The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About _ 4.11(a)--Final Map-Alturas Crossing Subdivision � � �' � � � � � � ' � �' � � ' � ` CITY OF REDDING REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: December 5, 2023 FROM: Michael Webb, Public Works ITEIVI NO. 4.11(a) Director ***APPROVED BY*** � �c a� � �bEi� 'c�r�Cs I7�reetcsr 1 tf2�i2t}`?3 r�> �p�si��,C�i �r� �° 1 l,f?7�'2{�?� mwebb@cityofredding.org btippin@cityofredding.org SUBJECT: 4.11(a)--Approve Final Map for Alturas Crossing Subdivision, AMND-2023- 00295 Recommendation Authorize the Mayor to approve the Fina1 Map for the Alturas Crossing Subdivision (Amendment AMND-2023-00295), an amendment to Tentative Subdivision Map (5-201'7- 00239) and Planned Development Plan (formerly Live Oak Estates); and direct the City Clerk to file the map with the Shasta County Recorder. Fiscal Impact There wi11 be cumulative impacts to the Public Works Department due to the increase in public- street infrastructure requiring annual maintenance, especially the asphalt pavement. The project will generate an incremental increase in State of California gas-tax funds based on population and point-of-origin sales; however, the increase in these revenues falls short of the anticipated annualized maintenance cost. In addition, there will be an incremental increase in the City of Redding (City) utilities costs due to the additional infrastructure. Generally, except for the Storm Drain Utility, sufficient revenue is generated by monthly use charges to offset any increase in annual maintenance costs. The Storm Drain Utility is challenged with increasing requirements that current rates do not cover. Alte�native Action The City Council may choose not to approve the fmal map. This option requires a finding that the subdivision is not being developed in accordance with the conditions of the approved tentative map or in conformance with the State Subdivision Map Act. Report to Redding City Council November 28,2023 Re: 4.12(a)--Final Map-Alturas Crossing Subdivision Page 2 Background/Analysis The Alturas Crossing Subdivision, AMND-2023-00295 was approved by the Planning Commission on June 27, 2023. Attached is a map showing the subdivision, which is located on the north side of Old Alturas Road west of Victor Avenue intersection. The developer, ADK Properties, LLC, has submitted the final map and all other required data, which has been checked and approved by various City departments. Relevant subdivision map conditions of approval have been met and the subdivision is complete. Environmental Review A Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the original project was adopted by the Council on May l, 2018. An Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration was adopted by Planning Commission on January 11, 2022. No further action is required. Council Prio�ity/City Manage� Goals • This agenda item is a routine operational item. c: Ryan Masterson, Fire Marshal Ken Iwamura, Public Works Department Kyle Jones, Public Works Department Attachments ^Location Map ^Subdivision Map PC Previous Staff Report 6-27-2023 PC Previous Staff Report 1-11-2022 Previous Staff Report 5-01-2018 t � _�.1 ��, 1, t_._ _ � 't ff ,r �4 , � _,�__,_, , f � ; f' , t 4 ' �., % , � � f �� ---._---.___._____ � �; r `�, � \ 4} \ 1 ,, � _C..___ .._____�_. ---_._� �_ �_____�-�____-------�_____ __________--l---- --_-_______�__ r � i �� i � � }� : � , � � �� ____i ,___ � /' � ;---z--- .� � ,, `� / -_—___...__II � i \ / � � i � � �`�, ,/� , 1 � � � � � � 1 r � � l � �',�•'�� i' ' � � m��.,.�� ..___._.� _____.__�I j �. { 1 �� I ! ...F..................... ________� : [ �� ______ � � ______ _ I _ .._..___.__--___�_i__.____ � _____.__�_ --, O�D A�TURAS RD '� � °� � �`_----- ___� ---� `_____ . �,, y ,---------------_.� � � ; 'y , �__ - .� � � � t ; PROJECT -- ; �', ; ` � �j � �, �, � LOCATION , � ` � , �ti + ---- --- -.._ ---- —� � � _- _ � j ; ; _.. � � _.__ � 7 � � � ___�__ ___�.._.._ ._ '� ._ _ � ? --_____ __,..._____ ,'4 � �}_______�..___..___; I 1 1 � � �----- �-_ � . , _ __ � ..� ; � _ -.�- i � o � � � � � � � � � �_ - _�.�� _._. � �v.� _ � l f ��_ , , _ } � r._ _-� � � � � � � � —��--_......_-_.......--�� ', m ; � �, � � - ` � � � r � � __. �t � ', � �--._. _ --. � 1 �__ , , ---� � � � ....___ , } �. ---_.._ _.....__ __.__ �..,�.�.. I ,1 ' � iV y ..�..� ' \.. ..�....__--`_----- E �*. _.�.._---....._ i----........_.--- .........., �."'--------.�---__. [- \ � ....--- ( � � . � 1 i I 1 �___._�____�____��___�__,_ , ; � ' ` 1 � { � t � _....... _...._--J�-- ___._-1 � � � �. �I � 1 � � � I i � � � , r � � � 9 c � i ! I ; z ; � J w ; , � ......._...- .__�._..._..._..._..�.�..�� .-......... . ..._.... ._.. �__.................___�._� ........_..-___...__.�.__ .._.... ........_... __�,, -_.._..___.._______ 3 � DANA DR mmTT � � �.;�, __.__. ___ __ .___ ,--.__.__.___ � � ( _ ._ ._ ,__ _ R ---- _ __�. __ _ o � � __� � M -- � � � � � � � � c � � � � � � � � � � o �; , o S , , � I i , �___....___. _ ��F '��o� CITY OF REDDING EXHIBIT A _ ,� . Z 1320 O�D A�TURAS ROAD _ � � PUBLIC WORKS � t�,� , ��.� DEPARTMENT c,F��, LOCATION MAP _ _ _ _ _ ! OWNER'S STATEMENT' 1 HEREBY STATE THAT I AM THE OWNER OF, OR HAVE SOME RIGHT, TITLE OR INTEREST IN AND I, GRE�ORY S. ROBINETT, CITY TREASURER OF THE CITY OF REDDING, HEREBY TO THE REAL PROPERTY INCLUDED WITHIN THE SUBDIVISION SHOWN UPON THIS MAP, AND i AM CERTIF�( THAT THERE ARE NO LIENS FOR UNPAID CITY OR MUNICIPAL TAXES OR THE ONLY PERSON WHOSE CONSENT IS NECESSARY TO PASS CLEAR TITLE T0 SAID PROPERTY, SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AGAINST THE LAND INCLUDED IN THE WITHIN SUBDIVISION AND 1 HEREBY CON�ENT TO THE MAKING AND FILING OF SAID MAP AND SUBDIVISION AS SHOWN OR AGAINST ANY PART THEREOF, EXCEPT TAXES OR SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS NOT WITHIN THE DISTINCTIVE BORDER LINE. YET PAYABLE AGAINST SAID SUBDIVISION OR ANY PART THEREOF, AND THAT THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT INCLUDE ANY ASSESSMENT OF ANY ASSESSMENT DISTRICT, THE REAL PROPERTY DESCRIBED BELOW IS DEDICATED AS EASEMENTS FOR PUBUC PURPOSES: THE BONDS OF WHICH HAVE NOT YET BECOME A LiEN AGAINST SAID LAND OR ANY PART THEREOF. EASEMENT "A" AS AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC SERVICE PURPOSES � EASEMENT "B" AS AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC SERVICE PURPOSES. ° EASEMENT "C" AS AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC OPEN SPACE FOR ACCESS AND TRAIL PURPOSES. DATE:___��z"3 _�• -------BY:---- -------------------- EASEMENT "D" AS AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC SERVICE PURPOSES. CITY E SURER, CITY OF REDDING, e COUNTY OF SHASTA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA ALL AS SHOWN ON THIS MAP WITHIN SAID SUBDIVISION. � ADK PROPERTIES, L�.C, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, WHO ACQUIRED �ITLE AS COUNT� RECORDER'S� STATEMENT � � �� '��. �� ADK PROPERTIES, L�C, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED COMPANY FILED THIS ____ DAY OF __________________, 2024, AT ________.M. IN BOOK ____ OF MAPS AT PAGE ____ AT THE REQUEST OF SHARRAH DUNLAP 0 D ' ` 1 l - !'�- O 3 SAWYE�, INC. A T RA � ,�•. i✓!U�l�� ALLEN KNOTT, MANAGING MEM�ER DATE � '`) DATE:-----------------SIGNATURE:---------------------------- o LESLIE MORGAN ° � COUNTY RECORQER TAX C�LLECTOR'S STATEMENT A NOTARY PUBUC �R OTHER OFFlCER COMPLETING THIS I, LORI J. SCOTT, TAX COLI.ECTOR OF SHASTA COUNTY, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT - CERTIFICATE VERIFIES ONLY THE IDENTITY OF THE THERE ARE NO LIENS FOR UNPAID STATE, COUNTY, OR LOCAL TAXES OR SPEC(AL INDIVIDUAL WHO SI�NED THE DOCUMENT TO WHICH THIS ASSES�MENTS AGAINST THE LAND INCLUDED IN THE WITHIN SUBDIVISION OR CERTIFICATE IS ATT�CHED, AND NOT THE TRUTHFULNESS, AGAIN�T ANY PART THEREOF EXCEPT TAXES OR SPECIAC ASSESSMENTS NOT YET VICIIWTY MAP ACCURACY, OR VALIDITY OF THAT DOCUMENT. PAYABLE AGAINST SAID SUBDIVISION OR ANY PART THEREOF, AND THAT THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT INCLUDE ANY ASSESSMENT OF ANY ASSESSMENT DISTRICT, SOIL ENGINEER'S STATEMENT NOT TO SCALE ACKNOWLEDGMENT THE BC�NDS OF WHICH HAVE NOT YET BECOME A LIEN AGAINST SAID LAND OR A SOiLS REPORT WAS PREPARED FOR THIS SUBDIVISION BY MID PACIFIC STATE OF CALIFORNIA ANY PART THEREOF. ENGINEERING, INC. DATED MARCH 15, 2022 ENTITLED "GEOTECHNICAL COUNTY OF SHASTA �� ENGINEERING REPORT" PROJECT NUMBER 05820-01 AND IS ON FILE WITH THE ON N��1��1�.��5��______ , BEFORE ME,S�,L�..�.�ac ___ DATE: ��L�___________ C�� v. �Je�� _�_____ CITY OF REDDING DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, AND IS SIGNED BY _ 3 �-� BY: _______ ____ WOODY JOE POLLARD, C.E.G. REGISTRATION N0. 2291, AND TROY W. KAMISKY, - - ---- ---- --- -- , NOTARY PUBLIC, PERSONALLY APPEARED TAX COLLECTOR, COUN OF SHASTA, REGISTRATION N0. PE68350. - ----- __ - CL'��-�Q ___________, WHO PROVED TO ME ON THE BASIS OF STATE OF CALIFORNIA SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE) TO BE THE PERSON(S) WHOSE NAME(S) IS/ARE , SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT SUBSCRfBED TO THE WITHIN INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT CLERK 4F THE CITY COUNCIL S CERTIFICATE THIS MAP WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION AND IS BASED UPON A FiELD HE/SHE/THEY EXECl1TED THE SAME IN HIS/HER/THEIR AUTHORIZED CAPACITY(IES), I, SHAF�LENE TIPTON, CLERK OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING, SURVEY IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SUBDIViSION MAP ACT AN[3 AND THAT BY HiS/NER/THEIR SIGNATURE(S) ON THE INSTRUMENT THE PERSON(S), HEREB� CERTIFY THAT SAID COUNCIL APPROVED THE WITHIN MAP ON THE ___ DAY LOCAL ORDINANCE AT THE REQUEST OF ADK PROPERTIES, LLC IN SEPTEMBER 2023. I OR THE ENTITY UPC?N BEHALF OF WHICH THE PERSON(S) ACTED, EXECUTED THE OF _�_________, 20___ , AND DID ACCEPT ON BEHALF OF THE PUBLIC HEREBY STATE THAT THIS FINAL MAP SUBSTANTIALLY CONFORMS TO THE CONDITIONALLY INSTRUMENTS. EASEMENT "A" AS AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC SERVICE PURPOSES, EASEMENT "B" AS APPROVED TENTATIVE MAP, THAT THE SURVEY IS TRUE AND COMPLETE AS SHOWN AND AN EA�EMENT FOR PUBLIC SERVICE PURPOSES, EASEMENT "C" AS AN EASEMENT THAT ALL THE MONUMENTS ARE OF THE CHARACTER AND WlLL BE SET IN THE I CERTIFY UNDER P�NALTY OF PERJURY UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF FOR PUBLIC OPEN SPACE FOR ACCESS AND TRAfL PURPOSES AND EASEMENT "D" AS POSITIONS INDICATED ON OR BEFORE DECEMBER 31ST, 2023, AND W{LL BE SUFFlCIENT CALfFORNIA THAT TNE FOREGOING PARAGRAPH IS TRUE AND CORRECT. AN EA�EMENT FOR PUBLIC SERVICE PURPOSES, SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS OF THE TO ENABLE THE SURVEY TO BE RETRACED. ------------------------- PUBLIC SERVICE EASEMENT NOTE ON SHEET 2, OFFERED FOR DEDIGATGON FOR � ---� WITNESS MY HAND____ PUBLIC USE IN CONFORMITY WITH THE TERMS OF THE OFFER OF DEDICATIONS. DATE:<< .�.��.,�Zd Z 3 ` - - - -------- SIGNATURE: - ----------------------- ��,, JOSHUA R MARTIN, LS 8184 LICENSE EXPI S 12/31/24 N A M E (P R I N T)�,�,..l--ti.,��_��--------------------- M Y COM M I SSI ON E X P I R ES ��;►u��_L�Q1�Z.�,p D A TE:-------------SI GN A TU R E:-------------_-_---------------- �5��P R L� 5�,� C L E R K O F T H E C I T Y C O U N C I L, C I T Y O F R E D D I N G MY COMMISSION N0. _�,��______ SHASTA COUNTY CALIFORNIA �o�� o COUNTY OF NOTARI�'S PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSiNESS SECRETARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S CERTIFICATE 4 � L.S. 8184A � � m - s=�K�• ---------- I, JEREMY PAGAN, SECRETARY OF THE REDDING PLANNING COMMISSION, HEREBY � �G �;�� CERTIFY THAT I HAVE EXAMINED THIS MAP, THAT THE SUBDiVISION AS SHOWN v � � ��''f � v * ' HEREON IS SUBSTANTIALLY THE SAME AS IT APPEARED ON THE TENTATIVE MAP £ XP. 12/31/24 AND A�IY APPROVED ALTERATIONS THEREOF, AS APPF�O E BY THE CITY OF �P : REDDING P ANNIN/G COMMISSION, ON JULY 27 2023. ' ST��E OF CP�-�F�� fi � DATE: � Z�.��3_ BY:---- -`�=`---------- � z � SECR¢ TA �r�� O�HE CITY OF sicrtEo: �� 1��-� REDD��ANN(NG COMMISSION, _ A SHASTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA ��'��N� S� CITY S�JRVEYOR'S STATEMENT , ��'�� G�o ALTU R AS CR OSSI N G I HEREBY STATE THAT I HAVE EXAMINED THIS MAP AND THAT I AM SATISFIED a c� y � THRT THIS MAP IS TECHNICALLY CORRECT. L.S. 854a AM � D— 2023— 00295 - � � , � � _ �� 5-�2017— QC�239 t t �-' - -- -------------- EXP. 12/31/24 DATE:__= �_��.?�___SIGNATURE: __ _ CHARLES KEN IWAMURA, PLS 8540 S�. ��P „ „ LfCENSE EXPIRES: 12/31/2024 �TE 0�CPL�FO� BEING A SUBDIVISION OF ADJUSTED PARCEL B OF THE LANDS DESCRIBED IN A GRANT DEED, RECORDED ON . FEBRUARY 8, 2022 AS DOCUMENT NUMBER 2022-0004030, CITY E�IGINEER'S STATEMENT SHASTA COUNTY RECORDS, SITUATE IN THE CITY OF i HEREBY STATE THAT i HAVE EXAMINED THiS MAP AND THAT THE SUBDIViSION REDDING, COUNTY OF SHASTA, STATE OF CAUFORNIA AS SH�3WN HEREON IS SUBSTANTIALLY THE SAME AS IT APPEARED ON THE QRO��SS/pN FOR TENTATIVE MAP AND ANY APPROVED ALTERATIONS THEREOF; THAT ALL THE ��°��,�5 �� q� �, ADK PROPB RTIES, LLC PROVI�IONS OF THE CALIFORNIA SUBDIVISION MAP ACT AND LOCAL ORDINANCE �<v�P yZ� APPLICABLE AT THE TIME OF APPROVAL OF THE TENTATIVE MAP HAVE BEEN � v No. 56420 � z SHARRAH DUNLAP SAWYER� INC, COMPL[ED WITH. � �m � � Civi! Engineering� Land Planning• Surveying&Mapping - � � � / �� /�� EXP. 6�30�25 � � Eandseape Arehitecture• Presenta�ion Graphics � DATE:---��--f�3-----SIGNATURE:---� -------------------- CHARLES R. AUKLAND, CITY ENGINEER `S'T CI IL ��\� 320 Hartnell Avenue, Redding,CA 96002 RCE 56420 LICENSE EXPIRES:06/30/2025 �T F 0�'CP�-�F� 530.221.1792 voice• info@sdsengineering.com DATE: NOVEMBER, 2023 SCALE: 1"=N/A SHEET 1 OF 5 r ' 15 99 m— ni .19 �ooK _ oF MAPs, ��c� �9�1110NS OF APPROVAL: 1 C}. INDIVIDUAL LOT QEVELOPMENT IN PHASE 2 SHALL MEET THE FOLLOWING STANDARDS: PIANN� DEVELOPMENT PIAN AND SITE DESIGN REt�11REMENTS 7. PRI�R TO RECORDATION OF A FINAL MAP, THE DEVELOPER SHALL CREATE AND a. A 0—FOOT BUILDING SIDE—YARD COMBINED WITH A MINIMUM 5—FOOT FUND A PRIVATE HOMEOWNERS'ASSOCIATION TO PROVIDE FOR THE BUILDING SIDE—YARD SETBACK. MAINTENANCE OF ALL GOMMON AREAS AND IMPROVEMENTS AS OUTLINED IN b. MINIMUM 8—FOOT REAR—YARD BUILDING SETBACK. TH� PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN PERPETUITY. THE ARTICLES OF IN�C?RPORATION AND COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, AND RESTRICTIONS FOR THE c. MINIMUM 18—FOOT FRONT—YARD BUI�DING SETBACK T0 THE GARAGE. ° HOMEOWNERS'ASSOCIATION SHALL BE REVIEWED BY THE CITY ATTORNEY. THE HQMEOWNERS'ASSOCIATION SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF d. ALL FRONT—YARD AREAS SHALL BE LANDSCAPED PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY IMPROVEMENTS, LANDS, AND FACILITIES, INCLUDING, �BUT NOT LIMITED T0, THE OF THE RESIDENCE. FQ�,LOWING: � � � a. ALL LANDSCAPE, IRRIGATION, FENCES, WALLS, AND OTHER L�NDSCAPE, RECREATIONAL FACIUTIES, OPEN SPACE IMPROVEMENTS AND AMENITIES WITHIN ALL AREAS MAINTAINED IN 1�, RECREATIONAL—VEHICLE AND BOAT PARKING SHALL BE PROHIBITED THROUGH COMMON BY THE HOMEOWNERS'ASSOCIATION, INCLUDING THE NORTH AND THE HOMEOWNERS'ASSOCIATION DOCUM.ENTS. - SOUTH GROUP GATHERING AREAS, AND THE FRONT— AND REAR—YARD AREA OF EACH LOT. FI�tE AND EMERGENCY SERVICE 4�. THE INTERNAL PRIVATE DRIVEWAYS THROUGN THE DEVEL(�PMENT SHALL BE b. COMMON UTILITY SERVICES AND THE PRIVATE STORMWATER SYSTEM SIGNED AND/OR STRIPED AS NECESSARY TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE FIRE INCLUD{NG THE DETENTION/INFILTRATION SYSTEM. MARSHAL TO PROHIBIT PARAL�EL PARKING ON ANY CURB WITHIN THE DEVELOPMENT. c. JNTERNAL PRIVATE DRIVEWAYS, COMMON PARKING AREAS, NONPUBLIC SIDEWALK OR PATHWAYS, AND INTERIOR PROJECT LIGHTING. d. ANY PROJECT ENTRANCE FEATURES INCLUDING L,4NDSCAPE MEDIAN AND MONUMENT SIGNS. � � � - � � � e. TRASH AND RECYCLING ENCLOSURES. f. TRASH AND RECYCLING RECEPTACLE MRRKERS. g. LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION INSTALLED WITHIN THE PUBLIC . RIGHT—OF—WAY ALONG OLD ALTURAS ROAD. h. OPEN SPACE TRAILHEAD IMPROVEMENTS AND VEGETATION AND FIRE—FUEL MANAGEMENT OF THE PRIVATE OPEN SPACE LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SITE AND THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 12. FORMATION OF A PRIVATE HOMEOWNERS'ASSOCIATION WILL OBLIGATE EACH LOT OWNER WITHIN THE SUBDIVISION TO PARTICiPATE IN THE ASSQCIATION: THE ` ESCROW INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE SALE OF EACH LOT SHALL REQUIRE THAT THE PURCHASER AND SELLER OF EACH LOT SIGN A STATEMENT THAT THEY HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THIS CONDITION OF SALE. 9. TRASH AND RECYCLING SERVICE FOR THE QEVELOPMENT SHALL INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING: a. EACH UNIT IN PHASE 2 WILL HAVE 2 ROLL OUT CARTS THAT WILL BE CO��ECTED AT CURBSIDE WITHIN THE DEVELOPMENT, ONE FOR GARBAGE AND ONE FOR RECYCLING. b. PLACEMENT OF THE CARTS SHALL BE AS SHOWN IN THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PLAN WITH CURB MARKERS PLACED ON THE CURB TO IDENTIFY THE LOCATION FOR EACH ADDRESS. c. THREE FEET SPACING iS REQUIRED BETWEEN CARTS AND' 6 FEET FROM ANY OTHER OBSTAC�E. d. PROVISIONS FOR STORAGE OF CARTS WHEN NOT AT THE CURB. e. ENFORCEMENT OF NO PARKING ON THE STREET BY THE HOMEOWNERS' ASSOCIATION. f. A MINIMUM OF TWO TRASH AND RECYCLING ENCLOSURES F4R PHASE 1, MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 18.4Q.120 OF THE REDDING A CROJSI � V MUNICIPAL CODE. aLTU R S g. SHADE TREES SHALL BE PLACED SUCH THAT THE CANOPY DOES NOT {�' OVERHANG THE ENCLOSURE WHEN MATURE AM 1 V D— ZOZ�— OOZ�� h. BILLING FOR PHASE 2 WOULD REQUIftE EACH TENANT TO PRY FOR �� 2Q� �— OOZ�� GARBAGE SERVICE SEPRRATELY. i. BILLING FOR PHASE 1 WOULD REQUIRE ONE SINGLE ACCOUNT FOR BEING A SUBDIVISION OF "ADJUSTED PARCEL B" OF THE GARBAGE SERVICE PAID BY THE HOMEOWNERS'ASSOCIATION. �ANDS DESCRIBED IN A GRANT DEED, RECORDED ON FEBRUARY 8, 2022 AS DOCUMENT NUMBER 2022—t}004030, j. NO GREEN WASTE CARTS OR PICK—UP WILL BE PROV{DED FOR THE SHASTA COUNTY RECORDS, SITUATE IN THE CITY OF DEVELOPMENT AND ALL LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SHALL BE REQDING, COUNTY OF SHASTA, STATE OF CAUFORNIA CONDUCTED BY THE HOMEOWNERS'ASSOCIATION. FOR PUBLIC SERVICE EASEMENT NOTE ADK PROPERTIES, LLC ALL PUBLIC SERVICE EASEMENTS (PSE'S) AS SHOWN ON THIS MAP ARE DEDICATED FOR THE PURPOSE TO BY ERECT, INSTALL, CONSTRUCT, REMOVE, REPAIR, REPLACE, RECONSTRUCT, MAINTAIN AND USE F�t�R PUBLIC SHARRAH DU N LAP SAWYER I NC. SER�IICE PURPOSES AND ANY AND ALL MATERIALS, FIXTURES, AND EQUIPMENT NECESSARY FQFt THE � TRA�ISMISSION, DISTRIBUTION AND DELIVERY OF ELECTRICITY, WATER, SEWER, STORM WATER, G1aS, CABLE Civil Engineering• Land Planning•Surveying&Mapping TELEVISION, COMMUNICATIONS, AND INFORMATION SERVICE UTILlTIES OVER, ALONG, .,UPON, UND�R AND �andscape Architecture• Presentation Graphics ACF��?SS TME PARCEL OF REAL PROPERTY AS SHOWN ON THIS MAP. RESPONSIBILITY FOR MAIN�'ENANCE OF SAI[3 LANDS SHALL REMAIN WITH THE OWNER OF THE FEE TITLE OF SAIQ LAND AND:.NOTHING �ONTAINED 320 Hartnell Avenue, Redding,CA 96002 HEREIN SHALL BE CONSTRUED TO ASSIGN MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITY TO THE CITY OF REDC�ING. 530.221.1792 voice• info@sdsengineering.c�m DATE: NOVEMBER, 2023 SCALE: 1"=N/A SHEET 2 OF 5 ro� 15199 dw 15199 fm—unit .dw 15.199 _ . _ _ _- 6�OK OF MAPS, PAGE ,� 1 . LEGEI� ; � FOUND STANDARD CITY OF REDDING CENTERLINE MONUMENT PER 2Q RM 98 � � � FOUND STANDARD CITY OF REDDING CENTERLiNE � MONUMENT ;--,W . �'�� • FOUND MONUMENT AS NOTED ---__ � --- ►`� �,�QjI "' (N) RECORD AND MEASURED PER DOC. N0. 2�22-0004030 li, p �_-` -----_ �N� Lv � � � RECORD AND MEASURED PER 20 RM 98 �o Q � (R) RADiAL J!/? <� ��C6 O.t:. ;n�? �� (� {T) TOTAL Q m ESMT EASEMENT � FOUND 5/8" REBAR FOUND 5/8" IRON PIN MARKED in t ��5�2;34�10„� �7 WITH AN ALUMINUM CAP "LS 4642" PER 17 LS 30 � � i �� \ �8� � MARKED "RCE 14359" FOUND 5/8" IRON PIN MARKED S88'43'40"E 151.30' ^ " " " F: �� :� � � �� T � 8g PER 20 MAPS 98 » „ \ `� " � '`" ��T/E� LS 4642 PER 17 LS 30 PER 17 LS 30 � C �� ;, ;' � us � _ ( � �� — — (S88'32'23"E 151.31') — _ � (N88'32'23"W 167.73'} — — (S88°32'23"E 324.00') —� �� .-._ o� � rn � rn � �� ,, � � � 5 6 7 8 9 1� 11 12 , � c�j'� � 1 . � . � � � . ��O� ". l`.,• .,O W DO t.�'J� C`J`' !�v aJ i��J� �J W 0 � J �i`� �,�;✓`�e ��✓ ,��•r��''�� CO 0 M `_ nC>�Y `.'°r�`��'�� r � � ,•`;'j V _�`> rN N W W � j� Z � � � � Z - � � � !.� s`5',, � � , JJ Z �.y, ��.�;� 13 � .� „�;`� r J � J a?^J V� � r � FOUND 1/2» REBAR 3 ��;;'c�'• V WITH A PLASTIC CAP ��`;' 14 MARKED "RCE 22093" ��`��' PER 30 PM 79 �v� (N19'14'51"E} 2 (63.95') ,-. 1 20 � �- s u 19 18 17 16 15 � �� o �s� (N73'32'23"W) -' �`' J �l ` \/ "�` r �` C$8,60'> ,C - .. W :� �i . . L�J l,��• t^J� � 00 O F- �;��%JJ �C�' � t� L] �= �- r�: ��'J v�G"� c�o��o°' ` (N86'47'06"W 205.78') ' '` o ca � —� �3� �S�'J��'� v ,�--� O�� (N59'04'14"W) v cn "r��,��. ��, �,� (60.07 ) :: '- ., `�`)� tL�`�' << ,�r � �� O�G �� ; �; �,�QF,� �� O c� �� fT� ACES & UILITY AEME T •-� PER DOC#2022-0009969 � A LTU R A S C R 0 S S I N G �- � v AM � D— 2023— a0295 � � S— 2017— 00239 FOUND STANDARD CITY QF REDDING BEING A SUBDIVISION OF "ADJUSTED PARCEL B" tJF THE CENTERLINE MONUMENT PER 40 LS 54 LANDS DESCRIBED IN A GRANT DEED, RECORDED ON �� REMOVED DURING CONSTRUCTION. FEBRUARY 8, 2022 AS DOCUMENT NUMBER 2022-0004030, --' RESET STANDARD CITY OF REDDING SHASTA COUNTY RECORDS, SiTUATE IN THE CfTY OF CENTERLINE MONUMENT R€DDING, COUNTY OF SHASTA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA !/ FOR _ OLD ALTURAS �OAD N�4•39.��»E ADK PROPERTIES, LLC _��,,,....___.-- — _ S86'47'06"E 635.�39' _ �`--30.61' 8Y FOUND CENTERLINE MONUMENT — SHARRAN DU N LAP SAWYER� (NC. NOT OF RECORD BASIS OF BEARINGS CURVE NOTE c;vil Engineering• Land Planning•Surveying& Mapping NORTH 09'50'58" EAST BETWEEN ALL CURVES ARE TANGENT TO THE 60 0 30 60 Landscape Architecture• Presentation Graphics FOUND CENTER�INE MONUMENTS ADJACENT COURSES UNLESS NOTED 320 Hartnell Avenue, Reddi�g,CA 96002 ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF OTHERWISE WITH A RADIA� BEARING. 530.221.1792 voice• info@sdsengineering.cam MALLARD STREET PER 20 RM 98. - 1 INCH = 60 �"EET DATE: NOVEMBER, 2023 SCALE: 1"=60' SHEET 3 OF 5 ro� 15199 dw 15199 fm—uni .dw 15.T99 _ __ B40K �. C�F MAPS, PAGE � �� FOUND MONUMENT AS NOTED O SET 5/8" REBAR W/ ALUM CRP MARKED LS 8184 FOUND 5/8" IRON PIN MARKED FOUND 5/8" IR�?N PIN MARKED � SET 3/4" BRASS TAG MARKED LS 8184 `v:'� `.�. =�� "LS 4642" PER 17 LS 30 "LS 4642" PER 17 LS 30 (S88'32' 3"E 324.00' _ (N) RECORD AND MEASURED PER DOC. N0. 2022-0004030 j 33.i 2' 32.00' 32.00' 32.00' 32.00' 32.00' 32.00' 98.88' �� (R) RADIAL (T) TOTAL PUBLIC OPEN SPACE EASEMENT "C' FOR WC WITNESS CORNER � � � � � � � ACCESS AND TRA1L PSE PUBLIC SERVICE EASEMENT � � � � � � � PURPOSES � o � o � o � o � o � o � o SEE SHEET 5 � cn � cn � cn .- v� � o ESMT EASEMENT � �co � �pao �3 �ao � �ao � �oo � O� � �oo � a 12 `n o .� � d- M d- � .d- �r,� � � �r- M `-� � w o r�i � r�i � r�i � ri � �i � �i � rri � � 10,576 SF N N N N (�l N N �- (n (/� (n (n t!) (n (!? � ^ - - - - - - - - - - � - - - - - � 16.50' WC � - - - - - a, - - - - - - �- . w 16.50' WC 16.50' WC 16.50' WC 16.50' WC 16.50' WC 5•57� 16.50' WC M 31.79' 32.00' 32.00' 32.00' 32.OQ' �� - 26.43' �' 32.00' 99.72' � EDGE OF PSE "g" N88'32'23"W 165.36' -`' �� S88'32'23"E 158.15' EDGE OF PSE "B" z SEE SHEET 5 �_ � -� SEE SHEET 5 ..'o - - - � � � ^ - - - - o- - - - � o o ��-- - - � � � � 4 „ » �, � � �3 � PSE D ,n � 8,417 SF SEE SHEET 5 � 8,834 SF . �� I - S88'32'23"E 164.73' ��ri � , » " � � 92.04' � 72.68' � -� �-� 67.32' - �5 PSE A ,� IJ( 5.40 �.,, N88'S9'22"W 158.59' �� 0 72.68' WC I d', `W 67.32' WC � o � :� i� I � c� 5,922 SF I �� ;n `� �4 0 M , „ , cr;o o N � 8,275 SF i� o � S8832 23 E 164.28 �"� vi � ,ri � ` I - 72.68' � � z / �� - - - - _ �n� �,,,. ��., 108.09' � �, 56.18'-. - - - - - - _ _ ��,,. ��.,. � �C�n-C)�„6�'.� / ` 5.23' 16.50 � EDGE OF PSE "B" � � , ,, » WC �� 00 i_ SEE SHEET 5 o�, ,,,�N 2 5 PSE A --{ � o � M , �S86'47'06"E 159.09' _ �i 4,441 SF � a, � , 32.00 32.00 32.00' ' co ,,,�N � N �J 16.50 WC 32.00 31.09' ,�, 16.50' WC � � v� '� S88'32'23"E 117.90' -'� i ,� _ _ - - - - - - - -- � _ ;d' , 6.98' 16.50' WC 16.50' WC 16.50' WC 16.50' WC w � � co EDGE OF PSE "B" � ( o o a �_ ,.� SEE SHEET 5 ' ZO `r' 's? � o = � o �w 6,973 SF o � o � o � o � o ¢ � � /O N cv ' � v� '- t/� �- v� .- w � � 5,672 SF � o� � �`' �� 0�0� !-�' �� w t�ao w a tn�r � _. � M � � �N�3 32,23»W / �'/ �� %% N Irj � N N N t�f�j �� i� �1� 00 $ . , V e- � e, M N N t� � 8 6�� / 26.16' / Z ►'� ,� � � o 10.0, W� �, \ � EDGE„oF z Z z z �, ALTU R AS CR OSSI � G P E B (N59'04'14"W) `339�,� SEE SHEET � �� D_ �0��_ (�O�{�� (60.07 ) . v �r � � 'L�, - `� ` 42.78' 32.00' 32.00' » 32.00' 32.00' 35.00' � J- �O� �- 0 0 2 3 9 �\� �� r'� (N 8 6 4 7 0 6 2 0 5.7 8 } _ BEING A SUBDIVISION OF "ADJUSTED PARCEL B" OF THE �,��'��0�� s�� LANDS DESCRIBED IN A GRANT DEED, RECORDED ON G��,��0�� y�,�\ , 2022 AS DOCUMENT NUMBER 2Q22-0004030 FEBRUARY 8, , SHASTA COUNTY RECORDS, SITUATE IN THE CITY OF �' �' J ^^ �� :T�^ �^-�«�� ^ REDDING, COUNTY OF SHASTA, STATE OF CA�IFORNiA_ P ��,'� ��..�� „h.,��_ � O ��Lr\ LJVv`. IVV. �V��-%VVvv�si FOR Q�.� ADK PROPERTIES, LLC � BY SHARRAH DUNLAP SAWYER, INC. Civil Engineering• �and Planning•Surveying&Mapping C`UR� N�� 30 Q 15 30 Landscape Architecture• Presentation Graphics ALL CURVES ARE TANGENT TO THE 32o Hartnell Avenue, Redding,CA 960t32 ADJACENT COURSES UNLESS NOTED 530.221.1792 voice• info@sdsengineering.com OTHERWISE WITH A RADIAL BEARING. 1 WCH = 30 FEET DATE: NOVEMBER, 2023 SCALE: 1"=30' SHEET 4 OF 5 ' r ' 15199 dw 15199 fm-u it .dw 1 .199 E��}QK � 4F MlAPS, P��E _... � � -� 2�� .,.r,. �>sn LECi�END (S88'32'2�"E 324.00') - LINE T/QBLE PUBLIC SERVICE EASEMENT "B" 6 $$ � PRIVATE ACCESS EA�EMENT I \ l 1 / t l l l I l \ LINE BEARING LENGTH --�-5.00' S.00' 5.00' 5,pp' S.00' L4 S1'27'37"W 13.00' PUBLIC OPEN SPACE EASEMENT "C" FOR �-5.00' �5.00' � ACCESS AND TRAIL PURP�SES L6(T) S88'32'23'yE 41.00' PRfVATE STORM DRAIN EASEMENT PRIVATE OPEN SPACE EASEMENT FOR � o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o L13 S88'32'23"E 23.18' LIMITED AND PASSIVE RECREATION 0 ap ao ad ao ao ao o� a� � � , » � � ao 00 0o ao ao 0o aa a� . L15 S88'32 23 E 17.82 �'J 6 7 8 Q 9 10 11 12 � 00 Li 6(T) N1'27'37"E 38.73' � PUBUC SERVICE EASEMENT "D" w � PRIVATE ACCESS, STORM DRAIN AND d L17 S1'27'37"W 20.73' MAINTENANCE EASEMENT ^ - - `�' - - - L18 S1'27'37"W 18.OQ' PRIVATE EASEMENT FOR INGRESS, EGRESS � -� - AND MAINTENANCE PURPt3SES � � � � �� 67.58' L19(T) S1'27'37"W 39.98' � � S88'32'23"E �23.60'(T)� � �20 N1'27'37"E 16.88' W o (N} RECORD PER DOC. N0. 2022-0004030 � � , o L22 N1'27'37"E 23.11' (R) RADIAL � � L6(T) �4 "� L27 S86'47'06"E 23.81' � �L ''�' � 'L15 (T) TOTAL � N8�2,��;9�5 � L13 � � . Sg8'32 23'� 74 48' � � . , „ > I �, �o,. � � � � � � � � � �,� �,� L28(T) N864706W 41.02 - - - -� �' � � � � � � � � � � � � p � - - - , » , WC WITNESS CORNER cs� L29 S1'27 37 W 38.00 PSE PUBLIC SERVICE EASEMEE�T 4 � � � � � � �� . � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 5' PSE "A" C°- ' L30 N1'27'37"E 36.04' ESMT EASEMENT ��\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ �N;� N� �� ! - 90.04' 31.5 ' . J� � `43.18'� � 5.40'� � �� I �` 00 L31 N1'27'37"E 42.01' � 74.68'. � � � � � � ;� N88'59'22"W 158.59'(T) � } o�� 37.82'' 31.50' 89.27' � L32 N1'27'37"E 19.15' NOTE: � ' .�. �- �� o �� PRIVATE EASEMENTS WILL BE ESTAB�ISHED PER � 0 3 I '� J �� .a � � � � � ,� �31(T) J � °,,�° L33 N1'27'37"E 22.86' CC&RS RECORDED CONCURRENTLY WITH THIS MAP. �i fo � � � � � � � � � � � � � 14 � o �36 S86'47'06"E 17.21' I � � � � � � � � � � � �� M � i � 89.60' -I�. �'cp� � � � � � 5.45 � G1 �,R �-- - _ _ _ � v �,,,. �� w L36 � ��.,. ��. � � 7. � � � • �„�s_,,,,;� ,,,, T/ �- T- ��_ L V 1 v V V v�J I V 1 �� / 86'47'06"W 75.54' � i`� L28 T) � � � 2 � �z � co 5' PSE »A„---I � 99.41' L'1 r� tv ._ - � _ � 8�'06"E 82.22' ;, � . R3 � - `� - ��- - � RADIAL TABLE � _ � � iys � Q LINE BEARING \ OS ' N • �ASS� / � 20 a : R3 S85'11'27"E � � � ( / / r 3 32�23..� 88 �'� ��, 0 19 M 18 0 17 0� 16 0 15 � so� / �, � � �; ,� � CURVE TABLE � � ` 3� CURVE RADIUS DELTA LENGTH � 6' 5.00' 5.00' � 5.00 ° C1 81.50' 37'37'28" 53.52' �� ,� ��T�� a�-�,.�� (N59'04'14"W) , 15.31' 5.00' S.00' �v�Jv.:i�v r�f'�..u_ � . � � �'�i� CO:,'. ��0. �ll��-llV��n (60.07') � � C2 14.54' 90'00'00" 22.78' �� i � ` i� � C3 14.50' 9Q'00'00" 22.78' �Ss2. �3. •_ (N86'47'06'W 205.78'} _ . - `�s' 28� C4 14.50' 88'14'44" 22.33� A LTU R A S C R 0 S S i N G � SR��( � (�� '� c5 14.50' 88'24'20" 22.37' ��T�� :�L�_ � A M N D- 2 0 2 3- 0 C�2 9 5 ;'�R �0'.;. �d C. ��«-��0��6s C6 118.50' 31'43'09" 65.6Q' C7 20.OQ' 91'45'16" 32.03' J- �O� �- O V�� C8 20.00' 88'14'44" 30.8Q' BEING A SUBDIVISION OF "ADJUSTED PARCEL B" OF THE LANDS DESCRIBED IN A GRANT DEED, RECORDED ON C9 20.00' 90'00'00" 31.42' FEBRUARY 8, 2022 AS DOCUMENT NUMBER 2022-0004030, SHASTA COUNTY RECORDS, SITUATE IN THE CITY OF - C10 20.00' 90'00'QO" 31.42' REDDING, COUNTY OF SHASTA, STATE OF CALiFORNiA FOR ADK PROPERTIE�, LLC BY SHARRAH DU N LAP SAWYER, I NC. `� Civil Engineering• Land Planning•Surveying&Mapping 30 0 15 3Q CUR vG NO� Landscape Architecture• Presentatian Graphics ALL CURVES ARE TANGENT T� THE ADJACENT COURSES UNLESS NOTED 320 Hartneil Avenue, Redding,CA 96002 OTHERWISE WITH A RADIAL B�ARING. 530.221.1792 voice• info�asdsengineering.com 1 INCH = 30 FEET DATE: NOVEMBER, 2023 SCALE: 1"=30' SHEET 5 OF 5 : ro' 15199 dw 15199 fm- " .dw 15.199 1VIEETING DATE: June 27, 2023 FRt?M: Lily Toy, Planning Manager ITEM NO. 4(b)1 *��APPROVED Bl'�� ltay@ei.redding.ca.us � . � Lily .�vn , ��z�na�;�r 1�,2?,'��23 Itoy@ci.redding.ca.us SUB�ECT: 4(b)1-- Amendment Application AMND-2023-00295, an amendment to the Alturas Crossing (formerly known as Live Oak Estates) Tentative Subdivision Map 5-2017- 00239 ancl Planned Developinent PD-2017-04241, by ADK Properties, LLC,, to const�ct 39 multiple-family units and 24 single-family units, a total of 59 units, on property located an the north side of 01d Alturas Road west of the Victor Avenue intarsection and addressed as 1200 and 136& Old Alturas Road. The site is zoned Residential Multiple Family with a Planned Development Overlay "RM-12-PD" Distriet and a General Plan designation of"Residential 10- 20 units per aere." The amendment application praposes to amend the Subdivision and Planned Deve�opment in arder to replace the attached townhome style units in Phasa 2 of the project with detached single-falnil units. Recomnzendation Conduct a public hearing and, upon conc�usian: {1) find the Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration is adequate to comply with th� requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act CEQA; (2) determin� the necessary findings for approval are in evidence, and (3} approve Amendment Applicatian AMND-2023-00295, an amendment to the Alturas Crossing (formerly known as Live Oak Estates} Tentative Map 5-2017-00239 and Plannad Development PD-2017-OQ241. PNoject DescNiption Planned Development Amendmenic The p�roject applicant, ADI�Properti�s, LLC, is requesting approval af an amendinent to the approved Alturas Crossing (formerly known as Live Oak Estates) tentative map and planned development plan for the development of 39 multiple-family units and 20 single-family units on eight acres. The amendinent propases ta amend the project by replacing the attached single-family townhom� styla units in Phase 2 with detached units. PAxc�r.Slz� Two parcels with a total of 8 acres. T��N/VEGETAT�oN The property is relatively flat along Old Alturas Road to gently sloping in the northwest eorner of the property with topography ranging from 555 feet above mean sea Packet Pg.4 Report to Reddrng Planning Commrssian June 23,2023 Re: 4(b)1--AmendmentApplicationAMND-2023-04295, byA1?KPraperties, LLC. Page2 �eve1 {msl) to 615 ms1. The site is characterized as blue oak woodland in the northwest corner and annual grassland thraughout the xest of the property, with minimal barren l�abitat type surrounding the existing and previous residential buildings on the site. Churn Creek, is located outside th�nartheast boundary of the site. E�s�'�N�L�v�UsE Phase I(southerly half of project site)is und�r construction Phase II(northerly half of project site) is vacant GENE�z PzAN DEs1GNATloN "Residential, 10 to 20 dwelling units per acre" and"Greenway" ZoNING DESIGNATioN "RM-12" Residential Multiple-Family SURR(3UNDING LAND USES Narth: Single-family residential subdivision and City open space along Churn Creek East: Single family home and vacant land designated "R1VI-12" Residential Nlultiple-Family adjacent to Churn Creek South: Montessori school, alder single-fan�ily homes, and vacant land across Qld Alturas Road West: Duplex Subdivision Backg�ound In March of 2018, the Planning Commission recommendec� app�oval to City Council and the project was subsequently approved and the site was rezoned to include the "PD" Planned Development overlay. Further, on May 25,20021, the Planning Commission granted a three-year extension for the tentative map. In January of 2Q22, the Planning Commission approved an amendment ta the subdivision and planned deve�opment plan which consisted o£ (1) a reduction in the total number of units from 64 to 59 units; (2) a reduction of lats from 26 lots to 21 lots (3) changes to the layout of the site and arch�tectural design; (4) replaced the amouilt of garage parking with uncovered parking spaces; (5) provision of additional recreation amenities; and (6} phasing of the development into two phases. Phase 1 is the southerly portion of the project area, along 01d Alh�ras Road, and Phase 2 is tlze northerly portion. 'I"he amendment appraved the praject to develop phase 1 with 39 units consisting of duplexes, faur-plexes, and a tri-plex on one single Iot and to develap phase 2 with 10 duplex units with each unit on its own 1at. Thereby reducing the number of lots from 26 lots to 21 lots. The prraposal at this time is to raplace the 10 duplex units in phase 2 with 20 detaehed units. Each unit will remain on inc�ivid�ual lots as previously praposed. Due to the narrow 1ats, units wi11 be minimally s�parat�d by 5 feet, witl� 13 units consisting of a z�ro-side yard setback. �urther, rear yards wi11 be reduced to 8 feet. General Plan Cansistency. The total number of units remain unchanged. The praposed subdivision supports 59 units over a net dev�lopable area(exeluding steap slope, open space, and right-of-way dedication} of appraximately 5.5 acres. This represents a net c�ensity of 10.7 units per acre, which falls within the range allowed by th� General Plan classif cation for the site of 10 to 20 units per acre. Overall, staff feels the project advances General P1an Community Development and Design Elament (CDD) Goal 11 and Policy 11D, to ensure new residential developments are well-loeated and well designed with a mix of residential density and dwelling Packet Pg. � Report to Reddrng Planning Commrssian June 23,2023 Re: 4(b)1--AmendmentApplicationAMND-2023-04295, byADKPraperties, LLC. Page3 types and CDD Gaa� 12 and Policy 12A, to ensure attractive, safe, and we11-maintained n�ighborhoods by promoting z�eigllborhood quaiity though project amenities and establ'zsll�nent of a homeowners' association. Amendments to Planned Develt�ptnent Plan At this time, the amendment is praposing the following changes to Phase 2 of the project. SIT� DEs1�N. The revised layout expands on the previous amendment l�y incorporating a more pedestrian-friendly design with a sidewalk along both sides of the driveway leading to the front doars of each unit. Tl�is is achieved by reducing the rear yards to 8 feet. Staff is supportive of the rear yard reduction as the revised layout approved with the 2022 amendinent incorparated common recreation am�nitzes whzch consisted of a play court, a kid's play lot, and a eommunity room in phase 1. AxexlT�cTURE. The design of the units has been madi�ed with a different architecture style by �ncorporating varying materials and replaeing the previously approved two-story duplexes with single-story structures, ereating a small-lot single-family enclave within the planned development. Each unit of phase 2 will consist af three bedrooms replacing a mix of two- and three-bedrooin units. PAxx�tG. The previous approval for phase 2 incorparated into a11 duplex units an a�tached one- or two-car garage and into each duplex, providing a total of 28 garage spaees and 9 uneoveredlguest parking spaees. The amendment, similar to the previously approved project, incorporates a one-car ar two-car garage into each unit, providing a total of 32 garage spaees and 16 uncoveredlguest parking spaces, resulting in the provision of more garage spaees and uncovered/guest spaces. T�sx AN� REcyZCING. The previous approval incorporated roll out carts ta be collected at c�rbside within the devalopment. Phase 2 would continue to incorporate roll aut earts for each unit. Issue Staff has nat identified any issues of inconsistency with the City General P1an ar standard development policies or signifieant environmental coneerns. The ainendment, in al� aspects, other than those changes discussed abave, is consistent with the previous approval. The amended planned development (PD) plan still provides single-family units with same private outdoor living areas including a variety of common reereation areas. The overa�I site layout is enhanced with pedestrian connections between units, parlcing areas, and eommon areas. E�tvironmental Determination Since the amendment is substantially consistent with the previously approved footprint af disturbanee, the original Mitigated Negative Declaration adopt�d for thi� project has been determined to be adequate for the amendment application. Therefare, staff has prepared an Addendum to the previously approved Mitigated Negative Deelaration and is recommending the Addendum be adopted pursuant to the Californi� Quality Act. A eopy af the Addendum, initial study and mitigated negative declaration is attached. Packet Pc�, 6, Report to Reddrng Planning Commrssian June 23,2023 Re: 4(b)1--AmendmentApplicationAMND-2023-04295, byA1?KPraperties, LLC. Page� Public Com ent Staff has not received any public eomment on the applicatian as a result of the amendment public notice. P�nject Conditions The am�nded conditions far this project are attached. Requiped Findings The revised findings are provided as an attachment to this report, Planning Commissian�4uthority Amendments to planned developments, pursuant to Sect�on 18.53.100, are required to be approved by the Planning Commission similar to amendments to Use Permits. Alternatives The following alternatives are offered for considaration: 1. Based upan a determination that the necessary fmdings are in evidence, approve Amendment application AMND-2023-Q0295, subjeet to the attael�ed draft canditions. 2. Deny the amendment applieation, such actian must be based upon a finding that the project is inconsistent with the General Plan or other City development standards ar pases a threat ta public health, safety, or welfare. Staff has not identified any justificatian for denying the project. 3. Continue the item or refer the itein baek to staff for project modifications the Planning Commissian deeins necessary to support the projeet. Minor modifications ean be incorporated into a motion for a recommendation of approval. C'onclusian It is the opinion of staff that the amendment to the planned development plan is consistent with the letter and intent of the Redding Municipal Code pravisions �overning the applications. This infill development will eomplete needed raacl and sidewalk infrastrueture in an important heavily traveled portion of the City. Staff believes the proposed project is a good fit for the site and the general neighborhood. c: ADI�Properti�s, LLC Mike Dormer, SDS Attach ents Findings Draft Condit�ons of Approval Zoning/Locatzon Map Packet Pg. 7 Report to Reddrng Planning Commrssian June 23,2023 Re: 4(b)1--AmendmentApplicationAMND-2023-04295, byA1?KPraperties, LLC. Page 5 Existing Approved Tentative Subdivision Map Praposed Phase 2 Tentative Subdivision M.ap Proposed Alturas Crassing Planned Developinent Plan Addendum to Mitigated Negative Declaration 2022 Approved Amendment Permit Packet Pg.8' ENVIR(�NMENTAL,TE;NTATIVIE SUBDIVISION AP AND PLA:NNEI? IEVELOPMENT PLAN FINDINGS A�NnME�vz A�rz,Ica�r�oN A N -2423-00295 AMENDING TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP S-2Q17-OO2�9 AND PLANNED I�EVELOPMENT PD-2017-OOZ�l. ALTURAS CROSSING�FORMERLY LIVE OAK ESTATES} Envi�^onmental Findings � � 1. Based on the Initial Study and the infonnation contained in the record, there will be na � significant�ffect on th� environment. A Miti�ated Negative Daclaratzon is appropriate for � the proj ect. � � 2. The Mitigated Negative Declaration and its supporting dacumentation reflect the ind�pendent judgment and analysis of the City of Redding. � � 3. The am�ndm�nt is substantia�ty consistent with the pr�viously appraved project,therefore, the original Mitigated Negative Declaration adopted for this praject is adequate and the � adoption of an Addendum is appropriate. � � � Tentative Subdivision Map Findings � To approv� the tentative subdivision map, the Planning Commission must �n� that none of the � circumstanees set forth in the Government Code of Californ�a Chapter 66474.61(a) through (g) � below exist: `� .� a. That the p�oposed map is not eonsistent with applieahle geneNal and specifie plans r�s � speci�ed in Secti�n 55451. The project density is within that allowed by the Genera�Plan � designation of"Residential, 10 to 20 dwelling units per aere." The proposed net residential � density is 10.7 units per acre. � � ! B b. That the design o� ilnp�ovement of the proposed subdivision is not consistent with � � applieable gener�al and specific plans. As a planned development,the praject's lot design � confornas to the standards of the General P1an and Zoning Ordinanee within tl�e guidelines �, and purpos�s of Chapter 18.53 Planned De�velopment, Construction of th� project wi11 � include reduced lot sizes and public street frontages,custom-lat configuration, and red�uced � building setbacks in accordance with the Plann�d Development P1an. �- .�; � � c. That the site is not physieally suitabl�fo�the type of development. The ste�p-slope araa in � the northwest portion of the site and the creel� corridor setback in the northeast corner af � th� site which is not suitable for d�velopment wi11 be deszgnated as a private open-space � easement for limited passive recreational activities. Qtherwise, the site is physically suitab�e for thas type of development as the property can accommodate crsatian of tl�e prapased lats in accordance with the planned development plan without the need for any unusual grading or construction practices. Short retaining walls will be located betw�sn Findings,�lturas Crossing(former^ly Live C)ak Estates)�-20I9-Q0239 Page 1 PaCICe�PC,,,�.'g lots to accommodate the Ieve� buzlding pad on each lot; however, the private driveway through the projeet meets the driveway grade reguirements. d. That the site is not physically suitable.for the p�opased density af the develo�ment. The site is suitable for th� d�velopm�nt proposed, utilizing the density allowed by the General Plan designation of"`Residential, 10 to 20 dwelling units per acre." The proposed project int�nds to use only that portion of the site whic]� is suitable for devslopment and is not encumbered by steep slopes whieh would restriet development. Steep-slope areas will be � preserved within private open spac�. Adequate acc�ss and utility-servic� capacity is � � available to accolnmodate the project. � � a� � e. That th� design of the subdivision o� the p�opr�sed imp�ovements is likely to cause � substantial envi�ontn�ntal damag�o�substantially and avoidably inju�e�sh ar tivildlife o� � � their� habitat. The proposed improvements would not cause sub�tantial environmental damage or substantially and avaidably injur� fish or wildlife or their habitat. Nlitigation � measures more fully set forth in the Mitigated Negative Declaratian for the project address �,; the minar loss of potentially jurisdictional waters and protection measures for mi�ratory � birds during construction. The subdivision design avoids the northwest portion af the � property containing steep slopes and th� northeast portion of the property adjae�nt to the � creek corridor which will provide protection of those areas from environmental damage. � The project ineludes an und�rground storm water det�ntion and in�'iltration system that wi11 � meet City requirements for quantity and qaality prior to diseharge to Churn Creek,avoiding � �nvironmental da�nage to fish or wildlife and their habitat. � :� � f That the design of the subdivision or type of'imp�ovements is likely to eause serious public " health p�oblems. The residential project does not present any adverse impaets to public � health. The d�sign of the subdivision includes twa driveway locations that would provide � safe access to the projeet in accordance with City requirements and avoid inotor vehicle � injuri�s. Improvements along 01d Alturas Road include an 8-foot-wzde bike lane and � 8-foot-wide sidewalk providing safe access for pedestrians and bicyclists. Two group � gathering areas are designed into the proj�et, as wall as an aceess to tl�e public trail system � � along Cl�urn Creek, which would provide outdoor aetivity for residents of the project, � promoting a h�althy lifestyle. The project wi11 provide 64 individual multiple-family � � housing units in accordance with and consistent with the existing�eneral Plan and Zoning � dasignations for the property. � °� � g. That the design foN the subdivision or the type of improv�inents will confliet with easetnents � acquir�ed by the publie at la�ge for access thNough, or�use of,prope�ty within the pNopased � subdi�vision. I� this cannection, th� go�ve�ning body inay app�ove a map if it�nc�s that � alte�nate easernents fr�r aecess e�r� fo� us� will he pr�ovided and that these will he � substantially equivalent to ones p�eviously czcqui�ed by the public. This su7�seetion shall � apply only to easements o.f'reeo�d o� to easements e.stablished by judgment of a court o,f carnpetent jurisdiction, and no autho�ity is h��eby granted to a legislati�ve body to dete��nin� that the public at la�ge has acqui�ed easements fo� aeeess zhr�ough o� use of p�operty within the p�^oposed subdivision. D�sign of the subdivision improv�ments will not conflict with easements acquired for access through, or use of, property within the Findings,�lturas Crossing(former^ly Live Oa1r Estates)5-2017-Q0239 Page 2 �r7C{(��(�, "�� propos�d subdivision. Conditions of approval require d�dication of appropriate rights-of-way and easements for OId Alturas Road and public utilities within the project. A public open-space easement for access and trail purposes is requir�d with r�cording of the final map for the area in the northeast corner of the praposed subdivision adjacent to the Churn Creek corridor. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PLAN F'INDINGS � 1. The proposed development is consistent with th�goal.�, objectives,policies, stczndards, and � pNograrns of this e�d�and of the Gene�al Plan and any applicable speci,fie plan, including � density and int�nsity lilnitations that apply. The projeet d�nsity falls within th�limitations � of the property's General Plan designation of 'Residential, 10 to 20 dwelling units per � acre." This project's nst density is, excluding steep slope, open space, and right-of-way � dedication, 10.7 units per acre, which falls within the range allawed by the General Plan � classification for the site of 14 to 20 units per aeres. Further, the Housing Element � identifies the neec� to eonstruet additional 3-bedroom units in the coinmunity, a prod�uct � whieh wi11 be providec�by the project. � � � 2. The site foa the p�opos�d de�v�lopment is ad�quate in size and shape to accorr��odate said � use and all ya�ds, open s�aaces, sethacks, walls and fences, pa�king a�ea, l�ading areas, � landscape, and other f'eatu�es �equired. The project deszgn satisfies all site standards and � residential feat�ure requirements of the City Zaning Ordinanee within the guidelines and � purpos� of the "PD" Distriet. Individual lot development includes a minimum S-foot � building side-yard setbacl� and a miniinum 8-faot rear-yard building setbaek, All garage, � parking space, and drive aisle dimensions meet the minimum standards contained in the `� City's C�ff-Street Parlcing Ordinance. � � � 3. The site.f'o�the p�opr�s�d development has ad�quate access conside�ing the lirnitations of �' existing and planned streets and highways. The projeet wi11 have adequate public-street � access to Old Alturas Road accarding to City standards. A 15-foot right-of-way dedication � for a total �a1f section of 42 fe�t wi11 �e r�quired along Old Alturas Road. An � � 84-foot-wide right-of-way w�ll meet the City's planned arterial standard for this corridor � of 01d Alturas Road which will include three 12-foot-wid� travel lanes (one � � west-bound, one east-bound and a eenter left-t�urn lane) between the proposed roundabout �, at Victor Avellue and tying into the existing improvements at tha intersection of Old � Alturas Road and Browning Street. Canditions of approval also require eonstruction of an � 8-foot-wide bike lane and an 8-foot-wid� sidewalk, or shared-use path, as opposed to the '�°° typical5-foot-wide sidewalk, consistent with the draft Active Transportation Plan that will � be considered for approval by the City Council in the n�ar futur�. Th�westerly driveway � will include a center-turn lane for access inta and out of the project while the easterly � driveway wi11 function as the fourth 1eg of the future roundabout planned for Victor Avenue � and Old Alt�uras Road. 4. Adequate public se�vices exist o� will l�e p�ovided in accordance with the conditions o,f developfnent plan app�oval, to se�ve the proposed development,� ar�d the approvc�l �ff'the p�oposed development will not �^esult in a reduction of'such puhlie .se�vice.s to p�opeNties Findings,�lturas Crossing(former^ly Live Oa1r Estates)5-2017-Q0239 Page 3 �e3C�4��C�. '�'� , so as to be a c�etz�iment to publie health, safety, or welfare. Adequate public-service and utility capacity is available to accommodate the project without adversely affecting overall s�rvice Ievels or resulting in detrimental �ffects to public h�alth, safety, or welfax�. Water and sewer service will be provided by the City of Redding with connection to existing mains in Old Alturas Raad. Ac�equat� capacity for both utilities and s�rvice systems are available to the project. The City would provide police and fire protection under existing services l�vels. The size af the projeet would not znandate the need for additional facilities. The project is also subjeet ta Chapter 16.20 of the Redding Municipal Code which requires � new developm�nt to pay water-, sewer-, storm-drain, and fir�-facilities impact fees �' calculated to mitigate a projeet's fair share of cumulative impacts to the City's water, � sewer, storm-dxain, and�r�-prot�ction infrastructure based upon improvements necessary � to accommadate new developinent under the City's General Plan. � � 5. The pz�oposed development, as canditioned, will nat hav� a suhstantic�l �dverse effect on sur�ounding p�ope�ty o�the permitted use thereof and will be coanpatible with the existin� � and planned land use charaete�of the sur�ounding area. The project proposes one lot�n � Phass 1 with 39 units consisting af duplex�s,four-plexes,and a tri-plex and 201ots in Phase � 2 to be developed with a single-family unit on each lot with a residential density consistent � with the multiple-family zoning of the property. Th�proj�ct wi11 be compatibl� with th� � densities allowable alang Old Alturas Road between Browning Street and Victor Avenue. � It is also compatible wzth the duplex subd'zvision project dir�ctly ta the west, as well as the � mix of uses,incl�uding an apartment project, school, and office complex,across Old Alturas � Raad to the south. Th� site is physically separat�d from the single-family residential � properties in the Quail Ridge Subdivis�an by approximately 40 to 60 feet in elevation `� change. " e� 6. Th�imp�o�ve��nts�equired and the�nanne�of develapment adequately add�ess all natu�al � and manmade hazard.s associated with th� proposed devel�pm�nt and the project site, � includin� but not limited to,.flood,�re, and slop� haza�ds. The proposed d�v�lopm�nt � plan avoids areas of steep slope and is adequately eonditianed to address potential f�re � hazards. Conditions of approval r�quire fire-fuel manag�ment of the steep slope and oper► � e space areas by the hoineowners' association,prohibit wood fences along the units abutting � the open space, and include a requirement ta allow p�destrian access for Fire Department � � personnel to the private and public open space along Churn Creek for fire-protectian � purposes. The devalopment is locat�d outside of tl�e ]00-yeax floodplai� for Churn Cre�k. �' � 7. The proposed de�veloprri��t car�ie�s out the intent of the Planned De�velopment pro�visions � by p�oviding a more ef�cient use o,f the land anc� an excellenee of a�chiteetu�e and site � design �;reate� than that which could be achiev�d th�ough the a�plication of the base � distriet regulations. The project provides a more efficient use af the Iand,which wil�allow � duplexes, four-plex�s, a tri-p1�x and single-family units with a moderate density. Al1 the � multiple-family units are two-story. The single-family units are one-story with an attached on�- or two-car garage and will includ�privat� fenc�d yards. The Plann�d D�velopznent Plan illustrates common ainenities proposed for the development. A praperty owners' associatian would be formed to maintain the two group gathering areas, open-space area, front- and rear-yard landscape an all Iots, all other common �andscape areas, and all Findings,�lturas Crnssing(former^ly Live Oa1r E.states)5-2017-Q0239 Page 4 �c'1C�t£'t�t,�. '�� common recreation amenities. �'inal site development, architeetural, and landscap�p�ans are subject to approval by the Deve�opment Services Directar, in part to ensure further consist�ncy. � � � �i � � � � � � e � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 4 3 � � � � +n.w � � � � � � � � � � Findings,�lturas Crnssing(former^ly Live Oa1r E.states)5-2017-Q0239 Page 5 PaCltet Pt,�. "I� raft Conditions of Approvai Amendment Application AMND-2023-Q0295 Amending Tentative Subdivision Map 5-2017-OQ239 and Planned Development PD-2017-00241 � Alturas Crossing (formerly Live Oak Estates Subdivision) � � � *Conditions arked with an asterisk are ta be indicated on the final ap as notes. °� � �*Conditions marked with a doubie asterisk are also environmental mitigation � measures. � � Gene�al Requi�ements � � 1. Tentative subdivision map approval is gran�ed for the A1t�uras Crossing Subdivision, �' allowing division of 8 acres to create 21 znultiple-family r�sid�ntial lots in two � phases for development af a total of S9 multiple-family units as shawn on the � tentatzve subdivision map and Planned Dev�lopment Plan. Phas� 1 consists of 1 lots � total to be developed with six two-family dwelling units (duplex units), six four-plex � units, and a tri-p1�x unit with an attached community room for a total of 39 units. '� � Phase 2 consists of 20 lots to be developed with 20 single-family units. The final � map sha11 be prepared in accordance with the revised t�ntative subdivision map as � approved by the Planning Commission on June 27,2023. The requirements of these � conditions shall prevail in th� �vent tl�er� is any inconsisrency between a eondition '� � and informatian or data presented on the tentative subdivision map. � � � 2. The standard conditions for subdivisions delineated in Resolution 92-18 shall be met, � �xcept as may be speeifically modified by thesa conditions. � A � � 3. The d�v�laper sha11 nat�that Section 711.4 of the State Fish and Game Cod�requires �" � payment of a fee to the County Clerk for filing a Notice of Determination for an '�' �nv�ronmental doeument; payment of this fee is the responsibility of the proj�ct � � proponent, � � 4. In accordance with Chapter 18.40.040 af the Zoning Cade (Compliance with Map � Requir�ments),all conditions applieable to post-subdivisian constructian(as marked � with an asterisk} sha11 be noted on the final map under"Statement of Conditions"to � � provide notification to futur� prop�rty own�rs of buildzng limitations and other `� requirements far the subdivision. � � � Planned eveloprazent Plan and Site e.sign Requi�^ements �' � � 5. The standard requiremen�s of Chapter 18 {Zoning) of the Redding Municipa� Code °� and tlae zoning designation underlying the"PD"Overlay sha11 apply,unless a special � development standard is allawed pursuant to these canditions and the appraved � plann�d deve�opment plan. � Racket Pc�, 14 I MND-2(�23-0029SJAlturas Crossin,g Subdrvision and Planned Development Page 2 Draft Conditions ofApproval 6. All site and building development shall be consistent with the Alt�uras Crossing Planned Development Plan Amendment AMND-2Q23-00295, dated Jun� 2023. Final plans shall be approved by the Planning Division prior to recordation of a final map or bui]ding permit for any phase of the prajeet. These p�ans shall consist of a � final map and development details for landscape,decorative retaining and sound wall � design, improvement in the common outdoor gathering areas, trailhoad � impravements, lighting, and final bui�ding architectural design consistent with the � City's Design Criteria for Multiple Fa�nily. � � 7. Prior to recordation of a final map, the developer s1aa11 create and fund a private homeowners' associatian to provide for the maintenance of a11 eommon areas and � improvements as outlined in the planned dev�lop�nant plan in perpetuity. Th� � articles af incorporation and eovenants, conditions, and restrictions for the � homeowners' association sha11 be reviewed by the City Attorney. The homeown�rs' � association �hall be responsible for the maintenance of improvements, lands, and � facilities, including,but not limited ta, the following: * � � a. Atl landscape, irrigation, f�nces, wa11s, and other improvements and amenities within all areas maintained in common by the homeowners' � association, including the north and sauth group gathering areas, and th� � front- and rear-yard area of each lot. � ,� � b. Cammon utility services and the private stormwater system including �he �,, d�tentionlinfi]tration system, � E � c. Internal private driveways, common parking areas, nonpublic sidewalk or � pathways, and interior praject lighring. � � � � d. Any project entrance features incl�uding landscape median and inonument � � signs. � � � e. Trash and recycling enclasures. � � f. Trash and reeyeling rec�ptacle mark�rs. � �, � g. Landscape and irrigation installed within the pub3ic right-of way a�ong QId � � Alturas Road. �� h. Open space trailhead iinprovemen�s and vegetatian and �re�fuel � managem�nt of the private open space loeated at the northwest carner of tlze � site and the northeast corner of Lot 12. � � Formatian of a private homeowners' association will obligate each lot owner within � t1�e subdivision to participate in the association. The escrow�nstructions for the sale � of each lot shall require that the purchaser and seller of each lat sign a stateinent that they have read and understand this condition of sale. � Pack+�t Pg, 15 I MND-2(�23-0029SJAlturas Crossin,g Subdrvision and Planned Development Page 3 Draft Conditions ofApproval 8. The internal private driveways, common parking areas, north and sauth group gathering area improvements, inc�uding �anc�scape and irrigation system, and open space trailhead shall be coinpleted by the developer and approved by the City prior to issuance of any building occupaney permit, If th� project is phased, only those � unprovements shown within the phase boundary shall be campleted priar ta a � building accupancy permit in that developing phase. Phasing sha11 be as shown on � the tentative subdivision map and as follows: � � � a. Phase 1 —Lots 1. � � b. Phase 2—Lots 1 through 20. � 9. Trash and recycling service for the development shall include the following: * � a. Eaeh t�nit in Phase 2 will have 2 ro11 out carts that will be collected at ° curbsid�within the d�v�lopment, on�for garbage and one far recyclzng. � � b. P1ac�ment of the carts shall be as shown zn th� plann�d d�v�lopm�nt p�an. with curb markers placed on the curb ta identify the location far each � address. ° � � � c. Three f�et spacing is required between carts and & feet from any oth�r � obstacle. � � � � d. Pravisions for storage af carts when nat at the curb. � � e. Enforcement of no parl�ing on the street by the homeawners' association. S � � f. A minimuin of two trash and reeycling enclosure for Phase 1, ineeting the ;� requirem�nts of Section 18.40.120 of the Redding Municipal Code. �' � � � g. Shade trees shall be plaeed such that the canopy does not overhar�g th� � enclosure when mature. � � � � h. Billing for Phase 2 would require each tenant to pay for garbage service � separately, � ;� � i. Billing for Phase 1 wauld require one single account for garbage service � paid by the haineowners' assoeiation. � � j. No green waste carts or pick-up wi11 be provided far the develapment and � a11 landscape maintenanee sha11 b� conducted by the homeowners' � � assoeiation. �, � � Packet Pg. �� I MND-2(�23-0029SJAlturas Crossin,g Subdrvision and Planned Development Page 4 Draft Conditions ofApproval 10. Individual lot development in Phase 2 shall ineet the following standards: * a. A 0-foot building side-yard combined with a minimum 5-foot building side-yard setback. � � � b. Minimum 8-foot rear-yard buildrng setback. � � c. Mir�imum 18-foot front-yard bui]ding setbaek to the garage. °� � � d. All front-yard areas sha11 be landscaped prior to occupancy of th�residence. � �andscape, ecreational,�'aeilities, pen Spaee �' � 11. The develaper sha11 installlandscape alang the frontage of Old Alturas Road, in the � front and rear yard of each unit, the north and south group gathering area, and � throughout the subdivision as is d�pict�d in the Planned Development P1an. As part � of the final plan review process, a comprehensive landscape plan shall be prepared � and submitt�d for approval by the Developm�nt Services Departm�nt. The plan sha11 � address the requirements of Chapter 18.47 (Landsca�e Standards), Chapter � 18.41.100(Off-Street Parking, Scre�ning,and Landscape}and Chapt�r 16.70(Water � � Efficient Landscape} of the Redding Municipa�Cade, These regulations regu�re, in � part, that: � � � a. Lai�dseape plans sha11 be prepared by a registered/licensed landscape � professional and in stalled in accordance with City's landscape installation � guidelines. � � b. Th�required Landscape Documentation Package sha11 be submitted at th�time � of submittal of the landseape p�ans, � � c. The California Green Bui�ding Code Section 5.304.2 required a separate water � met�r for�rrigation of landscape areas wh�n a projeet includ�s more that 1,000 � � square feet of irrigated landscape. Utility and landscape plans shall depict the proposed loeation of th� water meter and identify the total ar�a of landscape � proposed with the project. � � � d. The landscape planter along 01d Alturas Road sha11 ineorporate the use af �� bermed sod andlor shrubs, and tr�es wzth a minimum size of 15-gal�on at a �y minimum ratio of 1 tree far every 30 feet of frontage. � � e. Any area between the back of the sidewall� and the property line shall be � incarporated into the adjacent street-slde planter. � � � f. Planter areas not having densely planted groundcover or utilizing turf sha11 � include the use of high-quality-fabric weed barrier and appropriate inulch materials. F'acket Pg, 17 I MND-2(�23-0029SJAlturas Crossin,g Subdrvision and Planned Development Page S Draft Conditions ofApproval g. New trees within the interior of the project must be planted based on a minimum of 1 tree for�very S00 square feet of enclos�d living area d�veloped. Trees planted to fulfill this requirement shall have a minimum size of 15 gallons and consist of a combination af evergreen and deciduous spacies. � � � h. A minzmum of 1 tree per 1ot shall be planted in the front-yard araa of each unit. � The Iandscape planter provided for any required tree shall have a minimum � area of 72 squar�feet and zninimum wldth of 6 fe�t. � � 12. The hillside area located northwest of the retaining wa11 along units 32 �hrough 39 of Phase 1 and the ar�a loeat�d at the northeast corner of Lot 12 of Phase 2 shall be � designated on the final map with a private open-space easement in which liinited and � passive recreational activities Inay be allowed incl�uding the placement of a picnic � tabl�andlor benches. No tree removal 3 inches or greater will be permitt�d in these � areas, and no building, fences, or other structures may be erected. � � 13. The area adjacent to Lot 12 shall also include a public open-space easement for � access and trail purposes dedieated to the City for rhe area adjaeent to the northeast � corner of the property within the creek corridor setback of Churn Creek as identified � in the r�sourc� evaluation done for the subdivision. � °� � � 14. At the tim�of construction of Phase 2,a pedastrian-access trailhead shall ba provided � between Lots 12 and �3 at the street providing access through the open space area to � � the public Churn Creek open spaee ar�a. Improvement shall includ� 8 feet of pavzng � or all-weather sc�rface, identification/signage, and fencing as necessary. The private � open-space easem�nt shall include provisions fox ped�strian access for Fire a Department personnel. Final plans shall be reviewed and approved by Community � Services and the Fir�Department. � � � 1S. Desig�l for the north and south group gathering aroas sha�l include am�nities such as � benches, play str�cture, basketball court, picnic or barbeque area, andlor shade � structures for the outdoor enjoyment of the occupants of the d�v�lopment. The north � � group gathering area sha11 be constructed with Phase 2 and the south group gathering � � and recreation araas sha11 b�constructed at the til�e of Phase 1. � � � 16. R�creational-vehic�� and baat parkzng shall be prohibit�d through the homeown�rs' � � association documents. * �� Stkeet�and Cir�culation � � 1'7. At the time of recording of any phase af the subdivision i�nap, street dedication sha11 � ��made including dedication of the appropriate right-of way r�acessary to achieve a � 42-faot-wide half section along Old Alturas Road and additional right-of-way far � construction of a future round-about at the inters�ction with V�ctor Avenue. � � Packet Pg. 18 ' I MND-2(�23-0029SJAlturas Crossin,g Subdrvision and Planned Development Page 6 Draft Conditions ofApproval 18. Design for necessary street widening and frantage improvements along Old Alturas Road sha11 �e as follows: a. With canstruction of Phase 1, thre� 12-foot-wide paved travel lanes Ly {east-bound, west-bound, and a center left-turn lane) transitioning ta the � existing improvement west of th� subdivision. East of the driv�way entranc� � shall transition to two 12-foot-wide lanes (one in each directian}. � � � b. If Phase 1 is construeted prior to the raundabaut at the Qld Alturas Road and �' Victor Av�nue intersection, the thre� travel lanes shall continue along the � � frontage and transition to a left-t�rn lane into the easterly project driveway at the all-way stop intsrsectian. � � c. Minimum �ight-foot-wide paved shoulderlbike lane on the north side of Old � Alturas Road. �, � r� d. Minimum six-foot-wide paved shoulder/bike lane and any necessary roadside � drainags facilities on the south side. � � � e. Vertieal curb, gutt�r, and 8-faot-wide sidewall� along Old Alturas Road. With ° canstruction of Phase 1, sidewalk width shall transition to the 5-foot-wide � sid�walk to the west and sha11 b�extend�d easterly to th�point at which it would � connect with the ultimate improvements to be constructed with the raundaboat. � � � aa f. A cateh basin and storm drain extension across Q1d Alturas Road. � � � g. Any necessary reconstruetion ar overlay an the existing section of Old Alturas � Road necessary ta pxovide appropriate ti�-in paving and a unifarm cross slop� � from centerline to the gutter, � � � h. A11 neeessary pavement transitions, signage and striping. � � � 19. Access rights to Old Alturas Road, with the exception of the twa private driveways shown on th�t�ntativ� subdivision map, shall be waiv�d via dedication to the City. � � � 20. Streetlights shall be placed a�ong Old Alturas Road in accordance with tl�� ;� specification of the Engineering Division and Electric Department. Streetlights e� install�d in the int�rior of the proj�ct shall be owned and operated, and maintained � by the homeowners' assaciation. � � 2L Upon development of Phase 1, if the proposed roundabout at the OId Alturas Road � and Victor Avenue intersection has not alr�ady been constructed, developrnent shall � ine�ude a temporary driveway access to be located entirely on the subject property � with a minimum width of 20 feet. Construction shall inelude a rais�d curb on the � east side of the driveway with a curb return at the travel lane, A depressed curb shall � Pack�t Pg, 19 ' I MND-2(�23-0029SJAlturas Crossin,g Subdrvision and Planned Development Page 7 Draft Conditions ofApproval be construeted ta allow access to the driveway fram the property to the east at the intersection with the road through Phase 1. 22. Fire Departlnent turning radius diazneter of 45 feet outsida and 30 f�et inside is � required ta be provided throughout the site. The landscape median in the westerly � driveway sha11 be setback far enough to meet the turrzing rac�ius with access from � Old Alturas Road. =� � � G�ading and rainage � � 23. Prior to the beginning of any clearing, grading, or site impravement activities, improv�ment pla�as for grading, drainag�, and utilitias, and other r�quired � iinpraveinents shall be approved by the engineering Divisian and ather cancerned � City of Redding Departments. These plans shaIl be in conformance with R�dding � Municipal Code (RMC) Tit1e 16.12. Prior to the issuance of a clearing andlor � grading permit, an Interi��Erosion and Sediment Control P1an shal3 be includ�d and � approved by the City Engineer as part of a11 elearing and grading perinit applications, � As-built impravem�nt plans with th� Engineer's deelaration ar� required in � conformance with RMC 16,12. � � � °� 24. The final grading and drainage plan shall be in substantial eonfarmance with the � approved preliminary grading plan (Sheet 3 of 4}. Slapes along Old Alturas Road � shall be kept at 3 to 1 or less and incl�ude the use of a retaining curb at the back of � � sidewalk and bermed landseapa to the retaining wa�1, as neeessary such that the � arterial wal�,if bu�lt on top of the retaining wa11,does not appear over 8 feet in height, � � � 25. Trees identified within the hillside area in the northwestern partion of the praperty s�aall be preserved. Placement of snow fencing or some other�neans of protection ox � identification along the boundary of the area shall be required at the time of grading � to ensure equipment operators ar� aware of the �imits of grading. This sha11 be � � confirmed in the field at a preconstruction meeting with Planning Division and � Public Works staff. � � � 26. A catch basin and storm drain�xtension acrass Old Alturas Road sha11 b�constructed � at the time of frantage improvements with Phase l. � � � 27. A11 on-site starm drain callectian and the underground detentionlinfiltratian facilities �� shall be privately owned and maintained by the homeowners' association of the � subdivision. � � 28. Storm-drain outlets into Churn Creek sha11 be designed to provide a sedimentation � basin or filt�r strip between the drain outlet anc� creek chann�l in order to prev�nt � erosion impacts and protect water quality. Plans and speeifications for the basin � and/or�lter strip sl�all be submitted with the subdivision improvement plans and be � sabject to review by the Department af Fish and Wildlife. Pack�t Pc�.2#3 I MND-2(�23-0029SJAlturas Crossin,g Subdrvision and Planned Development Page 8 Draft Conditions ofApproval 29. Priar to issuance of a grading permit that inay cause the loss of jurisdictional waters of the U.S., the dev�lapsr sha11 secure all necessary permits and authorization �rom the U.S. Army Corps af Engineers, the California Regional Water Quality Control Board,and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife. All terms and conditions � o�the required pennits and authorization, including initigation, shall be met. ** � �i � 30. In order to avoid iinpacts to nesting raptors or migratory birds, vegetation removal � and other ground disturbance activities associated with construetion shall be � conducted outside of the main nesting season, Septeinber 1 through January 31, � oth�rwise a pre-construction survey for nesting bzrds sha�1 b� compl�ted during the � � nesting season af February 1 through August 31. The survey shall be cond�ucted by a quali�ed biologist no more than one weel�prior ta vegetatian r�moval, If an aetiv� � nest more than half completed is located during the survey, a non-disturbance buffer � sha11 be established by the qualified biologist in consultation with the California � Department of Fish and Wilc�life. No vegetation removal or construction activities � shall occur within the non-disturbarace buffer until tlle young have fledged, as � determined through additional monitaring by the gualified biolagist. The results of � the preconstruction survsy shall be sent to the California Department of Fish and � Wildlife. If a lapse in construetion activities of 15 or more days occurs, then another � pre-construction survey sha]I be condueted. ** � � � Sewe�, Wate�, and Elect�ie Utilities � � 31. Final utility plans for davelopment of th� subdivision shall b� in substantial � conformance with the approved Preliminary Utility Plan(Sheet 4 of 4). � � aa 32. Water and wastewater lines shall be constructed and loeated in the drive aisle, Provide pav�m�nt and/or hammerhead turnaround for vehicular access to tha � sanitary sewer inanholes. � � 33. The existing overhead electric lines alang Old Alturas Road shall be converted to � underground facilities as sp�ei�edby the R�dding Electric Uti]ity. This shall inelude � removal of the existing pole directly west of the property boundary and relocation of � � tha pole east of the properiy boundary to a location that wi11 not conflict with the � fut�ure roundabout. A ten-foot-wide public service easement shall be provided � behind the back of sidewalk except for on Lots 1 and 2 where th� public s�rvice � � easement shall extend froin the back of walk to the arterial wa11. e� � � 34. Sufficient space near the intersectian shall be provided for 12kv switchgear ta serve � the proj�ct. Improve�nant will r�quire th� developer to provide infrastructure to � maintain existing services to the south side of Qld Alturas Road. The cost of the � conversion is th� sole responsibility of the developer. � � � 35. Electricit� for all units shall be individually metered. Electric meter locations shall .� be in accardanee with the Redding Electric Utility requirements. � Pack�t Pc�.2� I MND-2(�23-0029SJAlturas Crossin,g Subdrvision and Planned Development Page 9 Draft Conditions ofApproval Fire and Er�ae�gency Service 3b. A 20-foot a11-weather-�urface access road shall be installed and remain serviceable priox to any v�rtical construction. Fir� hydrants shall be install�d and fire flow � available for firefighting purposes during vertical construction. � � � 3'7. The burning of eonstruction debris is prohibited; a11 such inaterial shall be disposed � of by transpart ta an acceptab]e landfill. � � 38. V�getatron within th� hillsid� area in th� northwest partion of the projeet (cov�red with a private open-space easement) shall be cleared of up to 90 percent of � combustibl� brush, Nlaintenance on an annual basis shall be requir�d by th� � homeowners' association. � c� 39. Waod fences, including pasts, are prohibited adjacent �o the open-space areas on � units 32 through 39 and Lots 1 th.rough 12. Fenc�s must be constructed of � noncambustible materiaL � � 40. The internal private driveways thraugh the development sha11 6e signed and/or � strip�d as nee�ssazy to the satisfaction of the Fire Marshal to pxohibit parallel parking � :� on any curb within the development. * � � � � � � A � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � c� � � � � � � � � � Packef,Pg, 22 ' STaNDa CoNDITIONs oF App ovaz Fo SusnlvlsloNs FFECTIVE AY Z4, Z I� In accordance with City of Redding Ordinance 2469, Section 26, the fallowing �tandard � conditions of approval apply to all subdivision projects requiring a final map. Project-specific � conditions af approval will take precedence in the event af a canflict with standard conditions. � R�ferences ta the Grading Ordinance ar� based on R�dding Municipal Cod� (RMC) Titl� 1 b, � Chapter 12. References to the Subdivisian Ordinance are based on RMC Title 17. References to � th�Zoning Ordinanee ar�based on RMC Title 18. � � FINAL AP �, � 1. A final map sha�l be prepar�d in accordance with Chapter 17.40 of the Subdiviszoz� �, Ordinance. The final n�ap and all neeessary supparting documents and information must o b� fil�d with tha City Engineer prior to the expiration date of the tentative map as � required by Section 17.4Q.020 of the Subdivision Ordinance. � � 2. In accordance with Chapter 17.50 of the Subdivision Ordinance, the property owner shall dedicat� to the City all right-of-ways and easem�nts necessary to provide public accass � and utilities to the subdivisian as required by the tentative map approval. °� � a� 3. Prior to the recording af a final inap, a eomplete application shall be submitted to the City � to apportion any special assessment-district lien (Improvement Bond Act of 191 S) � affected by the subdivision, including the applica6le fees, an assesslnent segregation °� � diagraln, and an�r�quired additional Information. � � 4. In-lieu park fees must be paid prior to the recording of the �na1 map in accordanee with , Chapter 17.54 of the Subdivision Ordinance, unless an equivalent parkland dedication is � made in conformance with tl�e tentative map approval. � S. Proposed street names must b� submitted for City and ag�ncy revi�w in accordanee with � Section 17.64.020 of the Subdivision Ordinance prior to the recording of the final map. � The final map shall re�ect on�y st�eet names approvad by the City. � � � 6. A S-faot-wide public-s�rvzce eas�mant sha11 be dedicat�d on the �nal map abutting a11 � public-street right-of-ways within the subdivision. � � � � 7. In the case where a regulatory floodplain exists on a subdivision site, the final map shall � cl�arly delineate the limits of the 100-y�ar base f�oodplain and el�vations. The floodplain � identified an the fmal map shall be cansistent with Section 18.51.020, �3asis Fo� ° Establishing A��as of Special F'lood Haza�c�, of tl�e Zoning Ordinanc�. � E � 8. For r�sid�ntial subc�ivisions, cov�nants, canditions, and restrictions (CC&Rs) shall be � reearded in conjunetion with recordation of a final map which prohibit the s�orage of q recreational vehicles in the front-yard or st�aet side-yard-setback areas as described in Schedule 18.31.030-C(8) of the Zoning Ordinance. i�acket �g, 23 ' CoNss�:UCTioN-G�N�,RaL EQUiREMEN�rs 9. In accordanc� with Chapt�r 17.70 of the Subdivision Ordinance, the dev�lop�r must �y secure approval of subdivision �mproveinent plans for grading and all street, utility, and � drainage infrastructure from the City Engineer prior to the start of any construction. � Subdivision improvement plans �ust be prepared by a registered civil engineer and fully =� address th� construetion af all impravements required of the subdivision under the � approved tentative map. � � 10. Aeguisition of a11 aff-site interests in title or easements necessary to satisfy the requirements af tl�e subdivision approval shall be th� responsibility of the dev�lop�r. In � the event the developer is unable to acquire such interests, the developer may petition the � City Couneil for adoption of a resolution initiating eminent-domain proceedings ov�r the � lands needed for the off-site improvements. The developer sha11 bear all costs for such � praceedings, including attarney fees, eourt costs, and land-value eosts, � � 11. Unless a proj�ct-specific dev�lopm�nt standard is identifi�d and approved for the � subdivision project with the tentative map, all public improvements required of the � � subdivision shall comply with City Construetion Standards and other adapted standards � � specified under Section 17,70.020 of the Subdivision Ordinance and/or eguivalent � standards, as determined necessary by the City Engine�r. � � 12. Prior to appxoval of subdivision improvement plans and issuanee of a grading permit, the � property owner shall secure all other necessary permitsfappravals required by law frol�n � outside agencies also having jurisdietion over the projeet, includxng,but not Iimited to: � � a. R�gional T�T�ate� Quality Cont�ol Baard (RWQCB). In most cases, tha d�velaper � must prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention P1an and seeure a Constrt�ctian � Activity Storm Wat�r Permit from RWQCB. � � � b. Depa�tm�nt of Fish and Ga�ne (DFG). Where a proj�ct would impact a � waterway, a Seetian 1602 Streambed Alteration Agreement must be finalized � with DFG. � � � � c. �S ANmy �'o�ps of Engin��s (ACOE). Where a project would i�npact � � jurisdictional waters of the U,S., appropriate Nationwide or Individual Permit `� approvals sha11 be obtained from ACOE. � c� Capies of rec�uired ag�ncy p�nnitslappravals sha11 be submittad to the City Engineer, � Any special development requirements of these agencies affecting impravements within � the subdivision shall b�r�fl�cted on the�nal improvement plans. � � � � � � StandaNd Conditions of�pproval-Subdivisions Z Packet Rc�,24 13. Required subdivisian improvements shall be properly and fu�ly canstructed, insp�cted, and aceepted by th� City in aceordance with Cl�apter 17.74 of the Subdivision Orc�inance. Any incomplete improveinents sha11 be secured under the provisions of Schedule 17.40.060.B and Chapter 17.74 of the Subdivision �y Ordinance. Fina1 survey, as-built improvement plans, and related engineering � certificatzons ar� r�quired at th� eompl�tion of woxk in conformance with � Sectians 1'7.70.070 and 17.70.080 of the Subdivisian Ordinance and Section � ]6.12.230 of th� Grading Ordinanee. � � CONSTRUCTION-STANDARD IMPROVEMENT EQUIREMENTS � GNading, E�asian �'ontr�ol, Ti^ee PNeservation � � 14. Subdivision clearing, grading, and erosion-control plans shall b� in fu11 `� eonformance with the Grading Qrdinance. The final grading improvement plans � shall be consistent with the preliminary grad�ng plan and any tree-preservation � plans considered with the appraved tentative map. � � 15. The project develaper shall prepare a site and cons�ruction-phase-specific Storm � Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) and secure a Construction Aetivity � � Storm Water Permit from the Central Valley Reg�onal Water Quality Control � Board in compliance with the requirem�nts of the Stat� General Construction � Activity Storm Water Permit. Best Management Practices (BMPs) prescribed in � � the SWPPP sha�� be utilized and followed in all project site-development � activities. � � � 16. All trees identified for preservation shall be clearly identified on the subdivision improveinent plans. A tr�e construction/protection plan sha11 be pxepar�d by a � qualified(tree)professional in aeeordance with Chapter 18.45, T��e Management, � of the Zoning Ordinance and includ�d as part of the subdivision grading � improvement-plan package. Tree-protection measures identified in the tree � construetion/pra�ectian plan sha]I be reflected in the fmal subdivision � iinproveinent plans and followed during construction, � � � rainage System � � � 17. Storm-drain facilities shall be designed consistent with the requirements of City °� Construetion Standards, the City of Redding Storm V1Water Quality Improvement � � Plan, and the City of Redding Phase II NPDES Permit froin the California Regional Water Quality Control Board (Water Quality Order No. 2003—OS - � DWQ). Project design shall incorparate Best Management Practices (BMPs) to � minimize the polluting of stormwater, both during construction and long-term. � Should the maintenanee costs of the long-term pollution-eontrol measures exceed � typical storm-drain-syste�n costs, such costs shall be borne by the proj�et by wa� � of a landscape inaintenance district, eserow account, or ather such financing � mechanism. Packet Pg.25 18. Prior to improveinent-plan approval, the developer inust abtain approval for proper manag�ment of stormwater peak flows in accordance with City Council Policy 1806 and the specifications of the City Engineer. Such measures sha�l address impaets frol� th� 10-, 2S-, and 100-year-starm �vents. Projeets shall � address peak flows to inaintain predevelopinent levels at a1l locations downstream � of the project. A draznage rsport shall b� pr�pared ta the format outlined by the � Engineering Divisian, stamped and signed by a qualified engineer, and provided � to the Engin�ering Division with submittal of project improvement plans. � � Utilities � 19. Essantial utiliti�s, including, but not limitad to, sanitaxy sewer, water, electric, � natural gas, and communication distribution lines, incl�uding main lines and � service 1at�rals, sha11 �ae ext�nd�d and sized appropriat�ly ta serve eaeh 1ot and to � pravide logical extensions af serviee to subsequent phases and adjacent properties � in aceordance with Section 17.60.080 af the Subdivision Ordinance. These � utilities shall be installed in accordance with the capaeity, construction, inetering, � and testing standards of the City and other involved private utility company(s), � � including applicable utility master plans. � � ;� 20. Any necessary aff-site utility extensions shall be placed in a public-street right-of- � way or public-s�rvie� easement in a location approved by the City Engineer and � other responsible utility companies. Vehicular access for maintenance purposes � � shall b� provided to all utility i�frastructure outsid� a publie right-of way as � determined necessary by, and in a manner approved by, the City Engineer, � � � 21. New "dry" �tilities, including eleetrie, telephone, and cable television, must be insta�lec� u��derground in accordance with Section 17.60.090 of the Subdivision � Ordinance, Any existing overhead facilities within a proposed sabdivision and � along peripheral streets must also be placed underground, unless waived under the �° project-speci�c conditions. � � � 22. Electric-supply facilities shall be furnished and installed in accardanee with the Redding El�ctrie Utility Service Policy Resolutian curr�ntly in eff�et at the time � the developer's plans are approved by the City. � � � 23. The developer shall be responsible for all costs associated with the relocat�on or moc�ification of �xistzng utilzty facilities ar struetur�s necessitated by the � c� construction of the project or of improvements required as a condition of approval of this pxoj�et, including r�imbursement of any costs to the affected utility for � work performed to support the project. � � � � � � � Packet P�.26 24. After the initial review af project improvement plans by the Engineering Division, th� developer shall consult with the Redding Electrie Utility (REU) for preparation of an electric-service p1an. A copy of the electric-service plan, developed and approved by REU, shall be ir�corporat�d into the final � i�npravement p�ans, � �i 25, Streetlights sha11 be provided in aceordance with applicable Redding Electric � Utility Construction Standards SS3.0, et seq, � �. Fi�^e epa�^t ent � 26. Fire hydrants shall be install�d at Iocations throughout the subdivision in � accordance with the California Fire Code as approved by the Fire Marshal, All � fire hydrants shall have a minimum fire flaw meeting Appendix-B of th� � California Fire Code and meet the maximum daily demand for the area. "On-lat" � hydrants and n�cessary aasements to service development on flag lots or � oversized lots sha11 also be installed as required by the Fire MarshaL � � 2'7. Br�sh piles resulting from land-clearing activity shall be fully removed from the � sit� prior to the start of the �re season or, if generated during fire s�ason, be � :� removed immediately. � ,� � Air° uality � � 28. The following Air Quality Element Standard Mitigatian Measures shall be applied during grading and construetion activities to control dust and PM1� emissions: � � a. Nontoxic soil stabilizers shal] be applied according to mai�ufacturer's � specificatians to all inactive construction areas (previausly graded areas � inaetive for 10 days or mor�}. � � � b. All grading operations may be suspended by the City Engine�r w1�en � winds (as instantaneous gusts) exceed 20 m�les per hour, � � � c. Temporary traffic contral sha11 be provided as appropriate during all � phas�s of construction to improve t7c�affic flow (e.g., flag parson). � ;� � d. Construction aetivities that could affeet traffic flow sha11 be sch�duled in � off-peak hours. � � e. Active canstruction areas, haul raads, ete., sha11 be watered at least twice � daily or more as needed to limit dust. � � � f. Exposed stockpil�s of soil and othax back�ll mat�rial sha11 either be � covered, watered, ar have soil binders added to inhibit dust and wind � erosion. P�ck�t:Pc�. �7 ' g, A11 trucks hauling sail and other loase material sha11 be covered or should maintain at least 2 feet of freeboard (i.e., minimum v�rtical distance between top of the load and the trailer) in accordance with the require�nents of CVC S�ction 23114. This provision is e�forced by 1oca1 �y law enforcement agencies. � � h. A�1 public roadways used by the projeet eontractor sha�� be maintained � fr�e from dust, dirt, and debris eaused by eonstruction activities. Streets � shall be swept at the end of the day if visible so�l materials are carried onto � adjaeent public paved roads. Whe�1 washers shall b� us�d wher� vehicles � enter and exit unpaved roads onto paved raads, or trucks and any � ec�uipment shall be washed off l�aving tha szte with each trip. � � i. Alternatives to open burning of cleared vegetative material on the project site sha11 be used, unless otherwise approved by the Planning Division, � Fire Marshal, and Shasta County Air Quality Management District. � Suitable alternatives include, but are not limited to, on-site chipping and � mulching and/or hauling to a biomass fuel sita. � � � CuZtuNal esou�ees � � � c� 29. If, during th� course of d�velopm�nt, any archaeological, historical, or � paleontolagieal resources are uncovered or otherwise detected or observed, � � eonstruction activiti�s in th� area affected shall ceas� and the City sha11 �� notified immediately. A qualified archaeologieal professional must then be � retained by the d�velaper to investigate the discov�red cultural obj�ct ta � detennine its �ignificance. If the cult�ural objeet is deemed potentially significant � by the archaeologist, appropriate treatment and maasures sha11 be followed in � accordance with applicable laws, as reviewed and approved by the City, prior to ,� the resumption of work in th� affect�d area. �° � � Miscellaneous � 3Q. Issuance of buildzng permits for structures on lots resulting from the subdivision � wi11 not occur until a final map is recorded and necessary public-street and utility � improv�ments are availa�le. An exception may ba granted at the discr�tion of the � � Building Offieial allowing issuance of a bu�lding permit for the eonstruction of °� model homes and other special cireumstanees in accordane� with Seetion � � 17.44.090 of the Subdivision Qrdinance. � � 31. Permanent and temporary signs related to the subdivisian shall comply with � Chapter 18.42 of the Zoning Ordinance. � � � � � Packet Pg.28 32. In the event of any confusion, eonflict, vagueness, typographical error, or spec�al circumstance wher� implementation of any standard or proj�ct-specific condition is in question, the Development Services Director has the autharity, in accordance with Section 17.04.080 of the Subdivision Ordinance, to dat�rmins an appxopriat� � remedy as necessary to ensure that the intent of the eondi�ion and related tentative � map approval is met in accordance with applicabl� laws and polici�s, and as � necessary to ensure orderly development. � � � 33. The developer/applicant sha11 note that pursuant to Chapter �6.20 af the Redding � Municipal Cod�, City development impaet fees are required to be paid at the time of building occupancyffinal inspection far new construction, building � enlargement, or oth�r improv�m�nt. These fe�s ar� structur�d to znitigate the � project's fair share af eumulative impaets to the City's transpartation, fire- � suppr�ssion, utility, and parks in�'rastructure systems based upon necessary � improvements to aecommodate new development under the City's General Plan. � The dev�lopex/applicant is hereby notified tlaat llefshe has the right to � �rotest/appeal imposition af any af these fees or fee amounts. Any protest/appeal � must comply with the provisions of Gov�rnment Code Seetzon 66020(a}.