HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso. 1976-014 - Authorizing City Manager to submit an application to California Council on Criminal Justice for a grant for law enforcement purposes and to execute a grant award contractRESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING
AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO SUBMIT AN APPLICATION TO
THE CALIFORNIA COUNCIL ON CRIMINAL JUSTICE FOR A GRANT
FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT PURPOSES AND TO EXECUTE A GRANT AWARD
CONTRACT.
WHEREAS, the City of Redding desires to undertake a cer-
tain project designated Community Crime Resistance Program, to be
funded in part from moneys made available through the Omnibus Crime
Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, P.L. 90-355, as amended, P.L.
91-644,((hereinafter referred to as the Safe Streets Act), admin-
istered by the California Council on Criminal Justice (hereinafter
referred to as CCCJ),
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that William Brickwood, City
Manager of the City of Redding, is authorized to submit,. on City's
behalf, the attached Application for Grant for Law Enforcement Pur-
poses to CCCJ, and is authorized to execute, on behalf of the Redding
Police Department, the attached Grant Award Contract for law enforce-
Ment purposes, including any extensions or amendments thereof.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the applicant agrees to provide
all matching funds required for said project (including any extension
or amendment thereof) under the Safe Streets Act and the rules and
regulations of CCCJ and the Law Enforcement Assistance Administration,
I
and,that cash will be appropriated as required thereby.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that grant funds received hereunder
i
shall not be used to supplant ongoing law enforcement expenditures.
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was intro-
duced and read at a regular meeting of the City. Council of the City
of Redding on the 2nd day of February , 1976, and was duly adopted
at said meeting by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Anderson, Demsher, Fulton, Pugh, and Denny
I
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
`A EST:
MILDRED L. BRAYTON, City Clerk
FORM APPROVED:
ARL•D. MURPHY, CA-y6Kttorney
Mayor of the City of.Reddin
R
W.
• GRANT AWARD •
The Office of Criminal Justice Planning, hereinafter designated "OCJP", hereby makes a
grant award of funds to City of Redding
hereinafter designated the "Subgrantee" under the provisions of Title 1, part C
Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (PL 90-351) as amended (PL 91-644),
hereinafter designated "Safe Streets Act", in the amount and for the purpose and duration
set forth in this grant award.
Project Title
Contract No.
Community Crime Resistance
Program
Project No.
Grant Period
7/1 76 throu h 6/30/77
Project Director (Name, Address,
Telephone)
Federal Amoi.:nt
Chief Robert H. Whitmer
$31,275
Redding Police Department
1313 Market Street
State Buy in
$ 1.737
Local Hard Match
$ 1,738
Redding, California 960'01,.:916/241-1212
Financial Officer (Name, Address,
Telephone)
Other Match
Robert E. Courtney
-0-
Director of Finance
Total Project Cost '
760 Parkview Avenue
$34,750
Redding, California 96001
916/246-1151
4
This grant award consists of this title page, the application for the grant which is attaci
hereto as Attachment A and made a part hereof, and the Standard Grant Award Conditions whi;
are attached hc..cto as Attachment B and made a Tart hereof
r`
The Subgrantee hereby signifies its acceptance of this grant award and agrees to administez
-the grant project in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in or incorporated
by reference in this grant award and the applicable provisions of the Safe Streets Act.
y' i �
B�/.i r I �, z- - ?.i. ?. {, DATE
Official Authorized to Sign for Subgrantee
Name: William Brickwood
Title: City Xnager - City of Redding
Address: 760 Parkview Avenue
Redding,
CaliforniaCaliforni96001
I hereby certify that all conditions for exemption set forth in State Administrative Manual -
Section . 1209 have been complied with and this document isexempt from review by the
Department of Finance.
By DATE
Executive Director, OCJP
SPECIAL DEPOSIT GENERAL FUND
FUND LEAA ITEM
Fiscal Year
Fiscal Officer
OCJP 650 - For use ONLY when TOTAL PROJECT COST is at least $25,000 but less.than $50,000.
Revised 7/75
CALIFORNIA COUNCIW_I CRIMINAL JUSTICE
Application for a grant under
Section 301(b) of the Omnibus
Crime Control and Safe Streets
Act of 1968 (PL -90-351), as
amended by PL -91-644.
