The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About _ 4.11(b)--Transportation Infrastructure Agmt & Budget Reso for Hartnell Commercial ComplexREPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: May 6, 2025 FROM: Michael Webb, Public Works ITEM NO. 4.11(b) Director ***APPROVED BY*** AcaOubl4iclorksWD'trectcr 4f251202: mwebb@cityofredding.org btippin@cityofredding.org SUBJECT: 4.11(b)--Transportation Infrastructure Agreement for Hartnell Commercial Recommendation Authorize and approve the following actions related to the Hartnell Commercial Complex located at the southeast corner of Hartnell Avenue and Shasta View Drive: (1) Authorize the Mayor to execute the Transportation Infrastructure Agreement with North State Grocery, Inc.; (2) Adopt Resolution approving and adopting the 77th Amendment to City Budget Resolution No. 2023-060 appropriating funds in the amount $2,477,350 for Fiscal Year 2024-25; (3) Authorize the City Manager or designee to approve amendments; and (4) Find that the action is categorically exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, pursuant to Section 15301 — Existing Facilities. Fiscal Impact The City of Redding's (City) Shasta View Drive Improvements Project (Project), including developer conditioned infrastructure associated with the Hartnell Commercial Complex development (Development) is estimated to be approximately $4.1 million of which, includes project development and construction costs. North State Grocery, Inc. (NSG) has agreed to contribute $977,347 to the project, the value of their Use Permit conditioned improvements associated with their development. In addition to the NSG's funding, the project is funded by the Transportation Development Impact Fee Program (TIF) ($700,000), the Streets Department ($923,000) and Redding Electric Utility (REU) ($1,500,000). Sufficient funding for the project is available within each of the respective City Departments Fiscal Year 2024-25 Budgets. Report to Redding City Council April 30, 2025 Re: 4.11 (b)-- Transportation Infrastructure Agmt & Budget Reso for Hartnell Commercial Complex Page 2 Alternative Action The City Council (Council) could decide not to approve the Transportation Infrastructure Agreement (Traffic Agreement), in which case NSG would only construct partial improvements as conditioned in the Use Permit and the full proposed improvements along Shasta View Drive would not be constructed until a later date. Background/Analysis On July 20, 2021, the Council approved the Use Permit (Use Permit UP-2020-01669) to construct the Hartnell Commercial Complex at the southeast corner of Hartnell Avenue and Shasta View Drive, which consists of a 30,000-square-foot Holiday Market Grocery Store and five outer pads for retail. The conditions of development for the project require various transportation related infrastructure improvements including, but not limited to, full frontage improvements along both Hartnell Avenue and Shasta View Drive adjacent to the development boundaries, the Hartnell/Shasta View intersection, and improvements along Shasta View Drive north of Hartnell Avenue to approximately 573 feet north of Kerry Avenue. The Shasta View Drive Improvements project (attached 60% plans) includes: widening to provide one travel lane in each direction; a two-way center left -turn lane; five-foot bike lanes on both sides; a five-foot sidewalk, curb and gutter on both sides; Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) curb ramps and corner bulb -outs at all cross streets and driveways; storm drain pipe and catch basin relocations; asphalt concrete resurfacing and tie-ins; pavement striping and markings; signage; and relocation of overhead electrical lines to underground. While the conditioned improvements along Shasta View north of Hartnell meet the needs of the development's immediate traffic impact to the local roadway system, staff recommends that this segment of Shasta View be constructed to the ultimate section by providing much needed sidewalk along both sides of the roadway, undergrounding of overhead electrical lines to provide an obstruction free pedestrian path of travel, traffic calming measures for side street connections and roadway pavement rehabilitation. The development has completed all frontage and intersection improvements. Many of these roadway improvements are included in the City's TIF Program under Minor Projects that increase capacity related to roadway widening and pedestrian and bicycle facilities and are, therefore, eligible for project costs in accordance with Chapter 16.20 of the Redding Municipal Code. By completing the improvement of the roadway to its ultimate section, it is likely to reduce the amount of traffic related offsite improvements that may become the burden of other future development in the area as the roadway will have added capacity that will mitigate increased traffic demand by development. In accordance with the agreement, NSG will provide design services for delivery of the project and a fair share payment accounting for the costs of the conditioned improvements. The construction of the project will be delivered via a public works contract, awarded by the Council, and administered by staff and/or consultant. The anticipated total cost for the project including design, construction management, and construction is estimated to be $4.1 million. Should the Council approve the agreement, construction of the transportation improvements should begin in fall 2025 and be completed the following summer. The agreement has been approved as to form by the City Attorney. Report to Redding City Council April 30, 2025 Re: 4.11 (b)-- Transportation Infrastructure Agmt & Budget Reso for Hartnell Commercial Complex Page 3 Environmental Review Staff has reviewed the action and determined that it is categorically exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, pursuant to Section 15301 — Existing Facilities. Class 1 exemptions include the permitting, leasing, and operation of public or private structures, facilities, mechanical equipment, or topographical features that involve negligible or no expansion of existing or former use. Future transportation improvements will be subject to separate review under CEQA. Approval of the Traffic Agreement has no potential to have a significant effect on the environment. Council Priority/City Manager Goals • Economic Development — "Facilitate and become a catalyst for economic development in Redding to create jobs, retain current businesses and attract new ones, and encourage investment in the community." Attachments ^Resolution ^Location Map ^Transportation Infrastructure Agreement ^Exhibit A ^Exhibit B A60% Design Plans 72021-Use Permit - Shasta View Dr Improvements (large file) NOE Traffic Agreement —North State Grocery, Inc. RESOLUTION NO.2025- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF REDDING APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE 77cH AMENDMENT TO CITY BUDGET RESOLUTION NO. 2023-060 APPROPRIATING $2,477,350 CONTRIBUTED FUNDING FROM NORTH STATE GROCERY, INC (NSG) TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE AGREEMENT FOR THE SHASTA VIEW DRIVE IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024-2025 BE IT RESOL VED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING THAT Budget Resolution No. 2023-060 be and is hereby amended as follows: FUND DIVISION DESCRIPTION INCREASE DECREASE 1.51 1671 Transportation. Grant Projects $977,350 211 8095 REU — CapitaUGeneral System $1,500,000 Improvements THAT account titles and numbers requiring adjustments by this Resolution are as follows: USE SOURCE OF FUNDS OF FUNDS Increase (Decrease) Revenue 151-1671-3731001-00000 Contributions - Public Works $ 977,350 211-8095-2910000-00000 Fund Balance $ 1,500,000 Increase Expenditures 151-1671-6711021-00000 Designated Expenses $ 977,350 211-8095-7800010-00000 Underground Conduits $ 1,500,000 Total $ 2,477,350 $ 2,477,350 THAT the purpose is to appropriate $2,477,350 in contributed funding for the Shasta View Drive Improvements project for the fiscal year 2024-2025. I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the 6th day of May, 2025, and was duly adopted at said meeting by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ATTEST: SHARLENE TIPTON, City Clerk JACK MUNNS, Mayor CHRISTIAN M. CURTIS, City Attorney AVE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CITY -NORTH STATE GROCERY TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS SHASTA VIEW DRIVE NORTH PROJECT n§00E09DffW This Agreement is entered into by and between the CITY OF REDDING, a municipal corporation ("CITY"), and NORTH STATE GROCERY, INC., a California corporation ("NSG") A: NSG intends to construct a grocery store and five retail pads with the Hartnell Commercial Complex Project (the "Development") on land they own along Hartnell Avenue and Shasta View Drive in East Redding (the "Development Property"). 13: The Development is the subject of Use Permit 2020-01669 approved by the CITY (the "Use Permit") incorporated herein by reference. C. Use Permit Development Standards and Regulations condition 20 includes Street Improvement and Transportation Mitigation Measures (the "Use Permit Transportation Improvements") that are consistent with General Plan and City of Redding Construction Standards (CORCS). D. The CITY desires to partner with NSG to construct additional improvements above and beyond the Use Permit Transportation Improvements to ensure a safe and efficient transportation corridor along Shasta View Drive for all transportation users and NSG seeks to accommodate this desire provided it does not result in delay or unforeseen expense to the Development. E. The CITY and NSG intend to construct improvements generally consisting of widening Shasta View Drive north of Hartnell Avenue to provide a three -lane road section with bike lanes, sidewalks on both sides, modified curb returns and pedestrian crossings and other improvements as defined in this Agreement (the "Project'). F. The purpose of this Agreement is to facilitate construction and financial responsibility for the Project. G. This Agreement is separate from and does not modify, amend, or replace any other agreement between parties regarding the Development nor obligation for payment of any other fees, impact fees, charges, permits or any other requirements associated with the Development. Transportation Infrastructure Agreement Page 1 City of Redding — North State Grocery, Inc. Transportation Infrastrucure Agreement NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the above recitals which are deemed a material and substantive part of this Agreement, and for other good and valuable consideration the receipt and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: 3.1 NSG Transportation Improvements ("NSG Improvements") - For purposes hereof, the term "NSG Improvements" includes all transportation structures, facilities and improvements identified in Exhibit A and Exhibit B of this agreement as NSG responsibility. 3.2. Design and Permitting of the Project — At the direction of the CITY, NSG shall be responsible for all aspects of design of the CITY and NSG Improvements of the Project as identified in Exhibit A and Exhibit B at their own cost and expense without contribution from the CITY and in accordance with the related Use Permit conditions and CORCS. This includes, project design, utility coordination, support for construction permitting, preparation of plans, specifications and estimates, design services during construction and construction plan development. The estimated cost for this work is $275,000 which shall be reimbursed from the NSG Payment by the CITY to NSG per section 3.4. 3.3. Payment for NSG Improvements — NSG shall pay CITY the sum of $977,347 as payment in full for the NSG Improvements ("NSG Payment") as shown on Exhibit A. The NSG Payment shall be due and payable within 60 days of the effective date of this agreement. 3A Reimbursement for Design and Permitting — CITY shall reimburse NSG for the actual costs of Design and Permitting of Project as defined in section 3.2 and Exhibit A. NSG shall submit to the CITY a proposed estimated budget for completion of the work including standard project development tasks and their associated costs for review and approval, which approval shall not be unreasonable withheld, conditioned, or delayed. The CITY shall, within five (5) business days, approve the proposed budget, or provide to NSG a statement of changes required to be made in order for the proposed budget to be approved. Once approved by the City, the proposed budget as modified by change orders is referred to herein as the "Approved Budget." NSG shall submit funding requests as frequently as monthly to the City for Work completed to the date of the funding request. All funding requests shall include backup documentation sufficient to show the tasks worked on and actual costs incurred during the period in which work was completed. Transportation Infrastructure Agreement Page 2 City of Redding •- North State Grocery, Inc. Transportation Infrastrucure Agreement Within ten (10) business days after receipt of a funding request from NSG, the City Public Works Engineering Division shall approve the complete funding request or only a portion of the funding request in its reasonable discretion and notify NSG. The CITY shall not disapprove a funding request that conforms with the Approved Budget and is accompanied by the backup documentation required above. If the City Public Works Engineering Division disapproves any amount requested by NSG in a disbursement request, the CITY shall promptly notify NSG of the disapproved amount and the reason for disapproval. If any item in a disbursement request is disapproved, the representatives of NSG and the CITY shall meet promptly and in good faith to attempt to resolve the matter to their mutual satisfaction. All correct, complete and undisputed funding requests sent by NSG to CITY shall be paid within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt. 3.5. Fulfillment of NSG Responsibilities — By complying with sections 3.2 and 3.3, NSG shall be deemed to have fully satisfied condition 20(a),20(b) and the restriping and asphaltic seal of condition 21 of Use Permit 2020-01669. 4.1 City Transportation Improvements - For purposes hereof, the term "CITY Improvements" includes all transportation structures, facilities and improvements identified in Exhibit A and Exhibit B of this agreement as CITY responsibility. 4.2. Construction of the Project— CITY shall be responsible for permitting and construction of CITY and NSG Improvements identified in Exhibit A and Exhibit B and described below including advertisement, award, and administration of construction contract for the Project at their own cost and expense without contribution from NSG. The City reserves the right, at its sole discretion, to construct CITY Project using multiple public works construction contracts. 4.2.1 Shasta View Drive North Transportation Improvement Project — CITY will construct the Shasta View Drive North improvements as identified in Exhibit A and Exhibit B under one public works construction contract. The improvements generally include widening to provide one travel lane in each direction, a center turn lane, five-foot bike lanes on both sides, a five-foot sidewalk, curb and gutter on both sides, ADA curb ramps and corner bulb outs at all cross streets, driveways, storm drain pipe and catch basin relocations, asphalt concrete resurfacing and tie-ins, pavement striping and markings, signage and relocation of overhead electrical lines to underground. The improvements will approximately take Transportation Infrastructure Agreement Page 3 City of Redding — North State Grocery, Inc. Transportation Infrastrucure Agreement place along Shasta View Drive from Hartnell Avenue to 573 feet north of Kerry Avenue. The term of this Agreement shall commence as of the date it is signed by all parties and shall terminate on the satisfaction and performance of all of the parties' obligations hereunder, unless terminated in accordance with the conditions identified herein. 6.1. NSG hereby agrees to protect, defend, indemnify, and hold harmless, City, its officers, directors, employees and agents (individually, a "Related Party"; collectively, the "Related Parties") from and against any and all claims, actions, liabilities, damages, losses, expenses, judgments, demands, penalties, reasonable defense costs, and damage or liability, including those resulting from death or injury to persons or damage to or destruction of property, to the extent arising directly or indirectly out of the construction of the NSG Improvements or the other related obligations or operations herein undertaken by NSG, or caused in whole or in part by any negligent act or omission of NSG, any subcontractors, anyone directly or indirectly employed by NSG or anyone for whose acts NSG may be responsible, including, but not limited to, concurrent, active or passive negligence, except where caused by the negligence or willful misconduct of the CITY, any contractors, subcontractors or anyone directly or indirectly employed by the CITY or anyone for whose acts the CITY may be responsible. NSG will conduct all defenses at its sole cost and expense and CITY shall have the right to approve or disapprove legal counsel retained to defend CITY, such approval not to be unreasonably withheld. CITY shall be reimbursed for all costs and reasonable attorneys fees incurred by CITY in enforcing this obligation as part of its judgement. This indemnity shall apply to all claims and liability regardless of whether any insurance policies are applicable. The policy limits do not act as a limitation on the amount of indemnification to be provided by NSG. 6.2 CITY hereby agrees to protect, defend, indemnify, and hold harmless, NSG and each of their respective officers, directors, employees and agents (individually, a "Related Party"; collectively, the "Related Parties") from and against any and all claims, actions, liabilities, damages, losses, expenses, judgments, demands, penalties, reasonable defense costs, and liability resulting from death or injury to persons or damage to or destruction of property, to the extent arising out of the construction of the CITY Improvements or the Project, and the other related obligations or operations herein undertaken by CITY, or caused in whole or in part by any negligent act or omission of CITY, any contractors, subcontractors, anyone directly or indirectly employed by CITY or anyone for whose acts CITY may be responsible, including, but not limited to, concurrent, active or passive negligence, except where caused by the negligence or Transportation Infrastructure Agreement Page 4 City of Redding — North State Grocery, Inc. Transportation Infrastrucure Agreement willful misconduct of NSG, any contractors, subcontractors or anyone directly or indirectly employed by NSG or anyone for whose acts NSG maybe responsible. CITY will conduct all defenses at its sole cost and expense and NSG shall have the right to approve or disapprove legal counsel retained to defend CITY, such approval not to be unreasonably withheld. NSG shall be reimbursed for all costs and reasonable attorney's fees incurred by NSG in enforcing this obligation as part of its/their judgment. This indemnity shall apply to all claims and liability regardless of whether any insurance policies are applicable. The policy limits do not act as a limitation on the amount of indemnification to be provided by CITY. The CITY and NSG shall coordinate the work of the contractors constructing the Project and all contractors employed by NSG for construction of the Development. The CITY and NSG agree to cooperate with one another in order that the work of the Project shall be completed in a timely manner with no unreasonable delay or unreasonable increase in cost to the work of the other party. Such cooperation may include, by way of example and without limitation, electric and communications utility coordination with the respective stakeholders at the northwest corner of the Shasta View Drive and Hartnell Avenue intersection. In the event that a condition occurs which may cause a delay or increase in cost to the work of the other party, the parties will meet and confer in good faith to discuss a resolution no later than five (5) calendar days after one party gives written notice to the other pursuant to Section 22. If the parties cannot agree on a resolution, the needs of the CITY to construct the CITY Improvements set forth in Exhibit A shall take precedence. NSG shall consent to the written good faith determination of the CITY with regard to precedence of work to resolve a delay or increase in cost resulting from the work and both hereby waive any claim or right of action in law or equity relating to any such delay that may occur as a result of City's good faith final determination. R�1 A-MV11111163F11301 CITY will assume responsibility for all environmental, construction or other studies, permits or approvals required in connection with the construction of the Project. This responsibility includes, without limitation, any construction required in connection with environmental resource agencies, public or private utility owners and the California Department of Transportation. Transportation Infrastructure Agreement Page 6 City of Redding — North State Grocery, Inc. Transportation Infrastrucure Agreement ZJJJJJL��q� Failure or unreasonable delay by any party to perform any material term or provision of this Agreement constitutes a default under this Agreement. The party who so fails or unreasonably delays must immediately commence to cure, correct, or remedy such a failure or delay and shall complete such cure, correction, or remedy with reasonable diligence. The injured party shall give written notice of default to the party in default, specifying, in detail, the default complained of by the injured party and steps which must be taken to cure the default. Except as required to protect against further damages or as otherwise provided in this Agreement, the injured party may not institute proceedings against the party in default or take other action with respect to the default until ten (10) business days after giving such notice. The rights, duties, and obligations of this Agreement may only be assigned by NSG with the prior written consent of CITY and the assumption by the assignee of all of the obligations of this Agreement. Any assignment to which CITY has not consented shall be of no force and effect and if not timely cured following the required notice, shall constitute a material breach and default of this Agreement. In determining whether to approve an assignment, the CITY may, in its discretion, consider the financial capability of the assignee to comply with the terms of this Agreement. The captions of the sections and subsections of this Agreement are for convenience only and shall not be deemed relevant in resolving any question of interpretation or intent. 3400� �--. The invalidity in whole or in part of any provision of this Agreement shall not void or affect the validity of any other provision. In the event of any legal action brought to enforce or interpret any term or terms of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to its reasonable attorneys' fees and court costs, in addition to any other relief to which it is entitled as part of its judgement. A. This Agreement and the attached exhibits represent the entire and integrated Agreement between CITY and NSG regarding the subject matter hereof, and Transportation Infrastructure Agreement Page 6 City of Redding — North State Grocery, Inc. Transportation Infrastrucure Agreement supersedes all prior arrangements and understandings between the parties. This Agreement may be amended only by written instrument signed by CITY and NSG. B. This Agreement shall be construed as only addressing the improvements and impact fees specifically addressed herein. It is not intended to address the disposition or liability for any other impact fee or other fee, charge or cost that may be otherwise due under the Redding Municipal Code. The undersigned hereby represent and warrant that they are authorized by the parties to execute this Agreement. In the event of a dispute between any of the parties hereto over the meaning of this Agreement, or any part thereof, no party shall be deemed to have been the drafter hereof, and the principle of law that contracts are construed against the drafter does not apply, This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. I No waiver of any breach of any covenant or provision herein contained shall be valid unless in writing nor shall it be deemed a waiver of any preceding or succeeding breach thereof or of any other covenant or provision herein contained. No extension of time for performance of any obligation or act shall be deemed an extension of the time for performance of any other obligation or act. IOEIIEIJIM5� Time is of the essence with respect to each term and condition of this Agreement. This Agreement is made solely for the benefit of NSG and the CITY, and their respective successors and assigns, and no other person or entity shall have or acquire any rights by virtue of this Agreement. Transportation Infrastructure Agreement Page 7 City of Redding— North State Grocery, Inc. Transportation Infrastrucure Agreement Formal notices, demands, and other communications between the CITY and NSG shall be sufficiently given if personally delivered, or dispatched by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt required, to the principal offices of the CITY and NSG, CITY NSG: City of Redding North State Grocery, Inc. Attention: City Engineer Attn: Legal and Accounting 777 Cypress Avenue PO Box 439 Redding, CA 96001 20803 Front Street (courier only) Cottonwood, CA 96022 WITH COPIES TO: Such written notices, demands, and other communications may be sent in the same manner to such other addresses as either party may from time to time designate by mail as provided in this paragraph. Notice shall be deemed effective upon: 1) personal service; or 2) three (3) business days after mailing, whichever is earlier. 22. NONLIABILITY OF CITY OFFICIALS AND EMPLOYEES No member, elected official, or employee of the CITY shall be personally liable to NSG, or any successor in interest, in the event of any default or breach by the CITY of this Agreement or for any amount that may become due to NSG, or successor pursuant to this Agreement. The CITY has the right at all reasonable times, upon written notice, to inspect NSG's books and records pertaining to this Agreement. NSG has the right at all reasonable times, upon written request, to inspect the books and records of the CITY pertaining to this Agreement. These inspection rights shall not apply to confidential or proprietary information. The relationship between the parties to this Agreement is not that of a partnership or joint venture, and no party shall be deemed or construed for any purpose to be the agent of another party. The CITY and NSG are independent contractors under the Agreement. Transportation Infrastructure Agreement Page 8 City of Redding — North State Grocery, Inc. Transportation Infrastrucure Agreement Holiday -4-2-25 updated with Inc. No waivers, changes, amendments, or alterations shall be effective unless for good cause, evidenced in writing, and signed by all parties. Minor amendments which do not result in a substantial or functional change to the original intent of the Agreement and do not cause an increase to the maximum amount payable under this Agreement by any party, including, without limitation and notwithstanding Section 19 hereof, extensions of time for performance, may be agreed to in writing among NSG and the City Manager acting on behalf of the CITY without action by the City Council. All Exhibits attached to this Agreement are hereby incorporated into the Agreement in their totality. This Agreement may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which shall be deemed a duplicate original, and all of which, taken together, shall constitute the same instrument. This Agreement shall be executed only by a pen and ink signature, but it may be delivered by facsimile or by email with a pdf attachment of a signed counterpart. [Signatures on following page(s)] Transportation Infrastructure Agreement Page 9 City of Redding — North State Grocery, Inc. Transportation Infrastrucure Agreement IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the days and years set forth below. Dated. 2025 By: jACK MUNNS, Mayor City Attorney By: By: Brad Askeland, President Tax ID No: 68-0173691 Transportation Infrastructure Agreement Page 10 City of Redding — North State Grocery, Inc. Transportation Infrastrucure Agreement Holiday -4-2-25 updated with Inc. Exhibit A Proportionate Share of Project Responsibility and Estimated Costs Description NSG Improvements (see Exhibit B for more detail) City Improvements (see Exhibit B for more detail) Total Est. Cost Engineer Reimbursable costs UP Condition Scope of Proportionate Share Est. Cost Scope of Proportionate Share Est. Cost Est. Cost Comments Shasta View Drive North Widening structural section, tie in paving an Hartnel) to Christian; Westside C&G N. of Christian; NSG to provide engineering and proportionate Westside driveways; RRFB's; storm drain DI's and AC resurfacing; storm drain DI and pipe at Wilson construction share, City to construct including Project 3-lane road section 20(a) pipe abutting SVD curb $ 529,977.00 and Christian $ 860,811.00 $ 1,390,788.00 $ 94,638.75 Delivery and Construction Oversight Eastsi e sidewalk, ADA ramp bulb outs and driveways Westside si ewa ; eastside sidewalk, C&G and NSG to provide engineering and proportionate to Christian Ln; Westside ADA ramp bulb outs at driveways north of Christian; Westside ADA ramp construction share, City to construct including Project 5 foot sidewalks 20(b) crossings $ 370,370.00 bulb outs $ 524,776.00 $ 895,146.00 $ 66,137.50 Delivery and Construction Oversight Underground overhead REU electrical ine and REU to provide engineering and NSG to coordinate Underground Overhead third party communications from Hartnell to private utility relocation and incorporate all into final Utilities $ - Wilson $ 1,750,042.00 $ 1,750,042.00 $ 112,502.70 plans Resurface Hartnell Avenue project frontage with Type 3 Seal and associated restriping within the existing Actual Costs for improvments that City will construct Hartnel surface and striping 21 ROW $ 77,000.00 $ - $ 77,000.00 $ - via separate Paving Capital Project Total Costs $ 977,347.00 $ 3,135,629.00 $ 4,112,976.00 $ 273,278.95 *Actual Costs for Engineering to be reimbursed per section 3.4 of the Agreement Transportation Infrastructure Agreement City of Redding — North State Grocery, Inc. CITY OF REDDING PRELIMINARY PROJECT COST ESTIMATE Shasta View Drive North PROJECT NAME Improvements Project ALTERNATE NO. DATE: 1 03/06/25 Iree JECT DESCRIPTION: -lane road section with bike lanes, sidewalks on both sides, modified curb returns, enhanced pedestrian ossings, AC mill and fill, residential driveways, storm drain pipe and catch basins, traffic control devices and pavement striping and markings CLIENT North State Grocery, Streets Division '::306 ORDER NO: IN/A QUANTITIES BY: HOR QTY CHECKED BY: LL UNIT PRICES BY: CV NSG Obligation per COR Obligation per Exhibit B Exhibit B CONTRACT ITEMS UNIT QUANTITY PRICE AMOUNT QUANTITY AMOUNT QUANTITY AMOUNT Demo 1 Street Signs EA 13 500.00 6,500.00 8 4,000.00 5 2,500.00 2 Landscaping SF 5900 2.00 11,800.00 5900 11,800.00 0 0.00 3 Fencing LF 90 25.00 2,250.00 90 2,250.00 0 0.00 4 Concrete Driveway, Gutter CY 600 75.00 45,000.00 25 1,875.00 575 43,125.00 5 Catch Basin EA 7 110,001 770.00 3 330.00 4 440.00 6 Striping LF 8300 1.20 9,960.00 8300 9,960.00 0 0.00 7 Pavement Markings SF 1000 5.00 5,000.00 1000 5,000.00 0 0.00 8 HMA SY 5000 5.50 27,500.00 0 0.00 5000 27,500.00 Concrete 9 C&G LF 4329 50.00 216,450.00 2000 100,000.00 2329 116,450.00 10 Type A Mod Curb Ramp EA 18 12,000.00 216,000.00 10 120,000.00 8 96,000.00 11 4"PCC Sidewalk SF 18143 15.00 272,145.00 8700 130,500.00 9443 141,645.00 12 Driveway Residential SF 5965 23.00 137,195.00 0 0.00 5965 137,195.00 Road Design 13 Agg Base CY 350 275.00 96,250.00 20 5,500.00 330 90,750.00 14 Adjust Utility Cover to Grade EA 19 1,500.00 28,500.00 0 0.00 19 28,500.00 15 HMA (Type A) TON 1248 150.00 187,200.00 624 93,600.00 624 93,600.00 16 Traffic Control LS 1 170,000.00 170,000.00 0.29 50,000.00 0.71 120,000.00 Miscellaneous 17 No.5 Catch Basin EA 7 15,000.00 105,000.00 3 45,000.00 4 60,000.00 18 Water Pollution Control Plan LS 1 2,000.00 2,000.00 0 0.00 1 2,000.00 19 water Pollution Control Plan Implementation LS 1 10,000.00 10,000.00 0 0.00 1 10,000.00 20 Storm Drain Pipe LF 800 25.00 20,000.00 0 0.00 800 20,000.00 21 Rapid Flashing Beacon Crossing EA 2 18,000.00 36,000.00 2 36,000.00 0 0.00 Stripin '.. 22 6" Thermoplastic LF 10000 1.00 10,000.00 10000 10,000,00 0 0.00 23 8" Thermoplastic LF 300 2.20 660.00 300 660.00 0 0,00 24 Type D Two Way Reflective Markers EA 221 30.00 6,630.00 221 6,630.00 0 0,00 25 Pavemnet Markings SF 1000 10.00 10,000.00 1000 10,000.00 0 0.00 Electrical Undergrounding (Eng4by REU, Total not included in calculating Project Development Costs) 26 R.E.U. LS 1 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 0 0.00 1 1,000,000.00 27 Joint Utility Trench LF 1667 90.00 150,030.00 0 0.00 1667 150,030.00 28 AT&T LS 1 50,000.00 50,000.00 0 0.00 1 50,000.00 29 Spectrum LS 1 50,000.00 50,000.00 0 0.00 1 50,000m SUBTOTAL(CONTRACT ITEMS) $ 2,882,840.00 `- - ,.. $ 643,105.00:. $ 2,239,735.00 CONTINGENCIES (15%) $ 432,426.00 $ 96,465.75 '. $ 335,960.25 CONSTRUCTION SUBTOTAL $ 3,315,266.00 '.. $ 739,570.75 $ 2,575,695.25 (Environmental, Design, Plan Review, Permits, Surveys) PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING (10%) $ 288,284.00 $ 160,776.25 ,. $ 127,507J5 (Contract Admin., Inspecting, Testing, Staking) CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING (15%) $ 432,426.00 $ - ':. $ 432,426.00 TOTAL $ 4,035,976.00 $ 900,347.00 $ 3,135,629.00 FUNDING SOURCE: OTHER, STREETS 22% 78% For Budget Purposes, Say: PREPARED BY: I Josh Anthony' COPIES TO: LD's per Capital Improvement & Maint Project Submittal Reqn 50/b *EE Working Days L:\Forms File\Project Cost Estimate Exhibit B E 3 5 Know what's below. Call before you dig. ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS 1USIN SHASTA VIEW DRIVE REDDING, CALIFORNIA PROJECT SITE SHEET LIST INDEX PAGE # SHEET # SHEET TITLE 1 C.1.0 COVER 2 C.1.1 NOTES 3 C.1.2 LEGEND 4 C.1.3 KEY MAP 5 C.2.0 EX. CONDITIONS & DEMOLITION PLAN 6 C.3.0 HARTNELL AVE - HAWN AVE 7 C.3.1 BELLADONNA ST - WILSON AVE 8 C.3.2 CHRISTIAN LN - KERRY AVE 9 C.3.3 KERRY AVE - GOODWATER AVE 10 C.3.4 SIDE STREET PROFILES 11 C.4.0 DETAILS 12 CAA GRADING DETAILS 13 C.4.2 GRADING DETAILS 14 C.4.3 GRADING DETAILS 15 C.5.0 EROSION CONTROL 16 C.6.0 SIGNING AND STRIPING PLAN 17 C.6.1 SIGNING AND STRIPING PLAN C\1 - W —i F- < 0 z U z z III U) U) 3:—0 W 1- 0 = z C\j 0 W Z cr_ ::) U) 00 U) U) (D z LL ry c) z 0 W W of L I L > L L CY) C:) U C14 0 Lj z C-4 m CD 00 (? C14 C:) < z o z z C) WW 0 W 0 101 101 101 m lot of 10-1 FESS/ CO P, 0 p C LU 2i L.L 8pqV� rn 0 C/) z z ry, 0 ry W 2 W > LLIO LL LLJ 0 > 0 z ES 0 W 0 7-22 Holiday Marketplace - Shasta View\Project Data\02 CAD\2.03 Sheet Files\Construction Drawings\CA-6817-22—C.1.0—COVER.dwg - C.1.0 COVER- 2/03/2023 04:41pm, matt.graham E GENERAL NOTES 2 GRADING & DRAINAGE NOTES 3 4 5 UTILITY CONTACTS 1. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH THE CITY OF REDDING CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS, THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION, DATED 2021 (GREENBOOK), AND THE CONTRACT SPECIFICATIONS AS THEY PERTAIN TO THE WORK DEPICTED HEREIN. CORCS AS APPLIES TO THIS PROJECT SHALL BE THE CURRENT VERSION AS POSTED ON THE CITY OF REDDING WEBSITE, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. SEE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARDS SECTION ON THIS SHEET FOR MORE INFORMATION. 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP ON SITE AT ALL TIMES A COPY OF THE APPROVED AND STAMPED CONSTRUCTION PLANS ON WHICH IS RECORDED THE ACTUAL LOCATIONS OF THE CONSTRUCTED UTILITIES AND ANY OTHER UTILITIES ENCOUNTERED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE THESE LOCATIONS TO THE DESIGN ENGINEER. 3. THE CONTRACTOR(S) SHALL REMOVE ALL OBSTRUCTIONS, BOTH ABOVE AND BELOW GROUND, AS REQUIRED FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS. THIS SHALL INCLUDE CLEARING AND GRUBBING WHICH CONSISTS OF CLEARING THE GROUND SURFACE OF ALL TREES, STUMPS, BRUSH, UNDERGROWTH, HEDGES, HEAVY GROWTH OF GRASS OR WEEDS, FENCES, STRUCTURES, DEBRIS, RUBBISH, AND SUCH MATERIAL WHICH IN THE OPINION OF THE ENGINEER, IS UNSUITABLE FOR THE FOUNDATION OF PAVEMENTS. ALL MATERIAL NOT SUITABLE FOR FUTURE USE ON SITE SHALL BE DISPOSED OF OFF SITE. 4. OWNER/DEVELOPER/CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO CALL LOCAL UNDERGROUND UTILITY LOCATING SERVICES IN A SUFFICIENT AMOUNT OF TIME SO AS TO PROPERLY DETERMINE THE LOCATION OF ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND TO AVOID DELAYS TO THE CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE. 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLYING WITH ALL RECOMMENDATIONS WITHIN THE PROJECT GEOTECHNICAL REPORT IF ONE IS AVAILABLE. SEE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARDS SECTION ON THIS SHEET FOR MORE INFORMATION. 6. GENERAL CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATION OF WORK AND BETWEEN TRADES. SUB -CONTRACTORS ARE ALSO RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATION WITH OTHER TRADES AND DISCIPLINES INCLUDED IN THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. IF ANY DISCREPANCIES ARE FOUND, THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR IS TO NOTIFY ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY BEFORE COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. NO EXTRA COSTS TO THE PROJECT WILL BE INCURRED DUE TO FAILURE OF GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUB -CONTRACTORS TO REVIEW CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND COORDINATE WITH OTHER TRADES. 7. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL SHALL CONFORM TO THE MANUAL OF UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES AND CITY OF REDDING STANDARDS. 8. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE BARRICADES, SIGNS, SAFETY DEVICES, AND TRAFFIC CONTROL AS NECESSARY WITHIN THE CONSTRUCTION AREA. THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO WORKING HOURS. THE USE OF FLAGGERS, BARRICADES, AND CONSTRUCTION SIGNING SHALL COMPLY WITH THE CALIFORNIA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (CA-MUTCD) 9. THE DEVELOPER AND/OR CONTRACTOR SHALL, THROUGH AN APPROVED PRIVATE MATERIALS TESTING LABORATORY AND AT THEIR EXPENSE, PROVIDE FOR ALL MATERIAL AND COMPACTION TESTS REQUIRED BY THE CITY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. TYPE AND FREQUENCY OF TESTING TO BE DETERMINED BY THE CITY. 10. ALL UTILITY AND DRAINAGE CONDUITS SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO THE PLACEMENT OF HMA AND CONCRETE. 11. DUST CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE STRICTLY ADHERED TO. DUST CONTROL PROCEDURES SHALL CONFORM TO SECTION 7-81 OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION; CURRENT EDITION. 12, IF, DURING THE COURSE OF DEVELOPMENT, ANY ARCHEOLOGICAL, HISTORICAL, OR PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES ARE UNCOVERED, DISCOVERED, OR OTHERWISE DETECTED OR OBSERVED, CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES IN THE AFFECTED AREA SHALL CEASE AND A QUALIFIED ARCHEOLOGIST OR PALEONTOLOGIST SHALL BE CONTACTED TO REVIEW THE FIND AND ADVISE THE CITY OF THE SITE'S SIGNIFICANCE. IF THE FINDINGS ARE DEEMED SIGNIFICANT, APPROPRIATE MITIGATION SHALL BE REQUIRED PRIOR TO ANY RESUMPTION OF WORK ON THE PROJECT. THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL ALSO APPLY DURING THE CONSTRUCTION OF IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED AS A CONDITION OF THE SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT. 13. PRIOR TO TRENCH EXCAVATION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL POTHOLE ALL UTILITIES TO BE CROSSED TO VERIFY THAT NO GRADE CONFLICTS EXIST. 14. ALL TRENCHING AND BACK FILLING SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF REDDING CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS OR AS SHOWN IN THE CONSTRUCTION DETAILS ELSEWHERE IN THE PLANS. TRENCH BACKFILL SHALL ME MECHANICALLY COMPACTED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE CITY OF REDDING ELECTRIC UTILITY PRIOR TO EXCAVATING CLOSER THAN EIGHT FEET TO AN EXISTING UTILITY POLE. 15, FOR ALL TRENCHING EXCAVATIONS 5 FEET OR MORE IN DEPTH, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN A PERMIT FROM THE DIVISION OF INDUSTRIAL SAFETY (381 HEMSTED DRIVE, REDDING CA, 224-4743) PRIOR TO BEGINNING ANY EXCAVATION. A COPY OF THIS PERMIT SHALL BE AVAILABLE AT THE CONSTRUCTION SITE AT ALL TIMES. 16. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ACCESS TO EXISTING MAILBOXES OR PROVIDE ALTERNATE TEMPORARY MAILBOXES APPROVED BY THE U.S. POSTAL SERVICE. 17. CARE SHALL BE TAKEN TO PROTECT EXISTING PLANTS, SHRUBS, TREES, LAWN, LANDSCAPE AREAS, AND IRRIGATION SYSTEMS. ANY ITEMS REMOVED OR DAMAGED SHALL BE REPLACED. ALL ITEMS WHICH REQUIRE REMOVAL OR ARE DAMAGED BY THE CONTRACTOR'S OPERATION SHALL BE REPLACED TO ORIGINAL CONDITION AND TO THE APPROVAL OF THE ENGINEER. 18. EXACT LIMITS OF PAVEMENT REMOVAL AND RECONSTRUCTION SHALL BE DETERMINED IN THE FIELD BY THE ENGINEER. THE ASPHALT CONCRETE ALONG THE EDGES OF THE TRENCH SHALL BE SAWCUT AND REMOVED TO A STRAIGHT LINE PRIOR TO FINAL PAVING. EXPOSED VERTICAL EDGES WHICH WILL HAVE ASPHALT CONCRETE AGAINST THEM SHALL BE TACKED WITH EMULSION PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF ASPHALT CONCRETE. REVISIONS REV No. SHEET No. DATE OF REV DESCRIPTION 1. HORROCKS HAS PREPARED GRADING PLANS AND SIZED DRAINAGE FACILITY SHOWN ON THIS PLAN TO CONTAIN THE RUNOFF AS REQUIRED BY THE JURISDICTIONAL ENTITY. SEE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARDS SECTION ON THIS SHEET FOR MORE INFORMATION. 2. ALL IMPORTED STRUCTURAL FILL, IF REQUIRED, SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER PRIOR TO DELIVERY TO THE SITE. 3. THE GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLANS DO NOT IDENTIFY THE CONSTRUCTION METHODS, EQUIPMENT, PROCEDURES, AND OR SEQUENCING TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE CONTRACTOR. ALL GRADING OPERATIONS INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO SITE PREPARATION, SCARIFICATION, EXCAVATION, OVER -EXCAVATION, PLACEMENT, OF FILLS, AND COMPACTION OF FILLS, SHALL BE PERFORMED BY THE CONTRACTOR IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE ONSITE FIELD OBSERVATIONS BY A GEOTECHNICAL FIRM. 4. IT IS THE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO NOTIFY HORROCKS IMMEDIATELY IF THERE ARE ANY CONFLICTS BETWEEN THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLANS AND THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE GEOTECHNICAL FIELD OBSERVATIONS. 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ALL EXISTING DRAINAGE FACILITIES WITHIN THE CONSTRUCTION AREA UNTIL THE DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS ARE IN PLACE AND FUNCTIONAL. 6. ALL EXCAVATION, GRADING, AND FILL OPERATIONS WITHIN THE BUILDING AREA SHOULD BE OBSERVED BY THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER TO VERIFY SUBSOIL CONDITIONS AND DETERMINE ADEQUACY OF SITE PREPARATION, SUITABILITY OF FILL MATERIALS AND COMPLIANCE WITH COMPACTION REQUIREMENTS. 7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE SUITABLE METHODS & EQUIPMENT TO CONTROL DUST AND AIR POLLUTION CAUSED BY CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO PROVIDE SUITABLE MUD AND DIRT CONTAINMENT TO MAINTAIN THE WORK SITE. ACCESS ROADWAYS AND ADJACENT PROPERTIES IN A CLEAN CONDITION. 8. ALL EXCAVATION AND GRADING SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT REQUIREMENTS OF THE JURISDICTIONAL ENTITY, UNIFORM BUILDING CODES, AND THE GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION STUDY. 9. THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER SHALL PROVIDE A FINAL GRADING REPORT TO CONFIRM WORK HAS BEEN PERFORMED IN CONFORMANCE WITH THEIR RECOMMENDATIONS. 10. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, AN EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN WILL BE SUBMITTED TO THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR FOR APPROVAL. 11. THE FOLLOWING STANDARD MITIGATION MEASURES SHALL BE APPLIED DURING GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES TO CONTROL DUST AND PM EMISSIONS: 12. NON -TOXIC SOIL STABILIZERS SHALL BE APPLIED ACCORDING TO MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS TO ALL INACTIVE CONSTRUCTION AREAS (PREVIOUSLY GRADED AREAS INACTIVE FOR 10 OR MORE DAYS). 13. ALL GRADING OPERATIONS SHALL BE SUSPENDED WHEN WINDS (AS INSTANTANEOUS GUSTS) EXCEED 20 MILES PER HOUR. 14. TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL SHALL BE PROVIDED AS APPROPRIATE DURING ALL PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION TO IMPROVE TRAFFIC FLOW (E.G., FLAG PERSON). 15. CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES THAT COULD AFFECT TRAFFIC FLOW SHALL BE SCHEDULED IN OFF-PEAK HOURS. 16. ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION AREAS, HAUL ROADS, ETC., SHALL BE WATERED AT LEAST TWICE DAILY OR MORE AS NEEDED TO LIMIT DUST. 17. EXPOSED STOCKPILES OF SOIL AND OTHER BACKFILL MATERIAL SHALL EITHER BE COVERED, WATERED, OR HAVE SOIL BINDERS ADDED TO INHIBIT DUST AND WIND EROSION. 18. ALL TRUCKS HAULING SOIL AND OTHER LOOSE MATERIAL SHALL BE COVERED OR SHOULD MAINTAIN AT LEAST 2 FEET OF FREEBOARD (I.E., MINIMUM VERTICAL DISTANCE BETWEEN TOP OF THE LOAD AND THE TRAILER) IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF CVC SECTION 23114. THIS PROVISION IS ENFORCED BY LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES. 19. ALL PUBLIC ROADWAYS USED BY THE PROJECT CONTRACTOR SHALL BE MAINTAINED FREE FROM DUST, DIRT, AND DEBRIS CAUSED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. STREETS SHALL BE SWEPT AT THE END OF THE DAY IF VISIBLE SOIL MATERIALS ARE CARRIED ONTO ADJACENT PUBLIC PAVED ROADS. WHEEL WASHERS SHALL BE USED WHERE VEHICLES ENTER AND EXIT UNPAVED ROADS ONTO PAVED ROADS, OR TRUCKS AND ANY EQUIPMENT SHALL BE WASHED OFF LEAVING THE SITE WITH EACH TRIP. 20. OPEN BURNING OF CLEARED VEGETATION SHALL BE PROHIBITED. LIMITED MINOR BURNING MAY BE ALLOWED WITH APPROVAL FROM THE FIRE MARSHAL AND THE AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT. CLEARED VEGETATION SHALL BE TREATED BY LEGAL MEANS OTHER THAN OPEN BURNING SUCH AS CHIPPING, SHREDDING OR GRINDING. SUCH METHODS SHALL BE NOTED ON IMPROVEMENT PLANS. AT NO TIME SHALL OPEN BURNING OF MATERIALS GENERATED BY THIS PROJECT OCCUR AT ANOTHER SITE. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARDS 1. CITY OF REDDING CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS (CORCS) LATEST EDITION WATER PUBLIC WORKS UTILITIES 20055 VIKING WAY, BLDG #3 REDDING, CA 96001 (530)-224-6068 JOSH WATKINS SEWER PUBLIC WORKS UTILITIES 20055 VIKING WAY, BLDG #3 REDDING, CA 96001 (530)-224-6069 JOSH VANDIVER POWER REDDING ELECTRIC UTILITY 3611 AVTECH PARKWAY REDDING, CA (530)-339-7200 NATURAL GAS PG&E 3600 MEADOW VIEW DR REDDING, CA (800)-743-5000 ED NORMAND /'%1a1 4434 MOUNTAIN LAKES BOULEVARD REDDING CA 96003 (530)-229-2034 KATHY VANCE CATV SERVICE SPECTRUM 5797 EASTSIDE RD REDDING CA 96001 (530)-510-0201 ENGINEER'S NOTICE TO CONTRACTOR THE EXISTENCE AND LOCATION OF ANY UNDERGROUND UTILITY PIPES OR STRUCTURES SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS ARE OBTAINED BY A SEARCH OF THE AVAILABLE RECORDS AND WHERE POSSIBLE, MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. TO THE BEST OF OUR KNOWLEDGE THERE ARE NO EXISTING UTILITIES EXCEPT AS SHOWN AND WE ASSUME NO RESPONSIBILITY AS TO THE ACCURACY OF THEIR DEPICTED LOCATION ON THESE DRAWINGS. THE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO TAKE DUE PRECAUTIONARY MEASURES TO PROTECT THE UTILITY LINES SHOWN, AND ALL OTHER LINES NOT OF RECORD OR NOT SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS BY VERIFICATION OF THEIR LOCATION IN THE FIELD PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. THE CONTRACTOR WILL NOTIFY HORROCKS OF ANY FOUND CONFLICTS PRIOR TO ANY WORK BEING DONE RELATED TO THE ISSUE. USE OF THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS INSTRUMENT FOR OTHER THAN THE SPECIFIC PURPOSE FOR WHICH IT WAS INTENDED AND FOR OTHER THAN THE CLIENT FOR WHOM IT WAS PREPARED IS FORBIDDEN UNLESS EXPRESSLY PERMITTED IN WRITING IN ADVANCE TO HORROCKS, AND HORROCKS SHALL HAVE NO LIABILITY TO ANY USE OF THIS INFORMATION WITHOUT THEIR WRITTEN CONSENT. N w J 0 z 0 Z WI=O _ 0 " ~ O < � Z 00 � - Q U = W Z F LL < O 0 W OW -I-_ Cn > Q F < i W o 4 - L it C L C W M N O U Q � (D N � r Li-O Z o 72 � U 00 U' N o ¢ Q U Z N o 0 W z z U W Ur cn Q w O Q 0 W 01 01 _ 01 of 0_ TF I 04 Z ry O LL U Z 0 0 W IY W W O z %IN 7-22 Holiday Marketplace - Shasta View\Project Data\02 CAD\2.03 Sheet Files\Construction Drawings\CA-6817-22_C.1.1_NOTES.dwg - C.1.1 NOTES - 2/03/2023 04:41 pm, matt.graham E 2 3 5 SEWER POWER EXISTING PROPOSED EXISTING PROPOSED UNKNOWN _ p OVERHEAD OHP OHP ........, 4 a. ...,--_.n..._----- 4as ................ ..w. 4 INCH e ....................... bee --. _ .. ....M ........ .... UNDERGROUND ...-.------- BEL BEL 6" spa — — — S's 6 INCH - W 2 INCH 2„ PHL 2" BEL- - 8° So 6' 2s-----www. 8 INCH - N/A 3 INCH 3" BEL 3" BEL 10 s_; _ E0 ,u; 10 INCH N/A 4 INCH 4" BEL 4" BEL 1° as -----au ..12' s_ __ ___________ 12 INCH - N/A 6 INCH 6" BEi 6" BEL 4 ... 14 ............... 14 INCH N/A 8 INCH 8° BEL 8" BEL_.-..-..-.— 1.a .e. - 1~^"> . 15 INCH - - - - N/A- 10°° r3EL 10" BEL- -18' 88— - 16,:,r,-- 16 INCH - - - - ---.- _--A,1/0--------- .,,,.r s1..........,,-1;tJ.................r 1 PH A 1/0 11.1 a .-_..-- 1f1 a .................... 18 INCH ------- A_/0---- 1 PHA4/0 2424 24 INCH . .. ., f I 0 ------ 1 PH B 1/0 .........36- ----- . -------- -------- ,33 gs ------ .............. 30 INCH ..... -.._. i.«s ti -..-. .._ ,: �.�. � ..�,. 1 PH B 4/0 N,t1' a 36 INCH Vo C, i , 1 PH C 1/0 SERVICE LATERAL 1 PH C 4/0 ........................... , BC10 _.. --B ,14„ _.._. --_- 3 PH ABC 4/0 3 PH ABC 750A t--.--.--- -- E( ---------------- ..a SECONDARY —13 6 L 6 STREET LIGHT STORM GAS EXISTING PROPOSED EXISTING sd --- -- 6......... _------- UNKNOWN _SD —SD— _ a . -n UNKNOW rom..4' 3d ..n.... .......... .4• id n__------------- 41NCH 4" BID 4" SO /A 1 INCH 6` �,,d — 6' sr1 — 6 INCH 6" SD 2° , —2' a 2 INCH 6"SD ,6 ,..,...... 3 ,,1 ..._----------- 8 INCH 8" SD 8" SD 4 cr ......... 3 10 INCH 10" SD 4 4 INCH 10" ED 12' 12' --------- 12 INCH 12" SD 12" SD „ r1 ...n 6 INCH a4 w .... , ..... 1u ,1 a .................. 15 INCH 15" ED 15" SD ......... 6 , . 8 INCH 16s sd-- 11 sd— 16 INCH 16" sD 12' g 2' 3 12 INCH 16" SD 16 4 .. ,... 184 ................ 18INCH 18" BID 18°so ..... ,,......, r,k,1------ .-----1,§,r1..... ------------------ HIGH PRESr 24 s4 """"- """"- 24,sd 24 INCH 24" sD 24" sD 6 a --- --- ,-bpi .-. -------- 30 INCH 30" ED 30" SD 36" q4.__ .__ 3 >a__-..______ 36 INCH 36"SD 36"SD 42ad — - 42 sa 42 INCH 42" SD 42" SD 48 . .._........... .......... 446 d ------ ----------- 48 INCH 48" SD 48" SD 4 54 d 54 INCH 54" ED 54" ED 60 ,,d .... 60 -- ---- ---- - 60 INCH 60" sD 60" SD 31 93 66 :,4 66 INCH 66" SD 66" ED —,72"asa — 72s4 72 INCH 72" ED 72" sD .... -11-1. ----- -------- ........ . Id ----- -------------- LAND DRAIN 72" SD 72" ED WATER EXISTING ....................... W UNKNOWN 3/4 INCH w - 1INCH 1.; a ...,.. 2 1-1/2 INCH f w ..._ _- 4 ...-. 2 INCH .:.......... ..... .:r ww.-------------.. 3 INCH __..... 4 _ _._ 4"' a.-. 4 INCH 13 6 INCH ................. 8 INCH rc w r0' w 10 INCH 12' v, 12 v, - . 12 INCH ......... .. 1,1 1z 14 INCH 1 6' w 16 INCH ,8 n ,8 w ------ 18 INCH 24 r,. 24,-",w— — 24 INCH 30" w— — E09, w 30 INCH ........ 36 36, w----- ..... .....- 36 INCH 4S } 48ws 48 INCH 60,2........ . ---- . 6 2-------- . -------------- 60 INCH 6 v- r." w— 72 INCH -------- -------wwwm SERVICE LATERAL IRRIGATION EXISTING . - UNKNOWN -------- .- --------- 1 INCH 2" 1rr-- 2' irr — 2 INCH irr 4 err.,, .,.............., 4INCH 6 - - 6" irr — 6 INCH 6` rr. — 8' ,s, --- _ 8 INCH ......... 111irr ....,.. -- ----- 1 0irr ..... ...----.----- 10 INCH ..w.12 irr ...... . ........ 12- ---- ---------- 12 INCH US',,r,s,.----- --- .... ;<.. in .................... 18 INCH 24." rr fr,rsf irr 24 INCH 33 �r, a. .au 30' I,r 30 INCH 4 irr ........ ... ......... .% irr ---- ......_.._._ 36 INCH --- uu.w SERVICE LATERAL PROPOSED —w—w- - 1*' w 1"W- 1-1/2" W 1-1/2" W 3"W 3"W. 4„W 4"W. 6"W 6"W. 8"W 8" W, 10" w 10" w 12" W 12" W 14" W 14" W 16" W 16" W 18" W 18" W 24" W 24" W 30" W 30" W 36" W 36" W 48" W 48" W 60" W 60" W 72" W 72" W N/A N/A N/A N/A EXISTING µ . ..t2 6o1.r, .._. 6.1:r.__ r 1r -- bf) ...... — Mo ...._._ EXISTING COMMUNICATIONS OVERHEAD CABLE TV UNDERGROUND CABLE TV OVERHEAD FIBER OPTIC UNDERGROUNG FIBER OPTIC OVERHEAD TELEPHONE UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE MISCELLANEOUS PROPOSED r V CTV _ BCTu BCTv/ DEMO \,- UNKNOWN PIPE JOINT UTILITY TRENCH JUT TOE OF SLOPE —TOE— — —TOE— TOP OF SLOPE --TOP--TOP--TOP— DIRECTIONAL FLOWLINE -- ------ ;.....___ ______..,... . EDGE OF PAVEMENT GUARDRAIL RAILROAD TRACKS CONTOUR - MAJOR 4000 CONTOUR - MINOR 4002 HATCH PATTERNS BUILDING/PAD CONCRETE SIDEWALK / FLATWORK W2 ,w� DECORATIVE BRICK / SIDEWALK 1 f 4` FLATWORK / LANDSCAPE AREAS -------------------- -------------------- ------------------ POOL DECK XERISCAPE LANDSCAPE AREAS / GRASS HEAVY DUTY PAVEMENT SECTION LIGHT DUTY PAVEMENT SECTION ADA ACCESS RAMP TRUNCATED DOMES RIPRAP s� M x' « 4 GRAVEL SURFACE FEATURES EXISTING/PROPOSED CUT CUT_____________C CUT --------------- CUT LINE FILL LINE LOD LOD LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE DITCH ---GB-----GB-----GB- GRADE BREAK HWM HIGH WATER MARK —HWM 1YR HIGH WATER MARK - 1 YEAR EVENT —HWM 5YR HIGH WATER MARK - 5 YEAR EVENT HWM 10YR HIGH WATER MARK - 10 YEAR EVENT HWM 25YR HIGH WATER MARK - 25 YEAR EVENT HWM 50YR HIGH WATER MARK - 50 YEAR EVENT HWM 100YR HIGH WATER MARK - 100 YEAR EVENT FENCE -BARBED ^ FENCE - CHAIN LINK FENCE - DECORATIVE - FENCE - WOOD WALL - BLOCK WALL - CONCRETE WALL - PANEL WALL - ROCK R/W RIGHT OF WAY CENTERLINE (ROAD/ENTITY) CURB & GUTTER PARCEL LINE PROPERTY BOUNDARY - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 10' PUBLIC UTILITY & DRAINAGE EASEMENT (P.U.E.) PAINT STRIPE - SOLID PAINT STRIPE - DOUBLE SOLID PAINT STRIPE - BROKEN PAINT STRIPE - BIKE LANE INTERSECTION PAINT STRIPE - LANE DROP PAINT STRIPE - LANE LINE EXTENSION — DET DET TRAFFIC SIGNAL - DETECTION CONDUIT PUT PUT TRAFFIC SIGNAL - FUTURE CONDUIT — LTG LTG TRAFFIC SIGNAL - LIGHTING CONDUIT PED PED TRAFFIC SIGNAL - PEDESTRIAN CONDUIT — PSH PSH TRAFFIC SIGNAL - PUSH BUTTON CONDUIT PWR PWR TRAFFIC SIGNAL - POWER SOURCE CONDUIT SIG SIG TRAFFIC SIGNAL - SIGNAL CONDUIT CONSTRUCTION KEYNOTE TAGS 0 OR DO DEMO PLAN G1 OR G1 GRADING PLAN 01 OR 35 SITE PLAN 36;> OR 50;> WATER 51 OR 65, SEWER 66; OR 44 STORM DRAIN 181i; OR 90`,j IRRIGATION 91 OR �'93'1 CABLE TV 94 OR 96 TELEPHONE 97 OR 99 GAS OR 00 POWER rA —«- OR , Z % MISCELLANEOUS CALLOUTS FF:2752.841 FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION TBC:2752.85 TBC & TBDC SPOT ELEVATION FL:2752.86 FL & TG SPOT ELEVATION PARKING STALL COUNT 4 STANDARD SYMBOLS EXISTING PROPOSED �; ELECTRICAL MANHOLE fo FIBER OPTIC MANHOLE u fr ;f TELEPHONE MANHOLE 4 j CABLE TV MANHOLE ELECTRICAL POWER POLE Fey SIGNAL POLE01 i._ ... ,...I 1 e I ELECTRICAL BOX FIBER OPTIC BOX >' JUNCTION BOX JB TELEPHONE BOX IJ. TELEPHONE PEDESTAL� 41 CABLE TV BOX \I - LIGHT POLE I L LIGHT POLE OPT 2IGHT POLE OPT 3 _ �w ., . g GAS MANHOLE ,.',i GAS METER 4;1 CLEANOUT SEWER MANHOLE `A IRRIGATION MANHOLE _- -r IRRIGATION BOX r r WATER MANHOLE w1 WATER METER w WATER METER OPT 2 wM BLOW -OFF FIRE HYDRANT ,., FIRE HYDRANT OPT 2 F <y s GATE VALVE rx,.6 GATE VALVE OPT 2 4- CROSS TEE 90° BEND _...J I 45° BEND 22.5° BEND ------j 11.25° BEND WYE REDUCER CAP & PLUG I\N Ss . 1 STORM DRAIN MANHOLE di AREA DRAIN ROUND jz' l AREA DRAIN SQUARE n DROP INLET 6 CURB INLETFf CURB INLET OPT 2 �4 CURB INLET OPT 3 r CURB DOUBLE INLET �pNs11 N�yti CURB DOUBLE INLET OPT 2 COMBO BOX SD .. k OILIWATER SAND/GREASE OIL/WATER SAND/GREASE OPT 2 C FLARED END PLANWK - FLARED END PROFILE FLARED END SECTION SIGN _0_ 4 BOLLARD 0 t -9 BORE HOLE TEST PIT x -------.. BENCHMARK s x I x - - SECTION CORNER r s s ..,I CONTROL POINT .€ DETAIL REFERENCE X DETAIL NAME SCALE:NTS MATCHLINE STA. XX+XX.XX SEE SHEET PP-XX DWG E DRAWING EAST OR EASTING 0 N H Q EA EACH cr_ U) EG EXISTING GRADE/ GROUND 00 = - ELEV ELEVATION (n Q Z EOC EDGE OF CONCRETE 2 W - EOP EDGE OF PAVEMENT 2 Q EP END POINT ILL -ry ESMT EASEMENT p EVC END VERTICAL CURVE EVCE END VERTICAL CURVE ELEVATION EVCS END VERTICAL CURVE STATION F EVP END VERTICAL PROFILE L L EX EXISTING FE FLANGE END FF FINISHED FLOOR W L FG FINISHED GRADE z < FJ FLANGE JOINT W FL FLOW LINE j Q p FM FORCE MAIN I FPS FEET PER SECOND of 4 L FT FOOT OR FEET FLIT FUTURE it L G GAS LINE ; W GB GRADE BREAK Of GFF GARAGE FINISHED FLOOR = GV GATE VALVE HGL HYDRAULIC GRADE LINE N N , HP HIGH POINT HRZ HORIZONTAL LL co 00 HWM HIGH WATER MARK - cv 75 U 00 Q ID INSIDE DIAMETER U o 0 Q U IN INCH(ES) z N IRR IRRIGATION (PRESSURIZED)/ NON -POTABLE K VERTICAL CURVE COEFFICIENT Q p I- L LENGTH z z Y U LF LINEAR FEET LLI U U Lu LP LOW POINT 0 L/S LANDSCAPE Q p W p p _ U of d LT LEFT LVC LENGTH OF VERTICAL CURVE MAX MAXIMUM FESS/ ME MATCH EXISTING -----�.� MFR MANUFACTURER@ MGD MILLION GALLONS PER DAY MH MANHOLE mmmmm � MID MIN MIDDLE MINIMUM n 9 MJ MECHANICAL JOINT N NORTH OR NORTHING, FRICTION FACTOR _ N/A NOT APPLICABLE�� NTS NOT TO SCALE cpj_\ OC ON CENTER OD OUTSIDE DIAMETER OVHP OVERALL HIGH POINT OVLP OVERALL LOW POINT PC POINT OF CURVE PCC POINT OF COMPOUND CURVE PH PHASE PI POINT OF INTERSECTION PL PROPERTY LINE PRC POINT OF REVERSE CURVE PT POINT OF TANGENCY PUE PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT PVI POINT OF VERTICAL INTERSECTION Q RATE OF FLOW R RADIUS REV REVISION RT RIGHT R/W RIGHT OF WAY S SLOPE SD STORM DRAIN SDMH STORM DRAIN MANHOLE SEC SECTION SF SQUARE FOOT/FOOTAGE uj S/L STREETLIGHT SPEC SPECIFICATIONS SS SANITARY SEWER _ SSMH SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE STA STATION STD STANDARD SVE SIGHT VISIBILITY EASEMENT Q z S/W SIDEWALK z W TA TOP OF ASPHALT TBC TOP BACK OF CURB 0 Q W TBDC TOP BACK OF DEPRESSED CURB LI_ Z i 0 TBM TEMPORARY BENCH MARK LU Q TIC TOP OF CONCRETE W n TEMP TEMPORARY C) (D TF TOP OF FOOTING > TG TOP OF GRATE LU TWB TWF TOP BACK OF WALL TOP FRONT/FACE OF WALL 0 _j Q 3: 0 TWR TOP OF WALL - RETAINING LU 0 TW TOP OF WALL TYP TYPICAL O � UTC UNTREATED BASE COURSE � V VELOCITY VC VERTICAL CURVE VRT W/ VERTICAL WITH WMH WATER MANHOLE WTR WATER * ALL ABBREVIATIONS MAY NOT BE USED PIPE ABBREVIATIONS* RCB REINFORCED CONCRETE BOX CULVERT RCEA REINFORCED CONCRETE ELLIPTICAL ARCH PIPE REC REINFORCED CONCRETE ELLIPTICAL CULVERT RVEC REINFORCED CONCRETE VERTICAL ELLIPTICAL CULVERT EGG REINFORCED CONCRETE EGG SHAPED CULVERT PVC POLYVINYL CHLORIDE RCP REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE VCP VITRIFIED CLAY PIPE CIP CAST IRON PIPE HDPE HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE DIP DUCTILE IRON PIPE CMP CPP CORRUGATED METAL PIPE CORRUGATED POLYETHYLENE PIPE POLY POLYETHYLENE * ALL ABBREVIATIONS MAY NOT BE USED CmI m2 7-22 Holiday Marketplace - Shasta View\Project Data\02 CAD\2.03 Sheet Files\Construction Drawings\CA-6817-22-C.1.2-LEGEND.dwg - C.1.2 LEGEND - 2/03/2023 04:41 pm, matt.graham 1 SEE RIGHT BELOW MATCHLINE "A" 2 SEE RIGHT BELOW MATCHLINE "B" 4 R1W Flu:: D10 D10'', H AW N03 P10" I.I AVENUE— T _ — n mD02� _ D04„ " --� I " D10' —bt m, P01 Y S 4 ;,P02 L S t t P01� " _. .... __—w_—.___ HARTNELL AVEN7T� U� t WI LSO N� EQ— ,. AVENUEµT D10 BELLADONNA D70 STREET= dDo D10 _ WIN — D081 4 to # 1� w. _,_... _mob" as D10. R/W 041 # I l i I C 1 # MATCHLINE "A" SEE LEFT ABOVE 3 SEE RIGHT BELOW MATCHLINE "C" I" °" " 6 d 071 d 7 I I cr c 9 I I � � 4 ti ` P07 E w I 1 i ., PO4> � ' I d d [ I � I P02, e I �, P01s , ?r D10�� 7 D07 DO 1 —, s d �D02 L KERRY — IP10 p a" I 4 AV E N V E M E , I 11)03 I P051 D10 gg i I D041, ' t D08� PO4: t D03 D08'' d # ;D02: N � D10; 15d, IT _ � r r -" 1 " 02 P10 ..... __ — CHRISTIAN ybellLANE a bt — APO = "P06'" D0 �D10I D02 008 P12 I s s Nk s, I s ! D02'' D02 I I P 13 � I " I I s ° , D04 _ > P05. P 14 � I MATCHLINE "B" SEE LEFT ABOVE IE I'1 # 1 �# � Ild #Is s'd d�d CD I 4 ! dl I�# f p sl +"mil PI E d I # 9 # P14 d l s I s 11 ICI +'I s I #«s I,l � s d #,s 1'I d s d'I dmd #d d d Ind d,E s�l I II Is I d�I I � i II s� +1� # n I 3 # 1�I s, 1 # II # E d� # sus # dl d I did � I sI ICI s I� I s s ICI I g B I P07 � L a d co I 9 "1,4 � II II^ I D071°"# P11', 7 P10 I iI i �D07 41 9I r I DOT "� dy 5 Y # I 907 PO4 N ,I` I" I I + e D07 s MATCHLINE "C" SEE LEFT ABOVE _ N ?**1001 0 30' 60' SCALE: 1" = 30' PROTECTION KEYNOTES P01 EXISTING SIDEWALK (PROTECT IN PLACE) 11302 EXISTING CURB (PROTECT IN PLACE) p03 EXISTING 6" WATER MAIN (PROTECT IN PLACE) p04 EXISTING 8" WATER MAIN (PROTECT IN PLACE) p05 EXISTING SANITARY SEWER LINE (PROTECT IN PLACE) pQ6 EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE (PROTECT IN PLACE) PO7 EXISTING BURIED ELECTRICAL LINE OR ELECTRIC JUNCTION BOX (PROTECT IN PLACE) P08 EXISTING STORM DRAIN CATCH BASIN (PROTECT IN PLACE) P09 EXISTING POWER POLE (PROTECT IN PLACE) P10 EXISTING WATER VALVE (PROTECT IN PLACE) p11 EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT (PROTECT IN PLACE) p12 EXISTING COMMUNICATIONS MANHOLE (PROTECT IN PLACE) P13 EXISTING WATER METER (PROTECT IN PLACE) P14 EXISTING LIGHT POLE (PROTECT IN PLACE) P15 EXISTING GUY WIRE (PROTECT IN PLACE) DEMOLITION KEYNOTES D01 EXISTING SIDEWALK (TO BE REMOVED) D02; EXISTING CURB (TO BE REMOVED) D03 EXISTING FENCE TO BE REMOVED AND RELOCATED BEHIND FUTURE - SIDEWALK D04 EXISTING SIGN TO BE REMOVED AND RELOCATED D05 EXISTING STORM DRAIN CATCH BASIN TO BE REMOVED AND RELOCATED D06. EXISTING STORM DRAIN PIPE TO BE REMOVED D07 EXISTING MAILBOX TO BE REMOVED AND RELOCATED EXISTING ELECTRICAL/UTILITY JUNCTION BOX TO BE REMOVED AND D08: RELOCATED BEHIND FUTURE SIDEWALK, COORDINATE WITH LOCAL UTILITY COMPANY D09 REMOVE EXISTING TREE D10 ADDITIONAL DEMOLITION AS REQUIRED, SEE ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT SHEETS FOR LIMITS D11 REMOVE EXISTING LANDSCAPING LEGEND: REMOVE EXISTING: ASPHALT, CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER, SIDEWALK AND VALLEY GUTTER NOTE: CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF ALL MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS WITHIN RIGHT-OF-WAY TO CONSTRUCT PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS. THESE MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS MAY NOT BE SPECIFICALLY CALLED OUT IN THE DEMOLITION PLAN. N w V OWC)z Zz OWH oNl- 0 z m � C0 Q U z = W w � O U z p w < W >0 Q — w O a L C w ch N p U -71 N � O I Z o � � U � 00 U N o 0 Q Q U z N o 0 w z z U w � _ � Q w 101 1U d EESS/ r A V U or 3 9 m Z W °- > z O Q Q O U) Z W `� cc G W 7� W ° Q W o > ° U C� 0 ri G Qr) z � W O O Q = z O U k W 7-22 Holiday Marketplace - Shasta View\Project Data\02 CAD\2.03 Sheet Files\Construction Drawings\CA-6817-22_C.2.0_EX.CONDITIONS & DEMO PLAN.dwg - C.2.0 EX. CONDITIONS & DEMOLITION PLAN - 2/03/2023 04:41 pm, matt.graham 2 3 4 5 OODWATERAVE.— KERRY AVE. HRISTIAN LN.- WILSON AVE. U) U) BELLADONNA ST. ST* —HAWN AVE ------HARTNELL AVE. KEY MAP SITE KEYNOTES 01 ROADWAY SECTION, SEE DETAIL 3 SHEET C.4.0 02 INSTALL 6" VERTICAL CURB AND GUTTER PER CORCS 136.00. 03 INSTALL CONCRETE SIDEWALK PER CORCS 131.00. 04 INSTALL ADA CURB RAMP PER CORCS 141.10 TO 141.30. 05 STORM DRAIN CURB INLET PER CORCS 230.00. 06 STORM DRAIN PIPE, SIZE PER PLANS 07 DRIVEWAY APPROACH PER CORCS 148.00. 1 - REMOVE 3' MINIMUM EXISTING ROLLED ASPHALT CURB AND 08 TRANSITION INTO 6" VERTICAL CURB PER PLAN 09 4' VALLEY GUTTER PER CORCS 125.50 - RELOCATE FENCE TO EDGE OF ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY, 10 COORDINATE WITH CITY AND HOME OWNERS FOR FINAL SIGNOFF 11 - RELOCATE MAILBOX IN ACCORDANCE WITH POST OFFICE REQUIREMENTS 12 REMOVE LANDSCAPING UP TO ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY NOTE: -ADJUST ALL UTILITIES TO GRADE SHASTA VIEW DRIVE PLAN VIEW 0 20' 40' HRZ SCALE: V = 20' VRT SCALE: V= 4' 560 PVI STA: 11+37.37 PVI ELEV: 548.86 m Z� LVC: 50.00 LF ...... ....... (0 Cl) ........... ........PVI STA: 13+73.83 ............ .. .. .. ... ......... .. .. .. . ........... .. .. .. ........................... . .... .... .... . . C'i rn K: 32.52 06 N PVI ELEV: 547.22 PVI STA: 16+91.83 LO +(0 PVI ELEV: 545.80 w 0 CO' 0') C� 221.06 K: 907.22 ........... .................... LVC: 168.81 LF > 00 > w co (0 r- It It U-) 00 + K: 895.14 + m ................... ...... w..................... ..... .... > > 06 LO Co ui ui .................... 6mi 0 ... .................... CO 550 550 ................................... — — — — — — — — — — — — — ...... ............... — — — — — ---- ......... ......... .............. .. . — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — -4 --------------- EXISTING SURFACE ................ ............... .......... 0;45% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — - .................... ........ ........... PROPOSED SURFACE .................. ............. ...... ............... ....... ................. .......... ''SHASTA VIEW'DRIVE'' ............................. ...... ...... ..................... ....... ................. STA: 10+75.00 TO STA: 16+75.00 c' 0 C'j 0o OR (q Lq C') "t C'4 C? 0� 0� 60 (9 to Cn Lr) (5 Lq co r- C� Iq (0 Q) CO�6 80 COCO(0 iZ LO "I, Lr) Cl) L0 C) as a) 0S 0) as 00 6 00 C6 00 'r C6 00 NT C6 OD CO 00 't tl- C6 t_� 't 11, 'zt K �t 't (6 't '* (6 't (6 "It It Lx) L0 u') L0 I- Nt L0 LO L0 LO 1�t LO LO 'It Lo 114, LO L0 LO 't L0 L0 Lr) to lzt Lf) LO LO L0 LO LO Lr) LO It LO LO Lr) Lf) Lf) Lo L0 L0 LO tr) Lr) Lr) Lr) Lr) Lf) V) LO LO Lr) Lr) LO LO Lr) L0 10+75 11+00 11+25 11+50 11+75 12+00 12+25 12+50 12+75 13+00 13+25 13+50 13+75 14+00 14+25 14+50 14+75 15+00 15+25 15+50 15+75 16+00 16+25 16+50 16+75 SHASTA VIEW DRIVE PROFILE VIEW C\1 - w _j F_ < 0 z 0 Z Z Lu U) U) 3: 0 w l_ 0 = z r-) C\j 0 W Z cr- ::) U) 00 U) Lf) < (D LIJ Z LL < ry c) z 0 w l_ cn < w of L I L > L L CY) C14 C) C) 7-> (D C14 0 LL Z C14 m CD 7_2 75 0 0 75- 00 (? C14 C:) 0 Q < 0 Z w Z z w �e C) LLj w Ur Fn < 0 w ---) 0 w � m of FESs/ CO AVE 0 Lu Of U— 8pq 0 F- cf) CN- w � Q z < U) Z-- 0 M w ILL LLI _j < UJ > 0 olf C) z> < n Z ES 0 _j < w Lu < 0 Z U) 7-22 Holiday Marketplace - Shasta View\Project Data\02 CAD\2.03 Sheet Files\Construction Drawings\CA-6817-22-C.3.0-HARTEN ELL AVE - HAWN AVE.dwg - C.3.0 HARTNELL AVE - HAWN AVE - 2/03/2023 04:42pm, matt. 2 4 5 OODWATERAVE.- -KERRY AVE. LHRISTIAN LN. W WILSON AVE. U) U) BELLADONNA ST -HAWN AVE ------HARTNELL AVE. KEY MAP 3 NOTE: -ADJUST ALL UTILITIES TO GRADE SITE KEYNOTES 01 ROADWAY SECTION, SEE DETAIL 3 SHEET C.4.0 INSTALL 6" VERTICAL CURB AND GUTTER PER CORCS 136.00. 03' INSTALL CONCRETE SIDEWALK PER CORCS 131.00. '04 INSTALL ADA CURB RAMP PER CORCS 141.10 TO 141.30. '05 STORM DRAIN CURB INLET PER CORCS 230.00. STORM DRAIN PIPE, SIZE PER PLANS OT DRIVEWAY APPROACH PER CORCS 148.00. REMOVE 3' MINIMUM EXISTING ROLLED ASPHALT CURB AND 08 TRANSITION INTO 6" VERTICAL CURB PER PLAN 09 4' VALLEY GUTTER PER CORCS 125.50 - RELOCATE FENCE TO EDGE OF ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY, 10 COORDINATE WITH CITY AND HOME OWNERS FOR FINAL SIGNOFF RELOCATE MAILBOX IN ACCORDANCE WITH POST OFFICE REQUIREMENTS 12 REMOVE LANDSCAPING UP TO ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY SHASTA VIEW DRIVE PLAN VIEW 0 20' 40' HRZ SCALE: 1 20' VRT SCALE: V = 4' LIP STA: 19+65.96 LIP ELEV: 545.10 PVISTA: 20+06.50 .......... .... .... .... .. .... .... .... ... .. . .... .... . .... ............ ..... . .. .... .... . ............. .............. PVI ELEV: 544.98 PVI STA: 21+07.87 00 Lq 't C"! LVC: 110.10 LF PVI ELEV: 546.71 LO CDrn .............. ................... .................. K. 55.92 LciLo - ..... C� 0): 'LVC: 73.34 LF co 'IT ........... 6i + LO LO + C� Q0 K: 47.96 Q0 Lq 'zt 0 > W . .................... ......... 6i ... ( I j C) r 11 + -,I- LO 'q + .. . . . .. . .. . ...... w .... .... .... . . .. . .. . .. . .. . .. . .. ........................ ... .... .... .... . . . . . . U) .. . .. . .. . > > Lu C0 0 (D N W w N w > co > w 66 C) > w U) 550 > in > W 550 EXISTING SURFACE ....... ........... .................... ................ .. ............... 0.18% 77, 77, =_77,= ... ................. ............................ ............... ............... .......................................... .......... 0.26% .................. PROPOSED SURFACE ...... ............. 540 540 ...................... .................... ............ ................... SHASTA VIEW DRIVE ............... ............... ........... ............. .............. .................... ........ STA: 16-415.00 TOSTA: 22-ii&75.'00 .......... . ..... .. . .... .... . .. . .. .... ... ji3' LO N m LO CA Nco C\1 E;z CN co (�o m Co 00 0O LO 0� C� co C? C'? (0 C� LO C� Lo a� C�) C? co 00 C� I: N' 00 00 0) LO '0 Li Q0 Ld (0 V� (0 L6 (0 Lrs Lf) LC5 LO . LC LO L6 LO -'r LO L6 LO u') LO L6 L6 LO (0 It L6 cc 't �6 (0 (6 (0 'r (6 (0 Nt t6 (0 It t__ �6 C�6 t__ 'r �6 t'- �t '4- 't 11, NT 11, �t 1*1 �t 't LO "I, 't LO It 't LO 1q, Lo It Ln 't LO �t LO 11, �T LO m LO LO 'tq1 V) `q, V) NI, u) NI, LO "j, m 1q, 'zt m LO LO Lr) u') u') LO LO LO L0 LO 10 V) LO LO LO LO L0 L0 LO LO Lr) 16+75 17+00 17+25 17+50 17+75 18+00 18+25 18+50 18+75 19+00 19+25 19+50 19+75 20+00 20+25 20+50 20+75 21+00 21+25 21+50 21+75 22+00 22+25 22+50 22+75 C\1 - w _j F_ < 0 z 0 z Z Lu U) U) 3: 0 w 1-- 0 = zOr-) CN w < < cr_::)U) — 00 U) Lf) < (D LIJ Z LL < c) z 9 w I.- U) > < w of L I L > L L CY) C) C) 7-> (D NC14 0 LL z N0 m CD 7_2 75 0 75- 00 (? C14 C:) 0 Q < 0 z LU z z w �e C) ww Ur Fn < 0 w ---) 0 w � m of FESs/ CO AVE 0 L(D U Of LL 8R9 0 F- LL1 Q z 0 < U) _j U) z z ry 0 w 2 w LIJ ILL < > 0 C) U) z < < 0 0 Z 3: w z 0 0 < 0 0 olf < j _j w co I A 7-22 Holiday Marketplace - Shasta View\Project Data\02 CAD\2.03 Sheet Files\Construction Drawings\CA-6817-22-C.3.1-BELLADONNA ST - WILSON AVE.dwg - C.3.1 BELLADONNA ST - WILSON AVE - 2/03/2023 04:42pm, matt.graham 0 2 SITE KEYNOTES 3 NOTE: -ADJUST ALL UTILITIES TO GRADE Il 5 OODWATER AVE. I €trt II,��lil -KERRY AVE. �ffI st IIII ��+ WILSON AVE. Q U) oELLADONNA ST. HAWN AVE —1-ARTNELL AVE. KEY MAP ti N r- N ri Q U� w� w wW U Z J W = UU Q 01 ROADWAY SECTION, SEE DETAIL 3 SHEET C.4.0 02 INSTALL 6" VERTICAL CURB AND GUTTER PER CORCS 136.00. 03 INSTALL CONCRETE SIDEWALK PER CORCS 131.00. 04 INSTALL ADA CURB RAMP PER CORCS 141.10 TO 141.30. '05 STORM DRAIN CURB INLET PER CORCS 230.00. 06 STORM DRAIN PIPE, SIZE PER PLANS 07 DRIVEWAY APPROACH PER CORCS 148.00. REMOVE 3' MINIMUM EXISTING ROLLED ASPHALT CURB AND 08, TRANSITION INTO 6" VERTICAL CURB PER PLAN 09` 4' VALLEY GUTTER PER CORCS 125.50 RELOCATE FENCE TO EDGE OF ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY, 10) COORDINATE WITH CITY AND HOME OWNERS FOR FINAL SIGNOFF 11 RELOCATE MAILBOX IN ACCORDANCE WITH POST OFFICE REQUIREMENTS 12, REMOVE LANDSCAPING UP TO ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY Z Q >m =) � J W W 0 20' 40' HRZ SCALE: 1" = 20' VRT SCALE: 1" = 4' ti 00 N m ri �U �w Ww Z_= (n JUJ = W U Q ._ _.__.__._.. _ __ _ _ __ __ _ _.__.__.__ ............. _ _ _ __ _ _ _ __ __ _ _ ___ _ __ __ _ _ .......... _ _ __ _ ___ _ __ ... .... .... ..... _ __ _ __ __ _ _ __ __ PVI STA: 29+19.23 PVI ELEV: 552.51 ........ .. .... . .. ................... ...... . _ ......... ... _...,...,...,.. _. _.._. , , „ , „ , ,,. ...... _.,, , „ ,.,, , „ , .... _.................. L _. VC' 150 00 LF K: 93.24 560 __ __ _ ___ _ _ __ _ __ __ __ _ __ __ _. _ _ __ :. coO .. ......... ......... .. N. N ....... ........ ......... 560 PVI STA: 25+26.91 It N LO PVI STA: 23+77.89 PVI ELEV: 551.17 N tii __ __ __ __................. ... ... ... ..... . . ......... . PVI ELEV. 547.20 _. _. _._._. _ _ LVC: 116.93 LF ... _... _.. v . LVC: 86.90 LF K: 50.27 U m m K: 34.95 ......... _ _ .......... _ ..... ....... ......... �t co co u') : u') } SURFACE m_ r ......... ......i,.,.. w `� N 1.,- .............,_...... ..._..._.... _ ,._.,._.,.,, ,.,, ,.,,.,. _...,...,...,... _..._..._.................... „ , „ , „ , , __;__.___EXISTING co N w : : W N: : U m : W U (n _.___ ..._. �...,.�. — _. U. gyp.._ ..... .................................. .....:...__ __ __ __.,....,...,...... ,._.,._.,._.,. ,.,,. W _ __ __ __. W... , .._.�,...—.., �..._._ ...� _.._ �.._ ._..._ _. .. . m w . _ _ 0.34% 550 _. 50 5 PROPOSED SURFACE 2.67%" O CO W M M M i� --_ M (O N M N r M '' v L tv O o) w Co M O � N n") N N M O d) O �t O O W r co W O co r- CO �1' O t-- c0 r- i^- N CO N � O e,- � O N e- N e- N LO N N M N "t �7- W V "t 6 7 V 6 tLO rt O O tf)to O e-" to O Lo e- O � �� O O � tN LOLO LO tf) Lo O LO Lo O U-) LO�,{) O to t() O tC) O U) O LC) V O to O V Lo V O O !a U-)v LO LO V) Lo h v !a Lr) Lo L LO LOv O !a h v O u') O v v 22+75 23+00 23+25 23+50 23+75 24+00 24+25 24+50 24+75 25+00 25+25 25+50 25+75 26+00 26+25 26+50 26+75 27+00 27+25 27+50 27+75 28+00 28+25 28+50 28+75 N � U)o G7 C.0 �0) �U L N c 4- o a i C Q N W V 0ww Z wF-O z oN� O �rz m�CQ Q �Qz Z = W LL ry p 0 U) W L C coQ W > L W M N p U Q � 0 (� N , r O LL Z o � � U 75 00 (D N O 0 Q Q U Z N 0 r W Z Ur Z w U W W I- Q to w Q Of w _ O [If FESS/ Arn CD 8�9 W W � Q U) Q Z w w O W `, i 2 W > ILL W1 O U Z �- Z Q Z Q Q < r) �— O vI..L U 7-22 Holiday Marketplace - Shasta View\Project Data\02 CAD\2.03 Sheet Files\Construction Drawings\CA-6817-22_C.3.2_CHISTIAN AVE - KERRY AVE.dwg - C.3.2 CHRISTIAN LN - KERRY AVE - SHASTA VIEW DRIVE PROFILE VIEW matt.graham I 2 SITE KEYNOTES NOTE: -ADJUST ALL UTILITIES TO GRADE 3 4 9 OODWATER AVE. 'C KERRY AVE. 010 —CHRISTIAN LN.--3:— —WILSON AVE. U) U) —BELLADONNA ST.— UAIA/M AVE -------HARTNELL AVE. KEY MAP oil ROADWAY SECTION, SEE DETAIL 3 SHEET C.4.0 INSTALL 6" VERTICAL CURB AND GUTTER PER CORCS 136.00. '03" INSTALL CONCRETE SIDEWALK PER CORCS 131.00. 04' INSTALL ADA CURB RAMP PER CORCS 141.10 TO 141.30. 05' STORM DRAIN CURB INLET PER CORCS 230.00. 0_6STORM DRAIN PIPE, SIZE PER PLANS 071' DRIVEWAY APPROACH PER CORCS 148.00. 06! REMOVE 3' MINIMUM EXISTING ROLLED ASPHALT CURB AND TRANSITION INTO 6" VERTICAL CURB PER PLAN 09' 4' VALLEY GUTTER PER CORCS 125.50 RELOCATE FENCE TO EDGE OF ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY, 0; COORDINATE WITH CITY AND HOME OWNERS FOR FINAL SIGNOFF RELOCATE MAILBOX IN ACCORDANCE WITH POST OFFICE REQUIREMENTS 121, REMOVE LANDSCAPING UP TO ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY 0 20' 40' HRZ SCALE: 1 20' VRT SCALE: 1 4' 570 PVI STA: 31+78.71 ................ .............. ........ ................ ......... PVI ELEV: 557.56 Ao .................... ................ . 1 LVC: 00�00 LF� ......... PVI STA: 29+19.23 CI00 J K: 41.10 0.) 00 C11 4 .3 B)/0 PVI ELEV: 552.51 + in U-1 + C\1 Cl) ......... ...... LVC: 150.00 LF K: 93.24 > w > ............. I- 0� co C� . .... .... .... ... .. . .. . .. . .. ..... .. . . co ....... ui .......... ........... ..................... co LO 'IT m 560 m w + 560 W w ............. .......... . ... ................ . ...................PROPOSED SURFACE ....... EXISTING SURFACE ...... ...... ..................... ............ ............... 'SHASTA VIEW DRIVE''' .. .. .. .. ............... ............... STA: 28+75.00 TO STA: 34+75.00 00 — 00 LO co U-) Cn N to U-) C) m m w co t-- .0 CO C� U-) 11� LO 't U-) to C� C\! "It �0 (q (5 C:� C� co Lq Z C� C�) V� 0) C� to t": Zo q to Lq Lo q OR 6 q 17 N C6 C, CO m C�) u) LO (0 t6 to 1- t*- t6 K 06 co m 0S u') CD CS C.0 C\1 (0 m CIS (0 LO L6 (0 (.0 (0 t— 00 m cc CD L0 L0 Lo V) u') Ln to u') Lo LO u) to LO LO IX) u') LO u') LO V) LO u') LO LO V) L() V) V) V) U) V) L0 V) V) LO Ln Lr) LO (0 U") LO �0 to �0 V) LO V) L0 LO u') LO to LO V) LO Lr) LO LO LO 11 LO LO 28+75 29+00 29+25 29+50 29+75 30+00 30+25 30+50 30+75 31+00 31+25 31+50 31+75 32+00 32+25 32+50 32+75 33+00 33+25 33+50 33+75 34+00 34+25 34+50 34+75 SHASTA VIEW DRIVE PROFILE VIEW C14 - 0 z C) Z z Lu U) U) _r 0 z w F__ C) = 0 C�j r) w C0 co U) < (D Z T LLI 1.-- 2 3: LL < C) U) z w L C/) 5; C) w Of L L L cy') NU C) :5 C14 0 LL z C14 Cy') C) 0 00 Q? C14 C:) < < Z < w Z z w V 0 uj w 0 F/) < w 0 w 0� m fY FESS/ ip% 0 LL 8P9 0 U) w w Q w U) z ry 0 w 2 w uj ILL �:i <0� O > ri z 0 r') 1 W < Q w 0 lMi �e Cww 7-22 Holiday Marketplace - Shasta View\Project Data\02 CAD\2.03 Sheet Files\Construction Drawings\CA-6817-22—C.3.3—KERRY AVE - GOODWATER AVE.dwg - C.3.3 KERRY AVE - GOODWATER AVE - 2/03/2023 04:43pm, matt.graham 2 3 4 TER i AVE. ERRY AVE.- CHRISTIAN LN.- WILSON AVE. - BELLADONNA ST. UAWN AVE HHARTNELL AVE.- KE RNV R/W ,d pq tl f yt v tyssiY ttti3t}'t '< { tF. t 7 k { f t } I + t { #� Y st7 tls} t ti �tt it�f trt ti s t r} tr :... I q st i t i f s t } s t i } { i t t F / S Y 4 { t t t } tt t 120+25 . -1� 20+50 Y t��,i� it�,ft 121 ......... -- "_h---�" ,t'FF ,.7 tt st s stJ tf 4 it47. £�`4t t} � t tii}}sibs i{tyr s Ft FF 2ts s}t �l j :l}s �ts1}ift iy4strt i � P __.._. 6' b is s{k{{J ttiFt .. vt�i . ;�ttJ iitt�'1 t tt F ss d ......_.._,_.._,_.._,__._ �iy t dv 121+50 d f, RNV — J RAN — 121+75 6" a9 ' aq — t,� — —w— bel ---- R/W HAWN AVENUE PLAN VIEW I r e � R q. Rt�S q i tS � J}Jt t}t {JJr�t�r}fY �ryt 160+25 �16x0+50 t; }t ty `tt; t{J � 6°° as ' � 7 tFI .t��ri; 4 Ii 1 J y iJ yil lFis{s 2{}tt{. tf t. �z .v. dv ..._ ...._,... ...,... _ _� d ate., R/W \ R/W \ 1 550' I Mel R/W R/W tit ...._ bed 25; i 161 +75 t{FisJS { F 161 +50}r } } { t 1 � t t Jt{yt!' } IJttt t}i Ft� i3 tit} f�4r${{F t44}Ft�t {� i t{ it E+�tfy$t tJ >if tt 7;tzt yy F{t t.i i t jfit Ott. Fitr ;' t}s� si Ott ? } y sJt 1 t . rtFt}t ttt 4 2 17�} t �r�r kz« s�, .._—,_ . _......... ri jrt 4ys ._ .... ... .... ..... _ _ .._...... a d 4 �R/W _ R/W WILSON AVENUE PROFILE VIEW fi R/W R/W d d it t t 7 t sf{� iy £t It jy j 7 s (t 4 t Ft' t !s > t tt �7(ztsJrt�its{ys{7 is tt t�ssf� S� �� { t r t Jt }s 4 f tt t 140+25,..... -.. _-.'q 140+50 trt��14( 1 J srt b1t bel yt r t t } ;.stttt s tt: r 2tU l . / t se y t { f ........ ....,..6y€ �� " It f Y t. t� d d-d R/W R/W 550 1 MM h I '^^-.�'— beg ®...... .,ems J tt f i } is S t ..,.w..... �{1F}t - 4}Jtt lity} t .,jtf k 141 +75 t i it {i tsi — {}tJ r jtf {ttt{,tt jt{I11/Jft tfy t S' tsftttttt tJ tJtf t1s tits: y ll s t.s{ttt f 4 7 „ttJs 7.: tttt Str ty;t It kt R/W BELLADONNA STREET PLAN VIEW 1:14 R Wil 111,11 111'1� �1` '111" 1 :14 =k d;J:T*T;J_W 00+25 200+50 ` 21 t'yi``t aq tf ttt }147 f f ttt."" { 901, a s y s ... ..—...= 6" W"^'= t#At;t,; 4 OF 1 KERRY AVENUE PROFILE VIEW t / a hi ti s. s at: t 4 t, 180+25� �180+50 � t ty hens. t Jf }tt Jt `yY Jf J ".. tZ iffyy}1 t iJ: i F 1 k i { } t } )J y 1 I7 Jt. Jt; .,._._. CtV ..^^^^^ — tfs { m-T Ct1t — tWaajj. .. tf S tt t Yt M a KI, ,. f. 0 20' 40' HRZ SCALE: V = 20' VRT SCALE: 1" = 4' ,Wa 172sy{ t},£ }tf t tykt,tttt r}isyY. 181 +50 181 +75 - _ �n'ItJttt itY t, {{ss tt 1: t t 1 } Y t { " tv- v_Q �... _m...._ ..._. -t„... m° R/W RNV — N t` U)o �(0 �0-) 3:U L 4- O T ti_ Q N w r n V J z C) 0 U Z z F__ 0 N H O � Z D m Q U Z = w LL ry O U) Z O w w E < cn > Q C - i w O a - L c L w ch N U � N O LL No c M S` 00 U No 0 Q U Z N 0 w Z Z U W Ur 0 Q W _ fl� EESS/ , A V <fG or M Tir U) W Q Q Ory W 0 ry 2 w W LL Q n i o n rUnn V W 2 Q z_ r 0 ry %' Q r) U) 0 a 0 UJ of Q � s U) 7-22 Holiday Marketplace - Shasta View\Project Data\02 CAD\2.03 Sheet Files\Construction Drawings\CA-6817-22_C.3.4_SIDE STREETS.dwg - C.3.4.—SIDE STREETS - 2/03/2023 04:44pm, matt.graham 1 Z 1.79% /✓n, 5' V R/W TBC:545.96 a h o' `\9 0 R/W RNV '�� TOC 546.19 Q �6 a ° R Q :545.99 M I Q PED RAMP DETAIL - NW CORNER OF SHASTA VIEW DR AND HAWN AVE SCALE: 1" = 5' PED RAMP DETAIL - SW CORNER OF 4 SHASTA VIEW DR AND HAWN AVE C 4.1 .qC.Ai F' 1° = .' 4r t4� n �f k r grit s r� 3 1.79% TC 5' � 3�r �kr rrSlf ksf 7(irir $� }, f ,fit t/eft }i ....... . ... . .. t? .<E Imm An - O .q(:AI F. 1" = .ri, FAI • , RAMP OF © - AND HAWN AVE SCALE: 1" = 5' < t. 7 R/w _ 1�-' j , " Q J-" * " - - \ � TO 0 w� Q W R/W RA QR/W TOC:545.68 � Q �, Q TBC:545.63 1�n TBC:545.62 Q 4 �"� TBC:545.59 , 5' a Q ° V 0 Q. S6, PED RAMP DETAIL - NW CORNER OF SHASTA VIEW - AND BELLADONNA PED RAMP DETAIL - SW CORNER OF A.IkSHASTA VIEW DR AND BELLADONNA SCALE: 1" = 5' N � CD U)p �0) �U L N c — O a cn c tiQ r 0 C N J V 0zzcn z Lu U)2 0 TIN _ Z w I.— o N o Z 1.1� tCQn Q V z cW G p U) z W L C C/) 5; Q 0 i w � 4 % c k w L M N p U ¢ :5 0 (D N � r O LL Z o U 00 N Q Q U z N 0 r) w z Ur z U w w I— Q to w Q Of w _ O [If 0 0 U 0- FEES/ PCD LL cm-\ w■ U) z Q cn w ~ w UA0� LILo o ri Q 0 Q o W ry 0 7-22 Holiday Marketplace - Shasta View\Project Data\02 CAD\2.03 Sheet Files\Construction Drawings\CA-6817-22_C.4.1-4.3_GRADING DETAILS.dwg - C.4.1 GRADING DETAILS - 2/03/2023 04:44pm, matt.graham F 2 3 4 I 5 w RM R/W RNM TOC:547.04 a � Cn TBC:547.05 Q a h 0 1.44% Q 5' 1.72% z �'o Q Q TBC:546.89 PED RAMP DETAIL - NW CORNER OF 1 " = 5' i UV.J"Y V.JJ/ A ACO/ PED RAMP DETAIL - SW CORNER OF (--jiSHASTA VIEW DR AND WILSON AVE NQ1 Im S6\ 1 :Nil Z 111:14• I p� TBC:545.58 S TBC:545.58 `f' u ON jt 4 TBC:545.61 IF t�i S. Q 1 J�j x3 �#i 4 sill yi4 C' S 4rl z tl �t� I, f z£��t tl'iy 3 87% $ ft} 3 � t t tti s f t1 �rfl; 5' 7 PED RAMP DETAIL - SE CORNER OF SHASTA VIEW DR AND BELLADONNA ST 0i7:��omm t K-20 J m m • 1 , 01 , • - • - • SCALE: 1" = 5' • CD U)p �0) �U L N c — O a cn c tiQ r N J v 0 z C) 11 z (n = O TIN _ z Z W I. - r)N O � "' � L.V W' W Z m D (� U� Q U Z = W ry p 0 U) z W L C C/)Q 5; 0 - i w � 4 % c W L M N p U Q � 0 � N � r O LL Z o U 00 Z N Q N Q U 0 r W Z Z U IW- Ur to Q w W O Q w 0 Of 0 _ U [If 0- FEES/ CO Pv 0l I /� c }l rail II�II W r � V, W Z Ow 0ILL w > LLJ Q Q 0 0 z z ri Q o o Q 0 1- W0 Q 7-22 Holiday Marketplace - Shasta View\Project Data\02 CAD\2.03 Sheet Files\Construction Drawings\CA-6817-22_C.4.1-4.3_GRADING DETAILS.dwg - i.»rai16v :45pm, matt.graham F 2 3 El 5 • - , 9 1 • , , 0 0 , SCALE: 1" = 5' m Hw 9 Is J'A ji I in j �1 d1A I = i 11:101 U L, I � '16 III- ,Z I mKill m 1- , , SCALE: 1" = 5' V n —1 0.34% Q 0.34% n rn ^� RIW PED RAMP OF ® , , VIEW DR , CHRISTIAN LANE- SCALE: 1" = 5' c r 20 J m 0.75% Q I i0 0.75% Q r mw 9 Is U J1 I in Ij 3 IFA I = i iY&A"ll 4 119 &1 0 F!" fALTJ I =1T M 11 - VA - - Va WA PED RAMP DETAIL - SW CORNER OF ri 8 SHASTA VIEW DR AND KERRY AVE C'.Al C(01F-1"=F' 1.00% 5' a o U)o �0) �U L N c — O a cn c tiQ N w c V O z w w w II.- TIN o W o Z � ry Q CQ Q �Q(D = w Z > ~�< ry 0 C U z W E C C/) 5; Q 0 - W � 4 L % C k � L i W M N U Q :5 I n N � r O L.L z C14 MO v CO O N o 0 Q Q U z N 0 r W z Ur z w U W W I- Q to w Q Of w _ O [If 0 0 U 0- FEES/ � Pv r- CD LL c }l 7-22 Holiday Marketplace - Shasta View\Project Data\02 CAD\2.03 Sheet Files\Construction Drawings\CA-6817-22_C.4.1-4.3_GRADING DETAILS.dwg - C.4.3 GRADING DETAILS - 2/03/2023 04:45pm, matt.graham F 2 3 m 5 MATCHLINE 1.0 SEE RIGHT BELOW I I mm FAI I L FAI - -- — -- — -- — - HARTNELL AVENUE /0 COA17 COMP, GF PERSPECTIVE VIEW CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA NTS I MATCHLINE 2.0 SEE RIGHT BELOW %` . . . .. ... . it 4 "syf CHRISTIAN' "''N'101 Ile 1111�"11111111" 30" 30 LANE MRl RI\N R/W R/W ftlW' WILSON AVENUE-' R1W I —R[W- RNV RfW IV ", ......... � BELLADONNA ` !�"'! STREET MATCHLINE 1.0 SEE LEFT BELOW PORTABLE TOILET NTS RNV — 6' as -- — — 6' . NOTE: POINTS A SHOULD BE HIGHER THAN POINT B. KERRY DRAINAGEWAY INSTALLATION (FRONT ELEVATION) SILT FENCE w 1. SET THE STAKES VOID 3. STAPLE FILTER MATERIAL TO STAKES AND EXTEND IT INTO THE TRENCH. 03M 400/ 0 60' 120' SCALE: 1 60' LEGEND —LOD—LOD— LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE MINLET PROTECTION 2. EXCAVATE A 4"x4" TRENCH UPSLOPE ALONG THE LINE OF STAKES. 4. BACKFILL AND COMPACT THE EXCAVATED SOIL. F_ < 0 z C) zC/) z Lu U) _r 0 z w F- F- 0 C*4 = I.— 0 W Z < ry 5 CQ (0 u) < Q Z _r LLJ F- u- < ry C:) U) z 0 w L C/) < w > L L III CY) C14 (=1 0 :!!� :5 0 (D C14 r 0 LL z C-4 m C:> 2 -7) 2i :_2 0 0 75 00 C9 (D C14 < < 0 z P:: r) w z Ur z 3: w Y Q Lu w < &5- w < Of Q w _r 0 [If 0 0 C) 0- FEES/ P, lix 0 7— Mj LL 3: 8p9Z rn mmm� 0 F— d�x A cm- Tir 0 • z 0 z 0 0 0 • i NO i w 7-22 Holiday Marketplace - Shasta View\Project Data\02 CAD\2.03 Sheet Files\Construction Drawings\CA-6817-22—C.5.0—EROSION CONTROL.dwg - C.5.0 EROSION CONTROL- 2/03/2023 04:45pm, matt.graham 2 3 4 5 OODWATERAVE.— KERRY AVE. LHRISTIAN LN. w WILSON AVE. U) U) < U) BELLADONNA ST. —HAWN AVE — ------HARTNELL AVE. KEY MAP uj D Z, uj 0hp >® "hp- 4 ____ - mi uj SIGN AND STRIPE KEYNOTES INSTALL STOP SIGN PER CORCS 152.01 WITH ROADWAY SIGNS 01 PER CITY OF REDDING STANDARDS 02 REESTABLISH EXISTING SIGN PER CITY OF REDDING STANDARDS ,03 ROAD STRIPING PER CORCS 171.00 AND 175.00 INSTALL RECTANGULAR RAPID -FLASHING BEACON (DETAIL 2, SHEET C.4.0) 05 INSTALL PAVEMENT ARROWS PER CORCS 172.00 BICYCLE STRIPING 0 20' 40' HRZ SCALE: V = 20' VRT SCALE: V= 4' 0 SHASTA VIEW DRIVE PLAN VIEW z uJ QW UJ A it J uJ uj111111111110 m � � Q C\1 - w _j F_ < 0 z 0 z Z Lu U) U) 3: 0 w l_ 0 z r-) 0 z 5 U) CO U) Lf) < (D LIJ Z LL < c) U) z Ljj 0 I-_ < w L I L it > L L CY) C14 C) 0 Q 7-> C14 C14 0 LL z C14 m CD 7_2 (D 0 r 00 C14 C:)o 75 0 Q < 0 z w w z z w �e 0 LLJ z 0 7 w w < W _r of CO W 101 101 101 lul JIL LU FESs/ CO 0 ,u Of U— 8pqv� rn o F- C/) J, w w z CD U) < z 1Z-- ry 0 w LL _j LIJ - < > n C/) 2 z ES C) < 0 Q w o 0< z z (D U) I Roex-f] SHASTA VIEW DRIVE PLAN VIEW 7-22 Holiday Marketplace - Shasta View\Project Data\02 CAD\2.03 Sheet Files\Construction Drawings\CA-6817-22—C.6.0—SIGN & STRIPE PLAN.dwg - C.6.0 SIGNING AND STRIPING PLAN - 2/03/2023 04:46pm, matt.g 2 3 El 5 Lu U) TER AVE. I -KERRY AVE. WILSON AVE. W U) BELLADONNA ST.— UAIA/M AVE l-ARTNELLAVE. KEY MAP F SIGN AND STRIPE KEYNOTES - INSTALL STOP SIGN PER CORCS 152.01 WITH ROADWAY SIGNS 01, PER CITY OF REDDING STANDARDS 02 — REESTABLISH EXISTING SIGN PER CITY OF REDDING , STANDARDS 03, ROAD STRIPING PER CORCS 171.00 AND 175.00 — INSTALL RECTANGULAR RAPID -FLASHING BEACON (DETAIL 2, 04, SHEET C.4.0) 05, INSTALL PAVEMENT ARROWS PER CORCS 172.00 06' BICYCLE STRIPING 00' uj uj 19 z Z ce Lu J 94 1% 0 0 20' 40' HRZ SCALE: 1" = 20' VRT SCALE: 1 " = 4' C14 - (D F_ < 0 z C) ZC/)F-_r z Lu U) 0 z w F- 0 = I.— r') CIJ 0 W O� Z < ry U) (D Z LLJ F- LL ry C) U) z w L C/) < w > L L III CY) C14 (=1 0 !!!� :5 0 (_q C14 r 0 LL Z C14 m C:> 2 -7) 2i :_2 0 0 75 00 C9 Z C14 < N < 0 3: < r) w Z z w Y Q w F_ 0 to 3: < Q w Lu 0 < w 0 Of 0 m C) [If 0- FESS/ CO PkI 0 r'D C. LL rn w z > n (D U) < z 1Z-- z ry, 0 - EL w 2i w ILL > 0 n 2 z C) < Hr) Q (_9 < 0 z z U) 7-22 Holiday Marketplace - Shasta View\Project Data\02 CAD\2.03 Sheet Files\Construction Drawings\CA-6817-22—C.6.1—SIGN & STRIPE PLAN.dwg - C.6.1 SIGNING AND STRIPING PLAN - 2/03/2023 04:46pm, matt.graham CITY OF REDDING MEETING DATE: July 20, 2021 FROM: Toccarra Nicole Thomas, ITEM NO. 6.4 Development Services Director ***APPROVED BY*** t t s �w.,,.. ' 3�0 i Nicr�.00� ,m Directt , fiI '�. Tnanm t''txxxi.as, Del e $;.'�i�.ics i7r232ISeLeaag,ssasany tnthomas@cityo6' or ;? btippin@cityofredding.org SUBJECT: --Public Hearing taT�nsider Use Permit Application (UP-2020-01"669)/Parcel Map Applic n (PM-2021-0029""I'lltt ij,,, eneral Plan Amendment Application (GPA-2020- 01662)/Rezon Application (RZ-2020-01668), by TJG/Summit Development Corporation, requesting app�r to allow theconstruction of the Hartnell Commercial Complex consisting of a 30,000-square-f�ji kJplt Marker yoit Store and five outer pads for retail, a drive - through restaurant, a c 'wive .. arl i ,,,,,,automobile fueling station with a convenience store on property located at 24C� d 2525 Ha fall Avenue, 3055 and 3091 Appian Way in a "SC" Shopping Center Distrio,""t"I`;rand a 38,40 `care -foot mini -storage facility on property �J i .. located at 3050 Leonard StreettSentl in ag Center District. 4 ti` i tttUii t� 4� ti l} tt itt�t �i., ittj�t}tti it {4lttt7t iYt <. Recommendation Conduct a Public Hearing and, upon concltn!'t (1) Approve and adopt the Mite t tt;t'Ne� ve De'1 itigation Monitoring Program for the Hartnell Comm"'"'"" t t St t?s z, tt rt} i a1 Co 2,0 (2) Approve Use Permit (UP-2020-01669) for %hbeartnell ;tnmercial Complex upon t tl, determination that the necessary findings for approval up Reddxtt ` nicipal Code Chapter 18.14 Use Permit Ordinance are in evidence; (3) Approve Parcel Map Application (PM 2021.-00290) , i��t i rho '`Iartnell Commercial Complex; (4) Adopt Resolution approving General Plan Amehdtint Application (GPA-2020-01667) and finding that the action is consistent with the General Plan; and (5) Offer Ordinance approving Rezoning Application (RZ-2020-01668), for first reading by title only, waive the first reading; and authorize the City Attorney to prepare and the City Clerk to publish a summary ordinance. Fiscal Impact Development of the project would result in additional sales tax receipts for the City of Redding (City), as well as additional employment opportunities. Report to Redding City Council July 13, 2021 Re: 6.4--Public Hearing Re: Use Permit Application UP-2020-01669, TJG/Summit Dev Corp (Hartnell Complex) Page 2 Alternative Action The City Council (Council) could determine that the Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) does not adequately address the potential impacts of the project and refer the document, with specific concerns delineated, back to staff for further analysis. Depending on the scope, the Draft MND may have to be recirculated for an additional 30-day period and additional public hearings would be scheduled to obtain a recommendation on the revised document from the Planning Commission. The Council could additio 11 determine, relative to the General Plan Amendment/Rezone/Use Permit Applications ��f`�opt to the project is necessary which substantially changes the scope of the proletd1,t=,}'D'ependin"ithe scope of amendments, further consideration by the Planning Coma require,rior to adoption by the Council. The project cd# is of a proposal to develop 12.13 acres of vacant land with a shopping center and self-storagsty on x perty at the southeast corner of Hartnell Avenue and Shasta View Drive. The project consists of the 1. General Plan Amendment'' pnlicanon,,65}> -202 plan from the existing de to "Heavy Commercial." 2. Rezoning Application RZ-2020-016 from "SC," Shopping District to "I1 3. Use Permit UP-2020-01669. A ruest to square -foot Holiday Market Grocery Store, 667. A request to amend the general ,project site from "Shopping Center" to ve outer restaurant, a coffee drive -through, and an automobile store. The project also includes the request to allow a_ land. 2.8 acres of the projectsite consists of a 30,000 Mail, drive -through on 2.8 acres of 4. Parcel Map Application PM-2021-00290 to delineate each of the retail spaces and the proposed self -storage warehouse facility on their respective parcel, taking the total parcels from five to seven. The project site encompasses five parcels of approximately 12.13 acres and was previously developed with a retail complex located at the northwest corner. The site is currently undeveloped and has sparse coverage of Blue and Interior Live Oak trees, annual grasses, and scattered native shrubs. Commercial uses are located to the north and west. The south end of the project is bordered by single and multiple family uses. West of the project is a mix of commercial and multiple family. Report to Redding City Council July 13, 2021 Re: 6.4--Public Hearing Re: Use Permit Application UP-2020-01669, TJG/Summit Dev Corp (Hartnell Complex) Page 3 The proposed shopping center consists of a 30,000-square-foot Holiday Market Grocery Store, and five outer pads for retail, a drive -through restaurant, a coffee drive -through, and an automobile fueling station with a convenience store. The project also includes the request to allow a mini -storage facility on 2.8 acres of land. A parcel map related to the project will delineate each of the retail spaces and the proposed self -storage warehouse facility on its respective parcel, taking the total parcels from five to seven. The rezone is a request to change the current zoned "SC" Shopping Center on the proposed 2.8-acre self -storage warehouse facility parcel to "HC" Heavy Commercial. The general plan amendment request reflects the rezone request to amend the existing general plan designation of "Shopping Center" to "Heavy Commercial. The Project -generated traffic, is protected to further reduce the roadway level of service (LOS) to unacceptable LOS 41o� ��it�Iw Drive between Hartnell Avenue and Goodwater Avenue.. In lieu of widenin"61" to View through the corridor which would require acquisition of residential parcgtg �',ondition 20 req,s re -striping Shasta View Drive from two to three lanes (creating a I left turn laneus eliminating parking and shoulder space. Further, Condition 2I�`�uires installation ofsft� site sidewalk on the east side of Shasta View Drive to provide safe Viking space for pedesf`ns displaced from the shoulder area being reduced with the re -striping fae Citywide Transportation Impact Fee (TIF) Program of Projects contains a line item for M�tsr jPro�ects ,Including bike and pedestrian facilities. Although typically used to provide local —I and# � �f we transportation grants and/or minor capacity enhancements and not 'support ,�f�ridividual,'evelopments, this line item may allow the A,01developer to request reimburse��"`for the offsl improvements per Redding Municipal Code Section 16.20.090. This projects{} a of sigmfican`gional importance and staff recommends the Council consider partial reimbu�nent of the lie pe�trian improvements in an amount not to exceed $125,000 from the TIINNp tha , t`does ��the condition/mitigation, therefore a recirculation of the MND is nod tiaYy Tl �f;'ofitet,IF Project List is attached for reference. ' W", PREvious ACTION. At its regularly sched�{ l' eting of J{;x, 2024 the Redding Planning Commission conducted a public heari erta� `' to tz„ eject (ff report attached and p �� r P ) public comments were received. At the raring, thetp CommIon discussed the impacts of the allowed uses in the "HC" Heavy Commercial Dsirict onto th`t'jacent residentially zoned properties and recommended the general plan amendment and re b I to "General Commercial" and "GC" General Commercial, respectivelyfj5�'l�et'��ing Commission unanimously recommended that the Council approver zhe pro'4rttlrnents, recommending: (1) approval and adoption of the MND and Mitigatlofprogram; and (2) approval of the use permit, general plan, and rezoning applications vUlt'Ftfie recommended changes regarding the general plan amendment and rezone as discussed above. Council Priority/City Manager Goals • Economic Development "Facilitate and become a catalyst for economic development in Redding to create jobs, retain current businesses and attract new ones, and encourage investment in the community." c TJG/Summit Development North State Grocery DKM Engineering Report to Redding City Council July 13,2021 Re: 6.4--Public Hearing Re: Use Permit Application UP-2020-01669, TJGISummit Dev Corp (Hartnell Complex) Page 4 Attachments Resolution (GPA) Ordinance (RZ) Findings (available online) Draft Conditions of Approval (available online) Zoning Map (available online) General Plan Map (available online) Proposed General Plan Map (available online) Proposed Zoning Map (available online) Site Plan (available online) _,,, Parcel Map (, Architectural Comments (a Mitigated N online) Planning Cor Adopted TIF 8, 2021 (available online) List (available online) Report (available RESOLUTION NO.2021- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING ADOPTING THE MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION INCLUDING THE MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM AND APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE GENERAL PLAN DIAGRAM OF THE CITY OF REDDING RELATING TO THE LAND USE CLASSIFICATION OF THE NORTHSTATE GROCERY, INC. PROPERTY (APN 110-020-061) CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 4.12 ACRES LOCATED AT 3050 LEONARD STREET IN THE CITY OF REDDING (GPA-2020-01667) WHEREAS, Council WHEREAS, t 'le amendment to tlr development ;'j a 3 8,400-square-to Application L 020-01669; and �l ft r WHEREAS, t4 amendment on described on the attached amendtit to the City Council; General Plan on October 3, 2000; and general Plan Diagram is desired to allow for the mini -storage facility as identified in Use Permit fs, duly noticed public hearing pertaining to said �er 1 TWWAmendment Application GPA-2020-01667 as to the Ge"�f' l Plan Diagram and made a recommendation WHEREAS, the Planning C4"21j,6ission, accordance with the requirem6"'" , � recommended that the Mitigated Negative adopted for GPA-2020-01667 after cans submitted prior to and during the aforemen WHEREAS, the City Council held a 20, 2021; i�Wd 1pertinent documents prepared in �=r{.}ironmental Quality Act and do and Mtation Monitoring Program be of all te&onial and written evidence lic hear NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City C follows: 1. The above recitations are true and correct. A-2020-01667 on July of Redding as 2. The City Council has reviewed the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program, all reports submitted by staff, and all testamentary and documentary evidence presented at the public hearing, and has determined that the actions contemplated will not have an adverse impact on the environment. 3. The City Council hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program for GPA-2020-01667 as referred to the City Council by the Planning Commission. 4. The City Council hereby approves the amendments to the General Plan Diagram as set forth on the mapattached hereto and made part hereof by; LOCATION: Approximately 4.12 acres located at 3050 Leonard Street FROM: Shopping Center (SC) TO: General Commercial (GC) I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Redding City Council on the 20th day of July, 2021, by the following vote: AYES: COUNT NOES: COItl ABSENT: . C,,tt° �C1L ABSTAIN: C CIL ERIN D. RESNER, Mayor Jk ftYt itj y� } �t}�i tNt ptt �S (t ATTEST; " r`ai'�r' `.t "pis,,',} _� 'r �` '� , 4 rr� ,�� FORM APPROVED: PAMELA MIZE, City Clerk BA' E. DeWALT, City Attorney ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF REDDING ADOPTING THE MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION INCLUDING THE MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM ADOPTING AN AMENDMENT TO THE CITY OF REDDING ZONING MAP RELATING TO THE REZONING OF THE NORTHSTATE GROCERY, INC PROPERTY (APN 1.10-020-061) CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 4.12 ACRES LOCATED AT 3050 LEONARD STREET IN THE CITY OF REDDING (RZ 2020-01668) THE CITY COUNCIL 0FTHE CITY OF REDDING DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1 F Ok of fact ty finds and declares as follows: IN A. The Zo�� Map of the City �, Redding is incorporated in and made part of Redding Mumci & },bode Title 18, know ' the City of Redding Zoning Ordinance. B. The Plate g Cmission held a duly noticed public hearing pertaining to said amendment tp7� on June�1, for R 2020 01668 to allow for the development of a 38,400-square-foot mini-s -orag ''`� �'t It Id � t yi d }j,Use Permit Application UP-2020-01669 and recommended that "the C,t `=',.`Council ` ,� pt the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Prin prepared�jtthe project and the attached amendment to the Zoning Map. 7 yt � r t4 tj} C. The City Council held a }djs not } sitbhc on July 20 2021 prior to the first reading of this ordinance .il tf $ 1 Sr(t 1 D. Adoption of this ordinance will not adyd � y impact thertl lfare of the citizens of the City Qg of Redding and its surrounding regiq?y,,{ Section 2. On the basis of the :initial stn+�;,i'f{�oonirzg tY�plicaton RZ-2020-01668 prepared by the Development Services Department, theC'1ty Counci'�ds that the subject rezoning will not have a significant effect on the environment and adopts thetitigateJ�z�we Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program with the following 1. The City of Redding has completed a MitigI,,,te Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program for the rezoning. Based o°gW analysis of the potential impacts associated with the rezoning, the project will not have a significant effect on the environment. 2. The Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program and its supporting documentation reflect the independent judgement and analysis of the City of Redding. Section 3. The boundaries of the districts referred to in Section 18.01.050 of the Redding Municipal Code, as designated on a map entitled "Zoning Map of the City of Redding, California," dated January 7, 2003, are hereby altered as set forth on the map attached hereto and made part hereof by: LOCATION: Approximately 4.1.2 acres located at 3050 Leonard Street FROM: "SC" Shopping Center TO: "GC" General Commercial Section 4. This ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after the date of its adoption; and the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and cause its publication according to law. I HEREBY CERTIFY that this ordinance was introduced and read by the City Council of the City of Redding at a regular 11t� the 20th day of July, 2021, and was read and adopted at a regular meeting on the dayy; i� ,x '' i �ut,r=��ra 2021, by the following vote: AYES: CQQ CIL MEMBERS: NOES: TNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: NCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: C`NCIL MEMBERS: ATTEST PAMELA MIZE, City Clerk 1 vt., RIN D. RESNER, Mayor City Attorney FINDINGS SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION UP-2020-01669 PARCEL MAP APPLICATION PM-2021-00290 SUMMIT DEVELOPMENT USE PERMIT FINDINGS 1. The proposed use will not be detrimental to the health, safety, and general welfare of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of such proposed use. The shopping center and mini -storage facility use at this site will have additional impacts to the neighborhood in regards to traffic and general activity at the site. The conditions of approval req ��anents that address these potential impacts such as road improvemp� eapiietng, and traffic signal. Overall the additional traffic signal and other` ft „�' ovements wil" �1gate the impacts so that the use will not be detrimental to the he��,afety and general are of the neighborhood. 2. The prr�sed use will not be iri4`rious or detrimental to the general welfare of the city. As descrih �$lunder Finding 1 above, the proposed project would not result in any detrimental effects the health, safety, and general welfare of persons residing or working in the surroundrtE��frod b�'��site has adequate distance separated by a public road froresd �,,vi�� be roved by the proposed improvements. For the m i�i�o�s`"en� { same reasons described 5�r Findmg 1 e proposed project would not be injurious or detrimental to the gener 3 r✓elfare of they" t i { 3. The proposed use is cath t11als a�`lacaes established by the General Plan and the Redding Zoning ned -"'Shopping Center with a General Plan classification of `ioppm ��er (SC) ;�s current designation does not allow for convenience gas marts. Tl�'�j{ect reguire,t4general plan amendment and rezoning to Heavy Commercial to a i��t r the equi nt of a mini storage facility on the eastern portion of this siteth tj��pproval11 ;��e ge�i plan amendment and rezoning applications, the cons tfion offj�`�shopp center and mini storage would be permissible. The pro jeciener 05 goals and policies that call for complete streets (Goal T3); economic vitality 13), audeased retail opportunities in appropriate locations (CDD13A, B, 4: The proposed use and project design are consa l ill u � tt1esign guidelines established by resolution of the City Council in accordance�lt�4�edding Zoning Ordinance Section 18.40.050, Design Criteria. The proposal is subject to the adopted design criteria for commercial development referenced in the Redding Zoning Ordinance. In accordance with the design criteria, the architectural design of the proposal incorporates the use of various building materials and forms and design techniques that provide interest and avoid long, blank walls along the street front. Findings for UP-2020-01.669 and PM-2021-00290 Page 2 PARCEL MAP FINDINGS July 7, 2021. The proposed division of the property is consistent with the General Plan designations of Shopping Center "SC" and Heavy Commercial "HC. " The proposed parcels have sufficient acreage, configuration, and access to public streets to satisfy General Plan, Zoning requirements, and Planning Commission Resolution 2001-03. 2. The design of the proposed division is consistent with the General Plan and zoning in terms of lot size and accessibility. All proposed parcels have sufficient size, configuration, and access to satisfy the standard "SC" Shopping Center/Heavy Commercial "HC" District zoning criteria applicable to the site and can support future commercial uses promoted under the Gen��,�� {t� tt st rtl s �1�, 1tt (ti 4 £ s+° 1 3. The sate tf�ysacally suitable}jt the development proposed. The parcel map would create AM lots thte suitable area to OR any future commercial development consistent with the Holy Marketplace as p,sed under Use Permit UP-2020-01669. E 5. 6. The sd t" physically suitable for the proposed density. The proposed parcel map involves land de§mated for only commercial uses proposed by Use Permit UP-2020-01669. >ttyzti £ � �4s tt yt� tt The design of stt°ptoposit�tvasaon' improvements will not cause environmental damage or injure fish or"""J" life or them{Akgbitat. The project parcels were evaluated as part of the use permit poss in which ii ations were proposed under Use Permit UP- 2020-01669. The design of the proposed t�t,rjz�d imprh.> problems; Adequate measth tl potential concerns related to public h�II`,`mcluding, water for domestic use and fire pro��1�� extension o proper management of wastewater ti£tion of ne of proper public streets and sid alk, a`vft,,p�a. construction of necessary improvements. 7. The design of the proposed division and improvements for access through, or use of property within, the prop+ application of the conditions of approval, will ii" easements of record. ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS not cause serious public health auditions of approval to address not limited to, provisions for ,, titaryrewer facilities to ensure y sty drainage, construction pr and orderly timing for c�1 wtth easements 1 he parcel map, with any existing public Basedonthe Initial Study and the information contained in the record, there will be no significant effect on the environment. A Mitigated Negative Declaration is appropriate for the project. 2. The Mitigated Negative Declaration and its supporting documentation fully "reflect the independent judgment and analysis of the City of Redding. USE PERMIT APPLICATION UP-2020-01669 HARTNELL COMMERCIAL COMPLEX DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL General Requirements 1. Approval is granted for TJG/Summit Development Corporation to construct of the Hartnell Commercial Complex consisting of a 30,000-square-foot Holiday Market Grocery Store, and five outer pads for retail, a drive -through restaurant, a coffee drive -through, and an automobile fueling station with a convenience store insubstantial conformance with the site plan approved by the City Council on July 20, 2021. Minor modifications may be approved by the Development S�tipr; any substantial revisions will require either an amendment to this permit 2. Prior to z ' Ott of a building= 4 �rmit, Parcel Map PM-2021-00290 realigning the parcel configuoWn of the project, sha g= `te recorded. 3 0 5. 6 Parking il�'„lo be improved in accordance with Chapter 18.41 of the Redding Municipal Code a with a msrt um of 214 parking spaces. 0�.' r�i37 ytu f i't�S � .i i 4i{is t The developer is ft3" ttbYnI a ,1 'dustical ysis in compliance with Title 24 of the California Administrative Code when (h ",""building pl &,, are submitted in order to achieve interior CNEL noise levels of 40 dBA , eep1 9 areas "_� 45 dBA in habitable areas. The analysis and attending noise mitigatisures a}�;,ib be approved by the Development Services op Department prior to issuan`,,{q, a buil��o'ermit ,�t 'r r Any night lighting is to be rights -of -way. All outdoor storage is prohibited. so as 7. The mini -storage units are to be used for sW6ft"only. administrating the rental of the ministorage units only. A caretaker's residence, renting out office space, or using th equipment franchise; shall require an amendmentSothis u1 residential areas or public cc area shall be used for uses "y,ding creating a ,,;,`ml or other rental 8. Prior to issuance of a building permit, final plans J tl'e` entire project shall be provided that demonstrate that all applicable conditions of this Use Permit and requirements of the Redding Zoning Ordinance will be satisfied. Final plans shall consist of the following: a. Final building architectural elevations. The existing elevations of the anchors and retail pads shall be designed and enhanced as shown on the elevations approved with the Use Permit, or similar or enhanced design as approved by the Development Services Director. b. Landscape plans. C. Improvement plans for required public space. d. Materials/plans for hardscape features. UP-2020-01669 & PM-2021-00290 Draft Conditions of Approval Site July 2Z 2021 Page 2 e. Detail of all trash and recycling -area enclosures, screen walls; retaining walls; and sound walls. f. Lighting plan (building and parking lot) specifying the design of individual light fixture types. The plan shall include a photometric analysis demonstrating that excessive light and glare does not impact adjoining residential properties. A post -occupancy review shall be conducted by the Planning Division to ensure compliance with Sections 18.40.090 and 18.41.090 of the Redding Zoning Ordinance. g. Civil improve ment{„plan related to grading, drainage, and utilities. 10. TheMI"drrvough facilities shal('ket the design standards of Section 18.43.080 of the Redding Zoning mance, including netoration of a minimum 42-inch-high masonry screen wall or a mini rrtt 42-inch-high combitYii`alion landscaped berm and masonry screen wall between the drive thr h aisle and the public street or parking lot. 11 A to in the form of publi'c'gathertp`ace in the Redding Zoning Ordn, As spe area(s) "should reflect cal planning incorporate features such,netal trellis art, and incorporate stampe' color,+�. area with a dimension of demonstrate how use of the area meets tl 12. Decorative hardscape features shall entrances, and interior parking lot 5 percent of the total building area shall be provided dance with the standards of Section 18.33.040 of in the City's Commercial Design Criteria, this {;tiot simply be leftover areas." Plaza areas shall �orativ g%,,etaining walls, planters, fountains, public �cret}� pavers, or similar paving features. Any building entrance shall clearly rr t of Sectiort} 8.33.040. at the 13. Aboveground water -service utilities shall be scrcened_from possible with landscaping and/or masonry walls and be driveways where feasible. The locations shall be appi Development Services Departments. ,. entrances, all driveway e Building Code. the street to the extent r , �� from interior ilic Works and 1.4. All utility meters or similar mechanical equipmentJlnoaaons visible from a public street or the parking lot shall be placed in cabinets or incorporate other effective screening devices consistent with the project architecture. 15. The driveway access to refuse -collection locations shall have minimum turning radii of 29.5 feet inside and 45 feet outside. 16. The driveway access to store merchandise -receiving locations shall have a minimum outside radius of 50 feet; it is the developer's responsibility to determine if greater room for delivery truck movements is necessary based upon tenant needs. UP-2020-01669 & PM-2021-00290 Draft Conditions of Approval July 2Z 2021 Page 3 17. All noise walls, screening walls; landscape walls; retaining walls; and refuse -collection enclosures shall be constructed of masonry materials consistent with the architectural design of the center to the satisfaction of the Development Services Department. 18. All outdoor storage of miscellaneous equipment or materials (e.g., pallets, racks boxes, throwaway items) is prohibited. Any such storage shall be located within a masonry enclosure complementing the architecture of the main building. 19. Shopping cart collection areas in the parking lot shall be low profile in design in accordance with Section 18.41.130 of the Redding Zoning Ordinance. Business owners shall comply with Chapter 9.07 (Shopping Carts) of the Redding Municipal Code, including but not limited to the requirements fob �� #nd the development and implementation of cart containment and retrieval bland Streets and 20. The foll ing minimum off-sit&oublic improvements are required to be constructed or paid prior to� issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for any building within the proposed project as con it below ljl{ a. Priorto the`''ist°`'ertlf}tOccu'*y; the applicant shall be responsible to design and construct athree-land zjdway sectiaitj(11 e striping) on Shasta View Drive from Hartnell Avenue to approxir.rti ly 573 feet h of Kerry Avenue where a three -lane section exists. The cross-seshall inch, two two travel lanes, and acenter-turn lane subject to approval �'2, e C �`t��gme�r '�� need east -west pedestrian crossings, including rectangular rbeaq�;.baf b�tmstalled at two intersections along Shasta View Drive, as determined �'�`e City Er��eer. Re -striping shall consist of grinding the existing striping, slur tl of the road', and placement of new striping 3 and markings. b. Prior to the first Certificate cif'ceupair�{t;�$04re displ'ent of pedestrians from the "ingexisting wide shoulders from the restriping}`te apbe responsible to design and construct a 5-foot sidewalk where gaps exist on the; ern side, d�' sta View Drive from Hartnell Avenue to Christian Lane. C. Prior to the first Certificate of Occupa s�r� �1'p,„�pfieant shall be responsible for Ai MR, contributing their fair share cost of 249 percostcost of design and construction for a signalized intersection at the Hartnell Avenue and Alta Mesa Drive intersection. d. Prior to the first Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant shall be responsible for contributing their fair share cost of 16 percent of the cost of design and construction for a signalized intersection at the Shasta View Drive and Goodwater Avenue intersection. 21. Frontage Improvements — Hartnell Avenue along the project frontage shall be improved as follows: a. Widening and restriping to provide a 96-foot Right of Way cross-section i. 8-foot Parking UP-2020-01669 & PM-2021-00290 Draft Conditions of Approval ii. 3-foot Parking Buffer iii. 6-foot Bike Lane iv. 2-foot Bike Lane Buffer V. 12-foot Travel Lane vi. 14-foot Center Turn Lane vii. 12-foot Travel Lane viii. 2-foot Bike Lane Buffer ix. 6-foot Bike Lane X. 3-foot Parking Buffer xi. 8-foot Parking b. A 5-foot July 22, 2021 Page 4 C. preparation of the subbase, allaggregate base, and aziZ asp concrete between gutter and the existing street section and all necessary tra jtions and tie-in pavb�t,s well as asphalt overlay work on the existing street sections ne�� ary to provide aunicross slope from centerline to the gutter. All required street im ements shall include appropriate storm drain facilities, streetlights, and any 22. Frontage follows: a. Widening and face of curb wE i. 8-foot Bi'. ii. 2-foot Bi;» iii. 12-foot T iv. 12-foot C V. 12-foot T vi. 2-foot Bi]„ vii. 5-foot Bi viii. 2.5-foot ( ix. 5-foot La X. 10-foot F )e improved as (from existing b. Street improvements shall include preparation of the subbase, all aggregate base, and asphalt concrete between the new gutter and the existing street section and all necessary transitions and tie-in paving, as well as asphalt overlay work on the existing street sections necessary to provide a uniform cross slope from centerline to the gutter. All required street improvements shall include appropriate storm drain facilities, streetlights, and any necessary striping and signage. 23. Frontage Improvements — Leonard Street along the project frontage shall be improved as follows: a. Provide a half -section for a 60-foot right of way cross-section per City of Redding Construction Standard 112.30. UP-2020-01669 & PM-2021-00290 July 22, 2021 Draft Conditions of Approval Page S 24. Intersection Improvements = Shasta View Drive and Hartnell Avenue shall be improved as follows: a. Conform three -lane section on Shasta View Drive to the intersection. Southbound modifications to allow for a left -turn lane, through lane, and right -turn lane with a length of 75 feet. b. Construct all signal and intersection modifications required to properly align existing and proposed cross -sections of Shasta View Drive and Hartnell Avenue through the intersection c: The si t o1e and rriIJ arm on the south-eastern corner of the intersection shall be re �:f. , d. Tl{fisting 170 signal cller shall be replaced with a 2070 controller. Municipal Udh,#s, Drainage, and Grading tit tt tp{ 25. All food set ��ls regpt{ 1 ,r f kt Industrial Wastedivtslon. ai,}<£t{}, 26. Any onsite public wet longitudinal encroach 27. Public storm -drain shall be other ut A grading permit is to be obtained control measures shall be in place 29. All water meters with backflows 30 31 The fuel -dispensing area(s) must be covered minimum of 8 feet from the face of the fuel c constructed to prevent drainage across, or from, must be routed to prevent drainage flow througl such as an oil/water separator, sand filter, or apl Interceptors to the satisfaction of the City's in a 15-foot public service easement with no of Redding standards. Installation of sediment t�t 0s, extending fist be graded and -roof downspouts area. A structural control, dual, must be installed in storm drains to intercept and pretreat water and must be regularly inspected and maintained. Materials removed may need to be disposed of as hazardous waste. Provide calculations to justify sizing of structural control. Thefacility must have a spill cleanup plan. The dispensing area must be dry -swept routinely. Dispensing equipment must be inspected routinely for proper functioning and leak detection. No structures are allowed in the 15-foot public service easements. 32. Prior to improvement -plan approval, the applicant shall obtain approval for storm water peak flow in accordance with City Council Policy 1806 and the specifications of the Engineering Division. Such measures shall address impacts from the 10-, 25-, and 100-year storm events. Projects shall address peak flows to maintain predevelopment levels at all locations downstream UP-2020-01669 & PM-2021-00290 Draft Conditions of Approval July 22, 2021 Page 6 of the project. The drainage report shall be prepared to the format outlined by the City Engineer, stamped and signed and dated by a qualified engineer, and provided to the City Engineer with submittal of site improvement plans. 33. Provide a storm drain system that conveys the existing drainage from the north through the development and connecting to the existing channel to the south. 34. The project shall meet all MS4 clean -water compliance in addition to detention requirements. 35. Prior to the beginning of any clearing, grading; or site improvement activities, improvement plans for grading; drainMe, utilities and other required improvements shall be approved by the City Engineerp�{�� p erned City of Redding departments. These plans shall be in conformancqii1 � � tt h' eddmg�'r �nicipal Code (RMC) Title 16.12. Prior to the issuance of a clearing anO. Jgrading permit, � interim Erosion and Sediment Control Plan shall be included and appr�� by the City Engi built imvement plans with RMC 1<. All excess earth n 36. If raptors (Feb 1=; t ,.,, 't r � yftfi� ,< survey 7 days befor` ' h,, will be notified and consu biologist, will be placed cease for a period greater part of all clearing and grading permit applications. As gineer's Declaration are required in conformance with shall be disposed of lawfully. uction activities will occur during the nesting season for birds or qualified biologist shall conduct a preconstruction �n`activitt� tegin. If nesting birds or raptors are found, CDFW n appropril,buffer, as determined by CDFW and the qualified i the nest unl he young have fledged. If construction activities 7 days, a ,,,"l prJ tnstruction surveys will be required. 37. To the extent practicable, re"lies, crevices, or snags shall occur before bat maternitycolonies form i e , ( p�r°,� March lafter young are. volant (i.e,, after August 31). If construction large es >12 inch dbh ) occurs during the bat non-volant season (March 1 t��'�ugust 31), '�alifi professional shall conduct a pre -construction survey of the sn�rea�� locatety c� ies and identify measures to protect colonies from disturba''`'The��ttin surv��vill be performed no more than 7 days prior to the implementation of construction acttv(es. If a maternity colony is located within or adjacent to the study area, a disturbance frs'uffer shy. $f stablished by a qualified professional, in consultation with CDFW, to is protected from project activities.,a 38. Prior to any discharge of dredged or fill material! eaters of the U.S." including wetlands, authorization under a Nationwide Permit or Individual Permit shall be obtained from the Corps. For any features determined to not be subject to the Carps jurisdiction during the verification process, authorization to discharge (or a waiver from regulation) shall be obtained from the RWQCB. For fill requiring a Corps permit, water quality certification shall be obtained from the RWQCB prior to discharge of dredged or fill material. Verification shall be provided to the City of Redding Development Services Department prior to issuance the issuance of a grading permit. 39. Prior to any activities that would obstruct the flow of or alter the bed, channel, or bank of any intermittent or ephemeral creeks, notification of streambed alteration shall be submitted to the CDFW; and, if required, a 1602 streambed alteration agreement shall be obtained by the project UP-2020-01669 & PM-2021-00290 July 2Z 2021 Draft Conditions of Approval Page 7 applicant. Verification shall be provided to the City of Redding Development Services Department prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 40. The project applicant shall achieve the mitigation for the permanent loss of streams, wetlands, and other waters through the purchase of mitigation credits at an agency -approved mitigation bank at a minimum 1:1 ratio, or through onsite/offsite habitat restoration at a minimum 31 ratio. If onsite/offsite habitat restoration is proposed a detailed mitigation plan, including success criteria, monitoring, maintenance, and reporting as required by the regulatory agencies (i.e., Corps, CDFW, RWQCB) shall be submitted for review and approval. The affected regulatory agency shall identify when measures shall be implemented and completed for those activities impacting streams, wetlands, or other waters. All measures contained in the permits or associated ytgpprovals shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the lead regulatory 491. Redding E 41. Existing, erhead utilities alofi# he Hartnell Avenue and Leonard Street frontages shall be relocatedJerground. This shall include through the Leonard Street intersection continuing to the caster' of 2635 Hartnell Avenue (automotive repair). Off -site utility work may be re qu� t t'��oda� ` ` f;`�runding of existing overhead utilities. 42. Street Lights required on}7tintages. 43. A 5-foot public service ea�ent shall b ;Solid Waste 44. Double enclosures recommended to business that produces large amoutr Landscape, and Fencing acent to all right of way. trash 45. The project landscape plan shall be designed and installed i of Section 18.41.100 and Chapter 18.47 of the Redding 2 Landscape Plan Requirements and Installation Guidelines ,d regulations require, in part, the following:`'�,t`t; t' recycling for each retail >.... e requirements Knee and the Redding 2000. These landscape a. Provision of broad -leafed shade trees in and around the parking areas at a minimum ratio of 1 tree for every 4 spaces in a planter containing a minimum area of 72 square feet. A minimum of 60 square feet of landscape shall be provided for each required parking space and 80 square feet of landscape for each additional parking space. The landscape plan shall include a tabulation of trees and landscape area demonstrating compliance with Section 18.41.100(d) of the Redding Zoning Ordinance. b. Landscaping equal to a minimum of 5 percent of total building area shall be provided in accordance with Section 18.47.050(B) of the Redding Zoning Ordinance. The landscape areas used to satisfy this requirement shall be identified on the landscape plan. UP-2020-01669 & PM-2021-00290 July 22, 2021 Draft Conditions of Approval Page 8 C. A minimum landscape planter; as specified below, shall be provided along the following street frontages: i. Shasta View Drive: 25 feet ii. Hartnell Avenue: 20 feet iii. Leonard Street: 10 feet The landscape planters shall include irrigated groundcover, shrubs, and shade trees placed at a minimum of one tree for every 30 feet of frontage. d. Any area between the back of the sidewalk and the property line shall be incorporated into the adlacela ter. e. Parkl�v'ot landscapmg11 incorporate landscaped berms, shrubs, and/or decorative waIscreen the view "king areas from adjoining streets. f. R red trees shall be a ffftmum of 15 gallons in size. g• h. Groundcover shall similar materials s] area as a mulch to has achieved full o densely planted groundcover or turf shall include the use of high riatemulch materials. tt �§ c)t54i { f ' +live plant 4 ,Jerial. Walk-on bark, gravel, colored rock, and e used in comilnation with a living groundcover in all non -turf rot weeds an r�nsery$� pr retain water until a living groundcover i. Planters shall be protected from ve a , by 6- materials, ,ll j. All parking lot and occupancy permit. k. Placement of all aboveground or underground utility i planter shall be shown on the landscape plan. gh concrete curbs or equivalent prior to issuance of an in a landscape 46. The proposed project may require a Stream orb t raiion Agreement from the State hf„ Department of Fish and Game or a "404" Permit from�'e Army Corps of Engineers for wetland impacts. The project proponent is responsible for contacting the State Department of Fish and Game and/or the ArmyCorps of Engineers to verify the need to obtain an agreement or permit. 47. An Oak Tree Mitigation Plan shall be incorporated into the landscape and grading plans for protection of oak trees identified for preservation. Preservation efforts shall be to the satisfaction of the Development Services Department. 48. The developer will replace the blue oak trees removed from the site with suitable minimum 15 gallon size shade trees at minimum ratio of 1:1. UP-2020-01669 & PM-2021-00290 July 2Z 2021 Draft Conditions of Approval Page 9 Cultural Resources 49. If, during the course of development, any archaeological, historical, or paleontological resources are uncovered or otherwise detected or observed, construction activities in the area affected shall cease and the City shall be notified immediately. A qualified archaeological professional must then be retained by the developer to investigate the discovered cultural object to determine its significance. If the cultural object is deemed potentially significant by the archaeologist, appropriate treatment and measures shall be followed in accordance with applicable laws, as reviewed and approved by the City, prior to the resumption of work in the affected area. Signs 50. Prior totce of the firstf'J ""�rtificate of Occupancy, an Administrative Sign Permit applicr a sign plan for thntire commercial center shall be submitted for review and approv ccordance with Segfb',"' 18.42.050 of the Redding Zoning Ordinance. The sign plan shall adds s the location, size,""' td types of freestanding and wall signage allowed for each r, tenant, a�, s ell as the distribution of the total allowable signage area between tenants. All DW signage st the architectural features of the buildings and be in compliance with Chapter 18�they �� r�pning Ordinance and the Redding Advertising Sign a�sr:= t Design Mnual. '``°'' i j#4f a<`ti 51. No more than three mon`�ent signs or tW;tTnonument signs and one pole sign are allowed along the project street frokge and a in of,0 feet of separation shall be maintained between any two such sigh t��unles � dt icahoal" these standards are authorized by an rt s Administrative Sign Permit ah�ahCe 52. The pole sign shall have a maximum sic 0it of 90 feet, unless modifications of these st� are autY and/or Variance. Fire 53. Gates for storage facility shall have a 15-foot wide to be wider if fire apparatus must turn while enter}, of Click -to -Enter system or a Knox Key over - event of power loss so as to be manually opened and a maximum height of 25 ve Sign Permit e xte opening may have �4� v ir'ehectronic opening by way to an unlocked position in the personnel. The location of the Knox Key over -ride shall be on a post or other approved location for use by emergency personnel. 54. Provide one additional hydrant to serve the Holiday Market store. Hydrant to be located near the northwest corner of the building. 55. The location of the Fire Department Connection (FDC) for the shopping center main building shall be on the south-east corner, within 40 feet of the hydrant, but no closer than 10 feet. There shall be a Post Indicator Valve (PIV) in the same vicinity of the FDC so as to isolate the water supply from the FDC. All on -site hydrants, water systems and valves shall be behind City of Redding approved back -flow protection. UP-2020-01669 & PM-2021-00290 Draft Conditions of Approval July 22, 2021 Page 10 56. All on -site driveways adjacent to a building shall have a minimum width of 26 feet, unless a lesser width is approved by the Fire Marshal. 57. No combustible vertical construction will be allowed until serviceable fire hydrants and fire flow are available for firefighting purposes during construction. Industrial Waste 58. A general Industrial Wastewater Survey/Application No. 1 (Form F-0020) for each proposed commercial facility shall be completed and submitted to the Municipal Utilities Department, Industrial Waste Division, for evaluation of wastewater pretreatment requirements prior to � i r„ftif�i r issuance of a bta��, 59. If a foodaration facility' any kind is proposed within the project, an Industrial Wastew��''Survey/Applicati2 for each such food -preparation facility shall be complets�nd submitted to ticipal Utilities Department, Industrial Waste Division, for evaluatif`�,and sizing for wasteter pretreatment of oil and grease removal requirements. If outside ��.h*ing /cleaning of any food -preparation service equipment is planned or included in the faclhtt�osign, a c vered sanitary sewer -connected work area is required. It must be designed so a� '��t po11t�� entering the outside environment and storm water from entering the`sewer syst"O'S `must awe connected to an oil and grease interceptor. 60. If proposed commercial bi food -preparation facilitiesr a separate water service afi remaining commercial user. Environmental Health Departme) 61. Plans and specifications for Division of Environmental building permit. PARCEL General Requirements s) will types of uses, which includes one or more ,n facility with ving the other Shasta County issuance of a 1. In accordance with Redding Municipal Code Chapter 17.20, tentative map approval is granted for Parcel Map Application PM-2021-00290, allowing five parcels totaling 12.13 acres to be divided into seven lots to support future development. The parcel map shall be prepared and development commenced in accordance with these conditions and the tentative parcel map as approved by the City Council on July 20, 2021. The requirements of condition shall prevail in the event that there is any inconsistency between a condition and information or data presented on the tentative parcel map. 2. The applicant shall note that approval of the tentative parcel map will expire 3 years from the effective date unless an extension has been approved in accordance with Section 17.20.140 of the Redding Municipal Code. UP-2020-01669 & PM-2021-00290 Draft Conditions of Approval July 22, 2021 Page 11 3. A final (parcel) map shall be prepared in accordance with Chapter 17.40 of the Redding Municipal Code. The parcel map and all necessary supporting documents and information must be filed with the City Engineer prior to the expiration date of the tentative map. 4. In accordance with Section 18.40.040 of the Redding Municipal Code (Compliance With Map Requirements), all conditions marked at the end with an asterisk (*) shall be noted on the parcel map under a "Statement of Conditions" to provide notification to future property owners of development: requirements and restrictions established for the parcel map.* Map Requirements The following co~'apply on and recording of a parcel map: 5. In accar ,# with Chapter 17 dedications and Reservations, of the Redding Municipal Code, thy` �operty owner shall ate to the City all rights -of --way and easements necessary to prove' ublic access and ut* s to all parcels in the subdivision and to properly manage storm dry �ze. 6. The parcel and Leonard Stret'`oi plans for Use Permit UP Development Requirements 7. A reciprocal driveway and pai°" time of conveyance of any of the ' rights to Shasta View Drive, Hartnell Avenue ther then what is shown on the improvement )ugh 6 at the L.... _ ..... ;..--�... i U) RS _3 5 ...Y.__UU LIJ Q, cn I - ---------- Z U) - O HAWN AVE I F__....- [I- JONQUIL WAY Y ALDEN AVE N GIS DIVISION INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT E DATE PRODUCED: NOVEMBER 24, 2020 s 0 200 400 Feet Kol m H ♦.1 ZONING MAP -12 UP-2020-01669 / GPA-2020-01667 / RZ-2020-01668 TJG /SUMMIT DEVELOPMENT 2469 & 2525 HARTNELL AVE/3055 & 3091 APPIAN WAY/3050 LEONARD ST AP# 110-210-055 / 110-020-001, -037, -038 & -061 MTG. DATE: ITEM: ATTACHMENT: WILSON AVE _ _ _ 15�to 6 a — L £ __ �.. �. _4 LT I ......1 i _BELLADONNA ST 2 to 15 w w —_ _. I m Q > i Oi Q ------- t— ----- Q HAWN AVE �w T ------------- I � U - - - ---------- ----------- i i JONQUIL WAY 1 I E 1 � F i ! �t+'f HARTNELLAVE GC , I ---- t 7t�t Si tt { i t i �� 5l•�: �{ O ! �} It a J" u S itit i i 3 3 t iF� w MARILYN AVE 1 t0°0-___ I ... -i-__--------- ------------+-__ 10 Ito 20 to 3.5 V 4 i i IL 1 3il tlyt iT tzr �. _.... ......�.... ! f£� £tt''it}t 1 tr7lt�tt+ iiiFt.. t\F'I t F t 1 6s it7£r ALDEN AVE. t'1} - ; --- -- £ a � ti ________ i j I) ilir k# rtf y£ _ �..------'----- -�-- i. ,.....,'..____-_-_ ' �} (i �� JFF! ijst ${ t„t ! �.. ............... # � t i 2to�3:5 £ "," \ l� r,,..1 a.JO o MARLENE AVE / _ --------- f > co b a i —i N GIS DIVISION GENERAL PLAN MAP MTG.DATE: INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT E DATE PRODUCED: ITEM: NOVEMBER24,2020 UP-2020-01669 / GPA-2020-01667 / RZ-2020-01668 TJG /SUMMIT DEVELOPMENT s 0 200 400Feet 2469 &2525 HARTN ELL AVE/3055 &.3091 APPIAN WAY/3050 LEONARDST ATTACHMENT: AP# 110-210-055 / 110-020-001, -037, -038 & -061 annino\ProProiects\UP\UP-2020-01669.aorx _VVILbUN _�� 35�to6 1 BELLADONNA ST1,111111 L to.3.rJ _ >} i 'W Q� Q -- ZO O :FFfl c/) — —, Q HAWN AVE w — U ' I t � i I ------- _ y' _ _ _ _ 4 �+ JONQUIL WAY GL' _ HC �fr'rwlfis}=r= HARTNELLAVE -- Proposed GP GC'....�:� rrlcs s}, �I 1 i SC < GC z° .,..._, W 1 � f MARILYN AVE .__...— - ---- -________- _ �/ ry -_—r I_- - _________ 10 tt0 20 _ ( t0{ 3.5 t0 `3i rrt ill}t $,,,,}, }1 t I a 9 ALDEN AVE ; yr==f }t}} 7 rf '� J }}f=t e s --------- r � - I � YT f, �}t �y tl fit= I } j i f �'' __.. ------ 2 t0�35 ` },{' r r�==J=7 ki il'`` ir of, _ -� MARLENE AVE `� 0" � � m � r T" T---------- --- i m s t _µ r, N GIS DIVISION PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN MAP MTG.DATE: INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT E DATE PRODUCED: ITEM: JUNE4,2021 UP-2020-01669 / GPA-2020-01667 / RZ-2020-01668 TJG /SUMMIT DEVELOPMENT S 0 200 400Feet 2469 &2525 HARTN ELL AVE/3055 & 3091 APPIAN WAY/3050 LEONARDST ATTACHMENT: AP# 110-210-055 / 110-020-001, -037, -038 & -061 —ir,niP�a-i—+w iav 1Pamn_01ae4 any _VVILbUN _�� 35�to6 1 BELLADONNA ST 2 t0 .3.5 _ >r i 'W Q� Q -- ZO O :FFfl c/) — —, Q HAWN AVE 7 w ' I t � _ i I ------- y' _ _ _ _ 4 �+ JONQUIL WAY GL' _ HC t k HARTNELLAVE — t Proposed Zoning GC r ys {} U) SC I ; }t}tr r}t5 < " } GC �.} z° n o MARILYN AVE ._._.._ 1-0 tO 20 I A', '- i r rir t } ryt r tr\u 1 t ------------ - — ----- 4 tl� £ - �,,. 2 to 3 5 6 t ��`� '} } , {I,# ,t s 7� 10 ;to 20 r, .. t k {Ir}t 1 f i u\{r k -- T �� ALDEN AVE } a }t} t mop", k a t -_-_- t ` t i ` ` � _ \j tt t{rrr y r t<,„k:, I i 1 3 I 2to35 t} r 1 t � I r CQ f / c01 1t MARLENE AVE_ ~ �, T11...... - - ------- T 1CO - i / `SO 1_....._.... i Q V N GiS DIVISION PROPOSED ZONING MAP MTG.°ATE: INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT E DATE PRODUCED: ITEM: JUNE4,2021 UP-2020-01669 / GPA-2020-01667 / RZ-2020-01668 TJG /SUMMIT DEVELOPMENT s 0 200 400Feet 2469 &2525 HARTN ELL AVE/3055 & 3091 APPIAN WAY/3050 LEONARDST ATTACHMENT: AP# 110-210-055 / 110-020-001, -037, -038 & -061 a�nr,nP�nP��P�+w 1Pv 1Pamn_01aen any P�' I I 1 I I A I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I RIM 537.72 I I -- —�-- — INV 534 5B _ L Z-_ — _ _� _ _� - _ _ -------J HARTNELLAVENUE :_. _.._. _.. _- :...�._.: _ ..-.. _. _. — _ ..:,- ..TOP534.02 ._. — _. BUS � INV. 534 02 { �n 1 2W SETS — — — _ V i _.. I. RETAIL { I r t f,, } { 3,000 SFIcr 11 1 rci PARCELS l I 1 L € ; I =r { .,4rt 3a--:.:{ t; i1 !„{.� >24t7;.1 •�'`s,-- .57 ACRES 11 I 1' k PARCEL 1 1 1.0 ACaE� g -: j r t t)5 w; PARCEL 2 129ACRE5 } f , _') ,1 � I ;; @ 1 •: � -. 5 `, } c #,s EASTIIENT 77 3 z - t i. _ 24 I..� if• 't# $ 7t e t ^, 's �1 I PARC �. 1 ��, r itt -`' - ; : - <.. 2a - ---- --- — - ) I 1 ., U). I '^ .94 AC S ___ __ __ ( I' a v ; U25, k J ,t ffr t --- _____ ! ---- - e j I (. SETBACK a .6,1 24' L.??. 57 -- t1 �a I ___ _ 'i �om0, 2a. ( �, r s { r t.,4s• £ rf;;fts';silt{f �r�;ta � gag �M Eti 8 AY 46 '---•--' 12 17111A „ ,. c. —"�j., } Y (<{fs F t I R a'.. '" F i tij } 1r`r: Oa {t { i 1 �. r i l 6 SHOPPINGr ) + `+' PARcEt 7 ---- — -- . t 5 ----- - I.I g 43 �� i � i i _ STORAGE FACILITY a t ¢ I ` GROSS:2.77 ACRES ____ k ' d IS"' -. #-_: 2a'. - PARS o )�,t( t 1 + N 4ACRES O 6 � . I a 350 } ( rr' rs; I 2.•3. } W 15' 1 C. C'. 3. if itt ty �. •,.y n }:{}s - 1 e i. ______ -1 H30.664 t fr t ts}; �Ir,trsf ?.I,t,::Ytr ,{Y �,�,f.,t -zf ,Zit ;k3 -: __�_I t_,h_i fi`I £2l,t,:ti "�.,�.ff;y; 7+�8.;'S); .4�, • (JJ If F't, ______ 5PARCEL G i t 7< tt}, trf 1 1 1 }ntf - tt i .,�;, I s` t ltt t �- \` t 1 k tfSt t c .ttt}fr�'if 1 \', 11 t f1) FgiE EBCAPE \; ..' ... .._ ._._t-. .._ .._... .._.. ..,_. _... .— — — -'i'S"�+ Y 'tL+•+'F•''.'EASEMEBT , _.... za i " I , I r gi ti �\V. °s � � 9 I I }krt�t ft{t� 7 ri 1 rs t� rtalrrttts$t t, � �. � .•_.��• THE ARCHITECTURAL THEME OF THE SHOPPING CENTER WILL BE APPLIED It, f TO THE SELF STORAGE FACILITY TO }�A CREATE COHESIVE AESTHETIC TO THE I t {tI t} ttr y tir }t t7 %i I ENTIRE 11 ACRE PROJECT. �ff it t Itt t t A arrrir } rlt �f i }{I3t`r } `y •�{r�}rttrtf{}.i ttttr itrl tt,t.S},}' ll:; I E Y I Ns t I b Y 9! e r \0 INV. 526.73 RIM 530.90� I -_ _ ---"-- -- i) SHOPPING CENTER PARKING ANALYSIS USE REQUIRED STALLS PROVIDED A. 30.664 SF GROCERY 103 147 S. 2,000 SF COFFEE 27 28 C. 3,200 SF DRIVE THRU 43 30 D. 3.024 SF GAS 13 21 E. 3,6110 SF CAR WASH 12 24 F. 3,000 SF RETAIL 13 19 TOTAL 211 7 38,400 SF STORAGE FACILITY PARKING AND. BUILDING ANALYSIS USE/SIZE REQUIRED STALLS PROVIDED Al. 500 OFFICE /1.200 STORAGE 3 3 B1. 6.600 SF STORAGE - - C1, 3.000 SF STORAGE - - D1. 3,000 SF STORAGE - - El. 12,60GSFSTORAGE - F1.6,0GOSFSTORAGE - - G1.6,000SFSTORAGE - - TOTAL 3 3 NOTE: T ACCORDING TO SITE. PLANNING PRINCIPLES IN THE COMMERCIAL DESIGN. CRITERIA DEVELOPMENTS 25,000 SF OR LARGER REQUIRE AREAS EQUAL TO 5% OF THE TOTAL BUILDING SF FOR PUBLIC USES. 2. ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPE EQUALING 5% OF THE TOTAL BUILDING SF IS REQUIRED IN ADDITION TO FRONTAGE AND PARKING LOT LANDSCAPE. LEGEND RECORD BOUNDARY - — — — — — — - ADJACENT BOUNDARY - — — — — — - 25' BUILDING SETBACK: ----« -- - -- (EX) OVERHEAD ELECTRIC '^ •' '' (EX)STORMDRAIN _. .. ._--- _ .-_- - (EX) SEWER LINE —.. -- - —9. (EX). SSMH _. _. _. _.._.._ .._.._.._. (EX) WATER LINE —.._.._._. _.._._ _. (EX)WATER VALVE: --- -----'-'-----IF (EX) FIRE HYDRANT ROW DEDICATION - (N) LANDSCAPING VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE OWNER/APPLICANT NORTH STATE GROCERY, INC PO BOX 439 COTTONWOOD, CA 96022 ENGINEER DUANE K. MILLER CIVIL ENGINEER, INC. 6172 MEISTER WAY, UNIT 1 PO BOX 1307 ANDERSON CA 96007 PROJECT ADDRESS 2469 HARTNELL AVE REDDING,. CA 96002 2525 HARTNELL AVE REDDING, CA 96002 3055 APPIAN WAY REDDING, CA 96002 3050 LEONARDST REDDING, CA 96002 3091 APPIAN WAY REDDING, CA 96003. APNs 110-210-055,110-020-001 110-020-037,110-020-038 110-020-061 TOTAL AREA 11.32 ACRES CURRENT ZONING SC -SHOPPING CENTER 11.20 ACR ES PROPOSED ZONING HC - HEAVY COMMERCIAL 2.77 ACRES CURRENT GENERAL PLAN SC -SHOPPING CENTER. 11.20 ACRES. PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN HC- HEAVY COMMERCIAL 2.77 ACRES LANDSCAPING (11.32. ACRES) REQUIRED- 13,140 SQ FT PROVIDED - 42,484 SO FT APN STORAGE FACILITY 110-020-061 APNs SHOPPING CENTER 110-210 055, 110-020-001 110.020-037,110-02O-038 PLANS PREPARED UNDER City of Redding THE SUPERVISION OR Holiday Market Place ea°FEssiQv Use Permit Site Plan �O E K. 4,7 'T( DUANI1.11 ILI.F.R DATE SHEET 3 21 OVIL ENGINEIR INC. 11/i6/20 �`1 Q `Tl,IT CIVIL F.OF 0 Po I`Xl 1 1IF.'ISTtN tt 11 L VIT ] AnoFJls�n, ra�sum SCALE OF IENC CO PhtiF.NOk.COM 1"= 50' C4 ------- ------ --- --- - ----------------- --- - ------- - - ----- - ---- HARTNELLAVENUE 031.1"-k — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — -- ' 51 PSE N59W37-E 20:54- NSVW37E EASEMENT 270.13! Nawwi" 14&06, (E) 2� ---- — — — — — — -- -- — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — V 0 DRIVEWAY EASEMENT PER 32_PM_59 Im, f"" AQW, 43,625 W 1.0 ACRES 24.675 W R 0.6 ACRES Li (E) 40 MN-EXMUMVE ROAD AND PPUJBK�UC u UTY n EASBANTS LIJ 141 OR Ibi of Ji" DRIVEWAY &5i� x "m E X4W -- — — — — — — — — — - SO NgOWOG'W 202-0 N89'W'24W "13' s00 Do' 12,17R-2992' L-378' > E 0,47' —29,92' L-3,24' < 0 4 41,313 ft' U.9 ACRES 25 LAND SCAME 17U 5MACK Lu F- - — — — — — — — — — - 2000-\ 1Y R-9QO.00 L-G2,22' 7 IX 120,780 ft� 2.8 ACRES It s52sztlw 7&46 - * 0 Lu 4111 011,11 '4p 50,126 ro — — — — — — — — — - .2 ACRES "I ............................................................................ LEGEND PROPOSED EASEMENT 4W RIGHT Y OF WA DAD (E) 20' EASEMENT FDR R DEDICAMON TAL Pu AND INCIDEN EXISTING EASEMENT PER 14 PM 31, 343ROPROSESS3 AND 350 OR 39 INTERMITTENT STREAM 20' EASMENT PER 30 ORfrl(E) EMERGENT WETLANDS Om (2.492 SF) EPHEMERAL SWALE — — — — — — — — -N59'52!55E (1,639 SF) N90rW00"W 285.54' EASEMENT "0' SEE WETLANDS DELINEATION it AND TREE SURVEY PE I R 1579—OR-103 BY WILDLANO RESOURCE MANAGERS 'V" sL (N) ROW DEDICATION 79 . . . . . . ... fl-798,00 M-1 01" — — — — — — — — — — — — — -- Z PLANS PREPARED UNDER City of Red 4 THE SUPERVISION OF: — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — - Holiday Marke Tentative Para (E) ZW EASEN" --TDAI M1 LF V/.�J WANE K. 17 t{ f F f �r{7r tr ll`If at}t}} � ! I�{j�it,a ?•rjta$�tfffki r{r}t�1'trt{'� ati {; rft�ii#aa ss�a u<31 t{�]}yt�i{t�yfj,}%rr t,. f � tr sif3 C}ti a at a t�{1M�`}'irs;�'J'S#'Stia+aFa }it ar t Ir t. Ihtttt,s�`�ra}atyl}s�{ UN SOUTH WEST 3 SOUTH EAST ® 4 SITE AERIAL VIEW - 4 VIEW 3 VIEW - 4 LVV^V 74'-8" 1OT' 9'-2" 70'-8" 35'-6" STORAGE YARD O g O tv r ti e " WAREHOUSE. " RISER OLER PROOU .FIRE N cV _ ill I J .. 7 i tI(t£.. f4`t tt MEAT (:OGLER MEAT PREP PRODUCE PR r 29'-9" 22'-7" 161-8" 22 3" 17=311 DELI RE }. { F cm! (. t t4, it ii i} { i £ I ;4 o cC O _ DELI t t14t r } It Y £ i }Cj� t tl '}its it}ii Vi }<#it'st. }�tjt - tip ttsAl #t �� i i �it'�}I } F �' A Y 1 i ,• #. � � I ....... p. I. !.. I I i ! o it ire'._ I fi i}} }Y Vt Y I 12 t I # ( r { F ❑ ❑ DELI COOLER } '. 1 I Y�� tit I T £ � 3i� f£�EiSt f} t - J I r iiif'r i hks 11 £ i£;,kt t i{Jtt{ I ALLGENOE� pf �} Itly'" ti i>liaSOFFIT ABOVE dA1L 6ER6E I ._1 OSCT ' RE9TRO.. � 5-2 tffi5� I� 1' 21I 8-2" 30'-7" 7i42�9" L2 2 8 & REAI(R..OFi DINING REFR CA<•E --OFFICE ROOEt if IJ �jl L! 17 it. ftt allz... i -- -- o.. l 1 II tt t{ t p{~L i tyit t r� II II❑ v 36'-7" 10'-0" 48'4' 39'-4" 32'-8" 37A" 13' 6" 217'-0" j"tt } Will ,, � IL ' ' FLOOR PLAN - GROCERY I iit"I'm U111' IL4 I �q vo, ---- ------ -- V-5 IT . .. . ... ... I CO El J'u - - - - - - - - - - � - - - - - -- I lit- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - L r- 3- I - - - - - - L- - - - - - - - IfL- E TYP. BUILDING'A'- ROOF PLAN - GROCERY COLORSCHEME1 STONE VENEER BUILDING'A' ELEVATION GROCERY I BSB D E S I G N D C S I G BUILDING 'A' ELEVATIONS- GROCERY s PERSPECTIVE . C?LRSC EME1 STUCCO � N .. ROOF \\//� y \\ . . \[{±2\ . } BSB . } 2\ Gam} � \\ \ \ ƒ ( \� ,) BSB COLOR C METAL ROOF i I in BSB D E S VIEW - 3 VIEW - 4 IL ` ' RM BSB DESIGN rem no CrUCRAC " mo t �tv BUILDING ' ' ELEVATIONS - CS GAS 2 VIEW - 3 VIEW - 4 BUILDING'D' ELEVATION - CS GAS A4.03 L#L#fSC2ESC} STONE VENEER BOARD k BATT . ._e .. �� .|�¥.■: � <y K7777a M� FRONT ELEVATION , VIEW = 3 VIEW - 4 r �` VIEW - 4 COLOR STONE VENEER BUILDING'G' ELEVATION - STORAGE LAP SIDING LAP SIDING SCHEMES} BOARD & BATT 2:��.!■■ -.■:: ©�-©:.■©■ y-GROVE\ BOARD $ BATT 00� PYRAMID FLAGSTONE POST CAPC- ASPEN VISUAL BARRIER DETAIL OPTION 2 769- SPLIT FACE STANDARD - LIGHT / NOR- MAL WEIGHT 375- SPLIT FACE STANDARD - LIGHT / MEDI- UM WEIGHT VISUAL BARRIER PILASTER DETAIL - OPTION 2 FLAGSTON WALL CAP ASPEN CMU WALL DETAIL - 2 A8.02 VISUAL BARRIER WALL AND CMU WALL DETAILS NOTE PROD AEOL TRAS TO 11 DRAY (2H'X6'X3/16' STEELTUBE BEAMS CONNECTION PER STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS "ICHOLS PERFORATED METALPANEL -'STYLE. NAME" 8'.BASALR'E SPLIT FACE :37S STANDARD LIGHTfMEDIUM WEIGHT OR APPROVEDEGUAL:. SEE APPROVED PITCH TOWARDS GATE, SEE PLAN I THIS SHEET ROLL ON TRASH ENCLOSURES 3 CU VD 4Ff.X 6 FT 91N 6'.W CONC. CURB 4 8c.ROCKFACE CMU DOORS ANCHORED TO 4' DVG POST:: PROVIDE STEEL LATCH W/ PAD LOCK; BALL BEARING HINGES & CANE. BOLT WITH HOLES AT CLOSED B OPEN POSITIONS 4': MIN. THICK CONCRETE APRON FRONT ELEVATION 1 TRASH. ENCLOSURE PLAN SCALE: 3/6 =1'. SCALE: WEI IX M I STONE VENEER STUCCO PERSPECTIVE MONUMENT SIGNAGE AT CS GAS ALONG HARTNELL AVE. STUCCO FRONT Ej OF S k/ QVJVE SIDE FRONT PERSPECTIVE - V I E W - 3 MONUMENT SIGNAGE AT ENTRY ALONG SHASTA VIEW DRIVE ti tt {#t�jt'tttl3t t4tt t i t ttjt�#tt��ttw e `��tsflJ�€1x! ttz r ss tis )ti'. }tit st t''1rl s:.. s}si7is}t{tts ljttitif�{ s t ttsf sftE $t ifrstt,cs {ts tt1; �+s> tt}} i 7 z t3'(d}77sft,tr.�,>, rjr£ttt rJ�} } { trsst sr f ; 7 ft t' i�T �1 S��, t1 2 tz� j4 ztttt rt� tir #t t r YOU t t7att'tttJ�t {its"� i i�t�i��s� 4 t tt}fir sts{4 tf{�t,itj t4r� s2� Jz}y ist t t}t+st }r t t t1 zt i� rlttf k i} is } t { { s ttt .. �; tt tJ i?�jt�tttts t}t a}�tS t- iri - t«f'Ptr{tn tJ�t t tt# ttktstr ityJYt}7tt tp } � �tf iy t st t, t tti 7 } tJztstttzy �k`�' I it { r 4t�t r # i�lrlsJ} { ztt ztt�ytttk?, xsrRt{l tt' sf #t sits�rt�t �t�st�,�}�ttlsst�''� tttrt`it�s��frt`�'� IM i — .. �, j t a s , {�yi it }.�J } tf� f �i tlyt �( y •. _ .. �. _ _ -�_. £ £ 3 t Y T -4 Allf �wrrr Wrrw� rrr Yrrww� rr�r �r� R 1 F.rr�� rwn I rrrw� t}zfs If (Ian Il £ r{i£ ££ jt{�i{ts �F£Ji:r F 1 rF ('vr£k it,jj ateSHT'LL46 = 11 } t l I 1 77 a 7, t t f� tjlf 4 14 �i` ; � t 1i jail yAtj 1 1 f t j£t j t 4 j`i fjj tn1,l tttj i$ tr tt s„+y„a lilyil�SRI L 3 si t ss tt J6Yti£ saj i£ £tt t t=----- _j L N TT- ...� ..... .... .�.� _j SCALE: I, = 40'_Cn CENTIRE a s s o c i a t e s green design -landscape design emiranmental consulting mwM1 .mcentlreassocIates.cm 4475 Tenaya CL Redding, CA 96003 P 530-245-4590 F 530-245-4593 www.mcentirelandscaping.com C-27 U0 361638 PROJECT NAME: DESIGN/BUILD FOR HOLIDAY MARKET PLACE HARTNELL AVE at SHASTA VIEW DR, REDDING, CALIFORNIA SHEET NAME:MR LANDSAUMPE SHEET LAYOan UT PROJECT PHASE: DESIGN SUBMITTAL WORKING DRAWING REVISIONS: DESCRIPTION DATE DRAWN BY: JCC APPROVED BY: JLM DATE ISSUED: 2020111115 SCALE: AS -NOTED SHEET NUMBER: Plant Legend BOTANICAL —COMMON [Water Use] SIZE QTY 1 Acerrubrum'Red Sunsel'- 15 GAL 26 Red Sunset Maple [MOD] 2 PI tacla chinensis'Kelth Davey- Keith Davey Chinese Plslache [LOW] 15 GAL 41 3 Acermbrum'Bowhalr- 15 GAL 43 Bowhall Scarlet Maple [MOD] 4 Prunus cerasifera'Krautor Vesuvius'- 15 GAL 19 1 Kreuter Vesuvius Purple Leaf Flowering Plum [MOD] �� 5 I Lagerstroemia x'Natchez'- 15 GAL 24 Natchez (While) Crape Myrtle [LOW] 6 6 Abella x Grandiflova'Sherwoodg' -' Sherwood Glossy Abega[MOD] BGAL 35 7 ( Ilex comuta 'Dazzlee - 5 GAL 82 Dazzler Chinese Holly [MOD] 4",J 8 Rhaphialepis lndica'Enchantress'- Enchantress Pink India Hawthorn [MOD) 5 GAL 27 9 9 — Berbads Thunbergil Rose Glow'- Rose Japanese Barberry 5 GAL 108 ( Glow [MOD] 10 10 Vibumum finus'Compacta'- 5 GAL 43 Compact Laumstinus (MOD) F"t9g �11C 11 — Loropeta/um chinense'Razzleberry- 5GAL 34 .get. Razz{ebeny Lorapetalum [MOD]. - tz 1 12 Lavandula Auguslifolia'Hldcote Giant'- Hldcote Giant English Lavender — 5 GAL 110 ( [LOW] 13 13 Rosa 'Flowering Carpet Rose'- 2 GAL 95 Flowering Carpet Rose (Reds and Whites) [MODI Phormium lenax'Bronze Baby - 't 14 �15 Bronze Baby New Zealand Flax [LOW) 5 GAL 20 t5 Parovskla atriplicifolia Blue Spire'- Spire 1 GAL 73 I Blue Russian Sage [LOW) i - ---- Deer Grass I Muh/enbergia rigens - 1.GAL 64 [LOW] 17 Ca/amagrostis x aculiflom'Karl Foerster - 1 GAL 14 — Feather Reed Grass [LOW] 181 I Pennisetum orientale'Kariey Rose'- 1 GAL 50 Kadey Rose Fountain Grass [LOW] t9I Bouteloua grac/lis'Blonde Ambition' - 1 GAL 140 Blonde Ambition Grama Grass [LOW] 20 Pennisetum alopecuroides'Lgtle Bunny- 1GAL 98 Little Bunny Fountain Grass [LOW] �— ----,apan!hus -- -�-��_ 21 hybdd'Queen Anne'-- F{9 GAL 122 Queen Anne U lyof-the-Nile (MOD) aWe 22 Cotoneaster dammeri'Lowfast'- 1 GAL 104 o Lowfast Cotoneaster [LOW] 23 Dietes Iriefloides - 1 GAL 148 Fortnight Lily [LOW] r 0- ' 24 ----- Pitfosporum tobim'Wheeler's Dwarf - 1 GAL 21 Wheeler's Dwarf Tobira [MOD] z5 125 Pymcantha coccinea'Lowboy- 1GAL 62 Lowboy Flrethom [LOW] 26 Hemerocalfis hybrfd'Stala do Oro- 1 GAL 26 Stage de Oro Yellow Daylgy [MOD] !i 27 Rosemadnus officinalis'Huntington Carpef - 1 GAL 138 . Huntington Carpet Rosemary [LOW] 0• 2e 28 Ceanothusgriseushonzontafis- 1 GAL 135 Carmel Creeper [LOW] a 29 29 Juniperus sabins'Broadmoor 1GAL 168 Broadmoor Jun[per[LOW) �� ArctosfapRadi ut 1 GAL X. Boari erry [LOW] Radiant t3oarberry [LOW] 660 SF Annual 4" POTS @12"OC f Juncuspalons'ElkBlue'- 1 GAL 193 (386 LF Elk Blue California Gray Rush [LOW) @24° OC) 1. Symbols reflect approximate plant size with 5 years growth. 2. Quantities shown are approximate. Verify quantilles In the field to accommodate actual site conditions and dimenslons, and to preserve plan spacing and layout. 3. An planters shall be mulched to a minimum depth of 3" with: A) 1/4" itne bark mulch to Annual Color areas; B) Waikon fir bark or rack (as noted) in remaining planter areas. 4. All construction shag conform to the'Standards for Public Works Construction' (Green Book), Slate and Local Ordinances, and Local jurisdictlon Construction Standards. 5. In accordance with Chapter 18.47.020 of the Redding Municipal Code,. the Contractor reserves the right to make alterations to the Approved Plans as necessary to address existing conditions, unforeseen site changes due to construction activities, and/or. plant nursery stock avagabpty, without plot City approval or re -submittal, so long as said changes do not affect the character or quantity of the plant material or the Inigatbn system design t I� (i rf fit St 6. AD dirnenslons, grades, and utility locations , of ponstruotion: i } i-{ iilit t+tirr)iii(rr�t 7. Ali planting areas shag be loosened top 'p '¢t`' i,�'` `s1te eo sir 'i� � s needed to provide moisture retention if lopso,jp"fTItag be dean, friable loti`tY)rt ,,Y"at( of approximately 6.5-7.0. t) rii } rt Y7 t istri it t r}� AA 8. Ail planters shall have a mug hf� '4i'elrnv the top of cacti,. tl i ii#,' 54 rj i?i 4i 9. A fully automatic krlgat4on �, be Installed. All valves shag be below gretle valve box.. ;ti>, MII,RN�01 10. This plan is for the sole num Associates and Is not Intended to be used purpose. Copyright by �A&soctates. AN rights reserved, No part of this plan ma "41 t t, i reproduced out ex��en pemdsslon from McEntb'e Associates. To be returt'!`i"+}` used, rr�) rr j t�rrfi'i r 11. The Contractor has sate Si to limit and/or hag work to be performed during times of unsuttabla conditions'to pth to prevent voiding the long-term Warranty/Guamnteeror produce situations where I ; 4,lrnt the Project or Agency are necessary. Said conditons may Include, but not be ted folic 11tp temperature conditions, hot or acid; eHmatk conditions such as high winds or rain: wet or tY(1 conditons; and work or Installation conflicts with other contractor/sub-contractors on ��ir Ch the conditions Iisted "A" through 'Incomplete or un-flnlshed I ndscap i 12. Landscape maintenance and estabi hmant PROJECT REVIEW BY DIVISION RECEIVED APPR( PLANNING PARKS WATER REU-ELECTRIC 1. THIS IS A NEW CONSTRUCTION PROJI 2. TOTAL LANDSCAPE SQUARE FOOTAG OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS McENTIRE ASSOCIATES, INC. WILL NOT BE REST UNAUTHORIZED USE OF, OR CHANGES AND/OR ANY AND ALL CHANGES TO THESE PLANS MUS' APPROVED BY McENTIRE ASSOCIATES; INC. TH AND iDEAS.SET FORTH HEREIN AS AN INSTRUN IS THE PROPERTY OF McENTIRE ASSOCIATES A IN PART FOR ANY OTHER PROJECT, WITHOUT T AUTHORIZATION OF McENTIRE ASSOCIATES. © COPYRIGHT. 2020. ALL RIGH CRIME PREVENTION THROUGH ENVIRONMENTF THIS PLAN HAS BEEN DESIGNED UTILIZING THE DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS OF "CPTED", CRIME ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN. a s s o c I a 1 e s green deSW • landscape deskJn environmental convuliing tW✓w.meentlreassociates.eom 4475 Tenaya Ct. Redding, CA 96003 P 530-245.4590 F 530-245-4593 www. meentimiandsm plrig.corn C-27 Llc# 361638 PROJECT NAME: DESIGN/BUILD FOR HOLIDAY MARKET PLACE HARTNELL AVE at SHASTA VIEW DR, REDDiNG, CALIFORNIA SHEET NAME: LANDSCAPE PLAN PROJECT PHASE: p� DESIGN SUBMITTAL WORKING DRAWING REVISIONS: DESCRIPTION DATE DRAWN BY: JIM APPROVED BY: JLM DATE ISSUED: 2020/11/15 SCALE: AS -NOTED SHEET NUMBER: 1 t 1 F 1 r 1 1 1 1 1 , 1 1 1 C I i 1 I t I I 1 i I 1 I r r I I r I F I 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 r I I I ( I I I I I I I f i i I I 1 N I 1 1 , I 0 10' zo' 40' 1 1 9GALE: I" = 20'-0" 1 NOTE: FOR LEGEND & 11 CONSTRUCTION NOTES, 11 SEE SHEET L-1 i 1 210 5F OF ANNUAL GOLOR 0 tl G. V °1 � a i Rw PAD E .� , i "' ' �.�% � �.n. ° o a : � ;,c=o"a � °-�'�®® ..�. �.Fl�:tk.®®®ix ��,.rt;: R. 'r-.n:_ ®m®rt;.r; st tt:.,•: rtz 1151101111111 ��` ��,_ ��►,►��, gym; ",- 4Y 0 1 }� n rA �1 I�wlq O �° 0 r n*� �' E • :s 6tpio — D Jar,I CENTIRE a s s o c i a t e s greon 0+lantls�apa tleslAn envlrgnmvilal consulting www.mcenthassociates.c°m 4475 Teneys Ct. Redding, CA 96003 P 630-245.4590 F 530-245.4593 www.mcentrelarvdscaping.com C-27 Lc# 3616W PROJECT NAME: DESIGN/BUILD FOR HOLIDAY MARKET PLACE HARTNELL AVE at SHASTA VIEW DR, REDDING, CALIFORNIA SHEET NAME: LANDSCAPE PLAN PROJECT PHASE: DESIGN SUBMITTAL WORKING DRAWING REVISIONS: DESCRIPTION DATE DRAWN BY: JCC APPROVED BY: JLM DATE ISSUED: 2020/11/15 SCALE: 1'm20'-0" SHEET NUMBER: N a lo' 20' 40 SCALE: I" = 20'-0" NOTE: FOR LEGEND & CONSTRUCTION NOTES, SEE SHEET L-1 { { 1 1 1 1 1 1 \ \ 1 1 I 1 i 1 \ 4 1 C \ j t v „t PAD"srt r t t 1 7 rtt' R E Ttyylt.; i}tir 13 7u{� o 7 � C \ It f t �� \ E.Y � 0 VOa ze k Jul�rs \ � 0��;o, J 4, 4. tlN t' tttr t }{ttl} .,1 rri 44} f v '. .22 �A C\ \ E \ \ \ c C \ c tAu�scar CENTIRE a s s o c i a t e s green desW. lords ps daign emkonme wc."utam www.mcentlreassoclates.com 4475 Teneys Ct Redding, CA 96D03 P 530-2454590 F 530,2454593 www,mcenUrdandscaping.com C-27 Lc# 361638 PROJECT NAME: DESIGNBUILD FOR HOLIDAY MARKET PLACE HARTNELL AVE at SHASTA VIEW DR, BEDDING, CALIFORNIA SHEET NAME: LANDSCAPE PLAN PROJECT PHASE: DESIGN SUBMITTAL WORKING DRAWING REVISIONS: DESCRIPTION DATE DRAWN BY: JCC APPROVED BY: JLM DATE ISSUED: 2020111115 SCALE: 1"-20'-W SHEET NUMBER: 1 I HARTNELL AVE 1 I oUDPOon _ » _,m° _p000po DP o DOPDo O°9P a. DO o4 p➢DO p0➢P _.. e9➢ oOUPo °PPO .. ° °�Dbp°70➢boo. Ovo- 29 w '-__ • o � � o� ao 'o � a o ao c n 2B o 48- � m 29 29 0� v 2B e - ve➢D29 �....