* � �c � � � � � � � � � � � � 9 1 � � � � � L � ��p aaP � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � {'QYR�1..r�v�7 � _— l l '�. 1 �.�-'' ( � � t ' 1 �_�. ti ,, '" 1_. , � _ _ � i �.__.._._..{ �,.. ' �._...... ......_ ._ ._.... ........ f �,, � i � � �... � ._ '_ _..... _ h �......... � ___ � . t -----� � , � , �________. � 1 -- �G� ; ,. � a.__._I_1 . �--� �� ___ ,�. , ,� -. t ____ _.__. ---- } ______� � �� 1 .pG �.- , _.�_ � __ _ -OAKMONT dR ,, _ __. �� ,-' - _ , ' f..._.� ; � � s ,-' l -�-" � , �`� � ..,.� �_ � _ - t , ',o� , �,, 1 ____ � �-- r __�1 � - t �t �_� �r�._ _ �- � ._� �_�_�� . t`.,-�,� � �.-r� `t i G� `�. �� '1 l ` //�- �,,�, , �. ,r � ��.f„�5 i ; �1�' , r__�_,.� ` --� � �_ �Q �.-- � in �� l l �� / � __.. � _. � 1 � �' 1..� �" o. ; 1�\ ,.�� j �,/ `t � _..> �= � f r_. .- � � ,� 1--'-_ , � ;,,�,� � �C� �` f`� 1 ,_�_� la�,1 `� 1� �, / � � _ __ : .... �� , , , �,�P\ti."�, �� '1 � 1 �. � `,,... ,a� _� �. -- - -- � , , � , �,,� ��1�� if \, �y.� � _� {� ..��, {,�� . �... - ' � l f, i.� 1 � � 1 > � l. l ��.r_... �� r.. ,� , �,, ,.� _ ,� ,, � �.... , , {, �� __� � �.., �� \,�,--'"1 , . �� 1 �. � � r'? ��„,r � 1 ��`'1 -_.r,j�..,,, �� `�,,. �,�` `r.... ,......... ,�3 �y' �/� "'� ) �I" f'' � 1 il �,��a� t ff -' l--" 1 , � s - � j �\"' � ' � � ,.. � �I *„ � Jr �Jr�..b,. .... �, ,*_._._.'_ �_.� � + 1 �\, ^- 1 � _ �� .� 1' � / `� ,� 1 l, � �.� � �� '��,R _ � � , _-- � , ` T� �c.�. �.� �_. . �. ... _ � �..�- , ., �_ �` ; �___._._ �.�. :� � �., t�., ��., � I �STpR j ; ;�� RS-3.5 ____ �. �� ,, / �. _ � � __.__ , .-. ,- � ,,`, ��,, ,>I j...,� �.. 1 ��, -l� f T � 1..__ _. __._. � , \ �,,,� ,%�, � , � _ � ��,, ��--��" � : , �.� � ,- _._ � �,, ,�, __ � ' ` � � , ,,-- ,�, �. __ ____ �-. t � ,�, ,,r� v } �, ��,� _ ..- _ __� � _... � � , 1 /� �- � _._ _._� ____ _..Q ; ,r Q - � r � ' \ o � �' ( � _.._ -- h , � �_ ..... Q i --- - f '�� '� O� � ti , �_ .� �. r' � r , . .. .._._ ......— � .....__; ..��...�..�I � ....._ I r � r (�) 1 , � � '� i !Yt � f { � ~�...�, �q � -- tr 1 ,� _ _ , �� __- _ _. __ .._ � , ,, _ __ _ _ ,, � - , / l T �.. f..,... r �� 'r _ ___-- _-- __ --- -_ �'�, � � � ��1' � �. � � � - c^� __,__ -�__ �_. �l ��' --- --�-_�_-_ _�___.� _-----�---� � �_" � ��%r��l�s�fx<7s4{{i�t4 t�f77r'��'b�f�)�}tjy�E�}1��jjt3N, � •��. r��i��s��r�1��4s� titt}��t��ti��y�,��Si})i(�iti�; � � t i � t, szs �)��l�ts xzt ssil�'t��t � `• �'� f��€��7#�ti}7}4j�tz�t}�t� 7{{t�&sri4lJ� �ti �.`�ynr � ��`"".� �`* .` � s t�.�u f�,Usft �}t? 3}sfir��s$t!s�Siti4tj`�rr{t ` ��'—'`"�� '� f;�l�si� 5k�t�t�i�{i t��14�titttt�i�tu�74:}�{�{�u1� ytt�iF��jr tf I�it�tf; —_._ q�}(�p /� } p 1 � % ; r i.s�v ftS�tr4kt.}I 7,,tt�`t f �7+ii4 i ti tti� 1��4`ir I JL141 ��t1�tC..��C�.S 1A� � — 1200 Old Alturas Rd ' ; ��3��s�r��E��t�,�}��`;�jr'�=r�u��'',�,,��,;,��}�{`�a��,z�,,��,fi,��sfz`�'�,t,� _��.�� £t z 1 ��ttt��}t J it 1i}�i2�iir{� �Ly r��y�£��i��sr Fl .,��.�— ' � --; i ��s t �� r ?t ,}.t � tn { i� ��p�g�� st r+i�at�. s 5 il S r �sl t t� t1�i 5{ 4�,t,n �..�-._.._ —' � . t IYIY/ $f ifstLt t�ti� �, i f$: #as'r it 1 .--- � � ......�._� t£i�it�r{{�2�14�4tri41t;��17��ifs{tif ii 1��1�21��t##�t� s � � r� ir5 {r _ �� t��..� �t �(c tftF��F tlt ' s'� il�<i�'! r�lki �t�'r �''�tE 3£2 rj{i7��si it Sf ittl�. t It �Et�a��)j"t r$ �i�3t}4t`�#�t#�Sy r {�t�tz tj�JtTi��, �t� � rt,�� t1 � V 1�...�..�'\ t�j��{}�;�;�f�4{j�tt� }tifi2ls}�;�'�1G�It3�ftt{~j��tf4#�rf�4�jt�x��{s£{� f�t�7;�4j�, �M � �,'�� ...� _ _ }�rii� )7`'l�t�sstl}3�rsil��t3j}jtEr ;�7, �a�i�ii�st��,}(it�{E� �i�tt�It��` � i .. �.� v�� ,�. , r�t}{�,)i��.�.�t�t��t}`r} �� i�'trt4i�#t �t4F�'t��}ir�st�i�4`sJ�fi'�jti� � R� ( � ��rY�i{7�}sist$��it��E j�tt �rJrt��t��i4�lit��t 4��ti� �x�j�}��{�S�juUzt�t;}{�� "� �' �„� � � � , r .,�,.ar s},�c2,.U�t tf i�� }t 1� if }�..t� t l�t ' �'" "� -- ."`' � ti..v---�..�— • 1i ss,..a,,u�'t t��„�t7�,�� ti 3;��''��( , .. .... � .......s ..�._ � ,,,.--,,,�=""� ____ � ._..�._ _.. � ___ 4�DAL URAS RD �� _..__-- __ — .� „r-' _.. �,, ��. ___ � 5y __ t �r' ,- u --�{ 4 �-____�_. ,___� l t .f' : -.r ,' � ' r . -� � , ; r � , �� ` m,,. , � r .- r t — — � . �-- � � `�,;� � r -,-' , __�_.- , �` '� _. ; �, G -� " , ,,'r } - 1---_ � __.� _ 1 �' — _..� � ,�� 0 RM-12-- � �` -� � � �l l ��.��.. � �� , � _ __� 1 �_�. -- _�_�. , � � , � � � � ___ � ~ � � ; __. , � o �.�_ _� , � � _ _ -i � t ti� ��_� t � ; �,�` � o =- - y v.�� ,f`� � �I o� � � 1 1 ; �� `�,, ��' / � t � �` , , _�� -- -- �.� -, � - -- _-—- --- " i' �� '. i �, �__- __-- _� �,`�� -- `" -� � '� } � � � �' . m _ __ ' , " (I ��___--- -_ �- -- � - ' , ,f K..�-�` �� ,�'� �� ? � �� , � _� , � t� ` ` � ,., ,+ ` F-/ �, � `� � Ol ,r�r T`�� ,,,�,,4 __� . —--- _ __- _l:_�_ L t ,,.�--' t' � � --- .____.— _------ , _.— _,_� ___ _ _ `� DAN C1R i_ � J>._,t y/� ______--- . i Q I--- � _ , _ _____- � � _ �1 � _ l,, ,r � � � � a� — __ � �' ,� - — `� � i�_i_ I �; �-- ___ � �( _ 1 �__ -,, � _- _ __ , ,__- , I, � ---- . j ARROYO MANOR DR �'`� .� � Q f_,__ __ _ ._ "" d� ____.-� G �-------- . -L' _______ --- v i__�__�_�__��_ �� N GIS DIVISIC?N ZONING MAP MTG.DATE: INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT �7 .Ej DATEPRODUCED: RMND-ZV2�"0112�5 ITEM: JUNE13,2023 ADK PRo�ERT�Es, ��G S 0 200 400Feet 1200 & 1368 ULD ALTURAS RORD ATTACHMENT: P:\Planning\ProProjects�AMND�AMND-2623-00295.aprx AP#Q71-270-0478& -047 �y��Fy��i.�� i" R � �: � } � � rrs� ��a`� . I I I... � � : �� . e ra�d. � ��`��,...�,' � . � II I � � _ �� .�, � � � $ > il I �� ' � i T� �,� � �'�' ��°ji � � � � �� C F^'�Fz. .. �� s �� tC z� .. �� . ��=a , �''� .. Q �. .. � " i �� `° ��k � ! � �" acs�° �.� � a �y� ar It M� "� � l �`� c*� � " 's c' � � �d � '_ a m� � � �, 11 1 L3 � � ��,..,. ... .v. � � *- I I I -- ,'. f� o � 11 I � � �s ;�� `, � � � � i( i I�:mw � � �`i� �� _ �� '��, I V 1 A � � � e� c�i � a µ � � i ��Ks� p �_ , _._...3 � �c � ,c �' � t f �� .�_.__ � �__� � � �t � � � � � E j � �__ _-{�!-"._ � « , �� 4 � ¢ � � � c.a � � . .. � �. .. � . }{ `.1 r '�� 'd-j�t�� '�''� ¢�� '-�F' t�s. z � ;��. . � �L�-i_u.�{� t. .'�'"�`.�� .. �y�, � d�� : �. M � _ � �s w �— �. . ..�.�. �� a� �` � � � � "�".`� E��._._ � � � s � � ��— < � � `, ;� ;� � r . .... � � ' � � � �� ". � -� � i� �„ 1 ... !�� : ca � � r. �.��.i .._, � �,*--�-� �� s�,. , �a�" ��: �.... �- � ,i� � � . � t, � � � �� „� =t : ._.� �..�`'`��}�„� � �_( } I 1 ... �" t � M--""" � � � ,r'� ,� <te•tr�s ,�.�<as.�:.��,_m �-��.�--�.�_�;�� -- ---� � _ � I �;� �,.�"Y F� ,[t ,�s .ss <ss ,� �, -�• � . � >;i��'��s�� '�� i � „�' � �, �r �� ,,.� � f'� r" � ry ; .� --7 C`S��- -'� _.__ j rt;�f i �.r, 4 /�,�� %'�. n ��j .,�.. ,r'� r'" � i �� ;� E i�d� � �:� �'€ _. � � �'" ^��,�� , �� — � 1 I � � ��.- �; ( «� � � � f ' �- �� tp �-� r- � .�' �� , ;��- 3 'r , _.: �,�: ✓" � F �e- � � `�� r_._ ._ �� i � � � r�y�✓, �' 7 ,. � � r%s � tk m-� �r"y E�� r � � � �� r '�� k� �� '� ' �i" ,! , "� E �,�� ,. { �� }.� ,� � 1.3" ��1 �`` ��*.*.� _S�-'°('�,�� '� �� "s �at� i � �s< < ;` >�v',r f � I � C ^ � i. 11 �„ �7 � � � , �, ;��: *�. .� ....,€ '. '$�; �'y� � i p '� �'j�� I{ k .. . '� { � k ( �: .. [ 7'i�. �"s V' ,� �L �� k � P aBFk. .. "�d� I .�""�.n�Jxa}.:�-�. ��`z,� t7 � j r! s;r `` E Yy T ..w:J 'f,g �,.^� ��! 1 vs ( � �`� � ��`n,'ry%�'�*"�.„�y,`.,��f,`�"\�Ys.k;'�� >�.., „ � �� i$ � ;.:� S �� i �.:_ y_ .. i },�� ,� . �i �� { ;- Y`` z-- � . �� ' 3 C � � 5 �` a: � g �...4. �"„� � I , �. �M,,�yr, v�� *�..:``�. x`�., n"�.�}"�' d$i ��.i� 3 �� ,`� `,y,'} r v' � "� � �A�3 "^�� p'� i. � ti � � _ �; oe � ._�� °' �� 1✓� 'i�`� � � ��S f r. . > .�� ,.^Y�"f ,1 i_ f 5 '. � ,� y � �� , � �� i' 1 S6'�' �;�;J%`? �'�'S` �`� `�,��,;,�T ,� �.w , �..r � � i ��'T,_., r.� .. _ ;�✓� i i� �n, dp r : }".�'y,`t �'",,�,%�'y�`4 G, .. .v'`.�'sy:e a '�v�? .�i � �'� 1 C � @� �`` f� �4�_ � t . �� 0° S� __,.�."u f�`�j��:�`x�J,��.,�.��.�`�* `�'`7,: c, ..� ,1 i. � �S�s �t.��,� ��`��;` - _t �� . a � .�.., ' A /:�' y:,�."v�`�. `�a�,�� . _,�- ' ' .... � I, � �r�'�,� � ( y ,m..... ��: �, ��,_,��`;�5{X 3v'� � ��",�? �.. ��.. � �. ��'� • ��, ".:' � ' �. �``,�as ,,:� jj '"", a�_� P 1# � `� � }y%�� y �; �e"�` fi, r�i a *tr m�p�1�, � 'a ,�; � f ( � �ti . � a � „y {� � )'� �._ � .+'�� /��`��^`��`��; .��` � y��'`a,�.p"1,� � • : �� 3:. � � .� ._7 [�",�"'� =��#�`�^�..`^�} �� .n. � � � # � � .`�,.*,y,' ?� ,... �, �.� '.� _..._ ., p f � ..� � A � .. �,:'�,y'�`�) `e ��✓ .�,�.. {�`�.�r��'�:. "`,� '" ,.,.,.„ � C � �'' � .,. . � 1 Sfa;',;:r,' �'....}h x,��^ �,-�„��'`� �""%. ��.fi*�x,^�;.., > ... � . x'r` � � ,�'i;,., >� *., a. r� I ",� k' I , *�„ �s 1 1 t{ k �� '�r` },`f� }�y`� �j'�'.:'� �;" � .� �� / x K`f" 'x s "� '?.. i `� % �� : �.� t 4 ,� '4..��/�Y^��.,�.�.'Si,,,h��/y�`��yT .�,� �y a— ..rv :. � Gk T�.� t��){S+ ,��Sw. *.,�"* � ' � � p� � ��1 ; � � ^� � �� , � �'x,�' �� '"K''��',;x� '�� ,� .�cL"��n� �_,. :. � � � � j'� �� '�,1�- r�.`x ''�S��i '�✓u'�..� � �Y '* ..x`�"y� �'' '�''�::�� u v�r'",�° ✓� �'�`;,;�`�^ . . ! �. �� . �. 1 '�' �- �"�I <��"" .�, r.,r '�.,.'Cx .`.�,,� $ �� .r �`.OS.I�`�..�`�?,,rt.� r� ;,X`'� ,t ;:�;�'`,,��, r" .��.,� t £Zd.._,�.,.4 �� M .:i � �? a � �,�,�� f'`�,t��::�.'m�,„`1t�� `'X xc�"��,�� `�,.., `�'�^`�°Y��v'�r a�'`rrY t�, �� ; � � * ,.e.,...�..,,—.,,, � ��''`�''r C [ �.,, 'w:.4�Y..�,�'; `::t � jr`�"�.'>,',�,k'",,r:: "`�� >��I �( . � �� ,;. � . v �� -� �m �' ,� �.�; � t... ��h,,,Yf�, �... '�.,�� _C �u �� a�i t o. � �y ` � �5s}�;� € ' t., � �� f.. ��r r �� , rn� a�� f ...�-�--- y�� k. �� ' �� f � � `r ' ��;% �, � � ��;�.� �^s '' i G � .�. ��g-::,, s.�<�j�� :.,,., ��....4� .��..w;.., f�3 }`�„.� 'f HI c, rM�;�`�"�.r2',�.;,�,'` ..��, `"�� "��`�+. .... �� .�t , I �.. �� N .��t ,� i � � �.,,..; ;� ��. '�'w .r '`'4'�;� �;,� .. i�� "k , i ,.� � (� .:� � S*".e p , c� 1�." ��ft N� � �j s�i� �� w*.,.�� » s �``: �",��c �',;, `� 1._,�`ti a'�, ` P , j.� i� � G�,� . 3 �^` � "r^'�l� CJ�� ..., ,.„�F: ,:�, ` �� as- r ,� SW � ,f 3_ �.: . .� a^,a � ,�. � � j� #� '� � ,�..,.„,. ^� ��,- `p ,� ., -� �,{�,'t q,� ,. . .i � ,�' � .. w_w �"�° ` *� �� t�� t m cv �_ ca .. ,._ � �„ 'fa ��"-. ' b�"' %'� . �`�"� � �' � i�.i, "� 3� . , � , �f `r�,,.� � "�*.� t .� � y, �.. �,€�' . � � �, � `�. c r,., � . � �o � �� .. �` ;�� r v 1 � ��s .-� . �„ ; ~4-w�,� „ ,p < � ;r. � �� ,. r ,� �•a, �, �� , � � � �.. ..;�. M . ,� �»,�sc�j;m. ., ,>.: �� ° � � �. � , , � "' �� de �� . „� � � �.� � � , ,� , .� .w,Y „ '"� �'' .�"° „� .�.�:.;::fsas}am� ,{ �:,� � ``� �l, x� �x � t° `m�"' `� � ; (`"� �f � �� . � ,.- .«m. . ..i ��^� �'Y' � eE.� �� r . .J .._:�✓"' ""'*^:.r+a � .'".,. N t � � a . '' sy �„w..-� .�'��.'Cjt31, ...... m ... ""-,�,:x �"`g, '�`t., \t �±� �Z�v}�%'�� Ml''- : .' i ,."' .�� L`? ��:''� ,;,'� �.`x'= �i ( � .I. � �4 , ...r . �--:,. "'�, .. Me�.,_,� ��a� ' . * � � ..._ .. a,, `� G � � v5 y� .. � . .�,.._., �,�,� '�°. . � � , '�`� �X �r .?> i ,..�' l" ,,.._ S)..m,.g �. 'v,.,� .'-.,. �.:,,,.� .. ;,. ..�'�'�,'�: �., ,�� . � f � . "q� `'7 Y{ 1�'?� 'x �, "...'`£� �. I x � ,H � �� ..,� � ,��0}.�. -.�.�....- '`ti,„ "'.:-",� `",*.,� � °�. F v.":� ,�.,,,,��("•"+��, �` p ^` � „�' '�� . �� . ..m .... --,,,. .� �.:.w '"� "� ^. �,. �,.s � .. -. � . c t � ✓�1 ��L � wr° ., . � „�m.-' , �, � �� r , � `` � ` °�` � �� .. _._��,� , � �� - �. "� "� ` — � > � � ' ? i� __--�— �� - � '� ��-.A �. � �� t �" � �� ,.:;..� €� . { �:,.s, � � a� t � ` �€ �. � � �� ,q "^,.ti .,.�"`^u� ,�,,, .,..a-...n...k{Csd�� v1 `�° ;. ' y �o.r f 4 �: *, ';� w�m ��' � � y �.. w� � {�- ,#m r,� �� ,.d ' '�`� 5 k ,� < ....,� a ., . ,,...«,. } 4 €, s �x � ' � .'4£Z —. �;<o �` � 3 __ .. ¢ , �, � . .SB „s::� "� ��: y4 °'� ; � �, f. ` e`% �.'� }y y43� ,^y��- F" ,�. � �� . , � _ .,a: .,+....-M, ,,,�"� .8 6. € . t.. � t�: : b �t: � � ^ �� 3,�i i � . a ,. � 7 � . ' ,-6 .�,�, a a;.` �"� J' � i � �� "s"�------ , �' I ,...,�� ;,61��- � � � �v � � � %4 ' �.� F �s� � �` �i I k° ,�� { � � � � 5 � . 7 � ��'�� ..:a,r"^"� � �� . � ' �'.`•�, �� . �3 �/�� !�� ",d ar y, a �": � .. i3, _M,r�^'" �t,. p s J j. r`°.� ... � .�r sy n�.,�� : a�. '�,� �. �� ' �� f � t T� �,. �Q» ,_ �'�,�:,v �, � ` �. � �3 �� i� � .. � � � �. ' q�. _ , I . ' t . 1 y 8 � } , v y � s i !i � �� , � � � z � .�' > u� ,�d a r ' �`..� t ` � � ' � J �� , �x 0�, � � � '�� : �.�a ��M., � �, . , � '�'a �..... "�'j . .ua �'' r r � �,.��.� `v�` �c` �- tc.,� �„._ r- ._� .�.� � ..� J � . � � � � I t' . . . �a� � '�. .. � ° ;r`. �"� i {.1Q�y�5ky. F ' `'�.,� ' 9�;r .., ( � .. ry, ! �t r ` .r' .._. �� 1 ,,. .`en � � �� + ��`` � r� ,, ? ?�.�� ".:� �� t � II m � il � � II w � ii � II ' �OOZ o � m m � W� a� �� `C� �3� w� �cn w� m a'- pc�i�o G? U W [Y M U � W �' L n- QQ ;� � �c¢�� i� N �c4i� Q ;h N �� Q i� � �� 1� Hp�� O t�- or� Qt-� Qz� �, 4�c zM ¢ g� (n> �n>� � u»33 v�m w� aNwc=i> ?� t�> �pz � � � �p � �f � �P � �t � � N � � � � � � � .— x � � I— Z W � 0 _ Z W Q a � a � � w w � 3 w w � � r r � � ¢ a F- i- � w v4i c�n � __-------_--�"�l � � w z z � � i= ¢ � � � X X C3 W W (n � . Cn I _, ,., ...—._. _—.— � - . _ _ - —. .._ � ,r'-- m.........___ .._ ._._._ ... .. .... .% i i' � _ � .... — �.'_ ' �' �ac � _ � - ,- f , i �� '-�� _% o cn��-Q __ . ;�' X�m ^ � ------- __� i� ,w... .� N - -..a..a.. ' � / L�J� '. ' . '% , f ._._....,. -) � r I ( � Y I �. 6.,< � L � _ _ � :� , ,, __ �' ; .__. , � __ _ _ �_ � 7. -- - I �..'.___ �, �; , ; / - � / , , , , , , , , ; � ___ _, ,_ r_. ! �__. -- -- -! � �,�._ �... �— ;.. A r �� _ . �� .� � .� 31s�t1 � ,__ �.-, � 7 i 1+-► �- , ' � �^� � i W -- -- r o Q � J � �� -, _�� Q � .=iI � "_____ � �s",. � �— I �, o � � ��_ � �- �� ___ _ _ 7 _� � : �� i !r� .ti'99 �. . — � 1 1 �---------------� _ �` �� ' ��. � ' -- � ,0'9�---=r _.____ � � �- �� - -._ 1�> � I �� — — � � I� ,�.� —�— , n,,�, � � i �� 7..._: __ '—'—'—'—'—'—' ' . _ , � ?;��;.r � �. ��Q � � ��..—�_- ; ____________ ..... ,� ,. �� "�..�� . N U W � .�..,,,�' i ;�_...�(n , ~C _� l':, 4�F ��:'�'�"+^�".,..w � _........_ __. `� � V . _..._ ,- -- ,�r...� _ _ � � � -. ...— ' �a Y �1��Y �' � -- . � � t —.�—.�—.�—. , p , � � y � � � i i �.. � � .,: ` j ,.I�'�a",�'�. �` � , � � f `_ ` i ,� ... � � ... y ' ____ .--... �, I� ��8 .� ____— ._.—__ . „ , � , ._� , . ,.� _ ..—_ .� .—__ ' ' � ., t • ,t � -. .� _a , --- � �`t� .: r ?� f , ! . � � i`.f "�� '� '—.'.—.'—.'.—.'_'_'—.'.—_—.I \ .. { ._ . �� l ( �� " � �.\ \ , ......... �t�� { '�. .. m ' �� . , \�l�k`.. _:_�.- J"u.� �. _..... ....._.. ., .,. � u"� '�� ,��':a..� � � � � ]' -� � �= � � � `� � O � `� p Q � � a�aoz��!H °� (..,� Z� � v} � � � � �3 � U � O � Z3 g a}e�etuE -�— � � � Q � � U � � -4� cr? cn Q Q Q � a-�'- � � O � Z3 N � ' � s��r�rn�"t�� <n � � �' � � � � � � � tn :�. � Qa O � Q '� Q v � � � � � cn � `� � U Z3 � .� � � � � � � � �3 Q <CC� Qcn �3 .� �3 � `� o � O i ,�� . Q � �; Q , � u � t1�h` { � �i�?}33 � � , ��,� f t t i' '"`�`"�1��`�t;�,�s �`�*j�..; as� �"�"„� 1 � � � ` e, i # � v � �� '. ?��t�»� t` ' ��ii� + y )�� ,� . g, rz .'y ¢ �,�, .� �i z Y { tl� fi., . > <ti _ a�'/ � *� �t� �. '+�"�� f( '1} � f ?� v�`., AU. 1 :y vffi hc��i4 �? �i;�44'� a �l .,wxr t�,` .�i="� � :..t;�i ,<J� t ,{ #]�' � �i4��1 ��4.. .� ,7 .! .� � t, �{,� � �51�, � � S' ;A�� Y t. ` }n ; � ,�k� � �� ;, � � I U t I I t s �1 yt t � i� ,� ".. �. .s � :. ,. '„ . , .,, ,,;.��.. � , � F, sv. �.: `,� , � ( � < „-.�,�.; ,. �, ,w€ f� I u� � . �t , �,,,, � ; - �" s , . ';t - « �,� , � � �`a t � '"' � s � t�� .,.,� � � �� , �� i m � ' .=�i � - � � i . '� � � t9 a� '`� �}'; r�'' � 4 , S� � i �E' �, nN' �:C : , � ' t �y IR r`�Rb'L��z'�f{}�u )�(f t� ( �s{, �� r �'�F- �� r i �!�.:.r � � .. �,, �� i � � � � � I F �� ( �,s � `.`�, �r �, \ I r��` � r t �' � i � � �� j � r' }7 t , �� d/.�`� s s . }t �u r� Y5��'}` �`4 3 4. "� 'ni' r, �ei.^ �': '�t�f� $ � .� �{ i �}}'t. 7�� ( ..}� 'I } �„9 �`.i�" f �� y ' � ;� �t �} Fy�� I �`°t . �4 4� � i - �� , �� r; � ,�, ( "4 � rs �, ' �t,'!'l� `` }�e rk� ��+ t � j i �}� � � � ,,,y t �.< : ° � � � � I s ` t;c ak � �� , �� ...! p .L � fi }t`,#�"'_i X ,a 5 ' �j 3}"' s 3 € ?�re' `a+ , "'�: . � t� .,,�, r f �� ' 5 "� t ` � � F�.. � �S� i ,�z �� 1�� j 6 , �� ..a ?l 4 :, 'A t �t � S� �it,„ � i ri. � ? p�"t�i i G z }s §� �, � t'.. ', t 1 � � ��?�f��'�n� �. a .t 4 u � s � , t �. r t 4J�,t� i��a ., �7 �zr } � � � 5 '.• i z i1t� ,. 4 �..'��',,.. l�' i=' S s t x � ' 3 th i;, r �f a�;tt,s. t '. �' q �� 4�,�.. �; 3' � � � �. , , f t ;� r � f�� i �� s �G,� �+ v �;� � E�t � � zk Lf �� .� S� sif �' C: s s�': t �� ''� � r f y `� � t, ��r, z�� '�v�� t � } � t � � �� E �� x� ''� � ��`��°{%� �� >�� ;.� �� t � � ' ��4� `�` ��^ a Ir�, � �ti ;' } ;, ,,,,.��.x�7r'e � '`` F ' ` , " , �'e� � fl t S+ �' t � �„ tS ,. n S j u#t `A�t � �� ,�t�t' �,„s,r� t�� F � � � ��s �' � rr`.,�' � ��£� " � t � � � � �� s;' �� xii��.�t�3ss� : �s £( � �r �� lt �s 1 €�§� cf r�. � �°,t�`� a ,�' �4<; ��' ( ?? �I, i `��'� E;� ?�a � ' � ` '�'� �`' � , t � + � � „�,a. t * �t � � ��z , t `;,.� t r � �� "�' �; �.�ti } t� '�� +�" � `��#�'. � r i�r �% � . ( �� '' � '�; � �,�� sf g� rrgt; � 1�? � i`" i.: �t t �� xt � . e F ;Lt "� &t{' t' �, t'�:12�rt�'�. " } ' �`�`� �4 I }. � � �� . � . . . . � �� . �� '�,YbS l. ,��" 1 S 1� ;t � � � �.� � 4 { �� '+�r ( �� 1,�„ �� ,. .^�. .e ex�r�u�r�' , �t�, � �� tr J` a � � � � � �� Q � � � � � � � v t� Q Q � +_ � �5 O � 4.) � � � � `" N � Q � � � � 4�—�. '� � � +�-- +�-- �` � � � �,,, � � '� � Q � � � Q m m � =T Q Q •� °� �� u'} � � � Q C� -6 N ;�— °Z� � � �3 � �— � Q � � U � � �� v � Q� � +— ._ � Q � � � � � � � � Q.� � � � L � � �� -+— U �— t13 � � � � t� � � °Q � U � � �3 �- ,c°� U Z� �3 Q � � � .� � � �� -+— Q � � O � L— Us �n (.} Q }�g�� i �� , � ��'�u�i�� s �r{ � � . ��a�.; `�,, Y��k�'�t ��..'�� z`s es ` ,,:�� - a � __ �a„ _�...__-.�,e,,. ..,,py,''}r{ a�n�... �,�:��,t;�� ,¥ '�`LR s �4�`�,��>. Pi��'�''��. } a t c � �".�.�.,. � �,, �,�as.�xffx�. a,a'�r "'�m�nt"�` �' �r� �'�F�. ,y„"�'�` �� > . � � � ez#�'�� x. � �"� � ��d�� t �..� � `t�� e � . � � � „ ,.., � . � —o � � � ' ; 1 I � i � ; �n{� �.� � �'�` �_ � S14P � � � � � �, c� � r —�._.. � ___��.,_ , � � � _._ _. .�_ � fi s�n� � i:� i� � � � I'° � �� '� t / �,�' t4� �si� � ......- � � � ;x,� � �' s �I��i � I ��. .'...,,. 3L,f ��t t,1'c. � n u. ..R� �.e...--.� ( ' ...- �� t�� — z.� i M , < t ?� � I � � ��`� i �_._____ _�. _._ �___ „ �� i �' 1 ....._� � � i "4�� gr�'„ i �� i 1 T �. " a �t � A� u rr,„ : .. � , .,�:' ,r s� . ___ I ! „i.. � t ii� �� J �. � _ µ�� y r I �i� �+- � }{i� j} �; �' � — . _� � � �Z ' � �� ,� ____ �� , � � � . �� I � � � � � � _.__._ _ . __. _.?._.. � , �, � __� ._.� , �, �r � , _ .� �3 f� 'j ;i�� w. \ t, ii I f, V1 �. Y \ } ' '�l ,i �'� „/� \ � "— ' ' � „ y F�`�� z { ,ct � \ st .....____ .. .,.._. '� /, 9` i� ? ty � ., r V ' _...�.,,�., .. .� z.. �i � I j � '� „{g'� t�.y � � \/ ' { � � � '�� ; � � �h z��. �� , � �� P ' � � �� r .� � ',. ` �� ,�, �..,v t /��,, ,�, ��_: �, � � � "�.. z � ,> c„ �Y� � � c� �� f� �<. � r �r ..r�� };,��t;,,�<, � � � �n w � i ��, � � � � �' m � p ,y� � �'- �v i � � kf r � Y v ,._t # ;a� � �,,�, �. �N rY l Q g f . �t� �,�.� x �,teS� � �� `q._" t}tj � t �,i`�i �,,, �'�':� £�. M � � ��N 't�•J��*,� Q ��$ ~t. { $ �� , �� c{{ � `7;.ye .i9�,)s4r � , {� S� E. �r �i�`" '', a t � s � �� t''s � x� �� P t �` }��} :� ''i �'t N '� 3 'v� .;,� �� a,�i.�f�' '�: t N . t 4 � � t x��'�`&`�'� y { s� �i`< $�� ' � �t 1 ��; f j,� '�' R � � � i � � �' 1 5 S j� N � y�� 1 i �kr �+tt r,Y��;' $ � i rf�l }� � ¢ �� V� :,bi;?`;��"�.`�?.fA. � t xc � � �� xt � �, . :�t sts �� { j � '' Si � ; � a, � G �# f & { ' 4 } • i r a3i 3� t^� k i' t� t � '' q?.. t)�'� � �� ..� ,�� ,� a � � � �a,y^S �i� �6 � ai <,.� � �� r��„��; M � k (�.. � Et��' �� &r,��7r�h� "' �� .�,is�� 4"'�� 't :� I �, „� 4 �� r•.� t ��' �� 1" �� 1 : +» �4 � .,.U`�^� (_, v h� I 1{ �'�,t?� ��.�5�. ��.�} , ��.. �� m .,. �� a u. Ms�. � � � � �� a°a a°a a°a a°a Q) � � Q Q � � � � � 4) � � � � � � '� va ?� ?� � Q+..- °� � � �} � Z�? .� � Q � ,� Q � �3 � � � Q � � ;� � � �„ +— (� N � �— � Q � .��— U "�- �` �` �` C� � � � � Q � U � � � � �� O � � � � � � � � 0 � ,� N a— U � v U � � � cn Q7 _,_, � ,� �, (� � � U � � Z3 {J U � � � � s� � � '� � 4 O U � Q Q �s n (.� Q -� � --�' -�-� --- � � � ��,� �� — 4 �-- -a-• � � - - - - - - ��. � � � � � r � <� � � ,�= _ �� , � � �� , � �, � � �ra, � ��, ,,.� r 4 � � Q � �" �x�� ti ui�. �, '" �. � ��t, � � — � � � , �,.� � , , C.� � # � �r�iat�; g� ..5� I�: "ru yg Icp ... : -- r , <st �f��{� �,. � h' �; � � � � '� � .. ;� , , .. � . � ...�_ � ��" � � , � �t� �'' � � �, , � � �: �{ �T �� _ � _ -� � �.2,. � �;� : � �� r `�, ��.� � ,� ,� �� .y � � � _ � � � 4 �� x � � � � P�*, � . — ._ � � �" �� t g � � . re �,.'� st .. . .,� 5.$, a `>.•.' � i , �„y � ,.� ,,.� � ,. . . i - . � � . �. , .at' ' � . {C � � tB I� ., . . � ��.� � . .._. � ,... � .., ^�' `� �,�� .� „, i..,, ,. . f _, ` . � .. __ F e , �.. F...�; „ ��' �� y��„° ��2 �� . . .�... � „ . `'�; { i i i � 3 N k�a � _ � , i,,,"� '.i c*�' ,r . � �. � � ..� � � � �� z� . . � � rt � ,....,. _ 1 � � ��+ ��,3;, � .. �, , �. , ,.. ,,'. � �: � tr �� j' �'�` . � .. � } � �."�.�". ��N,, $y � C'�° .l.:. �� . I. �� . � l,,: �.cY m �' r� :L � � . � tf5 ,t,§�� , ,, % � �. � 4�: ' . . �x�{ � r'�t �yt}. . � �{ ut�.i � 2' .tY'II �. ,} � 1 y � 1? ' lt5 k� ---^---�-.� �£ ! � . �} �r � ,,�4 L �'��t t` � �t .� 1�� ;r' �� £'jr�'`'�`: "(- � . � � � �� i �i �4 i}�#A �( }y� � 1`� �T $t 7 . j��.i, {�>.. 4GS # � �r s2 II �f i y� � }i . 1,�: � f'xF..,r ff ;,. { ,, �� ; p { �. �� '� .�4 f .. k{ia�i SE t' L ^�`.�, t�� t �5+�� h� 4}3#a'�`�.'w' t�3, �� ..0 �`� {"+� , , ��, � .� �� E ' � :� � t .. � , ..� . .._ro..�... Y� < �3 i x �'�� } � tr t� a f ! �i �� f� �t "y `� y k� 1�s3$ S � � ; 5�� ; > � � �� i .. R �S� �� ' � 1,,' 4 �� tir � �� '� � ,, j �t �r � � * .$ �, t � 4 �t �� vt� r �i�y� k �� i�{ G i ld*£��t�' . �-, - , tr Il��'�f Y � '�,��`i t � `�' o . . � .,,,�:k� ��;�; 7 � � �, �. .' ;: t � � � r t �� t ,`" �" lr "��k s • : f �a ' � � s�Y��}{�+'� �� t� � �; i �`r;t,� r,'" �'`r' Y t�; � .?�x�i:zY^,'et ; , . ' ' � tr ary., .3C"t tY — — �ii s� a � � � � w'ti, } 4Ad +' S' .+'�' ' 3 '�{�' � t.� { � 1 �. �. ; �„,: �r Y €,, ti � 1 r ;, , . . 1 � r f� '- tt g�� t r:� �. . � 7 . ��`:;� i� ' � , Elty t �t t �� ... „S•.r; :. „� , +..� '�- �.r.wi.'. ' rt 4t; tt�4�{f� �#t�� . �y3��k,u . ��` �t. �1 t;`r,,,�,.��;� ;�� . ,��w��. .�' � �t � � �� . t i4 i i � � � �� { ;{. , 7, � . n ^�y �k�t:i, �. ' � '�� s� � :� ��, ....... ��} r ;�t} „ � { �`� � � � l�,r.` � �.� �Gi� � y�<�;„ �� t { � � i '. `'��''°hs n..a . .r� .�,r±�S ' � _ ,_ �. ,kn��. � : .. .�� v � � � � � � � � �r U v 3 � c � � °�' �, � � � � � � Q �' �' � o a� � �v � � � � � Q� � o �� U > � � � � � � � •� � Q� v O � N Q � � � v � '� � �. � ,>_ U U � � U tll � Q cn N � � N Q) Q) � � U � N O � Q? O � � � .� Z� �'�2. � � �� Z5 Q) � �` '� U � � il � O � � O � � � Q- � � -�— � � � v � Z5 � � � � � 3 . . . . . Q � o o � � � � � � N � �' � z ;�s��r' `�,.� � �... ,��`` � � �� ,, � �;,� x ��,�:�� _ r � ��, k � ��t� . � 3 t�. � � i � g' � 'i' ,.. . � � >r �� r�'� : �7� ��Y� � �� ; ��'�� l� + �t z � . s # ,i, ��,� ' t i -^� � t� , �var�a:ru„'. , �z� t �'"' �sait�+�s`` �.U� x�E#t,�<�` �,�i��.'�� '� k�,�> ..J �.� �' ,,<� 1t� r�,n,''� , , � r� �� n �� ' � � � �� `_ �� j" r ' � � � �� ' � � � � � t� �t ,; �, tit, �� '��z l r � "� � �, ��' ✓ �� _` � '� 4 j $� � �x � � t � � � � � 5 �� , , °:t �� ,,, i � i`�� .. � �;' � � � F� � � �� , �� ,�� '� ��;�� ° t , �,a�� " � y k i - z „� 4 4,u-� i � ��. � � .� �y � ��, �� , , k � ��;` ��;., � 3�:. � ��.� � ;� t t " i � �. �ti '„ -., � ff � i �� i ��r. � 's} � � � � � n t,�'A�'�"'�#:�Ui;= { �',' � i � � ' � �: � � �� , � i� ` ��?�� i � �� . �� r � � � �`3 �`� v � yv :u � � � � � � . ,. , , ;; � , � � �� A�� ,� • � �, � � , ,� k�; �.�. 4.�.. �}� � ,�Y: }lq �� 1}��••� I � �` � �,� / ' ,� i 4£ fk� , it i �r*ir. �` ,� tt � � , I �'-'.�, �' t S � ( �g ry � tly�, /�� ; � �' a� ��' .�s�k� �4'' �� i ,r,��' , `� ,r� � f, ; f °�t� � „„ ��= F � � ` �� ` � � �� ;: ,� , i ; { i"� .S r1 �', �._ ''; $' ,`�,�, �` , � � � ��`�S t' ... .E ' '� �_��:.. �+��. � , �I �: ' � _ � � �� a`{ ,�yt e � � ' `U3 m, �f � f t �� i � � ��`,��,.�;��z u �S : � �ts�9 +' �75e" ° � "� � � t� f� � .i r �� .�. t ��. y� s t �y� �`� 4�'f�t m�r s { .,�4�,T� i �'< �� 4`� �� d � t� �r� � � �.t � , � d� �4 ai. �h� ��, s � �� , ��' '��°�' � ; �is��m.�� ,�� 7�� y "4� " � �, ;; I � � � � � r �i, :s?� a`��' �j� �' `n'�' �� u �" � ` � �, t't�� t t 1 c�r � �`�� s{�}�Y��, � ' �; S, ��s � � ��<r�, "� F' � �;�� i � �� ,.� t4 ';<'; {�, !: l "Y�, ..� � v t � t� � s �� t� } y J r'. �r'� � �� r � i t,�, , t � � � r f r� � � x � � : , �t$ `� �`�• �i � a r z� r.,. v�,�#�4i��`: �� ' � �r �n � � ��. � �r� trl'� �tU 7 '�`,��Ai �� s � �{ '} p;� ,! t t; � � �'� � ' � r. � �S st t s i, t� � � I � � � 2 � � � tf �.� � d ct*7;�,�'f��,:�, ��t, �?7� S a�'�n s z�t ' �� .�'��,<� '�i�. 1 � 1� � c G � {, � ts��r�is 4��i+� ��, 1�� Gt��i�� ti 3� ; . kr � :. � 7� ,� �� 3tf;iri� 3 � �d; � � �� 7',. � �� i�� t?. z 4a'� ��,. � { s . t � � `'� �x �� . � � � � � E,�„ �a.,.„., f „ � s< r )'�' t. �Y;'r � Fr{ u �a ,� � .��y ��;' {,:q � �� ( � zp�` i' ;,5 ,.,4•�Y ��` ��4 t. �4�4` s�, ai',` � �1 y�� i�'y , � t �� I i !rt,s j ^ . ... ,, f�a � CJ"} � �'�� „;� i' `;i � � � 4 'S., � � '� �J� �' i � � r� '�t 1 ��'�� . - �� ,. � �' . � � t $ ��; ( i _ W �� .,. .'�;.. Y�..�':-s. ... ,�.,n'wn5��rui� �1�`r� ,�'. .� ,U� , 3 �.I 9 �,..�,,�,., � � � '� � � i '� ' �� '�� a ��'4 ��' � ; � { � � 't ii' � �� aj � � ,Y{ b64�t , _�� >� 1 1 ��, y,{ ;#' � � � ,.�� {� {} .�� , 8 � � � � fi, .:1 4�I..ri� , ��.x �� l ��'�� t�� t r t � i�y �.� �v � ��>�, r' l�, sd�`��. ;d G }�� 4, � � "t= t��x. t<1 ; �; "� � �y�r�► i+�'� � r �g . �� 1. ��ir „��'� y�/�� y.f` j3 �J u e,. F v ,. � , i r ' { .: .:,�, C, ��r�� s.,x^`— � � y, u,. � � S9 ;,� j ¢ � � rt :��5 bt � �S � '��t' � ��' ��f k � } �` �.' x4 �`N �'��} � Y�, � s �� S�i�u'r t� �� `�k� 4 �� :,. �,,,��, n } �r �� n�} � �-,�S i { � �� i; J ' � k � � � $ Z { � � f � � . �� £ k t � 2 �,,,;;:� ,�r� �,,. �^..r.�7 �{�'�` '' �i kS N ' t ,h�� i , ��ur t��:. , ; t s,�� 8��. �'� � � a � ,s x7� �n�., ;tt� � St �p. t.'� . �� 3' ��{ � � � �, � �t � �� # .�t5:'.�'�S, y �i ��" ) �.,'� � 4 , ri { , }�� t }` {., � �� 4�,�� Z f Q ij t c t�d j�4� } (�� t `P ��,E��&,��rti� �� ,; . t ;� � � �?�,.}��3§r� � .av' , + �� ""S � ' u �3""j ��R�?l��p� 1 S �n } i ' i�4��>ti. }st{ } ��f� �'*�3 = � :�. �` �7��i�t t> ,� � ,:�'e4. :,�i tl .�. �} # s ` ��,� m s �il �q �, i�43� � �� F. N;v��i F r4 � tb tiY t£; � Y �.. r � rz ti�ts� €'�i '+ . ay��'� � �' �'� "`. �� i� �s i< � z��` s�� t., F�� ,� � � �s � a� �� 3�� , &t �� ;� �� "k, r} �� s�u „ � �w �;�,`� , � a� .11 � � �,�; �� »� .� '` ` ` ��_ � a> � � � +-. .� � .� � � � � v � � p U � � � ., ce x v .x q� CA � Pa P� � � � � � � � O � � �, C� v �v ;�, ,�t � �, � � ��}� � � � � �� ,; � � � � �s . � c � Q, �' `, � cr� � �� t � q�� „ �s, � �`f�� • t • • . � � � ��?r„ , t <<� �, � � t r ��f�� t ; ,�' t �� a 4 Et Wzl, T /� ,4 .Y�� l�i x��, �� i j; �, f; y" f};=% . .s= f ' f�'.�. � v } � . } �. i ' � , :g"i �,i, � � ,�ls, ';""� �.�J� , � { {y j�<� ! ` } {� Zz ,y�-J �� f J�t " �� t� t�� „ �,�� € ' i � , '"k• ` '�% ` , : = ti� 3. ��^ � � 4g€1}YV��'g��$�� .__„ � �,�3�� , � � �� „t�'j�� fj /�� f �� ..�� ! ! � � � � � � d � � � t+�� #b 4 �� l��F�� ,, t�;�tr i��dt } 'ta �:�.�� "r�'�1�°`"�' ''�1;�4�: € 4�,#� , j� �`�� ' � �j"� �� ?� r, ��}Y;}:'.. sp�a vt � „ fi 3; �;',,d tR�4,�,��,�{{'?��'�,�F��A�,-l:. w's t � �� } 4 � 4� 4 �� y � ��4�t�,� . "�`�` ��, �� ti yr ��"' �; � � �� "��n • � ��a 3 �'� x�.�,,,'��, �� `�t�tF;c��t`� �� ' `,� .. .�" � .� ��;'��q � � �J'f��1 ^�, ''�w t � � z�s. +ti;..,i Y�*W �`�✓'• t�,'� �'��. 3'�.`.��L � �:� k T s�` �,d�� :,. � k"t �� .� O ~__ r� �:�,. � ,,. I + i & r � `�J, — I � � � b�= � i i ; � i � _ e � i , �. / --� P , _ i / � f ' s i �� '\ o �' � _ � I r o % ,� o � f � V � Q = � � � _c,OD > � I 1I m � � m m �.._ I I 1 �� L � �., � E._. —� , ... ., � I�° � ^�� _ _ z 1 �� U � r^ • � f + — � ' Tq � �/! ___ L�.� — U � . ,,, � , m _... � _ \ � p � m � — � � m i �, �; > . ; � '�J , / � i � _ — � � � �Y... ..._ 1 J : �, LI I � I I�� . ' '�_��... I e_s , � � i i i �—y� �, r , , � ��—�iJ ___ • a� °_. r � r— �p �J � � � � z � I �--� I � U — 1 � O = � O � j � � � � � r� _ _ �_. � ; � '' Q Q � m !\ l�."_,,' m • r � � � / ; � � T 7 �/ � �= I ` � � j i � , � : �. i —� � � a / ---� . � J � � � �--- ' � l , i � o �� ` �_ � � � � — � I s Cy o — i 0 � , . � � , � �r � .. �, , � o __. �\ � � ' �. � � � � � f�� . �"� �mv t ' ,�.. ?�z w2� � ��. k�'�� i i � tt r{s � � �� tt� "�'"' E , �{, �y�"*'��,�p '.� , , ^ . + � . .4;� ' N �.� '� ',t��'x � � � ,."„�"`"."" O_. � � -� � � ( �^Yt. � �� ( 1lY`�;.7r. q� � � , x�� x � � >_— � � � , � ' ° � — '�� : & � -• 1 _h / � �� _ / ! , I `i I� � ,� I ; / —� `� � � o � 1 a �� o � � � � � ° _ �] � & & C ° x o � QO U - m m Z � p� � � m � � �._.._.._.._.._.. I -'_'" ` �� K : .IIL �� . .. ... : � p� ' C .�..� � � � S � � 3C°� o — ' = I � co 0 0 ' _ _ c_ r � _ � � � � � � o � � o �" m �� m � � s `� � � � � . � _ � � � � � � o ; , � ,� i � � —' L]... , � � � ( � � � Q . � �, � _, r . - � � — � ._ : - - � �' � , - - ___. a � �9 � Ls � � �,, , � �� N � _ � � � � o � � —� � �o (!� �i � � ,i � .� � , ,'' `_;�, � ! l � �� , �_ (� ,- � � il I� �� _% �.1 � � _ � o � i a � o \ � � — ,,, CL'� �. _ �� i , & = a� � 0 0 � I m � — m O �� > I � "� � m � `v' ' I ' _ ; : I '-"" , I / J ..... '.,. �b`5. {° � ' `&�v� 0 . :: �� 4" �;� t'� � ��i�� +� � � � t E � �– �• ; � t-- � r � — t '�� r�;z, � ws`" k�r�`"��4" ,r � ��t �� m � �� ,�� '`'�,; lE�li��ll' `i� ��,; r� �l.,. tt�ifr'1r*o��,>�Fi ��., • ��47 �w ,� ��#�� #�� n��', � ,u�� , �,; i �` �asw.�a��'V4 eri �.�..�� I ��Ut��§�kt';�,"'xt£� ��p� ��' . . . u4`+�;�� . ��>� �'�GY.,�.$� �,�_ ��. ��'; � �.: ;.�� `° o�s _ , .6-i .,r,iE < � �! R� � � I-- � I - I �.� � � � �� .�ze �y L = o - r & , i i %' �i� ' � i 1 ` ' = I � i - � � _ � ,lp � _ i j i ' � ,� \ � % \ � � 'i o '_ '� o 0 0 �� i � & � & � �� o 0 0 0� � m � m m �...: I L �—' ' � ._.. -� � ... ..... I �� `—� 0 J ....._ - � � � �. � _ , � � � � � z � - I o � i � _.. o � �6 � I� �o - c -� ;� •`-- o '�, m � � m ` - - � y � , � �'_ o � ; °� � �- � �� I � �� ; , <C � � _, z � ,� - _ � � � ` � c� �� - ` � i � > � � - ., , � _ , � � T � � � � � �� i � , � ...... � —,'k ... �----� � � ! � ,, o� � � � �° I�°��J ;° _ � t,y� & � � & i tJ_f U ' � F. f r �� _ � I m � � m � I I! �I \ I I � � I I I � � � /� � � � ', - ` � > � _� ii �r� ,� _ �. " � ± .� ', V � =t � — � � �� , �r i �v � � ��a C�a�� '�� i � , �� °� � � � �i � _ � a N. i o � ` I � I � ��, I li i �� t� � � � ii -i _r� � (C3 I � i � � � ; � , i � I �; � � , � � E' i i � U �� - i ! � � < J� �-- � ' � i ° � � �; � �u �--� � � u_ e ' ��1��(� � � ��:; �'— � ��' � �— �.. ��._, � � t � � �g � ,; j} 0 � � �� ,,��' � � ��'$ � �. t � ,�j �� Ys�,,, � �� '�.r�� ` � ��z; � �� ,i� �. �,� � �� '�d`r. .".. � N ��:: }4��4 `� <.� �d �� , �$�� , ~ �;� "�, � "� .o�,zs "� .o,c `' �, � � � �� z _i � � �� F— > _ ___, ,� � � � � � _ � � \ �� Q r� � � I ° _ ° � ° - � `� ° '� �� m m � _ � , O = O ! � � �/T � � � m �°,,J m �y � IJ� , _ � I �- \ � � � � � , � E— �� _ � C� ; � ,�� — z _ � . � � . o = > _ ! . �- m � � � � , ,�, ,� �" � � �; �i o�> � { � � � � o II � � � , � ` �� ( � I ��'�r� .,v x,�;�` � ; �ke tl��49@I'9��,Y��"�bt�l��71�,d�k��'re1�`��,M1 '� / � ..� � � � �d�,, � �$��; ! E � � � � � � � � � =� �y�� . � � �� i': �� . ��YP4'f �;`�� (t �r��.�,��*� ��,. � ��"��; ��:,`�'/�;�w �m . � r , .fi"�� s��.'' `a"�.,� rY �p. `� � ' �"� �?' �; ; � �,. v � �� s�,� ��`�� . ��' ��'�,� �n� 4�,�a yti� � „ � � � ��,�� < , � �, �� , j i, �� s�f.�f, 4�� g� �f�'�F� �� $&�� p��fs ' +:� a. �',4�};�'4� x��''� ��, �� .��' r ■ �0-,I. r, ____. .o: .6-�al I i� .G-,6£ (,/'� — - ...... � �——— � 7 _ � — 4 � � r , � ` '% `' � �� / cr' � �Q � _ —� � C, ; � - �� Z ; � _ � f— �� _ � � y � o ; '...... � � o � � � � , o ' = 0 1 � �...; Q Q � Q `O�, U � ` � ` " !'i� U�� m �� m '^ p] ! e�} �, , I/ ___-�i \ 7 � � O ��'�� U �; � � _ � � � m � 1�1� o � ___ � � —Y & � UI - m � � m [ � � ,\ �,� � .�� , _ � � > _ , , _ _ . .� _ %�i Q ; ] I� � — — � � "J � ' - � . � i J' '� � ---- =� �� Q .o,rr . . �; �, ' �# �� y .� W z i�;# � '� r,�.,4r,...� � � � � u ...,,.. � � � � � �. � �`'"�� }z�� t� �; `�� t.� s�`t��t�x�;;. � �'? �Y {7 /'y ,�p�" � .11 �, r�.�� 1e1s ` ;;�� °'°�:e�� ; �.. �wr� �� ` � �„, � � �' s � 7^'C '`�f # � } "" 11 .,s "�' � 1 t y�¢j:�.:�< � '�4�z��{�;,y.4 + � r u , �.., ,:�� , , .;" �t. �.m : � � � �« (�} )I�t, ;..t� SJ �.'�.'��. � � � 4 � � � { r ? �C s o z ; ' p � C C �4 S� ��, � � F, r ,i x �wf ��'�;�� , w.D w` ,�, F��tr,�mr�,`� ( � �: �� `�� ' �•� � � �� * � �' ��.�� `� � �' � �t � � � � � k NJ� ;��''�'t��t"��' � r � � }tti�P�� i $�d � � $ �,'? "" t�r��}r� .; � '��'��5. :7 "�� '�}��;si�� "� � .,n"�� ,��'�.�#'�+� �� .�i s�y��in. � i� �Y � „�f' ..: i : � � � � 7a Y t�, � U }t�'s x��7� `S�43 �v� Y Y, „� r"i��b'i�i ��$�� . �aA.,;w9��.:....: >:......�...�,. 5 m::; . � u — :�: ,�. ..� �_:,� , ; .��-. ,, I O O U I I � ,� � � _ U I � ❑ p ,, — � ',,. .. m m '.,., �� .,,,, ��' ',,. ' � � � / � lSh� � ( ' �,. _ �� I�� ° � � o = � � � � � � m = Q- I� � � , , ��. . � � � � � i � � 5 �... � ~ .....""_ .—I � ' _ .-- ,• ..... ',, .,'., ',, � � � U � � � � � �� U ,,,, ',, � I m Z" � � o �I � m ...� ; I � � ' s � �#'�� '�r° � �1�§r�tE � �.1� �S; �-- u`,�� F— u�,,� � � a� t b��, � �.�t�� "� vrti�'' � ��t" � ��r C� ��.:, G� � � LL �rs �� u� y�}� �"��tj��.�� R 4 i�e�'�t�V.�yX� � A� � �A ! \ & \ �(� �g� E— 1— � � ; �$ � 1� } � } a 7 i j i � � � t } � £ � y,;l I # � Y t m; � �� I s ` � �� a �� 7 f s �,��g�� "a � 'E ��`�s'�� *i, I i � 6 � r�. ^�i ��.a �r� " �,afk. i �r u�� F � t� r a v t s . �, � � . Y� ��'��' � 1�1�tr�s�5�" �y t � � J P��s� 3� '� �� it�� '� �' � � `�,��'� ��'`��i��v. �'�"�� 'p��. �5:�;;�`�k„�"a �xI� ��,�,u�, Y,;� t b b I _ �_r _.�r � ____. ____. � �,., ... ,,.. ( O O � � - � � G,,' ',,. � O � I o] p.1 ' _,__.. J . � *i�;� m �� Mw,t, ..Y� � ._ �� ,1� ,,. � ao v �' �.,r,� � ° _ ...... I�.. v��'� .y��`3, ��: � �� ` � �„. �" ,� �. : �..... . a; s � ,; _ . � : Y� . 'i� ° � _ � �� a x,� kk �o � '�� U ¢ ��r�t`��=�3 �:`� ��, . L''{t a ,r . m .... , � , �� i �r . �� , � s�, . . �--; , ;' �, �: , � �a°�'�'y� �F 4 � $ k§ ��t i� . '�� l 3 t� y b b b ft � ' '� `� _ � � � � � � � — — _ — � ' x � �. .n � � �� i! i u, .. . �� ; r � ? � � � $ � � � � •� � ,i � �� L_ �� m Q � �r�.i.; � _�� 65 I �f ao v ,.�._. ' �� xi� �I �� ° ° ` I� � � � : LL `� � � � o � � ��"`�,s7�� °� ,�� (..) II � � — Q � ��' ��. � � � m m - : � °` �u � � � � k �r �, .y P.... � b b b 4 > � � { ,�� w��wwwn� II ._` n� � � ... ..... . ',, � _ �mmmi� � _es —c ...� � LI � �� h t, f', � � � � �- a� � � � v � � � �a c � � �' U �, � � � � � — � � � � � U o �� a� r — � � � .� � .� .� — .— — .� � � ..� -- — -- _... .._ _. �_� _., _� � � � ; � -- � � i - ; � � I ��`�mm � i � � ��'�� , — I � ' � � � � �— _ � �� _ I — � � I � �� , { � a � ; _ r _ � — , r . _ � � �:� .C e �... .. .. ,... � .. .... �� _— __v � I I._ ___ � _ , � ; I — � �r_�.. � � ._ � . � , �� I �� a , � � — _ � � � r �� . . . . � � � � � �� _� _ �� — � � ;, � _ I � � — , 1 ��, „ � � , � a � � � ,' , , � � � �� _ ; ; �,� � �; , � � � j �� ' ; � ; � ' ' °�� I� � . I i i � � i � — 3 Y � i I i � , ' �� wi � � � � ��i� � �� '' � .. �::� � .:...� ,i� . �q � AA � , ..,... ' .. ' � � .. .. ,, ',.' � . � •� � � � ! /�5� V U � �a � � � uO ' n s mis ar w� �mm � � . , ,. � �� ' �� ' � i ..... ..... ,'� ,� � .. � �� ... " � ,. . . ... .. ._.. p� ! ,,. I T Y �IT'Y F 1. � _ -�= 777 �ypr��s A��nue, R�dd�n�, �A �6�C�� .�- �.-- ` P� �C�?� 4��C}7�, F��d�ir�g, C� ��C}49-�C?7� ,� , .�r (� 1� L 1 F C� � [� � ;i�'� cityc�i��ddin��e�rg � � �,� �� A EN U TO A ITIGATE NEGATIVE ECLA ATION � � Addendum to Mitigated Negative Decla�ation Prepa�ed fc�� Altu�as Crossing Subdivisian c�nd Plann�d Development � (fo�tne�ly Live �ak E,states Subdivision anc�Plc�nnec�Development) � Amendrnent Applieation AMNZ?-2Q23-00295, � an Am�nu'ment ta Ter�tati�ve Subdivision Map S-2017-OD239 and � Planned Develop�nent Plan PD-20I7-00241 � � SUB�Ec�'Amendment Application AMND-2023-00295,by ADK Properties, LLC,requesting an � amendment to Tentative Subdivision Map 5-2017-OQ239 and Planned Development Plan � � PD-2017-00241 for the A�turas Crossing Subdivision and Planned Developm�nt, formerly Live � Oak Estates Subdivision and Planned Develapment to construct 39 multiple-family units and 2Q � sir�gle-family units on property]oeated an th� nortl� side af Old Alturas Road west of the Victor � � Avenue intersectian and addressed as 1320 and 1368 Old Alturas Road. The site is zoned � "RM-12-PD" Residential Multipl� Family with a Planned Dsvelopment Ov�rlay District and a General Plan designation af"Residential 10-20 units per acre." � � � PROJ�Cz �SC�Pz1o1v ADI�Properties, LLC, is requesting an amendment to the tentative map � � a to reconfigure the d�mensions of the approvad 10 duplex �ots to 20 single-family lots and am�nd ,� the planned development in order to change the architectural design af the homes, replace the � two- and tllres-bedroom units wit1� three-b�draom units, allow for a zero sid�-yard setbaek; � thereby, allowing for a minimuin of S-foot side-yard setbacks between units, and reducing the rear � � yards to 8 fe�t. � � � � �a � ENv7RONMENTAL SET'rrNG The praj�ct site is not expandi�2g. The al�endment area encampass�s �� ` � the salne project area and does not impact additional lands off-site that have not been addressed �� with th�prsvious�ntitlem�nts. The op�n spac�locat�d on the sloping�iillsid�area in the northwest � � portion of the project area will remain as an open space area. � ca � � ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT BACKGROUND � ; � A Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the original project was adopted by the Redding " ' � � City Council on May 1, 2018. An Add�ndum to the Mitigated Negative D�claration�vas adopted � � � �� by Planning Commissian an January 11, 2022. � EVISED IMPACT ANALYSIS � �� i � The original approval was for 64 units. Amendment AN[ND-2021-02�14 appraved by Planning , , � Commission on January 11, 2022 amend�d t��:��oject to 59 units. This amendment mak�s no � � � � ; : � P�ck+et Pg.4� changes to the total number of units and therefore, would have no impact and hence no further � impact is anticipated � � ET�Rm�NAT1oN �' � � � On May l, 2018, the City of Redding previously certified a Mitigated Negative Decla�ation for � the projsct described above. Further, the City of Redding adopted an Addendurn to the M'itigated � Negative Decla�ati�n for the ainended project deseribed above on January 11, 2022, � � � Based upon a review of the eurrent amendments to the project, it has been de�ermined that an °' addendum is appropriate beeause the additions are minor, and none of the following conditions � (pursuant to CEQA Sectian 15262)have occurred: � � 1. Substantial changes are proposed far the project tha�wi11 require major revision of the previo�s 4 Nfitigated 1Vegative Decla�ation due to new, significant environm�ntal effeets or a substantial � increase in the severity of previously identified effects. � � � 2. Substantial ehanges oceur with respect to the eircumstances under which the project is � und�rtaken that involve new, signif�cant environmental effacts or a substantia� increase in the `� severity of previously identified effects. � � � � 3. New infonnation of substantial importance indicates that: � � � a. The project will have one or more significant effects nat discussed in the previous Mitigated Negative 1�eciczration. � � � b. Significant effects previously�xamined wi�l be substantially mor� s�vere than shown in ,� the previous Mitigat�d Negative Decla�ation. � :� �a c. Mitigation measures previously found not to be feasible would in faet be feasible and � �� would substantially reduce one or mare significant effects af the project, but the project ° - z � proponents decline ta adopt them. � � � . � d. Mitigation measures that are eonsiderably different from those analyzed in the previous ; � tl�litigat�d Negativ� Decla�ation would substantially reduce one or more significant � � effeets,but the project proponents decline to adopt them. � � °�» FINDINGS � � �� ; ,� 1. The City of Redding has deter�mined that an addenduin is rvaN�anted,fincling that none of � � the above canditians are in evidence and that the�e is no substantial evidence, in;:light a�'the �< �� ; whole r�eeoNd befoz^e the City, that the amendment pr^oposal will have a,signifieant effect on � � , the envi�onment � � ; � ' , � � � � � . � � ' , � Acldendum to 112itigcct�d N�gative D�claratio�,� ��z. Page 2 AMNZ?-2(I23-00295-A�nending 5-2017-00239�a�d PI.�-�0�7-0024I � Packet Pg.47 2. The Addendum to the � itigated Negativ� � eclapation, with its supporting daeumentation � (Initial Study),fully incor�or�ated he�ein, reflects the independent judgment and analysis of � the City af Redding. � a� � 3. Pur�suant to Seetion 15074.1(b) of CE A, the City of Redding finds that the itigatian � measuNes eontained in the Mitigated Negative Decla�ation a�e sufficient and that the Pr�ject � � will not eause any potentially signiftcant ef'fect on the envir�onmen� � � PUszie �vl�w rsTzuBu�r�oN � � Pursuant to Section 1 S 164(c) of CEQA, an addezldum does not requir� cireulation for public �' review, � c� Copies of tl�e Addendum, the itigated Negative ecla�ation, and the or�iginallnztial Study may � be obtained at the I'lanning Division of the Developinent Ser•vices Department, City of'Redding, � � 777 Cyp�ess Avenue, edding, �A 96001. Contact Lily Trjy at 530.245.7231. � � � � � �� _ June 21, 2023 � Date Li1y Toy, Planning Manager Development Services Departmexlt � � 9 � � � � � � � . . . .. ... ��. � . . . .. .. ... �� . .. ... ... � . . .. .. .. �:' � � � . . . . .. �:' � �. . . .. .. . ��.:: V �: � . . . .. .. . . �.:. � � � . . .. .. ... .. . .. � ��.. � . . . .. . . ��... � �. . . . .. .: . .. ::: b� �.�: � > . . . . .. . . . .: � �� . .. . .: .. . .. � �:�: . . . . .. . . . � Addendum ta Mitigccted N�gative Decla�ation.� � � �'' � Pa�e 3 AMND-2(I23-00295-An�ending 5-2017-OQ239 a�d 1'�-��1�7-0024I P'acket Pc�.�8 �ro� �: � �� ,�� ;��,� � ��a �,� � ��. ��,�`#� 7�7 <"YPN�� `a»��'vw�s�. 4"B�C�z�6r;t�k C"�,�t �#�C=C71 � � f �'� F'�s� ��t�c}"r�b. �i�€?�ztt�tC>, (�� 7�iC�� ak�%; C3 � � � �1 9P � � � � A ENl)U TO A ITIGATE NEGATIVE DEC�A TION � Addendum to Mztigated Negative Decla�ation P�epa�ed fo� � Altu�as Crossing Subdivisian anc�Plann�d De�v�l�p�nent � (f`o�tne�ly Live Oak Estates Suhdivision and Planned Dev�l�ptnent) � Amendme�t Appliccztion AMND-2021-02114, � an Ar�tendntent to Tentative Map S-2017-00239 and Planned Developtnent PD-2017-OQ24I � � e SUs.r�,�T Amendment Application A D-2021-02114, by K2 Dev�lopment, requ�sting an amendment to Tentative Map 5-2017-00239 and Planned Development PD-2017-4Q241 for the � Alturas Crossing Subdivision and Planned Develapment, farmerly Live Oak �Estates Subdivision � and Planned Develapment to construct 61 multiple-family units on property lacated an the narth �? side of Qld Alturas Road west of the Victor Avenue intersection anc�addressed as 1320 and 1368 � 01d Alturas Road. The site is zoned Residential Multiple Family with a Planned Development � Ov�rlay "RM-12-PD" District and a G�neral Plan d�signation af "Residential 10-20 units per � acre." � � � PROJECT ESCRIPTT4N K2 Development, is reguesting an amendment ta the tentative inap to r�duee the approved 261ots to 23 lots and amend the planmed d�velopm�nt in order to change the � � architectural design of the hoines, replace the amount of garage parking with uncovered parking spaces, and provide additional recr�ation ameniti�s. �'° � � ENv�xoN�,N�'AL S�`r`rING�The project sit� is not expanding. Tha amendment area encampasses � the same project area anc� does not �mpact additianal lands off-site that have not been addressed � with th�prsvious�ntitlem�nts. The op�n spac�locat�d on the sloping hillsid�area in the northwest � portion af the project area will remain as an open space area. > ;� � ENVIRON1vtE1vTAL oCU1vt�N'r ACxGROUND �' a� A Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the original projeet was adopted by the Redding � Ciry Counci] on 1VIay 1, 2018, � � � EVISED IMPACT ANALYSIS � � � The original approval was for 64 units. The arnendment consisting af 61 units is a reduction of � units and therefare,would have a lesser degree af impact and hence no further impact is anticipated � � � � � � � � � Packet Pg.49 ETERIYIINATION On May 1, 201$, the City of Redding pr�viously certified a NI'itigated Negative DeclaNation for the project described abave. � � � Based upon a review of the eurrent amendments to the project, it has been determined that an � addendum is appropriate beeause the additions are minor, and none of the following conditions � (pursuant to CEQA Section 15�62) have occurred: � � 1. Substantial changes are proposed for the project that will require major revision of the previo�:ts Nfitigated N�gative Decla�ation due to new, significant environmental effeets or a substantial � � increase in the severity of previously identified effects. � � � 2. Substantial ehanges oceur with respect to the eircumstances under which the project is undertaken that involve new, signif�cant environmental effects or a substantia� increase in the � severity of previously identified effects. � E 3. New infonnation of substantial importanee indicates that: � a. The project will have one or more significant effects nat discussed in the previous � Mitigated Negative 1�eciczration. � o� � b. Signi�cant effects previously�xamined will be substantially mor� severe than shown in ,�, the previous Mitigat�d N�gative L?ecla�ation. � � c. Mitigation measures previously found not to be feasible wauld in fact be feasible and � would substantially reduca one or more significant eff�cts of th�proj�ct, but the project � proponents decline to adopt them. � � d. Mitigation measures that are eonsiderably different from those analyzed in the previous ^�° tl�litigat�d Negativ� Decla�ation would substantially reduce one or more signifcant � effeets,but the project proponents decline to adopt them. � � � FINDINGS � as � 1. The City of Redding has dete� ined that ar� addendum is wa�panted,�nding that none of � the above conditians a�e in evidence and that thev�e is no substantial evidence, in light of the � whole r�eco�d bef�r^e the City, that the amendmentpr^oposal will have a signifzeant effect on � the envir�onmen� � � 2. The Addendum to the itigated Negative eelaration, with its supparting d�cumentation � (Inztial Study),fully ineor�o�^ated hev�ein, �eflects the independent.judgment and analysis�f � the City of Redding. � � � � 3. Pursuant to Section I5D74.1(b) af CE A, the City af edding finds that the mitibation °� measu�es contained irt the itigated Negative ecla�ation a�e sufficient and that the P�^�ject � will not cause any potentiaZZy significant effect on the envir�onment. � � � � � Adden�d,um to c�Miti�ated Negative Declaration—AMND-2021-02114-Amen�di��g 5-2017-00239 cznd Plannecl l�evelopmen�t PD-2fI1�-0�241 Page 2 PaCt�et Pc�, 50 PUBLIC EVIEW ISTRIBUTION Pursuant to S�ctian 1 S 164(c) of CEQA, an addendum does not require circulation for public review, �j � � Copies of the Addendum, the iti�a�ed Negative Deela�atio�, and the o�iginallnitial Study may � be obtained at the I'lanning Division of the Develoginent Se�vices Department, City of Redding, � 777 Cyp�ess Avenue,Rec�ding, CA 96001. C�ntaet Lily T�ny at(53(1� 245.7231. � � � � January 6, 2Q22 � Date Li�y Toy, Planning Manager Development Services Department � a � A � � � � �a � � � � � � � E � � � � � � � � � � � � � as � os � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � Ac�clen�d,um ta c�Miti�ated Negative➢eclaNation—AMND-2021-02114-Amending 5-2017-�0239 cznd Planr�ed l�evelopmetzt PD-201�-Ot1241 Page 3 PaCket Pg, 5�1 i iky &"F�� r� �v �vv , � r. "� � ,�•�* � «�� '��" ��" ��w��4"��,;,a ''�'x�: y,�,... 7`f��.:/F swk:.::i„`i ,�"r`¥�;C�i�:tBE. �'��"[1C�Sfl:C,, 4:'�.A �$�',rC�L��:.�: �. �,: . ��.:,�r. .. . . � .� � � �"+{ F'�,1, i"�t>x �tE3t�t�}?�, E�d:�t�4t�;t�`. t"�� 3fiC}��-�t�3J{ � � , � � . � �� `�� f� ��.",,., ��,. „� q� � � � I � ��T`I ` +�I� "�' � �'ez�tative��bc��vi�i�� a� A��a��atic�r� ��2{l1�`�t�Q�3� ��e��n�n A ��tic�n -�E��'7-44��f} � ' � � i�� f � P1�nned Il��velc��rieut�'I�n Applic��ioni P ��Q��0�4� � � i m � ,�+CT:�`J��'�" � � 0 Tent�tz�v� ��ad��iszan;;,��A:��1ic��ior��-�,��'�-�}C}�3�� I�.e��az�g�:pp�z�a�ic��z -2�}�7-�1Q2�4� � � T�� ed I7��r��c�prr��t�Ia� App�i��c�n��-2{��'7-(�t��41,by{� i�in�nci��, LI.;�:< � � � � 1'�f1J�'�'�'.Z��`,�C.I�11'�'1�"IN � z _ ; T�nt�t�� a�iuzs�c�ri M�p Applic�.t�c�n �nd �'�, e� I��ve�cs�rr�er�t PI�;A�plz��trc�n� I��v� t��' ��dx��sic�z� is � ��c�� c� s��divide �p�z•��z��te�y 8 ��t�es ir�tc� �� n.��p��-�`�mz�� r�s�d��ti�� c�ts�n thr��se�fc�r d�ve�c�pr��n�t��4<��alt�p��-fam��y �n�ts. Pha�� nd 2 cc�ns��t c�f 2(} 3.c�ts � tc�t�1 t�r b� deve�c�ped with � r�-f�mily �w�I�i�g��it;��u��e� u�it� �� e�ch �c�t �`c�r �.��ta� c��tJ` � �z�zts, P�.�s� 3 �c��s�s�s c�� c��s�c� b�devela�ed'wi�� f��r-p�e� it e�n e��h 1��for��;�c�ta.��`�4 j' ,° .ts. �"he prc��t �nc�udes � I�e�c� ° g Applic�ti�� c� �dc� the `tPI�" l'1a ed ��v�lc�pr�e�t` � {�vezl�y�}istrict�c�t��exist��g" -12'��ultz�l��' il��istrict z�nin��f'the pr��a��y. �' � � E .�(?.1V.1��Ca�NT`�[��.�;�'TI.tV(.�` � � � � T�� r� �rc��a�r�� s�n�is�� c�f�vves �a�r��1s �c��a�ed ��t� �af`t3�c� Alt�r�� l�.�ac1 �nc� �e�t �a�th� � �i��Av��s�e i�t��s��tic��. e w��y par��;l u��s p��vic�u�1� ��ve��p�c� �ith � sir�� f ;�i�Y' ° ;;., �v�e sit� w�ic� has �e�n ��nc�li��ec� �� re�s�ve�. T�.c-e��t�r�y �arc�� cc��tain� �wc� sza�� ':; r�nt�� u�i�s �nd � deta�h�� a��ge. Th� �s��°t� �� r�l�tivel� :�at a�c�� JId A�ttzras Rc�ad ��r � ,;, gen��y �l�pi�� in �h� �c�rthw�s� c��#n�r c�f`t�� p��c�pex�ty �v��h tc��c��,nap��y ;r �i�� `rc�m 55� �ee�; � ��i�e mea� s�a 1�vel {I��`�)�� 61� �`e�t�as�. Chtarn��k, �v�ich zs t�°ibutary tc� t�e Sacramen�e� zF Ri��a, is lac�.tcc�. �ut�i�i� th� �c�rt��t cc��r��r esf'th� sitc. T�i� �it� is �ha�;��t�ri�ed �s ��ue r�� }' �c�c�d��nd �n t�� zac�z�l�w�st ��rn�� d u�I grass��nd thrc�u�;hc�ut th� ��st c�f th� �rc�p�r�y, �v�� , mirr�i�al ��.rrx�en�i�'b�t�t��e s�rrc�u�:di�g t�i��zst�ng .��r��i�tzs��szd�t�t�a�bui�dfng sit��a '; � � r .�`�.l�T..��N��'�`�`I��N��":�'"(�1l� � ; � �'�� i c�f��i� �c��duct�� nftial �tud �ttac�� vh�ch d�t�rrr�inec� �hat t�� c� c�s�d � � � � � �� ;` �rc�� c��l�l �av� s�g�i��r�t en��rc��ae�.tal �f��. �ub��c��i��t ��vz��c�ns �n t�ae �rc��c� ,_ ��c�pc��I �reat� t�e sp��;if��ni�igatzc�r��a�u��s id��ti�e� ��. Z`he prc��ec�, �s z�vis�� and as � a��ed tc� by tt�e ��rlic�,nt, �vc�i�ls �r rmi�i��tes �he pc�tenti��ly �i�z��fi��t en�i�c�nn�ent�l eff�cts ��r�tifi��,, �nd the �r��c�n a�an en�i�c�nr�e�t�� a�t�°eperz�t vvi�1 r�c�t �ae r��u�zee�. Ther� �� zac� �u�as�ant��ll evid�z��, i� Iight c�f'the -�vh�� re��d bef�re �h� (�it�, tha� th� p�•ca�� s r�vzs�d � ` � i t; ,; h�iti�at�c�Negativ�L�eclarali�n 7'�ge 1 P�Ck��. �� ;i m�y k�a�e a szgnificant e��ect o7� t�e ezaviz•onnnez��. If there are substantial chas��es th�t alter fihe c�.aracter c�r impacts of the�ro�ac�sed praject, an�a�hex�e��virc�nrz�entai ina�act ciete�•za�i�aatzan��ill be s�ecessary. � � 'Z'k�Ce �roject inc�udes �measuzes to mitigate potentially szg�zfzca�zt xr�pacts tc� �xo�ogzcal reso�.��ees � assaciated with develop��er�t of the�roperty. � � ' Prior to approval of the p�•aject, �he 1�ad ag;enc� n�ay conclude, at a��.��Izc �aearing, that certain � ' mitigatio�� z�easures identified i�� the Miti�ated Negative I�eclaration are i�f'easible or � undesirable. In aecesrc�ance wxth CEQA Sectxon 1�074.Z, th� ��aci agency may delete t�ose ' mitigation �neas�res and substi�ute c�ther n�easures �hich 'rt deterrni��es are equzvalez�t c�z• znare � effectiv�. T�e �ead agency would adc�pt written f ndings that the new measure i� equivale�t or �ore effective in zz�ztigating or avaiding pr��ez�tial signi�eant effects a�ad that it, i�z itself, would not cause any poten�iall� significant eff�ct o1�the environ�n�nt. 0 1. �ased on the whoie recard {incIuding the �nitia� Study and any supporting documentatian) and th:e �itigation rneasc�res incc�rpora�ed into the px•c�ject, the +City � � o�'Redding has determined that there is r�o sttbsfian�i�l evidence th�t the �roject will � i have a signi�cant ef£ect an the environment. � � � 2. The Mitigated Nega�ive lleclaratic�n, with it� supportiug drrcu�entatiun, reflects the � indepen.dent jadgment and analysis �f the Iead agency,which is the City af Redding. � � i Z)t7C�TMENTATIC?N � i � � The attached Initia� �tucly d�cun�ents the reasons to sup�c��-�the abc�v�determinaticrn. � 1t�I�'IG.�[TI(?NME`ASUR�`S" � Mitigatic�n 1. Pric�x• to zssuance of a g�adz'ng �e��znit tl�at may cause t��e lc�ss af jurisdictional � i { waters of the U.S., the deve�aper shall sec�re alI t�e�essary pez�ifis and autlac�rizatic�n fr�am t�e � LT.S. A�y Cazps af Engineers, the California Regional �Vater Q�ality Contrc�l Bc�ard, and �c � California l)epa�tn�et�t o�Fis� and Wzldlz�e. A11 terms and conditi�ns c�f th� required permits � and authorizatian, inelud'zng nzitz�ation, shall be met. �; � ,: � Mitigation 2. In o�cier to avoid 'zzn�racts to nesting raptors or migratory birds, vegetaticrn remc�val � and other gro�u�d distu�•bance act�vit�es �ssoc�ated w�th constrr�ction shall �e condu�ted outside � r�f the rnaiz�neskzng seasc�n, September 1 through,�anuary 31, otherwise a pre-er�nstr�ction survey � for nesting birds shall be co;r�n��eteci during the nes�ing seas�n o�'�ebruaz•y � t�a��c��gh August 31. � The suz�vey shali be co�zduc�ed by a qualified biQlc�gis�no zzzore than one r�eek�rior to �eget�tion � ;; , removal. If an active nest more than �alf co�za�leted is located during the survey, a non � .: � 4 �istti�rl�anc� buffcr shall be established by tlre qualifiec� bzolo�zst in ct�nsulfiatzc�x� wzth the California Depaz-tment af Fish and Wildlife. I�o vegetatior� remc�val c�r conshuction ac�ivities � shall occur vvithiza the non-d�st�trrbance bu��e� until the young have fledged, as determined � ;� thz�ough additior�al snnnitoring by t�e qualified biolQgist. T�e z�esu�fis o� t�e precc�z�structic�n � j; surv�y sha�l be serzt to the Califc�rnia 1�epartment of Fish and Wildlif�. If a lapse ir� cc�nst��tction activities of 15 c�r�nc�re days accuz•s,t��en anc�t�er p��e-cc�x�str�.�ctic�ri survey shall t�e�c��ducteci. � � � i: F AfitigaJed Negative LJectaratrorz Prrge 2 P�Ckef Pg. 53 ; �. �. I'LT��`��`��'��`��' ��J"�""�C}N I�r�f��e��ies c�r�c�tz��c��`tl�is Iv�iti�atec��e��tiv� Il�ec�ar��zc�� vvez°��is��°�b��t�c�t�r.' � r� �' �l�ast� ��at�nty��k � � I_T.�. �rrr��c��s c��`��z��r�,�.ede��z�' � « ��ifc��°ni��Ycp��tm��'i�li�t�d Wildlif�, ��dclin� e� ' � �a1z�`crr�i��ati��P�a��t �`�ci�t� � ' � �1�a�t� ��vire� �nta1 AIIia�� 1�prc�p�rty c�vvn�rs wi��in 30� ��t c�fth�pr��a�i�y bc�unc��y � PIT�sLX�`R:�'i'IET3� ��} 3�r��e�t r�fe�� f�r�€��n��ts `�il�r�� 2�1� 0 � � � �T� cc��rz��nts vve��receive� c[�ri��'��zb�i�r��ev�peric�cl. � j � }, Cc� ; ��n�s w��e ��ceive� E��t did �c�t a�dres� t1°�� raft Ivliti�a.ted Neg�tiv� II��c�ax��ic�n ; fz�di�gs c��t1�� ccur��Icc� ��en�s� c��he Ir��al St�zd�. I`�c� �°�s�c�nse i� ne�essar�� '�`h� � i �ett�rs��a�tach�d. � � c� � � �ca ��nt� addr�ssi�� find�n�s e�f the draf� Ivliti�a��d Negati�e ��clar�tic�� d/c��: � x accur�cy �r �c�m�r�et�nes� �f i:h� �r�itia� �t��y w�r� rec��ved d�ring t�� p��c re�iew � E ��ric��. Th�1�tters �,resp�nses�`c�l�c�w�s�e l�.e��t�s�t� ��z� �z�ts, atfiach�d).- � i � � �a�ics c�f th� N��fi��t�d ��iv� Z�►ecl�r�tic�z�, �he ��iti�l �tudy, �!�cu�t��a�ic�n m�t+�ria1�,- � � � ��3 th� IYlitig�tian onitari��g Prcr�r� �� b��i��d at �h� 1'l�nni�g;I7►ivi�ic�n s�f t�t� Il�ev�l�p�n�� e��i�es ��r��t, �it� ��' ��[i�z�, ��d 7'7�7 �yp�ess A,ve��,, R�dd° �;; � C� 9&{�f�l. �'c��►et: Li�d�B��r��, 5�t1 ��-4{}2'�. .� r � �� , � � x ` ,�«,�d ='� �.� � a� � � . -�"'��.�'��.' v ,r�`� �'. . ,.��' � t'��+w�°� �� ^�� . �'�uI�-l�l��n,�'�an�in�IV�a��ge� T�at� , � 4 ; a� E; � � P�II;p��` � � � f ��t��h��ts. � �; �,; �e�ca�ic�z� n��p � t� �. Initz��tudy � � � � � � � 's ;t � ;_' � tiz � �i � 3`' � � � � �� _;, � ;;;, r i rYfr"Ji�ctt�c�I�cgi��iue 17ecti�r atin�r Page 3 P21C�C�f P�. �4 ;.; � � � i � � � � � � � � � � � � 0 � � � � ;; � � j � �` o� � � � � � � � � �� a , �+��+�r��c�� a�d C�c�cum��ntatic�r� � ��a��i�risic�r� �� i��ti�r� �-�t��.�-Q+�� '� ��zt�r�i�� A�pli�a�i�r� R�-��.�-�C��l�4C� � : �f�r�� e��l��r��n� �l�n � -��3.�-{�+��: � � , � � s � �iv+� � � ivisi � �r� evel r�� ; � �;. � � 4 � 5 � �!"�'��'�L� �3�/; 13 ��E�� „ [3�v�E�pmer�t ServPces Depart��r�fi � ` � Afarrnft�r��t��si�n � j 777�ypress Avenu� °` Redding;Califorr�ia�G�{�1 � � � � � Fe�ruary 2�3�.8 ` Packet Pt�.55 � CITY F REL�D[�� 11IR�1� ENT;A��. ��E��C�1�T �� ' � 1. Prt�ject TitEe: I�Fve C�ak�c�bdfuision and F�lanned Develc�pm�nt 2. Lead�gen�y n�trse and��ldr�ss: � � C]TY t7F��C3�IN�;C�evelt�pr�ent Services C�epartmer�t,Plc�nning�7rvrstcirt c� 777 C�J�JJ�"£'$S,�V�Y10E�p �@C�C�#tl�,�l� ��(��: e C"$ 2. Cr�nta�t Persan�nd Phone Nurnber: I�ir��l��u�ke,�530�Z25-4027 ' 8 � 4: Project i.ocation: 1�2t}anc!136�t}fd Altur�s Rc�ad,r�ort3iwest s�ete of Victcsr Avenue and�Id A(tura�ita��rsectiora ; , � % 5. Appficant's l�arr�e ar�d Address: R��rres�ntative's Name and Rd�iress: p+� ; � c� � Nl��tin Boors�,C}mni Fin�r�cial, Lf�C `€'irr� M�cLe�n,Sharr�h Dun1�p Sawyer,€r�c: °� ? �.26C�41��Stre�t,Suite C3 �594[:ockh�ed Drive � � Capit�ia,�A�5(710 Reddi�i�,CA 96t�(}� � t � � 6� C;ener�t P1a�a�te�ignation. ft�sid�ntiaf[vlultiple F�mi1y;l:iJ ter 2CI dwelling units per�cre,Greenw�y ` � � 7� �c�n�ng: "�tM-12"ResidentiaC IVlulti�le�amily � �� 8, t�e��ripfiic�n�f Prr�ject: Tent�tive Subdivisiczrr MapApplication�nd Planned Devefc�prnent P1an App(icati�n,�.iv��k Sub�ivisi�n, �. �; is a requesfi tc�subdivide approximat�ly 8 aeres intc�26 multip�e-f�miCy residentia9 lc�ts in thr�e phases far develc�pmer�t cr€�# � A' �ultiple-f�mily unPts. ��ase�ar�d 2 consist af 2U Ic�fs to b�deve(csped with a�wc�-f�mif�r3v�eilir��unit{du�a[ex unit�c�n each�cat ; fc��-a trata�c�f�.t�ttr�its: Phase 3�c�nsists c�f 6 lcits tc�be develcaped�vith a fc��rr�plex unit c�r�each Ic�t for a tcatal c�f�A units: The � prc�jeet inc�ticfes a�ezoning Applicafiit��r t��dd t�ie•,PE�"I�lann�d l3�veltipment t�verEay i�isfricttt�the existin�"E�M��.2,,Mu1�ipE� � �% �ami�y l�istrict zor�ing crf the�aroperty t�facilitate th�d�ve�c�pm�nt: � j; cs �r % 9. Surround�ng Land t1se�and S�#ting: 'The 8 acre property consists of�wo pareels loc�ted rrorth�f t�ld Alturas f2c�ad anc�west caf � ; � ; the V€etar Av�nue intersectic�n. The westerly parcel vdas preuio�rsiy develc�p�d wifih a sing]e fami(y hc�rne site whiel�has been .,� ; dernc�9isl�ed�nd rer�aved. Th�easterly parcel cc�ntains two srr�all rental�rnits and a detached g�rage, The property is re(ative(y `� ` flat alon Uld Alturas Road to enti slo 1n rrr the ne�rthwest corner of the rt� ert wi�h to o ra h t�an in from 555 feet � � 6 Y P� �� P P �l P � €� Y � � ab�ve mean sea}ev�1{MSE�}tes 615 feet MSL, �hurn Cree�,which is trabt�t�ry tcr the S�cramentc�I�iver,Es€aeated c�utsicle the � r�e�rtl�east cc�rnet°s�f th�site. Th�site�s characteri�ed a� blue c��k vvc�c�d�an�!�n the nc�rthwest cc�rn�r and ar�nual gra�sfand � �° thr�aughc�ut the r�st c�fthe prc�pert}�,v�rith mir�i€n�1�sarren habitat type surr�un�lirig the exisfiing and previ�us resiclentia6 building � sites. Surrc�unding lan�i uses include a duplex su�rdivision directly west c�f the praj�c�at{�!d Al�uras Ft�ad arrd Brownin�Street and t�vo,primarily vacar�t,�ut similarly ze�ned mu(tip(e fami[y prcaperties tc�the�ast between th�subject praperty and Churn � �� Cree�c. Prc�perty south nf C31d A[tura�Rc�ad is�ls�+zvned fe�r multiple farr�ily�nd currently clevefe�pe�f with a mix ofmu(tipie ff�mify {: � apar#ments;sa[cfer sir�gE�farni�y homes,and a scht�ol I�cated af the seruthwest cc��raer af the ir�tersecti�n with Victor Avenue. � � � � 1EI. C3t��r�aublic ag�n�ies whc�s�appr�vat is r�quirect�e.g,,p�rrnit�,financing a�+pr�val,or�articipatson agr�emment�: Calif�rni� � T i��partmenfi c�f Fish and 1t+/ildlife,U:S, Army�orps�f Engine�rs j. � �. � 11.. Naue California Native Arrr�rfcan triE�es traditionally and cu(turaliy affiliated with th�projeet�r�a reques#ed consultat�on � ` pursuant#s�Public Resources�ode s�ction 21t}�{l.�.Z? [f scs,has cssr�scaitation beg�n?A[ett�r notice of this project�as send ta � ; � the �aliforn�� IVafiive American trib�s that l�ave req��ested ncrtifi�ati�n, Redciing Rarrcher'sa and 1Nintu Tr�ibe c�f tVr�r�herr� � Ca€ifcsrnia;on�ti�3arcf��4,2C1�:7 anc�fVlay 5,2(}1?,respeetiveCy; Nc,request f�r consultaticrn was irritiated c,r r�ceiveef� �; �: s-z��-�oaas��csai�su6��u��,or� z P'acket P'g. �6 ; I; C�ty af Redding ', Developrrtent Seivices 0epartment Plan�iing E�ivision initial 5tucfy ', � �I�VlRt�NN1E�ti�'A1.��1�'CC}RS PC�T�NTIA�.LY AFFECI°Et}: � ' � .a 1"heenvirc��imentalfact�rrsc�ecked�ie€c�wwouldbepotenti�l►yaffected�iytl��sprc,j�ct,involuir�gatleastr�neimpactthatisa"Potenti�([y �; 5igriifica�t lmpact c�r��'otent�a[iy Sm�nificant i3nless Mitig�tion lncorpc�r�ted"as indicated tay th��heckl�st c�n th�fall�urin�p�ges. � � � A�sth�tics Agricult�ral Resa�rc�s Air Qua�ity � � x Bic�logie�I Resc�urces Guitur�l Resources �enl�gY/S�r�ls �._._�. .�.��" � Greet�house Gas Err�issi�ns Hazar�ds&Nazardr�us Nta�erials Flydr�lc�gY/Wat�r Quality �cs I.and tls�f Plar�ning Nlineral F��sc�c€rces i�oFse � � ; � � , , Pc�pu3atic�n/Hc��sing Public Services Reer�ation � i , Trarrs�ortaticrn/Traffie Tr[ba!Cultural Resources [Jtilities f Serv3ce 5ys�ems ; � ; 1lllar�datc�ry Findings t�f gi � Si�nificanc� � � DETERMIN1�Ttt}N: (i`c�be corrapleted by the 1,ead Agency� � ; cs I C�n�he basis of the initial evalu�ti�n: "� ' � � C� l find that the proposed prajeet Ct��IE[��C�T have a significant effect e�n the envir�r�m�nt,�nc�a�3E�ATt11E t��CLAR�TlC��i w's{I be r ��rep��ed;� � � Cf✓ 1 ffnd tt�at�ItF�au�l�ti�e p��apc,��pr�j�ct c�uld[�ave a significant�ffect can the er�vironr��r�t;there will�r�t be a signific�nt��ectin � : tt�Es case because revisior�s in th�pr�ject(�av�beer� made�ay or a�ree�to�y�h��rroject prcap�n�nf. A MITI�ATEC��tE�AT1�� E�CARATIC7N will be prepared. � � c� f� 1 find that the pr�p�se�pr�j�ct MAY have�s€�r�€ficant eff�ct an t�ie env"sr�nrneret,and�n E�VV€€tC}l�ME�lTAL IMFACT REPORT€s � required. � C� I fir�d tF�at the prr�pers�d prcrject MAY have a"pc�tenti�lly sign€f"r�ant impact"ar"poterttiaEly s�gnificant unless€�titi�ated"impact an � the envir�nment; �ut at [east c�ne effect 1} has been ac{equately a�t�lyzec� in ar� earli�r docurr��nt p�rs�ant��pplicable(e�a� � standards;�nc{2}has been adc�ressed by mitigatic�n measures baseei c�n the earl(er analys�s as described on attached sheets. An ,� ENVIR��i�1tENTA[.iMPA�T REPC}RT is requir��,f�ut it rnust analyze c��rfy the effects th�t rerr�air�tc�be a�clressed. � � ❑ I�incf that alt�ough the prcap�sed prt�ject ccaul� 3�ave a signi€�cant�ffecfi ort the enviranrrrent because�[I peatentia3[y significant '� i, �, effects{a)have been an�iyz��adequately in an earlier EIR or�tE�A1"IVE��CC:RR�TIt�[�p�rsuantto applic�f�le standarc�s,anef{b} � h�ve been avc�ided or mitigated pursuant tc�that eariier�[R of N��AT[VE C�EGLAR�T`I��l;including revisic�ns c�r miti�atic�n rraeasures � tFrat are irraposed up�n the propased praject;not�ing further is re�uirec�. � � � � Ccapies caf the Initi�I Study and reiated materials and dc�cumentaticsrt rr��y be c�bt�ined�t tYre Pfanning Divisiein c�f the DeveloprrEent � ; Ser�rices�epartrnent,777 Cypress Avenue;Redding,GA 96C1t11. �ontact[Ftar�n�r�at{53C�}225-402Q. � � � ' �� m � � ,; _ �inda Bcar[ce Date � >: Development 5ervices Clepartretent 5-201T-t7Q239 Live OakSubdivision � Pa�ket Pg. 57 ,' City c�E Redding Deuelapment Serviees t�eparCmer�t Plar�nirrg bivislcrn initi�(Stuciy EVALEI}�T1C}N O��IVV�RCl3�iMEt�ITAL IMPACTS: � T�is secticrn attalyzes t(�e�aot�:nti�I et�virc�nm�ntal irnpacts assc�ciated with the prcr�osed presject.The issu�ar��s eualuatecE in this[niti�( � Stu�iy ir�clude. �i � _ Aesthet'scs - Lanci Use�nd Pfanrain� � - Agricultural Resources - Nlinera(E2es�rurces � - ,�6C C�.�3��I�� - �,St76SE' � - �€o9c�gEc�3 Resc�urces - Populatic�n and�iousing ; Cu3t�rral Rescaurces _ Public Services - ��r��ogy ancl Sc��ls - ftecr�at€on � - GreenY�tiuse�as�rriissions - TranspcsrtationJCirculat�c�n � - �f��ards an�1 Naz�rdsat�s Mat�riaE� - Tribai C�altural Resources � lit€Ifties�nd Service Systerrr - F€ydroCagy and Water�2��lity 0 � T�te env�ronr�ental anafysis irt this secti+an is patterried after the InEtia!Stady`hecklist recorr3mended Eay the�tate��QA�`uFdelines and � � �sed by the Gity of Redding in its envir�nmenta[�eview process: �or the pre(irni�sary envircinment�[assessrrten'�und�r��(cen�s part of this � i Initia[Stucfy's preparatic�n,�c�e�ertnin�ti�r�tha��heee is a pot�nti�l for sigrt9fieant eff��ts irr�ic�tes�E�e r�eed�c�rnar�fully analyze the development's impacts�nd tcr i�ier�t3fy miti�atic+n. � � Fc�r the�va�uatiesn o€pot�ntial�rnpact�,the questi�r�s in the InitiaPStudyGhecklist�r�stated and ars answer is provided accc�rdiragtc�the � � ; analysis �andectaken�s part c�f tl�e Initial Study. �"h�analysis c�rnsiders the l�rrrg�term,c�9rect, €ndirect,�rrc3 c�rrrulativ�€rnpacts�f th� � ` d�velopmenfi. T�each questir�n;fhere are fo�rr p�ssible responses; �. i � ; �Ya��mp��t: T�e development wiEi nc�t�ave an�me�surabl�envirc�nrnerital ir�rpa�t c�r�the er�v�rorsment, � ; � � l.es�"Than Significant Irn�sact. The devefopment will have tf��pcstentia(Far im�rackirrg the er�virc�nrr7er�t;altht�au�h fi�is ir�pact wilt � be be3ow�stab{ish�d�hreshc�l�fs that are�c�nsiderec�to be signif�cant. ° ,. �: e ;: A • Potent��liy Signi�cant tmpact Un1�ss IVf�tigatic�n Ir�cc�rp�ra#e�: �°he deve(oprrtien�wiil�ave the�c�tent3aE to�enerat�irr�pacts � € wF�i�h �ay be es�nside��d �s a si�nificant effe�t c�n the envir�nrnent, althc�ugh rriitigaticin measures or changes tc� th� �, „ �I�velopm�r�t's physica�c�r c�perati4n�l characteristics�an reduce these impa�ts to€evels that�r�(ess than significant: � � • lPotentiaily Significant 1m�aact: Tl�e develc�pment will have impacts wt�ich are ccrnsidered significant;anc�additicin�l analysis is � ; required tc�identify rrtitigatic�r�measures that ct�u�d reduce these�mpacts t€�I�ss thatt sign[ficant levels, � I; c� � vUhere poter�ti�! irn{��ct�are�rt�i�ip�tet� tc�be$ignific�nt; mitigati�n m�asures w9C!be re�uired,s�th�t irnpacts rr�ay be�vaid�d �r � ` reduced to�nsignificant fev�(s: � � � F�ri�ar envir�n�ental�valuatie��s a�piicab]�ta ali or p�rt�f the�r�aject site: � � �� = Cr`ty o,�Reddr'ng�er�eraT Ptar�.2Ut�0 � ;; _ City c�,�Redding General Ptczn Final�'nvirt�rim�rrtal lrnpttct Repvrt;2(}C?O,SCN#1�J�3(7721Ct3 � y List of at�achmentsf referencesi � ' Att�ct�m�nt A�-l�iv�O��C�stafies�['e�itative Nl�p Sheets(Sheets�.tF�ough A�� , Attachment B—[,ive C}ak Estates Plannec�C�evelc�pment Pfan � Attachrrt�nt C—IJRBENfIS�ir quaiity�tirrrputer rrtodel,clafied Apri3 2�,2C�17 � Atfae�trne�t D�-T�ci�nic�f IVIem�—Pr�e(iminary Resc�urc��val�ati�n fc�r tf�e C�ld�fturas Rc�ad and t�ictor Av�n�e Project;pre�iared by : �allaway Enf�rprises,dated t�ctc�ber 24,2ti1�{C7n fi�e with the Planning Division} � � Attachment�—Gtaltural Reso��rce Assessment,I�iue(�ek�states Pr�saect;prepared by Gallaway�ntarpr€��s;clated ApriP 201:7{C}n fi[e with � ;: th�P[�nning Division) � Att�chrnent F�-Letter frorn Central V�ll�y Regional Vv�ter Quality��ntrol Board, dated Nl�rch 1f, 2��7 �c�n f►le w[th#�S� Planni�ig � � I�ivis3�t�� S-2(}17-00239 live CTa#c Sutadivi5ion ' q P�CICI�'��. �$ ; City af Redding Develapment Services C�epartment Planning Divisiorr ir�itial Study Attachrnent G—O[d Alturas Mulfii Family Entitlemen�C.evef Stc�rr�r Drain Analysis pre�rared by Sharrah Dunlap 5awyer,[nc.,dated January 30,2C�17,{pn file with the Planning D'avisian} �3 �tttachment H--�ive t�ak Estates Residential Noise At�alysEst,prepared by Saxelby Acoustics,clated�€ovember 27,2U27(On fi(e with t(te � Plartnin�Division) � Attachment I—Traffilc Impact Ana]ysis Memorandurn,prepared by t�rnni Means,a GHd Cornpany,dated Septerr��er 27,2017{On fiEe with � #�t�P�8i311111g DIVt514�1� � � � SEJMMARY t�F MITIGATIGIN f1+1�ASUR�S: Bio�o�ic��REsou�ces � ' � Mitigation S. Prior to issuance of a grading permit that may cause the lass af jurisdictic�nal waters af the E1.S.;the develop�rshall secure �rs ' all necessary permi�s and authorization frarn fihe 13.5.Army Carps of Engineers,#I�e Ca(i�c�rnia Regionai Water Quality Con�r418oard.and � ' the Califarnia department of Fish ar�d Wilc4life. All terms and conditions af the required�aermits and authc�r�zatian,(r�eluding mitigation, , st�alf be met. � � a Mitigation 2. In order to avafd irnpacts tc�nestEng raptors ar migratcrry birds,vegetation rernoval and other ground dist��rbance aetivities associated with canstructic�n sha]I be cociducted outside of the main nesting season,5epten�ber 1 through January 3�.,c�therwise a pre- canstructian survey for nesting birds shall be compieted during the nesting season ofi�ebruary�.through August 31. The suruey shall be conducted by a qualified biologist no rnore than nne week prior to vegetatiar��emova{. if an active nest more than half cQmpleted is � located during fihe survey, a non disturbance buffer sha11 �e establishecE by the qualified bialog�st in cc�nsultation with the Callfc�rnia � Depart�'tent af Fish ar�d Wildlife. Na vegetatian removal or construction activities shaE!oceur within the non-disturbance bufFer unti(the � young have fledged,as determined through addEtiona(monitorir�g by the qualified biologist. The results of the precartstruction survey � shal]be sent to the California C7epartment of Fish and Wifdfife. (f a fapse in constructian activit€es af 15 or mare days occurs,then another � I pre-eanstruction survey shal)be conducted, � � � � i � Potentially Less-Than- �ess-Than- Ncs I.AESTHETtCS: Woutd the pro,ject: Significant Significant With Significant Impack � [mpact Mitigatian lmpact „� Incorpc�rated � i � ( a} Have a substantiaf�dverse ef€ect on a scenic vista? x � � bj Substantially damage scenic resources, includ'€ng, but not €imited to, x � � trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State scenic � ' highway? � � c} Substantially degrade the existing visual ct�aracter or qsaality af the site � x � and its surroundings? � a� d) Create a new source of substarttial light or giare which would aduersely affect day or night�irne views in the area? � � s� ; � Discussian: � a) The project must comply with the height stanclarcfs ofthe City's Zoning Ordinance. Th�project wo�Id be cc�nsisten�in height with � buildings an adjacent properties and wauEd not obstruct any docun�ented scerticvistas. The prape�sed projectwauld not represent a � �; significant change to the overall scenic quality af the area. � �? � �; b} The praje�t site is nofi locatec(adjacent to a state-designated scenic h�ghway. �. � � c} The project will be compat9ble wit(�the exist�t�g visual character c�f the property and its surroundings. � cs � d} The project would generate light that is cc�stamary�ar develapmertt anc{campfy with the Z�ning t�rdinance Eight sfiar�ciards. T�ere � would not be an adverse effect on day ar r�ighttime views in the area. _ i y s-zoi�-oa�3s�;V�a��s�bd�v�s�or, � P'�cket Pg �9 City of Redding ��velopment Serviees Uepartment Planning Diu3sion Initia(Study �?C1Ctli't2�C�#�tit3�1: � Clt}�t�,f RG'L�C3ttiC�G�t721'CP�F'JCIt�, N�i�It"�I R�S[7L4�'C�S�I�CS1�Cit,�C�CJ(� � �t��Of�'i£'L�R+itit�`ZL?t?!f}t�C?1"t�'l�tC7t?CE', ��i��i�21`1�;4t7.C)9�} .� t�& � M11:I�7�It)P7: � ' � ' NCPCi�1'E�C£'SSc�t"�: ' � ' �. � ' 11. AGRtCUL7Uit� �tESC}UR��S. Jrr deterrr>ininq whether imptrces to agricutturaf Potentia�ly Less�'Than- G�ss-Th�n- No � resc�urcesaresignificantenviranmentale�fetts,leadagenciesrra�ryrefertotheCalrfcrrnia Significant 53gniEicantWith S�gnificant Impaet AgriculturaF,Land�vrrtu�rtic�n�nrlsr"t�Assessment�vli�rfej1997)preparedbytheC`aTifornia tr4'ep��t Mitigakton Imp�ct � f�epfi.of Conservritiot��s an rrptiiinal modef tc�use in assessing impacts on�griculture and �ttcorporat�d farmfand. Would the pralect: � a} Cc�t�vert Prime Farmlar�c(, Uniqc�e Farrr�l�nd, or Stat�utitSe lrnperr�ance ; � {F��rr�iand},as sFrc�wn on tiY�e maps prepared p�z�-suant ta th�Farmland ; Mapping and Mor�itiiring Progr��f the Calif�rr��Res�iur�es Ag�ncy,to x i e� non�agricu�tural use? � i I � b} Conflict with existing zoning for agricultur�l use, nr a Williamsr�n Ace � Cc�ntract� � � o� � c} €nvcalve ofiher chai�ges i�fihe exis�ing env[rc�nment which; dcae t4 t�eir �' I�cation or nature; coulc! result in cQnv�rsic�n of Far��t€and #o nott- x � ' agr�c��lturai use? � � � � � � s � _ i�lscussictn: � ` � ; a-c) �'�e pre�ject site niat b�en hEstorica(8y us�d far ag�icultura€p�[t�psa�es,nor dcses�t pcassess s�3ls�hat are prirne f�r agricu(tural � < � pre,d�€ction. a e ' Ctocumentatic�n: � City r�f Redclar��Ca`en�raJ Plcrr�; �3at�ral Res�urces E3erner�t,ZO�C� � City t�f Ftedd�ng Gener�rt P1at�Backgrocrnd Rep�srt;�hapter 9.�.A�ricuitur`a(�ands �° ; , � ; Califc�rr�ia �repartment crf Conservatic�n s�arml�nd M�pping�nd Mc�ni��iring Prc�grann � ; Unitec�Sta�es l�epartrn2�t c�f A�riculture,Soil�onservation Servi�e at��Forest Serv[�e,��ai1 Survey of S�i�sta Courrty Area. � y � � ; Mitigati�n: � �one neces�ary. � ;: . � �; � fi � ;; [It.AtR QUALITY:Where avaiJable,the signr`ficance crfteria established 6y the Pc�tentially Less-Than- [.ess�Than-' Nc� � � aPplr"ca�tle air r�t�allty manag�ment or crr'r pr�lfution contrcrl districtmery be S�gnificant Sigt�ific�nt With Sign�ficant Itrtpact � reJied upara to rnake the fotl+�wing deterrni�crtions. INouftJ the project: Empa�# Mitagat�o� la�apact �y ; � �lncorpor�ted � � � a} Cc�nflic#v�ith or of�struct implerrientatian o#the appticable air quality p€�n? x � b} V1�lateanyaPrqual9tystandardorcontri�utesu�stantialiytcranexistingor x � p€�c�jected alr qua3lty violation? � �`: ;€ � ,; cj Result in a curnufatively considerable net increase of�nycriteria pc�l[utant � � for which the projeet regicrn is ngn-attainrn�nt€�nderan applicab[e��dera[ � � ' e��tate�rrsbient airqs�ality�starrdarc#(inc(�c(ing re(easing emissir�ns w}�9ch exceed quanti�ative thres�scslds fc�r i�zane precursars}? � ' d) ExpQse sensitive receptQrs�osubstantial pc�f(utant concentraticins� x ; � � e} Creat�c�ksjectinnable adc�rs affecfing a substan�ial numb�r esf peaple? � � S-2t717-t1�239 Cive OakSubdivisian ; �s� F��cke�Pg. �it? ��; I; City of Redding Developrnent Seruices Departrnent Planning Division inikiai Study DI"SCUSS�OYt: ,„�,, C� � a-c} Shasta County,inclur��r�g the far northern Sacramentca Valley,eurrently exeeeds the state's ambientstandard�fc,r ozone(smc�g}and � particul�tes(fine,airborne particles}. Conseqe�entEy,these pc�llufiants are fihe fflcus af Ir�cal air c�ua(ity policy,especia(ly when relatecl � to]and use and transpartatian p3anning. Even with applicaticrn of ineasures to reduee emissions far individual prc�jects,cumulative `� irnpacts are unavoida�le when nzane andJcrr paeticulate emissions are invalved. For example,the primary source of ernissions � contribut�ng ta ozone�s From vehic(es. Any project that generafies uehicle trips has the pofierttial of contributing ir�crementa(ly to � the problem. The�nvironmental Impact Repc�rt fc�r the 6enerat Ptan acknowledged this di(emrr�a;and as a result,�inc(ings and a S�atement of t�verriding Considerations were actopted by tl�e City Cauncil far Etnpacts tc�air quafity resultingfrom growth suppc�rted under the Genera!Plart. � ' � The C�ty Air Q�aality Element af the �enerat Pfan establishes emissir�n-reducCian goals of 2C}te� 25 percent, depending an t}�e � ' projected levef of unrr�9tigafied emissions far a praject. Mitigation thresholc{s are established for the impo�tant regianal/lc�eal pallutar�ts, inc]udir�g: Reaetive Drganic�ases (ROG} anct (�xides crf Nitra�en {NC?x},which are ozane precursors, and Inhalabl� " Particulate Matter, �.0 Micran{PMzo). The mitigafiion threshQfds far these poflutants are tiered at twa(evefs as foilows: � � 0 I.evet��A° level„B" 25 pounds per day af NOx 137 pounds per day crf NOx 25 pounds per day af Rt3G 3.37 paunds per day of Rf�� 8C1 pounds per day af PM�o 137 pouncfs per day of PM10 � � If a proJect has unmitigatect emissions�ess than the Level"A"threshold,then it is viewed as a minar project{from an air quality � perspec�i�e) and anly applica�ion n�Standard Mitigation Measures {SMMs} is required to try to achieve at feast a 2CI percent ' reductinn in emissinns,or the best reduction feasible otherwise. l�and uses�hat generate unr�itigatecf emissians abc�ve[.evel"A" � require applicatian of apprapriaxe BestAva�lable M�tfgat€on Measures(BAMMs},in addition to the SMMs,in arderte�achieve a net em9ssion reduction of 20 percen�or more. If,after applying SMMs ancf BAMMs,a ctse still exceeds tt�e�evei'�8„thresha[d,fihen a � rnin�mum of 25 percent of the�anmitigatec(emissions exceed3ng 137 pounds per day rnust be offset by reducing emissior�s from °' existing sources of poflution;atherwise,an�nvironmental Irnpact Repart is required. � A � Under palicy of the Air Quality�lement,a praject has the pc�tent9al tc�impact a�r quality primarily in two ways: {1}the project would ,� generate vehic�e trip emissions(with NOx,ROG,and PNE10)that contribute eumufat�vely ta Iocal and regional air quality canditions; � and{2}fugiti�e dust{particulafieJPM1{,}emissions are possible during construction activities. As a residential deve3opment,a prr�ject � does not have the potent]al to generate significant emissior�eaneentrations af ather paEiu�antssubject to state and fec{eral ambient °� air quality standards. � � � In order to calculate the�nmitigated emissions for the key pc�(�utants nated above,th��urr�nt ItRB�N11S air�gua]ity camputer rn�del was used as prescribed in the Air Quality Element. The resul#s were as follows: � , � � RC?G l�C?x PMs� � Total�rnissions(fbs.fdayj 7.99 4.66 �S4 � These results inc�icate that the pro�ect would resc�ft in Rt��,Nt7x,and PM1�,emissions weEl be[ow the LeveE•`A•,thresho(d.Hence, `� '' ap�lications of 5N[Ms are required in order to strive toward the Generat Plan policy af a net-reduction abject3ve af 2{l percent tc� � � address s�all-seafe cumt�lative effects. SMMs applicab[e to this project address primarily short-term im�acts reiated tc� � canstruction. For the most part,these reguirernen�s are star�dard development regu(ations in the City pramuEgated in the City � Grading Ordinance and Uniforrn Building Code. Appficatic�n crf special rnitigatic�n to achieve a level of less than signiFicartt is not � necessary since actions fc�r campliance are already included in existing unifc�rmly app[ied regulations and cflnstruction star�dards. � The fiollowing City standard regulatians applied during grading and cotts�ruction activities ta cc�ntral dust and PM�oemissians apply � tca the project. � ;: � 1. Nontaxic sail stabilizers shal( be applied aceord9ng tc� manufacturer's specification to all inactive cor�structicrn areas � {previausly graded areas ina�tive for fien days or more}. 2. Alf grading aperatians shalE be suspended when winds{as instantaneous gusts}exceed 2C�t�niles per hour. � � j� 5-2017-00239 Live Oak Subdivision 7 �2t��C@��.�"� �ity a€Redding DeVelopment Service5 Oepartr�rent Plann�ng Division initia(Study 3. Tempc�rary traffic contrral sf�al]be prc�videc#as appropriate clurir�g a[I ph�ses+�fconsfiructic�n ta�imprc�ve traffic flc�w{�:g,,f�ag ,� ' person}. ° � 4: C�nstruction activ€fiies th�fi cc�u�d�ffe�t traffic fl�w shall�e scheduled in�ff-�eak ht�urs: � 5. Active ccsnstr�cti�n areas;haul rcrads,etc.,shall k�e watere�at least twic�daily c�r mc�re as needed to Ifrr�it dus�; � � 6. Expr��d stoc#spil�s vf sail ar�d other backfill materi�l shall either�se covered,waterec�,c�r have st�il binders a�lded tc�inhib9t � dust�rtd wind eressian. � 7. AP[trucCc hauling so(id and c�ther l��s�rr��Ceri�l shal( be c�sverec�c�r sh��ld mair�tain at least two f�et c�f free�i�ard {i:e., � minirraum ver�ical cl�stanc�between top of the€c��d and the tr�i3er}[n accc�rdance with fihe requir�rnents c�f CV�5ect�c�n 231��. This praui�ic�rs is enforcecf by local iaw enfc�rcernent agenci�s. 8. All p�ablic rr�adways use� Eay the prcaje�t �cintractvr shaP1 b� maintainec# fre� fr�m dust, dirt; �nc� debris caus�cf #�Y � ; �onstructian activities. �treets shall b�swept at the encf af the day if v�sEble soil mater[als are carried antia act��cen�publac � i �aved rerads. Wheel washers shall be user�a�vh�re veh�cies enter and exit unpav�cf roads r�ntc�pavecE re�ads,c�r trucks artd � � any equiprn�nt shall be washed off leaving the site wit�r e�ch trip. �: Alternatiues to open burnin�of cE�ared v�g�ta�ive�at�rial c�r�tiie project site shalf E�e usec( €�nless otherurise deerraed � ; 3nfeasible by the�ity Planning[7�visian. Suit�bl�alCernatives incluc[e;but�r�n�it lirnitecf to,c�n-�ite chipping and rr�ulching `� ; and/c�r�aulir��tc�a l�iarnass fuel site. ° d� �crtential impact�to n�igl�bc�ring ho�es {sensitive receptors) fs�c�m fugitive dust �aused d�rr€ng ce�nstructic�n are n�it9�ated by : applieation�f the S�Ms�iscussec(above: � i � � _ e� The pr�ject d�es ncit it�vtrlve]�nd t�seth��cruld generate obJectior�able c�dors afEecting substantial number esf p�c�pl�. c� ; � � ' t�ocu�entations : Shasta Gounty APG[�A"sr Quafity(t1laint�nance Pl�n and 3mplementing�tfeasures � : Git�n�`Redding�er�er�i1 P#an,Ai�Quality Element � ' �`ity�,f R�dding t�enerad Pfan�incr/�ravirc�rrrr��ntcrl lr»pa�t�eport,2�1t3t}�SC�3#3.9�8CI721C}�,Chapter 8.6,Air t�.uality, � �EQA�indings of Fact ar�ti State�ent caf C�verr€�Iing:�ansideratic�ns for the�r`ty of t3eddfng �`en�rerl Plan Fina!�'nvircarrmerrta!lriaperct � �S'G��}C3t`�,�5�{�Cl�}��CI�}��'R�C�CII11g�E��t C{��ti1C[I t7l1 C}C�C��7�€`3;2{7{�{�; �i�f R�St3�l3�IClt1�{}�1E7-16b �`9�}�C7f�#,'t�t�tt�(�G�t?�tY��}��£7t7$CdC�4`!�i'tttitttdf R�pC1l"�,�}1�pt�t'�.7,��t4i'��SOUCC�S e�l1t�l�ii"�U��l��f e i �1�{��1(��i��;V�.�:��#3E`�Ei��i��4711"1�7L3��E"�V'�CSt�E'��i'85U��S�ClC{��C{{�E�UC�S SU�}C�til6StC3T'I�C�S�l1�£'S.��f5�]V�(�c��f�C�a�Pf��i'1��.5,��}�.7 � '; � Ml�1g�#IC1Ei. � " � � l�C1Pl�T72�C25S�Cy. � � � � Potentially Cess-'Fhan- �:ess-'i�rar�- N�s � IV.