Part Part C X Part E
Pre -Agreement Effective
Date
Grant Extension Approved
To
1. Title: Community Crime Resistance Program 2. Region: B
3. Type of Application 12. Applicant:
City of Redding
Year: lst X 2nd 3rd 760 Parkview Avenue
Original (Date) October, 1975 Redding, California 96001
916/246-1151
Revision (Date)
4. Grant Duration: 12 Months 13. Project Director:
Chief Robert H. Whitmer
5. Length of Project: 36 Months Redding Police Department
1313 Market Street
Redding, California 96001
Support Dollars Percent 916/241-1212
6. Federal $31,2.75 90% 14. Financial Officer:
Robert E. Courtney
7. State Buy -In $ 1,737 5% Director of Finance
760. Parkview Avenue
738 5% Redding, California 96001
1
8. Local Hard Match $ 916/246-1151
9.
Other
Match &
In -Kind.
-0-
-0-
10.
Total
Project
Cost
$34,750
100/
11. Category:
Program:
I
Crime Specific
16. Project Summary
15. Official Authorized to.Sign
Application:
William Brickwood
City Manager - City of Redding
760 Parkview Avenue
Redding, California 96001
916/246-3.151 /
Luce most communities, the City of Redding has experienced an increase in
all classes of criminal activity. Burglary is the major crime problem in
the City. From 1970 through 1974, the incidence of burglary increased 31
percent. For calendar year 1975, we project a 35 percent increase over
1974.
The project, utilizing two sworn officers, is designed to help the community
to resist criminal activity generally and burglary in specific. To accomp-
lish this end, project personnel will attempt to encourage citizen involve-
ment in methods to more effectively resist crime and to upgrade burglary
and correlated activity criminal intelligence and analysis as the primary
component. The secondary component involves a concentrated intensified
and cooperative multi -agency investigative effort.
I -1-
16. Protect Summary
intensified and cooperative multi -agency investigative effort.
The objective is to reduce burglary by 15 percent during the
project period compared to the peak year 1975. To expect other
criminal activity to reflect: a corresponding change would be
presumptuous. However, a decline in the rate of increase is an-
ticipated.
20 . BUDGET SliMu'`-9ARY FCR GRANT FROjECT
if It is anticipated that funds Will be requested for second and/or third -year activities, fill
in those spaces. If this application is for second -year funding; then fill in the "Total First
Year" with the approved roved amounts for that period, and the anticipated amounts for third year funding.
t' -
1. Budget should he based on a grant year (12 -month or shorter period if the project is
less than 12 months) is) rather than calendar year or fiscal year.
2. Inc!u6ing State Buy -1n funds
i1 TOTAL
FIRST
'
`HART j�
TOVAL
SECOND
YEARZ �
TOTAL
1
j{t
f _
BUDGET {
r �
GRA,\1� I
i r^ Ti 2 l)
�i=�!C��I��.G �'
m
GF.�'�l
�„ r'' i 2 )
i':A�CHIi\;G I
�:�i��r..
_
GRANT �
�1-::'r^`{'-,�?T\� L
! 1 :G
� CATEGORY E TOTAL
1 ti
.. u ; DS ,
'L i DS
TOTAL
FUNDS
FUNDS
TOTAL
FUNDS
FUNDS
Persona! Sona! I'r
S ��4_,750
Services
$31,275
$3,475
5._..2..^4,325
521,893!
$2,432
$17,3 75
$15,637
$1,732
�Travel
t�}ry}`
.
con s _` _nt
-o- 1
Services-o-
f'1
-o--
-o--
j� -o-
i
_0-
-o-
Equipment � -0-
� '-0-
i -0-- k;
-0-
-.0-
� ^0-
-0-
Stip_ lies
'I
--0-
Operating -0-
Expenses
_0-
-0- �I
-0-
I
-0-
_0-
_0-
-0-
-0- i
iKKK;
{xr x}y;
x(
r:,�
'�
'1rr'r_.