� � ° 29 "p029 �'v�p� ...no29 0 _ i. ,vP pDDo a vi°aDDp D D8w> Pgbneov ° °°evgD ovPo P➢ao v ° vaD ° vD Dve°°vvD ➢ D D➢ ° P Dv °a ° °aao °vim ab ° vv � � dv vu vvDo D -ed D - — — — _' — — — — — — — — _ � .. m � a o o ° za zB ze ze za 2 "o o➢o vvD � za ze 2e ze za ° � °° ° zs 4 g tV _ a 2e za a „_� ze zB 2B v 1� ze a m o ze ° zB 2e°� ®2B za o 2a ° 2B °p _ , \ ° o® ®= o a° o n a= va a o o> =o ze d ° 6 8 i.1 OP 0� °p➢DOD 0 0 ° °00 06�°. °0 Da° °OP 21 26 8 28 2B aD80� ° DP40 0 0 °aD OD fl\� °O 0� °OD a 28 28 D 2B ADC➢0 oODCOL OP ° °00000 op a •• W_.W ., 9 8 10 10 7 r,g 1wE ag 11? �, 7 7 10 10 N tii y�1 %N 10 0 6 e -_ e, I. Lu _ w I ,. 0 T A P R, 10 0 6 8 ,,„, 10 . , 0 8 i � I PAD F I I — — — RE,AI L. - 1 T i it ti`t i � i I � E X I S T I. N' G. 2 A R. t Est �ttt t t#'t r /t; - / P A D E 1 ,2 zz ... 4' {�}t £ t lr{ w. s I Itk t t2 2"SA1y i - � ;. R A H 27 a 27 _ J ti SHEET L-6 I 1 ._�.. _ I >< sl Y L.E.. S 11:.§ It }2 I I rz 12 O F F I C E r — 2 27 SHEET L"4 2 1 !i'.. .� y sI tl I J r} ENTRY EXIT DRIVE 7. ._ ,� x'. .i: _...x ,d.'. WI— _i'_ ._._t.,,;t It t rt'.. t.'1 it Srst_ _......... _..___ W 1 I DEC.OftAtlVtr MA501L4RY WALL LIN E F t � 18 16 19 15 16 15 18 15 1b 3� 18 16 18 �:'�'i��, r tv _ �l}I �SJt ui Lu y 2 15 SHEET _ 12 1 �SHEET.L-5 u I3 I 1 2 27 27 1 1 1 `f 1_j � Iw f t ( } f tk b tti. t/ t t�t} t 1 1?t It tltt4 (. 1J3F i _ L[J �2 ,4 4k ftt {ti }J t n}'£ i.?,St�t 3J y 1 F (1 1 i k Sr t.tl k�£ i tt t I t 7 S f 5 tt ft. - #{{,.2{}„ 1t 3 �<'{'..,� r U ttt, tt;t„„r�✓ ",. 1�{SI £ U- t 1 £ti rt{ 14t{j i _ LU t _ 7tS ti 14£. Jt e[ }ti 1 tf rtr;tt�(tt� }^{ ty{t t# fit t Lt}lJ�t h i t Sk {tc tt t� /irt di7l� _ Vl lr4�E'2t 1 l 1 1 ...I 1 J W_ -ui ui x1 Lu 1= GENTIRE aSSoCIates green desIgn • landscape design environmenlal con Oft www.mcentireassodatee.com 4475 Tenays CI. Redding, CA 96003 P 530.2454590 F 530-245.4593 www.mcenlrebndscaping.com C-27 LIC# 361638 PROJECT NAME: DESIGN/BUILD FOR HOLIDAY MARKET PLACE HARTNELL AVE at SHASTA VIEW DR, BEDDING, CALIFORNIA SHEET NAME: LANDSCAPE PLAN PROJECT PHASE: DESIGN SUBMITTAL WORKING DRAWING REVISIONS: DESCRIPTION DATE DRAWN BY: JCC APPROVED BY: AM DATE ISSUED: 2020/11/15 SCALE: 1'-10'-0" SHEET NUMBER: I _ SHEET _ _r -r_-...rro r......_rr_.. 15 ri � i � i r a. r r. i. r r i2 I SHEETL-5 YI 27 L - 1 27 27 4 f - 1 t7 itt'dy;��t t,t !fj7 I i� 22 // I,.VQ �. T 9 22 22' -H ts17tjy�st{iji 'situ{lxl }t 1 (LLi kti tuft tt`ft{i ''tlt4s it aftft F— e rYIto 1z12I PAD A stI at `c, t+, St{67sf i. 25 r MARKET u _ II Y{;P _ 3�2 _ o fa tfstk�jzst {{rat{ is t r tS is �{itt _ � 9 � 22� V). •t ft ( t ^t st i s ts� t I. 9 �� ts�t{ytlts 7tt,t �`tt ti i{tt 1`vF z i iti kj tt is ;tlti ��°g� _159t. s k t tl{ rttrs } t {1 9 na 9 ots{z t }} t 25 z - si4 Ld G r is :5 12....9 12 12 i i : i « 9 22 5 , 8 3 8 B 6 n 71 t Iti t t t s i j 9 22' �t s { tf i 3 s I 1 1 a 1 I I� - 16 I f E 99 D RI V E W A Y I ( LRIVEW4Y w-� - T T_ T T T T _ �_ - -- --- --- -- — - — -- -- ---- ---- -- -- --- -- -- -- — — — — — — — — — - — — — — — — �,fi� 0 10' 1d 40' •--------------------------------� — — — — — — — — — — — — — � I I NOTE: FOR LEGEND 8. L CONSTRUCTION—_-----�-- SEE SHEET L-1 _ _MATC THIS I- N Q 2 O W .l LIMITS OF LAND50APE IlMcENTIRE a s s o c I a t e S en Bred-Wm-land-A. dealgn enviro—ital mnsu*v www.mcenereassociates.com 4475 Teneye CL Redding, CA 96D03 P 530-245.4590 F 530-245.4593 www.mcanOrelandsca*g.com C•27 Uc# 361638 PROJECT NAME DESIGNIBUILD FOR HOLIDAY MARKET PLACE HARTNELL AVE at SHASTA VIEW DR, REDDING, CALIFORNIA SHEET NAME LANDSCAPE PLAN PROJECT PHASE: DESIGN SUBMITTAL WORKING DRAWING REVISIONS: DESCRIPTION DATE DRAWN BY: JCC APPROVED BY: JLM DATE ISSUED: 2020/11/15 SCALE: 1'-20'-0" SHEET NUMBER: — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1 HARTNELL AVE ' w e ng IDEW ALK ' __ b'1 9 � I e 0a0o oOODaoa00oP g 9 oxem eo290 ao aVo°�o6� — i-1------------- --.. 9 na o °aa �22 9 Vi 12 a i r °i f ttl 822 EX , S T i ,..r Z s � _ �.. 6 A R � G • 1222 n L t {f rt 1 tY t 15 25 M ATCHLINE_ — THIS SHEET SHEET L-6-- - F 9 22 22 9 22 �L E A S I N G ( t2 t2 ti i t 0 F F IOE r t t r 1 i }a ii isitl i i 1$ }t t7 y {�f}i�� flit tiY ijt l}3 i I{ ti 4i t �.Fi i'�f} _ fit{lt t�t i. i { 1t}t '( jii 9 2x'ag - ® r) ti.t;l{Y t(ltli 713i Sti ii t t"' t ii. } i <.tib i{f it jt}I„r Ltf i1 SHEET L1�uj i `: i J 21GF to> lY ii 26 ENTRY / EXIT DRIVE` _ ij t ti ff ..i# i 1 �v vuLL or+ PROPERrT uNe )it ij.. _ a y t t.........t I ea r,I t3 1 S l 1 I iii i s.y 5tJ j Jti tj fit` i 7 r {} ti t} - 9 na ttl L'J - h ii t ;�t�i kkyt yitftt4 t i {F t. i3ti jyr }i ill;;. � itci t t i� ti Sit 4� I. .8' tfly is $t4f;t it}3y (tt t.. '�. 1 it fit r}ii }l lE g 22 / L,J 9 i� 1 Srtiit Y1I. F- ° ° i,l it t t 1, g _ k� S y l Y s i t ftii 8 22"4 a tilyi}}tt:dts, { sijyl I s} tsitl;i6 i f "22Y °1 L. .1st e t} H =n I hyt{ 71 ttiti t tJ71 i / �. -° g L S �t}ty C Ctrs' a i s •$i t$ktiy e} e22 t tt s r ii t !t£ii -. L4 tit{ 8;�' 4yryx t{ I yt ) .. � I z22 v I i�"� i littiittt}dl`} ti jy S'u ttl it#sctl 22 _ LJPi)22 0�< 1 ti tit,i ittt t I. I. {i i 8 ii y i 9 a n 9 0,11 �- IC Aaea i t 7 4 tJ . c 4, n ;' _ ffi y FIRE ACC-55. OR, MATCHLINE. t tr=ti#,'i., I Z THIS SHEET 777777-7 s ` I. 2s xx S W - 22 ,°,ZI - l� — — — — ° J 9 n a I 13 ° N LIMITS OF ( LANOSGAPE . u �v r, " n ,° Ir 2N2�t?'I I--_---_-_-----i_--__--_�/ w I- I SCALE: P- 20'-O° W 22.a, J Lu NOTE: FOR LEGEND & I CONSTRUCTION NOTES, - I ' I—T---------------------------r---------- SEE SHEET L-1 CENTIRE a s s o c i a t e s green design - Iandstape design envirO tal -aft www.mcenllreassoclates.00m 4475 Tenaye Ct Redding, CA 96003 P 530-245.4590 E 530.245�4593 www.meandrelandscaping.com C-27 Uc# 361638 PROJECT NAME: DESIGN/BUILD FOR HOLIDAY MARKET PLACE HARTNELL AVE at SHASTA VIEW DR, REDDING, CALIFORNIA SHEET NAME: LANDSCAPE PLAN PROJECT PHASE: DESIGN SUBMITTAL WORKING DRAWING REVISIONS: DESCRIPTION DATE DRAWN BY: JCC APPROVED BY: AM DATE ISSUED: 2020111115 SCALE: 1"=20'-V' SHEET NUMBER: SCEIVED MAY 1 8 2021 BYt............. --, ........... unbeara ................. solution t "fe noise, traffic, WATIM-72 R CITY OF BEDDING 777 CYPRESS AVENUE, REDDING, CA 96001 P.O. Box 496071; REDDING, CA 96049-6071 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AND INTENT TO ADOPT A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION REVISED Dear Property Owner or Agency: This notice is being sent to property owners within or near the area shaded on the attached map and to all public agencies who are reviewing agencies for this environmental document. The map shows the property, consisting of 12.13 acres, on which TJG/Summit Development Corporation is requesting approval of Use Permit Application UP-2020-01669, Parcel Map Application PM-2021-00290, General Plan Amendment Application GPA-2020-01667, and Rezone Application 2020-01668 to allow the construction of the Hartnell Commercial Complex consisting of a 3�e foot Holiday Market Grocery Store, and five outer pads for retail, a drive -through restaurart�'ditwhrough, and an automobile fueling station with a convenience store on property located a�and 2525 %a�lj Avenue, 3055 and 3097 Appian Way. The project also includes the r. quest to a11o�v l` if storage facility 6 8 acres of land on property located at 3050 Leonard Street. he parcel map relate ;the project will delin�,each of the retailspaces and the proposed self -storage facility on their respectli'arcel, taking the total �atrels from five to seven. The rezone is a request to change the current zoned "1�i#. Shopping Center on t,`�roposed 2.8-acre self -storage facility parcel to "HC" Heavy Commercial. Thy=,�neral Plan amendment request reflects the rezone request to amend the existing General Plan designation �� hopping Center" to "Heavy Commercial." rti} Yl The City of Redding �lgtion had �t�e the project and, based upon the whole record before the City (including the Init�alrdy and�=pporti a;documentation), is recommending that a Mitigated Negative Declaration* be adopted pur to the Cali to Environmental Quality Act. All interested persons are invited tc ainment in Planning Division prior to the end public rev Declaration begins May 8, 20217 ends J� recommending adoption of the Mitigated �I notification will be made for all public ldart� and project approval. Adoption of the Mitigated N of the project. the draft Mitigated Negative Declaration to the Thc,comment period for the Mitigated Negative 2;k„?'`he Planning Commission will consider t{'f� �tt� Council at a later date. Subsequent ,�b`onsid;txon of the environmental document 'laration wI!`„conclude the environmental review tt 1 f ri t } ik� �i The Initial Study; site plan, project descrlptloz;tlgated Ne�t� Decla�tlon, and other information concerning the project is available for pubhcr��tew frci��z ��tti. weed sat the Planning Division, Development Services Department, 777 Cypias Avenue, fi g, CA 9600I � olephone 530-225-4022) and online on the Planning/Projects page of the Development Services webslt+# www cityofredding ors. For more information pleasecontact Assistant Planner, Sean Price at the abovxt�dress 41 �Y l / t "i,:r ij" f77 t�,ir �tf?�t it ,J. Lily Toy, Planning Manager Development Services Department *A Mitigated Negative Declaration is a determination that a project will not have a significant impact on the environment because of mitigation measures that have been added to the project. LT:et Dated: May 7, 2021 Attachment: Location map c: Shasta County Clerk U.S. Army Corp of Engineers, Redding Shasta Environmental Alliance CDFW. Redding California Native Plant Society, Shasta Chapter CVRWQ Control Board, Redding All pro2erty owners within 300 feet of the project The purpose of the public hearing is to obtain information from the public concerning theyroject described above. At the hearing, the Planning Commission will consider the information provided by the public; the applicant, anstaff and then determine whether to approve or deny the project. In most cases, the project will not be before the Planningg Commission unless staff is recommending approval of the project. If you challenge the project or decision in court; ,you may be limitedto raising only those issues you raised at t e public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission at, or prior to, the public hearing. WILSON AVE BELLADONNAST -- ------ - LLu — — -- > Z O (A O] _ -- cn — -- —Q HAWN AVE -- - - z JONQUIL WAY -- �. I 2525 HT� j - -- — _ HARTNELLAVE r , -- F 4m �� ' '� �`' � t� �� 73050 LEONARD ST----...--- 2468 — ----- tax p, p d O t( f i � l MARILYN AVE a rrrr i�r��itE� 30 PIAN WAY AN,1� i { tlll t 4 tri ALDEN AVE cn 4 r1 7 t rs k ,,y� — --- - T MARLENE AVE O��ST z m N GIS DIVISION INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT w E DATE PRODUCED: NOVEMBER 24,2020 5' 0 200 400 Feat LOCATION MAP MTG. DATE: ITEM: UP-2020-01669 / GPA-2020-01667 / RZ-2020-01668 TJG / SUMMIT DEVELOPMENT &-2525 HARTNELL AVE/3055 & 3091 APPIAN WAY/3050 LEONARD ST ATTACHMENT: AP# 110-210-055 / 110-020-001, -037, -038 & -061 May 13, 2021 Lily Toy, Planning Manager Development Services Department City of Redding P.O. Box 496071 Redding, CA 96049-6071 RE: Approval of UP-2020-01669, GPA-2020-01667 and Rezone Application 2020-01668 Dear Ms. Toy d the current Holiday Market. We have lived here since ) We live on Marilwwhich 1 1978. It's been tant battle with the (area behind market is not paved). The litter from the recyclin N J r and market blows yards and pools. Both companies have been . . . . . . . contacted � y times regarding this i' ue. They have done a horrible job of helping keep our -- neighbo uent the recycling center and have cut holes in our neighbors fences. ssp ,y,,our neighbors and needles have been tossed over fences. Supposedly, there is a curfew onesdelivery s can arrive but frequently they have failed to abide by these directives. Thet"A"'e from these s can be heard in all directions around the market. There is a nice shopping area in' City needs to revitalize existing c Since we feel that a larger complex will sign this project. Sincerely yours, X" David & Lana Ferreira 2405 Marilyn Ave. Redding, CA 96002 most of it sits empty. The we are opposing From: Se Yulli To: To Lii Subject: Shasta View/Hartnell Holiday projects Date: Friday, May 14, 2021 11:07:49 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside the City of Redding; please be careful with links or attachments. I own the home at; 2980 Shasta View Dr. My concerns are very real. It seems the homeowners on the Westside of Shasta View Drive are being left out of all Enviormental documents that I have read! I'm not only speaking of homes on S.V. Please take into consideration of all the single family homes and apartments on the West that have been patronizing the Holiday MaT�,et for years Their welfare is a serious matter, Why? Because of mother's pushing children in buggies, disal chairs and others must travel in the street in the right tuning lane on S. ¢4 fry s f � r i s� tri View to reach the ex��hday Mark ys r hy� Because there is "NO" sidewalk on the west side. It is only a matter of time until ne is injured or This is not the first time I have requested a sidewalk at the Planning Deptiers walk in street to agrass, mud, a fence and tree on public land where sidewalk is N. needed so the s� is used. It is my understag a sidewalk is going in on the east side, again this is not a safe option either, b Rv@ se cars that try to turn lei Ito side streets get rear ended. A crosswalk dose not seem as safe as a signal. My hod ,on the corner of S. View is had cars making a right coming from East (where New Holiday is proposed) they o��p in my front yardtearing the fence down and it has been replaced twice. I also spent close to $1000 placing hu ``� �ulders m front to hopefully protect my Grandaughter and Great Grandchildren. I sold a potion of in cornef l l instal � th `` !, ,scorner. So Where is the sidewalk to go with to it? If you need videos we have a c . glad to � `h �i"'k : Another example is the car traveling in the right turning lane off Hartnell to S.View he rtio thesign tht faced just passed the industrial driveway. Please Mw someone truly need to takeresponsibi tiow. Do not wai�,�take responsibility after the inevitable happens! Remember all of us we will be your mers, plead "HThe City needs to really should look at t i � the NW corner it is a trash collector, d trees I found of meths lot of garbage etc.. my market value has declined, more noise, pollutants and tr�t�nll co�rd`effect�i .ght when there was only a stop sign, etc. Getting out of the driveway takes time, pi��scary A� and now we expect more! Sincerely, Betty Yuill and Gomez 05/14/21 Sent from my iPhone A. oPtvu, 1e Pl cUAl?E 1 Ful5e-1G < is * �C-n� G (0-Fr- H :7�ja j a ,e m %i MASO 9/ V I 1 I � �� q -- 0 ivo 140 Mayor R. Anderson did not object to limiting the amount of professional office space-. Council Member P. Anderson stated that in the spirit of economic development and the creation of employment, she would like to see the applicant's representative work with staff to develop alternatives acceptable to both parties. Mayor R. Anderson determined that there were no additional individuals present wishing to speak on the matter and closed the public hearing. MOTION: Made by Council Member P. Anderson, seconded by Council Member Kehoe, requesting staff to work with the applicant's representative to develop alternatives which are acceptable to both the City and the applicant. The vote; Unanimous Ayes At the hour of 9:17 p.m., Mayor R. Andersen declared the meeting recessed. At the hour of 9:28 p.m., Mayor R. Anderson reconvened the meeting. PUBLIC HEARING - re Appeal of Tentative Subdivision Map S-3-90, Forest Homes Sub v s o-n, -Phase III, Appeal by Kenneth Harrison, et al (Shasta view Drive) (S-100-208) The hour of 7 OQr�arrived, Mayor R. Anderson opened the public hearing regarding tt'} ,optative Subdivision Map 5-3-90, Forest Homes Subdivisio�r,;%.. III; api,abyKenneth Harrison, et al. The fold � documents are one, le in the office of the City Clerks R, avit of Puhlication`E ', otice of Public Hearing avit of Mailing - Nt�` of Public Hearing ning Commission recordation dated May 31, 1994 V city k Strohmayer advised i* no protests were received. Princit iplanner Keaney related that the Planning Commission, at its meeting of RI April#,`994, approved the Tentative Map for Forest Homes III Subdivision, granting# v zLyrsn perngkssion to create 58 single-family residential lots on 17 acres loca}� t� Shasta Vi*Wy# e� west of Clover Creek, and south of Hartnell Ave �� 'ent1�%��'�xappeal of the conditions of approval pertaining to 'ieitpro ments "�eYinard � "r was received. He noted that the subdivision was original%proved in �, and the initial phases of the project on the west side,o asta View Dr were constructed. The portion of the subdivision east of�sta View Drive This subdivision represents a reapplication. Mr. Keaney explained thattt e appeal of t�IPpravalr t the subdivision reflects concerns of property owners%,}i Leonardtt��t nor�;� the subdivision regarding increased traffic on that � t 10�;ttion ,�4�`��mal limit improvements to that street to providing `��'gavel �lders`'%� Bcent to undeveloped parcels. This portion of Leonard`'""street, �t,�e"opinion, {Mthe City Attorney, is not a public street; however, it hau,,�k maintaine�t�y the city since annexation in 1976. It was also maixtaine� the County ofr �ssta prior to that time. The street has a paved width of #'i" t, although br� has narrowed the effective width to 20 feet adjacent,��k' pndeveloped pas orb, gutter, sidewalks and streetlights are nonen% Mr. Keaney stated that the desigp��( the �ts�'��bdivisio�'as far back as1985, recognized the desiraShastaView Drive, providing a southern outlet for that desert'ss primarily for access to Alta Mesa School, for emergency needs, and ,allow servo, vehicles to be more efficient. The provisions of the develo�it agreem,% not require Mr. Lynn to obtain public dedications for her% d Stre�;,,,t provide additional improvements.�7�?, '» Mr. Keaney related that the appellants, represent ,,g 4 of , y� operties that abut the street, have requested the following 1. Assurances that there will not be an strict formed to maintain and improve Leonard Street, a�t`si 2. That the City establish and purchase a 40-foot right-of-way for the street. The minimum right-of-way width is generally 60 feet; 3. That streetlights be provided; 4. That sewer and gas lines be installed in Leonard Street, presumably at Mr. Lynn's or the City's expense. It is the recommendation of staff that the City Council deny the appeal and uphold the conditions applied by the Planning Commission. If the City Council determines that Leonard Street should not be connected,- it is suggested that it would be prudent to cease further maintenance of that street by the City and to not require completion of the road shoulder work. Council Member McGeorge noted that trees in the area are very close to the street, which is dark and narrow. He also indicated that there are children in the area and did not believe that the current plans were adequate if Leonard Street in to become a natural arterial for the subdivision. 06/07/94 California Wildlife FoundationlCalifornia Oaks, 201 University Avenue; Berth H-43 Berkeley, CA 94710, (510) 763-0282 June 2, 2021 Lily Toy, Planning Manager City of Redding, Development Services Department 777 Cypress Avenue Redding, CA 96001 RE: Hartnell Commercial Complex proposal by Summit Development, Permit No. UP-2020- 01669, PM-2021 002 }Q 01667, and RZ-2020-01668 �t , O��R ter zia+` ttj,r � Submitted via erp� ;toy@cityofre f g org ( p tk 4 Dear Ms. ToyZi""J}"" tt t = t}1 tt77, i rjt £f The Californ��Faks ro ram of Califs `{4f`ia Wildlife Foundation CWF/CO works to conserve �r P g f � ) oak ecosyste�f their criticalrole in sequestering carbon, maintaining healthy watersheds, prang wildlife habitat, and sustaining cultural values. Shasta Environmental Alliance, a mem� r@la Oaks n, reached out to CWF/CO with concerns about the proposed Hartnelrclal�p� pct impacts on the oak trees on the site. t'ta zizf �� ,ixr is CWF/CO reviewed the Recircul 1Vlitigated tive Declaration, Biological Review, Environmental Initial Study, aR4ak Resource wort. It is concerning that the project does not include the retention of any of t ative trees �uding , blue oaks that are 20-inches or greater at breast height, that the 1$@,or ru��tlon @�izy itg does not specify that it will include native oaks, that the enviro�t}nalysi,jnct'bphhider the Greenhouse Gas (GHG) impacts of the proposed tree removals, aatthe ms not include conservation of oak woodlands. ALIGNMENT OF PROJECT WITH SAAS F}Y OAK GL�INES CITY OF BEDDING el Shasta County's Oak Woodland Management Guidh re"comme@tat when planning a building site that oaks are maintained for habitat and landscape vale �'" Further 5t.1.4 pity of Redding's General Plan includes the following Natural Resource {)4= :Y =_ ' ,r.{.ts t: 7: Recognize the aesthetic and biological values of oak vs' and other natural t vegetation. y 1�} tt} f V e etation. 8: Recognize and protect habitat linkages and migratory corridors. 9: Promote and facilitate habitat preservation, restoration and enhancement. The Biological Review cited these, as well as other natural resource goals from the General Plan, yet these goals were not properly addressed in the Initial Study. The Initial Study simply references a section of the General. Plan EIR that development can sometimes conflict with tree protection goals and then states: But efforts must still be made to retain existing trees if reasonably possible, and to sufficiently plant new trees in the context of the new development. A tree survey C� is required to identify natural trees and tree groups most suitable for preservation or "candidate trees/groups." Where all identified candidate trees/groups cannot be preserved, the set -aside of a natural area or areas within a project site that is particularly suitable for the planting, retention, and/or natural regeneration of trees is considered to be a desirable means of accomplishing the goals of the ordinance. The removal of all of the trees —including 285 candidate trees —on the site combined minimal mitigation that does not specify oak tree replacement runs counter to the aforementioned General Plan goals and Shasta County's Oak Woodland Management Guidelines. HABITAT AND CLIMATE IMPACTS OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT The Biological Review characterizes the site as isolated from other habitat: Wildlife corridatory routes: With housing subdivisions and retail stores on all four oe� i an island of vegetation within a developed landscape. The Shasta Msubdivisio"Kil, s to the north, the Sunset Oaks subdivision is to the east, the For4I omes subdivision{,Y the south and the Cockerill Acres subdivision is to the west. ition, Hartnell Av�� and Shasta View Drive, both busy arterial roads, are foundng the north and we les. These developments limit access to and through the pnrceh'terrestrial wildlife species. During site visits WRM personnel noted several bird species`= Ymg through the area as well as bats foraging over the site. These movements may be e�zl `�pportumxtr�'}rlher than evidencing atravel corridor or migratory {�£t # f 4 fit+ 1tit movement, Ihere i{{`yden�4ks,, The vegetation island characters 401 is contr of the Project Area, which shoe `ak habitat � with isolated oaks also to the sc"west of the the south and east appears to be , align_ goals of retaining some natural hal'"15"g"t#` Biological Review characterizes as "opportun_ site are removed and replaced with non-native ROf d by the Biological Review's Figure 2, Soils ues to the east and the south of the project, 0""'i act site Much of the adjacent development to the ��rng General Plan Natural Resource of tfr�j`�cel by birds and bats, which the icj7ill be imbtlble if the native trees on the Another deficiency of the environmental r��`,t� that Calif law r#qires the GHG impacts F, , �, �. of proposed oak removals to be assess e �t ' mi l d I � usent y,� of GHG emissions forms the foundation of the states gree i se redu�t � bloctives, dell as the California Forest Protocol preservation standards. Every to of carbon dioxide��a) released into the atmosphere by oak woodland or forest conversio`"adverse environmental effect. MITIGATION F" The Initial Study indicates blue oak and interior live oaand covers approximately 31.4 percent of the parcel, with small and medium stature oaks on another portion of the site. CWF/CO was puzzled by the discussion in the Initial Study calling for mitigation replanting at a rate of 1:1, which would result a minimum of 194 trees planted. Given that 285 trees are being removed, it is unclear why the figure is not 285, as the 92 impacted interior live oaks of diameter of 6-inches or greater also provide habitat and carbon sequestration value. Further, Public Resources Code §21083.4 requires mitigation for trees of 5-inches or more in diameter at breast height above natural grade level, rather than 6-inches. The plan should not move forward without a majority of the oaks of greater than 5-inch diameter at breast height being retained, without a revegetation plan for the site that requires the reestablishment of oaks for landscaping, and 2 without a plan for oak habitat that is conserved in perpetuity to partially mitigate project impacts on Redding's native tree canopy. Sincerely, Janet Cobb Executive Officer California Wildlife Foundation Angela Moskow Manager California Oaks Coalition 3 DocuSign Envelope ID: 99E4C69E-456D-4972-82F0-456784D93BEE State of California — Natural Resources Agency GAVIN NEWSOM, Governor DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE CHARLTON H. BONHAM, Director Northern Region 601 Locust Street QO Redding, CA 96001 wvvw.vvildqfgqa. ov June 7, 2021 Sean Price, Assistant Planner City of Redding Development Services Department 777 Cypress Avenue Redding, CA 96001 SUBJECT: REVIEW OF MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR HARTNELL CO E PERMIT UP-2020-01669, PARCEL MAP PM- 20; AMENDMENT GPA-2020-01667, AND REZONE R,ASTA COUNTY Dear Sean ,,g, The Cal 6 Department of Fish 1hd Wildlife (Department) has reviewed the recirculated )Ojj, ated Negative Declaration (MND) dated May 7, 2021, for the above referenced r As a tru, for the State's fish and wildlife resources, the ,,t t2l ,5 ,p p Department a ption, protection, and management of fish, wildlife, native I agency, the Department administers the California Entgered Spec' � Act and other provisions of the Fish and Game Code that a il lie public trust resources. The Department offers the followentcorrnendations on this Project in our role as a trustee and responsi11' e n u A California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), California Public U7170411117-447=!I, a The Project as proposed "consists of{{ �"e ",emit, pa ...... WI"ra/ Pla n amendment, and rezoning for the ddto ,r and self -storage facility on 12.13 acres of /and located at the sodth,", corner nell Avenue and F Shasta View Drive. The shopping center consists of a are -foot !,day Market Grocery Store, and five outer pads for retail, a drive-th e drive - through, and an automobile fueling station with a con roject also includes the request to allow a self -storage f la" nd. A parcel map ... ......... . "I'll,', " related to the project will delineate each of the ret� the proposed mini storage warehouse facility on their respective parcel, taking the total parcels from five to seven. The rezone is a request to change the current zoned "SC" Shopping Center on the proposed 2.8-acre self -storage facility parcel to "HC" Heavy Commercial. The general plan amendment request reflects the rezone request to amend the existing general plan designation of "Shopping Center" to "Heavy Commercial." The Department is concerned that the City of Redding is not circulating all of their environmental documents through the State Clearinghouse at the Governor's Office of Conserving Cafifornia's Wifdfife Since 1870 DocuSign Envelope ID: 99E4C69E-456D-4972-82F0-456784D93BEE Sean Price, Assistant Planner City of Redding June 7, 2021 Page 2 Planning and Research (OPR) as required by CEQA. This letter serves as an important reminder that CEQA's circulation, notice, and consultation requirements play a critical role in the Department's trustee mandate to conserve the State's fish and wildlife resources for all the people of California. In general, CEQA requires lead agencies to submit draft environmental impact reports (EIR), proposed negative declarations, and proposed IVINDs to the State Clearinghouse at OPR when: • A state agency is the lead agency, a responsible agency, or a trustee agency; • A state agencyp ,,has jurisdiction by law with respect to the project; or • The pr ide, regional, or areawide significance. (Pub.Cade, subd. (c)(4); CEQA Guidelines, §§ 15205, subd. (b), 1520 OX In the case ,.,4Dept,. . ... ij �', OU!, his Project, the t 'I acting as a trustee agency for the State's fish i,,,,,;,1 en s 01i'm"I'MR,J11111UW'11' and wildlife "!lMources because the AVbject will impact those natural resources. There may also be ta" necessary for wetland impacts, in which case there would be State responsible Submitting W pd helps to ensure responsible and trustee agency input f g leadll',";" ency environmental review.' CEQA also requires lead agencies to subr the following ices to OPR: • Notice of Preparation (N101, of an E • Notice of Completion • Notice of Determination (NOD • Notice of Determination (NOD) for specified by statute are not subject (Pub. Resources Code, §§ 21080, Again, these notices serve to ensure"site age CEQA, including Department participation as a t t e n cy t a egency;and a cy concIus(,,",0,, that certain housing projects 21152.1, Won in,,,`,`,,`,,,"" agency review under le and tJ e agency., The Department urges State and local lead agencies to east enwxd analyses 4,4 jw, are submitted to the State Clearinghouse as required by C ing with these requirements, along with CEQA's responsible an "I"notice and consultation Us . . . . . . .... . . �,t 9M, requirements, plays a critical role in the Departmett,,ttee mandate to conserve California's important fish and wildlife resources. The Department has the following recommendations and comments as they pertain to biological resources: 1 See, e.g., Pub. Resources Code, §§ 21082.1, subd. (c)(4), 21083, subd. (d); see also §§ 21069, 21070 (responsible and trustee agencies defined). DocuSign Envelope ID: 99E4C69E-456D-4972-82F0-456784D93BEE Sean Price, Assistant Planner City of Redding June 7, 2021 Page 3 Mitigation for the Loss of Wetlands, Streams, and other Waters Wetlands are considered extremely valuable natural resources. To this end, the state policy requires no net loss of these habitats. The Department considers all wetlands sensitive, and the State has a "No Net Loss" wetland policy. 2 The Mitigation for impacts to fresh emergent wetland should be included in the IVIND at a ratio greater than 2:1. Currently, Mitigation Measure MM-1 (c) states, "The project applicant shall achieve the mitigation for the permanent loss of streams, wetlands, and other waters through the purchase of mitigation credits at an agency -approved mitigation bank at a minimum 1: 1 ratio or through onsiteloffsite habitat restoration at a minimum 3:1 ratio." The Department recommends the ratio $I . . . . . . pacts to streams, wetlands or other waters start at 2:1. In . addition, onsite/off %,igpration should have a monitoring and maintenance period and assia established within the MND. , cl succ According 014xBiological Revie,`,,,,,;1 0111,b w�',,dJ ted May 2020, and prepared by Wildland Resource Managers, "Ut' I poidfairy shrimp (Branchinecta lynchi) (federally 1SU'turveys for vernal threatened)'1,,*_ s ,,O,,,rnal pool tadpole hkhp (Lepidurus packardi) (federally endangered) or western s t t (Spea hammondii) (Priority 1 Species of Special Concern) were conducted in , pond present onsite. The Department presumes the Project applicant is assuming r on rri, f Yill need to be higher than 2:1 for impacts to these speciion ,ishand Wildlife ServiceshouI should be underway or completed for t06rally listegpecies prior to approval of this Project A'A eclaration a mitigation is agreed to up front. since it is a mitigative ne a4e,"', Mitigation under C a . .. . . . . different r permitting. Botanical Surveys The Biological Review stated there was abitat O-hyssop ggs Lake hedge . . . . ... (Gratiola heterosepala) (state endangere occurs soils in or near shallow water and blooms April through Septe gopurveys for tl r J were conducted beginning September 30, 2019 and April 8, Siuitable habitat was it" "n ud observed, surveys should have bee 0ij, 0"" d lant, most likely to be observed blooming which would not have been""', r the very end of the species blooming period. If such dates are to be used siteg,,, ould have been visited to determine the species was still identifiable. ornmends tk surveys be conducted during the appropriate blooming pe ggs Lake hedge -hyssop is not present. Botanical surveys should follow the Department's MAt6ft"20, 2018, Protocols for Surveying and Evaluating Impacts to Special Status Native Plant Populations and Sensitive Natural Communities, available here: https://nrm.dfa.ca.aov/FileHandier.ashx?DocumentlD=18959. If no special status plant species are found during the botanical survey, no other measures will be required. However, if drought conditions exist, additional pre -construction surveys for special status plant species may be warranted. If special status plant species are found during the botanical surveys, the plants should be marked by a qualified biologist familiar with the species. If the area can be avoided, exclusionary fencing will be placed around the plants and no pedestrian or vehicular entry shall be allowed. Botanical survey results shall be 2 Fish and Game Commission Wetlands Resources Policy (Amended 8/18/05) 000uSignEnvelope ID: rU-450784o93aEE Sean Price, Assistant Planner City ofRedding June 7,2021 Page Mitigation Although an adequatebat survey was not conducted, bats were observed 0nSite according to the Biological Review. Impacts to roosts are usually accompanied by high mortality of bats may be a significant impact, because a single colony could consist of the entire |000| population of o species. The availability of suitable roosting habitat is considered a limiting factor in almost all bat species. Roost site suitability is often based on @ Oa[rOVV range of suitable t8nlp8[8tUr8s' [8|8tiVe hU[Oiditv, physical diDl8nsiOO9' etc., and many species 11 ite fidelity. Depending on the impact, if any, to the may be necessary and could include providing replace nt ate roost hi', 6t If necessary, humane evictions should be conduct sonal period �,"i4i't, bat activity, which may vary by year, location, or species n st conducted by under the supervision of a biologist with specific mane exclusions could consist of a two-day tree bitat trees and brush are removed along with certain removal whereby the non -ha tree limbs and the remainder of the tree on the second day. This two-step abitat of,,,,_,hip%j ,ea causing the bats to vacate the area under process c I Mill Z_ T"11 '111i0",,,,i,@,,jjty and other impacts to bat species. MND; however, the Department Mitigation for impacts t ats pces to Mitigation Measure MM-3: Humane evictions should be c n uct ring seaso, 64,1111,'Oeriods of bat activity, which may vary by year, location, or spe i s an with specific experienc cond ""'a exclusions could consist of a two-day tree removal proces 600,.""'hand brush are removed along with certain tree limbs on the er of% tree on the second day. Mitigation Measure MM-4 is not I,,,,,dividual oak trees being removed. The oak trees should,"111 "N I e oak e d wit es as opposed to shade trees", which is not specific atilpp"woul jw, t value. In Shasta Ve mitigation measures, County, oak woodlands continue to be removed Wit Ot any e,,,,,,, . AMV resulting in a continuous regional loss of oak woodlands. ak" odland,,,,N, () . . . . .. . . rsj a wide range of wildlife species and have higher levels of other terrestrial ecosystem in California. Oak woodlands p n")"i the 632 terrestrial vertebrates species found in t uland should be replaced at a minimum 3:1 ratio at Stillwater Plainz, J or another conserved offsite location. The Department recommends and encourages retaining and working around the existing mature, healthy oaks 0Othe extent possible, and mitigating appropriately for losses that cannot beavoided. Ifyou have any questions, please contact Amy Henderson, GeniorEDv0DmeDta| DocuSign Envelope ID: 99E4C69E-456D-4972-82F0-456784D93BEE Sean Price, Assistant Planner City of Redding June 7, 2021 Page 5 Sincerely, EDocuSigned by, -T Idabco C.A 74D273FEE784E2... Curt Babcock Habitat Conservation Program Manager �, ner �� ohtIl � ec: Sean Price, A w11'7'j ...... City of Reodj- .. .. .... .. .... Oil spricet fredln q. or 1011, I'll Amy rson Cali Department of Fis#ixnd Wildlife Matthew' U.S. Army Lynn Coster g Central Valley wReg " kB ter Qua,�ntrq j rd Habitat Conservation Planning Bra From YaaiKBffl91rW To: Niam�gr�m Cc: Price —Sean; Wayne RasLnussen; Subject: Letter of Opposition Pertaining to the Proposed Holiday Market Place Shopping Center, 2*sg*annel|Avenue, Redding, California Date: Monday, June 7, 20212:40:17 PM CAUTODN-Thisema|originatedfrmm outside the City ofRedding; please becareful vvith|inksurattachment, Dear Ms. Niemer, Asthe owner of —the Hen House property at 2621HartneUAvenue, |am opposed tothe proposed Holidayket |with Qt eeks to resolve issues pertaining to several adverse WA on I owever several serious planning issues remain and Until the impacts, particularly the substantial I king on my property, would put the Hen House out of business. |twould also have asimilar ruse thusrendering itunusable. As a result,| am requesting thatCorri to allow time for me to reso ve it the participation with us in our isc I be, choose to proceed with actin C ff to adequately address all of t e include land use, parking loss, and vehicular ingne! Finally, | request that the City Attorney p exposure created by the widening of Hai�,,, Thank you for your attention to this matter. Yaniv8enaroya ME �Flf 5aLRailrna Ave Piitt"sr 6A 94 6 Mobile: 510-928-4270 ()ffioc:925-363-5328 Fur:86h-53l-33l4 pnhearing onthe Project either becontinued �|oper,orthat the Project bedenied. City iuch,agppreciated, Should the Commission �,,,,,,CEQA document first be expanded s on my property. This should potential legal use of my property. Email: yanivgpropertyupsurge.com Web: hilp,/I-w-w-H-.V-r-oT-e-rt-y-up-sur_U -com M June 7, 2021 Lily Toy, Planning Manager Sean Price, Planner Redding Planning Commissioners 777 Cypress Ave. Redding, CA 96001 Re: Summit Dear imissioners; Our organizatit'�1ed a public records request as follows on the project: kSt 77 t s 4 irj 5 1, A map shout'iG tes that urkk(preserved on site. 2. The mitigation`a3stJ'vel `tt�ta1rrite for oak trees removed that must be planted on site and for the ratio for mi, offsite 3. If it is a mitigation bank, the fi ation and na 4. Is mitigation required for irior live oaks? We only received general answers i i i i i replacement of 'ak Trees , removed for the i. • !. i the mitigation bank. 0 from Planner Sean Price: unknown. The development team has submitted the attached tree su t • r t - i. i • r r r i t •211KI011611MrST11471TV conditions require Unfortunately, this answer is somewhat vague as to what the fihal'`fequired mitigation will be. The Planning Commission or Planning Department should specify at the hearing what the exact mitigation will be as well as answers to our questions 3 and 4 We would like to commend the Planning Department for requiring mitigation for the removal of the any blue oak trees on the project site; however, we feel that this mitigation should also include interior live oaks. The best result would be for the developer to work the oak trees into the landscaping as much as possible and that the Planning Department will require that a grove of the larger blue oaks be preserved. Oak trees are a keystone species in many habitats. Oak trees can support over 500 different types of caterpillars in the United States, whereas crepe myrtles can support only one species of caterpillar (The Nature of Oaks, Doug Tallamy 2021); thus, crepe myrtle is a food desert for insects. Caterpillars are one of the most important sources of food for baby birds. Scientists tell us that the world's insect population is in an alarming decline, up to 50%. Oak trees support many species of insects, which is why so many birds visit them. Acorns are a food source for birds, squirrels, deer, insects and even bears. The old Cobblestone Shopping Center; formerly Raley's, was built preserving a number of blue oaks in the parking lot and the north end of the Center. They have survived for 35 years, while almost all of the horticultural trees that were planted (except along the street and in a median) died and the new owners had to plant new trees. Interior live oaks were also preserved and are still standing today. This type of oak preservation can be done in the new development, as well. BIOLOGICAL SURVEY The plant survey (Page 12 of the Biological Review) of the site was completed on April 8, 2020— too early for many wetland plar}t Io,,gave flowered and be identified. From a casual observation from the roadway and adjacent), �'Wj`�, a SEA member easily identified the following plants not in the biological survey: istle (Eryt�� Rl articulatum), seepspring monkeyflower (Erythranthe guttata), mallow (Sidalcec�ta), wavy -leaf so�}�t (Chlorogalum pomeridianum), Fitch's spikeweed (Centromadad woolly sunflo ' Eriophyllum lanatum)—all plants not on the biological survey. Therendoubtedly otheat were missed. The survey is inadequate. Sincerely, David Ledger, President Shasta Environmental Alliance CITY of REDDING MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Permit No. UP-2020-01669, PM-2021. 00290, GPA-2020-01667, and RZ-2020-01.668 SUBJECT Hartnell Commercial Complex by Summit Development Ii� Nxf Yts { t t it i t17] c l4fitlt, ,� PROJECT DESG�'t1V Iier, ect consists of a use permit, parcel map, General Plan , amendment, an��nmg for the d`c}�lopment of a shopping center and self -storage facility on } ` f �`t corner of Hartnell Avenue and Shasta View Drive. The 12.13 acres of ��+ tocated at the soutl�� shopping cent consists of a 30,000�are-foot Holiday Market Grocery Store, and five outer to ;� pads for retai�, ��fdrive-throughrestaua coffee drive -through, and an automobile fueling station with a conveu e store. The project also includes the request to allow a self -storage facility on 2.8 acres of la n;f parcel map related to the project will delineate each of the retail spaces and the proposed mirr'�r��hous r..'�a� their respective parcel, taking the total parcels from five to seven T o're he is west to"��ge the current zoned "SC" Shopping Center on the proposed 2.8-acre self-stora ' `{icilit arce ;t r "HC" Heavy Commercial. The general plan p p �ff yp Y g amendment request reflects theone request tt�� ` end the existing general plan designation of tss wf ,� fr,j "Shopping Center" to "HeavyWmercial " `1 hI ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING 12.13 acres. The property is currently vacant and,t�rpulated wt annual grasses with scattered shrubs. Commses are loca south the project is bordered by single andI 'le Id ilyUs f fr,tf ,f commercial and multiple family. The prate fa»es gent��; stream flows in a southwest direction DvWnnmg Hartnell Avenue exiting the property at the southwest e'er of tl exists along the intermittent stream just west of the center of the parallels Shasta View Drive along Appian Way which joins w southwest quadrant of the project site. A small isolated pond,, quadrant of the project site.�r five parcels of approximately blue and Interior live oak trees; 1 to the north and west. To the West,cf the project is a mix of i north south.. An intermittent int of the property on An emergent wetland ,pmeral swale stream at the he southwest FINDINGS AND DETERMINATION The City of Redding conducted an Initial Study (attached), which determined that the proposed project could have significant environmental effects. Subsequent revisions in the project proposal create the specific mitigation measures identified below. The project, as revised and as agreed to by the applicant, avoids or mitigates the potentially significant environmental effects identified, and the preparation of an environmental impact report will not be required. There is no substantial evidence, in light of the whole record before the City, that the project as revised may have a significant effect on the environment. If there are substantial changes that alter the character or impacts of the proposed project, another environmental impact determination will be necessary. UP-2020-01669, GPA-2020-01667, RZ-2020-01669; PM-2021-00290 Mitigated Negative Declaration Page 1 The project includes measures to mitigate potentially significant impacts to transportation in the area. Prior to approval of the project, the lead agency may conclude, at a public hearing; that certain mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration are infeasible or undesirable. In accordance with CEQA Section 15074.1, the lead agency may delete those mitigation measures and substitute other measures which it determines are equivalent or more effective. The lead agency would adopt written findings that the new measure is equivalent or more effective in mitigating or avoiding potential significant effects and that it, in itself, would not cause any potentially significant effect on the environment. 1. Based on the whole record (including the Initial Study and any supporting documentation) and the mitigation measures incorporated into the project, the City of Redding has ed that a Mitigated Negative Declaration is appropriate. All potentially sg� �'�p,ets would be reduced to less than significant. ,; )), k );S{iJ ji {7ti4 2. The Nitfed Negative TOlaration, with its supporting documentation, fully incorpted herein, �,b reflect{te independent judgment and analysis of the lead agency which is the City of ding. N The attached Initi MITIGATIONMEASURES Transportation Mitigation Measure 1 — Off --site following: to support the above determination. iew Drive shall include the a. Restriping of the portion of Shastat�� Drive venue and Goodwater Avenue to a three -lane arterial�;r�bne t�el lanq n$�ch d��lion with atwo-way left turn lane. b. Construct a 5-foot sidewalk alongthe east side of Shasta Vie*,` give from IiartnellAvenue to Christian Avenue. AN � Draft copies or notice of this Mitigated Negative Declaration were distributed to: Shasta County Clerk • U.S. Army Corp of Engineers Redding California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Redding Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board, Redding California Native Plant Society, Shasta County Interested Parties All property owners within 500 feet of the property boundary UP-2020-01669, GPA-2020-01667, RZ-2020-01669; PM-2021-00290 Mitigated Negative Declaration Page 2 PUBLIC REVIEW (x) Draft document referred for comments May 21, 2021 ( ) No comments were received during the public review period. Comments were received but did not address the draft Mitigated Negative Declaration findings or the accuracy/completeness of the Initial Study. No response is necessary. The letters are attached. } Comments addressing the findings of the draft Mitigated Negative Declaration and/or accuracy or completeness of the Initial Study were received during the public review period. The letters and responses follow (see Response to Comments, attached). 4 1 . )t£. Copies of the Mitlt�� Declaration, the Initial Study, documentation materials, and the Nut* t 4onitormg "g -am may be obtained at the Planning Division of the Development Departmeof Redding, 777 Cypress Avenue, Redding, CA 96001 and o'e on the Planniects page of the Development Services website at: www.citvorn.or. Contact: rice, (530) 225-4471 April 30, 2021 Final Report Attachments: A. Location map B. Initial Study C. Mitigation Monitoring Program UP-2020-01669, GPA-2020-01667, RZ-2020-01669; PM-2021-00290 Mitigated Negative Declaration Page Hartnell Comm Prepared by: CITY OF REDDING Development Services Department Planning Division 777 Cypress Avenue Redding, California 96001 I N ITIAL STUDY CH ECKLIST . 0 4 es and Documentation Summit Development 11011,0011 May 6, 2021 1. 2. C41111V&SI: 2da711L1 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM Project Title: Hartnell Commercial Complex by Summit Development Lead agency name and address: CITY OF REDDING Development Services Department Planning Division , tsit �t ; 777 Cypress Avenue Redding, CA 96001 Contact Person Project Applicant's Name` TJG/Summit Devela 2451 Birchwood Circl Redding, CA 96002 Number: Sean Prig„Assistant Planner, (530) 225-4471 and 2522 Hartnell Avtti'e, 3055 and 3091 Appian Way, and 3050 Leonard Street 6. General Plan Designation: 7. F-A 'ess: Representative's Name and Address: Zoning: "SC" Shopping Center Description of Project: The project consists "use perms J tc'el map; development of a shopping center and self -storage facilCt ,""" �= 2.13 acres o Avenue and Shasta View Drive. The shopping center co j_t of a 30,000-squ outer pads for retail, a drive -through restaurant a ctf}dve rthrough ar flll store. The project also includes the request to zj4a storage faceReg project will delineate each of the retail spaces ki the prcYg�►`f,ai s �tF � s� rs� taking the total parcels from five to seven. The rezone is a reque'�� changE proposed 2.8-acre self -storage facility parcel to "HC" Heavy Commercial. Th rezone request to amend the existing general plan designation of ping eral Plan amendment, and rezoning for the d located at the southeast corner of Hartnell -foot Holiday Market Grocery Store, and five utombjle fueling station with a convenience 8 ajof land. A parcel map related to the ✓af�jtusefacility on their respective parcel, w' 'r1ent zoned "SC" Shopping Center on the rral plan arPEdent request reflects the tter to,..Jie�tiitimercial.,, Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The project site encompasses five parc,pproximately 12:13 acres: The property is currently vacant and is populated with blue and Interior live off,"tttal grasses with scattered shrubs. Commercial uses are located to the north and west. To the south the project is'[°ite'red by single and multiple family uses. West of the project is a mix of commercial and multiple family. The project site slopes gently from north to south. An intermittent stream flows in a southwest direction beginning approximately at the midpoint of the property on Hartnell Avenue exiting the property at the southwest corner of the property. An emergent wetland exists along the intermittent stream just west of the center of the project site. An ephemeral swale parallels Shasta View Drive along Appian Way which joins with the intermittent stream at the southwest quadrant of the project site. A small isolated pond also exists within the southwest quadrant of the project site. 10 Other public agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement): • U.S. Army Corps of Engineers • Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board • California Department of Fish and Wildlife UP-2020-01669, PM-2021-00290, RZ-2020-01668, GPA-2020-01667 Hartnell Commercial Complex City of Redding Development Services Department Planning Division Initial Study 11. Have California Native American tribes traditionally and culturally affiliated with the project area requested consultation pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21080.3.1? If so, is there a plan for consultation that includes, for example, the determination of significance of impacts to tribal cultural resources, procedures regarding confidentiality, etc.? Consultation letters were sent to the Redding Rancheria and the Wintu Tribe of Northern California on March 25, 2021, to invite their participation in the project development process. On April 22, 2020, Governor Newsom signed Executive Order N-54-20 that suspends the mandated timeline for tribal consultation for a period of 60 days. As of April 22, 2021, no request for consultation was received. Note: Conducting consultation early in the CEQA process allows tribal governments, lead agencies, and project proponents to discuss the level of environmental review, identify and address potential adverse impacts to tribal cultural resources, and reduce the potential for delay and conflict in the environmental review process. (See Public Resources Code section 21080.3.2.) Information may also be available from the California Native American Heritage Commission's Sacred Lands File per Public Resources Code section 5L2ttl California Historical Resources Information System administered by the California t�s{ a,Z,titr ,t 1 , Office of Historic ....... it Pres�d f�ut' lease t f ote that Public Resources Code section 21082.3(c) contains provisions specific to tt�t,t confidentiality itl��r to u i i ENVIRONMENTAL FACT�IALLy AFFECTED,` tjtr Et fit$ The environmental factttif,hecked below would be`'.potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Imtt or Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated" as indicated by the checklist on the following O tt pages. t is 4(r �`� 4 �a r2 u s 1 �ifjttta 'orestry Aesthetics t.ry�.n „� Air Quality �StSurces X Biological Resources t� § yr Ultural Resource Energy , Geology J Soils isslp t , t' Hazards & Hazardous Materials ;reenhouse �t t Hydrology /Water Quality Land Use'/ Plamm Mineral Resources Noise t Population ing t I' �f Services � f ,Public Recreation X Tran�I�tlon '$�,'��I �` , tribal Cultural Resources } r t trt b � Utilities /Service Systems Wildfire ttt Mandatory Findings of Significance Ad — DETERMINATION: 1 find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. x I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact UP-2020-01669, PM-2021=00290, RZ-2020-01668, GPA-2020-01667 Hartnell Commercial Complex City of Redding Development Services Department Planning Division Initial Study on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR of NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. Copies of the Initial Study and related materials and documentation may be obtained at the Planning Division of the Development Services Department, 777 Cypress Avenue, Redding, CA 96001. Contact Assistant Planner Sean Price at (530) 225-4471. Sean Price, Assistant Planner Development Services Depar May 7, 2021 Date UP-2020-01669, PIA-2021-00290, RZ-2020-01668, GPA-2020-01667 Hartnell Commercial Complex City of Redding Development Services Department Planning Division Initial Study EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: This section analyzes the potential environmental impacts associated with the proposed project. The issue areas evaluated in this Initial Study include: ■ Aesthetics Z Mineral Resources ■ Agricultural and Forestry Resources 0 Noise ■ Air Quality 0 Population/Housing ■ Biological Resources 0 Public Services ■ Cultural Resources 0 Recreation ■ Energy N Transportation ■ Geology/Soils ■ Tribal Cultural Resources ■ Greenhouse Gas Emissions ■ Utilities/Service Systems ■ Hazards & Hazardous t\!1rj� �i 1 Wildfire ■ Hydrology/Water Mandatory Findings of Significance ,' ■ Land Use/Planrltp,�«',� The environmental analysjtn. this section is pattern ter the Initial Study Checklist recommended by the State CEQA Guidelines and used by the City of 14diing in its environmentalp�ew process. For the preliminary environmental assessment undertaken as part of this Initial Study's�' h aration, a determinatiNK at there is a potential for significant effects indicates the need to more fully analyze the development 1,",,pacts and to identify mitigation. For the evaluation of potential lrEppycts,thestion�tlalStudyy Checklist are stated and an answer is provided according to the analysis undertaken as part �'#`ifstudyt siders the long-term, direct, indirect, and cumulative impacts of the development. To each question, there are fq,,#1 Bible respo : No Impact. The development will not',e any measura • Less Than Significant Impact. The devei rnent wllj, '' , he will be below established thresholds thaNX,, o,'rtt i tc" l`to b, • Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Ir which may be considered as a significant effect development's physical or operational characterise Potentially Significant Impact. The developmen f' ill have lb is required to identify mitigation measures that could reduce ronmental impact on the environment. impacting the environment, although this impact 1'. The developr n t will have the potential to generate impacts vironment, alitigh mitigation measures or changes to the uce these Irrti to levy that are less than significant. � 00 irii`are conred significant, and additional analysis thesd4' m pacts to Ie1 lesignificant levels. ' �� an g Where potential impacts are anticipated to be significant, mitigation measures will b'tu reduced to Insignificant levels. Prior environmental evaluations applicable to all or part of the project s - City of Redding General Plan, 2000 - City of Redding General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report, 2000, SCH #1998072103 List of attachments/references: Attachment A — Figure 1 Location Map Figure 2 — Project Site Plan Figure 3 — Parcel Map Figure 4 — Grading Plan Figure 5 —Vegetation Map Figure 6 — Preliminary Utilities Plan pacts may be avoided or UP-2020-01669, PIA-2021-00290, RZ-2020-01668, GPA-2020-01667 Hartnell Commercial Complex 5 City of Redding Development Services Department Planning Division Initial Study Figure 7 — Building Elevations Attachment B— Wetlands Delineation, Wildland Resource Managers, May 2020 (on file with the Planning Division and available online) Attachment C— Biological Review, Wildland Resource Managers, May 2020 (on file with the Planning Division and available online) Attachment D — Cultural Resources Inventory Survey, Sean Michaellensen M.A., December 2019 (on file with the Planning Division) Attachment E — Oak Tree Report, Wildland Resource Managers, dated September 27, 2019 (on file with the Planning Division and available online) Attachment F—Traffic Impact Analysis Memorandum for Holiday Market, GHD, dated March 1, 2021(on file with the Planning Division and available online) SUMMARY OF MITIGATION MEASURES: • MM-1. Prior to issuance of a grading permit affecting any jurisdictional waters, including wetlands, as identified in the project wetland delineation, the �Is nt shall provide written verification to the City of Redding Development Services Department that the fpdjg re'sour,cy permits and mitigation requirements have been successfully secured from the Corps, CDFW, R��, or any other ap9ple agency (i.e., USFWS) identified through the permitting process:* M a C. Prior tojclischarge of dredged orfl(I' material into "waters of the U.S:", including wetlands, authorization under a Nationermit or Individual Pei shall be obtained from the Corps. For any features determined to not be subject tt'( he Corps jurisdiction �d g the verification process, authorization to discharge (or a waiver from regulatijhall be obtained from the RWQCB. For fill requiring a Corps permit, water quality certification shall be obtarned'f '` jthe RWQCB prior to discharge of dredged or fill material. Verification shall be provided to the City of Redding Devi l r r ,5 es Deport l2 $k li{tprlfor to issuance the issuance of a grading permit. i Prior to any activities that wcttt`o'bstruct the of, or alter the bed, channel, or bank of any intermittent or i , ephemeral creeks, notificatir pjf f streambed alt` rfiJon shall be submitted to the CDFW; and, if required, a 1602 streambed alteration agreerp� shall be obtainthe project applicant. Verification shall be provided to the City of Redding Development Serve De The project applicant shall achiev " , t,% fat through the purchase of mitigation cre�dif"s"'at an onsitejoffsite habitat restoration at a minlmurr mitigation plan, including success criteria, prtift,`'' agencies (i.e., Corps, CDFW, RWQCB) shtjI"""'`' shall identify when measures shall betilt�toier or other waters. All measures tonged in to the t?,ante of a grading permit. rr,tt,,ear7t loss of streams, wetlands, and other waters �a`pproved r(ration bank at minimum 1:1 ratio, or through atio. If onsite/tiIte habitat restoration is proposed a detailed 1g, maintenan,�1'and Ire porting as required by the regulatory fitted for reyje�I nd a oval. The affected regulatory agency nd compl 41, 1 or tho �3 tivities impacting streams, wetlands, ta;�rf'"associalth any agency approvals shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the lead regulatory agency. MM-2. If vegetation removal or construction activities will occur during the through August 31), a qualified biologist shall conduct a precor If nesting birds or raptors are found, CDFW will be notified and `b rds or raptors (February 1 construction activities begin. ropriate buffer, as determined by CDFW and the qualified biologist, will be placed around the nest until the yburt'have fledged. If construction activities cease fora period greater than 7 days, additional preconstruction surveys will be required. MM-3. To the extent practicable, removal of large trees with cavities, crevices, or snags shall occur before bat maternity colonies form (i.e., prior to March 1) or after young are volant (i.e., after August 31). If construction (including the removal of large trees >_12 inch dbh ) occurs during the bat non-volant season (March 1 through August 31), a qualified professional shall conduct a pre -construction survey of the study area to locate maternity colonies and identify measures to protect colonies from disturbance. The preconstruction survey will be performed no more than 7 days prior to the implementation of construction activities. If a maternity colony is located within or adjacent to the study area, a disturbance free buffer shall be established by a qualified professional, in consultation with CDFW, to ensure the colony is protected from project activities. UP-2020-01669, PM-2021-00290, RZ-2020-01668, GPA-2020-01667 Hartnell Commercial Complex City of Redding Development Services Department Planning Division Initial Study • MM-4. The developer will replace the blue oak trees removed from the site with suitable minimum 15-gallon size shade trees at minimum ratio of 1:1. ■ MM-5 Off -site improvement along Shasta View Drive shall include the following: o Restriping of the portion of Shasta View Drive between Hartnell Avenue and Goodwater Avenue to a three -lane arterial with one travel lane in each direction with a two-way left turn lane. o Construct a 5-foot sidewalk along the east side of Shasta View Drive from Hartnell Avenue to Christian Avenue. ■ MM-6 Construct 3-leg, single lane roundabout at the Alta Mesa Drive and Hartnell Avenue intersection. Potentially Less -Than- Less -Than- No 1.AESTHETICS: Except as provde f t£ �t b � Code Section 21099, Significant Significant With Significant Impact would the project: Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated a) Have a substantial ay��e effect on a scenic vista i�£ i ix x 4A 7 b) Substantially dam lacenic resources, includin' N,', not limited to, trees, rock outcrojits, and historic buildings within a State scenic x highway?,� £ c) In nonurbanized area�£'i£stal�a�legradeh' visual character or quality of puksjlf"rtvsi`f)le siteaJtjt t{sttuin;ings? (Public views are those that area expenencpublicly ac lble x vantage point). If the project is in an urbanled'rea, would thep�<£ ct conflict with applicable zoning and other, Actions governing tic £ , quality? �£ 40 i; d) Create a new source of substantial light or g1��hlch vy{gersely £" affect day or nighttime views in the are; It, x ,<;,�£ i ,£,�r Discussion: a=c) The project site is located on land that is highly vlslblp t� w z £ nman y al r f d'Ytnell hue and Shasta View Drive. The City's R Planning Division has reviewed the site design )�ljng ell �rdhdeterm irt,£fhe proposed design is in conformance with the City's General Plan, Zoning Ordinance andmmercial Desi,'.�iielines Th£lectwould be consistent in height with buildings on the developed adjacent commercial properties. Therefore, the protect d,�£''`ot represert,�a slgnificantadverse visual impact. The project site is not located adjacent to a state -designated scenic highw4 £ i { The six commercial buildings are proposed to be architecturally compatible whic a£�fc)f `ia''mixture of materials including, metal roofing material, stucco, stone veneer, lap siding, wood plank sidrng,�t'£r�;'grovesiding, and glazing. The buildings and associated facades will have varying heights, awnings, canopies, cornicS=rbied roofs, trellises, and other decorative fixtures to provide articulation to the building elevations which, along with varying natural earth tone colors and patterns, provide variation in the appearance of the buildings. Other project features include, but not limited to landscaping, hardscape features, solid waste enclosures, monument signs, building signage, and parking lot, driveway and walkway lighting. d) There would not be an adverse effect on day or nighttime views in the area. Shielding of lighting as required by City Ordinance will minimize any impact to a level of less than significant. The following standard condition will be applicable and therefore any potential impact will be less than significant. Construction activities for the project will be limited to normal daytime hours (i.e., 6:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. on weekdays from May 15 through September 15, 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. on weekdays from September 16 through May 14, and from 9:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. on weekends and holidays in accordance with RMC Section 18.40.100). The proposed project would not require nighttime UP-2020-01669, PM-2021-00290, RZ-2020-01668, GPA-2020-01667 Hartnell Commercial Complex City of Redding Development Services Department Planning Division Initial Study lighting for construction activities. Thus, no impact would occur in this regard. Standard Condition Regarding Lighting In accordance with Chapter 18.40.090, Lighting, of the Redding Municipal Code, any new roof -mounted or freestanding exterior lighting shall be designed, located, directed, and shielded in such a_manner so as to prevent objectionable light at, and glare across, the property lines. A lighting detail/photometric study demonstrating how this requirement will be satisfied shall be submitted with the building permit application. Documentation: City of Redding General Plan, Natural Resources Element, 2000 City of Redding Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 18.40.090 Mitigation: None necessary. i�fi � �4TI0��i II. AGRICULTURE RESOU�I ,an determining whether ipcts to agricultural Potentially Less -Than- less -Than- No resources are significant envC�ntal effects, lead agencies �Ifer to the California Significant Significant With Significant Impact Agricultural, Land EvaluatY�'hd Site Assessment Mode i prepared by the Impact Mitigation Impact California Dept. of Consen, as an optional model to use¢ t sessing impacts on Incorporated agriculture and farmland i rmining whether impacts to fott resources, including effects, lead agencies may rr information compiled by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection $ i.ng the state's inventory of forest land, including the Forest and Range Assessment f s ct and the Forest Legacy Assessment project, and forest carbon measurement meorest fted by the California Air ResourcesBaard. Woff 15 a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique FarmIant }`z i Statewide Imce (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepatidd`'oursuant to the F nd x Mapping and Monitoring Program of the Crnia Resources A��y, to non-agricultural use? r t "'d tt j1 ifs {}y [ b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or "a"Williams Contract?53 X c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of (as s �t defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g,laber1I (asp; defined by Public Resources Code Section 4526) o�tfk'berlantf ��}t�t�" AVII �iy „t X } 41 Timberland Production (as defined by Governmei t Code SeCfee , t i f i t k t f �$ d Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non -forest use? X e) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to ;t� location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland to non-' tt R� x agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non -forest land? Discussion: a-e) The project site contains soils that consist of Red Bluff Loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes (RbB), and Churn Gravelly Loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes (CfA) and is not within an area identified by the California Department of Conservation's Important Farmland Series Mapping and Monitoring Program as meeting the criteria for Prime Farmland if irrigated. Red Bluff loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes, is representative of the Redding series, in which permeability is very slow. Runoff is slow to medium, and the hazard of erosion is slight to moderate. Churn Gravelly Loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, is moderately well drained. Permeability and runoff are slow. The hazard of erosion is none to slight. These soil classifications do not represent prime suitability for agricultural use; therefore, development of the property would not result in any impact to agricultural resources. UP-2020-01669, PM-2021-00290, RZ-2020-01668, GPA-2020-01667 Hartnell Commercial Complex City of Redding Development Services Department Planning Division Initial Study Documentation: City of Redding General Plan, Natural Resources Element, 2000 City of Redding General Plan Background Report, Chapter 9.4: Agricultural Lands California Department of Conservation's Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service and Forest Service, Soil Survey of Shasta County Area. Mitigation: None necessary. III. AIR QUALITY: Where available, the significance criteria established by the Potentially Less -Than- Less -Than- No applicable air quality management district or air pollution control district may Significant Significant With Significant Impact be relied upon to make the following et Would the project: Impact Mitigation Impact `,; Incorporated a) Conflict with or obentation of f*Rf applicable air quality plan? X b) Result in a curets., ely considerable net in cr e of any criteria �'t pollutant for whi, trhe project region is nment under an applicable Federal Ji f�)ate ambient air quality standard X c) Expose sensitive receptYtrs t'sftlfapJ X �...�. �. pns? rr,7) d) Result in other emissions {such as those Irsg to odors) �sely affecting a substantial number of people? ' ,, }7, f,z X 7 Discussion: j�? rrtf� rt, a-c) Shasta County, including the far northern Saii�)tey, curets)f,td and particulates (fine, airborne particles), Consequ'eity, thee related to land use and transportation planning. Even with f ation of me cumulative impacts are unavoidable when ozone and/ol-�,',i, late emission emissions contributing to ozone is from vehicles Ar�r'ot that gener incrementally to the problem. The Environmentah,a`ct E�,ft for th� z result, Findings and aStatement of Overriding Consii ations'�j from growth supported under the General Plan. ISrthe state's ambient standards for ozone (smog) tj cus of local air quality policy, especially when s11 reduce emissions for individual projects, rWnvolved. For example, the primary source of S'ehiele �s has the potential of contributing Oral Plcra;ioknowledged this dilemma; and as a IV the Cit t, 16ncil for impacts to air quality resulting The City Air Quality Element of the General Plan establishes emission -reduction �als of ','��' ercent, depending on the 4r �� ,t}i projected level of unmitigated emissions for project. Mitigation thresholds tff�tlfor the important regional/local Pollutants, including: Reactive Organic Gases (ROG) and Oxides of �tFogerf are ozone precursors, and Inhalable Particulate Matter, 10 Micron (PMio). The mitigation thresholds for'`iants are tiered at two levels asfollows; Level "A" 25 pounds per day of NOx 25 pounds per day of ROG 80 pounds per day of PM,o Level "B" 137 pounds per day of NOx 137 pounds per day of ROG 137 pounds per day of PMlo If a project has unmitigated emissions less than the Level "A" threshold, then it is viewed as a minor project (from an air quality perspective) and only application of Standard Mitigation Measures (SMMs) is required to try to achieve at least a 20 percent reduction in emissions, or the best reduction feasible otherwise. Land uses that generate unmitigated emissions above Level "A" require application of appropriate Best Available Mitigation Measures (BAMMs), in addition to the SMMs, in order to achieve a net emission reduction of 20 percent or more. If, after applying SMMs and BAMMs, a use still exceeds the Level "B" threshold, then a minimum of 25 percent of the unmitigated emissions exceeding 137 pounds per day must be offset by reducing emissions UP-2020-01669, PM-2021-00290, RZ-2020-01668, GPA-2020-01667 Hartnell Commercial Complex City of Redding Development Services Department Planning Division Initial Study from existing sources of pollution; otherwise, an Environmental Impact Report is required. Under policy of the Air Quality Element, a project has the potential to impact air quality primarily in two ways: (1) the project would generate vehicle trip emissions (with NOx, ROG, and PM,o) that contribute cumulatively to local and regional air quality conditions; and (2) fugitive dust (particulate/PMlo) emissions are possible during construction activities. As a shopping center and self -storage facility serving and underserved area of the city where many residents travel much farther for these services, the project does not have the potential to generate significant emission concentrations of other pollutants subject to state and federal ambient air quality standards. Application of Standard Mitigation Measures (SMMs) is required in order to strive toward the General Plan policy of a 20 percent reduction in emissions to address small-scale cumulative effects. SMMs applicable to this project address primarily short-term impacts related to construction and are standard development regulations promulgated in the City Grading Ordinance and California Building Code identifiedtbS w Application of the SMMs and the application of Best Available Mitigation Measures for NOx emissions as outlined "A the the projects potential air quality impacts to a level less than significant. 1. Nontoxic soil Jffffirs shall be appffi��}z�ccording to manufacturer's specification to all inactive construction areas (previously gre3'rareas inactive for tenfis or more). 2. All grading 0,01 tions shall be suspend et OR f en winds (as instantaneous gusts) exceed 20miles per hour. 3. Temporaryf�ic control shall be prove sappropriate during all phases of construction to improve traffic flow (e.g., flag persons s 4. Constructlol444,fivltles that could affect traffic flow shall be scheduled in off-peak hours, 5. Active construct inn areas haul,,roads, etc shall be watered at least twice daily or more as needed to limit dust. P 6. Exposed stockpif,��o��;rther b�jfl4stftfJal shall either be covered, watered, or have soil binders added to IY�irug inhibit dust and windtn. 7. All truck hauling solid and other 1�iiaterial sha minimum vertical distance betwe `,,,14 p of the load 23114. This provision is enforce d'f local law enfori 8. All public roadways used by the (olect contra construction activities. Streetssha�ff,'swpitzt� paved roads. Wheel washers shall be i�E any equipment shall be washed off leaving the site 9. Alternatives to open burning of cleared vegetative; s, si infeasible bythe City Planning Division. Suitable,,,,,,,,,' and/or hauling to a biomass fuel site. !lt c) Potential impacts to neighboring homes (sensitive inceptors) application of the SMMs discussed above. r$overed or should maintain at least two feet of freeboard (i.e., it"'he trailer) in accordance with the requirements of CVC Section ,t agencies ' hall be,g��lntamed free from dust, dirt, and debris caused by d oftka (i k ffurra iblesoil materials are carried onto adjacent public clenpaved roads onto paved roads, or trucks and htrip.�t I on the pro, site shall be used unless otherwise deemed include, bu, not limited to, on -site chipping and mulching d) The project does not involve land use that could generate objectionable odors Documentation: dust cau"during construction are mitigated by mber of people. Shasta County APCD Air Quality Maintenance Plan and Implementing Measifu{ City of Redding General Plan, Air Quality Element City of Redding General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report, 2000, SCH #1998072103, Chapter 8.6 Air Quality, CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations for the City of Redding General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report, as adopted by the Redding City Council on October 3, 2000, by Resolution 2000-166 City of Redding General Plan Background Report, Chapter 9.7, Natural Resources and Air Quality California Air Resources Board. 