�1Ul.OG1�At,R�SC1tlt�C�S.kNauld th�presjeet: Signific�n� 5ignificant With SignSficant ltnp�rct � Impa�t Mitigatinn lmpact � � Incor�orat�d � � �a � a) Have a sufast�nt'raf adverse ��fect, either direct[y c�r througl� habitat madificati�ns, r�� any species ider�tiFied as a candidate: sensitiv�} c�r � � special4�tattts species in local or re�ic�nal plans,pc�lici�s,Qr regulatians,c�r � ' layt�e�a(ifornia G�epartmenfi o�Fish and Wild(ife ar U.S. Fish and W11c€[Ife � 5ervice? � � ,: 6} Have a substantia)adve�se efFectz�n any ri{�arian habitatorc�thersensitive � l; natural community ide��ified �n iocat af regicrnal plans, pc�licie�, � regu�ations,ar I�y�he CalEfarn�a t�epartment af�ish and Wildlife c�r U.S; � � � Fis�and Wildlife 5ervic�? � � � c} Have a substant[af ad�ers� effeet on Fed�rally pre�tectet� wetlands as ,: de�ined k�y5ecticsn 4t14 cif the C[e�n Water Act{inci�ading,but nc�t(irnifed � x � �; fo; marsh; verria) poc�[, caastal, et�.} thrt�trgh dlt'�ct removal, filling, '; hydralogic�l interruptian,or ot�er rr��ans? � y, � � �. 4 5-2Cs�:7-OC72391.ivc�ak Subdivisic�n ' $ ��C{C@��.�L � �t i< i'. City of Itedding Development Services t�epartment Planning Divis'san inieia(Study PatentialEy Cess-7han- Less-Than- No '�` IV.�IUL�GICA�.R�SQURCES:Wcrtrld the project: Significant 5ignificant With Signiticant Impact � irnpact NliEigatian [mpact incorporated � d) Infi�rfere substantially with the movement af any natiue resident or � nmigratory fisn ar wifdlife species ar wifih establis�ted native resident ar � migratory wi3diife corridors,or impede the use of natiue wildlife nursery � � sites? � e} ConflRct with any local po(icies or ordinar�ces pratecting biologica( � � I resources,such as a tree�areservation palicy ar ardinance? a�a f} Conffict with the provisions aF an adapted Habitat Conservation Plan, � Natural Comrnunity,Conservatian Plan,orotherapproved locai,regional, x m or State hab€tat cc�nservatian plan? � 0 Discussion: � aud} The 8 a�re property h�s be�n previ�usly di��urbe�l with a h�me site c�n fihe w�sterly p�rcel{recent�y demc�i�shed}and 2 srrkaC(ex9sting � � rentals hornes an the easterly site. The site is characterized as bfue oak woadland in the northwest corner and annual grass(anc! °� i thro�ghout the rest af the praperty,wifih mir�imaE barren habitat type surra�nding the existing and previous residential building pca 3 sites. The site is flat to gently sloping in the r�orthwest corner with topography ranging frc�rrt approxirnately 555 feet abav�mean sea � Cevel{rnsl}to 615 feet msl. Churn Creek,which is tributary to the Sacramento River,is[ocatecf just outside the northeast cnrner af the project area, �a3laway Enterprises prepared a Technical Memo—Preliminary Resource Evaluatic�n (dated C3ctaber 24,2016}far � the prajec�site that Encluded a habitat assessrnent ta determine if suitabEe habitat occurs for specia!status species,a botan9cal s�€r�ey conducted for the purpose of determining presence of special status species and suitabfe habifiat elements fc�r thc�se species, � and an aquatic survey to deterrnine the presence af potentiai jurisdietional waters csf the US,and ta dc�cumertt the edge crf the � riparian habitat to determine the 50 foat setback ft�om the edge of riparian habitat. e ; o i; � No endangered, threatened, or rare pfant species were observed, however, because fihe survey was conduct�d outside of the �`" j' blooming period for most flowering plans,the habitat assessment was canducted to determine if the site provides habitat for special � � r. status plant species. The assessrr�ent determined that the sifie lacked suitab(e habitat fc�r a11 bufi one special status p1anC species, � ; Redding eheckerbloom,a California Native Plant Saciety Rank 3 p(ant. Because this p(ant would only crccur within the blue crak °� woodland portian of the site, which is praposed to be cornpEetely av�ided, a prQtocol-Ieve( survey far this pEanfi was not � recommended. Additianafiy,the status as a California Rare P[ant Rank 3(more information�does nc�t currently warrant mitigation � requiremer�ts by California Departrnent af�ish and Wildlife{CDFW}. a� � No endangered,threatened,ar speciai status wildlife species were observed,t�awever,there is suitable hal�itatfor nesting migratory � j and non-�arr�e �irds in the blue oak waodland area,fiFte riparian carridar al�ng Churn Creek,and ather trees near the existing � j; �; residential structures. The Migratory Bird Treaty Act(MBTA)prot�ibits the ki(ling of rnigratory birds or destructic�n of their occupied ': nests anc(eggs, except in accnrdar�ce with regulations prescribed by the US�ish and tNildlife Service. Activities that invalue the � " rernoval of vegetatian, including trees, has the patentiaE to affect bird species pratected by the MBTA,therefore, ta minimize � ,: impacts from canstructior�,rnitigation is prov€ded taelow to encc,urage tree remcrva[and otl�er[and-cfearing work ta be conducted � outside the main nesting period. To avoid the potentiaE of impacting ground nesting migratory birds protected iay the N[BTA,it�s � recammended that vegetatian removal and ground disturb�r�g activities occur ouCside tl�e rtesting season(Septen�ber 2-January 31}. � Cf graund disturbing activities occur during fihe bird nestir�g season{February 1—August 31}a preconstruction raptor and�igratory � �ird survey should be conducted by a qualified biolagist within 7 days prior�o the start of constructiQn and appropriate nest- � avoidance measures reguired if an active nest more tharr ha[f cc�rnpleted is locatecf during the survey. If a fapse in constructian j- activities of 15 or mare days occurs,then another pre-canstructic�n survey shaEl be candueted. i= r � During the aquatie survey,a potentiaf[y jurisdictiona(wetland feature and a drainage ditch were idenfi�fied on the west and south � sides of the project site,respectively. The potential wetland feature is fargefy I�cated between the prc�ject bcrundary and the private � driveway an the property to the west. lfi receives water in tt�e form of sheet flow from the drav�way,the apartment buildings to the � west,and from the hillside. The drainage ditch on the south si�le of fihe praject receiues sheet flow frc�m Old Alturas Road as we[[as �`' off the project site. It is heavily vegetated with annua[grasses anc[other weedy herbaceaus plants.However,there appears t�be no I:` 5-20�.7-p0239 Live Oak Subdivision 9 ��Ck�t��. �� City af Redding C�evelcapmerrt Services pepar�ment Pisnning C7ivision Initial Study � �aec�,ba�il�,ar channei m�r�h�E�gy.Therefore,G�[]�w�y�nterp��is�s�or�cluded it is nat jur�sdictiona[: � � The City t��s not est�blished its own rnitigati�in standai�ds fe�r rep��cement c�fwetlar�ds im�acted�y dev�le�pment and,inste�d,r�lies s� on crit�ri�rec�gnized by�ta��atad federa[rese�ur�e ag�nc3es: FederaC and state p�r�€cies prcimc�te a nc�net lass ofv��tland res�aurces; �, T�r�s ean[ae aecorrtplished in�nurrrber s�f urays,but a ccar�irn�rn appr�ach�s th�purchase by the d�veloper cif mitigation cred3ts at an � esta�l�sE�ed wetland m�ti��ti�sn f�ank. �ased c�n these factc�rs,mifiigati�rn me�sur�s are�st�b(ished�ie€c�tnr�o ensure th�t,pri�r tcs issuance caf a City gr�ding perrri�fi,any necessary wetland rriitigatic�n cr�c�€ts are secured ar�d suffici�rrt mitigati�n is perfr�rrnect in �ccc�rc�ance�ith the US Ar•my Corps�f�n�ir�eers�r�d CC�FW permitting requir�rr�ertts if�arc�ject p[�ns ws�ulc[result i�r destruction crf jurisdicti�nai wetlands. � � ' e) i'he City f�as a��a�tec!a Tree M�nag��ent C�rdir�artee{�hapte�18,45 cifthe R�V1C)t€�at prc�mc�tes the cc�nservatic�n raf matu�-e,healtlty � tre�s in tE�e d�sign of r�ew development. The�rdinance alsc�recognizes t�at the preservaticrn c�f tr��s wi31 s�r�►etimes cc�nf3ict wrth � necessary land=developcnent requ�rements: Th�City's�err�ral Pl�zra�tR furtl�er a�knc,w�edges that preservation caf native trees will � sc�metirrtes ec�nffict with nc�rmal#�nd deve�oprr«nt�n�t that imp3errientatie�n af the Genere�l Pdcrn will�(t9rnately set aside over 7;tli7Cl 8 acres c�f ope�s space,rr�uch c�f which cc�ntains oak�abitat.8ut effc�rt$r��ust stilf be made tr�retain existing tr�es if reasonably possible, ancl to sufficiently pfant new trees fr�tl�e context c�f the r�ew develapment. A tree survey i�required to identif+�natural tr�es and tre� gresups rr��st suitable fc�r�reserva�'son or"candidat�tre�sl�r��rups." Where aIf identified candi�lafietre�s�groups eann�st be preserve�, th�sef-asid�of�natur�I area or areas within a project site that is paeteca9atiy su's�able fc�r th�p[ar�t"sng;retentir�r�,and/or natur�C a ; re�enera�ic�rs of trees is ccansiderect t�be a�3esirable rnearts caf�cc�m�r��shing th�gaals�f the c�rdinanc�. � ; � [r�th'ts c�se,t�re tree sucvey prepared�ay Sharrah�3unlap S�wyer,(nc:,indicates th�t firee c�uer on the site is m�inly Iracated ort th� � i sl�pin�hillside in the nc�rthw�st c�rner of thesite which�s pr�pr�sec�tv�e se��side fc�r preservati�r�. The maj�ority of tt�e 2��trees � $ i�ienti#ie��n site are blue nak tree�;�ic�w�ver;ther�are severa!pine and shade trees fc�und mainlyin the area e�fthe�arevious ancf � ; currer��h�rne sites: The rnaje�rity af tr�es �21�:�wcr�id �e preserved, cz�rost loc�ted on t}��slc�p�ng hi�lsic�e, How�v�r, due to the ; pr�jec�'s gradin��nd utility d�mands necess�ry for de�e€�prr�er��ofthe site to the p�fentia!anticipate�by�h��neral P1an,sav"sng � � trees 9n the main su�div�sic�n cl�velc�pn�ent area is nc�t cc�nsiderecf feasiksl�a�d remc�val c�f f8 trees weauld resc�lt; � 8 Cn additicsn to t�ee rete�tior�efforts,the developer is als�a ai�ligate�t�re�rla�rt s�itaEal�new tt-ees�t the tir�e c�f c�instruetion�c�r shade and th�enje�ymenfi c�f residents.TI�e Tr�e Management t�rdiriance ident6fies r��in€mum pP�nting c�-itecia c�f or�e tre�per SCJt� � r square feet of grrass liuing area.Thu�,with reten��on of trees in the pro�s�rsed private c��r�space area and the plant9ng�f new trees as a standarc�candition�f develapment,th�prc�ject�s cansistent wifih the intent of the Tree Managemant�rdinance. g � ' f} �1r,habifiat��r�servation plans cir c�ther s�milar pEans liave been adopted fc�rthe pr€�ject site or project ar�a.t��3�pact iruauld e�ccur in � � t�ris regard. � � ;' � ., [?ocutv�entation: � ;; �al"[fornfa Departcr►ent af Eish anc(ti�t191dl�fe: hJatural Diversity i�ata��se `� > G'ity ci�'h'edding t�er�er�f Pfcrra,Natur�l ��so�r�es Elernen�,2fl0f� � �; L.�G�r��ll�t{Ut��3Y#��1 i.�Ll�'1�Ui IL��:�€?.�-t�fi 1��IYEc��y��t'E�� : � } Cit}�of Rect�ing General Pfan Enviranrsaentat lmperctRepnrt,2C�t3t];SCH#19�80T21t73 � : Te�hc�ical tt�lerno—Prelirninary R�sc��rc� Eva(uatic�n fc�r th�(�IcE Alturas Road �nd Victor Avenue Pr�ject—Reclding, GA; prepare�l by � r Gall�way�r�terp�ises,�l�ted�7ctob�r 24,2E1�.� �:'rve Qak Estate Tree 5�srvey,pr�pare�#by Sharrati C�unlap 5�wyer,lnc.,d�ted Apri1 2CI1� � � � j, Mitig�t€c�nt Mitigation 1� Pr€c�r to issuan�e c�f a gra�ling perrr�it that may cause the€cass of jur[��ict€c�na[watsrs�f th�tJ:S.,t�ie deve(oper sl�all se�ure � ' all necessary perrtiits and a�€tho�izatian frc�m the�.5.Arrr�y Carps�af�rrgir�eers,th��alif€irnia€tegio�a(v5tater C2ti�ality Gc�ntrc�l�c�ard,and � the�a�ifornia[7�part�ent c�f Fish and WildCife. All#errrts and cor►difions of the re�u3re�i�ierrnits and authorizafiior�,includPrag rr�itiga�io�, G shall�e met. � � Mit�gation 2r 9n order tc�avoid irr�pacts tcr nesting raptc�rs�r rraigrat€�ry k�irds,vegetatic�n removal an�othe�grc��nd c�msturbance activities � asscacia�ed with ccsnstr��ction shaE3 b�canducted outsrd�c�fth�main nesting season,September 1 tl�rough January 31,c�therwise a pre- � cc�nstructi�rn survey for r�est3ng birds shall be compl�ted dur'sng the nestings�ason c�f Feb�-uary�.�hrough Aug�ast 3�.. Tl�esurvey shall be �e�nductec!by a q�alified bic�lc��ist no more tharr one week prior to vegetation rern�vaL If�n active nest more than half completed i� ,: s-zr��7-ooa�s��c��suba;vas�an z� Pa�cket�g. 6� �; �;. Ciiy o#Redding DeveltapmentServices qepartment Planning pivision initiai Study � loca�ed durEng the survey� a nan d�sturbance buffer sha(I be estab(ished by the qua(ified bio3c�gist in consultation with the Ca(iforr�ia � C7epartmertt of Fish and Wildlife. No vege�atic�r�rernoval r�r eonstructian activities shall occur within the non-disturbance EaufFer until the � young haue fledged,as determined thraugh additiona!rr�onitoring by tt�e qua�ified bioEagist, The results af the preconstruction scarvey � shall be sent ta the Califarnia L�epartment of Fish arsd Wildi�fe. If a lapse in ce�nstruction activities of�S ar more days occurs,then another �, ' pre-eanstrucfiion sur�ey shall be conduc�ed. � ' potentially Less-TMan• Less-Than- No V. CUC7l3RAt RE5011RCE5.Wvuid the project: Significant 5ignifie�nt W�th Signifieant impact � Impact Mitigation impact � Incorparated � a) Cause a substantial adverse change ir�the sfgnificance of a historica( x � resource pursuant ta Section].5t}64.5? ; b} Cause a sufastantial adv�rs� change in the significance o# an x � � archaealogical resaurce pursuant to Sec�ian 15064.5? c} Directly or indieectly d�stray a unEqu�paleontological resource or site or x unic�ue geologfc feature? � � � dj Diseurbanyhumanremains,includingthoseinterredoutsideofdedicated x � cemeteries? � � � Discussion � � � a-d} GalEaway Enterprises canducted a cultural resources assessrrrer�t far the project site€nc€uding a field survey,archivaE researeh,and � a recard search at the Northeast Ir�formation Center. A mixed recannaissance and intensiue-IeveE ped�strian was conclucted on A�ril 14,2017,cc�vering t�re entire area of�satential effect ta identify the presence or absence af historic resources and to evaluate � the significance of ar�y id�ntified arehaeologica[resources. The resuEts af tEae reccrrd search indicate that three previous cultural � resource surveys have been undertaken within the praject site with no prehistaric and one historic site having been recorded. A � ;: tota�of 4 prehistoric sites have been recarded within a ha(f mi(e radius of the site,al€located direct(y abutting or closely adjacent � �; ta Churrt Creek. A previous cultural res4urce inventory conducted in 24�0£�ietai[ed the rec4rded site for the residentia!hamestead, � ir►cluding a house,barn,and outbuifdings on the western parcel,known as"Little Rags." The structures were determined to]ack � r integrity and were not recorr�rnended as eligibEe far tt�e Califarnia Register c�f Historic Resources (GRHR), The survey results � r- indicate that the site had undergone significant mociificafiic�r� since 20£�6 and the structures had all been demalished. C3rs tF�e °� � eastern parcel,the structures constructed in�.95�and 1965 were stil(standing ar�d currently inhabited. Hcawever,bc�th struetures � have been�pdated,undergone intense remadeling,and neither rnaintains the integr3ty ofthe initial construction. Therefore the °� eastern portion of the site is not eligible for CRHR or the National Registry of Nis�oric P(aces. [n consideratian c�fthe�ndings afthe � i record search and pedestr9an survey, no impaets in this area are anticipated. � � c: � However, in accordance w�th C�QA 6uideline 15064.5 �f},shoulc(any previausly unrecc�rded historic or prehistoric resources, � cnclud�ng hurnan remains,be discavered daring ground disturbing activities,cor�struction acti�ities shal(cease and the Cityshall be � notified, A qualified archaeological professianaf must be retained tt�investigate the c€iscovery ta deterrnine[ts significance in accardance with applicataEe]aws. � � � i; c} No ur�ique geologic features,fossii-bearing str�ta,or palec�nto(ogical sites are ltnown tc�exist on the prc�ject site, � � � t�ocurnentation; � City of Redding 6eneral Ptan Sackgrc�und Repc�rt,1998 City af Redding General Ptcrn FinaJ EnvironmentaJ Impact Report,2�C70,SCN#�9980721(}3 � Cultural Resource Assessment, (�ive Oak�s�ates Project,Prepared by�allaway Enterprises,dated April 203.7. � � '' � � i% s-zo�7-ooas�u��aaksUba�V«�or, 1�. F��cket Pg. 65 i;. ; City af Redding C�evelopment Services Department Planning pivisian initiai Study � {m? �Itl��lOtl: � � Nane r�ec�ssary. � � �'oter�tially t,ess-Than- I.ess-Than- No � V1. GEO�OGY AND SC}tLS: WouJd the praject; Significant Significant With SignificanY tmpact � tmpact ttt�itigation Impac# incorporated a) Expose p�ople or structures�a pafienfiial substantial adverse efFects, � including the risk of loss,injury,ar death involving: � c� ' i� Ruptur-e of a known earthquake,fault,as delirreated on the �' � most rec�nt Alquist-Prialo Earthquake Faulfi Zoning Map X ' issued by the State Geologist far the area ar based on att�er � ' substantial evidence of a known faulfi� Refer to Diuisicrn of � {�rlines and�eo[ogy Special Publications 42. ii} 5tros�g seismic ground shaking? iii� Seismic-related ground failure,inciuding IiqueFaction? iv� Landslides? � � c� b) Result in substaneial soii erosion or the loss of topsoil? �? x � i � � � ? c} Be focated an a gealogic un[t or soil tt�at is unstable, or tha#wauid � become unstable as a resuft caf the project,and potent[afly result in an- x or off-s'ste fandslide, lateraf spreading, subsidence, liquefaction, or � col]apse? e d} Be located o�expansive soil,as defined in Table 18-�.-8 of the Uniform x � ; Building Code{3994},creating substantial risks to lifie or property? � � � e} Ha�e soifs incapaEafe af adequately supporiing the use af sep#ic tanks or x � a[terr�atiue wastewafier d isposal systems where sewers are not avai3a61e � for the disposal of waste water7 � � �s �fSCt#SSiOtI: � i: � � a,c, d} There are no AEquist-Pricrlo earthquake faufts desi�nated in the Redding area c�f Shasta Cc�c�nty. There are ncs other dc�cumented � earthquake fau]ts in the immediate vicir�ity that pose a significant risEc,and the site is€acated in an area designated in the Health � and Safety Element of the�enera!Ptan as having a low ground-shaEcir�g potential. The project is not Ic�cated c�n ar near any doc�menteci landslide hazard areas,and there is nc�evidence of ground slippage ar subsidence occurr€ng naturally or�the site. � ` The type of soils and t�nderlyi�tg geofogy is identified as having rta potential fr�r[iquefactic�n. The site is located o�tside of the � �' 100-year floodplain of Churn Cree[c which is located on the praperty fic�the north and east of this site. � b� The project site cantair�s three sail classiFications including Churn grauelEy loar�n{CeA},Newtcsn gravelly loam{NeD},and i�ewt+an � gravelly loarn{Ne�2). The developable areas afthe sutadivision are those sails eontained within the CeA and NeD c(assificafiions and � are characterized by slopes of zero to 3 percent and 15 to 30 percen�,respective(y. The rnajority afthe site,CeA,is well drained soi[ � and has moderately sEaw permeability. Runoff is slow ar�c(the hazar�d far erc�siar�is none to slight. 5oi(s in the western partic�n of � ;; the deve[apn�ertt are cansidered NeD and a]sa have slow permeability; hr�wever runc�ff is medium antl to hazard of eros€on is � maderate. The sfop'tng areas in northwest cc�rner c�f the site that wil(be preserved and undeve[c�ped ecrntain NeE2 soils that have = slopes of 30 ta 50 percent Permeabr(ity is slow and rur�aff is rapici,however,nc�grading or graund disturbance is proposed in this � area. Proposed grading consists af that necessary for ccrnstruction s�f the units and internal dr�veways on the lower terrace. A � retaining walf is propc�sed at the base of the s[ope and between unifis as necessary for canstructiort of units. � � � Packet P 6S I 5-2017-00239 Live Oak Subdivisian l2 �° City of ftedding Development Services Departrnent Planning Pivlsion initiaE Study � The project is sutaject ti�certain erosic�n-control reqctirements mat7dated by existin�City and State regulations.These requirer�tents � include: �i � ♦ City of Redding G`rading Urdinance. This ordinance requ�res the app(ication of "Best Managernent Prac#ices" {BMPs) in � accardance with the City Erasicrn and Sediment Cantraf Standards t7esign Manual{Redding lVtunieipa)Cc�de Secfiion 16.12.�6t}, � Subs�ctions C, D, E}. In practice, specific erasion-cantrc�l measures are determined upon review of the final praject improverr�ent plans and are tailor�ed to prsaject-specific�rading impacfis. , ♦ Catifornia Reglonai Water Quafity�oard"Construction Activity5tc�rrn Water Permr't."This permit somewhat overlaps tFre City`s ' Grading C7rcfinance pravision by applying state standards for erosicrn-eor�trc�i measures during consfiruction of the project. � � Cali�ornra Regiana! Wai�er t2uality Coni�ro! Bvard "Prc�ject Storm Water Pc�!lution Frever�tic�n Plan �S�iVPPP)." This plan �ci emphasizes storm water best rnanagement practic�s and is required as part af the Construction Activity Stc�rrn Water Permit. � The objectives of fihe SWPPP are ta icientify the saurces of sediment and other poflutants that affectthe quality of storrn water a discharges and ta describe and ensure the imp[ementatian c�f practiees tc�r�educe sediment and c�ther pc�i(utants in st4rm water � dis�harges. � # �'afifcrrnia Departrnent af Fish and Witdtife "36C1C1 Agreerrtertt." This natification is requireci for any wot�k within a defined streambed. ♦ U.S.Rrrrty corps af�ngineers Natr`vnwide Permit. A new Nationwicfe 29 Permifi(residential d�ve[oprr�ents}wif f be req��ired�ro� � the U.S,Army Carps of Engineers to address impacts tc�jurisdicfiianal waters, gi ;� a� � Acti�ns for cc�mpliance with tFiese regulat'sons are addressed uncter standard ccrnditic�ns of approva[,which are unifc�rmly app(ied tc� � aEl iand development projecfis.Since the praject is subject to un€forrnly applied ordinances anc! pa(icies and the averali risk o� � erosion is]ow, potential irr�pacts reiated to saiE erasic�n and sedimentation are Iess than significant. � � i e} The prapased projeet does not invalve the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater dispasal. No impa�t has�aeen identified. � � Dacumentation: Cr'ty of Redding Nealth and 5afety E7ement,frgures 4-1(Graund Shaking P�tentialt and 4.2(Lrquefactiart Pc�tentiat� e City of Redding Generai Plan Final�ravironmentaJ impact Reperrt � C�ty of Reddirag Genera!Plata Backgraund Rep�rt,1998 � City of Redding Grading Ord�nance, RMC Chapter 16.12 � � City of Redding 5tandard Specificatians,Gradir�g Practices � i CEty of Reddfng Standard Conditions of Approval tor Subdivisions � i So�l Survey of Shasta County Area,Unified States l7epartment of AgricuEture,Sail Conservat�c�r�Service and Forest 5ervice,August 1974 � Division af Mines ar�d �ealogy Specia!Publicatian 42 � State Regional Water QuaEity Cantrol Baard,Centrai Va(ley Region,ftegulations related to Consfiructic�n Activity Storrn Water P�rmits and � Storm Water PoElution Frevention Plans °� Letter from Central Valfey Regional Water Quality Control Board,datect Mareh 16,�t}�.7 � Mitigation: � Riane necessary. '� � Potentially Less-Than- Less-Than- Na � VII. GR�ENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS:Wou1d the pro1ect: 5ignificant Significant With Significant Impact � Impact lViitigatian tmpact � Incorpc�rated � �` � �; a} Generate greenhouse gas ernissions,either directly or indirectly,that may x � have a significant irnpact crn the�nvironmenfi? � b} Conflict with an app(icable plan, poficy or regulation adoptecl fgr the x � purpose af reducir��the emissians of greenhouse gases? � c� � � 5-2017-OQ239�ive C?ak Subdivision 13 ��C�{��. �� C'sty ot Redciing Qevelopment 5ervices Department P�annirrg t�ivisiot� lniCial Stiudy � � ' Ctisc€tssi�r�: � ' � �a a} Irs 2f�05; tl�e ��verncsr of�a(if�irnia sigr�ed Executive C�der 5--3-(}5, esta�(ishing that it is t�ie State of California's gc�al tti reduce � stat�wide green�sause�as{�;HG}emi�sion 1�vels:Subsequen�I�,�r�2C#06,th�Califc�rnia State L��islature adoptect Ass�rnb3y Bil�A�S 32; �a the CaEifcrrnia C�lobal Warming 5o�uticsns Act. 9n part,AB �2 �eqc�ires the Cali�arnia Air Resour�es E�c�ard to develcap and adopt � regt�3�tions to achieve a reducti�an in t�ie Stat�'s�Flt�emissions tc�year�:�9{]leve3s by ye�r�t7�tl. �a[ifornia Sena�e�i115�97 estalalished th�t a��indlvictu�l project's effect csr►GNC�ernissii�n levels ancig[r�ba(warrnin�must�e assessed ; c€nder C�t�A,SB9T further directed t�at the�tate�ffice af P(�nnir��and Ftesearch�C}P�tj cfevelcap�uide[ir�es f�r tl��ss�ssrr�enC crf a � proj�ct's�Ff�err�issic�r�s.7hras�guicle(ines fcsr�F�G emissians�nr�re su�asequerttly ir�clud�d as amendm�nts to th�C�QA Guicf�Cines: � � The guide3ir�es did rttrt establish tt�reshc�lds of sigrrific�nce and there ar�currently no st�te, reg€r�naC,�c�untyf c�r�ity guir�e(inas t�r � i thresholds w�th�,v#�ich to ciirect proJect-(evel CECEA review.As a r�s�rlf,the City of�edding has utiE�zed the�est av�il�bCeinfrarrn�tion , ; tcs�eve#e�p a t}�resh�ld unti]a specific quant€tative threshoicf is a�o��e�by th�state c�r regianal air district. a� a �1s the Lead Agency, #he �ity tia� opt�d tc� uti6ize a quantitafiive nor�-zerc� project-$pecific threshc�[d using a methoctolcrgY ; recomrnended by the Cal€fornia A;ir PcrlEutic�n C�ff€cers{CAP�tJA}�nci accepted b�r th�C�liforr�ia Air R�sc�urces�oarci.Acccsrdin�to ; CAPCC3A's Threshvla,�:;�, C`AR8 R�p�rting Threshatd, 1tJ,t}O�l r�etric tons c�f carbc�n��3ic�xi�e ec�uivalents per year{rntCC�2eqlyr� is ' ��ecc�mrnent3ed�s a quantitative non-�xerQ t�tresi�old.Accc�rding t�the�AP�C�A,this threshr�ld would be equiva6�nt to 550 cfw�llin� � � units,40�;i�Qt7 square feet csf office use,S2E7,�t�t3 square feet of retai[,e�r 7CI;(3C�t}square feet of st�permarket u�e.�'his apprc�ach�s � � # �stirrgate�tc�capture c�ver half the f��ure resid�nt'saC and c�mrnercial d�velopmen�prc�jects and is c(esi�ned ta suppc�r�tl�e�c�als c+f A�32 an�ricrt hinc��r if. � � � ' T�e t�nited S�ates Envi€��nrr�entai€�rat�ctic�r�Agency(EPA�ideritifies fc�ur primaryc�rn�ti�uenCs that ar�me�st repres�nt�tive�f the � GF�G�missicrns.T�rey are. � � as + ��rbc�rs Diox�de{CC3x�: Emit�ecf primari(y thrciugh t�re b�rning�f fc�ssil fueEs:t�thersc�urces inc€�cfe th��i�rning�fscrl€d�aste � and wc�crd ar�dJor wc�crd prc�duet�and cernent rt�tanufa�turing� o • Methane{Ct1�). Erniss�c�ns�ecur durin�the prc�duc�ican and trans�c�i�t c�f f�€els,such as cc�a( and natcrr�l gas.Addit�c�n�l � ; � err�issions are generated f�y liv�sto�k and agri�u3tural land uses,as we11 as the decornpc�sitian of solid w�ste: � ` + Nitrous �3xide {N�C��: The pr�ncipaf ert�itters inclu�e agricul�ural and indu�tr�al land uses ar�d fc�ss�€ fuel artd w�st� � combustiot�. � "' � I' • �lur�rinate�Gases: Tl�ese can b�err�itted c3urEn�s�irne industri�l acttvities;Als�; r��ny csf tl�ese gases are subsCifiutes for � t; a� i�zc�ne-depEetin�substances,such as C�C's,wh�ch have E�een�ased�ristoric�Ily as refrigerants�Gc�llectively;t�es�gasc�are � n often referred to as"high g��ibal-war�°nin��c;Cent�al,,ga�es. °� as � ' '�he primary ger�erators c�f G��emissions in the t�nited States ar��lectriclty�ener�tion and tr�nsp+a��atic�n:The EPA estim�tes t�a�near(y � ; 85 �re�cent c�f the nation's GH� emissions are c�rnprised of car�a�an clPc�xicle (GC?�}. The rr�ajority of CC?x is �enerated by petroleurrt � cc�rssurnptic�r�associated with transpc�rtation anr�eoai c�nsumptian assc�ciated with e]ectricity generat€an:'t'he re�ainin�err7Pss�ons are �; �redo�iinately tt�e result af rratur�l-gas ce�t�surn�tian associated with a variety�f uses� � � � ; Wifih regard t� the pr�ject�the predc�mir��nt assc�ciated GHG is �Cs� generated by m�tor-vehicle travel t� and fror�� th� sit�:Te� a � ;; substar��ially Eesser degr�e,the proj�ct wfl!resu�t in CN�emissic�ns assc�ciated with use of electric pe��ver gei�er�ted�y t�te Redding E[ec�rEc � i �..ltility�RE�t},t�rou��s'st sh�auld Ia��otect that REU d�strik�utes power from a variety�f�c�urc�s,fncluding l�ydraelectric,wind,ancl r��t�r�( �. l,' gas: � � ; Accordir�g te�t�e Ca�ifc�rr�ia Air Pcr(lutic�n��rntresl t7fficers Ass€�ciafiion's{CA�C�A�pub[`s�atitrn; C�t�A crnd�limate Ghange;published in °� �lan�aary 2�t�8; tf�ere �s�urcent[� nnt a sir�gle cc�rt�put�r rr��de�that is capa�il�of estimating�IC of a pr�j�ct"s ct�rect and indire�t��1G � ; emissic�ns.However,#F�e Urban�rr�issic�ns Ivt+adel{tJR�EM(S}is Ii�CeCy the mc�st consistently useci�ric�del t�estimate a prc�ject's direct�FiG ` �17!€SSIC7TIS.�.1�B�E�1I1$!S C�E'St�11�{'�$t�CYIt�{��E'_TT1f5Sff}Yt8 35SCYCf��t�WIt�I f��'V��t3�3T]'t�t7t C}�Ut"�?c�il��C1C�CiSE?S.[.1RBE��S d��LYCk��S fi�SLiCfttYl��IZP. � �. criteria air pcil�utants �nd Ct�� eraaissi�ns t�at w�uir� o�cur during�per�tic�n c�f new deve�c�prnent. URBEt�11S �vas devel�{a�c� and is � �pprc�v�d fcsr statewid�use by CA;RB,Or�e r�ft��e shorlfalls o#UR��MI�is thafi the rrsode�does nc�t cc�nta`sn emission factc��s for�H�s other � ;` t�san�C}��xcept for m�thane{CH�}frc�m rnobile sources,wh`sch is converted to�C7�.This may not be a�najor prc�blem since Ct��is the � ; most intp�rtar�fi�NG from land d�ve€opm�nt projects. i; s-ao�.7-ooz��.�ve c��s�,�a�v��o�; �.� Pa�ket Pg.68 City of Redding I�evelopment Serv�ces Department Pla�ning Divisia� initial 5kudy � The emissians frorr�the project as indicated by the�R6EMIS rnodel are signifieantly laelow the City of Redding's air q��a(ity thresholds,as � , w�ll as GH�emissions threshofds put fc�rth by CARS.Ther�fore,the praject will not con�ribute significantly to GNG emissions irt the air � basin, No rnitigation measures are required. However,in an effart to reduce any potentia(con#ribution tQ negative effects frram�NG � emissions,�he project inccarporates elernents that serve to reduce vehicle-miles traveled,the main project evntrlbutar c�f GNG emissions, � ' and implernents the State Attarney General's reeammended measurEs ta reduce GN�ernissians as fol(aws:2 � Projecfi FeaturesjRegulations a. The prc�ject is loeated adja�ent fa and withFn walk�ng distance of tE�e majcrr Regiona(Commereial district in Redc(ing seruing the shopping r��eds�f the comrnunity incEud�ng this devefoprr�ent. � b. bld Alturas lioad and the praject site is served by severa)bus routes and is apprc�ximately,7 mile fre�m the Redding Area Bus c� Authority Canby Road Transfer S�atir�n,facilitating use of�ransifi options throughout the City, c� c. The project will pravide connection to existing bicycle facilities along O{d A(t�ras Raad and Browning Street and w�lf enec�urage p bicycle use by residents in the development. d. 1'he project will be reguired to p[ant one new tree for every 5t�t}square Feefi of enclosed gross living area,v,rhich wil(prc�vicie a a� coaling effect, [essening energy use,and sequester�ng CCt�. ' e. Starage and collecYian areas w�ll be provided fe�r recyclabfe materia3s and the prr�ject will cornply with c�tFrer rec�uirements in th� statewide adapted California�reen Building Standards Code. � On a larger scale,the City af Redding's General Plan ackr�crwledges that land use decisians have an impact can c[�rr�ate and air quality.Land � use decisions that result in law or very Ec�w density t�n the periphery of the comrnunity increase the amount af uehicle-txxi(es traveled � {VMT},which increases ve�icfe er�issin�s.fn response ta this irnpact,the City's 6enerat Plan includes a number of gaals and palicies in the � ' Community Develapment and pesign Element,Transpartation Elesr�ent,and Ho�tsing Element that prcrmote a compact urban forrn and � � encaurage infill devefapment,advocate h�gher housing density,and ensure connectiv[ty ta cifiywide biEceways and pedestr9an plans.The � goa!of these poEicies is to reduce VM1",which also reduces emissians and reduces a wic[e variety of air quality impacts.5ince autarnabi[es � � ' are considered a rnajor source of GHG ernission,each vehicle trip reduced alscr reduces GH�emissians. � 1 CPCOA websi#e,July 19,2010 �California Offiee of the Attarney General,"The Caiifornia Environrnental Quality Act Adctressing 6(aba(Warrning(mpacts at the�oca[ o Agency Leuel,••updated May 2�.,2008. � t�oc�tttentatic�n: `�` City of Rer�ding Generaf Plan,2000 � URBEMIS(2�07,v 9.2.4}Air Quality Cornputer Model � _ � � Mitigation: � Nar�e necessary. �s � � i;: P4tentially I,ess-Than- Less-Than- No � '` VIII.HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS:Wautd the prajecf: Significant Significant With Signiftcant Irnpact � lmpact Mitigatian Impsc# lncarporated � � a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment thraugh the � routine transport,use,ar d'tsposal of hazardaus materials? x � 6) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment throtagl7 � reasonabfyforeseeable upset and accidentcanditians involvingti�e release x � af haaardaus materials inta the env�ronment? � as c} �mit hazardous emissio�s or har�dEe haaarcfous or acutely hazardous � materials,substance5,or wa5te within one-quarter mi[e of an ex€sting or x proposec€schoo[? � � � I;` d} Se located an a site which is inciuded crn a(ist of hazardous materials sites � 1,;' cornpiled[aursuartt to Governrt�ent Code Seetlon 65962.5 and,as a result, x wou[d it create a significant hazard to the pula]ic or the envir4nment? � � ;z P'�ckef Pg. 69 � 5-2017-OQ239 Live Oak Subdivision 15 � City of Redding [�evelapment Services Departrne�7t Planning�}ivision Initial Study � CJ ' Potentially Less-Than- Less-Than- No � Vltl,HAZARDS AI�[?IiAZARDCtU5 NIATEi21At5:Wauld ifre�rroject: 5ignificant Sign�ficant With Signi#ican# tmpact � tmpact Nli#igatic�n impaet � � Incorporaked � e) For a projectlocated withan an airport larrd use plan or,where such��lan � has�ot been adopted,wifihln two miles of a public airpor�ar public t�se � airport,would the projecfi result in a safety hazard far peaple residing or working in the praject area? � f} For a �rr�ject within the vicinity of a private airstrip, waulc!the projecfi °� result ir�a safety hazardfor peopfe resid'sng ar working in the project area? � � � g} Impair impfementation af or physically 'tnte�ere witl� an adopted emergency respons�plar�or erne��gency evacuation plan? � � � � ; h} Expose people ar structures to a significanfi risk af lass,injury,or death j invalving wildland fires, including wher� wilr3lar�ds are adjacent to x I urbaniaed areas,or where residences are ir�termixed with wiidlands? ; � i � Discussian: � ca � ; a,b,c,d} The nature of the praject as reside�rtial ho�sing does not presersfi a signi�cant risk re(ated to hazardaus materEals s�r emissie,ns. � There�s no documented haxardous rnateriaE sites[ocated on ar near the project. � � � e,f) Th� pre,ject is located autside the established �ppraachldeparture elear zc�nes for Redding Municipal Airpc�rt. The project's � residentiaE land use would not conflict with operatians of the Airport or present a safety hazard to people res€dirsg in the subdivision. � ! There are no private airstrips in the project v9cinity. ? � j g} The project does not involve a use or activity that cou(d interfere with emergency-response c�r emergency-evacuatic�n plans f�sr th� � ; � area. � h} The oak trees on the sloping hillside in the narthwest carrrer af the site would be preserued, hawever,the area does not have � significant fire fuel, and the►�efore, would not have a wildland fire-hazard pofient€aL The project site 9s lacated c�utside of the � boundary af the uery high-fire hazard severlty zone. � � i' r. Documentat�on: � �' City of Redding�eneral Plan, Nealth and Safe#y Elernent,�OU(7 ! � � f: � Mitigation: None necessary. � � � �s Fo#e�ttial#y Less-Than- Less-Than- M1io � r IX.MYDROLOGY AND WAT�R QUALITY: Would the project: Significant Significant With 5ignificant tmpact ' Irnpaef NFitigation Impact � �; Incorparated � i` � ,: � i; a} Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? x � ;; � 6} Substantially deplete g�Qundwater supplies or ir�fie�€ere substantiai(y with graundwater recharge such that there wouid be a new deficiC in aquifer voEume ar a lawering of the local groundwater table levei(e.g.> � � the production rate of pre-exisfing nearby welis wauld drap to a level � whieh wauld nofi support existing land uses or planned uses for wnich � permifis have been granted)? � � � ;; S-2Q17-OC}239�ive Oak SuE�division 76 ��.�� City o#Redding Developrnertt Services Department Planning bi�isian iriitial Study � C.� � PatentiaEly Less-Than- t,ess-Than- Nc� 1X.HYDRC}Lt3GY AN�7 WAT�R QUALITY': Woufrl the profect: Significant SignificanC With Signiffc�nt tmpact � (mpact iVlitigation irrtpact � lncorporated � � c} Substantialfy after the exist'sng drainage pattern of tF�e site or area, � including through the alteration c�f the course af a stream ar river,in a X manner wf�ich would result ir�substantial erosion ar sFltation nn-c�r c�tf- site? � d} Substantial[y al#er tFte existing drainage pattern of the site or area, `°� ineludi�g through the alteration oP the course nf a stream or river,or x � substantia]Ey increase the rate or amount af st�rface rur�off in a manr�er � whicf�would resu[t in flooding an-or nffsite? � e� Create or contribute runflfE water which wauld exceed the capacity of x � existing or planned stoem water drainage systems or pravide subsfiantial o � additiana�sources af polluted rur�aff? i i f) Otherwise substantia[ly degrade water quality? � � � g} Place housing within 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a � Federal Ffnnd Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or otF�er x � $ flaad hazard delineation map? � i � ' h} Place with'rn a 7.Q0-year flood hazard area strucfiures which would impede ar redirect flaad ffows? x � � i� Expase people nr structures to a s'sgnificant risk of lass,injcary,ar death in�alving flc�ading,includ'sng flaoding as a result nf t�te failure af a levee x � or dam? J} Enundation by seiche,tsunami,or mudflow? � o � � dlSGU951CTC1: � � ' a� Since the project�tauld be ser�ed�y City sar�itary sewer service,fihe project wcsuCd��ot invc�lue any p�rrnitted ctisc��r��s c�f waste � ; � � materia] into ground or surface waters. � � 6} The prolect would utilixe City water service far dc�mestic uses and fire �rotection. The prapc�secl proj�ct would not irnpact �' groundwater supplies. � � � c,f� Th�project is subject to standard requiremer�ts ciefined ur�der Section VE.,Geafogy and Sc�ils,abc�v�that rnin�miz�the�atential fe�r � erosion or siltation an�ar off-site. The�na€improvernent p(ans far the project must afso incorpc�rate specific design measures intended ta fimit pollutant discharges irt storm water fram urban impraverrtertts as estabfished underthe 5tate's Nafiianal Pc�llutant � ; Elimination Systerr�(NPD�S}general permit,whieh the City is now abligatec[to follow in accardance with State Vilater Quality Control � � Order No.2003-t�Ci05-DWCt. All starm water runoffwill be conveyed to an undergr�aund detentic�nJir�fi[tration facility located in the � area of the praposed comrnan area where it wil!be treated for both storrrt water quaEity and quantity. Low#!ow filtration trenches � ; will 6e constructed thraughout the detentian/infi(tratian basin and the private underground system stc�rm drain system. Feasil�le � �. Best Management Practices(BMPs}wauld be incorporated in the fina3 desigt�of the prcr}ect's storm-drain system,as apprt�ved bY � the City Engir��er,based on the BMPs listed in the latest edition of the Califarnia Storrn Water Quality Associaticrn St�rm Water Best � Managemertt Practices NandEaoo[c. � � d,e}Storm water runoff from the project site flows ger�eralCy in a easterly direction from the gently s[c��ing area in nor�thwest corner of °° i the site toward Churn Creek. 5fiorm drairi impravements wi[I direct storm waters Ehrough the site tt�an au#fall in the norfiheast � ; E '; corner of fhe site which wii)then drain offsite ta the creek. City of Redding Policy 1806 requares that all subctiv�sion developtr�ent � � ir�clude storm water detention facilities des'sgned to maintain existing predevelopmen�rates af runoff during a 1t�-,25-,and 1t��-year � storrn e�ent with 6-hour duration. The project application includes a storm water hydre�[ogy analysis pcepared by Sharrah C�unlap � Sawyer,Inc.,dated January 30,2017 that incfudes use of ar�undergraund drain rock storm water detenfiion facility in the area of the prc�posed comrnon area that wil)detain runoff before canveying the metered runoff to Churn Creek. s-aos�-ooz�s��V�oaxs�,�d�UE��or, �7 P'�ckef Pg.71 City af 12edding bevelopment Seruices Department Plar�ning D€vision initiai Study � � � g,h,i) The 1.Ot�-year floacfplain boundary af Chcrrn Creek is just ou�side the rrartheast property baundary. Nv encroachment in the � floodpCain will acctar with the project. � '� � jJ The�hreat oF a�sur�ami wave is r�ot appEicable to inland,central vaEley comrnur�ities such as Redding.Seiches cc�ulc3 pc�t�ntially be � generated in either Shasta or Whiskeytawn�.akes during an earthquake.However,r�either lalce has been�dentified irt the Nealth and 5afety Element of the General Plan as having any risk to the City under such circumstanees.7here is nc,documented threat of rnudflows affecting fihe project site. � � Uacumentation: �a C'ity o�'Reddirrg Genera!Plara Backgraund Repo,rt,Chapter 1C7,Health anc[5afety Elernenfi, 1998 Federal Ern�rgency Management Agency Flaodplairt regu[afiions,FIRM map 06089C�.55�1G,dated Marc�17,�C11.1 � Cfty of Redding Storm Drain Master Pfan, Mon�gomery-Watson �ngineers 1993 � ' O�d Alturas Multi-Far�tily Entifilernenfi Level Storm prain Analysis,prepare by Sharrah Dunlap Sawyer, Inc.,da�ed.Ianuary 3f�,202.7. 0 Mitigation: Nane necessary. � � � Fptentialty Less-Than- Less•Than- Na � X.I.AND US@ AND PLANNITUG:Wtrutd#he project: Significant Significant With Significant Impact � lrnpact �Viitiga#ictn Impatt inecarporated ,� ; � a} Physically divide an estabNshed eommunaty? x �' � b) Conflict wit17 any app3icable land use plan, palicy,or regulatian of an � ; agency with jurisdiction over the project{including,but not limited to the general plan, speeific plan, local coastal pragram, or zonSng ardinance} adapfied for tl�e purpose of avoiding or mitigating an X � � environmental effect? � � � c} Confliet with any applicak�fe habitat conservation plan ar natural � � x � community conservat�on plan? :� f scs � � � Discussion: � � a) The project is a multiple�family developrnent[ocated in an area that is xoned€or this use,and is surround�d by other similar or � campatible�ses. Residential single-farnily neighborhoods are separated f�om this�leve[apment by�rivate open space and grade � separatior�to the north and Churn Creek to the east. Therefore,the prc�ject does r�c�t have the poten�ial to physica[ly div9de an � estabEished comrnunitY. � ; � i c� ; b} The praject is compatibCe with the applicable poiicies and regulations of the City Gerrera]�'(an�nd�onirrg C3rdinance and is n�rt in � canfliet with any other Plan adapfied by a jurisdictiona!agency far the purpase of avc�iding csr n�itigat€ng an envir�nmental effect. = � c} There is no habitat conservation or naturaE cammunity conservation plans that are ap�licable tc�the site. � Documenta#ion: � as � City of Redding 6er��ra!Plan,Cornmunity De�elopment�lement,200(} I: City of Reddirtg Generat Plan Environmental lmpact Report, 2000,SCH#199$C1721C13 City of Redding General Plan,Naturaf�teso�rces�lement,2Q{l0 � � � � c� � r S-2017-Q4239�ive Oak Subdivision 18 ��k��,�� City of Redding Devel�aprnent 5ervices#�epark�rtent Plar�n�ng bivision Initi�l5tudy � �I�Igr��ICt2"1: �8 � �IOP��t1GC2SSaP'�+: tJd � s� � P'otentially Less=Than- l�ess�Than- No � }{1. IV1[NEt�AL R�St)U�tC�Si�tould fhe prQj�ct; Signific�nt Significarat With Signifisant Impa�t � I�npact �ttigatic�n Impact Inccerporated a} Res�#� ir� the Ics$s of availa�rilltiy c�f� kr�c�wn mineral rescr�aree that x � wauttt�ae of value to the region and th�residents�f the 5tate? � � bj �es��1t in the Cc�ss c�f availability of'a I�cally-in�pc�rtant minerai � r��caurce rectrvery site d�lir�eated i�n a loca[General Plan,specif3c x plan or erther land use plan� ° ' [)isecassion: , 8 a,�a}The presject site is r��t�derrtifiecl in the Genera3 Pl�r�as havin�any knc�wn rr�irs�ral�r�sc�urce value e�r as being locatec(wit�,€rr any "Crit�cal l�ir�eral Resc�urce�}v�rlay"area. � � I?ocumentativn: °� City o�#�edding General Plan, IVatural Resc�urces�lerneri�;2t?�� a�' � Mitigat�vn: �l�r�e necessaryt � � � � ; 1�0�@P2#Ic��tif �.�55-�"�4c"3�1- �.@SS-��'l�CI- �O � i XII. N�ISE: ErVoutd the presject result ira: S�gnific�nfi Sigr�ificartt 5igr�ifi�ant 1m�sact ; Impact With Impact e l�lliti�atior� � Incorprarated � ' a} Expc�sure c�f persr�ns to r�r gen�r�tian caf nc�ise levels in excess � of standards esta��ished in the [csca( general p�an c�r noise x � c�r�inanc�.or applicab€e standards c�f c,th�r ag�neies? � I � ; b} �xpc�sure caf persons tc�ar generati�n c�f ex��ssiv�grt�und- � k�r�rne vibratE�an or grouncl-bc�rne rrais�l�ve]s:� � � c} A substar�tial perre�an�nt increase�n ambaent ne�ise l�ve€s in � r. the pr��ect vEcin ity a��ve levels e�isting urithc�ut tl�e pr�ject? � � �� A su�st�ntial t�rn�c�rary�r peri�dic increase�n ami�i�nt noise � levels in the�rrc�j�ct vicinity�k�c�veleuels ex[�tir�g without the x � � project? _ : � . �� Fc�r a pre�ject Incatec� w�thin an air�ort 1an� us� p[an or, � : where such a plan h�s raot been adopted,within twc�miles c�� a pubiic �irport or public us� airp�rt, wouEd the prc�ject x � ". exp�rse pec�pl� resid�ng c�r wc�rkin� in the project area to � excess�ve nc�ise l�v�[s? � � ;; � (; f� For a �r�ject with€n the vicinity of� private airstri�,wc�uld � the p�'oject expc�se people cesiding or wt�rking irt the prc�ject x � area to excess�ve r�oise levels? � ` � ; c� � � � S-2Ci�'�-0(1239 L'at�e Oak Subdivision 39 ��}{��. �� City of Redding Deve(opment Services DeparYmenk Planning Divisicrn initia)St�ady {af5CUS51Uri: ,.�, fn? � �,b,c} The City c�f Redding G`enera!Plan Noise ECen�ent estabiishes 60 dB �dn as the stendard aeceptab(e exterior naEse leve[ for � residential iand use and 45dB�dn far interior noise levels(40c(B in sleep�ng areas�. The pro�ect site is lacated ne�rthwest of C�3c( � Alturas Road and Victor Avenue and the exis#ing noise environment is defined primarily by traffiic on fl!d Alturas Road. An �� acousfiieal analysis was prepared for the subdivision project by 5axelby Acoust�cs,dated Navember 27,20�.7. To quantify the �' existing amE�ient noise environment an the project site,Saxelby Acousties conducted a ne�ise rneasc�rernent suruey. The study � then utilized the Federa!Highway Administra�ir�n Traffic Noise Predic�ion Made(to estimate future traffic vo(urnes fc�r tl�e year 2037 using a one pereent increase per year aver existirrg{2012)claily traffic volumes abta�ned fram the City af Redding Public Works Deparfimer�t. The study also taak into consideration the setbac[c tc�the prflject�iuildings and accounted forthe prc�posed �, 6-foot-tall sound wall that would be canstrueted c�n either a S-for�t-tall retaining wafl c,r graded slope adjacent tQ the street. ' Traffic noise levefs at tP�e individt�al first fEoor patios for lots acEjacent to C?!d Alturas Roacf would be 60 dBA C��,while the graup � ' gather�ng outdaor activity areas would be 55 dBA��„vr(ess. Therefore,wifih the installafiion of the standard sc�[id arfieriai b[ock , walf noise barrier,traffic naise would be attenuated to an acceptable[eve[. Based on a typica(2S d�exteriQr ta interior nnise � level reduction achi�v�d Eay modern builc[ing canstruction,an interior noiselev�f of4�d6A L�„wauld be excepted,therefare,nc� �' ' interior noise cantrol measures would be required to achieve carnpliance w€th tF�e�ity's interior nc�ise levef standards. ° There are no nan-transportatian-related or vibration-generating s�aurces ir�the genera!vicinity of the prc�ject. � d) During the construction c�f the prapc�sed prcyect,there will be a�emporary increase in ncrise in�he praject vicinity above existing � arnbient naise levels, The most noticeable construction r�aise will be re(ated ta gracfing,utility excauatian,and[and-cfearing a�tivity. � The City's Grading(7rdinanee{RMC Chapter 16.12.1.20.H)lirnits grading-pertt`tit-authar3zed activities tca between the hours of 7:C30 � a.m,and 7:00 p.m.,Mor�day through Saturday. No operations are ailowed on Sunday. Sinee heauy canstructic�n wark associated with the praject is fimited in scape and!ay existing regulation,fihe anticipatecf ncrise impact to neighbc�ring residents is ccrnsidered � � less than significant � � j e,f} The proposed subdivision site is not located within any of the naise eontours af Redding Mur�icipa! Airport and is lacat�d �' appraximately 5 miles frorn the Airport. There are no private airstrips Pn the vieinity of the project site. z A Ltocumentation: City of Redding G'eneral P/ara,Noise Elernent,2000 �` i City of Redding Grading Urdinance Redding Municipat Cc�de,Sect�c�n 3.6.12.220 � ; City of Redding General Pfan,Transportation Element,20�0 � E Cr"ty of Redding Zonfng t7rdrnance iiedding Municipal Cocle,Sectian�.8.�t}.200 � � City of Redding Municipat Airport Area Platt � _ Li�e Oak Estates Residentiaf,prepared by Saxelby Acoust�cs,dated November 27,2017 � � Mitigatian; � None r�ecessary. aa � �! Fotentially Less-1'han- Less-Than- Na � r XIII. POPUI.ATICIIV AIUD NOUSING:Wou/d the praject: Significant Signi#icant WiCh Signi#icant [mpact � Impact ltllitigation Impact m Incorparated '; � _ � I: a} Induce substantial population grawth in an area,either directly i; {for example, by propasing new homes and businesses} or � �i indirectly {for exarnple, through extensian af roads or other � � t: infrastructure)? � ; � bj Disp€ace sabstantia[nurnbers of existing housing, necessitating the canstruction of re}alacerr�et7t housi�7g elsewhere? x � � c} Displace s�bstantiaf num�ers af people, necessitating the constructaan of replacement housing elsewhere? x � � � i; r: ;; Packet P 74 �: S-2017-t14239�ive Oak Su6div]sion 2Cl �` ' City of Reddin� #�eve3opn�ent S�rvices beparfiment Pianning Dtvision Initial Study �71SCU�S 90tt« �, � a,k�;c) The prc�ject woulti create oppc�rt�nity fc�r the ci�nstructi�n of n�w mu[tipfe-f�m"sly units as planrred and ant€ci�ated by the � Redding G'enerc�f_Plan. As �r�eviausly ns�ted, tl�e project 3s s�mi��r to other dev�laprrients �n the�rea c�r in char�ct�r v�rit�i � surroundin��and u�es.TI�e pra��ct�,�rc��ld not inc#uce�npEanr�ed pc�pulatican grow�h�ract does r��t pr�rpcase tE�e extension e,f any g� r�ew rc�ac�s�r uti{ities �t�t ant3cipated by the C�eneral Plan. The praject does not dis�[�ce substa��tial num�iers c�f people t�r � substantial numk�ers of existing�r�ausir�g:�'I�e prc�j�ct will be�r�vidin�hca�tsin�. � 13acumentation. �`rty vf Fiedding�'erret'al l'Icrn,�c��sirtg Ele�tent,Z�14- � ' Mit�g�t�on: � ' c� t�or�e necessary: � a � XtV. PUBI.IC S�RVICE�. Wauld the praject result in sub�tpntr'a! cadver's� Pc�tentially �.es��Th�n� L�ss-Than� No � physicaf imprrcfs ass+aciatect wr`th the provisTon c�f rreUv or physictr!!y caltererl Sigrt€f�c�nt Sigr�iffc�rrot With Significar�# Impact � gavernmeratcr!facilities, need far new or physically c�Itered gaver'n�renta! Impaet Mikigati[rn Crnp�� facifities; the canstrcrctio�r �f whicfr cr�u(d cause sigrtificant�nvircrnmentat Incorpcarated impacts, in c�rder to main�ain acceptab�e service rcrtios, r�spnr�se times r�r � other per�r�rmance ca6}ectisres for any nf the publieserviees: � � ; Fi�`£�CQ��CtIflC1? 7{ � i, Pcslice Protectir�n? x Schc�crls? x � � ' Parks? x � ; � , Other pu#�l�c facifities:� x � � � � Discussion: � � Fr're and Potice Pri�tec�r'on; ; � � The�ity�vc�uld provicfe pc�Eic��nd fir�p�-otectican�o�he�iri�ject fr�rn exis�i�rg facfl�t�es��d uncier�xist�rrg seru�c�Cevels:The siz�csf the E� project wc�uid n�at rnartdate the need for addit`sonal police c�r fire facilities. � �' � The prajectis subject tc�Cha�rter�6.�(7 of the R�dding Municipal Cade,w}�ic?�requi�es new r�eveloprrsent tQ p�y a citywide fire fac'slities- � ! im�aact fee calcu6ated to rniti�ate a proj�ct's f�ir share c�f cumuiat9ve im�aacts te�the City}s fir�-protect�on "snfrastrueture based u�on � ; impr�vern�r�ts necessary to acce�mr�odate new c�evelc�pment ut�der the City's G`er�era{PJar�. � � i ,; 5�h�iols: � � The proj�ctis Ioca�ed i�1 the E��terprise ElemerrtarySchoc�l[�istrict and Shast�Unicin H'sgh Schac�!�is�ri�t anc��ay contri�sut�to tl�e tc�t�) ,� stucient�nrt�llment in�hese districts.However,�sc�oca(-f�cility i�p�ct{in-19eta�fe�exists;as pravided under Stat�Caw that€s paid priorto tl�e iss�ance�f a bu�lciing�ermit fc�r eac�i resid�nt�el uni�to address schaol--facilityf�rrding necessitated 6ythe effec�s of gr�wth citywide. � Parks: � � � � The pro�ect will ntit ca�se a p�ey��ca[c�eterioratic�r�af an ex�stEng p�rk facility�r cause�n�duerse p}�y�ic�l im�a�t�s�c�ci�t�d with a new � ; parfc facility. The pro�ect Es s�bject tcr Chapter 16.2t7 af the Redding I�uni�i�al Cc�de,which requires new residentia�development tc��ay a cityv�ide parl�and recreation-facilities im�act fee ca3culated tc�mitigate a project's fair share c�f cumulative in�pae:ts�a the City's p�rks and � (^ recreation infrastr�ucture based upan ir�presvements ne�essary ta accomm�date n�w d�velopment under the City`s Gener�3 P(an, �ee � el�scussion undet'Iters�Xlt1��ecreatic�n)Eielaw. � � � i: ,. 5-2017-00239 Giue�ak Subdivisian 21 �"�C�B��.�'� City of Redd€r�g Pevelapment 5ervices flepartrnent Planning Division initiai Study � t)ther pubtic facr`!r'ties: � � s� See discussion under Item XVHI�UtiEities and Service Systems)below. � ' � [}ocumentation: � ' � Clty of R�dcfing Genera!Pfan, Public�acilifiies Elernent,2t300 ' Mitigatian: None necessary. � � Less-Than- [.ess-i'han- � Potentially No }(V.RECREATI4N; Significant $��nificenk With Significant E�pact � Impact Mitigat�crn lrnpact incorporated � B a) Wou[d the project inct'ease t�e use of existing neighborhood and x ' reg€onal parks or other recreational faci[ities such that substantiai physical deterioration af the facNity wou3d occ�r or be accelerated? � � { b} does the pro;ect include recreatianal facilities or require the °� consfiructian or expansion of recreational facilities wt�ich might Mave an x � adverse physical eff�ct on the envaranrnent? �. � ; Discussian: � � � a, b)T�re project will not cause a physica!deter-iaratian c�f an existing recreation faeility or cause an adverse�ahysical impaet assoeiated � � with a new recreation facility. Chapter 3.7.42 of the City's Subdiuision C�rdinance,Parkand Recrea�ionalLand Uedicatic�ns and In-Lfeu � �ees,requires that as a condit�on of appraval af a tentative map,a subdivEder shall either dedicate lanc(or pay a fee in(ieu therec�f for park or recreation purposes. In accordance w€th state subdivision law,oniy projects cantaining 50 or rn�re Icats may be required � ta dedicate land for park de�elopment. Therefare,the project proponent woulcl tae subject to tE�e in-l�eu fee that wi[I contribute to � providing or impro�ing recreational facilities througho�t the city. However,prc�pc�s�d underthe Planr�ed C�eveloprn�nt Plan fc�rthe � project are fiwo groups gathering areas that will provide residents with nutdoc�r space inefuding a smal(turf area,walking path, � benches and picniclbarbeque area for oufidoar gatherings and prc�vide recreational opportunities. � i � � Dacumentation: � City of Redding G'enera!Ptan,Natura!Resources�lernent,2000 C"ity of Reddrng�6eneral P�an,Recreation Element,2000 � ; ,. City of Reddrng Gerrercrl Ptan,Public Facilities�lement,ZQOQ c� � � Mifiigation: £ None necessary, � ` � � i.ess-Than- `� PotentialEy i.ess-Than- Na ?(VL TRANSPORTATION/TI2AFFIC.Wauld ti�e projeGt: Significant With � 5ignificanfi Significant tmpact � -' Impact 1Vli�igation ImpaeC � Incorparated � � a} Cause an increase in tra#fie which is substantia!in relation to the � existing traffic load and capacity a#the street system{i.e.,resu€t � � in a substantial increase in eithertFre number vf vehicle trips,the x volume-ta-capacity ratia an raads, or congestion at � intersectians}? � � � l:. ,: bj Exceed,�ittter individually or cumu4atiuely,a Ievel c�f service � standard established by the County congesfiian tnanagement x � agency for designated raads or highway? �' 5-2027-f10239 Give t}ak Subdivisi4n 22 �'�C{{�"��.�� ' ,< City of R�ddir�g I�evel�pment Services�epartm�nt Planning bivision 3nitial Sfiudy � ' � ' � ' less-Than- 9 Poten#�a11y less-Than- No XV[.TRANSPt7RTATl4�1V�TRAFFIC:4Nau1d the prQject: Significan#With � Signitic�nt Sigr�ifican# Impact � , Im act Mitiga#ion #rt�m a�t � Irrcorporated � � ' c� Resuft in a change in a1r traffic patterns, including eifi��er an x � €ncrease 3n fraf�Ic Ieve[s r�r a chan�� €n �o�ation tha� results in substantiaE safety risks? ci� 5ubstantEalfy increase hazards due tc�a design feature�e.g:,sharp � curves or t#�ng�rous intersectic�ns} c�r incc�snpatible uses {e.g., x farm equipr�renfi)? � � t�a � e} Result i�inadequate err�ergency ac�ess? x ; m I f} Res�tlt in inadequ�te p�rking capacity? x � i � ; 8 �� Conflict with adc�p�ed palicies, pians or programs supporting � � alt�rr��tive transportat�on(e.g,bus kur��o€�ts,b;cycie rac[cs�? � � €��scussiaar�. � � ' � ia,b,d� The Transpc�rt�t�c�n�lerr��nt c�fthe GeneralPlan est�blishes accep�able peak-hour"Leve�e�f Service"�L�S�criteria for roadv.iays � �nd intersectic�ns far us�in transpcartat€�n planning and pr��ect review: 1"he Lt3S rr��th�d��c�gy i�an�s�ablisY�ed way of ranki�g � � the�legree�f traffic-fla+u effic�ency�nd cc�rrgesti��s. �c��m�st af the�ity; l�t3�,`C„cir"�cc�ptal�le�el�y„ is identified as the � maxim�r�r�(1c�v+tab€e threshold befc�re a more congested ant�pc�ter7tiafly s€gn�fEcant traffic cc�r�dition r�ecurs. Frsr�t�te highway � interch�nge conr�ectic�ns with local streets,a maxlmum�.C��„t�,,c�r"tt�3era�[e delay„is esta�a{is[�ed. A thorc�ugh expEan�fiion of � ; �C�S n�eth�d�,l�r�;y is�rov��ed€n t�e'Cransperrtatic�n Element and the Trarrspcsrtati�n ane��irculatic�n Se�ion c�fthe�eneraf Ptcrrr � �nvi�-onrrr�ntal Irripacf}�eport{E€R�. � Access ta the subdiv�s�nnwc�uld�e derive�fr�ar�t�E�Altur�s R�ad i�two]�a�ations. Phase 1 and 2 woul�take a�cess fr�rtt th� � �vesterly�friveway shc�wrt r�n th�t�t�tative map u�hile Phase 3 would r�ecessitate second access that wau[d be►ocated at the � ! intersectic�n c�f t�Id Alt�a��as Rc�ad anci Victor Avenu�,es�entially fc�rming the fi�urth(e�ofthe al(-way stczp in�ersectic�n. Tr�heip � assess potentia[t�iS and traffic-ir�overner�t irrt�acts, �fc�cused Tra�fic trrrpact A�alysis t�Jemorancfum was pr�pared �y�mni g ;: Nleans,A C;H�Cc�m�ar�y,f�sr th�pt�t�jecf aricf ctated Septernber�7,2Q�.7: The merrro ar�alyzed pre�ject€mpacts cturing both A�I � ; �nd Ptv�p��k hour far i�t�th existing corrdit�ons and cumulative(Year 2037}ccsn��tic�ns fc�r the in�er�e�tic�n csf C7Id Al�uras Rc�ad � c� and Victc�r Av�nue anct�he prc�ject's westerly driveway. The irnpac��r�alyses iraciicates thatt�ie current�!d Alt�sr�s Rc,ad and � �; Victc�r Avenue �ntersecti�n oper`�t�s at an acee�atabE� I�vel irr the ex�sting�rt�! the existing plus pres�ect cond'€tic�n {��S �}, � �; liowever,c,perates�t ar�unaccept�ble I�ue�in tFse curnulat€ve c�r�ditic�n bQth w[th anci withc�ut the proje�t([�t�S�in the PM pe�k � �4 �ou�}. Nc�w�ver,the c�elay bet�nreen the cumu3ative conciition with�rtd witho�€t t�e prc�jeet is incre�sed by Cessfha�i 5se�onds `� {the City's thr�shald fc�r signif[car,ce}at an alr�ady unacceptab[e intersectic�n,therefore it we�uld nc�t be considered a signi�car�t °' impact associated�uith the praject�nd n�mitiga#ic�n is warr'anted. T�e�rc�ject's westerly d�-iveway hcawever wc�u(d c�perafie�fi � aceeptab�e lev�[s in ai1 c�r�dit9�sr�s; � � �: ��nstruction r�f a rcrundabaut at the�9c[A�t�r�s R�ad and Vietcsr Aven��i�iter�ectit�n;in c�anjurr�tic�n with a rnurrdabe�ut cc�rridor '' I �lon�bId Alturas fi�ca�d;is iden#ified�s a future pro�ect in the Gity's Ca�aital tmproverr�ent Plan:A pr�lirv�in�ry design l�yout has � beet�cot�npl�ted by�3rr�ni iVl�ans. Tl�is prelirnin�ry dessgn was utiPize�l wifih the tentative s�abdivisic�r�rna�layout in order to ensure tf�at actequate right-af-way far future improvements'ss p��avided as a cs�nditior�c�f recording t�se finai subdivisior�tnap:1f � ; t�e rc�ur�dabo�at has r�c�t been cc�nstrucfec(at th�ti�e af c�eve�opcnent ctF Phase 3 then a ternpora�y dr�veway wcsuPd need tcs�e � ' constructed tc� �ccess the project and provicfe seca�nd access with � min'srr�urr� c�f 2�}f�et in width. �i�nstruct(c�n oF prc�ject imprc�verr�ents wc�a�l�elirninate the existirrg driveway access�rorn the prerperty to the east�rad wa�rEd require that access�ie �, pr�vit�ed frc�rn the new prc�lect driveway. � ,_; r T#�e prr�j�ct��s�bj�ct�o Chapt�r Z6.2(l of the Redding Mc�nicipal Code,which requir�s new deve[t�prr�en�tc�pay a citywide � �rar�sportatic�n devel��rt�er�t i�pact fee caicula�:ed tc�mlti�ate a project'�faPr sh�r�of cumulative�rr�pacts te�the City's s�reet� � 5-20�:3-t10239�ive t7ak�uL�division 23 � �•. �'21C�C��"�.�� a; CitY of Redding Developmeni Services l�epar�tment Planning�ivision Initial Study � � and traffic-control infrastructure b�sed upc�� improvements necessary tcr accommodate new developrnent under the City's � �'enera!Ptan. � � c} The project sEte is Ic�cated outside the Approach Zones fc�r both the Redd'rng Municipal Airpc�rt anc!�enton Airpark;therefore, � there is na potential ta interfere with airport operatic�ns. No irrtpacts are�nticipated in this regard. � e} Tl�e Generaf Plan Health and Safety Policies H541�nd H�4I generally require that resicE�ntia)deve(opment having 50 c�r more dwelling units have at least two points af public-street access and that cul-de-sac s�r dead-end street lengths r�4t exceed 6Q�feet. � ; The praject includes a tofial af 64 fots and so second access is required. As noted above,access to the subdiuision wc�uld be � derived Frorn�Id Alturas Road in two Ic�cations. The westerly driveway would be provide adeq�ate access for the 4(l Ic�ts to be c�+ developed with Phase 1 and 2,however,deveEopment of Phase 3 wauf d necessitate seeond access that would be Iocated at the , intersection c�f t�fd Alturas Road and V�ctor Avenue, essentially farrning the fourth feg,�f the all-way stop �nfiersecti�n. The Redding Fire Marshal wo�fd requir�the secand access be a minimum of a 20-foot-wide ciriueway wh�ch we�u(d be adequate fc�r c� ernergency access and fire protection. f� DupEex units require a rninimum aF on�covered and one urtcovered parking spaee while�he 4-plex units tn+ould require up fio 2 j uncovered spaces. Adequate parkir�g has been provided tQ meet fil�e r��inirnurn and parkirr�would not be a significant impact. � � � � g} The City's Bakeway Actian Plan 203{7-2025 idenfifies Old Alturas Road as an existing Ciass 3 bikeway fihat is propc�sed to be upgraded tc� � Class 2 with develapment. Hawever,the City has just recently completed the Aetive Trar�sportatit�n P(an(ATP}that wc�u(d serve as an � update ta thafi pla�. That docurnent,whEch is in draft form and recently released for reuiew,identifies t�ld Alturas Road,as a Shared Use � Path which cauld consist af an S-foat-wide sidewalkf path shared by pedestriar�s and bicyelist,adjacent tc�tne roadway(i.e.side path)as � well as Buffered Bike Lanes. The ATP afso identifies this section of C?Id Alturas Road,�aetween Browning Street and Victor Avenue,as a pr�arity pedestrian project. Redding Area Bus Authority(RABA}serves this area with several bus routes;however,the praject site is also � located within wa(king distance(.7 mile}fram fihe RABA Car�by Raad Transfer Statian,facilitating use of transit c��rtians thraughaut�he � City. Cor�ditians of approva(will require impravernents a(ang the frantage of O[d Alturas Roacl to acc�rrtmadate pedestrians and bicyc(es � I; and wauld not cor�flict with adopted policies,plans,or programs supporting a3t�rnative transpartati�an. �. � Dacumentat�on: � City of Reddirag 6eneral P(an,Transpartatian Element,�tIOC! � City of Redding Genera!Ptan Environrnental lmpaet Repc�rt, 2Cl00,SCH#1998�72103 � ' C7ty of Redding Parks, Trailsf and Open Space Master Ptar�,20C12 � �,' ca Crty of Redding Tra,�ic fmpact Fee Prograrrr �' :; City of Reddrng Brkeway Action Ptan 202CJ 2t115 � � Redding Area�us Authority System Map and Rout�Guide,October 200t3 � City of Redding Active Transportation Plan, February 2018 I7raft � Traffic Im�act Analysis Mernorandum,prepared by C}mni Means,a GF{D Ce�rnpany,dated September 27,2U17 � � � ;- Mitigation: � `' I< �Ione necessary. � I; ,� � �°. Potentially I.ess-Than- �ess-"Chan- No XVIt.TRIBAC CllLTURAL RESOURCE3:Wauld the project eause t7 Substarltitrt Significant Significant With Signi�cant Irttpact � adverse change in the significance of a tri6al cultura!resouree,defirred in tmpact Nlitigation (mpact � FubJic Resaurces Code sectian 21074 as either tr site,feature,ptcree,ccrltural [ncorparated � �` �. lanc�scape Yhat is geographiccrtfy defined in tet`ms of the size and scope of the � I' landscape,sacred ptace,or objeci with cufturat value ta a Catifornia Native � �� Amerlcan tribe,ond Pht�t�s: � � a) Gisted or eligible for (istirtg in th� California Register of Hisfiarical °� � ftesources,or in a loeal register af historical resources as defined in Public X � Resources Code sectic�n 502t}.1{k),or ii. 5-2017-Q0239 Live Oak Subdivision 24 P�C{C�"�P�.T$ City oP Redding Development�ervices Departrs7ent Planr�ing C�ivisian initi�i Study � � Poten#7ally �ess-Than- Less-Than- �!a �1 X1J1[.TFtIB;4L CULTU�tAL RE5tJt7FtCE5:L�loald the pr°r�j�ct�cause a su6starrtic�f Sigr�ificant Significant With Signafieant Impact � rrduerse change in the significance of a tribal cr�lturat resaurc�,ctefitred ir� tmpact Mitig�tio� tmpact � Publxc Resciurces�'ode section.2.�1?74 c�s eith�r a sit�,feafure,plerce,c��ltural incc�rparated � lanclscape ttiat r's r�eographieally cfefined in terms of the size a»d seape c�f the � Bandsc�rpe,,�trcr�rf plcrce,or�b,�ecC wttfr cutfur�at value tv cr CafifQrnr'cr Nirtir�e Aarter{cat�tribe,r�rad that is. b} A r�sr�carce�eterraained by t}�e lead�g�ncy,in its d'sscretio�andsuppar�ed � ' E�y substanti�[evidence,tr�be slgrsificant pursuant to cr3teria set fc�rth in s�bdivisaon�c�c�f Pu�lie R�sources Co�1e 5s�tic�n St�24.1.In applying ttte � ' criteri� set f�r�� in subdivision {c) c�f Pt�bl�c Res�rurces Code Section � � ' �{��$��. ��'1 s��7�7�jtlT1��.' �rl��Yt� 5G'� �t7t��7 ITl SUE}CZIVISlDIl �C} �� Uk7�1£ o Re��rurce �ode S�cticiri 5{324:i, the lead a�ericy sha11 consider the � significance c�f the�esc�terc�ta a�alifc�rnta�lative Arr�arican tri6e. c� �iscttssir�n: � As-discussed c�nd�r Se�tic�n V, Cultural R�scstarc�s;a Cultt�ral ftest�urces Assessm�nt fcrr the prc�ject site; incicrding�fie[d survey artd � archivaf rese�rch, an�l a re�c�r�f search at ttr� Nc�rtheast 1r�Fe�rmatican Center was ccanc{ucted by �allaway Enter�rises. A mixed � reconnaissance ar�d intens�ve-Ievel pedestr�an was cc�nducted c�n Apri11A,2017,cc�veringtl�e entire ar�a i�f pot�ntial e#f�ct to identify the � �resence�r absenee cif h3stori�resc�urces�rid tc�eval�iate t��signlfican��cif any identified arch�eol�gical resour�ces, The res€i9ts c�fthe �` � r�c�r�sear��t€�tdicate tt�at three previous cultural resource surveys have�een und�i�taket�within the prr�ject site with na pre�istoric and � ' c�ne�istoric site having been r�corded, A previous��€Itural resc�urce inver�tory cv�ciuctied in 2�t�6 detailed the recc�rd��(site for the �' resider�ti�l E��mesteac�,lncluding a hc�use;barn,and o�€t#��ildings on the wes�ern p�rce�,k�c�wn as"L�tt3e Rags." In 22�;the strc�ctures � « #ackee� i�t�grity and were n�t rec+arr�rr�ended as el€gib[e f�r the California Register c�f Hostoric Re�c�urces ��RHR). Th�s�rrv�y resu(ts � ; indicate that t�re site hacf undergone signif�cant m�clificafiion sirice 2006 and�h�structures h�d�l! �e�ra d�rrio�ished,t�n the easterrr ; � parcef;th�s#ructures ee+r�sfiructed in 1957 ancl�3�5 were stifl�ta��c�in�artd currently inf�akaited. Now�ver,both strcrcture�haue been � � updated,ur�dergsane"sntense remodelin�,anci neither maint�ins the integrity c�f the initial constructic�n. Tl�eref�re th�easterr��esrtic�n of „� � t�ie site is r�e�t eligible fc�r CFtHR�r the Nat€onal Ft�gisfiry of N€sfinri�Places: �ra conside��atic�n c�f the findings c�f t�e re�c�rd search and � p�destrian su�vey,n�ir�paets in�his area are anti�ipatec�: � � � ; Reg�rding i�ative American t�utreaeh,the�ity caf Redding s�nt nc�tificataon�rf the pr�rject tc�the Calif�arr�i�[tlative Ameri��n tribes that � ; have requestec!r�c�tificatian,hedd€ng Rancheria anc4lhlintu Tri�e c�f�+1r�rthern�alifc�rrtia,c�n March 1.4,2017 and M�y 5,2t117;respectiue6y. r� �to req�aest for cc�nsultatic�n was initiated or rec�ived. as � Gc�curr��ntatie�n: � � � �u1�s�ral Ftesource�lssessmer�t,prepared�iy Gailaway�nt�rprises,dated April 2C�17. � ; Mitigat�on: � Nc�ne nec�ssary. � � �: Pc�tentoally Less-�7han- Less-Than- �tcs � Xlli11.l3"f1CtTt�S A�1�SIERVIGE SYSTEMS.UVo�tld t�he project. Significant �ignificant With Significant 1m�aact I tmpact Mitigat'son impact � ` Incorpvrated � , � : � . aj �xc�ed wastewater treat�nei7t rec�uirements c�f the applicable Regional Water t�.[a�lity Contresl 8oarr�? x 6� Require or resulfi in the ce�nstruciion of new water or � � We�S��W��Ei` �C�'��Tt�CI� ��I�I�I�I�S t�C �'X�5�115]t731 Cs� t7{IStlllg � � #acifities, the cons�rucfiion csf whic� ce�i�id cause signiflcant � e�vironmentaf effects? � ,�. ;: 4 °.: i` 1 5-2017-QQ239 Live 0ak 5u6division 25 ��C�€�'��, �"� Caty cr�Redding Develapment Services aepartnaent P[arrning C�ivisiarr Initiat S#udy � � � Poteritialiy l.ess-Than- Less-Than- 1;10 � }{�ttL UTEL1711:5 AN[�SERViGE SYSTENIS:Wnuld#f7e prc�ject: 5ig�ifican� Significan�1l4tath Significant Imp�ct eai Brvtipact Mitigaticrn Irr�pact � I ncorpr�rated � cJ Re+�uire or result in the cc�nstructicsn e�f n�w stz�rm water � drait�age facilifiies tsr expansi�rn of exist�ng fa�ilit€es, ttie construcfion c�f w3iicli c�uld cause significant envirc�nmerrtal � eff�cts� � d} Have szafficient water supplies availabie to serve t�e projeet wliicf�serves or mayserve the}�roject from existing entitl�m�nts `�s and res€�urce�;or are new ar expanded entltlerr�ents neecied? '� � c� e} Result in a determinatP�i��byt�r�wast�w�tertr�:atm�nt#�rovider � wh€ch serves or rr�ay ser+te the project t�rat it has adequate x � capacity to serve the project's prajected dem�nd in�dt�itiic��tics the}arouider`s�xisting commitrr�ents;� f} Be serve� by a tandfi(1 with sufFicien� permittec� capacity to � accommat��te#he�roject's solid waste disposa3 rteeds;� � � ta g} Comp[y with Federat,State,ar�cl iocal statutes and r�gulations X °� relat�d to stili�i w�ste? � ' � Lt�SC�aS�iCrrt: � ' � � �,kr,d,e} Adequate i�tslities and servic�systi�ms are av�ilaf�le to the project;there�ore the prc�j�ct i�roulc�h�v�r�r�impact arthe p+�tential � impacts tc��tilities are cc�ns€dered less tha�signi�ie,�nt: Water and�ewer s�ruice wi(l be provided by the City of�eddi�g rnr�th connection to existing mains En�lld Alturas Rc�ad. The prc�pc�sed developrnent wo�ald rrc�t�enerate w�stiewat�r�lerr�ands th�t p w�uld exceec{treatrr�ent rec��irernents of the Reg9c�nal 1Nater Qu�19ty Control �o�r�!�nc�does nc,t generate th�n�ed for the � c�nstructic�n c�f new water or w�st�water-treatment faci(�ties. Adequ��e sewer�apac�ty is availab3��n the C[ty's existing system. � Water is ava�la�iC�frerm the C�ty t�r s�rve the project v,rith adequate pressure anc�flc�ws for�re su�pr�ssic�n: The demands af tYae � praject can be accor�a�crdatec3 wi�hin the�ity's existing w�t�r resoure�s. N�wever,t�e proj�ct is subject'tcs Chapter 16.2(�nfthe � �e�iding M�rnicipal Cs�de, which requires new deve(oprr�ent:tc� pay water-and sewer-impact fees calculated te� mitigafie a � pr°oJec�'s fair share vf cumulative irnpacts tc�the City's water ar�c�sewer distr9�s�tion,colle�tion,anct treatrr�ent ir�frastructure � i based upon improue�rierits necessary to accc��rtmodate ne�nr develc��ament under the C�ty's Gen�ra!Pl�rn, °� ; a� ; � : c} St�rrt�water will be collected and deta��ed ar�site in�n�and�r�rc�u�rd cc��v�yance system in a�c��dar�ce wifih City c�nstruction � � startdar�s and City�c�licy 18C16 pertainin�to storm�vaterdetention{alsc�see 1X,Nydre�fogyand WirterQcratr"ty,d ar�d e}, Stc�rrrt � water would then be discharged to Ghurn Creek ie�the northe�st cc�rner�f the sit�: T�e proj�ct is also subject to Chapter 15:�tJ � �f the Reddin�M�nicipa��ode,which requires r�ew develo�amerittc�pay a storr�t-c�raina�e i�npact fee ca[culated tc��ritigate a � pres�ect's fair sh��-e of curr7ulativ� 9mpa�fis fia the C�ty's stc�rm-drain infra�truct�€re base� upon 'rmpr�vet�rents neces�ary t� � ° accc�mmc�dat�new develc�pment under t�e Gity's Gerrerad Alan. � f,�} The City prt�vides solid tr�aste disposal serv€ce ivhich t�e�rr�sject�+c�ulc(utili��. The d€�pEex un�ts irt Phase 1 and�woulc�be servecl by � � curbside pick--u�fc�r garbage and r�cyclEn�whi(e �hase 3 wc�uEd be provided service of k�oth wCth insta[Iation c�f a c�rrrrrrunity � enc�osure: Adequate capacity�s avai(able to serv�the neec�s cafth� project wit�rc�ut need o#speeFak �ccorrE��nar�atic�rr.The City � reg�lates anc��perates prograrr�s that promate the proper c4ispc�sa€r�€toxi�anct hazardous materials frc�rn hc�useholds,incl�rding � i � thcas�createc!}�y tf�e project: � � 4 v. C�octam�ntatior�: � ` E C'ity crf Redding G�rrercrt Pltrta, P�biic Facilities E[errtents,�t�� G'1�y r�f Reddr`rtg bV'ater�r�rd Set�ver�4tlas � � i: � ,; 5-2017-�t1239 I�ive 0ak 5�abdiuisic�n 2fi : PaGI{et Rg. S� ; ,> City of Redding pevelapme�t Se�viees Department Planning Division initial Study Mitigation: � � Nane necessary. � � � Poten�iaEEy less-Than- �.ess-Than- No � XV{V. MANDATORY FINDINGS C1F SI�N1FlCANCE: Significant Significant 3ignificant impact � lrnpac� With lmpaet Mitigatian '' tncorporated � � a) D�es the pro;'ect have the potential to degrade the qual9ty of tf�e enviranment, substantia[ly reduce the habitat of a fish ar wildlife a� speci�s, cause a �ish or wild[ife populaYion ta drop below the self- � sustaining leuels,threatet�ta efiminate a p]ant or animal cammun�ty, x reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plantor " anirnal or eiin7inate in3portatai exam�les of the majar periods af � CaliFornia history or prehlstary? � b} Does the project have ampacts that are individually (imited, but i cumulatiuely considerable? ("Cumulativefy considera6le'"n3eans that � the incrementa)ef#ects aF a project are considerable when viewed�n x � � connectian with fihe efFects of past prnjects,the efFects of other current � projects,and the efFects of probab]e future prajects)? � c} Goes the project have poter�tial environmental ef€ects which mayca�se � suhstantial adverse effects an hur�tan beings, either directly or ; indirectiy? .� ' � ' � Discussion: � � �ased on the analysis undereaken as part of this Ir�itial Study,t}�e follc�wirig findings�an be made: e A a} As diseussed under Item IV, Biotngical Resr�urces, if unmitigafed, the project has the poterrtiaE to resuft irr impacts ta species �° protecfied under the MBTA that may be nesting witFtin the project site and patentiaEly the Eoss of jurisd�ction�l Waters of the UnPted � States. Mitigation Measure 1 and 2 are established ta reduce potential impact ta less than significanfi. � � � b� As cfiscussed in Section V,the project will contribt�te to regic�n wide cumulative air qua[ity impacts. Nowever,under pc��icy o�fhe � Generat Plan,application af existing grading and constructian standardswill reduee patentiaE impacts frc�ni this project to a Eevef(ess � than significant. � � c) As discussecf herein,the proj�ct does not have characteristics wh�ch could cause substant�a[adverse eff�ct�on hurn�n b�ingsa eitt�er � ( � I, directly or ir�directl�. � ! %; � � ;� � � � Is � �s � � � �; � � � � 5-2017-QOZ39[.ive oak Subdi�isian 2? P'�cket Pg.81 . � _ , � � � � �";'�� i � =� _ . 1V7'CIfi2 w, �,.. � �}AKM(� � � , -� _� _ ��_ ,� �� ... � 1...,��''� �� .. ..�,. ..., � �.._.. .� � � � � � �.._ .. �,,:�. -._ . �., `.� � ,,�� ,.. ., � �� .. � � ��. _... �� , , . ,._. � . ��. �- � rvN:r.. � .: � ,.��,,<;� `�t µj�'�{,�3'f � �� '��.;°'`� � � ' � �..:_, } ..�,., ., � w .� C.� ,.:.. � � � .� a �`�, .. j f%^��4 � �1 ,,� ti � t ,= t �, . ...- yC ��Y•��;"' �i.. ,r�r ��:. . , `� ..�, .. t` � � ��.... �,:% e .. ��. � ,.� � ; - ..,.. �� _�� ;�.'' �C3�1�'}'3 F�I�G� � ',�`Cxf�, � � ,. � �,.� � % J �, , ,. : , .... �' Q�°'' `� �`�: �....�..,.,A � ...� r �;:�_„ �'� ~-� ti.`v � �,,,� '`� ,>' F� � _ � ,� `�, _„�` r `� ` � � � � M_ � � �)•'� '' -.. i .�'".� t ,�� : .- � f ,-_.. � ;, �. '� � '*t � \ � � "�, ,.' �.�, �4� �' � � �,�f� � y � � ,.� �'" . ! , �, . ., , � ... / . j � ...�. -., j `-�U} _.. . L2� _._ � ,�,`,� `�,.:...., � �t, .: � �.... r ,�r/r�� t �.:;, � � ,:�' � � �`j� .1�$�.��' � f .::- `'� � 1 C� .,... t�� j;``� j � .� > 1 �:�; �_"� ., ''-,4 s�', ,�'� +� �.X �� `�� ._.._ a ._� . ._._ � -- � , ,_ � _ P = � .,_._�_ ;�� . �.. .� � - ,,��. �,, ;�� , , , d..,. � �` , , y ,� �, � �- �.._ .�� _. � �� _ �, ;; �,� ��,�4 ;�`� � � �, t �.._� ��., � , , _r.. , � , . ... t ., ,� � ..: � ;�, '.,, .. x � „+ 4:.i' (` � r ....��. i . �^'` .� �-...._ ` � 1 \ r` `{' '+�t� t ;�.� � t ,,. �..:_ _ . .. .�. l�i" .�'� t~ �......--�-= � � .:,:... 1, lJ it .f� fX � �.J t `. ��.... } :. . e- z �_ � \ � � I 1 � ,� � I � � � .... ,t�r'' �� `�f .f�� }� � ,�' �ss _ _ +�, `i� , � ,.-t, ,� m ..... � -— . � ; .4 � '�� .�� .._.. c{' � �� ,� �f_. � � _ � _ t _._,_ � �`� '� �.; �.� m , �, I ^}f�t . :- �" .� �.__�_, � ._.. � _.._�.._. � f, � r� ��3G�VtIC3�C� I�E � ; � ....._ _,.. .� �, C� , � , � ` � ,,� � �.� 4, � � ; �� l � �mi�__ � �..��_� � _, _��j �; ��_�v_� _ _ � ,��' _�_. .__� __ _ �_ � : � _ � . ._ ,�__ m.� _�_� . ��r � �__._� �_ _� ,�� , � _ , `�;�r��. �32C�Ql�fAltura� FtcJ �� _. .... � �y:.,.. � ti ; , .,.. � ; ,� '�'��,,�`�; .y �a �s68 t�la Alturas Rd �.; .. � �� ,..._.. ....._.: �� ° :� ,�. E.___ ._..�.:- ..__'.`��``�� , � � �, �� / ca �;�. �;. .' �,' . ,,; � � ``� `� ...._... � � � '`�,,....�,r � � � �� ,.� ; .--,' : � .... ; � ; , t :.��'"` � ,r,� _..,__;. � �`��y .✓ � � � .. �,� ,...._.3 ,. :. �-� ,-�" � .- � ��,... .,. .; � ��... ::�-� aa I s ,�.:r,. � __�:_� �a.a��. '�' W'W-' � ; � _. ..�.. .. r:_:: .�_ C}[..L�A�.TURA� Rt� �... ``��`'� � : ,� � �_.�._ _._,� � f�� .4 � .. ...�✓'i e ....,_,.._...,.„._,.,� g v > ^ t JJ � � .—...�_...,,..� <,� . 1�.. .+s^`� � � ,f ._...__._-..... ( . y� +` � t � ��" ^� v�& "4 ...;;; ., ��._. . ___..._.....�.. t ti ��' �`:,, e "� `�y t JJ``* �� .... � ... .�.�,:.:: �^'� ... � ... . ��... �`'r. � .;,,,,,...w .+'' � ....... .� { �' ..:..� , � � � ;/ ;,•.;.1.. .' .,.... � _. �.:'�+.. ., .., .... �, .,. �tp.`..ry \ .�»_... �...... j � � .. ,; J ...* � . ...,,.:.. , � .. .._..,_..., � � . � J..._... .rQ�\� ./``,. � ' ..._...-- x. . ,,� J � t}V}' f�Vu�L�.�'—, .k��« -' � i..,._„-. � _/` � �`�{�� ,'� ' � , ,� � 1 � f �-- -.. t� `�<.� ;'' � � �� f _ .�--._:��....�_ .:_ `�',�' ,,, r;�' �,r.., �� _ �+ t �.m..,..,.... ` '' � .F �.. �\��. � ..,1,_4� , ��} ..... k .,..-�� r y .-.. ._,._.,.. �.. {� .��_:. .._�,.:.: .1. �^I 1 ,.., _....:..�;�_1 ._., � ' ��P. �.,m____ _ � l �-�� ' � ,C.�,(`� �" fl 1 .,_.__ � ...__._... �', `t �.'�'"'�`; `y��.f\'f`� � � U�� t . :.,. . _.,� Q _ _. _ C��_�.€ _-� w �`'� "`� ``./� �� ,� i: (L' �F��f 1 ( `�_.:.� ,r'� y.�."' `�, :�'� � �1 L�t .. � � � ~ � ..,_.._... ,. 3 t /``.� ' � �ry�� J` �b � 4,.. ..... .... . � � � . . ...,___ .._N.......�:— —__.._.:. ............._,._, �=_-.1 J......_�;.: �` �' � . .....v�.._.... _...w.,...__..__.....� , .__. ``�...:� `.i' CIA�.�C3� -- � , �.d..:... ; _ „ ,.m.:._ :...�_ - - ....__. `� ;._. �4 � �....�.�_.. ,....... . � , ---:_ � _...__ �--_.,�... __._� � �� _. ___� _,��___.__ - -._ ___ � � _ _ . _.. __ �. _.._� r: � � _:_:. �:___r_._ � �..�i=y-_.�-:,::�,�..__.-_.. � ,.,_�..._.-....�..-r^ � �, � ��:�1�}�� .��}�i �� .___ ____ _r;:_:._ .-- �.�... � � �_ _��.�. _w--- ,. �:� _ � .�_� �_ _ .� �,�Mu.��..�_ � 3 _ ..::..:<, . . ...... . ..� � 3 � "�. ...:..:.... ..:�..;_... ._:_.:.__ � 1 � ' -...::.:::..'__�__.._.....3 � .r: _._._....,......'_'_" � :��,� .._....... . . Y. � ;�: ........ . � � �- � ��s �rv�s�c�� L,�CAT�C� AP �,T�.aAT�: � � INFOt2MATIqN TECNNCJL�fiiY flEPAl�T�vSENT '� W E �n7��Raz�uc��: S�-2Cl�7�QQ�39 f RZ-2017-�3��44 t F'E}-2�17-�fl24� irE�a. ; �cr�s.zo�7 C?�:I��L.TUR�0.S tt�ULT1-FAMIL.Y SUBDEV[�It�N � ° a°° {°°F��` �,�2U� �368 C��:[}A�.Tt.1RAS RC}AE� n-rrac�innerar: a:��a�,�,��;��v;r��su�ks-�oa�-��2ss.�xa �P#{�°�1-270-[}1� �-C}21 lP2t�ket Pg. 82 — �� ; � il � �� i = _� � . ,; , ��1 � �� 1 .,r�.� ..� � i _ ' %=- c� , r� � ..� ____ � � _,�� ' � R �,� /` � ' � , � , � f , �� t� � i � t�, � � j {t � � � 1 '�., .. 1 �. � � �� . "t � ' . L*� ' �.-�.( t • i 1 y 1� � ._ �. �� ,,�. :.� � 5C J "�` 'se � � � g�2 t �, �� .••((({i€ J t a r,, . �[ ✓� � �' � �f� ��` � -�J F f 1 � t ( J-...�' ". . ` . . � ( y i ` � � � ' � � )� ! � .� �:�V � r'vl{ � �-� +ht��f—"(�� . . �)� .. � �. � } ` �: j ! � �� 3 j �� i .l �� 'i`�1 �.� � '__ . � � � � , � > � �-{ _ � --��. � , .�� `�� ' _ � }_� , «�` . {t !� I' t �. . : p.�5_ t �` 3 � �': . .�? 1'sa.,ua."�'" ,`.�`"_""": � � � I -,'/�' `' s"Y �._ Y..,�! .��' ` •/'� � �fl� ...""'v. �.� ! � ` W ��.. �nh � '� � . } x �f� 4� .�'�'J�a� ��}t�i�f"a'+� �^�,.---�� . ' 1 �� y�� :�� "��"�'� ��. t� �� ,s � # � .. �� ; � j .� �tt a"s'`" :,' r'� r . � e � '�"'` � ��* �b�'` ta�"s .�, �' �..''� -s �.a . � i .� ' �- � .� "�. ` '. . ', i � -'' f' \�._ I 't �� '�i✓ �,�,. .%'�. i , r ,(y[�p�} . E .,� � .t �i'o ��o*..J .., .S_ �UF3 � � .. '_�.. � 7 ...�. . y 1 '^.v"'4.d"' �Yi`+.,±^_"� r�'� g f 5 , � ` . �" t_.- ..�..�' 1 ��(. ' i � �,i �� :.: " �, 7�# N v'� '� ( �� ( K iv �� ¢ mm � �� `7 � ( , � , x � �_ ".� �, �' .� � � e fi �l i A.___((i�\ ..�' ,�� '^�L+�� . j� �� p' _ ' '�� },` ... ,,.-... �'� j. � ��Q� , � -� . � I 1- . , 1 C66 M1+ � • - � � , � � ,��.— � � a � � I r .��- f ,y_ � � �w � ' ( 1 _ � ��.�� h� ��. �.;.� -_l��_ __ � __ ..t�� . � . ,� � � �� f a+ J,� a i z � ��,,�f�Y� i, �, i �� , ��r'��d � � I f � _ � `��, `t�'q�.��1 � � �g � , �; i � � O x,"'��(; �; '��"; x�'4 g x* � � � t�;�* '( _ -� g ) i .,��g - . '� � � . [ �. ( .a .�� t L r � f' � ' � - 4 � � ( � � � n � 1_. � 3� t �: �y{� �� ( ��.�.. � � �� x. _��. i � � � � -- --1; r�. � � �. � �s � ,� r. � �4� __ �- _. � f-- ... ��-----"--��:Y. ' ` � . i € ..� � Y L" $�r . p � � - � � . � �»�� I ----�„ 1 i ' ' 1 N �v , ot � - ,�° I p �� H J�.� 4EI�� Iil� �-Iii ,�,i!�li a�I �� 4 ;'�mr�r�i,"�� w�--_ � �".: � , t `�' III tll.Blll �11(� ��, �. ��,,,�„_1� �-.____ � ,m„- .�� ` � - �, o��v� ,.�,�. � F. �� ...:. � . �" • _ � +� � .-.��- is )�� g�� ' .v. �� . � . �:.\�? ��J M.s ,.. 4� , - /�'��;:j^�.". ,/�� .��; � __ . . .. .^` ,.'.., _�..�'.. . :� C� �I; , � _ ��. �-_� })y7 � � .... ��n� ......� �.. � ij t-Q� * � LI� � �9�0. � l�: �� , �__��' `� � � �; � � � $ � � } e � � � , o > N ��., � � & � � s � � � � �: s � s � � �: �,°� � � � ^ c � y � �� u �� , h � ��g � w . '' � s>£ � � z� � - - �;�� = a � � � � v � € '= m ��a< x � a � fl � � ' `� } � �� 3�µ� � � � � � � � � o � � � �� t � � � .°=�� n�� F t5�«w � # �.� g. � I? ,�� .... � i J; .�4 ��i'a �� . . .� i ,"j��Ci >� �' � z � � i 3:. a m `-' � � �; � � �� n —m�- � � ^ � � :� �' � � � �� i s. a �r�+� 1`�t Ct)g�—� �.: �. '"•. r�F � �. ��ma a.��.�� i, .a ( ( .� G .Y��. ..�. � ��z �� } � F�.. � 5 p � . � �' t; �3+�4 z �� K7��, �'_m � � � � � � z S � y�. {tt c��... �x�..,,,�V�X ra .� �FF �.0 8 "' � .', Q� �s;f(��.��K a� �� .��'��'f �.� g��` . m g� ��.b �" � � �� s t"fi} � ��a� �� R� � g �` C� �.��;.fl� � �� s��R � �� g � u > � A �. �;{t} " � ..A �. ., .�7 m ..�4 ^ z � = I � i; ......::�� C4CP'��fY �:� � � . _.�.._-._� �. ...� � . ��F�� .;i� �� F (} 3 .. ��S�t1��', . , :�� L`'. . e�, #`�i � � � _�� t � S`a b., � ` ��. 1� . E_?rf�a�,�, ) � � _w�x � � .�. . .+'�� . � � � � . � —.�., � �- j � ,; � f � ` '` f - �' ,tf� �ihrt�tR a � �� : � � . �; �� ;:�� i � '� � ��. �� --..'S� � Q3 i, f n��s � , ; �� = x+ �� ,:: � �:��a J , �z• �; F � { � --� h� � � �d ��.�� 4s a�� J f � 1 �"f ' ^�'£� 5 ;t�� ;� � �� b ��Y�! :�``� ;r: � ��,.'_ �----� �� O2 � *'�� 3�� _,,=, '.�,'I � �� i ---� �--r` � "i I � ;�: A 4` � � � � � � � �� a�. �;�� I , �� ! � i �'' �f: i 3�-` �'-��"�-�`{'`�T�� ra . ;�� .�{�$o � �� '.� r � �� l�: �� -��a s�� t� � �' � #J� � ;� � � J �� `� �� L� } � p 9, `�� i 2 t �� yy�� °� i � " ) t > € �� tS � �� ,� r �� ` . . � r r �� t ; \S x^3 � � \ F d o f — � � m�f il �' rr; t ) ! *£ ��L��s�'�.a 6.iu��- � � t r � �- ti i ' v r l.t €`` � t {�� '-,'"""" ;-: .L�-`�t s �o � ��`;�� .:..:a ��r '�s �' `}'�t"�"� 'Z� � :��,.�'��. o tS��q � � � L . �� Q`'�,�}�,,'� �.�4� �� "i` 3�.3 .�`�� $ ,.:?l/ ' ...��.. �� . � . (��- e. �.`� `` z� ��` I45? ^a� � �` ��' n� � ..-.--- � � � � � � � y � .. � �.,;�� .�ri g:� � '�� ': � � ..� � � � �:.:. "��c'�..a�"�'�r... ""'- [,� ��,-..x-� ;�� S ".;� ` ,�� " � �,�s� ! � t� .�`(R�f} , ,� '. '+....�.. '"`^'-a:.�>. , i�l "�,.= 2� ._: '�' �'`' -. �r _ A' � ,�,3. �. ......, a .�:. P i % w..p� � i�.a' i$<-��...-'"" .�,�� f'i�� i' "� - � � `� �� ,�'. .� �,,+ \�L' -i � �S. F3s . � 4�� f I' � /'f ��.' "� S? � $f �:� m� � ::� ��`� '"f�� '� „ � _ �� (f, {: l � ~Z��r=.�--- � _ � � (( 1 � j .{ t tp . . � � �'u �. . 1 � K� . �V� �$ a I�.. ' � Y *�.� a' � ��; � 7F__ �""�_ � �. `��l.�`"�, �,� � ` �, i. �. �� . ( ��_�. .�..� C,`_"�y.� � -,.j �. � �� b .�.� .?. � �e� � _�� +�".�i �`fi� f�'�t " "�*�'� � s� �§��a`f�i � �� >'�-�''t.=�'s-*' __ � ��9�� evsn' �',�:.a"I � ��,.-� ' S�s � � � � � � ' �� '�r\t�+ '� �, � � �iE,•� '�. �d _ � � � � q �� " � {�t� � ��:�� i� � t" � �� :.�.. �� . . .�� [ � � � �� a t. � - 1 y � �� . � � F�� i, f, � � - � - �� "; `�' ' � � � �, a #E : r � i I �� po ��°'` . .�4' � �? { f i. . ; '�.:. y.� .�. " i f '— � y t _ �'� ; �, � � � i , � � � - �ar ;�� .:�--�—.-W�-�t�'��-�—.�.�:�-•--� i � _ '� - �.�.��.a, _ ^---��-��- -� � r � , � � � ` .�n � . eG�� : �t �tie . F�� , f�.+'�y, �� c� ; `y � /' �, �,. 64� y ;: .... .... �\5�w ::.,P� .,.,.. f�:'�.. f�{55�� .. �� . ... I � � Ee �- ��r .:�r� ....._�..... ..�:.�� F . . .� . . � �'.^�. N b 9 Y,...'i . : yw ��.� �. � i . ; �m � , �`' rn i i ��.�� ("�' m• �Y �` } e.aitqn ��. � �y� 3�� 4�`....�n 4� � .I c'�1 �I " �O � i� � �� , �D .� ��..g "' m � {i-. �� ,�: ��n `��`� ��a�� .3 `� � '4� � �. '�` �.� ,-�� i� o � v �. y} W {r � : z S$ '�i'�'. .�� .��Ef.' S'�5�� ..�'y .� y �..� v S'. a � ��T! e'� � .. . � .��R � ��. � .� � .F. � �. �� :g �� $ � e � � � � mr, a .� � z �' ..F �� woa�" � �, ,� :o �.a �, ..� � ..9 .: �� 3 � €� � �.� .�. �.4 ��.� m � . . � �� £ $: �.�.� .. .. .$ �. � �. � 3 e „ � � � � $ � � �>m'�� '��r� a"�� a� s�� `'�'� i�,` ��3 � � � � � � r�� K ,,. �� „ - � - �..� � � l „ �, � � �` �� e�G��asp s�� wy� �"�� a�' 1 € {��E. r. tt3-iG ,� '. �s.� �'x��e E�"-qs" ; . ��,. 3�_ �f�� >,- `�`�� ,, i. ' � a � e�� C")N � €"a"!CTT. . �. � R� �' ��i�F� y . �g.R�L . � P �y4 's �`�\dt i- It��f��a � . .� � �S' C7 1 � � � �,,' ��'� �r � a� � �� N ;n �� `-iri,��?`�I �+'�.�5; �ki�� .�.N.�,-j{�� ` .�s a.s� �S'�� ¢N � .�� Q �;��- �'�r.�`�.iaf'�l i -� ; ��x� � ��" R .0..� . '�u�sxo � �. �{�f��.��s �.�Q�� .'i1.��.,,��—��3.��. �' _' �€�,�.� ��c} �g � ¢� � �� z ...�� `K-.�';k�-r� ' � �'. �� .`�'--� s� -� . s �3�i��ro �� g8•�0G .�V} � � (�`r3F'� r2 . ��t�� '`'T A�, �O� � 4: s+� �� y^�� `�{ `^Y`�� k�--•'�`„� e �F .k'Y F�fl�'�"3+ '�..f7.� .Ci7 '� ` F—�.�. c �i-r� � �y '�'U�� t .....f- '�� !r. �{i�t�.� r�i. €�,�F� .�Nh�3'S'�T'"'�,. <i <��. ° `� �� 4�.; . �r-r'-�'� "� (_ 4� � 1 ��.�. .>�'�'� �.�t�U"�C1.��. ` r;>� s :� � �$.�.� `�--�`"�{�tt�`��.-s'-Fs.��`� �; � �:� �. �� .N. � �. �l�ti � -� �t�`�'�-��_.. _. � i .�'''�..=��,--'-E� _' . . �� .v� -, I�}��"-�. .��. � , _"" 1; .__� P�arka#��, Rd I ' �, i �� ii Il � � � ° � � � _._ � � k �� ,� .�, r � � � ; � � � � � � ,-'�, � �---se.— —_— � �r � � i ' U:rr. . _ � � � .—. _..� �... � �3 � ��; .r,�a�� 3 t z+ � j � {t � j ' { j �r t� ��w�1`�$ Q � �� f �� . ' ��.Ji' �El j `_ ��` Q� � t i � ��' � 9�� ,/�� i ` �' � � ,'�"i,'�/� 1 .�t1t�a �? � I � j ��f�,r' � ,.-,., � i !� �:,\i''�s'eT,�,��,,%.w s-��qQ. ° ))j((j � U y�g / �f y�� \ a�, ( �� —.._ � 9W'� � t 1 'r �J ,('�".��>N��<., z�s� �� t i � � f h��y� '� �- . �%N �� <Z,�. � � � { �' �� j' � V�'�� ' �� ' ( ( � (t �i ((��ce��•,��(��,f �$�'�'> ! e�w � � i �i O ;�� -+�9 lv�'_J.�'�ce' �� t_� 4yyt.,^"`a �",_,,..._.. „� ... ! {� � � J; e �}� -'-s^�oz'�''��1C'*#�' � l_� � � � i ' }'� �� .� � --�y�`�x'�'?\x.t,. ,-- ga 5 � � �� r !f'�� .�a''q�i- �� q Caro7 � ^�,,.�.. C"+S '�. �.�� 4..y Ak s,,, �-�-tt „'"�..� ,.,.. Q a�_� � n,� � �u �� k�Z „�f�� d y,s �,r'� �•--`"'� � � t � +,�-�i�-._.... ``��,,�<';$(�},tx $ d*2 � 4�?�� os• �'� '-xf'x^" "''~l � fs t�ny � 3� -� �{ 9 t � y �� '�_ ;'f.�� .t '��` \� �S 8 S� � � � p'�.N E� �J�� ' �S, ��g 4k `( ,f. (669}�{ „/� }I M � �`tiX. �$ a.��,.1 Y fsa �,r_ ..- �----� i � s ^� %`�j k.�r.�r 1� � s �� . 1� � �� 3��i �g� � v.,/ "`-,'�„• acv5 j'� f �':..<:\ �� l j �. 1M� �{.Y� (` �µ. \ ��.