`�xJ" xx4. x1/x.c_:.
xyt.`-
x.,�x• xx_x�x
}}iYr,t l}:l':•
r.}ti�...V
Total
%
,F✓>t-J
i
;-,J-.%'"Y;}-:.
��
r..x
ii
;aYix. '
Y;'
$24/J
XXXv}vr_.n>x•xY
t x
.xy
.
,p34/
$17, 375
Y�`}YC Y}-.;_
y%.tV..:.7
JO
Pro ecLCost
�%}".:
.
�'
��'�-•-,
Vx
.
'a_•Y`
r71:
%�'.
. ,.J�:.
J-�r
:..:fr•{:
l�_r"� Ar^//: �a
11
�,V_-
_ LC `' �.r �'
�- •, . r _r. _
y ` r
11 _ ;/:.}. '.%.
Grant Funds
^.n L•.'.%., i /}.: 7
r- �
3 275
V '; "�1.:� r r -�4
r Vii."J�✓�.-� V j
�,
� r j T
.r�..v�-
n
$L1, 893j;
jl; _% � r
r, r:".r,,. ; J
✓`'":-{'r:__
h .r r.�."
ti
$15, 63 /�
}: t 4 {-'�!ii `-jc. �']
�- r: i•-{}���Xf}'ji
r r r
Requested i' ti /
J
;• s;
r r r%
1 ,' x��
l- r.. r:,� f {
Yr 't
n r X_
ti �,
_ty r
�- > Y�
I _ Y:. J !'�.
Y J - 7 f J `
X? tt,
t'- '✓_..
:CK. _
:x;; XXX r .}•.j
-v J f
�',C f i )l 1.((•f:
1' % }c. -::F.
~" - ::
II
' y�7 II - J
Grantee
'
� �,
f }-_ _ri
r
'=;
)
$3,475
- } r.
Ir r r
�„
�xr ': r: r -Vi
cr
r :
d
� $2/ 32 II
-I l•_
),. . ..'":;"r,":':
xx;<">•r
:LX _: a
$� ,738
",.
e.
`y -;�,:;
i,
�. ,X=_;:rid
:=J
:ay=
f
CALIPORA COUNCIL ON CRIMINAL JUST*',
DETASLL;D 1'ROJJEC'I' BUDGET
C.Pota1. of 21A nI]d 21.1 ;,;42,074) Co! -;t a1.L t..r ,_,....
total. of: $42,074 �:Irld budgeted funds of $34,750 will. be absorbed thougl]
local. resource -S.
1IARD MI't,TCII
STA'.I E
J_,OCAL
FEDERAL
BUDGET CATEGORY
TOTAL,
ml 1)S
Buy-INHARD
MATCH
0TI-Ii:,I�
1. Personal. Services
A. Salaries
Two Police Officers, Grade
III, @ $7.76 per hour,
2,080 hours x 2, assigned
full time to program.
$32,282
$31,275 +
-0-
$1,007
-0-
B. Benefits -- 30.31% of
Total Wages
L. Worhmen's Corl]pe.i sati.on 9.070
$ 2,928
--0-
*
2. Retirement - 1-5.148%
$ 4,890
-0--
$1,737
$ 731
-0-
,. Iicd:i.ra1/Deni a.1 Insurance,
�.
-0-
$60.6.3 per month x 1.2 x 2
$ 1,455
-0-
-Q-
-p-
1. Life Insurance - $.44 per
thousand x 16,000 x 1.2 ll-tonths
$ 1691
-0-
-0-
-0-
_0.
x 2
J. Un:Lf:0]"]Il Allowance per yea]-,
1
�.
-Q-
175 x 2
$ 350
�0�
_-_-.�.
�-0-
34 7!)0
$34,
$ 31.,'L'J5
$1. 73'7
`
$.l, 73F3 -0-
TOTAL
--... _
7-7----77
r
') A 1. ,,-'
C.Pota1. of 21A nI]d 21.1 ;,;42,074) Co! -;t a1.L t..r ,_,....
total. of: $42,074 �:Irld budgeted funds of $34,750 will. be absorbed thougl]
local. resource -S.