2017. Area designations maps/state and national. http://www.arb.ca,goyldesiJadm/adm.htm (accessed April 19, 2021). Mitigation: None necessary. UP-2020-01669, PM-2021-00290, RZ-2020-01668, GPA-2020-01667 Hartnell Commercial Complex 10 City of Redding Development Services Department Planning Division Initial Study Potentially Less -Than- Less -Than- No IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES: Would the project: Significant Significant With Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special -status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, x or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. x Fish and Wildlife Services c) Have a substantial adyY*,`effect on sprotected }fiederally wetlands (includmg ""'A" limited to, marsh, ve'r�l'pool, coastal, etc.) through direct rerrtt,X�i'` filling, hydrological irreiUption, or other x means? d) Interfere substanal with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wflgfe species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife coi rzrs, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery x sites?s',�{ e) Conflict with any local policies or ordina, ectmg 1pgicaI Sf. resources, such as a tree preservation polics�rttrdinance?`�,'�� x ��}r •st,t i �: f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopt,"'$Jabitat Conservati,�an, 1 Natural Community, Conservation Plane,{` other appra��'9ocal x regional, or State habitat conservation plank Sri a t x<,�4 �.<<�{ . ��. t Discussion: a) A Biological Review Report was prepared for the proiec) ,�j hand Resource � lagers ,,WRM), dated May 2020, to assess the impacts of the proposed project on biological resourc ject area anity Ipt'dition to research, database review, and species list reviews, a habitat assessment and;togical rblsney waducted, Upon numerous inspections „t . �.,. of the project area few wildlife species were observed and no Ilstt'tres of flora r"7una were found Several bird species were observed moving through the area as well as bats foraging over the site. These rtjt UN ments were classified as "opportunistic" rather than evidencing a travel corridor or migratory movement, of which there is '' vldenc t,;l 'ruary 26, 2020 and April 8, 2020, a spade -foot survey was conducted paying particular attention to the{Itermtt�`d'"ephemeral stream areas. No toads were seen or heard. Although the intermittent stream that flows th�4�4�troject area has connectivity to the Sacramento River downstream, fish passage during normal flows Is r ' ip " . � eiS. b) According to the California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB), 11 sensitive habitats, either on the Federal or State status, occur within CNDDB Enterprise Quadrant in which the project site is located: foothill yellow -legged frog, bald eagle, bank swallow, tricolored blackbird, vernal pool fairy shrimp, green sturgeon, steelhead, chinook salmon -Central Valley spring -run and - Sacramento River winter -run, gray wolf, slender Orcutt grass. Based on the Biological Review Report, discussed above, no riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulation, or by CDFW or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service were observed on the project site. c) A Wetlands Delineation was prepared for the project by WRM in November 2019 and revised in May 2020. The field study efforts mapped 4 features in the proposed project site, including wetlands and other waters: emergent wetland, ephemeral Swale, intermittent stream and a pond. There is an intermittent stream that flows through the center of the project site from north to south. The stream only carries water during the wet season from a culvert under Hartnell Avenue south across the property to the southwest corner. After leaving the property the stream is channeled along the western side of Shasta View Drive south to UP-2020-01669, PM-2021-00290, RZ-2020-01668, GPA-2020-01667 Hartnell Commercial Complex 11 City of Redding Development Services Department Planning Division Initial Study Clover Creek Preserve. There is no true riparian habitat present. An ephemeral stream originates near the paved parking area in the northwest corner of the property and flows to north to south, intersecting the intermittent stream near the center of the property. This stream has a very shallow gradient with annual vegetation present within the stream channel. The emergent wetland is just to the east, and associated within, the intermittent stream near the center of the property. This wetland is moist during the winter months but dries out during the summer. The emergent pond holds water during the rainy season and quickly dries with the onset of warm weather. The delineation summarized that the combined total of jurisdictional wetland features on the proposed project site is 0.4013 acres. The project will impact all the wetland features found on the property. The intermittent stream will be placed within a 24-inch buried culvert and the ephemeral stream, emergent wetland and pond will be filled to the necessary project grade. In February 2020 the wetlands delineation report along with a Pre -construction notice, both prepared by WRM, were submitted to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers with a request for a preliminary jurisdictional determination and assistance with implementation of appropriate mitigation measures. However, a response from the Corps is still pending. Implementation of MM-1 would l�,tftpntial impacts to jurisdictional waters to less than significant. d) Although no active bird observed d" t(,"ie proposed project site during the field inspections, birds could establish nests in vegetation on or a lii4to these areas in fulnestiIt, seasons. The federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act (META) requires that nesting migratory biriat be adversely affectei, human activities. Nesting migratory birds would potentially be directly or indirectly impacted Instruction activities as �ted with the proposed project. Direct impacts include mortality resulting from removal of ve I n contained an active' s "with eggs or chicks. Indirect impacts include nest abandonment by adults in response to loud no��' veIs or human encroachment, or a reduction in the amount of food available to young birds due to changes in feeding bel�4rprr by adults. Most migratory birds anticipated to occur in the project area next between February 1 and August 31. Implementat� i +MM Id red uce+ t aI impacts to nesting migratory birds to less than significant. During the biological field inspection, it was", and that tlto+is some bat roosting habitat on -site in the form of tree cavities and bark crevices as well as several snags , r`,#ever, no bat au imk y was observed around these features. The non -riparian trees on the site offer lower habitat values for 'however, even non riparian trees it is possible that bats could roost in trunk cavities or under loose bark. Implementatrl;9of MM-3 woul'Uce potptial impacts to roosting bats to less than significant. e) The City has adopted a Tree Management,IY�{��'fiter healthy trees in the design of new development: Tft+rordinangd r`recogn�i conflict with necessary land -development requirements Tho�js General P rtj+' native trees will sometimes conflict with normal land dev)iii�ent and that i set aside over 7,000 acres of open space, much of why+r�h.ins oak habitq trees if reasonably possible, and to sufficiently plantl`rl tree �{#�.rthe cont t C) that promotes the conservation of mature, ghat the preservation of trees will sometimes further acknowledges that preservation of �entation of the General Plan will ultimately to identify natural trees and tree groups most suj file for p �r� l , '"°can candidate trees/groups cannot be preserved, the set -aside of a naiuraj' area or at suitable for the planting, retention, and/or natural regeneration of trees is consider the goals of the ordinance. l,must still be made to retain existing WUW12�ielopment. A tree survey is required gtrees/groups." Where all identified rithin a project site that is particularly be a desira l means of accomplishing A Tree Survey was prepared for the project by Wildland Resourq Mana",1+'purvey found two primary vegetation associations on the project site. Blueoak/interior live oak woodlands{�>f�"long the eastern and southern edges of the property covering approximately 31.4 percent of the project site.Tntified 193 blue oaks larger than 6-inch dbh and 92 interior live oak larger than 6-inch dbh. The Tree Survey Exhibit depicts the location of the group of trees on the proposed site plan. Further, it identified that there are several small to medium-sized oak trees located in the southwest portion of the site, however, none would be considered candidate trees. It was further observed that some vegetation management has taken place in the past as there is evidence of oak harvesting resulting in root crown sprouting and an open appearance in the north central portion of the project area. The proposal does not incorporate the retention of any of the trees. The developer is obligated to replant suitable new trees at the time of construction for shade. The Tree Management Ordinance identifies minimum planting criteria of one tree per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area or covered space, hence based on the proposed 83,888 square feet of gross floor area, a minimum of 84 trees are required. Additionally, the street frontages are required street trees at a ratio of 1 tree for every 30 feet of street frontage, therefore with the project site consisting of approximately 2,100 feet of street frontage, a minimum of 70 trees are required along the street frontages. Therefore, the requirement to plant a minimum of 154 new trees as a standard condition of development. Additionally, to mitigate the loss of trees at the project site MM-4 requires replacement at a minimum of 1:1 ratio resulting in a minimum of 194 trees planted in association with the project. Hence, the project is UP-2020-01669, PIA-2021-00290, RZ-2020-01668, GPA-2020-01667 Hartnell Commercial Complex 12 City of Redding Development Services Department Planning Division consistent with the intent of the Tree Management Ordinance. Initial Study f) No habitat conservation plans or other similar plans have been adopted for the project site or project area. No impact would occur in this regard. Documentation: California Department of Fish and Wildlife: Natural Diversity Data Base City of Redding General Plan, Natural Resources Element, 2000 City of Redding Municipal Code, Chapter 18.45, Tree Management Ordinance City of Redding General Plan Environmental Impact Report, 2000, SCH #1998072103 Wetlands Delineation, by Wildland Resource Managers, May 2020 Tree Survey by Wildland Resource Maj�,,ptember 27, 2019 Mitigation: MM-1. Prior to is }if ue of a grading permit a'fit ting anyjurisdictional waters,including wetlands, as identified in the project wetland delineoo-; the project applicantii=provide written verification to the City of Redding Development Services Department tllowing resource agef"t �i permits and mitigation requirements have been successfully secured from the Corps, CDFWrUQCB, or any other applicable agency (i.e., USFWS) identified through the permitting process:* t tj{t4 d. Prior to an��l�re otldged or f)ji �teial Into "waters of U.S:", including wetlands, authorization under a Nationwide P`ot�),'f��viifual;Qbtained from the Corps. For any features determined to not be subject to the Corps ring the 4,cation process, authorization to discharge (or a waiver from regulation) shall be obtained,,,,,,;" the RWQCB.t'ill requiring a Corps permit, water quality certification shall be obtained from the RWQCB pti"to discharge of t)'r ged or fill material. Verification shall be provided to the City of Redding Development Servicepartment pry issuanaheissuance of grading permit. e. Prior to any activities that ephemeral creeks, notification of sttearn%ed streambed alteration agreement shall be obtai of Redding Development Services Departme.p f. The project applicant shall achieve ow.bed, channel, or bank of any intermittent or rajAXIt`f ;b€shall be s �rtted to the CDFW; and, if required, a 1602 �the project apfkant. Verification shall be provided to the City i to the issuanc}a grading permit. the p through the purchase of mitigation creQFat an agd7nitigat onsite/offsite habitat restoration at a minimum 3:1 site/offsitji mitigation plan, including success criteria, monitoring, maintenance,{0, agencies (i.e., Corps, CDFW, RWQCB) shall be submitted for review a' shall identify when measures shall be implemented and completed�t or other waters. All measures contained in the per,#, s or implemented to the satisfaction of the lead regulatory' �t }{streams, wetlands, and other waters Wmnk at a minimum 1:1 ratio, or through "bitat restoration is proposed a detailed reporting ait#luired by the regulatory pprlpf,zf��fected regulatory agency apes impacting streams, wetlands, f``" it any agency approvals shall be ■ MM-2. If vegetation removal or construction activities will occur during the nesting season for birds or raptors (February 1 through August 31), a qualified biologist shall conduct a preconstruction survey 7 days before construction activities begin. If nesting birds or raptors are found, CDFW will be notified and consulted. An appropriate buffer, as determined by CDFW and the qualified biologist, will be placed around the nest until the young have fledged. If construction activities cease for a period greater than 7 days, additional preconstruction surveys will be required. • MM-3. To the extent practicable, removal of large trees with cavities, crevices, or snags shall occur before bat maternity colonies form (i.e., prior to March 1) or after young are volant (i.e., after August 31). If construction (including the removal of large trees >:12 inch dbh ) occurs during the bat non-volant season (March 1 through August 31), a qualified professional shall conduct a pre -construction survey of the study area to locate maternity colonies and identify measures to protect colonies from disturbance. The preconstruction survey will be performed no more than 7 days prior to the implementation of UP-2020-01669, PM-2021-00290, RZ-2020-01668, GPA-2020-01667 Hartnell Commercial Complex 13 City of Redding Development Services Department Planning Division Initial Study construction activities. If a maternity colony is located within or adjacent to the study area, a disturbance free buffer shall be established by a qualified professional, in consultation with CDFW, to ensure the colony is protected from project activities. • MM-4. The developer will replace the blue oak trees removed from the site with suitable minimum 15-gallon size shade trees at minimum ratio of 1:1. Potentially less -Than- Less -Than- No V. CULTURAL RESOURCES: Would the project: Significant Significant With Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated ffitt�'1 a) Cause a substantial adverit�� tn4ficance of a historical x resource ursuanttoSeol 64 p.5? f } ) b Cause a substanti t verse change in the t, nificance of an x < i tt� .t{ Sfi It jc archaeological resc��=pursuant to Section 1506�'y s c) Disturb any hurr remains, including those Jarred outside of x dedicated cemeterJeyi Discussion a-c) An archaeological inventory survey, d*, ecember 2 archaeological reports, records searchjid information subject property, it has been determin4ghat the project, the project is not anticipated to affec ,`�ltural resoIt f' development, any archaeological, historhi lr p) construction activities in the area affected�ia��'�nc professional must then be retained by the developer to inv, If the cultural object is deemed potentially significant M followed in accordance with applicable laws, as reviev affected area.u} was prepared by Sean Michael Jensen, M.A. Based upon :ained in the General Plan EIR pertinent to the vicinity of the s not in an area of archaeological or cultural sensitivity. While con�i of approval will require if, during the course of ri`i""',e uncovered or otherwise detected or observed, �st'ptified immediately. A qualified archaeological f°e the discovi cultural object to determine its significance. archaeologist, �ropriate treatment and measures shall be Documentation: City of Redding General Plan Background Report, 1998 City of Redding General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report, 2000,'. Archaeological Inventory Survey, by Sean Michael Jensen, M.A., Decem Mitigation: None necessary. imption of work in the Potentially Less -Than- less -Than- No VI. Energy: Would the project: Significant Significant With Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated a) Result in potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during X project construction or operation? b) Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or X energy efficiency? UP-2020-01669, PM-2021-00290, RZ-2020-01668, GPA-2020-01667 Hartnell Commercial Complex 14 City of Redding Development Services Department Planning Division Initial Study Discussion a) The project would not result in potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during project construction or operation. Direct energy use would involve the short-term use of energy for construction activities. Project construction would primarily consume diesel and gasoline through operation of construction equipment, material deliveries, and debris hauling. Construction is estimated to result in a short-term consumption of energy, representing a small demand on local and regional fuel supplies that would be easily accommodated and would be temporary. Long term use of electricity for operations such as lighting, heating, and cooling in the development is excepted to be less than significant. b) The project will not conflict with a f' , t�},gr local plans for renewable energy or energy efficiency. kt(} 7 t t itr}t 4St k to, i it}}j zt7 , r 7a �t rr Documentation: Sri' �{ � art t } r City of Redding General Plart�st C2uality Element, 26� "(a California Long -Term Ener,iciency Strategic Plan, ��? Regional Transportation zfor Shasta County, 2015 Mitigation: None necessary. �rt� Potentially Less -Than- less -Than- No VII. GEOLOGY AND SOILS: Would the praject: 5~ t�' rt}� ��t`%<f}5 Significant Significant With Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact c tell° Incorporated # v ' t)lt r f a) Directly or indirectly cause potential susntial adver�"��cts��t includingthe risk of loss, injury, or death inv�i) `{' �`'ts tki;r { �1 i S tFU t irk } i) Rupture of a known earthquake, fault, as delineated oiy)> most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake F �i,i x issued by the State Geologist for the area or basetf r t „ substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer tiii75ia oft tt, Mines and Geology Special Publications 42 5 i) Strong seismic ground shaking? I {It ttt' iii) Seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction? tt It iv) Landslides? s I, t b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? { t i! t�41ti{t)f 4k}rfn}, S x c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- x or off -site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction, or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform x Building Code (1994), creating substantial direct or indirect risks to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not x available for the disposal of waste water? f) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? x UP-2020-01669, PIA-2021-00290, RZ-2020-01668, GPA-2020-01667 Hartnell Commercial Complex 15 City of Redding Development Services Department Planning Division Discussion: Initial Study a, c, d) There are no Alquist-Priolo earthquake faults designated in the Redding area of Shasta County. There are no other documented earthquake faults in the immediate vicinity that pose a significant risk, and the site is located in an area designated in the Health and Safety Element of the General Plan as having a low ground -shaking potential. The project is not located on or near any documented landslide hazard areas, and there is no evidence of ground slippage or subsidence occurring naturally on the site. The type of soils and underlying geology is identified as having no potential for liquefaction. No portion of the site falls within the 100-year floodplain of the Sacramento River or any creek. b) The project site contains two soil classifications types, Red Bluff Loam (RbA), and Churn Gravelly Loam (CfA). These classifications are characterized by slopes of 3 $° 4 eir"',%pt and slow to medium runoff with a hazard of erosion that is slight to moderate. The soil is well -drained and has f, )00111 11t V 1� rmeability. Proposed grading will consist of that necessary for improvements of property in preparation ff �p 'fig, landscaj fd building construction. The project is subi,'to certain erosion-coniOf „ requirements mandated by existing City and State regulations. These requirements lnclud#,, i } City of Reddmc ygg ding Ordinance. This ordinance requires the application of "Best Management Practices" (BMPs) in accordance with 11t Gty Erosion and Sediment Control Standards Design Manual (Redding Municipal Code Section 16.12.060, Subs e�tl C D, E l practiceof/c erosion -control measures are determined upon review of the final project improvement�p�}�fi'�tallort�ecific grading impacts. California Regianal Water 1uahty BoarX��6nstruct�onttvity Storm Water permit." This permit somewhat overlaps the City's Grading Ordinance provision jmlpplying state shards for erosion -control measures during construction of the project.5 a California Regional Water Quality `trai Boarter Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)." This plan emphasizes stormwater best manageracticart of the Construction Activity Storm Water Permit. t , }r, The objectives of the SWPPP are to id J tf i �� urces �4 lei? r tIn other pollutants that affect the quality of tf,<, { i stormwater discharges and to describe ensuuethe imp)�tation ofp�t ;'tices to reduce sediment and other pollutants i in stormwater discharges. California Department of Fish and Wildlife "1600 Afnt." This no Is required for any work within a defined streambed. �u} fi s4 t� �rl�tat ��is{`s j U.S. Army corps of Engineers Nationwide Perrl��neuvi� Ionwide rtial developments) will be required ,, t it y�tr 1 ti �t jtt i, from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to adds impacts ttiprral waterG� v=�' Actions for compliance with these regulations are addressed under standard condl/fls of approuaG�'ch are uniformly applied to all land development projects. Since the project is subject to uniformly applledinanctand the overall risk of erosion is low, potential impacts related to soil erosion and sedimentation are It. f) The proposed project does not involve the use of septic tank ii) pi at"Je wastewater disposal. No impact has been identified. g) No unique geologic features, fossil -bearing strata, or paleontological sites are known to exist on the project site. Documentation: City of Redding Health and Safety Element, figures 4-2 (Ground Shaking Potential) and 4.2 (Liquefaction Potential) City of Redding General Plan Final Environmental impact Report City of Redding General Plan Background Report, 1998 City of Redding Grading Ordinance, RMC Chapter 16.12 City of Redding Standard Specifications, Grading Practices City of Redding Standard Development Conditions for Discretionary Approvals Soil Survey of Shasta County Area, United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service and Forest Service, August 1974 Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42 UP-2020-01669, PIA-2021-00290, RZ-2020-01668, GPA-2020-01667 Hartnell Commercial Complex 16 City of Redding Development Services Department Planning Division Initial Study State Regional Water Quality Control Board, Central Valley Region, Regulations related to Construction Activity Storm Water Permits and Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plans Mitigation: None necessary. Potentially Less -Than- less -Than- No Vill. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS: Would the project: Significant Significant With Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions,ttitr directly or indirectly, that X may haven significant impacoi't�dr�nt7 {t G� b) Conflict with an applic , inn, policy or mgadopted for the X purpose of reducing t'Dnissions of greenhouse'j ? Discussion: M a) In 2005, the Govern fsj�i,Califorrna signed Executive Oder S-3-05, establishing that it is the State of California's goal to reduce statewide greenhouse emission levels Subsequently, in2006, the California State Legislature adopted Assembly Bill AS 32, the California Global�T`��r s Act �s'requires the California Air Resources Board to develop and adopt regulations to achieve a red year 1990 levels by year 2020. California Senate Bill SB97 established thh individual projjj� s effect on GHG emission levels and global warming must be assessed under CEQA. SB97 further dire that the State ing and Research (OPR) develop guidelines for the assessment of a project's GHG emissions f�tye guidelinesY'�fiG emCjns were subsequently included as amendments to the CEQA Guidelines. The guidelines did not esta hie !� Hof signtft jai d there are currently no state, regional, county, or city guidelines or thresholds with which to dir``vel # result, the City of Redding has utilized the best available information to develop a threshold until a specific qu�tjfft�lve threshca)t adopted by the state or regional air district. As the Lead Agency, the City has opted to utilize afative non zeror}ect specific threshold using a methodology recommended by the California Air Pollution Officers (0 end acceptec��te Calif,trtJa Air Resources Board. According to CAPCOA's Threshold 2.3, CARB Reporting Thresholdj;U00 rr,fit,tor1,t;'ron-dio equivalents per year (mtCO2eq/yr) is recommended as a quantitative non -zero threshold according to t1��, this thrld would be equivalent to 550 dwelling units, 400,000 square feet of office use, 120,000 square feet of retail, or 70,000 squet of supermarket use. This approach is estimated to capture over half the future residential and commercial development ejects ar�ctlti�ed to support the goals ,z of A6 32 and not hinder it, ,�,',..y rr�, The United States Environmental Protection Agency(EPA) identifies feistlp7rrrt #yttuents that are most representative of the GHG emissions. They are: • Carbon Dioxide (CO2): Emitted primarily through the burning of fossil fuels. Other sources include the burning of solid waste and wood and/or wood products and cement manufacturing. • Methane (CH4): Emissions occur during the production and transport of fuels, such as coal and natural gas. Additional emissions are generated by livestock and agricultural land uses, as well as the decomposition of solid waste. • Nitrous Oxide (N20): The principal emitters include agricultural and industrial land uses and fossil fuel and waste combustion. • Fluorinated Gases: These can be emitted during some industrial activities. Also, many of these gases are substitutes for ozone -depleting substances, such as CFCs, which have been used historically as refrigerants. Collectively, these gases are often referred to as "high global -warming potential" gases. The primary generators of GHG emissions in the United States are electricity generation and transportation. The EPA estimates that nearly 85 percent of the nation's GHG emissions are comprised of carbon dioxide (CO2). The majority of CO2 is generated by petroleum UP-2020-01669, PM-2021-00290, RZ-2020-01668, GPA-2020-01667 Hartnell Commercial Complex 17 City of Redding Development Services Department Planning Division Initial Study consumption associated with transportation and coal consumption associated with electricity generation. The remaining emissions are predominately the result of natural-gas consumption associated with a variety of uses. With regard to the project, the predominant associated GHG is CO2generated by motor -vehicle travel to and from the site. To a substantially lesser degree, the project will result in CH4 emissions associated with use of electric power generated by the Redding Electric Utility (REU), though it should be noted that REU distributes power from a variety of sources, including hydroelectric, wind, and natural gas. Given the scope and nature of the proposed project compared to that of similar projects, emissions from the project would be significantly below the thresholds put forth by CARB, as well as the City's air -quality thresholds. Therefore, the project would not contribute significantly to GHG emissions in the air basin. Additionally, the City and State's construction standards and BMPs, including Air Quality SSM 1 through 9 (listed r y ptj ll Air Quality, above), will be used during construction to further limit any potential contribution to negative impactsr Niof4i H0f The project s direct or indirect impact on measurable GHGs in the Redding area would be less than si nificant, g Documentation: City of Redding General�yi.000 CPCOA website, July 19, California Office of the Aiti",, ey General, "The California Environmental Quality Act Addressing Global Warming Impacts at the Local Agency Level," updated Ja'fr 6, 20010 Air Quality Management D15tiritj hops coahasta�, ids/Index/drm_indexfaq_index.aspx. Accessed April22, 2020 Mitigation: "ryryry f{{ tik` f i'7', ${) i`ttjt4 f4} None necessary. J f ittt�yt"' pl r3 Potentially Less -Than- less -Than- No IX. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: W� the proje gnificant Significant With Significant Impact �' f pact Mitigation Impact {}x«;t,'n� , ;�s+��.,.,,_? �t�,','i �'h}, :.>,,.,,.� Incorporated dY t yt 7 tl�t �ti} l; 1 1 '�:. a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the envint throw`' ,nr1 4} ..�wys{t 4t4 routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materialst{ ` �,` ',i' i x b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environr)tifioughM', reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions toly( the �r ,� x release of hazardous materials into the environment? '" �t Yll �t !i P c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazartldus� � materials, substances, or waste within one -quarter mile of an existing or gq x proposed school? N.. d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5and as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or then x environment? t i i {A 1 k sjt,, e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard or excessive noise for x people residing or working in the project area? f) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? x g) Expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving wildland fires? x Discussion: UP-2020-01669, PIA-2021-00290, RZ-2020-01668, GPA-2020-01667 Hartnell Commercial Complex 18 City of Redding Development Services Department Planning Division Initial Study a, b, c, d) The nature of the project as a shopping center and storage facility, does not present a significant risk related to hazardous materials or emissions. There are no documented hazardous material sites located on or near the project. e) The project is not located within an airport land use plan or within two miles of a public airport or public use airport and would not result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area. There would be no impact on public safety. f) The project does not involve a use or activity that could interfere with emergency -response or emergency -evacuation plans for the area. g) The project site is not located within the Very High Fire Severity Zone and is not adjacent to areas with significant fuel loads. The property does not have a wildland fire -hazard potential and will not expose people or structures to significant risk involving wildland fires. Documentation: City of Redding General Mitigation: None necessary. Potentially Less -Than- Less -Than- No X. HYDROLOGY AND WATER#�1tJl� lxa�the proyetr�� ,ir�'f ,,� Significant Significant With Significant Impact � Impact Mitigation Impact "' " Incorporated a) Violate any water quality standards or wastlscharge require rritl5 or otherwise substantially degrade surface otjund water quality r� x 3ti + t b) Substantially decease groundwater sup plr� tsar interfere F f {r 4 tkl �su�'htially with groundwater recharge such that t�` t?f4e1 t ,sz impede i ;�,� x sustainable groundwater management of the b 4's �g �, f' t / ljTharr, t titr,=.,. t k,f Y{wk s i c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the sitea, t�i including through the alteration of the course of a stream fa,i"er or t x through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner wit Suld: c �i 4 ii i7� 3s-' ! } t f FI t ft�v ti 3 1 i) Result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off `` _�' NEW' "� zi}{ x w, ii) Substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner k x which would result in flooding on- or off -site; iii) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of , � tf{'�',,}sNIPi existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial„a "t, t}�`�'� 7�'`�''' x additional sources of polluted runoff; or �' iv) Impede or redirect flood flows? x d) In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, risk release of pollutants due to project inundation? x e) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan x or sustainable groundwater management plan? Discussion: a) The project proposes to extend the public sewer system down Leonard Street to serve this site and the properties to the south. Construction and operation of the project would not violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements UP-2020-01669, PIA-2021-00290, RZ-2020-01668, GPA-2020-01667 Hartnell Commercial Complex 19 City of Redding Development Services Department Planning Division Initial Study established by the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) in its Basin Plan for the Sacramento River and San Joaquin River Basins. Water pollution best management practices are required and will be incorporated into the improvement plans for the project. The City's construction standards require that all projects prepare an erosion and sediment control plan (ESOP) prior to construction to address water pollution control. The ESCP will ensure that water quality standards are not substantially affected by the project during construction. b) The project would utilize City water service for domestic uses and fire protection. The proposed project would not impact groundwater supplies. c) Stormwater runoff from the site flows from north to south by way of an intermittent stream. The stream carries water from a culvert under Hartnell Avenue south across the property to the southwest corner. An ephemeral stream flows from the northwest to the center of the iloins the aforementioned intermittent stream. The project will be required to install storm drain pipe connectin, 10 t�Hartnell Avenue to the storm drain system running along the western side of Shasta View Drive, but w� not alter the' r�t n or result in substantial erosion, surface runoff, flooding on- or off- site, or otherwise substantial }trade water quality �tconstruction. The project is subJErdtltb standard requirement!Eid ned under Section VII., Geology and Soils, and mitigation measures (if any) under Section IV ,ogical Resources, above �t minimize the potential for erosion or siltation on- or off -site. The final improvement plans11tithe project must also incorporate specific design measures intended to limit pollutant discharges in stormwater from urb�tr%improvements as established under the State's National Pollutant Elimination System (NPDES) general permit, which the City�;�a obli to follow trt�rdance with State Water Quality Control Order No. 2003-0005-DWQ. Feasible Best Management}�r>�MPs) zttr3)rorated in the final design of the project's storm -drain system, as approved by the City Engineer, based on thp's listed in ��4aatest edition of the California Storm Water Quality Association Storm Water Best Management Practices 0i" book. � �, 5 r City of Redding Policy 1806 requires thi I subdivision i �a lopmeraf, include stormwater detention facilities designed to maintain existing predevelopment rates ff durin �4 '25 , an � tfi year storm event with a 6-hour duration. The project ygl application includes a stormwater hydrolo"I",f}jy�)'ip source Managers and dated May 2020 that concludes that impacts from stormwater draina�i'unoffWO OkiJe less gnificant. d) The property is not located within any agency or otherw $ Wumented fl( threat of a tsunami wave is not applicable to inland, ejra),�Iley commu generated in either Shasta or Whiskeytown Lakes d��)�'anquake Hpfl ,� and Safety Element of the General Plan as having �r't isk to they � r {i,4 of mudflows affecting the project site. e) The project would not conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water management plan. Documentation: hard boundary, tsunami, or seiche zones. The jk u c h ai�edding. Seiches could potentially be neit�t,ake has been identified in the Health ch circutfntnces. There is no documented threat stainable groundwater City of Redding General Plan Background Report, Chapter 10, Health and Safety''i`ement, 1998 Federal Emergency Management Agency Floodplain regulations, FIRM map 06089C1554G, dated March 17, 2011 City of Redding Storm Drain Master Plan, Montgomery -Watson Engineers 1993 Mitigation: None necessary. Potentially Less -Than- less -Than- No XI. LAND USE AND PLANNING: Would the project: Significant Significant With Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated a) Physically divide an established community? x UP-2020-01669, PM-2021-00290, RZ-2020-01668, GPA-2020-01667 Hartnell Commercial Complex 20 City of Redding Development Services Department Planning Division Initial Study Potentially Less -Than- Less -Than- No XI. LAND USE AND PLANNING: Would the project: Significant Significant With Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated b) Cause a significant environmental impact due to conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or X mitigating an environmental effect? Discussion: a) The project does not have the potential to physically divide an established community. The project site is zoned "SC" Shopping Center as are the properties to d west. The zoning transitions to multiple family and then single-family zoning to the 4 south. 1a4,'mr„,',},' b) The project is approxlr ly'12.13 acres in size '£ t ,project area is currently zoned for shopping center, "SC" Zoning Designation, and has a General PIsignation of "Shopping ter." A shopping center, therefore, is appropriate within the existing zoning district and General, f designation. However, f storage facility is not a permitted land use with the existing zoning district nor General Plan d�ation. Therefore, the a)j`ant is requesting a rezoning to "HC" Heavy Commercial and a general plan amendment to'`Hea commercial." The zoning transitions to multiple family to the east across Leonard Street and single family to the -south, howeve` aseIf-storage facility, very little traffic or noise is associated with these sues. The main office and gate for the facility is locate? the Lard Street f,e at the northwest corner of the facility. A detention basis and an emergency access ease me►T{a ea aIor �t ,s �.rr ^"zi rfsti�xfi4, tit} Si { t i districts from the proposed shopping centefi, self -storm+ regulations of the City General Plan and �t�ig Ordinance adopted for the purpose ofavoiding or rrtting an enviror Documentation: City of Redding General Plan, Community Developr City of Redding General Plan Environmental Impact City of Redding General Plan, Natural Resources Eleme Mitigation: None necessary. ty line which will buffer the single family and multiple family ity. The project is compatible with the applicable policies and s not in conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation A effect. M potentially -Than Less Than- No XII. MINERAL RESOURCES: Would the project: Significant t nificant With , Significant Impact Impact ��' �� 1Vlitigattc)�4 }tr i r �Im act p a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that t F{r would be of value to the region and the residents of the State? 5 ,< ;{y x { ',fins b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally -important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local General Plan, specific x plan or other land use plan? Discussion: a) The project site is not identified in the General Plan as having any known mineral -resource value or as being located within any "Critical Mineral Resource Overlay" area. Documentation: City of Redding General Plan, Natural Resources Element, 2000 Mitigation: UP-2020-01669, PM-2021-00290, RZ-2020-01668, GPA-2020-01667 Hartnell Commercial Complex 21 City of Redding Development Services Department Planning Division None necessary. Initial Study Potentially Less -Than- Less -Than- No XIII. NOISE: Would the project result in: Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact With Impact Mitigation Incorporated a) Generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan x or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? �4 ..a k$J t 1 its{ ijt„i. } If lx b) Generation of excessi tf fot nd-borne vI or ground- borne noise levels s` c) For a project lhi n the vicinity of a pirate airstrip or an airport lari,Eit e plan or, where such '),n has not been adopted, \q,`f§`#1 two miles of a public ai p rt or public x use airport, wou�,fe project expose people residing or working in the pro area to excessive noise levels? Discussion: a) During the construction of the proposedJJct, there will ambient noise levels. The most noticeab�)�{Construction r activity. The City's Grading Ordinance (ESA Chapter 16.; hours of 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m., Monda�'j�ugh Satk work associated with the project is limited"°fI�IYa^ residents is considered less than significant b) Due to the nature of the project as a shopping center ambient noise levels and would not result in generati c) The proposed project site is not located within the'virnity of a Airport or Benton airport land use plan. l mporary increase in noise in the project vicinity above existing fat ill be related to grading, utility excavation, and land -clearing .H) lime grading -permit -authorized activities to between the No opi^i(fbns are allowed on Sunday. Since heavy construction °xl """f guij q ., the anticipated noise impact to neighboring storage facillt7,41 jt would not result in a permanent increase in sive ground` vlbr�� or ground -borne noise levels. Documentation: City of Redding General Plan, Noise Element, 2000 City of Redding Grading Ordinance Redding Municipal Code, Section 16.1j City of Redding General Plan, Transportation Element, 2000 City of Redding Zoning Ordinance Redding Municipal Code, Section 18.40. City of Redding Municipal Airport Area Plan Mitigation: None necessary. or airpq,,k within area of the Redding Municipal UP-2020-01669, PIA-2021-00290, RZ-2020-01668, GPA-2020-01667 Hartnell Commercial Complex 22 City of Redding Development Services Department Planning Division Initial Study Potentially Less -Than- Less -Than- No XIV. POPULATION AND HOUSING: Would the project: Significant Significant With Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated a) Induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of x roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing x elsewhere? Discussion: a, b) The project will Imprc t rontage of {t, roject site. The nature of the project, as a shopping center and self -storage facility, would not to unplanned popuja)fiil growth and does not propose the extension of an new roads or utilities not anticipated by th0}eral Plan. The project" not displace substantial numbers of people. No impacts to population and housing will resuFjom the project. Documentation: f rs tf City of Redding General P%�'ousing Element,2014 + { CF R� U Mitigation: None necessary. aVn df.. t" I��tjx i,tX t XV. PUBLIC SERVICES: Would the project re," in substantial ad Potentially Less -Than- Less -Than- No physical impacts associated with the provision o w or physically al r d Significant Significant With Significant Impact governmental facilities, need for new or physit l) i}altered gave t Mitigation Impact facilities, the construction of which could cause ant erritr?ntal Incorporated impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ra''�jao�ef�ztimes or r,� other performance objectives for any of the publrc servtce��z tss t Fire Protection? �s t-� ` �''' x f ,{ f Isz Police Protection?,�,� s s 4 ,,{ �', �}, rk� x Schools? .,+t.?.�o,� t �'{,l.i„ a,e',31, � ust }{ } �2� ?,3r.;inS�. x Parks. x Other public facilities? �a f, ' ri �l'} ,r I,i,as, t x �l s}itl� i! y t�i ft�ryll st .},s .c i Discussion: Fire and Police Protection: The City would provide police and fire protection to the project from existing facilities and under existing service levels. The size of the project would not mandate the need for additional police or fire facilities. The project is subject to Chapter 16.20 of the Redding Municipal Code, which requires new development to pay a citywide fire facilities - impact fee calculated to mitigate a project's fair share of cumulative impacts to the City's fire -protection infrastructure based upon improvements necessary to accommodate new development under the City's General Plan. Schools: The project is a commercial shopping center and mini storage facility and will have no impact to schools. Parks: UP-2020-01669, PIA-2021-00290, RZ-2020-01668, GPA-2020-01667 Hartnell Commercial Complex 23 City of Redding Development Services Department Planning Division Initial Study The project will not cause a physical deterioration of an existing park facility or cause an adverse physical impact associated with a new park facility. Other public facilities: See discussion under Item XIX (Utilities and Service Systems) below. Documentation: City of Redding General Plan, Public Facilities Element, 2000 Mitigation: t None necessary: afsi t, r Potentially Less -Than- less -Than- No XVI. RECREATION: ,f�r,f �' '. Significant Significant With Significant Impact �t Impact Mitigation Impact ,,' Incorporated n✓F a) Would the project tease the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or ottr�7recreational facilities such that substantial x physical deterioration oxfllitypii) occur or tZ,peerated? b) Does the project include `iciettti'na[ facj))I� �'or requi��#he construction or expansion of recreational f(,)I�'s which mightJve x an adverse physical effectonthe environm ti t. t r Discussion: IN jl+ � tl t�� r i �� r rf��£ xi r i }�� :at{�s a) The project is a shopping center and self-storar��))1�a s a norj��Jtfiat4�elopment project, the proposal is not expected to generate any significant additional demand for recreationrtunities or ir"&act existing or proposed recreational facilities z, r 0 in Redding b) The project does not propose any recreational facil{atx`arj uirE "NY adverse physical impact associated with the proje,, ,�;,�� Documentation: City of Redding General Plan, Natural Resources Element, 2000 City of Redding General Plan, Recreation Element, 2000 City of Redding General Plan, public Facilities Element, 2000 Mitigation: None necessary. es. There would be no Potentially Less -Than - less -Than- No XVII. TRANSPORTATION: Would the project: Significant Significant With Significant Impact Impact P Mitigation Impact p Incorporated a) Conflict with a program plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle and x pedestrian facilities? b) Conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3, Subdivision (b)? x UP-2020-01669, PIA-2021-00290, RZ-2020-01668, GPA-2020-01667 Hartnell Commercial Complex 24 City of Redding Development Services Department Planning Division Initial Study Potentially Less -Than - less -Than- No XVII. TRANSPORTATION: Would the project: Significant Significant With Significant Impact Impact p Mitigation Impact p Incorporated c) Substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible x uses (e.g., farm equipment)? d) Result in inadequate emergency access? x Discussion: a=c) A traffic study forthJ'i>wiias prepari;tr GHD, dated March 1, 2021. The study assessed four scenarios; (1) existing conditions; (2) exis ,,1,,, is project conditi f' 3) year 2040 no project conditions; and (4) year 2040 plus project conditions. The study dentffRO under the "Existing Pltl ,i1 toject" scenario, the Shasta View Drive roadway segment is projected to operate at LOS Pi j�plementation of MM-5 �hi4i Involves restriping of Shasta View Drive and construction of sidewalk along the east side off 1�ista View Drive will reduce potential impacts to the Shasta View Drive roadway segment to less than t it significant. k }* ly f4S Under the "Yearjjed intersection at Alta Mesa Drive and Hartnell Avenue is projected Ul to operate at LOS E In the'Ilanc( LOSJtpfre PM peg},hours. Implementation of MM-6 requiring the construction of a roundabout at this intersection will retf�,'otential imp�tothe Alta Mesa Drive and Hartnell Avenue intersection to less than significant, Therefore, incorporating the off -site Irtvements as �)iations, r��'yrpacts associatedwith traffic volumes are anticipated. The project would not conflict with any pi,rm 1��3rdinanp�t addressing the circulation system and the project will not conflict with CEQA Guidelines Section,4`G(b). Tk,'ject r )iJ required to construct frontage improvements along Shasta View Drive, Hartnell Avenue, and Leonard A elitae, includingjl,ewalk along Shasta View Drive and Hartnell Avenue. The project would not significantly increase af�r��zards due to but would enhance the circulation system with completion of sidewalks along both streets_ The project is subject to Chapter 16.20 of the 'zing M60"i4j3palt {C4ak soji'ich rec)3)ls new development to pay a citywide transportation -development impact fee calculated to mitigate its fair sha)�cumulative Impacts to the City sstreet- and traffic -control infrastructure based upon improvements necessary to accor�t��date new dtyplopment under the City's tit General Pan. With the proposed improvements, impactsto transportation would, be consitthan significant, and likely will improve levels of service. d) The Redding Fire Marshall has reviewed the project. The project includes entrances along Shasta View Drive and an emergency access/exit from the facility to Maraglia Street which is adequate access for emergency access and fire protection. Documentation: City of Redding General Plan, Transportation Element, 2000 City of Redding General Plan Environmental Impact Report, 2000, SCH #1998072103 City of Redding Parks, Trails, and Open Space Master Plan, 2018 City of Redding Traffic Impact Fee Program City of Redding Active Transportation Plan, 2018 Redding Area Bus Authority System Map and Route Guide, October 2000 Holiday Market Traffic Impact Analysis Memorandum, prepared by GHD, dated January 14, 2021 UP-2020-01669, PM-2021-00290, RZ-2020-01668, GPA-2020-01667 Hartnell Commercial Complex 25 City of Redding Development Services Department Planning Division Mitigation: Initial Study MM-5 Off -site improvement along Shasta View Drive shall include the following: a. Restriping of the portion of Shasta View Drive between Hartnell Avenue and Goodwater Avenue to a three -lane arterial with one travel lane in each direction with a two-way left turn lane. b. Construct a 5-foot sidewalk along the east side of Shasta View Drive from Hartnell Avenue to Christian Avenue. ■ MM-6 Construct a 3-leg, single lane roundabout at the Alta Mesa Drive and Hartnell Avenue intersection. Potentially Less -Than- Less -Than- No XVIII. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOU4�4,cause a substantial Significant Significant With Significant Impact adverse change in the signift �' j� a tribal cultural y�rce defined in Impact Mitigation Impact Public Resources Code secit074 as either a site, feel place, cultural Incorporated landscape that is gened in terms a the y pnd scope of the landscape, sacred lace ;' f p p f�iject with cultural value to Yt �a�r ornia Native American tribe, and thafj�r If4 t a) Listed or eligible ft,itsting in the California Register of Historical x Resources, or in a Id it ester of histprical resources as defined in Public Resources Code si}r b) A resource determined by the lead agen�'td''its discrete{� nd x supported by substantial evidence, to be sirsuant to a set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resoode Section 502In applying the criteria set forth in subdivisionofPublic Resoure igv Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall con r the significafa �the M resource to a California Native American tribik Discussion: a, b) In accordance with Assembly Bill 52 (AB 52), th pursuant to Section 21080.3 of CEQA. This consultati 2021. No tribal cultural resources were identified within the project area and the pi substantial adverse change in the significance of any known tribal cultural resources. Mitigation: None necessary. requesting notification !tters sent on March 8, therefore, not cause a Potentially Less -Than- Less -Than- No XIX. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS: Would the project: Significant Significant With Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated a) Require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water or wastewater treatment or storm water drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications x facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects? b) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development during x normal, dry and multiple dry years? UP-2020-01669, PIA-2021-00290, RZ-2020-01668, GPA-2020-01667 Hartnell Commercial Complex 26 City of Redding Development Services Department Planning Division Initial Study Potentially less -Than- Less -Than- No XIX. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS: Would the project: Significant Significant With Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated c) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in x addition to the provider's existing commitments? d) Generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards, or infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid x waste reduction goals? a ``t e) Comply with Federal, Statement and reduction statutes and reins `related tipI�tt`l+yaste? x Discussion: a) Wastewater gene. the City sanitary s exceed treatment need for the consi mthe project would b j at associated with the shopping center and manager's office discharged into item. This type and intensity of land use activity does not generate wastewater demands that would nents of the Regional Water Quality Control Board. The proposed development does not generate the f?,new water:,,or wastewater» -.treatment facilities. The project is subject to Chapter t". of t impact fees calculated to mitigate a project. and treatment infrastructure based upon Plan. „ Project -related stormwater-management i .f accordance with City construction standards a Water Quality, d and e). g Munic)4)=Code, which requires new development to pay water and sewer -e of cum i� e Impacts to the City's water and sewer distribution, collection, ents nece) y to accommodate new development under the City's General b) Potable water is available from the City to serve all suppression. The demands of the project can be aeq foreseeable future during normal, dry, and multiple€j ng els of the within th( on of collection and conveyance systems in Or j-mwater detention (also see IX, Hydrology and c) All seven of the project parcels will utilize the City's sanitary sewer system to disp available in the City's existing system. d, e) The City provides solid waste disposal service, which the project wo l f utilize l of the project without need of special accommodation. Documentation: City of Redding General Plan, Public Facilities Elements, 2000 City of Redding Water and Sewer Atlas Mitigation: None necessary. with rdequate pressure and flows for fire xist`�� ater resources and the reasonably sewer capacity is is available to serve the needs UP-2020-01669, PIA-2021-00290, RZ-2020-01668, GPA-2020-01667 Hartnell Commercial Complex 27 City of Redding Development Services Department Planning Division Initial Study Potentially less -Than- Less -Than- No XX. WILDFIRE: If located in or near state responsibility areas or Significant Significant With Significant Impact lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the Impact Mitigation Impact project: Incorporated a) Substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or x emergency evacuation Plan? b) Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose projects occupants to, x pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of wildfire? s, c) Require installation or,;,�j�s �)'f, associated infrastructure (such as rgat 14sources, s or other utilities) that may ex 2e fire risk or {resuit in x temporary or ongoi (f#t cts to the environment d) Expose people orr�ictures to significant risk{cluding downslope or do f #tteam flooding or landslides�t ` result, x post -fire slope ins , or drainage changes? s# jit�r Discussion: r a) The project site is not locatedvihtff`rti"'the project would not impair an emergency rl b, c d) Because the project site is relativelyi vegetated area or slopes, the prof concentrations from a wildfire, requir wildfire risks, or expose people or stru anticipated. dire SevtjZone and is not adjacent to areas with significant fuel loads. The plan or emftricy evacuation plan. without any -would not,. Documentation: CalFire, Fire Hazard Severity Zone Maps, Shasta County, Mitigation: None necessarv. and vegetation, nor is it surrounded by any significant ,fire risks or expose project occupants to pollutant t=J)associated infrastructure that could exacerbate lides. No impacts associated with wildfire are XXI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE: t��tlt g PotentiallyLess „{ , Significant, i di)f t Impact �' ij'i tr}1' }with Incorporated Than- Significant Impact No Impact a) Does the project have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below X the self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in X connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? UP-2020-01669, PIA-2021-00290, RZ-2020-01668, GPA-2020-01667 Hartnell Commercial Complex 28 City of Redding Development Services Department Planning Division Initial Study Potentially Less -Than- Less -Than- No XXI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE: Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact With Impact Mitigation Incorporated c) Does the project have potential environmental effects which may cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or X indirectly? Discussion: Based on the analysis undertaken asrtto{ta lmtial Study, the following findings can be made: i �; nisi s3f {t l$s( r Sl is ra a) The project has the po,fli11 to degrade wildlife`tltat in general due to erosion and sedimentation resulting from grading and construction of proli infrastructure. However `tf project conditions as identified under Hydrology/Water Quality have been established to redu��,tential impacts to a levi i,s than significant. b) As discussed in lterrf,< General Plan, applica potential impacts fro project will contribute to regionwide cumulative air quality impacts. However, under policy of the Standard Mitigation Measures (SMMs) and Best Available Mitigation Measures (BAMMS) will reduce o,r.,oiect to„a=;.Jeve less thantsfanificant. c) As discussed herein, the proj either directly or indirectly. Documentation: See all Sections above. Mitigation: None Necessary fects on human beings, UP-2020-01669, PM-2021-00290, RZ-2020-01668, GPA-2020-01667 Hartnell Commercial Complex 29 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM HARTNELL COMMERCIAL COMPLEX BY SUMMIT DEVELOPMENT PROJECT MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM CONTENTS This document is the Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) for the Hartnell Commercial Complex by Summit Development. The MMP includes a brief discussion of the legal basis for and the purpose of the program, discussion, and direction regarding complaints about noncompliance, a key to understanding the monitoring matrix, and the monitoring matrix itself. LEGAL BASIS OF California Publ, sources Code monitoring or++ 't"rtin g programs rams w ; g mitigated neeclaration. TI measures ado1 through the Califs t+, The MMP co"t 011� anteni Initial StudylMitlgat'ogivje D, Summit Development. It is into" agencies, project contractors, project.tzj f` Mitigation is defined by CEQA following: MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM in 21081.6 requires public agencies to adopt mitigation per certifying an environmental impact report (EIR) or a quirement facilitates implementation of all mitigation Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) process. lej t fy the requirements of CEQA as they relate to the �ia ared for the Hartnell Commercial Complex by 0'it to be us y City of Redding (City) staff, participating itigation mo"prmg personnel during implementation of the a measure that does any of the Avoids impacts altogether by nottak�n�,ertain actiontarts of an action. 1q, Minimizes impacts by limit*, dgre ,rYit{ntuctt=jf the action and its implementation. Rectifies impacts by repairing, rehabilitating or restoring • Reduces or eliminates impacts over time b,m�tenance operations during the life of the project. Compensates for impacts by replacing or providing substitute resources or environments. The intent of the MMP is to ensure the effective implementation and enforcement of adopted mitigation measures and permit conditions. The MMP will provide for monitoring of construction activities as necessary, on -site identification and resolution of environmental problems, and proper reporting to City staff. Mitigation Monitoring Program, UP-2020 01669, PM-2021-00290, RZ-2020-01668, GPA-2020-01667 -I- April 30, 2021 MITIGATION MONITORING TABLE The Mitigation. Monitoring Table identifies the mitigation measures proposed for the Hartnell Commercial Complex by Summit Development. These mitigation measures are reproduced from the Initial Study and conditions of approval for the project. The tables have the following columns: Mitigation Measure: Lists the mitigation measures identified within the Initial Study for a specific impact, along with the number for each measure as enumerated in the Initial Study. Timing: Identifies at what point in time, review process, or phase the mitigation measure will be completed. { ti art y, 1 41siii t Ur Agency/Depart}konsultation,'tk;��ferences the City department or any other public agency with which coion is required t 4, isfy the identified mitigation measure. Verification`' faces to be initialed a specific miti, on measure. N Any person or agency may file a associated with the project. specific information on the att determine the validity of the co�� the City shall take appropriate a" written confirmation indicating the the particular noncompliance issue. dated by the individual designated to verify adherence to l 7 amt assettg noncompliance with the mitigation measures aint shall��' directed to the City in written form, providing violation he City shall conduct an investigation and If none �phanc�� th a mitigation measure has occurred, 04 r��dy an�J�tta The complainant shall receive it# the lntlation �?e final action corresponding to Mitigation Monitoring Program, UP-2020 01669, PM-2021-00290, Ry 2020-01668, GPA-2020-01667 -2- April 30, 2021, 20 Mitigation Measure Timing/Implementation Enforcement/Monitoring Verification ' (Date and Initials) Mitigation Measure 1 — Prior to issuance of a grading permit prior to issuance of a Grading Permit Planning Division, and Public affecting any jurisdictional waters, including wetlands, as Works Department identified in the project wetland delineation, the project applicant shall provide written verification to the City of Redding Development Services Department that the following resource agency permits and mitigation requirements have been successfully secured from the Corps, CDFW, RWQCB, or any other applicable agency (i.e., USFWS) identified through the permitting process:* s i t x�¢ taU�ti a. Prior to any discharge of dredged_',,,,, �� ferial mom, f F t "waters of the U.S." including � 'n 's authorization under a Nationwt rmit or Individual Permit shall be ob"a from the Corps. I, For any features determined f dot be subject to the Corps jurisdiction during thlrification process,s authorization to discharge (o aiver from regulation) shall be obtained �� the RWQCB. For (4 �£f' iity fill requiring aCorps permit wXh certification shall be obtained , prior to discharge of dredged or fill maerla°: tt £t, Verification shall be provided to the City of Reddi�£`' £ Development Services Department prior to issuan�t,, the issuance of a grading permit. tl r �j£i f 4 z b. Prior to any activities that would obstruct the flow" �' NSf 7� p of, or alter the bed, channel, or bank of any �} intermittent or ephemeral creeks, notification of�'��` si streambed alteration shall be submitted to the CDFW; and, if required, a 1602 streambed alteration 5 agreement shall be obtained by the project applicant. t4 F Verification shall be provided to the City of Reddingt Development Services Department prior to the t issuance of agrading permit. t £Jt t�tJJ< <; ft7 i i t t l GJtt 3D t4�{ 4 k c. The project applicant shall achieve the mitigation for the permanent loss of streams, wetlands, and other waters through the purchase of mitigation credits at an agency -approved mitigation bank at a minimum l :1 ratio, or through onsite/offsite habitat restoration at a minimum 3 :I ratio. If onsite/offsite habitat restoration is proposed a detailed mitigation plan,}",�,.",f`z including success criteria, monitoring, maintenance, and reporting as required by the regulatory agencies (i.e., Corps; CDFW, RWQCB) shall be submitted for review and approval. The affected regulatory Mitigation Monitoring Program, UP-2020-01669, PM-2021-00290, RZ-2020-01668, GPA-2020-01667 -3- April30, 2021 agency shall identify when measures shall be implemented and completed for those activities impacting streams, wetlands, or other waters. All measures contained in the permits or associated with any agency approvals shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the lead regulatory a enc.� Mitigation Measure 2 — If vegetation remove�1t, to issuance of a grading or tree Planning Division, and Public �f� t activities will occur during the nesting for birds or aeaor oval permit. Works Department raptors (February 1 through August 3112 salified biologist shall conduct a preconstruction si��r 7 days before construction activities begin. If nest, birds ar raptors are t found, CDFW will be notified and c�lted. An appropriate t buffer, as determined by CDFW an ; qualified biologist, will be placed around the nest until the ,i �ng have fledged. If construction activities cease for a perroater than 7 days, t additional preconstruction surveys will be�, Mitigation Measure 3 — To the extent practreab`�toal of, °�G,�t;,, ',1 1, to rssua� of a grading or tree Planning Division; and Public large trees with cavities, crevices, or snags shall occur befo�ti ,(nr �. �moval permit, . Works Department bat maternity colonies form (i.e., prior to March 1) or young are volant (i.e., after August 31). If construct (including the removal of large trees >12 inch dbh during the bat non-volant season (March 1 through August q p p{ a qualified professional shall conduct a re -construction survey of the study area to locate maternity colonies and s identify measures to protect colonies from disturbance. The preeonstruetion survey will be performed no more than 7 days prior to the implementation of construction activities. If a p P maternity colony is located within or adjacent to the study area, a disturbance free buffer shall be established by a qualified � professional, in consultation with CDFW, to ensure the colony is protected from project activities. t Mitigation Measure 4 — The developer will replace the blue , Prior to issuance of a certificate r,pF P1a�1�� t�ion, and Public oak trees removed from the site with suitable minimum 15- occupancy. ��e)artment gallon size shade trees at minimum ratio of 1:1. ��Yr� , `t �' z i' Mitigation Measure 5 —Off-site improvement along Shasta prior to issuanceof , €t�t��3'�of Plannin Division, and Public g View Drive shall include the following: occupancy. Works Department o Restriping of the portion of Shasta View Drive between Hartnell Avenue and Goodwater Avenue to a three -lane arterial with one travel lane in each direction with a two-way left turn Mitigation Monitoring Program, UP-2020-01669, PM-2021-00290, RZ-2020-01668, GPA-2020-01667 -4- April30, 2021 lane. o Construct a.5-foot sidewalk along the east side of Shasta View Drive from Hartnell Avenue to Christian Avenue. Mitigation Measure 6 — Construct a 3-leg, single lane Prior to issuance of a certificate of Planning Division, and Public roundabout at the Alta Mesa Drive and Harm 1`zA t �, occupancy. Works Department intersection: Mitigation Monitoring Program, UP-2020 01669, PM 2021-00290, RZ-2020-01668, GPA-2020-01667 -5 April 30,2021 WILSON AVE ------ r �_ ! __._.�..__ _ 1 �. _ G U) 1 BELLADONNA STUY �— !I . _,. —,-,— at W 1 < ----- Q��-- 0} 1: -------- -- - - ---- -------- -------- HAWN AVE I JONQUIL WAY — 2525 H,_E HARTNELLAVE itt t S t1 t4' 3,a t J f it b Y.. I —� 6 HA ?,t I' L AVE fx 3050 LEONA 32, I t t Z' d Oi i W I 4 4 {} I { i Ji t 1 MARILYN AVE -------- ------------------- ------------------- \{ � t _ _�_-- {'-------- ----- N i--- ---- -- .�-..........- —i PPIAN't`Y� m l ALDEN AVE _ _ ({ ru t;ity t l t t a—� �—,- --I- ._ ' a ---------------- { 4 i # __ -- - - --------- --- ---------- ] � � ...�-{ � t s j {t }t, r r { �. `✓ •fit t }, y i - - -- - --------- - - ------- L _jC) j Y 1 { r= �.__ — —i ,, // _E It MARLENE AVE O� r� i J — 1 } ------------------- of -------------- -------- INr i _- ra ` T — t — N GIS DIVISION LOCATION MAP MTG. DATE: INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT E DATE PRODUCED: ITEM: NOVEMBER24,2020 UP-2020-01669 / GPA-2020-01667 / RZ-2020-01668 TJG /SUMMIT DEVELOPMENT s 0 200 400Feet 2469 &2525 HARTN ELL AVE/3055 &.3091 APPIAN WAY/3050 LEONARDST ATTACHMENT: AP# 110-210-055 / 110-020-001, -037, -038 & -061 RIM 537.72 ------- — — -------- INV. 534.58 ------ ------- - - ------ ------ --------------- i- T-T ------ ------ ------ HARTNELLAVENUE (N) BUS STOP /-INV. 534.02 ------ ------ ...... . I. . .. - -- - -- _,Ss ............. 7! — - ---- ------ 20': SETBACK, _44 fl� F ... .. . ...... -- - -------- I t I&I (D 20' RETAIL V) 3,000 SF ...... ...... 10, C-4 7- 7 7777_77-7- 0 (N) FUEL CANOPY 600 S 26" PARCEL3 17 C E 11 D PARCEL.1 28' 0 1.0 ACRE PARCEL 2 uJ 1.29 ACRES ... . . ... .... 7' 2 (N) 30' D/w ty EASEMENT DRIVE TH Uv, �2 r) =4 6' VEH CLE SCREEN14G . 32' J 12 24' '5 ---------- Lu E) WELL TO BE 27'� ---------- D - A ANDONDE E PARC 4 ;0 5' ------- ------- - ---------- M, X., S .95 AC LANDSCAPE ------- ------- _0 U SCREENING ---------- ;0: -------- -------- 25' !SETBACK v, 24' --------- ------ t Z, --------- -------- -------- -------- V) 0 27 M 0 ---------- EL 0 S L 0 A < 44 -- ---- ------------- ............ . .............. 6`� 42 - ------- - 48' Cq ..... * .... .—N I ....... ... 24 . ........ INN, i ........................... . ------------ ---------- -------------- - ui 12' ry 0 ------ T, I t Cn PARCEL7 SH PPI 'so 8.4 rr STORAGE FACILITY GROSS: 2.77 ACRES < — — — — — — — — — 1 15' NET: 2.43 ACRES PAR ------- 28' 0 I ___mED 3.47 ui .... .. PSE N) 15 T ------- 15 EASEMEN 13 —;7- - — ---------- ---------- DRIVE �HRU A, I HOLIDAY MA VEHICLE n SCREENI�G 30,664 S "'w"", p PARCEL 6 4- `0 , � , '1 i ;000,m ---------- 24' R7 1.15 ACRES - -------- - L -------- 46 w ......... 24'--i ...... U OL---------- -------------- -------- --- N) 15' PSE f EASEMENT ,n 7 7 7ESCAPF,� rlrNr- 27' g_ ----------- -------------- - ------ - ----- IENT . ... .. . ... .... ... . ... . ... . ... .. ... ...... ---------- L ------- A00 --- 27'_ -7 43, p 40M A 1TION,\,AND,,'MS4, :TkEATMENT'A" E A"" ON, ........ ...... '00,0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — '00v 10: THE ARCHITECTURAL THEME OF THE SHOPPING CENTER WILL BE APPLIED TO THE SELF STORAGE FACILITY TO CREATE A COHESIVE AESTHETIC TO THE A. ENTIRE 11 ACRE PROJECT. — — ------- — - ""A --- — — — — — — — — — — — -- — `7 R� *110 INV. 526.73 o* woo, .f RIM 530.90 - — — — — — — — — — — — — — — im HARTNELL AVENUE S1111 TE r- m 0 z /;u ALDEN:A::VE:NUEP m m SHOPPING CENTER PARKING ANALYSIS USE REQUIRED STALLS PROVIDED A. 30,664 SF GROCERY 103 147 B. 2,000 SF COFFEE 27 35 C. 3,200 SF DRIVE THRU 43 30 D. 3,024 SF GAS 13 21 E. 3,600 SF CAR WASH 12 23 F. 3,000 SF RETAIL 13 17 TOTAL 211 273 38,400 SF STORAGE FACILITY PARKING AND BUILDING ANALYSIS USE/SIZE REQUIRED STALLS PROVIDED Al. 500 OFFICE / 1,200 STORAGE 3 3 131. 6,600 SF STORAGE - Cl. 3,000 SF STORAGE - Dl. 3,000 SF STORAGE - El. 12,600 SF STORAGE - Fl. 6,000 SF STORAGE - Gl. 6,000 SF STORAGE - - TOTAL 3 3 NOTE: 1. ACCORDING TO SITE PLANNING PRINCIPLES IN THE COMMERCIAL DESIGN CRITERIA DEVELOPMENTS 25,000 SF OR LARGER REQUIRE AREAS EQUAL TO 5% OF THE TOTAL BUILDING SF FOR PUBLIC USES. 2. ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPE EQUALING 5% OF THE TOTAL BUILDING SF IS REQUIRED IN ADDITION TO FRONTAGE AND PARKING LOT LANDSCAPE. LEGEND — --- — --- — --- — --- ------ ------ ------- X RECORD BOUNDARY ADJACENT BOUNDARY 25' BUILDING SETBACK (EX) OVERHEAD ELECTRIC (EX) STORM DRAIN (EX) SEWER LINE (EX) SSMH (EX) WATER LINE (EX) WATER VALVE (EX) FIRE HYDRANT ROW DEDICATION (N) LANDSCAPING VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE OWNER/APPIL�CANT NORTH STATE GROCERY, INC. PO BOX 439 COTTONWOOD, CA 96022 ENGINEER DUANE K. MILLER CIVIL ENGINEER, INC. 6172 MEISTER WAY, UNIT 1 PO BOX 1307 ANDERSON, CA 96007 PROJECTADDRESS 2469 HARTN ELL AVE REDDING, CA 96002 2525 HARTNELL AVE REDDING, CA 96002 3055 APPIAN WAY REDDING, CA 96002 3050 LEONARD ST REDDING, CA 96002 3091 APPIAN WAY REDDING, CA 96003 APNs 110-210-055,110-020-001 110-020-037,110-020-038 110-020-061 TOTAL AREA 11.20 ACRES CURRENT ZONING SC - SHOPPING CENTER 11.20 ACRES PROPOSED ZONING HC - HEAVY COMMERCIAL 2.77 ACRES CURRENT GENERAL PLAN SC - SHOPPING CENTER 11.20 ACRES PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN HC - HEAVY COMMERCIAL 2.77 ACRES LANDSCAPING (�1,20 ACRES) REQUIRED - 13,140 SQ FT PROVIDED - 42,484 SQ FT APN STORAGE FACILITY 110-020-061 APNs SHOPPING CENTER 110-210-055,110-020-001 110-020-037,110-020-038 AP: \Projects\ 19. OOOJobs\19.053 \DWG \PLAN -USE PERMIT 5/6/2021 Lu Lu TZ U) ui ui ry ry 0 ui I 121, W/ TO —ENTER NOX KEY DE AP: \Projects\ 19. OOOJobs\19.053 \DWG \PLAN -USE PERMIT 5/6/2021 7 - - - - - - -- - - — - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - ------ --------- ---------------- --------- HARTNELLAVENUE - — - — -- - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - ........... .......... N89'SY37*E 248.54' EASEMENT N8993,37*E 270LIN 'LOW + --- - - - - - - - - N89'WIO`W 14, (E) RECIPROCAL -- — — — — — — — — DRWEWAY EASEMENT PER 32 _PM_59 oi Ru �N ut"l, 13,625 ft' /56.276 3 1.00 ACRES 1, 67 5 A' 1.2 C yt 0.57 ACRES S89*53'59'W 122.76' RECF,,IOCAL�, am EASEMENT - - - - - - - - - - ox,- Ngo*wo(rw 202.�V NaM'24*W 9913' Sesu'SI'W 304.52' -"92' L:",13,78' -2992 41,313 f 0 115 ACRES 25' ---------- LANDSCAPE SEMACK ----------------- 1-7 Lu---------- - - - - - - - - - - 20,00- 1"N 00' L-62* 7 - - - - - - --- - - - Iizo o rt < 5,4V .20\,too, PSE LLI S42,5, 6"J(N) 13' EASEMENT 6 �ljl KARA (N) S. PSE \EASEMINT . . . . . . . . . . V 1 15 ACRE S - - - - - - - - - % m-- --------- -7 -------------- (N) IS- PSE N•(E) 20' EASEMENT FOR ROAD EASEMENT 4V RIGHT OF WAY AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES DEDICATION ---------- ------- PER 14 PM 31. 345 OR 293 --------------- ----------- AND 3N OR �ag "IX 01P --------- ------- ----------- I -- - ------ --- ------------ ---- --------------- (E) 2V EASMENT PER 345 OR -N893358*E 2 - - - - - - - - - NVO='OWW 28154' L4PCaE EASEMENT PER 1679-OR_103 R-79 L-aAO' is .......... R=79600 36 7w 36�1 --------------- 4 --------- --------------- wi. (E)FOR HIG20' EAHWAYSEMENT PURPOSE PER M ORS 153 LEGEND PROPOSED EASEMENT EXISTING EASEMENT INTERMITTENT STREAM EMERGENT WETLANDS (Z492 SF) EPHEMERAL SWALE (1.639 SF) SEE WETLANDS DELINEATION AND TREE SURVEY BY WILDLAND RESOURCE MANAGERS (N) ROW DEDICATION I 1 l I I I I I I I f I I I _T--- ---_ _L—i--� -- I U HARTNELL AVENUE ..., / -r .�.,...... aT...... ._ -. ,..,.,,K,,... ..... ...-. _.. .__ ._... ENIRY 70T � F � ENTRY 4 4 CEO � � 3t4 t '}� 4t tY lfi 3 tt t4r 4 3 t?rrt� ilt di,,, 4s i, t't4t4t l,lfr t �'I 4 �'•: � T'i �� J fs"}jt4tt l,�U { t,,S7 t i4 11 rt �r d' oo iCaes tltrr� T PAPS Y I� tr } b REC .57 05 ACRF,S �.. PARC,", uj i4' sot 44 a 7 1i1� I'{4� of t i i� VL I t k ti c[ PARCEL 4 .95 ACR S Y 1 4 .. ✓? ix s 1, 1 1 J st! 24 si4t ( �! trc t r tt lit s 4 t4 r 1 T4lLq APE i 0:95 ACRES I — _______-_ _ r4 a J i tt err r'r4 tu- I: Sv` 4 -- -^., �4 xg �44ir �s SHOPPINGCENTER �r r t -- 43 ACRESf s r l r PARCEL 7 I 4 s i 74 t STORAGE FACILITY r I --_-- -- PACRO55�2 43A6S �e Q RCELS 3:7 VRE9 ACRES I z I (N) 15• PSE t 4t� a av Acaes t}'LU �.. EASEMENT � rail 31 (t,�ts itr 7�f r4 7f r s}4 44Y 4 �24 t4 r +� i41t 1�, 1 4ttS ys ld tt' tf t tt ti t, �. rll4 t 4 Y r i£ tt Olt tr PARCE 4r rle ssrxs�Wut b7L `� Ij { i y4t, tli4{tt {r A 7 LBAIR. i $14,i 4 rY L — _,. .... .-., .. i _i__"- ! rti rt f 1; l S r,t iE W ��t \ l . ✓ �4 - - --- -------- cAre k�n`i ' ac—. I Er+tEa OR 4- I +. .4t i C l 4 t CUQ(} t 4 KNO KEY T (N)EASaENr r �j I 4� itti i, 47"q41 F7REE I T " -- ---'-`�'`'j' H�4" } t t \ � - 'a #s y'v�"t�7'�'' t I t 4 t I t t --ti}'- rQy t� Tll 4 { 4 is _T_----- vv l \ l .v = �, f # t t k4r 2 sl y 7 S'31.,~•,t.,r, rt .,, �� I �— — — — — — — _---- - - + .. —... i' (E) 2V EASENENI FOR HGHWAY 1 PURPOSES I I � , I I ! I "I I I 11 I � � � � I � � I � � I � � i I "I", / I I I � I � � I � I � I',, � � I ! I , , I I \1 "I l-, I B I � � , \ I 11 I I I , �_____ _____ ,- I - -_ - - - --- - - - _____ _,, - _L_ _�_ _L ,-, - _ --- - - _� 'I', I I � i , , ,-,-F-- I I -_ - - - - -_ - _L_ - - - - - -_ -SH--2 � - - I— ______ ______J L_ - I_ I I ____J_______ -'- .-- -1 I I I I -11 - J ------- , , , --- - I ''I I � I I I - - - - _ - - �- ---- ------ -- - --- _ __L - - - - --- ,- -_ _____ - -...