HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso. 1976-066 - Approving a proposal to dissolve Enterprise Public Utility District and annex its territory to CityRESOLUTION NO. 7,1-1 K
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING
APPROVING A PROPOSAL TO DISSOLVE THE ENTERPRISE PUBLIC
UTILITY DISTRICT AND ANNEX ITS TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF
REDDING.
WHEREAS, there is attached to this Resolution and incor-
porated herein by reference a proposal to dissolve the Enterprise
Public Utility District and annex its territory to the City of
Redding, prepared by the Enterprise Reorganization Committee and
submitted to the Shasta County Local Agency Formation Commission,
and
WHEREAS, the aforesaid proposal is subject to five con-
ditions as set forth therein, and
WHEREAS, the proposed dissolution and annexation can be
handled by the County of Shasta and the Local Agency Formation
Commission of Shasta County as a single "reorganization" under
the District Reorganization Act of 1965 (Government Code Section
56003.1), if the City Council makes no objection and approves the
aforesaid proposal, and
WHEREAS, the City Manager, the Planning and Community
Development Director, and the City Attorney of the City of Redding
have advised Council that the attached proposal is the most ap-
propriate procedure to accomplish the proposed "reorganization,"
and the City Council has carefully studied. the proposal and deems
it to be in the best interests of the City of Redding and its
citizens,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the attached proposal
to dissolve the Enterprise Public Utility District and annex its
territory to the City of Redding be and it is hereby approved by
the City Council of the City of Redding, and the City Council
hereby determines that the plan of reorganization together with
the conditions thereof is unobjectionable.
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was intro -
an adjourned
duced and read at /. regular meeting of the City Council of the City ,
of Redding on the 2.8th. day of June, 1976, and was duly adopted at tam
-1-
said meeting by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Demsher, , Gard, Pugh, and Anderson
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Fulton
AT BEST: > ZZ)
MILDRED L. BRAYTON, CAty Clerk
V
FORM APPROVED:
EARL D. MURPHY, gi.ty/Attorney
-2-
Robert C. Anderson
Vice Mayor of the City of Redding
LOCAL AGCY FORMATION C0MOESSION
,i
BILL G. MINTON„-EXECUTIVE OFFICER
ROBERT A.-REHBERG, COUNSEL
SHASTA COUNTY COURT HOUSE
REDDING, CALIFORNIA
PHONE 246-5561
COMMISSION MEMBERS
C.J. FERREIRA, D.V.M.,CHAIRMAN
DONALD DEMSHER
June 2, 1976 MICKIE JAKEZ
R.D."DAN" GOVER
BESSIE L. SANDERS
Report to the Local Agency Formation Commission
From: Enterprise Reorganization Committee
Subject: Proposal to Dissolve the Enterprise Public Utility
District and Annex that Territory to the City of Redding
Pursuant to your Resolution 76-11, the Reorganization Committee appointed therein
has met and reviewed the proposed annexation. During the course of the meetings,
the committee has heard from interested persons appearing at the meetings for
that purpose. Following is the recommendation of this committee.
Annexation of the territory within the boundaries of the Enterprise Public Utility
District to the City of Redding was requested by resolution of the Board of
Directors of the Enterprise Public Utility District, adopted at its regular
meeting of March 8, 1976. The stated purpose of the resolution is that the
proposal "is the most satisfactory method for the citizens of the District to
determine the question of annexation and to resolve the question whether or not
the citizens of the District will benefit from the annexation of the District
territory to the City of Redding.”
The area proposed for annexation includes approximately 14,000 inhabitants and
encompasses approximately 5.4 square miles. The area is, at present, highly
developed with residential and business areas, and it is not anticipated that
the annexation will cause any significant change in the development patterns of
the area.
The assessed valuation of the District for the 1975/76 fiscal year is:
Land $ 6,459,360
Improvements 177054,240
Total Secured $23,513,600
Overlapped Area Only - Total Assessed Valuation $3,006,040
A comparison of comparative costs of service is as follows:
Enterprise P.U.D.