GLITAILrD M-'OJJ'C'J.' BUDGET •
(Continued)
"1-
��-�- JIARI:) MATCH
FEDERAL S'I'A`I').", LOCAL
BUDGET CA'T'EGORY
TOTAL,
BUY -IN HARD MATCI-I
OTHER
22. Travel
None
-0-
-0-
-0-
-0-
-0-
TOTAL
'-0-
'-0-
-0-
.
0
-0-__. !
23. Consultant Services
None
-0-
-0-
-0--
-0-
i
i
s
TOTAL
-0-
-p_
-p-
_p.
-0-
24. Equipment
None
_p_
-p-
-p_
-p-
-0-
-p-
_p..
-0-
,_p._..
-0-
"1-
DE`1ATI.,l. D PROJECT BUDGL`.I'
(Continued)
r�
IT7\R1) A7A'J:'C'I-I
S7'A'1'}�
~� LOCAL
FEDERAL
BUDGE'P CATEGORY
TOU'AL
F UN1)S
BUY -IN
IL1,RD MATCH
O`.l'IILR
25. Supplies and Operating
Expc-,nses
None
-0-
-0-
�
-0-
-0-
I
I
I
TOTAL
-0-
_o-
-0-
-0-
0-2G.
2 6 .TOTAL, PPOJI.,C7.' COST
$34 , 7_-,0
$31,275
$1., 73.7
$.1, 73£3
-0-
2 7 Pe- cent of '.Pot al
Project Cosi:
100;
X30%
5`/
5`/
--0-��
r�
•
0
28. Buduct. Narrative: Begin below and add as many continuation pages
'(numbered 9--A, 9-B, etc..) as may be necessary to relate the items
budgeted to project activities and complete the required justifi-
cation and explanation of the project- budget. Explain the source,
the grantee will utilize for its matching contribution. Enumerate
those proposed expenditure items that require prior approval, as
spcci fried
in Bureau of the Budget Circular. A—U, and in CCCJ Fiscal
Affairs Manual, so prior_ approval may be considered at the time
application is made.
21. Personal Services
A. Salaries -- Two (2) full-time Police Officers (2,080 hours/
annum) , Grade III, at $7.76/hour, in accord with the current
established salary ordinance of the City of Redding. Officer
work schedules are four (4) teat -hour shifts per week.
B. Fringe Benefits -- Total Fringe Benefits as shown on the line
item budget are those employer --paid coats for all patrolmen
by the City of Redding in accordance with 'established City
policy and. procedures. -Although _all benefits are listed in
the contract budget category and total $9,792, only,$2,.468 in
State Buy -In and Local Hard. Match categories are budgeted,
leaving a difference of $7,324, which is ex.plalnea in the
asterisk notation as follows: "*Cost difference of $7,324
between this total of $42,074 and budgeted funds of $34,750
will be absorbed through local. resources". (Emphasis added).
Total projected costs for fully implementing this program
(providing required support equipment and other resources),
actually exceed the total budgeted amount: of $34,750,in the
project contract,. The cost difference will be absorbed
through local resources; in addition, the City will utilize
the general fund for its hard cash matching contribution .for
the project contract.
9-
PROJI�;CT I:JARRI'�'I.'J: VL
Problem Statement
The following is a summation of burglaries in Redding for the years
1,970 through 1974, and a projection for the year 1975.
1. Using the five-year average of 429 per year and the projected
1975 total_ of 630, the City should experience an increase of
201 burglaries or 47% over the previous five years average.
2. Using the projection of 630 and compar.i-ng this against the
previous year of 1974, 467 burglaries, the burglary rate can
expect to have an increase of 163 burglaries or 35% over 1.974.
3. Using current known figures of 1974, 467 burglaries, against
the first eleven months of 1975, 57£3 burglaries, an actual
increase of 111 burglaries or 24% is noted to date.
in summary, it is reasonable to assume that since the burglary rate
has already experienced a 24% increase over the previous year, it
can be expected to reach a 3�/ to 47% increase depending on which
base of comparison is used.
Proliect Oblecti.ves
1. Reduce burglary in Redding by 15% during the project period
compared to 1975.