- -_ - - ____' _ ---- ------- I -_ - - - I - - � - - _ --- -t I I — l____L__p � - - I : -_ _ I I I I - - - I 11 , I � I , I I � I � I ,_ — ------- I — — — — — — 7--- —/ ----- ------- --F, I I 11 I 11 I '', I , I I I I I I , - I I I I I I � I I i I I , I F ____ I I � I , I I I I — �_ I I � I � I � I - � .1 � �l I I 11 a I I I I I I I � 11 I I I I I I : � � , I ___ I __L - .-.��.—..-�,$-=--�%=--��:--�,.--=.,:�,:-7��-.� i_-4- - - -,.-- - _ - _ - - - ---,-,- - —I - -,-,--- - - - ___ I—- l._---SS— - - —r - - - — - - - ----- - - - --- - - - — - - - ----- -- - -- - - — - - - — - - -,-- -- - - --- - - J___. �1111 � - __=�� ... �,l =_1 —I,—,'.,. �=t��: — � �� .__- ==�T_,=� ____/ �T -- — -- ----------- ___'____ ------ _'___' ' ��:,_=_ ��__== - - --,-,- - - EX. SSMH a I I �- 77- <� ------- EX. SSMH I I : I _�a � 1� I a � 01 � I IM = 547.00 1�_ HARTNC�,L AVENUE RIM = 540.53 1 1 '"' I � U-) - I ''I Ln 38 � a I �_) � : I � INV IN = 538.50 - - � - — - — - — - — - INV IN = 536. � - . ______ - - — - -_ - — - - i i __l — - -_ - — - — - — - — - �/) ! �,, N?) ) I I k 11 ,,,,/ '�",_� I'll . ... - 11, " - � _ I I -) INV OUT = 538.40 1 INV OUT = 536.28 1 , I � �L 542.92 � ...... -..-., 4T. ____i_..__ - ------ _______l_'l._. ------ _-� ...... - ...... ___--__.._�._.__..__ , � ...... _.. I � ) I " , ' i I � - � - .._..__.._ -1-1 I , — I , I _.._ ...... _.T.._..___.._..___ I , I I I I I � I I --, . ` - - - 7 - -,-- - - -, -- - - - , I 1� ! 'i I - I - 1 Vi- � � - - TL 543.80 -1 111-1 7- ...... -n7_ -'-'- 1 -"- - - -"-' - ' , , I , FL 547.05 , ___ _-7---' "' - (�j 7 ...... ------ - "-"-,, " , I" s-.-.- -, ", - , , 17- ,77'K - _________<_�D I � �,�l ll��_ _ - - --- --r -4 --- I— - - - --- - __ --- - - - ''I 'I- 1� -1 - - - — -, FL 54Z 6f _ - —'-'"-'- - - It ____ , — FL 540.7� " , 11 - - I ,� � - FL 543.33 114 , ''I I I - �_ I " " - I 11 , a I I I'll ''I I 11 I'll I " , " - I I � rl'� 77 _7 I I - � , , 11 I - I I � -1 I '' J �� ", \---,- .." - � .,...WL..tm._,.m� ............ mm�� .. . ..... lm�%7 , I I /. . w-'91W.0 .... 116-0-4 - ,, �� " ': , I , _____ , .-..p ........ �p . I 1�..[*. a , � , , , - , ", , 1, I , I I ....... _7i,,�. . . ...... P. 6� ........... % ........ f ... " , , " � "'', FL 544.06 1 " -, " "I'l I I I I " , -_ I __\l I , - - 'm 4 7..,! .... � - ,_ I I 1, � \ � I I �'ll 11'' I I : - � I I 1 9_1 1 'I- —1, 10- I - � ... .... . " - , . _111 1-1 -1 11 � -_ I I , I 1 11 '9_`� !'�`�� 11 I , _ 1 , ': -------- 7— , �' I I, I � , I �:_,�11_ I , � T , I 1, I , ,,, � , '', , I '' �"b " , , ", I I 11 --'I'll I'll, I I 71 I ''I I I 11 I ''I I I ''I I : f I I " , \ I � �,,-' , , I I � - I I � I 11 I ", - I � I -1-11-11, I � , , I .... � , , , t 1�!ll , I I I � �:j-�,�-",,-,[�L� I 11 I I I I:: I , I I I I I I � I I I _1 ........ ---I— , , �. �_ 1 �,,-�7- --!:: 1 1 i � , � , 11 I—- ----- — ____ I I I I I I '', I I ''I'll, "I ''I I I'll", 1-11 I'll, — I I . . . . A : I -_ — — — — "" , I , I I I I I'll I 1, I — I I , 0 1 1 1 1 11 I I I'll ''I I I I I I I I I I , — — , . ....... I ,--' I - I I I I I � I � , i A, J �': - ,: � � \ , FL 542.76 �*, I I I ''I'll'', I I I'll I � , __� I I , �11 �'l , "I 11 I ,�, I I " ��__ - 11 11 I I I ''I � ll::,:-::�,:� " ,1, . I I I ' I I --,''''I'll, I I ''I � ''I I'll, I'll 11 I I 11 I I �_ , " I - - I , I , I ''I "I � --� ,,� I - ___ - - ______ ____ - "�_� FL 547.48 , , I'll, , , , , , - I I ''I 111:, , , . J: , , :'' , � I I - I I I'll I 11 I 11 I ''I'll I I I ''I I I � , " � I 1 1 1 - I � , ........ �, , ", : ''I ''I ,� ", , I , I � " __ � , , ,,,,, I'll I I 11 I'll 1� I 1: ..,: I ''I'll'' 1� 'I I I I ''I I I I I'll I I I I I I I I I I I I , I I I I I 11 11 I'll, 11 - ��R,_'_��: V, v v v _. 1p.:� � L 2� I I I \ , I I IJ , I % \ , 11" : ,,� I : '' :: , , I I , I'll I , , , , , , :::,:, :::::!,I : - _.- -...- , -, � � I I - _�� t5/-5,:,,: , , I 'I'll 1,1 ... I , I , , I I I'll, , I I I I'll I I I I 1:, , .. � 7..� f I I , " ,:: , i I ,I- : : ", , � '' , , , I " -1 ''I � 11, - I I ''I'll 11 1111,11 ''I I ''I 1 � I ,:" I", 1, : ::: :'I: , ''I 11 ''I I I'll, I'll, " � � �: "A" , , I I'll , , , , , , % , , , , _'', '', _ v v v , �, I I I l� _��, I 1, ,f__�\ I v "I v v v I I � 1 1 , I " , v v v 1 7�5 H �- �_'l I FL 5 , -, - -- I I I v v v I I v I V" I I I I v I I I I \ I ''I " ''I'll I I'll, I - :�_��: -:, :)��_ — '' : m�, �V�� I I , 1.� -, �� - - , _ V�� _�_ __;_.�_ 1.�� I - - _.�_ v �.�_ __;.�_ ".;_�_ -, __.� 11 V I V v v v ,� v I : � , - v , v I v v � I v I I , I , � , I , , I , � 11717 , I v I v I , v I v v v , , v 1 '. I , , " � I v v I I � � It I I I v I v I I I I I v I v I I v I I I I I I I v v v I v v I I I I I I v I � I I I I I : , " , - , , : , i I ': : � , , v v � : i - , I I I I v v I I I I I I v v v I " I V v vvv 11 If 11 I , � - , I I I I I I I I I I I I I � . I I I I I I I I I I I I , I , - - I , - - - -11 - "I I "I I 11 I , I J� 1. I I I �l vIll v , , , , V,"; I , �_�< � I I'v, I I V� �,� - v v v V. v v v vvv - v v - v � : v -- _--l- " 'I', � "I � 44.79 1 1, , � �F � I -1 __ J`,, I I , - I v I I I I I I . � � 1 : , , � I I : v , , '*lq__*�, I I 1"� v v � �) I- V,:, v v , I : I I I I i I 1 L - 1 L 1 , u 1 , - 1 , , �_, � , - � ,, - _ � - , " � , I � � , I \ v I 11 v i I I � � � � I � � I I I I : I � I I I I L � , � I 1� 1\ I � I -1, ! �: - ! � - ! � - ,� 1 - v I �l - - - 1-1 I V I-*-- I �, , � :' 1, ,I v v � I v V, I v v ''I v . I : I v v v v v I I I I I I I I" \ I I I I I - v v I v I , � 1. � � I I 11 I I I 11 ''IV, " I 1, � , I IV I I " I I , I I -1-111- I I 11 I 11 "I I'll ,v I I z " I , I I I I � \ , v v v v I 11: " I v I I � I I . I I � I � I v 11 11 v v v v I I v v v l7v v I ; I v. I I I ''I 1� I I I I 0 I ": � z I I 11 11 I �'lv , :::: : -,: FF=543.00 � ''I I v ��,:�,v I " i i I \ I I \ \1 I v I I I I 4- � I : : ''I , I - �,� I I , I , � � I I I , � 1 V-1 11 I 0 1 , I v - ;� - ... � I-- � I I v I I I I I I � - I � � I I'll I I I v I � , I - I I I I , ,�� a: � - �_, � ,�' 7-1 � \ � - --,' - - — - - -, I V, I -. I � I � \ , � t �� , , r"i � I I I I I I I . I I : I I I I _� 1� I I I I , I I I I I I I I � � I I I I : v I v , � � I �,.� I I I I � , , � v � , � , , �:v , 1 , � I I I , I I v I I I I I I . I v I v v I I I I v I � , , 1A 1 1 1 v � I 4 I � — . � _�. � . — " �� _J v v v I v V� v _: - , I -_ I v I � , I � 541.21 � � , - i : �, V, 1; __ 1, I � I I � �l � I ': v 11 I 11 11 I vv � I I v I I I I �l � 1, I V� v v I � � I � I I \ i,� � I : : , � v :, : I � , : ::��v I It : , I , 'O :1 , 11 I I 11 �,:" " , " \ I , �: i � 4 C I I \ \� \ 1, I v v I v v Lf) � I I 0 i i I I v v I I I / I I I 1� C � , � I , % v � v v I I : � I I ,/ I 1. , , i v : I � I I , � I v \ , , ,I I I I � � \ I I � F - I � I I I I I I I I I � I I I I � 0 I I i I I , I , I I LL_ 1 I I I , v v , I I I 1, I I i I , I 11 , I I I I -1 I I I � i . I I I � I I v v ,� v I I v v I : SH � � �SH I v , I I I � �l -2) 1 LL_ X �: v I v I v 1____� - '' I I __ : :: � � �� v . I 1�lvlv 11 I 1��,lll I 1, "I ''I 1� ''I I ''I I ` "", �� , I I \ I � v � I � - & I I I I I I , I � '' "I "I'll ''t, M � , � � ,� � \ � \ I - - , i " I I I I i I i ,. 7, �)lt,J.vu I ,� i� �� J - , I 0 1 1 � I I . I I I " : i I q I I I I i � v � v , , :� , v : � v �:, , I "I � I ::, , v A � i � � : :1 1 I I � , I � ,� I 1� I \__ ,I I I v I I I I I I 11 I 9" i �: , , � �: �� v'p , 1 . v I I v - , r , ,7, � ' I I ,, vt� � " , I - v I , . ' � . a , '0 I � I \ � __ I � __ IV I � i 0 \ � V, � , 1. I , , 'V� 1 - IV ��' -11, \541.66 - : I 1 v I � " 01 I -T � ; ", I "I � V � I � , % � . � : v : I I I v "I �g � ..... . � -, _,� V, 4 i r � I I v � I \ 1� FL 544'.22 , �: �:: V� , , , � ,. I "I", ' , I -_ I I I I ) , I I I .1111, I V, I I I *. I I I I 1, I I I 11 \ I , I * I IV ", I - , I - 11 , ��,!, " i � I I I I ''I'', I IV I , I I ::::: :1/1� : 'I, i a � , I I : 1 . , ", , , , , I � , 'l " I I : , � : � I v I 111 ''I IV 11 "",� ", , ,� � I , , v v I ,'', I 11 1, 1 tO ��'._, 'M v v v I , "'lli"", 1 1 11 I I'll I 11_,_.,� I ; I � __ � I , I I ; I I � 1, I . "'It, 11,01111 I � A v J� : v , v , , , '' �l Y, A ,,,,,, � � I I I ) 11 I I � I I � , v v I I VV-V,V-V,-�-V-VV-VVIVVVI�-�-�''V,�,- - - , - , - 7 - " 1 77 , V, i FL 545.21 � , ,� � , � 0 1 , . t" '", I , i� '�., I v v i " � "I I � I '1� : �v v � , I v v I I I v , � I I 0 1, . ''i-, I - � I I I I I I ,I v v , a � ' _..11__. _J I :� *, , 1, v I � I v I I ,v , 1 % � � i � , __r CU_CLAD_= � �� I , I I :1 11, I v - I , ,� ,v I i I "I I " I I I IV i I , : : : : , � �,) '' I % � I " I � � I I � v I I � I I � z , 9 , , v v v vv I I I ' " ' "I, ' I I vv I , , I ,I - , :: I , i I � ; �' , I I I I ! , I � . 1 . I v v v I I v v v v v I I I v v I v v � i , If I : : : , , <_ I I I = I I . �viv v v v , v , I I I t I I , I I I : � 1 � . . . . : �\ FF=543.50 �v "" I I I" I V, 1, : �� ,�_l _ , " I I , i , ! � i � - I , �_ F I ''I , I I I I v I I � v ,� � s i : � I I I �l " - -----,-I � LJ I I "I v ,/ ,) I . � , '� , m :� , : : , : I � : �' '' 1, v I I I 6v I'll ,- ,__,� I v v I v v v I " N - � . v v " v I = % :, � I 1�1 v � 11, "I v I I 1, I � � v " I � > I : , , � :,I , , I , , I , I 'I I 1, � , I " � .... . v � ,� � N -) 11 I , I I .. , :�� : : :, 11 . I v 0.1 7 �l �v . I I I I I � , . . . , i , I I I I I � 1 1, , , " 0 v 1� I I I 1 I I :v I V, I v v v I 11 v v v 11 I I �1, I I " , , \ -,,-, , : 0 � - ''I v 11, I - ____ - ,",I � -' , FL 545.16 - � , , v 11 1, �: I'll � I I I � "It V., , "; , " V, , '' " 1, I 11 IV, IV, IV I I, �_ ,- � I �l . Al I I I'll ! 1� I 1-1, � �� I �/ , " �,�; I 'a L I I A ''I'v, "I :_ I - A 1 i,51 1 /� " " , I :,,: : I ,� V: 0 � I V::, , '' v 'Ili .1 I ,, , , I'- - I � 7 1 1 V11, ], I I v I ,'I , 1 . I - I I I/ '' i m i I � : : i � I : 1111 .111.1 I I : ': : �: ,� � ." � I , 1� I mi, z I I 11 I �� 'L 0. I I �,D , I � I I 1� I :: �11 I V "I'v V I I � � I", I ''IV 1, � I I I I 0 1 � v ,:::: , 11 - 0 1 , , ��: , , '' :, I : :, �,�' � I % � "I :: :, I I : �, � : , I I 1:%, I I I , I I I .- I I I 1, � 0 � 11 I ''I 11 I v I v I I v v v v v v v v I I v 1: �:: V_ I , , I I 'IV I'll, ,': , � , - � . - - - ------- ____ ____ , , -- v I , 1, , , I �: V, I A Al I i � . I -,-Vv ---------- 1--_`_,_�Lv --Vv�,�v--V�,vv-v-s�v�vvvv-----",-�v-vvvvv--",,-�---�,.t _i]i, - _ � 542.94 t . v - I -_ v - - . � "I v v I �,�� - " I 0 , I V, d / �. I _112 , - , . , � I I :1 I , I . . . .. I v , v v v �/ % ',\,, 539.68 V, IV , v v - I I � � I �l v I v v v v I I I I I I I : : v ", v I � � I � I : I I I I I I V, I v I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 . , , , I I 1, � v v - v v v v - v v v v � I � I " , v - I I I , � I v v � ''I v 1� I I I IV I , $ 1 . � 11 I I I : : : : - �� : " '' I I I— I I I I " V" I I � , ,: "": � : ,, I'� � "I 1 v v v v v v IV v � I I I I I I v , , lv-�� I I I v I I � V, I v v I v v v I v 0 1 11, I I, i I I - � 177 1 1 1 v I I F" " ,3: 1 " "I I I I I I v I I V, I v v I �, � /,, :- ------_-___--_______,_,, i � I ______ 'Ili, I � .111 _e �. :y. 1. � I .... — __ -1 I I � 1. , � I . I V, �, � 11 "I , v v I .1 � �_ , I I I I i " " I I I I I --- I I , �� ! "al I'lit'i , g, I I I I I I i 't"I't1t, 2"'O'g! <1 I I v , , I v " I v v v v v v ' , , I I I : , I � - "I y"'vy,"I'll �lllt g" "m � � I , I , ,�I� I I � V, I , "lig""i"ll"All ,,g� t,� 11 v I 0 , I -� I I I v I "I I � � , I : � � : : I 1: ------ "_ I - � 1 : I ,; � v I I 11 W, , I � 2 1, I :� � : b, 1, I i I 11 I 0, � - I %I � : i I I I , , c I , , I , v - I �� 4-0 _:777�� , � , v , - , � gv I I � : 11 I I � , UJ I v I I I )"',,"', ,� , � , I I I I I I I I v I I I I v , v v I % I - 1-1 � � ': V::�: , 1: � 1 "'ll � � I I " I � � ; I I I I . I I - I I I - - ------- __ I � I _ 1. 1 v I it � I I I " v I I I I v v I I . I ,�� I I I 11 I v I � , , , , , I I * � - , I 1 . I I 11" �� ,,, vvvvvvvvvv I v I I I I v I I I I 11 : I ": : ::, , , v . , I' , I 11 11 I , I I t - , I I , I I , I I I 11 � � : v , : , � 11 � v 539.61 v , 540.86 ' I I I I I I , � 1 v v v I p I ; v I I I I I I I A I v v , I v � I I I v I I I ' Y I . I I 1, ------- I i ,IN/ I , I I � , , I > i 1�1'1 : : I � I I I , I I - � - " I I : : : : v � � � I I I I I .. � I - � I I I "I , - t, I v I : v I I I I v I I I I I I v i . i � , I I I v v I v v I I I I I I I I � I V��l v ", " m I � I I I ; , ,v- I I � ,> I I v � I � I - � I , v v v 1, I : , 1:1 I , � I I ", I v v v , - I I � 1, " I I i - I 1, I � v I , v � , , , "I I - ". , I 1 1 1 : : , ': , "I . I I I I I I I 11 I I I I , I , I I I -, � � . [ v I 11 I I , I , I I : , I 11 , 'I', , v I , , - ml � 1, I , I " I I < I I v I v I I v " :" I , , '. , I " ,� ,�� , 1, I v I I I I v 1. I I v I I I I ,v I v v v v I v I � 1. � ,�� f . , I � ,: I v I 1% I � .. � I i : I I I I I � � I �l �1/ , I , I v v I I I I v I v I ��/ / I a 7-7--- � v . I , I I I I I 11 I I I 0 1 : ., I I I I I v I I I v , v I v , I v I - I I : v , v . , � I v [ I., I , I % % % 1% I .'. I I � I m , , I ; 11 v__ � I I I I I I v I I v v v I I I I : ::"v - v I , � . I- I - v v v I � I I I I I I , - I I 0 1 1 1 v I . % I I : � - I I % , : m , I I I (p I - I v � v I v v v v I I I � � % � , I I I 1 ..' 1 � v " , , I v � I I v v I . � � I I I v I I I I I I I v , -539.95 1 1 1 � " � I I I I , I I vi I v v v % , " , � I : I I I I I I . _-- v � I � :' � 0 , I � 0 0%%, �, . 0 : I % m � I I : % I I I I I I I I I I v:: , " I 11 I I 11 %, % I . : I i :w I I � 1, I I I I , : I I I I . __ "I I 11 , I , � I I C) � '� � 0 �� g 1 ! 0 � : i : Im I 11 , I � � � 11 I I , I I \ " - � . � I I , % < � � ',:_ , , I , , =';'l-________._,_,l '. __J__ __ I , , " " I , I � I I 0 � . I -: v v : . 1, I " I I I I I I v . . � v , � i I v 9 ____J w I �, I �,% � " 1 I " v i � f. I ,-�, _ I ... 1111"i �� 11,11 11 , I I I I 1 ,: , I , �� 11 "I 1 " rri w� w� w� � w� . w� , � , � : %% , I I " I WA I % " 1 I I I I I I I v I . I v �� I I � I % �, I : , : � : "I � � : 04 C'4 '% � % I I �l I I I I v I � I I v v I v v I I , I . It I 14- lq- . % I I I ,, 11 l . I , A, FL 544.95 , � I I % , I :1 I 't : I , , I I ,___�_,_ I 1�%,,'lq 1�1 I I . �_ I I ;__.--/-:'l 4, , I I w - %",,,,,, % I 1 1 �� 1 I � LO : v LO I LO � LO I I I 1, I : v 11 v � I 1 I I � 'D A,0 - v I . � I I v I I 1 541.29 / t , %: %: fL_� , i .. i -, _ : I.; ` ----- - ----- v "I � I � V� : . I � I , , : : v I v , % � 1 -- , , � , I � - %%% I I ;V: % , ,v : � : : ! I I I I - _--t , I I I I � .. ��l % I 11 w � % .. . I � m I : : :::; � �, % , m - -_ � I I '. I I FL % 1% , � I I "I I , I I I I � I I I I 11 " � I I �: I- - � � I I !- , , v % , , gi,ill,�,,,,, a I I v : : I I I �__ I i _l___, % I "I ,,, I : : LL_ 1 I i LL_ � I I % I I I � % % I I I : I 1, I -- I . __� I 11 1 ,6 [I : I Ll- LL_ : : 1.1i '1� � I . I "I �� - I I I I v I v v I : - , - I I I 1 I 1 i v . I I - I I I � .. I "I,, LL_ U- U- � :': : : I I I � , 0 . , � v : I %, 11 I : � , I I I I % � , � ,:, v b � : � � I I � v I . �, I � 0. , � I __ " > : I � � .- I I , , I � � I I I M , " : I i I I I V�l I I � I 0 � \ "� "I I � , , I . 11 i v v I - I I I I I . : " , � I I � � : � I I I I I I . ' � � �_ . , , v - 1, � I I " I I . � v v 0 1 � I I 1, % 1 , I � v � " , � � v % , I : I , - "" % 11 -1 v . I � I I v I I I 1. I � I �, v � , v v -1 N �, : � I 1 � v I � � . I % __ I'll, �l � I �v t I - v : 1. � � ___ I I , � Y"AA � , I %, V� "4. . - I I � � I , I I � 4 I 11 I'% I . � :� V�V�, I I I I if: � A ::J` � - 1 I I , t -1- I', ,i ,' - v ! 1. � L � _-, v v I W I � I -- - ",", I v i � I : ; � , W I __;_ --- J V. p T � I v v v v . z I 0 � ' I _ v - 11-1-1- . .. � - - - - - - - - - � , I .1 I I - . 11 , I 1� ... � V I v i 541 . �lv% v , v . ______ I I % I ______ I ) ' ' _� . 5 t 1�11%15� "Ill"!""""",,�,i(�"")��m"I - , , 540.71 .71 [ 1 542.67 � � � � --------.-I- 11,111,1111ilivs, %11%11,11,1111111 t"I"ll"11,11,111111", __r �1111,1,,%i �11111 ... .. 'l,',,',��,",,,,"",(,t"�,',),"i,,,,,>>�",,�""",�l,"",'4,1.11--l""'I %, "' I I I F I ! . - �11 11 I v _VSH % -, `` - -2 v v I I , I ' `\�__ I � I 11 "I I I v -2T I :: � SH ' -_ - I, I v L� I - -4�..* ........... _...i .......... I..." I I ,,, "I'll'' 11 I I my i i I 1-1111, % _ I : �, : : ,I I I 1: U- -_ ---.--I- _�ll i I I I I i I , : % I v I I - I' � l.' �l 539.69 w I � � I -, " i I I : I I . I I v v I I I - I I I 0 1 1 � : v . I I I I I , , I , I I I I I , I V, I v ��J' , , , ), '?-,� \'L 539.87 - - - - - - - - "I �, � [ ., [ I v I I I :_ ., I I % % %% � . I I v [v ,_87 --- - --- - . I I I ,10 I I I I I im.,4..,iti.i ...... a .......... t, .... 1 � : : . I I I I 11 11 v I 11 - , 1 �� 0 1 /�_�___ I v I I � I - I v 11 I I : ,v I Lu , __ . � I .1 i i � I I v uJ , I ,I % I I I I I v I I "I �[ . I - � � 1 - .- � L_' � -, . I I 1% V, ;w i I , � � I � v v I I I % v v I v v I 9 I I 10 . � I , v . I % : I., L I "." , � [ �. � -1 1 : � �: . % i I I I v v I I \ I . � � v , (,�) �_____ I % I . I , I I , : : . I I I v I I v v I v I I � ,% � � ! � v �Y_ % I I 9 1, � ,� . I � ,% v v v v v v v - � � � % , : � rlr , I I I I I % I I v I v % a I I I 11 I I I % I , v I I I I I I I I I I I v % I ----,---,, � �_ . i 2, � . � I , ! I , , � , ; I v � �1,11,11" : , � I I v v I v , I I % I , v <,,-) , , 4 v v v v v I . I I I , - - . F p 11% I i . i A I v v v v , . � : :�: % : I I I I I I I I I I I I I I z . . :: -4- 0 . I � , v v . � % � % I i , � v I v v I � 1: : : �1, v 1, I - 10 - it % , I -1 I I -_ -_ I v I � : I I , � 1 1 1 %� . U) � � � I / I I : F_ _�_ -_ ____ --- _____ - I � i I , , � � I I I I I I I I _11 I ,v - I I 1; I , I I", /," � , I , I I . '� ,%,(, I I : v - I , , I I 11 I I I 0 % I I i I I v I � V: , " I , � 'I 'I , � " 1"" ", , I � I I I , I I I., I " "'I, I I " , �l ' """ , , 0 , = � I I I � I I 1 I `J_ , v 11 I � w - I , . I I I ; I . , 9 1�,11, t 11, I I 0 i i I I I I I I , �l . " , l"_'l,:l' , '' ,11 0 Ali: I I I I : 1. I " ". " , � I I I v v I � �m v v v v --- - -,--- � I I ,. I I � , I � . I v I I I I I I I I v I v", V: v , �v , , 1,1 , I � A 11 : I I % I - v v I = ,�, 1, . I I � " v C) � I L0 I v v I ;0 L I %, I .- , 1. I � I I I w v % I v , , : " , " , I I I - - - I v V% a = , I v v I %, ,� I , : . ..... %:', , v , I :v � : - ---- i I I J�, I I , , , : v , __ I = 4", , , " i , -, �: , I , I __ .1 "is � r', � % , , , I I iq: A : : I � , : : , � , , : � ill'i I I I I I I V, , - I I - i � :1 . % , ,�! I I , � I i ! � LA_ � % I � FL 540.�5 , : : , � __�______ : I � I �L ' "I 11 I , , v I . � : : ::,:, : , . � I -,,,� . :1 : '' I I , I , , v , . a - - __ - - __ I � 0 0 1, I 0 11 I I I < � % � 539.54 1 01 � 539.50 13 : v i 0 � , : , , v v , v , � % , . . �r! I . 0 1 0 1 1 C� v , ,I , I , * I - -- I � � 1.� � 0 .., , 1 i �., z � I I t" - __' __� � 0 v I — - — — — I I-,-- ,- - , - v - ,::�,�,t t � � I , v - � � � I I , v I 0 _____ __ __ - _r`_ - � I . � � a i , I : � - � - - a -q- I , I . v I 0 � It I v v v "41 i C14 I ll� - — — — — I i : . I i � , � �� , I : , - _ � :�_,_ ,'I �� - ___ - � __ __ - % I C_� . I � C� v v v v v v - , v v % I 11 � � ,I , % I I l_,A_,_ v 1, , " I � I - ' � I 6 i : : : Z 0 � EL 544.47 1 v % I I I , , I . - - I - I - I I :: , . 1 1 1 1 I., � . E3 � I � ! v v v R . : v : v v : � I 11-: : - � � -1 �� v I 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 , 1, I I I I 11 I 4 (N) 15' PSE a I [ : I I 1, I �, v I I I IS I 11 �l � I 1 1 1 1 '' I �l � � , , � ,I � *0 m � ; � 11 I ., 11 I I I . I I I v v %% � . � I . i 0 -..*— ` 1 L-1 � I I , , 0 , I % �, % v - v'v I ,�_I-� EASEMENT % - I I 9 I � : 0-1 1 L, �' i � IA_ I v � I - . L , , LL_ LL_ v I � I I v , v . . ,, , - , I I � EL 540.3 . .r , , , � ,:�%, � % � , - : ------.I',-- 540 -t---------- J i 13 , I � I �,>hllll I I I I I I I 9 , v I l v I % � ), . � � , � v v v v � � v I "I', I � v ", , ,� � 11 i v , __ � I .1 I 11 : : v I , I �, I I I , v v v I I I I v . : , I g I v v I , I � 0 � , A I I I % � , *0 v % I , I % , : : : ] : I I I v � , ., � � , i ! I I I I I I � , � ! I I , . . . . , � , , , � a I , , , % I I v v . , � % :� I I I I v v v v I li v v v v v , % . . . . , , � " 1 , 0 1, % i , , , : : , , I � , % , v v v I \ I I I , , � , , , I \ , , � � � � '. I v I , I 1111 I � I I I I I I I I I v , v 0 1 � "I'll, , � I � - I , I I v I I I , v I I I v . . I , % I v v I I I 1, v v I v 11 : �l �, 'So : ,� FF=541 I 11 I I I v 1, � '� , I � . : 1: %,'�v , VV`v v \ I I I I �i v v � , I I i ll "I I I I I I I I I v , � ,v v V, IV I I I I I - . I k i i I � : , � % I v v I I I , 0 � --- _�- v I ,.t , � tt� I I I v , v v v v v � -- - -,-- % 11 1,� I I %;I%X� I I v I I I I � \ -1 v . �l gg''po"o,'-V I I 1, I i I I I v - )I 1� 111 � I I X, I I I I I I I I 1� � ___ 13 1 , lvl�i 11 , t � % I I v I , I � � , � � I � , � � : � � � i % - - v v _��_ _� --- �--� \ \ : : : -------,--------- v . I . , A� .... li , I : - � v � _v-, � � :: - " I � - : v V v v _� � � , � , � I I i 1 539.50 ,, , . �, " I " 1 1 :/,: .��: : I � 1� � . I I - \ I v v � � \\ --------- , I'll � , I I i : ::, � � I � , \ \ z I I v v , � �. I I I v - I '\_ \ �l . � v , , ,� t I , v v 11 '\ I \_ 1� I I I � 11 I �v I'v ., I I \ 1; , , , I I 1, �,', I \ � I : I I I I I � 539.90 . I , I I : " I I 1� " v v I % v I .� :v I I � I I I I v - : !!, � � �'111'1! � ,: \ I I � '1>1�1"111111 ? I I - \\-I'-- % I � , ", , I I I \ � ""�\ % - - I v � ,�l ,',,>,,,,',",',,�'��",�,,%,,,,',,,,,,',,,�""��,', v v I , -, I I , :: \ . 1, I , , , � - , : , , , , v , 1�1 � I � � � � - % \ � I 11 _ v : : \ , : I I I I I I I I V, � I m I : 11"1111111 , � I vvvvv , % v : :1 I I : � k I I I % v v I I I . -, I I "I'll- I t, . � - _ v v I , v � % I I v .� - 1'� v I v v v v I , . \ 0 1 " , , ", � I 141111"', , % I % I \ �11 1, I'M, , v v I . 11 -/- -5 \ � 1� I I % I v I , I I I I v I v I , , , \ \ " I I , � % � I , ,�', I I I : ,I I � v % I 1% V" v ., � % I � 0 - % A \ I I . 1� � I : :1 I % i V% I 0 - , I I I v � I \ v I � I I I . v v I I I v v I I I I � -,--- , v 0 1 1 �l I . I I , I v I %11 I " % _______ I , 11 ; , IV 11 v V'' '" � � I ----- I . � . - ____ � � v I : v I . I , , , �� ... \ � __ . I � � I ), I � I v :� , a � \�l \ \ % 0 \ , , , , , , ) � , , "I : � " I \ \ v % v v v 'v 1__" \ \ �, \ , 1 _5,�OA 1 �_ I . I , : I � I Lf) 11 ...... I \ "' , , , " A \ % 1� : I \, � [_ I v I I \ 11 il v I I 1-11 I I I I I �,l \ I I \ 11 I v I , \ I , � , %I " , � '\ ,,, _� �� I - � I I I ��, v , I 0 v : I : , , \ ,\ \ - \, �% � V%� , " , , I " � � �, ,,, " I ,v �� , � I'll � i v : I 11 I � I \ % I I I I I � , v � I I " � : v v i I I v I I \ % , , I % I , 11, � % 111"111,11,111, : \ %% % % ", � 0 ill"I'll I'll"i I v I I I I - "I "I \ I � I % I 1, I , - : , � � : : : : v : , v : 6)� 5, �xl ,� I ... __ I I I . , I C 0 I 0 : I � % I "I I I I % I 1, IV I \ , \ ** I 1�� ___ I __ . I I � I I v . , I - - - - - I % I I . , % \�_ \ I \ : \ 1, 0 * I : I \ : : , , , I I" ,� \ 4 \ , , -'-- _____ it � mi I I , V, -) L0 I I : � _\ . :: :::: \ � : : :�v ,V, , - - v , a I , % \ \ I " ... 11 1\ \ * \ , ,V, -- - I � � , I ul v I I u I 11 , *0 , I III I 1: I 1:�,, I , \ % v v v I I � I 1, � % \ 39. 41, v ': I \ 0, ... v I � � """"" . I . I . % I v v I I I I w - - v v a I % I I I v � . � I , � I � I I � � : I 114- i _q i *q- I . : I v I I I I v v "I ... 11 ,� � 0 1 1 v , V: \ 1 9.82 - 1 539.50 � 1111 I 1 � v v � v - I I I I I I I ,\ ,.,,, ,\ , �3 4 ---- - - - - - - - - - - 0 \ \ \ I , FL 5 ��__�, I I I \ I - \ 4i - - .- - - _ _� . I �, � I I "I . i %% I � % v , v v , , I � \ \ il , 0 1 - � :1 : IV 1 Lo LO L0 . � \ % I I 1� I A % �,, - I I \ 0 I "I I I , - 11 I 1 i , ::V: : , Z I I % \ I/ � 0 1 % \ , I �� 4N I I \ \ - X�..,V. . . . . . . . . m..... . . . . . . . w . . . . . . . .. . . � , I % ; I I 11 I I ! II I 11 A , %v I : - , -A I I % , '\ I I : : V" I � I , , v v - v v I , ,,�,),, lt,0�%, LL_ v I I 1 I % \ � 0 1 v \ \ \ v I I I I "I", , I I , i I I v I I ,�e , 7 ___ ____ v 11 I I � , f I A 1 ll,�,,�, � % v v v v v I ,; . . . . I - - - - - - - - - - � i 1 , I v v v v v - v I Ll_ i u- 11""I'll i ", , �V, I" \ \ , * v , � - �', , , U- ", " N � , - 1� I 1, \ , , v v � I I v : I , IV 1 u- I U- Hi v i EL 543.19 1 " . I %% I : % ,�� '1� 1�1 % I , \ v % 9 I v : v 11 1 � ,v - I I I %, I I I 11, %�: % V,: � �: � I I v v I % 1., � : , : � , � � 11 I I I I I T, � % :: I ii, 1� , v I I I I I � i :� � I �l I � I , I I % \ \ " i kp " I \ , I , \ :� v I 11 � v v , I I ( ) 5' PSE I I % % % , �A, v : I % I % 'i ,� I v v - : , , \\ \ .. ... �, v % - : I 1%, , \ � � \ , " � \ \� : v I I � . I I I I I I I I , I I 11 I "" I I I % 9 I I % ! I I I , \ I 1* v v v I I I I \1 : % � I SEMENT � i - - I �,_ - __ � - I I I , 11"�,"',"", " I % , �s 11 , % %�,, \ � � \ , I I , � - , \, I : �' . - I I I � v F � I %1,00 , " - �:l : I I - - : : I vvvvvv % I I I I v I 1, 1\ , I , 11 � v I I , , � : I 0, i -,--- __ " , � I I R 11 -1 _____ %% � v : I I I 1, I, �, % % I \ " 1, " % %, I � I \\ % '00 ,� 1`�,_�,_ : I I v I , % , I ---- — - 540 - - - - - -- �- --------- I I � v I I � ' " 'EL 543.13 1 1 V_ V 0% , , , , " 1� - v � t f/ % � \ \ 1) � 1, 1% *0 : 1: I I 1� I , ,�e: I I I I ::: , � , , � , I 1, " � I I � , �, % A 1, , v , - , I v , _t - - - - - - - - - - , , — %, % % � : , \ : I I I - � � - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ---- - - - �_ - - - - - - - T - , - 1p,-,7gj � - - - ____ I - - - 7 %, \ I 10 , ,; ";;.,l - , t I I I I I I v I , �itl,,,,jg I I I 11* I %: : � \ I I "I I I k- I '1� I . ", 1 I , � I I 1� I I I 11 : , - I I - I N, , I I I- - I I 11 , I / ,,>�� , , \,� .... ... 1.�.'.-.��-�.�-.��-��.-"�..��.��-�.�-�..-..�� ... . ... - ... - - ... - ... . ... . ... . ... . . - ... __... - ... - , I .. . ... �� 1�.�,_J ', _� . � . �_ � I . � _Q, � I I I \ 11 % 'v , I I I lvvll �111 'IV _;,"�� " i,- , . , v I ',,�, W : %*� , I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - - � � I ,�l v v v % :,,;, _ - �,=_� _____l__. 1, I I I ' " / - - - I � ' "' I � I F_ ""')� ' "" 11 \ ". , 1% � I % I t�"'� " . : , , : : , , I A I I I v v -:" ", �� - - v I � v 11 I I - - - - - - - - - - - ' I I �, : : , , ,� - - __c "I - - .. - . - " � - - - � � - . . - � � - .. - . - 1. - .-. - - - � .. . L 7 - . - . . IF I % � \ I \ \ v , " I v lll�` 11 " . . , , I . . � It , T - 17- ""'�,, I -1 - I 1 -7 1 I'll, - 1�1 , � � I ,,, l 11 % \ % ') I � %/ , � , 11 , - - __l___7 I I < 114, - v - ,v vt v v , v - v __ - v - v , v v v , - % \ % , , , , ,,,�, I I - - -- - - - - - - I I I I I I I I , . � I � , v I v v I I " I ,� - - :1 % %: , , . I % I " I i % % % \ I \ * v � � : � : % , , ll� , ,, � , �l 1\ Z) ') 'Zo .10 - , ��V, �, t , __ % : I , V,v� - , v % v %V , � , :� , , , � v - , v v % , , --v- vvv v v vvvvv vvvvvvvv I , il : , , , , , % % % I � I % � , I % \ % 1% I \ 4 4 : , % % � % I 1, v ; , ': , % "% � � % % % 0 , ,\, . . . . I 1� , , : , : , , " �l - ,v . '� I , , I I , % I % I I I % % I % % " I " % I " %, % % % I I I % I I I % I , , - ,%, �% % % I � I I ��_ll _� __� % , %, . % I I I I I % \% \ I v , � v I v I , % , v , I '' % , , I , , % I I I , %% , I , I , %% , % I \ , '' % I 11 I I , I 11 % % I I % I I 1: % %%ll , I , % % % I I / � I % "I I 11 " I , I , % %% I " , V% I I- � \ , � � �\ � � �l ", __�____ , % % I % I % I , % % v I I I -1 v V% " ____ , ,` 1 % % �� I % %% I % I I " I v v v v v v v I % ,,� , , , I I %% % I % , % % , % 1% " % % % 11 I I % I %% % % � I " I : , 11 , % , % I , , I I I , , I I I % I I " % 11 �� I I � i I � I I , \11 I , I " %e I %, , , I %, % \ I I : 1 %, %'l , , , , , I % , % % % I v , � v v v v %% I : % :, % V, ,, , � , % 1% % , % % % I % I %% I ,% %% I .1 I I 1 I % I I 1% % I � X : : I , I I v I v v ,-t- , , ,---� - - I "I, I % I %% % I , , % I I " , \% , , I I ,,, I % , I % I I I I , % % % % I % 11 11- 11 I %, v v " v I I I % I % \ #* v v I �,�l I I I I I % I I I . "ll , I " , % % % % ' % ' % ' % % I , �, I I I � I I _�l " I � , %, � % , I % % ' " % ' ' ' % ' ' ' , % ' ' ' % % ' , I , v I % % % I I I �, , % � % , 10 I % I , I I , , I I % I % %� ,%', .Q % % , , , %:, , %� I 1, � , % m1p "I'll, "I v % %11, % I 4 . , , , I I , I % I , I % 1�' , I % I " I % , " <, I % % % , %, % " I 11 % % " %, % � �;l 3, I v I'll %%, % % I % % �1% I I I ,%, � I I , 537,/ 0 :% , I %, I \ � I I 1, , . , �', , ", , I v Q , I I , , I % I I I % I % I % % I % % % %, I I % I , :'l _', % % % , . " , - �) -, - , mu." I - % % I % %, , , %, , � \ ,v , I 1, 1% I I I I % I /", , - I I %/%, 1, I � , -vv . - � / v � I I I � , - I 1 I V, �l 1 % 1, 0 ';��,;` A ' ' � I I I 1% � % I I "I % I %%, V, I / I V, I'll % I I ," %1' I ,% , �� I I , % 11 % vll% � % , I I V, , , , , , I %% I % , % % , I "' % '%' I , - I I I % %, % I I %Vl" I I % I % % ,% I I % , I % I %% v I , 11 - I IV % I I I I I lll�l 1, : � I I '\� 1, \�\\ ,,.�; , . ,o v : V�v �t_ I I ...... '" , � , I , 1% , 1% , I % % I 1,1% I I I v 1 I I I I %1% %% '_ %% I , 11 I % I % % %, " I I % % I % I % % 1% I � I v - v vvvvvv v v v - v v vvvv I'll � I I %, I I I , % % % % I % I I I % % I % I % I , I I I 1 % I % \% " % % I % " I , v I , % , % , I % I 11 1% I 1, % I I I ,,'I'll � I I 11 I i % , , 1� I \ % I - ___� I - I I � I 11 k, 1" %, " %"' % I I % -_ i , 11 , , I I , % I % " I I % % %% I I I I I 1, - ----- ----- \ , \ %% \ \ � A -, v .... m % I I % I I I V, I I I v " , I , I v I - -"- � � � V ,: , �,�_��-.5� , I ---"' % %%% % , I I ,/, I %%, I I % I , , , I %, %"%% I 1%, "I %, %_, V, I I I I %, % - -- " AM, %11 I I I I � , � � I I " ,", 1, ,,, ., %%% I I I I I I I 1 %, I I % 11 I'v ,%%, , I %, %,V, " % I % 1 I I -----, - - -- 'ir "T"I'l, X �l ","'', - A� ____ " I I .11 � .......... . N�� ..... v v - - - - �,Mlll� I , I I % - 1� I , ; V", , �l I � I " I � vvv I v v v vvvvv IV- v I v v v v v v v v v v vvv �:7__�� "'l, 11 ", ,%A, ,e .v % v 3 i "'ll"IN , I 1, I , , \ , No .1 , I , , I � ..... % * ... � ", "I I ," , , , " , , " I FL 538.47 , % * \ v f , --- - I I �` \ I ---, ��_ , I . , ", I % I , ---,--, v %% I % I I I I 1� I I " : -, % _____ - �tn�._ I---,-,-- - ._.__.7_ -,.-. 1-1---, _'17-11 V, ,,, !, , " I \ 11 I \1 , ,l '014 ::, 0 v -1 I I I � �,,,l , , I% I x "I %% % % _- I I " , --- I I I � \ ill I �% I %,, �--- 1_� % %% % I ,�__ i I I % , � I ) I I \ , I I % 1'11� , \ , "I �1'vll : , : '' � < I --t--- I � I � \1 \ �f % " 1�1: 19 : : ( � I I I , I "V\ I I % 6 , : , % a , , \ \\ I I I , J I \ I % #* 114 , ,,\ I : �,: 1: , I I I : 0 ), \ � __� I \ , � I � . � \ I - % EL 538.23 % *- , ' I v : � � 1 I %, V % I 1, I "I'll % I ... 1,_ � I % I I - \ , t'. I ", - v % v I . � \ I % i % !ii ,111111111111 ....... I "I", " '� � ,,mv, 11 , '� "' ",�,�l ,_ \\\ I I I , I "I w % I � , �,",I%', 5 ll "","i , I \ " I , I I , ,% " I I I I , ,,!J�`,l 11 I , 1% % V: 1: � I �� % I Q11. im, ,, \ ** I � I v v . : \ % "I " I'm , , , , � t "I I I I I \ \ % I "" - "I I I I 1� 1, , : : , v v v I � � �� % ., : , % % 11 I , , 4"" : " I I I / \ , \ 1, I \ \ 11 " \ , : v � % % %, % I , I 11,6111"I'll", , I \ \ v "I , / I I I I v v v v v I \ , v � % % % li I 11 , , \�\ I ... 11%, � I I - I I �A: v:A v % _-, % % 11 "- "I I I "I I I I I " , I \ % ," IN: , : , : , , , , ., I v % % % I % % 1 11 11 � r1l I "I \ \ 1�, I � : - I % 1% % I I / I I " I I \ 11 v , . '' I I �: 'n I "I % I I v IV, I I : v V. L(� � % % % % �, I , , I I I / 1�1 __z I I I, I I / \ v \ `x,� " I . . I % % % � I I - I , I , � : , _. . \ % �\ v - /,� _,, I \ , %,� . . . . ... , 1, I : : t-l') % % % % I I 11 , � % 11 � 11 I I /J \ \ % . v , , v mv \ , �, " : " 'i I ID I %% 0 d) I % AR I I v , 11 I / \ v I : : : : : : % % I I I ll ,% , I I �11 � l 11 I ! I "I", I I . . .. ... . A I I 11 \ \ 11 % * :, , , : , : v-, I % % �gt I I " 0 - "" I I " I "i" Y "'_ , I \ I : X I % �`--S, 41,06", ,,, , "I , I l-,", \ , � vglli -Z- I I I I " I 11 I \ ' I I I I I v v . \ % % % _5/ � Al"N't'M 11 "ll"ll " I I 11 / I 73 � 11 1 1 : : : , % V\ I % % % 0�1 % % I � , "I , I f I - , I I'll Z % � , % 11 I I 11 I "I" I I I \ V % 11"""', �* v : I � I : . I I --- % % , I I I � , I "I � , % i I I I I % I I I , , / I ,-/ � i I \ I I , I " __�/ I I I , I __ ___ I I 1 \ , \ I 4, I I I I v I � 111) % % % ��\,� % % I'll 11 " , 1, I �l I I ", i 11 " - _-, ,� I 11 I \ \ I % \%�/ � 0* " A I I � I I 11 - I / I "I I I 11 \ \ I I I . , v �() % % 11 � I I I 'k v " I . , I I I � I I v 4 , I I % I , I I I I I , A , , * � / % I %% % "I 1 11, 1 v I I Q) / I 1, \ \ 11 � % I a \ I 11 I � I I I 1, " , , � : : v % \ I , I I / N I I \ �_ll \ I IV 0 1 1 1 \ % % % % � " I I ":, " , I 11 �7) 1 , I � I %\ \ % % \_ I 11 I 11 I , , : " i I I I I ,\' \ \ X: ., -, � I " I I I -,/ , I I I I \\//�---__--,, \ % \:, m'' � I %% I I 11 11 " I I \ I v . v v I � I % I % I _� % I 11 'I'll I I I I I I 0. , 1%, % I ,I I % 11* I I % % - %% \ 11 11 11 I % %% 11 I I " I \ � I , , C, I I I \ % % %% I -- -_ - - - - - _____ , I I I" I I vvvvvvvvv I - I I % %% ��- - - - I I " 11 v v I v \ � I I I % %% I / v 11 I I \ \ I v I I �l " I % % %\ I \\ I I I I �11 , I I /--"/ , "I � \ %, I I I I I I � 11 I " \ I % I \ I'll " " I "I, " - '_ -4- � - I t :7 \_'�'- - - - Y110 �� \ I " 'vi� r7 I I ],_.�--_ �i, � I I ,----, —, �� % I \ * %% I I v I I I I "I , I I I v 11 I % I , - I I � I I , \ I I %% \ 11 I I I I- " I , I , \ \ \ " \ 41 %, , I � I % % % % % % I \ Ll __% -- -- -------- - -_ - - 11 - - - - - - - - -- _ 1, ___.. _�_ - - - - - % % % % \ I , I __ ---__--,/, v v I 1 / % *11 / I % - % % % 1% % % � � , I N'* % % % , , I � - I I I / I / \ \ , I \ %%% I 1% - - -1-1-1 ------- - - - - - - - _____ - __ - -1 % I , I , �/_,_/ \ 1. 1��', I ':: % I I I % % v I % % % - I 11, 1 7- _� I I / J, � , , I ,I I \ \ / \ I I 11 I v % I % %% % I "I', I � v v - v I % I I I I I I ( \ , I � I \ I I I 'I'll "I I I \ / 11 � \ \ / I 1, \ I I \ I , I � � i R/W Cn 0 > r— m �� 11 . q 96' 48' � 48' 12' 01 8' 12' 12' LEFT TURN 12' 1 12' 8' BIKE TRAVEL TRAVEL LANE OR TRAVEL ___F_ TRAVEL BIKE 10, LANE LANE RAISED LANE LANE MEDIAN ______ 1_5 7. ______ j.57. ,---------- TYPICAL SECTION: SHASTA VIEW DRIVE SCALE:NTS 971 R/W 48' � 48' 1 2' i 8' 1 1 2' 1 2' LEFT TURN 1 2' 1 1 2' 8' 10, BIKE ___l TRAVEL TRAVEL TRAVEL - I TRAVEL BIKE 10, LANE LANE RAISED LANE LANE MEDIAN 1.5%_ _____ 1.5% R/W __ (13-13'�TYPICAL SECTION: HARTNELL AVENUE �SH-2) . SCALE:NTS 1--1 60' 30' � 30' 8* 1 2' 1 2' 8' 0, ---d PARKING I- TRAVEL TRAVEL-----d PARKING �_BIIOKE LANE LANE rc__C,�TYPICAL SECTION: LEONARD STREET �SH-2) SCALE:NTS l_____l AP: \Projects\ 19. 000 Jobs\19.053 \DWG \PLAN -USE PERMIT 5/ 6/202 1 I I I I I I I I I !� 1 1 I I - --I - ------- - - - I I" , I a .__..3F. ......................... � ...... ...... -..-..-O-----Iz---M..--.-.Z--.=77.;--.-.7.7..---.=- - --- - --- - --I--T I - a- I � --r- - - - 11 i : i I HARTNELL AVENUE a I I I 6 1 : I : - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I - - 4 - - - - - - - - - - - ----i - - - - - - - - - - I '' I I -- ---- - "I'm , ... -1 i I .. a � ...... _.i_.._..___..__.. --..-..-��-..�-.�-..-��-��-..-.�-..-��-..-.�-.�-�.";i;�� I I N_ ------ ------ -11-11-11-11 F, I ..-.. ...... - ._.._.._.lr_.._ ........... ___�_.. ...... , i i I (� .�46-..-.�-�w-'�-..-.4-.�"..-�.-.�-.�-�� 11 a- L I I '''"', -, I � 11" I I I , -e- - T ...... _", I --- ____________(� 5" - ...... - I , _T*�''_�_"__ 11 1. --- , ---[(:E�X�) SS -- - I= A \I , -(- ____ f rol - - I 1� -------0-----T_----I --- - --- - �N)�_SWfff _LlGWf TYF� I GO : I -1 , I , '! . 11 � 1 1; - 11 I - I 4 I I , I � - , I I - I I " 11.17 - - . , '. �_l 11 I I - 41S ............. X'..�.i ....... 1 , . I I I I— I I I I � I ..-A..y.mi.. .:" I.Ale . �l , , '' _ I " I 1 I \ I 11 I � I 1� , , O.-i.'..........? ..... ....... .... L..,..� .. . ........ at .... i .... w ... . ....... , ..9....#@')�,m9,w.,.... ,w��p I � , I I , 4 , , el I � i , �l I I �' 'I" " I I 1� I � , � I I , I "I 11 - � - '' � , , Y, i I I I , I I - - I I . I _111111-11111 1-11, I 11 1� , � -, 11 I I I I 11 I'll, 11 - I I I'll I I I I I I I �,S,:�,,�_ I ..... .. . . .... 9:, , ! ,� I I *. I , , , I, 9��l 1 1 I'll " _ 2, "i- , - I 11 11 , ..... I I I �l , , . _,��_ I I I i I - ''I'll, � I � "':'ll I I ........ .... '', , ,, � , r'" -��,,-�-, ::� �: ''I , ! 2 - - - - - - � 11 \ I i i 1,17 I ''I'll �, , '' '' , , , - I � ---- _ - - -, _:�L_ �1' _�__ -, - - - LL�L::X�,_�� , I I I , , , , I I � - � � - -1-1 -1 ----- I'll ----- i I ----------------------- - I I I I 11 : - � I � � N � 1, , 1: _L�_ I � 1 x . t I 43lt ' :_1111 11 I 1, , A I I I I'll 11 I , I I I I I : I : I � ** 1 1, � I I 1: 11 I I I I 11 .111, 11 I I ll 11 I 1 '' : -, I l� I � 1� ..... I'll I � , � I I I I I I ,:,, � , � \ 11 , :/ f'': , 1: n- � : I """" 1, (N) � TRASH_ ENCLOSURE I , , , , , I - , , I'll, - , , I I ''I I � , � � :1, 1, I '* :::: :,J:, , : \1� I'll 11 I I I I ''I 11 I - , , � , I I ''I , : , ..'.�-..I--4 I �l I I I i 1-111, I I � I I I I'll I I'll I I � , , i�. I. , ,, , :: :::::: I , I I - I v v - v v I � *. , , , '' 4 , , , , I '::::* 11 � � v � %: : : I � v I 11 I I v v v I I I I I v v i I I I v v = v 11 I I " I : : � � ... I �, i� � A, ,,, � � - - -, - ,- . I v v v v I I v v I I � "11-1 , ,- +_ , , - � _Z7 : _: V_ I !v - . - - _�� , i v �= , _% - -, _ _ � v , , - , , , , , , , 11 I :I:v v I v I v : v : v v I % I I "I I � 11 , v v v v I I I v v v v v I % � v I I v v I I v I I I I v I v i I I v I I I v I I v v I I I I v v I I I I v I v I , I I % � v I I � 1 W. I v , -1 , -- \� I 1. I I I v I I I �v - v I I I I v I I I v v I I I I � I � � � . I I � - I - I � I I 1, - : v . : 1, � . . . . I - , ,,-jl ,� ! I v I I 11 V011111- I—, , - . : '_� 'O I � �. V, " , I I - � '' r ;,� I � ;,� I � -;;;,, I � `,�v , I � '� V", � __, : : _______ L__ S � I I I'� I 1. % I I 0 1 1� I I I � � � I : I I m - ", I I I I , , I v ! I IV v, I I , , I ,, ,- ,, ,� � I �, - � I :� " I I I i, I � \ - I V : v , v I I I . I v v ; : , : � LD I I . , ,, ,,", , ,, -, I I I I I , I I I I � ,:, v :1 �,_ -.0-1 i , , I � v I " I I I I , I I I I I : I . I 1. I I : 1, I I . I � I v v I I I v v I I'll I % -1 , �� - I �� I -- I I I v v v v I v I I I , v 1 I I * � I I � I I � I , � : : v : I , LL_ � - � I i 1. � � � I v I � I I , I -, I i I'll, I i -_ i � 1 i � RETAIL �� ,�\77_7____I___ V) V, I I .. I I 1� 1: I , - 11 - � I I I - V, I � I i �v I I I v I I -, I 1� I I I ! I � . I I : , I %1�, v I I v v v I I I I � 3,000 SF � � � � - � I : : . . . , , I I . . . I � � , , - � I v ; � I I I . v I I , : � I x I I 11 I M. I I : ---I I I v I I 11 11 : I 11 I 1, I I 1. 0 N I , i ) � - Q __ I I I I i I � I I , I � ) . - I I : I I I V, 1- , 'm I IV _ I v 1, v � , , v I I : : : : I I I 11 I \ v F - - - I v - % I � , N cy� � � : , \1 -: 0 1 1 1 1 (N FUEL ! - i V, i ,, 4" v . . . � V" I � I � � 0101 I I I I I : �� , , , , 'IV vi - . 1 CANOPY ' 1 ' I : � : v : : = I � I I v , v I I , , I I � \ � � 0 1 1. I . I - 1 2 � v I I I , , � � 1: 1:� : , I I I I I . I :-: : I I vv: v 1 3,600 SF I � - I I � : I � " I I v v � � " I I I � I �* I I v 1 v � i 'a, I v I I Bill I , i I v I I I \ � : � - - __ ,, I - .- I v : : �0\,-- I � , I � � � . I : : �, , � - I I - 1 i: ,-, ': , I " I I � � , I , I I I I I I I v I v I v I , I � , I I L__ � I � � � - � � � � . . . k I I I I I I � ,-:- I I I I v I I � ; I I . I v -- I � - I I v v v I I , � I � I � . I - v , I 00 I --- � ! IV - V, I I - : , 11 v v I v v v v v v I I i I * I � , : � � I "! I .0 I [ . � I v v v v v v v v v , I v v v � �_ . , I I . I � , I I , I : ! I 0 1 . % � � v v I I I . I I I I I I I _W___I� � i I I I I 1: � , : , :, : : , : , � : � -. � v 0 � I I 4 v I 11 v I I I . � � � [ . � I v I � I I 2 � I L--.--..--.-. I � r: 9� � v % I i I " 0" I I I I I � I I I : I , - v I I - � * i I I 11 , I I I � I v I v I I I 1, v I � , v , , , I I I IV I I I I , � , I : � . . . � v v " v % v , I V�l I % """ I ! , I I I v � S I � � : , 1,�,_ = . I - V 11 v I I I 11 4 I I I 1 , % "I'll I I I % : I � "37 - .[?!w i ... v , � v v I I v I I I I ::X111111, 1,2", 1 ll,� % I cl I , I I I LU � v I , v � v I � , I I I 1, = t V: � :11 'I I � I .. � 0 1 1 � - "'I � �""#"""",��l"","��',,"��, , . v v v v v 11, I � - " I v 11 , . , , � v I � " "I § I 11 I I : : � I " , I : , : . . . : :,:) . � I , � I � 11 -, , � - v , , v , v v v , , , , v , V, . , I 1, : : ,,, : � � g � I 8 � I " � I I I 4, � e : : :� � � : %%% ii I i I , I I I . : : I , , - v I � � I I 1, , : I v , t I � I , I I ,, 1,§Il�m�,","",",, 1% I I IV > , I �� , � : . I v I , � :1 I v , , � 1. : I I : , I I ,,!',,,,,,,%�,,,,,�,,�'%,',,,�",�,�,I - I ., I v I I v v I : I , v v v � : , : . v I v v I v I I v I I I I F - - - I I % I v - , I 1, I I I � . I v , � .. , I I I : I I I I , " -- - ", � % � 1,6, , I I I : : I 1 ! I , I � I " I I v I , , I v :, : : v � : � , I I 11 i �";"'," �,,,�' i"'ll"'P, 11 I v 4___�_ 1 � , I , v v v v , � I I , : I �, , : , � v v , I 1, I I v I - I I v I 1. , I I L 1w I. , � , : a 11 , : : 1 : , : : v I I I I I I . I I , I - _. V, �, � I , I I I I I I I � '. �l ,� I I I I I I � 0 � % � , , I I I v v v I I v � 0 1 v I � 10111 , I fy , , , , , , �l % � I I v I I N I , , v , " I � , I I v I I I I I I I , , v , � � n , , , - I � I I I I I � I I I : I I v IV I v v v v I I v I I I I , 'm I I I : 1 : : : � U111"'110- - -111, , I , I 11 ` , I _� I e � 11 I v v v I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I v I � t � : I I I I i I I . � : I I I , I 11, I ))) � , % , I -1 R I I , I A � I I- -_ -- -- - - - ! I �l v I v I - v -111, v 1-v v - --' _', v v v - - - - - i v - -, _'� - - `,, v _ ,,," _1 1, I I � , , , kv� v I I - v 1, : � I : , 1: , , v . I v I - I I I : , , � e I I . I I � : I'll " v I zv 1, I I I I I , � -. I I v I I i . � llmllg"%lll % 1-111- 111111,11, , I , I , I . � � , , I I , I " � � - , I I'll, v v I � I � , - - - I I I i � I I , I , I , . I v v � I I %. , I : �� I v v v , v v v v � �' v F I , � I : I , � � � : � � � � � � I : � � : , I I I v � � % � , , I � - � . , , I , v v I I : - I � '-2 1 , v I I v v I I I v v I � � I I v v I I I . �C . .3ja I I I � I 1 3: 1 . I I I , " I I I i , , A . . . . 11 , " , v , , v I v , - I I I I I I I I I I I I � � v - � � � I I I I , I , , , , , I v , v , v , I I . I I I I I I � 'a I ., I 1 1 J I I I � � , � , I I � � A � I % . . . � � I I I � � � � � I I I I � : , , , v , � , , , , , , . - -_ � - - - v - - a - v - - - - - �� - - - - - .. � , I . . . . v , i v2"RV5'Vllllw I 11 I v v v v I v v , I I , " , , 1 � I I v I , , I , � [ v - I : v I I I I , I I .. , I I v v I . I , I , I � [ I I � . : I , I �� ml,' h"'I'll"e, I I I I i . I 11 : � , v v I , I I I 1 ;. � I I I v I", z w "" I .1 , I I � . �, , 1, I - I I I , , - , I , , : : , 11 11R�,',�p"" : , , 0 � , , : � , � 1 1 m " , , I v v I , 1 ..' � : - - , , , , , v 11 � � I I I I ,,� I v I I - I 1, ',,'�l , I I � I , i , v v v v , v " I I I I 11 I I v v I v v v 11 � � UJ I : , I , v , , v , v v I I v v v v I " I v v v v : � (N) � � ASH ENCLOSURE � I � v � I i v 1: �:� , , V " I "I I v I v v � 2 i I �l 11 IV I . I � i 0 1 %%% ,�� " I I I � I I : : v % q : � I , . m . . a I v I I � I f I I I I , v % I � , : , I I v I I v v I I I v �;II I m I . " . - - - - - I � , > I ': : 11 I I I I I : : : , : : v v i ,/// 1 .. 1 I 11 I I . I I I I I I I I I I Z / �� . - v - - - - - - - - __A_L_L_J_L : . I I v � , I I- : I I : � .. ,�: I V, I 1� 'I, . i I I I I I � � v I I - I I I I I I I I I vv - I I I . I I ,v 1:1 , I I I I - I �l I v '� , " v v [ . I I I 1 I 1 I : I I v , � I 11 : , t * :: , ( 1, v , I , V 1� , " 11 " I 11 I v I ., 1 1 v I . , . v , I N v I I 1 1 - : : I I I " I [ I A< . I v I I v I I I'll "I "I v I v v v v v I � :1 v " V, ,:' , �:: � 1 , I �: ,/ , , - - - - - - I - - - - - - - I I : 1 13Z . , v I v I 'a 1 v j, , I . : . I I .� I I - - ( i : :1: : : , : I I I v I I I I " : , , v Q v m I I I , �� ,% v I . I I I .,� � , v v [ . I I I I v v " I v " ,,, % � : � � (9) ... __ i , , v I I I ...... v , . I I v v v v I I I . , , , I I �', F , I I : : , I . I I � I I 'U, I v v �1'1 , - - - I : - - - - - - - ; - - - - - - - i 1, i , ::: , � � , I v I I 1- v 'IV v I I I ': ��: �,� : % , , v 1:, I , , I I � : , -V , " , � : I I , v , I ,. � ,% I I , , I I � � I , I I I I � �:` I � � : I I t � I v v I : : I I . I -1 v_lv VIV, I I I I I I',, , I � i I : � � . - ,�, I I I I I � v � I I 10 , , , , , , I � I , , , I'll, � I "I I , - - - - - - - - - - . �� I (f) I \_ (EX, :kL L' : IV I 11 v v , v v v I I . I 11 - �� I I �11 I � v I , I : I 9 � � .1. � 01 11 1 , I I'll 1, 11 I I , I I v � - - - - - - - I v I E�: ED I _F I I , I I , , � � " I I I , v I . . I 1 < : 8 v ANbo =_7_ -- - --- I . I . � � � - I I I I :,� , � I v I v v I I I ! v I � I I I I , v I I v I I � � I 1. i � v � 1. 1: 1: I y v v v 'I I , I I I � I I I v )s 0 1 : I I � I I � � , 1 I I �, V, � 7 1 . I I I I I I I I I vv I "I I v I I : � I I . I I ____ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I , - - - - - - - - - - V, , I I v . I I V w , v v : I I I I � I , I I � - , � I I I i . I I I I I I I I . m: I \ A \ I I : I I � I � v : , I I I v I I , I %%% I I I , I I I I I . I \ ., , �[` I I . I ., \ i I v I I 0 I : I v I N ** \ "m , v , \ ,,,,,,,,,,?'%,,�i,,,,,,,� I I ! I I v v I I I ____ . I I : , v "17' 1 1 1 \ \ \ � I " % : � 1: , I I I \ , "n, � j., I v 1, . 1 , v v � % % I . I I , R, - I I I , e 0 i 1 i i "I v , A ,� I 11 I 1111 � . : : : ": .- , I i I I : I I : : , I v I I 0 U) � I ', I 0, � " I v) I , I I I I I I I � - Ell - - 1 . ":: : ,I'- � , , , I . l , " " "I I I 1, I'll I I I 11 I I 1� I v � I . " _� I I I I I --- - --- - --- - - �vl � I � I m I ; v I " I I I �, % '. I � � I I I I v I I , I , , 11 I I I I N 11 v � I I i : - - - - - - - - - - : : : v v 0. , I I UJ , . I 11 I i lls"", ,,", I I I - 01 - (D - (D . I y LL_ Ig � " I :, : I I , � " I 'ele 'v" � (a I , 9� I , 11 v I I I -- , I § I �, I , �, , , " , __l � - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - : � I v v v V) I 1 1 1 : , I", I I . 11, v I : � i I I , I " V, m I , . _T____ , ,v , 11 . I : I , I i J , 1� 1: � v I v 0 Z) ? - ; W. v 11 I i � K 11 - I .. I I I ,., : I v v 0 1 1 I I I . , � , 11 v . I � .. I . � v I v 0 . , , 1 4 I v I v v , I I , . � :� I I v v v v Q_ M 9 I � � , : : 1 I "I 6"v - + ---- I I ! I I I , I . I v v 0 1 1 1 i . I I I -1-F-T-1-F . --- I : I I I . IV, I M, I , 'g� ... I 1 1 ,4 1 1 1 , I : - - - ,,,, 1� v I I I I I I .., I I , , � : . � . � : : "I h� I . I I 1 1 - - __a_ - - v - .. - , � I '%' I I . "'I : v v I : : : .., I i �_ I 1 SF � I . I I I W I ! w 4444- � I I v I I : -,- I v I I'v v v � -1 . 7_ � .§ I . - - - - - - - - - - - - - . .... 1� v I I , I I � � I I v I 11 I v I I I � - 11 -_ __0 '( - , � � , � . , I ,v � 11 i : I v I I , I : v � R: C14 i v %! . 0 11, � I � I vo I I I i I I �:� n �(-,) 0 � ' � t � • . - �� I ,. - , fILLi J I :_1 I I I v " : I I I � 1*11,111,1111, . . . . . . . . . . s.r . . . . �i..M.,. . : I _�____ F-7 _� � - - - - - - - . i f , I . I 11 �Ri,i,,,i, V, � ". I 9 I : I I v * LU , I - , 11 i J I L - - - [ - - - - - - � a - !,i','�,'% � . f.4.A".w.z..ir ...... .w.., : , .,:* , � 71 v w7r -9f SS , "I'll, 91, ---- � I ... v I I I'' I I " Ivi I :v , _ � : , w I ! :,I,- �� :,! _... 'IV I v I v v ; I il % I, ,, ", , I : , � I , . I V: [ ''I I I , ,,� ,,, , I 0. I , v I I I I I I 11 "l?" ,,, I 11, i i ---------- I v 1, I , " . � : , I _ , LIJ i I I � '! I I I .v I , I v v I I A i I I � 01M "I,'," i i I v � v .!�l 0"""', 11 - I I, I - I I : ,: � . I I , I � �111 . I I I I i I N I'�,�""�'ll",�""I'l�,�'llv,%��'I'll�""%,�'ll""�"",%"�""I""'I'l"I I v v I '' " I v % I """' �� 111,1111ii'l �l v "g,",m, I � � '. -� r,r i I I I I ,. - ,@,��;.,',,,,,, ",%, �@,�v I , llf��,M�- - - I -7-7-r-7= ,,,, , v I I I I , ,,,, I ,. I : : :,, I : , : , : � � . , I � �; ln'lli'lllil "I'lil" I'll", 1, "'i'l 1, . I I 1 : I I % - 1 111111111,1111", if v v I I I" 1! 'll!", "I"", 11 , , ,�V%$, I I" 1, v v v v � I I I ","ll"""I",","" Iv , � " � � I'm � , 1 1, 1 i I � v v v III , , U, , � I I I , , I 11 , " " I - - - - - , - I I .. I 1 01j" I , , , : v I I , , , A, "" , "' i,,, v . 1 v v v . U) ! R11,101"it m"".""', v I "��i,,,,�>,',i�,',,,,�,,,',,!,,,',',,""V")I ... i 1 1 1 1 , -I-- -_ - --- , v I I v , , I "', , ,, F il ,,, I I - I "I II!,?"'i'll �1� , V, I I I I I , "', , , ,�, , , , , , , I : , i I, I I , '11, � _J_L I . I I I 1: : I I , , , . I � 1, ,� , " , ", " ", , v I 1 . : I 9 I , I 4 : �l : 1, V�v 'I v 4 v v �l - - v - - -- - - e'e -1 I I -1 v v v v v , v v , , "'I'll?"I'll . I : : , , . v _� - L . : : I v I � v I I " , ,,, , , , , , , , , - - T , 1. , I v I I , v I � � t, - " , � , -1 I I � ", % ', V" ��, �', I I v , , , : " - I I , I �" I .. I I I I I . I I I I i I . J, � � � I v I J, I , , , " ,� " , , , , , , , � : , , IV,, -, , v v v % I I % ,,, � , - I i i 9 - - - - - - - - - � � , I I " 1" : - - - -,I- --- - : : � : : � , " . V v v v v v v v v v 11 IV v � � v , : v v ; """""."', " I I I , I I I I I , , , � � I 11, , 4 i i 14 . , , I t v , v , v '' v v v v v I I I """"""Ill I " , ,,',�g � v v . I v I I , 1 , "I'll I 11 � I I I I , 0 I : I v v v v , v , , :,V�:, � I I I I I 1, I "ll" I'll ',�`,'lllll I " , , , I �• : : I v , I I I I , - I v , � , , I I I I I I , I , ,',�,,,,, r', : � � , �. � I i 0 ;,", ,,,��,,�,,,,,�, ,, ,,,,i',;h,, � I i I I - I I I I I I v I I v ,j, I c I ll,,� � I , I - , � ® v . . . I : I 0 1 � i 4 " ! tq 1 ! S11 , v 11 � , I �, , , I , I I I � 1. I I 11 I v I I I v : I : I I I I - I 1 0, I I E3 1 . -,---- I t ". �� 1, . � : , , , , v I m - - - - - - I I - I � I � . � % % I i�' I . � v � q , I I I I I - __ - I I I I I I 0 i ,,, , '. I i I I I : I .:. . < : I '. 1 � � �. , w , 1 9 I I I I 11 . I I � I "I , I i I , 4 0 1 ��i � A � - 1 - - - - I I I . I I v 1. . , - �- ,. I '. 1- i ON � I W. I - - , � 1. � Z I I - - - - IV 0 1 1 IV - m � . � I � I - - - - - - ', "I . I . v I I I ! - I � I I i , I _� � I, , , : I I 1� -A-' - � I M : I I 4444%, . I I I � �-�7�v- v I � t 7 - : .v . I I , , I . , I . I , . - - - - - I -�- " R I I W, 0 i I � I � , a 1 "I', , .... ", " m ", i - I : - - - v .. . . 15 I , v %, ", i I 11 I 1. � v I + . � .1 � I � � I - � - I � - 9 ------ ��l 7 - , � I : , I , --- - 14i, 111 - - - - - - - . I I � v v v - I v v v - I I �� % 1 � a .1 .. I � ",,"",,,,,�i,i",I ::: : : : : UJ : . . . v v I I I I � I P, , I , . . % � (N) ' � .., , . i . I i , , I I v v v I I ---------- A , � , I v , , 15' PSE I i � V, . ,�, I I'll 1, . , I .� I i - - - , - illl"-,�,�'�l'l',� I 1� : I _7____ - - - I I I E. , I I � - , I - - - t I -.1 , - - - - - - - - - - .- . .. . I �� I . I I . I , % _�-- v . 1 1 1 � : � . "' I I I . I % � I j I i,�" "I i '� " I . I . � , I I , I , I � . 1, � v v v �v , I ,---, - 'L : , , I v I I I I . I - V, I N I "",,;",",,',,,,,',',,,, I "I I I I ; " 1� , - I -_ i, , I � "M 1 1 � , , I I v I w , I . - I ____ . I 1 , I I : , .; � , � , � . I * - - - Y . i I : , w I . , , I I I i I , 13 1 1 1 1 ..v I I I 11"I'l � I , .11 � , . I I %. , � I AIN � . I I � v v v V", IV, V, I IV � , i I " I . � I V, v � I I v Av I I v v I I I I I v v , v � � , � . " I : It I � .-- � " I v I I v v . I V" "I I I % I 6, � , I � I I '. � I I 1 i , I �; - I . , , , : 1 " I , , I , - - + ---- .... ... I I , I I . I : � I � v \ v I v v . v v I , , " , , ': \, , I � :� 1 I - , I � .. I : . , , v I I I , � ,,�� ` - - I I I I , I v , ,� � I, \ � ; I I , a', I I I I v . � I I I I I I x .- I � I I . I , , , % v I I I I I I I I , v v I v v , , v I I v v & , : I -( , � �i _(� • 0 � I I . � 4 � v � I � , I I I , ;, ,�,� I � % I � m I G "I � � 11 , ��',,,,, 1, "i"", \ � - . I : I I � I v v I I I v v v I I , I I 0 \ ! I v i I I I , I A �,,,�i!i�',,,�,,,,,,,�,,,,,I,,,,�,,� I � . - - I , , � I 1. " v . v I I I I I I : � I I " , I _7____ - - - 11 % - - - I - - - - { -x % I � , , \ v , , � - I \1 11 v I I v v v I I I I I I HOLIDAY MARKET � I',, � . � I � � " I ,�, � � , I , � v v , I v v I I I I I I � \ I I I � J. [3 � "" I I I I � I i I I % I I . I I I , I I " � � . I ,\ v I v I I I I I � \ , , 1 : I . I � . � � , � I , 11% � : I I . I I , - � \,q.\ I I I " - I I I "I I I I I : I I . I I I I : � J� I I , C I I . I " , , •: , � , 0 i I I I I IR I I I I I I 1. � � : : � \ , , � \t 0 1, 30,664 SF ___�,_ I I v . \ : ,\� � , � , , : : , : , , ,\ \ v I : . . . I , I . v v . , \ "A , I \ � i . I ,/ I �; - i I I : : � �,� , I . I v v I v I IV I �, , I � \ m � , I I - � 1 1, 1 1 I . I I " : I ____ -,.4 i : - - - � -_ v I V, I I I w I 'k - I, I I m \ � . � � % , � � � I I v I v I v , , , I I I I\ , \ \ I i m I � 1� "", � . I I - F I I I I I I I "m : : I I I , . I I 1!11� - - . I � I I I , I I I ,:, ,� , , , \ I I I I : , � , . , - - - - - - - - \ � 1. I v I I I I I I I I I \, % \ , I ." I I - , I , ! i I I I I . I I * I I v I I M v I ': I I % . 10 I I I v I I I I I I I I I I . I I � v .. _7____ I v v , , V . . . . v , � v I I I , V� , � \ I I I I : 'I %% ... I - - - t - - - I : : : : v & ir , , v v v I , I v � - , .. I I , � : ,w I I 1 1, � I "I'll ,�� ", I . " I � \ � \- \ , : \ I I - , v , v v I \ \ \ \ \ \ " I . � I I •. I : 0 1 I! I I . I . I . I I : I v I I I I I I v v I I 11 ,�,� \ -. \ I I I , I v I " , i I - I - - - - I (II , � I � - - I I : , . I I \ 1. - I v v v v v I I ... 11 , � 11 � ,, k : - :\ � : - , - \ v v v v v I 11 , \ \\ I 1\ , , I 1� I - . I I I , . : 111, IR T - - - . 0 1 1� v v I v v I 11 , , " : I . v I I v VA , I : \ \ , I I I I I v I I I I I I �1' I \ I m � � : I I I I i - - - I 0 1 1 . , \ I � I , I v I - I I I I . I - \ � \ 0", \ , , " , , � � � 9 I : C - + - - - - ��91,,,`g I I � I : \ \ � , �'j,""ll","'t I I v I : 0, � I : : I , I I I I I I I I "","'l,"', w � \ % I , I I I . ..... 'A \ I v I I I I I � , I '11, � . , " , ox"',>,", 111 , I , I I v w . I V, , , I ,� , 1� A I : : : \ I , I I " , 1,41,,"ld 1 11111111%l, 111;l � : v I � I I I I v I I I , , , T1 � ) 1"ll, I *. v v v v , I I . 11 \ \ \ 0 \ � � , , , � I I \ ,�� I i"'ill"'11,111%,l, ,',,", ,,q§"",o�,�), I I I I I I � \ t \ I I :" ", d I v I i 11 ,� 51 I % , I : ',?,%,'v,,,�',@,' I I I I v v I . : I 1 I. \ \ I 0 ,\ : , , I I v I \ I v v v : : : : I I , I v I I I v I -L - - � I \ 11 0 , , v v I \ , 11 , v I I ::� ! I I '� , ,,, \ \ , *. v : N I v " _� � �, I �,,,,,, """', ',"�,,,,',,J � j� I I . v I I ; I : : 11 : , I I """,ti"",!V>;"",�,,,,,,,!,��"��,��""","�,,,�l,,�',,I " , " " , , , " , , " " ... . .. ; � "'Sm � ,,,%,,,, ,� " , , , I 0 , �,, " , "m 101,11% 0 . : \ \ \ 04, \ I v I . I �>l ,� .. .. . ... i " %� v v v v v I v I I I I , " , I , "I" \ ...... 9 . _ 1 1 , i'll,"IM11, �, , ,___% ,',,',%,,l,,',!�';'�,, ", v v I I , , � v I I m � , ", , . 11 ,27, ... � ,,�,,A � 1 I 11"i""I'V11,11% , ,, A �',�,',', � 11 \ ,\ : \ I I I , � 1 1 1 g �7 "I" % IV"-,,-,, A I'll � pu%ll I I I I , I : I 1 1 \ " \ - •- m I , � ME1,11"'I'll'i �wg, 'I, I � '71 , ", , I I I; I , I %1,111111", 11 , w, " I �,�,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,�,,�ll,��,,�,t!I ,,,, 6" "'ll, ; I . V I 11 t , , I '�4't,',,,�l,',,Ie,,,'�,',,,,,',,�,,',,,',�'ll"�',�"I'll"""","",I �l . 1. I I I,, 1", "�,""I'l, 0 1 11"im � "� ,le,,," !111 of",>,",��%'>�i�?"""��i,��I'l�•�g, , .... ; � '�I't',,,',', i""';i" ",", 111,11,111g,"m", ,,,%>,,,,,>,%;,,,',,,,,,,""ivi,�,'�,,,�"?', I " I . I A , . % \_ - - - - - - - - - - I - - - - � I I � 40114,10 I 1, Iggg""""', - __a-__ - - m, w"mm".1% "," \ : "I I I'll l,'lll,,�%,gq" iW1111,111,11,21,%I - , : v � ... � , ", g,,im 1, ," I I � a \ \ : \ \ % I I � " _.-I ,,, Ji"I", v im I N�m I Imm \ \ , � \ � I " , l,", "di 011i, I 1,111, �'w"' � """'im" I �id � , 1 ... � 1 , tQlk!%H',l,`k% I 111111"I � , "I'll - I : : : I , p . . . . * . . . . . A . . . . m . RUIN"I"'N" 11 .,,�,d I \ : � - %�_, , , \ \ ,* -g-v. .- . ��, 1,�,�'W,,,%%""","","",>�,,,,%',,ii "I'll 190S ,,,,, , I ,01"Al - N'l I . I : I , v I __1 , tj ) � �l - - I - I - , , , . v :\, I - :, � \ I - : � - � ll',%i,,,11`1� ! ,; I , I \ 1. % 1�-. , v \ , \ """"I'," 1*4�1 i � v v v v v (Pi I , i I 1 \.------------- "t. I \ I 'T - - -I v v I •v I - ,A , . 11 � I , I . I ; \ \ 1. , I % v I>- \ �, I 10-1 I I . "i I i I --- I I , * I I I - \ , I v I v v I '. : , I I t : I I , i, , - I 1101111- I I Q 1. , Aa- %� I v v v . - I - - - - . - - - - : I \ \ , A. 1.1 I I I - 0 " 11 , ,� , I I I A I I v v v I I I v v � 1� , , I 1, I I � 4 . I I 1 (2) y \ v I 11 I : � (N) 15' PSE I V:l : . i ..., i I t I i I . I I I \�>, &,�. \1 I I . I i i i . . . I I I I'll - � 11 I I I I I v I I I � , , IV I � � I . 10 : I I I I I M. I . , 1 0 1� * \ \ . . . V' � - v v I I EASEMENT I . . I 1. I 0 1 1 1 v I I I I � i V.. I � \ 11 I , \ b(- In , `_ % , I I ,v v I A, I I , I � � : \ \ \ _, )k \,- � I � , _,_� i - I � : 1 1 , \ - I,,- \, , '' 1 " I 1 41. . %% w I , , I I : w . I , - , � - \ � \ ,�, � t : , , � , / 0 1 1 , I ;, , I v v I I v v I ...... � � % I ". IV, V, 1: I . I I . ( I / : .1 \ \ v 110 , I I 1, v �� I I I 'm I I • :lE I I I . I I / I I " \ '' , , , - : I v v � � -,.- I v v v I I 'A I , � 1-1 �l % � : I I - - - - --- - -_ -- ,- - - - -1 -- I I I I . - -- - - - I I I- I I � I . . 1 ,4 1 1 1 � % I , I I I I I .m I I � I . . , 0 \ '7 *"@- .. _'... . . . � . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . � . . . I . I - - - � - - - ___... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - � -7 . . . �__...-I.- .. - _. , _... . � ;X: , I 1% : , N � I - - T � : , � � \ \ , I _ , I I I I I - I -_ - -_ I - i - , , v " , I -8 �Ss - - - - v v \ - '_�� 4 � , � .- ...-.- *v � - . _.. .(�- ... � - , , .%. 7 . . - . . . - .. I" - 4 � , - � - v I I � I : , % , % , t V:: , M , I 1 , - � \ I , I I I I ,,, 0 1, � I I : 1. III , , I � I � I -�- I : I I .. - i I 1, I - - , , - %%% . � I __L� -_ --I -- -_ -_ - -_ - -_ -_ --- -_ - - I \ A , I I : - - - . - - - - - - - - - E -1 E�;] � �-. �� -- - - - - - - --- --- --- - - -- -_ -_ -_ - - - -- - - .1 \ � v , . .� - - �4 - l� - - - - - - - - - - - - . . - .. - . .- __ - �,_ _v _.__ I , . . . .. . .. . .. . .. . . '= ..-..-.. ...E._ . - v - v - - I 1� 1140 1 , , I v v , v I .,, -Nf - " - - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - - - -- - -- - - - - - - -- - - --V-7--7--s � -V I - , I v I � 10 I I I . -1 =St -- - - . - \ \ \ \ I � � I I I v � I I , � (N ) TRAISK -_ JRE - im-1 k I 0 , ,� 1, I I n � , . I . 'II 1� v � � , , , \ *. , v v , , I I I I ...." I IN 'I '' v v v - v v v v - v v v Vi- 30 I 11, , I , , , , , m % I " I I I � � 0, ,\ : : , , , I I . I I I I , " ll \ I 11 I I 1-1 "I \1 1, , 1�, �, I 11 I ."ll : :: " - i "I'll, 1 " I I I "I "I, , , ", 1, "', ", 1, ''I " I I I *. "t v I V" I I v v .. v I I I - J I , I �,,��, , , , ", , , , ", , " , , , I , I 11 I I " 11 I / I I I 111 I 1 14", 0"', I I 'I',",, I" I " I "I '' I '' , I 1, I - � 11 I I I I \ 10 I v v .11 I , ; " , , " , , " , I 1, , I I I I I I I " v I I 1, I , I 11 I I v �� 1� I I I I " I , , I I , , Ir \ , # v ,,*' I � v v v v �l I I " I � 11 " I 11 I 'I' I , I I I I 11 I , 11 I / I I 11 1, I 1, , , I " I I 1, I I I I I I I I I , I I 'I, : : .. , , I I I -fs , I", , 1 11 v I I/ I I I I I . . . . . Iit . *4 v , , ..", � : I " I " 1, " I I 11 1, " I 1: 1, '' 'I'' "I I I , : , �11 , " (k) :TR I I I , 11 " ,\1 , "I I " 11 I 1 " I % I I I v v v v v , I I , I I I I - \ \ \ \ I , �4 v I I \ v ,: I I I :11, 5 , 11 ',_ � .. .� ..'� � I , I , I � , v v . V -vt k I I "I I , \ .,o�,* : I I I �, � I 1 I - I I I I , " , I 11, 11 I 1, I I 11 I �, ,, ,,, , ", ,,:: , " " ' , , DETENTION ,AND,,, IM S,4,,,, \,' � I I � I "I I /, I I I", N, \ v I v I I - I v .. I I I 11 I �, I %, I I 1, "I I 11 '' I ,,, " , , 1, � I I I I 1, 11 I I I v I v I I I v I V11 I I I % I I � I 1, , I I I I I , I " "I , , I < , , ' I , I ,�% W " , I , I I , 11 I � I � I - I , 11 I I I I I I I I - � I I , , I ,� I I v I I I �l 1, " I v I", � I 11 I I . . . . 11 � I I I I v v , W,�r�, , , 11 I I I I v I , , , I I v " ,\ %%% "I'll", v I , I , I I I I 1, " I I I I I I I " I I 1 I 4 .., . 1 I$ . ....... " " I I " I I T I "I I , I I I 11 I , � , : , TREATMEN ,,, AREA' ', , , , , I \ I '' \ v , : , . I I � 11, -- I I I I I I I I I I 11 , I I I I I I ,,, 1, I I I I I I I I I I , I ,�.. , 1� I I 1, " I I I I 1, I "/ ,I ,,I I 'I', I " I I I I " , , I I " 1, I I I I 1, I, 11 I I I I " I I , 'I'll 11 'IV I , , I , , ", , , , , %% ,, , , , \ I I I I g _', , , " I I v I I , , , , " , , ,� , " , , \� I I ", 1, I , 11 , " , , , , I I I I , " I I I 1""""', I 11 \1 , 1, I 1 I , , " I , , " "I , , �� I . , " : "I I I 'I,' , , I � \ I �l 11 1,111-1-1-11-1 . . ..... , "m ", � \ t v � , I \�'. I I , I , , " , g"', ", ,� i I :\, -�W.� , I , , , I I ", , ", "" , , I I, imo ,��, � .•--im."'.,wo� ....... 1, 11 I 1, 1, � I I I � , I 11 I I I I V, I I , , � - , , , , , , , I-L 011�1 1111,0 11 - - - - - - " %% t.� - , ,1_11 '* \ •. � I , , , -, - -1 I � "I , , , """" """"" "' \ \ , �l �' \ , - \ •, - - - za , L , a , 2 , 44L - - I'll ,,,i,y, - V �l 11 - I I \ *" -1. I I , i,`� """""""'�""""""""�""">�', �` "I" , ,�ffigl:' HE ,, IP�,, , , , I I . I ,,,,,,,,i',',,j',, ,,lil I " , I . . . " ', , , , - I lmi',�,, v 1 �v% I'll- .. , ,4 m I - - 'I�"""""""",!'�"">",�Ill"""""f"",;",�ll"�'I'll,"""��ll,"!""",tllill",�,�!""llll,!",�Ill","""",ll""I"�l"i'llI'lil�"I'l�l�i""Ili'll",�Ill""I""""I', . , , � or , - I I I '11111111-1111111 �!�""Ill"��,�'I'll'Il"""I I'll I "", , ", " ". \ \ "',""I'll", m"I'll'm '11" .__ -N11- "" zi " "" , , ", �m',, \ \ , " :, : mv , I . . . . � � ...... i "It"i, - , "", , , , " ", "" "" " " , - ,ve, 0 \ •m , " . " ""', I i� "T,,,7 !"17" , � ", , , , , ... . .... . , , , "" " , , , ,", "" "" .. � "" ., " , "". ... I i , , F ll� \ \ - .., 1A " , , " "!"'m � ", , "'. " " , ", , , , , " , , , 911, "" , , , 1, I . , " ,., , 11 ` � , , , , , "", , 1 %%% , , , 1, I , ,�."�, "I'll \ .. � . . ..... �',',, ,rl?i I ", , ", , , * I I - I : - 1,11, 4t tit 11, � le \ " , 1>1 ", " \ \ \ % , I \ % I \ - , I I i,,,, I \ \ , I v �*q", l,,,',',�)�,,,,r*v v : � tug \ � ,� , VLEGEND `, , I I , , v , v \ . , 11 * I I v I I I 11 . P I �,* , " \ \ - I 11. v I v 1 11 I v I I \ \ 1110 I v : I , , , ,% : :0 . . . ______ - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- ____ (N) WATER LINE I I \ \ \ I v I : :� I I . , , % \ .. 14 v I A I I I I . v v v I I I 1 \ , \ , 111% , \ \ 'O I I 1\1 I v , v " . , 11Z \ . 11 . ! 11 i � , .. ,, 9 , , , v v v v v � �l I I I � � �l I ."Ir �. 11 I I I I . (N) WATER VALVE I I I - - I N, I I ''I I . I - - ADJACENT BOUNDARY ------------------A------- � I , I I I I I I , : , I I \ �# I I i I " v . \ \ *. "116- \ I .\ . C.O.R.C.S. 404.00 � I I � I I I . 1 � I \ 1100.1 v 1\ "I - v I 11 '' m,%g,,'�',", \ \ 1. 1, , , N, (N) WATER METER I ,��""!�,�,i"""�l,,,,!?"�,,�,�"",t�� *. , , v .v \ 1, I I . \ - - - - 5' PUE ______ - -- - -- - -- - -- --------a I 011 \ *,, , \ . . . I m , , C.O.R.C.S. 401.00 1 1 4 � I , % \ .. I %� : - .1 \ I " ,,, ,,, \ I i """,",�""�>,',,,',";"",>,!,Vt""if,,�,, \ 1, vwvl I . ,>',',,,""�,�,,,��,,,,,,,"",","",,>""�""","', I , I v I 10 �a \\ '*' : : 0. I (N) FIRE HYDRANT 111111��"',l � " 1 * . I \ - - - - ----------* I I : I'll, ...... 11 , � � I I I 1 20' SETBACK LINE ______ - -- - -- ____ �� 1,11,1, " I I N I I I 11 . " \ \ *I , 0, C.O.R.C.S. 421.00 1 A I'll, 'll - 0 , \ g , "I - � , , , v . , " � %% % \ � " v v 0 , , Mlk " %%, , v I , 0 , l," I 1\41 I 1]] (N) RPP DEVICE I 1"O"', �%l , 51 g,,,,,,i'� 7%711,'K�, , " _________________________ 2�'%,"',J,l il,56�,11,,�', V \ � 4 : -_ (EX) 8" SEWER LINE - -- - -- - -- - -- - - - -(ff ------- 1 , , ", I'll , , 5 � I 1, 11 " \ \ -*: , l I I C.O.R.C.S. 431.00 g 1111 11,113t, 1'1� , , I � \ I I � I "I" 1, " , \ � �* I I A , \ \ lk I 91 I , \ \ I , 0 11 It I \ ---------------- ' I I , _______0 (EX) SSMH ______ - -- - -- - -- - -- ----(,, (N) FDC � I I � A 1, \ \ 10 \ C.O.R.C.S 422.32 1 �, "I'll, % - � -1 IV 11 V, .1 I - � I I \ \ . I I v 1 iiiii� ,� , , , \ (EX) WATER LINE � I i I :1 il I � � - I I � \ \ \ *. 4 , , I I - - -- - - ---- (N) AREA DRAIN "I I•1 4 1 1 � , I I \\ \ 4 1 � 1. * - ____ - -- - -- ___-A------- (EX) WATER VALVE I k- __ -11,11,1111, , I I , % 4 % .... . % ...... , , , I , - _ - - I - � --- - - - - �,% - �l ", ,% I I I \ M I - t, :, : \ \ I (N) NO. 3 CATCH BASIN " , , , - � I - I - 1`�,,L�'1111� d --- i , I \ \ I , 1, " � lb , , , 'I I ------ - -- - -- - -- - -- -------- O3 (EX) WATER METER � 1, I \ ........ (N) SD PIPE I I " I I i I 1. \\ I I I I .e I I I \ \ .." 11 ______ - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- 4 (EX) FIRE HYDRANT I I I " " � I ._* 1 _�14 9 (N) STREET LIGHT I 1 I "I , , I '""! I \ 1011, .." v C.O.R.C.S. 560.04 1 1 " I , � "'.010 11 � , , , 1 At 1 -,,.-,,--,-,-----...-,..-.,.-,--- (EX) FLOW LINE I ,,,, (N) TRASH ENCLOSURE I I 11 I I (DOUBLE AS NEEDED) PER :1 (E) RODHOLE TO \ I /-,,\ , - I � " : I i I BE REPLACED fIr Ill TIA .____l___t_ - - - - - _13 ELECTRIC UTILITIES = (EX) ROAD ------------------- (N) GRADE BREAK .------------ (N) 4" SEWER LATERAL C.O.R.C.S. 301.00 _____(N) LATERAL CLEAN OUT C.O.R.C.S. 302.00 =- (N) FENCE I ] (N) ADA UNIT (N) HMA = (N) CONCRETE = (N) LANSCAPING SSMH I SEE DETAIL A THI&SHEET ME= Ems No= ME= mmmms* # ftmmm wm- ME= LEONARD STREET OFF -SITE SANITARY SEWER DETAIL A NTS NOTE: ALL ON -SITE PUBLIC STORM DRAIN AND SANITARY SEWER SHALL BE LOCATED WITHIN A 15'PSE WITH NO LONGITUDINAL CONFLICTS. AP: \Projects\ 19. 000 Jobs\19.053 \DWG \PLAN - USE PERMIT 5/6/2021 HARTNELLAVENUE (EJ PP TO —BE 7 ...... ------ REMOVED_(T)?)__ (N) 5' PSE N89*53'37"E 246.54' N89*5337"E 270. R=20.00' L=3t) 12' EASEMENT S89'56'10"E 34,59' A=l 03'28'56" F 13' — — - — ------- ----- - SOO'03'24"E 4.28' N89*56'1 0"W 145.06' (E) 20 RECIPROCAL DRIVEWAY EASEMENT T OR PER 32—PM-59 Lf) tc) ;e) (D AND PUBLIC N "1 TiLITY EASEMENTS 0 0 A 14 PM 31 AND z cl� 43,625 ft- 1491 OR 108 56,�76 ft2 co OOACRES 24,675 "is0, 0 to .. .... . . ll',r 129 ACRES 1 0.57 ACRES .. . ...... . S89*53'59"W 122.78 UJ (0 io `(N) 30' RECIPROCAL, I,'DRIVEWAY EASEMENT 38.45' N89*56$24"W 99.13' N N90*0000W 202.45' LO S89*59'51 W 304.52 R=29,92' L=43,78' SOO'00'00"E 12.17' S55'46'03"E 20.47' A=8,3'49'48" O� 8 R-29.92' L=3,24-' A=6'12'05" CL C) ZWO 00 O W A� X Nq LLWIJ I . .. 41,313 ft2 0.95 ACRES O 0 iN OL 0 ------------ F— — — 25'LANDSCAPE V) SETBACK uJ ------------------ I uJ 0 cr_ — — -------- -------- -------- • __J N89'35'31"E' 20.00' it a> w [N89'35'31"E 20,02'ra LO 0 R=,' O�00' L=6212�12' ry N ILI A=7'07'48'✓tt tt 120,780 ft2 LO Ln LO - — -------- ------- 't 2.77 ACRES 0 7 8.46 (N) 15' PSEi. LLJ Ss2-5f I N90*00'00"W 14.84' EASEMENT C, b N 3.4 (N) 5' PSE EASEMENT X, 50,126 ft2 N1. 15 ACRES Cn (N) 15 PSE "p, V)sit EASEMENT (E) 20- EASEMENT FOR ROAD 48' RIGHT OF WAY AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES — — — — — — — — — — — — ---- PER 14 PM 31, 345 OR 283 ---------- DEDICATION At. t.PIT, AND 350 OR 39 ----------- I --------------- --------------------- (E) 20- EASMENT PER 345 OR 2831 40.00' w -------------- ----------- ------------ ............. 350 OR 39 -N89*52'58" — — — — — — — — — 1 51.16' 1 --r4' PG&E EASEMENT PER 1679—OR-103 - - - - - -------- r- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ---- A A (E) 20' EASEMENT FOR HIGHWAY PURPOSES PER 355 OR 153 LEGEND PROPOSED EASEMENT EXISTING EASEMENT INTERMITTENT STREAM EMERGENT WETLANDS (2,492 SF) EPHEMERAL SWALE (1,639 SF) SEE WETLANDS DELINEATION AND TREE SURVEY BY WILDLAND RESOURCE MANAGERS (N) ROW DEDICATION AP: \Projects\ 19. 000 Jobs\19.053 \DWG \PLAN - USE PERMIT 5/6/2021 LEGEND TREES 6" - 8" TREES 8 - 10 TREES >10 TREE CLUSTER TREE SURVEY SPECIES NUMBER OVER 6" DBH DBH SIZE RANGE BLUE OAK 193 6" - 34.5" INTERIOR LIVE OAK 92 6" - 22" AP: \Projects\19.000Jobs\19.053\DWG\PLAN -USE PERMIT 5/6/2021 t{ f F f �r{7r tr ll`If at}t}} � ! I�{j�it,a ?•rjta$�tfffki r{r}t�1'trt{'� ati {; rft�ii#aa ss�a u<31 t{�]}yt�i{t�yfj,}%rr t,. f � tr sif3 C}ti a at a t�{1M�`}'irs;�'J'S#'Stia+aFa }it ar t Ir t. Ihtttt,s�`�ra}atyl}s�{ UN SOUTH WEST 3 SOUTH EAST ® 4 SITE AERIAL VIEW - 4 VIEW 3 VIEW - 4 LVV^V 74'-8" 1OT' 9'-2" 70'-8" 35'-6" STORAGE YARD O g O tv r ti e " WAREHOUSE. " RISER OLER PROOU .FIRE N cV _ ill I J .. 7 i tI(t£.. f4`t tt MEAT (:OGLER MEAT PREP PRODUCE PR r 29'-9" 22'-7" 161-8" 22 3" 17=311 DELI RE }. { F cm! (. t t4, it ii i} { i £ I ;4 o cC O _ DELI t t14t r } It Y £ i }Cj� t tl '}its it}ii Vi }<#it'st. }�tjt - tip ttsAl #t �� i i �it'�}I } F �' A Y 1 i ,• #. � � I ....... p. I. !.. I I i ! o it ire'._ I fi i}} }Y Vt Y I 12 t I # ( r { F ❑ ❑ DELI COOLER } '. 1 I Y�� tit I T £ � 3i� f£�EiSt f} t - J I r iiif'r i hks 11 £ i£;,kt t i{Jtt{ I ALLGENOE� pf �} Itly'" ti i>liaSOFFIT ABOVE dA1L 6ER6E I ._1 OSCT ' RE9TRO.. � 5-2 tffi5� I� 1' 21I 8-2" 30'-7" 7i42�9" L2 2 8 & REAI(R..OFi DINING REFR CA<•E --OFFICE ROOEt if IJ �jl L! 17 it. ftt allz... i -- -- o.. l 1 II tt t{ t p{~L i tyit t r� II II❑ v 36'-7" 10'-0" 48'4' 39'-4" 32'-8" 37A" 13' 6" 217'-0" j"tt } Will ,, � IL ' ' FLOOR PLAN - GROCERY I iit"I'm U111' IL4 I �q vo, ---- ------ -- V-5 IT . .. . ... ... I CO El J'u - - - - - - - - - - � - - - - - -- I lit- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - L r- 3- I - - - - - - L- - - - - - - - IfL- E TYP. BUILDING'A'- ROOF PLAN - GROCERY COLORSCHEME1 STONE VENEER BUILDING'A' ELEVATION GROCERY I BSB D E S I G N D C S I G BUILDING 'A' ELEVATIONS- GROCERY s PERSPECTIVE . C?LRSC EME1 STUCCO � N .. ROOF \\//� y \\ . . \[{±2\ . } BSB . } 2\ Gam} � \\ \ \ ƒ ( \� ,) BSB COLOR C METAL ROOF i I in BSB D E S VIEW - 3 VIEW - 4 IL ` ' RM BSB DESIGN rem no CrUCRAC " mo t �tv BUILDING ' ' ELEVATIONS - CS GAS 2 VIEW - 3 VIEW - 4 BUILDING'D' ELEVATION - CS GAS A4.03 L#L#fSC2ESC} STONE VENEER BOARD k BATT . ._e .. �� .|�¥.■: � <y K7777a M� FRONT ELEVATION , VIEW = 3 VIEW - 4 r �` VIEW - 4 COLOR STONE VENEER BUILDING'G' ELEVATION - STORAGE LAP SIDING LAP SIDING SCHEMES} BOARD & BATT 2:��.!■■ -.■:: ©�-©:.■©■ y-GROVE\ BOARD $ BATT 00� PYRAMID FLAGSTONE POST CAPC- ASPEN VISUAL BARRIER DETAIL OPTION 2 769- SPLIT FACE STANDARD - LIGHT / NOR- MAL WEIGHT 375- SPLIT FACE STANDARD - LIGHT / MEDI- UM WEIGHT VISUAL BARRIER PILASTER DETAIL - OPTION 2 FLAGSTON WALL CAP ASPEN CMU WALL DETAIL - 2 A8.02 VISUAL BARRIER WALL AND CMU WALL DETAILS NOTE PROD AEOL TRAS TO 11 DRAY (2H'X6'X3/16' STEELTUBE BEAMS CONNECTION PER STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS "ICHOLS PERFORATED METALPANEL -'STYLE. NAME" 8'.BASALR'E SPLIT FACE :37S STANDARD LIGHTfMEDIUM WEIGHT OR APPROVEDEGUAL:. SEE APPROVED PITCH TOWARDS GATE, SEE PLAN I THIS SHEET ROLL ON TRASH ENCLOSURES 3 CU VD 4Ff.X 6 FT 91N 6'.W CONC. CURB 4 8c.ROCKFACE CMU DOORS ANCHORED TO 4' DVG POST:: PROVIDE STEEL LATCH W/ PAD LOCK; BALL BEARING HINGES & CANE. BOLT WITH HOLES AT CLOSED B OPEN POSITIONS 4': MIN. THICK CONCRETE APRON FRONT ELEVATION 1 TRASH. ENCLOSURE PLAN SCALE: 3/6 =1'. SCALE: WEI IX M I STONE VENEER STUCCO PERSPECTIVE MONUMENT SIGNAGE AT CS GAS ALONG HARTNELL AVE. STUCCO FRONT Ej OF S k/ QVJVE SIDE FRONT PERSPECTIVE - V I E W - 3 MONUMENT SIGNAGE AT ENTRY ALONG SHASTA VIEW DRIVE ti tt {#t�jt'tttl3t t4tt t i t ttjt�#tt��ttw e `��tsflJ�€1x! ttz r ss tis )ti'. }tit st t''1rl s:.. s}si7is}t{tts ljttitif�{ s t ttsf sftE $t ifrstt,cs {ts tt1; �+s> tt}} i 7 z t3'(d}77sft,tr.�,>, rjr£ttt rJ�} } { trsst sr f ; 7 ft t' i�T �1 S��, t1 2 tz� j4 ztttt rt� tir #t t r YOU t t7att'tttJ�t {its"� i i�t�i��s� 4 t tt}fir sts{4 tf{�t,itj t4r� s2� Jz}y ist t t}t+st }r t t t1 zt i� rlttf k i} is } t { { s ttt .. �; tt tJ i?�jt�tttts t}t a}�tS t- iri - t«f'Ptr{tn tJ�t t tt# ttktstr ityJYt}7tt tp } � �tf iy t st t, t tti 7 } tJztstttzy �k`�' I it { r 4t�t r # i�lrlsJ} { ztt ztt�ytttk?, xsrRt{l tt' sf #t sits�rt�t �t�st�,�}�ttlsst�''� tttrt`it�s��frt`�'� IM i — .. �, j t a s , {�yi it }.�J } tf� f �i tlyt �( y •. _ .. �. _ _ -�_. £ £ 3 t Y T -4 Allf �wrrr Wrrw� rrr Yrrww� rr�r �r� R 1 F.rr�� rwn I rrrw� t}zfs If (Ian Il £ r{i£ ££ jt{�i{ts �F£Ji:r F 1 rF ('vr£k it,jj ateSHT'LL46 = 11 } t l I 1 77 a 7, t t f� tjlf 4 14 �i` ; � t 1i jail yAtj 1 1 f t j£t j t 4 j`i fjj tn1,l tttj i$ tr tt s„+y„a lilyil�SRI L 3 si t ss tt J6Yti£ saj i£ £tt t t=----- _j L N TT- ...� ..... .... .�.� _j SCALE: I, = 40'_Cn CENTIRE a s s o c i a t e s green design -landscape design emiranmental consulting mwM1 .mcentlreassocIates.cm 4475 Tenaya CL Redding, CA 96003 P 530-245-4590 F 530-245-4593 www.mcentirelandscaping.com C-27 U0 361638 PROJECT NAME: DESIGN/BUILD FOR HOLIDAY MARKET PLACE HARTNELL AVE at SHASTA VIEW DR, REDDING, CALIFORNIA SHEET NAME:MR LANDSAUMPE SHEET LAYOan UT PROJECT PHASE: DESIGN SUBMITTAL WORKING DRAWING REVISIONS: DESCRIPTION DATE DRAWN BY: JCC APPROVED BY: JLM DATE ISSUED: 2020111115 SCALE: AS -NOTED SHEET NUMBER: Plant Legend BOTANICAL —COMMON [Water Use] SIZE QTY 1 Acerrubrum'Red Sunsel'- 15 GAL 26 Red Sunset Maple [MOD] 2 PI tacla chinensis'Kelth Davey- Keith Davey Chinese Plslache [LOW] 15 GAL 41 3 Acermbrum'Bowhalr- 15 GAL 43 Bowhall Scarlet Maple [MOD] 4 Prunus cerasifera'Krautor Vesuvius'- 15 GAL 19 1 Kreuter Vesuvius Purple Leaf Flowering Plum [MOD] �� 5 I Lagerstroemia x'Natchez'- 15 GAL 24 Natchez (While) Crape Myrtle [LOW] 6 6 Abella x Grandiflova'Sherwoodg' -' Sherwood Glossy Abega[MOD] BGAL 35 7 ( Ilex comuta 'Dazzlee - 5 GAL 82 Dazzler Chinese Holly [MOD] 4",J 8 Rhaphialepis lndica'Enchantress'- Enchantress Pink India Hawthorn [MOD) 5 GAL 27 9 9 — Berbads Thunbergil Rose Glow'- Rose Japanese Barberry 5 GAL 108 ( Glow [MOD] 10 10 Vibumum finus'Compacta'- 5 GAL 43 Compact Laumstinus (MOD) F"t9g �11C 11 — Loropeta/um chinense'Razzleberry- 5GAL 34 .get. Razz{ebeny Lorapetalum [MOD]. - tz 1 12 Lavandula Auguslifolia'Hldcote Giant'- Hldcote Giant English Lavender — 5 GAL 110 ( [LOW] 13 13 Rosa 'Flowering Carpet Rose'- 2 GAL 95 Flowering Carpet Rose (Reds and Whites) [MODI Phormium lenax'Bronze Baby - 't 14 �15 Bronze Baby New Zealand Flax [LOW) 5 GAL 20 t5 Parovskla atriplicifolia Blue Spire'- Spire 1 GAL 73 I Blue Russian Sage [LOW) i - ---- Deer Grass I Muh/enbergia rigens - 1.GAL 64 [LOW] 17 Ca/amagrostis x aculiflom'Karl Foerster - 1 GAL 14 — Feather Reed Grass [LOW] 181 I Pennisetum orientale'Kariey Rose'- 1 GAL 50 Kadey Rose Fountain Grass [LOW] t9I Bouteloua grac/lis'Blonde Ambition' - 1 GAL 140 Blonde Ambition Grama Grass [LOW] 20 Pennisetum alopecuroides'Lgtle Bunny- 1GAL 98 Little Bunny Fountain Grass [LOW] �— ----,apan!hus -- -�-��_ 21 hybdd'Queen Anne'-- F{9 GAL 122 Queen Anne U lyof-the-Nile (MOD) aWe 22 Cotoneaster dammeri'Lowfast'- 1 GAL 104 o Lowfast Cotoneaster [LOW] 23 Dietes Iriefloides - 1 GAL 148 Fortnight Lily [LOW] r 0- ' 24 ----- Pitfosporum tobim'Wheeler's Dwarf - 1 GAL 21 Wheeler's Dwarf Tobira [MOD] z5 125 Pymcantha coccinea'Lowboy- 1GAL 62 Lowboy Flrethom [LOW] 26 Hemerocalfis hybrfd'Stala do Oro- 1 GAL 26 Stage de Oro Yellow Daylgy [MOD] !i 27 Rosemadnus officinalis'Huntington Carpef - 1 GAL 138 . Huntington Carpet Rosemary [LOW] 0• 2e 28 Ceanothusgriseushonzontafis- 1 GAL 135 Carmel Creeper [LOW] a 29 29 Juniperus sabins'Broadmoor 1GAL 168 Broadmoor Jun[per[LOW) �� ArctosfapRadi ut 1 GAL X. Boari erry [LOW] Radiant t3oarberry [LOW] 660 SF Annual 4" POTS @12"OC f Juncuspalons'ElkBlue'- 1 GAL 193 (386 LF Elk Blue California Gray Rush [LOW) @24° OC) 1. Symbols reflect approximate plant size with 5 years growth. 2. Quantities shown are approximate. Verify quantilles In the field to accommodate actual site conditions and dimenslons, and to preserve plan spacing and layout. 3. An planters shall be mulched to a minimum depth of 3" with: A) 1/4" itne bark mulch to Annual Color areas; B) Waikon fir bark or rack (as noted) in remaining planter areas. 4. All construction shag conform to the'Standards for Public Works Construction' (Green Book), Slate and Local Ordinances, and Local jurisdictlon Construction Standards. 5. In accordance with Chapter 18.47.020 of the Redding Municipal Code,. the Contractor reserves the right to make alterations to the Approved Plans as necessary to address existing conditions, unforeseen site changes due to construction activities, and/or. plant nursery stock avagabpty, without plot City approval or re -submittal, so long as said changes do not affect the character or quantity of the plant material or the Inigatbn system design t I� (i rf fit St 6. AD dirnenslons, grades, and utility locations , of ponstruotion: i } i-{ iilit t+tirr)iii(rr�t 7. Ali planting areas shag be loosened top 'p '¢t`' i,�'` `s1te eo sir 'i� � s needed to provide moisture retention if lopso,jp"fTItag be dean, friable loti`tY)rt ,,Y"at( of approximately 6.5-7.0. t) rii } rt Y7 t istri it t r}� AA 8. Ail planters shall have a mug hf� '4i'elrnv the top of cacti,. tl i ii#,' 54 rj i?i 4i 9. A fully automatic krlgat4on �, be Installed. All valves shag be below gretle valve box.. ;ti>, MII,RN�01 10. This plan is for the sole num Associates and Is not Intended to be used purpose. Copyright by �A&soctates. AN rights reserved, No part of this plan ma "41 t t, i reproduced out ex��en pemdsslon from McEntb'e Associates. To be returt'!`i"+}` used, rr�) rr j t�rrfi'i r 11. The Contractor has sate Si to limit and/or hag work to be performed during times of unsuttabla conditions'to pth to prevent voiding the long-term Warranty/Guamnteeror produce situations where I ; 4,lrnt the Project or Agency are necessary. Said conditons may Include, but not be ted folic 11tp temperature conditions, hot or acid; eHmatk conditions such as high winds or rain: wet or tY(1 conditons; and work or Installation conflicts with other contractor/sub-contractors on ��ir Ch the conditions Iisted "A" through 'Incomplete or un-flnlshed I ndscap i 12. Landscape maintenance and estabi hmant PROJECT REVIEW BY DIVISION RECEIVED APPR( PLANNING PARKS WATER REU-ELECTRIC 1. THIS IS A NEW CONSTRUCTION PROJI 2. TOTAL LANDSCAPE SQUARE FOOTAG OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS McENTIRE ASSOCIATES, INC. WILL NOT BE REST UNAUTHORIZED USE OF, OR CHANGES AND/OR ANY AND ALL CHANGES TO THESE PLANS MUS' APPROVED BY McENTIRE ASSOCIATES; INC. TH AND iDEAS.SET FORTH HEREIN AS AN INSTRUN IS THE PROPERTY OF McENTIRE ASSOCIATES A IN PART FOR ANY OTHER PROJECT, WITHOUT T AUTHORIZATION OF McENTIRE ASSOCIATES. © COPYRIGHT. 2020. ALL RIGH CRIME PREVENTION THROUGH ENVIRONMENTF THIS PLAN HAS BEEN DESIGNED UTILIZING THE DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS OF "CPTED", CRIME ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN. a s s o c I a 1 e s green deSW • landscape deskJn environmental convuliing tW✓w.meentlreassociates.eom 4475 Tenaya Ct. Redding, CA 96003 P 530-245.4590 F 530-245-4593 www. meentimiandsm plrig.corn C-27 Llc# 361638 PROJECT NAME: DESIGN/BUILD FOR HOLIDAY MARKET PLACE HARTNELL AVE at SHASTA VIEW DR, REDDiNG, CALIFORNIA SHEET NAME: LANDSCAPE PLAN PROJECT PHASE: p� DESIGN SUBMITTAL WORKING DRAWING REVISIONS: DESCRIPTION DATE DRAWN BY: JIM APPROVED BY: JLM DATE ISSUED: 2020/11/15 SCALE: AS -NOTED SHEET NUMBER: 1 t 1 F 1 r 1 1 1 1 1 , 1 1 1 C I i 1 I t I I 1 i I 1 I r r I I r I F I 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 r I I I ( I I I I I I I f i i I I 1 N I 1 1 , I 0 10' zo' 40' 1 1 9GALE: I" = 20'-0" 1 NOTE: FOR LEGEND & 11 CONSTRUCTION NOTES, 11 SEE SHEET L-1 i 1 210 5F OF ANNUAL GOLOR 0 tl G. V °1 � a i Rw PAD E .� , i "' ' �.�% � �.n. ° o a : � ;,c=o"a � °-�'�®® ..�. �.Fl�:tk.®®®ix ��,.rt;: R. 