�^4b, �� r �15� ,�(�M1,,� f�"�g J /��4�mP•i6a=l'm�.�' . �.,.m,. � � � � �1�,� j �., /` �� (,��, ti � ��,� ��'' i`f.��'�'',�,�Y'y_! C J „{��4 7 w� ��..-. �t'.�f;..z�y'�' � a� � (� f � 1 �w r; . ' ""�,J, { {' a Q '{�o � � ,y��`��{ :�%sk'''�, r`�n$ �<,,'�F��,�`�y` �� a��}��i s��. �"�+ a u ( Ci - --"" '� � j ��=� I z� �'��y�K�� .�� , � � .�,f � r �� i � I � (—� �� "�^'L��f . �Z��' � � .Ca� 1'� � � ' "73a 7 -�r�yct`�,`v .0'`: ,:'�'�x� '�. Y X'S`5,.� '-�. � � I ' ��° ��Y: �k'� a� r�`�S$+o� �. 'e w k E � ''��¢h`t��ti' �"<:�.��t ci�,,t�� rr > !�� `; °y,, � t � �;� �� .��r��:�� M �� t��s � � � }} k f � �� i s�� "`"�r?�vk�_r_— " �.s .. <5: y '�<. , ; .�n a u � ; (� , � -=� �--;- -�' ;;' �`� 'a-�-�� s '� '� �:`� ��-� 1 € t � �xin-�;�`f� a -v�. a . - �y`"..�G'yK 4 �s � � � � --,;� ; zy��i_.��'�__�� w `i ,k ��..,`.ru,,y. -�b��;�; � /��i �� ; �-�-- C,,�� ,!� j�, i M'Qa >�'�..�r��`;Y � �x�,��r ;-'�--� f. � i j sw - ( .� ��'`��' � sv��-�,_3 ., �a..�� i �c� ,r'r't%x`��` --��„ € j� j�f � ��._�__��'��<`v` � �� v� >s �� ' �'{� (�"pa °' � e ( � ��_ � g �„��r X� �*�N �' � s.-+ '� ``� 1 � d� � � � j � /�0 '� I � y: ��«. x �' ae�_ \ �,, � „, , : �F;,y<'ti�Y x��'__�__�_..��t ,,:�a#�g,. ,�� t t._...-J��.� °ra' ! j'% -t• - It ! .:4�'� ,..x�n'� �' u E9 ��` � � '� p� `'� - n 1 �n. � � ��`„'' ��+�I ��-� ��-��r-�T-'� i__,�� t ��j � i ..�., ..>u�.,x � 99' � b4. �, � � �fi' l €?. ! ...�4� —��'IM']H'N 56i.Gi` 9 � s . J 3 ( t } � � j � �, � , + f � � � RA�+9. . h`'"� ..4�`O C� � � o � � ,-- � � "� �� --� � �� €; �� t�� {_� � ' �Q � � N � o � �� _' �c _ � � ; � � � � r � y $ »�H � � j� � p � S � g _� .._.. � o� t � t� a � � � m � i .�.�j� r� � � {+ � w i i{ Z �15 � q � � i 14 :: � Y � e � rf 'rY � �tl � w � '; y � � --"'S'x �� i tf s �C �� "' i lY �' � " � �p � � i{� � i� ; � �Y' R�� 'e� ��) ; a $ � �,� v"�m � �� z � �� 0 3 �_.: " i ii ' > � �%��. �� - $+� v�t � < ii � � a i i1 � sr. p � �' � m�£zoso o z � r'y � ��i r ;; �fft-!C � ��gg � � �a �x s} o ;��8 � ( C+i�l � °.�$ .� ��m� 4 � � ��"+. �— rflN-fS� ��"�� P � RQ� � n e m m�J`�I S .`�1- �x�-nii �1�.. �.�'.�' �9C � $ � �" �e0¢ Li , C m T F x?`"�#� �V�� z�y � � e�� k g � � RFv � )Ct z � ?��q1� � ��5'i� O��C�7 �o ~c � $ �'*�' � � "�4m � g!�i�� '2.g� �N�� s �� Z`�' B� �,� ��S �"�,'a -A,Csf T'� C�3 � i " C?�� z � I"t (f} N � .._..,.... 1`Gf4R�i�r C�a �� v �# x �� `��,�� = � � � �� x `� �� I �1 �' � `_ _._ _ _ � � �-�_.�; � ' �'>�;;�f __.__�__�, _____ ' ' ' � — � `�" ; �.r� r � ` ; _.._ �. � ,� , ` �f�. �j �;. ,�• �� f 1 ! _ �� e� � � 1: �, � �(� , r F �,� �. E � � -�- � � ,` ,}I�.#�,- •�ti �,':`� ;�� +'1 � � �l,��-�� E �, � � �,.�-- [ , F�J-,;. 1 � �,,� ��'` J ; , -,I`� F � _._. � , _�� K�-� � �l � ,f '� g � `��'{ � `` � �E_ { ,t *� `�' �--t� a:. � , r �� '� � � � � {'j�•� ��`;, `� .� �:2 i�_ - " � 1 �� ) i ��' ��' � i ':l� ' � � �a � � �� ;� �.� ,� '1 �,: � _ �. ,4� ��: �, �� :�- - � �� . � � �. � � � � �� 1 � t �1�, - � � � �'� ' � � rr � �--_-`. � �� _a �� -� s i tgm '-:: � " �� lu 1t �r� , ;�=� ' ; ��... � f " �l � 't i ��a � �� f; t ,. o �: I � ;�3�� . ��.l, '� :'= �� `� ��'t"� '' cn�i � � � � � � r'�I -y.- "' �` ' r.; "� t � r .�. .-'' `''_�'�c �-- � � �`. t� �..' � •��=�� il J�:�; � ,�. y r _ c ; � ,S � '. � � � r�`<,� i � ' { ��, , �,o� �;:-. i � � � � �� _�� _ _,_ � � �� ; : t � . . . t� � .! ;—� � �'� �_,.1, ,t�'�`�i.. �,.,�'' ,„i' � , . P � t� / .'�y� , ' s��,,., � �` �1 j ,f, � �� 'l �'' ! /yf �=+ ��--..Is,.'.J-'"---"�!";�� .( � � �� '�."".�4 �j}. .f�{ ' f.� s�+.,j .4��f y� ' � �� ' , ,�,��"�, `.',-��.r�"`�'` a 1 � f f,� � ��. � :� -�' � �� ; � � � —� � 1_ � , �� .. ��,r'� ,,_;� ; > ' � .� � y i:• � I =.� ` � f��"T� � ��.. � f=-`' `�' � � �+ � � � _ � ; ; �...��, `.'_---_,� ,� �� ,-�`�'-�---r��- � � � �j � r ,. �--, � ��. �� `� _:' � i �� .� � ��. i� �..�:� qq�—r��.. � _.. �� `ft�. ' �s.�'�i� � ' }4 � ! �, �---y� ( �.,,}z.,� ��,`�a -�� s � ; °3 � � �',...{� �.�� .....� }.�J�.._� ��'�V��`14�y# .1, , ; f �' n-� I � '.Y� �r '_'.� G � 4... � . �(��'� y`^.��5,} � ' �j �.�.� -. �., Et i: �� N -".---;-"-"=--_� R��+�,��ti,'�c�r.:t-�. . . � i ��}�,� i� � E� � ��....'� ,,,�' � t+� 'e`...4�.tir�$ . , . Q� �p � ` i t-i �I s $ h� .�s"� �t� t-(:..� k ��j � � t..—t o � � � I� ��'�*—`'t"��`.St.2+.� 7 4 � �.�}� J��,Jj �� . � ! � t '� " � � I s� � � � ! f �� F �! . � � g -' _ s "� �; : �'"' � � t`� � � � .C/ ` ,!-_" l_f L �- i. ((( ( ��,' l-..� �� * l,'Y -^o-.-�_....�,�i ��. t. �.-'� ' �,. . � � �� j f'� . � i � ,f � .., " t� .� w.a t�.Z � ..�� _ �,4 ... s0 {t � .. � �. r+ � _ � 'i1,1. �n .ss��<��,,:��i!� i Gi�r�l€I-fitit�TaEffi I�€�r�rr r-r r�3�w-.�..�_.._f �n _ �, � �� sff � � ,� �_ .. ... .... � t� .�� i. -ss,"-�—,-.., '�,.�=��.. ,-t -__ ... .ViCT •- � .. � .,.' - � � �j r �� - ' � { ] ' 1 t q�,�",� �" � ` �� I t; �;, `� �; ,,��s s4� ; t� as = � � � l; � � s � s � , �,;� � w__,�-- )' .. � � }q ''r�''��} g�. �� .• a � i vi: � F�� 4 �.y � a ti �� . � � R ��3� a� 8 �i L � � � � �� ' . �m � 8 s F�.� � � � . �.� ��. �� .�� I; � 9 � d: � R a � z r v. �r� �. � �u z i Q� � z v a ... �.�.... .`� o.�.�� g -, d p. p o��8 1�4��' m � � � � � � m � � � � � "� z a��g �N�� °�� >.,�g�� 7'`�* } � � _ � �' � ;'i_�.�& �"� '*.!`.t��' � x, �C�S ��a� 1 -C � � '{;[�� —�I � �3 a.a�[`•�� m�� N��.�'`^ $� �� 3�.� . . �'�.. .�.�.�� m£!7 Va i:: I; � F��cket P{,�. $fi � �: __ _. �� ; � ��, � � + �a�'��a�w `< ,. ^z �m--��^�t;��:�:s� r � � ,^a,�.�i� � �� . F I ,� ( \ s .:i�r �r: t • � 7 � ; C_ -- - o. + .�. �t �''^+� b �' s � � ; i"4 »7 v�" "'�� t�; *� E .. a.,r cn�cn �' �� 'f''� ,"��,?."� . .�, J �� '' �^" �r� �� § � � ' p�Z� �r r . ' lr` c^i' ' ,,t rfi ru',�� a�Y:-: , .�� ? � k ..�-;,�� =# r s � s# 4��a> �'�� :�. � ,� -�`� �''�� ;>��: " .'� F ��', � � + x :^. 3 79'O� i �v � ,� ` ,� ,. .�. _- �' R. ,, r� �`';.�"`r f - � �� ,'.''*�� "�a�, �` ��" .�ct a ^3, �' ' .y'`" . � r '�.. � ' � � �''� �. '� �g � i � � f � � � "� "�' ��, ,,. � i � €� 3 Y+ � /M s+�"rx ' y } ,PJ3 i �� I :� ��yJ' � � � «3'N°r; J� ��Y""x« 'Z °� .• .,5 ' .� 5��::�:`-��T' . �� ,'�,, , Yw �'^�,�^ r"��,a? 9 �� Z � t g, i�J F � " ;�"� ! '�..:'�'. ��2�N � � #2* ,.m^ �a�s-�' > �;.,.« ..�.r'�^.,.�^�' ,�y � + ��. ;.." "�� .,� � � X a N � „ �: .� £'"�' `� .� � :�� W E � � k �, ".w.t � -. $� � � � �y�� 1 ~ � � J i � . " �M w�-i.i�. ' � � � ,"r ii ..M` � 'S�v I � . ,'� �'r.�� f .� C � "� � � 3"' � e i "s � „-�(^�.. � aro'��.„ ��:�w -{i f �,:, (� ,# I F ai' : CJ) G1 � :P : a � "� _ . , � � � 'r: W «.f' ,"�.:'w .,,'.y . '�. i . � l i � .y?Y i -' ,w'� rv'%Q' �'Y i"-� , r� " � , J ....�. �d�e4#iiY � '�ai5. �.� .�/' _ 3 J :n �«�'_., Y�{� 4'} � � �V v �.kn":".::.�, �� '� � . ..s r r � �m : Y �� m ,.,y ..�� .,�: , � � w �� ' �� e ;� F `a � h, +�,�, N � 4 �' � r �t�r �4 � �r. � . r ; �� , ��a ',.�� s� � � � , � , �•. E:.��"".��,,,,r�.��-,.��.".r^x,�''�r� t � .i I��` y 4 ::r' � � '� " ��I ��„`�-„ :: � � � t � :��s F.�:.,�: .�..+�„��"��"� � u � ' ! u � m! �� b ,�,. ,'� ,' � �.. ��,�,�"�'�,�� .'_i,� � � ��%;�;� ; � -c„ � "� - �n na w � .� � � .,� .y � � �:,% �',�,� �� i ; � ..' ,; . �_,t^ � '�� Y�� -�E 1 ` : W S �� ' � � � � � � � � �� -.d ,z�f t�ry ,� " "t � � � � :r-�. � .r N � . k�,,,.., �� .� � � • :: W a�,a"-�� - rr 7'z`,�„' K? � �`� � �g �- s.�r Crv , ( Iv 34 '�' � �'"� � �' '( � - lv C3 # ! "�3 V' x ' Q �,� •. � s � i.��Fl�� J.. � i � I' ��`Cj' v.} � W W�W N ��W 4*y � 1� tfi 1�'+ W � �- i � 7 r "�.�„�� : l 4 �. � ' d!� ✓,j � � � t �4 ,3 ��'�� '"'��C 3�"'3 " �� T� �� ......;„�� '� .r'.. A� q .�.� � $�: ��;�:. �h r' i�� a�� jl a�„��s ii -µ�„ ''S��,;�.� ' �d { (�p F � . . . . . ' . .. � 4 � � � r-R � � ��"i �` ��4/� Il{.�. � i: i t o, o#°�a �;��° o �. � � •a �;c� i � � � ^�' y � a � � :: � Ab r.�f C- C�'r'O Ci? !7 ,.��L�7 m� �"�v a.� � � axoo�vS � Q � ,.�.�,o y, tc �� ap'.. '� # }me w i��C a; `'" � ,T .�s � '�n' q p � .�� t-i �,:,-..� Gt,.. . �* � � R; , �` , {�y � `-'�� m `� C'3 Interstate 5 � � w � + � p � � � `:' � � � Hi42ka Dr. ' � � � � � ' � � F� � � �: n � ��:� .._._....._i'__ `� , �::. csx N c co ��cn� o ,.��', C�urn£reel: d. � :: in ta iu o ro �� o �z (� � � f�3' 'r��' .n�'.�'n' 6 . � �N � F3 ..'_ . 4�t� � I—�ii� � �T.2 '27.yy q 4 i-� : � �: s� �' �i� py � �' o O 2� i ^� Qel � � 4 st +�*�e� � (�'3 �� d v �+/."i5� � "' �i � ��y � � �� b � �r'` � �� ,, "� m �a � w �, sY�� ro � a � � �'.�, � �iclflT tS.ve. � . ��'::'::.,. � �' i (� I; ��C{C��. +�� ; � 3 y' � 7 I � � � � N��s a-^ .�„-.�_, w,;✓ '. � '__ � .R`.�;. .; ` `"�p��'" r\i SY". 3 . .. - " .' _ . : . " " __... � T �1 � , _ yr j .,� i `�-��-a,..q ,�WW_ : f b... ik� '' % ��ya.. �1� � �� . .r.C. `k: :_ r ' . ,1' "S '+�a �J trs _cn CJ vr �' � , ��„'� F"r- {� ,� p�A M �. cn cti v tw -,�' �, , ` �`, � � . �.-. � i �2� � � f' �' ; '�� ; � ��>Y � � �'� ��' � ��; � � ., �` S68 't � �. �.i . �� c � �� ..�,� , . z � c 3 o Sv'9 2 � ,� . ��< <n � �.�„ � _ �� }� _ �"' � t �n �j,� � I �� f 1 " ` ,_ �, m .. . ..1.*�, 1 � A 4S � � r �� wLf.�� r{ x � � .Y � � �_ k�e r�� ' . .. �� . 1 i� �i _�'i•"y 3 _ �l�w'�. � '� �c"=�� = E ! f � � �� '�� 9 o , � � s � r-. _� � ,�� ' �,�� ; � ` , � �_ � h' ° ;, tn ��, ; v� � v E . _ .�.-.�.,e �� ' �} F. � �y �� h, :� t � ��,�,,'"� { �� ; ,� � � " t ; w � �'"` �� rr�� O �a ;� � � �,wv'" ��,y � } � �' �"�"( S`""` � �,`y� � z �' 1' 1,� �� `.',' �` '7�� ; ` � o �' � { H [ -`" � t R s„ �t . �.t3 ' � � S*3 � � � i�� 1 ,� 4, r� af � ,� � � ' ' v' �r t ti 1 1 �� „� � ° � � ,� y ' ,� � O (i `�F4 -, t 1� �. �.� ' � a �, ` .M ,a � (f " 1 1 ♦ , f'=+1yt� "� �+•��.� �' ,, � � � 5 f �, 9' �: (�� , � �� 'W � � ��.., j^'""�, � �� !�•r'.� f"t (� � � V� � �.: �„� .!N"�� ,�^ ..^-� � � � E� `�� ti' �i r[� t'r-,.�`'0.,*.�` �° � ,.� �� tb''i� € �� . �� .slr�, i,�- �� g ' �. , *,. ti�� .. � �"�"�' `� € .� � -,ti �.,, ,� , �� f. z�, ' �. �,�.. � � ... �, � �" � ��,,r"ry �`-'�;.,� (� ��``• ,�� E- � ^ „v, a,.-�'�y ,ra� � �$ � �� r � � �..,. .� _ ... __. � � . � � a�`� ,�,x.�-.�.5,j�✓"""� � .n � , � � sF .�F .1...,.� � , � r,ry., ,�'�'�.,.„„y,.�� (f "'�� } i1 � j t' � > � - (� � _ � C� � ="��. �� h 4'f 3 3 E � +A M � i£ � �.:_ �� i �'''�vF' �t '1 � �.. _; �, i ,�r,`',��,^rrr� . A. t � . � � � ' �� f t_: .:�� ... � � � � � � � 1� �' - � � ,�, � " � t J r' w G} �v �� U7 . �_._ �` � ... �f N � � � I �- «.. ':. w � � � � �� #� � i �� '�-��°� I = C � f t� F � ,� ^� a°"` � aa e x. � 4.`-�^�, U c,�� .r�� y � .�, � .�.� ��.� � o o j l� � � 1 :u )� a z .3 � s ; : i VICTC3R ' ;'- � ' !_�: � �� °� < { AVE. �_�� p:, � � w dw c.� N �„ a� �i�i� � i ' � cr� ��,. .s� w ' � c n �� -""�� t ' ... � ._ _ , "a. ..,, � ., �,,r . . .. .._......-., - . . �,r �,�' � _ ,-...,�.. ...� ..? � , ,, �, � ' { . � ' _ ,._.,, „._�,._ .. . . � . i , � � ::.- F� � (� � I >c�c� ��c� H��" ' � I �� ; �� i ��a � i �M-�o �tn*�d � �xs 48 ' �i t z z � ` �s � � i � � � a � 7-� � �� , a �~� . . . . . . . . . � ; � � °� � � � b V �� g w � * `'_' °' '��' � � �' � � cs.s�. Cs� Q w� w o�i ro �C5'� �n�+}� ' � � �S � E r�. °n' �.'a � � �. O w w ia � �y� y G °� . � �� -ftls m y �- in n ia� � �o c9 n � C.'�s�� q ;� �l�" ip fOr e"M1(3s �, �; � Y0y G' a'rra � � .tl y ..� �,� n � rya ^P' � 4 'J' � Ay �' •�,� ro� �p � rn tn "�tlC '�" ,p..Y '�' .,� � '•,. � ro ,n�' 'LfN m v rn uz�tC�"'�' n "'� O� � 31 � m °i Fa tlG as � '.yS' w � �� 'T � � w "" `n .� m m ti � m N � � � �� a�c o 0 0 � " � ? vu � �` � � � � � �, `�'-� �o r-.4 � � � � � I' a `ro m o �,', � 3 � � � � � �. � , � � � � V� ro N � � � � � � � � � � � �d � � � � � n ¢,� ry p� -�., y � �v t� f M � a � �fi.t V (q v � N � O � �; P� i`��rt�1�.1-�: iJ� �. --- — ,, . � =�� a � � , �`��;; � : � � �� :� a `��; i R 4 ,��„ � ; � °° .°'C-�v' ,� s r es� ; s�*e� � �, � ; �� x�� ; ,� y}�'` to� � i �w °-Cr?J ,a � � � � � ,� � tAb r a �:�+'v 5 � � y {�'r � t p � 1� ,,, °�`'Q :., ;� �'3 . � . � � �.�, '�y-� � `+ � ��`��s�� r r;. � � � �,� � � a� � � �� y'' , 9 � � � >'� an � � � �! � �� "cs �i'.� ,.4. r:: '�( �- " �. � £ s, � x.. �. � rl ; � € � � rn. � � '' � � � o � � � � V � 1 r,',� x�:. ; :� �� , � , ' � � � r � Cf� -.�r`A,t. 3�"^ � ; � � �� c �1�� i�� 6 �°,�`�� I a;� c� � � �� - i , ; .: : � � ��a�� `' . , �= `�� ' � T',: L Q �" ";T ` ,�-�� y�. � H 'i � � ; � O '�` �;� a� {, „:� � s � � � r. ; � � � � .: � �,� ; C) � x�,"� r.�"�= ' t � �'�--:.0 r : � � ..� ' � �q � � �'�"sa�� „.t^'�'` ^� `� � ±**��,,,,,, ` � � h � ::�,,,,��` R. :�," G :Mi.,. ,.�,, . '..t t," T � �i , �'"✓„"v� �i7 � �� v� �� ` f � � .��, �� -- ... � �..�c,`.'� � � j �h^�, '�� „ � ,4¢� �+� ' � � . � � ,�, � ��M � �.� �.��"'.^� � � �' � c� �` S O � ' a` . � � "� ��F � ��,":a �,„�y�„ �'�"e �-3 � ° � ti<_ � � � O �5r3 � '�� . � '; {7 � . �� e�"i � �'„` � ro � �... !� �' M j•.., � � � � � �� " 1 �' C) �a � � � a�, 4.� � c. �, � � � � � � � � � I i� �' � �. � _ � � � � � i' r,A � `' � � � �: � � k � � � - � , � i � - !. � m �� t �� ; � � �,�x � � � � � �:. � M � � -� :' , - — . . . . , .. : � - . a „ � �.. �": � � �� t �- � ±:; � � � �' ��,� � , � � � �. � � , 'r n � � � � H a �� z < � ` � � � o �y � , , �a � � � �,� `� "�.:� . I � � � ^ �„� C 1 :� '��"k _.� � '� � C � '� O � � c �,:� ;�a�.� w"' � n � GS " s� �-.�-.��„ �, � �' � � I � �'�*.� ��' � � � �,� �'J� � � �� 1 S"�',� i��' 9�2 , � � � '�; 1� ^`�t} .�� q�, �; " � � � w� - �t fJ,� � � f +,.�.� 4� � � � � . �, � �� a �:�� j�a��t�� . 2l� � �; � n ��. $� � = G,, � � �'��h+;'��j . ,_ ; ,: � �„� � . �m�Y F � r .:.. E ., �J.(}��-��I.�j� �3 J��}� ��, s �. : � .,� ; ...... ........ � � y � � ` .-,L� if�7..�� C� � �x�_"_'�'""7 "-1 � .. �� c 7F- � � ii.a+ , � � ..... �... �. � � '. .� t��z � �ndry. � �.. � �. � � � . ; �` `. G . �. � 6 ,. ` _ 9 ` � a :�\:t � tzr �.: ,.- ,�.. �O a�. �" ��. .� ,-1 �"';�t'„L7 ' � �o. __ -,E:j � � MU� � �.�. i �IT� y7 W r : � $ �r o 'm��',7s` { '','. .�w '.� � .y n"� �.� . .�..:.�� . �aa� a,�,' � �'v� >.; � Y .,� �y 'r"4` -� ;- ' s;�, �b �. —r ,.='�- �" .� �ttn#fi � _ `" _- z�"�i:� :w .�, �x �a � ��aF..� ��. a.`j ° r r�' � , ; � , , . ,� .. �` i � � �; C; _ j� � , � �a �, ;� � � — - �; � ; � _ ;, . : ,ra �. ,. a cn�� -- - .F� n - , ; -: _'� ' 4�. �� r' N �-s'. I t'�v �.:��: C�A ._# � �� M �� '.� r��v� a�.� C"� ;J�� i , - -N� �.!1�....� ,� ", : . . � �.-'�. . �. ; �� a � ' �� . ` __. _ 1 �.. ; � �� : � u/' , _�" u'g y� � ( C�i } i � � � � s � � � � ✓'N, f � y� v . : � / .. ' F> .. � fi" � N� t "' l � �. � �� :T, . r�' .� �' �r.�,J� �� a' ,S ✓, K+.� # K�� ( �,� i ,. �� 4� � " � � a � :;,p^� '� i �'=r ' A✓� � �� j T �, � � ,./�'r r„ ,_;, 9� . �` .":`'.��i: � . �k 9> x� i ( ' � ^�.��. � � i �;„ �J�-"'s�.`zry� "`"' s � '� `?��r.3�'.--� � � � � � ��- ��r..�'�Q� (i u<Ct�.� �� ,�. If �s a' S � � �� _�;�; �Qt�� r � ��* � q � � � : "' -� x�-r �. .� �� P va �S,{ ..�� a;_ � i ��* �! -� � p K�_"-- � ��"' �� ` � � � � � '�� s' �� z"' ' '°�C`�`j� � ; �. �� °� �� `��C�'M ^�� i � � �� y�" �,��',� �s :;,� ';� � 3 � :� �'� I' � u`C_`I�=i ' ;; � i1 � �'��'� � � � � �,� ;'�,r�� ,�. ° I � � � " �� 1; ^t'`� �a - r' � ;; �,r , �-'. - .�, ,�. ' - �� `.C3�, ',� �' � , �;: � � �,F � � � ,„ ,� �^,, � d€ 10 3� � � � � � 1 �3 � � � � � � �i i:'= � ?.' � � 3r, � � j1 � �� i^`A�{f.SF ./.� ..... �. � .�u ��} � , . � ... - - -_ - _. �' � i, C;J wic� �J �,� � � � � � _,'�+�''�� ^ � I { C,'., . .�,.� et�'f. u�_-.Lndry .� �. ��. .. �. � t� � �r� .. �� t � M � �9 t'x'j .G __�'7. �ff..,��'.. Y+�.�� w`'y E �' .� � W. � ,. �: � � � � � �. ��. s'.��.;.. �o a j � �f �� h = � � .« ,F �y '� � � ty e . � � " n `,_-; � � ,,_ _ C3 � a t _ ,. ;: � � .. cx ct . � ' � .. � .. a. — � � �&' „ r� � �� `. �, � �s�9 r�" "'� ..:, ,-. .�n �jy : �a� �t �_ _ ^ � oa _:� ;�. � �'. �� wt .:' � .�a . n ""� --� � � � � , � , � ` ' � � � r � Qy � � � - �-'1V1C D ca k � m 4 "a�J �° Lndiy.� .��.. S � ,� _. �. . ,.. -. - � .' "� .� ,.. .. . �. r C!'S I".4> .3�. � *G .V�'t � .. !7 ;�� C.� �' .� . � � � � � ,_ �• � � , � � r PaGk�t F�C�. �0 i: �._ --, — ; � �� , s , �� .. � �; , �'��i k � ��' 3 � �" . ��; � � g ��,,: ; � t� � ` � � : . , cr r� n�� ' �� ,, � �,.. y �.��— -.;,; � : � ,a z�, i as' zx �� i i o� ` -�rw� F � �, � � m Y 3* ; �:.-.:...� ,; � ———- � " � aa�v� ; '^? ": ,�, � . v , .._._.__ ,y , � � ,� . , —�—_—°"'—'__'vt • �� ...„ � r " ` ,�,. �.o,'x+ '� � .} '.. „ � ' .. ; '... � � — �. ei �. � j . p� . �� . R.."'s� `/'a,�. ... i �, f'...� i I. ��—�' p� � ( — �� .,�-' 'w� ;� !f < ' � _ 4�. ') �T .+��. — 4 � ,�ysa:"'..*"'. ; . - t._} � .r:: . .. J-. _ � __� , � � � } , ,-y � t s�� } � � � ' � S_.:� s�.�� I. ' E�,_: ��'� �� y - � � " aa � � � � � � _ ,._� € -� � - � # ! � � � � � € d � � t a , __ � y y F f - � t _ � � �.- . � 3 � '^ � . . „�' � - '�Grs` ;i� ��.'�'-�� : �� r � > ' ,•r,/� '' � �� .: '�' -- '�� ' W�, � � .,, ..: , � �, , w. �:� S '�',� � : �_ "�� :�� _,. � ��......:.�._.._m_��,.�� 7 � � I ... _._.._.. _ .<._.w_ ; ;._ . .^ ,r, � �;. � .: <, . '.,: :i � -`-�-�'� i.__ a_ ; � `�. t � � i i � v. � � � �� v �� t �� ' �� I ;, ✓, �. � c ,�i,�;.„� ,� t �, r' �� , ,. ,� . � � '.�"" . ,' � ` "� � I.' j "��.�.-li : .. a��.. �, ,., ��" M > _a � r �� r � "�`�� ."5.�� _..—, �`�� , � li ,r�'�'��a.� .. . ?� k�y ,y`�v'v"^"" �� '�'+. � -✓' �„�""<� ' 8 c^ ^W � 3 t-, I =� �z,�yw ' <3 i 6 � "�"��-"�"'�''�� . �� :.�'t �Z�, s :.� � i�� "�� ' �� ., e� I �� ^�'�,� `<"` s�� „��,,�� j; �✓a �� E ��r �� ' � � ��' '� � �.. -� �: �, {�. �' ,.'c��l.. �. � ' "r! . +�. z �.. p� j'" y� � ; �'"� ; ' �`� � C3 � Cx r C? tri �;,., ' C7� �.� &"�.� -s ' �3 �y ° ,� .i�-3 � _ � f �:.� - # "�U� , .� � ''s�.� � . I< � � �� j � � � a �� r f �p �: �s� �� : , �. � � M� s��; r� � � f :•+� � .� � �; �� I � � ��s� � , . _ ,f z .� � ; _--- .�� x �� : � � �_. � � : : � � _ �� : , � � � �; , ��. t' __'" � . � �: � .� �. � (.,. � 1 �1 t� � '�''"°a."�'�a _ . � i � � � � a � � � (,' #'t��'t��f'{�. +.'R� �; t:: ,-;s�,� ��, � �� ;, � � � ��'�rv;1 �.� , ' � �-� � � � �� ,., � x; t 4,p aa �vi„ g,� � ,,.£'r � �< �`�� ^b; �I i , ;w a{r^� .� .� a o "�Z'�.` " �� 'i 3 �.`9'A� � 3 � ! � � � '� a( � � a 4' �' { ., �� _� � �� {`} � " � � � 1 / � j ��3 � p � �.t^'��- � '' � �3 �."�� ,� �! � � � � 7_ � ��; � � � � � � � � � �a � . �y. j .�� s "f '� r� . r �a � 3 � � ° � S � � r .Z'y✓�� '�" ,..a � + `""� ��,. � �^ti � � , .✓�, �. Y, � �� . � ..%'",�'�.r-.Y J .� � ��_._��`a� � ?✓�JTi'". �g : i� � %�� I i �.:.�.� �"'�r %'+ � �" � � .�%�-..'.,.�,�"M„"'�'" y i' �--� � ,t""""'� � j ��..,�"^,x''� r �, t -'`.•✓u.� '"��-�'f j { i�.-- ~� � ,� E �� ` �'� t� � _ �?"�'� �r f �' ;� � � i i ..��,-�.� -��r r:� . � 5 � s ��. . .� � } � � F "��.x-'.„�p--�� '�".,�^_'�. �� t� �, � i t�� '� ��"' '��5�� '4 � '-�._, � ��,..�� y�"'��.��X� � q �� ."""„-'^>b�....�.. _.....�...._ --�–�...._�. � � ;:t.��,�, ` � t��' �',. � � =��ra� � � � :� i `�� `'�` ' ��—�� : 3 g � i � '� � � ��" � �� ''� � -�. p � �3 G "�r-' -' tt ^� � "`:+-+�`y` 5 [t �L'�--1 "' G � .� � f i � � �� : e��" '� 1 I� � "� i�' i ° e � t'—_—y � �rYM1—� �___{'�'� � ,. . s r , � ' � . �� y� � �-�...�.._�_, � � ;: r � -—.. � c � � � j;. � :�� I 1 I I �. � �` __ � � �� _,�-- � � �"��.� �� } � � :�.�:_.��' �� ,� �-�� ' � �: � �. � � � � � j; �� i j�. o �- � I � ;s � ¢, .�a ',, 's�,`� � � n � ', � � � ,�.,'�. W .. ,_ . . . .. .._"." _. ' ,..__,. € �_ �_.. � . . _"—._ ..._ , J._. fp y � � .y N �, � � ii � ryy W Ca � W h' .'K a��yy � � M � ( t��4 � �'n '�3 � � ::��:,: �� /y � V � Q� r,' Nf ' R � � � ': � �' � ,;. = � � a� �q � � ` N� �. �£ � 1'��R�i�1��.�G ��5"� �;��°� q � g e �;� ��`�$' ��' �'��[�l�� f,. � ?'Y7 Cvp�a��5 Av�:rtt�e. R�cit�tra�, CA 9�C�G�1; � � PG� �3C�x `19�C77 1, i��s�ntNG; CA �C�tJ�G9-6C1?! _' � . � - .�: � � � Ja�itiaiy 2�,2�22 � K:2 D��relopm�nt; � AI)K P`rc�pert�es; LLC � 1{�l1 I'�rkview Aven�e, Suite A Redding, CA 9�U(lI � � Subject: Amendm�nt A1��1D-�Q2�-t}21'�� {T�ntativ� ��bdivision S-2(}17-{1�123�and P1�r��ed � I�eve�a�ament PD-�,017-0{��41),A�t€zr�s Cre�ssi�g�ub�ivisic�n(fc�rmerly Live Qal� Estat�s Subd�v�si�n and P�anned Develc�pment} � c� � I3ear Property C}wner: � At its regular meeting of Jan�ary 11, 20�2, the Redding P1an�ing Cc��nissic�� granted approval � c�f Amen�iment � L}-2021=02114, an amen�ment tc� Tentative �ubdivisic�n 5-��17-002�9 and � Planned Develc�pment PD-2017-00241 (f�rmerly Live t�ak Estates Subdivisioz� and F1 ed g� Deve�c�pmeent),tt�divicle eight�cres�c�cre�te�l mu�tip��-famiiy residential lots in twt��hases far � deve�t�p�nent c��' a tc�tal of �9 multiple-fami�y units t�r� �ro�erty 1c��ate� at 132�} anc� 13�� (�1d � Alturas R�aad, Redding, Ca�ifornia� A�rprova� c�f the prc�ject is �ubject to the att�.ched list e�� cs�nditzons. The appro�ral is effective January 24, 2022: � � � P"Ieas�: nc�te t1��t the tentativ� �na� will ��pire c�n 3�r��ary 24�, 2�2�, unless it i� extenc�ed. Any request f�r extension m�st be submitted pric�r tc�th��xpirat�on�ate. � � Ifvve may be of further assistance t�yc�u,'please feel free to contact,Lily Tc�y at{S30}245-72�1 � or ��ra cit c��`r�dcii� ;�r . = � � Sincerely, � �� a� � , � � �c � Lily Toy; l'lanning Mana�er � I�ev�ropment S�rvices D��rtment � LT:et � �4ttczchment � � � Ct�pies t�: El�ctric I�epartment � Engir�eering l�ivis�c�n � Devela�mer�t'�ervices Tech � Field �perations Fire GI� File P�cket Pg.93 A end ent Application 2021-02114 An Amendment to Tentative Subdivision ap 5-2011-00239 Planned Development PD-2417-00241 � Alturas Crossing Subdivisian and Pianned Development � (farmerly Live Oak Estates Subdivision) � Conditions of Appraval � � *Canditions arked with an asterisk are to be indicate on the final ap as notes. **Conditions marked with a double asterisk are also enviranmental mitigation � easures. � General equireinents e 1. Tentative map approval is granted for the Alturas Crossing Subdivision, allowing division of 8 aeres to create 21 inultiple-family residential lots in two phases for � development of a total af 59 multiple-family units as shown on the tentative � subdivision map and Planned Developinent Plan. Phase 1 consists of 1 lots total ta � be developed with six two-family dwelling units {duplex units), six four-plex units, � and a tri-plex unit with an attached community room for a tratal of 39 units, Phase 2 � consists of 201ots to be developed with 10 duplex un�ts with each unit on a lot for a � total of 20 units. Th� final map sha1l be prepar�d in aceordanee with tha revised � � tentative map as approved by the Planning Cominission on January 1l, 2022. The � requirements of these eonditions shall prevail in the event there is any ineonsistency � between a eondition and information or data presented on the tentative map. � � 2. The standard conditions for subdivisions delineated in R�solution 92-18 shall be met, � except as may be specifically modified by these conditions. � � � 3. The develaper shall note that Section 711.4 of the State Fish and Game Code requires � payment of a fee to the County Clerk for filing a Notice of Determination for an � environmental document; payment of this fee is the responsibility of the project � proponent. �' � � � 4. In accordance with Chapter 18.40,040 of the Zoning Code (Com�plianc� with Map °� Requirements), all conditions app�ieable ta postsubdivision construction(as marked � with an asterisk) sha11 be noted on the final map under"Stat�m�nt of Conditions"to � provide notification to fut�ure property owners of building limitations and other � xequir�ments for th� subdivision. � � � � � � � � � � � Packet Pg.94 AMND-20Z1-02114Alturas Crossing Subdivision and Ptanned Develapment January 6,ZOZZ Conditions afAppraval Page 2 Planned evelopment Plan and Site esign equi�ement.s 5. The standard requirements of Chapter 18 (Zoning) of the Redding M�unieipal Code � and the zoning designation underlying the"PD"Overlay s1�a11 apply,unless a special � development standard is allowed pursuant to these conditions and the approved � planned d�velopment plan. � � � 6. A1� sit� and buzlding developm�nt shall be consistent with th� Alturas Crossing � Planned Development Plan AMND-2021-02114 dated January 2022. Final plans � shall be approvad by th� Planning Division priar to recordation of a final inap or � � building permit for any phase of the project. These plans shall consist af a final map � and developm�nt details for landscap�, decorative retaining and sound wa11 d�sign, � improvement in the cammon outdoor gathering areas, trailhead iinprovements, � � lighting, and final building archit�ctural desigz� consistent with the City's Design Criteria for Multiple Family, � � 'T. Prior to recordation of a final map, the developer sha11 create and fund a private homeowners' association to provide for the maintenance of all coininon areas and � improvements as outlined in the planned development plan in perpetuity. The � articles of incorporation and covenants, conditions, and restrictions far the �' homeowners' association sha11 be reviewed by the City Attorney. 'I"he homeowners' � association shall be responsible for the maintenanee of improvements, lands, and .� fac�lities, �ncluding,laut not liinited to, the following: * � � � a. All landscape, irrigation, fences, walls, and other improvements and � amenities within all areas maintained in common by the homeowners' � association, including the narth and south graup gathering areas, and the � � front- and rear-yard area of each lot. � � b. Camman utility serviees and the private stormwater systein ineluding the `� � detentionlin�ltration system. � � � c. Internal private driveways, common parl�ing areas, nonpuhlic sidewalk or °� pathways, and interior projeet lighting. � � E d. Any project entrance features including landscape median and mon�ment signs. � � � � e. Trash and recycling receptacle markers. � �, � f. Open space trailhead impravements and vegetation and fire-fuei management of the private open space located at the northwest corner of the � site and the northeast eorner of Lot 12. � � � � Formation of a private homeowners' assaeiation will obligate eaeh lot awner within � the subdivision to�articipate in the association. The escrow instructions for the sale Packet P�.95 ' AMND-20Z1-02114Alturas Crossing Subdivision and Ptanned Develapment January 6,ZOZZ Conditions afAppraval Page 3 of each lot shall require that the purchaser and seller af each lot sign a statement that they hav�read and understand this eondition of sale. * � 8. The internal private drivetivays, common parking ar�as, narth and south group � gathering area improvements, incl�uding landscape and irrigation system, and open � space trailhead shall be co��pleted by the developer and approved by ths City prior � to issuance of any building occnpancy permit. If the praject is phased, only those � improvem�nts shown within the phas� boundary shall be completed prior to a � building oecupancy permit in that developing phase. Phasing shall be as shown on � the tentative Inap and as fol�ows: � � � a. Phase 1 —Lots 1. c� b, Phase 2—Lots 1 through 24. � � , 9. Trash and recyeling service for the develapment shall include the following: � � a. Each duplex�nit in Phase 2 will have 2 roll out earts that will be collected � at curbside within the development, one for garbage and one for recycling. � c� b, Placement of the carts sha1� be as shown in the planned development plan � with curb markers placed on the eurb to identify the lacation for each .� address. � � � � � c. Three feet spacing is required between carts and 6 feet from any other � obstacle. � , � � � d. Provisions for starage af earts when not at the curb. � � e. Enfarcement of no�aarking on the street by the homeawners' assaciatian. `� � � f. A minimum of two trash and recycling enelosure far Phase 1 meeting the � requireinents of Section 18.40120 of the Reddin�;Municipal Cade. � � � �;. Shaae trees shall l�e placed such that the canopy does not overhang the � anclosure when mature. � � � � h. Billing for Phase 2 would require each duplex tenant to pay for garbage � service separately. � � � i, Billing for Phase 1 would require one single account for garbage service paid by the homeowners' association. � � j. No green waste carts or picic-up wi11 be provided for the davelopment and � all landscape maintenance shall be conducted by the homeawners' � association. P�cket Pg. 96 AMND-20Z1-02114Alturas Crossing Subdivision and Ptanned Develapment January 6,ZOZZ Conditions afAppraval Page 4 10, A minimum 6-foot-high, so�id decorative block or masonry wall sha11 be install�d along the Old Alturas Raad frontage with canstructian of Phase 1. The wall shall be � ext�nd�d along the west boundary of Phas� 1 for a distance of 66 feet and the �ast � bounc�ary of Unit 8 a minilnum distance of 15 feet. The wall shall be reduced ta a � height of 3 fest along the driveway entrances. The wall sha11 ineorporate the use of � distinctive columns and horizontal design eleinents and be approved by the � D�v�lopment S�rvices Department in conjunction wzth th� subc�ivision � � improvements. � � � 11. Individual lot development sha11 meet the following standards: � � � a. Minimum 5-foot building side-yard setback. e b. Minimum 10-foot rear-yard building setback. ' e. All frant-yard areas shall i�e landscaped prior to oeeupancy of the residence. � Landseape, Ree�eational Facilities, Open Spaee � � � 12. The developer sha11 install Iandscape along the frontage of Old Alturas Road, in the � front and rear yard af each unit, the north and south group gathering area, and � throu�hout the subdivision as is depicted in the Planned Development Plan. As part � of the fmal plan r�view process, a comprehensive landscape plan shall be prapared � and submitted for approval by the Development Services Department. The plan sha11 � address the requirements of Cha�ter 18.47 (Landscape Standards), Chapter � 18.41.100(Off-Street Parking, Screening,and Landscape)and Chapter 16.70(Water � � Efficient Landscape) of the Redding Munieipal Code. Thes�regulations require, in � part, that: "� � � a. Landseape plans shall be prepared �y a registeredllicensed landscape � professiona� and in stalled in aecordance with City's landscape installation � a� guidelines. � � � b. The required Landscape Documentation Package shall be submitted at the time � of submittal of the landscape plans. °� � c� � c. The California Green Building Cac1e Seetion 5.304.2 required a separate water � meter for irrigation of landscape areas when a project includes more that 1,OOQ � � square feet of irrigatad landscape. Utility and landscape plans shall depiet the � praposed location of the water meter and identify the total area of landscape � proposed with the praject. � cs d. The landscape planter along 01d A�turas Road shall incorporate the use of � i�ermed sad andlor shrubs, and trees with a minimuin size of 15-gallon at a � minimum ratio of 1 tree for every 30 feet of�rontage. I�acket I�g.�7 AMND-20Z1-02114Alturas Crossing Subdivision and Ptanned Develapment January 6,ZOZZ Conditions afAppraval Page 5 e. Any ax�a betw�en th� back of the sidewalk aa�d the property line sha13 b� incorparated into the adjaeent street-side planter, � � f. Planter areas not having densely planted groundcover or utilizing tarf sha11 � include the use af high-quality-fabric wsed barri�r and appropriate mulch � � materia�s, � � g. New trees within the interior of the project mus� be planted based on a minimuzn of 1 tree for every 500 square feet of�nclos�d living area develaped. � � Trees planted to f�lf�ll this requireinent sha11 have a minimum size of 1 S � gallons and consist of a eombination of evergreen and deciduous sp�ei�s. � � h. A minimum of 1 tre�per lot shall be planted in the front-yard ar�a of eaeh unit. � The landscape planter pravided for any required tree shall have a minimum � area of 72 square �eet and minimum width of 6 feet. � � 13. The hillside area located northw�st of th� r�taining wall along units 32 through 39 � of phase 1 and the area located at the northeast corner of Lot 12 sha11 be designated � � on the fina� map with a private open-spaee easement in which limit�d and passiv� �? recreational activities may be allowed �ncluding the placement of a picnic table � and/or bench�s. No tr�e removal3 inehes or greater will be permitted in these areas, � and no building, fsnces, or other structures may be erected. � � 14. The area adjacent to Lot 12 sha�l also inc�ude a public open-space easement for � access and trail purposes dedicated to the Clty for the area adjacent to the north�ast � eorner of the property within the creek corridor setback of Ch�urn Creek as identified � � in the resouree evaluation done far th� subdivision. °� � � 1 S. At the time of construction of Phas�2,a pedestrian-access trailhead sha11 be provided � between Lots 12 and 13 at the street providing aceess through the open space area to � the public Churn Creek open space area. Improvement shall includa 8 feet af paving � or all-weather surface, identification/signage, and fencing as necessary. The private � op�n-space easement sha11 inc�ude provisions for p�destrian access for Fire � Department personnel. � � 16. Design for the narth and south graup gathering areas sha11 include amenities such as � bench�s,pienic or barbeque area, andlor shade structures for the outdoor enjoyment � � of the oeeupants of the develapment. The north group gathering area sha11 be � constructed with P�ase 2 and the south group gathering and r�creation areas shall b� � canstructed at the time of Phase 1. � .� � 17. Recreational-vehicle and boat parking shall be prohi6ited thraugh the hameowners' � associatian documents. * � � � Pacf�et Pg. �� AMND-20Z1-02114Alturas Crossing Subdivision and Ptanned Develapment January 6,ZOZZ Conditions afAppraval Page 6 1$, This eonditian shal� be recorded on the fmal map and not�d in the title report. The escrow instructions far the sale af each 1at sha11 require that the purchaser and seller � of each 1ot sign a statement that they hav�read and und�rstand this cond�tion of sale. � The property awner(s) shall consent to farmatian of a landscape maintenance district � for a11 irrigation, landscape, and fencing im�pxovelnents installed within the publie � right-of-way af Old Alturas Road and between the subdivision perimeter wall and � the right-of-way,to be located within a landscape maintenance easement. Fornaation � shall be in accordance with the following: � � � � a. Prior to reeordation of a final map, the property owner(s) sha1� submit a � landscape maintenance district petition and consent farm, a landscap� � maintenance agreement form, and applicable applieation fees to the � Development Services D�partm�nt. Th� fonnation shall be completed and the � Iandscape installed or properly bonded for prior to issuance of a bu�lding permit � for any stn�eture within the dev�loping phase of the subdivision. Formation of � the district will abligate each lot owner within the subdivision to participate in � the district. A eost-esealation clause will be included in the assesslnent levy to � cover increases in maintenance expenses due to inflation. � � b. The landseape and assoeiated irrigation system far the district shaIl be designed ��' in aecorclance with the speeifications available from the Development Services � Department and instal�ed in aecordance with the fmal plans as approved by the � City. The landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to the Development � Services Department at the time the �ubdivision improvement plans are � subinitted to the Public Works Department and are subject to approval prior to � recordation of a final map. � � � � c. The irrigation system shall be installed and accepted by the City in conjunction �"' � w�th the public iin�rovements within the subdivision, landscape improvements � � shall be installed and accepted by the City prior to issuance af any certificate of � occupancy within the developing phase of the subdivision. � � c�. The developer shall be respons�ble for a11 costs and fees assaciated with the � formation,installation, and eonnection to C�ty water and electric utilities. Such � fe�s include, but are not neeessarily limited to, formation costs, metar fees, � � connectian charges, benefit fees, inspectian fees, and development fees. The � developer sha11 also be responsible for maintenance of the landscape and � irrigation system until such time as the district is formed and fees are levied. � The miniinum maintenance responsibility shall be 94 days for plant lnaterial � and 1 year for the irrigation system from the date improveinents are accepted � by the City. � � StNeets and Cireulation �, � � � Packet P�. �9 ' AMND-20Z1-02114Alturas Crossing Subdivision and Ptanned Develapment January 6,ZOZZ Conditions afAppraval Page 7 19. At the time of recording of any phase of the subdivisian map, street dedication shall b�made including d�dieatior� of th�appropriate right-of-way nee�ssary to aehieve a 42-foot-wide half section alang Old Alturas Road and additianal right-of-way for � construction of a future round-about at the int�rsection with Victor Av�nu�. � a� � 20. Design for necessary street wid�niz�g and frontag�improvem�nts along Old Alturas �� Road shall be as follaws; � � � a. With construction of Phase 1, three 12-foot-wide paved travel lanes (east- bound, west-bound, and a c�nter left-turn lane) transitioning to the existing � � improvement west of the subdivision. East of the driveway entrance shall transition to two 12-foot-wide Ianes (one in each direction). � � b. If Phase 1 is constructed prior to the roundabout at the Old Alturas Road ai�d � Victor Avenue intersection, the three travel lanes shall continue along the � frontage and transition to a left-turn lana into the easterly projeet driveway at � the all-way stop intersection. � � c. Nlinimum eight-faat-wide paved shoulder/bike lane on the north side of O�d � � Alturas Road. �' e� d. Minimum six-foot-wide paved shaulder/bike lane and any l�eeessary roadside drainage facilities on the south side. � � � e. Vertical curb, gutter, and 8-foot-wide sidewalk along 01d Alturas Raad. VVith � constt-uetion of Phase l, sidewalk width sha11 transition to the 5-foot-wide � sidewall�ta the west and shall be extended easter�y to the point at which it would � connect with th�ultimate improvements to be construetec�with the roundabout. °� � � � f, A catch basin and storm drain extension across Old Alturas Road. � � g. Any necessary reconstn3ction or overlay on the existing section of 01d Alturas � Road necessary to provide appropriate tie-in paving and a unifarm cross slope � from centerline to the gutter. � �a h. All necessary pavement transitions, signage and striping. a� � 21. Access rights to Old Alturas Road, with the exception of the two private driveways � shown on the tentative map, shall be waived via dedication to tl�e City. c� � 22, Streetlights shall be placed along Old Alturas Road in accardance with the specification of the Engineering Division and Electric Depart7nent. Streetlights � installed in the interior of the project shall be awned and operated, and maintained °� � by the homeowners' association. � � � � Pack�t Pg. '100 ' AMND-20Z1-02114Alturas Crossing Subdivision and Ptanned Develapment January 6,ZOZZ Conditions afAppraval Page 8 23. Upon development of Phase 1, if the proposed roundabout at the Old A1t�uras Road and Vietor Av�nue intersection has not already been constructed, development sha11 include a temporary driveway access to be lacated entirely on the subject praperty � wzth a minimum width of 20 feat. Construction sha11 includ� a raised curb on th� � east side of the driveway with a curb return at the travellane. A depressed curb shall � be eonstructed to allow acc�ss to the driv�way from the property to the east at tbe � intersection with the road through Phase l. � � 24. Fire Department turning radius diameter af 45 feet outside and 30 feet inside is requir�d to be provided throughout the site. Th� landscape median in th� westerly � � driveway shall be setback far enough to lneet the turning radius with aecess from � Olc�Alturas Road. � � a GNading and � Nainage � � 25. Prior ta the beginning of any clearing, grading, ar site improvement activities, improvement plans far grading, drainage, and utilities, and other required � improvements shall be appraved by the engineering Divisian and other concerned � City of Redding Departments. These plans shall be in conformance with Redding � Municipal Code (RMC) Title 16.12. Prior to the issuanee of a clearing and/or �? grading permit, an Interim Ero�ion and Sedin�ent Control Plan sha11 be included and � a��roved by the City Engineer as part of all elearing and grading permit applieations, � As-built impravement plans with the Engineer's declaration are required in � confarmance with RMC 16.12. � � � 26. The final grading and drainage plan sha11 be in substantial confor�nanee with the approved preliminary grading plan (Sheet 3 af 4). Slopes along �ld Alturas Road � .-� shall be kept at 3 to 1 or �ess and include the use of a retaining eurb at the back of � � sidewalk and bermed landscape to tlie retaining wall, as neeessary such that the °�` � arterial wall,if built on top of the retaining wal�,cloes not appear over 8 feet in height. � � � 27. Trees identi�ed within the hillside araa in the northwestern portion of the property � �hall be preserved. Placement of snow fencing or sonze other means of protection or � identification along the boundary of the area shall be required at the tiine of grading � to ensure equipment operators are aware of the limits of grading. This shall be � confirsned in the field at a preeonstnietion meeting with Planning Division and � � Public Works staff. °� � � � 28. A cateh basin and storm drain extension across 01d Alturas Road shall be constructed at the time of frontage improvements with Phase 1. � � � 29. A11 on-site storm drain eollection and the unclerground detentionlin�ltration facilities � shall be privately owned and maintained by the homeowners' association of the � subdivision. � � � � Packet P'g. 1�1 AMND-20Z1-02114Alturas Crossing Subdivision and Ptanned Develapment January 6,ZOZZ Conditions afAppraval Page 9 3Q. Starm-drain outlets inta Churn Creek shall be designed to provide a sedimentarion basin or filter strip b�twe�n the drain outlet and ere�k chann�l in order to pr�vent erosian impaets and protect water quality. Plans and specif�cations for the basin � andlor filter strip shall be submitted with th� subd'zvision improvem�nt plans and be � subject to review by the Department of Fish and Wildlife. � � � 31. Prior to issuance of a grading permit that may cause the loss of jurisdict�onal waters � of the U.S., th� developer shall secure a1� necessary permits and authorization from � the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the Ca�ifornia Regianal Water Quality Control � Board, and tl�e California Department of Fish and Wildlife. A13 terms and conditions � � of the required perinits and authorization, including mitigation, sha11 be met. ** � 32. In order to avoid ilnpacts to nesting raptors or migratary birds, vegetation removal and other ground disturbance activiti�s associated wit1� construetion shall be � conducted outside of the main nesting season, September 1 through January 31, � otherwise a pre-construction survey for nesting birds sha1�be completed during the � nesting season of February 1 through August 31. The survEy sha11 be conducted by � a qua�ified biologist no mare than one week prior�o vegetation reinovaL If an active � nest more than half completed is located during the survey, a non-disturbanee buffer � shall be established by the c�ualified biologist in consultation with the California �' Department of Fish and Wildlife. No vegetation removal or constructian activities � shall occur within the non-disturbanee buffer unti� the young have fledged, as � determined thraugh additional manitoring by the qualified biologist. The results af � the preeonstruetion survey shall ba sent to tha Califarnia Department of Fish and � Wildlife. If a lapse in construction activities of 15 or more days occurs,then another � pre-coils�ruction s�rvey sha11 be collducted. ** � � � � Seive�, Watea�, and EZectNic Utilities � � 33, Final utility plans for development of the subdivision shall be in substantial � � canformance with the appraved Preliminary Utility Plan(Sheet 4 of 4). � � � �s 34. Water and wastewater lines shall be eonstructed and loeated in the drive aisle. � Provide pavement and/or hammerhead turnaround for vehicular aecess to the � sanitary sewer manholes. � � as > 35. The existing overhead eleetric lines along �1d Alturas Road shall be eonverted ta � unc�erground facilit�es as specifiec�by the Reddin�Electric Utility. This shall inelude � removal of the existing pole direetly w�st of the property baundary and relocation of � the pole east of the property boundary ta a location that will not confliet with the � future roundabout. A ten-faot-wide public service easement shall be provided � behind the back of sidewalk except far an Lots 1 and 2 where the publie service � easament shall extend from the back of walk to the arterial wall. � � � � �ack�t�"g. �fl� ' AMND-20Z1-02114Alturas Crossing Subdivision and Ptanned Develapment January 6,ZOZZ Conditions ofAppraval Page 10 36. Sufficient space near the intersection shall be provic�ed for 12kv switchgear to serve the project. Improvement wi11 require the dev�loper ta provide infrastructure to maintain existing services to the south side of Old Alturas Road. The cast of the � conv�rsion is the sole r�sponsibility of th� develop�r. � � � 37, Electricity for al] units sha�1 be individually m�ter�d, Electric meter locations shall �� be in accordance with the Redding Electric Utility requirements, � � � Fi�^e and Emergeney Se�vice � � 38. A 20-foot a11-weather-surface access road shall be installed and remain serviceable prior to any vertical eonstruction. Fire hydrants sha11 �ae installed and fir� flow � available for fire�ghting purpases during vertical constructian. � � 39. The burning af constructian debris is prohibited; all such material shall be disposed � of by transport to an acceptable landfill. � 40. Vegetation within the hillside area in the northwest portion of the project (eavered � with a private open-space easement) shall be eleared of up to 90 percent of � � combustible brush. Maintenanee on an annual basis sha11 ba req�ir�d by the � homeowners' assaciation. g� � � 41. Waod fences, including posts, are prohibited adjacent to the open-space areas on � units 32 through 39 and Lots 1 through 12. Fences must be construeted of � noncombustible material. � � 42. The internal private driveways through the development sha11 be signed ancUor � striped as nec�ssary to the satisfaetion of the Fire Marshal to prohibit parall�l parl�ing � on any eurb within the development. * '�' � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � c� � � � Packet Pg. 103 ' STaNDa CoNDITIONs oF App ovaz Fo SusnlvlsloNs FFECTIVE AY Z4, Z I� � � In accordance with City of Redding Ordinance 2469, Section 26, the fallowing �tandard � conditions of approval apply to all subdivision projects requiring a final map. Project-specific � conditions af approval will take precedence in the event af a canflict with standard conditions. � R�ferences ta the Grading Ordinance ar� based on R�dding Municipal Cod� (RMC) Titl� 1 b, � Chapter 12. References to the Subdivisian Ordinance are based on RMC Title 17. References to �°` � th�Zoning Ordinanee ar�based on RMC Title 18. � FINAL AP � � � 1. A fmal map sha�I be prepared in accordance with Chapter 17.40 of the Subdivisioi� � Ordinance. The final map and all neeessary supporting documents and information must � b� filed with tha City Engineer przor to the expiration date of the tentative map as � required by Section 17.4Q.020 of the Subdivision Ordinance. � � 2. In accordance with Chapter 17.50 of the Subdivision Ordinance, the property owner shall � dedicat� to the City all right-af-ways and easements necessary to provide public accass � and utilities to the subdivision as required by the tentative map approvaL �� 3. Prior to the recording of a final inap, a eomplete application shall be submitted to the City � to apportion any special assessment-district lien (Improvement Bond Act af 1915) � affected by the s�bdivision, including the applica6le fees, an assessment segregation � diagraln, and an�r�quir�d additional Information. � � � a 4. In-lieu park fees must be paid prior to the recording of the �na1 map zn accordanee with �, Chapter 17.54 of the Subdivision Ordinance, unless an equivalent parkland dedication is � � made in conformance with tl�e tentative map approval. � � � S. Proposed street names must b� submitted for City and ag�ncy revi�w in accordanee with °' Section 17.64.020 of the Subdivision Ordinance prior to the recording of the final map. � The final map shall re�ect on�y st�eet names approvad by the City. � � a� 6. A S-faot-wide public-s�rvzce eas�mant sha11 be dedicat�d on the �nal map abutting a11 public-street right-of-ways within the subdivision. � � � 7. In the case where a regulatory floodplain exists on a subdivision site, the final map shall �' cl�arly delineate the limits of the 100-y�ar base f�oodplain and el�vations. The floodplain � identified an the fmal map shall be cansistent with Section 18.51.020, �3asis Fo� � Establishing A��as of Special F'lood Haza�c�, of tl�e Zoning Ordinanc�. � .� � as 8. For r�sid�ntial subc�ivisions, cov�nants, canditions, and restrictions (CC&Rs) shall be reearded in conjunetion with recordation of a final map which prohibit the s�orage of � recreational vehicles in the front-yard or st�aet side-yard-setback areas as described in � Schedule 18.31.030-C(8) of the Zoning Ordinance. I*ack�t�'g. 104 CoNss�:UCTioN-G�N�,RaL EQUiREMEN�rs � 9. In accordanc� with Chapt�r 17.70 of the Subdivision Ordinance, the dev�lop�r must � secure approval of subdivision �mproveinent plans for grading and all street, utility, and � drainage infrastructure from the City Engineer prior to the start of any construction. � Subdivision improvement plans �ust be prepared by a registered civil engineer and fully � address th� construetion af all impravements required of the subdivision under the � approved tentative map. � � 10. Aeguisition of a11 aff-site interests in title or easements necessary to satisfy the � requirements af tl�e subdivision approval shall be th� responsibility of the dev�lop�r. In � the event the developer is unable to acquire such interests, the developer may petition the � City Couneil for adoption of a resolution initiating eminent-domain proceedings ov�r the � lands needed for the off-site improvements. The developer sha11 bear all costs for such � praceedings, including attarney fees, eourt costs, and land-value eosts, � � 11. Unless a proj�ct-specific dev�lopm�nt standard is identifi�d and approved for the � subdivision project with the tentative map, all public improvements required of the � :� subdivision shall comply with City Construetion Standards and other adapt�d standards � specified under Section 17,70.020 of the Subdivision Ordinance andlor equivalent �� standards, as determined necessary by the City Engine�r. � � � 12. Prior to approval of subdivision improvement plans and issuance of a grading permit, the property owner shall secure all other necessary permitsfappravals required by law froln � outside agencies also having jurisdietion over the projeet, including,but not Iimited to: � , a � a. R�gional T�T�ate� Quality Cont�ol Baard (RWQCB). In most cases, the d�velaper � must prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan and seeure a Constrt�ction � � Activity Storm Wat�r Permit from RWQCB. � � � b. Depa�tm�nt of Fish and Ga�ne (DFG). Where a proj�ct would impact a � waterway, a Seetion 1602 Streambed Alteration Agreeinent must be finalized � with DFG. � c� c. �S ANmy �'o�ps of Engin��s (ACOE). Where a project would i�npact jurisdictional waters of the U,S., appropriate Nationwide or Individual Permit � approvals sha11 be obtained from ACOE. � s�. � Capies of rec�uired ag�ncy p�nnitslappravals sha11 be submittad to the City Engineer, Any special development requirements of these agencies affecting impravements within � the subdivision shall b�r�fl�cted on the�nal improvement plans. � � � � � � � StandaNd Conditions of�pproval-Subdivisions Z Packet Pg. �I(?5 ' 13. Required subdivisian improvements shall be properly and fu�ly canstructed, insp�cted, and aceepted by th� City in aceordance with Cl�apter 17.74 of the Subdivision Orc�inance. Any incomplete improveinents sha11 be secured under the � provisions of Schedule 17.40.060.B and Chapter 17.74 of the Subdivision � Ordinance. Fina1 survey, as-built improvement plans, and related engineering � certificatzons ar� r�quired at th� eompl�tion of woxk in conformance with � Sectians 1'7.70.070 and 17.70.080 of the Subdivisian Ordinance and Section � ]6.12.230 of th� Grading Ordinanee. � � CONSTRUCTION—STANDARD IMPROVEMENT EQUIREMENTS � Gkading, E�asion Contr�ol, Ti^ee F,�eservation c�s 14. Subdivision clearing, grading, and erasion-cantrol plans shall b� in full e eonformance with the Gradin Qrdinance. The final radin im ravement lans � g g g p l� � shall be consistent with the preliminary grading plan and any tree-preservation ' plans considered with the appraved tentative map. � � � 15. The project develaper shall prepare a site and construction-phase-speeific Storm � Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) and seeure a Construction Aetivity � Storm Water Perinit fram the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control ¢� Board in compliance with the requirem�nts of the Stat� General Construction � � Activity Storm Water Permit. Best Management Practices (BMPs) prescribed in � th� SWPPP shal� be utilized and fol]owed in all project site-develapment .� activities. a 16. A11 trees identified for preservatian shall be clearly identi�ed on the subdivision � improvement plans. A tr�e eonstructionlprotection plan shall b� pxepar�d by a � c�ualified (tree)professional in aecordance with Chapter 18.45, T�ee Manageinent, � of the Zoning Ordinance and includ�d as part of the subdivision grading � improvement-plan package. Tree-protection measures identified in the tree � construetion/pra�ectian plan sha]I be reflected in the fmal subdivzsion � iinproveinent plans and followed during construction, � � � � rainage System °' � 17. Storm-drain facilities shall be designed consistent with the requirements of City � Construetion Standards, the City of R�dding Storm Water Quality Improvement � Plan, and the City of Redding Phase II NPDES Permit froin the California � Regional Watex Quality Control Board (Water Quality Order No. ZOQ3—OS - � DWQ). Project design shall incorporate Best Management Practices (BMPs) to � minimize the polluting of stormwater, both during construction and long-term. � Should the lnaintenanee costs of the long-term pollution-eontrol measures exceed � typical storm-drain-syste�n costs, such costs shall be borne by the proj�et by way � of a landscape maintenance district, eserow account, or other such financing � mechanism. � Packet P'g. 1 t3f� 18. Prior to improveinent-plan approval, the developer inust abtain approval for proper manag�ment of stormwater peak flows in accordance with City Council Policy 1806 and the specifications of the City Engineer. Such measures sha�l Ly address impaets frol� th� 10-, 2S-, and 100-year-starm �vents. Projeets shall � address peak flows to inaintain predevelopinent levels at a1l locations downstream � of the project. A draznage rsport shall b� pr�pared ta the format outlined by ths � Engineering Divisian, stamped and signed by a qualified engineer, and provided � to the Engin�ering Division with submittal of project improvement plans. � � Utilities � 19. Essantial utiliti�s, including, but not limitad to, sanitaxy sewer, water, electric, natural gas, and communication distribution lines, incl�uding main lines and � service 1at�rals, sha11 �ae ext�nd�d and sized appropriat�ly ta serve eaeh 1ot and to � pravide logical extensions af serviee to subsequent phases and adjacent properties � in aceordance with Section 17.60.080 af the Subdivision Ordinance. These � utilities shall be installed in accordance with the capaeity, construction, inetering, � and testing standards of the City and other involved private utility company(s), � including applicable utility master plans. � :�, � � 20. Any necessary aff-site utility extensions shall be placed in a public-street right-of- �� way or public-s�rvie� easement in a location approved by the City Engineer and � � other responsible utility companies. Vehicular access for maintenance purposes � shall b� provided to all utility i�frastructure outside a publie right-of way as .� determined necessary by, and in a manner approved by, the City Engineer, � � 21. New "dry" �tilities, including eleetrie, telephone, and cable television, must be � insta�lec� u��derground in accordance with Section 17.60.090 of the Subdivision � Ordinance, Any existing overhead facilities within a proposed sabdivision and � � along peripheral streets must also be placed underground, unless waived under the � project-speci�c conditions. � � � 22. Electric-supply facilities shall be furnished and installed in accordanee with the � Redding El�ctrie Utility Service Policy Resolutian curr�ntly in eff�et at the ti�me � the developer's plans are approved by the City. � � 23. The developer shall be responsible for all costs associated with the relocation or � moc�ification of �xistzng utilzty facilities or struetures necessitated by the � construction of the project or of improvements required as a condition of approval � of this pxoj�et, ineluding r�imbursement of any costs to the affected utility for c� work performed to support the project. � � � a� � � � � � Packet P'g. �i Q7 24. After the initial review af project improvement plans by the Engineering Division, th� developer shall consult with the Redding Electrie Utility (REU) for preparation of an electric-service p1an. A copy of the electric-service plan, � developed and approved by REU, shall be ir�corporat�d into the final � i�npravement p�ans, � � 25, Streetlights sha11 be provided in aceordance with applicable Redding Electric � Utility Construction Standards SS3.0, et seq, � � Fi�^e epa�^t ent � 26. Fire hydrants shal� be install�d at Iocations throughout the subdivision in. accordance with the California Fire Code as approved by the Fire Marshal, All � fire hydrants shall have a minimum fire flaw meeting Appendix-B of th� � California Fire Code and meet the maximum daily demand for the area. "On-lat" � hydrants and n�cessary aasements to service development on flag lots or � oversized lots sha11 also be installed as required by the Fire Marshal. � � � 2'7. Br�sh piles resulting from land-clearing activity shall be fully removed from the � � sit� prior to the start of the �re season or, if generated during fire s�ason, be � removed immediately. � Air° uality � � 28. The following Air Quality Element Standard Mitigation Measures shall be applied � during grading and construe�ion activities ta control dust and PM1� emissions: � 6 9 � a. Nontoxic soil stabilizers shall b� applied accarding to manufacturer's "�' specificatians to all inactive construction areas (previously graded areas � � inactive for 10 days or mor�}. � � � b. All grading operations may be suspended by the City Er�gineer wl�en � winds (as instantaneous gusts) exceed 20 m�les per hour, � � � c. Temporary traffic contral sha11 be provided as appropriate during all °� phas�s of construction to improve t7c�affic flow (e.g., flag parson). � � a� > d. Construction aetivities that could affeet traffic flow sha11 be sch�duled in � off-peak hours. � � e. Active canstruction areas, haul raads, ete., sha11 be watered at least twice `� � daily or more as needed to limit dust. .� � c� f. Exposed stockpil�s of soil and othax back�ll mat�rial sha11 either be � covered, watered, ar have soil binders added to inhibit dust and wind � erosion. � Packet Pg. 7 t}8 ' g, A11 trucks hauling sail and other loase material sha11 be covered or should maintain at least 2 feet of freeboard (i.e., minimum v�rtical distance between top of the load and the trailer) in accordance with the � require�nents of CVC S�ction 23114. This provision is e�forced by loca] � law enforcement agencies. � � h. A�1 public roadways used by the project eontractor sha�1 be maintained � fr�e from dust, dirt, and debris eaused b� eonstruction activities. Streets � shall be swept at the end of the day if visible so�l materials are carried onto � � adjaeent public paved roads. Whe�1 Washers shall b� us�d wher� vehicles enter and exit unpaved roads onto paved raads, or trucks and any � ec�uipment shall be washed off leaving the site with each trip. � � i. Alternatives to open burning of cleared vegetative material on the project " site sha11 be used, unless otherwise approved by the Planning Division, � Fire Marshal, and Shasta County Air Quality Management District. � Suitable alternatives include, but are not limited to, on-site chipping and � mulching and/or hauling to a biomass fuel sita. � � CuZtuNal esou�ees � a� � 29. If, during th� course of d�velopm�nt, any archaeological, historical, or � paleontolagieal resources are uncovered or otherwise detected or observed, � eonstruction activiti�s in th� area affected shall ceas� and the City sha11 �� notified immediately. A qualified archaeologieal professional must then be � retained by the d�velaper to investigate the discov�red cultural obj�ct ta � detennine its �ignificance. If the cult�ural objeet is deemed potentially significant s � by the archaeologist, appropriate treatment and maasures sha11 be followed in '�`° accordance with applicable laws, as reviewed and approved by the City, prior to � � the resumption of work in th� affect�d area. � � � Miscellaneous � � � 3Q. Issuance of buildzng permits for structures on lots resulting from the subdivision � wi11 not occur until a final map is recorded and necessary public-street and utility � improv�ments are availa�le. An exception may ba granted at the discr�tion of the � Building Offieial allowing issuance of a bu�lding permit for the eonstruction of � model homes and other special cireumstanees in accordane� with Seetion � 17.44.090 of the Subdivision Qrdinance. � � 31. Permanent and temporary signs related to the subdivisian shall comply with Chapter 18.42 of the Zoning Ordinance. � � � � � � � Racket Pg. 1�9 32. In the event of any confusion, eonflict, vagueness, typographical error, or spec�al circumstance wher� implementation of any standard or proj�ct-specific condition is in question, the Development Services Director has the autharity, in accordance Ly with Section 17.04.080 of the Subdivision Ordinance, to dat�rmins an appxopriat� � remedy as necessary to ensure that the intent of the eondi�ion and related tentative � map approval is met in accordance with applicabl� laws and polici�s, and as � necessary to ensure orderly development. � � 33. The developer/applicant sha11 note that pursuant to Chapter �6.20 af the Redding Municipal Cod�, City development impaet fees are required to be paid at the time of building occupancyffinal inspection far new construction, building � enlargement, or oth�r improv�m�nt. These fe�s ar� structur�d to znitigate the � project's fair share af eumulative impaets to the City's transpartation, fire- � suppr�ssion, utility, and parks in�'rastructure systems based upon necessary � improvements to aecommodate new development under the City's General Plan. � The dev�lopex/applicant is hereby notified tlaat llefshe has the right to � �rotestlappeal imposition af any af these fees or fee amounts. Any protest/appeal � must comply with the provisions of Gov�rnment Code Seetzon 66020(a}.* � � � � � e� � � � � � � � � � � .� � � � � a� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � Packet Pg. 1�i� ' 5 � � � w � r..v.l ° � _� w g § � �" a ip= s�g oo ' }� $ � � � • „ a a � � -�`�' V� ��i z` � �� c ;o g � � � � - 3 O g �o $� �� " wa A� a� � � g„8 W ��`> ww 5� � �" S o - k � 8 "g � �� E�: �� W �� E.. w3� w� S � � .E a� � m o ° � °� � 3� �� a= �� 3� o�Q -'g O � u° � �� u� E �#^ � W o c � g r � V] � Q�� .�gm �� N�m �;3� � NSo Z �� a� ; � ° � 3� � � % � � - 'c � � s �.,a o � �� 'as 7�5� w�� 8�<W = u � � �� 3� S�� o �� S�� g�" o �-7 w�� m� ° x� d � o�- o�.- � o�� g � _ _ _ _ � � � � s � g �N� s�� e� ° � s�� s �� swm N� � �" a � N � � o � w $ W w w � W � � `� W �° $� � 8� a ' N ,-�. � s m m � � m s � � � g � � � k�-��' � W ��.. �g � �( �¢ ,� 'aF � ¢�� ci. a `� # Ll' '� o �°��' wE �i v 2 00000 � 0000a � o � � � �..r,� _ � � � > LLm �� LL� �LL �a �� =� LL�r �LL �� LLLL �� s .b y�� 'v a4 Q � " y'w �§ ua � 8n S« a'—' g� g� E� � „. ,. , ,:,., � Y r��§ .9b -0A1 W§ � I+�i e i �w p'a„w � '' °� ° � � � � � � ��=a;� a� O 4" O o � o e _ ,Y � � w � � � j � ' � °� � �;r.. � � <� � � � W � x � �, � w a � � a .... � � � . � 3 �, �� < H/Y�O> � J ��y�� V W h : t f V O �4 � �. � � � A� � . . . . .. a . t � � � A� ��' � � �� - � � :. � � � ,,� �" � a .:_. �� r f� r �. � , _ � ,�._,,...�., .. � : ` � _ (} { S w � � f: 1 t� C , n j r � ° � �, � �� z � � � � _ a � � � � t � ; - �� „ r � $ � _ r w ,� , r� r ; , � �� , �, { r� � � �fi �-. ,.. y . . . . . ; f§y S; �E$ . p ; � . � ' � f � ry �.'� y Q . ` ` '2 « � � ;� e {� t „ f y � , .. , . . .. .. `} J / : , 3 r , f �,„�f.. { . ("� � - i. � ._ �z,.,J. .,., ,< „I. .�. 4 . 'P�. � . U _l:.' ._ _ .. _ C 'M ,; � � . �- � s & ' ' r - t � r �',z � � s � � < _ '. ' � k t :,y z r j � � u� :t � , 3 f� � ' S4 s� . _ O i � , - , ' : ;1��> ,.,. .. . ` �/ 4 ��Y St4 .. _Q .. _ . .. ; . � t = W �� _ � � � �� ;� � � � �� ,�� _ � d _ r.. ` ��- ,... ; '. Y f <, � i b t i�, �� r ,... .�.., �:..,.. ^ YA. _ . , . ' .. ,..m.. . .�.. „. ,a..,�..wtv'a.�s: -.es.t �.,�,s,/�,� �. , . ,- �- ...,, ..�. ,,.x ,,,,,,, ,�,� � .y....+ ._ ..� . , fi� _ , � � t . _ � .-...,. . ,n ..,� ,O � � < : F ...�, p � � m ', . .� J � . �..... ,. r v, . . .�.. .� 4.,,,.. O. $ , .. ! : . .�,y y� ..� .. ... �2 6 ¢� ;� ... .. ..� U ,.,.e E.,x,m., 'i . . ,. E � ... .:r f ,tiv� . .. _ . e. .ny y`�'., s n _ . ..,. '� ,`a _ { . .'. � ... � ,i.. . . � � �Y t � S x Z � L� 7 { � ik � '� � .O� 4F�:F tv b�� _ .. , S ^- _ {� �� 5 � � .. , u d& �'��".t i�ii�s�zzkstiwtM'� i k �:. , .,... �r, . ,... . - ,X� �,,.-...e.k=, - _ . .. � ._. q3+��. .� ._ '. � � < , r t, y x t ,...._. :Y, " � � > � t4; � � W e y� �� ` ; � a Q £} r � � �. �} �.�s � �� v7 �. . .<:i n,,,�i 4 vv`w - � t'°' { . _, , �_ _. r . - • ,a.aaF �,.'�: - -`�� O � � }1� F: { � _ . . . . fi 2 A b J„ �1 �k#€ � - -9��?�,:'-�^�`� � S_'{ �. .. � � x �., � ,7 � r� �� , i. � � � ' ��.r 1�� - �,�,��q a ' �+ , " � � r�� . �m �:� �y 3 ti: ... w ; ' " : . t'��.��t�� a.�� . , .,„..,� [r a �rv�'5 -- . . . �`sd'?Ra 1�� . �"-�i.��Y`�-m° ��'�`��`"��$�`. �� `� � { '�''�`�f . .. .,. , .. � � }t��r �' � s :� ��;�" �� d A ��f � �'� � (K. i, � �CH � `�S �4�f�(� �� . �Z i y „ . . _ S t � �' s'; . � . � r�� r�r�i ,u�� t } '�x��'��`s�i�'�� i� '�;� '�r - . . � i � - ��'� �� k��'4%w� f .� -i �,F {{ .; � � � � § �s� i.� a .� 's�'�x; } �� ;�. s �� ., . � , .��,�� v �� s�'� ;� � � ��t�;, � �f , ,; tt �. �, � � ;�� r�a �� '� � e � N �� <� iM'r�": � `' "Si'�,c �v*��'�r� .� ,��rs� � �,: .,�. y�.. . � r,,. ' � ��"X�'�;��' ��g �.�t�. � s w�ni r .��` .:r . � � . '� ' .. q: :� r�,4�3�g,� .�� y ��"� �;,r ��t'�,� ,. . f��,r�t t� r s;.a��,t r.�Y � ��'�� _' _ �c �� s��r a��'� x�� ;z�,,;��``�a�, �" �� ta r ��v �`. �'��.rtta sr''� ,��n;��^hf�tr �,}�e�r;. KS�� :��m� e; t�;�' � �� r e��.� �. r �°�r��aa � � F�{X�a t��r.�^�'t �ra'��ri ��}��"��{��}� �� "�7�a�n�`r�,'� �`� a�t x.,�a��r°ts�t �'�„ x ��"� t'`k��:h �`� n „��`��'s x��ti:� '��}��tF y��`�. �' ��'�'��q✓� � � �-;r��#�,�'�Yt��,5 a� i� L��'��2 4#I,r.r� r�'iv .. . . �,�:�,:��,3<sj,�`�x"^�^�,��..�=;r�'�Ua l�sri�",�2v,�t W £ qga ' � •- � � i z � W z9w N �' col " y H aw c4 � � o w H H zz Nog $.go `3 Via; E ul E A D a E "s m _ y oho ori 53: El ; w w afl000�00000Eloo H S § JH !# ,:` ;§ _.§ !i�§ \\M Hi \M §!` so? 8A §!§ � t a IM -1 oil §\ AS Ina _ C.i YNQ ie!§ I Wowwwww= Hw ai5 Besse ooTIE] o0of-.1 O E o P v F W .i 3°M °y3 °iX ��,° W 3 su�3'�u '20� ZSJm N6 =d� O w �R,777 WWW x C Q � 6M c g V g �� a �zz Ng Oy 3o 3 s3 $LLQ "$ $ o io 0 o iiE gnaw �� o zW Q ue 8 g w w " a w 99 § -� E § § § ( (( /§§ E § ! ■_ \# ( \ �� a>\§/ §§ .1 !] \]( §(§§( ) \/ ``\ `|! ``, z !]] ,!. ,�, -: � \§ M t\\§\ u 4! /I °3,o \ O �!�■.°°; G A #Q2lb . � «cr- ! §@eE@m222E@nEm 4 � � MEETING DATE: January 11, 2022 FROM: Lily Toy, Planning Manager ITEM NO. 4(b)1 ***APPROVED BY*** AUIA�,ylll g#Ufftiaa_�ger1/6/2022 loft<nWr", CifNn Me 11)ev")P;At Services Director I/7+202", Itoy*6redding.camsLb �ippin*�cityofredding.org SUBJECT: 4(b)1 --Amendment Application AMND-2021-02114, an amendment to the Alturas Crossing (formerly known as Live Oak Estates) Tentative Map S-2021-00239 and Planned Development PD -2017-00241/S-2017-00239, to construct 59 multiple -family units on property located on the north side of Old Alturas Road west of the Victor Avenue intersection and addressed as 1320 and 1368 Old Alturas Road. The site is zoned Residential Multiple Family with a Planned Development Overlay "RM -12 -PD" District and a General Plan designation of "Residential 10-20 units per acre." The amendment application proposes to reduce the number of units and lots and amend the Planned Development in order to change the architectural design of the homes, replace the amount garage parking with uncovered parking spaces, and provide additional recreation amenities. Conduct a public hearing and, upon conclusion, find the Addendum to the Mitigated Negatilm Declaration are adequate to comply with the requirements of the California Environment Quality Act, the necessary findings for approval are in evidence, and approve Amendine Application AMND-2021-02114, an amendment to the Alturas Crossing (formerly known Live Oak Estates) Tentative Map S-2017-00239 and Planned Development PD -2017-00241. I UMUZZME= Planned Development Amendment The project applicant is requesting approval of amendment to the approved Alturas Crossing (formerly known as Live Oak Estates) tentati map and planned development plan for the development of 59 multiple -family townhome sty units on eight acres. The amendment includes a reduction of units from 64 units to 59 units, reduction of lots from 26 lots to 21 lots and changes to the layout of the site, the architectur design of the homes, replacement of the amount of garage parking with uncovered parki spaces, and provision of additional recreation amenities. Report to Redding Planning Commission January 7,2022 Re: 4(b)l --Amendment Application AMND-2021-02114(PD-2017-00241IS-2017- 00239),Alturas Crossing Page 2 TERRAINNEGETATION The property is relatively flat along Old Alturas Road to gently sloping in the northwest comer of the property with topography ranging from 555 feet above mean sea level (msl) to 615 ms]. The site is characterized as blue oak woodland in the northwest comer and annual grassland throughout the rest of the property, with minimal barren habitat type surrounding the existing and previous residential buildings on the site. Chum Creek, is located outside the northeast boundary of the site. M � I IMI M.- I North: Single-family residential subdivision and City open space along Chum Creek East: Single family home and vacant land designated "RM -12" adjacent to Chum Creek South: Montessori school, older single-family homes, and vacant land across Old Alturas Road West: Duplex Subdivision WE= In March of 2018, the Planning Commission recommended approval to City Council and tl-" project was subsequently approved and the site was rezoned to include the "PD" Plann 6 Develo)�ment overlay. Further, on May 251. 2002 1, the Plannin_Q Commission granted a three-, extension for the tentative map. The proposal at this time is to phase the development in two phases. Phase I is the souther portion of the project area, along Old Alturas Road, and Phase 2 is the northerly poirition. T amendment request is to develop phase I with 39 units consisting of duplexes, four-plexes, and tri-plex on one single lot and to develop phase 2 with 10 duplex units with each unit on its o lot. Thereby reducing the number of lots from 26 lots to 21 lots. I Report to Redding Planning Commission January 7,2022 Re: 4(b)l --Amendment Application AMND-2021-02114(PD-2017-00241IS-2017- 00239),Alturas Crossing Page 3 General Plan Consistency. The proposed subdivision supports 59 units over a net developable area (excluding steep slope, open space, and right-of-way dedication) of approximately 5.5 acres. This represents a net density of 10.7 units per acre, which falls within the range allowed by the General Plan classification for the site of 10 to 20 units per acre. Overall, staff feels the project advances General Plan Community Development and Design Element (CDD) Goal I I and Policy I ID, to ensure new residential developments are well -located and well designed with a mix of residential density and dwelling types and CDD Goal 12 and Policy 12A, to ensure attractive, safe, and well-maintained neighborhoods by promoting neighborhood quality though project amenities and establishment of a homeowners' association. Amendments to Planned Development Plan At this time, the amendment is proposing following changes to Phase I of the project. SITE DESIGN. The revised layout incorporates a more pedestrian -friendly design with a sidewam along both sides of the driveway leading to the front doors of each unit. This is achieved eliminating the garages from phase I of the project thereby allowing the units to be closer to main drive. The elimination of the garages within phase I is replaced with uncovered parki spaces which are disbursed throughout phase 1. The revised layout also includes a play co kid's play lot, and a community room in this phase of the project. Phase I includes six dupl units and six four-plex units, and a tri-plex unit with an attached community room. The duplex will each of one two-bedroom unit and one three-bedroom unit. The four-plexes will each consi of two two-bedroom units and two three-bedroom units. The one tri-plex will consist of two tw bem units and•ne three-bedrm units. I drooooo ARCHITECTURE. The design of the units has been modified with a different architecture style 1• A incorporating varying materials and further articulation. I Al PARKING. The previous approval incorporated into all duplex units an attached one- or two- I garage and into all fourplex units one covered parking space. The amendment, as not �ireviously would eliminate all the attached garages. The amendment, similar to the previous approved project, is subject to the multiple family development parking requirements whi would require 76 uncovered parking spaces. The amendment proposes 82 uncovered parki spaces, exceeding the minimum requirement. TRASH AND RECYLCING. The previous approval incorporated roll out carts to be collected curbside within the development. The amendment would eliminate the roll out carts and will viding minimum f two trash nd recycling enclsures fr this •hase. Citin 9 hs•e reviseto reflect this change. I proa oaoopondoab d ram, Staff has not identified any issues of inconsistency with the City General Plan or standard development policies or significant environmental concerns. The amendment, in all aspects, other than those changes discussed above, is consistent with the previous approval. The amended planned development (PD) plan still provides large landscape areas along 0' Alturas Road and substantial landscape areas including a centrally located open space area. T overall site layout is enhanced with pedestrian connections between units, parking areas, a] common areas. Report to Redding Planning Commission January 7, 2022 Re: 4(b)1 --A endmentApplication AMND-2021-02114(PD-2017-00241IS-2017- 00239),Alturas Crossing Page 4 Since the amendment is substantially consistent with the previously approved footprint (M disturbance, the original Mitigated Negative Declaration adopted for this project has beA determined to be adequate for the amendment application. Therefore, staff has prepared Addendum to the Gyreviouslp a! roved Mitigated Negative Declaration and is recommending t] Addendum be adopted pursuant to the California Quality Act. A copy of the Addendum, initi study and mitigated negative declaration is attached. I VOWWOMEW 1=1 Staff has not received any public comment on the application as a result of the amendment public notice. MEMMUM= WrEzzi= Amendments to planned developments, pursuant to Section 18.53.100, are required to EN approved by the Planning Commission similar to amendments to Use Permits. I 9WM"F4= The following alternatives are offered for consideration: I Based upon a determination that the necessary findo ings are in evidence, apprve Amendment application AMND-2021-02114, subject to the attached draft conditions. 2. Deny the amendment application, such action must be based upon a finding that the project is inconsistent with the General Plan or other City development standards or poses a threat to public health, safety, or welfare. Staff has not identified any justification for denying the project. 3. Continue the item or refer the item back to staff for project modifications the Plannitz Commission deems necessary to support the project. Minor modifications can incorporated inta motin for a recmmendatin of apprval. I o oooo W17MI= Report to Redding Planning Commission January 7, 2022 Re: 4(b)1 --A endmentApplication AMND-2021-02114(PD-2017-00241IS-2017- 00239),Alturas Crossing Page 5 traveled portion of the City. Staff believes the proposed project is a good fit for the site and the general neighborhood. Revised Findings Revised Conditions of Approval Location/Zoning Map Revised Site Layout Revised Tentative Map Revised Phase I Building Elevations Phase I Renderings Addendum, Mitigated Negative Declaration, and Initial Study City Council Staff Report - May 1, 2018 (available online) ENVIRONMENTAL, TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PLAN FINDINGS ALTURAS CROSSING (FORMERLY LIVE OAK ESTATES) Based on the Initial Study and the information contained in the record, there will be no significant effect on the environment. A Mitigated Negative Declaration is appropriate for the project. 2. The Mitigated Negative Declaration and its supporting documentation independent t and analysis , of of Redding. 3. The amendment is substantially consistent with the previously approved project, therefore, the original Mitigated Negative Declaration adopted for this project is adequate and th* adoption of t. appropriate. a. That the proposed map is not consistent with applicable genual and specific plans as specified in Section 65451. The project density is within that allowed by the General Plan designation of "Residential, 10 to 20 dwelling units per acre." The proposed net residential density is 10.7 units per acre. r not applicable general andspecific plans. As a planned •'!- !, t t conforms • the standardsof ` Plan and Zoning Ordinance within the gui• and purposes of Chapter 18.53 Planned Development. t • of t ` buildinginclude reduced lot sizes and public street frontages, custom -lot configuration, and reduc #acks in accordance with the Planned Development Plan. steep-slopeC. That the site is notphysically suitablefor the type of development. The area in the northwest portion of the site and the creek corridor setback in the northeast comer of the site which is not suitable for development will be designated as a private open -space easement • limited passive recreational activities. Otherwise, the site is physically suitable for this type of development as the property can accommodate creation of the proposed lots in accordance with the planned development plan without the need for any unusual grading or construction practices. Short retaining walls will be located between lots to accommodate • t on •t; however, the private driveway through the project meets the driveway grade requirements. •proposed site is suitable for the development proposed, utilizing the density allowed by the General Plan designation of "Residential, 10 to 20 dwelling units per acre." The proposed project Findings, Alturas Crossing (formerly Live Oak Estates) 6-2017-00239 Page I intends use only i i of . for development i is not encumbered by steep slopeswouldrestrictdevelopment. • . areas preserved within private open space. available to accommodate designe. That the or the proposed improvements is likely to caun damagesubstantial environmental their habitat. The proposedimprovements wouldnot •use substantial envir• •'I damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. Mitigati measures more fully set forth in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project addre the minor f # #' jurisdictional . i protection # • .'# propertybirds during construction. The subdivision design avoids the northwest portion of t i i!' and the northeastportion iadjacentt creek corridor which will provide protection of those areas from environmental damagl- The project includes an underground storm water detention and infiltration system that wi meet City requirements for quantity and quality prior to discharge to Churn Creek, avoidi environmental damage to fish or • and their habitat. accordancef. That the design of the subdivision or type of improvements is likely to cause serious publ' health problems. The residential project does not present any adverse impacts to publ health. The design of the subdivision includes two driveway locations that would provi safe access to the project in • # avoid motor injuries. Improvements along Old Alturas Road include an 8 -foot -wide bike lane and foot -wide sidewalk providing safe access for pedestrians and bicyclists. Two gro gathering areas are designed into the project, along Chum Creek, which would provide outdoor activity for residents of the proje promoting a healthyprojectprovide housing units in accordance with and consistent with the existing General Plan and Zom designations forii. g. That the design for the subdivision or the type of improvements will conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through, or use of, property within the proposed subdivision. In this connection, the governing body may approve a map if it finds that alternate E easementsfor access or far use will be provided and that these will be substantially equivalent to ones previously acquired by the public. This subsection shall apply only to easements of record or to easements established by judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction, and no authority is hereby granted to a legislative body to determine that the public at large has acquired easements for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. Design of the subdivision a improvements will not conflict with casements acquired for access through, or use of, property ;_ within the proposed subdivision. Conditions of approval require dedication of appropriate rights- of-way and easements for Old Alturas Road and public utilities within the project. A public open- > space easement for access and trail purposes is required with recording of the final map for the area in the northeast corner of the proposed subdivision adjacent to the Churn Creek corridor. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PLAN FINDINGS E ca Findings, Alturas Crossing (formerly Live Oak Estates) S-2017-00239 Page 2 1. The proposed development is consistent with the goals, objectives, policies, standards, and programs of this code and of the General Plan and any applicable specific plan, including density and intensity limitations that apply. The project density falls within the limitations of the property's General Plan designation of "Residential, 10 to 20 dwelling units per acre." This project's density is... Further, the Housing Element identifies the need to construct additional 3 -bedroom units in the community, a product which will be provided by the project. 2. The site for the proposed development is adequate in size and shape to accommodate said use and all yards, open spaces, setbacks, walls and fences, parking area, loading areas, landscape, and other features required. The project design satisfies all site standards and residential feature requirements of the City Zoning Ordinance within the guidelines and purpose of the "PD" District. Individual lot development includes a minimum 5 -foot building side -yard setback and a minimum 10 -foot rear -yard building setback. All garage, parking space, and drive aisle dimensions meet the minimum standards contained in the City's Off -Street Parking Ordinance. project3. The site for the proposed development has adequate access considering the limitations of existing and planned streets and highways. The • access to Old Alturas Road according to City standards. A 15 -foot right-of-way dedication for a total• `i along Old Alturas • • i • •• wide Alturas right-of-way • . •ne west -bound, one east- bound tying • the existing improvementsat the intersectionof Alturas Road and Browning Conditions of a• . also require construction of •• i` bike lane and an • ii'sidewalk, or path,opposed • s •• sidewalk, • Active Transportationthat be considered approval by •uncil in the near future. The westerly driveway center -turn lane for • and out of • driveway function as the fourth leg of the future roundabout planned for Victor Avenue and Old Alturas R•.t 4. Adequate public services exist or will be provided in accordance with the conditions of Ti development plan approval, to serve the proposed development; and the approval of the proposed development will not result in a reduction of such public services to properties so as to be a detriment to public health, safety, or welfare. Adequate public-service and utility capacity is available to accommodate the project without adversely affecting overall service Levels or resulting in detrimental effects to public health, safety, or welfare. Water U. and sewer service will be provided by the City of Redding with connection to existing mains in Old Alturas Road. Adequate capacity for both utilities and service systems are available to the project. The City would provide police and fire protection under existing services levels. The size of the project would not mandate the need for additional facilities. The project is also subject to Chapter 16.20 of the Redding Municipal Code which requires new development to pay water-, sewer-, storm -drain, and fire -facilities impact fees calculated to mitigate a project's fair share of cumulative impacts to the City's water, Findings, Alturas Crossing (formerly Live oak Estates) S-2017-00239 Page 3 storm -d!. and fire -protection infrastructurebased upon improvements to accommodate development under 5. The proposed development, as conditioned, will not have a substantial adverse effect on surrounding property or the permitted use thereof and will be compatible with the existing and planned land use character of the surrounding area. The project proposes lots in Phase 1 and 2 to be developed with a duplex on each lot and a fourplex on each lot in. Phase 3 with a residential density consistent with the multiple -family zoning of the property. The project will be compatible with the densities allowable along Old Alturas Road between Browning Street and Victor Avenue. It is also compatible with the duplex subdivision project directly to the west, as well as the mix of uses, including an apartment project, school, and office complex, across Old Alturas Road to the south. The site is physically separated from the single-family residential properties in the Quail Ridge Subdivision by approximately 40 to 60 feet in elevation change. 