2. Anticipate a decline in the rate of increase of other cr.i.minal
activity (to expect other criminal. activity to reflect- a corres-
ponding change %.,ould be presum).?tuous) .
Met boc3olos.y
The project, utilizing two sworn officers, is desi.gned to help the
community to resist criioi_nal act.i.v:ity generally and burglary in
sZ:>(--,c:i.fic. To accomi.:)IJ.�-,li thi end, project-. personnea. attempt to
-11-
+
ACTUAL BURGLARIES
REPORTED ARE
AS FOLLOPdS:
3�
1970
357
1977-
442
+24%
1972
421
--• 5%
3
1 1
1-973
457
+ 9%"
1974
467
+ 2%
v�
1975
57£3
-1-24% (First
11 months only) -
1975
630
(Projected
or +35`/)
Proliect Oblecti.ves
1. Reduce burglary in Redding by 15% during the project period
compared to 1975.
2. Anticipate a decline in the rate of increase of other cr.i.minal
activity (to expect other criminal. activity to reflect- a corres-
ponding change %.,ould be presum).?tuous) .
Met boc3olos.y
The project, utilizing two sworn officers, is desi.gned to help the
community to resist criioi_nal act.i.v:ity generally and burglary in
sZ:>(--,c:i.fic. To accomi.:)IJ.�-,li thi end, project-. personnea. attempt to
-11-
PROJL;C')' Jj7112R71'.I.'T VE
Methodology (Continued)
encourage citizen :involvement in methods to more effectively resist
crime and to upgrade burglary and correlated activity criminal intelJ_i-
gence and analysis as the primary component. `17ie secondary component
involves a concentrated intensified. and cooperative multi -agency
investigative effort.
Work Schedule
-12-
1
" ... . POLICE DEPARTMENT
u' OR
F 1 E, 041 a N, r
TY
-1
CALIFORNIAROBERT H. WHITMER
CHIEF OF POLICE
January 21, 1976
CERTIFICATION
OF
FORMULATION AND AVAILABILITY
OF
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY PROGRAM
I, Chief Robert H. 1•\ihitmer, certify that the Redding Police
Department has formulated an equal employment opportunity program
in accordance with 28 CFR 42.301, et. seq., subpart E, and that it
is on file in the office of NLr. Ron Reynolds; Personnel Officer;
Personnel Office; 760 Parkview Avenue; Redding, California; 96001,
for review or audit.by officials of -the cognizant state planning
agency or the Law Enforcement Assistance Administration, as
required by relevant laws and regulations,
!
Roh,ert H. 6dhitmer`
Chief of Police
Redding Police Department
RH W : pa e
-13-
F RE. o''�'�
to
a
significant
increase
in
pos_.fcr__ D►,r7Aszrn-,ervr
2. Lead
to
a
significant
increase -in
water pollution? •- No.
o
CHIEF os= POLICE
APPLICANT'S
ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
AI'PLIC11Iv7" S NAME - City of Redding
I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
a, and b. 'Type of Grant and Project - ghis LEAA/CCCj Part. C
Action Grant will provide for two sworn officers to help
the community to Tesist criminal activity generally and
burglary in specific. To accomplish this end, project:
personnel will attempt to encourage citizen involvement
in methods to more effectively .resist crime and to upgrade
burgl.aVy and correlated activity criminal intelligence and
analysis as the primary component. The secondary component
involves a concentrated., intensified and cooperative mu:l.ti_..-
agency investigative effort.
C. Size of Project (construction projects only) - N/A.
QhavtR ('n,ig*"
e. Surrounding Area - N/A.
II. DOLS THE PROPOSED ACTION CONFORM TO ALL; LOCAL, STA'I'R AND FEDERAL
PLANS, POLICIES AND CONTI OLS ICOR THE AFFECTED AREA, INCLUDIK3
THE CLEAN. AIR ACT AND T.EE 17EDERT- L 'NATi,1Z POLLUTION. ACT OF 1972?
Yes.
III. INIHA'T AL'TERNT,'I'-I-VES ARI; TIlErE TO TEE PROPOSED ACTION?
N /A .