'r-.n:_ ®m®rt;.r; st tt:.,•: rtz 1151101111111 ��` ��,_ ��►,►��, gym; ",- 4Y 0 1 }� n rA �1 I�wlq O �° 0 r n*� �' E • :s 6tpio — D Jar,I CENTIRE a s s o c i a t e s greon 0+lantls�apa tleslAn envlrgnmvilal consulting www.mcenthassociates.c°m 4475 Teneys Ct. Redding, CA 96003 P 630-245.4590 F 530-245.4593 www.mcentrelarvdscaping.com C-27 Lc# 3616W PROJECT NAME: DESIGN/BUILD FOR HOLIDAY MARKET PLACE HARTNELL AVE at SHASTA VIEW DR, REDDING, CALIFORNIA SHEET NAME: LANDSCAPE PLAN PROJECT PHASE: DESIGN SUBMITTAL WORKING DRAWING REVISIONS: DESCRIPTION DATE DRAWN BY: JCC APPROVED BY: JLM DATE ISSUED: 2020/11/15 SCALE: 1'm20'-0" SHEET NUMBER: N a lo' 20' 40 SCALE: I" = 20'-0" NOTE: FOR LEGEND & CONSTRUCTION NOTES, SEE SHEET L-1 { { 1 1 1 1 1 1 \ \ 1 1 I 1 i 1 \ 4 1 C \ j t v „t PAD"srt r t t 1 7 rtt' R E Ttyylt.; i}tir 13 7u{� o 7 � C \ It f t �� \ E.Y � 0 VOa ze k Jul�rs \ � 0��;o, J 4, 4. tlN t' tttr t }{ttl} .,1 rri 44} f v '. .22 �A C\ \ E \ \ \ c C \ c tAu�scar CENTIRE a s s o c i a t e s green desW. lords ps daign emkonme wc."utam www.mcentlreassoclates.com 4475 Teneys Ct Redding, CA 96D03 P 530-2454590 F 530,2454593 www,mcenUrdandscaping.com C-27 Lc# 361638 PROJECT NAME: DESIGNBUILD FOR HOLIDAY MARKET PLACE HARTNELL AVE at SHASTA VIEW DR, BEDDING, CALIFORNIA SHEET NAME: LANDSCAPE PLAN PROJECT PHASE: DESIGN SUBMITTAL WORKING DRAWING REVISIONS: DESCRIPTION DATE DRAWN BY: JCC APPROVED BY: JLM DATE ISSUED: 2020111115 SCALE: 1"-20'-W SHEET NUMBER: 1 I HARTNELL AVE 1 I oUDPOon _ » _,m° _p000po DP o DOPDo O°9P a. DO o4 p➢DO p0➢P _.. e9➢ oOUPo °PPO .. ° °�Dbp°70➢boo. Ovo- 29 w '-__ • o � � o� ao 'o � a o ao c n 2B o 48- � m 29 29 0� v 2B e - ve➢D29 �....� � ° 29 "p029 �'v�p� ...no29 0 _ i. ,vP pDDo a vi°aDDp D D8w> Pgbneov ° °°evgD ovPo P➢ao v ° vaD ° vD Dve°°vvD ➢ D D➢ ° P Dv °a ° °aao °vim ab ° vv � � dv vu vvDo D -ed D - — — — _' — — — — — — — — _ � .. m � a o o ° za zB ze ze za 2 "o o➢o vvD � za ze 2e ze za ° � °° ° zs 4 g tV _ a 2e za a „_� ze zB 2B v 1� ze a m o ze ° zB 2e°� ®2B za o 2a ° 2B °p _ , \ ° o® ®= o a° o n a= va a o o> =o ze d ° 6 8 i.1 OP 0� °p➢DOD 0 0 ° °00 06�°. °0 Da° °OP 21 26 8 28 2B aD80� ° DP40 0 0 °aD OD fl\� °O 0� °OD a 28 28 D 2B ADC➢0 oODCOL OP ° °00000 op a •• W_.W ., 9 8 10 10 7 r,g 1wE ag 11? �, 7 7 10 10 N tii y�1 %N 10 0 6 e -_ e, I. Lu _ w I ,. 0 T A P R, 10 0 6 8 ,,„, 10 . , 0 8 i � I PAD F I I — — — RE,AI L. - 1 T i it ti`t i � i I � E X I S T I. N' G. 2 A R. t Est �ttt t t#'t r /t; - / P A D E 1 ,2 zz ... 4' {�}t £ t lr{ w. s I Itk t t2 2"SA1y i - � ;. R A H 27 a 27 _ J ti SHEET L-6 I 1 ._�.. _ I >< sl Y L.E.. S 11:.§ It }2 I I rz 12 O F F I C E r — 2 27 SHEET L"4 2 1 !i'.. .� y sI tl I J r} ENTRY EXIT DRIVE 7. ._ ,� x'. .i: _...x ,d.'. WI— _i'_ ._._t.,,;t It t rt'.. t.'1 it Srst_ _......... _..___ W 1 I DEC.OftAtlVtr MA501L4RY WALL LIN E F t � 18 16 19 15 16 15 18 15 1b 3� 18 16 18 �:'�'i��, r tv _ �l}I �SJt ui Lu y 2 15 SHEET _ 12 1 �SHEET.L-5 u I3 I 1 2 27 27 1 1 1 `f 1_j � Iw f t ( } f tk b tti. t/ t t�t} t 1 1?t It tltt4 (. 1J3F i _ L[J �2 ,4 4k ftt {ti }J t n}'£ i.?,St�t 3J y 1 F (1 1 i k Sr t.tl k�£ i tt t I t 7 S f 5 tt ft. - #{{,.2{}„ 1t 3 �<'{'..,� r U ttt, tt;t„„r�✓ ",. 1�{SI £ U- t 1 £ti rt{ 14t{j i _ LU t _ 7tS ti 14£. Jt e[ }ti 1 tf rtr;tt�(tt� }^{ ty{t t# fit t Lt}lJ�t h i t Sk {tc tt t� /irt di7l� _ Vl lr4�E'2t 1 l 1 1 ...I 1 J W_ -ui ui x1 Lu 1= GENTIRE aSSoCIates green desIgn • landscape design environmenlal con Oft www.mcentireassodatee.com 4475 Tenays CI. Redding, CA 96003 P 530.2454590 F 530-245.4593 www.mcenlrebndscaping.com C-27 LIC# 361638 PROJECT NAME: DESIGN/BUILD FOR HOLIDAY MARKET PLACE HARTNELL AVE at SHASTA VIEW DR, BEDDING, CALIFORNIA SHEET NAME: LANDSCAPE PLAN PROJECT PHASE: DESIGN SUBMITTAL WORKING DRAWING REVISIONS: DESCRIPTION DATE DRAWN BY: JCC APPROVED BY: AM DATE ISSUED: 2020/11/15 SCALE: 1'-10'-0" SHEET NUMBER: I _ SHEET _ _r -r_-...rro r......_rr_.. 15 ri � i � i r a. r r. i. r r i2 I SHEETL-5 YI 27 L - 1 27 27 4 f - 1 t7 itt'dy;��t t,t !fj7 I i� 22 // I,.VQ �. T 9 22 22' -H ts17tjy�st{iji 'situ{lxl }t 1 (LLi kti tuft tt`ft{i ''tlt4s it aftft F— e rYIto 1z12I PAD A stI at `c, t+, St{67sf i. 25 r MARKET u _ II Y{;P _ 3�2 _ o fa tfstk�jzst {{rat{ is t r tS is �{itt _ � 9 � 22� V). •t ft ( t ^t st i s ts� t I. 9 �� ts�t{ytlts 7tt,t �`tt ti i{tt 1`vF z i iti kj tt is ;tlti ��°g� _159t. s k t tl{ rttrs } t {1 9 na 9 ots{z t }} t 25 z - si4 Ld G r is :5 12....9 12 12 i i : i « 9 22 5 , 8 3 8 B 6 n 71 t Iti t t t s i j 9 22' �t s { tf i 3 s I 1 1 a 1 I I� - 16 I f E 99 D RI V E W A Y I ( LRIVEW4Y w-� - T T_ T T T T _ �_ - -- --- --- -- — - — -- -- ---- ---- -- -- --- -- -- -- — — — — — — — — — - — — — — — — �,fi� 0 10' 1d 40' •--------------------------------� — — — — — — — — — — — — — � I I NOTE: FOR LEGEND 8. L CONSTRUCTION—_-----�-- SEE SHEET L-1 _ _MATC THIS I- N Q 2 O W .l LIMITS OF LAND50APE IlMcENTIRE a s s o c I a t e S en Bred-Wm-land-A. dealgn enviro—ital mnsu*v www.mcenereassociates.com 4475 Teneye CL Redding, CA 96D03 P 530-245.4590 F 530-245.4593 www.mcanOrelandsca*g.com C•27 Uc# 361638 PROJECT NAME DESIGNIBUILD FOR HOLIDAY MARKET PLACE HARTNELL AVE at SHASTA VIEW DR, REDDING, CALIFORNIA SHEET NAME LANDSCAPE PLAN PROJECT PHASE: DESIGN SUBMITTAL WORKING DRAWING REVISIONS: DESCRIPTION DATE DRAWN BY: JCC APPROVED BY: JLM DATE ISSUED: 2020/11/15 SCALE: 1'-20'-0" SHEET NUMBER: — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1 HARTNELL AVE ' w e ng IDEW ALK ' __ b'1 9 � I e 0a0o oOODaoa00oP g 9 oxem eo290 ao aVo°�o6� — i-1------------- --.. 9 na o °aa �22 9 Vi 12 a i r °i f ttl 822 EX , S T i ,..r Z s � _ �.. 6 A R � G • 1222 n L t {f rt 1 tY t 15 25 M ATCHLINE_ — THIS SHEET SHEET L-6-- - F 9 22 22 9 22 �L E A S I N G ( t2 t2 ti i t 0 F F IOE r t t r 1 i }a ii isitl i i 1$ }t t7 y {�f}i�� flit tiY ijt l}3 i I{ ti 4i t �.Fi i'�f} _ fit{lt t�t i. i { 1t}t '( jii 9 2x'ag - ® r) ti.t;l{Y t(ltli 713i Sti ii t t"' t ii. } i <.tib i{f it jt}I„r Ltf i1 SHEET L1�uj i `: i J 21GF to> lY ii 26 ENTRY / EXIT DRIVE` _ ij t ti ff ..i# i 1 �v vuLL or+ PROPERrT uNe )it ij.. _ a y t t.........t I ea r,I t3 1 S l 1 I iii i s.y 5tJ j Jti tj fit` i 7 r {} ti t} - 9 na ttl L'J - h ii t ;�t�i kkyt yitftt4 t i {F t. i3ti jyr }i ill;;. � itci t t i� ti Sit 4� I. .8' tfly is $t4f;t it}3y (tt t.. '�. 1 it fit r}ii }l lE g 22 / L,J 9 i� 1 Srtiit Y1I. F- ° ° i,l it t t 1, g _ k� S y l Y s i t ftii 8 22"4 a tilyi}}tt:dts, { sijyl I s} tsitl;i6 i f "22Y °1 L. .1st e t} H =n I hyt{ 71 ttiti t tJ71 i / �. -° g L S �t}ty C Ctrs' a i s •$i t$ktiy e} e22 t tt s r ii t !t£ii -. L4 tit{ 8;�' 4yryx t{ I yt ) .. � I z22 v I i�"� i littiittt}dl`} ti jy S'u ttl it#sctl 22 _ LJPi)22 0�< 1 ti tit,i ittt t I. I. {i i 8 ii y i 9 a n 9 0,11 �- IC Aaea i t 7 4 tJ . c 4, n ;' _ ffi y FIRE ACC-55. OR, MATCHLINE. t tr=ti#,'i., I Z THIS SHEET 777777-7 s ` I. 2s xx S W - 22 ,°,ZI - l� — — — — ° J 9 n a I 13 ° N LIMITS OF ( LANOSGAPE . u �v r, " n ,° Ir 2N2�t?'I I--_---_-_-----i_--__--_�/ w I- I SCALE: P- 20'-O° W 22.a, J Lu NOTE: FOR LEGEND & I CONSTRUCTION NOTES, - I ' I—T---------------------------r---------- SEE SHEET L-1 CENTIRE a s s o c i a t e s green design - Iandstape design envirO tal -aft www.mcenllreassoclates.00m 4475 Tenaye Ct Redding, CA 96003 P 530-245.4590 E 530.245�4593 www.meandrelandscaping.com C-27 Uc# 361638 PROJECT NAME: DESIGN/BUILD FOR HOLIDAY MARKET PLACE HARTNELL AVE at SHASTA VIEW DR, REDDING, CALIFORNIA SHEET NAME: LANDSCAPE PLAN PROJECT PHASE: DESIGN SUBMITTAL WORKING DRAWING REVISIONS: DESCRIPTION DATE DRAWN BY: JCC APPROVED BY: AM DATE ISSUED: 2020111115 SCALE: 1"=20'-V' SHEET NUMBER: REPORT TO REDDING PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: June 8, 2021 FROM: Sean Price, Assistant Planner ITEM NO. 4(b)1 ***APPROVED BY*** Price, Assistaax ;{ r=, ('f}4 rff 6/4/2021 g , gager 6/4/2021 sprice@cityofredclYt rrg Itoy@ei.redding.ca.us SUBJECT: �)1--Use Permit A,cation UP-2020-01669lParcel Map Application PM- 2021-00290/��eral Plan Amendme��pplication GPA-2020-01667/Rezoning Application RZ- 2020-01668,�Jt TJG/Summit Development Corporation, requesting approval to allow the construction ofj Hartnell Commercial Complex consisting of a 30,000-square-foot Holiday Market Grocery �a ,and �J outer p retail, a drive -through restaurant, a coffee drive - through, and an aulo�t �, olmgy��bn ��:� convenience store on property located at 2469 and 2525 Hartnell Avenue, 3055}1 App Way in a "SC" Shopping Center District and a 38,400-square-foot mini-stor 0- cility on pr" y located at 3050 Leonard Street currently in a "SC" Shopping Center Di'�ct. The rezon a request to change the current zoned "SC" Shopping Center on the prop'�ed 2 8 aI3�r3self stao facility parcel to "HC" Heavy Commercial. The General Plan ctlnn�;'questa ��I ale rezone request to amend the existing General Plan desi nation oh'`' in to "I��.; Commercial." t jYy t{t yf t =4 fi; Recommendation }� Conduct a public hearing and, upon conclusion forward a recon�rldatlon tc council to: (1) Adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration under the California ��ironm�l�ality Act; (2) Determine that the necessary findings for approval are inevide�T�� pprove Use Permit Application UP-2020-01669, Parcel Map Appltion �P�'1-00290, General Plan Amendment GPA-2020-01667, and Rezone applicat��,020-01668, subject to the draft conditions. Project Description The applicant is requesting approval of a use permit, parcel map, general plan amendment, and rezoning for the development of a shopping center and mini -storage facility on 12.13 acres of land located at the southeast corner of Hartnell Avenue and Shasta View Drive. PARCEL SIZE. 12.13 acres. TERRAIN/VEGETATION. The property is currently vacant and is populated with blue and Interior live oak trees, annual grasses with scattered shrubs. The project site slopes gently from north to Report to Redding Planning Commission June 4, 2021 Re: 4(b)1--Use Permit Application UP-2020-01669, TJG/Summit Development Corp (Hartnell Com Complex) Page 2 south. An intermittent stream flows in a southwest direction beginning approximately at the midpoint of the property on Hartnell Avenue exiting the property at the southwest corner of the property. An emergent wetland exists along the intermittent stream just west of the center of the project site. An ephemeral swale parallels Shasta View Drive along Appian Way which joins with the intermittent stream at the southwest quadrant of the project site. A small isolated pond also exists within the southwest quadrant of the project site. EXISTING LAND USE. The property is currently vacant. GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION. "Shopping Center". ZONING DESIGNATION "SC'',.,,ShoDDin2 Center. SURROUNDING North: Heavytftrimercial r j� East: Heavyt �zmmercial and Resic�tal Multi -Family South: Resid' al Multi -Family andtf trsidential Single -Family West: Gener mmercial and Residential Single -Family Background The project site encompasses J developed with a retail com undeveloped and has sparse c( scattered native shrubs. Comm( project is bordered by single commercial and multiple family. parcels of `proximately 12.13 acres and was previously located at,`;J ;'e northwest corner. The site is currently ;e of Blue, F Inter:r Live Oak trees, annual grasses and 42 Use�Ft�{cater ``�t forth and west. To the south the Rpm{ farrly ;die{s.t`st of the project is a mix of �... The proposed shopping center consists o;�,"00-square-f and five outer pads for retail, a dra�Yfoz 'restaura$' automobile fueling station with a con cc allow a mini -storage facility on 2.8 acres of land.X�pareel delineate each of the retail spaces and the proposed mini-stc respective parcel, taking the total parcels from five to seven. the current zoned "SC" Shopping Center on the propod 2 $ a "HC" Heavy Commercial. The general plan amends% p ;, amend the existing general plan designation of "Shopping's ntl Issues Yllohd� Market Grocery Store, r eof drive -through, and an Alfflincludes the request to m'{'belated to t11e project will 7 ajvareho,�';,��ility on their �,e�t4j�{$t'3request to change {��t storage facility parcel to s��`eflects the rezone request to r" to "Heavy Commercial." GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY. It is staff s opinion that the project shopping center embodies the very land uses that are envisioned by the property's zoning and General Plan designations and that the surrounding area is currently underserved by the types of goods and services that will be provided by the proposed shopping center. The Community Development and Design Element of the General Plan defines the Shopping Center designation as being applicable to sites for shopping centers serving a larger market area than a neighborhood center, but a smaller market area than a regional center, typically including two or more anchor tenants, such as a supermarket and combined drug/variety/garden business, tenants offering consumer goods and Report to Redding Planning Commission June 4, 2021 Re: 4(b)1--Use Permit Application UP-2020-01669, TJG/Summit Development Corp (Hartnell Com Complex) Page 3 personal services, and office and clinic uses. Sites designated Shopping Center generally range from 5 to 20 acres and accommodate 50,000 to 200,000 square feet of building area. The project is consistent with the General Plan definitions of allowable land uses. The project provides a transition to the residential uses nearby through the use of appropriate setbacks, landscape buffers, and solid masonry walls with pedestrian access points enhancing compatibility between the residential and commercial land uses (Policy CDD9D). The proposed mini -storage facility on the east side of the project site requires an amendment to the General Plan and Rezone for consistency. The site is currently zoned "SC" Shopping Center with a General Plan classification of"Shopping Center." These current designations do not allow for mini -storage facilities. The project requires a general plan amendment to "Heavy Commercial" and a rezonzn to "HU Heavy Commercial, to allow for the development of the mini -storage facility, t��1�1�`t? the approval of the general plan amendment and rezoning applications, then,' 14etion of tit {'�oposed storage facility would be permissible with a Site Development P f The zoning trams ons to multiple family to the east across Leonard Street sr and single fardT to the south, howe�� as aself-storage facility, very little traffic or noise is associated w ' these ensues. The � � office and gate for the facility is located along the Leonard Str , EIIP rontage at the nortvest corner of the facility. A detention basis and an emergency act , _i easement is proposed along the south property line which will buffer the single family aipltlple famiily districts from the proposed shopping center and self -storage i# i' j t 4 �� tit "buffer" facility. In the opttp ��,{{artll�t��' �e storage facility provides a suitable buffer between the a single-family residences located east of they development. SITE DEsGN. The project site i, cated on l Hartnell Avenue and Shasta Vi, ft �rrly, design and building elevations and"h�r$41 the City's General Plan, Zoning Ordinance would be consistent in height with buildings Other project features include, but n enclosures, monument signs, building hat is 1�g111y visible as viewed primarily along ity't�ng Division has reviewed the site dr{'�4p'rd�'� } , design is in conformance with. ,,�ommercial �3�`sign Guidelines. The project developed aent commercial properties. e features, solid waste and walkway lighting. TRAFFIC. A traffic study for the area was prepared by GHn The{ sty;`xdentified two intersections with existing less than ideal level of service, Sly V�,? t ''°tve at Goodwater Avenue and Alta Mesa Drive at Hartnell Avenue The project ��,�' off --site improvements to Shasta View Drive including restriping Shasta{x�� '' _e from Hartnell Avenue to Goodwater Avenue, as well as construction of sidewalk alcing the east side of Shasta View Drive from Hartnell Avenue to approximately 573 feet north of Kerry Avenue. Furthermore, the applicant will also be obligated to contributing their fair share of the cost of design and construction for signalized intersections at both the Shasta View Drive at Goodwater Avenue and Alta Mesa Drive at Hartnell intersections. Therefore, incorporating the off -site improvements and fair share costs as a mitigation, no impacts associated with traffic volumes are anticipated. These mitigations are reflected as conditions of approval, attached. The project would not conflict with any program, plan, ordinance, or policy addressing the circulation system and the project will not conflict with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3(b). In regards to project frontage improvements, the project will be required to construct frontage improvements including sidewalk along Shasta View Drive and Hartnell Avenue. Frontage Report to Redding Planning Commission June 4, 2021 Re: 4(b)1--Use Permit Application UP-2020-01669, TJG/Summit Development Corp (Hartnell Com Complex) Page 4 improvements along Leonard Street will also be required. The project would not significantly increase any hazards due to design but would enhance the circulation system with completion of sidewalks along both streets. BIOLOGICAL.. A Biological Review Report was prepared for the project by Wildland Resource Managers (WRM), to assess the impacts of the proposed project on biological resources in the project area and vicinity. In addition to research, database review, and species list reviews, a habitat assessment and biological reconnaissance survey was conducted. Upon numerous inspections of the project area few wildlife species were observed and no listed species of flora or fauna were found. As a result of the delineation of Waters of the U.S., a small jurisdictional water of approximately 0.4 acres in size was located. The report identified the loss of jurisdictional waters and potential habitat loss for migratory birds, bats and any other potential species of concern t ��{��gasures contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration t include: • Prior by discharge of or fill material into "waters of the U.S." including wetla�' authorization under �f�ationwide Permit or Individual Permit shall be obtained from t��f,Corps. For any featui"s determined to not be subject to the Corps jurisdiction durin verification process, authorization to discharge (or a waiver from regulation) shall ed fropa the RWQCJ itY • Allowing trosr�� only�t i i, e nesting seasons for migratory birds and bats, unless their absence is confirmed by a q-Ified biologist. • Purchase wetland credit',f 0.15 acres o`'�etland features at an approved wetland bank. x K tr} � f3 5 tir t{E #�, These mitigations are reflected t�t�e attached edition approval. }1 � zi°t{i;it 7; i �� its r 4r rtst i ,t [`t �i. tti it rs, � �t LIGHTING. There would not be an adorsfect o� or mIne views in the area. Shielding of lighting as required by City Ordinance ixnize pact to a level of less than t s r�' k' t i ii significant. The following standard condrt�;11 be apphc and therefore any potential impact will be less than significant. Construction activities for the project WM be limiturs (i.e.,-6:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. on weekdays from May 15 through September 15, 00 p ru on weekdays from September 16 through May 14, and from 9:00 a.m. to 8 w�N'and holidays in accordance with RMC Section 18.40.100). The proposed pro�w��dt°require nighttime lighting for construction activities. Thus, no impact wq;d occn,,'flfiegard. BUILDING DESIGN. The project site is located on land that`="is highly visible as viewed primarily along Hartnell Avenue and Shasta View Drive. The six commercial buildings are proposed to be architecturally compatible which includes a mixture of materials including, metal roofing material, stucco, stone veneer, lap siding, wood plank siding, board and bait, grove siding, and glazing. The buildings and associated facades will have varying heights, awnings, canopies, cornices, pitched roofs, trellises, and other decorative fixtures to provide articulation to the building elevations which, along with varying natural earth tone colors and patterns, provide variation in the appearance of the buildings. TREE PRESERVATION. The City has adopted- a Tree Management Ordinance (Chapter 18.45 of the RMC) that promotes the conservation of mature, healthy trees in the design of new development. The ordinance also recognizes that the preservation of trees will sometimes Report to Redding Planning Commission June 4, 2021 Re: 4(b)1--Use Permit Application UP-2020-01669, TJG/Summit Development Corp (Hartnell Com Complex) Page 5 conflict with necessary land -development requirements. The City's General Plan EIR further acknowledges that preservation of native trees will sometimes conflict with normal land development and that implementation of the General Plan will ultimately set aside over 7,000 acres of open space, much of which contains oak habitat. But efforts must still be made to retain existing trees if reasonably possible, and to sufficiently plant new trees in the context of the new development. A tree survey is required to identify natural trees and tree groups most suitable for preservation or "candidate trees/groups." Where all identified candidate trees/groups cannot be preserved, the set -aside of a natural area or areas within a project site that is particularly suitable for the planting, retention, and/or natural regeneration of trees is considered to be a desirable means of accomplishing the goals of the ordinance. A Tree Survey was prep a q J j}fqr the project by Wildland Resource Managers. The survey found two primary vegetatI,0 4 `10 t t , r on the project site. Blue Oak/interior live oak woodlands were found alon `$oastern and,,$ ,,kern edges of the property covering approximately 31.4 percent of the A site. The surv` ,y,11 ��l�dentified 193 blue oaks larger than 6-inch diameter at breast height and 92 interior h � rbak larger than six-inch dbh. The Tree Survey Exhibit t depicts the to the group of trdd� n the proposed site plan. Further, it identified that there are several snit to medium-sized oal gees located in the southwest portion of the site, however, none would b ,considered candidate trees. It was further observed that some vegetation management 4� there is evidence of oak harvesting resulting in root MN crown sprouting 'n��;,��t� appej ��c,� north central portion of the project area. The t `t,�a„ ,.,, i y t 1 3 proposal does not incorporate tendon of the trees. However, the developer is proposing to retain those healthr`ees that wlll�`t be impacted by buildings and paving. The developer is obligated to replItuitable new,'s at the time of construction for shade. The Tree Management Ordimini1 planttp criteria of one tree per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area or cove i�� pac�{''e ba�';t ,,the proposed 83,888 square feet of gross floor area, a minimum of't,f`rse red��,,d��tgnally, the street frontages are required street trees at a ratio of one tree for ever 0 feet of s `i� t frontage, therefore with the project site consisting of approximately 2,10i1;11 of street fro z e, a minimum of 70 trees are required along the street frontages. There`�t requireme51{'planl minimum of 154 new trees is a standard condition of develop�� `F", yer, to to to th r, i s of trees at the project site a mitigation of the project requiresV-replacern�1:1 ratio resulting in a minimum of 194 trees planted in association with the project He; the project is consistent with the intent of the Tree Management Ordinance. a PARCEL MAP. The proposed parcel map is intended to,vide this �''6 e retail spaces and the proposed mini -storage warehouse facility on their res�1�1, taking the total parcels from five to seven. The parcel sizes range from 0.57 acres (2�''square feet) to 3.47 acres (151,153 square feet). The "SU Shopping Center and "HU Heavy Commercial zoning districts allow parcels to be a minimum size of 10,000 square feet. The proposed parcels are well over the minimum requirements. Reciprocal driveway and parking easements are managed privately by the shopping center's Property Owners Association. Environmental Determination Staff prepared an Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act. A notice of availability of the environmental document was sent to surrounding property owners, local agencies, and the State Clearinghouse for public review. The public review period will end on June 7, 2021. The environmental document Report to Redding Planning Commission June 4, 2021 Re: 4(b)1--Use Permit Application UP-2020-01669, TJG/Summit Development Corp (Hartnell Com Complex) Page 6 concludes that with the application of standard City and agency development standards and regulations and the identified mitigation measures, the project does not have the potential to significantly affect the environment. Public Comment To date staff has received four written comments from residents expressing concern about the project. These comments are attached. The comments express concern over the lack of sidewalk on the west side of Shasta View Drive, noise, traffic, dust, transient activity, and the use of Leonard Street as a result of the proposed mini -storage development. One comment received from Angela Moskow of the California Oaks Coalition expressed concern over the removal of oak woodlands on the properly t it 7 t} �fl { i`t�'fi �G�ysi4 4 Additionally, the , held a}' ��l c information meeting regarding the project on May 20, 2021. Staff was �' tendance and ob"*ed a majority of positive comments. Project The conditached. tta� t Required Flnding ' `SiCia l j1t {Is siJ <trx t tfs Certain findings must be found be in ev under CEQA Section 15074 an�,111" l of 18.10.030 of the Zoning Code J approval 66474 of the State Governmentd'k. Thefit Planning Commission Authority Although the City of Redding Planning " applications, since the proposal alsc,,z )eh applications the proposal requires appro``� by Planning Commission. Alternatives The following alternatives are offered for adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration permit as set forth in Section 18.14.030 and tent ye parcel map as set forth in Section rjr�d as an attachment to this report. has th'thori ,ftto approve Use Permit ezom # `d �heral plan amendment �31t to l with,, r ommendation from the Based upon a determination that the necessary findings are in evidence, recommend that the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration and approve Use Permit Application UP-2020-01.669, Parcel Map Application PM-2021-00290, General Plan Amendment Application GPA-2020-01667, and Rezoning Application RZ-2020-01668, subject to the attached draft conditions. (Staff Recommendation) 2. Recommend denial to the City Council of the use permit, parcel map, general plan amendment, and rezoning applications. Such action mast be based upon a finding that the project is inconsistent with the General Plan or other City development standards or poses a threat to public health, safety, or welfare. Staff has not identified any justification for denying the project. Report to Redding Planning Commission June 4,2021 Re: 4(b)1--Use Permit Application UP-2020-01669, TJGISummit Development Corp (Hartnell Com Complex) Page 7 3. Continue the item or refer the item back to staff for project modifications the Planning Commission deems necessary to support the project. Minor modifications can be incorporated into a motion for a recommendation of approval. Conclusion The proposed shopping center and mini storage facility has been thoroughly considered and the impacts from the proposed change have been adequately mitigated through the project conditions. The use of this site as a shopping center and storage facility is the highest and best use of the site that will best serve the neighborhood. Therefore, staff recommends the Commission forward a rqc pmendation to the City Council supporting the adoption of the Mitigated Negative prove the project. c: TJG/Suf Development .......... No Grocery DKM ineerin2 Attachments Findings Use Permit Draft C Parcel Map Draft Conditions Draft Resolution for General Draft Ordinance for Rezoning Location/Zoning Map General Plan Map Proposed Zoning Map Proposed General Plan Map Site Plan Parcel Map Architecture Package Comments Mitigated Negative Declarati, FINDINGS SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION UP-2020-01669 SUMMIT DEVELOPMENT USE PERMIT FINDINGS 1. The proposed use will not be detrimental to the health, safety, and general welfare of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of such proposed use. The shopping center and mini -storage facility use at this site will have additional impacts to the neighborhood in regards to traffic and general activity at the site. The conditions of approval require improvements that address these potential impacts such as road improvement ��; t ��t� fencing, and traffic signal. Overall the additional traffic signal andf��f�'`improv��s will mitigate the impacts so that the use will not be detrimen3 the health, safe I`,$nd general welfare of the neighborhood. 2. The p sj 6sed use will not bets�rious or detrimental to the general welfare of the city. As dd ibed under Findin`��above, the proposed project would not result in any & detrimeffects upon the health, safety, and general welfare of persons residing or workm;�r�� the surrounding neighborhood because the site has adequate distance separated f�r 1�'�ad frq�ces and traffic will be improved by the proposed tt i £ improvements °t��te seasons otpribed under Finding 1, the proposed project would not be injurious 0r mental to *general welfare of the City. 3. The proposed use is co�stent with t11,als a policies established by the General Plan and the Redding is currently zoned "SC" Shopping Center with a General 21 catioh ,p Center (SC). This current �� designation does not allow for conveme��'as marts{,�;he project requires a general plan amendment and rezoning to Hear �f�t mmercial t� low for the development of a mini storage facility on the eastern ��p of this site 3, },,tth the approval of the general plan amendment and rezoning ,,fat �s, the co etion ; 4 i p g p �'he proposed shopping center and mini storage would b,rmissi��t� 4 'ect is}Istent with General Plan rk• \f i ZI FY 4 �;Fv goals and policies that call for complete stye°coal T3) �nomic vitality (CDD13), and increased retail opportunities in appropriate locations (13A, Bs,}$,: 4. The proposed use and project design are consistent with yet ' h`'guidelines established by resolution of the City Council in accordan`'Wt1.1;� ttg'Zoning Ordinance Section 18.40.050, Design Criteria. The proposal is sbd`}4`0? the adopted design criteria for commercial development referenced in the Redding Zoning Ordinance. In accordance with the design criteria, the architectural design of the proposal incorporates the use of various building materials and forms and design techniques that provide interest and avoid long, blank walls along the street front. PARCEL MAP FINDINGS 1. The proposed division of the property is consistent with the General Plan designations of Shopping Center "SC" and Heavy Commercial "HC. " The proposed parcels have sufficient acreage, configuration, and access to public streets to satisfy General Plan, Zoning requirements, and Planning Commission Resolution 2001-03. 2. The design of the proposed division is consistent with the General Plan and zoning in terms of lot size and accessibility. All proposed parcels have sufficient size, configuration, and access to satisfy the standard "SC" Shopping Center/Heavy Commercial "HC" District zoning criteria applicable to the site and can support future commercial uses promoted under the General Plan. 3. The site is physically suitable for the development proposed. The parcel map would create lots that have suitable area to support the future commercial development consistent with a$�` `t; jp�„ Marketplace as proposed under Use Permit Application UP tf f tt�, t tia tlt2 a: 2020-0166t',j,s 4. The sat `,l `, ihysically suitable fi he proposed density. The proposed parcel map involves land nated for only comral uses proposed by Use Permit Application UP-2020 0166',„ 5. The destJ,of the proposed division and improvements will not cause environmental damageygir habitat. The project parcels were evaluated as s tcEi �zttat t�J14t4�'++ry r part of the pry{�n w15`54mitigations were proposed under Use Permit ApplicationUP-2020-01`#,�';,, 6. The design of the pro division health problems. Adequi �measur � to address potential conce� provisions for water for domestic use W facilities to ensure proper manageme drainage, construction of proper pub orderly timing for construction o`i✓� and ents will not cause serious public ied with the conditions of approval including, but not limited to, extension of sanitary sewer er;1,1,, stallation of necessary storm and,provision for proper and The design of the proposed division and imprr ments for access through, or use of property within, the pro) with application of the conditions of approval, will not easements of record. ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS conflict with easements isaon ttr ct{,parcel map, A"; existing public 1. Based on the Initial Study and the information contained in the record, there will be no significant effect on the environment. A Mitigated Negative Declaration is appropriate for the project. 2. The Mitigated Negative Declaration and its supporting documentation fully reflect the independent judgment and analysis of the City of Redding. USE PERMIT APPLICATION UP-2020-01669 HARTNELL COMMERCIAL COMPLEX DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL General Requirements 1. Approval is granted for TJG/Summit Development Corporation to construct of the Hartnell Commercial Complex consisting of a 30,000-square-foot Holiday Market Grocery Store, and five outer pads for retail, a drive -through restaurant, a coffee drive through, and an automobile fueling station with a convenience store in substantial conformance with the site plan approved by the Planning Commission on June 8, 2021. Minor modifications may be approved by the Development Services Director; any substantial revisions will require either an amendment to this permit or a new use permit. 2. Prior to lssu�'l'a' ul permit, Parcel Map PM-2021-00290 realigning the parcel �1s,01"1 configurat1 ilif,lhe prolect,'be recorded. 3. Parking r1 to be improved in rdance with Chapter 18.41 of the Redding Municipal Code a minimum of 214 �es. 4. The deb{per is to submit an acoustical analysis in compliance with Title 24 of the Cal' mistratve Code win the building plans are submitted in order to achieve "*is" d��;�ee in areas and45 dBA in habitable areas. The interior to� o t p g analysis and attending �lgation Qsures are to be approved by the Development Services Department pno';lissuance of �pilding permit. yt fry yjs�{4 5. Any night lighting is to �onented sq r�, to no��re onto adjacent residential areas or s7t6tss; 4E� sss t public rights-of-way.E `�stsst(Ittr t� i}1 ts irs,,' t 7}s�l,%<i i5� t 7 F}t silt 6. All outdoor storage is prohibited.,giftgu�z', ` i4 It} sit tss �Jt }s a. 7. The mini -storage units are to be u o storage onl xta,$ tj= ie offii� area shall be used for administrating the rental of the apt torah (units o �>�i11 y of r�Iuses, including creating a caretaker's residence, renting of`'office sp�G'r{ t�ing they' cc as a U-Haul or other ; rental equipment franchise, shall require an amendme permit. 8. Prior to issuance of a building permit, final plans for the �ti $t� ct shall be provided that demonstrate that all applicable conditions this Utt"and requirements of the Redding Zoning Ordinance will be satisfied. Fl p1 consist of the following: a. Final building architectural elevations. The existing elevations of the anchors and retail pads shall be designed and enhanced as shown on the elevations approved with the Use Permit, or similar or enhanced design as approved by the Development Services Director. b. Landscape plans. C. Improvement plans for required public space. d. Materials/plans for hardscape features. UP-2020-01669 Draft Conditions of Approval Site 10. 11 June 4, 2021 Page 2 e. Detail of all trash and recycling -area enclosures, screen walls, retaining walls, and sound walls. f. Lighting plan (building and parking lot) specifying the design of individual light fixture types. The plan shall include a photometric analysis demonstrating that excessive light and glare does not impact adjoining residential properties. A post - occupancy review shall be conducted by the Planning Division to ensure compliance with Sections 18.40.090 and 18.41.090 of the Redding Zoning Ordinance. g. Civil improyMent plan related to grading, drainage, and utilities. The drt through facilities s�lft meet the design standards of Section 18.43.080 of the gnit Redd'lning Ordinance, i�ding incorporation of a minimum 42-inch-high masonry scree4,,,,, 11 or a minimum 4` ,, me high combination landscaped berm and masonry screen �„ ;r V between the drive -through aisle and the public street or parking lot. A cumulati��{ual to j}�1i provided in th`e =rr din of j re gathel Section 18.33:040 of G�� 7=�edding Zi Commercial Design Cr�a, this area(s be leftover areas." Plazeas shall may s retaining walls, planters; �pntaln' concrete, stone pavers, or s`nt`�t`ii€ 10 feet or located at a building entrant meets the intent of Section of 5 percent of the total building area shall be space in accordance with the standards of g Ordinance. As specified in the City's Mould reflect careful planning and not simply pirate f tures such as metal trellis, decorative �c �`z�d incorporate stamped and colored dimension of less than j clearly �onstrate how use of the area 12. Decorative hardscape features 1 be'`,�xovl(dedt ;t'�e m'z wilding entrances, all amgdriveway entrances, and inters parking f ppb �rian rwalks required by the Building Code. 13. Aboveground water -service utilities shall be screened f v1r��'"tlie street to the extent possible with landscaping and/or masowy wed for access from interior driveways where feasible. The locatit11 }� approved by the Public Works `� ttf��t(�14t4" ;,,,... and Development Services departments, 14. All utility meters or similar mechanical equipment locations visible from a public street or the parking lot shall be placed in cabinets or incorporate other effective screening devices consistent with the project architecture. 15. The driveway access to refuse -collection locations shall have minimum turning radii of 29.5 feet inside and 45 feet outside. 16. The driveway access to store merchandise -receiving locations shall have a minimum outside radius of 50 feet; it is the developer's responsibility to determine if greater room for delivery truck movements is necessary based upon tenant needs. UP-2020-01669 Draft Conditions of Approval June 4, 2021 Page 3 17. All noise walls, screening walls, landscape walls; retaining walls, and refuse -collection enclosures shall be constructed of masonry materials consistent with the architectural design of the center to thesatisfaction of the Development Services Department. 18. All outdoor storage of miscellaneous equipment or materials (e.g., pallets, racks, boxes, throwaway items) is prohibited. Any such storage shall be located within a masonry enclosure complementing the architecture of the main building. 19. Shopping cart collection areas in the parking lot shall be low profile in design in accordance with Section 18.41.130 of the Redding Zoning Ordinance. Business owners shall comply with Chapter 9.07 (Shopping Carts) of the Redding Municipal Code, including bud, the requirements for cart signage and the development and x ft,"cart con1}�nent and retrieval plans.implemen Streets and 20. Prior he first Certificate 6ROccupancy, the applicant shall be responsible to design and couct a three -lane roadway section (re -striping) on Shasta View Drive from Ha el e to approximately 573 feet north of Kerry Avenue. The cross-section shall inclu��r��twotw �and a center -turn lane subject to approval by the City Engineerrihnce ?=west pstrian crossings, including rectangular rapid flashing beacons, shall t''`mstalled at`'`l�o intersections along Shasta View Dr, as determined by the City] t�ngineer. Reping shall consist of grinding the existing stripes, slurry seal, anent of nmarkings. 21: Prior to the first Certificate tisacement of pedestrians from the existing wide shoulders from the restriprt�� the applica� jshall be responsible to design and construct a 5-foot sidewalk where,,,,{,exist on the side of Shasta View Drive from Hartnell Avenue to a-ODroximat '; feet north 0rry Avenue. 22. Prior to the first Certificate d r` ccupa�%�{rlj�'S{'phcanl$ all be responsible for contributing their fair share cost of 24.9 perceni`othe cost��esign and construction for a signalized intersection at the Hartnell Avenue and Alta 1V1� give (�jJi S 4 1i4t1 YEt.ys 3' 23. Prior to the first Certificate of Occupancy, the appi{responsible for contributing their fair share cost of 16 percentFesign and construction for a signalized intersection at the Shasta View Drivater Avenue intersection. 24. Frontage Improvements — Hartnell Avenue shall be improved as follows: a. Widening and restriping to provide a 96-foot Right of Way cross-section i. 8-foot Parking ii. 3-foot Parking Buffer iii. 6-foot Bike Lane iv. 2-foot Bike Lane Buffer v. 12-foot Travel Lane vi. 14-foot Center Turn Lane vii. 12-foot Travel Lane UP-2020-01669 Draft Conditions of Approval 25. F 26. 27 viii. 2-foot Bike Lane Buffer ix. 6-foot Bike Lane x. 3-foot Parking Buffer xi. 8-foot Parking b. A 5-foot sidewalk C. June 4,2021 Page 4 Street improvements shall include preparation of the subbase, all aggregate base, and asphalt concrete between the gutter and the existing street section and all necessary transitions and tie-in paving, as well as asphalt overlay work on the existing strep pt sections necessary to provide a uniform cross slope from centerline to ..uired street improvements shall include appropriate storm ... .. .... .. .. dr str ts, and any necessary striping and signage. iew Dr shall be improved as follows: ig and restripi to provide a 96-foot Right of Way cross-section (from face of curb west to east) — 12-foot T Lane 12-foot er Turn La 12-foot 1`16cl Lane M 2-foot Bi g, 5-foot Bi 2.5-foot Curb & Gutter 5-foot Landscape Buff Al 10-foot Full Width 01111" Street improvements sfi� clud . . 0 . . . . .. . ...... . . . _6', . . .... . ..... .. . . and asphalt concrete between the newgutter and necessary transitions and tie-in paving, as well existing street sections necessary to provide a un to the gutter. All required street improvement$ drain facilities, streetlights, and any ne ....... ...4. base, all aggregate base, R1,11"I"I'll ting street section and all ,bhalt work on the cr, by fro m in centerline Agma appropriate storm and signage. Frontage Improvements — Leonard Street shall be improved as follows: a. Provide a 60-foot Right of Way cross-section per City of Redding Construction Standard 112.30. Intersection Improvements - Shasta View Drive and Hartnell Avenue shall be improved as follows: a. Construct all signal and intersection modifications required to properly align existing and proposed cross -sections of Shasta View Drive and Hartnell Avenue through the intersection. UP-2020-01669 Draft Conditions of Approval June 4, 2021 Page 5 b. The signal pole and mast arm on the south-eastern corner of the intersection shall be relocated. c. The existing 170 signal controller shall be replaced with a 2070 controller. Municipal Utilities, Drainage, and Grading 28. All food service facilities require Oil Grease Interceptors to the satisfaction of the City's Industrial Waste division. 29. Any onsite public wets utilities shall be located within a 15-foot Public Service Easement with no longittaent of other utilities. 30. Public strain mprovemo are to be constructed to City of Redding standards. rt�ir 31. A grad;`g permit is to be obov ��ed from the Public Works Department. Installation of sedim� control measures sha l7;be in place prior to October 15 of any year. 32. All waterers withackflows shall be located in the public right of way. 33. The fuel-dispen' i'iit `''area(;,,,, minimum of 8 feet from dace of the constructed to prevent ��mage acros downspouts must be rot structural control, such as'4��oll/wtt7 installed in storm drains to lflts=ar and maintained. Materials removed n Provide calculations to justify sizing cleanup plan. The dispensing area must be inspected routinely for pr`fi I and on impermeable surfaces, extending lispensers. These area(s) must be graded and . from, the dispensing area. Canopy -roof i g e flgw through the fuel -dispensing area. A at�� filter, or approved equal, must be �I' w`y end must be regularly inspected r ed to be djg osed of as hazardous waste. Aural contrfacility must have a spill dry- swept5 ` melt'.... Dispensing equipment 34. No structures are allowed in the 15-foot public 35. Prior to improvement -plan approval, the applicant shall quln{ra�al'`for storm water peak flow in accordance with City Council Pyghcy 18^fthe"specifications of the Engineering Division. Such measures shall add I�s" from the 10-, 25-, and 100- year storm events. Projects shall address peak fis,f maintain predevelopment levels at all locations downstream of the project. The drainage report shall be prepared to the format outlined by the City Engineer, stamped and signed and dated by a qualified engineer, and provided to the City Engineer with submittal of site improvement plans. 36. Provide a storm drain system that conveys the existing drainage from the north through the development and connecting to the existing channel to the south. 37. The project shall meet all MS4 clean -water compliance in addition to detention requirements. 38. Prior to the beginning of any clearing; grading, or site improvement activities, improvement plans for grading, drainage, utilities, and other required improvements shall UP-2020-01669 Draft Conditions of Approval June 4, 2021 Page 6 be approved by the City Engineer and other concerned City of Redding departments. These plans shall be in conformance with Redding Municipal Code (RMC) Title 16.12. Prior to the issuance of a clearing and/or grading permit, an Interim Erosion and Sediment Control Plan shall be included and approved by the City Engineer as part of all clearing and grading permit applications. As -built improvement plans with the Engineer's Declaration are required in conformance with RMC 16.12. All excess earth material shall be disposed of lawfully. 39. If vegetation removal or construction activities will occur during the nesting season for birds or raptors (February 1 through August 31), a qualified biologist shall conduct a preconstruction survey 7 days before construction activities begin. If nesting birds or raptors are fop`�� jvi11 be notified and consulted. An appropriate buffer; as determinedrj� {"W analified biologist, will be placed around the nest until the young ed. If co ion activities cease for a period greater than 7 days, additio`reconstruction survj will be required. 40. To thej tent practicable; removal of large trees with cavities; crevices, or snags shall occur t maternity colonies form (i.e., prior to March 1) or after young are volant (i.e., ion (including the removal of large trees >12inch dbh ) occurs"on (March 1 through August 31), a qualified professional sh�tfiiduct ��'consn survey of the study area to locate maternity colonies and identify met#es to protects ' lames from disturbance. The preconstruction survey will be performed p more than 7 7's prior to the implementation of construction � activities. If a materm `t �&colony is 1�td whin or adjacent to the study area, a disturbance free buffer s j1 fe es", b��ed by`ghfied professional in consultation with CDFW, to ensure the c`t t j tect�ul, ptof activities. 41. Prior to any discharge of dredged orj,lx riaterial intoaters of the U.S.' including wetlands, authorization under a NPermit or �idua hermit shall be obtained f from the Corps. For any feature,terrrl�d to nos; �sitbje the Corps jurisdiction during the verification process, �lhorizatt� ��tL�drge (q�� waiver from regulation) shall be obtained from the RWQCB. For fil'requirmg as �s permit, water quality certification shall be obtained from the RWQCB prior tdlscharge�cdged or fill material Verification shall be provided to the City of ' opment Services sly G{. it{i Department prior to issuance the issuance of grading p ,'yz, s 1, 42. Prior to any activities that would obstruct the flo ,ol or alter the bed, channel, or bank of any intermittent or ephemeral creeks, notification of streambed alteration shall be submitted to the CDFW; and, if required, a 1602 streambed alteration agreement shall be obtained by the project applicant. Verification shall be provided to the City of Redding Development Services Department prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 43. The project applicant shall achieve the mitigation for the permanent loss of streams, wetlands, and other waters through the purchase of mitigation credits at an agency approved mitigation bank at a minimum 1:1 ratio, or through onsite/offsite habitat restoration at a minimum 3:1 ratio. If onsite/offsite habitat restoration is proposed a detailed mitigation plan, including success criteria, monitoring, maintenance, and reporting as required by the regulatory agencies (i.e., Corps, CDFW, RWQCB) shall be submitted for review and approval. The affected regulatory agency shall identify when UP-2020-01669 Draft Conditions of Approval June 4, 2021 Page 7 measures shall be implemented and completed for those activities impacting streams, wetlands, or other waters. All measures contained in the permits or associated with any agency approvals shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the lead regulatory agency. Redding Electric Utilities 44. Existing overhead utilities along the Hartnell Avenue and Leonard Street frontages shall be relocated underground. This shall include through the Leonard Street intersection continuing to the easterly property line of2635 Hartnell Avenue (automotive repair). Off site utility work may be required to accommodate under grounding of existing overhead utilities. 45. Street Licht tkttired on allinta2es. 46. A five p+''public service t shall be dedicated adjacent to all right of way. Solid Waste 47. Double e � ,sures recommended to accommodate trash and cardboard recycling for each retail businee��`1�I��ces s of cardboard. s +` f Landscape, and Fencing p ,Ig : 48. The project landscape shall be dtgned grad installed in compliance with the requirements of Section ; l�hapter$;t�;7t of the Redding Zoning Ordinance and the Redding Landscape' y�utrem��n�lation Guidelines dated January 2000. These landscape regulations requirxCpart, the fog`wing: a. Provision of broad -leafed shacrjin and arou4j`he pap,�ng areas at a minimum ratio of one tree for every £q�lpae�n a p1at�,�fontamt�g a minimum area of 72 t tt r t <t s i t s ;lt� square feet. A minimum o 0 squar4��ridscape�all be provided for each required parking space and 80 square feef"of landscap `'4 reach additional parking space. The landscape plan shall incdscape area demonstrating compliance with Seedding Zoning Ordinance. rrt i�3.t J�Z, b. Landscaping equal to a minimum of 5 percerit oftotal building area shall be provided in accordance with Section 18,47.050(B) of the Redding Zoning Ordinance. The Landscape areas used to satisfy this requirement shall be identified on the landscape plan. C. A minimum 15-foot-wide landscape planter shall be provided along Industrial Street. The landscape planters shall include irrigated groundcover, shrubs, and shade trees placed at a minimum of one tree for every 30 feet of frontage. d. Any area between the back of the sidewalk and the property line shall be incorporated into the adjacent street -side planter. UP-2020-01669 Draft Conditions of Approval June 4, 2021 Page 8 Parking lot landscaping shall incorporate landscaped berms, shrubs, and/or decorative walls to screen the view of parking areas from adjoining streets. f. Required trees shall be a minimum of 15 gallons in size. g. Planters not utilizing densely planted groundcover or turf shall include the use of high -quality -fabric weed barrier and appropriate mulch materials. h. Groundcover shall be of live plant material. Walk-on bark, gravel, colored rock, and similar materials shall be used in combination with a living groundcover in all non - turf area as a mulch to control weeds and conserve or retain water until a living groundcoyi�'=t�t£d full coverage. i. Plap shall be protectetz om vehicles by 6-inch-high concrete curbs or equivalent j. AYtarking lot and landscape improvements shall be completed prior to issuance of arr4pupancy permit. zr£ qfS � it k.bovr�; btu} underground utility infrastructure located in a landscape �plahter shad`'liown landscape plan. 49. The proposed project in equire a Stre£ { ,, Lake Alteration Agreement from the State Department of Fish and e or a in the Army Corps of Engineers for 4 t } t `t � £t rr } s t £�£ t wetland impacts. The prohr�pro�o�, resptjb}for contacting the State Department of Fish and Game and/or tom£ 3� £� corps�t� ih £ , , y, g ' � �� to verify the need to obtain an agreement or a permit. 50. An Oak Tree Mitigation Plan shall,b�}} jrtpprporated ilandcape and grading plans £ �.€t � £1Ir.i t�St iv for protection of oak trees identz��;or {�servation,,�eservrl efforts shall be to the satisfaction of the Development vices j 51. The developer will replace the blue oak trees removed 'om the f {t+{, "with suitable minimum 15-gallon size shade trees at minimum ratio of Cultural Resources 52. If, during the course of development, any archaeological, historical, or paleontological resources are uncovered or otherwise detected or observed, construction activities in the area affected shall cease and the City shall be notified immediately. A qualified archaeological professional must then be retained by the developer to investigate the discovered cultural object to determine its significance. If the cultural object is deemed potentially significant by the archaeologist, appropriate treatment and measures shall be followed in accordance with applicable laws, as reviewed and approved by the City, prior to the resumption of work in the affected area. UP-2020-01669 June 4, 2021 Draft Conditions of Approval Page 9 Signs 53. Prior to issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy, an Administrative Sign Permit application for a sign plan for the entire commercial center shall be submitted for review and approval in accordance with Section 1.8.42.050 of the Redding Zoning Ordinance. The sign plan shall address the location, size, and types of freestanding and wall signage allowed for each tenant, as well as the distribution of the total allowable signage area between tenants. All signage shall complement the architectural features of the buildings and be in compliance with Chapter 18.42 (Signs) of the Redding Zoning Ordinance and the Redding Advertising Sign Design Manual. 54. No more than F cut signs or two monument signs and one pole sign are allowed alcl 5 M project r ,,� ,frontage and a minimum of 100 feet of separation shall be maintain f fotween any two=ch signs, unless modifications of these standards are authori*,4' y an Administrati � gn Permit and/or Variance. 55: The pcign shall have a maxum sign area of 90 square feet and a maximum height of 25 feet' '' less modifications of these standards are authorized by an Administrative Sign Permit a'', ` fir. Variance,. Fire 56. Gates for storage facility{4a11 have a 15 have to be wider if fird"'� paratus mnx opening by way of CliclnterjsI unlocked position in the eveh"1111! personnel. The location of the Knox K location for use by emergency persona ffi wide minimum opening. Gate opening may rn while entering. Gates shall be electronic n or 'jt"off Key over -ride and default to an los�rp�`d,,b manually opened by emergency �r, t for -ride sha e on a post or other approved 57. Provide one additional hydrant t0ejHoliday"rket. #11 0rant to be located near the northwest corner of the built'"r)g: `t rat 58. The location of the Fire Department Connection (FDC)t the shopp ,center main building shall be on the south-east corner, within 40 feet,} 'e 1l but no closer than 1.0 feet. There shall be a Post Indicator Valve (PJV) in th '5 �� cmlty of the FDC so as to isolate the water supply from the FDC. All i��r{��aarits, water systems and valves shall be behind COR approved back -flow protectdrt`f� 59. All on -site driveways adjacent to a building shall have a minimum width of 26 feet, unless a lesser width is approved by the Fire Marshal. 60. No combustible vertical construction will be allowed until serviceable fire hydrants and fire flow are available for firefighting purposes during construction. Industrial Waste 61. A general Industrial Wastewater Survey/Application No 1 (Form F-0020) for each proposed commercial facility shall be completed and submitted to the Municipal Utilities UP-2020-01669 June 4, 2021 Draft Conditions of Approval Page 10 Department, Industrial Waste Division, for evaluation of wastewater pretreatment requirements prior to issuance of a building permit. 62. If a food -preparation facility of any kind is proposed within the project, an Industrial Wastewater Survey/Application No. 2 for each such food -preparation facility shall be completed and submitted to the Municipal Utilities Department, Industrial Waste Division, for evaluation and sizing for wastewater pretreatment of oil and grease removal requirements. If outside washing/cleaning of any food -preparation service equipment is planned or included in the facility design, a covered sanitary sewer -connected work area is required. It must be designed so as to prevent pollutants from entering the outside environment and storm water from entering the sewer system. It must also be connected to an oil andr�Qr. 63. If propos 'd in cial build�� s) will have mixed types of uses, which includes one or more f `k reparation facilitiMpe applicant shall provide each such food -preparation facility th a separate water,,$ ice and meter from the common water -service meter servmgul other remaining co y,..,'` ercial user. ironmentat=nith Department 64. Plans and sped cati` County Division of issuance of a building the Shasta val prior to PARCEL MAP APPLICATION PM-2021-00290 DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL General Requirements 1. In accordance with Redding Municipal Code Chapter 17.20, tentative map approval is granted for Parcel Map Application PM-2021-00290, allowing five parcels totaling 12.13 acres to be divided into seven lots to support future development. The parcel map shall be prepared and development commenced in accordance with these conditions and the tentative parcel map as approved by the Planning Commission on June 8, 2021. The requirements of a condition shall prevail in the event that there is any inconsistency between a condition and information or data presented on the tentative parcel map. 2. The applicant shaIl,.no-t } that approval of the tentative parcel map will expire three years from the effec ),an extension has been approved in accordance with Section 17.20 140 a,11" `l eddinat Code. $ Aft 3. A final ({ Wel) map shall be tared in accordance with Chapter 17.40 of the Redding Mumc1�� 'Code. The parcel m nd all necessary supporting documents and information must bo, i ed with the City Engm er prior to the expiration date of the tentative map. 4. In ace rd'�'� with Sg ,j on 18 40 kt�4, 0 of the Redding Municipal Code (Compliance With ter t�„� t� era Map RequireI��{�eond4��zatthe end with an asterisk (*) shall be noted on MI the parcel map under a "St00, et of dilita ons" to provide notification to future property 70 owners of development r�fements and *ictions established for the parcel map.* Map Requirements The following conditions apply to 5. In accordance with Chapter 17.50, Deciaa {t is and Code, the property owner shall necessary to provide public acc�t''7nd `11es t� properly manage storm drainage. 6. The parcel map shall waive access and abutters' rights Avenue and Leonard Street for Parcels 1 through 7, o improvement plans for Use Permit UP-2020-01. Development Requirements a parcel map: ons of the Redding Municipal ngl�pf--way and easements elsa he subdivision and to Mad, Hartnell A" is shown on the 7. A reciprocal driveway and parking easement shall be provided for parcels 1 through 6 at the time of conveyance of any of these parcels. * RESOLUTION NO.2021- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING ADOPTING THE MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE GENERAL PLAN DIAGRAM OF THE CITY OF REDDING RELATING TO THE LAND USE CLASSIFICATION OF THE NORTHSTATE GROCERY, INC PROPERTY (APN 110-020-061) CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 4.12 ACRES LOCATED AT 3050 LEONARD STREET IN THE CITY OF REDDING (GPA-2020-01667) WHEREAS, tl7i #„> Council adoptp'd`he General Plan on October 3, 2000; and WHEREAS,, amendment to the GWal Plan Diagram is desired to allow for the development of a 38,400,e-foot mini-storagility as identified in Use Permit Application UP-2020 01669; and % WHEREAS, the `'�,l,l, yrnmiss "fit duly noticed public hearing pertaining to said amendment on June "� �2 1, forty�ei al P1,Amendment Application GPA-2020-01667 as described on the attached amen -fit to the Gel Plan Diagram and made a recommendation to the City Council; and "s` i t st{ i f £sir 6 i WHEREAS, the Planning Come on has '� �ved p, J#a nt documents prepared in accordance with the requirements of the CandiI�'onme�t� {Il�' Act and recommended that they Mitigated Negative Declaration be adopted fob$}4'��PA-2020 67 after consideration of all testimonial and written evidence submitted przF and during t z''forementioned public hearing; and WHEREAS, the City Council held a p;r�atg on G 2021-01667 on X, 2021; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Court l'of the �,t,% Redding as follows:`,�. 1. The above recitations are true and correct. 2. The City Council has reviewed the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, all reports submitted by staff, and all testamentary and documentary evidence presented at the public hearing, and has determined that the actions contemplated will not have an adverse impact on the environment. 3. The City Council hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration for GPA-2020-01667 as referred to the City Council by the Planning Commission. 4. The City Council hereby approves the amendments to the General Plan Diagram as set forth on the map attached hereto and made part hereof by; LOCATION: Approximately 4.12 acres located at 3050 Leonard Street FROM: Shopping Center (SC) TO: Heavy Commercial (HC) I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Redding City Council on the xth day of x, 2021, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: PAMELA MIZE, City Clerk ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF REDDING ADOPTING THE MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ADOPTING AN AMENDMENT TO THE CITY OF REDDING ZONING MAP RELATING TO THE REZONING OF THE NORTHSTATE GROCERY, INC PROPERTY (APN 110-020-061) CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 4.12 ACRES LOCATED AT 3050 LEONARD STREET IN THE CITY OF REDDING (RZ-2020-01668) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: ?it' Nt rky prat i�{Y� , Section 1. �� of fact QC,,$ity finds and declares as follows: t1" t A. Th4,2dning Map of the Gty, of Redding is incorporated in and made part of Redding 1Vcipal Code Title 18,wn as the City of Redding Zoning Ordinance. B. Thy' j' Tanning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing pertaining to said 2021� for RZ-2020-01668 to allow for the development of a ame�,, { 38,400� mm4k''�lity as identified in Use Permit Application UP- 2020-0166`'and'reco��`ded that,}(ie City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative t tE,F5 Declaration prepared `the projects the attached amendment to the Zoning Map. C. The City Council hexf duly ' of this ordinance.,,>d ing on x, 2021 prior to the first reading D. The proposed amendment to the is coo"' tent with the General Plan and any applicable specific plan. E. Adoption of this ordinance,�ot versely mitt the ��fare of the citizens of the City of Redding and its surr ,4b, ing Section 2. On the basis of the initial study for Rezoning Appltp�iJ 668 prepared by the Development Services Department, the City Council finds �t t rezoning will not have a significant effect on the environment and adopts the MDeclaration with the following findings; 1. The City of Redding has completed a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the rezoning. Based on the analysis of the potential impacts associated with the rezoning, the project will not have a significant effect on the environment. 2. The Mitigated Negative Declaration and its supporting documentation reflect the independent judgement and analysis of the City of Redding. Section 3. The boundaries of the districts referred to in Section 18.01.050 of the Redding Municipal Code, as designated on a map entitled "Zoning Map of the City of Redding, California," dated January 7, 2003, are hereby altered as set forth on the map attached hereto and made part hereof by; LOCATION Approximately 4.12 acres located at 3050 Leonard Street FROM: "SC" Shopping Center TO: "HC" Heavy Commercial Section 4. This ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after the date of its adoption; and the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and cause its publication according to law. t�. JF I HEREBY CERTIij�` }f itt f {t?�nce was introduced and read by the City Council of the City of Redding at a re'iieeting o' day of x, 20121 and was read and adopted at a regular �, meeting on the -,�,,�'� of 1, by the following vote: AYES: �t NOES: C ': ABSENT: C(: ABSTAIN: CO MEMBERS: MEMBERS Mayor PAMELA MIZE, City Clerk L.... _ ..... ;..--�... i U) RS _3 5 ...Y.__UU LIJ Q, cn I - ---------- Z U) - O HAWN AVE I F__....- [I- JONQUIL WAY Y ALDEN AVE N GIS DIVISION INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT E DATE PRODUCED: NOVEMBER 24, 2020 s 0 200 400 Feet Kol m H ♦.1 ZONING MAP -12 UP-2020-01669 / GPA-2020-01667 / RZ-2020-01668 TJG /SUMMIT DEVELOPMENT 2469 & 2525 HARTNELL AVE/3055 & 3091 APPIAN WAY/3050 LEONARD ST AP# 110-210-055 / 110-020-001, -037, -038 & -061 MTG. DATE: ITEM: ATTACHMENT: WILSON AVE _ _ _ 15�to 6 a — L £ __ �.. �. _4 LT I ......1 i _BELLADONNA ST 2 to 15 w w —_ _. I m Q > i Oi Q ------- t— ----- Q HAWN AVE �w T ------------- I � U - - - ---------- ----------- i i JONQUIL WAY 1 I E 1 � F i ! �t+'f HARTNELLAVE GC , I ---- t 7t�t Si tt { i t i �� 5l•�: �{ O ! �} It a J" u S itit i i 3 3 t iF� w MARILYN AVE 1 t0°0-___ I ... -i-__--------- ------------+-__ 10 Ito 20 to 3.5 V 4 i i IL 1 3il tlyt iT tzr �. _.... ......�.... ! f£� £tt''it}t 1 tr7lt�tt+ iiiFt.. t\F'I t F t 1 6s it7£r ALDEN AVE. t'1} - ; --- -- £ a � ti ________ i j I) ilir k# rtf y£ _ �..------'----- -�-- i. ,.....,'..____-_-_ ' �} (i �� JFF! ijst ${ t„t ! �.. ............... # � t i 2to�3:5 £ "," \ l� r,,..1 a.JO o MARLENE AVE / _ --------- f > co b a i —i N GIS DIVISION GENERAL PLAN MAP MTG.DATE: INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT E DATE PRODUCED: ITEM: NOVEMBER24,2020 UP-2020-01669 / GPA-2020-01667 / RZ-2020-01668 TJG /SUMMIT DEVELOPMENT s 0 200 400Feet 2469 &2525 HARTN ELL AVE/3055 &.3091 APPIAN WAY/3050 LEONARDST ATTACHMENT: AP# 110-210-055 / 110-020-001, -037, -038 & -061 annino\ProProiects\UP\UP-2020-01669.aorx _VVILbUN _�� 35�to6 1 BELLADONNA ST 2 to .3.5 _ >} i 'W Q� Q -- ZO O :FFfl c/) — —, Q HAWN AVE 7 w ' I t � _ i I ------- y' _ _ _ _ 4 �+ JONQUIL WAY GL' _ HC HARTNELLAVE — t Proposed Zoning GC .w r 1 U) SC I ; Jr}tr r}�5 < " } HC W i Jl f5tt 1 f it Jr�11r} i 1� MARILYN AVE to 20 I - ------------ - ------- 10 to 20 q3.5 I��[ I L t} V }t f r a } i ALDEN AVE ---_� 1 r i f } r r 1 i \\ 1 1 , _{ t j 2 tO 3.5 r r 1 7 MARLENEAVE J _ --- - . �U_. r `S'T' — --- — zi r -------------- f ---- r N GIS DIVISION PROPOSED ZONING MAP MTG.DATE: INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT E DATE PRODUCED: ITEM: JUNE4,2021 UP-2020-01669 / GPA-2020-01667 / RZ-2020-01668 TJG /SUMMIT DEVELOPMENT s 0 200 400Feet 2469 &2525 HARTN ELL AVE/3055 & 3091 APPIAN WAY/3050 LEONARDST ATTACHMENT: AP# 110-210-055 / 110-020-001, -037, -038 & -061 iav 1Pamn_01ae4 any -VVILbUN _�� 35�to6 1 BELLADONNA ST1,111111 L t0 .3.5 _ >} i 'W Q� Q ------ — — fi— ZO:FFfl O c/) — —, Q HAWN AVE w — U ' I t � i I ------- _ y' _ _ _ _ 4 �+ JONQUIL WAY GL' _ HC ! fr' rwlfis}rr } HARTNELLAVE -- Proposed GP GC'....�:� i SC < HC Z' 1 � f 1_0 t0 20 MARILYN AVE I jglmg", j n = t ---- --_________-__ j I-- tr{ iI{Y }f r G{j4 i} ,y i7 ( l0 Ito 20 b 2 t0 .5 to t },z, } r" ' �} I a - \ lt7rilr, ti{r!r ------ r r r f 1 � _� - i � i ALDEN AVE ( .......... j ........... + ! I ( }rJ r a 9 r _ } _ \ r r �ID t r _ -- MARLENE AVE �� \ OA ..... _ ---- — v. ' T" ' c4 % i._. z l �j — 2l�CO tw } ... 'V. i 1 N GIS DIVISION PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN MAP MTG.DATE: INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT E DATE PRODUCED: ITEM: JUNE4,2021 UP-2020-01669 / GPA-2020-01667 / RZ-2020-01668 TJG /SUMMIT DEVELOPMENT S 0 200 400Feet 2469 &2525 HARTN ELL AVE/3055 & 3091 APPIAN WAY/3050 LEONARDST ATTACHMENT: AP# 110-210-055 / 110-020-001, -037, —038 & —061 anning\ProProjects\UP\U P-2020-01669.aprx P�' I I 1 I I A I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I RIM 537.72 I I -- —�-- — INV 534 5B _ L Z-_ — _ _� _ _� - _ _ -------J HARTNELLAVENUE :_. _.._. _.. _- :...�._.: _ ..-.. _. _. — _ ..:,- ..TOP534.02 ._. — _. BUS � INV. 534 02 { �n 1 2W SETS — — — _ V i _.. I. RETAIL { I r t f,, } { 3,000 SFIcr 11 1 rci PARCELS l I 1 L € ; I =r { .,4rt 3a--:.:{ t; i1 !„{.� >24t7;.1 •�'`s,-- .57 ACRES 11 I 1' k PARCEL 1 1 1.0 ACaE� g -: j r t t)5 w; PARCEL 2 129ACRE5 } f , _') ,1 � I ;; @ 1 •: � -. 5 `, } c #,s EASTIIENT 77 3 z - t i. _ 24 I..� if• 't# $ 7t e t ^, 's �1 I PARC �. 1 ��, r itt -`' - ; : - <.. 2a - ---- --- — - ) I 1 ., U). I '^ .94 AC S ___ __ __ ( I' a v ; U25, k J ,t ffr t --- _____ ! ---- - e j I (. SETBACK a .6,1 24' L.??. 57 -- t1 �a I ___ _ 'i �om0, 2a. ( �, r s { r t.,4s• £ rf;;fts';silt{f �r�;ta � gag �M Eti 8 AY 46 '---•--' 12 17111A „ ,. c. —"�j., } Y (<{fs F t I R a'.. '" F i tij } 1r`r: Oa {t { i 1 �. r i l 6 SHOPPINGr ) + `+' PARcEt 7 ---- — -- . t 5 ----- - I.I g 43 �� i � i i _ STORAGE FACILITY a t ¢ I ` GROSS:2.77 ACRES ____ k ' d IS"' -. #-_: 2a'. - PARS o )�,t( t 1 + N 4ACRES O 6 � . I a 350 } ( rr' rs; I 2.•3. } W 15' 1 C. C'. 3. if itt ty �. •,.y n }:{}s - 1 e i. ______ -1 H30.664 t fr t ts}; �Ir,trsf ?.I,t,::Ytr ,{Y �,�,f.,t -zf ,Zit ;k3 -: __�_I t_,h_i fi`I £2l,t,:ti "�.,�.ff;y; 7+�8.;'S); .4�, • (JJ If F't, ______ 5PARCEL G i t 7< tt}, trf 1 1 1 }ntf - tt i .,�;, I s` t ltt t �- \` t 1 k tfSt t c .ttt}fr�'if 1 \', 11 t f1) FgiE EBCAPE \; ..' ... .._ ._._t-. .._ .._... .._.. ..,_. _... .— — — -'i'S"�+ Y 'tL+•+'F•''.'EASEMEBT , _.... za i " I , I r gi ti �\V. °s � � 9 I I }krt�t ft{t� 7 ri 1 rs t� rtalrrttts$t t, � �. � .•_.��• THE ARCHITECTURAL THEME OF THE SHOPPING CENTER WILL BE APPLIED It, f TO THE SELF STORAGE FACILITY TO }�A CREATE COHESIVE AESTHETIC TO THE I t {tI t} ttr y tir }t t7 %i I ENTIRE 11 ACRE PROJECT. �ff it t Itt t t A arrrir } rlt �f i }{I3t`r } `y •�{r�}rttrtf{}.i ttttr itrl tt,t.S},}' ll:; I E Y I Ns t I b Y 9! e r \0 INV. 526.73 RIM 530.90� I -_ _ ---"-- -- i) SHOPPING CENTER PARKING ANALYSIS USE REQUIRED STALLS PROVIDED A. 30.664 SF GROCERY 103 147 S. 2,000 SF COFFEE 27 28 C. 3,200 SF DRIVE THRU 43 30 D. 3.024 SF GAS 13 21 E. 3,6110 SF CAR WASH 12 24 F. 3,000 SF RETAIL 13 19 TOTAL 211 7 38,400 SF STORAGE FACILITY PARKING AND. BUILDING ANALYSIS USE/SIZE REQUIRED STALLS PROVIDED Al. 500 OFFICE /1.200 STORAGE 3 3 B1. 6.600 SF STORAGE - - C1, 3.000 SF STORAGE - - D1. 3,000 SF STORAGE - - El. 12,60GSFSTORAGE - F1.6,0GOSFSTORAGE - - G1.6,000SFSTORAGE - - TOTAL 3 3 NOTE: T ACCORDING TO SITE. PLANNING PRINCIPLES IN THE COMMERCIAL DESIGN. CRITERIA DEVELOPMENTS 25,000 SF OR LARGER REQUIRE AREAS EQUAL TO 5% OF THE TOTAL BUILDING SF FOR PUBLIC USES. 2. ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPE EQUALING 5% OF THE TOTAL BUILDING SF IS REQUIRED IN ADDITION TO FRONTAGE AND PARKING LOT LANDSCAPE. LEGEND RECORD BOUNDARY - — — — — — — - ADJACENT BOUNDARY - — — — — — - 25' BUILDING SETBACK: ----« -- - -- (EX) OVERHEAD ELECTRIC '^ •' '' (EX)STORMDRAIN _. .. ._--- _ .-_- - (EX) SEWER LINE —.. -- - —9. (EX). SSMH _. _. _. _.._.._ .._.._.._. (EX) WATER LINE —.._.._._. _.._._ _. (EX)WATER VALVE: --- -----'-'-----IF (EX) FIRE HYDRANT ROW DEDICATION - (N) LANDSCAPING VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE OWNER/APPLICANT NORTH STATE GROCERY, INC PO BOX 439 COTTONWOOD, CA 96022 ENGINEER DUANE K. MILLER CIVIL ENGINEER, INC. 6172 MEISTER WAY, UNIT 1 PO BOX 1307 ANDERSON CA 96007 PROJECT ADDRESS 2469 HARTNELL AVE REDDING,. CA 96002 2525 HARTNELL AVE REDDING, CA 96002 3055 APPIAN WAY REDDING, CA 96002 3050 LEONARDST REDDING, CA 96002 3091 APPIAN WAY REDDING, CA 96003. APNs 110-210-055,110-020-001 110-020-037,110-020-038 110-020-061 TOTAL AREA 11.32 ACRES CURRENT ZONING SC -SHOPPING CENTER 11.20 ACR ES PROPOSED ZONING HC - HEAVY COMMERCIAL 2.77 ACRES CURRENT GENERAL PLAN SC -SHOPPING CENTER. 11.20 ACRES. PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN HC- HEAVY COMMERCIAL 2.77 ACRES LANDSCAPING (11.32. ACRES) REQUIRED- 13,140 SQ FT PROVIDED - 42,484 SO FT APN STORAGE FACILITY 110-020-061 APNs SHOPPING CENTER 110-210 055, 110-020-001 110.020-037,110-02O-038 PLANS PREPARED UNDER City of Redding THE SUPERVISION OR Holiday Market Place ea°FEssiQv Use Permit Site Plan �O E K. 4,7 'T( DUANI1.11 ILI.F.R DATE SHEET 3 21 OVIL ENGINEIR INC. 11/i6/20 �`1 Q `Tl,IT CIVIL F.OF 0 Po I`Xl 1 1IF.'ISTtN tt 11 L VIT ] AnoFJls�n, ra�sum SCALE OF IENC CO PhtiF.NOk.COM 1"= 50' C4 7 - - - - - - -- - - — - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - ------ --------- ---------------- --------- HARTNELLAVENUE - — - — -- - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - ........... .......... N89'SY37*E 248.54' EASEMENT N8993,37*E 270LIN 'LOW + --- - - - - - - - - N89'WIO`W 14, (E) RECIPROCAL -- — — — — — — — — DRWEWAY EASEMENT PER 32 _PM_59 oi Ru �N ut"l, 13,625 ft' /56.276 3 1.00 ACRES 1, 67 5 A' 1.2 C yt 0.57 ACRES S89*53'59'W 122.76' RECF,,IOCAL�, am EASEMENT - - - - - - - - - - ox,- Ngo*wo(rw 202.�V NaM'24*W 9913' Sesu'SI'W 304.52' -"92' L:",13,78' -2992 41,313 f 0 115 ACRES 25' ---------- LANDSCAPE SEMACK ----------------- 1-7 Lu---------- - - - - - - - - - - 20,00- 1"N 00' L-62* 7 - - - - - - --- - - - Iizo o rt < 5,4V .20\,too, PSE LLI S42,5, 6"J(N) 13' EASEMENT 6 �ljl KARA (N) S. PSE \EASEMINT . . . . . . . . . . V 1 15 ACRE S - - - - - - - - - % m-- --------- -7 -------------- (N) IS- PSE N•(E) 20' EASEMENT FOR ROAD EASEMENT 4V RIGHT OF WAY AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES DEDICATION ---------- ------- PER 14 PM 31. 345 OR 293 --------------- ----------- AND 3N OR �ag "IX 01P --------- ------- ----------- I -- - ------ --- ------------ ---- --------------- (E) 2V EASMENT PER 345 OR -N893358*E 2 - - - - - - - - - NVO='OWW 28154' L4PCaE EASEMENT PER 1679-OR_103 R-79 L-aAO' is .......... R=79600 36 7w 36�1 --------------- 4 --------- --------------- wi. (E)FOR HIG20' EAHWAYSEMENT PURPOSE PER M ORS 153 LEGEND PROPOSED EASEMENT EXISTING EASEMENT INTERMITTENT STREAM EMERGENT WETLANDS (Z492 SF) EPHEMERAL SWALE (1.639 SF) SEE WETLANDS DELINEATION AND TREE SURVEY BY WILDLAND RESOURCE MANAGERS (N) ROW DEDICATION I 1 l I I I I I I I f I I I _T--- ---_ _L—i--� -- I U HARTNELL AVENUE ..., / -r .�.,...... aT...... ._ -. ,..,.,,K,,... ..... ...-. _.. .__ ._... ENIRY 70T � F � ENTRY 4 4 CEO � � 3t4 t '}� 4t tY lfi 3 tt t4r 4 3 t?rrt� ilt di,,, 4s i, t't4t4t l,lfr t �'I 4 �'•: � T'i �� J fs"}jt4tt l,�U { t,,S7 t i4 11 rt �r d' oo iCaes tltrr� T PAPS Y I� tr } b REC .57 05 ACRF,S �.. PARC,", uj i4' sot 44 a 7 1i1� I'{4� of t i i� VL I t k ti c[ PARCEL 4 .95 ACR S Y 1 4 .. ✓? ix s 1, 1 1 J st! 24 si4t ( �! trc t r tt lit s 4 t4 r 1 T4lLq APE i 0:95 ACRES I — _______-_ _ r4 a J i tt err r'r4 tu- I: Sv` 4 -- -^., �4 xg �44ir �s SHOPPINGCENTER �r r t -- 43 ACRESf s r l r PARCEL 7 I 4 s i 74 t STORAGE FACILITY r I --_-- -- PACRO55�2 43A6S �e Q RCELS 3:7 VRE9 ACRES I z I (N) 15• PSE t 4t� a av Acaes t}'LU �.. EASEMENT � rail 31 (t,�ts itr 7�f r4 7f r s}4 44Y 4 �24 t4 r +� i41t 1�, 1 4ttS ys ld tt' tf t tt ti t, �. rll4 t 4 Y r i£ tt Olt tr PARCE 4r rle ssrxs�Wut b7L `� Ij { i y4t, tli4{tt {r A 7 LBAIR. i $14,i 4 rY L — _,. .... .-., .. i _i__"- ! rti rt f 1; l S r,t iE W ��t \ l . ✓ �4 - - --- -------- cAre k�n`i ' ac—. I Er+tEa OR 4- I +. .4t i C l 4 t CUQ(} t 4 KNO KEY T (N)EASaENr r �j I 4� itti i, 47"q41 F7REE I T " -- ---'-`�'`'j' H�4" } t t \ � - 'a #s y'v�"t�7'�'' t I t 4 t I t t --ti}'- rQy t� Tll 4 { 4 is _T_----- vv l \ l .v = �, f # t t k4r 2 sl y 7 S'31.,~•,t.,r, rt .,, �� I �— — — — — — — _---- - - + .. —... i' (E) 2V EASENENI FOR HGHWAY 1 PURPOSES t{ f F f �r{7r tr ll`If at}t}} � ! I�{j�it,a ?•rjta$�tfffki r{r}t�1'trt{'� ati {; rft�ii#aa ss�a u<31 t{�]}yt�i{t�yfj,}%rr t,. f � tr sif3 C}ti a at a t�{1M�`}'irs;�'J'S#'Stia+aFa }it ar t Ir t. Ihtttt,s�`�ra}atyl}s�{ UN SOUTH WEST 3 SOUTH EAST ® 4 SITE AERIAL VIEW - 4 VIEW 3 VIEW - 4 LVV^V 74'-8" 1OT' 9'-2" 70'-8" 35'-6" STORAGE YARD O g O tv r ti e " WAREHOUSE. " RISER OLER PROOU .FIRE N cV _ ill I J .. 7 i tI(t£.. f4`t tt MEAT (:OGLER MEAT PREP PRODUCE PR r 29'-9" 22'-7" 161-8" 22 3" 17=311 DELI RE }. { F cm! (. t t4, it ii i} { i £ I ;4 o cC O _ DELI t t14t r } It Y £ i }Cj� t tl '}its it}ii Vi }<#it'st. }�tjt - tip ttsAl #t �� i i �it'�}I } F �' A Y 1 i ,• #. � � I ....... p. I. !.. I I i ! o it ire'._ I fi i}} }Y Vt Y I 12 t I # ( r { F ❑ ❑ DELI COOLER } '. 1 I Y�� tit I T £ � 3i� f£�EiSt f} t - J I r iiif'r i hks 11 £ i£;,kt t i{Jtt{ I ALLGENOE� pf �} Itly'" ti i>liaSOFFIT ABOVE dA1L 6ER6E I ._1 OSCT ' RE9TRO.. � 5-2 tffi5� I� 1' 21I 8-2" 30'-7" 7i42�9" L2 2 8 & REAI(R..OFi DINING REFR CA<•E --OFFICE ROOEt if IJ �jl L! 17 it. ftt allz... i -- -- o.. l 1 II tt t{ t p{~L i tyit t r� II II❑ v 36'-7" 10'-0" 48'4' 39'-4" 32'-8" 37A" 13' 6" 217'-0" j"tt } Will ,, � IL ' ' FLOOR PLAN - GROCERY I iit"I'm U111' IL4 I �q vo, ---- ------ -- V-5 IT . .. . ... ... I CO El J'u - - - - - - - - - - � - - - - - -- I lit- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - L r- 3- I - - - - - - L- - - - - - - - IfL- E TYP. BUILDING'A'- ROOF PLAN - GROCERY COLORSCHEME1 STONE VENEER BUILDING'A' ELEVATION GROCERY I BSB D E S I G N D C S I G BUILDING 'A' ELEVATIONS- GROCERY s PERSPECTIVE . C?LRSC EME1 STUCCO � N .. ROOF \\//� y \\ . . \[{±2\ . } BSB . } 2\ Gam} � \\ \ \ ƒ ( \� ,) BSB COLOR C METAL ROOF i I in BSB D E S VIEW - 3 VIEW - 4 IL ` ' RM BSB DESIGN rem no CrUCRAC " mo t �tv BUILDING ' ' ELEVATIONS - CS GAS 2 VIEW - 3 VIEW - 4 BUILDING'D' ELEVATION - CS GAS A4.03 L#L#fSC2ESC} STONE VENEER BOARD k BATT . ._e .. �� .