HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso. 1976-147 - Giving notice of proposed annex to City of uninhabited territory designated "Twin View Annex no. 8" and giving notice of time and place for hearing of protestsRESOLUTION NO. / -/I
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING GIVING
NOTICE OF PROPOSED ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF REDDING OF
UNINHABITED TERRITORY DESCRIBED HEREIN AND DESIGNATED "TWIN
VIEW ANNEX NO. 8" AND GIVING NOTICE OF THE TIME AND PLACE FOR
HEARING OF PROTESTS THERETO.
follows:
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Redding as
1. That, pursuant to the provisions of the Annexation of
Uninhabited Territory Act of 1939, a petition signed by owners of more than
twenty-five per cent (25%) of the land in the hereinafter described property
by area and by assessed value as shown on the last equalized assessment roll
of the County of Shasta, was filed with the City Council of the City of
Redding on November 10, 1976.
2. That the territory which the petitioners request be annexed
to the City of Redding and which said City and its Council propose to annex,
is situate in the County of Shasta, State of California, hereby designated
"Twin View Annex No. 8" and more particularly described in "Exhibit A"
attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.
3. That the Local Agency Formation Commission of Shasta County,
California, did in session duly assembled on Wednesday, October 13, 1976,
consider and approve the proposed annexation of said "Twin View Annex No. 8",
as above described.
4. That Monday, December 20, 1976, at the hour of 7:30 o'clock
P.M. in the Council Chambers in the Police Department and City Council
Chambers Building, 1313 Market Street, Redding, Shasta County, California,
is hereby fixed as the time and place when and where any person now owning
real property within the uninhabited territory above described and proposed
to be annexed to the City of -Redding, and having any objections to the
proposed annexation, may appear before the Council of the City of Redding,
and show cause why such uninhabited territory should not be so annexed to
the City of Redding. The protest must be in writing, may be filed at any
time prior to the termination of said hearing for objections to the proposed
annexation, and shall state the name or names of the owner or owners of
-1- �
•
•
property affected and the description and area of such property in general
terms.
5. The City Clerk of the City of Redding is hereby authorized
and directed to cause a copy of this Resolution to be published twice, but
not oftener than once a week, in the Redding Record -Searchlight, a newspaper
of general circulation published in said City of Redding, the city to which
it is proposed to annex the aforesaid territory, said publication to be
complete at least twenty (20) days prior to the date set for hearing.
6. The City Clerk of the City of Redding is further authorized
and directed to cause a copy of this resolution to be published twice, but
not oftener than once a week, in the Valley Times, a newspaper of general
circulation published outside of the City of Redding but in the County of
Shasta, in which is located the territory proposed to be annexed, said
publication to be complete at least twenty (20) days prior to the date set
for the hearing.
7. The said City Clerk is further authorized and directed to
cause written notice of such proposed annexation to be mailed to each person
to whom land within the territory proposed to be annexed was assessed in
the last equalizdd County assessment roll available on the date the above
said proceedings were initiated, at the addresses shown on said assessment
roll or known to said Clerk, and to any person who has filed his name and
address and the designation of the lands in which he has an interest, either
legal or equitable, with said Clerk, such notice to be given not less than
ten (10) days before the first public hearing on the proposed annexation.
8. The City Clerk is further authorized and directed to cause
written notice of such proposed annexation to be mailed to the%Board of
Supervisors of Shasta County, since the County of Shasta has a legal interest
in certain portions of the territory proposed to be annexed.
9. The City Clerk is directed to cause written notice to be
given to such other persons as may be legally entitled thereto, in the
manner required by law.
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was introduced
and read at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding
-2-
on the 15th day of November, 1976, and was duly adopted at said meeting
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Anderson, Demsher, Gard, Pugh, and Fulton
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
ATTEST:
j-�2
MILDRED L. BRAYTON, Cit Clerk
FORM APPROVED:
f�1�5U6-j!
10
(iU
ARL MUAPHt, eity ttorney
24 - ��- 'Z7-'!2
LEE D. FULT N, M.D.
Mayor of the City of Redding
-3-
TWIN VIEW ANNEX NO. 8
•
All that portion of Section 19, T.32N., R.4W., M.D.M. described as
follows:
Commencing at the W. 1/4 corner of Section 19, T.32N., R.4W., M.D.M.
marked by a brass disc in concrete as shown on the map recorded May 13,
1976 in Book 8 of Parcel Maps, at page 121, Shasta County Records, said
W.1/4 corner being on the City of Redding boundary line; thence along
said boundary line N.89006'20"E., 1009.42 feet to a point on the west
line of a proposed 60 foot road easement as shown on said Parcel Map
said point also being the point of beginning; thence continuing along
said City of Redding boundary line N.89006'20"E., 1657.17 feet to the
west line of Interstate 5 Freeway; thence alongsaid line S.0012'25"W.,
44.14 feet; thence S.29054'24"W., 937.58 feet; thence leaving"said City
of Redding boundary line S.53002'58"W., 219.32 feet to the north line of
Lake Boulevard East; thence along said line S.73050'37"W., 550.99 feet;
thence S.77016'38"W., 570.00 feet to the southwest corner of the parcel
conveyed to John H. Windesheim, et al, by deed recorded December 30, 1966
in Book 904 of Official Records at page 23, Shasta County Records; thence
along the west line of said parcel northerly 200.00 feet to a point, said
point being, N.73016'38"E., 100.00 feet from the centerline of old aban=
doned Highway 99; thence N.0041'40"W., to a point which bears southeasterly,
as measured at right angles from said centerline 30.00 feet; thence parallel
with said centerline, northeasterly to southerly line of Parcel "B" as shown
on said Parcel Map; thence N.65047'19"W., 60.00 feet to the southwest cor-
ner of said Parcel "B" and to the west line of said proposed 60 foot road
easement; thence along said line N.31005'08"E., 95.93 feet; thence along a
480.80 foot radius curve to the left; through an angle of 82037'34" for a
distance of 693.36 feet; thence N.51032'26'W., 36.58 feet to the point of
beginning.
Exhibit A