HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso. 78-160 - Pertaining to Grievance Procedure for Employees of the City of Redding Who Are Not Covered by the Provisions of a Memorandum of Understanding i •
RESOLUTION NO. 'rc/l(J
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING
PERTAINING TO GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE FOR EMPLOYEES OF THE
CITY OF REDDING WHO ARE NOT COVERED BY THE PROVISIONS
OF A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING.
WHEREAS , grievance procedure for employees not covered
by the provisions of a Memorandum of Understanding is presently
provided in Resolution No. 75-49 , and
WHEREAS , City Staff has recommended that the City Council
approve certain changes in policies concerning grievance procedure
for those employees not . covered by the provisions of a Memorandum
of Understanding, and
WHEREAS, the aforesaid recommendations are included in
the attached "Exhibit A" entitled Grievance Procedure and incor-
porated herein by reference, and
WHEREAS, the City Council deems it to be in the best
interests of the City of Redding to adopt such recommendations ,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Redding as follows :
1. That Resolution No. 75-49 is hereby rescinded, effec-
tive June 25 , 1978 , and shall be of no further force and effect
from and including that date. •
2 . That the aforesaid "Exhibit A" is hereby approved
and shall become effective on June 25 , 1978.
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was intro-
duced and read at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City
of Redding on the 5th day of Sept. , 1978 , and was duly adopted at
said meeting by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Fulton, Gard, Kirkpatrick, Pugh, and Demsher
NOES : • COUNCILMEN : None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
ATTEST: 1
A =
NALD M. DEMSHER Ij
MILDRED L. BRAYTON, Ci'ty Clerk Mayor of the City of Redding
FORM APPROVED:
I `�a, ow `, Rescinded -by R-•81 125 tN
\ EARL D. MURPHY, Ci Attorney -- - — 0
1 ,
• • • .
GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE
1 . Any grievance, which may arise between an employee or his represen-
tative, and the City, with respect to the interpretation or application of
any of the terms and conditions of employment, and with respect to such
matters as the alleged discriminatory or arbitrary discharge, demotion or
discipline of an individual employee, shall be determined by the provisions
of this procedure, except that such matters as are included in the definition
of impasse as set forth in Resolution No. 4217 are not a grievance.
2. Step One: The initial step in the adjustment of a grievance shall
be a discussion between the employee or his representative and the immediate
Supervisor directly involved , Division Head or Department Head as applicable,
who will answer within ten (10) weekdays. This step shall be started and
completed within thirty (30) days of the date of the action complained of, or
the date the grievant became aware of the incident which is the basis for the
grievance. This step may be taken during the working hours of the employee.
3. Step Two: If a grievance is not resolved in the initial step, the
second step shall be a discussion between either the employee or his represen-
tative and the Director of Personnel and Labor Relations who shall answer within
ten (10) days. This step shall be taken within ten (10) days of the date of
the Department Head' s answer in Step One.
4. Step Three: If a grievance is not resolved in the second step, the
third step shall be the presentation of the grievance , in writing, by the
employee or his representative to the City Manager, who shall answer, in writing,
within ten (10) weekdays. The third step shall be taken within ten (10) sixty
4604 days of the date of the answer in Step Two aetien-eearplained-e€;-eF-the
date-the-grievant-became-aware-e€-the-incident-which-is-the-basis-€er-the
grievance.
5(a) Step Four: If a. grievance is not resolved in the third step, the
fourth step shall be referral by either the City, or the employee or his repre-
sentative, to arbitration, or the employee may elect, at his or her option,
to appeal to the City Council in private or public personnel session pursuant
to the authority contained in the Redding City Code. The fourth step shall be
•
taken within ene hundred twenty (420) days of the date of the answer in Step
Three aetien-eerxplained-e€;-ee-the-date-the-grievant-became-aware-e€-the
incident-wbieh-is-the-basis-fee-the-grievance.
5(b) An Arbitration Board shall be appointed on each occasion that a
grievance is submitted to arbitration. The Arbitration Board shall be composed
of one (1 ) member appointed by the City, one (1 ) member appointed by the employee
or his representative, and a third member chosen by mutual agreement of the City
and the employee or his representative. Such third member shall act as Chairman
of the Arbitration Board. In the event that the City and the employee or his
representative are unable to agree on the selection of a Chairman of the Arbi-
tration Board , they shall request the State of California Federal-Mediatiem-and
Conciliation Service to nominate five (5) persons for Chairman. The City and
the employee or his representative each will alternately challenge two (2) of
such nominees , the party having 'the first challenge to be determined by lot.
The remaining nominee shall be accepted as Chairman of the Arbitration Board ,
l '
•
•
and his compensation and expenses shall be borne equally by the City and the •
employee. The City and the employee shall pay the compensation and expenses of
their respective appointees and witnesses. At employee's or his representative's
request the City shall release employees from duty to participate in arbitration
proceedings.
•
5(c) The Arbitration Board shall hold such hearings and shall consider such
evidence as to it appears necessary and proper. The majority decision of the
Arbitration Board shall be final and binding on City and the aggrieved employee
and his representative provided that such decision does not in any way add to,
disregard or modify any of the provisions of City Policies , Resolutions or
Ordinances eAl.y-advisery-4n-nature-as-te-e4ther-the-64ty-er-the-aggw4eved
ewp3eyee.
6. Failure by either party to meet any of the aforementioned time limits
as set forth in Section 2, 3, 4, er 5(a) or 5(c) will result in forfeiture by
the failing party. Except, however, that the aforementioned time limits may
be extended by mutual agreement. Grievances settled by forfeiture shall not
bind either party to an interpretation of City Policies , Resolutions or Ordinances,
nor shall such settlements be cited by either party as evidence in the settlement
of subsequent grievances.
•
•
•
CRReynolds/vkt
September 5, 1978