|�¥.■: � <y K7777a M� FRONT ELEVATION , VIEW = 3 VIEW - 4 r �` VIEW - 4 COLOR STONE VENEER BUILDING'G' ELEVATION - STORAGE LAP SIDING LAP SIDING SCHEMES} BOARD & BATT 2:��.!■■ -.■:: ©�-©:.■©■ y-GROVE\ BOARD $ BATT 00� PYRAMID FLAGSTONE POST CAPC- ASPEN VISUAL BARRIER DETAIL OPTION 2 769- SPLIT FACE STANDARD - LIGHT / NOR- MAL WEIGHT 375- SPLIT FACE STANDARD - LIGHT / MEDI- UM WEIGHT VISUAL BARRIER PILASTER DETAIL - OPTION 2 FLAGSTON WALL CAP ASPEN CMU WALL DETAIL - 2 A8.02 VISUAL BARRIER WALL AND CMU WALL DETAILS NOTE PROD AEOL TRAS TO 11 DRAY (2H'X6'X3/16' STEELTUBE BEAMS CONNECTION PER STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS "ICHOLS PERFORATED METALPANEL -'STYLE. NAME" 8'.BASALR'E SPLIT FACE :37S STANDARD LIGHTfMEDIUM WEIGHT OR APPROVEDEGUAL:. SEE APPROVED PITCH TOWARDS GATE, SEE PLAN I THIS SHEET ROLL ON TRASH ENCLOSURES 3 CU VD 4Ff.X 6 FT 91N 6'.W CONC. CURB 4 8c.ROCKFACE CMU DOORS ANCHORED TO 4' DVG POST:: PROVIDE STEEL LATCH W/ PAD LOCK; BALL BEARING HINGES & CANE. BOLT WITH HOLES AT CLOSED B OPEN POSITIONS 4': MIN. THICK CONCRETE APRON FRONT ELEVATION 1 TRASH. ENCLOSURE PLAN SCALE: 3/6 =1'. SCALE: WEI IX M I STONE VENEER STUCCO PERSPECTIVE MONUMENT SIGNAGE AT CS GAS ALONG HARTNELL AVE. STUCCO FRONT Ej OF S k/ QVJVE SIDE FRONT PERSPECTIVE - V I E W - 3 MONUMENT SIGNAGE AT ENTRY ALONG SHASTA VIEW DRIVE ti tt {#t�jt'tttl3t t4tt t i t ttjt�#tt��ttw e `��tsflJ�€1x! ttz r ss tis )ti'. }tit st t''1rl s:.. s}si7is}t{tts ljttitif�{ s t ttsf sftE $t ifrstt,cs {ts tt1; �+s> tt}} i 7 z t3'(d}77sft,tr.�,>, rjr£ttt rJ�} } { trsst sr f ; 7 ft t' i�T �1 S��, t1 2 tz� j4 ztttt rt� tir #t t r YOU t t7att'tttJ�t {its"� i i�t�i��s� 4 t tt}fir sts{4 tf{�t,itj t4r� s2� Jz}y ist t t}t+st }r t t t1 zt i� rlttf k i} is } t { { s ttt .. �; tt tJ i?�jt�tttts t}t a}�tS t- iri - t«f'Ptr{tn tJ�t t tt# ttktstr ityJYt}7tt tp } � �tf iy t st t, t tti 7 } tJztstttzy �k`�' I it { r 4t�t r # i�lrlsJ} { ztt ztt�ytttk?, xsrRt{l tt' sf #t sits�rt�t �t�st�,�}�ttlsst�''� tttrt`it�s��frt`�'� IM i — .. �, j t a s , {�yi it }.�J } tf� f �i tlyt �( y •. _ .. �. _ _ -�_. £ £ 3 t Y T -4 Allf �wrrr Wrrw� rrr Yrrww� rr�r �r� R 1 F.rr�� rwn I rrrw� t}zfs If (Ian Il £ r{i£ ££ jt{�i{ts �F£Ji:r F 1 rF ('vr£k it,jj ateSHT'LL46 = 11 } t l I 1 77 a 7, t t f� tjlf 4 14 �i` ; � t 1i jail yAtj 1 1 f t j£t j t 4 j`i fjj tn1,l tttj i$ tr tt s„+y„a lilyil�SRI L 3 si t ss tt J6Yti£ saj i£ £tt t t=----- _j L N TT- ...� ..... .... .�.� _j SCALE: I, = 40'_Cn CENTIRE a s s o c i a t e s green design -landscape design emiranmental consulting mwM1 .mcentlreassocIates.cm 4475 Tenaya CL Redding, CA 96003 P 530-245-4590 F 530-245-4593 www.mcentirelandscaping.com C-27 U0 361638 PROJECT NAME: DESIGN/BUILD FOR HOLIDAY MARKET PLACE HARTNELL AVE at SHASTA VIEW DR, REDDING, CALIFORNIA SHEET NAME:MR LANDSAUMPE SHEET LAYOan UT PROJECT PHASE: DESIGN SUBMITTAL WORKING DRAWING REVISIONS: DESCRIPTION DATE DRAWN BY: JCC APPROVED BY: JLM DATE ISSUED: 2020111115 SCALE: AS -NOTED SHEET NUMBER: Plant Legend BOTANICAL —COMMON [Water Use] SIZE QTY 1 Acerrubrum'Red Sunsel'- 15 GAL 26 Red Sunset Maple [MOD] 2 PI tacla chinensis'Kelth Davey- Keith Davey Chinese Plslache [LOW] 15 GAL 41 3 Acermbrum'Bowhalr- 15 GAL 43 Bowhall Scarlet Maple [MOD] 4 Prunus cerasifera'Krautor Vesuvius'- 15 GAL 19 1 Kreuter Vesuvius Purple Leaf Flowering Plum [MOD] �� 5 I Lagerstroemia x'Natchez'- 15 GAL 24 Natchez (While) Crape Myrtle [LOW] 6 6 Abella x Grandiflova'Sherwoodg' -' Sherwood Glossy Abega[MOD] BGAL 35 7 ( Ilex comuta 'Dazzlee - 5 GAL 82 Dazzler Chinese Holly [MOD] 4",J 8 Rhaphialepis lndica'Enchantress'- Enchantress Pink India Hawthorn [MOD) 5 GAL 27 9 9 — Berbads Thunbergil Rose Glow'- Rose Japanese Barberry 5 GAL 108 ( Glow [MOD] 10 10 Vibumum finus'Compacta'- 5 GAL 43 Compact Laumstinus (MOD) F"t9g �11C 11 — Loropeta/um chinense'Razzleberry- 5GAL 34 .get. Razz{ebeny Lorapetalum [MOD]. - tz 1 12 Lavandula Auguslifolia'Hldcote Giant'- Hldcote Giant English Lavender — 5 GAL 110 ( [LOW] 13 13 Rosa 'Flowering Carpet Rose'- 2 GAL 95 Flowering Carpet Rose (Reds and Whites) [MODI Phormium lenax'Bronze Baby - 't 14 �15 Bronze Baby New Zealand Flax [LOW) 5 GAL 20 t5 Parovskla atriplicifolia Blue Spire'- Spire 1 GAL 73 I Blue Russian Sage [LOW) i - ---- Deer Grass I Muh/enbergia rigens - 1.GAL 64 [LOW] 17 Ca/amagrostis x aculiflom'Karl Foerster - 1 GAL 14 — Feather Reed Grass [LOW] 181 I Pennisetum orientale'Kariey Rose'- 1 GAL 50 Kadey Rose Fountain Grass [LOW] t9I Bouteloua grac/lis'Blonde Ambition' - 1 GAL 140 Blonde Ambition Grama Grass [LOW] 20 Pennisetum alopecuroides'Lgtle Bunny- 1GAL 98 Little Bunny Fountain Grass [LOW] �— ----,apan!hus -- -�-��_ 21 hybdd'Queen Anne'-- F{9 GAL 122 Queen Anne U lyof-the-Nile (MOD) aWe 22 Cotoneaster dammeri'Lowfast'- 1 GAL 104 o Lowfast Cotoneaster [LOW] 23 Dietes Iriefloides - 1 GAL 148 Fortnight Lily [LOW] r 0- ' 24 ----- Pitfosporum tobim'Wheeler's Dwarf - 1 GAL 21 Wheeler's Dwarf Tobira [MOD] z5 125 Pymcantha coccinea'Lowboy- 1GAL 62 Lowboy Flrethom [LOW] 26 Hemerocalfis hybrfd'Stala do Oro- 1 GAL 26 Stage de Oro Yellow Daylgy [MOD] !i 27 Rosemadnus officinalis'Huntington Carpef - 1 GAL 138 . Huntington Carpet Rosemary [LOW] 0• 2e 28 Ceanothusgriseushonzontafis- 1 GAL 135 Carmel Creeper [LOW] a 29 29 Juniperus sabins'Broadmoor 1GAL 168 Broadmoor Jun[per[LOW) �� ArctosfapRadi ut 1 GAL X. Boari erry [LOW] Radiant t3oarberry [LOW] 660 SF Annual 4" POTS @12"OC f Juncuspalons'ElkBlue'- 1 GAL 193 (386 LF Elk Blue California Gray Rush [LOW) @24° OC) 1. Symbols reflect approximate plant size with 5 years growth. 2. Quantities shown are approximate. Verify quantilles In the field to accommodate actual site conditions and dimenslons, and to preserve plan spacing and layout. 3. An planters shall be mulched to a minimum depth of 3" with: A) 1/4" itne bark mulch to Annual Color areas; B) Waikon fir bark or rack (as noted) in remaining planter areas. 4. All construction shag conform to the'Standards for Public Works Construction' (Green Book), Slate and Local Ordinances, and Local jurisdictlon Construction Standards. 5. In accordance with Chapter 18.47.020 of the Redding Municipal Code,. the Contractor reserves the right to make alterations to the Approved Plans as necessary to address existing conditions, unforeseen site changes due to construction activities, and/or. plant nursery stock avagabpty, without plot City approval or re -submittal, so long as said changes do not affect the character or quantity of the plant material or the Inigatbn system design t I� (i rf fit St 6. AD dirnenslons, grades, and utility locations , of ponstruotion: i } i-{ iilit t+tirr)iii(rr�t 7. Ali planting areas shag be loosened top 'p '¢t`' i,�'` `s1te eo sir 'i� � s needed to provide moisture retention if lopso,jp"fTItag be dean, friable loti`tY)rt ,,Y"at( of approximately 6.5-7.0. t) rii } rt Y7 t istri it t r}� AA 8. Ail planters shall have a mug hf� '4i'elrnv the top of cacti,. tl i ii#,' 54 rj i?i 4i 9. A fully automatic krlgat4on �, be Installed. All valves shag be below gretle valve box.. ;ti>, MII,RN�01 10. This plan is for the sole num Associates and Is not Intended to be used purpose. Copyright by �A&soctates. AN rights reserved, No part of this plan ma "41 t t, i reproduced out ex��en pemdsslon from McEntb'e Associates. To be returt'!`i"+}` used, rr�) rr j t�rrfi'i r 11. The Contractor has sate Si to limit and/or hag work to be performed during times of unsuttabla conditions'to pth to prevent voiding the long-term Warranty/Guamnteeror produce situations where I ; 4,lrnt the Project or Agency are necessary. Said conditons may Include, but not be ted folic 11tp temperature conditions, hot or acid; eHmatk conditions such as high winds or rain: wet or tY(1 conditons; and work or Installation conflicts with other contractor/sub-contractors on ��ir Ch the conditions Iisted "A" through 'Incomplete or un-flnlshed I ndscap i 12. Landscape maintenance and estabi hmant PROJECT REVIEW BY DIVISION RECEIVED APPR( PLANNING PARKS WATER REU-ELECTRIC 1. THIS IS A NEW CONSTRUCTION PROJI 2. TOTAL LANDSCAPE SQUARE FOOTAG OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS McENTIRE ASSOCIATES, INC. WILL NOT BE REST UNAUTHORIZED USE OF, OR CHANGES AND/OR ANY AND ALL CHANGES TO THESE PLANS MUS' APPROVED BY McENTIRE ASSOCIATES; INC. TH AND iDEAS.SET FORTH HEREIN AS AN INSTRUN IS THE PROPERTY OF McENTIRE ASSOCIATES A IN PART FOR ANY OTHER PROJECT, WITHOUT T AUTHORIZATION OF McENTIRE ASSOCIATES. © COPYRIGHT. 2020. ALL RIGH CRIME PREVENTION THROUGH ENVIRONMENTF THIS PLAN HAS BEEN DESIGNED UTILIZING THE DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS OF "CPTED", CRIME ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN. a s s o c I a 1 e s green deSW • landscape deskJn environmental convuliing tW✓w.meentlreassociates.eom 4475 Tenaya Ct. Redding, CA 96003 P 530-245.4590 F 530-245-4593 www. meentimiandsm plrig.corn C-27 Llc# 361638 PROJECT NAME: DESIGN/BUILD FOR HOLIDAY MARKET PLACE HARTNELL AVE at SHASTA VIEW DR, REDDiNG, CALIFORNIA SHEET NAME: LANDSCAPE PLAN PROJECT PHASE: p� DESIGN SUBMITTAL WORKING DRAWING REVISIONS: DESCRIPTION DATE DRAWN BY: JIM APPROVED BY: JLM DATE ISSUED: 2020/11/15 SCALE: AS -NOTED SHEET NUMBER: 1 t 1 F 1 r 1 1 1 1 1 , 1 1 1 C I i 1 I t I I 1 i I 1 I r r I I r I F I 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 r I I I ( I I I I I I I f i i I I 1 N I 1 1 , I 0 10' zo' 40' 1 1 9GALE: I" = 20'-0" 1 NOTE: FOR LEGEND & 11 CONSTRUCTION NOTES, 11 SEE SHEET L-1 i 1 210 5F OF ANNUAL GOLOR 0 tl G. V °1 � a i Rw PAD E .� , i "' ' �.�% � �.n. ° o a : � ;,c=o"a � °-�'�®® ..�. �.Fl�:tk.®®®ix ��,.rt;: R. 'r-.n:_ ®m®rt;.r; st tt:.,•: rtz 1151101111111 ��` ��,_ ��►,►��, gym; ",- 4Y 0 1 }� n rA �1 I�wlq O �° 0 r n*� �' E • :s 6tpio — D Jar,I CENTIRE a s s o c i a t e s greon 0+lantls�apa tleslAn envlrgnmvilal consulting www.mcenthassociates.c°m 4475 Teneys Ct. Redding, CA 96003 P 630-245.4590 F 530-245.4593 www.mcentrelarvdscaping.com C-27 Lc# 3616W PROJECT NAME: DESIGN/BUILD FOR HOLIDAY MARKET PLACE HARTNELL AVE at SHASTA VIEW DR, REDDING, CALIFORNIA SHEET NAME: LANDSCAPE PLAN PROJECT PHASE: DESIGN SUBMITTAL WORKING DRAWING REVISIONS: DESCRIPTION DATE DRAWN BY: JCC APPROVED BY: JLM DATE ISSUED: 2020/11/15 SCALE: 1'm20'-0" SHEET NUMBER: N a lo' 20' 40 SCALE: I" = 20'-0" NOTE: FOR LEGEND & CONSTRUCTION NOTES, SEE SHEET L-1 { { 1 1 1 1 1 1 \ \ 1 1 I 1 i 1 \ 4 1 C \ j t v „t PAD"srt r t t 1 7 rtt' R E Ttyylt.; i}tir 13 7u{� o 7 � C \ It f t �� \ E.Y � 0 VOa ze k Jul�rs \ � 0��;o, J 4, 4. tlN t' tttr t }{ttl} .,1 rri 44} f v '. .22 �A C\ \ E \ \ \ c C \ c tAu�scar CENTIRE a s s o c i a t e s green desW. lords ps daign emkonme wc."utam www.mcentlreassoclates.com 4475 Teneys Ct Redding, CA 96D03 P 530-2454590 F 530,2454593 www,mcenUrdandscaping.com C-27 Lc# 361638 PROJECT NAME: DESIGNBUILD FOR HOLIDAY MARKET PLACE HARTNELL AVE at SHASTA VIEW DR, BEDDING, CALIFORNIA SHEET NAME: LANDSCAPE PLAN PROJECT PHASE: DESIGN SUBMITTAL WORKING DRAWING REVISIONS: DESCRIPTION DATE DRAWN BY: JCC APPROVED BY: JLM DATE ISSUED: 2020111115 SCALE: 1"-20'-W SHEET NUMBER: 1 I HARTNELL AVE 1 I oUDPOon _ » _,m° _p000po DP o DOPDo O°9P a. DO o4 p➢DO p0➢P _.. e9➢ oOUPo °PPO .. ° °�Dbp°70➢boo. Ovo- 29 w '-__ • o � � o� ao 'o � a o ao c n 2B o 48- � m 29 29 0� v 2B e - ve➢D29 �....� � ° 29 "p029 �'v�p� ...no29 0 _ i. ,vP pDDo a vi°aDDp D D8w> Pgbneov ° °°evgD ovPo P➢ao v ° vaD ° vD Dve°°vvD ➢ D D➢ ° P Dv °a ° °aao °vim ab ° vv � � dv vu vvDo D -ed D - — — — _' — — — — — — — — _ � .. m � a o o ° za zB ze ze za 2 "o o➢o vvD � za ze 2e ze za ° � °° ° zs 4 g tV _ a 2e za a „_� ze zB 2B v 1� ze a m o ze ° zB 2e°� ®2B za o 2a ° 2B °p _ , \ ° o® ®= o a° o n a= va a o o> =o ze d ° 6 8 i.1 OP 0� °p➢DOD 0 0 ° °00 06�°. °0 Da° °OP 21 26 8 28 2B aD80� ° DP40 0 0 °aD OD fl\� °O 0� °OD a 28 28 D 2B ADC➢0 oODCOL OP ° °00000 op a •• W_.W ., 9 8 10 10 7 r,g 1wE ag 11? �, 7 7 10 10 N tii y�1 %N 10 0 6 e -_ e, I. Lu _ w I ,. 0 T A P R, 10 0 6 8 ,,„, 10 . , 0 8 i � I PAD F I I — — — RE,AI L. - 1 T i it ti`t i � i I � E X I S T I. N' G. 2 A R. t Est �ttt t t#'t r /t; - / P A D E 1 ,2 zz ... 4' {�}t £ t lr{ w. s I Itk t t2 2"SA1y i - � ;. R A H 27 a 27 _ J ti SHEET L-6 I 1 ._�.. _ I >< sl Y L.E.. S 11:.§ It }2 I I rz 12 O F F I C E r — 2 27 SHEET L"4 2 1 !i'.. .� y sI tl I J r} ENTRY EXIT DRIVE 7. ._ ,� x'. .i: _...x ,d.'. WI— _i'_ ._._t.,,;t It t rt'.. t.'1 it Srst_ _......... _..___ W 1 I DEC.OftAtlVtr MA501L4RY WALL LIN E F t � 18 16 19 15 16 15 18 15 1b 3� 18 16 18 �:'�'i��, r tv _ �l}I �SJt ui Lu y 2 15 SHEET _ 12 1 �SHEET.L-5 u I3 I 1 2 27 27 1 1 1 `f 1_j � Iw f t ( } f tk b tti. t/ t t�t} t 1 1?t It tltt4 (. 1J3F i _ L[J �2 ,4 4k ftt {ti }J t n}'£ i.?,St�t 3J y 1 F (1 1 i k Sr t.tl k�£ i tt t I t 7 S f 5 tt ft. - #{{,.2{}„ 1t 3 �<'{'..,� r U ttt, tt;t„„r�✓ ",. 1�{SI £ U- t 1 £ti rt{ 14t{j i _ LU t _ 7tS ti 14£. Jt e[ }ti 1 tf rtr;tt�(tt� }^{ ty{t t# fit t Lt}lJ�t h i t Sk {tc tt t� /irt di7l� _ Vl lr4�E'2t 1 l 1 1 ...I 1 J W_ -ui ui x1 Lu 1= GENTIRE aSSoCIates green desIgn • landscape design environmenlal con Oft www.mcentireassodatee.com 4475 Tenays CI. Redding, CA 96003 P 530.2454590 F 530-245.4593 www.mcenlrebndscaping.com C-27 LIC# 361638 PROJECT NAME: DESIGN/BUILD FOR HOLIDAY MARKET PLACE HARTNELL AVE at SHASTA VIEW DR, BEDDING, CALIFORNIA SHEET NAME: LANDSCAPE PLAN PROJECT PHASE: DESIGN SUBMITTAL WORKING DRAWING REVISIONS: DESCRIPTION DATE DRAWN BY: JCC APPROVED BY: AM DATE ISSUED: 2020/11/15 SCALE: 1'-10'-0" SHEET NUMBER: I _ SHEET _ _r -r_-...rro r......_rr_.. 15 ri � i � i r a. r r. i. r r i2 I SHEETL-5 YI 27 L - 1 27 27 4 f - 1 t7 itt'dy;��t t,t !fj7 I i� 22 // I,.VQ �. T 9 22 22' -H ts17tjy�st{iji 'situ{lxl }t 1 (LLi kti tuft tt`ft{i ''tlt4s it aftft F— e rYIto 1z12I PAD A stI at `c, t+, St{67sf i. 25 r MARKET u _ II Y{;P _ 3�2 _ o fa tfstk�jzst {{rat{ is t r tS is �{itt _ � 9 � 22� V). •t ft ( t ^t st i s ts� t I. 9 �� ts�t{ytlts 7tt,t �`tt ti i{tt 1`vF z i iti kj tt is ;tlti ��°g� _159t. s k t tl{ rttrs } t {1 9 na 9 ots{z t }} t 25 z - si4 Ld G r is :5 12....9 12 12 i i : i « 9 22 5 , 8 3 8 B 6 n 71 t Iti t t t s i j 9 22' �t s { tf i 3 s I 1 1 a 1 I I� - 16 I f E 99 D RI V E W A Y I ( LRIVEW4Y w-� - T T_ T T T T _ �_ - -- --- --- -- — - — -- -- ---- ---- -- -- --- -- -- -- — — — — — — — — — - — — — — — — �,fi� 0 10' 1d 40' •--------------------------------� — — — — — — — — — — — — — � I I NOTE: FOR LEGEND 8. L CONSTRUCTION—_-----�-- SEE SHEET L-1 _ _MATC THIS I- N Q 2 O W .l LIMITS OF LAND50APE IlMcENTIRE a s s o c I a t e S en Bred-Wm-land-A. dealgn enviro—ital mnsu*v www.mcenereassociates.com 4475 Teneye CL Redding, CA 96D03 P 530-245.4590 F 530-245.4593 www.mcanOrelandsca*g.com C•27 Uc# 361638 PROJECT NAME DESIGNIBUILD FOR HOLIDAY MARKET PLACE HARTNELL AVE at SHASTA VIEW DR, REDDING, CALIFORNIA SHEET NAME LANDSCAPE PLAN PROJECT PHASE: DESIGN SUBMITTAL WORKING DRAWING REVISIONS: DESCRIPTION DATE DRAWN BY: JCC APPROVED BY: JLM DATE ISSUED: 2020/11/15 SCALE: 1'-20'-0" SHEET NUMBER: — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1 HARTNELL AVE ' w e ng IDEW ALK ' __ b'1 9 � I e 0a0o oOODaoa00oP g 9 oxem eo290 ao aVo°�o6� — i-1------------- --.. 9 na o °aa �22 9 Vi 12 a i r °i f ttl 822 EX , S T i ,..r Z s � _ �.. 6 A R � G • 1222 n L t {f rt 1 tY t 15 25 M ATCHLINE_ — THIS SHEET SHEET L-6-- - F 9 22 22 9 22 �L E A S I N G ( t2 t2 ti i t 0 F F IOE r t t r 1 i }a ii isitl i i 1$ }t t7 y {�f}i�� flit tiY ijt l}3 i I{ ti 4i t �.Fi i'�f} _ fit{lt t�t i. i { 1t}t '( jii 9 2x'ag - ® r) ti.t;l{Y t(ltli 713i Sti ii t t"' t ii. } i <.tib i{f it jt}I„r Ltf i1 SHEET L1�uj i `: i J 21GF to> lY ii 26 ENTRY / EXIT DRIVE` _ ij t ti ff ..i# i 1 �v vuLL or+ PROPERrT uNe )it ij.. _ a y t t.........t I ea r,I t3 1 S l 1 I iii i s.y 5tJ j Jti tj fit` i 7 r {} ti t} - 9 na ttl L'J - h ii t ;�t�i kkyt yitftt4 t i {F t. i3ti jyr }i ill;;. � itci t t i� ti Sit 4� I. .8' tfly is $t4f;t it}3y (tt t.. '�. 1 it fit r}ii }l lE g 22 / L,J 9 i� 1 Srtiit Y1I. F- ° ° i,l it t t 1, g _ k� S y l Y s i t ftii 8 22"4 a tilyi}}tt:dts, { sijyl I s} tsitl;i6 i f "22Y °1 L. .1st e t} H =n I hyt{ 71 ttiti t tJ71 i / �. -° g L S �t}ty C Ctrs' a i s •$i t$ktiy e} e22 t tt s r ii t !t£ii -. L4 tit{ 8;�' 4yryx t{ I yt ) .. � I z22 v I i�"� i littiittt}dl`} ti jy S'u ttl it#sctl 22 _ LJPi)22 0�< 1 ti tit,i ittt t I. I. {i i 8 ii y i 9 a n 9 0,11 �- IC Aaea i t 7 4 tJ . c 4, n ;' _ ffi y FIRE ACC-55. OR, MATCHLINE. t tr=ti#,'i., I Z THIS SHEET 777777-7 s ` I. 2s xx S W - 22 ,°,ZI - l� — — — — ° J 9 n a I 13 ° N LIMITS OF ( LANOSGAPE . u �v r, " n ,° Ir 2N2�t?'I I--_---_-_-----i_--__--_�/ w I- I SCALE: P- 20'-O° W 22.a, J Lu NOTE: FOR LEGEND & I CONSTRUCTION NOTES, - I ' I—T---------------------------r---------- SEE SHEET L-1 CENTIRE a s s o c i a t e s green design - Iandstape design envirO tal -aft www.mcenllreassoclates.00m 4475 Tenaye Ct Redding, CA 96003 P 530-245.4590 E 530.245�4593 www.meandrelandscaping.com C-27 Uc# 361638 PROJECT NAME: DESIGN/BUILD FOR HOLIDAY MARKET PLACE HARTNELL AVE at SHASTA VIEW DR, REDDING, CALIFORNIA SHEET NAME: LANDSCAPE PLAN PROJECT PHASE: DESIGN SUBMITTAL WORKING DRAWING REVISIONS: DESCRIPTION DATE DRAWN BY: JCC APPROVED BY: AM DATE ISSUED: 2020111115 SCALE: 1"=20'-V' SHEET NUMBER: SCEIVED MAY 1 8 2021 BYt............. --, ........... unbeara ................. solution t "fe noise, traffic, WATIM-72 R CITY OF BEDDING 777 CYPRESS AVENUE, REDDING, CA 96001 P.O. Box 496071; REDDING, CA 96049-6071 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AND INTENT TO ADOPT A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION REVISED Dear Property Owner or Agency: This notice is being sent to property owners within or near the area shaded on the attached map and to all public agencies who are reviewing agencies for this environmental document. The map shows the property, consisting of 12.13 acres, on which TJG/Summit Development Corporation is requesting approval of Use Permit Application UP-2020-01669, Parcel Map Application PM-2021-00290, General Plan Amendment Application GPA-2020-01667, and Rezone Application 2020-01668 to allow the construction of the Hartnell Commercial Complex consisting of a 3�e foot Holiday Market Grocery Store, and five outer pads for retail, a drive -through restaurart�'ditwhrough, and an automobile fueling station with a convenience store on property located a�and 2525 %a�lj Avenue, 3055 and 3097 Appian Way. The project also includes the r. quest to a11o�v l` if storage facility 6 8 acres of land on property located at 3050 Leonard Street. he parcel map relate ;the project will delin�,each of the retailspaces and the proposed self -storage facility on their respectli'arcel, taking the total �atrels from five to seven. The rezone is a request to change the current zoned "1�i#. Shopping Center on t,`�roposed 2.8-acre self -storage facility parcel to "HC" Heavy Commercial. Thy=,�neral Plan amendment request reflects the rezone request to amend the existing General Plan designation �� hopping Center" to "Heavy Commercial." rti} Yl The City of Redding �lgtion had �t�e the project and, based upon the whole record before the City (including the Init�alrdy and�=pporti a;documentation), is recommending that a Mitigated Negative Declaration* be adopted pur to the Cali to Environmental Quality Act. All interested persons are invited tc ainment in Planning Division prior to the end public rev Declaration begins May 8, 20217 ends J� recommending adoption of the Mitigated �I notification will be made for all public ldart� and project approval. Adoption of the Mitigated N of the project. the draft Mitigated Negative Declaration to the Thc,comment period for the Mitigated Negative 2;k„?'`he Planning Commission will consider t{'f� �tt� Council at a later date. Subsequent ,�b`onsid;txon of the environmental document 'laration wI!`„conclude the environmental review tt 1 f ri t } ik� �i The Initial Study; site plan, project descrlptloz;tlgated Ne�t� Decla�tlon, and other information concerning the project is available for pubhcr��tew frci��z ��tti. weed sat the Planning Division, Development Services Department, 777 Cypias Avenue, fi g, CA 9600I � olephone 530-225-4022) and online on the Planning/Projects page of the Development Services webslt+# www cityofredding ors. For more information pleasecontact Assistant Planner, Sean Price at the abovxt�dress 41 �Y l / t "i,:r ij" f77 t�,ir �tf?�t it ,J. Lily Toy, Planning Manager Development Services Department *A Mitigated Negative Declaration is a determination that a project will not have a significant impact on the environment because of mitigation measures that have been added to the project. LT:et Dated: May 7, 2021 Attachment: Location map c: Shasta County Clerk U.S. Army Corp of Engineers, Redding Shasta Environmental Alliance CDFW. Redding California Native Plant Society, Shasta Chapter CVRWQ Control Board, Redding All pro2erty owners within 300 feet of the project The purpose of the public hearing is to obtain information from the public concerning theyroject described above. At the hearing, the Planning Commission will consider the information provided by the public; the applicant, anstaff and then determine whether to approve or deny the project. In most cases, the project will not be before the Planningg Commission unless staff is recommending approval of the project. If you challenge the project or decision in court; ,you may be limitedto raising only those issues you raised at t e public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission at, or prior to, the public hearing. WILSON AVE BELLADONNAST -- ------ - LLu — — -- > Z O (A O] _ -- cn — -- —Q HAWN AVE -- - - z JONQUIL WAY -- �. I 2525 HT� j - -- — _ HARTNELLAVE r , -- F 4m �� ' '� �`' � t� �� 73050 LEONARD ST----...--- 2468 — ----- tax p, p d O t( f i � l MARILYN AVE a rrrr i�r��itE� 30 PIAN WAY AN,1� i { tlll t 4 tri ALDEN AVE cn 4 r1 7 t rs k ,,y� — --- - T MARLENE AVE O��ST z m N GIS DIVISION INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT w E DATE PRODUCED: NOVEMBER 24,2020 5' 0 200 400 Feat LOCATION MAP MTG. DATE: ITEM: UP-2020-01669 / GPA-2020-01667 / RZ-2020-01668 TJG / SUMMIT DEVELOPMENT &-2525 HARTNELL AVE/3055 & 3091 APPIAN WAY/3050 LEONARD ST ATTACHMENT: AP# 110-210-055 / 110-020-001, -037, -038 & -061 May 13, 2021 Lily Toy, Planning Manager Development Services Department City of Redding P.O. Box 496071 Redding, CA 96049-6071 RE: Approval of UP-2020-01669, GPA-2020-01667 and Rezone Application 2020-01668 Dear Ms. Toy d the current Holiday Market. We have lived here since ) We live on Marilwwhich 1 1978. It's been tant battle with the (area behind market is not paved). The litter from the recyclin N J r and market blows yards and pools. Both companies have been . . . . . . . contacted � y times regarding this i' ue. They have done a horrible job of helping keep our -- neighbo uent the recycling center and have cut holes in our neighbors fences. ssp ,y,,our neighbors and needles have been tossed over fences. Supposedly, there is a curfew onesdelivery s can arrive but frequently they have failed to abide by these directives. Thet"A"'e from these s can be heard in all directions around the market. There is a nice shopping area in' City needs to revitalize existing c Since we feel that a larger complex will sign this project. Sincerely yours, X" David & Lana Ferreira 2405 Marilyn Ave. Redding, CA 96002 most of it sits empty. The we are opposing From: Se Yulli To: To Lii Subject: Shasta View/Hartnell Holiday projects Date: Friday, May 14, 2021 11:07:49 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside the City of Redding; please be careful with links or attachments. I own the home at; 2980 Shasta View Dr. My concerns are very real. It seems the homeowners on the Westside of Shasta View Drive are being left out of all Enviormental documents that I have read! I'm not only speaking of homes on S.V. Please take into consideration of all the single family homes and apartments on the West that have been patronizing the Holiday MaT�,et for years Their welfare is a serious matter, Why? Because of mother's pushing children in buggies, disal chairs and others must travel in the street in the right tuning lane on S. ¢4 fry s f � r i s� tri View to reach the ex��hday Mark ys r hy� Because there is "NO" sidewalk on the west side. It is only a matter of time until ne is injured or This is not the first time I have requested a sidewalk at the Planning Deptiers walk in street to agrass, mud, a fence and tree on public land where sidewalk is N. needed so the s� is used. It is my understag a sidewalk is going in on the east side, again this is not a safe option either, b Rv@ se cars that try to turn lei Ito side streets get rear ended. A crosswalk dose not seem as safe as a signal. My hod ,on the corner of S. View is had cars making a right coming from East (where New Holiday is proposed) they o��p in my front yardtearing the fence down and it has been replaced twice. I also spent close to $1000 placing hu ``� �ulders m front to hopefully protect my Grandaughter and Great Grandchildren. I sold a potion of in cornef l l instal � th `` !, ,scorner. So Where is the sidewalk to go with to it? If you need videos we have a c . glad to � `h �i"'k : Another example is the car traveling in the right turning lane off Hartnell to S.View he rtio thesign tht faced just passed the industrial driveway. Please Mw someone truly need to takeresponsibi tiow. Do not wai�,�take responsibility after the inevitable happens! Remember all of us we will be your mers, plead "HThe City needs to really should look at t i � the NW corner it is a trash collector, d trees I found of meths lot of garbage etc.. my market value has declined, more noise, pollutants and tr�t�nll co�rd`effect�i .ght when there was only a stop sign, etc. Getting out of the driveway takes time, pi��scary A� and now we expect more! Sincerely, Betty Yuill and Gomez 05/14/21 Sent from my iPhone A. oPtvu, 1e Pl cUAl?E 1 Ful5e-1G < is * �C-n� G (0-Fr- H :7�ja j a ,e m %i MASO 9/ V I 1 I � �� q -- 0 ivo 140 Mayor R. Anderson did not object to limiting the amount of professional office space-. Council Member P. Anderson stated that in the spirit of economic development and the creation of employment, she would like to see the applicant's representative work with staff to develop alternatives acceptable to both parties. Mayor R. Anderson determined that there were no additional individuals present wishing to speak on the matter and closed the public hearing. MOTION: Made by Council Member P. Anderson, seconded by Council Member Kehoe, requesting staff to work with the applicant's representative to develop alternatives which are acceptable to both the City and the applicant. The vote; Unanimous Ayes At the hour of 9:17 p.m., Mayor R. Andersen declared the meeting recessed. At the hour of 9:28 p.m., Mayor R. Anderson reconvened the meeting. PUBLIC HEARING - re Appeal of Tentative Subdivision Map S-3-90, Forest Homes Sub v s o-n, -Phase III, Appeal by Kenneth Harrison, et al (Shasta view Drive) (S-100-208) The hour of 7 OQr�arrived, Mayor R. Anderson opened the public hearing regarding tt'} ,optative Subdivision Map 5-3-90, Forest Homes Subdivisio�r,;%.. III; api,abyKenneth Harrison, et al. The fold � documents are one, le in the office of the City Clerks R, avit of Puhlication`E ', otice of Public Hearing avit of Mailing - Nt�` of Public Hearing ning Commission recordation dated May 31, 1994 V city k Strohmayer advised i* no protests were received. Princit iplanner Keaney related that the Planning Commission, at its meeting of RI April#,`994, approved the Tentative Map for Forest Homes III Subdivision, granting# v zLyrsn perngkssion to create 58 single-family residential lots on 17 acres loca}� t� Shasta Vi*Wy# e� west of Clover Creek, and south of Hartnell Ave �� 'ent1�%��'�xappeal of the conditions of approval pertaining to 'ieitpro ments "�eYinard � "r was received. He noted that the subdivision was original%proved in �, and the initial phases of the project on the west side,o asta View Dr were constructed. The portion of the subdivision east of�sta View Drive This subdivision represents a reapplication. Mr. Keaney explained thattt e appeal of t�IPpravalr t the subdivision reflects concerns of property owners%,}i Leonardtt��t nor�;� the subdivision regarding increased traffic on that � t 10�;ttion ,�4�`��mal limit improvements to that street to providing `��'gavel �lders`'%� Bcent to undeveloped parcels. This portion of Leonard`'""street, �t,�e"opinion, {Mthe City Attorney, is not a public street; however, it hau,,�k maintaine�t�y the city since annexation in 1976. It was also maixtaine� the County ofr �ssta prior to that time. The street has a paved width of #'i" t, although br� has narrowed the effective width to 20 feet adjacent,��k' pndeveloped pas orb, gutter, sidewalks and streetlights are nonen% Mr. Keaney stated that the desigp��( the �ts�'��bdivisio�'as far back as1985, recognized the desiraShastaView Drive, providing a southern outlet for that desert'ss primarily for access to Alta Mesa School, for emergency needs, and ,allow servo, vehicles to be more efficient. The provisions of the develo�it agreem,% not require Mr. Lynn to obtain public dedications for her% d Stre�;,,,t provide additional improvements.�7�?, '» Mr. Keaney related that the appellants, represent ,,g 4 of , y� operties that abut the street, have requested the following 1. Assurances that there will not be an strict formed to maintain and improve Leonard Street, a�t`si 2. That the City establish and purchase a 40-foot right-of-way for the street. The minimum right-of-way width is generally 60 feet; 3. That streetlights be provided; 4. That sewer and gas lines be installed in Leonard Street, presumably at Mr. Lynn's or the City's expense. It is the recommendation of staff that the City Council deny the appeal and uphold the conditions applied by the Planning Commission. If the City Council determines that Leonard Street should not be connected,- it is suggested that it would be prudent to cease further maintenance of that street by the City and to not require completion of the road shoulder work. Council Member McGeorge noted that trees in the area are very close to the street, which is dark and narrow. He also indicated that there are children in the area and did not believe that the current plans were adequate if Leonard Street in to become a natural arterial for the subdivision. 06/07/94 California Wildlife FoundationlCalifornia Oaks, 201 University Avenue; Berth H-43 Berkeley, CA 94710, (510) 763-0282 June 2, 2021 Lily Toy, Planning Manager City of Redding, Development Services Department 777 Cypress Avenue Redding, CA 96001 RE: Hartnell Commercial Complex proposal by Summit Development, Permit No. UP-2020- 01669, PM-2021 002 }Q 01667, and RZ-2020-01668 �t , O��R ter zia+` ttj,r � Submitted via erp� ;toy@cityofre f g org ( p tk 4 Dear Ms. ToyZi""J}"" tt t = t}1 tt77, i rjt £f The Californ��Faks ro ram of Califs `{4f`ia Wildlife Foundation CWF/CO works to conserve �r P g f � ) oak ecosyste�f their criticalrole in sequestering carbon, maintaining healthy watersheds, prang wildlife habitat, and sustaining cultural values. Shasta Environmental Alliance, a mem� r@la Oaks n, reached out to CWF/CO with concerns about the proposed Hartnelrclal�p� pct impacts on the oak trees on the site. t'ta zizf �� ,ixr is CWF/CO reviewed the Recircul 1Vlitigated tive Declaration, Biological Review, Environmental Initial Study, aR4ak Resource wort. It is concerning that the project does not include the retention of any of t ative trees �uding , blue oaks that are 20-inches or greater at breast height, that the 1$@,or ru��tlon @�izy itg does not specify that it will include native oaks, that the enviro�t}nalysi,jnct'bphhider the Greenhouse Gas (GHG) impacts of the proposed tree removals, aatthe ms not include conservation of oak woodlands. ALIGNMENT OF PROJECT WITH SAAS F}Y OAK GL�INES CITY OF BEDDING el Shasta County's Oak Woodland Management Guidh re"comme@tat when planning a building site that oaks are maintained for habitat and landscape vale �'" Further 5t.1.4 pity of Redding's General Plan includes the following Natural Resource {)4= :Y =_ ' ,r.{.ts t: 7: Recognize the aesthetic and biological values of oak vs' and other natural t vegetation. y 1�} tt} f V e etation. 8: Recognize and protect habitat linkages and migratory corridors. 9: Promote and facilitate habitat preservation, restoration and enhancement. The Biological Review cited these, as well as other natural resource goals from the General Plan, yet these goals were not properly addressed in the Initial Study. The Initial Study simply references a section of the General. Plan EIR that development can sometimes conflict with tree protection goals and then states: But efforts must still be made to retain existing trees if reasonably possible, and to sufficiently plant new trees in the context of the new development. A tree survey C� is required to identify natural trees and tree groups most suitable for preservation or "candidate trees/groups." Where all identified candidate trees/groups cannot be preserved, the set -aside of a natural area or areas within a project site that is particularly suitable for the planting, retention, and/or natural regeneration of trees is considered to be a desirable means of accomplishing the goals of the ordinance. The removal of all of the trees —including 285 candidate trees —on the site combined minimal mitigation that does not specify oak tree replacement runs counter to the aforementioned General Plan goals and Shasta County's Oak Woodland Management Guidelines. HABITAT AND CLIMATE IMPACTS OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT The Biological Review characterizes the site as isolated from other habitat: Wildlife corridatory routes: With housing subdivisions and retail stores on all four oe� i an island of vegetation within a developed landscape. The Shasta Msubdivisio"Kil, s to the north, the Sunset Oaks subdivision is to the east, the For4I omes subdivision{,Y the south and the Cockerill Acres subdivision is to the west. ition, Hartnell Av�� and Shasta View Drive, both busy arterial roads, are foundng the north and we les. These developments limit access to and through the pnrceh'terrestrial wildlife species. During site visits WRM personnel noted several bird species`= Ymg through the area as well as bats foraging over the site. These movements may be e�zl `�pportumxtr�'}rlher than evidencing atravel corridor or migratory {�£t # f 4 fit+ 1tit movement, Ihere i{{`yden�4ks,, The vegetation island characters 401 is contr of the Project Area, which shoe `ak habitat � with isolated oaks also to the sc"west of the the south and east appears to be , align_ goals of retaining some natural hal'"15"g"t#` Biological Review characterizes as "opportun_ site are removed and replaced with non-native ROf d by the Biological Review's Figure 2, Soils ues to the east and the south of the project, 0""'i act site Much of the adjacent development to the ��rng General Plan Natural Resource of tfr�j`�cel by birds and bats, which the icj7ill be imbtlble if the native trees on the Another deficiency of the environmental r��`,t� that Calif law r#qires the GHG impacts F, , �, �. of proposed oak removals to be assess e �t ' mi l d I � usent y,� of GHG emissions forms the foundation of the states gree i se redu�t � bloctives, dell as the California Forest Protocol preservation standards. Every to of carbon dioxide��a) released into the atmosphere by oak woodland or forest conversio`"adverse environmental effect. MITIGATION F" The Initial Study indicates blue oak and interior live oaand covers approximately 31.4 percent of the parcel, with small and medium stature oaks on another portion of the site. CWF/CO was puzzled by the discussion in the Initial Study calling for mitigation replanting at a rate of 1:1, which would result a minimum of 194 trees planted. Given that 285 trees are being removed, it is unclear why the figure is not 285, as the 92 impacted interior live oaks of diameter of 6-inches or greater also provide habitat and carbon sequestration value. Further, Public Resources Code §21083.4 requires mitigation for trees of 5-inches or more in diameter at breast height above natural grade level, rather than 6-inches. The plan should not move forward without a majority of the oaks of greater than 5-inch diameter at breast height being retained, without a revegetation plan for the site that requires the reestablishment of oaks for landscaping, and 2 without a plan for oak habitat that is conserved in perpetuity to partially mitigate project impacts on Redding's native tree canopy. Sincerely, Janet Cobb Executive Officer California Wildlife Foundation Angela Moskow Manager California Oaks Coalition 3 CITY of REDDING MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Recirculated Permit No. UP-2020-01669; PM-2021-00290, GPA-2020-01667, and RZ-2020-01668 SUBJECT Hartnell by Summit Development PROJECT DE,�IPTION The ptjct consists of a use permit, parcel map, General Plan amendment, a �� zoning for the de X ent of a shopping center and self -storage facility on 12.13 acres o'd located at the Bout corner of Hartnell Avenue and Shasta View Drive. The shopping cen��' consists of a 30,00are-foot Holiday Market Grocery Store, and five outer pads for retail, - rive -through restaurant, a coffee drive -through, and an automobile fueling, station with a conveme�£ More The project also includes the request to allow a self -storage facility on 2.8 acres of land f'£ �' �`�i relat i'� tie, roj ect will delineate each of the retail spaces and jt}t 3 4tStt{2 7{3 i 41t yi the proposed mine-st(ige�'arehq� Facirty {£ their respective parcel, taking the total parcels from five to seven. The rezone��`equest to che the current zoned "SC" Shopping Center on the proposed 2.8-acre self-stor��facility parcel "HC" Heavy Commercial. The general plan amendment request reflects they"£� one request,+��nend sae existing general plan designation of Shopping Center to Heavy 04 ercial fr r{tit£ f 1}tkj`�i4>, ,i, t tiiz ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING The project st l�icomp ass` 5 ive parcels of approximately 12.13 acres. The property is currently vacant aopulated w`Inc and Interior live oak trees; annual grasses with scattered shrubs Come�i� uses are loci to tt north and west. To the south the project is bordered b single a� ` ult family,�� Wef the project is a mix of p J y g t� commercial and multiple family. The pr�et site south. An intermittent stream flows in a southwest direction beginning appTotiiately at tldpoint of the property on Hartnell Avenue exiting the property at the southAn �'4" ent wetland exists along the intermittent stream just west of t ,,.�'' ephemeral swale parallels Shasta View Drive along Appian Way which joins vl� ��';iferinittent stream at the i' J4 southwest quadrant of the project site. A small isol"� p� ists within the southwest quadrant of the project site.�� FINDINGS AND DETERMINATION The City of Redding conducted an Initial Study (attached), which determined that the proposed project could have significant environmental effects. Subsequent revisions in the project proposal create the specific mitigation measures identified below. The project, as revised and as agreed to by the applicant, avoids or mitigates the potentially significant environmental effects identified, and the preparation of an environmental impact report will not be required. There is no substantial evidence, in light of the whole record before the City, that the project as revised may have a significant effect on the environment. If there are substantial changes that alter the character or impacts of the proposed project, another environmental impact determination will be necessary. UP-2020-01669, GPA-2020-01667, RZ-2020-01669, PM-2021-00290 Mitigated Negative Declaration Page 1 The project includes measures to mitigate potentially significant impacts to transportation in the area. Prior to approval of the project, the lead agency may conclude, at a public hearing, that certain mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration are infeasible or undesirable. In accordance with CEQA Section 15074.1, the lead agency may delete those mitigation measures and substitute other measures which it determines are equivalent or more effective. The lead agency would adopt written findings that the new measure is equivalent or more effective in mitigating or avoiding potential significant effects and that it; in itself, would not cause any potentially significant effect on the environment. 1. Based on the whole record (including the Initial Study and any supporting documentation),, mitigation measures incorporated into the project, the City tl tE rEt tkt }i of Redding hi�e�3, That a Mitigated Negative Declaration is appropriate. All potential � � cant im#", would be reduced to less than significant. FJ t{ 1}y i�7 7 2. The Negative ration, with its supporting documentation, fully incor€�ted herein, reflec�t`he independent judgment and analysis of they lead agenc�£,vhich is the City of °'adding. DOCUMENT The attached Initial Study docue reason p support the above determination. MITIGATION MEASURES • MM-l. Prior to issuance of a' dan r { 1 affectlrt �r asdictional waters, including wetlands, as identified in the project w� ,.dolmeat p z the prod et applicant shall provide written verification to the City of Redding Develop }Services D}`ment thatthe following resource agency permits and mitigation requiretr�Illiave been secured from the Corps, CDFW, RWQCB, or any other applici ujpcy (i.e , Ud through the permitting process.* a. Prior to any discharge of dredged s of the U.S.", including wetlands; authorization under a Nationwide Permit or In`(tdual Permit, all be obtained from the Corps. For any features determined to not bn�ect t �t�'ops jurisdiction during the verification process, authorization to disckl��e �;i�%ver from regulation) shall be obtained from the RWQCB For, dill rec,'`` corps permit, water quality certification shall be obtained from the .�nr to discharge of dredged or fill material. Verification shall be provided to th'e pity of Redding Development Services Department prior to issuance the issuance of a grading permit. b. Prior to any activities that would obstruct the flow of, or alter the bed, channel; or bank of any intermittent or ephemeral creeks, notification of streambed alteration shall be submitted to the CDFW; and, if required, a 1602 streambed alteration agreement shall be obtained by the project applicant. Verification shall be provided to the City of Redding Development Services Department prior to the issuance of a grading permit. C. The project applicant shall achieve the mitigation for the permanent loss of streams; wetlands; and other waters through the purchase of mitigation credits at an agency- UP-2020-01669, GPA-2020-01667, RZ-2020-01669; PM-2021-00290 Mitigated Negative Declaration Page 2 approved mitigation bank at a minimum 1:1 ratio, or through onsite/offsite habitat restoration at aminimum 3:1 ratio. If onsite/offsite habitat restoration is proposed a detailed mitigation plan, including success criteria, monitoring, maintenance, and reporting as required by the regulatory agencies (i.e., Corps, CDFW, RWQCB) shall be submitted for review and approval. The affected regulatory agency shall identify when measures shall be implemented and completed for thoseactivities impacting streams, wetlands, or other waters. All measures contained in the permits or associated with any agency approvals shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the Lead regulatory agency. MM-2. If vegetation removal or construction activities will occur during the nesting season for birds or raptors (February 1 through August 31), a qualified biologist shall conduct a preconstruction survey 7 days before construction activities begin. If nesting birds or raptors are found, CDFW will be notified and consulted. An appropriate buffer, as determined by CDFW and the qualified biologist, will be placed around the nest until the young have fledged. If construction acttyzttl,��e for a period greaterthan 7 days, additional preconstruction surveys s x1� �f will be reautr • MM 3 $sf $'tlie extent practcable, Koval of large trees with cavities, crevices, or snags shall occur before l� '`maternity colonies fq r(i.e., prior to March 1) or after young are volant (i.e., after Augus�,�). If construction (incl"W"""', g the removal of large trees >12 inch dbh) occurs during the bat non::::t t season (March I through August 31), a qualified professional shall conduct a pre constey of the study area to locate maternity colonies and identify measures to protect col es txb�e The pre�n�p�ction survey will be performed no more than 7 days prior t Ss t r f r z M 4 y� 't t to the implem� �,t eons , �n ctt�I cs. If a maternity colony is located within or adjacent to the study area, a distur��, rV�xfree buffR all be established by a qualified professional, in consultation with CDFW, "ure the colo �t protected from project activities. t,, • MM-4. The developerwived from the site with suitable minimum 1.5-gallon size shade trees t t§4jsi�t s tsr t i Fi s tr �i t yr S i { it ■ MM-5 Off -site improvement along Shasta Vk�,�l}'give shall e the following: o Restriping of the portionell Avenue and Goodwater Avenue to a three -lane arterial with$, �� wel lane in e� � irectign with a two-way left turn lane. i s tti+x r h o Construct a 5-foot sidewalk alo`he east �I�,pi �Vlew �� from Hartnell Avenue to 4 � {4J ESQ Christian Avenue. � �r,`,.� ■ MM-6 Construct a 3-leg, single Lane roundabout at the Alta I+a Driv4 * t 4tnell Avenue intersection. PUBLIC REVIEW DISTRIBUTION Draft copies or notice of this Mitigated Negative Declaration were distributed to: Shasta County Clerk U.S. Army Corp of Engineers, Redding California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Redding Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board, Redding California Native Plant Society, Shasta County Interested Parties All property owners within 500 feet of the property boundary UP-2020-01669, GPA-2020-01667, RZ-2020-01669; PM-2021-00290 Mitigated Negative Declaration Page j P P (x) Draft document referred for comments May 8, 2021 ( ) No comments were received during the public review period. Comments were received but did not address the draft Mitigated Negative Declaration findings or the accuracy/completeness of the Initial Study. No response is necessary. The letters are attached. Comments addressing the findings of the draft Mitigated Negative Declaration and/or accuracy or completeness of the Initial Study were received during the public review period. The letters and 4 How (see Response to Comments, attached). Copies of the MPWd Negati i"I"I"I", I ),j,,1,,claration, the Initial Study, documentation materials, and the Mitig I"Monitoring Priam may be obtained at the Planning Division of the vll- Develop e lees Department' ,,," 1 1,Wity of Redding, 777 Cypress Avenue, Redding, CA 0 96001 an e on the Plannin ects page of the Development Services website at: wwwx,itv fr 2.or2. Contact: SeWn Price, (530) 225-4471 May 7, 2021 Lily Toy, Da f Final Report Attachments: A. Location map B. Initial Study C. Mitigation Monitoring Program UP-2020-01669, GPA-2020-01667, RZ-2020-016()9, PM-2021-00290 Mitigated Negative Declaration Page 4 WILSON AVE ------ r �_ ! __._.�..__ _ 1 �. _ G U) 1 BELLADONNA STUY �— !I . _,. —,-,— at W 1 < ----- Q��-- 0} 1: -------- -- - - ---- -------- -------- HAWN AVE I JONQUIL WAY — 2525 H,_E HARTNELLAVE itt t S t1 t4' 3,a t J f it b Y.. I —� 6 HA ?,t I' L AVE fx 3050 LEONA 32, I t t Z' d Oi i W I 4 4 {} I { i Ji t 1 MARILYN AVE -------- ------------------- ------------------- \{ � t _ _�_-- {'-------- ----- N i--- ---- -- .�-..........- —i PPIAN't`Y� m l ALDEN AVE _ _ ({ ru t;ity t l t t a—� �—,- --I- ._ ' a ---------------- { 4 i # __ -- - - --------- --- ---------- ] � � ...�-{ � t s j {t }t, r r { �. `✓ •fit t }, y i - - -- - --------- - - ------- L _jC) j Y 1 { r= �.__ — —i ,, // _E It MARLENE AVE O� r� i J — 1 } ------------------- of -------------- -------- INr i _- ra ` T — t — N GIS DIVISION LOCATION MAP MTG. DATE: INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT E DATE PRODUCED: ITEM: NOVEMBER24,2020 UP-2020-01669 / GPA-2020-01667 / RZ-2020-01668 TJG /SUMMIT DEVELOPMENT s 0 200 400Feet 2469 &2525 HARTN ELL AVE/3055 &.3091 APPIAN WAY/3050 LEONARDST ATTACHMENT: AP# 110-210-055 / 110-020-001, -037, -038 & -061 Hartnell Comm Prepared by: CITY OF REDDING Development Services Department Planning Division 777 Cypress Avenue Redding, California 96001 I N ITIAL STUDY CH ECKLIST . 0 4 es and Documentation Summit Development 11011,0011 May 6, 2021 1. 2. C41111V&SI: 2da711L1 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM Project Title: Hartnell Commercial Complex by Summit Development Lead agency name and address: CITY OF REDDING Development Services Department Planning Division , tsit �t ; 777 Cypress Avenue Redding, CA 96001 Contact Person Project Applicant's Name` TJG/Summit Devela 2451 Birchwood Circl Redding, CA 96002 Number: Sean Prig„Assistant Planner, (530) 225-4471 and 2522 Hartnell Avtti'e, 3055 and 3091 Appian Way, and 3050 Leonard Street 6. General Plan Designation: 7. F-A 'ess: Representative's Name and Address: Zoning: "SC" Shopping Center Description of Project: The project consists "use perms J tc'el map; development of a shopping center and self -storage facilCt ,""" �= 2.13 acres o Avenue and Shasta View Drive. The shopping center co j_t of a 30,000-squ outer pads for retail, a drive -through restaurant a ctf}dve rthrough ar flll store. The project also includes the request to zj4a storage faceReg project will delineate each of the retail spaces ki the prcYg�►`f,ai s �tF � s� rs� taking the total parcels from five to seven. The rezone is a reque'�� changE proposed 2.8-acre self -storage facility parcel to "HC" Heavy Commercial. Th rezone request to amend the existing general plan designation of ping eral Plan amendment, and rezoning for the d located at the southeast corner of Hartnell -foot Holiday Market Grocery Store, and five utombjle fueling station with a convenience 8 ajof land. A parcel map related to the ✓af�jtusefacility on their respective parcel, w' 'r1ent zoned "SC" Shopping Center on the rral plan arPEdent request reflects the tter to,..Jie�tiitimercial.,, Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The project site encompasses five parc,pproximately 12:13 acres: The property is currently vacant and is populated with blue and Interior live off,"tttal grasses with scattered shrubs. Commercial uses are located to the north and west. To the south the project is'[°ite'red by single and multiple family uses. West of the project is a mix of commercial and multiple family. The project site slopes gently from north to south. An intermittent stream flows in a southwest direction beginning approximately at the midpoint of the property on Hartnell Avenue exiting the property at the southwest corner of the property. An emergent wetland exists along the intermittent stream just west of the center of the project site. An ephemeral swale parallels Shasta View Drive along Appian Way which joins with the intermittent stream at the southwest quadrant of the project site. A small isolated pond also exists within the southwest quadrant of the project site. 10 Other public agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement): • U.S. Army Corps of Engineers • Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board • California Department of Fish and Wildlife UP-2020-01669, PM-2021-00290, RZ-2020-01668, GPA-2020-01667 Hartnell Commercial Complex City of Redding Development Services Department Planning Division Initial Study 11. Have California Native American tribes traditionally and culturally affiliated with the project area requested consultation pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21080.3.1? If so, is there a plan for consultation that includes, for example, the determination of significance of impacts to tribal cultural resources, procedures regarding confidentiality, etc.? Consultation letters were sent to the Redding Rancheria and the Wintu Tribe of Northern California on March 25, 2021, to invite their participation in the project development process. On April 22, 2020, Governor Newsom signed Executive Order N-54-20 that suspends the mandated timeline for tribal consultation for a period of 60 days. As of April 22, 2021, no request for consultation was received. Note: Conducting consultation early in the CEQA process allows tribal governments, lead agencies, and project proponents to discuss the level of environmental review, identify and address potential adverse impacts to tribal cultural resources, and reduce the potential for delay and conflict in the environmental review process. (See Public Resources Code section 21080.3.2.) Information may also be available from the California Native American Heritage Commission's Sacred Lands File per Public Resources Code section 5L2ttl California Historical Resources Information System administered by the California t�s{ a,Z,titr ,t 1 , Office of Historic ....... it Pres�d f�ut' lease t f ote that Public Resources Code section 21082.3(c) contains provisions specific to tt�t,t confidentiality itl��r to u i i ENVIRONMENTAL FACT�IALLy AFFECTED,` tjtr Et fit$ The environmental factttif,hecked below would be`'.potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Imtt or Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated" as indicated by the checklist on the following O tt pages. t is 4(r �`� 4 �a r2 u s 1 �ifjttta 'orestry Aesthetics t.ry�.n „� Air Quality �StSurces X Biological Resources t� § yr Ultural Resource Energy , Geology J Soils isslp t , t' Hazards & Hazardous Materials ;reenhouse �t t Hydrology /Water Quality Land Use'/ Plamm Mineral Resources Noise t Population ing t I' �f Services � f ,Public Recreation X Tran�I�tlon '$�,'��I �` , tribal Cultural Resources } r t trt b � Utilities /Service Systems Wildfire ttt Mandatory Findings of Significance Ad — DETERMINATION: 1 find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. x I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact UP-2020-01669, PM-2021=00290, RZ-2020-01668, GPA-2020-01667 Hartnell Commercial Complex City of Redding Development Services Department Planning Division Initial Study on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR of NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. Copies of the Initial Study and related materials and documentation may be obtained at the Planning Division of the Development Services Department, 777 Cypress Avenue, Redding, CA 96001. Contact Assistant Planner Sean Price at (530) 225-4471. Sean Price, Assistant Planner Development Services Depar May 7, 2021 Date UP-2020-01669, PIA-2021-00290, RZ-2020-01668, GPA-2020-01667 Hartnell Commercial Complex City of Redding Development Services Department Planning Division Initial Study EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: This section analyzes the potential environmental impacts associated with the proposed project. The issue areas evaluated in this Initial Study include: ■ Aesthetics Z Mineral Resources ■ Agricultural and Forestry Resources 0 Noise ■ Air Quality 0 Population/Housing ■ Biological Resources 0 Public Services ■ Cultural Resources 0 Recreation ■ Energy N Transportation ■ Geology/Soils ■ Tribal Cultural Resources ■ Greenhouse Gas Emissions ■ Utilities/Service Systems ■ Hazards & Hazardous t\!1rj� �i 1 Wildfire ■ Hydrology/Water Mandatory Findings of Significance ,' ■ Land Use/Planrltp,�«',� The environmental analysjtn. this section is pattern ter the Initial Study Checklist recommended by the State CEQA Guidelines and used by the City of 14diing in its environmentalp�ew process. For the preliminary environmental assessment undertaken as part of this Initial Study's�' h aration, a determinatiNK at there is a potential for significant effects indicates the need to more fully analyze the development 1,",,pacts and to identify mitigation. For the evaluation of potential lrEppycts,thestion�tlalStudyy Checklist are stated and an answer is provided according to the analysis undertaken as part �'#`ifstudyt siders the long-term, direct, indirect, and cumulative impacts of the development. To each question, there are fq,,#1 Bible respo : No Impact. The development will not',e any measura • Less Than Significant Impact. The devei rnent wllj, '' , he will be below established thresholds thaNX,, o,'rtt i tc" l`to b, • Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Ir which may be considered as a significant effect development's physical or operational characterise Potentially Significant Impact. The developmen f' ill have lb is required to identify mitigation measures that could reduce ronmental impact on the environment. impacting the environment, although this impact 1'. The developr n t will have the potential to generate impacts vironment, alitigh mitigation measures or changes to the uce these Irrti to levy that are less than significant. � 00 irii`are conred significant, and additional analysis thesd4' m pacts to Ie1 lesignificant levels. ' �� an g Where potential impacts are anticipated to be significant, mitigation measures will b'tu reduced to Insignificant levels. Prior environmental evaluations applicable to all or part of the project s - City of Redding General Plan, 2000 - City of Redding General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report, 2000, SCH #1998072103 List of attachments/references: Attachment A — Figure 1 Location Map Figure 2 — Project Site Plan Figure 3 — Parcel Map Figure 4 — Grading Plan Figure 5 —Vegetation Map Figure 6 — Preliminary Utilities Plan pacts may be avoided or UP-2020-01669, PIA-2021-00290, RZ-2020-01668, GPA-2020-01667 Hartnell Commercial Complex 5 City of Redding Development Services Department Planning Division Initial Study Figure 7 — Building Elevations Attachment B— Wetlands Delineation, Wildland Resource Managers, May 2020 (on file with the Planning Division and available online) Attachment C— Biological Review, Wildland Resource Managers, May 2020 (on file with the Planning Division and available online) Attachment D — Cultural Resources Inventory Survey, Sean Michaellensen M.A., December 2019 (on file with the Planning Division) Attachment E — Oak Tree Report, Wildland Resource Managers, dated September 27, 2019 (on file with the Planning Division and available online) Attachment F—Traffic Impact Analysis Memorandum for Holiday Market, GHD, dated March 1, 2021(on file with the Planning Division and available online) SUMMARY OF MITIGATION MEASURES: • MM-1. Prior to issuance of a grading permit affecting any jurisdictional waters, including wetlands, as identified in the project wetland delineation, the �Is nt shall provide written verification to the City of Redding Development Services Department that the fpdjg re'sour,cy permits and mitigation requirements have been successfully secured from the Corps, CDFW, R��, or any other ap9ple agency (i.e., USFWS) identified through the permitting process:* M a C. Prior tojclischarge of dredged orfl(I' material into "waters of the U.S:", including wetlands, authorization under a Nationermit or Individual Pei shall be obtained from the Corps. For any features determined to not be subject tt'( he Corps jurisdiction �d g the verification process, authorization to discharge (or a waiver from regulatijhall be obtained from the RWQCB. For fill requiring a Corps permit, water quality certification shall be obtarned'f '` jthe RWQCB prior to discharge of dredged or fill material. Verification shall be provided to the City of Redding Devi l r r ,5 es Deport l2 $k li{tprlfor to issuance the issuance of a grading permit. i Prior to any activities that wcttt`o'bstruct the of, or alter the bed, channel, or bank of any intermittent or i , ephemeral creeks, notificatir pjf f streambed alt` rfiJon shall be submitted to the CDFW; and, if required, a 1602 streambed alteration agreerp� shall be obtainthe project applicant. Verification shall be provided to the City of Redding Development Serve De The project applicant shall achiev " , t,% fat through the purchase of mitigation cre�dif"s"'at an onsitejoffsite habitat restoration at a minlmurr mitigation plan, including success criteria, prtift,`'' agencies (i.e., Corps, CDFW, RWQCB) shtjI"""'`' shall identify when measures shall betilt�toier or other waters. All measures tonged in to the t?,ante of a grading permit. rr,tt,,ear7t loss of streams, wetlands, and other waters �a`pproved r(ration bank at minimum 1:1 ratio, or through atio. If onsite/tiIte habitat restoration is proposed a detailed 1g, maintenan,�1'and Ire porting as required by the regulatory fitted for reyje�I nd a oval. The affected regulatory agency nd compl 41, 1 or tho �3 tivities impacting streams, wetlands, ta;�rf'"associalth any agency approvals shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the lead regulatory agency. MM-2. If vegetation removal or construction activities will occur during the through August 31), a qualified biologist shall conduct a precor If nesting birds or raptors are found, CDFW will be notified and `b rds or raptors (February 1 construction activities begin. ropriate buffer, as determined by CDFW and the qualified biologist, will be placed around the nest until the yburt'have fledged. If construction activities cease fora period greater than 7 days, additional preconstruction surveys will be required. MM-3. To the extent practicable, removal of large trees with cavities, crevices, or snags shall occur before bat maternity colonies form (i.e., prior to March 1) or after young are volant (i.e., after August 31). If construction (including the removal of large trees >_12 inch dbh ) occurs during the bat non-volant season (March 1 through August 31), a qualified professional shall conduct a pre -construction survey of the study area to locate maternity colonies and identify measures to protect colonies from disturbance. The preconstruction survey will be performed no more than 7 days prior to the implementation of construction activities. If a maternity colony is located within or adjacent to the study area, a disturbance free buffer shall be established by a qualified professional, in consultation with CDFW, to ensure the colony is protected from project activities. UP-2020-01669, PM-2021-00290, RZ-2020-01668, GPA-2020-01667 Hartnell Commercial Complex City of Redding Development Services Department Planning Division Initial Study • MM-4. The developer will replace the blue oak trees removed from the site with suitable minimum 15-gallon size shade trees at minimum ratio of 1:1. ■ MM-5 Off -site improvement along Shasta View Drive shall include the following: o Restriping of the portion of Shasta View Drive between Hartnell Avenue and Goodwater Avenue to a three -lane arterial with one travel lane in each direction with a two-way left turn lane. o Construct a 5-foot sidewalk along the east side of Shasta View Drive from Hartnell Avenue to Christian Avenue. ■ MM-6 Construct 3-leg, single lane roundabout at the Alta Mesa Drive and Hartnell Avenue intersection. Potentially Less -Than- Less -Than- No 1.AESTHETICS: Except as provde f t£ �t b � Code Section 21099, Significant Significant With Significant Impact would the project: Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated a) Have a substantial ay��e effect on a scenic vista i�£ i ix x 4A 7 b) Substantially dam lacenic resources, includin' N,', not limited to, trees, rock outcrojits, and historic buildings within a State scenic x highway?,� £ c) In nonurbanized area�£'i£stal�a�legradeh' visual character or quality of puksjlf"rtvsi`f)le siteaJtjt t{sttuin;ings? (Public views are those that area expenencpublicly ac lble x vantage point). If the project is in an urbanled'rea, would thep�<£ ct conflict with applicable zoning and other, Actions governing tic £ , quality? �£ 40 i; d) Create a new source of substantial light or g1��hlch vy{gersely £" affect day or nighttime views in the are; It, x ,<;,�£ i ,£,�r Discussion: a=c) The project site is located on land that is highly vlslblp t� w z £ nman y al r f d'Ytnell hue and Shasta View Drive. The City's R Planning Division has reviewed the site design )�ljng ell �rdhdeterm irt,£fhe proposed design is in conformance with the City's General Plan, Zoning Ordinance andmmercial Desi,'.�iielines Th£lectwould be consistent in height with buildings on the developed adjacent commercial properties. Therefore, the protect d,�£''`ot represert,�a slgnificantadverse visual impact. The project site is not located adjacent to a state -designated scenic highw4 £ i { The six commercial buildings are proposed to be architecturally compatible whic a£�fc)f `ia''mixture of materials including, metal roofing material, stucco, stone veneer, lap siding, wood plank sidrng,�t'£r�;'grovesiding, and glazing. The buildings and associated facades will have varying heights, awnings, canopies, cornicS=rbied roofs, trellises, and other decorative fixtures to provide articulation to the building elevations which, along with varying natural earth tone colors and patterns, provide variation in the appearance of the buildings. Other project features include, but not limited to landscaping, hardscape features, solid waste enclosures, monument signs, building signage, and parking lot, driveway and walkway lighting. d) There would not be an adverse effect on day or nighttime views in the area. Shielding of lighting as required by City Ordinance will minimize any impact to a level of less than significant. The following standard condition will be applicable and therefore any potential impact will be less than significant. Construction activities for the project will be limited to normal daytime hours (i.e., 6:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. on weekdays from May 15 through September 15, 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. on weekdays from September 16 through May 14, and from 9:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. on weekends and holidays in accordance with RMC Section 18.40.100). The proposed project would not require nighttime UP-2020-01669, PM-2021-00290, RZ-2020-01668, GPA-2020-01667 Hartnell Commercial Complex City of Redding Development Services Department Planning Division Initial Study lighting for construction activities. Thus, no impact would occur in this regard. Standard Condition Regarding Lighting In accordance with Chapter 18.40.090, Lighting, of the Redding Municipal Code, any new roof -mounted or freestanding exterior lighting shall be designed, located, directed, and shielded in such a_manner so as to prevent objectionable light at, and glare across, the property lines. A lighting detail/photometric study demonstrating how this requirement will be satisfied shall be submitted with the building permit application. Documentation: City of Redding General Plan, Natural Resources Element, 2000 City of Redding Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 18.40.090 Mitigation: None necessary. i�fi � �4TI0��i II. AGRICULTURE RESOU�I ,an determining whether ipcts to agricultural Potentially Less -Than- less -Than- No resources are significant envC�ntal effects, lead agencies �Ifer to the California Significant Significant With Significant Impact Agricultural, Land EvaluatY�'hd Site Assessment Mode i prepared by the Impact Mitigation Impact California Dept. of Consen, as an optional model to use¢ t sessing impacts on Incorporated agriculture and farmland i rmining whether impacts to fott resources, including effects, lead agencies may rr information compiled by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection $ i.ng the state's inventory of forest land, including the Forest and Range Assessment f s ct and the Forest Legacy Assessment project, and forest carbon measurement meorest fted by the California Air ResourcesBaard. Woff 15 a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique FarmIant }`z i Statewide Imce (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepatidd`'oursuant to the F nd x Mapping and Monitoring Program of the Crnia Resources A��y, to non-agricultural use? r t "'d tt j1 ifs {}y [ b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or "a"Williams Contract?53 X c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of (as s �t defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g,laber1I (asp; defined by Public Resources Code Section 4526) o�tfk'berlantf ��}t�t�" AVII �iy „t X } 41 Timberland Production (as defined by Governmei t Code SeCfee , t i f i t k t f �$ d Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non -forest use? X e) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to ;t� location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland to non-' tt R� x agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non -forest land? Discussion: a-e) The project site contains soils that consist of Red Bluff Loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes (RbB), and Churn Gravelly Loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes (CfA) and is not within an area identified by the California Department of Conservation's Important Farmland Series Mapping and Monitoring Program as meeting the criteria for Prime Farmland if irrigated. Red Bluff loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes, is representative of the Redding series, in which permeability is very slow. Runoff is slow to medium, and the hazard of erosion is slight to moderate. Churn Gravelly Loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, is moderately well drained. Permeability and runoff are slow. The hazard of erosion is none to slight. These soil classifications do not represent prime suitability for agricultural use; therefore, development of the property would not result in any impact to agricultural resources. UP-2020-01669, PM-2021-00290, RZ-2020-01668, GPA-2020-01667 Hartnell Commercial Complex City of Redding Development Services Department Planning Division Initial Study Documentation: City of Redding General Plan, Natural Resources Element, 2000 City of Redding General Plan Background Report, Chapter 9.4: Agricultural Lands California Department of Conservation's Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service and Forest Service, Soil Survey of Shasta County Area. Mitigation: None necessary. III. AIR QUALITY: Where available, the significance criteria established by the Potentially Less -Than- Less -Than- No applicable air quality management district or air pollution control district may Significant Significant With Significant Impact be relied upon to make the following et Would the project: Impact Mitigation Impact `,; Incorporated a) Conflict with or obentation of f*Rf applicable air quality plan? X b) Result in a curets., ely considerable net in cr e of any criteria �'t pollutant for whi, trhe project region is nment under an applicable Federal Ji f�)ate ambient air quality standard X c) Expose sensitive receptYtrs t'sftlfapJ X �...�. �. pns? rr,7) d) Result in other emissions {such as those Irsg to odors) �sely affecting a substantial number of people? ' ,, }7, f,z X 7 Discussion: j�? rrtf� rt, a-c) Shasta County, including the far northern Saii�)tey, curets)f,td and particulates (fine, airborne particles), Consequ'eity, thee related to land use and transportation planning. Even with f ation of me cumulative impacts are unavoidable when ozone and/ol-�,',i, late emission emissions contributing to ozone is from vehicles Ar�r'ot that gener incrementally to the problem. The Environmentah,a`ct E�,ft for th� z result, Findings and aStatement of Overriding Consii ations'�j from growth supported under the General Plan. ISrthe state's ambient standards for ozone (smog) tj cus of local air quality policy, especially when s11 reduce emissions for individual projects, rWnvolved. For example, the primary source of S'ehiele �s has the potential of contributing Oral Plcra;ioknowledged this dilemma; and as a IV the Cit t, 16ncil for impacts to air quality resulting The City Air Quality Element of the General Plan establishes emission -reduction �als of ','��' ercent, depending on the 4r �� ,t}i projected level of unmitigated emissions for project. Mitigation thresholds tff�tlfor the important regional/local Pollutants, including: Reactive Organic Gases (ROG) and Oxides of �tFogerf are ozone precursors, and Inhalable Particulate Matter, 10 Micron (PMio). The mitigation thresholds for'`iants are tiered at two levels asfollows; Level "A" 25 pounds per day of NOx 25 pounds per day of ROG 80 pounds per day of PM,o Level "B" 137 pounds per day of NOx 137 pounds per day of ROG 137 pounds per day of PMlo If a project has unmitigated emissions less than the Level "A" threshold, then it is viewed as a minor project (from an air quality perspective) and only application of Standard Mitigation Measures (SMMs) is required to try to achieve at least a 20 percent reduction in emissions, or the best reduction feasible otherwise. Land uses that generate unmitigated emissions above Level "A" require application of appropriate Best Available Mitigation Measures (BAMMs), in addition to the SMMs, in order to achieve a net emission reduction of 20 percent or more. If, after applying SMMs and BAMMs, a use still exceeds the Level "B" threshold, then a minimum of 25 percent of the unmitigated emissions exceeding 137 pounds per day must be offset by reducing emissions UP-2020-01669, PM-2021-00290, RZ-2020-01668, GPA-2020-01667 Hartnell Commercial Complex City of Redding Development Services Department Planning Division Initial Study from existing sources of pollution; otherwise, an Environmental Impact Report is required. Under policy of the Air Quality Element, a project has the potential to impact air quality primarily in two ways: (1) the project would generate vehicle trip emissions (with NOx, ROG, and PM,o) that contribute cumulatively to local and regional air quality conditions; and (2) fugitive dust (particulate/PMlo) emissions are possible during construction activities. As a shopping center and self -storage facility serving and underserved area of the city where many residents travel much farther for these services, the project does not have the potential to generate significant emission concentrations of other pollutants subject to state and federal ambient air quality standards. Application of Standard Mitigation Measures (SMMs) is required in order to strive toward the General Plan policy of a 20 percent reduction in emissions to address small-scale cumulative effects. SMMs applicable to this project address primarily short-term impacts related to construction and are standard development regulations promulgated in the City Grading Ordinance and California Building Code identifiedtbS w Application of the SMMs and the application of Best Available Mitigation Measures for NOx emissions as outlined "A the the projects potential air quality impacts to a level less than significant. 1. Nontoxic soil Jffffirs shall be appffi��}z�ccording to manufacturer's specification to all inactive construction areas (previously gre3'rareas inactive for tenfis or more). 2. All grading 0,01 tions shall be suspend et OR f en winds (as instantaneous gusts) exceed 20miles per hour. 3. Temporaryf�ic control shall be prove sappropriate during all phases of construction to improve traffic flow (e.g., flag persons s 4. Constructlol444,fivltles that could affect traffic flow shall be scheduled in off-peak hours, 5. Active construct inn areas haul,,roads, etc shall be watered at least twice daily or more as needed to limit dust. P 6. Exposed stockpif,��o��;rther b�jfl4stftfJal shall either be covered, watered, or have soil binders added to IY�irug inhibit dust and windtn. 7. All truck hauling solid and other 1�iiaterial sha minimum vertical distance betwe `,,,14 p of the load 23114. This provision is enforce d'f local law enfori 8. All public roadways used by the (olect contra construction activities. Streetssha�ff,'swpitzt� paved roads. Wheel washers shall be i�E any equipment shall be washed off leaving the site 9. Alternatives to open burning of cleared vegetative; s, si infeasible bythe City Planning Division. Suitable,,,,,,,,,' and/or hauling to a biomass fuel site. !lt c) Potential impacts to neighboring homes (sensitive inceptors) application of the SMMs discussed above. r$overed or should maintain at least two feet of freeboard (i.e., it"'he trailer) in accordance with the requirements of CVC Section ,t agencies ' hall be,g��lntamed free from dust, dirt, and debris caused by d oftka (i k ffurra iblesoil materials are carried onto adjacent public clenpaved roads onto paved roads, or trucks and htrip.�t I on the pro, site shall be used unless otherwise deemed include, bu, not limited to, on -site chipping and mulching d) The project does not involve land use that could generate objectionable odors Documentation: dust cau"during construction are mitigated by mber of people. Shasta County APCD Air Quality Maintenance Plan and Implementing Measifu{ City of Redding General Plan, Air Quality Element City of Redding General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report, 2000, SCH #1998072103, Chapter 8.6 Air Quality, CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations for the City of Redding General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report, as adopted by the Redding City Council on October 3, 2000, by Resolution 2000-166 City of Redding General Plan Background Report, Chapter 9.7, Natural Resources and Air Quality California Air Resources Board. 