6. The improvements required and the manner ofdevelopment adequately address all natu including,and manmade hazards associated with the proposed development and the project sit but not limited• i i, -i developme plan avoids areas of - slopeand is adequatelyconditioned i address potential- hazards.Conditions approval . t i and op space. homeowners' i i iialong the i i- -i- , - ipartme • i i 'i i i i, purposes. development • -• i -00-year floodplain i -- 7. The proposed development carries out the intent of the Planned Development provisions � by providing a more efficient use of the land and an excellence of architecture and site design greater than that which could be achieved through the application of the base district regulations. The project provides a more efficient use of the land, which will allow a duplex or fourplex on each lot with a moderate density. All units are two-story with an a) attached one- or two -car garage and will include private fenced yards. The Planned Development Plan illustrates common amenities proposed for the development. A property owners' association would be formed to maintain the two group gathering areas, open -space area, front- and rear -yard landscape on all lots and all other common landscape areas. Final site development, architectural, and landscape plans are subject to approval : by the Development Services Director, in part to ensure further consistency. U. e T Findings, Alturas Crossing (formerly Live Oak Estates) S-2017-00239 Page 4 Amendment Application 2021-02114 An Amendment to Tentative Subdivision Map S-2017-00239 Planned Development PD -2017-00241 Alturas Crossing Subdivision and Planned Development (formerly Live Oak Estates Subdivision) Conditions of Approval *Conditions marked with an asterisk are to be indicated on the final map as notes. "Conditions marked with a double asterisk are also environmental mitigation measures. MEMEWFEM= I Tentative map approval is granted for the Alturas Crossing Subdivision, allowing division of 8 acres to create 21 multiple -family residential lots in two phases for development of a total of 59 multiple -family units as shown on the tentative subdivision map and Planned Development Plan. Phase I consists of I lots total to be developed with six two-family dwelling units (duplex units), six four-plex units, and a tri-plex unit with an attached community room for a total of 39 units. Phase 2 consists of 20 lots to be developed with 10 duplex units with each unit on a lot for a total of 20 units. The final map shall be prepared in accordance with the revised tentative map as approved by the Planning Commission on January 11, 2022. The requirements of these conditions shall prevail in the event there is any inconsistency between a condition and information or data presented on the tentative map. 2. The standard conditions for subdivisions delineated in Resolution 92-18 shall be met, except as may be specifically modified by these conditions. 3. The developer shall note that Section 711.4 of the State Fish and Game Code requires payment of a fee to the County Clerk for filing a Notice of Determination for an environmental document; payment of this fee is the responsibility of the project proponent. accordance with Chapter 18.40.040 of the Zoning Code (Compliance with Map Requirements), all conditions applicable to postsubdivision construction (as marked with an asterisk) shall be noted on the final map under "Statement of Conditions" to provide notification to future property owners of building limitations and other requirements for the subdivision. AMND-2021-02114AIturas Crossing Subdivision and Planned Development January 6,2022 Conditions ofApproval Page 2 5. The standard requirements of Chapter 18 (Zoning) of the Redding Municipal Code and the zoning designation underlying the "PD" Overlay shall apply, unless a special development standard is allowed pursuant to these conditions and the approved planned development plan. 6. All site and building development shall be consistent with the Alturas Crossing Planned Development Plan AMND-2021-02114 dated January 2022. Final plans shall be approved by the Planning Division prior to recordation of a final map or building permit for any phase of the project. These plans shall consist of a final map and development details for landscape, decorative retaining and sound wall design, improvement in the common outdoor gathering areas, trailhead improvements, lighting, • final building architectural design consistent with the City's Design Criteria for Multiple Family. 7. Prior to i• of a final map, the developer shall create and fund a private homeowners' association to provide for the maintenance of all common areas and • as outlined in the planned development • in • The articles of incorporation and covenants, conditions, and restrictions for the homeowners' association shall be reviewed by the City Attorney. The homeowners' association shall •- • for the maintenance of improvements, lands, and facilities, including, but not limited to, the following: * a. All landscape, irrigation, fences, walls, and other improvements and amenities within all areas maintained in common by the homeowners' association, including the north and south group gathering areas, and the front- and rear -yard area of each lot. b. Common utility services and the private stormwater system including the detention/infiltration system. C. Internal private driveways, common parking areas, nonpublic sidewalk or pathways, and interior project lighting. d. Any project entrance features including landscape median and monument signs. f. Open space • improvements and vegetation and fire -fuel management of the private open space located at the northwest corner of the site and the northeast comer of Lot 12. Formation of a private homeowners' association will obligate each lot owner within the subdivision to participate in the association. The escrow instructions for the sale AMND-2021-02114AIturas Crossing Subdivision and Planned Development January 6,2022 Conditions ofApproval Page 3 a i requiro mat LHO purcilasor anit F. P sign a SLaLcTTT=ffaT they have read and understand this condition of 8. The internal private driveways, common parking areas, north and south group gathering area improvements, including landscape and irrigation system, and open space trailhead shall be completed by the developer and approved by the City prior to issuance of any building occupancy permit. If the project is phased, only those improvements shown within the phase boundary shall be completed prior to a building occupancy permit in that developing phase. Phasing shall be as shown on the tentative map and as follows: a. Phase I — Lots 1. b. Phase 2 — Lots I through 20. 9. Trash and recycling service for the development shall include the following: * �RIWOIN 11 RN2 It RATAVA III RUEN I 1W4 MW NI b. Placement of the carts shall be as shown in the planned development plan with curb markers placed on the curb to identify the location for each address. C. Three feet spacing is required between carts and 6 feet from any other obstacle. e. Enforcement of no parking on the street by the homeowners' associatioin F . A minimum of two trash and recycling enclosure for Phase I meeting the requirements of Section 18 .40.120 of the Redding Municipal Code. 9- Shade trees shall be placed such that the canopy does not overhang the enclosure when mature. h. Billing for Phase 2 would require each duplex tenant to pay for garbage service separately. Billing for Phase I would require one single account for garbage service paid by the homeowners' association. j. No green waste carts or pick-up will be provided for the development and all landscape maintenance shall be conducted by the homeowners' association. AMND-2021-02114AIturas Crossing Subdivision and Planned Development January 6,2022 Conditions ofApproval Page 4 10. A minimum 6-foot-bigb, solid decorative block or masonry wall shall be installed along the Old Alturas Road frontage with construction of Phase 1. The wall shall be extended along the west boundary of Phase I for a distance of 66 feet and the east boundary of Unit 8 a minimum distance of 15 feet. The wall shall be reduced to a height of 3 feet along the driveway entrances. The wall shall incorporate the use of distinctive columns and horizontal design elements and be approved by the Development Services Department in conjunction with the subdivision improvements. a. Minimum 5 -foot building side -yard setback. b. Minimum I 0 -foot rear-ynlr*1#301lg"•. IMMMEM203= 12. The developer shall install landscape along the frontage of Old Alturas Road, in the front and rear yard of each unit, the north and south group gathering area, and throughout the subdivision as is depicted in the Planned Development Plan. As part of the final plan review process, a comprehensive landscape plan shall be prepared and submitted for approval by the Development Services Department. The plan shall address the requirements of Chapter 18.47 (Landscape Standards), Chapter 100 (Off -Street Parking, Screening, and Landscape) and Chapter 16.70 (Water Efficient Landscape) of the Redding Municipal Code. These regulations require, in part, that: a. Landscape plans shall be prepared by a registered/licensed landscape professional and in stalled in accordance with City's landscape installation guidelines. b. The required Landscape Documentation Package shall be submitted at the time of submittal of the landscape plans. C. The California Green Building Code Section 5.304.2 required a separate watHI meter for irrigation of landscape areas when a project includes more that 1,0 square feet of irriatlandscapede . Utility and landscape plans shall pict t proposed location of the water meter and identify the total area of landscal ged proposed with the project. d. The landscape planter along Old Alturas Road shall incorporate the use of bermed sod and/or shrubs, and trees with a minimum size of 15 -gallon at a minimum ratio of I tree for every 30 feet of frontage. AMND-2021-02114AIturas Crossing Subdivision and Planned Development January 6,2022 Conditions ofApproval Page 5 e. Any area between the back • the sidewalk and the property line shall incorporated into the adjacent street -side planter. •- f. f. Planter areas not having densely planted groundcover or utilizing turf shall include the use of high -quality -fabric weed barrier and appropriate mulch materials. g. New trees within the interior of the project must be planted based on a minimum of I tree for every 500 square feet of enclosed living area developed. Trees planted to fulfill this requirement shall have a minimum size of 15 gallons and consist of a combination of evergreen and deciduous species. h. A minimum of I tree per lot shall be planted in the front -yard area of each ung The landscape planter provided for any required tree shall have a minimu area of 72 square feet and minimum width • 6 feet. I 13. The hillside area located northwest of the retaining wall along units 32 through 39 • phase I and the area located at the northeast comer • Lot 12 shall be designated on the final map with a private open -space easement in which limited and passive recreational activities may be allowed including the placement of a picnic table and/or benches. No tree removal 3 inches or greater will be permitted in these areas, • no building, fences, or other structures may be erected. 14. The area adjacent to Lot 12 shall also include a public open -space easement for access and trail purposes dedicated to the City for the area adjacent to the northeast comer of the property within the creek corridor setback of Chum Creek as identified in the resource evaluation done for the subdivision. 15. At the time of construction of Phase 2, a pedestrian -access trailhead shall be providei between Lots 12 and 13 at the street providing access through the • space area to the public Chum Creek open space area. Improvement shall include 8 feet of paving or all-weather surface, identification/signage, and fencing as necessary. The private open -space easement shall include provisions for pedestrian access for Fire Department personnel. 16. Design for the north and south group gathering areas shall include amenities such as benches, picnic • r• area, and/or shade structures for the outdoor enjoyment • the • • the development. The north group gathering area shall • constructed with Phase 2 and the south group gathering and recreation areas shall be • at the time •' Phase 1. 17. Recreational -vehicle and boat parking shall be prohibited through the homeowners' association documents. * AMND-2021-02114AIturas Crossing Subdivision and Planned Development January 6,2022 Conditions ofApproval Page 6 18. This condition shall be recorded on the final map and noted in the title report. The escrow instructions for the sale of each lot shall require that the purchaser and seller of each lot sign a statement that they have read and understand this condition of sale. The property owner(s) shall consent to formation of a landscape maintenance district for all irrigation, landscape, and fencing improvements installed within the public right-of-way of Old Alturas Road and between the subdivision perimeter wall and the right-of-way, to be located within a landscape maintenance easement. Formation shall be in accordance with the following: * a. Prior to recordation of a final map, the property owner(s) shall submit a landscape maintenance district petition and consent form, a landscape maintenance agreement form, and applicable application fees to the Development Services Department. The formation shall be completed and the landscape installed or properly bonded for prior to issuance of a building permit for any structure within the developing phase of the subdivision. Formation of the district will obligate each lot owner within the subdivision to participate in the district. A cost -escalation clause will be included in the assessment levy to cover increases in maintenance expenses due to inflation. b. The landscape and associated irrigation system for the district shall be designed in accordance with the specifications available from the Development Services Department and installed in accordance with the final plans as approved by the City. The landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to the Development Services Department at the time the subdivision improvement plans are submitted to the Public Works Department and are subject to approval prior to recordation of a final map. c. The gation system shall be installed and accepted by the City in conjunction with the public improvements within the subdivision; landscape improvements shall be installed and accepted by the City prior to issuance of any certificate of occupancy within the developing phase of the subdivision. d. The developer shall be responsible for all costs and fees associated with the formation, installation, and connection to City water and electric utilities. Such fees include, but are not necessarily limited to, formation costs, meter fees, connection charges, benefit fees, inspection fees, and development fees. The developer shall also be responsible for maintenance of the landscap- •. • gation system until such time as the district is formed and fees are levied. The minimum maintenance responsibility shall be 90 days for plant material and I year for the irrigation system from the date improvements are accepted by the City. AMND-2021-02114AIturas Crossing Subdivision and Planned Development January 6,2022 Conditions ofApproval Page 7 19. At the time of recording of any phase of the subdivision map, street dedication shall be made including dedication of the appropriate right-of-way necessary to achieve a 42 -foot -wide half section along Old Alturas Road and additional right-of-way for construction of a future round -about at the intersection with Victor Avenue. 20. Design for necessary street widening and frontage improvements along Old Alturas Road shall be as follows: a. With construction of Phase 1, three 12 -foot -wide paved travel lanes (east- bound, west -bound, and a center left -turn lane) transitioning to the existing improvement west of the subdivision. East of the driveway entrance shall transition to two 12 -foot -wide lanes (one in each direction). b. If Phase 1 is constructed prior to the roundabout at the Old Alturas Road and Victor Avenue intersection, the three travel lanes shall continue along the frontage and transition to a left -turn lane into the easterly project driveway at the all -way stop intersection. c. Minimum eight -foot -wide paved shoulder/bike lane on the north side of Old Alturas Road. d. Minimum six -foot -wide paved shoulder/bike lane and any necessary roadside drainage facilities on the south side. e. Vertical curb, gutter, and 8 -foot -wide sidewalk along Old Alturas Road. With construction of Phase 1, sidewalk width shall transition to the 5 -foot -wide sidewalk to the west and shall be extended easterly to the point at which it would connect with the ultimate improvements to be constructed with the roundabout. g. Any necessary reconstruction or overlay on the existing section of Old Alturas Road necessary to provide appropriate tie-in paving and a uniform cross slope from centerline to the gutter. h. All necessary pavement transitions, signage and striping. 21. Access rights to Old Alturas Road, with the exception of the two private driveways shown on the tentative map, shall be waived via dedication to the City. 22. Streetlights shall be placed along Old Alturas Road in accordance with the specification of the Engineering Division and Electric Department. Streetlights installed in the interior of the project shall be owned and operated, and maintainei- by the homeowners' association. AMND-2021-02114AIturas Crossing Subdivision and Planned Development January 6,2022 Conditions ofApproval Page 8 23. Upon development of Phase 1, if the proposed roundabout at the Old Alturas Road and • Avenue intersection has not already been constructed, development shall include a temporary driveway access to be located entirely on the subject property with a minimum width • 20 feet. Construction shall include a raised curb • the east side of the driveway with a curb return at the travel lane. A depressed curb shall be constructed to allow access to the driveway from the property to the east at the • with the road through Phase 1. 24. Fire Department turning radius diameter of 45 feet outside and 30 feet inside is required • be provided throughout the site. The landscape median in the westerly driveway shall be setback far • to meet the turning radius with access from Old Alturas Road. mzmmlmm�= 25. Prior to the beginning of any clearing, grading, or site improvement activities, • plans for grading, drainage, and utilities, and other required improvements shall be approved by the engineering Division and other concerned City of Redding Departments. These plans shall be in conformance with Redding Municipal Code (RMC) Title 16.12. Prior to the issuance of a clearing and/or grading permit, an Interim Erosion and Sediment Control Plan shall • included and approved by the City Engineer as part of all clearing and grading permit applications. As -built improvement plans with the Engineer's declaration are required in conformance with RMC • 26. The final grading and drainage plan shall be in substantial confon-nance with the approved preliminary grading plan (Sheet 3 of 4). Slopes along Old Alturas Road shall be kept at 3 to I or less and include the use of a retaining curb at the back of sidewalk and f landscape to the retaining wall, as necessary such that the arterial wall, if • on top of the retaining wall, does not appear over 8 feet in height. 27. Trees identified within the hillside area in the northwestern portion of the property shall be preserved. Placement of snow fencing or some other means of protection or identification along the boundary of the area shall be required at the time of grading to ensure equipment operators are aware of the limits of grading. This shall be confirined in the field at a preconstruction meeting with Planning Division and Public • staff. 28. A catch basin and storm drain extension across •t Alturas Road shall be constructed at the time of • improvements with Phase 1. 29. All on-site storm drain collection and the underground detention/infiltration facilities shall be privately owned and maintained by the homeowners' association of the subdivision. AMND-2021-02114AIturas Crossing Subdivision and Planned Development January 6,2022 Conditions ofApproval Page 9 30. Storm -drain outlets into Chum Creek shall be designed to provide a sedimentation basin or filter strip between the drain outlet and creek channel in order to prevent erosion impacts and protect water quality. Plans and specifications for the basin and/or filter strip shall be submitted with the subdivision improvement plans and be subject to review by the Department of Fish and Wildlife. 31. Prior to issuance of a grading permit that may cause the loss of jurisdictional waters of the U.S., the developer shall secure all necessary permits and authorization from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife. All tenns and conditions of the required permits and authorization, including mitigation, shall be met. ** 32. In order to avoid impacts to nesting raptors or migratory birds, vegetation removal and other ground disturbance activities associated with construction shall be conducted outside of the main nesting season, September I through January 3 1, otherwise a pre -construction survey for nesting birds shall be completed during the nesting season of February I through August 3 1. The survey shall be conducted by a qualified biologist no more than one week prior to vegetation removal. If an active nest more than half completed is located during the survey, a non -disturbance buffer shall be established by the qualified biologist in consultation with the California Department of Fish and Wildlife. No vegetation removal or construction activities shall occur within the non -disturbance buffer until the young have fledged, as determined through additional monitoring by the qualified biologist, The results of the preconstruction survey shall be sent to the California Department of Fish and Wildlife. If a lapse in construction activities of 15 or more days occurs, then another pre -construction survey shall be conducted. ** Sewer, Water, and Electric Utilities 33. Final utility plans for development of the subdivision shall be in substantial conformance with the approved Preliminary Utility Plan (Sheet 4f 4). 34. Water and wastewater lines shall be constructed and located in the drive aisle. Provide pavement and/or hammerhead turnaround for vehicular access to the sanitary sewer manholes. 35. The existing overhead electric lines along Old Alturas Road shall be converted to underground facilities as specified by the Redding Electric Utility. This shall include removal of the existing pole directly west of the property boundary and relocation of the pole east of the property boundary to a location that will not conflict with the future roundabout. A ten -foot -wide public service easement shall be provided behind the back of sidewalk except for on Lots I and 2 where the public service easement shall extend from the back of walk to the arterial wall. AMND-2021-02114AIturas Crossing Subdivision and Planned Development January 6,2022 Conditions of Approval Page 10 36. Sufficient space near the intersection shall be provided for 12kv switchgear to serve the project. Improvement will require the developer to provide infrastructure to maintain existing services to the south side of Old Alturas Road. The cost of the conversion is the sole responsibility of the developer. 37. Electricity for all units shall be individually metered. Electric meter locations shall be in accordance with the Redding Electric Utility requirements. 38. A 20 -foot all -weather -surface access road shall be installed and remain serviceable prior to any vertical construction. Fire hydrants shall be installed and fire flow available for firefighting #• • vertical • 39. The burning of construction •`# is prohibited; all such material shall •` disposed of by transport to an acceptable landfill. 0. Vegetation within the hillside area in the northwest portion of the project (covered with a private open -space easement) shall be cleared of up to 90 percent of combustible brush. Maintenance on an annual basis shall be required by the homeowners' association. 41. Wood fences, including posts, are prohibited adjacent to the open -space areas on units 32 through 39 and Lots I through 12. Fences must be constructed of noncombustible material. 42. The internal private driveways through the development shall be signed and/or striped as necessary • the satisfaction of the Fire Marshal to prohibit parallel parking • any curb within the development. * Kol �m R i 9 m I OLD ALTURAS RD DANA DR 5 N GIS DIVISION ZONING MAP W+ INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT E DATE PRODUCED: AMND-2021-02114/PD-2017-00241/S-2017-00239 DECEMBER 27,2021 ADK PROPERTIES LLC S 0 200 400 Feet 1320 & 1368 OLD ALTURAS ROAD .-1--, --l.-.---1 1 1111 -111 -- I AP# 071-270-012 & 021 CL m ARROYO MANOR DR 0 .2 0 -j MTG.DATE. ITEM: ATTACHMENT: E \\\\ :NA ........... p pv d •. ° a Oi tG xz NO y 'Zil " ,\ /, i Y.. e D D s Ini I m U Fc -0 Xkk34,f�117 r U I” r rk£j"�in +4��f"'t}7 rrtt iyf.,{F21>#ES �'f„i r�{7s'�"+,F32{�tiirist is { fj£f:`y};n'ct�}7.2{rjt ii{ftr�7 }.r.'rf2+s f�lt�.z7rti Ti i7 }r rtt{jrFi�. ter P{rS�,s';•tj}s ON i£t,tzt t7(!1'�ts}r?si?#1 7t7£it?S�I47#j$ftt�)}r}Pr}`ilt�F%+'�t`tf}}`rt}4'%7�tr.}s#}I �t .tt{'i�Y s4t }4�j;J}�',ii{J34tt �{ 4S iit if t��',�?tt i#riri' r ;�?}irr#t sil{1##ikft{}�ftr r!J#;4�+it;?�jzrr r4j'7ttyiihe}#jr?��,ii. $}�}Sit;i�i4iijt}; I3';JsZ"ft}r`•r}rTt142Y{,SrSis}htr;'ltf#�yfr�frt 'o ti rtcz ��tssb}zix.r CITY OF RiEDDING 777 <"YPREss AVENUE, 4"t Dzz NG CA 96001 1=.17 Box 496071 . 1"dEL?DING, CA 96049-6071 Addendum to Mitigated Negative Declaration Prepared for Alturas Crossing Subdivision and Planned Development (formerly Live Oak Estates Subdivision and Planned Development) Amendment Application AMND-2021-02114, an Amendment to Tentative Map S-2017-00239 and Planned Development PD -2017-00241 AmendmentSUBJECT Application ANMD -2021-02114, Development, amendment• Tentative Map S-2017-00239 • Planned Development CrossingAlturas • d Planned Development, •rmerly Live Oak Estates Subdivisi• and Planned Development to construct 61 multiple -family units on property located on the no •- of Old Alturas ' • • west of •r Avenue intersection and addressed as 1320 and 13•c approvedOld Alturas Road. The site is zoned Residential Multiple Family with a Planned Developme Overlay "RM -12 -PD" District and a General Plan designation of "Residential 10-20 units p PROJECT DESCRIPTION K2 Development, is requesting an amendment to the tentative map reduce the i to 23 lotsand amend the planned• 1 order architectural design of the homes,• of • `• parki ENVIRONMENTALspaces, and provide additional recreation amenities. I o not • i amendment area • the same project area a • does not. additional l. • •ff-site thathave o add=" •• .•: with the previous entitlements. The open space located on the sloping hillside area in the northwe portion i•ect area will remain as an a. ■1Q111,10_11k1� . r A Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the original project was adopted by the Redding City Council on. May 1, 2018, On May 1, 2018, the City of Redding previously certified a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project described above. Based upon a review of the current amendments to the project, it has been determined that addendum is appropriate because the additions are minor, and none of the following conditio (pursuant to CEQA Section 15162) have occurred: I 1. Substantial changes are proposed for the project that will require major revision of the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration due to new, significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. 2. Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken that involve new, significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. 3. New information of substantial importance indicates that: a. The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. Mitigation measures previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt them. 41. Mitigation measures that are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration would substantially reduce one or more significant effects, but the project proponents decline to adopt them. I 1. The City qf Redding has determined that an addendum is warranted, finding that none of the above conditions are in evidence and that there is no substantial evidence, in light of the whole record before the City, that the am endm ent proposal will have a significant effect on the environment. 2. The Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration, with its supporting documentation (Initial Study), fully incorporated herein, reflects the independentjudgment and analysis of the City of Redding. 3. Pursuant to Section 15074.1(b) of CEQA, the City of Redding finds that the mitigati measures containedin the Mitigated Negative Declaration are sufficient and that the Prqje will not cause anypotentially significant effect on the environment. Addendum to a Mitigated Negative Declaration —AMND-2021-02114-AmendingS-2017-00239 and Planned Development PD -2017-00241 Page 2 Pursuant to Section 15164(c) of CEQA, an addendum does not require circulation for public review. rArArAK5VUK*MW I YIWI HV" OrMf January 6, 2022 Lily Toy, Planning Manager Development Services Department Addendum to a Mitigated Negative Declaration — AMND-2021-02114-Amending S-2017-00239 and Planned Development PD -2017-00241 Page 3 CITY OF REDDING 777 CYPREss AvFwjE, REDDING, CA 9600 P0, Box 49607 1, Rf,'DCPINGCA 96049-607 11- 01" # 11MIMEM — 101111WIN41100-1 H=FA =#JJLJU# 111111111"Ifurd I M ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING MMZZEM The City of Redding conducted an Initial Study (attached), which determined that the proposed project could have significant environmental effects. Subsequent revisions in the project proposal create the specific mitigation measures identified below. The project, as revised and as agreed to by the applicant, avoids or mitigates the potentially significant environmental effects identified, and the preparation of an environmental impact report will not be required. There is no substantial evidence, in light of the whole record before the City, that the project as revised Mitigated Negative Declaration Page 1 may have a significant effect on the environment. If there are substantial changes that alter the character or impacts of the proposed project, another environmental impact determination will be necessary. The project includes measures to mitigate potentially significant impacts to biological resources associated with development of the property. Prior to approval of the project, the lead agency may conclude, at a public hearing, that certain mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration are infeasible or undesirable. In accordance with CEQA Section 15074.1, the lead agency may delete those mitigation measures and substitute other measures which it determines are equivalent or more effective. The lead agency would adopt written findings that the new measure is equivalent or more effective in mitigating or avoiding potential significant effects and that it, in itself, would not cause any potentially significant effect on the environment. 1. Based on the whole record (including the Initial Study and any supporting documentation) and the mitigation measures incorporated into the project, the City of Redding has determined that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. 2. The Mitigated Negative Declaration, with its supporting documentation, reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the lead agency, which is the City of Redding. DOCUMENTATION The attached Initial Study documents the reasons to support the above determination. MITIGATION MEASURES" Mitigation 1. Prior to issuance of a grading permit that may cause the loss of jurisdictional waters of the U.S., the developer shall secure all necessary permits and authorization from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife. All terms and conditions of the required permits and authorization, including mitigation, shall be met. Mitigation 2. In order to avoid impacts to nesting raptors or migratory birds, vegetation removal and other ground disturbance activities associated with construction shall be conducted outside of the main nesting season, September I through January 31, otherwise a pre -construction survey for nesting birds shall be completed during the nesting season of February I through August 31. The survey shall be conducted by a qualified biologist no more than one week prior to vegetation removal. If an active nest more than half completed is located during the survey, a non disturbance buffer shall be established by the qualified biologist in consultation with the California Department of Fish and Wildlife. No vegetation removal or construction activities shall occur within the non -disturbance buffer until the young have fledged, as determined through additional monitoring by the qualified biologist. The results of the precolistruction survey shall be sent to the California Department of Fish and Wildlife. If a lapse in construction activities of 15 or more days occurs, then another pre -construction survey shall be conducted, Alitigated Negative Declaration Page 2 • Shasta County Clerk • U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Redding • California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Redding • California Native Plant Society • Shasta Environmental Alliance • All property owners within 300 feet of the property boundary ( x) Draft document referred for comments March 2. 2018 ( ) No comments were received during the public review period. Comments were received but did not address the draft Mitigated Negative Declaration findings or the accuracy/completeness of the Initial Study. No response is necessary. The letters are attached. Paul Hellman, Planning Manager PH:pr Attachments: A. Location map B. Initial Study dlaj-d Z, qzg Date Alifigated Aregative Declaration Page 3 ENVIRONMENTAL INITIAL STUDY Prepared |« CIT OF REDDING Planning Division 777 Cypress Avenue Redding, California 96001 \§�# #�2 /\# 2 \\� # : ■ #� ?� \�#�° \ \ $\\-�� \ \ f Abe&2018� CITY OF REDDING EIMIZAAL111fALUISMF M-LSI-Umf 1Project Title: Live Oak Subdivision and Planned Development 4 2. 4. S. 6. 7. Lead agency name and address: CITY OF REDDING, Development Services Department, Planning Division 777 Cypress Avenue, Redding, CA 96001 Contact Person and Phone Number: Linda Burke, (530) 225-4027 Project Location: 1320 and 1368 Old Alturas Road, northwest side of Victor Avenue and Old Alturas intersection M Martin Boone, Omni Financial, LLC 1260 41st Street, Suite 0 Capitola, CA 95010 Representative's Name and Address: 6590 Lockheed Drive Redding, CA 96002 General Plan Designation: Residential Multiple Family, 10 to 20 dwelling units per acre, Greenway MENMIMM 8. Description of Project: Tentative Subdivision MapApplication and Planned Development Plan Application, Live Oak Subdivision, is a request to subdivide approximately 8 acres into 26 multiple -family residential lots in three phases for development of 64 multlple-familyunits� Phase land 2 consist of 20 lots to be developed with a �wv-jamjty dwelling unit (duplex unit) on each lot fora total of 40 units. Phase 3 consists of 6 lots to be developed with a four-plex unit on each lot for a total of 24 units. The project includes a Rezoning Application to add the "PD�" Planned Development Overlay District to the existing "RM -12" Multiple Family District zoning of the property to facilitate the development� 9. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The 8 acre property consists of two parcels located north of Old Alturas Road and west of the Victor Avenue intersection, The westerly parcel was previously developed with a single family home site which has been demolished and removed. The easterly parcel contains two small rental units and a detached garage. The property is relatively flat along Old Alturas Road to gently sloping in the northwest corner of the property with topography ranging from 555 feet above mean sea level {MSL} to 615 feet MSL. Churn Creek, which is tributary to the Sacramento River, is located outside the northeast corner of the site. The site is characterized as blue oak woodland in the northwest corner and annual grassland throughout the rest of the property, with minimal barren habitat type surrounding the existing and previous residential building sites. Surrounding land uses include a duplex subdivision directly west of the project at Old Alturas Road and Browning Street and two, primarily vacant, but similarly zoned multiple family properties to the east between the subject property and Churn Creek. Property south of Old Alturas Road is also zoned for multiple family and currently developed with a mix of multiple family apartments, older single family homes, and a school located at the southwest corner of the intersection with Victor Avenue. 10. Other public agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement)- California Department of Fish and Wildlife, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 11. Have California Native American tribes traditionally and culturally affiliated with the project area requested consultation pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21080.3.1? if so, has consultation begun? A letter notice of this project was send to the California Native American tribes that have requested notification, Redding Rancheria and Wintu Tribe of Northern California, on March 14, 2017 and May 5, 2017, respectively. No request for consultation was initiated or received. 5-2017-00239 Live Oak Subdivision 2 City of Redding Development Services Department Planning Division Initial Study The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact or Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. On the basis of the initial evaluation: 0 1 find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. 121 1 find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. 0 1 find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. 0 1 find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. 0 1 find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR of NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. Copies of the Initial Study and related materials and documentation may be obtained at the Planning Division of the Development Services Department, 777 Cypress Avenue, Redding, CA 96001. Contact [Planner] at (530) 225-4020. liiA bwkp Uncia Burke Development Services Department 5-2017-00239 Live Oak subdivision Aesthetics Agricultural Resources Air Quality x Biological Resources Cultural Resources Geology/Sails' Greenhouse Gas Emissions Hazards & Hazardous Materials Hydrology / Water Quality Land Use/ Planning Mineral Resources Noise Population I Housing Public Services Recreation Transportation /Traffic Tribal Cultural Resources Utilities/Service Systems Mandatory Findings of Significance On the basis of the initial evaluation: 0 1 find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. 121 1 find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. 0 1 find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. 0 1 find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. 0 1 find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR of NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. Copies of the Initial Study and related materials and documentation may be obtained at the Planning Division of the Development Services Department, 777 Cypress Avenue, Redding, CA 96001. Contact [Planner] at (530) 225-4020. liiA bwkp Uncia Burke Development Services Department 5-2017-00239 Live Oak subdivision City of Redding Development Services Department Planning Division Initial Study This section analyzes the potential environmental impacts associated with the proposed project. The issue areas evaluated in this Initial Study include: - Aesthetics - Agricultural Resources - Air Quality - Biological Resources - Cultural Resources - Geology and Soils - Greenhouse Gas Emissions - Hazards and Hazardous Materials - Utilities and Service System - Land Use and Planning - Mineral Resources - Noise - Population and Housing - Public Services - Recreation - Transportation/Circulation - Tribal Cultural Resources - Hydrology and Water Quality The environmental analysis in this section is patterned after the Initial Study Checklist recommended by the State CEQA Guidelines and used by the City of Redding in its environmental review process. For the preliminary environmental assessment undertaken as part of this Initial Study's preparation, a determination that there is a potential for significant effects indicates the need to more fully analyze the development's impacts and to identify mitigation. For the evaluation of potential impacts, the questions in the Initial Study Checklist are stated and an answer is provided according to the analysis undertaken as part of the initial Study. The analysis considers the long-term, direct, indirect, and cumulative impacts of the development. To each question, there are four possible responses: * No Impact. The development will not have any measurable environmental impact on the environment, Less Than Significant Impact. The development will have the potential for impacting the environment, although this impact will be below established thresholds that are considered to be significant. • Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated. The development will have the potential to generate impacts which may be considered as a significant effect on the environment, although mitigation measures or changes to the development's physical or operational characteristics can reduce these impacts to levels that are less than significant. • Potentially Significant Impact. The development will have impacts which are considered significant, and additional analysis is required to identify mitigation measures that could reduce these impacts to less than significant levels. Where potential impacts are anticipated to be significant, mitigation measures will be required, so that impacts may be avoided or reduced to insignificant levels. Prior environmental evaluations applicable to all or part of the project site: List of attachments/references* Attachment A — Live Oak Estates Tentative Map Sheets (Sheets I though 4) Attachment B — Live Oak Estates Planned Development Plan Attachment C — URBEMIS air quality computer model, dated April 25, 2017 Attachment D — Technical Memo — Preliminary Resource Evaluation for the Old Alturas Road and Victor Avenue Project, prepared by Gallaway Enterprises, dated October 24, 2016 (On file with the Planning Division) Attachment E —Cultural Resource Assessment, Live Oak Estates Project, prepared by Gallaway Enterprises, dated April 2017 (On file with the Planning Division) Attachment F — Letter from Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board, dated March 16, 2017 (On file with the Planning Division) S-2017-00239 Live Oak Subdivision 4 City mRedding Development Services Department Planning Division Initial Study Attachment G—Old AkurooMulti Family Entitlement Level Storm Drain Analysispreparedby5hmrmhDunlapSemyer,!nc,doted]anuary 3q2017.(On file with the Planning Division) Attachment H — Live Oak Estates Residential Noise Analysist, prepared by Saxelby Acoustics, dated November 27,2017 (On file with the Planning Division) Attachment I—Traffic ImpactAnalysis Memorandum, prepared byOmni Means, a GHDCompany, dated September 27,2017 (On filewith the Planning Division) SUMMARY OF MITIGATION MEASURES: BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES Mftlgatioml.Prior to issuance ofmgrading permit that may cause the loss of jurisdictional waters of the U.S.; the developer shall secure all necessary permits and authorization from the U.S, Army Corps of Engineers, the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife. All terms and conditions of the required permits and authorization, including mitigation, shall bemet. Mitigation 2.|norder toavoid impacts to nesting raptors or migratory birds, vegetation removal and other ground disturbance activities associated with construction shall beconducted outside ofthe main nesting season, September 1through January 3],otherwise apre- construction someyformestingbirchyhmHbemomp|etedduringthenestinQseosonofFebnuary1throu8hAo8ust3I.Thesurveyxha|ibe conducted by a qualified biologist no more than one week prior to vegetation removal. |fanactive nest more than half completed is located during the survey, a non disturbance buffer shall be established by the qualified biologist in consultation with the California Department ofFish and Wildlife. No vegetation removal or construction activities shall occur within the non -disturbance buffer until the young have fledged, as determined through additional monitoring by the qualified biologist. The results ufthe preconstructionsurvey shall besent Lothe California Department ofFish and Wildlife. |falapse inconstruction activities uf1Sormore days occurs, then another pre -construction survey shall boconducted. a) The project must comply with the height standards of the City's Zoning Ordinance. The project would be consistent |nheight with buildings on adjacent properties and would not obstruct any documented scenicvistas.The proposed projedwmu|dnot represent a significant change to the overall scenic quality of the area. b) The project site bnot located adjacent toa scenic highway. d The project will becompatible with the existing visual character of the property and its surroundings. d) The project would generate light that is customary for development and comply with the Zoning Ordinance light standards.There would not be an adverse effect on day or nighttime views in the area. S-2m7-0m39Live Oak Subdivision Potentially Less -Than- Less -Than- No I. AESTHETICS: Would the project., Significant Significant With Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? x b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, x trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State scenic c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? x d) Create a new source of substantial light or giare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? x a) The project must comply with the height standards of the City's Zoning Ordinance. The project would be consistent |nheight with buildings on adjacent properties and would not obstruct any documented scenicvistas.The proposed projedwmu|dnot represent a significant change to the overall scenic quality of the area. b) The project site bnot located adjacent toa scenic highway. d The project will becompatible with the existing visual character of the property and its surroundings. d) The project would generate light that is customary for development and comply with the Zoning Ordinance light standards.There would not be an adverse effect on day or nighttime views in the area. S-2m7-0m39Live Oak Subdivision City of Redding Development Services Department Planning Division Documentation, zm!�� Initial Study H. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES: in determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies n7ay refer to the California Agricultural, Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Mode (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the project, Potentially Significant Impact Less -Than- Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less -Than- Significant Impact No Impact a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Statewide Importance Significant Significant With Significant Impact (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Impact Mitigation Impact Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to Incorporated x non-agricultural use? x b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act Contract? x X c) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland to non- x agricultural use? Discussion: a -c) The project site not been historically used for agricultural purposes, nor does it possess soils that are prime for agricultural production. Documentation: City of Redding General Plan, Natural Resources Element, 2000 City of Redding General Plan Background Report, Chapter 9.4: Agricultural Lands California Department of Conservation's Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service and Forest Service, Soil Survey of Shasta County Area. Ill. AIR QUALITY: Where available, the significance criteria established by the Potentially Less -Than- Less -Than- No applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be Significant Significant With Significant Impact relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? x b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? x c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non -attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? x e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? x S-2017-00239 Live Oak Subdivision City mRedding Development Services Department Planning Division Discussion: Initial Study a -c) Shasta Cuunty, including the far northern Sacramento Valley, currently exceeds the state's ambient standards for ozone (smog)and particulates Nne,airborne partided. Consequently, these pollutants are the focus of local air quality policy, especially when related toland use and transportation planning. Even with application of measures to reduce emissions for individual projects, cumulative impacts are unavoidable when ozone and/or particulate emissions are involved. For example, the primary source ofemissions contributing toozone |sfrom vehicles. Any project that generates vehicle trips has the potential of contributing incrementally to the problem. The Environmental Impact Report for the General Plan acknowledged this dilemma; and as a result, Findings and a Statement of Overriding Considerations were adopted by the City Council for impactsto air quality resultingfrom growth supported under the General Plan, The City Air Quality Element of the General Plan establishes emission -reduction goals of 20 to 25 percent,depending onthe projected level of unmitigated emissions for n project. Mitigation thresholds are established for the important regional/local pollutants, including: Reactive Organic Gases (ROG) and Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx), which are ozone precursors, and Inhalable Particulate Matter, 1OMicron (PKAm). The mitigation thresholds for these pollutants are tiered at two levels as follows: Leve "A" 2Spounds per day ofN0x 25pounds per day o[RDG 8Opounds per day otPK4m Leve "B" 137 pounds per day of NOx 137pounds per day ofROG 137pounds per day cfPK4m Ifaproject has unmitigated emissions less than the Level "A"threshold, then it isviewed asaminor project (from aoair quality perspective) and only application of Standard Mitigation Measures (3K4yNs) is required to try to achieve at least a 20 percent reduction |nemissions, orthe best reduction feasible otherwise. Land uses that generate unmitigated emissions above Level "A" require application ufappropriate Best/kmi|ab|e Mitigation Measures (BAMMs), in addition to the SMMs, in orderto achieve a net emission reduction of2Opercent mrmore. if, after applying SMMs and BAMMs, a use still exceeds the Level "B" threshold, then a minimum of 25 percent of the unmitigated emissions exceeding 137 pounds per day must be offset by reducing emissions from existing sources of pollution; otherwise, an Environmental Impact Report is required. Under policy of the Air Quality Element, a project has the potential to impact air quality primarily in two ways: (1) the project would generate vehicle trip emissions (with NOx ROG, and PM10) that contribute cumulatively to local and regional air quality conditions; and(2)fu6jdwedvat(perticu|ato/PK4«)emivaionmaoepoysiWeduringconstructinnoctivities.Asareddentia|deveopmentoprojeo does not have the potential to generate significant emission concentrations of other pollutants subject to state and federal ambient air quality standards. in order to calculate the unmitigated emissions for the key pollutants noted above, the current URDEMISair quality computer model was used as prescribed in the Air Quality Element. The results were as follows: ROG NOx PM,0 Total Emissions (lbs. /day) 7.99 4.66 7.54 These results indicate that the project would result |nR0G,NOx,and PMmemissions well below the Level "A" threshold. Hence, applications of SIMMS are required in order to strive toward the General Plan policy of a net -reduction objective of 20 percent to address small-scale cumulative effects, 3K8Kxs applicable to this project address primarily short-term impacts related to construction, For the most part, these requirements are standard development regulations in the City promulgated in the City Grading Ordinance and Uniform Building Code. Application of special mitigation to achieve a level of less than significant is not necessary since actions for compliance are already included in existing uniformly applied regulations and construction standards. The following City standard regulations applied during grading and construction activities to control dust and PM10emissions apply tothe project. 1. Nontoxic soil stabilizers shall be applied according to manufacturer's specification to all inactive construction areas (previously graded areas inactive for ten days mrmwn). 2. All grading operations shall be suspended when winds (as instantaneous gusts) exceed 20 miles per hour. seonuuosLive Oak Subdivision City of Redding Development Services Department Planning Division Initial Study 3. Temporary traffic control shall be provided as appropriate during all phases of construction to improve traffic flow (e.g., flag person). 4. Construction activities that could affect traffic flow shall be scheduled in off-peak hours. 5. Active construction areas, haul roads, etc., shall be watered at least twice daily or more as needed to limit dust. 6. Exposed stockpiles of soil and other backfill material shall either be covered, watered, or have soil binders added to inhibit dust and wind erosion. 7. All truck hauling solid and other loose material shall be covered or should maintain at least two feet of freeboard (ie., minimum vertical distance between top of the load and the trailer) in accordance with the requirements of CVC Section 23114. This provision is enforced by local law enforcement agencies. 8. All public roadways used by the project contractor shall be maintained free from dust, dirt, and debris caused by construction activities. Streets shall be swept at the end of the day if visible soil materials are carried onto adjacent public paved roads. Wheel washers shall be used where vehicles enter and exit unpaved roads onto paved roads, or trucks and any equipment shall be washed off leaving the site with each trip. 9, Alternatives to open burning of cleared vegetative material on the project site shall be used unless otherwise deemed infeasible by the City Planning Division, Suitable alternatives include, but are not limited to, on-site chipping and mulching and/or hauling to a biomass fuel site. d) Potential impacts to neighboring homes (sensitive receptors) from fugitive dust caused during construction are mitigated by application of the SMMs discussed above. I Documentation: Shasta County APCD Air Quality Maintenance Plan and Implementing Measures City of Redding General Plan, Air Quality Element City of Redding General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report, 2000, SCH #1998072103, Chapter 8.6, Air Quality, eE#,,k irhix�hrgr", 16i-su arif 6",V-pf Report, as adopted by the Redding City Council on October 3, 2000, by Resolution 2000-166 City of Redding General Plan Background Report, Chapter 9.7, Natural Resources and Air Quality URBEMIS (2007, v 9.2.4) Air Quality Computer Model Results for Old Alturas Subdivision (changed to Live Oak) dated April 25, 2017 Mitigation: None necessary. -2017-00239 Live Oak subdivision 8 Packet P -q. Potentially Less -Than- Less -Than- No IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES: Would the project: Significant Significant With Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated a) Have_a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special -status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or x bythe California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effecton any riparian habitat or othersensifive natural community identified in local of regional plans, policies, regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. x Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on Federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, X hydrological interruption, or other means? -2017-00239 Live Oak subdivision 8 Packet P -q. City wRedding Development Services Department Planning Division Initial Study Discussion: a -d) The 8 acre property has been previously disturbed with a home site on the westerly parcel (recently demolished) and 2 small existing rentals homes onthe easterly site. The site bcharacterized asblue oak woodland inthe northwest corner and annual grassland throughout the rest of the property, with minimal barren habitat type surrounding the existing and previous residential building sites. The site is f lat to gently sloping in the northwest corner with topography ranging from approximately 555 feet above mean sea level (ms|)to615feet ms|. Churn Creek, which is tributary to the Sacramento River, is located just outside the northeast corner of the project area. Gallaway Enterprises prepared a Technical Memo — Preliminary Resource Evaluation (dated October 24,ZO16)for the project site that included a habitat assessment to determine if suitable habitat occurs for special status species, a botanical survey conducted for the purpose of determining presence of special status species and suitable habitat elements for those species, and an aquatic survey to determine the presence of potential jurisdictional waters of the US, and to document the edge of the riparian habitat to determine the 50 foot setback from the edge of riparian habitat. No endangered, threatened, or rare plant species were observed, however, because the survey was conducted outside of the blooming period for most flowering plans, the habitat myuesmmentwasconducted todetermine if the site prnvi6eshab1tatfmrspecial status plant species. The assessment determined that the site lacked suitable habitat for all but one special status plant species, Redding checkerb|mom,oCalifornia Native Plant Society Rank 3plant. Because this plant would only occur within the blue oak woodland portion of the site, which is proposed to be completely avoided' o protocol -level survey for this plant was not recommended. Additionally, the status as a California Rare Plant Rank 3 (more information) does not currently warrant mitigation requirements byCalifornia Department ofFish and Wildlife (CDFVY). No endangered, threatened, orspecia|status wildlife species were observed, however, there isaitablehabitatfornesting migratory andnon-gameb|obintheWueuakwood|andmreathedpariancorhdora|mmQChumnCreek,andm1hertreeaneartheexistng residential structures. The Migratory Bird Treaty Act (K4EU7\) prohibits the killing mfmigratory birds ordestruction oftheir occupied nests and eggs, except in accordance with regulations prescribed by the US Fish and Wildlife Service. Activities that involve the removal of vegetation, including trees, has the potential to affect bird species protected by the K4BTA' therefore, to minimize impacts from construction, mitigation is provided below to encourage tree removal and other land -clearing work to be conducted outside the main nesting period. To avoid the potential of impacting ground nesting migratory birds protected by the MBTA, it is recommended that vegetation removal and ground disturbing activities occur outside the nesting season (September 1 January 31). If ground disturbing activities occur during the bird nesting season (February 1 —August 31) a preconstruction raptor and migratory bird survey should beconducted byaqualified biologist within 7 days prior tothe start mfconstruction and appropriate nest - avoidance measuvesre4o|redifanantivenmstmonethnnhm|fcomp|eted|s|mmeteddurinOthesurvey. |falapse |nconstruction activities of15ormore days occurs, then another pre -construction survey shall beconducted. During the aquatic survey, a potentially jurisdictional wetiand feature and a drainage ditch were identified on the west and south sides of the project site, respectively. The potential wetiand feature is largely located between the project boundary and the private driveway on the property to the west. It receives water in the form of sheet flow from the driveway, the apartment buildings to the west, and from the hillside. The drainage ditch on the south side of the project receives sheet flow from Old Alturas Road as well as off the project site. It is heavily vegetated with annual grasses and other weedy herbaceous plants. However, there appears to be no S-2017em39Live Oak Subdivision Potentially Less -Than- Less -Than- No IV, BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES., Would the project: Significant Significant With Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact incorporated d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery x e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? x f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community, Conservation Plan, orotherapproved local, regional, X or State habitat conservation plan? I Discussion: a -d) The 8 acre property has been previously disturbed with a home site on the westerly parcel (recently demolished) and 2 small existing rentals homes onthe easterly site. The site bcharacterized asblue oak woodland inthe northwest corner and annual grassland throughout the rest of the property, with minimal barren habitat type surrounding the existing and previous residential building sites. The site is f lat to gently sloping in the northwest corner with topography ranging from approximately 555 feet above mean sea level (ms|)to615feet ms|. Churn Creek, which is tributary to the Sacramento River, is located just outside the northeast corner of the project area. Gallaway Enterprises prepared a Technical Memo — Preliminary Resource Evaluation (dated October 24,ZO16)for the project site that included a habitat assessment to determine if suitable habitat occurs for special status species, a botanical survey conducted for the purpose of determining presence of special status species and suitable habitat elements for those species, and an aquatic survey to determine the presence of potential jurisdictional waters of the US, and to document the edge of the riparian habitat to determine the 50 foot setback from the edge of riparian habitat. No endangered, threatened, or rare plant species were observed, however, because the survey was conducted outside of the blooming period for most flowering plans, the habitat myuesmmentwasconducted todetermine if the site prnvi6eshab1tatfmrspecial status plant species. The assessment determined that the site lacked suitable habitat for all but one special status plant species, Redding checkerb|mom,oCalifornia Native Plant Society Rank 3plant. Because this plant would only occur within the blue oak woodland portion of the site, which is proposed to be completely avoided' o protocol -level survey for this plant was not recommended. Additionally, the status as a California Rare Plant Rank 3 (more information) does not currently warrant mitigation requirements byCalifornia Department ofFish and Wildlife (CDFVY). No endangered, threatened, orspecia|status wildlife species were observed, however, there isaitablehabitatfornesting migratory andnon-gameb|obintheWueuakwood|andmreathedpariancorhdora|mmQChumnCreek,andm1hertreeaneartheexistng residential structures. The Migratory Bird Treaty Act (K4EU7\) prohibits the killing mfmigratory birds ordestruction oftheir occupied nests and eggs, except in accordance with regulations prescribed by the US Fish and Wildlife Service. Activities that involve the removal of vegetation, including trees, has the potential to affect bird species protected by the K4BTA' therefore, to minimize impacts from construction, mitigation is provided below to encourage tree removal and other land -clearing work to be conducted outside the main nesting period. To avoid the potential of impacting ground nesting migratory birds protected by the MBTA, it is recommended that vegetation removal and ground disturbing activities occur outside the nesting season (September 1 January 31). If ground disturbing activities occur during the bird nesting season (February 1 —August 31) a preconstruction raptor and migratory bird survey should beconducted byaqualified biologist within 7 days prior tothe start mfconstruction and appropriate nest - avoidance measuvesre4o|redifanantivenmstmonethnnhm|fcomp|eted|s|mmeteddurinOthesurvey. |falapse |nconstruction activities of15ormore days occurs, then another pre -construction survey shall beconducted. During the aquatic survey, a potentially jurisdictional wetiand feature and a drainage ditch were identified on the west and south sides of the project site, respectively. The potential wetiand feature is largely located between the project boundary and the private driveway on the property to the west. It receives water in the form of sheet flow from the driveway, the apartment buildings to the west, and from the hillside. The drainage ditch on the south side of the project receives sheet flow from Old Alturas Road as well as off the project site. It is heavily vegetated with annual grasses and other weedy herbaceous plants. However, there appears to be no S-2017em39Live Oak Subdivision City of Redding Development Services Department Planning Division Initial Study The City has not established its own mitigation standards for replacement of wetlands impacted by development and, instead, relies on criteria recognized by state and federal resource agencies. Federal and state policies promote a no net loss of wetland resources. This can be accomplished in a number of ways, but a common approach is the purchase by the developer of mitigation credits at an established wetland mitigation bank. used on these factors, mitigation measures are established below to ensure that, prior to issuance of a City grading permit, any necessary wetland mitigation credits are secured and sufficient mitigation is performed in accordance with the US Army Corps of Engineers and CDFW permitting requirements if project plans would result in destruction of jurisdictional wetlands, e) The City has adopted a Tree Management Ordinance (Chapter 18.45 of the RMC) that promotes the conservation of mature, healthy trees in the design of new development. The ordinance also recognizes that the preservation of trees will sometimes conflict with necessary land -development requirements. The City's General Plan EIR further acknowledges that preservation of native trees will sometimes conflict with normal land development and that implementation of the General Plan will ultimately set aside over 7,000 acres of open space, much of which contains oak habitat. But efforts must still be made to retain existing trees if reasonably possible, and to sufficiently plant new trees in the context of the new development. A tree surveyls required to identify natural trees and tree groups most suitable for preservation or "candidate trees/groups," Where all identified candidate trees/groups cannot be preserved, the set-aside of a natural area or areas within a project site that is particularly suitable for the planting, retention, and/or natural regeneration of trees is considered to be a desirable means of accomplishing the goals of the ordinance. In this case, the tree survey prepared by Sharrah Dunlap Sawyer, Inc., indicates that tree cover on the site is mainly located on the sloping hillside in the northwest corner of the site which is proposed to be set aside for preservation. The majority of the 279 trees identified onsite are blue oak trees; however, there are several pine and shade trees found mainly in the area of the previous and current home sites. The majority of trees (211) would be preserved, most located on the sloping hillside. However, due to the project's grading and utility demands necessary for development of the site to the potential anticipated by the General Plan, saving trees in the main subdivision development area is not considered feasible and removal of 68 trees would result. In addition to tree retention efforts, the developer is also obligated to replant suitable new trees at the time of construction for shade and the enjoyment of residents. The Tree Management Ordinance identifies minimum planting criteria of one tree per 500 square feet of gross living area. Thus, with retention of trees in the proposed private open space area and the planting of new trees as a standard condition of development, the project is consistent with the intent of the Tree Management Ordinance. f) No habitat conservation plans or other similar plans have been adopted forthe project site or project area. No impact would occur in this regard. Documentation: California Department of Fish and Wildlife: Natural Diversity Data Base City of Redding General Plan, Natural Resources Element, 2000 City of Redding Municipal Code, Chapter 18.45, Tree Management Ordinance City of Redding General Plan Environmental Impact Report, 2000, SCH #1998072103 Technical Memo — Preliminary Resource Evaluation for the Old Alturas Road and Victor Avenue Project — Redding, CA, prepared by Gallaway Enterprises, dated October 24, 2016 Live Oak Estate Tree Survey, prepared by Sharrah Dunlap Sawyer, Inc., dated April 2016 mitigation: Mitigationl, Prior to issuance of a grading permit that may cause the loss of jurisdictional waters of the U.S., the developer shall secure all necessary permits and authorization from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife. All terms and conditions of the required permits and authorization, including mitigation, shall be met. Mitigation 2. In order to avoid impacts to nesting raptors or migratory birds, vegetation removal and other ground disturbance activities associated with construction shall be conducted outside of the main nesting season, September 1 through January 31, otherwise a pre - construction survey for nesting birds shall be completed during the nesting season of February I through August 31. The survey shall be conducted by a qualified biologist no more than one week prior to vegetation removal. if an active nest more than half completed is S-2017-00239 Live Oak Subdivision 10 City of Redding Development Services Department Planning Division In itia I Study located during the survey, a non disturbance buffer shall be established by the qualified biologist in consultation with the California Department ofFish and Wildlife. No vegetation removal or construction activities shall occur within the non -disturbance buffer until the young have fledged, as determined through additional monitoring by the qualified biologist. The results ufthe preuonstructionsurvey shall besent tothe California Department ofFish and Wildlife. !falapse inconstruction activities of15ormore days occurs, then another pre -construction survey shall beconducted. ad) Gallaway Enterprises conducted acultural resources assessment for the project site including afield survey, archival research, and arecord search atthe Northeast Information Center. Amixed reconnaissance and intensive -level pedestrian was conducted on April 14, 2V17,covering the entire area ofpotential effect 1nidentify the presence mrabsence ofhistoric resources and toevaluate the significance ofany identified archaeological resources. The results ofthe record search indicate that three previous cultural resource surveys have been undertaken within the project site with no prehistoric and one historic site having been recorded. A total of 4 prehistoric sites have been recorded within a half mile radius of the site, all located directly abutting or closely adjacent toChurnCreek. A previous cultural resource inventory conducted in 2006 detailed the recorded site for the residential homestead, including a house, barn, and outbuildings on the western parcel, known as "Little Rags.' The structures were determined tolack integrity and were not recommended as eligible for the California Register of Historic Resources (CRHR). The survey results indicate that the site had undergone significant modification since 2006 and the structures had all been demolished. On the eastern parcel, the structures constructed in 1957 and 1965 were still standing and currently inhabited. However, both structures have been updated, undergone intense remodeling, and neither maintains the integrity of the initial construction. Therefore the eastern portion of the site is not eligible for CRHR or the National Registry of Historic Places. !nconsideration mfthe findings ofthe record search and pedestrian survey, no impacts in this area are anticipated. However, in accordance with CEOA6u1de|ine 15064.5 Ul should any previously unrecorded historic or prehistoric resources, including human remains, be discovered during ground disturbing activities, construction activities shall cease and the Cityshall be notified. A qualified archaeological professional must be retained to investigate the discovery to determine its significance in accordance with applicable laws. d Nounique geologic features, fossil -bearing strata, or paleontological sites are known to exist on the project site. Documentation: City of Redding General Plan Background Report, 1998 City qfRedding General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report, ZOOO S[H#l99DU721O3 Cultural Resource Assessment, Live Oak Estates Project, prepared by Gallaway Enterprises, dated April 2017. s2017-00239Live Oak Subdivision 11 Potentially Less -Than- Less -Than- No V. CULTURAL RESOURCES: Would the project., Significant Significant With Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical x resource pursuant to Section 15064,5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an x archaeological resource pursuant to Section 15064.5? c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or x unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of dedicated X ad) Gallaway Enterprises conducted acultural resources assessment for the project site including afield survey, archival research, and arecord search atthe Northeast Information Center. Amixed reconnaissance and intensive -level pedestrian was conducted on April 14, 2V17,covering the entire area ofpotential effect 1nidentify the presence mrabsence ofhistoric resources and toevaluate the significance ofany identified archaeological resources. The results ofthe record search indicate that three previous cultural resource surveys have been undertaken within the project site with no prehistoric and one historic site having been recorded. A total of 4 prehistoric sites have been recorded within a half mile radius of the site, all located directly abutting or closely adjacent toChurnCreek. A previous cultural resource inventory conducted in 2006 detailed the recorded site for the residential homestead, including a house, barn, and outbuildings on the western parcel, known as "Little Rags.' The structures were determined tolack integrity and were not recommended as eligible for the California Register of Historic Resources (CRHR). The survey results indicate that the site had undergone significant modification since 2006 and the structures had all been demolished. On the eastern parcel, the structures constructed in 1957 and 1965 were still standing and currently inhabited. However, both structures have been updated, undergone intense remodeling, and neither maintains the integrity of the initial construction. Therefore the eastern portion of the site is not eligible for CRHR or the National Registry of Historic Places. !nconsideration mfthe findings ofthe record search and pedestrian survey, no impacts in this area are anticipated. However, in accordance with CEOA6u1de|ine 15064.5 Ul should any previously unrecorded historic or prehistoric resources, including human remains, be discovered during ground disturbing activities, construction activities shall cease and the Cityshall be notified. A qualified archaeological professional must be retained to investigate the discovery to determine its significance in accordance with applicable laws. d Nounique geologic features, fossil -bearing strata, or paleontological sites are known to exist on the project site. Documentation: City of Redding General Plan Background Report, 1998 City qfRedding General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report, ZOOO S[H#l99DU721O3 Cultural Resource Assessment, Live Oak Estates Project, prepared by Gallaway Enterprises, dated April 2017. s2017-00239Live Oak Subdivision 11 City of Redding Development SemiCes Department Planning Division Mitigation: None necessary. Initial Study a,cd) There are no Alquist-Priolo earthquake faults designated in the Redding area of Shasta County.There are mzother documented earthquake faults inthe immediate vicinity that pose asignificant risk, and the site is located |nanarea designated inthe Health and Safety Element ufthe General Plan ashaving elow ground -shaking potential. The project isnot located nnornear any documented landslide hazard areas, and there is no evidence of ground slippage or subsidence occurring naturally on the site, The type of soils and underlying geology is identified as having no potential for liquefaction. The site islocated outside mfthe 100 -year floodplain of Churn Creek which is located on the property to the north and east of this site. N Theprojec1siteouNa|nsthreesoi|dossNcatiwns|ndudin8ChornQmvdlyimamkCeA\Newtongrave|lyhomm(NeD),and0ewton gravelly loam (NeE2). The developable areas of the subdivision are those soils contained within the CeA and NeD classifications and are characterized by slopes of zero to 3 percent and 15 to 30 percent, respectively. The majority of the site, CeA, is well drained soil and has moderately slow permeability. Runoff is slow and the hazard for erosion is none to slight. Soils in the western portion of the development are considered NeD and also have slow permeability; however runoff is medium and to hazard of erosion is moderate. The sloping areas in northwest corner of the site that will be preserved and undeveloped contain NeE2 soils that have slopes of3Oto5Opercent. Permeability is slow and runoff is rapid, however, no grading or ground disturbance is proposed in this area, Proposed grading consists of that necessary for construction of the units and internal driveways on the lower terrace. A retaining wall is proposed at the base of the slope and between units as necessary for construction of units. s20oom39Live Oak Subdivision 12 Potentially Less -Than- Less -Than- No V1. GEOLOGY AND SOILS: Would the project., Significant Significant With Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact incorporated a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: I) Rupture of a known earthquake, fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map X issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publications 42. 11) Strong seismic ground shaking? iii) Seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction? iv) Landslides? b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially resultin on- X or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction, or d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform X Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or X alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? a,cd) There are no Alquist-Priolo earthquake faults designated in the Redding area of Shasta County.There are mzother documented earthquake faults inthe immediate vicinity that pose asignificant risk, and the site is located |nanarea designated inthe Health and Safety Element ufthe General Plan ashaving elow ground -shaking potential. The project isnot located nnornear any documented landslide hazard areas, and there is no evidence of ground slippage or subsidence occurring naturally on the site, The type of soils and underlying geology is identified as having no potential for liquefaction. The site islocated outside mfthe 100 -year floodplain of Churn Creek which is located on the property to the north and east of this site. N Theprojec1siteouNa|nsthreesoi|dossNcatiwns|ndudin8ChornQmvdlyimamkCeA\Newtongrave|lyhomm(NeD),and0ewton gravelly loam (NeE2). The developable areas of the subdivision are those soils contained within the CeA and NeD classifications and are characterized by slopes of zero to 3 percent and 15 to 30 percent, respectively. The majority of the site, CeA, is well drained soil and has moderately slow permeability. Runoff is slow and the hazard for erosion is none to slight. Soils in the western portion of the development are considered NeD and also have slow permeability; however runoff is medium and to hazard of erosion is moderate. The sloping areas in northwest corner of the site that will be preserved and undeveloped contain NeE2 soils that have slopes of3Oto5Opercent. Permeability is slow and runoff is rapid, however, no grading or ground disturbance is proposed in this area, Proposed grading consists of that necessary for construction of the units and internal driveways on the lower terrace. A retaining wall is proposed at the base of the slope and between units as necessary for construction of units. s20oom39Live Oak Subdivision 12 City ofRedding Development Services Department Planning Division Initial Study The project imsubject tocertain erosion -control requirements mandated hyexisting City and State regulations. These requirements * City ufRedding Grading Ordinance, This ordinance requires the application of "Best Management Practices" (8MPs) in accordance with the City Erosion and Sediment Control Standards Design Manual (Redding Municipal CodeSection 16,12.060, Subsections [^ D, [). In practice, specific erosion -control measures are determined upon review of the final project Improvement plans and are tailored toproject-specific grading impacts. + Colifbm/oRegional Water Quality Board "Construction 8cbvi4/S&onnNa/erPuno/t."This permitsommmhatoverlaps the City's Grading Ordinance provision by applying state standards for erosion -control measures during construction of the project. + California Ragh»nu/ Water Quality Control Board "Project Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWP9P).° This plan emphasizes storm water best management practices and is required as part of the Construction Activity Storm Water Permit. The objectives of the SWPPP are to identify the sources of sediment and other pollutants that affeathe quality ofstorm water discharges and todescribe and ensure the implementation of practices to reducesediment and other pollutants in storm water discharges. + California Department qfFish and Wildlife "160DAg*eement° This notification ixrequired for any work within adefined streambed. + US, Army corps ofEngineers Nationwide PermiL A new Nationwide 29 Permit (residential developments) will be required from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to address impacts to jurisdictional waters. Actions for compliance with these regulations are addressed under standard conditions of approval, which are uniformly applied to all land development projects. Since the project issubject touniformly applied ordinances and policies and the overall risk of erosion is low, potential impacts related to soil erosion and sedimentation are less than significant. e) The proposed project does not involve the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal. Noimpact has been identified. Documentation: City of Redding Health and Safety Element, figures 4-1 (Ground Shaking Potential) and 4.2 (Liquefaction Potential) City ofRedding General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report City ofRedding General Plan Background RepoM1880 City pƒRedding Grading Ordinance, RK4C Chapter 16.12 City of Redding Standard Specifications, Grading Practices City nfRedding Standard Conditions ofApproval for Subdivisions Soil Survey of Shasta County Area, United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service and Forest Service, August 1974 Division ofMines and Geology Special Publication 4I State Regional Water Quality Control Board, Central Valley Region, Regulations related to Construction Activity Storm Water Permits and Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plans Letter from Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board, dated March 16, 2017 Mitigation: None necessary. s-2017-nm39Live Oak Subdivision 13 Potentially Less -Than- Less -Than- No VII. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS: Would the project: Significant SignificantWith Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may x have a significant impact on the environment? I i b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the x purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? s-2017-nm39Live Oak Subdivision 13 City of Redding Development Services Department Planning Division RIMRIM MIS initial Study a) In 2005, the Governor of California signed Executive Oder 5-3-05, establishing that it is the State of California's goal to reduce statewide greenhouse gas (GHG) emission levels. Subsequently, in 2006, the California State Legislature adopted Assembly Bill As 32, the California Global Warming Solutions Act. In part, AB 32 requires the California Air Resources Board to develop and adopt regulations to achieve a reduction in the State's GHG emissions to year 1990 levels by year 2020. California Senate Bill SB97 established that an individual project's effect on GHG emission levels and global warming must be assessed under CEQA. SB97 further directed that the State Office of Planning and Research (OPR) develop guidelines for the assessment of a project's GHG emissions. Those guidelines for GHG emissions were subsequently included as amendments to the CEQA Guidelines. The guidelines did not establish thresholds of significance and there are currently no state, regional, county, or city guidelines or thresholds with which to direct project -level CEQA review. As a result, the City of Redding has utilized the best available information to develop a threshold until a specific quantitative threshold is adopted by the state or regional air district. As the Lead Agency, the City has opted to utilize a quantitative non -zero project -specific threshold using a methodology recommended by the California Air Pollution Officers (CAPCOA) and accepted by the California Air Resources Board. According to CAPCOA's Threshold 2.3, CARR Reporting Threshold, 10,000 metric tons of carbon -dioxide equivalents per year (mtCO2eq/yr) is recommended as a quantitative non -zero threshold. According to the CAPCOA, this threshold would be equivalent to 550 dwelling units, 400,000 square feet of office use, 120,000 square feet of retail, or 70,000 square feet of supermarket use. This approach is estimated to capture over half the future residential and commercial development projects and is designed to support the goals of AB 32 and not hinder it. The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) identifies four primary constituents that are most representative of the GHG emissions. They are: Carbon Dioxide (CO2,): Emitted primarily through the burning of fossil fuels. Other sources include the burning of solid waste and wood and/or wood products and cement manufacturing. • Methane (CH4): Emissions occur during the production and transport of fuels, such as coal and natural gas. Additional emissions are generated by livestock and agricultural land uses, as well as the decomposition of solid waste. • Nitrous Oxide (N20): The principal emitters include agricultural and industrial land uses and fossil fuel and waste combustion. • Fluorinated Gases: These can be emitted during some industrial activities. Also, many of these gases are substitutes for ozone-depleting substances, such as CFCs, which have been used historically as refrigerants. Collectively, these gases are often referred to as "high global -warming potential" gases. The primary generators of GHG emissions in the United States are electricity generation and transportation, The EPA estimates that nearly 85 percent of the nation's GHG emissions are comprised of carbon dioxide (CO2). The majority of CO2 is generated by petroleum consumption associated with transportation and coal consumption associated with electricity generation. The remaining emissions are predominately the result of natural-gas consumption associated with a variety of uses. With regard to the project, the predominant associated GHG is CO2 generated by motor -vehicle travel to and from the site, To a substantially lesser degree, the project will result in CH4 emissions associated with use of electric power generated by the Redding Electric Utility (REU), though it should be noted that REU distributes power from a variety of sources, including hydroelectric, wind, and natural gas. According to the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association's (CAPCOA) publication, CEQA and Climate Change, published in January 2008, there is currently not a single computer model that is capable of estimating all of a project's direct and indirect GHG emissions. However, the Urban Emissions Model (URBEMIS) is likely the most consistently used model to estimate a project's direct GHG emissions. URBEMIS is designed to model emissions associated with development of urban land uses. URBEMIS attempts to summarize criteria air pollutants and CO2 emissions that would occur during operation of new development. URBEMIS was developed and is approved for statewide use by CARE. One of the shortfalls of URBEMIS is that the model does not contain emission factors for GHGs other than CO2 except for methane {CHS) from mobile sources, which is converted to CO,. This may not be a major problem since CO2 is the most important GHG from land development projects, 5-2017-00239 Live Oak Subdivision 14 City uRedding Development Services Department Planning Division Initial Study The emissions from the project as indicated by the URBEMIS model are significantly below the City of Redding's air quality thresholds, as well as8HGemissions thresholds put forth by CARB. Therefore, the project will not contribute significantly to GHG emissions in the air basin. Nomitigation measures are required. However, in an effort to reduce any potential contribution to negative effects from GHG emissions, the project incorporates elements that serve to reduce vehicle -miles traveled, the main project contributor of GHG emissions, and implements the State Attorney General's recommended measures to reduce GHG emissions as follows: 2 ProjectFeuturey/ReQulatkons a, The project is located adjacent to and within walking distance of the major Regional Commercial district in Redding serving the shopping needs ofthe community including this development. b. Old Alturas Road and the project site is served by several bus routes and is approximately .7 mile from the Redding Area Bus Authority Canby Road Transfer Station, facilitating use of transit options throughout the City. c The projectwill provide connection to existing bicycle facilities along Old Alturas Road and Browning Street and will encourage bicycle use byresidents imthe development. d. The project will be required to plant one new tree for every 500 square feet of enclosed gross living area, which will provide a cooling effect, lessening energy use, and sequestering CO2 - e. Storage and collection areas will be provided for recyclable materials and the project will complywith other requirements in the statewide adopted California Green Building Standards Code. On a larger scale, the City of Redding's General Plan acknowledges that land use decisions have an impactonclimate and air quality. Land use decisions that result in low or very low density on the periphery of the community increase the amount of vehicle -miles traveled (VMT), which increases vehicle emissions. In response to this impact, the City's General Plan includes a number of goals and policies in the Community Development and Design Element, Transportation Element, and Housing Element that promote a compact urban form and encourage infill development, advocate higher housing density, and ensure connectivity to citywide bikeways and pedestrian plans. The goal of these policies is to reduce VIVIT, which also reduces emissions and reduces a wide variety of air quality impacts. Since automobiles are considered a major source of GHG emission, each vehicle trip reduced also reduces GHG emissions. ,CPC0Awebsite, July 19,2OIO zCeUfornia0fficeoftheAttorneyGenera|,°TheCaUforuiaEnvirmmmentalOua|ityActAddroaaingG|nba|Wmrming|mpactsattheLnoa| Agency Leve|,,updated May 21,ZOV8. City ufRedding General Plan, 2000 URBEMIS (2007, v 9.2.4) Air Quality Computer Model Mitigation: None necessary. S-2mr00239Live Oak Subdivision 15 Potentially Less -Than- Less -Than- No Vill. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: Would the project: Significant Sign if icant With Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact incorporated a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? X b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release x of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or x proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, X would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? S-2mr00239Live Oak Subdivision 15 City ofRedding Development Services Department Planning Division Initial Study a,b,c,d) The nature of the project asresidential housing does not present msignificant risk related tohazardous materials oremissions. There is no documented hazardous material sites located on or near the project. e, f) The project is located outside the established clear zones for Redding Municipal Airport. The project's residential land use would not conflict with operations of theAirport or present a safety hazard to people residing in the subdivision. There are no private airstrips in the project vicinity. g) The project does not involve a use or activity that could interfere with emergency -response or plamforthe area. h) The oak trees on the sloping hillside in the northwest corner of the site would be preserved, however, the area does not have significant five fuel, and therefore, would not have e vi|dbnd fire -hazard potential. The project site is located outside of the boundary of the very high -fire hazard severity zone. Documentation: City oƒRedding General Plan, Health and Safety Element, 200O Mitigation: None necessary. IX, HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY: Would the project: Potentially Less -Than- Less -Than- No Vill, HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Would the project., Significant Significant With Significant Impact b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially Impact Mitigation Impact with groundwater recharge such that there would be a new clef icit in incorporated e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan x has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use x airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project X result in a safety hazardfor people residing or working in the project area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted X emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to x urbanized areas, or where residences are intermixed with wildiands? a,b,c,d) The nature of the project asresidential housing does not present msignificant risk related tohazardous materials oremissions. There is no documented hazardous material sites located on or near the project. e, f) The project is located outside the established clear zones for Redding Municipal Airport. The project's residential land use would not conflict with operations of theAirport or present a safety hazard to people residing in the subdivision. There are no private airstrips in the project vicinity. g) The project does not involve a use or activity that could interfere with emergency -response or plamforthe area. h) The oak trees on the sloping hillside in the northwest corner of the site would be preserved, however, the area does not have significant five fuel, and therefore, would not have e vi|dbnd fire -hazard potential. The project site is located outside of the boundary of the very high -fire hazard severity zone. Documentation: City oƒRedding General Plan, Health and Safety Element, 200O Mitigation: None necessary. IX, HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY: Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less -Than- Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less -Than- Significant Impact No Impact a) Violate a ny water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? x b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a new clef icit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., x the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? s-2017-0023yLive oak Subdivision 16 City of Redding Development Services Department Planning Division In itia I Study Discussion: a) Since the project would beserved byCity sanitary sewer service, the project would not involve any permitted discharges ofwaste material into ground or surface waters. b) The project would utilize City water service for domestic uses and fire protection. The proposed project would not impact groundwater supplies. c, f) The project is su bject to standa rd req uIrements defi ned u rider Section VI., Geology and Soils, a bove that mini mize the potential for erosion ursiltation on- oroff-xbe. The final improvement plans for the project must also incorporate specific design measures intended to limit pollutant discharges in storm water from urban improvements as established underthe State's National Pollutant Elimination System (NPDES)genera|permit,m/hichiheOtyisnovvobU8atedtofn||mwinamcordoncewithStateVVaterQua|ityContvu| OvderNo.Z0D3'0OD5'DVVQ.AUsturmwaterronoffwi||bormnveyedtoanundergrmunddetentimn[In0trationfadKty|ocate6intbe area of the proposed common area where it will be treated for both storm water quality and quantity. Low flow filtration trenches will be constructed throughout the detention/infiltration basin and the private underground system storm drain system. Feasible Best01mnagementPract|ces(BK4Ps)wou|d6einoorporotedintbefina|dea|gnufthepnoject'sstorm'drainqmLem,ayapproxedby the City Engineer, based on the BMPs listed in the latest edition of the California Storm Water Quality Association Storm Water Best Management Practices Handbook. d, e) Storm water runoff from the project site flows generally in a easterly direction from the gently sloping area in northwestcorner of the site toward Churn Creek. Storm drain improvements will direct storm waters through the site to an outfall in the northeast corner ofthe site which will then drain offsite tothe creek. City mfRedding Policy 1DO6requires that all subdivision development inc|udestormwaterdetentinnfad|itiesdesigmedtmmaintoinexistingpredeve|opmentratesofrunmffdudnga1D`Z5',and10Dfmar storm event with G-hourduration. The project application includes a storm water hydrology analysis prepared by Sharrah Dunlap Sawyer, Inc,, dated January 30, 2017 that includes use of an underground drain rock storm water detention facility in the area of the proposed common area that will detain runoff before conveying the metered runoff to Churn Creek. S-2n17-0023ouveOak Subdivision 17 Potentially Less -Than- Less -Than- No IX. HYDROLOGY AND WATER Would the project: Significant SignificantWith Significant Impact _qQALITY: Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated c) Substantial ly alter the existing dra Inage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a x manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off - d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or x substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or offsite? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of x existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? x g) Place housing within 100 -year flood hazard area as mapped on a Federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other x flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100 -year flood hazard area structures which would X impede or redirect flood flows? I) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee x j) inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? x Discussion: a) Since the project would beserved byCity sanitary sewer service, the project would not involve any permitted discharges ofwaste material into ground or surface waters. b) The project would utilize City water service for domestic uses and fire protection. The proposed project would not impact groundwater supplies. c, f) The project is su bject to standa rd req uIrements defi ned u rider Section VI., Geology and Soils, a bove that mini mize the potential for erosion ursiltation on- oroff-xbe. The final improvement plans for the project must also incorporate specific design measures intended to limit pollutant discharges in storm water from urban improvements as established underthe State's National Pollutant Elimination System (NPDES)genera|permit,m/hichiheOtyisnovvobU8atedtofn||mwinamcordoncewithStateVVaterQua|ityContvu| OvderNo.Z0D3'0OD5'DVVQ.AUsturmwaterronoffwi||bormnveyedtoanundergrmunddetentimn[In0trationfadKty|ocate6intbe area of the proposed common area where it will be treated for both storm water quality and quantity. Low flow filtration trenches will be constructed throughout the detention/infiltration basin and the private underground system storm drain system. Feasible Best01mnagementPract|ces(BK4Ps)wou|d6einoorporotedintbefina|dea|gnufthepnoject'sstorm'drainqmLem,ayapproxedby the City Engineer, based on the BMPs listed in the latest edition of the California Storm Water Quality Association Storm Water Best Management Practices Handbook. d, e) Storm water runoff from the project site flows generally in a easterly direction from the gently sloping area in northwestcorner of the site toward Churn Creek. Storm drain improvements will direct storm waters through the site to an outfall in the northeast corner ofthe site which will then drain offsite tothe creek. City mfRedding Policy 1DO6requires that all subdivision development inc|udestormwaterdetentinnfad|itiesdesigmedtmmaintoinexistingpredeve|opmentratesofrunmffdudnga1D`Z5',and10Dfmar storm event with G-hourduration. The project application includes a storm water hydrology analysis prepared by Sharrah Dunlap Sawyer, Inc,, dated January 30, 2017 that includes use of an underground drain rock storm water detention facility in the area of the proposed common area that will detain runoff before conveying the metered runoff to Churn Creek. S-2n17-0023ouveOak Subdivision 17 City ofRedding Development Services Department Planning Division In itia I Study 8'h'0 The 100 -year floodplain boundary of Churn Creek is just outside the northeastproperty boundary. Nnencroachment inthe floodplain will occur with the project. j) The threat ofatsunami wave bnot applicable toinland, central valley communities such as Redding. Seiches could potentially be generated in either Shasta or Whiskeytown Lakes during an earthquake. However, neither lake has been identified In the Health and Safety Element of the General Plan as having any risk tothe City under such circumstances. There in no documented threat of mudfluwsaffecting the project site. Documentation: City ofRedding General Plan Background Report, Chapter 1lHealth and Safety Element, 1998 Federal Emergency Management Agency Floodplain regulations, RRk4 map 06089C1554G, dated PWanb 17, 2011 City nfRedding Storm Drain Master Plan, Montgomery -Watson Engineers 1993 Old Alturas Multi -Family Entitlement Level Storm Drain Analysis, prepare by Sharrah Dunlap Sawyer, Inc., dated January 30, 2017. Mitigation: None necessary, o) The project bomultiple-family development located |nanarea that is zoned for this use, and issurrounded byother similar or compatible uses, Residential single-family neighborhoods are separated from this development by private open space and grade separation tothe north and Churn Creek tothe east. Therefore, the project does not have the potential bophysically divide an established community, b) The project iscompatible with the applicable policies and regulations ofthe City General Plan and Zoning Ordinance and isnot in confUotwith any other Plan adopted byajurisdictional agency for the purpose mfavoiding ormitigating anenvironmental effect. 6 There is no habitat conservation or natural community conservation plans that are applicable to the site. City mfRedding General Plan, Community Development Element, 2OOO City of Redding General Plan Environmental Impact Report, 2000, SCH#1998072103 City ofRedding General Plan, Natural Resources Element, 2000 S-2mp0023yLive Oak Subdivision 18 Potentially Less -Than- Less -Than- No X LAND USE AND PLANNING: Would the project: Significant Significant With Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated a) Physically divide an established community? x b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning x ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? x o) The project bomultiple-family development located |nanarea that is zoned for this use, and issurrounded byother similar or compatible uses, Residential single-family neighborhoods are separated from this development by private open space and grade separation tothe north and Churn Creek tothe east. Therefore, the project does not have the potential bophysically divide an established community, b) The project iscompatible with the applicable policies and regulations ofthe City General Plan and Zoning Ordinance and isnot in confUotwith any other Plan adopted byajurisdictional agency for the purpose mfavoiding ormitigating anenvironmental effect. 6 There is no habitat conservation or natural community conservation plans that are applicable to the site. City mfRedding General Plan, Community Development Element, 2OOO City of Redding General Plan Environmental Impact Report, 2000, SCH#1998072103 City ofRedding General Plan, Natural Resources Element, 2000 S-2mp0023yLive Oak Subdivision 18 City of Redding Development Services Department Planning Division .. 0 Initial Study • a, b) The project site is not identified in the General Plan as having any known mineral -resource value or as being located within any "Critical Mineral Resource Overlay" area. Documentation: City of Redding General Plan, Natural Resources Element, 2000 Mitigation: None necessary. Potentially Less -Than- Less -Than- No XI. MINERAL RESOURCES: Would the project: Significant Significant With Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that Incorporated X would be of value to the region and the residents of the State? b) Result in the loss of availability of'a locally -important mineral X resource recovery site delineated on a local General Plan, specific x plan or other land use plan? a, b) The project site is not identified in the General Plan as having any known mineral -resource value or as being located within any "Critical Mineral Resource Overlay" area. Documentation: City of Redding General Plan, Natural Resources Element, 2000 Mitigation: None necessary. S-2017-00239 Live Oak Subdivision 39 Potentially Less -Than- Less -Than- No X111, NOISE: Would the project result in: Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact With Impact Mitigation Incorporated a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise X ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive ground- borne vibration or ground -borne noise levels? X c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in x the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the X project? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project X expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project X area to excessive noise levels? S-2017-00239 Live Oak Subdivision 39 City mRedding Development Services Department Planning Division Initial Study a,b,d The City of Redding General Plan Noise Element mmta6Uuhem 68 d8 bdn as the standard acceptable exterior noise level for residential land use and 45dB Ldn for interior noise levels (40dB in sleeping areas). The projectsite islocated northwest of Old Alturas Road and Victor Avenue and the existing noise environment is defined primarily by traffic on Old Alturas Road, An acoustical analysis was prepared for the subdivision project by Saxelby Acoustics, dated November 27, 2017. Toquantify the existing ambient noise environment on the project site, Saxelby Acoustics conducted a noise measurement survey. The study then utilized the Federal Highway Administration Traffic Noise Prediction Model to estimate future traffic volumes for theyear 2037 using a one percent increase per year over existing (2012) daily traffic volumes obtained from the City of Redding Public Works Department. The study also took into consideration the setback to the project buildings and accounted for the proposed 6 -foot -tall sound wall that would be constructed on either a 5 -foot -tall retaining wall or graded slope adjacent to the street. Traffic noise levels at the individual first floor patios for lots adjacent to Old Alturas Road would be 60 dBA Ldr, while the group gathering outdoor activity areas would be 55 dBA Ld, or less. Therefore, with the installation of the standard solid arterial block wall noise barrier, traffic noise would be attenuated to an acceptable level. Based onatypical 2Sd8exterior tointerior noise level reduction achieved by modern building construction, an interior noise level of 45 dBA Ldr, would be excepted, therefore, no interior noise control measures would be required to achieve compliance with the City's interior noise level standards. There are no non -transportation -related or vibration -generating sources in the general vicinity of the project. d) During the construction of the proposed project, there will be a temporary increase in noise in the project vicinity above existing ambient noise levels, The most noticeable construction noise will be related to grading, utility excavation, and land -clearing activity. The City's Grading Ordinance (RMC Chapter 16.12.120.H) limits grading -permit -authorized activities to between the hours of 7:00 a.m.and 7:00p.m.,Monday through Saturday, No operations are allowed on Sunday. Since heavy construction work associated with the project is limited in scope and by existing regulation, the anticipated noise impact to neighboring residents is considered less than significant. e,DThe proposed subdivision site bnot located within any of the noise contours of Redding Municipal Airport and blocated Documentation:approximately 5 miles from the Airport. There are no private airstrips in the vicinity of the project site. City qfRedding General Plan, Noise Element, 2000 City of Redding Grading Ordinance Redding Municipal Code, Section 16.12.120 City qfRedding General Plan, Transportation Element, IU80 City of Redding Zoning Ordinance Redding Municipal Code, Section 18.40.100 City ofRedding Municipal Airport Area Plan Live Oak Estates Residential, prepared by Saxelby Acoustics, dated November 27, 2017 Mitigation: None necessary. S-2o17-0023yLive Oak Subdivision 20 Potentially Less -Than- Less -Than- No XI II. POPULATION AND HOUSING: Would the project., Significant SignificantWith Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other x b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? x C) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? x S-2o17-0023yLive Oak Subdivision 20 City of Redding Development Services Department Planning Division Initial Study a, b, c) The project would create opportunity for the construction of new muitfple-family units as planned and anticipated by the Redding General Plan. As previously noted, the project is similar to other developments in the area or in character with surrounding land uses. The project would not induce unplanned population growth and does not propose the extension of any new roads or utilities not anticipated by the General Plan. The project does not displace substantial numbers of people or substantial numbers of existing hoproject will be providing housing, Documentation: Pr F Ptvip-st. 7 14 - - - - - - - - - - - XIV. PUBLIC SERVICES: Would the project result in substantial adverse Potentially Less -Than- Less -Than- No physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered Significant Significant With Significant Impact governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental Impact Mitigation Impact facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental Incorporated impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Fire Protection? x Police Protection? x Schools? x Parks? x Other public facilities? x The City would provide police and fire protection to the project from existing facilities and under existing service levels. The size of the project would not mandate the need for additional police or fire facilities. The project is subject to Chapter 16.20 of the Redding Municipal Code, which requires new development to pay a citywide fire facilities - impact fee calculated to mitigate a project's fair share of cumulative impacts to the City's fire -protection infrastructure based upon improvements necessary to accommodate new development under the City's General Plan. The project is located in the Enterprise Elementary School District and Shasta Union High School District and may contribute to the total student enrollment in these districts. However, a school -facility impact (in -lieu) fee exists, as provided under State law that is paid priorto the issuance of a building permit for each residential unit to address school -facility funding necessitated by the effects of growth citywide. Parks: The project will not cause a physical deterioration of an existing park facility or cause an adverse physical impact associated with a new park facility. The project is subject to Chapter 16.20 of the Redding Municipal Code, which requires new residential development to pay a citywide park and recreation -facilities impact fee calculated to mitigate a project's fair share of cumulative impacts to the City's parks and recreation infrastructure based upon improvements necessary to accommodate new development under the City's General Plan. See discussion under Item XVI (Recreation) below. 5-2017-00239 [wive Oak Subdivision 21 City of Redding Development Services Department Planning Division Other publicfacilities: See discussion under Item XVIII (Utilities and Service Systems) below. Documentation: City ofRedding General Plan, Public Facilities Element, 2000 Mitigation: None necessary. Initial Study Discussion: a, b) The project will not cause a physical deterioration of an existing recreation facility or cause an adverse physical impact associated with anew recreation facility. Chapter 17,42ofthe City's Subdivision Ordinance, Parkand Recreational Land Dedications and In -Lieu Fees, requires that as a condition of approval of a tentative map, a subdivider shall either dedicate land or pay a fee in lieu thereof for park orrecreation purposes. |naccordance with state subdivision law, only projects containing 5Oormore lots maybe required tmdedicate land for park development. Therefore, the project proponent would be subject to the in -lieu fee that will contribute to providing orimproving recreational facilities throughout the city. However, proposed under the Planned Development Plan for the project are two groups gathering areas that will provide residents with outdoor space including a small turf area, walking path, benches and picnic/barbeque area for outdoor gatherings and provide recreational opportunities. City qfRedding General Plan, Natural Resources Element, 2000 City q/Redding General plan Recreation Element, 2OOO City of Redding General Plan, Public Facilities Element, 2000 Mitigation: None necessary. Potentialiv . Less -Than- Less -Than- No XV..RECREATION: Significant Significant With Significant impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and x regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? x b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an x adverse physical effect on the environment? Discussion: a, b) The project will not cause a physical deterioration of an existing recreation facility or cause an adverse physical impact associated with anew recreation facility. Chapter 17,42ofthe City's Subdivision Ordinance, Parkand Recreational Land Dedications and In -Lieu Fees, requires that as a condition of approval of a tentative map, a subdivider shall either dedicate land or pay a fee in lieu thereof for park orrecreation purposes. |naccordance with state subdivision law, only projects containing 5Oormore lots maybe required tmdedicate land for park development. Therefore, the project proponent would be subject to the in -lieu fee that will contribute to providing orimproving recreational facilities throughout the city. However, proposed under the Planned Development Plan for the project are two groups gathering areas that will provide residents with outdoor space including a small turf area, walking path, benches and picnic/barbeque area for outdoor gatherings and provide recreational opportunities. City qfRedding General Plan, Natural Resources Element, 2000 City q/Redding General plan Recreation Element, 2OOO City of Redding General Plan, Public Facilities Element, 2000 Mitigation: None necessary. s-20o-0023smmOak Subdivision 22 Potentially Less -Than- Less -Than- No XVI. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFI . Would the project: Significant Significant With Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in eitherthe number of vehicle trips, the x volume -to -capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at b) Exceed, ither individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the County congestion management x agency for designated roads or highway? s-20o-0023smmOak Subdivision 22 City of Redding Development Services Department Planning Division Initial Study XV[. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC: Would the project, Potentially Significant less -Than - Significant With less -Than- Significant No Impact "C'U Impact Mitigation Impact 5 Dour). However, the delay between the cumulative condition with and without the project is increased by less than 5 seconds E Incorporated impact associated with the project and no mitigation is warranted. The project's westerly driveway however would operate at c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an acceptable levels in all conditions. Z Construction of a roundabout at the Old Alturas Road and Victor Avenue intersection, in conjunction with a roundabout corridor CU increase In traffic levels or a change in location that results in been completed by Omni Means, This preliminary design was utilized with the tentative subdivision map layout in order to :E substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g,, sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., x farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? x f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? x g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans or programs supporting x alternative transportation (e,g, bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? a, b, d) The Transportation Element of the General Plan establishes acceptable peak -hour "Level of Service (LOS) criteria for roadways and intersections for use in transportation planning and project review. The LOS methodology is an established way of ranking the degree of traffic -flow efficiency and congestion. For most of the City, LOS "C" or "acceptable delay" is identified as the maximum allowable threshold before a more congested and potentially significant traffic condition occurs. For state highway interchange connections with local streets, a maximum LOS "D" or "tolerable delay" is established. A thorough explanation of LOS methodology is provided in the Transportation Element and the Transportation and Circulation Section of the General Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR), 111 T! I R 1 11 1 11111� westerly driveway shown on the tentative map while Phase 3 would necessitate second access that would be located at the intersection of Old Alturas Road and Victor Avenue, essentially forming the fourth leg of the all -way stop intersection. To help assess potential LOS and traffic -movement impacts, a focused Traffic impact Analysis Memorandum was prepared by Omni 'or Means, A GHD Company, for the project and dated September 27, 2017, The memo analyzed project impacts during both AM Ef and PM peak hour for both existing conditions and cumulative (year 2037) conditions for the intersection of Old Alturas Road 0 and Victor Avenue and the project's westerly driveway. The impact analysis indicates that the current Old Alturas Road and "C'U Victor Avenue intersection operates at an acceptable level in the existing and the existing plus project condition (LOS C), IT - however, operates at an unacceptable level in the cumulative condition both with and without the project (LOS F in the PM peak 5 Dour). However, the delay between the cumulative condition with and without the project is increased by less than 5 seconds E (the City's threshold for significance) at an already unacceptable intersection, therefore it would not be considered a significant impact associated with the project and no mitigation is warranted. The project's westerly driveway however would operate at acceptable levels in all conditions. Z Construction of a roundabout at the Old Alturas Road and Victor Avenue intersection, in conjunction with a roundabout corridor CU along Old Alturas Road, is identified as a future project in the City's Capital Improvement Plan. A preliminary design layout has been completed by Omni Means, This preliminary design was utilized with the tentative subdivision map layout in order to :E ensure that adequate right-of-way for future improvements is provided as a condition of recording the final subdivision map. If Ef the roundabout has not been constructed at the time of development of Phase 3 then a temporary driveway would need to be constructed to access the project and provide second access with a minimum of 20 feet in width. Construction of project improvements would eliminate the existing driveway access from the property to the east and would require that access be provided from the new project driveway. The project is subject to Chapter 16.20 of the Redding Municipal Code, which requires new development to pay a citywide E transportation development impact fee calculated to mitigate a project!s fair share of cumulative impacts to the City's street - S -2017-00239 Live Oak Subdivision 23 City ofRedding Development Services Department Planning Division Initial Study and traffic -control infrastructure based upon improvements necessary to accommodate new development under the City's General Plan, 6 The project site is located outside the Approach Zones for both the Redding Municipal Airport and Benton Airpark; therefore, there isnopotential tointerfere with airport operations, Noimpacts are anticipated inthis regard. e) The General Plan Health and Safety Policies HS4.1 and HS41 generally require that residential development having 50 or more dwelling units have atleast two points nfpublic-street access and that co|de-sacordead-end street lengths not exceed 6U0feet. The project includes atotal ofG4lots and mosecond access isrequired. Asnoted above, access tothe subdivision would 6e derived from Old Alturas Road in two locations, The westerly driveway would be provide adequate access for the 40 lots to be developed with Phase I and 2, however, development of Phase 3 would necessitate second access that would be located at the intersection of Old Alturas Road and Victor Avenue, essentially forming the fourth leg of the all -way stop intersection. The Redding Fire Marshal would require the second access be a minimum of a 20 -foot -wide drivewaywhich would be adequatefor emergency access and fire protection. f) Duplex units require a minimum of one covered and one uncovered parking space while the 4-plex units would require up to 2 uncovered spaces. Adequate parking has been provided to meet the minimum and parking would not be a significant impact. g) The City's Bikeway Action Plan 2UIO- 015idenUUesO|dAhusoRoadasanexistng Class 3bikeway that bproposed tob*upgraded to Class 2with development. However, the City has just recently completed the Active Transportation P|anV\TP that would serve aaon update to that plan. That document, which is in draft form and recently released for review, identifies Old Alturas Road, as a Shared Use Pothwhiohcuu|dcondutnfan8'foot-widesidewa|k/pathoheredbypedestriansandbicyo(istaoUaoentLotheroadxvay(i.e.sidepath)as well as Buffered Bike Lanes. The ATP also identifies this section of Old Alturas Road, between Browning Street and Victor Avenue, as a priority pedestrian project. Redding Area Bus Authority (RABA) serves this area with several bus routes; however, the project site is also located within walking distance (.7 mile) from the RABA Canby Road Transfer Station, facilitating use of transit options throughout the OCy. Conditions of approval will require improvements along the frontage of Old Alturas, Road to accommodate pedestrians and bicycles and would not conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation. Documentation: City q/Redding General Plan, Transportation Element, 2OOO City n/Redding General Plan Environmental Impact Report, 2000,SCH#199OO7Z103 City ofRedding Parks, Trails, and Open Space Master Plan, 2O02 City ufRedding Traffic Impact Fee Program City o/Redding Bikeway Action Plan 2D10_20lS Redding Area Bus Authority System Map and Route Guide, October 2OOO City ofRedding Active Transportation Plan, February ZU18Draft Traffic Impact Analysis Memorandum, prepared by Omni Means, a GHD Company, dated September 27, 2017 Mitigation: None necessary. S-2m7-0o23sLive Oak Subdivision 24 Potentially Less -Than- Less -Than- No XVII. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES: Would the project cause a substantial Significant Signiflcant With Significant Impact adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Impact Mitigation Impact Public Resources code section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural Incorporated landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is: a) Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public X Resources Code section 5020.1(k), or S-2m7-0o23sLive Oak Subdivision 24 City of Redding Development Services Department Planning Division Initial Study As discussed under Section V, Cultural Resources, a Cultural Resources Assessment for the project site, including a field survey and archival research, and a record search at the Northeast Information Center was conducted by Gallaway Enterprises. A mixed reconnaissance and intensive -level pedestrian was conducted on April 14, 2017, covering the entire area of potential effect to identify the presence or absence of historic resources and to evaluate the significance of any identified archaeological resources. The results of the record search indicate that three previous cultural resource surveys have been undertaken within the project site with no prehistoric and one historic site having been recorded. A previous cultural resource inventory conducted in 2006 detailed the recorded site for the residential homestead, 'including a house, barn, and outbuildings on the western parcel, known as "Little Rags." In 220, the structures lacked integrity and were not recommended as eligible for the California Register of Historic Resources (CRHR). The survey results indicate that the site had undergone significant modification since 2006 and the structures had all been demolished. on the eastern parcel, the structures constructed in 1957 and 1965 were still standing and currently inhabited. However, both structures have been updated, undergone intense remodeling, and neither maintains the integrity of the initial construction. Therefore the eastern portion of the site is not eligible for CRHR or the National Registry of Historic Places. In consideration of the findings of the record search and pedestrian survey, no impacts in this area are anticipated, Regarding Native American Outreach, the City of Redding sent notification of the project to the California Native American tribes that have requested notification, Redding Rancheria and Wintu Tribe of Northern California, on March 14,2017 and May 5, 2017, respectively. No request for consultation was initiated or received. Documentation: Cultural Resource Assessment, prepared by Gallaway Enterprises, dated April 2017. Potentially Less -Than- Less -Than- No XVII. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES: Would the project cause a substantial Significant Significant With Significant Impact adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Impact mitigation Impact Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural Incorporated landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native X American tribe, and that is: b) A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported X by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying the X criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1 In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resource Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe. As discussed under Section V, Cultural Resources, a Cultural Resources Assessment for the project site, including a field survey and archival research, and a record search at the Northeast Information Center was conducted by Gallaway Enterprises. A mixed reconnaissance and intensive -level pedestrian was conducted on April 14, 2017, covering the entire area of potential effect to identify the presence or absence of historic resources and to evaluate the significance of any identified archaeological resources. The results of the record search indicate that three previous cultural resource surveys have been undertaken within the project site with no prehistoric and one historic site having been recorded. A previous cultural resource inventory conducted in 2006 detailed the recorded site for the residential homestead, 'including a house, barn, and outbuildings on the western parcel, known as "Little Rags." In 220, the structures lacked integrity and were not recommended as eligible for the California Register of Historic Resources (CRHR). The survey results indicate that the site had undergone significant modification since 2006 and the structures had all been demolished. on the eastern parcel, the structures constructed in 1957 and 1965 were still standing and currently inhabited. However, both structures have been updated, undergone intense remodeling, and neither maintains the integrity of the initial construction. Therefore the eastern portion of the site is not eligible for CRHR or the National Registry of Historic Places. In consideration of the findings of the record search and pedestrian survey, no impacts in this area are anticipated, Regarding Native American Outreach, the City of Redding sent notification of the project to the California Native American tribes that have requested notification, Redding Rancheria and Wintu Tribe of Northern California, on March 14,2017 and May 5, 2017, respectively. No request for consultation was initiated or received. Documentation: Cultural Resource Assessment, prepared by Gallaway Enterprises, dated April 2017. S-2017-00239 Live Oak Subdivision 25 Potentially Less -Than- Less -Than- No XVIII. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS: Would the project: Significant Significant With Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? X b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing X facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? S-2017-00239 Live Oak Subdivision 25 City of Redding Development Services Department Planning Division Initial Study a, b, cl, e) Adequate utilities and service systems are available to the project; therefore the project would have no impactor the potential impacts to utilities are considered less than significant. Water and sewer service will be provided by the City of Redding with connection to existing mains in Old Alturas Road. The proposed development would not generate wastewater demands that would exceed treatment requirements of the Regional Water Quality Control Board and does not generate the need for the construction of new water or wastewater -treatment facilities. Adequate sewer capacity is available in the City's existing system. Water is available from the City to serve the project with adequate pressure and flows for fire suppression. The demands of the project can be accommodated within the City's existing water resources. However, the project is subject to Chapter 16,20 of the Redding Municipal Code, which requires new development to pay water- and sewer -impact fees calculated to mitigate a project's fair share of cumulative impacts to the City's water and sewer distribution, collection, and treatment infrastructure based upon improvements necessary to accommodate new development under the City's General Pion, c) Storm water will be collected and detained on site in an underground conveyance system in accordance with City construction standards and City Policy 1806 pertaining to storm water detention (also see IX, Hydrology and Water Quality, d and e), Storm water would then be discharged to Churn Creek in the northeast corner of the site. The project is also subject to Chapter 16.20 of the Redding Municipal Code, which requires new development to pay a storm -drainage impact fee calculated to mitigate a project's fair share of cumulative impacts to the City's storm -drain infrastructure based upon improvements necessary to accommodate new development under the City's General Plan. f, g) The City provides solid waste disposal service which the project would utilize. The duplex units in Phase 1 and 2 would be served by curbside pick-up for garbage and recycling while Phase 3 would be provided service of both with installation of a community enclosure. Adequate capacity is available to serve the needs of the project without need of special accommodation, The City regulates and operates programs that promote the proper disposal of toxic and hazardous materials from households, including those created by the project. Documentation: City of Redding Water and SewerAtlas S-2017-00239 Live Oak Subdivision 26 Potentially Less -Than- Less -Than- No XVII 1. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS: Would the project: Significant Significant With Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the x construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project which servesor may serve the projectfrom existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? x e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate x capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? x g) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations Lx] related to solid waste? a, b, cl, e) Adequate utilities and service systems are available to the project; therefore the project would have no impactor the potential impacts to utilities are considered less than significant. Water and sewer service will be provided by the City of Redding with connection to existing mains in Old Alturas Road. The proposed development would not generate wastewater demands that would exceed treatment requirements of the Regional Water Quality Control Board and does not generate the need for the construction of new water or wastewater -treatment facilities. Adequate sewer capacity is available in the City's existing system. Water is available from the City to serve the project with adequate pressure and flows for fire suppression. The demands of the project can be accommodated within the City's existing water resources. However, the project is subject to Chapter 16,20 of the Redding Municipal Code, which requires new development to pay water- and sewer -impact fees calculated to mitigate a project's fair share of cumulative impacts to the City's water and sewer distribution, collection, and treatment infrastructure based upon improvements necessary to accommodate new development under the City's General Pion, c) Storm water will be collected and detained on site in an underground conveyance system in accordance with City construction standards and City Policy 1806 pertaining to storm water detention (also see IX, Hydrology and Water Quality, d and e), Storm water would then be discharged to Churn Creek in the northeast corner of the site. The project is also subject to Chapter 16.20 of the Redding Municipal Code, which requires new development to pay a storm -drainage impact fee calculated to mitigate a project's fair share of cumulative impacts to the City's storm -drain infrastructure based upon improvements necessary to accommodate new development under the City's General Plan. f, g) The City provides solid waste disposal service which the project would utilize. The duplex units in Phase 1 and 2 would be served by curbside pick-up for garbage and recycling while Phase 3 would be provided service of both with installation of a community enclosure. Adequate capacity is available to serve the needs of the project without need of special accommodation, The City regulates and operates programs that promote the proper disposal of toxic and hazardous materials from households, including those created by the project. Documentation: City of Redding Water and SewerAtlas S-2017-00239 Live Oak Subdivision 26 City ofRedding Development Services Department Planning Division Mitigation: None necessary. Based onthe analysis undertaken aopart ofthis Initial Study, the following findings can bemade: a) As discussed under hem |V, Biological Resources, if unmitigated, the project has the potential to result /n impacts to species protected under the K4BTAthat may benesting within the project site and potentially the loss of jurisdictional Waters of the United States. Mitigation Measure 1 and 2 are established to reduce potential impact to less than significant. W As discussed in Section V, the project will contribute to region wide cumulative air quality impacts.However, under policy ofthe Genemdylan application of existing grading and construction stanclardswill reduce potential impacts from this project to a level less than significant. C) Asdiscussed herein, the project does not have characteristics which could cause substantial adverse effects onhuman beings, either directly or indirectly. S-2o17-00239Live Oak Subdivision 27 Potentially Less -Than- Less -Than- No XVIV. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE: Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact With Impact Mitigation Incorporated a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below the self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, x reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plantor animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in X connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of othercurrent projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? c) Does the project have potential environmental effects which maycause x substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or Based onthe analysis undertaken aopart ofthis Initial Study, the following findings can bemade: a) As discussed under hem |V, Biological Resources, if unmitigated, the project has the potential to result /n impacts to species protected under the K4BTAthat may benesting within the project site and potentially the loss of jurisdictional Waters of the United States. Mitigation Measure 1 and 2 are established to reduce potential impact to less than significant. W As discussed in Section V, the project will contribute to region wide cumulative air quality impacts.However, under policy ofthe Genemdylan application of existing grading and construction stanclardswill reduce potential impacts from this project to a level less than significant. C) Asdiscussed herein, the project does not have characteristics which could cause substantial adverse effects onhuman beings, either directly or indirectly. S-2o17-00239Live Oak Subdivision 27 V' ral Illll I Kyj WE r. wi TI 368 Old Alturas Rd Emsm.. N GIS DIVISION INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT E DATE PRODUCED: MARCH 6, 2017 s 0 200 400 Feet P:XP]annlnUXDWGXSUMS-2017-00239.mxd -moi S MTG. DATE: LOCATION MAP 5-2017-00239 / RZ-2017-00240 I PD -2017-00241 ITEM: OLD ALTURAS MULTI -FAMILY SUBDIVISION 1320 & 1368 OLD ALTURAS ROAD ATTACHMENT.' AP# 071-270-012 & -021 F Packet Pg. 71 �o 44 -moi S MTG. DATE: LOCATION MAP 5-2017-00239 / RZ-2017-00240 I PD -2017-00241 ITEM: OLD ALTURAS MULTI -FAMILY SUBDIVISION 1320 & 1368 OLD ALTURAS ROAD ATTACHMENT.' AP# 071-270-012 & -021 F Packet Pg. 71 T ITS' y ix ku� 2 a a � t � � t R lit f l�ji.mo i" [> fl � d 7 G 60 +y i _ }gvp� T ITS' y ix ku� 2 a a � t � � t va 0 a a I \ R lit O v l�ji.mo i" [> fl � va 0 a a I \ R g a i. M r:lill C':A N w S'—SA-S (j 0 z Ok.s ;V0 Z, 'J j. t 124 } kf TIP ,jr i n --lip �s a im y R g a i. M r:lill C':A N w S'—SA-S (j 0 z Ok.s ;V0 Z, 'J j. t } kf TIP 0v i n jam 91 III - § (p --4 C: < m Ell -N, 13 ® /v 410` s ® 410` � \ \ ��\ � § f /��. � ZO IN 7 a ti £ x a a m n v o 4 .- R z s FIRE w - i Qua.,$ Va low p o tj P2, CL tj V; 0.9 0 .0 Y, 1g, oq rl. 0 0i a, ::: �� . . . . .: .� � . . :� . ... .. �. . � � . . � � .� �� \ y ®y®± ( � • / } �/ *\± \\ -- 47w n W � � � (yb m G "." "A X 1111 in FENTS 01MIDA MIUM! III MEETING DATE: May 1, 2018 FROM: Larry Vaupel, Development ITEM NO. 6.2 Services Director [S-101-152] ***APPROVED BY*** btippin@cityofredding.org � {at 'emse""i, ry ' el, ces Director 4/19/2018 a, 1vaupe1*_cityofredding.org SUBJECT: 6.2 --Public Hearing Regarding Tentative Subdivision Map submitted by Omni, LLC, for Live Oak Estates to include Adoption of Mitigated Negative Declaration, Ordinance approving Rezoning Application, approval of Tentative Subdivision Map Application and Planned Development Plan Application to divide 8 acres into 26 multiple -family residential lots for development of 64 multiple -family residential units. The project includes a rezoning to add the "PD" Planned Development Overlay District to the existing "RM -12" Residential Multiple Family District. Conduct a public hearing and, upon conclusion: (1) Adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration, upon a determination that the necessary findings for approval are in evidence. (2) Offer Ordinance approving Rezoning Application RZ-2017-00240 consisting of 8 acres located at 1320 and 1368 Old Alturas Road to "RM -12 -PD" Residential Multiple Family with Planned Development Overlay District, for first reading by title only and authorize the City Clerk to publish a summary ordinance; (3) Approve Tentative Subdivision Map Application S-2017-00239, Live Oak Estates Subdivision; and (4) Approve Planned Development Plan Application PD -2017-00241. The City Council (Council) could approve the project with modifications to the zoning, planned development plan, and/or conditions • approval deemed necessary to support the project based • the findings attached to this report, •'' deny the project. Denial • the project must •" based upon a finding that the project is inconsistent with the General Plan or other City development standards • poses a threat to public health, safety, or welfare. Staff has not identified any justification for denial of the project. M2EMMZXK= Report to Redding City Council April 19,201 Re: 6.2 --Public Hearing, Live Oak Estates Subdivision and Planned Development Plan Pagel The City of Redding Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the project its March 27, 2018, meeting. The staff report from that meeting is attached to this report. Sta has not received any public comment regarding the project and no testimony in opposition to t [�lroject was presented to the Planning Commission. The project requires Council approval due It the rezoning request to add the "PD" Planned Development Overlay District to the existi "RM- 12" Residential Multiple Family District zoning of the property. I Omni Financial is requesting approval to subdivide approximately eight acres into 26 multipl family residential lots in three phases for development of 64 multiple -family units. Phase 1 2 consist of 20 lots total to be developed with a two-family dwelling unit (duplex) on each lot al f a total of 40 units. Phase 3 consists of six lots to be developed with a four-plex unit on each I for a total of 24 units. Duplex units are a mix of two- and three-bedroom units with either on or two -car garages. Amenities include common landscape throughout the development and t group gathering areas with walking paths, benches, and picnic or barbeque improvements. property owners' association would be formed to address common ownership and maintenan needs. The application includes a rezoning request to add the "PD" Planned Development Overl District to facilitate development of the project (draft Ordinance attached). The subdivisi• would be developed in accordance with Chapter 18.53 of the Zoning Code to allow a custo design in accordance with the Planned Development Plan, and include the following desi concepts: ■ Reduced lot sizes, public street frontages, and building setbacks are provided to facilitate the development concept. ■ All units will have fenced, private backyards. All front and rear yards will be landscaped with unit construction. A system of private and reciprocal easements will facilitate all shared vehicle access, parking, utility needs, and common landscape. Amenities include twogroup gathering areas to be constructed with Phase 2 and Phase 3. Both will include walking trails, benches, picnic or barbeque area, and/or shade structures for the enjoyment of the occupants of the development. A pedestrian trailhead access will be provided to the private open space in the northeast comer of the subdivision and a public dedication of open space will provide access to the adjacent public Chum Creek open space area. A private homeowners' association would be formed to maintain all common improvements and landscape in the interior of the project. ■ A landscape maintenance district would be formed for maintenance of frontage landscape along Old Alturas Road. Report to Redding City Council April 19, 2018 Re: 6.2 --Public Hearing, Live Oak Estates Subdivision and Planned Development Plan Page It is the opinion of staff that with application of the attached conditions of approval, all necessaifl findings for approval related to CEQA compliance, the tentative map, and the plann development plan are in evidence. The proposed rezoning to include the "PD" overlay district appropriate to facilitate the project. The project also advances General Plan Communi Development and Design Element Goal I I and Policy I I D, to ensure new resident developments are well -located and well designed with a mix of residential density and dwelli types and CDD Goal 12 and Policy 12A to ensure attractive, safe, and well -maintain neighborhoods by promoting neighborhood quality though project amenities and establishme of c: Martin Boone, Omni Financial, LLC Tim MacLean, Sharrah Dunlap Sawyer, Inc. Findings Draft Conditions of Approval/Standard Conditions Planning Commission Staff Report Location Map Draft Ordinance Proposed Zoning Map Mitigated Negative Declaration and Initial Study (available online) Tentative Map Set Planned Development Plan ENVIRONMENTAL, TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PLAN FINDINGS LIVE OAK ESTATES ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS 1. Based on the Initial Study and the information contained in the record, there will be no significant effect on the environment. A Mitigated Negative Declaration is appropriate for the project. 2. The Mitigated Negative Declaration and its supporting documentation reflect the independent judgment and analysis of the City of Redding. TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP FINDINGS To approve the tentative map, the City Council must fine that none of the circumstances set forth in the Government Code of California Chapter 66474.61(a) through (g) below exist: a. That the proposed map is not consistent with applicable general and specific plans as specified in Section 65451. The project density is within that allowed by the General Plan designation of "Residential, 10 to 20 dwelling units per acre." The proposed net residential density is 11.6 units per acre. b. That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is not consistent with applicable general and specific plans. Asa planned development, the project's lot design conforms to the standards of the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance within the guidelines and purposes of Chapter 1.8.53 Planned Development. Construction of the project will include reduced lot sizes and public street frontages, custom -lot configuration, and reduced building setbacks in accordance with the Planned Development Plan. C. That the site is not physically suitable for the type of development. The steep -slope area in the northwest portion of the site and the creek corridor setback in the northeast corner of the site which is not suitable for development will be designated as a private open - space easement for limited passive recreational activities. Otherwise, the site is physically suitable for this type of development as the property can accommodate creation of the proposed lots in accordance with the planned development plan without the need for any unusual grading or construction practices. Short retaining walls will be located between lots to accommodate the level building pad on each lot; however, the private driveway through the project meets the driveway grade requirements. d. That the site is not physically suitable for the proposed density of the development. The site is suitable for the development proposed, utilizing the density allowed by the General Plan designation of "Residential, 10 to 20 dwelling units per acre." The proposed project intends to use only that portion of the site which is suitable for development and is not encumbered by steep slopes which would restrict development. Steep -slope areas will be Findings, Live OakF,states S-2017-00239 Page I preserved within private open space. Adequate access and utility -service capacity is available to accommodate the project. e. That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements is likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. The proposed improvements would not cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. Mitigation measures more fully set forth in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project address the minor loss of potentially jurisdictional waters and protection measures for migratory birds during construction. The subdivision design avoids the northwest portion of the property containing steep slopes and the northeast portion of the property adjacent to the creek corridor which will provide protection of those areas from environmental damage. The project includes an underground storm water detention and infiltration system that will meet City requirements for quantity and quality prior to discharge to Churn Creek, avoiding environmental damage to fish or wildlife and their habitat. £ That the design of the subdivision or type of improvements is likely to cause serious public health problems. The residential project does not present any adverse impacts to public health. The design of the subdivision includes two driveway locations that would provide safe access to the project in accordance with City requirements and avoid motor vehicle injuries. Improvements along Old Alturas Road include an 8 -foot -wide bike lane and 8 -foot -wide sidewalk providing safe access for pedestrians and bicyclists. Two group gathering areas are designed into the project, as well as an access to the public trail system along Churn Creek, which would provide outdoor activity for residents of the project, promoting a healthy lifestyle. The project will provide 64 individual multiple - family housing units in accordance with and consistent with the existing General Plan and Zoning designations for the property. g. That the design for the subdivision or the type of improvements will conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through, or use of, property within the proposed subdivision. In this connection, the governing body may approve a map if it finds that alternate easements for access or for use will be provided and that these will be substantially equivalent to ones previously acquired by the public. This subsection shall apply only to easements of record or to easements established by judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction, and no authority is hereby granted to a legislative body to determine that the public at large has acquired easements for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. Design of the subdivision improvements will not conflict with easements acquired for access through, or use of, property within the proposed subdivision. Conditions of approval require dedication of appropriate rights-of- way and easements for Old Alturas Road and public utilities within the project. A public open -space easement for access and trail purposes is required with recording of the final map for the area in the northeast corner of the proposed subdivision adjacent to the Churn Creek corridor. Findings, Live OakF,states S-2017-00239 Page 2 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PLAN FINDINGS 1. The proposed development is consistent with the goals, objectives, policies, standards, and programs of this code and of the General Flan and any applicable specific plan, including density and intensity limitations that apply. The project density falls within the limitations of the property's General Plan designation of "Residential, 10 to 20 dwelling units per acre." This project's density is... Further, the Housing Element identifies the need to construct additional 3 -bedroom units in the community, a product which will be provided by the project. 2. The site for the proposed development is adequate in size and shape to accommodate said use and all yards, open spaces, setbacks, walls and fences, parking area, loading areas, landscape, and other features required. The project design satisfies all site standards and residential feature requirements of the City Zoning Ordinance within the guidelines and purpose of the "PD" District. Individual lot development includes a minimum 5 -foot building side -yard setback and a minimum 10 -foot rear -yard building setback. All garage, parking space, and drive aisle dimensions meet the minimum standards contained in the City's Off -Street Parking Ordinance. 3. The site for the proposed development has adequate access considering the limitations of existing and planned streets and highways. The project will have adequate public -street access to Old Alturas Road according to City standards. A 15 -foot right -of. -way dedication for a total half section of 42 feet will be required along Old Alturas Road. An 84 -foot -wide right-of-way will meet the City's planned arterial standard for this corridor of Old Alturas Road which will include three 12 -foot -wide travel lanes (one west -bound, one east -bound and a center left -turn lane) between the proposed roundabout at Victor Avenue and tying into the existing improvements at the intersection of Old Alturas Road and Browning Street. Conditions of approval also require construction of an 8 -foot -wide bike lane and an 8 -foot -wide sidewalk, or shared -use path, as opposed to the typical 5 - foot -wide sidewalk, consistent with the draft Active Transportation Plan that will be considered for approval by the City Council in the near future. The westerly driveway will include a center -turn lane for access into and out of the project while the easterly driveway will function as the fourth leg of the future roundabout planned for Victor Avenue and Old Alturas Road. 4. Adequate public services exist or will be provided in accordance with the conditions of development plan approval, to serve the proposed development; and the approval of the proposed development will not result in a reduction of such public services to properties so as to be a detriment to public health, safety, or welfare. Adequate public-service and utility capacity is available to accommodate the project without adversely affecting overall service levels or resulting in detrimental effects to public health, safety, or welfare. Water and sewer service will be provided by the City of Redding with connection to existing mains in Old Alturas Road. Adequate capacity for both utilities and service systems are available to the project. The City would provide police and fire protection under existing services levels. The size of the project would not mandate the need for additional facilities. The project is also subject to Chapter 16.20 of the Redding Findings, Live Oak Estates S-2017-00239 Page 3 Municipal Code which requires new development to pay water-, sewer-, storm -drain, and fire -facilities impact fees calculated to mitigate a project's fair share of cumulative impacts to the City's water, sewer, storm -drain, and fire -protection infrastructure based upon improvements necessary to accommodate new development under the City's General Plan. 5. The proposed development, as conditioned, will not have a substantial adverse effect on surrounding property or the permitted use thereof and will be compatible with the existing and planned land use character of the surrounding area. The project proposes lots in Phase 1 and 2 to be developed with a duplex on each lot and a fourplex on each lot in Phase 3 with a residential density consistent with the multiple -family zoning of the property. The project will be compatible with the densities allowable along Old Alturas Road between Browning Street and Victor Avenue. It is also compatible with the duplex subdivision project directly to the west, as well as the mix of uses, including an apartment project, school, and office complex, across Old Alturas Road to the south. The site is physically separated from the single-family residential properties in the Quail Ridge Subdivision by approximately 40 to 60 feet in elevation change. 6. The improvements required and the manner of development adequately address all natural and manmade hazards associated with the proposed development and the project site, including, but not limited to, flood, fire, and slope hazards. The proposed development plan avoids areas of steep slope and is adequately conditioned to address potential fire hazards. Conditions of approval require fire -fuel management of the steep slope and open space areas by the homeowners' association, prohibit wood fences along the units abutting the open space, and include a requirement to allow pedestrian access for Fire Department personnel to the private and public open space along Churn Creek for fire -protection purposes. The development is located outside of the 100 -year floodplain for Churn Creek. 7. The proposed development carries out the intent of the Planned Development provisions by providing a more efficient use of the land and an excellence of architecture and site design greater than that which could be achieved through the application of the base district regulations. The project provides a more efficient use of the land, which will allow a duplex or fourplex on each lot with a moderate density. All units are two-story with an attached one- or two -car garage and will include private fenced yards. The Planned Development Plan illustrates common amenities proposed for the development. A property owners` association would be formed to maintain the two group gathering areas, open -space area, front- and rear -yard landscape on all lots and all other common. landscape areas. Final site development, architectural, and landscape plans are subject to approval by the Development Services Director, in part to ensure further consistency. Findings, Live OakF,states S-2017-00239 Page 4 "Tr.""W -I I JARPIVITA94�1 Planned Development Application PD -2017-00241 Rezoning Application RZ-2017-00240 Live Oak Estates Subdivision Draft Conditions of Approval ME32HWrM2= Tentative map approval is granted for the Live Oak Estates Subdivision, allowing division of 8 acres to create 26 inultiple-family residential lots in three phases for development of a total of 64 multiple -family units as shown on the tentative subdivision map (Sheet 2 of 4) and Planned Development Plan. Phase I and 2 consist of 20 lots total to be developed with a two-family dwelling unit (duplex unit) on each lot for a total of 40 units. Phase 3 consists of 6 lots to be developed with a four-plex unit on each lot for a total of 24 units. The final map shall be prepared in accordance with the tentative map as approved by the City Council on , The requirements of these conditions shall prevail in the event there is any inconsistency between a condition and infonnation or data presented on the tentative map. 2. The standard conditions for subdivisions delineated in Resolution 92-18 shall be met, except as may be specifically modified by these conditions. 3. The developer shall note that Section 711.4 of the State Fish and Game Code requires payment of a fee to the County Clerk for filing a Notice of Determination for an environmental document; payment of this fee is the responsibility of the project proponent. In accordance with Chapter 18.40.040 of the Zoning Code (Compliance with Map Requirements), all conditions applicable to postsubdivision construction (as marked with an asterisk) shall be noted on the final map under "Statement of Conditions" to provide notification to future property owners of building limitations and other requirements for the subdivision. milyllip 1�:11 1� 11,11111111 5. The standard requirements of Chapter 18 (Zoning) of the Redding Municipal Code and the zoning designation underlying the "PD" Overlay shall apply, unless a special development standard is allowed pursuant to these conditions and the approved planned development plan. 6. All site and building development shall be consistent with the Live Oak Estates Planned Development Plan PD -2017-00241 dated March 2018. Final plans shall be approved by the Planning Division prior to recordation of a final map or building permit for any phase of the project. These plans shall consist of a final map and development details for landscape, decorative retaining and sound wall design, improvement in the common outdoor gathering areas, trailhead improvements, lighting, and final building architectural design consistent with the City's Design Criteria for Multiple Family. 7. Prior to recordation of a final map, the developer shall create and fund a private homeowners' association to provide for the maintenance of all common areas and improvements as outlined in the planned development plan in perpetuity. The articles of incorporation and covenants, conditions, and restrictions for the homeowners' association shall be reviewed by the City Attorney. The homeowners' association shall be responsible for the maintenance of improvements, lands, and facilities, including, but not limited to, the following:* a. All landscape, irrigation, fences, walls, and other improvements and amenities within all areas maintained in common by the homeowners' association, including the north and south group gathering areas, and the front- and rear -yard area of each lot. b. Common utility services and the private stormwater system including the detention/infiltration system. C. Internal private driveways, common parking areas, nonpublic sidewalk or pathways, and interior project lighting. d. Any project entrance features including landscape median and monument signs. e. Trash and recycling receptacle markers. f. Open space trailhead improvements and vegetation and fire -fuel management of the private open space behind Lots 5 through 12 and adjacent to Lot 15. Formation of a private homeowners' association will obligate each lot owner within the subdivision to participate in the association. The escrow instructions for the sale of each lot shall require that the purchaser and seller of each lot sign a statement that they have read and understand this condition of sale.* 8. The internal private driveways, common parking areas, north and south group gathering area improvements, including landscape and irrigation system, and open space trailhead shall be completed by the developer and approved by the City prior to issuance of any building occupancy permit. If the project is phased, only those improvements shown within the phase boundary shall be completed prior to a building occupancy permit in that developing phase. Phasing shall be as shown on the tentative map and as follows: a. Phase I — Lots I through 9. •. Phase 2 — Lots 10 through 212 C. Phase3 — Lots 21 through 26. a. Each duplex unit in Phase I and 2 will have 2 roll out carts that will be collected at curbside within the development, one for garbage and one for recycling. b. Placement of the carts shall be as shown in the planned development plan with curb markers placed on the curb to identify the location for each address. C. Three feet spacing is required between carts and 6 feet from any other obstacle. e. Enforcement of no parking on the street by the homeowners' associatioll f. A minimum of one trash and recycling enclosure for Phase 3 meeting the requirements of Section 18.40.120 of the Redding Municipal Code. If only one enclosure is utilized it shall have a depth of 7 feet and the preferred location is the westerly enclosure on the south side of the main drive aisle. 9. Shade trees shall be placed such that the canopy does not overhang the enclosure when mature. h. Billing for Phase I and 2 would require each duplex tenant to pay for garbage service separately. Billing for Phase 3 would require • single account for garbage servics paid • the homeowners' association. j. No green waste carts or pick-up will be provided for the development and all landscape maintenance shall be conducted by the homeowners' association. 10. A minimum 6 -foot -high, solid decorative block or masonry wall shall be installed along the Old Alturas Road frontage of Lots 1 through 3 with construction of Phase I and along the top of slope adjacent to the units on Lots 23 through 26 with construction of Phase 3 as shown on the tentative subdivision map. The wall shall be extended along the west boundary of Lot 3 and the east boundary of Lots I and 23 a minimum distance of 15 feet. The wall shall be reduced to a height of 3 feet along the driveway entrance of Lots 2, 3, and 23. The wall shall incorporate the use of distinctive columns and horizontal design elements and be approved by the Development Services Department in conjunction with the subdivision improvements. b. Minimum 10 -foot rear -yard building setback. C. All front --yard areas shall be landscaped prior to occupancy of the residence. Landscape, Recreational Facilities, Open Space 12. The developer shall install landscape along the frontage of Old Alturas Road, in the front and rear yard of each unit, the north and south group gathering area, and throughout the subdivision as is depicted in the Planned Development Plan. As part of the final plan review process, a comprehensive landscape plan shall be prepared and submitted for approval by the Development Services Department. The plan shall address the requirements of Chapter 18.47 (Landscape Standards), Chapter 18.41.100 (Off -Street Parking, Screening, and Landscape) and Chapter 16.70 (Water Efficient Landscape) of the Redding Municipal Code. These regulations require, in part, that: a. Landscape plans shall be prepared by a registered/licensed landscape professional and in stalled in accordance with City's landscape installation guidelines. b. The required Landscape Documentation Package shall be submitted at the time of submittal of the landscape plans. C. The California Green Building Code Section 5.304.2 required a separ water meter for irrigation of landscape areas when a project includes mo that 1,000 square feet of irrigated landscape. Utility and landscape pI shall depict the proposed location of the water meter and identify the tot area of landscape proposed with the project. I d. The landscape planter along Old Alturas Road shall incorporate the use of bermed sod and/or shrubs, and trees with a minimum size of 15 -gallon at a minimum ratio of I tree for every 30 feet of frontage. e. Any area between the back of the sidewalk and the property line shall In incorporated into the adjacent street -side planter. I f. Planter areas not having densely planted groundcover or utilizing turf shall include the use of high -quality -fabric weed barrier and appropriate mulch materials. g. New trees within the interior of the project must be planted based on a minimum of I tree for every 500 square feet of enclosed living area developed. Trees planted to fulfill this requirement shall have a minimum size of 15 gallons and consist of a combination of evergreen and deciduous am= h. A minimum of I tree per lot shall be planted in the front -yard area of eacs unit. The landscape planter provided for any required tree shall have minimum area of 72 square feet and minimum width of 6 feet. I 13. The hillside area located northwest of the retaining wall along Lots 5 through 12 and the area adjacent to Lot 15 shall be designated on the final map with a private open -space easement in which limited and passive recreational activities may be allowed including the placement of a picnic table and/or benches. No tree removal 3 inches or greater will be permitted in these areas, and no building, fences, or other structures may be erected. 14. The area adjacent to Lot 15 shall also include a public open -space easement for access and trail purposes dedicated to the City in fee title for the area adjacent to the northeast comer of the property within the creek corridor setback of Chum Creek as identified in the resource evaluation done for the subdivision. 15. At the time of construction of Phase 2, a pedestrian -access trailhead shall be provided between Lots 15 and 16 at the street providing access through the open space area to the public Chum Creek open space area. Improvement shall include 8 feet of paving or all-weather surface, identification/signage, and fencing as necessary. The private open -space easement shall include provisions for pedestrian access for Fire Department personnel. 16. Design for the north and south group gathering areas shall include amenities such as benches, picnic or barbeque area, and/or shade structures for the outdoor enjoyment of the occupants of the development. The north group gathering area shall be constructed with Phase 2 and the south group gathering area shall be constructed at the time of Phase 3. S-2017-00239 Live Oak Estates March 22, 2018 Draft Conditions of Approval Page 6 17. Recreational -vehicle and boat parking shall be prohibited through the homeowners' association documents.* 18. This condition shall be recorded on the final map and noted in the title report. The escrow instructions for the sale of each lot shall require that the purchaser and seller of each lot sign a statement that they have read and understand this condition of sale. The property owner(s) shall consent to formation of a landscape maintenance district for all irrigation, landscape, and fencing improvements installed within the public right-of-way of Old Alturas Road and between the subdivision perimeter wall and the right-of-way, to be located within a landscape maintenance easement. Formation shall be in accordance with the following:* a. Prior to recordation of a final map, the property owner(s) shall submit a landscape maintenarice district petition and consent form, a landscape maintenance agreement form, and applicable application fees to the Development Services Department. The formation shall be completed and the landscape installed or properly bonded for prior to issuance of a building permit for any structure within the developing phase of the subdivision. Formation of the district will obligate each lot owner within the subdivision to participate in the district. A cost -escalation clause will be included in the assessment levy to cover increases in maintenance expenses due to inflation. b. The landscape and associated irrigation system for the district shall be designed in accordance with the specifications available from the Development Services Department and installed in accordance with the final plans as approved by the City. The landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to the Development Services Department at the time the subdivision improvement plans are submitted to the Public Works Department and are subject to approval prior to recordation of a final map. c. The irrigation system shall be installed and accepted by the City in conjunction with the public improvements within the subdivision; landscape improvements shall be installed and accepted by the City prior to issuance of any certificate of occupancy within the developing phase of the subdivision. d. The developer shall be responsible for all costs and fees associated with the formation, installation, and connection to City water and electric utilities. Such fees include, but are not necessarily limited to, formation costs, meter fees, connection charges, benefit fees, inspection fees, and development fees. The developer shall also be responsible for maintenance of the landscape and irrigation system until such time as the district is formed and fees are levied. The minimum maintenance responsibility shall be 90 days for plant material and I year for the irrigation system from the date improvements are accepted by the City. Streets and Circulation 19. At the time of recording of any phase of the subdivision map, street dedication shall be made including dedication of the appropriate right-of-way necessary to achieve a 42 -foot -wide half section along Old Alturas Road and additional right-of- way for construction of a future round -about at the intersection with Victor Avenue. 