . Mr. Koenig said he was certain that the District woulcl have no objection to the parking restrictions recommended by Mr , A.rness . MOTION: Made by Councilman Chatfield, seconded by Councilman A.nderson instructing the City A.ttorney to prepare a resolution re parking prohibition on a portion of Pioneer Drive for consideration by Council. The Vote: Unanimous A.yes with Councilman Denny abstaining. Legislation A. communication was received from the A.lameda County Mayors' Conference requesting Council to actively oppose AB 2057 and SB 347 . This item was tabled as it was felt that the Redding City ,�i,,� Council does not have a direct interest in the legislation nor'd�oes it have all of the facts available to take action either way. A.sphalt Cowboys MOTION: Made by Councilman Chatfield, seconded by Councilman Anderson approving the request of the A.sphalt Cowboys for per- �� mission to use Lake Redding Park on Sunday, July 20th for the ,�- A.nnual Community Barbecue, and authorization to sell:beer in the area west of the trestle. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes APPROVA.L OF CLA.IMS AND PA.YROLL MOTION: Made by Councilman Anderson, seconded by Councilman Denny that Special Civic A.uditorium Project A.ccount No. 1 , warrant nos . 13-7 to 139, inclusive, in the amount of $160, 880 .60 be approved and paid; that Accounts Payable Register No. 25 , warrant nos . 3850 to 4024, inclusive , in the amount of $65,856.49 and A.ccounts Payable Register No. 1 (1969-70), warrant nos . 4025 to 4109, inclusive, in the I l� � amount of $79, 549 .78, be approved and paid, and that Payroll Register No. 26, warrant nos� 23111 to 23402, inclusive , salaries in the amount of $75 ,773. 03 for the period June 8, 1969 through June 21 , 1969 be approved. Total $382, 059.90 Voting was as follows: Ayes° Councilmen - A:nderson, Chatfield, Denny, Fulton, and Moty Noes: Councilmen - None Absent: Councilmen - None r* 113 CLAIMS FOR DA.MAGES - lst hearing Dawain E. Jensen - Claim filed 6/26/69 MOTION: Made by Councilman Denny, seconded by Councilman Fulton that the Claim for Damages filed by Dawain E. Jensen on June 26, 1969 be referred to the City A.ttorney and the City %�-3 Insurance Carrier, and the City Clerk be instructed to reset the Claim on the Agenda for the meeting of A.ugust 4, 1969. The Vote: Unanimous A.yes General Foods Corp. (Richard Wright) - Claim filed 6/12/69 MOTION: IVlade by Councilman Denny, seconded by Councilman Fulton that the Claim for Damages filed by General Foods Corp. � on June 12, 1969 be referred to the City Attorney and the City /�� Insurance Carrier, and the City Clerk be instructed to reset the Claim on the A.genda for the meeting of August 4, 1969. The Vote: Unanimous A.yes SETTLEMENT OF CLAIM FOR DAMA.GES City Attorney Murphy advised Council that the Claim for Damages filed /�� by I,. C. Phillips on June 10, 1969 has been settled by the Insurance Car:rier in the amount of $30. 86. POLICE RESERVE PROGRA.M Councilman Denny reviewed the Council Committee Report regarding the City of Redding Police Reserve Program in which it was recommended that such program not be reactivated at this time, but that the concept of a police reserve program should be reviewed periodically as an element in the basic police program and also as a possible element in emergency, disaster, and civil defense programs. ��� In answer to Councilman Fulton's inquiry regarding how frequently per- iodic reviews should occur, Councilman Denny said it is his feeling that if it appears at any time that such a program is required, either Council or staff could request a study, but he would think that Council would rely on the Police Department expressing a need for such a program. Council- man A.nderson concurred. Councilman Chatfield believes that the ordinance now in effect re the police program is inadequate. Mayor Moty concurred, and said he thinks that the time may come when it will be very desirable or necessary for the Police Department to have a reserve program, and believes the City should have the legal framework to accomplish this in an orderly manner. The Mayor feels this should be worked on now and an adequat e ordinance adopted by Council; also, that the present police reserve ordinance should be rescinded. The subject of emergency situations was.discussed and it was brought out that in an emergency the City can caTl on all law enforcement agencies in the area. Councilrnan Denny said it might be well for Council to direct staff to confirm and formalize just what law enforcement resources are available to the City in an emergency situation. With Council approval, the Mayor directed the City Manager and staff to give fur.ther consideration to these problems discussed and, if necessary, confer with the representative of the International A.ssociation of Chiefs of Police. . MOTION: Made by Councilman A.nderson, seconded by Councilman Chatfield accepting the recommendations of the Council Committee re the Police Reserve Program. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes A.IRPORT COMMITTEE ACTIVITIES Councilman Denny reported that, prior to Councilman Doherty's resigna- tion from Council, he and Mr. Doherty met with the County Committee ��fY/� and explored many facets of a Capital Improvement Program for the Redding Municipal Airport. The Council Committee, with Councilman 114 Anderson replacing Mr. Doherty, has met twice with the County Executive Officer, the City Attorney, and County Counsel, and considerable progress has been made: The Board of Supervisors has had an opportunity to review the A.irport Master -Plari, and � representatives of the County assure us the Board is fully aware of the problems in carrying out a capital improvement program at the airport. The Board of Supervisors is very desirous of Shasta County continuing to have the best airport facility that it can possibly have. The Board recognizes the importance of having a commercial airport terminal in this area. The Joint Committee met this noon and va•rious po'ssibilities were considered; i.e. , to continue as at present with the City continuing to provide the'funds for capital improvements is beyond the City's capabilities. Any kind of voluntary arrangement whereby the County would contribute a certain amount is not suitable to the County. The City Attorney and others have argued for a Joint Powers A.greement but the Council Committee was told today that the Board probably would not wish to enter into this type of arrangement. The Council Committee believes that an airport district is the best answer under these circumstances . The County Committee Members agree that, from their point of view, an airport district is the best answer . Both City and County representatives realize that the chance for such a district to be formed through a county-wide election is certainly not assured. There is a risk involved in presenting this to the electorate; if it loses , the Board would have to consider the defeat a mandate from the people not'to support the airport. But the Committee feels that the argument� for preserving and further developing an excellent terminal facility here are so strong that the chances of succeeding in such an election are very good, once the electorate is educated.' An area that is not able to be served by jet planes is going to become second rate economically. A.ir service is just as important as rail and water service has been in the past. The Members of the Joint Committee have agreed to come to their respective Boards and request support in making an application to LA.FCO for a district, Details have not been worked out as to who should make the application. County repre- sentatives have stated that all members of the Board of Supervisors would support such an application, and the Council Comtnittee is hope- ful that Council will also support the application. It is hoped that an election can be held within one year. It is the under- standing of the Joint Committee that if a district were formed, the other airports in the district (Shingletown and Fall River) wbuld become part of the district. Council could decide whether Benton should become part of the district. It was pointed out that one of the adva 'ntages of forming an airport district is that the district would have t�:xing powers and additional money can be raised by issuing bonds. In conclusion Mr. Denny said the Coitncil Committee will have a recommendation on the A.genda for the meeting of July 21 st. R. W. BECK PROPOSA.L - City Electrical System In a memo to Council dated July l , 1969, the City Manager recommended that Council approve the City entering into a contract with R. W, Beck and A.ssociates to upgrade the City's electrical system. The cost of the work to be performed under Phase I, II, and IV of the proposal would be $15 ,300; however, the scope cannot be established entirely ahead 'of time �;Ir� for Phase III. The cost of the work for Phase III will be as indicated under � Paragraph 2, Page 9 of the Beck proposal. MOTION: Made by Councilman Chatfield, seconded by Councilman Fulton approving the contract with R. W. Beck and Associates and authorizing the Mayor to sign said contract on behalf of the City, subject to limiting Phase III to a maximum of $5, 000. , and any amount in excess of $5, 000. requires Council approval. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes ,.� 115 PERSONNEL BUDGET INFORMATION Members of Council were presented with a booklet entitled "Personnel j,f��� Budget Information, 1969-70, for their information and review. EMPLOYER-EMPLOYEE RELA.TIONS A. recommendation re appropriate bargaining units - employer-employee relations , was submitted in a memo to Council dated July 3 , 1969 from the City Manager, Assistant City Manager , and Personnel Director. In a di s cus s ion of thi s matter the point wa s rais ed a�s to whethe r• it would be proper for Council to approve said bargaining units and then appoint a Municipal Employee Relations Officer as provided in Resolu- tion No. 4217, or if it would be in order to first appoint a Municipal Employee Relations Officer who would?make a determination as to the appropriate bargaining units. City A.ttorney Murphy said that Council could proceed in either of the aforesaid manners; that the Staff Committee had recommended appro- priate bargaining units for consideration by Council this evening and , �, given notice to all employee organizations . Since the IBEW, who has =��/ , requested recognition, has not appeared at the Council meeting tonight, it is not mandatory that a determination of bargaining units be made this evening. Moe Finn, representing Local 22 of the Business Service Employees Union, appeared before Council stating that, in his opinion, the present law is ambiguous and will get the City into nothing but trouble. He feels that the new State law is no different than it was before, and that the final determination is up to the City Council. Mr. Finn referred to the fine relationship his union has had with the City with respect shown on both sides, and said his union is going to do business just as they have always done. He is opposed to bargaining units . He thinks unions, as well as government, have to show their responsibility to the community. Mr. Finn further stated that he does not believe the IBEW should represent building and maintenance employees but that if any such employees want such representation, it is up to them. City A.ttorney Murphy said that City staff has , in the past, entirely agreed with Moe Finn's views :as to the relationship between employee organizations and the City, and staff pleaded with representatives of the IBEW to allow the relationship to remain informal. Mr. 'Murphy said Resolution No. 4217 has come about entirely as a result of the IBEW request for recognition. A.fter the IBEW requested formal recognition in their letter of June 9th, the Council had no choice but to ' adopt Resolution No. 4217 in order to provide rules and procedures with which to operate in compliance .with the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act of 1968. The resolution is a reaction of the Council to the request of the IBEW and not something that would have been initiated by Council in the absence of such request. Mr . Murphy, in answer to a question raised by Mr. Finn, .pointed out that in the case of the Los Angeles County Employees Association vs . the Board of Supervisors of Los Angeles County, the Superior Court upheld an ordinance similar to the City's resolution and that the Employees A.ssociation did not appeal to a higher court from that decis,ion, and that this is the only judicial testing that has occurred thus far in the State of this type of�resolution. City Manager Cowden then recommended the appointment of the Municipal Employee Relations Officer and recornmended that action re bargaining units be deferred. The City Attorney joined in that recommendation. Mayor Moty then nominated A.ssistant City Manager Brickwood for appointment as the City's Municipal Employee Relations Officer. MOTION: Made by Councilman Denny, seconded by Councilman Chatfield appointing A.ssistant City Manager Brickwood as the Municipal Employee Relations Officer. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes 116 MOTION: Made by Councilman Chatfield, seconded by Councilman Denny that the IBEW lett.er of June 9th requestin'g, recognition be , referred to the Municipal Employee Relations Officer for action in accordance with Resolution No. 4217. , The Vote: Unanimous A.yes At this point in the meeting, Councilman Chatfield left the meeting temporarily. TRUNK SEWER FEE Public Works Director Arness submitted the revised Construction Cost Index as of June 30 , 1969 as follows: Engineering News-Record 330 West 42nd Street New York, N.Y. 10036 - June 19, 1g69 ;��� Construction Cost Index - June 19, 1969 ,J San Francisco, California - 1475. 