2017. Area designations maps/state and national. http://www.arb.ca,goyldesiJadm/adm.htm (accessed April 19, 2021). Mitigation: None necessary. UP-2020-01669, PM-2021-00290, RZ-2020-01668, GPA-2020-01667 Hartnell Commercial Complex 10 City of Redding Development Services Department Planning Division Initial Study Potentially Less -Than- Less -Than- No IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES: Would the project: Significant Significant With Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special -status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, x or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. x Fish and Wildlife Services c) Have a substantial adyY*,`effect on sprotected }fiederally wetlands (includmg ""'A" limited to, marsh, ve'r�l'pool, coastal, etc.) through direct rerrtt,X�i'` filling, hydrological irreiUption, or other x means? d) Interfere substanal with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wflgfe species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife coi rzrs, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery x sites?s',�{ e) Conflict with any local policies or ordina, ectmg 1pgicaI Sf. resources, such as a tree preservation polics�rttrdinance?`�,'�� x ��}r •st,t i �: f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopt,"'$Jabitat Conservati,�an, 1 Natural Community, Conservation Plane,{` other appra��'9ocal x regional, or State habitat conservation plank Sri a t x<,�4 �.<<�{ . ��. t Discussion: a) A Biological Review Report was prepared for the proiec) ,�j hand Resource � lagers ,,WRM), dated May 2020, to assess the impacts of the proposed project on biological resourc ject area anity Ipt'dition to research, database review, and species list reviews, a habitat assessment and;togical rblsney waducted, Upon numerous inspections „t . �.,. of the project area few wildlife species were observed and no Ilstt'tres of flora r"7una were found Several bird species were observed moving through the area as well as bats foraging over the site. These rtjt UN ments were classified as "opportunistic" rather than evidencing a travel corridor or migratory movement, of which there is '' vldenc t,;l 'ruary 26, 2020 and April 8, 2020, a spade -foot survey was conducted paying particular attention to the{Itermtt�`d'"ephemeral stream areas. No toads were seen or heard. Although the intermittent stream that flows th�4�4�troject area has connectivity to the Sacramento River downstream, fish passage during normal flows Is r ' ip " . � eiS. b) According to the California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB), 11 sensitive habitats, either on the Federal or State status, occur within CNDDB Enterprise Quadrant in which the project site is located: foothill yellow -legged frog, bald eagle, bank swallow, tricolored blackbird, vernal pool fairy shrimp, green sturgeon, steelhead, chinook salmon -Central Valley spring -run and - Sacramento River winter -run, gray wolf, slender Orcutt grass. Based on the Biological Review Report, discussed above, no riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulation, or by CDFW or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service were observed on the project site. c) A Wetlands Delineation was prepared for the project by WRM in November 2019 and revised in May 2020. The field study efforts mapped 4 features in the proposed project site, including wetlands and other waters: emergent wetland, ephemeral Swale, intermittent stream and a pond. There is an intermittent stream that flows through the center of the project site from north to south. The stream only carries water during the wet season from a culvert under Hartnell Avenue south across the property to the southwest corner. After leaving the property the stream is channeled along the western side of Shasta View Drive south to UP-2020-01669, PM-2021-00290, RZ-2020-01668, GPA-2020-01667 Hartnell Commercial Complex 11 City of Redding Development Services Department Planning Division Initial Study Clover Creek Preserve. There is no true riparian habitat present. An ephemeral stream originates near the paved parking area in the northwest corner of the property and flows to north to south, intersecting the intermittent stream near the center of the property. This stream has a very shallow gradient with annual vegetation present within the stream channel. The emergent wetland is just to the east, and associated within, the intermittent stream near the center of the property. This wetland is moist during the winter months but dries out during the summer. The emergent pond holds water during the rainy season and quickly dries with the onset of warm weather. The delineation summarized that the combined total of jurisdictional wetland features on the proposed project site is 0.4013 acres. The project will impact all the wetland features found on the property. The intermittent stream will be placed within a 24-inch buried culvert and the ephemeral stream, emergent wetland and pond will be filled to the necessary project grade. In February 2020 the wetlands delineation report along with a Pre -construction notice, both prepared by WRM, were submitted to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers with a request for a preliminary jurisdictional determination and assistance with implementation of appropriate mitigation measures. However, a response from the Corps is still pending. Implementation of MM-1 would l�,tftpntial impacts to jurisdictional waters to less than significant. d) Although no active bird observed d" t(,"ie proposed project site during the field inspections, birds could establish nests in vegetation on or a lii4to these areas in fulnestiIt, seasons. The federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act (META) requires that nesting migratory biriat be adversely affectei, human activities. Nesting migratory birds would potentially be directly or indirectly impacted Instruction activities as �ted with the proposed project. Direct impacts include mortality resulting from removal of ve I n contained an active' s "with eggs or chicks. Indirect impacts include nest abandonment by adults in response to loud no��' veIs or human encroachment, or a reduction in the amount of food available to young birds due to changes in feeding bel�4rprr by adults. Most migratory birds anticipated to occur in the project area next between February 1 and August 31. Implementat� i +MM Id red uce+ t aI impacts to nesting migratory birds to less than significant. During the biological field inspection, it was", and that tlto+is some bat roosting habitat on -site in the form of tree cavities and bark crevices as well as several snags , r`,#ever, no bat au imk y was observed around these features. The non -riparian trees on the site offer lower habitat values for 'however, even non riparian trees it is possible that bats could roost in trunk cavities or under loose bark. Implementatrl;9of MM-3 woul'Uce potptial impacts to roosting bats to less than significant. e) The City has adopted a Tree Management,IY�{��'fiter healthy trees in the design of new development: Tft+rordinangd r`recogn�i conflict with necessary land -development requirements Tho�js General P rtj+' native trees will sometimes conflict with normal land dev)iii�ent and that i set aside over 7,000 acres of open space, much of why+r�h.ins oak habitq trees if reasonably possible, and to sufficiently plantl`rl tree �{#�.rthe cont t C) that promotes the conservation of mature, ghat the preservation of trees will sometimes further acknowledges that preservation of �entation of the General Plan will ultimately to identify natural trees and tree groups most suj file for p �r� l , '"°can candidate trees/groups cannot be preserved, the set -aside of a naiuraj' area or at suitable for the planting, retention, and/or natural regeneration of trees is consider the goals of the ordinance. l,must still be made to retain existing WUW12�ielopment. A tree survey is required gtrees/groups." Where all identified rithin a project site that is particularly be a desira l means of accomplishing A Tree Survey was prepared for the project by Wildland Resourq Mana",1+'purvey found two primary vegetation associations on the project site. Blueoak/interior live oak woodlands{�>f�"long the eastern and southern edges of the property covering approximately 31.4 percent of the project site.Tntified 193 blue oaks larger than 6-inch dbh and 92 interior live oak larger than 6-inch dbh. The Tree Survey Exhibit depicts the location of the group of trees on the proposed site plan. Further, it identified that there are several small to medium-sized oak trees located in the southwest portion of the site, however, none would be considered candidate trees. It was further observed that some vegetation management has taken place in the past as there is evidence of oak harvesting resulting in root crown sprouting and an open appearance in the north central portion of the project area. The proposal does not incorporate the retention of any of the trees. The developer is obligated to replant suitable new trees at the time of construction for shade. The Tree Management Ordinance identifies minimum planting criteria of one tree per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area or covered space, hence based on the proposed 83,888 square feet of gross floor area, a minimum of 84 trees are required. Additionally, the street frontages are required street trees at a ratio of 1 tree for every 30 feet of street frontage, therefore with the project site consisting of approximately 2,100 feet of street frontage, a minimum of 70 trees are required along the street frontages. Therefore, the requirement to plant a minimum of 154 new trees as a standard condition of development. Additionally, to mitigate the loss of trees at the project site MM-4 requires replacement at a minimum of 1:1 ratio resulting in a minimum of 194 trees planted in association with the project. Hence, the project is UP-2020-01669, PIA-2021-00290, RZ-2020-01668, GPA-2020-01667 Hartnell Commercial Complex 12 City of Redding Development Services Department Planning Division consistent with the intent of the Tree Management Ordinance. Initial Study f) No habitat conservation plans or other similar plans have been adopted for the project site or project area. No impact would occur in this regard. Documentation: California Department of Fish and Wildlife: Natural Diversity Data Base City of Redding General Plan, Natural Resources Element, 2000 City of Redding Municipal Code, Chapter 18.45, Tree Management Ordinance City of Redding General Plan Environmental Impact Report, 2000, SCH #1998072103 Wetlands Delineation, by Wildland Resource Managers, May 2020 Tree Survey by Wildland Resource Maj�,,ptember 27, 2019 Mitigation: MM-1. Prior to is }if ue of a grading permit a'fit ting anyjurisdictional waters,including wetlands, as identified in the project wetland delineoo-; the project applicantii=provide written verification to the City of Redding Development Services Department tllowing resource agef"t �i permits and mitigation requirements have been successfully secured from the Corps, CDFWrUQCB, or any other applicable agency (i.e., USFWS) identified through the permitting process:* t tj{t4 d. Prior to an��l�re otldged or f)ji �teial Into "waters of U.S:", including wetlands, authorization under a Nationwide P`ot�),'f��viifual;Qbtained from the Corps. For any features determined to not be subject to the Corps ring the 4,cation process, authorization to discharge (or a waiver from regulation) shall be obtained,,,,,,;" the RWQCB.t'ill requiring a Corps permit, water quality certification shall be obtained from the RWQCB pti"to discharge of t)'r ged or fill material. Verification shall be provided to the City of Redding Development Servicepartment pry issuanaheissuance of grading permit. e. Prior to any activities that ephemeral creeks, notification of sttearn%ed streambed alteration agreement shall be obtai of Redding Development Services Departme.p f. The project applicant shall achieve ow.bed, channel, or bank of any intermittent or rajAXIt`f ;b€shall be s �rtted to the CDFW; and, if required, a 1602 �the project apfkant. Verification shall be provided to the City i to the issuanc}a grading permit. the p through the purchase of mitigation creQFat an agd7nitigat onsite/offsite habitat restoration at a minimum 3:1 site/offsitji mitigation plan, including success criteria, monitoring, maintenance,{0, agencies (i.e., Corps, CDFW, RWQCB) shall be submitted for review a' shall identify when measures shall be implemented and completed�t or other waters. All measures contained in the per,#, s or implemented to the satisfaction of the lead regulatory' �t }{streams, wetlands, and other waters Wmnk at a minimum 1:1 ratio, or through "bitat restoration is proposed a detailed reporting ait#luired by the regulatory pprlpf,zf��fected regulatory agency apes impacting streams, wetlands, f``" it any agency approvals shall be ■ MM-2. If vegetation removal or construction activities will occur during the nesting season for birds or raptors (February 1 through August 31), a qualified biologist shall conduct a preconstruction survey 7 days before construction activities begin. If nesting birds or raptors are found, CDFW will be notified and consulted. An appropriate buffer, as determined by CDFW and the qualified biologist, will be placed around the nest until the young have fledged. If construction activities cease for a period greater than 7 days, additional preconstruction surveys will be required. • MM-3. To the extent practicable, removal of large trees with cavities, crevices, or snags shall occur before bat maternity colonies form (i.e., prior to March 1) or after young are volant (i.e., after August 31). If construction (including the removal of large trees >:12 inch dbh ) occurs during the bat non-volant season (March 1 through August 31), a qualified professional shall conduct a pre -construction survey of the study area to locate maternity colonies and identify measures to protect colonies from disturbance. The preconstruction survey will be performed no more than 7 days prior to the implementation of UP-2020-01669, PM-2021-00290, RZ-2020-01668, GPA-2020-01667 Hartnell Commercial Complex 13 City of Redding Development Services Department Planning Division Initial Study construction activities. If a maternity colony is located within or adjacent to the study area, a disturbance free buffer shall be established by a qualified professional, in consultation with CDFW, to ensure the colony is protected from project activities. • MM-4. The developer will replace the blue oak trees removed from the site with suitable minimum 15-gallon size shade trees at minimum ratio of 1:1. Potentially less -Than- Less -Than- No V. CULTURAL RESOURCES: Would the project: Significant Significant With Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated ffitt�'1 a) Cause a substantial adverit�� tn4ficance of a historical x resource ursuanttoSeol 64 p.5? f } ) b Cause a substanti t verse change in the t, nificance of an x < i tt� .t{ Sfi It jc archaeological resc��=pursuant to Section 1506�'y s c) Disturb any hurr remains, including those Jarred outside of x dedicated cemeterJeyi Discussion a-c) An archaeological inventory survey, d*, ecember 2 archaeological reports, records searchjid information subject property, it has been determin4ghat the project, the project is not anticipated to affec ,`�ltural resoIt f' development, any archaeological, historhi lr p) construction activities in the area affected�ia��'�nc professional must then be retained by the developer to inv, If the cultural object is deemed potentially significant M followed in accordance with applicable laws, as reviev affected area.u} was prepared by Sean Michael Jensen, M.A. Based upon :ained in the General Plan EIR pertinent to the vicinity of the s not in an area of archaeological or cultural sensitivity. While con�i of approval will require if, during the course of ri`i""',e uncovered or otherwise detected or observed, �st'ptified immediately. A qualified archaeological f°e the discovi cultural object to determine its significance. archaeologist, �ropriate treatment and measures shall be Documentation: City of Redding General Plan Background Report, 1998 City of Redding General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report, 2000,'. Archaeological Inventory Survey, by Sean Michael Jensen, M.A., Decem Mitigation: None necessary. imption of work in the Potentially Less -Than- less -Than- No VI. Energy: Would the project: Significant Significant With Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated a) Result in potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during X project construction or operation? b) Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or X energy efficiency? UP-2020-01669, PM-2021-00290, RZ-2020-01668, GPA-2020-01667 Hartnell Commercial Complex 14 City of Redding Development Services Department Planning Division Initial Study Discussion a) The project would not result in potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during project construction or operation. Direct energy use would involve the short-term use of energy for construction activities. Project construction would primarily consume diesel and gasoline through operation of construction equipment, material deliveries, and debris hauling. Construction is estimated to result in a short-term consumption of energy, representing a small demand on local and regional fuel supplies that would be easily accommodated and would be temporary. Long term use of electricity for operations such as lighting, heating, and cooling in the development is excepted to be less than significant. b) The project will not conflict with a f' , t�},gr local plans for renewable energy or energy efficiency. kt(} 7 t t itr}t 4St k to, i it}}j zt7 , r 7a �t rr Documentation: Sri' �{ � art t } r City of Redding General Plart�st C2uality Element, 26� "(a California Long -Term Ener,iciency Strategic Plan, ��? Regional Transportation zfor Shasta County, 2015 Mitigation: None necessary. �rt� Potentially Less -Than- less -Than- No VII. GEOLOGY AND SOILS: Would the praject: 5~ t�' rt}� ��t`%<f}5 Significant Significant With Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact c tell° Incorporated # v ' t)lt r f a) Directly or indirectly cause potential susntial adver�"��cts��t includingthe risk of loss, injury, or death inv�i) `{' �`'ts tki;r { �1 i S tFU t irk } i) Rupture of a known earthquake, fault, as delineated oiy)> most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake F �i,i x issued by the State Geologist for the area or basetf r t „ substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer tiii75ia oft tt, Mines and Geology Special Publications 42 5 i) Strong seismic ground shaking? I {It ttt' iii) Seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction? tt It iv) Landslides? s I, t b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? { t i! t�41ti{t)f 4k}rfn}, S x c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- x or off -site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction, or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform x Building Code (1994), creating substantial direct or indirect risks to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not x available for the disposal of waste water? f) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? x UP-2020-01669, PIA-2021-00290, RZ-2020-01668, GPA-2020-01667 Hartnell Commercial Complex 15 City of Redding Development Services Department Planning Division Discussion: Initial Study a, c, d) There are no Alquist-Priolo earthquake faults designated in the Redding area of Shasta County. There are no other documented earthquake faults in the immediate vicinity that pose a significant risk, and the site is located in an area designated in the Health and Safety Element of the General Plan as having a low ground -shaking potential. The project is not located on or near any documented landslide hazard areas, and there is no evidence of ground slippage or subsidence occurring naturally on the site. The type of soils and underlying geology is identified as having no potential for liquefaction. No portion of the site falls within the 100-year floodplain of the Sacramento River or any creek. b) The project site contains two soil classifications types, Red Bluff Loam (RbA), and Churn Gravelly Loam (CfA). These classifications are characterized by slopes of 3 $° 4 eir"',%pt and slow to medium runoff with a hazard of erosion that is slight to moderate. The soil is well -drained and has f, )00111 11t V 1� rmeability. Proposed grading will consist of that necessary for improvements of property in preparation ff �p 'fig, landscaj fd building construction. The project is subi,'to certain erosion-coniOf „ requirements mandated by existing City and State regulations. These requirements lnclud#,, i } City of Reddmc ygg ding Ordinance. This ordinance requires the application of "Best Management Practices" (BMPs) in accordance with 11t Gty Erosion and Sediment Control Standards Design Manual (Redding Municipal Code Section 16.12.060, Subs e�tl C D, E l practiceof/c erosion -control measures are determined upon review of the final project improvement�p�}�fi'�tallort�ecific grading impacts. California Regianal Water 1uahty BoarX��6nstruct�onttvity Storm Water permit." This permit somewhat overlaps the City's Grading Ordinance provision jmlpplying state shards for erosion -control measures during construction of the project.5 a California Regional Water Quality `trai Boarter Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)." This plan emphasizes stormwater best manageracticart of the Construction Activity Storm Water Permit. t , }r, The objectives of the SWPPP are to id J tf i �� urces �4 lei? r tIn other pollutants that affect the quality of tf,<, { i stormwater discharges and to describe ensuuethe imp)�tation ofp�t ;'tices to reduce sediment and other pollutants i in stormwater discharges. California Department of Fish and Wildlife "1600 Afnt." This no Is required for any work within a defined streambed. �u} fi s4 t� �rl�tat ��is{`s j U.S. Army corps of Engineers Nationwide Perrl��neuvi� Ionwide rtial developments) will be required ,, t it y�tr 1 ti �t jtt i, from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to adds impacts ttiprral waterG� v=�' Actions for compliance with these regulations are addressed under standard condl/fls of approuaG�'ch are uniformly applied to all land development projects. Since the project is subject to uniformly applledinanctand the overall risk of erosion is low, potential impacts related to soil erosion and sedimentation are It. f) The proposed project does not involve the use of septic tank ii) pi at"Je wastewater disposal. No impact has been identified. g) No unique geologic features, fossil -bearing strata, or paleontological sites are known to exist on the project site. Documentation: City of Redding Health and Safety Element, figures 4-2 (Ground Shaking Potential) and 4.2 (Liquefaction Potential) City of Redding General Plan Final Environmental impact Report City of Redding General Plan Background Report, 1998 City of Redding Grading Ordinance, RMC Chapter 16.12 City of Redding Standard Specifications, Grading Practices City of Redding Standard Development Conditions for Discretionary Approvals Soil Survey of Shasta County Area, United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service and Forest Service, August 1974 Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42 UP-2020-01669, PIA-2021-00290, RZ-2020-01668, GPA-2020-01667 Hartnell Commercial Complex 16 City of Redding Development Services Department Planning Division Initial Study State Regional Water Quality Control Board, Central Valley Region, Regulations related to Construction Activity Storm Water Permits and Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plans Mitigation: None necessary. Potentially Less -Than- less -Than- No Vill. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS: Would the project: Significant Significant With Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions,ttitr directly or indirectly, that X may haven significant impacoi't�dr�nt7 {t G� b) Conflict with an applic , inn, policy or mgadopted for the X purpose of reducing t'Dnissions of greenhouse'j ? Discussion: M a) In 2005, the Govern fsj�i,Califorrna signed Executive Oder S-3-05, establishing that it is the State of California's goal to reduce statewide greenhouse emission levels Subsequently, in2006, the California State Legislature adopted Assembly Bill AS 32, the California Global�T`��r s Act �s'requires the California Air Resources Board to develop and adopt regulations to achieve a red year 1990 levels by year 2020. California Senate Bill SB97 established thh individual projjj� s effect on GHG emission levels and global warming must be assessed under CEQA. SB97 further dire that the State ing and Research (OPR) develop guidelines for the assessment of a project's GHG emissions f�tye guidelinesY'�fiG emCjns were subsequently included as amendments to the CEQA Guidelines. The guidelines did not esta hie !� Hof signtft jai d there are currently no state, regional, county, or city guidelines or thresholds with which to dir``vel # result, the City of Redding has utilized the best available information to develop a threshold until a specific qu�tjfft�lve threshca)t adopted by the state or regional air district. As the Lead Agency, the City has opted to utilize afative non zeror}ect specific threshold using a methodology recommended by the California Air Pollution Officers (0 end acceptec��te Calif,trtJa Air Resources Board. According to CAPCOA's Threshold 2.3, CARB Reporting Thresholdj;U00 rr,fit,tor1,t;'ron-dio equivalents per year (mtCO2eq/yr) is recommended as a quantitative non -zero threshold according to t1��, this thrld would be equivalent to 550 dwelling units, 400,000 square feet of office use, 120,000 square feet of retail, or 70,000 squet of supermarket use. This approach is estimated to capture over half the future residential and commercial development ejects ar�ctlti�ed to support the goals ,z of A6 32 and not hinder it, ,�,',..y rr�, The United States Environmental Protection Agency(EPA) identifies feistlp7rrrt #yttuents that are most representative of the GHG emissions. They are: • Carbon Dioxide (CO2): Emitted primarily through the burning of fossil fuels. Other sources include the burning of solid waste and wood and/or wood products and cement manufacturing. • Methane (CH4): Emissions occur during the production and transport of fuels, such as coal and natural gas. Additional emissions are generated by livestock and agricultural land uses, as well as the decomposition of solid waste. • Nitrous Oxide (N20): The principal emitters include agricultural and industrial land uses and fossil fuel and waste combustion. • Fluorinated Gases: These can be emitted during some industrial activities. Also, many of these gases are substitutes for ozone -depleting substances, such as CFCs, which have been used historically as refrigerants. Collectively, these gases are often referred to as "high global -warming potential" gases. The primary generators of GHG emissions in the United States are electricity generation and transportation. The EPA estimates that nearly 85 percent of the nation's GHG emissions are comprised of carbon dioxide (CO2). The majority of CO2 is generated by petroleum UP-2020-01669, PM-2021-00290, RZ-2020-01668, GPA-2020-01667 Hartnell Commercial Complex 17 City of Redding Development Services Department Planning Division Initial Study consumption associated with transportation and coal consumption associated with electricity generation. The remaining emissions are predominately the result of natural-gas consumption associated with a variety of uses. With regard to the project, the predominant associated GHG is CO2generated by motor -vehicle travel to and from the site. To a substantially lesser degree, the project will result in CH4 emissions associated with use of electric power generated by the Redding Electric Utility (REU), though it should be noted that REU distributes power from a variety of sources, including hydroelectric, wind, and natural gas. Given the scope and nature of the proposed project compared to that of similar projects, emissions from the project would be significantly below the thresholds put forth by CARB, as well as the City's air -quality thresholds. Therefore, the project would not contribute significantly to GHG emissions in the air basin. Additionally, the City and State's construction standards and BMPs, including Air Quality SSM 1 through 9 (listed r y ptj ll Air Quality, above), will be used during construction to further limit any potential contribution to negative impactsr Niof4i H0f The project s direct or indirect impact on measurable GHGs in the Redding area would be less than si nificant, g Documentation: City of Redding General�yi.000 CPCOA website, July 19, California Office of the Aiti",, ey General, "The California Environmental Quality Act Addressing Global Warming Impacts at the Local Agency Level," updated Ja'fr 6, 20010 Air Quality Management D15tiritj hops coahasta�, ids/Index/drm_indexfaq_index.aspx. Accessed April22, 2020 Mitigation: "ryryry f{{ tik` f i'7', ${) i`ttjt4 f4} None necessary. J f ittt�yt"' pl r3 Potentially Less -Than- less -Than- No IX. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: W� the proje gnificant Significant With Significant Impact �' f pact Mitigation Impact {}x«;t,'n� , ;�s+��.,.,,_? �t�,','i �'h}, :.>,,.,,.� Incorporated dY t yt 7 tl�t �ti} l; 1 1 '�:. a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the envint throw`' ,nr1 4} ..�wys{t 4t4 routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materialst{ ` �,` ',i' i x b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environr)tifioughM', reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions toly( the �r ,� x release of hazardous materials into the environment? '" �t Yll �t !i P c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazartldus� � materials, substances, or waste within one -quarter mile of an existing or gq x proposed school? N.. d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5and as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or then x environment? t i i {A 1 k sjt,, e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard or excessive noise for x people residing or working in the project area? f) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? x g) Expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving wildland fires? x Discussion: UP-2020-01669, PIA-2021-00290, RZ-2020-01668, GPA-2020-01667 Hartnell Commercial Complex 18 City of Redding Development Services Department Planning Division Initial Study a, b, c, d) The nature of the project as a shopping center and storage facility, does not present a significant risk related to hazardous materials or emissions. There are no documented hazardous material sites located on or near the project. e) The project is not located within an airport land use plan or within two miles of a public airport or public use airport and would not result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area. There would be no impact on public safety. f) The project does not involve a use or activity that could interfere with emergency -response or emergency -evacuation plans for the area. g) The project site is not located within the Very High Fire Severity Zone and is not adjacent to areas with significant fuel loads. The property does not have a wildland fire -hazard potential and will not expose people or structures to significant risk involving wildland fires. Documentation: City of Redding General Mitigation: None necessary. Potentially Less -Than- Less -Than- No X. HYDROLOGY AND WATER#�1tJl� lxa�the proyetr�� ,ir�'f ,,� Significant Significant With Significant Impact � Impact Mitigation Impact "' " Incorporated a) Violate any water quality standards or wastlscharge require rritl5 or otherwise substantially degrade surface otjund water quality r� x 3ti + t b) Substantially decease groundwater sup plr� tsar interfere F f {r 4 tkl �su�'htially with groundwater recharge such that t�` t?f4e1 t ,sz impede i ;�,� x sustainable groundwater management of the b 4's �g �, f' t / ljTharr, t titr,=.,. t k,f Y{wk s i c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the sitea, t�i including through the alteration of the course of a stream fa,i"er or t x through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner wit Suld: c �i 4 ii i7� 3s-' ! } t f FI t ft�v ti 3 1 i) Result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off `` _�' NEW' "� zi}{ x w, ii) Substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner k x which would result in flooding on- or off -site; iii) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of , � tf{'�',,}sNIPi existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial„a "t, t}�`�'� 7�'`�''' x additional sources of polluted runoff; or �' iv) Impede or redirect flood flows? x d) In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, risk release of pollutants due to project inundation? x e) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan x or sustainable groundwater management plan? Discussion: a) The project proposes to extend the public sewer system down Leonard Street to serve this site and the properties to the south. Construction and operation of the project would not violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements UP-2020-01669, PIA-2021-00290, RZ-2020-01668, GPA-2020-01667 Hartnell Commercial Complex 19 City of Redding Development Services Department Planning Division Initial Study established by the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) in its Basin Plan for the Sacramento River and San Joaquin River Basins. Water pollution best management practices are required and will be incorporated into the improvement plans for the project. The City's construction standards require that all projects prepare an erosion and sediment control plan (ESOP) prior to construction to address water pollution control. The ESCP will ensure that water quality standards are not substantially affected by the project during construction. b) The project would utilize City water service for domestic uses and fire protection. The proposed project would not impact groundwater supplies. c) Stormwater runoff from the site flows from north to south by way of an intermittent stream. The stream carries water from a culvert under Hartnell Avenue south across the property to the southwest corner. An ephemeral stream flows from the northwest to the center of the iloins the aforementioned intermittent stream. The project will be required to install storm drain pipe connectin, 10 t�Hartnell Avenue to the storm drain system running along the western side of Shasta View Drive, but w� not alter the' r�t n or result in substantial erosion, surface runoff, flooding on- or off- site, or otherwise substantial }trade water quality �tconstruction. The project is subJErdtltb standard requirement!Eid ned under Section VII., Geology and Soils, and mitigation measures (if any) under Section IV ,ogical Resources, above �t minimize the potential for erosion or siltation on- or off -site. The final improvement plans11tithe project must also incorporate specific design measures intended to limit pollutant discharges in stormwater from urb�tr%improvements as established under the State's National Pollutant Elimination System (NPDES) general permit, which the City�;�a obli to follow trt�rdance with State Water Quality Control Order No. 2003-0005-DWQ. Feasible Best Management}�r>�MPs) zttr3)rorated in the final design of the project's storm -drain system, as approved by the City Engineer, based on thp's listed in ��4aatest edition of the California Storm Water Quality Association Storm Water Best Management Practices 0i" book. � �, 5 r City of Redding Policy 1806 requires thi I subdivision i �a lopmeraf, include stormwater detention facilities designed to maintain existing predevelopment rates ff durin �4 '25 , an � tfi year storm event with a 6-hour duration. The project ygl application includes a stormwater hydrolo"I",f}jy�)'ip source Managers and dated May 2020 that concludes that impacts from stormwater draina�i'unoffWO OkiJe less gnificant. d) The property is not located within any agency or otherw $ Wumented fl( threat of a tsunami wave is not applicable to inland, ejra),�Iley commu generated in either Shasta or Whiskeytown Lakes d��)�'anquake Hpfl ,� and Safety Element of the General Plan as having �r't isk to they � r {i,4 of mudflows affecting the project site. e) The project would not conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water management plan. Documentation: hard boundary, tsunami, or seiche zones. The jk u c h ai�edding. Seiches could potentially be neit�t,ake has been identified in the Health ch circutfntnces. There is no documented threat stainable groundwater City of Redding General Plan Background Report, Chapter 10, Health and Safety''i`ement, 1998 Federal Emergency Management Agency Floodplain regulations, FIRM map 06089C1554G, dated March 17, 2011 City of Redding Storm Drain Master Plan, Montgomery -Watson Engineers 1993 Mitigation: None necessary. Potentially Less -Than- less -Than- No XI. LAND USE AND PLANNING: Would the project: Significant Significant With Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated a) Physically divide an established community? x UP-2020-01669, PM-2021-00290, RZ-2020-01668, GPA-2020-01667 Hartnell Commercial Complex 20 City of Redding Development Services Department Planning Division Initial Study Potentially Less -Than- Less -Than- No XI. LAND USE AND PLANNING: Would the project: Significant Significant With Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated b) Cause a significant environmental impact due to conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or X mitigating an environmental effect? Discussion: a) The project does not have the potential to physically divide an established community. The project site is zoned "SC" Shopping Center as are the properties to d west. The zoning transitions to multiple family and then single-family zoning to the 4 south. 1a4,'mr„,',},' b) The project is approxlr ly'12.13 acres in size '£ t ,project area is currently zoned for shopping center, "SC" Zoning Designation, and has a General PIsignation of "Shopping ter." A shopping center, therefore, is appropriate within the existing zoning district and General, f designation. However, f storage facility is not a permitted land use with the existing zoning district nor General Plan d�ation. Therefore, the a)j`ant is requesting a rezoning to "HC" Heavy Commercial and a general plan amendment to'`Hea commercial." The zoning transitions to multiple family to the east across Leonard Street and single family to the -south, howeve` aseIf-storage facility, very little traffic or noise is associated with these sues. The main office and gate for the facility is locate? the Lard Street f,e at the northwest corner of the facility. A detention basis and an emergency access ease me►T{a ea aIor �t ,s �.rr ^"zi rfsti�xfi4, tit} Si { t i districts from the proposed shopping centefi, self -storm+ regulations of the City General Plan and �t�ig Ordinance adopted for the purpose ofavoiding or rrtting an enviror Documentation: City of Redding General Plan, Community Developr City of Redding General Plan Environmental Impact City of Redding General Plan, Natural Resources Eleme Mitigation: None necessary. ty line which will buffer the single family and multiple family ity. The project is compatible with the applicable policies and s not in conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation A effect. M potentially -Than Less Than- No XII. MINERAL RESOURCES: Would the project: Significant t nificant With , Significant Impact Impact ��' �� 1Vlitigattc)�4 }tr i r �Im act p a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that t F{r would be of value to the region and the residents of the State? 5 ,< ;{y x { ',fins b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally -important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local General Plan, specific x plan or other land use plan? Discussion: a) The project site is not identified in the General Plan as having any known mineral -resource value or as being located within any "Critical Mineral Resource Overlay" area. Documentation: City of Redding General Plan, Natural Resources Element, 2000 Mitigation: UP-2020-01669, PM-2021-00290, RZ-2020-01668, GPA-2020-01667 Hartnell Commercial Complex 21 City of Redding Development Services Department Planning Division None necessary. Initial Study Potentially Less -Than- Less -Than- No XIII. NOISE: Would the project result in: Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact With Impact Mitigation Incorporated a) Generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan x or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? �4 ..a k$J t 1 its{ ijt„i. } If lx b) Generation of excessi tf fot nd-borne vI or ground- borne noise levels s` c) For a project lhi n the vicinity of a pirate airstrip or an airport lari,Eit e plan or, where such '),n has not been adopted, \q,`f§`#1 two miles of a public ai p rt or public x use airport, wou�,fe project expose people residing or working in the pro area to excessive noise levels? Discussion: a) During the construction of the proposedJJct, there will ambient noise levels. The most noticeab�)�{Construction r activity. The City's Grading Ordinance (ESA Chapter 16.; hours of 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m., Monda�'j�ugh Satk work associated with the project is limited"°fI�IYa^ residents is considered less than significant b) Due to the nature of the project as a shopping center ambient noise levels and would not result in generati c) The proposed project site is not located within the'virnity of a Airport or Benton airport land use plan. l mporary increase in noise in the project vicinity above existing fat ill be related to grading, utility excavation, and land -clearing .H) lime grading -permit -authorized activities to between the No opi^i(fbns are allowed on Sunday. Since heavy construction °xl """f guij q ., the anticipated noise impact to neighboring storage facillt7,41 jt would not result in a permanent increase in sive ground` vlbr�� or ground -borne noise levels. Documentation: City of Redding General Plan, Noise Element, 2000 City of Redding Grading Ordinance Redding Municipal Code, Section 16.1j City of Redding General Plan, Transportation Element, 2000 City of Redding Zoning Ordinance Redding Municipal Code, Section 18.40. City of Redding Municipal Airport Area Plan Mitigation: None necessary. or airpq,,k within area of the Redding Municipal UP-2020-01669, PIA-2021-00290, RZ-2020-01668, GPA-2020-01667 Hartnell Commercial Complex 22 City of Redding Development Services Department Planning Division Initial Study Potentially Less -Than- Less -Than- No XIV. POPULATION AND HOUSING: Would the project: Significant Significant With Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated a) Induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of x roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing x elsewhere? Discussion: a, b) The project will Imprc t rontage of {t, roject site. The nature of the project, as a shopping center and self -storage facility, would not to unplanned popuja)fiil growth and does not propose the extension of an new roads or utilities not anticipated by th0}eral Plan. The project" not displace substantial numbers of people. No impacts to population and housing will resuFjom the project. Documentation: f rs tf City of Redding General P%�'ousing Element,2014 + { CF R� U Mitigation: None necessary. aVn df.. t" I��tjx i,tX t XV. PUBLIC SERVICES: Would the project re," in substantial ad Potentially Less -Than- Less -Than- No physical impacts associated with the provision o w or physically al r d Significant Significant With Significant Impact governmental facilities, need for new or physit l) i}altered gave t Mitigation Impact facilities, the construction of which could cause ant erritr?ntal Incorporated impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ra''�jao�ef�ztimes or r,� other performance objectives for any of the publrc servtce��z tss t Fire Protection? �s t-� ` �''' x f ,{ f Isz Police Protection?,�,� s s 4 ,,{ �', �}, rk� x Schools? .,+t.?.�o,� t �'{,l.i„ a,e',31, � ust }{ } �2� ?,3r.;inS�. x Parks. x Other public facilities? �a f, ' ri �l'} ,r I,i,as, t x �l s}itl� i! y t�i ft�ryll st .},s .c i Discussion: Fire and Police Protection: The City would provide police and fire protection to the project from existing facilities and under existing service levels. The size of the project would not mandate the need for additional police or fire facilities. The project is subject to Chapter 16.20 of the Redding Municipal Code, which requires new development to pay a citywide fire facilities - impact fee calculated to mitigate a project's fair share of cumulative impacts to the City's fire -protection infrastructure based upon improvements necessary to accommodate new development under the City's General Plan. Schools: The project is a commercial shopping center and mini storage facility and will have no impact to schools. Parks: UP-2020-01669, PIA-2021-00290, RZ-2020-01668, GPA-2020-01667 Hartnell Commercial Complex 23 City of Redding Development Services Department Planning Division Initial Study The project will not cause a physical deterioration of an existing park facility or cause an adverse physical impact associated with a new park facility. Other public facilities: See discussion under Item XIX (Utilities and Service Systems) below. Documentation: City of Redding General Plan, Public Facilities Element, 2000 Mitigation: t None necessary: afsi t, r Potentially Less -Than- less -Than- No XVI. RECREATION: ,f�r,f �' '. Significant Significant With Significant Impact �t Impact Mitigation Impact ,,' Incorporated n✓F a) Would the project tease the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or ottr�7recreational facilities such that substantial x physical deterioration oxfllitypii) occur or tZ,peerated? b) Does the project include `iciettti'na[ facj))I� �'or requi��#he construction or expansion of recreational f(,)I�'s which mightJve x an adverse physical effectonthe environm ti t. t r Discussion: IN jl+ � tl t�� r i �� r rf��£ xi r i }�� :at{�s a) The project is a shopping center and self-storar��))1�a s a norj��Jtfiat4�elopment project, the proposal is not expected to generate any significant additional demand for recreationrtunities or ir"&act existing or proposed recreational facilities z, r 0 in Redding b) The project does not propose any recreational facil{atx`arj uirE "NY adverse physical impact associated with the proje,, ,�;,�� Documentation: City of Redding General Plan, Natural Resources Element, 2000 City of Redding General Plan, Recreation Element, 2000 City of Redding General Plan, public Facilities Element, 2000 Mitigation: None necessary. es. There would be no Potentially Less -Than - less -Than- No XVII. TRANSPORTATION: Would the project: Significant Significant With Significant Impact Impact P Mitigation Impact p Incorporated a) Conflict with a program plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle and x pedestrian facilities? b) Conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3, Subdivision (b)? x UP-2020-01669, PIA-2021-00290, RZ-2020-01668, GPA-2020-01667 Hartnell Commercial Complex 24 City of Redding Development Services Department Planning Division Initial Study Potentially Less -Than - less -Than- No XVII. TRANSPORTATION: Would the project: Significant Significant With Significant Impact Impact p Mitigation Impact p Incorporated c) Substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible x uses (e.g., farm equipment)? d) Result in inadequate emergency access? x Discussion: a=c) A traffic study forthJ'i>wiias prepari;tr GHD, dated March 1, 2021. The study assessed four scenarios; (1) existing conditions; (2) exis ,,1,,, is project conditi f' 3) year 2040 no project conditions; and (4) year 2040 plus project conditions. The study dentffRO under the "Existing Pltl ,i1 toject" scenario, the Shasta View Drive roadway segment is projected to operate at LOS Pi j�plementation of MM-5 �hi4i Involves restriping of Shasta View Drive and construction of sidewalk along the east side off 1�ista View Drive will reduce potential impacts to the Shasta View Drive roadway segment to less than t it significant. k }* ly f4S Under the "Yearjjed intersection at Alta Mesa Drive and Hartnell Avenue is projected Ul to operate at LOS E In the'Ilanc( LOSJtpfre PM peg},hours. Implementation of MM-6 requiring the construction of a roundabout at this intersection will retf�,'otential imp�tothe Alta Mesa Drive and Hartnell Avenue intersection to less than significant, Therefore, incorporating the off -site Irtvements as �)iations, r��'yrpacts associatedwith traffic volumes are anticipated. The project would not conflict with any pi,rm 1��3rdinanp�t addressing the circulation system and the project will not conflict with CEQA Guidelines Section,4`G(b). Tk,'ject r )iJ required to construct frontage improvements along Shasta View Drive, Hartnell Avenue, and Leonard A elitae, includingjl,ewalk along Shasta View Drive and Hartnell Avenue. The project would not significantly increase af�r��zards due to but would enhance the circulation system with completion of sidewalks along both streets_ The project is subject to Chapter 16.20 of the 'zing M60"i4j3palt {C4ak soji'ich rec)3)ls new development to pay a citywide transportation -development impact fee calculated to mitigate its fair sha)�cumulative Impacts to the City sstreet- and traffic -control infrastructure based upon improvements necessary to accor�t��date new dtyplopment under the City's tit General Pan. With the proposed improvements, impactsto transportation would, be consitthan significant, and likely will improve levels of service. d) The Redding Fire Marshall has reviewed the project. The project includes entrances along Shasta View Drive and an emergency access/exit from the facility to Maraglia Street which is adequate access for emergency access and fire protection. Documentation: City of Redding General Plan, Transportation Element, 2000 City of Redding General Plan Environmental Impact Report, 2000, SCH #1998072103 City of Redding Parks, Trails, and Open Space Master Plan, 2018 City of Redding Traffic Impact Fee Program City of Redding Active Transportation Plan, 2018 Redding Area Bus Authority System Map and Route Guide, October 2000 Holiday Market Traffic Impact Analysis Memorandum, prepared by GHD, dated January 14, 2021 UP-2020-01669, PM-2021-00290, RZ-2020-01668, GPA-2020-01667 Hartnell Commercial Complex 25 City of Redding Development Services Department Planning Division Mitigation: Initial Study MM-5 Off -site improvement along Shasta View Drive shall include the following: a. Restriping of the portion of Shasta View Drive between Hartnell Avenue and Goodwater Avenue to a three -lane arterial with one travel lane in each direction with a two-way left turn lane. b. Construct a 5-foot sidewalk along the east side of Shasta View Drive from Hartnell Avenue to Christian Avenue. ■ MM-6 Construct a 3-leg, single lane roundabout at the Alta Mesa Drive and Hartnell Avenue intersection. Potentially Less -Than- Less -Than- No XVIII. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOU4�4,cause a substantial Significant Significant With Significant Impact adverse change in the signift �' j� a tribal cultural y�rce defined in Impact Mitigation Impact Public Resources Code secit074 as either a site, feel place, cultural Incorporated landscape that is gened in terms a the y pnd scope of the landscape, sacred lace ;' f p p f�iject with cultural value to Yt �a�r ornia Native American tribe, and thafj�r If4 t a) Listed or eligible ft,itsting in the California Register of Historical x Resources, or in a Id it ester of histprical resources as defined in Public Resources Code si}r b) A resource determined by the lead agen�'td''its discrete{� nd x supported by substantial evidence, to be sirsuant to a set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resoode Section 502In applying the criteria set forth in subdivisionofPublic Resoure igv Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall con r the significafa �the M resource to a California Native American tribik Discussion: a, b) In accordance with Assembly Bill 52 (AB 52), th pursuant to Section 21080.3 of CEQA. This consultati 2021. No tribal cultural resources were identified within the project area and the pi substantial adverse change in the significance of any known tribal cultural resources. Mitigation: None necessary. requesting notification !tters sent on March 8, therefore, not cause a Potentially Less -Than- Less -Than- No XIX. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS: Would the project: Significant Significant With Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated a) Require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water or wastewater treatment or storm water drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications x facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects? b) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development during x normal, dry and multiple dry years? UP-2020-01669, PIA-2021-00290, RZ-2020-01668, GPA-2020-01667 Hartnell Commercial Complex 26 City of Redding Development Services Department Planning Division Initial Study Potentially less -Than- Less -Than- No XIX. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS: Would the project: Significant Significant With Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated c) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in x addition to the provider's existing commitments? d) Generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards, or infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid x waste reduction goals? a ``t e) Comply with Federal, Statement and reduction statutes and reins `related tipI�tt`l+yaste? x Discussion: a) Wastewater gene. the City sanitary s exceed treatment need for the consi mthe project would b j at associated with the shopping center and manager's office discharged into item. This type and intensity of land use activity does not generate wastewater demands that would nents of the Regional Water Quality Control Board. The proposed development does not generate the f?,new water:,,or wastewater» -.treatment facilities. The project is subject to Chapter t". of t impact fees calculated to mitigate a project. and treatment infrastructure based upon Plan. „ Project -related stormwater-management i .f accordance with City construction standards a Water Quality, d and e). g Munic)4)=Code, which requires new development to pay water and sewer -e of cum i� e Impacts to the City's water and sewer distribution, collection, ents nece) y to accommodate new development under the City's General b) Potable water is available from the City to serve all suppression. The demands of the project can be aeq foreseeable future during normal, dry, and multiple€j ng els of the within th( on of collection and conveyance systems in Or j-mwater detention (also see IX, Hydrology and c) All seven of the project parcels will utilize the City's sanitary sewer system to disp available in the City's existing system. d, e) The City provides solid waste disposal service, which the project wo l f utilize l of the project without need of special accommodation. Documentation: City of Redding General Plan, Public Facilities Elements, 2000 City of Redding Water and Sewer Atlas Mitigation: None necessary. with rdequate pressure and flows for fire xist`�� ater resources and the reasonably sewer capacity is is available to serve the needs UP-2020-01669, PIA-2021-00290, RZ-2020-01668, GPA-2020-01667 Hartnell Commercial Complex 27 City of Redding Development Services Department Planning Division Initial Study Potentially less -Than- Less -Than- No XX. WILDFIRE: If located in or near state responsibility areas or Significant Significant With Significant Impact lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the Impact Mitigation Impact project: Incorporated a) Substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or x emergency evacuation Plan? b) Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose projects occupants to, x pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of wildfire? s, c) Require installation or,;,�j�s �)'f, associated infrastructure (such as rgat 14sources, s or other utilities) that may ex 2e fire risk or {resuit in x temporary or ongoi (f#t cts to the environment d) Expose people orr�ictures to significant risk{cluding downslope or do f #tteam flooding or landslides�t ` result, x post -fire slope ins , or drainage changes? s# jit�r Discussion: r a) The project site is not locatedvihtff`rti"'the project would not impair an emergency rl b, c d) Because the project site is relativelyi vegetated area or slopes, the prof concentrations from a wildfire, requir wildfire risks, or expose people or stru anticipated. dire SevtjZone and is not adjacent to areas with significant fuel loads. The plan or emftricy evacuation plan. without any -would not,. Documentation: CalFire, Fire Hazard Severity Zone Maps, Shasta County, Mitigation: None necessarv. and vegetation, nor is it surrounded by any significant ,fire risks or expose project occupants to pollutant t=J)associated infrastructure that could exacerbate lides. No impacts associated with wildfire are XXI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE: t��tlt g PotentiallyLess „{ , Significant, i di)f t Impact �' ij'i tr}1' }with Incorporated Than- Significant Impact No Impact a) Does the project have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below X the self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in X connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? UP-2020-01669, PIA-2021-00290, RZ-2020-01668, GPA-2020-01667 Hartnell Commercial Complex 28 City of Redding Development Services Department Planning Division Initial Study Potentially Less -Than- Less -Than- No XXI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE: Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact With Impact Mitigation Incorporated c) Does the project have potential environmental effects which may cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or X indirectly? Discussion: Based on the analysis undertaken asrtto{ta lmtial Study, the following findings can be made: i �; nisi s3f {t l$s( r Sl is ra a) The project has the po,fli11 to degrade wildlife`tltat in general due to erosion and sedimentation resulting from grading and construction of proli infrastructure. However `tf project conditions as identified under Hydrology/Water Quality have been established to redu��,tential impacts to a levi i,s than significant. b) As discussed in lterrf,< General Plan, applica potential impacts fro project will contribute to regionwide cumulative air quality impacts. However, under policy of the Standard Mitigation Measures (SMMs) and Best Available Mitigation Measures (BAMMS) will reduce o,r.,oiect to„a=;.Jeve less thantsfanificant. c) As discussed herein, the proj either directly or indirectly. Documentation: See all Sections above. Mitigation: None Necessary fects on human beings, UP-2020-01669, PM-2021-00290, RZ-2020-01668, GPA-2020-01667 Hartnell Commercial Complex 29 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM HARTNELL COMMERCIAL COMPLEX BY SUMMIT DEVELOPMENT PROJECT MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM CONTENTS This document is the Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) for the Hartnell Commercial Complex by Summit Development. The MMP includes a brief discussion of the legal basis for and the purpose of the program, discussion, and direction regarding complaints about noncompliance, a key to understanding the monitoring matrix, and the monitoring matrix itself. LEGAL BASIS OF California Publ, sources Code monitoring or++ 't"rtin g programs rams w ; g mitigated neeclaration. TI measures ado1 through the Califs t+, The MMP co"t 011� anteni Initial StudylMitlgat'ogivje D, Summit Development. It is into" agencies, project contractors, project.tzj f` Mitigation is defined by CEQA following: MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM in 21081.6 requires public agencies to adopt mitigation per certifying an environmental impact report (EIR) or a quirement facilitates implementation of all mitigation Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) process. lej t fy the requirements of CEQA as they relate to the �ia ared for the Hartnell Commercial Complex by 0'it to be us y City of Redding (City) staff, participating itigation mo"prmg personnel during implementation of the a measure that does any of the Avoids impacts altogether by nottak�n�,ertain actiontarts of an action. 1q, Minimizes impacts by limit*, dgre ,rYit{ntuctt=jf the action and its implementation. Rectifies impacts by repairing, rehabilitating or restoring • Reduces or eliminates impacts over time b,m�tenance operations during the life of the project. Compensates for impacts by replacing or providing substitute resources or environments. The intent of the MMP is to ensure the effective implementation and enforcement of adopted mitigation measures and permit conditions. The MMP will provide for monitoring of construction activities as necessary, on -site identification and resolution of environmental problems, and proper reporting to City staff. Mitigation Monitoring Program, UP-2020 01669, PM-2021-00290, RZ-2020-01668, GPA-2020-01667 -I- April 30, 2021 MITIGATION MONITORING TABLE The Mitigation. Monitoring Table identifies the mitigation measures proposed for the Hartnell Commercial Complex by Summit Development. These mitigation measures are reproduced from the Initial Study and conditions of approval for the project. The tables have the following columns: Mitigation Measure: Lists the mitigation measures identified within the Initial Study for a specific impact, along with the number for each measure as enumerated in the Initial Study. Timing: Identifies at what point in time, review process, or phase the mitigation measure will be completed. { ti art y, 1 41siii t Ur Agency/Depart}konsultation,'tk;��ferences the City department or any other public agency with which coion is required t 4, isfy the identified mitigation measure. Verification`' faces to be initialed a specific miti, on measure. N Any person or agency may file a associated with the project. specific information on the att determine the validity of the co�� the City shall take appropriate a" written confirmation indicating the the particular noncompliance issue. dated by the individual designated to verify adherence to l 7 amt assettg noncompliance with the mitigation measures aint shall��' directed to the City in written form, providing violation he City shall conduct an investigation and If none �phanc�� th a mitigation measure has occurred, 04 r��dy an�J�tta The complainant shall receive it# the lntlation �?e final action corresponding to Mitigation Monitoring Program, UP-2020 01669, PM-2021-00290, Ry 2020-01668, GPA-2020-01667 -2- April 30, 2021, 20 Mitigation Measure Timing/Implementation Enforcement/Monitoring Verification ' (Date and Initials) Mitigation Measure 1 — Prior to issuance of a grading permit prior to issuance of a Grading Permit Planning Division, and Public affecting any jurisdictional waters, including wetlands, as Works Department identified in the project wetland delineation, the project applicant shall provide written verification to the City of Redding Development Services Department that the following resource agency permits and mitigation requirements have been successfully secured from the Corps, CDFW, RWQCB, or any other applicable agency (i.e., USFWS) identified through the permitting process:* s i t x�¢ taU�ti a. Prior to any discharge of dredged_',,,,, �� ferial mom, f F t "waters of the U.S." including � 'n 's authorization under a Nationwt rmit or Individual Permit shall be ob"a from the Corps. I, For any features determined f dot be subject to the Corps jurisdiction during thlrification process,s authorization to discharge (o aiver from regulation) shall be obtained �� the RWQCB. For (4 �£f' iity fill requiring aCorps permit wXh certification shall be obtained , prior to discharge of dredged or fill maerla°: tt £t, Verification shall be provided to the City of Reddi�£`' £ Development Services Department prior to issuan�t,, the issuance of a grading permit. tl r �j£i f 4 z b. Prior to any activities that would obstruct the flow" �' NSf 7� p of, or alter the bed, channel, or bank of any �} intermittent or ephemeral creeks, notification of�'��` si streambed alteration shall be submitted to the CDFW; and, if required, a 1602 streambed alteration 5 agreement shall be obtained by the project applicant. t4 F Verification shall be provided to the City of Reddingt Development Services Department prior to the t issuance of agrading permit. t £Jt t�tJJ< <; ft7 i i t t l GJtt 3D t4�{ 4 k c. The project applicant shall achieve the mitigation for the permanent loss of streams, wetlands, and other waters through the purchase of mitigation credits at an agency -approved mitigation bank at a minimum l :1 ratio, or through onsite/offsite habitat restoration at a minimum 3 :I ratio. If onsite/offsite habitat restoration is proposed a detailed mitigation plan,}",�,.",f`z including success criteria, monitoring, maintenance, and reporting as required by the regulatory agencies (i.e., Corps; CDFW, RWQCB) shall be submitted for review and approval. The affected regulatory Mitigation Monitoring Program, UP-2020-01669, PM-2021-00290, RZ-2020-01668, GPA-2020-01667 -3- April30, 2021 agency shall identify when measures shall be implemented and completed for those activities impacting streams, wetlands, or other waters. All measures contained in the permits or associated with any agency approvals shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the lead regulatory a enc.� Mitigation Measure 2 — If vegetation remove�1t, to issuance of a grading or tree Planning Division, and Public �f� t activities will occur during the nesting for birds or aeaor oval permit. Works Department raptors (February 1 through August 3112 salified biologist shall conduct a preconstruction si��r 7 days before construction activities begin. If nest, birds ar raptors are t found, CDFW will be notified and c�lted. An appropriate t buffer, as determined by CDFW an ; qualified biologist, will be placed around the nest until the ,i �ng have fledged. If construction activities cease for a perroater than 7 days, t additional preconstruction surveys will be�, Mitigation Measure 3 — To the extent practreab`�toal of, °�G,�t;,, ',1 1, to rssua� of a grading or tree Planning Division; and Public large trees with cavities, crevices, or snags shall occur befo�ti ,(nr �. �moval permit, . Works Department bat maternity colonies form (i.e., prior to March 1) or young are volant (i.e., after August 31). If construct (including the removal of large trees >12 inch dbh during the bat non-volant season (March 1 through August q p p{ a qualified professional shall conduct a re -construction survey of the study area to locate maternity colonies and s identify measures to protect colonies from disturbance. The preeonstruetion survey will be performed no more than 7 days prior to the implementation of construction activities. If a p P maternity colony is located within or adjacent to the study area, a disturbance free buffer shall be established by a qualified � professional, in consultation with CDFW, to ensure the colony is protected from project activities. t Mitigation Measure 4 — The developer will replace the blue , Prior to issuance of a certificate r,pF P1a�1�� t�ion, and Public oak trees removed from the site with suitable minimum 15- occupancy. ��e)artment gallon size shade trees at minimum ratio of 1:1. ��Yr� , `t �' z i' Mitigation Measure 5 —Off-site improvement along Shasta prior to issuanceof , €t�t��3'�of Plannin Division, and Public g View Drive shall include the following: occupancy. Works Department o Restriping of the portion of Shasta View Drive between Hartnell Avenue and Goodwater Avenue to a three -lane arterial with one travel lane in each direction with a two-way left turn Mitigation Monitoring Program, UP-2020-01669, PM-2021-00290, RZ-2020-01668, GPA-2020-01667 -4- April30, 2021 lane. o Construct a.5-foot sidewalk along the east side of Shasta View Drive from Hartnell Avenue to Christian Avenue. Mitigation Measure 6 — Construct a 3-leg, single lane Prior to issuance of a certificate of Planning Division, and Public roundabout at the Alta Mesa Drive and Harm 1`zA t �, occupancy. Works Department intersection: Mitigation Monitoring Program, UP-2020 01669, PM 2021-00290, RZ-2020-01668, GPA-2020-01667 -5 April 30,2021 within the North Redding Traffic Benefit District or the Dana Drive Benefit District; or the improvements would require substantial and unlikely acquisition of additional right-of-way in already developed areas of the city. TM a4v�#Oy e,6&wmTt&a*&* impact fee program shown in Table 11 E . rBIX7 Placeholder project for capacity related work at the 1-5 Northbound Interchange at South Interchange of 1-5 with South Bonny\Aew. May include $8,000,000 all or parts of interchange (ie ramps, roundabouts, Ramp Bonnyview divergent diamond) and likely to be an initial and future Dbase. Ultimate cost is $21 M Churn Cr,* .O, .. . .. ... .... ... rs e c t i a n c h o Construct a roundabout to improve the intersection of CC2 11111 and Vitt,;. $4,313,000 Churn Creek Road, Victor Avenue, and Rancho Road. 0e k "Placeholder Chu project for ramp or intersection CIX zyg Int"inge Intersection B improvements for capacity related work at westbound Ramp intersection of the interchange at SIR 299 with Churn 99 Qmek Rd. Widen Churn Creek Road between Bodenhamer Blvd Chuiisreek Browning St to and Browning Street (approximately 2700 LF). A 96' CC1 $1,450,000 Right -of -Way is proposed. However a reduced section Bodenhamer Blvd of 3 - 12'lanes and 2 - 8' shouldersand completion of "Mw ped facilities is ipr000sed. & "&"XJ�QNKY"' Widen Victor Avenue between E. Cypress Avenue and VC 1 Victor Ave i 11 tEast 50 0 0 Mistletoe Lane (approximately 2700 LF). A 84'Right- of -Way is proposed for this segment of Victor Avenue, CY Ave 0, However a reduced section of 3 - 12'lanes and 2 - 8' Z' shoulders and completion of ped facilities is proposed. tit; t Al OViden Victor Avenue between Hartnell Avenue and E. , "Y Avenue (approximately 2500 LF). An ultimate A VC2 Victor Ave ` . . . . . . . Hartn . ..Victor .. # Mg, is proposed for this segment of but only 70'of improvements are neededl,""' - 1i% . - 1 Vlanes, center turn lane, 1 - '6 ";,is point�2 10'par -6'bike lane and 1 - 10'paved path. 0, s,t'ad ............ Widenti r Aven*,,,,','_, between State Route 44 and Old Altq, ately2500LF). A 96'Right -of- (app VC3 Victor Ave Highway 44 to 01 d d fo ropose segment of Victor Avenue. A50""I""'60", ,rpbection of 3 Wil d ludy 12'lanes and 2 - 8' " .......... . . . . ... . ... &' iulders wi4aft'facilities is DrODOsed. An 84 Right 41 y is proposedfer this segment of Victor Ave to Shasta View Old Alturas, n Inten a constructed OLD Old Alturas Rd Dr $5,500,000 with d f oundabouts at ' Victor A V 1'' 1111 11 11tl ewood Dr. PL Placer Street Pleasant to Airpark $1,800,, 7 Widen2nd westbound lane, shoulder M, , I "M �9& ,an . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ailroad Avenue between Sheridan Street and randview Aveni is (approximately 3100 LF). An 84' RA Railroad Ave Sheridan St. to Grandview $2,203,000 Right -of -Way is proposed: 3 - 12'lanes, 2 - 6'bike lanes and I - 8' parking. Realign Palisades Ave to the west to provide queing HI Hilltop Dr River Bend Rd to 1-5 $1,650,000 space for a turn lane on Hilltop Drive. This will delay the need to construct another structure over 1-5. Various Roadway, Bike and MIN Minor Projects Ped capacity enhancement $6,000,000 Minor capacity related roadway widening, bike and ped facilities, and grant match roiects DT1 Debt Service Bond Debt $1647,000 Repayment of Bond Debt for Bonny\4ew RAM Ramp Mitigation to prevent impacts to Includes placeholderto meterramps atTwin View, Metering Main Line fieewa s Lake and Cypress 18t� . . .. .. . ..... . . City of Redding Development Impact Mitigation Fee Nexus Study December 5, 2017 18 REDDImG CITY OF POBOX 4SO071 REDD|NGCAOG84A-6q7 Account Net Amount Gro""",',i' ount Total Amount Payment Method Payment Amount Amount Due Invoice Sales Rep: TWoodrurn Order Taker: TWoodrurn Order Created 07/09/2021 Product #Ins Lines Start Date End Date ALL TRANSACTIONS CONSIDERED PAID IN FULL UPON CL NCE OF FIN I ITUTIOY Text of Ad: 07/09/2021 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that at a regular meeting of the Redding City Council on Tuesday, July 20, 2021, at 6:00 p.m., in the City Council Chambers lo- cated at 777 Cypress Ave- nue, Redding, California, the City Council will hold a public hearing in compli- ance with federal regula- tions contained in Final- Rule, 24 CFR Parts 91, 92, 5780, 574, 576, and 968, pub- lished Januarys5, 1995,>to consider the following: (1) Adopt the Mitigated Nega- tive Declaration and Mitiga- tion MonitoringReports%(2) Approve Use Permit Appli- cation UP-2020-01669, Parcel Map Application PM-2021- 00290, General Plan Amend- ment Application GPA-2020- i 01667, and Rezoning Appli- cation 2020-01668; and {3} offer the Ordinance amend- nd}r} rt f t ing the Redding Municipal Code, offer Ordinance for first reading by title only, k rt and authorize the City Clerk 1 `t,1, : to publish the Ordinance in }lit summary; to allow the con- struction of the Hartnell i 1, Commercial Complex con- sisting of a 30000-square foot Holiday Market Gro- cery Store, five outer pads for retail, a drive -through restaurant, a coffee drive-, through; and an automobile fueling station with a con- venience store on property located at 2469 and 2525 Hartnell Avenue, 3055 and 3091 Appian Way in a "HC" Heavy Commercial District. The rezone is a -request to change the current zoned "SC" Shopping Center on the proposed 2 8-acre self - storage facility (parcel sto "HC" Heavy Commercial. The General Plan amend- ment request reflects the rezone request to amend the existing General Plan desig to "Heavy t;ommerciao.' On June 8, 2021, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing and, upon conclusion, rec- ommended that the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Re- port and approve Use Per- mit Application U P-2020- Plan Amendment Applica- tion GPA-2020-01667, and Rezoning Application 2020- 01668. The public comment period will run from July 10, 2021 through July 20 2021. All comments received dur- ing this period will be con- sidered ?prior _tosubmittal of the final Rezoning Applica- tion to the Planning Divi- sion. If you have any questions, prefer to provide comments by telephone or need a translator or other special services, please contact Planning Manager Lily Toy at 530-245-7231. Pursuant to California Gov- ernor Gavin Newsom's Ex- ecutive Order Nos. N-08-21 and N-09-21, members of the`< fccuwny..�Il Y..I UUIIl11. unu staff may participate in this meeting via teleconferencing and the City Council Chambers are fully open to the public.: With regard to attending this indoor meeting, in com- pliance with current guide- lines from the California Department of Public Health, fully vaccinated' people are not required to wear a -face covering. How- ever, people who are not fully vaccinated must wear a face: covering::. /s/ Pamela Mize City Clerk, City of Redding DATED: July 10, 2021 July 10 12021 4816971 To: R I Office of Planning and Research FROM: City of Redding 1400 Tenth Street, Room 121 Public Works Department Sacramento, CA 95814 777 Cypress Avenue Redding, CA 96001 FxI Shasta County Clerk County of Shasta P.O. Box 990880, 1643 Market Street Redding, CA 96099-0880 Project Title: Traffic Agreement with North State Grocery, Inc Project Location — Specific: 777 Cypress Avenue Project Location — City: Redding Project Location — County: Shasta Description of Project: The City of Redding wilt execute a Traffic Agreement with North State Grocery, Inc. The Traffic Agreement will allow North State Grocery, Inc. to contribute their fair share of traffic fees for future traffic improvements associated with the Hartnell Commercial Complex Development. Name of Public Agency Approving Project: City of Redding Name of Person or Agency Carrying Out Project: James Triantafyllou, Assistant Public Works Director Exempt Status: (check one) 0 Ministerial [Section 21080(b)(1); 15268] 0 Declared Emergency [Section 21080(b)(3); 15269(a)] 0 Emergency Project [Section 21080(b)(4)115269(b)] 0 Statutory Exemptions. State code number: 0 Common Sense Exemption (This project does not fall within an exempt class, but it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity may have a significant effect on the environment (14 CCR 1560 l[b][3]). Mx Categorical Exemption. State type and section number: Sec. 15301 Existing Facilities IE No exceptions apply that would bar the use of.a categorical exemption (PRD 21084 and 14 CCR 15300.2). Reasons why project is exempt: Class I exemptions include the permitting, leasing, and operation of public or private structures, facilities, mechanical equipment, or topographical features that involve negligible or no expansion of existing or former use. Future transportation improvements will be subject to separate review under CEQA. Approval of the Traffic Agreement has no potential to have a significant effect on the environment. Lead Agency Contact Person: Amber Kelley Telephone: 530.225.4046 If Filed by Applicant: 1. Attach certified document of exemption finding. 2. Has a notice of exemption been filed by the public agency approving the project? 0 Yes 0 No Signature: 1-11 Title: Environmental Compliance Imager V Ox Signed by Lead Agency Date received for filing at OPR: 0 Signed by Applicant