20. Design for necessary street widening and frontage improvements along Old Alturas Road shall be as follows: a. With construction of Phase 1, three 12 -foot -wide paved travel lanes (east- bound, west -bound, and a center left -tum lane) transitioning to the existing improvement west of the subdivision. East of the driveway entrance shall transition to two 12 -foot -wide lanes (one in each direction). b. If Phase 3 is constructed prior to the roundabout at the Old Alturas Road and Victor Avenue intersection, the three travel lanes shall continue along the frontage and transition to a left -tum lane into the easterly project driveway at the all -way stop intersection. c. Minimum eight -foot -wide paved shoulder/bike lane on the north side of Old Alturas Road. d. Minimum six -foot -wide paved shoulder/bike lane and any necessary roadside drainage facilities on the south side. e. Vertical curb, gutter, and 8 -foot -wide sidewalk along Old Alturas Road. With construction of Phase 1, sidewalk width shall transition to the 5 -foot -wide sidewalk to the west and shall be extended easterly to the point at which it would connect with the ultimate improvements to be constructed with the roundabout. g. Any necessary reconstruction or overlay on the existing section of Old Alturas Road necessary to provide appropriate tie-in paving and a uniform cross slope from centerline to the gutter. 21. Access rights to Old Alturas Road, with the exception of the two private driveways shown on the tentative map, shall be waived via dedication to the City. 22. Streetlights shall be placed along Old Alturas Road in accordance with the specification of the Engineering Division and Electric Department. Streetlights installed in the interior of the project shall be owned and operated, and maintained by the homeowners' association. 23. Upon development of Phase 3, if the proposed roundabout at the Old Alturas Road and Victor Avenue intersection has not already been constructed, development shall include a temporary driveway access to be located entirely on the subject property with a minimum width of 20 feet. Construction shall include a raised curb on the east side of the driveway with a curb return at the travel lane. A depressed curb shall be constructed to allow access to the driveway from the property to the east at the intersection with the road through Phase 3. 24. Fire Department turning radius diameter of 45 feet outside and 30 feet inside is required to be provided throughout the site. The landscape median in the westerly driveway shall be setback far enough to meet the turning radius with access from Old Alturas Road, MMERME�M 25. Prior to the beginning of any clearing, grading, or site improvement activities., improvement plans for grading, drainage, and utilities, and other required improvements shall be approved by the engineering Division and other concerned City of Redding Departments. These plans shall be in conformance with Redding Municipal Code (RMC) Title 16.12. Prior to the issuance of a clearing and/or grading permit, an Interim Erosion and Sediment Control Plan shall be included and approved by the City Engineer as part of all clearing and grading permit applications. As -built improvement plans with the Engineer's declaration are required in conformance with RMC 16.12. 26. The final grading and drainage plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved preliminary grading plan (Sheet 3 of 4). Slopes along Old Alturas Road shall be kept at 3 to I or less and include the use of a retaining curb at the back of sidewalk and bermed landscape to the retaining wall, as necessary such that the arterial wall, if built on top of the retaining wall, does not appear over 8 feet in height. 27. Trees identified within the hillside area in the northwestern portion of the property shall be preserved. Placement of snow fencing or some other means of protection or identification along the boundary of the area shall be required at the time of grading to ensure equipment operators are aware of the limits of grading. This shall be confirtned in the field at a preconstruction meeting with Planning Division and Public Works staff. 28. A catch basin and storm drain extension across Old Alturas Road shall be constructed at the time of frontage improvements with Phase I - i, , 29. All on-site storm drain collection and the underground detention/infiltration facilities shall be privately owned and maintained by the homeowners' association of the subdivision. 30. Storm -drain outlets into Chum Creek shall be designed to provide a sedimentation basin or filter strip between the drain outlet and creek channel in order to prevent erosion impacts and protect water quality. Plans and specifications for the basin and/or filter strip shall be submitted with the subdivision improvement plans and be subject to review by the Department of Fish and Wildlife. 31. Prior to issuance of a grading permit that may cause the loss of jurisdictional waters of the U.S., the developer shall secure all necessary perrnits, and authorization from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife. All terms and conditions of the required permits and authorization, including mitigation, shall be met.** 32. In order to avoid impacts to nesting raptors or migratory birds, vegetation removal and other ground disturbance activities associated with construction shall be conducted outside of the main nesting season, September I through January 3 1, otherwise a pre -construction survey for nesting birds shall be completed during the nesting season of February I through August 3 1. The survey shall be conducted by a qualified biologist no more than one week prior to vegetation removal. If an active nest more than half completed is located during the survey, a non disturbance buffer shall be established by the qualified biologist in consultation with the California Department of Fish and Wildlife. No vegetation removal or construction activities shall occur within the non -disturbance buffer until the young have fledged, as deten-nined through additional monitoring by the qualified biologist. The results of the preconstruction survey shall be sent to the California Department of Fish and Wildlife. If a lapse in construction activities of 15 or more days occurs, then another pre -construction survey shall be conducted." Sewer, Water, and Electric Utilities 33. Final utility plans for development of the subdivision shall be in substantial conformance with the approved Preliminary Utility Plan (Sheet 4 of 4). 34. The public wastewater line adjacent to lots 18 and 22 shall be located within a 15 - foot -wide public service easement with no structures or longitudinal private utility encroachment. 35. Water and wastewater lines shall be constructed and located in the drive aisle. Provide pavement and/or hammerhead turnaround for vehicular access to the sanitary sewer manholes. 36. The existing overhead electric lines along • Alturas Road shall • converted to underground facilities as specified by the Redding Electric Utility. This shall include removal of the existing •i' directly west of the property boundary and relocation of the pole east of the property boundary to a location that will not conflict with the future roundabout. A ten -foot -wide public service easement shall •- provided behind the •. of sidewalk except for on Lots I and 2 where the public service easement shall extend from the back of walk to the arterial wall . 37. Sufficient space near the intersection shall • provided for 12kv switchgear to serve the project. Improvement will require the developer to • infrastructure to maintain existing services to the south side • • Alturas Road. The cost of the conversion is the sole responsibility of the developer. 38. Electricity for all units shall be individually metered. Electric meter locations shall be in accordance with the Redding Electric Utility requirements. 20 -foot all -weather -surface access road shall be installed and remain serviceable prior to any vertical construction. Fire hydrants shall be installed and fire flow available for firefighting purposes during vertical construction, 40. The burning of construction debris is prohibited; all such material shall be disposed of by transport to an acceptable landfill. 4 1. Vegetation within the hillside area in the northwest r• of the project (covered with a • open -space easement) shall • cleared of up to 90 percent • combustible brush. Maintenance • an annual basis shall be required by the homeowners' association. .Q. Wood fences, including posts, are prohibited adjacent to the open -space areas on Lots 12 through 16. Fences must be constructed of noncombustible material. 43. The internal private driveways through the development shall be signed and/or striped as necessary to the satisfaction of the Fire Marshal to prohibit parallel parking • any curb within the development.* 44. The pedestrian access easement between Lots 15 and 16 shall include language 4, provide access for Fire Department crews through the • •« S-2017-00239 Live Oak Estates March 22, 2018 Draft Conditions of Approval Page 11 P0 WKMIM EFFECTIVE MAY 24,2011 In accordance with City of Redding Ordinance 2469, Section 26, the following standard conditions of approval apply to all subdivision projects requiring a final map. Project - specific conditions of approval will take precedence in the event of a conflict with standard conditions. References to the Grading Ordinance are based on Redding Municipal Code (RMC) Title 16, Chapter 12. References to the Subdivision Ordinance are based on RMC Title 17. References to the Zoning Ordinance are based on RMC Title 18. I A final map shall be prepared in accordance with Chapter 17.40 of the Subdivision Ordinance. The final map and all necessary supporting documents and information must be filed with the City Engineer prior to the expiration date of the tentative map as required by Section 17.40.020 of the Subdivision Ordinance. 2. In accordance with Chapter 17.50 of the Subdivision Ordinance, the property owner shall dedicate to the City all right-of-ways and easements necessary to provide public access and utilities to the subdivision as required by the tentative map approval. 3. Prior to the recording of a final map, a complete application shall be submitted to the City to apportion any special assessment -district lien (Improvement Bond Act of 1915) affected by the subdivision, including the applicable fees, an assessment segregation diagram, and any required additional information. 4. In -lieu park fees must be paid prior to the recording of the final map in accordance with Chapter 17.54 of the Subdivision Ordinance, unless an equivalent parkland dedication is made in conformance with the tentative map approval. 5. Proposed street names must be submitted for City and agency review in accordance with Section 17.64.020 of the Subdivision Ordinance prior to the recording of the final map. The final map shall reflect only street names approved by the City. 6. A 5 -foot -wide public-service easement shall be dedicated on the final map abutting all public -street right-of-ways within the subdivision. 7. In the case where a regulatory floodplain exists on a subdivision site, the final map shall clearly delineate the limits of the 100 -year base floodplain and elevations. The floodplain identified on the final map shall be consistent with Section 18.51.020, Basis For Establishing Areas of Special Flood Hazard, of the Zoning Ordinance. 8. For residential subdivisions, covenants, conditions, and restrictions (CC&Rs) shall be recorded in conjunction with recordation of a final map which prohibit the storage of recreational vehicles in the front -yard or street side -yard -setback areas as described in Schedule 18.31.030-C(8) of the Zoning Ordinance. 9. In accordance with Chapter 17.70 of the Subdivision Ordinance, the developer must secure approval of subdivision improvement plans for grading and all street, utility, and drainage infrastructure from the City Engineer prior to the start of any construction. Subdivision improvement plans must be prepared by a registered civil engineer and fully address the construction of all improvements required of the subdivision under the approved tentative map. 10. Acquisition of all off-site interests in title or easements necessary to satisfy the requirements of the subdivision approval shall be the responsibility of the developer. In the event the developer is unable to acquire such interests, the developer may petition the City Council for adoption of a resolution initiating eminent -domain proceedings over the lands needed for the off-site improvements. The developer shall bear all costs for such proceedings, including attorney fees, court costs, and land -value costs. 11. Unless a project -specific development standard is identified and approved for the subdivision project with the tentative map, all public improvements required of the subdivision shall comply with City Construction Standards and other adopted standards specified under Section 17.70.020 of the Subdivision Ordinance and/or equivalent standards, as determined necessary by the City Engineer. 12. Prior to approval of subdivision improvement plans and issuance of a grading permit, the property owner shall secure all other necessary permits/approvals required by law from outside agencies also having jurisdiction over the project, including, but not limited to: a. Regional Water Quality Ctl.Board (RWQCB). In most cases, the developer must prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan and secure a Construction Activity Storm Water Permit from RWQCB. b. Department of Fish and Game (DFG). Where a project would impact a waterway, a Section 1602 Streambed Alteration Agreement must be finalized with DFG. S-2017-00239 Live Oak Estates March 22, 2018 Draft Conditions of Approval Page 13 C. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOS). Where a project would impact jurisdictional waters of the U.S., appropriate Nationwide or Individual Permit approvals shall be obtained from ACOS. Copies of required agency permits/approvals shall be submitted to the City Engineer. Any special development requirements of these agencies affecting improvements within the subdivision shall be reflected on the final improvement plans. 13. Required subdivision improvements shall be properly and fully constructed, inspected, and accepted by the City in accordance with Chapter 17.74 of the Subdivision Ordinance. Any incomplete improvements shall be secured under the provisions of Schedule 17.40.060.13 and Chapter 17.74 of the Subdivision Ordinance. Final survey, as -built improvement plans, and related engineering certifications are required at the completion of work in conformance with Sections 17.70.070 and 17.70.080 of the Subdivision Ordinance and Section 16.12.230 of the Grading Ordinance. Grading, Erosion Control, Tree Preservation 14. Subdivision clearing, grading, and erosion -control plans shall be in full conformance with the Grading Ordinance. The final grading improvement plans shall be consistent with the preliminary grading plan and any tree -preservation plans considered with the approved tentative map. 15. The project developer shall prepare a site and construction -phase-specifi c Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) and secure a Construction Activity Storm Water Permit from the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board in compliance with the requirements of the State General Construction Activity Storm Water Permit. Best Management Practices (BMPs) prescribed in the SWPPP shall be utilized and followed in all project site -development activities. 16. All trees identified for preservation shall be clearly identified on the subdivision improvement plans. A tree construction/protection plan shall be prepared by a qualified (tree) professional in accordance with Chapter 18.45, Tree Management, of the Zoning Ordinance and included as part of the subdivision grading improvement -plan package. Tree -protection measures identified in the tree construction/protection plan shall be reflected in the final subdivision improvement plans and followed during construction. mmmw,�� 17. Storm -drain facilities shall be designed consistent with the requirements of City Construction Standards, the City of Redding Storm Water Quality Improvement Plan, and the City of Redding Phase 11 NPDES Pen -nit from the California Regional Water Quality Control Board (Water Quality Order No. 2003-05 - DWQ). Project design shall incorporate Best Management Practices (BMPs) to minimize the polluting of stonnwater, both during construction and long-term. Should the maintenance costs of the long-terin pollution -control measures exceed typical storm -drain -system costs, such costs shall be bome by the project by way of a landscape maintenance district, escrow account, or other such financing mechanism. 18. Prior to improvement -plan approval, the developer must obtain approval for proper management of stormwater peak flows in accordance with City Council Policy 1806 and the specifications of the City Engineer. Such measures shall address impacts from the 10-, 25-, and 100 -year -storm events. Projects shall address peak flows to maintain predevelopment levels at all locations downstream of the project. A drainage report shall be prepared to the forinat outlined by the Engineering Division, stamped and signed by a qualified engineer, and provided to the Engineering Division with submittal of project improvement plans. 19. Essential utilities, including, but not limited to, sanitary sewer, water, electric, natural gas, and communication distribution lines, including main lines and service laterals, shall be extended and sized appropriately to serve each lot and to provide logical extensions of service to subsequent phases and adjacent properties in accordance with Section .i.. :i of the Subdivision Ordinance. These utilities shall be installed in accordance with the capacity, construction, metering, and testing standards of the City and other involved private utility company(s), including applicable utility master plans. 20. Any necessary off-site utility extensions shall be placed in a public -street right-of- way or public-service easement in a location approved by the City Engineer and other responsible utility companies. Vehicular access for maintenance purposes shall be provided to all utility infrastructure outside a public right-of-way as determined necessary by, and in a manner approved by, the City Engineer. 21. New "dry" utilities, including electric, telephone, and cable television, must be installed underground in accordance with Section 17.60.090 of the Subdivision Ordinance. Any existing overhead facilities within a proposed subdivision and along peripheral streets must also be placed underground, unless waived under the project -specific conditions. S-2017-00239 Live Oak Estates March 22, 2018 Draft Conditions of Approval Page 15 22. Electric -supply facilities shall be furnished and installed in accordance with the Redding Electric Utility Service Policy Resolution currently in effect at the tim+ the developer's plans are approved by the City. 23. The developer shall be responsible for all costs associated with the relocation or modification of existing utility facilities or structures necessitated by the construction of the project or of improvements required as a condition of approval of this project, including reimbursement of any costs to the affected utility for work perforined to support the project. 24. After the initial review of project improvement plans by the Engineering Division, the developer shall consult with the Redding Electric Utility (REU) for preparation of an electric -service plan. A copy of the electric -service plan, developed and approved by REU, shall be incorporated into the final improvement plans. 25. Streetlights shall be provided in accordance with applicable Redding Electric Utility Construction Standards 553.0, et seq. 26. Fire hydrants shall be installed at locations throughout the subdivision in accordance with the California Fire Code as approved by the Fire Marshal. All fire hydrants shall have a minimum fire flow meeting Appendix -B of the California Fire Code and meet the maximum daily demand for the area. "On -lot" hydrants and necessary easements to service development on flag lots or oversized lots shall also be installed as required by the Fire Marshal. 27. Brush piles resulting from land -clearing activity shall be fully removed from the site prior to the start of the fire season or, if generated during fire season, be removed immediately. WIM = - I W_. - _. �__ Wo . - it I I[ I a am a L4 I I I P -M I I L4 Im-11 un I a I Lei ILI] awt gem Ly I I V-s-ROX6111 I is to] al ukaw, to 14 aIII I a. Nontoxic soil stabilizers shall be applied according to manufacturer's specifications to all inactive construction areas (previously graded areas inactive for 10 days or more). b. All grading operations may be suspended by the City Engineer when winds (as instantaneous gusts) exceed 20 miles per hour. C. Temporary traffic control shall be provided as appropriate during all phases of construction to improve traffic flow (e.g., flag person). S-2017-00239 Live Oak Estates March 22, 2018 Draft Conditions of Approval Page 16 d. Construction activities that could affect traffic flow shall be scheduled in off-peak hours. e. Active construction areas, haul roads, etc., shall be watered at least twice daily or more as needed to limit dust. f. Exposed stockpiles of soil and other backfill material shall either be covered, watered, or have soil binders added to inhibit dust and wind erosion. 9- All trucks hauling soil and other loose material shall be covered or should maintain at least 2 feet of freeboard (i.e., minimum vertical distance between top of the load and the trailer) in accordance with the requirements of CVC Section 23114. This provision is enforced by local law enforcement agencies. h. All public roadways used by the project contractor shall be maintained free from dust, dirt, and debris caused by construction activities. Streets shall be swept at the end of the day if visible soil materials are carried onto adjacent public paved roads. Wheel washers shall be used where vehicles enter and exit unpaved roads onto paved roads, or trucks and any equipment shall be washed off leaving the site with each trip. i. Alternatives to open burning of cleared vegetative material on the project site shall be used, unless otherwise approved by the Planning Division, Fire Marshal, and Shasta County Air Quality Management District. Suitable alternatives include, but are not limited to, on-site chipping and mulching and/or hauling to a biomass fuel site. 29. If, during the course of development, any archaeological, historical, or paleontological resources are uncovered or otherwise detected or observed, construction activities in the area affected shall cease and the City shall be notified immediately. A qualified archaeological professional must then be retained by the developer to investigate the discovered cultural object to determine its significance. If the cultural object is deemed potentially significant by the archaeologist, appropriate treatment and measures shall be followed in accordance with applicable laws, as reviewed and approved by the City, prior to the resumption of work in the affected area. 30. Issuance of building permits for structures on lots resulting from the subdivision will not occur until a final map is recorded and necessary public -street and utility improvements are available. An exception may be granted at the discretion of the Building Official allowing issuance of a building pen -nit for the construction of model homes and other special circumstances in accordance with Section 17.04.090 of the Subdivision Ordinance. 31. Permanent and temporary signs related to the subdivision shall comply with Chapter 18.42 of the Zoning Ordinance. 32. In the event of any confusion, conflict, vagueness, typographical error, or special circumstance where implementation of any standard or project -specific condition is in question, the Development Services Director has the authority, in accordance with Section 17.04.080 of the Subdivision Ordinance, to determine an appropriate remedy as necessary to ensure that the intent of the condition and related tentative map approval is met in accordance with applicable laws and policies, and as necessary to ensure orderly development. 33. The developer/applicant shall note that pursuant to Chapter 16.20 of the Redding Municipal Code, City development impact fees are required to be paid at the time of building occupancy/final inspection for new construction, building enlargement, or other improvement. These fees are structured to mitigate the project's fair share of cumulative impacts to the City's transportation, fire - suppression, utility, and parks infrastructure systems based upon necessary improvements to accommodate new development under the City's General Plan. The developer/applicant is hereby notified that be/she has the right to protest/appeal imposition of any of these fees or fee amounts. Any protest/appeal must comply with the provisions of Government Code Section 66020(a).* MEETING DATE: March 27, 2018 FROM: Linda Burke, Associate ITEM NO. 4(b)2 Planner [S-101-152-000] ***APPROVED BY*** , w Uik, rke, Ass&� to Planner 3/22/2018 Tann na ger 3/ Van man, Ian jig i ger 11jurke Caki.redding.ca.us pheliman*cityofredding.org SUBJECT: 4(b)2 --Tentative Subdivision Map Application S-2017-00239, Planned Development Plan Application PD -2017-00241, and Rezoning Application RZ-2017-00240, by Omni Financial, LLC, requesting approval of a tentative subdivision map and planned development plan to divide 8 acres into 26 multiple -family residential lots for development of 64 multiple -family residential units. The project includes a rezoning to add the "PD" Planned Development Overlay District to the existing "RM -12" Residential Multiple Family District. Conduct a public hearing and, upon conclusion, recommend that the City -council adopt tl-W Mitigated Negative Declaration and approve the Live Oak Estates Subdivision and Plarm Development project consisting of Tentative Subdivision Map Application S-2017-0023 Planned evelpment Plan Applicatin P-2017-1, and Rezoning Application RZ-201 00240. 1 DooD0024 UESMU33= Planned Development Subdivision. Omni Financial is requesting approval to subdivide approximately eight acres into 26 multiple -family residential lots in three phases for development of 64 multiple -family units. Phase I and 2 consist of 20 lots total to be developed with a two-family dwelling unit (duplex) on each lot for a total of 40 units. Phase 3 consists of six lots to be developed with a four-plex on each lot for a total of 24 units. Duplex units are a mix of two- and three-bedroom units with either one- or two -car garages. Amenities include common landscape throughout the development and two group gathering areas with walking paths, benches, and picnic or barbeque improvements. A property owners' association would be formed to address common ownership and maintenance needs. Rezoning. The project site is zoned "RM -12" Residential Multiple Family District. T145 - application includes a rezoning request to add the "PD" Planned Development Overlay Distri I I to the property. The subdivision would be developed under a Planned Development Plan accordance with Chapter 18.53 of the Zoning Code to allow construction of the project wi Report to Redding Planning Commission March 22, 2018 Re: 4(b)2-- 5-2017-00239, Tentative Subvision Map, Live Oak Estates Subdivision and Planned Development Page 2 reduced lot sizes and public street frontages, custom -lot configuration, and reduced building setbacks. TERRAIN/VEGETATION The property is relatively flat along Old Alturas Road to gently slopirm in the northwest comer of the property with topography ranging from 555 feet above mean s I level (msl) to 615 msl. The site is characterized as blue oak woodland in the northwest com and annual grassland throughout the rest of the property, with minimal barren habitat ty I surrounding the existing and previous residential buildings on the site. Chum Creek is locat outside the northeast boundary of the site. roxim "11IM-nMEM liggligliql ifflK1111 11 North: Single-family residential subdivision and City open space along Chum Creek. East: Single-family home and vacant land designated "RM -12" adjacent to Chum Creek. South: Montessori school, older single family homes, and vacant land across Old Alturas Roall', West: Duplex Subdivision. MRU= The eight -acre property consists of two parcels located northwest of the Old Alturas Roada] Victor Avenue intersection. The westerly parcel was previously developed with a single-faini home site and structures that dated to the 1950s; however, all buildings were recently demolish and removed. The easterly parcel contains two small rental units and a detached garage locat close to the intersection. The subdivision's design concept is very similar to the adjacent planned developme subdivision located at the intersection of Old Alturas Road and Browning Street. Thl subdivision includes duplex units developed on lots with a private internal driveway system a common landscape and amenities. Planned Development Process. Chapter 18.53 ("PD" Planned Development District) of t Zoning Code provides a process, or "zoning tool," that can be used where greater flexibility design is desired to allow a more efficient use of land than would be possible through stri I application of conventional zoning standards. The PD process can be used to customize use a] development standards to fit a project, as long as specific findings can be made, which large center on consistency with the General Plan. PD projects are also expected to provicr. appropriate amenities and design enhancements, thus providing something extra/unique 0. support justification for variation from standards. Report to Redding Planning Commission March 22, 2018 Re: 4(b)2-- 5-2017-00239, Tentative Subvision Map, Live Oak Estates Subdivision and Planned Development Page 3 To be eligible for the PD process, a site must be zoned to include "PW as an overlay distri Preparation of a Planned Development Plan, such as that attached, is required to illustrate t standards that are specific to the project. In this case, the proposedsubdivision must incorpor the "PW Overlay District with the "RNI" District to allow development of the duplex/four-pl project on individual lots with less than 10,000 square feet (standard "RM" district mimmu variation in lot configurations, street -frontage requirements, and building setbacks. I Design Concept. The planned development would allow for development of a subdivision of duplex and four-plex units based on the following design principles: ■ Reduced lot sizes and building setbacks are provided to facilitate the development concept. LEM ■ All units will have fenced, private backyards. All front and rear yards will be landscaped with unit construction. A system of private and reciprocal easements will facilitate all shared vehicle access, parking, utility needs, and common landscape. Amenities include two group gathering areas to be constructed with Phases 2 and 3. Both will include walking trails, benches, picnic or barbeque area, and/or shade structures for the enjoyment of the residents. A pedestrian trailhead access will be provided to the private open space in the northeast comer of the subdivision that will provide access to the adjacent public Churn Creek open space area. A private homeowners' association would be formed to maintain all common improvements and landscape in the interior of the project. ■ A landscape maintenance district would be formed for maintenance of frontage landscape along Old Alturas Road. Umm, Staff has not identified any issues of inconsistency with the City General Plan or standard development policies or significant environmental concerns. General Plan Consistency. The proposed subdivision supports 64 units over a net developabjs area (excluding steep slope, open space, and right-of-way dedication) of approximately 5.5 acre This represents a net density of 11.6 units per acre, which falls within the range allowed by t General Plan classification for the site of 10 to 20 units per acre, Overall, staff feels the proje advances General Plan Community Development and Design Element (CDD) Goal I I a Policy I I D, to ensure new residential developments are well -located and well designed wit mix of residential density and dwelling types and CDD Goal 12 and Policy 12A, to enst] Report to Redding Planning Commission March 22, 2018 Re: 4(b)2-- 5-2017-00239, Tentative Subvision Map, Live Oak Estates Subdivision and Planned Development Page 4 attractive, safe, and well-maintained neighborhoods by promoting neighborhood quality thoul project amenities and establishment of a homeowners' association. Traffic/Circulation. Access to the subdivision would be derived from Old Alturas Road in twm locations. Phases I and 2 would take access from the westerly driveway shown on the tentati map. Phase 3 of the project would necessitate a required second access that would be located the intersection of Old Alturas Road and Victor Avenue, essentially forming the fourth leg of t current all -way stop intersection. I Construction of a roundabout at the Old Alturas Road and Victor Avenue intersection, conjunction with a roundabout corridor along Old Alturas Road to the east, is identified as future project in the City's Capital Improvement Plan; however, timing and funding availabili is undetermined at this time. A preliminary design layout for the roundabout, utilizing t '4 tentative subdivision map layout, however, was recently completed by Omni Means in order ensure adequate right-of-way for future improvements is provided as a condition of recording t final subdivision map. If development of Phase 3 moves forward and the roundabout has not y been constructed, a temporary driveway would need to be constructed to access the project all provide proper secondary access. Tree Preservation/Open Space. The site has a moderate to dense covering of trees located I the sloping hillside area in the northwest portion of the subdivision. With the exception of th area, the site is relatively flat with little vegetation or tree cover. Due to the project's gradi and utility demands, some amount of trees will be removed and a retaining wall will constructed behind the units on Lots 5 through 12. The majority of existing trees (279) h a identified as blue oak; however, there are several pine and shade tree varieties found mainly the area of the previous and current home sites. The majority of trees (211) would be preservels most located on the sloping hillside. Also preserved in an open -space easement is the area in t northeast comer of the site consisting of the setback from the Chum Creek corridor. The ar J will include a trailhead to provide residents of this development with access to the public Chut Creek open space area and future trail system. Based on the Initial Study prepared for the tentative map and planned development plan, staff prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration, which was distributed to surrounding property owners and appropriate public agencies for review (these documents are attached). Mitigation measures were incorporated into the project to address impacts to biological resources pertaining to protection of nesting raptors and other migratory birds during construction and the loss of a minor amount of potentially jurisdictional waters. As of this writing, staff has not received any public comments on the application as a result of notification of the intent to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Planning Commission hearing today. W332�� Report to Redding Planning Commission March 22, 2018 Re: 4(b)2-- 5-2017-00239, Tentative Subvision Map, Live Oak Estates Subdivision and Planned Development Page 5 MORM219= There are three categories of findings that apply to the project: (1) environmental/CEQ findings; (2) subdivision map findings; and (3) planned development plan findings. All requir findings must be found to be in evidence to support approval of the proposed project. These a outlined and provided as an attachment to this report. The Planning Commission has the authority to approve tentative subdivision maps under Secticm 17.120.100 of the City's Subdivision Ordinance and planned development plans under Secticm 18.53.050 the City's Zoning Ordinance. In this case, however, the City Council has t responsibility for approval of the rezoning application that the tentative subdivision map a planned development plan are dependent upon. The Planning Commission, therefore, is asked make a recommendation on the project to the City Council. I 11111111 Iiil'i'ii�li'll��,��i,ilili�l��il��'il�i!l��l��Fo%lgror-jp.I Me Based upon a determination that the necessary findings are in evidence, recommend that the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the project and approve Tentative Subdivision Map Application S-2017-00239, Planned Development Plan Application PD -2017-00241, and Rezoning Application RZ-2017-00240, subject to the draft conditions of approval. (Staff Recommendation) 2. Recommend the project for approval with modifications to the draft conditions that ill Planning Commission deems necessary to support the project. Minor modifications may incorporated into a motion for approval. 3. Recommend denial to the City Council of the tentative map, planned development plan, and rezoning applications. Such action must be based upon a finding that the project is inconsistent with the General Plan or other City development standards or poses a threat to public health, safety, or welfare. Staff has not identified any justification for denial of the project. findings for approval related to CEQA compliance, the tentative map, and the plannAll development plan are in evidence. The proposed rezoning to include the "PW overlay district appropriate to facilitate the project. The project also advances General Plan Communi Development and Design Element Goal 11 and Policy IID, to ensure new residenti developments are well -located and well designed with a mix of residential density and dwellil Report to Redding Planning Commission March 22, 2018 Re: 4(b)2-- 5-2017-00239, Tentative Subvision Map, Live Oak Estates Subdivision and Planned Development Page 6 types and CDD Goal 12 and Policy 12A to ensure attractive, safe, and well -maintain neighborhoods by promoting neighborhood quality though project amenities and establishme of a homeowners' association. C: Martin Boone, Omni Financial, LLC Tim MacLean, Shaffah Dunlap Sawyer, Inc. Findings Draft Conditions of Approval Aerial Location Map Zoning Map Mitigated Negative Declaration and Initial Study Tentative Map Set (Sheets I though 4) Planned Development Plan /1 ° jus N GIS DIVISION INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT E DATE PRODUCED: + MARCH 5,2018 8 0 200 400 Feet IRTI wa�� c H Wo S-2017-00239/RZ-2017-00240/PD-2017-00241 LIVE OAK ESTATES i32O&1368OLD ALTURAGROAD AP#U71-270-012&-021 xrTAC*mswr AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF REDDING ADOPTING AMENDMENT TO THE CITY i*+ REDDING MAP RELATING TO THE REZONING F THE LIVE OAK ESTATES SUBDIVISION AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PLAN PROPERTY 071-270-021 AND 071-270-12) rrACRES LOCATED ALONG OLD ALTURAS ROAD NORTHWEST OF THE VICTOR AVENUE INTERSECTIONOF ' 1 i ' r rl ♦1= NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY *IF REDDINGFOLLOWS: Section 1. Finding offact: the City finds and declares as follows: A. The Zoning Map of the City of Redding is incorporated in and made part of the Redding t ••. Title 18, knownof Redd • Zoning Ordinance. B. The Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing pertaining to the amendment on March 27, 2018, and unanimously recommended that the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the Live Oak Estates Subdivision and Planned Development and the attached amendment to the Zoning Map. C. The City Council held a duly noticed public hearing on May 1, 2018, prior to the first reading of this Ordinance. D. The proposed amendment to the Zoning Map is consistent with the General Plan and any applicable specific plans. E. Adoption of this ordinance will not impact the welfare of the citizens of Redding and its surrounding region. Section On of • ♦lication RZ-2017-00240 prepared by the Development Services Department, the City Council finds that the subject rezoning will not have a significant effect on the environment and approved the Mitigated Negative Declaration e following findings: 1. The City of Redding has completed a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the rezoning. Bases on the analysis of the potential impacts associated with the rezoning, the project will not •: 2. The Mitigated Negative Declaration and its supporting documentation reflect the independent judgment and analysis of the City of Redding. Section 3. The boundaries of the districts referred to in Section 18.01.050 of the Redding Municipal Code, as designated on a map entitled "Zoning Map of the City of Redding, California" dated January 7, 2003, are hereby altered as set forth on the map attached hereto and made a part hereof by: REZONING: 8 acres along Old Alturas Road FROM: "RM -12" TO: "RM -12 -PD" Residential Multiple Family District with a Planned Development Overlay Section 4. This ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after the date of its adoption; and the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and cause its publication according to law. I HEREBY CERTIFY that this ordinance was introduced and read by the City Council of the City of Redding at a regular meeting on the 1st day of May, 2018; and was duly read and adopted at a regular meeting on the on the — day of 2018, by the following vote: Uff-M Kristen Schreder, Mayor Pamela Mize, City Clerk Barry E. DeWalt, City Attorney CEO] 1001 XLV1 132 Uff-M Kristen Schreder, Mayor Pamela Mize, City Clerk Barry E. DeWalt, City Attorney �� u N GIS DIVISION + APRL 17,2018 S 0 200 400 Feet Amend Zoning Map from "RM-12to"RM-12-PD" Residentia Multiple Family with Planned Development Overlay District � W � S-2017-80230/RZ-2017-08248/PD-2017-00241 LIVE OAK ESTATES 132U&1368OLD ALTURASROAD AP#U71-27U-U12&-U21 ^rTAComsmr E= CITY OF REDDING 777 CYrREss Avir4oF, RE'rtArM, CA 96001 F,,(',), Fa,,crx x.1960'7 2 is C.a aiY,7 A 96,049-607 1 QW, A Planned Omnlonaucial, LLC Tentative Subdivision Map Application and Planned Development Plan Application, Live Oak Subdivision is a request to subdivide approximately 8 acres into 26 multiple -family residential lots in three phases for development of 64 multiple-tarmly units. Phase I and 2 consist of 20 lots total to be developed with a two-family dwelling unit (duplex unit) on each lot for a total of 40 units. Phase 3 consists of 6 lots to be developed with a four -plea unit on each is for a total of 24 units. The project includes a Rezoning Application to add the "'PD" Planned Development Overlay District to the existing "RM -1 2" Multiple Family District zoning of the property. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING • Ell 1=WA mom W St0stAULIM QVVUQUQV�� In 11LIR M WTWW TCUM%AL IWIMC UIC k�471 UJUL MC� V"CCL R Mitigated Negative Declaration Page / r Packet Pg. 1T6 may have a significant effect on the environment. If there are substantial changes that alter the character or impacts of the proposed project, another environmental impact determination will be necessary. The project includes measures to mitigate potentially significant impacts to biological resources associated with development of the property. Prior to approval of the project, the lead agency may conclude, at a public hearing, that certain mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration are infeasible or undesirable. In accordance with CEQA Section 15074.1, the lead agency may delete those mitigation measures and substitute other measures which it determines are equivalent or more effective. The lead agency would adopt written findings that the new measure is equivalent or more effective in mitigating or avoiding potential significant effects and that it, in itself, would not cause any potentially significant effect on the environment. 1. used on the whole record (including the Initial Study and any supporting documentation) and the mitigation measures incorporated into the project, the City of Redding has determined that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. 2. The Mitigated Negative Declaration, with its supporting documentation, reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the lead agency, which is the City of Redding. DOCUMENTATION The attached Initial Study documents the reasons to support the above determination. MITIGATIONMEASURES Mitigation 1. Prior to issuance of a grading permit that may cause the loss of jurisdictional waters of the U.S., the developer shall secure all necessary permits and authorization from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife. All terms and conditions of the required permits and authorization, including mitigation, shall be met. Mitigation 2. In order to avoid impacts to nesting raptors or migratory birds, vegetation removal and other ground disturbance activities associated with construction shall be conducted outside of the main nesting season, September I through January 31, otherwise a pre -construction survey for nesting birds shall be completed during the nesting season of February I through August 31. The survey shall be conducted by a qualified biologist no more than one week prior to vegetation removal. If an active nest more than half completed is located during the survey, a non disturbance buffer shall be established by the qualified biologist in consultation with the California Department of Fish and Wildlife. No vegetation removal or construction activities shall occur within the non -disturbance buffer until the young have fledged, as determined through additional monitoring by the qualified biologist. The results of the preconstruction survey shall be sent to the California Department of Fish and Wildlife. If a lapse in construction activities of 15 or more days occurs, then another pre-constiuction survey shall be conducted. Mitigated Negative Declaration Page 2 Draft copies or notice of this Mitigated Negative Declaration were distributed to: • Shasta County Clerk U.S.• Army Corps of Engineers, Redding California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Redding California Native Plant Society` Shasta Environmental Alliance All property owners within 300 feet of the property boundary Draft document referred for comments March 2, 201 No comments were received during the public review period: Comments were received but diel not address the draft Mitigated Negative .tive Declaration findings of the accuracy/completeness of the Initial Study. No response is necessary. The letters are attached: Comments addressing the findings of the drat Mitigated Negative Declaration and/or accuracy or completeness of the Initial Study were received during the public review period. The letters and responses follow (see Response to Comments, attached). Copies of the Mitigated ed Ne ati Declaration, the Initial Study, documentation materials,. and the Mitigation Monitoring Program mayhe obtained at the Planning Division of the Development Services Department, City of Redding, and 777 Cypress AvenueRedding, CA 96401. Contact: Linda Burke 530 225-4027. r Paxil Hellman, Planning Manager Date PH:pr Attachments. A. Location .:map B Initial Study Mitigated Negative Declaration Page 3 Packet Pg. I I$ N +E S I 61()ijTH RIDGE Wo GIS DIVISION LOCATION MAP INFCPMTICN TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT CATE PFUDUCED S-2017-00239 / RZ-2017-00240 / PD -2017-00241 N44RCH 5, 2018 LIVE OAK ESTATES 0 200 400 Feet 1320 & 1368 OLD ALTURAS ROAD AP# 071-270-012 & -021 MTG.DATE: ITEM ATTACHMENT: ENVIRONMENTAL INITIAL STUDY Prepared y CITY OF REDDING Planning Division 777 Cypress Avenue Redding, California 96001 1. 2. 2. 4. S. .3 N CITY OF REDDING d Project Title: Live Oak Subdivision and Planned Development Lead agency name and address: CITY OF REDDING, Development Services Department, Planning Division 777 Cypress Avenue, Redding, CA 96001 Contact Person and Phone Number: Linda Burke, (530) 225-4027 Project Location: 1320 and 1368 Old Alturas Road, northwest side of Victor Avenue and Old Alturas intersection Applicant's Name and Address: 104TITI—Tips 1260 4ft Street, Suite 0 Capitola, CA 95010 f11 Tim MacLean, Sharrah Dunlap Sawyer, Inc. 6590 Lockheed Drive Redding, CA 96002 8. Description of Project: Tentative subdivision Map Application and Planned Development Plan Application, Live Oak Subdivision, is a request to subdivide approximately 8 acres into 26 multiple-fami[V residential lots in three phases for development of 64 multiple -family unitsPhase I and 2 consist of 20 lots to be developed with a two-family dwelling unit (duplex unit) on each lot for a total of 40 units. Phase 3 consists of 6 lots to be developed with a four-plex unit on each lot for a total of 24 units. The project includes a Rezoning Application to add the "PD" Planned Development Overlay Districtto the existing "RM -12" Multiple Family District zoning of the property to facilitate the development. 9. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The 8 acre property consists of two parcels located north of Old Alturas Road and west of the Victor Avenue intersection. The westerly parcel was previously developed with a single family home site which has been demolished and removed, The easterly parcel contains two small rental units and a detached garage. The property is relatively flat along Old Alturas Road to gently sloping in the northwest corner of the property with topography ranging from 555 feet above mean sea level (MSL) to 615 feet MSL. Churn Creek, which Is tributary to the Sacramento River, is located outside the northeast corner of the site. The site is characterized as blue oak woodland in the northwest corner and annual grassland throughout the rest of the property, with minimal barren habitat type surrounding the existing and previous residential building sites. Surrounding land uses include a duplex subdivision directly west of the project at Old Alturas Road and Browning Street and two, primarily vacant, but similarly zoned multiple family properties to the east between the subject property and Churn Creek. Property south of Old Alturas Road is also zoned for multiple family and currently developed with a mix of multiple family apartments, older single family homes, and a school located at the southwest corner of the intersection with Victor Avenue. 10. Other public agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement): California Department of Fish and Wildlife, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 11. Have California Native American tribes traditionally and culturally affiliated with the project area requested consultation pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21080.3.1? if so, has consultation begun? A letter notice of this project was send to the California Native American tribes that have requested notification, Redding Rancheria and Wintu Tribe of Northern California, on March 14, 2017 and May 5, 2017, respectively. No request for consultation was initiated or received. 5-2017-00239 Live Oak subdivision 2 City of Redding Development Services Department Planning Division Initial Study The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is "Potentially Significant Impact or Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages, on the basis of the initial evaluation: ❑ 1 find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. '121 1 find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. 0 1 find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. 11 1 find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. 0 1 find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR of NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. Copies of the initial Study and related materials and documentation may be obtained at the Planning Division of the Development Services Department, 777 Cypress Avenue, Redding, CA 96001. Contact [Planner] at (530) 225-4020, If I, II Unda Burke Development Services Department S-2017-00239 Live Oak Subdivision Aesthetics Agricultural Resources Air Quality x Biological Resources Cultural Resources Geology / Soils Greenhouse Gas Emissions Hazards & Hazardous Materials Hydrology / Water Quality Land Use/ Planning Mineral Resources Noise Population / Housing Public Services Recreation Transportation /Traffic Tribal Cultural Resources Utilities / Service Systems J Mandatory Findings of Significance on the basis of the initial evaluation: ❑ 1 find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. '121 1 find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. 0 1 find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. 11 1 find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. 0 1 find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR of NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. Copies of the initial Study and related materials and documentation may be obtained at the Planning Division of the Development Services Department, 777 Cypress Avenue, Redding, CA 96001. Contact [Planner] at (530) 225-4020, If I, II Unda Burke Development Services Department S-2017-00239 Live Oak Subdivision City of Redding Development SeMces Department Planning Division Initial Study This section analyzes the potential environmental impacts associated with the proposed project. The issue areas evaluated in this Initial Study include: - Aesthetics - Agricultural Resources - Air Quality - Biological Resources - Cultural Resources - Geology and Soils - Greenhouse Gas Emissions - Hazards and Hazardous Materials - Utilities and Service System - Land Use and Planning - Mineral Resources - Noise - Population and Housing - Public Services - Recreation - Transportation/Circulation - Tribal Cultural Resources - Hydrology and Water Quality The environmental analysis in this section is patterned after the initial Study Checklist recommended by the State CEQA Guidelines and used by the City of Redding in its environmental review process. For the preliminary environmental assessment undertaken as part of this Initial Study's preparation, a determination that there is a potential for significant effects indicates the need to more fully analyze the development's impacts and to identify mitigation. Forthe evaluation of potential impacts, the questions in the Initial Study Checklist are stated and an answer is provided accordingto the analysis undertaken as part of the initial Study. The analysis considers the long-term, direct, indirect, and cumulative impacts of the development. To each question, there are four possible responses: • No Impact. The development will not have any measurable environmental impact on the environment, Less Than Significant Impact. The development will have the potential for impacting the environment, although this impact will be below established thresholds that are considered to be significant, • Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated. The development will have the potential to generate impacts which may be considered as a significant effect on the environment although mitigation measures or changes to the development's physical or operational characteristics can reduce these impacts to levels that are less than significant. • Potentially Significant Impact. The development will have impacts which are considered significant, and additional analysis is required to identify mitigation measures that could reduce these impacts to less than significant levels. Where potential impacts are anticipated to be significant, mitigation measures will be required, so that impacts may be avoided or reduced to insignificant levels. Prior environmental evaluations applicable to all or part of the project site: List of attachments/references: Attachment A-- Live Oak Estates Tentative Map Sheets (Sheets 1 though 4) Attachment B — Live Oak Estates Planned Development Plan Attachment C — URBEMIS air quality computer model, dated April 25, 2017 Attachment D — Technical Memo — Preliminary Resource Evaluation for the Old Alturas Road and Victor Avenue Project, prepared by Gallaway Enterprises, dated October 24, 2016 (On file with the Planning Division) Attachment E —Cultural Resource Assessment, Live Oak Estates Project, prepared by Gallaway Enterprises, dated April 2017 (On file with the Planning Division) Attachment F — Letter from Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board, dated March 16, 2017 (on file with the Planning Division) 5-2017-00239 Live Oak Subdivision 4 City of Redding Development Services Department Planning Division Initial Study Attachment G— Old AlturasMu It! Family Entitlement Level Storm Drain Analysis prepared by Sharrah Dunlap Sawyer, Inc., dated January 30, 2Dl7.(On file with the Planning Division) Attachment H — Live Oak Estates Residential Noise Analysist, prepared by Saxelby Acoustics, dated November 27, 2017 (On file with the Planning Division) Attachment I—Traffic ImpactAnalysis Memorandum, prepared byOmni Means, a GHDCompany, dated September 27,2017 (On file with the Planning Division) SUMMARY OFMITIGATION MEASURES: BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES Mkigatioml.Prior Nissuance of a grading permit that may cause the loss of jurisdictional waters of the U.S.; the developer shall secure all necessary permits and authorization from the U.S, Army Corps of Engineers, the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife, All terms and conditions of the required permits and authorization, including mitigation, shall bmmet. Mitigation 2.|norder toavoid impacts to nesting raptors or migratory birds, vegetation removal and other ground disturbance activities associated with construction shall beconducted outside of the main nesting season, September 2through January 32,otherwise apre- construction sumeyfornctingbirdssha8becomp|etedduringthenesdng season ofFebruary lthrough August 3I.The survey shall be conducted by a qualified biologist no more than one week prior to vegetation removal, |famactive nest more than half completed is located during the survey, a non disturbance buffer shall be established by the qualified biologist in consultation with the California Department ofFish and Wildlife. No vegetation removal or construction activities shall occur within the non -disturbance buffer until the young have fledged, as determined through additional monitoring by the qualified biologist. The results ofthe preconstructionsurvey shall besent tothe California Department wfFish and Wildlife, |falapse inconstruction activities oflSurmore days occurs, then another pre -construction survey shall beconducted. e) The project must comply with the height standards of the City's Zoning Ordinance.The project would beconsistent inheight with buildings on adjacent properties and would not obstruct any documented scenicvistas.The proposed project would not represent a significant change to the overall scenic quality of the area. b) The project site bnot located adjacent toa scenic highway. c) The project will becompatible with the existing visual character ofthe property and its surroundings. d) The project would generate light that is customary for development and comply with the Zoning Ordinance light standards. There would not be an adverse effect on day or nighttime views in the area. S-2m7-0m39Live Oak Subdivision Potentially Less -Than- Less -Than- No I. AESTHETICS: Would the project., Significant Sign if icant With Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? x b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, x trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State scenic c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? x I d) Create a new source of substantial light or giare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? x e) The project must comply with the height standards of the City's Zoning Ordinance.The project would beconsistent inheight with buildings on adjacent properties and would not obstruct any documented scenicvistas.The proposed project would not represent a significant change to the overall scenic quality of the area. b) The project site bnot located adjacent toa scenic highway. c) The project will becompatible with the existing visual character ofthe property and its surroundings. d) The project would generate light that is customary for development and comply with the Zoning Ordinance light standards. There would not be an adverse effect on day or nighttime views in the area. S-2m7-0m39Live Oak Subdivision City of Redding Development Services Department Planning Division Documentation: VI&P4_QW&W� —,--2A-Q A City of Redding Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 1&40.090 Initial Study (1. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES: In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural, LandEvoluation and Site Assessment Mode (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as on optional model to use in assessing impacts an agriculture and farmland. Would the project, Potentially Significant Impact Less -Than- Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less -Than- Significant Impact No Impact a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Statewide Importance Significant Significant With Significant Impact (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Impact Mitigation Impact Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to Incorporated X non-agricultural use? x b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act Contract? x X c) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland to non- x agricultural use? I Discussion: a -c) The project site not been historically used for agricultural purposes, nor does it possess soils that are prime for agricultural production. Documentation: City of Redding General Plan, Natural Resources Element, 2000 City of Redding General Plan Background RepoM Chapter 9.4: Agricultural Lands California Department of Conservation's Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service and Forest Service, Soil Survey of Shasta County Area. Ill. AIR QUALITY: Where available, the significance criteria established by the Potentially Less -Than- Less -Than- No applicable air quality management or air pollution control district May be Significant Significant With Significant Impact relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project., Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? x b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? x c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of anycriteria pollutant forwhich the projectregion is non-attamment under an applicable Federal orState ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? X e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? X 5-2017-00239 Live Oak Subdivision City ofRedding Development Services Department Planning Division Discussion: Initial Study a -c) Shasta [munty including the far northern Sacramento Valley, currently exceeds the state's ambient standards for ozone (smog) and particulates (fins,airborne particles). [bnsequenUy, these pollutants are the focus of local air quality policy, especially when related tuland use and transportation planning. Even with application of measures to reduce emissions for individual projects, cumulative impacts are unavoidable when ozone and/or particulate emissions are involved. For example, the primary source nfemissions contributing toozone |sfrom vehicles. Any project that generates vehicle trips has the potential of contributing incrementally to the problem. The Environmental Impact Report for the General Plan acknowledged this dilemma; and as a result, Findings and a Statement of Overriding Considerations were adopted by the City Council for impactsto air quality resultingfrom growth supported underiheGeneral Plan, The City Air Quality Element of the General Plan establishes emission -reduction goals of 20 to 25 percent, depending on the projected level ofunmitigated emissions for mproject, Mitigation thresholds are established for the important regional/local pollutants, including: Reactive Organic Gases (ROG) and Oxides ufNitrogen (NOx), which are ozone precursors, and Inhalable Particulate Matter, 1OMicron (PK4m). The mitigation thresholds for these pollutants are tiered at two levels as follows: Leve "A" 25pounds per day ofNOx 23pounds per day nfR0G OOpounds per day nfpMm Leve °8" 137pounds per day ofNOx 137pounds per day ofHOG 137pounds per day ofPK4,m ifaproject has unmitigated emissions less than the Level °A"threshold, then it isviewed asaminor project (from anair quality perspective) and only application of Standard Mitigation Measures (8NMs) is required to try to achieve at least a 20 percent reduction |nemissions, orthe best reduction feasible otherwise. Land uses that generate unmitigated emissions above Level "A" require application of appropriate Best Available Mitigation Measures (BAMMs), in addition to the SMMs, in orderto achieve a net emission reduction mf2Opercent ormore. if, after applying SMMs and BAMMs, a use still exceeds the Level "B" threshold, then a minimum of 25 percent of the unmitigated emissions exceeding 137 pounds per day must be offset by reducing emissions from existing sources of pollution; otherwise, an Environmental Impact Report is required, Under policy ofthe Air Quality Element, aproject has the potential toimpact air quality primarily hntwo ways: (1)the project would generate vehicle trip emissions (with NOx ROG, and PM10) that contribute cumulatively to local and regional air quality conditions; and (2) fugitive dust (particulate/PM10) emissions are possible during construction activities. Asa residential development, a project does not have the potential to generate significant emission concentrations of other pollutants subject to state and federal ambient air quality standards. |norderbucalculate the unmitigated emissionshzrthekey pollutants noted above, the current URBEyN8air quality cmmputernnod* was used as prescribed in the Air Quality Element. The results were as follows: ROG NOx PM,0 Total Emissions (lbs. /day) 7.99 4.66 7.54 These results indicate that the project would result inROE, NOx and PK4memissions well below the Level 'Wthreshold. Hence, applications of3W1W1sare required inorder tostrive toward the General Plan policy mfmnet-reduction objective mf2Opercent *z address small-scale cumulative effect. 3k4N1s applicable tothis project address primarily short-term impacts nc|otad to construction, For the most part, these requirements are standard development regulations in the City promulgated in the City Grading Ordinance and Uniform Building Code. Application of special mitigation to achieve a level of less than significant is not necessary since actions for compliance are already included in existing uniformly applied regulations and construction standards. The following City standard regulations applied during grading and construction activities to control dust and PM10emissions apply tmthe project. 1. Nontoxic soil stabilizers shall be applied according to manufacturer's specification to all inactive construction areas (previously graded areas inactive for ten days mrnmn). 2, All grading operations shall be suspended when winds (as instantaneous gusts) exceed 20 miles per hour. s-2oz7-uu23yLive Oak su»uw,mn City of Redding Development Services Department Planning Division Initial Study 3, Temporary traffic control shall be provided as appropriate during all phases of construction to improve traffic flow (e.g., flag person). 4. Construction activities that could affect traffic flow shall be scheduled in off-peak hours. S. Active construction areas, haul roads, etc., shall be watered at least twice daily or more as needed to limit dust. 6. Exposed stockpiles of soil and other backfill material shall either be covered, watered, or have soil binders added to inhibit dust and wind erosion. 7. All truck hauling solid and other loose material shall be covered or should maintain at least two feet of freeboard (Le., minimum vertical distance between top of the load and the trailer) in accordance with the requirements of CVC Section 23114. This provision is enforced by local law enforcement agencies. 8. All public roadways used by the project contractor shall be maintained free from dust, dirt, and debris caused by construction activities. Streets shall be swept at the end of the day if visible soil materials are carried onto adjacent public paved roads. Wheel washers shall be used where vehicles enter and exit unpaved roads onto paved roads, or trucks and any equipment shall be washed off leaving the site with each trip. 9, Alternatives to open burning of cleared vegetative material on the project site shall be used unless otherwise deemed infeasible by the City Planning Division, Suitable alternatives include, but are not limited to, on-site chipping and mulching and/or hauling to a biomass fuel site. d) Potential impacts to neighboring homes (sensitive receptors) from fugitive dust caused during construction are mitigated by application of the SMMs discussed above. Documentation: Shasta county APCD Air Quality Ma ntenance an n Imp ement ng City of Redding General Plan, Air Quality Element City of Redding General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report, �000, SCH #1998072103, Chapter 8.6, Air Quality, 1%4irrg2i *f Irwee ani &e.1 Report, as adopted by the Redding City Council on October 3, 2000, by Resolution 2000-166 City of Redding General Ptah Background Report, Chapter 9.7. Natural Resources and Air Quality URBEMIS (2007, v 9.2.4) Air Quality Computer Model Results for old Alturas 5ubdivision (changed to Live Oak) dated April 2S, 2017 -2017-00239 Live Oak Subdivision Packet Pq. I Potentially Less -Than- Less -Than- No IV, BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES: Would the project., Significant Significant With Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated a Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special -status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or X by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or othersensitive natural community identified in local of regional plans, policies, regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. X Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on Federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, X hydrological interruption, or other means? -2017-00239 Live Oak Subdivision Packet Pq. I City wRedding Development Services Department Planning Division Initial Study Discussion: a -d) The 8 acre property has been previously disturbed with a home site on the westerly parcel (recently demolished) and 2 small existing rentals homes onthe easterly site. The site is characterized as blue oak woodland in the northwest corner and annual grassland throughout the rest of the property, with minimal barren habitat type surrounding the existing and previous residential building sites. The site isflat to gently sloping in the northwest corner with topography ranging from approximately 555 feet above mean sea level (ms|)tn6l5feet ms|. Churn Creek, which is tributary to the Sacramento River, is located just outside the northeast corner of the project area. Gallaway Enterprises prepared a Technical Memo — Preliminary Resource Evaluation (dated October 24,2OI6)for the project site that included a habitat assessment to determine if suitable habitat occurs for special status species, a botanical survey conducted for the purpose of determining presence of special status species and suitable habitat elements for those species, and an aquatic survey to determine the presence of potential jurisdictional waters of the US, and to document the edge of the riparian habitat to determine the 50 foot setback from the edge of riparian habitat. No endangered, threatened, orrare plant species were observed, however, because the survey was conducted outside cJthe blooming period for most flowering plans, the habitat assessment was conducted to determine if thesite provides habitat for special status plant species. The assessment determined that the site lacked suitable habitat for all but one special status plant species, Redding checkerbloom, a California Native Plant Society Rank 3 plant. Because this plant would only occur within the blue oak woodland portion ofthe site, which is proposed to be completely avoided' a protocol -level survey for this plant was not recommended. Additionally, the status as a California Rare Plant Rank 3 (more information) does not currently warrant mitigation requirements byCalifornia Department ofFish and Wildlife (C0PVV). No endangered, threatened, or special status wildlife species were observed, however, there issuitable habitatfor nesting migratory and non -game birds inthe blue oak woodland area, the riparian corridor along Churn Creek, and other trees near the existing residential structures. The Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) prohibits the killing of migratory birds or destruction of their occupied nests and eggs, except in accordance with regulations prescribed by the US Fish and Wildlife Service. Activities that involve the removal of vegetation, including trees, has the potential to affect bird species protected by the MBTA, therefore, to minimize impacts from construction, mitigation is provided below to encourage tree removal and other land -clearing work to be conducted outside the main nesting period. Toavoid the potential ofimpacting ground nesting migratory birds protected bythe yWBTA,itis recommended thatvegetation removal and ground disturbing activities occuroutsidethe nestingseason (September 1 -January 31). |fground disturbing activities occur duringthebird nestingseason(February l—Augurt 3l)aprecommtruct\mnmptorandmigratory bird survey should be conducted by a qualified biologist within 7 days prior to the start of construction and appropriate nest - avoidance measures required if an active nest more than half completed is located during the survey. |falapse |nconstruction activities of 15 or more days occurs, then another pre -construction survey shall be conducted. During the aquatic survey, a potentially jurisdictional wetiand feature and a drainage ditch were identified on the westand south sides of the project site, respectively. The potential wetiand feature is largely located between the project boundary and the private driveway on the property to the west. It receives water in the form of sheet flow from the driveway, the apartment buildings to the west, and from the hillside. The drainage ditch on the south side of the project receives sheet flow from Old Alturas Road as well as off the project site. It is heavily vegetated with annual grasses and other weedy herbaceous plants. However, there appears to be no S-2017-00239 Live oak Subdivision Potentially Less -Than- Less -Than- No IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES., Would the project: Significant Significant With Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery X e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? x f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community, Conservation Plan, orotherapproved local, regional, x or State habitat conservation plan? Discussion: a -d) The 8 acre property has been previously disturbed with a home site on the westerly parcel (recently demolished) and 2 small existing rentals homes onthe easterly site. The site is characterized as blue oak woodland in the northwest corner and annual grassland throughout the rest of the property, with minimal barren habitat type surrounding the existing and previous residential building sites. The site isflat to gently sloping in the northwest corner with topography ranging from approximately 555 feet above mean sea level (ms|)tn6l5feet ms|. Churn Creek, which is tributary to the Sacramento River, is located just outside the northeast corner of the project area. Gallaway Enterprises prepared a Technical Memo — Preliminary Resource Evaluation (dated October 24,2OI6)for the project site that included a habitat assessment to determine if suitable habitat occurs for special status species, a botanical survey conducted for the purpose of determining presence of special status species and suitable habitat elements for those species, and an aquatic survey to determine the presence of potential jurisdictional waters of the US, and to document the edge of the riparian habitat to determine the 50 foot setback from the edge of riparian habitat. No endangered, threatened, orrare plant species were observed, however, because the survey was conducted outside cJthe blooming period for most flowering plans, the habitat assessment was conducted to determine if thesite provides habitat for special status plant species. The assessment determined that the site lacked suitable habitat for all but one special status plant species, Redding checkerbloom, a California Native Plant Society Rank 3 plant. Because this plant would only occur within the blue oak woodland portion ofthe site, which is proposed to be completely avoided' a protocol -level survey for this plant was not recommended. Additionally, the status as a California Rare Plant Rank 3 (more information) does not currently warrant mitigation requirements byCalifornia Department ofFish and Wildlife (C0PVV). No endangered, threatened, or special status wildlife species were observed, however, there issuitable habitatfor nesting migratory and non -game birds inthe blue oak woodland area, the riparian corridor along Churn Creek, and other trees near the existing residential structures. The Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) prohibits the killing of migratory birds or destruction of their occupied nests and eggs, except in accordance with regulations prescribed by the US Fish and Wildlife Service. Activities that involve the removal of vegetation, including trees, has the potential to affect bird species protected by the MBTA, therefore, to minimize impacts from construction, mitigation is provided below to encourage tree removal and other land -clearing work to be conducted outside the main nesting period. Toavoid the potential ofimpacting ground nesting migratory birds protected bythe yWBTA,itis recommended thatvegetation removal and ground disturbing activities occuroutsidethe nestingseason (September 1 -January 31). |fground disturbing activities occur duringthebird nestingseason(February l—Augurt 3l)aprecommtruct\mnmptorandmigratory bird survey should be conducted by a qualified biologist within 7 days prior to the start of construction and appropriate nest - avoidance measures required if an active nest more than half completed is located during the survey. |falapse |nconstruction activities of 15 or more days occurs, then another pre -construction survey shall be conducted. During the aquatic survey, a potentially jurisdictional wetiand feature and a drainage ditch were identified on the westand south sides of the project site, respectively. The potential wetiand feature is largely located between the project boundary and the private driveway on the property to the west. It receives water in the form of sheet flow from the driveway, the apartment buildings to the west, and from the hillside. The drainage ditch on the south side of the project receives sheet flow from Old Alturas Road as well as off the project site. It is heavily vegetated with annual grasses and other weedy herbaceous plants. However, there appears to be no S-2017-00239 Live oak Subdivision City of Redding Development Services Department Planning Division MEN= Initial Study The City has not established its own mitigation standards for replacement of wetlands impacted by development and, instead, relies on criteria recognized by state and federal resource agencies. Federal and state policies promote a no net loss of wetiand resources. This can be accomplished in a number of ways, but a common approach is the purchase by the developer of mitigation credits at an established wetland mitigation bank. Based on these factors, mitigation measures are established below to ensure that, prior to issuance of a City grading permit, any necessary wetland mitigation credits are secured and sufficient mitigation is performed in accordance with the US Army Corps of Engineers and CDFW permitting requirements if project plans would result in destruction of jurisdictional wetlands, e) The City has adopted a Tree Management Ordinance (Chapter 18.45 of the RMC) that promotes the conservation of mature, healthy trees in the design of new development. The ordinance also recognizes that the preservation of trees will sometimes conflict with necessary land -development requirements. The City's General Plan EIR further acknowledges that preservation of native trees will sometimes conflict with normal land development and that implementation of the General Plan will ultimately set aside over 7,000 acres of open space, much of which contains oak habitat. But efforts must still be made to retain existing trees if reasonably possible, and to sufficiently plant new trees in the context of the new development. A tree survey Is required to identify natural trees and tree groups most suitable for preservation or "candidate trees/groups," Where all identified candidate trees/groups cannot be preserved, the set-aside of a natural area or areas within a project site that is particularly suitable for the planting, retention, and/or natural regeneration of trees is considered to be a desirable means of accomplishing the goals of the ordinance. In this case, the tree survey prepared by Sharrah Dunlap Sawyer, Inc., indicates that tree cover on the site is mainly located on the sloping hillside in the northwest corner of the site which is proposed to be set aside for preservation. The majority of the 279 trees identified on site are blue oak trees; however, there are several pine and shade trees found mainly in the area of the previous and current home sites. The majority of trees (211) would be preserved, most located on the sloping hillside. However, due to the project's grading and utility demands necessary for development of the site to the potential anticipated by the General Plan, saving trees in the main subdivision development area is not considered feasible and removal of 68 trees would result. In addition to tree retention efforts, the developer is also obligated to replant suitable new trees at the time of construction for shade and the enjoyment of residents. The Tree Management Ordinance identifies minimum planting criteria of one tree per 500 square feet of gross living area. Thus, with retention of trees in the proposed private open space area and the planting of new trees as a standard condition of development, the project is consistent with the intent of the Tree Management Ordinance. f) No habitat conservation plans or other similar plans have been adopted for the project site or project area. No impact would occur in this regard. Documentation: California Department of Fish and Wildlife: Natural Diversity Data Base City of Redding General Plan, Natural Resources Element, 2000 City of Redding Municipal Code, Chapter 18.45, Tree Management Ordinance City of Redding General Plan Environmental Impact Report, 2000, SCH #1998072103 Technical Memo — Preliminary Resource Evaluation for the Old Alturas Road and Victor Avenue Project — Redding, CA, prepared by Gallaway Enterprises, dated October 24, 2016 Live Oak Estate Tree Survey, prepared by Sharrah Dunlap Sawyer, Inc., dated April 2016 Mitigation: Mitigation 1. Prior to issuance of a grading permit that may cause the loss of jurisdictional waters of the U.S., the developer shall secure all necessary permits and authorization from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife. All terms and conditions of the required permits and authorization, including mitigation, shall be met. Mitigation 2. In order to avoid impacts to nesting raptors or migratory birds, vegetation removal and other ground disturbance activities associated with construction shall be conducted outside of the main nesting season, September 1 through January 31, otherwise a pre -- construction survey for nesting birds shall be completed during the nesting season of February I through August 31, The survey shall be conducted by a qualified biologist no more than one week prior to vegetation removal if an active nest more than half completed is 5-2017-00239 Live oak Subdivision 10 City of Redding Development Services Department Planning Division In itia I Study located during the survey, a non disturbance buffer dhmU be established bythe qualified biologist in consultation with the California Department ofFish and Wildlife. No vegetation removal or construction activities shall occur within the non -disturbance buffer until the young have fledged, as determined through additional monitoring by the qualified biologist. The results o[the preconstructionsurvey shall besent tothe California Department ofFish and Wildlife. !falapse inconstruction activities of15ormore days occurs, then another pre -construction survey shall beconducted. Discussion a -d) Gallaway Enterprises conducted a cultural resources assessment for the project site including a field survey, archival research, and arecord search a1the Northeast Information Center. Amixed reconnaissance and intensive -level pedestrian was conducted on April 14, 2017,covering the entire area ofpotential effect toidentify the presence orabsence ofhistoric resources and toevaluate the significance ofany identified archaeological resources, The results ofthe record search indicate that three previous cultural resouoesumeyshavebeemundertakemwithintheprniectsitewithnoprehistoricandonehistoricoiLehav|ngbeemrecorded.A total of 4 prehistoric sites have been recorded within a half mile radius of the site, all located directly abutting or closely adjacent to Churn Creek. A previous cultural resource inventory conducted in 2006 detailed the recorded site for the residential homestead, including a house, barn, and outbuildings on the western parcel, known as "Little Rags.' The structures were determined tolack integrity and were not recommended oseligible for the California Register ofHistoric Resources (CRHR). The survey results indicate that the site had undergone significant modification since ZO05and the structures had all been demolished. On the eastern parcel, the structures constructed in1957 and 1965 were still standing and currently inhabited. However, both structures have been updated, undergone intense remodeling, and neither maintains the integrity of the initial construction. Therefore the eastern portion of the site is not eligible for CRHR or the National Registry of Historic Places. in consideration of the findings of the record search and pedestrian survey, no impacts inthis area are anticipated. However, |naccordance with CEQA Guideline 15064.5 (f), should any previously unrecorded historic orprehistoric resources, including human remains, bediscovered during ground disturbing activities, construction activities shall cease and the City shall be notified. A qualified archaeological professional must be retained to investigate the discovery to determine its significance in accordance with applicable laws. d Nounique geologic features, fossil -bearing strata, orpaleontological sites are known toexist onthe project site. Documentation: City q/Redding General Plan Background Report, 1998 City of Redding General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report, 2000,SCH#199802I03 Cultural Resource Assessment, Live Oak Estates Project, prepared by Gallaway Enterprises, dated April 2017. s201p00239Live Oak Subdivision 11 V. CULTURAL RESOURCES: Would the project., Significant Significant With Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated a ) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical x resource pursuant to Section 15064,5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an x archaeological resource pursuant to Section 15064.5? c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource orsiteor X unique geologic feature? d) Disturbanyhuman remains, including those interred outside of dedicated X Discussion a -d) Gallaway Enterprises conducted a cultural resources assessment for the project site including a field survey, archival research, and arecord search a1the Northeast Information Center. Amixed reconnaissance and intensive -level pedestrian was conducted on April 14, 2017,covering the entire area ofpotential effect toidentify the presence orabsence ofhistoric resources and toevaluate the significance ofany identified archaeological resources, The results ofthe record search indicate that three previous cultural resouoesumeyshavebeemundertakemwithintheprniectsitewithnoprehistoricandonehistoricoiLehav|ngbeemrecorded.A total of 4 prehistoric sites have been recorded within a half mile radius of the site, all located directly abutting or closely adjacent to Churn Creek. A previous cultural resource inventory conducted in 2006 detailed the recorded site for the residential homestead, including a house, barn, and outbuildings on the western parcel, known as "Little Rags.' The structures were determined tolack integrity and were not recommended oseligible for the California Register ofHistoric Resources (CRHR). The survey results indicate that the site had undergone significant modification since ZO05and the structures had all been demolished. On the eastern parcel, the structures constructed in1957 and 1965 were still standing and currently inhabited. However, both structures have been updated, undergone intense remodeling, and neither maintains the integrity of the initial construction. Therefore the eastern portion of the site is not eligible for CRHR or the National Registry of Historic Places. in consideration of the findings of the record search and pedestrian survey, no impacts inthis area are anticipated. However, |naccordance with CEQA Guideline 15064.5 (f), should any previously unrecorded historic orprehistoric resources, including human remains, bediscovered during ground disturbing activities, construction activities shall cease and the City shall be notified. A qualified archaeological professional must be retained to investigate the discovery to determine its significance in accordance with applicable laws. d Nounique geologic features, fossil -bearing strata, orpaleontological sites are known toexist onthe project site. Documentation: City q/Redding General Plan Background Report, 1998 City of Redding General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report, 2000,SCH#199802I03 Cultural Resource Assessment, Live Oak Estates Project, prepared by Gallaway Enterprises, dated April 2017. s201p00239Live Oak Subdivision 11 City ofRedding Development Services Department Planning Division Mitigation: None necessary. Initial Study a,cd) There are no Alquist-Priolo earthquake faults designated in the Redding area of Shasta County.There are noother documented earthquake faults inthe immediate vicinity that pose asignificant risk, and the site hlocated |nanarea designated inthe Health and Safety Element of the General Plan as having a low ground -shaking potential. The project isnot located nnnrnear any documented landslide hazard areas, and there is no evidence of ground slippage or subsidence occurring naturally on the site, The type of soils and underlying geology is identified as having no potential for liquefaction. The site inlocated outside ufthe 100 -year floodplain of Churn Creek which is located on the property to the north and east of this site. b) The project site contains three soil classifications including Churn gravelly loam (CeA), Newton gravelly loam (NeD),and Newton gravelly loam (NeE2). The developable areas of the subdivision are those soils contained within the CeA and NeD classifications and are characterized by slopes of zero to 3 percent and 15 to 30 percent, respectively. The majority of the site, CeA, is well drained soil and has moderately slow permeability. Runoff isslow and the hazard for erosion isnone toslight. soils inthe western portion of the development are considered NeD and also have slow permeability; however runoff ix medium and to hazard of erosion is moderate. The sloping areas in northwest corner of the site that will be preserved and undeveloped contain NeE2 soils that have dupes of30to5Opercent. Permeability is slow and runoff is rapid, however, no grading or ground disturbance is proposed in this area, Proposed grading consists of that necessary for construction of the units and internal driveways on the lower terrace, A retaining wall is proposed at the base of the slope and between units as necessary for construction of units. s20oo0239Live Oak Subdivision 12 Potentially Less -Than- Less -Than- No V1. GEOLOGY AND SOILS: Would the project., Significant SignificantWith Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: I) Rupture of a known earthquake, fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map X issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publications 42. 