IV. ENVIRONMLNTA1, EFI'ECTS
WILL THE 1: 1.111 ON OF 7'.%I1 PROPOSED PROJI'CT OR PROGRAM
PRODUCE THE FOLLOWING EFFECTS:
1. Lead
to
a
significant
increase
in
air pollution? •- No.
2. Lead
to
a
significant
increase -in
water pollution? •- No.
—4—
0 •
APPLICANT'S ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
(Continued)
3. Lead to a significant increase in the ambient noise level
for a substantial number of people? - No.
4. Lead to poor incompatible land use, soil erosion or soil
pollution? - No.
5. Destroy or derogate from an important recreation area? - No.
6. Substantially alter the pattern of behavior of wildlife or
interfere with important breeding, nesting, or feeding
grounds? - No.
7. Disturb the ecological balance of land or water area, or
impact critical areas such as flood plains, wetlands, beaches
and damage unstable soils, steep slopes and aquifer recharge
areas? - No.
8. Have significant effect upon areas of historical significance,
archaeological significance, cultural significance or educa-
tional scientific significance? - No.
9. Have an adverse aesthetic or visual effect? - No.
10. Have a detrimental effect on the safety of the community? - No.
V. IS THERE OPPOSITION TO THE PROPOSAL? - None.
After evaluation of the above questions, it has been determined that:
X There are no significant environmental impacts.
There may be significant environmental impacts and an Environmental
Statement should be prepared. -N
Applicant's Signature
Robert H. Wb i tmer
Chief of Police
January 21, 1976
-4a-
n�i ....�,-'.r
v�.�°
0 •
TTACHMENT
•EDDIIG POLICE DEPARTMENT
•
COMMUNITY CRIME RESISTANCE PROGRAM
Program Budget (July 1, 1976)
First Year Costs (Based on 90% of original grant application)
Supplies and Operating Expenses
Telephone $ - 0 -
Postage - 0 -
* Personnel Costs
Two Police Officers, grade I11 $42,257
Sub total $42,257
* Equipment
Two vehicles, compact, @ $4,200 each $8,400
Taro mobile radio transceivers with scramblers
@ $1,909 each $3,818
Two Police Officer safety equipment packages
@ $403 $ 806
Sub total $13,02.4
City Matching Funds 1,738
Total $57,019
C C C J Grant Application
Regional Funds $31,275
State Match 1,737
City Match 1,738
$34,750
Cost Difference to City
Projected Total First Year Cost $57,019
Grant Funds $34,750
Sub total $22,269
Subtract City Match 1,738
$20,531
*Personnel costs supplied by Director of Personnel and Labor Relations.
Equ i pment costs determined December 1975 and estirna'ted to remain firm
for budget purposes.
EDDING POLICE DEPARTMENT
COMMUNITY CRIME RESISTANCE PROGRAM
_Pro gram_ Budc,�et __�_J►.ily�l , 1977)
Second Year (Based on 70% of first year grant application)
Supplies and Operating Expenses
Personnel Costs
Two Police Officers, grade III
Use July 1, 1976 figure of $42,257 plus 10%
City Matching Funds
Regional Funds
State Match
City Match
'total
CCCJ Grant Application
Total
Cost Difference to Cit
Projected Total Second Year Cost
Grant Funds
Subtract City Match
- 2 -
Sub Total
Total
$ - 0 -
$46,482
1,216
$47,698
$21,893
1,216
1,2.16
$24,325
$47,698
24,325
$23,373
1,213
$22,160
EODING POLICE DEPARTMENT •
COMMUNITY CRIME RESISTANCE PROGRAM
Program Budcget (.Jul 1 , 1978;
Third Year(based on 50% of first year grant application)
Supplies and Operating Expenses
Personnel Costs
Two Police Officers, grade III
Use July 1, '1977 figure of $46,482 plus 10%
City Matching Funds
CCCJ Grant Application
Regional Funds
State Match
City Miatch
Cost Difference to Cit
Projected Total Third Year Cost
Grant Funds
Subtract City Match
- 3 -
Total
Sub Total
Sub Total
Total
- 0 -
$51,130
$51,999
$17,375
869
869
$19,113
$51,999
19,113
$32,886
$32,017