Water Service & Fire
Protection & Sewer
Service Charge - Water
for 1000 Cu. Ft.
Present Cost
(Tax Rate or
Service Charge)
$ 1.85 per $100
4.25 Mo. Min.
Estimated
(After
Annexation)
$ 1.92 per $100
2.50 Mo. Min. City
for 500 Cu. Ft.
r
Street Lighting Various
Garbage Collection Service $47.40 Per Yr.
Charge Private
Recreation $ .15
Electricity PGCE Service
Charge & KWH
Charge
City inc. in $1.92
$36.00 Per Yr.
City
City inc, in $1.92
City Service Charge
d. KWH Charge
The present bonded indebtedness of the Enterprise Public Utility District is
$1,477,000. This amount is substantially less than the bonded indebtedness limit
of the District and would be assumed by the City upon annexation. Other
indebtedness of EPUD is estimated at $900,000.
There are at present approximately twenty lighting districts within the area
proposed for annexation formed under the Highway Lighting District Act, Section
19000 and following of the Streets and Highways Code. Under that law, following
annexation the City is empowered to terminate those districts. It is anticipated
that they will do so and the cost of lighting will be spread equally throughout
the entire city, as in the case of other city street lighting.
Under the Law under which it was formed, a public utility district has powers to
own and operate utility systems for light, water, power, heat, transportation,
telephone services, or other means of communication, and means for the disposition
of garbage, sewage or refuse matter. In addition, they may acquire and operate a
fire department, street lighting system, public parks, golf courses, swimming pools,
recreation buildings, other public buildings, and street drainage.
In practice, the District services are fire protection, water, sewer and recreation.
Within the same area, the County of Shasta exercises the general police power where
not inconsistent with state law and provides, or has the power to provide, directly
or by franchise, public roads, planning and zoning, recreation, garbage collection
and disposal, cable t.v., animal control, building regulations, land division
regulations, police protection and nuisance abatement, and imposes, or has the power
to impose, a hotel -motel occupancy tax, local sales tax and various licenses and
permit fees. If the annexation is approved generally, the foregoing powers and
services, formerly provided by the County and the Enterprise Public Utility District,
will be transferred to the City.
Assuming the City of Redding does not object to the inclusion of the annexation in
the single reorganization plan, the reorganization would be handled as a single plan
and proceedings would be conducted by the Board of Supervisors. If no such objection
is made, it is recommended that if the reorganization be approved, it be approved
subject to the following conditions:
1. That there be a single ballot measure to read substantially as follows:
"Shall the order adopted on , 1976, by the Board
of Supervisors of the County of Shasta ordering a reorganization
dissolving the Enterprise Public Utility District and annexing the
territory thereof to the City of Redding be confirmed?"
2. Thatthe annexation election be held within the area to be annexed and also
within the City of Redding. In order for the measure to be adopted, separate
approval by majority vote of each entity is required.
3. That the City of Redding assume the bonded indebtedness and all other debts
and obligations of the Enterprise Public Utility District.
4. That the City of Redding employ those employees of the Enterprise Public
Utility District listed in Exhibit A hereto and employed on the effective
date of annexation at a salary at least equal to that paid by the Enterprise
Public Utility District, and with employee benefits and rights consistent
with such benefits and rights given by the City to other comparable City
employees of comparable seniority at the time of such employment, provided,
however, that employees listed as sleepers are part time student employees
and shall not be entitled to benefits not provided them by EPUD, and provided
further that the City should not be obligated to employ such sleepers at a
cost to the City in excess of the cost to EPUD, and the conditions of employment
may be modified to meet such limited costs.
5. That the County shall continue road maintenance and law enforcement services
in the annexed area until June 30, 1977, or shall terminate sooner upon request
of the City of Redding. Upon termination of such services, the following shall
apply:
(a) That during the three (3) month period following termination of law
enforcement services or until the City has employed five former Sheriff Department
employees qualified for City employment, whichever is sooner, City shall give
first employment consideration to applicants who within the thirty (30) day period
before application have resigned or been laid off from the Sheriff's Department
in good standing by reverse seniority.