00 The revised index places the trunk sewer construction fee prescribed under Section 23-7(c) , Redding City Code at $528.05. MOTION: Made by Councilman Denny, seconded by Councilman Fulton approving the trunk sewer construction fee at $528.05 per acre for the period July 1 , 1969 through December 31 , 1969 . The Vote: Unanimous Aye s NOTICE OF COMPLETION - Linden Canyon Sewer Line Extension MOTION: Made by Councilman Anderson, seconded by Councilman Fulton accepting all items of work re Linden Canyon 8-inch sewer line extension, ,�1 � Bid Schedule No. 489, as completed satisfactorily, and instructing the C,�f �� City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion. The Vote: Unanimous A.yes ��� A.t this pbint, Councilman Chatfield re-entered the meeting. TRA.FFIC SIGNA.LIZA.TION NEEDS Public Works Director Arness submitted a study of signalization needs dated July 3rd, for Council information. This study indicates that signalization of the intersections of Court and Yuba, and California and ;J �� Tehama are not warranted. There was some discussion regarding � � signalization at these and other intersections in the City: No action wa s taken by C ouncil. PUBLIC WORKS PROGRESS REPORT Public Works Director A.rness submitted the Public Works Progress Report for June, .1969. Mr. A.rness said that if any members of Council are interested in making a field trip, they may wish to visit one or more ,1'L, of the following projects: Clear Creek Sewage Treatment Plan, Civic 7 A.uditorium, Coagulation Basin, Del Mar drainage ditch, or Hilltop Road installation of curb and gutter . RESOLUTION - rescinding Res. Nos. 3683 and 3746 re personnel rules MOTION: Made by Councilman Denny, seconded by Councilman Fulton that Resolution No. 4218 be adopted, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding rescinding Resolution No. 3683 and Resolution No. 3746. pertaining to personnel rules. �� Voting was as follows: ,�j` Ayes: Councilmen - A.nderson, Chatfield, Denny, Fulton, and Moty Noes: Councilmen - None Absent: Councilmen - None Resolution No. 4218 on file in the office of the City Clerk. , r 117 ' SUPREME COURT APPEA.L - re Employer-Employee Relations City Attorney Murphy advised Council that the California Supreme Court granted the petition for hearing in the case of Bishop vs. City of San Jose. This is the case wherein more than 100 California ���!,� cities, .including the City of Redding, petitioned the Supreme Court to hear an appeal from the decision of the District Court ruling that a city must pay all city employees doing construction type work the prevailing wages for private construction in that area, LEGISLA.TION - A.B 508 City Attorney Murphy reported that A.B 508 was held up in the Senate � �� Governmental Efficiency Committee and apparently is dead for all practical purposes in this session of the Legislature. EXECUTIVE SESSION - re Settlement of Condemnation A.ction At the hour of 11:00 P.M. , Mayor Moty declared an Executive Session �f��� , re a proposed settlement, City of Redding vs . Warren, et al. At the hour of 11:10 P.M. the meeting was reconvened. City Attorney Murphy recommended that the condemnation action against Don Warren and Irene Warren, his wife, and Eva R. Warren be settled for the sum of $400.00. This action pertains to a permanent sewer ' easement in the Russell-Weldon Sewer Assessment District. MOTION: Made by Councilman Denny, seconded by Councilman A.nderson approving the recomrriendation of the City A.ttorney re settlement of the Warren condemnation action. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes ROUTINE COMMUNICATIONS City of Redding Fire Department Report for Month of May ��� Shasta County Board of Supervisors Notice of Hearing re //��' ` Use Permit Appeal re Shasta Motorcycle Club, Inc. Communication from Harold T. (Bizz) Johnson re legislation -���� for taxing of municipal bonds Communications from San Francisco Bay Conservation and � J� Development Commission and from Citizens' A.11iance to Save ` San Francisco Bay re A.B 2057 and SB 347 i %� ICCCNC minutes of ineeting of June 17, 1969 /� � Shasta-Cascade Wonderland A.ssociation publicity re Annual Sports A.ward event Application for Alcoholic Beverage License - Hilltop Market � � f and Sporting Goods, 2160 Hilltop Drive Communication from State Division of Highways re Functional ; C 3 Classification Study of Roads and Streets LA.FCO notice of Public hearing on July 9, 1969 at 7:15 P.M. re -��� proposed Twin View A.nnex No. 2 to the City of Redding ADJOURNMENT 'I'here be ing no further business, at the hour of 11:15 P.M. , on the motion of Councilman Chatfield, seconded by Councilman A.nderson, the meeting was adjourned. A.PPROVED: A.TTEST: M City Clerk