(b) That during the three (3) month period following termination of road
maintenance services or until the City has employed six (6) former road
maintenance employees of the County qualified for City employment, whichever
is sooner, City shall gL e first employment consideration to applicants who
within the thirty (30) day period before application have resigned or been laid
off in good standing from the County Department of Public Works by reverse
seniority.
It is also recommended that the Commission find that the application of the
restrictions of Government Code Section 35002.3 (Creation of Corridors or
Islands) would be detrimental to the orderly development of the community as
to this reorganization, and based upon such findings to waive the restrictions
of said section.
County Counsel has advised that the effective date of the dissolution and annexation
would be the date of recordation of the Secretary of State's Certificate with the
County Recorder (G.C. Sec. 56455). He further advises that upon dissolution the
City would be the successor to the District for purposes of winding up the affairs
of the District (C.C. Sec. 56501(a)), that the City would succeed to all funds
and assets of the dissolved District, and that upon annexation the annexed area
becomes equally liable with other areas of the City for debts and obligations
of the City at the time of annexation (G.C. Sec. 56482).
It appears that the single act of annexation will have no impact on the
environment within the area to be annexed, and for that reason a Negative
Declaration should be adopted by the Commission.
Upon approval by the Commission, assuming that the City of Redding has not
objected to the inclusion of the City annexation in this reorganization, the
Commission's action will be forwarded to the Board of Supervisors to conduct
further proceedings pursuant to the Commission's approval.
ENTERPRISE REORGANIZATION COMMITTEE
PAUL STATHEM, CHAIRMAN
i
C-L.�tSSL'IC?TZOY
Genera 1--Manages
�2soiut�c a ,' i i 3
3amea
SecsBtasy-3oo'skaeosr
TL-3 : - - 1/5175
j Sally Ur•.ue-
-.
Jame Bird
_. _ Utjl+Lg_Cl,arx Scesial
3� 643
-- 4111
- Geesavlwe- 'oaaon
Uttli
5-� aflaf�-.
oa -
-.
3u}�enint_ ndentiL59
3o i~t3emia
� _44��%sem
'�' p.�ui�nt;,4$cizra3c x
-5`ae336n✓Eas-�l.s�
$iiI Poen
IItiliLyy�aa
Utilit'.7m an 4
Z3-C r `�fi0f73
_
. Y1 'cQ-ZW, D pp? ,, QQom�'
ZR
'' _ -
_ - _
..- -
�^• _ � _MS- -ham"^ -_ �.
_
`r
Erle SIou
Siparintandent
- ••
_
f 8f�8f�`3
_ Jake. 31aak
Ut iIityaseti _
Siil.,a Eayart
Uta Utyman _
77
l3-a ZI f73
13'-•. ^IOl3/73
Tam Zait* =
Utilityman
- - -
Lae. Hart-weiZ
Utiiitea
z
x
Bob Briasey
-
_
Fira: Chiaf
Don Kamp
-
.r y
y
Fierna
E4t neer
- i4-�3 ri y 111
&e ta,
_
t:~moi
Tacmas Rawsc-n
Caatain
17 z; �12l�f5S
Jim Hauer
Captain
-
_ -
- F»si Siders:-
_Fix-
-
...
-
_
Z I
���+; Ott ��
T'r+-rapaan
_. 3agi^r�er
...�
-
VirJsart AOTicic
Azai9taat. Fire Chief.
VA IC r Io13' _
3
J
et. anat to
J„ • -- ZZ I�/7S -
mica r 3canaen
Sleeper
Jaz Crsec.2s
Sleeve r.•
�..., ,-
Greg Lan a
S l e e e r-
P
- -
Tonv Hainer
S ieeoeT
+' xjrk_ .iT1'_. _ 1dd
Z;.-..._