11) Strong seismic ground shaking? iii) Seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction? iv) Landslides? b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially resultin on- X or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction, or d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform x Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or x alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? a,cd) There are no Alquist-Priolo earthquake faults designated in the Redding area of Shasta County.There are noother documented earthquake faults inthe immediate vicinity that pose asignificant risk, and the site hlocated |nanarea designated inthe Health and Safety Element of the General Plan as having a low ground -shaking potential. The project isnot located nnnrnear any documented landslide hazard areas, and there is no evidence of ground slippage or subsidence occurring naturally on the site, The type of soils and underlying geology is identified as having no potential for liquefaction. The site inlocated outside ufthe 100 -year floodplain of Churn Creek which is located on the property to the north and east of this site. b) The project site contains three soil classifications including Churn gravelly loam (CeA), Newton gravelly loam (NeD),and Newton gravelly loam (NeE2). The developable areas of the subdivision are those soils contained within the CeA and NeD classifications and are characterized by slopes of zero to 3 percent and 15 to 30 percent, respectively. The majority of the site, CeA, is well drained soil and has moderately slow permeability. Runoff isslow and the hazard for erosion isnone toslight. soils inthe western portion of the development are considered NeD and also have slow permeability; however runoff ix medium and to hazard of erosion is moderate. The sloping areas in northwest corner of the site that will be preserved and undeveloped contain NeE2 soils that have dupes of30to5Opercent. Permeability is slow and runoff is rapid, however, no grading or ground disturbance is proposed in this area, Proposed grading consists of that necessary for construction of the units and internal driveways on the lower terrace, A retaining wall is proposed at the base of the slope and between units as necessary for construction of units. s20oo0239Live Oak Subdivision 12 City ofRedd in Development Services Department Planning Division Initial Study The project iosubject to certain erosion -control requirements mandated by existing City and State regulations.These requirements * City of Redding Grading Ordinance, This ordinance requires the application of "Best Management Practices" (BK8Rs) in accordance withthe City Erosion and Sediment Control standards Design Manual (Redding Municipal CodeSecton16.12.0GO Subsections C [\ E). In practice, specific erosion -control measures one determined upon review of the final project improvement plans and are tailored toproject-specific grading impacts. + [olifhm/oRegional Water Quality Board "Construction Activity Storm Wa6erPenn/t"This permit somewhat overlaps the City's Grading Ordinance provision by applying state standards for erosion -control measures during construction of the project. + California Regional Water Quality [onun/ 8000/ "Project Storm Nater Pollution Prevention Plan (SN/PPP)." This plan emphasizes storm water best management practices and is required as part of the Construction Activity Storm Water Permit. The objectives of the SWPPP are to identify the sources of sediment and other pollutants that affect the quality of storm water discharges and to describe and ensure the implementation of practices to reduce sediment and other pollutants in storm water discharges, + California Department qfFish and Wildlife "160UAg/rement.° This notification isrequired for any work within adefined streambed. + KS,Army corps grEngineers Nationwide Permit. Anew Nationwide 29Permit (residential developments) will berequired from the UI.Army Corps ofEngineers twaddress impacts tojurisdictional waters. Actions for comp I iance with these regulations are addressed under standard conditions of approval, which are uniformly applied to all land development projects. Since the project is subject to uniformly applied ordinances and policies and the overall risk of erosion is low, potential impacts related to soil erosion and sedimentation are less than significant. e) The proposed project does not involve the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal, Nmimpact has been identified Documentation: City of Redding Health and Safety Element, figures 4-1(Ground Shaking Potential) and 4.2 (Liquefaction Potential) City nfRedding General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report City ofRedding General Plan Background Report, 1998 City ofRedding Grading Ordinance, RMC Chapter 1V.l2 City ufRedding Standard Specifications, Grading Practices City ofRedding Standard Conditions ufApproval for Subdivisions Soil Survey of Shasta County Area, United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service and Forest Service, August 1974 Division wfMines and Geology Special Publication 4Z State Regional Water Quality Control Board, Central Valley Region, Regulations related to Construction Activity Storm Water Permits and Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plans Letter from Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board, dated March 16, 2017 Mitigation: None necessary. s20u-00239Live Oak Subdivision 13 Potentially Less -Than- Less -Than- No VII. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS: Would the project: Significant SignificantWith Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may x have a significant Impact on the environment? I i b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the x purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? s20u-00239Live Oak Subdivision 13 City of Redding Development Services Department Planning Division initial Study Discussion: a) In 2005, the Governor of California signed Executive Oder S-3-05, establishing that it is the State of California's goal to reduce statewide greenhouse gas (GHG) emission levels. Subsequently, in 2006, the California State Legislature adopted Assembly Bill AS 32, the California Global Warming Solutions Act. In part, AB 32 requires the California Air Resources Board to develop and adopt regulations to achieve a reduction in the State's GHG emissions to year 1990 levels by year 2020, California Senate Bill SB97 established that an individual project's effect on GHG emission levels and global warming must be assessed under CEQA. SB97 further directed that the State Office of Planning and Research (OPR) develop guidelines for the assessment of a project's GHG emissions. Those guidelines for GHG emissions were subsequently included as amendments to the CEQA Guidelines. The guidelines did not establish thresholds of significance and there are currently no state, regional, county, or city guidelines or thresholds with which to direct project -level CEQA review, As a result, the City of Redding has utilized the best available information to develop a threshold until a specific quantitative threshold is adopted by the state or regional air district. As the Lead Agency, the City has opted to utilize a quantitative non -zero project -specific threshold using a methodology recommended by the California Air Pollution Officers (CAPCOA) and accepted by the California Air Resources Board. According to CAPCOA's Threshold 2.3, CARR Reporting Threshold, 10,000 metric tons of carbon -dioxide equivalents per year (mtCO2eq/yr) is recommended as a quantitative non -zero threshold. According to the CAPCOA, this threshold would be equivalent to 550 dwelling units, 400,000 square feet of office use, 120,000 square feet of retail, or 70,000 square feet of supermarket use. This approach is estimated to capture over half the future residential and commercial development projects and is designed to support the goals of AB 32 and not hinder it. The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) identifies four primary constituents that are most representative of the GHG emissions. They are: Carbon Dioxide (CO2,): Emitted primarily through the burning of fossil fuels. Other sources include the burning of solid waste and wood and/or wood products and cement manufacturing. • Methane (CH4): Emissions occur during the production and transport of fuels, such as coal and natural gas. Additional emissions are generated by livestock and agricultural land uses, as well as the decomposition of solid waste. • Nitrous Oxide (N20): The principal emitters include agricultural and industrial land uses and fossil fuel and waste combustion. • Fluorinated Gases: These can be emitted during some industrial activities. Also, many of these gases are substitutes for ozone-depleting substances, such as CFCs, which have been used historically as refrigerants. Collectively, these gases are often referred to as "high global -warming potential" gases. The primary generators of GHG emissions in the United States are electricity generation and transportation, The EPA estimates that nearly 85 percent of the nation's GHG emissions are comprised of carbon dioxide (CO2). The majority of CO2 is generated by petroleum consumption associated with transportation and coal consumption associated with electricity generation. The remaining emissions are predominately the result of natural-gas consumption associated with a variety of uses. With regard to the project, the predominant associated GHG is CO2 generated by motor -vehicle travel to and from the site, To a substantially lesser degree, the project will result in CH4 emissions associated with use of electric power generated by the Redding Electric Utility (REU), though it should be noted that REU distributes power from a variety of sources, including hydroelectric, wind, and natural gas. According to the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association's (CAPCOA) publication, CEQA and Climate Change, published in January 2008, there is currently not a single computer model that is capable of estimating all of a project's direct and indirect GHG emissions. However, the Urban Emissions Model (URBEM15) is likely the most consistently used model to estimate a project's direct GHG emissions. URBEMIS is designed to model emissions associated with development of urban land uses. URBEMIS attempts to summarize criteria air pollutants and CO2 emissions that would occur during operation of new development. URBEMIS was developed and is approved for statewide use by CARB. One of the shortfalls of URBEMIS is that the model does not contain emission factors for GHGs other than CO2 except for methane (CHS) from mobile sources, which is converted to CO2. This may not be a major problem since CO2 is the most important GHG from land development projects. 5-2017-00239 Live Oak Subdivision 14 City uRedding Development Services Department Planning Division Initial Study The emissions from the project as indicated by the URBEMIS model are significantly below the City of Redding's air quality thresholds,as well as6HGemissions thresholds put forth byCARB.Therefore, the project will not contribute significantly toG8Gemissions inthe air basin. No mitigation measures are required. However, in an effort to reduce any potential contribution to negative effects from GHG emissions, the project incorporates elements that serve to reduce vehicle -miles traveled, the main project contributor of GHG emissions, and implements the State Attorney General's recommended measures to reduce GHG emissions as follows: 2 ProjectFeuturea/RegmbKiom a, The project is located adjacent to and within walking distance of the major Regional Commercial district in Redding serving the shopping needs ofthe community including this development. b. Old Alturas Road and the project site is served by several bus routes and is approximately .7 mile from the Redding Area Bus Authority Canby Road Transfer Station, facilitating use of transit options throughout the City. u. The project will provide connection to existing bicycle facilities along Old Attu ras Road and Browning Street and will encourage bicycle use byresidents inthe development. d. The project will be required to plant one new tree for every 500 square feet of enclosed gross living area, which will provide a cooling effect, lessening energy use, and sequestering CO,. e. Storage and collection areas will be provided for recyclable materials and the project will comply with other requirements in the statewide adopted California Green Building Standards Code. On a largerscale, the City of Redding's General Plan acknowledges that land use decisions have an impactondknateamdairquaOty.Land use decisions that result in low or very low density on the periphery of the community increase the amount of vehicle -miles traveled (VMT), which increases vehicle emissions. In response to this impact, theCity's GeneralPlan includes a numberof goalsand policies in the Community Development and Design Element, Transportation Element, and Housing Element that promote acompact urban form and encourage infill development, advocate higher housing density, and ensure connectivity to citywide bikeways and pedestrian plans. The goal of these policies is to reduce VIVIT, which also reduces emissions and reduces a wide variety of air quality impacts. Since automobiles are considered a major source of GHG emission, each vehicle trip reduced also reduces GHG emissions. zCPO]Awebsite, July 19,2O1O zCalifornia Office ufthe Attorney General, "The California Environmental Quality Act Addressing Global Warming Impacts at the Local Agency Levei,updated May Z1,ZOO8. Documentation: City uƒRedding General Plan 2000 URBEM IS (2007, v 9.2.4) Air Quality Computer Model Mitigation: None necessary. s-20o-00239Live Oak Subdivision 15 Potentially Less -Than- Less -Than- No Vill. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: Would the project: Significant Significant With Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? x b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or x proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section G59G2.5 and, as a result, x would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? s-20o-00239Live Oak Subdivision 15 City ofRedding Development Services Department Planning Division Initial Study a,b,c,d) The nature ofthe project asresidential housing does not present asignificant risk related tohazardous materials memissions. There is no documented hazardous material sites located on or near the project. e, f) The project b located outside the established app dear zones for Redding Municipal Airport. The project's residential land usewould not conflict with operations of theAirportor presenta safety hazard to people residing in thesubdivision. There are no private airstrips in the project vicinity. A) The project does not involve a use or activity that could interfere with emergency -response or emergency-evacuationplonyhx\ho area. M) The oak trees on the sloping hillside in the northwest corner of the site would be preserved, however, the area does not have significant five fuel, and therefore, would not have o vi|dbnd fire -hazard potential. The project she is located outside of the boundary ofthe very high -fire hazard severity zone. Documentation: City nƒRedding General Plan, Health and Safety Element, 2D0O Mitigation: None necessary. IX. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY: Would the project: Potentially Less -Than- Less -Than- No Vill, HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS- Would the project: Significant Significant With Significant Impact b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially Impact Mitigation Impact with groundwater recharge such that there would be a new deficit in incorporated e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan x has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use x airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project x result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the projectarea? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted X emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to x urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildiands? a,b,c,d) The nature ofthe project asresidential housing does not present asignificant risk related tohazardous materials memissions. There is no documented hazardous material sites located on or near the project. e, f) The project b located outside the established app dear zones for Redding Municipal Airport. The project's residential land usewould not conflict with operations of theAirportor presenta safety hazard to people residing in thesubdivision. There are no private airstrips in the project vicinity. A) The project does not involve a use or activity that could interfere with emergency -response or emergency-evacuationplonyhx\ho area. M) The oak trees on the sloping hillside in the northwest corner of the site would be preserved, however, the area does not have significant five fuel, and therefore, would not have o vi|dbnd fire -hazard potential. The project she is located outside of the boundary ofthe very high -fire hazard severity zone. Documentation: City nƒRedding General Plan, Health and Safety Element, 2D0O Mitigation: None necessary. IX. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY: Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less -Than- Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less -Than- Significant Impact No Impact a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? x b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a new deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (eg., x the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? s-2o/7-oozaeLive Oak axuuwu^n 16 City ofRedding Development Services Department Planning Division In itia I Study Discussion: m) Since the project would beserved byCity sanitary sewer service, the project would not involve any permitted discharges oJwaste material into ground or surface waters. b) The project would utilize City water service for domestic uses and fire protection. The proposed project vvoo0 not impact groundwater supplies. c, f) Th e project is so bject to sta nda rd req u irements defi n ed u nd er Section VI., Geology and Soils, a bove th at mi n i ml ze th e poten ti al for erosion or siltation on -or off-site. The final improvement plans for the project must also incorporate specific design measures intended to limit pollutant discharges in storm water from urban improvements as established undertheState's National Pollutant Elimination System (NPDES) general permit, which theClty is now obligated to follow in accordancewith State Water Quality Control Order No. 2003-0005-DWQ. All storm water runoff will be conveyed to an underground cletentionfinfiftration facility located in the area of the proposed common area where it will be treated for both storm water quality and quantity. Low flow filtration trenches will be constructed throughout the detention/infiltration basin and the private underground system storm drain system. Feasible Best Management Practices (BMPs) would be incorporated in the final design of the project's storm -drain system, as approved by the City Engineer, based on the BMPs listed in the latest edition of the California Storm Water Quality Association Storm Water Best Management Practices Handbook. cl, e) Storm water runoff from the project site flows generally in a easterly direction from the gently sloping area in northwestcorner of the site toward Churn Creek. Storm drain improvements will direct storm waters through the site to an outfall in the northeast corner mfthe site which will then drain offsite tothe creek. City mfRedding Policy 1OO6requires that all subdivision development inc|udeutormwaterde1entionfad|idesdesignediomeintaineubtingpredevo|mpmemtratesofrunoffdur}nga1O`25',andIOO-year storm event with 6 -hour duration. The project application includes a storm water hydrology analysis prepared by Sharrah Dunlap Sawyer, Inc,, dated January 30, 2017 that includes use of an underground drain rockstorm water detention facility in the area of the proposed common area that will detain runoff before conveying the metered runoff to Churn Creek. S-2m7-0n23onveOak Subdivision 17 Potentially Less -Than- Less -Than- No IX. HYDROLOGY AND WATER Would the project: Significant Significant With Significa nt Impact _qPALITY: Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated c) Su bsta nt ia I ly a [ter the existi n g d ra I nage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a X manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off - d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or X substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or offske? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of x existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? X g) Place housing within 100 -year flood hazard area as mapped on a Federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other x flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100 -year flood hazard area structures which would X impede or redirect flood flows? I) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury� or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee X j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? x Discussion: m) Since the project would beserved byCity sanitary sewer service, the project would not involve any permitted discharges oJwaste material into ground or surface waters. b) The project would utilize City water service for domestic uses and fire protection. The proposed project vvoo0 not impact groundwater supplies. c, f) Th e project is so bject to sta nda rd req u irements defi n ed u nd er Section VI., Geology and Soils, a bove th at mi n i ml ze th e poten ti al for erosion or siltation on -or off-site. The final improvement plans for the project must also incorporate specific design measures intended to limit pollutant discharges in storm water from urban improvements as established undertheState's National Pollutant Elimination System (NPDES) general permit, which theClty is now obligated to follow in accordancewith State Water Quality Control Order No. 2003-0005-DWQ. All storm water runoff will be conveyed to an underground cletentionfinfiftration facility located in the area of the proposed common area where it will be treated for both storm water quality and quantity. Low flow filtration trenches will be constructed throughout the detention/infiltration basin and the private underground system storm drain system. Feasible Best Management Practices (BMPs) would be incorporated in the final design of the project's storm -drain system, as approved by the City Engineer, based on the BMPs listed in the latest edition of the California Storm Water Quality Association Storm Water Best Management Practices Handbook. cl, e) Storm water runoff from the project site flows generally in a easterly direction from the gently sloping area in northwestcorner of the site toward Churn Creek. Storm drain improvements will direct storm waters through the site to an outfall in the northeast corner mfthe site which will then drain offsite tothe creek. City mfRedding Policy 1OO6requires that all subdivision development inc|udeutormwaterde1entionfad|idesdesignediomeintaineubtingpredevo|mpmemtratesofrunoffdur}nga1O`25',andIOO-year storm event with 6 -hour duration. The project application includes a storm water hydrology analysis prepared by Sharrah Dunlap Sawyer, Inc,, dated January 30, 2017 that includes use of an underground drain rockstorm water detention facility in the area of the proposed common area that will detain runoff before conveying the metered runoff to Churn Creek. S-2m7-0n23onveOak Subdivision 17 City mRedding Development Services Department Planning Division B,h,0 The lOQ'yearfloodplain boundary ofChurn Creek is just outside the northeast property boundary. No encroachment in the floodplain will occur with the project. j) The threat of a tsunami wave is not applicable to inland, central valley communities such as Redding. Seichescould potentially be generated in either Shasta or Whiskeytown Lakes during an earthquake. However, neither lake has been identified In the Health and Safety Element of the General Plan as having any risk to the City under such circumstances. There is no documented threat of mudOowsaffecting the project site. Documentation:— City of Redding General Plan Background Report, Chapter 10,Health and Safety Element, 1998 Federal Emergency Management Agency Floodplain regulations, FIRM map 06089CI554G, dated March 17, 2011 City of Redding Storm Drain Master Plan, Montgomery -Watson Engineers 1993 Old Alturas Multi -Family Entitlement Level Storm Drain Analysis, prepare by Sharrah Dunlap Sawyer, Inc., dated January 30, 2017. Mitigation: None necessary, Discussion: a) The project isamultiple-family development located inanarea that iszoned for this use, and issurrounded byother similar or compatible uses, Residential single-family neighborhoods are separated from this development by private open space and grade separation tothe north and Churn Creek tmthe east. Therefore, the project does not have the potential bzphysically divide an established community. b) The project is compatible with the applicable policies and regulations of the City GeneralPlan and Zoning Ordinance and isnot in conflict with any other Plan adopted by a jurisdictional agency for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect. d There is no habitat conservation or natural community conservation plans that are applicable to the site. ----^~^---''. City ofRedding General Plan, Community Development Element, 2OOO City n/Redding General Plan Environmental Impact Report, 2000, 3CH#19B8O721O8 City of Redding General Plan, Natural Resources Element, 2000 S-2mp0023yLive Oak Subdivision 18 Potentially Less -Than- Less -Than- No X LAND USE AND PLANNING: Would the project: Significant Significant With Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated a) Physically divide an established community? x b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction overthe project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning x ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? x Discussion: a) The project isamultiple-family development located inanarea that iszoned for this use, and issurrounded byother similar or compatible uses, Residential single-family neighborhoods are separated from this development by private open space and grade separation tothe north and Churn Creek tmthe east. Therefore, the project does not have the potential bzphysically divide an established community. b) The project is compatible with the applicable policies and regulations of the City GeneralPlan and Zoning Ordinance and isnot in conflict with any other Plan adopted by a jurisdictional agency for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect. d There is no habitat conservation or natural community conservation plans that are applicable to the site. ----^~^---''. City ofRedding General Plan, Community Development Element, 2OOO City n/Redding General Plan Environmental Impact Report, 2000, 3CH#19B8O721O8 City of Redding General Plan, Natural Resources Element, 2000 S-2mp0023yLive Oak Subdivision 18 City of Redding Development Services Department Planning Division Initial Study a, b) The project site is not identified in the General Plan as having any known mineral -resource value or as being located within any "Critical Mineral Resource Overlay" area. Documentation' CA • PeAt4o Geientl • Potentially Less -Than- Less -Than- No X1. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project., Significant Significant With Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that Incorporated would be of value to the region and the residents of the State? X b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally -important mineral X resource recovery site delineated on a local General Plan, specific X plan or other land use plan? X a, b) The project site is not identified in the General Plan as having any known mineral -resource value or as being located within any "Critical Mineral Resource Overlay" area. Documentation' CA • PeAt4o Geientl • S-2017-00239 Live Oak Subdivision 19 Potentially Less -Than- Less -Than- No X111. NOISE: Would the project result in: Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact With Impact Mitigation Incorporated a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise X ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive ground- X borne vibration or ground -borne noise levels? c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in x the project vicinity above levels existingwithout the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the X project? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project X expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project X area to excessive noise levels? S-2017-00239 Live Oak Subdivision 19 City mRedding Development Services Department Planning Division Q MCI 03 MR Initial Study a, b, c) The [by of Redding General Plan Noise Element establishes GQ d8 Ldn as the standard acceptable exterior noise level for residential land use and 45dB Ldn for interior noise levels (40clB in sleeping areas). The projectsite islocated northwest of Old Alturas Road and Victor Avenue and the existing noise environment is defined primarily by traffic on Old Alturas Road, An acoustical analysis was prepared for the subdivision project by Saxelby Acoustics, dated November 27, 2017. Toquantify the existing ambient noise environment on the project site, Saxelby Acoustics conducted a noise measurement survey, The study then utilized the Federal Highway Administration Traffic Noise Prediction Model to estimate future traffic volumes for the year 2037 using a one percent increase per year over existing (2012) daily traffic volumes obtained from the City of Redding Public Works Department, The study also tookinto consideration the setback to the project buildings and accounted for the proposed 6 -foot -tall sound wall that would be constructed on either a 5 -foot -tall retaining wall or graded slope adjacent to the street. Traff ic noise levels at the individual first floor patios for lots adjacent to Old Alturas Road would be 60 dBA Ld, while the group gathering outdoor activity areas would be55d8A Ld, or less. Therefore, with the installation of the standard solid arterial block wall noise barrier, traffic noise would be attenuated to an acceptable level. Based onatypical 25dBexterior tointerior noise level reduction achieved by modern building construction, an interior noise level of 45 dBA Ld, would be excepted, therefore, no interior noise control measures would be required to achieve compliance with the City's interior noise level standards. There are no non -transportation -related or vibration -generating sources in the general vicinity of the project. d) During the construction of the proposed project, there will be a temporary increase in noise in the project vicinity above existing ambient noise levels. The most noticeable construction noise will berelated tograding, utility excavation, and land -clearing activity. The City's Grading Ordinance (RMC Chapter 16.12.120.H) limits grading -permit -authorized activities to between the hours of 7:00 a.m.and 7:OOp.m.,Monday through Saturday, Nnoperations are allowed nnSunday. Since heavy construction work associated with the project is limited in scope and by existing regulation, the anticipated noise impact to neighboring residents is considered less than significant. e,0 The proposed subdivision site is not located within any of the noise contours of Redding Municipal Airport and is located approximately 5 miles from the Airport. There are no private airstrips in the vicinity of the project site. Documentation: City qfRedding General Plan, Noise Element, 2000 City of Redding Grading Ordinance Redding Municipal Code, Section 16.12.120 City qƒRedding General Plan, Transportation Element, 200O City ofRedding Zoning Ordinance Redding Municipal Code, Section 18.40.100 City ofRedding Municipal Airport Area Plan Live Oak Estates Residential, prepared by Saxelby Acoustics, dated November 27, 2017 Mitigation: None necessary. S-2o17-0023sLive Oak Subdivision 20 Potentially Less -Than- Less -Than- No XI II. POPULATION AND HOUSING: Would the project. Significant Significant With Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other x b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? x c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? x S-2o17-0023sLive Oak Subdivision 20 City of Redding Development Services Department Planning Division Initial I Study project would create opportunity for the construction of new multiple -family units as planned and anticipated by the Redding General Plan. As previously noted, the project is similar to • developments in the area or in character with surrounding land uses. The project would not induce unplanned population growth and does not propose the extension of any new roads or utilities not anticipated by the General Plan. The project does not displace substantial numbers of people or substantial numbers of existing housing, The project will be providing housing. Documentation: #- 8, XIV. PUBLIC SERVICES: Would the project result in substantial adverse Potentially Less -Than- Less -Than- No physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered Significant Significant With Significant Impact governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental Impact Mitigation Impact facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental Incorporated impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Fire Protection? x Police Protection? x Schools? x Parks? x Other public facilities? X The City would provide police and fire protection to the project from existing facilities and under existing service eve s. T e size o t e project would not mandate the need for additional police or fire facilities. The project is subject to Chapter 16.20 of the Redding Municipal Code, which requires new development to pay a citywide fire facilities - impact fee calculated to mitigate a project's fair share of cumulative impacts to the City's fire -protection infrastructure based upon improvements necessary to accommodate new development under the City's General Plan. The project is located in the Enterprise Elementary School District and Shasta Union High School District and may contribute to the total student enrollment in these districts. However, a school -facility impact (in -lieu) fee exists, as provided under State law that is paid prior to the issuance of a building permit for each residential unit to address school -facility funding necessitated by the effects of growth citywide. The project will not cause a physical deterioration of an existing park facility or cause an adverse physical impact associated with a new park facility. The project is subject to Chapter 16.20 of the Redding Municipal Code, which requires new residential development to pay a citywide park and recreation -facilities impact fee calculated to mitigate a project's fair share of cumulative impacts to the City's parks and recreation infrastructure based upon improvements necessary to accommodate new development under the City's General Plan. See discussion under Item XVI (Recreation) below. 5-2017-00239 dive Oak Subdivi5ion 21 City of Redding Development Services Department Planning Division Other publicfacilities: See discussion under Item XVIII (Utilities and Service Systems) below. City ofRedding General Plan Public Facilities Element, 2000 Mitigation: None necessary. Initial Study Discussion: a, b) The project will not cause a physical deterioration of an existing recreation facilitynrcause onadverse physical impact associated with anew recreation facility. Chapter 17.42 of the City's Subdivision Ordinance, Parkand Recreational Land Dedications and In -Lieu Fees, requires that as a condition of approval of a tentative map, a subdivider shall either dedicate land or pay a fee in lieu thereof for park or recreation purposes. In accordance with state subdivision law, only projects containing 50 or more lots maybe required todedicate land for park development. Therefore, the project proponent would be subject to the in -lieu fee that will contribute to providing urimproving recreational facilities throughout the city. However, proposed under the Planned Development Plan for the project are two groups gathering areas that will provide residents with outdoor space including a small turf area, walking path, benches and picnic/barbeque area for outdoor gatherings and provide recreational opportunities. City uƒRedding General Plan, Natural Resources Element, 2OOO City ofRedding General Plan Recreation Element, 2OOO City of Redding General Plan, Public Facilities Element, 2000 Mitigation: None necessary. Potentially Less -Than- Less -Than- No XV. BECREATION: Significant Significant With significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact incorporated a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and X regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? X b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an x adverse physical effect on the environment? Discussion: a, b) The project will not cause a physical deterioration of an existing recreation facilitynrcause onadverse physical impact associated with anew recreation facility. Chapter 17.42 of the City's Subdivision Ordinance, Parkand Recreational Land Dedications and In -Lieu Fees, requires that as a condition of approval of a tentative map, a subdivider shall either dedicate land or pay a fee in lieu thereof for park or recreation purposes. In accordance with state subdivision law, only projects containing 50 or more lots maybe required todedicate land for park development. Therefore, the project proponent would be subject to the in -lieu fee that will contribute to providing urimproving recreational facilities throughout the city. However, proposed under the Planned Development Plan for the project are two groups gathering areas that will provide residents with outdoor space including a small turf area, walking path, benches and picnic/barbeque area for outdoor gatherings and provide recreational opportunities. City uƒRedding General Plan, Natural Resources Element, 2OOO City ofRedding General Plan Recreation Element, 2OOO City of Redding General Plan, Public Facilities Element, 2000 Mitigation: None necessary. smoa02anmmOak Subdivision 22 Potentially Less -Than- Less -Than- No XVI. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFI . Would the project: Significant Significant With Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in eitherthe number of vehicle trips, the X volume -to -capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at b) Exceed, ither individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the County congestion management x agency for designated roads or highway? smoa02anmmOak Subdivision 22 City of Redding Development Services Department Planning Division Initial Study XVI. TRANSPORTATIQNITRAFFIC: Would the project, Potentially Significant Less -Than- Significant With Less -Than- significant No Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase In traffic levels or a change in location that results in x substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g,, sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., X farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? x f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? x g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans or programs supporting x alternative transportation (e.g, bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? 7119AMEM a, b, d) The Transportation Element of the GeneralPlon establishes acceptable peak -hour "Level of Service (LOS) criteria for roadways and intersections for use in transportation planning and project review. The LOS methodology is an established way of ranking the degree of traffic -flow efficiency and congestion. For most of the City, LOS "C" or "acceptable delay" is identified as the maximum allowable threshold before a more congested and potentially significant traffic condition occurs. Forstatehighway interchange connections with local streets, a maximum LOS "D" or "tolerable delay" is established. A thorough explanation of LOS methodology is provided in the Transportation Element and the Transportation and Circulation Section of the General Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR). Access to the subdivision would be derived from Old Alturas Road in two locations. Phase I and 2 would take access from the westerly driveway shown on the tentative map while Phase 3 would necessitate second access that would be located at the intersection of Old Alturas Road and Victor Avenue, essentially forming the fourth leg of the all -way stop intersection. To help assess potential LOS and traffic -movement impacts, a focused Troffic impact Analysis Memorandum was prepared by Omni Means, A GHD Company, for the project and dated September 27, 2017, The memo analyzed project impacts during both AM and PM peak hour for both existing conditions and cumulative (year 2037) conditions for the intersection of Old Alturas Road and Victor Avenue and the project's westerly driveway. The impact analysis indicates that the current old Alturas Road and Victor Avenue intersection operates at an acceptable level in the existing and the existing plus project condition (LOS Q however, operates at an unacceptable level in the cumulative condition both with and without the project (LOS F in the PM peak hour). However, the delay between the cumulative condition with and without the project is increased by less than 5 seconds (the City's threshold for significance) at an already unacceptable intersection, therefore it would not be considered a significant impact associated with the project and no mitigation is warranted. The project's westerly driveway however would operate at acceptable levels in all conditions. RAW Improvement Plam A preliminarv_design-lay-n-i-tt-hRs- been completed by Omni MeansThis preliminary design was utilized with the tentative subdivision map layout in order to a4eijuate Wil st constructed to access the project and provide second access with a minimum of 20 feet in width. Construction of project �W�Memro #*v 61,4-1 d1&te'irr,--&&_,MF.g i-mewsy—a-ec&3T*#i caet a nrl vv*,er4-teit v w eld-iat� � eceis provided from the new project driveway. The project is subject to Chapter 16,20 of the Redding Municipal Code, which requires new development to pay a citywide transportation development impact fee calculated to mitigate a project's fair share of cumulative impacts to the City's street - S -2017-00239 Live Oak Subdivision 23 City ofRedding Development Services Department Planning Division Initial Study and traffic -control infrastructure based upon improvements necessary to accommodate new development under the City's General Plan, c) The project site is located outside the Approach Zones for both the Redding Municipal Airportand Benton AirpaMk;therefore, there is no potential to interfere with airport operations. No impacts are anticipated in this regard. e) The General Plan Health and Safety Policies HS41 and HS41 generally require that residential development having 50 or more dwelling units have atleast two points ofpublic-street access and that cu|de-sacordead-end street lengths not exceed 6OOfeet. The project includes atotal ofG4lots and aosecond access brequired. Asnoted above, access tothe subdivision would be derived from Old Alturas Road in two locations, The westerly driveway would be provide adequate access for the 40 lots to be developed with Phase 1 and 2, however, development of Phase 3 would necessitate second access that would belocated atthe intersection of Old Alturas Road and Victor Avenue, essentially forming the fourth leg of the all -way stop intersection. The Redding Fire Marshal would require the second access be a minimum of a 20 -foot -wide driveway which would be adequate for emergency access and fire protection. f) Duplex units require a minimum of one covered and one uncovered parking space while the 4-plex unitswould require upbmZ uncovered spaces. Adequate parking has been provided to meet the minimum and parking would not be a significant impact, 8) The City's Bikeway Action Plan 2010-2015 identifies Old Alturas Road as an existing Class 3 bikeway that is proposed to be upgraded to Class Zwith development. However, the City has just recently completed the Active Transportation Pbn(AJP)thatmmu{dmynmaoan update to that plan. That document, which is in draft form and recently released for review, identifies old Alturas Road, as a Shared Use Path which could consist of an 8 -foot -wide sidewalk/path shared by pedestrians and bicyclist, adjacent to the roadway (i.e. side path) as well as Buffered Bike Lanes. The ATP also identifies this section of Old Alturas Road, between Browning Street and Victor Avenue, as a priority pedestrian project. Redding Area Bus Authority (RABA) serves this area with several bus routes; however, the project site isalso located within walking distance (.7 mile) from the RABA Canby Road Transfer Station, facilitating use of transit options throughout the City, Conditions of approval will require improvements along the frontage of Old Alturas, Road to accommodate pedestrians and bicycles and would not conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation. Documentation: City n/Redding General Plan, Transportation Element, 2000 City of Redding General Plan Environmental impact Report, 2000, 5CH #1998072103 City ofRedding Parks, Trails, and Open Space Muster Plan, ZOUZ City ufRedding Traffic Impact Fee Program City ofRedding BikewoyAction Plan 2D10_Z015 Redding Area Bus Authority System Map and Route Guide, October 2OOO City ofRedding Active Transportation Plan, February ZD2BDraft Traffic Impact Analysis Memorandum, prepared by Omni Means, a GHD Company, dated September 27, 2017 Mitigation: None necessary. s2017-0023yLive Oak Subdivision 24 Potentially Less -Than- Less -Than- No XVII. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES: Would the project cause a substantial Significant Significant With Significant Impact adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Impact Mitigation Impact Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural Incorporated landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is: a) Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public X Resources Code section 5020.1(k), or s2017-0023yLive Oak Subdivision 24 City of Redding Development Services Department Planning Division Initial Study As discussed under Section V, Cultural Resources, a Cultural Resources Assessment for the project site, including a field survey and archival research, and a record search at the Northeast Information Center was conducted by Gallaway Enterprises. A mixed reconnaissance and intensive -level pedestrian was conducted on April 14, 2017, covering the entire area of potential effect to identify the presence or absence of historic resources and to evaluate the significance of any identified archaeological resources. The results of the record search indicate that three previous cultural resource surveys have been undertaken within the project site with no prehistoric and one historic site having been recorded. A previous cultural resource inventory conducted in 2006 detailed the recorded site for the residential homestead, including a house, barn, and outbuildings on the western parcel, known as "Little Rags." In 220, the structures lacked integrity and were not recommended as eligible for the California Register of Historic Resources (CRHR). The survey results indicate that the site had undergone significant modification since 2006 and the structures had all been demolished. On the eastern parcel, the structures constructed in 1957 and 1965 were still standing and currently inhabited. However, both structures have been updated, undergone intense remodeling, and neither maintains the integrity of the initial construction. Therefore the eastern portion of the site is not eligible for CRHIR or the National Registry of Historic Places. In consideration of the findings of the record search and pedestrian survey, no impacts in this area are anticipated. Regarding Native American Outreach, the City of Redding sent notification of the project to the California Native American tribes that have requested notification, Redding Rancheria and Wintu Tribe of Northern California, on March 14, 2017 and May 5, 2017, respectively. No request for consultation was initiated or received. Documentation: Cultural Resource Assessment, prepared by Gallaway Enterprises, dated April 2017. • Potentially Less -Than- Less -Than- No XVIL TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project cause a substantial Significant Significant With Significant Impact adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Impact Mitigation Impact Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural Incorporated landscape that Is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native x American tribe, and that is: b) A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported x by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying the X criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024,1 In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resource Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe. As discussed under Section V, Cultural Resources, a Cultural Resources Assessment for the project site, including a field survey and archival research, and a record search at the Northeast Information Center was conducted by Gallaway Enterprises. A mixed reconnaissance and intensive -level pedestrian was conducted on April 14, 2017, covering the entire area of potential effect to identify the presence or absence of historic resources and to evaluate the significance of any identified archaeological resources. The results of the record search indicate that three previous cultural resource surveys have been undertaken within the project site with no prehistoric and one historic site having been recorded. A previous cultural resource inventory conducted in 2006 detailed the recorded site for the residential homestead, including a house, barn, and outbuildings on the western parcel, known as "Little Rags." In 220, the structures lacked integrity and were not recommended as eligible for the California Register of Historic Resources (CRHR). The survey results indicate that the site had undergone significant modification since 2006 and the structures had all been demolished. On the eastern parcel, the structures constructed in 1957 and 1965 were still standing and currently inhabited. However, both structures have been updated, undergone intense remodeling, and neither maintains the integrity of the initial construction. Therefore the eastern portion of the site is not eligible for CRHIR or the National Registry of Historic Places. In consideration of the findings of the record search and pedestrian survey, no impacts in this area are anticipated. Regarding Native American Outreach, the City of Redding sent notification of the project to the California Native American tribes that have requested notification, Redding Rancheria and Wintu Tribe of Northern California, on March 14, 2017 and May 5, 2017, respectively. No request for consultation was initiated or received. Documentation: Cultural Resource Assessment, prepared by Gallaway Enterprises, dated April 2017. • 5-2017-00239 Live Oak Subdivision 25 Potentially Less -Than- Less -Than- No XVIII. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS: Would the project: Significant Significant With Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? x b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing x facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? 5-2017-00239 Live Oak Subdivision 25 City of Redding Development Services Department Planning Division Initial Study a, b, d, e) Adequate utilities and service systems are available to the project; therefore the project would have no impact or the potential impacts to utilities are considered less than significant. Water and sewer service will be provided by the City of Redding with connection to existing mains in Old Alturas Road. The proposed development would not generate wastewater demands that would exceed treatment requirements of the Regional Water Quality Control Board and does not generate the need for the construction of new water or wastewater -treatment facilities. Adequate sewer capacity is available in the City's existing system. Water is available from the City to serve the project with adequate pressure and flows for fire suppression. The demands of the project can be accommodated within the City's existing water resources. However, the project is subject to Chapter 16,20 of the Redding Municipal Code, which requires new development to pay water- and sewer -impact fees calculated to mitigate a project's fair share of cumulative impacts to the City's water and sewer distribution, collection, and treatment infrastructure based upon improvements necessary to accommodate new development under the City's General Plan, c) Storm waterwill be collected and detained on site in an underground conveyance system in accordance with city construction standards and City Policy 1806 pertaining to storm water detention (also see IX, Hydrology and Water Quality, d and e), Storm water would then be discharged to Churn Creek in the northeast corner of the site. The project is also subject to Chapter 16.20 of the Redding Municipal Code, which requires new development to pay a storm -drainage impact fee calculated to mitigate a project's fair share of cumulative impacts to the City's storm -drain infrastructure based upon improvements necessary to accommodate new development under the City's General Plan. f, g) The City provides solid waste disposal service which the project would utillzeThe duplex units in Phase 1 and 2 would be served by curbside pick-up for garbage and recycling while Phase 3 Would be provided service of both With installation of a community enclosure. Adequate capacity is available to serve the needs of the project without need o specia accommodation, T e City regulates and operates programs that promote the proper disposal of toxic and hazardous materials from households, including those created by the project. Documentation: City of Redding General Plan, Public Facilities Elements, 2000 City of Redding Water and Sewer Atlas 5-2017-00239 Live Oak Subdivision 26 Potentially Less -Than- Less -Than- No XVIII. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS: Would the project: Significant Significant With Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the x construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project which serves or may serve the projectfrorn existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? x e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate x capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? x g) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations I related to solid waste? x a, b, d, e) Adequate utilities and service systems are available to the project; therefore the project would have no impact or the potential impacts to utilities are considered less than significant. Water and sewer service will be provided by the City of Redding with connection to existing mains in Old Alturas Road. The proposed development would not generate wastewater demands that would exceed treatment requirements of the Regional Water Quality Control Board and does not generate the need for the construction of new water or wastewater -treatment facilities. Adequate sewer capacity is available in the City's existing system. Water is available from the City to serve the project with adequate pressure and flows for fire suppression. The demands of the project can be accommodated within the City's existing water resources. However, the project is subject to Chapter 16,20 of the Redding Municipal Code, which requires new development to pay water- and sewer -impact fees calculated to mitigate a project's fair share of cumulative impacts to the City's water and sewer distribution, collection, and treatment infrastructure based upon improvements necessary to accommodate new development under the City's General Plan, c) Storm waterwill be collected and detained on site in an underground conveyance system in accordance with city construction standards and City Policy 1806 pertaining to storm water detention (also see IX, Hydrology and Water Quality, d and e), Storm water would then be discharged to Churn Creek in the northeast corner of the site. The project is also subject to Chapter 16.20 of the Redding Municipal Code, which requires new development to pay a storm -drainage impact fee calculated to mitigate a project's fair share of cumulative impacts to the City's storm -drain infrastructure based upon improvements necessary to accommodate new development under the City's General Plan. f, g) The City provides solid waste disposal service which the project would utillzeThe duplex units in Phase 1 and 2 would be served by curbside pick-up for garbage and recycling while Phase 3 Would be provided service of both With installation of a community enclosure. Adequate capacity is available to serve the needs of the project without need o specia accommodation, T e City regulates and operates programs that promote the proper disposal of toxic and hazardous materials from households, including those created by the project. Documentation: City of Redding General Plan, Public Facilities Elements, 2000 City of Redding Water and Sewer Atlas 5-2017-00239 Live Oak Subdivision 26 City ofRedding Development Services Department Planning Division Mitigation: None necessary. Initial Study Based on the analysis undertaken as part of this Initial Study, the following findings can be made: a) As discussed under Item |V, Biological Resources, if unmitigated, the project has the potential to result /n impacts to species protected undertheK48TAthaimaybenestingwithinthe projectsite and potentially the loss ofjurisdictional Waters oftheUnited States. Mitigation Measure 1 and 2 are established to reduce potential impact to less than significant. b) As discussed in Section V, the project will contribute to region wide cumulative air quality impacts. However, under policy mfthe GeneolPlan application ofexisting grading andconstrucdonstoxdaobmjUreducepoienda|impaoi hom1h|spnojeottuakeve|kess than significant. C) As discussed herein, the project does not have characteristics which could cause substantial adverse effects on human beings,either directly or indirectly. S-2oo-00239Live Oak Subdivision 27 Potentially Less -Than- Less -Than- No XVIV. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE: Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact with Impact Mitigation Incorporated a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below the self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, x reduce the number or restrictthe range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate Important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in x connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? c) Doesthe project have potential environmental effects which maycause X substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or Based on the analysis undertaken as part of this Initial Study, the following findings can be made: a) As discussed under Item |V, Biological Resources, if unmitigated, the project has the potential to result /n impacts to species protected undertheK48TAthaimaybenestingwithinthe projectsite and potentially the loss ofjurisdictional Waters oftheUnited States. Mitigation Measure 1 and 2 are established to reduce potential impact to less than significant. b) As discussed in Section V, the project will contribute to region wide cumulative air quality impacts. However, under policy mfthe GeneolPlan application ofexisting grading andconstrucdonstoxdaobmjUreducepoienda|impaoi hom1h|spnojeottuakeve|kess than significant. C) As discussed herein, the project does not have characteristics which could cause substantial adverse effects on human beings,either directly or indirectly. S-2oo-00239Live Oak Subdivision 27 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Live Oak Subdivision and Planned Development Plan MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM CONTENTS This document is the Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) for the Live Oak Subdivision and Planned Development Plan. The MMP includes a brief discussion of the legal basis for and the purpose of the program, discussion, and direction regarding complaints about noncompliance, a key to understanding the monitoring matrix, and the monitoring matrix itself. LEGAL BASIS OF AND PURPOSE FOR THE MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM California Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 requires public agencies to adopt mitigation monitoring or reporting programs whenever certifying an environmental impact report (EIR) or a mitigated negative declaration. This requirement facilitates implementation of all mitigation measures adopted through the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) process. The MMP contained herein is intended to satisfy the requirements of CEQA as they relate to the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for Live Oak Subdivision and Planned Development. It is intended to be used by City of Redding (City) staff, participating agencies, project contractors, and mitigation monitoring personnel during implementation of the project. Mitigation is defined by CEQA Guidelines Section 15370 as a measure that does any of the following: Avoids impacts altogether by not taking a certain action or parts of an action. • Minimizes impacts by limiting the degree or magnitude of the action and its implementation. Rectifies impacts by repairing, rehabilitating or restoring the impacted environment. Reduces or eliminates impacts over time by preservation and maintenance operations during the life of the project. • Compensates for impacts by replacing or providing substitute resources or environments. The intent of the MMP is to ensure the effective implementation and enforcement of adopted mitigation measures and permit conditions. The MMP will provide for monitoring of construction activities as necessary, on-site identification and resolution of environmental problems, and proper reporting to City staff. Mitigation Moniforingh-ograin, S-2017-00239, Live Oak Subdivivion -I- "al Packet Pg. 147 1 MITIGATION MONITORING TABLE The Mitigation Monitoring Table identifies the mitigation measures proposed for the Live Oak Subdivision and Planned Development Plan. These mitigation measures are reproduced from the Initial Study and conditions of approval for the project. The tables have the following columns: Mitigation Measure: Lists the mitigation measures identified within the Initial Study for a specific impact, along with the number for each measure as enumerated in the Initial Study. Timing: Identifies at what point in time, review process, or phase the mitigation measure will be completed. Agency/Department Consultation: References the City department or any other public agency with which coordination is required to satisfy the identified mitigation measure. Verification: Spaces to be initialed and dated by the individual designated to verify adherence to a specific mitigation measure. NONCOMPLiANcr,, COMPLAINTS Any person or agency may file a complaint asserting noncompliance with the mitigation measures associated with the project. The complaint shall be directed to the City in written form, providing specific information on the asserted violation. The City shall conduct an investigation and determine the validity of the complaint. If noncompliance with a mitigation measure has occurred, the City shall take appropriate action to remedy any violation, The complainant shall receive written confirmation indicating the results of the investigation or the final action corresponding to the particular noncompliance issue. Mitigation Moniforing Program, S-2017-00,139, Live OakSubdivision -2 dl Packet Pg. 148 4 1, }" aha .15 � J8 8 . '1-, � bi1 > 'CS 0 ctf cC-7c to ,..,.� "�+` � H O to ai O �j C3n tC `!"''-� 47 }-` 4J F -e C7 "f3 Q C�7 O '—� (U OR a> o .a to o o m ." *oco�� 90 '' cn tall OD > o as o to o mo� o ti' � 40, � o o to � � � ��y t tip , -5 .= ,= fr' ` -v o. t�sj e cn 2 � R CU Lit c�.sv ° �z Hcy a iJ o 0 c3 f ca¢z is cd cd 0 -d 3cct av c"tr o . ' o OR P air w' ccs i1 Cy' 0a � caO N q} r � any, w O E a o� ,� g ccs na r� v - w a ? U) w wok 0, `� — n o ,A 0 cd In P,0 —C8 u°.}. 3 : id c# . O � O P. O 2 9 r� c` i� "� Cr 0 Q, r, H H H •� bA a Rt 4 1, }" aha .15 � J8 8 . '1-, � bi1 > 'CS 0 ctf cC-7c to ,..,.� "�+` � H O to ai O �j C3n tC `!"''-� 47 }-` 4J F -e C7 "f3 Q C�7 O '—� (U OR a> o .a to o o m ." *oco�� 90 '' cn tall OD > o as o to o mo� o ti' � 40, � o o to � � � ��y t tip , -5 .= ,= fr' ` -v o. t�sj e cn 2 � R CU Lit c�.sv ° �z Hcy a iJ o 0 c3 f ca¢z is cd cd 0 -d 3cct av c"tr o . ' o OR P air w' ccs i1 Cy' 0a � caO N q} r � any, w O E a o� ,� g ccs na r� v - w a ? U) w wok 0, `� — n o ,A 0 cd In P,0 —C8 u°.}. 3 : id c# . O � O P. O 2 9 r� c` i� "� Cr 0 Q, r, From: To: BurkeUnda co Heflman Paul; Subject: Live Oak Subdivision located on omxlturas Road Date: Wednesday, March ao.znznn:z4:noxM Dear Ms. Burke, My staff and I have discussed the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Live Oak Subdivision located onOld A|turasRoad. The Department appreciates the City ofRedding utilizing residential infill opportunities for this parcel. However, the Department has some concerns over the [EQA process followed as well as some minor comments regarding the project itself. State Clearinghouse Per CEQA Guidelines sections 15073(d) and 15205, the CEQA Lead Agency must submit a draft environmental impact report (EIR), negative declaration (ND), or mitigated negative declaration (MND) to the State Clearinghouse when any of the following are true: • Draft EIRs and NDs (including MNDs) prepared by a state agency where such agency is a Lead Agency. • Draft E|Rsand NDs UndodinQMNDs\ prepared by public agency where a state agency is a Responsible Agency, Trustee Agency, or otherwise has jurisdiction by law with respect to the project. � Draft BRS and NDs on projects identified in Section 15206 as being of statewide, regional or area wide significance. 0 Draft ElSs, environmental assessments and findings of no significant impact prepared pursuant to NEPA, the Federal Guidelines (Title 40 CFR, Part 1580, commencing with Section CDFVV is always a trustee agency whenever o project may have any effect on fish and wildlife of the state, even if that effect is considered less than significant by the lead agency, therefore, the project should have gone through the State Clearinghouse process. Wetlands A small wetland feature was described in the Preliminary Resource Evaluation (PRE) dated October 24, 2016, and prepared by Gallaway Enterprises, but no formal wetland delineation was conducted. In order for the Department to analyze and comment on biological resources, it is imperative we have all the necessary information. The first question that israised iswhether nrnot there are jurisdictional wetlands present onsite, and if there are, if those wetlands will be impacted. If the answer to both of those questions is yes, then the amount of wetland impacted should be disclosed aswell asthe proposed mitigation. The Department considers any impacts towetlands significant and opposes development or conversion of wetlands unless the mitigation assures there will be "no net loss" of wetlands. Mitigation for wetlands typically begin ata 2:1 ratio and 8o higher if listed species are present. If wetlands are present, and are proposed for development, avoidance, minimization or mitigation measures need to be developed prior the approval of the project. Special Status Species The PRE states the general botanical survey was conducted outside the blooming period for most flowering plants. One special status species, Redding checkerbloom (Sidolcea celoto), a California Rare Plant Rank 3 species was noted as having the potential to occur within the oak woodland portion. The PRE goes on to say no focused surveys were necessary because this portion of the site will be avoided. The oak woodland area proposed for avoidance will become "private open space", which means the homeowners and/or renters will be able to utilize the open space for hiking, dog walking, etc. Direct and indirect impacts to the open space were not discussed in the MND. The Department recommends botanical surveys be conducted at the appropriate blooming time to determine the presence and/or absence of special status plant species. If special status species are found, appropriate avoidance and minimization measures shall be developed to reduce any significant impacts to less than significant. Additionally, the Initial Study states, "the status as a California Rare Plant Rank 3 (more information) does not currently warrant mitigation requirements by California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFDW). California Rare Plant Rank 3 is defined as: "All of the plants constituting California Rare Plant Rank 3 meet the definitions of the California Endangered Species Act of the California Department of Fish and Game Code, and are eligible for state listing. Impacts to these species or their habitat must be analyzed during preparation of environmental documents relating to CEQA, or those considered to be functionolly equivalent to CEQA, as they meet the definition of Rare or Endangered under CEQA Guidelines §15125 (c) andjor §15380." 1 The Department works in collaboration with the California Native Plant Society and with botanical experts throughout the state to maintain an Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants, and the similar Special Vascular Plants, Bryophytes, and Lichens List. Species on these lists may meet the CEQA definition of rare or endangered. As the trustee agency for the wildlife of California, which includes plants, ecological communities and the habitat upon which they depend, the Department advises public agencies during the CEQA process to help ensure that the actions they approve do not significantly impact such resources. The Department often advises that plant species with an appropriate rare plant rank in the Inventory be properly analyzed by the lead agency during project review to ensure compliance with CEQA. If you have any questions, please contact either Amy Henderson, Environmental Scientist, at (530) 225-2779, or by email at Amy.Henderson{%wildlife.ca. ov or myself. Michael Harris Senior Environmental Scientist California Department of Fish & Wildlife Northern Region - Interior Conservation Planning (530) 225-2306 W http://www.cnps.org/cnps/rarepIants/ranking.php From: Burke. Linda To: Henderson, Amy &wildlife (Amv.Henderson cuwildlife.ca. ov) Subject: Live Oak Estates Date: Thursday, April 5, 2018 7:55:16 AM Attachments: imaae001.pnng Good morning Amy, We are in receipt of comments from Senior Environmental Scientist, Michael Harris, regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration for Tentative Subdivision Map S-2017-00239 and Planned Development Plan PD -2017-00241, Live Oak Estates. Below is a brief response to those comments. Please let me know if you have any further questions or concerns you would like to discuss. Thank you, Linda State Clearinghouse The City of Redding's past practice has not typically sent all Negative Declarations through the State Clearinghouse, particularly when a project would warrant a Lake or Streambed Alteration Permit for only minor improvements such as the stormwater outfall, as is the case with this project. If the project involves major issues with fish and wildlife resources, however, the City would be in contact with the DFW through the early planning stages and the environmental document would be sent through the State Clearinghouse. In this case, agency comments were requested in March 2017, however no comments were received and there was no indication that anything other than standard operating procedure should be followed. Wetlands The wetland area was disclosed in the Preliminary Resource Evaluation conducted by Galloway Enterprises as being .001 acres. However staff acknowledged it may not have been clear in the narrative that the grading plan shows avoidance of the area as it is located adjacent to the west property line. The mitigation measure was added as precautionary in the event the preliminary grading plan needed to be modified and fill necessary. The applicant's engineer however does not anticipate filling the wetland. Special Status Species According to California Department of Fish and Wildlife California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB) and California Native Plant Society information, a California Rare Plant Rank 3 are those for which more information is needed to assign them to one of the other lists or reject them. The definition states that many, but not all Rank 3 plants meet the definition of the California Endangered Species Act and are eligible for listing. In this case, the area of avoidance that will be designated "private open space" will be separated from the usable portion of the lot by a 4 to 5 - foot -high retaining wall and is a rather steep slope, and therefore not suitable for hiking or dog walking, affording protection to potential Rank 3 plant species. Linda Burke, Associate Planner City of Redding Development Services Department nw 61'c..c�. u - a w wZR 19 N a - 'qu!w a. va c5 ca> sa •- RR: u i 5 -ca z cr sa o w C} Ci. zc ac tr„i 9 t] i bars ! a2a. 59, lq offr"- � zro, t'a c� .w n M n co If } �y 1n CD zii IMY ity 1 z~ jj INOR �� s � �„.ytw l'�"�4S ss+s�lSfiy'n•- v 4 i 1 w"yl � d�s � � � •: w t L ��" � �3 3 1iw 1 "4N, 'oll-"��,� &1 oo0 , t 1 `v } t i4 a d A is v .i[3.. ., �t �£L iP, C9 tS ZI K{S'tiS 1.4C RAO id 'nod) �bl ss ri:Q of "X X id 'nod) �bl ss ri:Q "X X -xT I V41 gaLl -R, x x x7 X' /4 - J '-, — — — t5 :Z- LLJ Lr CL 2 F- < _ Cl QIx m :0; pp 10 u a uj oaaoa O �__ �� -j :Z- LLJ Lr CL w _ O r U 0111M sacra bn U •�` °" R� � � �C7cE � as a® � r CITY OF REDDING MEETING DATE: May 1; 2018 FROM: Larry Vaupel, Development ITEM NO. 6.2 Services Director [S -101 -152/L -010-230/C-1 10-100] ***APPROVED BY*** £orris � 1 t titt.f4 st,Y 3 t4,�� 'c:,: in,Ci to 'e 4J2312018 ry ai el ', "F icesBirectc�r'r=rkrt,ij4/19/2618 )7i rfs tlt{J + fSi Ivaupel cityofr btippin*_dtyofredding.org MFs f r f SUBJECT:lic Hearing .`grding Tentative Subdivision Map submitted by Omni, LLC, for Listates to include ''Adoption of Mitigated Negative Declaration, Ordinance approving Rung Application, approval of Tentative Subdivision Map Application and Planned Develoitr� `1 Plan pplicatioptvide 8 acres into 26 multiple -family residential lots for development 1 units. The project includes a rezoning to add the "PD" Plannethe existing "RM -12" Residential Multiple Family District. �� } �„ `' IE }' 4, n`USiq,+f� ,miff F ," r t f3 Fr' n. Recommendation ry tzJ j ss r Conduct a Public Hearing and, upon conclusio'1j4`{,'`" (1) Adopt the Mitigated Negative De ....14 upon a }£� {sttjtrl findings for approval are in evide 1 { , (2) Offer Ordinance approving Rttig A��,tzs' located at 1320 and 1368 Old Aluras Roac]`ts��=1 with Planned Development Overlay District, for first the City Attorney to prepare and the City Clerk to pub] (3) Approve Tentative Subdivision Map Application Subdivision; and (4) Approve Planned Development Plan Apphcatl6 j } Alternative Action ion that the necessary 017-, 0 consisting of 8 acres PD",£�sidential Multiple Family gqr adii,r v title on1=.and authorize -00241. Oak Estates The City Council (Council) could approve the project with modifications to the zoning, planned development plan, and/or conditions of approval deemed necessary to support the project based on the findings attached to this report, or deny the project. Denial of the project must be based upon a finding that the project is inconsistent with the General Plan or other City of Redding (City) development standards or poses a threat to public health, safety, or welfare. Staff has not identified any justification for denial of the project. Report to Redding City Council April 24, 2018 Re: 6.2 --Public Hearing, Live Oak Estates Subdivision and Planned Development Plan Page 2 BackgranndfAnalysis The City of Redding Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the project at its March 27, 2018, meeting. The staff report from that meeting is attached to this report. Staff has not received any public comment regarding the project and no testimony in opposition to the project was presented to the Planning Commission. The project requires the Council's approval due to the rezoning request to add the "PD" Planned Development Overlay District to the existing "RM -12" Residential Multiple Family District zoning of the property. Omni Financial is requesting approval to subdivide approximately eight acres into 26 multiple family residential lots in three phases for development of 64 multiple -family units. Phase 1 and 2 consist of 20 lots totalst developed with a two-family dwelling unit (duplex) on each lot for a total of 40 units. six lots to be developed with a four-plex unit on each lot ,..�....3F for a total of 24�� _ `ti'uplex unify �e a mix of two- and three-bedroom units with either one or two -car gara4t t' Amenities inclii� kommon landscape throughout the development and two group gatheriu�`�reas with walking `� s, benches, and picnic or barbeque improvements. A property own association would30,ormed to address common ownership and maintenance needs. 1 The applicationtdes a District to facilitate �„ would be developed in acc design in accordance with concepts: ■ Reduced lot sizes, public' the development concept. g rectet to add the "PD" Planned Development Overlay }„�{zaj�t (draft Ordinance attached). The subdivision ,With Chapto 18.53 of the Zoning Code to allow a custom nned Develent Plan, and include the following design All duplex units are two-story and ■ All four-plex units will have ■ All units will have fenced, private backyards. with unit construction. A system of private and reciprocal easemeni parking, utility needs, and common landscape: are provided to facilitate landscaped shared vehicle access, Amenities include two group gathering areas to be constructed with Phase 2 and Phase 3. Both will include walking trails, benches, picnic or barbeque area, and/or shade structures for the enjoyment of the occupants of the development. A pedestrian trailhead access will be provided to the private open space in the northeast corner of the subdivision and a public dedication of open space will provide access to the adjacent public Churn Creek open space area. ■ A private homeowners' association would be formed to maintain all common improvements and landscape in the interior of the project. Report to Redding City Council April 24, 2018 Re: 6.2 --Public Hearing, Live Oak Estates Subdivision and Planned Development Plan Page 3 ■ A landscape maintenance district would be formed for maintenance of frontage landscape along Old Alturas Road. It is the opinion of staff that with application of the attached conditions of approval, all necessary findings for approval related to CEQA compliance, the tentative map, and the planned development plan are in evidence. The proposed rezoning to include the "PD" overlay district is appropriate to facilitate the project. The project also advances General Plan Community Development and Design Element Goal 11 and Policy IID, to ensure new residential developments are well -located and well designed with a mix of residential density and dwelling types and CDD Goal 12 and Policy 12A to ensure attractive, safe, and well-maintained neighborhoods by promoting neighborhood quality though project amenities and establishment of a homeowners' assocla, Council This agenda its'` is a routine op c Marti4l', one, Omni F Tim Attachments Findings Draft Conditions of Planning Commissit Location Map Draft Ordinance Proposed Zoning M Mitigated Negative Tentative Map Set Planned Developrne in, Sharrah Dunlap Sawyer, Inc. ENVIRONMENTAL, TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PLAN FINDINGS LIVE OAK ESTATES ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS 1. Based on the Initial Study and the information contained in the record, there will be no significant effect on the environment. A Mitigated Negative Declaration is appropriate for the project. 2. The Mitigated Negative Declaration and its supporting documentation reflect the independent j£�t{ #nalysis of the City of Redding. TENTATIVE SUB4%ION MAP To approve th`�ntative map, the Clt�`t�ouncil must fine that none of the circumstances set forth it £ t 3 in the Governnt Code of Caliform.'t111"1111111"M apter 66474.61(a) through (g) below exist: a. That th ',p�jposed map is not consistent with applicable general and specific plans as specified i`,�£�� 51 Tx�t density is within that allowed by the General Plan designat esi, 0 1 o t�jj � dwelling units per acre." The proposed net residential density is 1.1its per acre III b. That the design orimps vement of d subdivision is not consistent with applicable general and sp�j sic plaFl� a plj£development, the project's lot design conforms to the standards z� t`, Yenerlt ', �r£��5 Zoning Ordinance within the guidelines and purposes of Chapter 18£lanned ➢elopment: Construction of the project will include reduced lot t�and pub1��'j}street frontages; custom -lot configuration, and reduced buiin `=ordce with the Planned r � „ Development Plan_ £ C. That the site isnot physically suitable for the"J"of d t The steep slope area in the northwest portion of the site and the creek corridorack in thoiheast corner ��,7 tt, F. of the site which is not suitable for development will besa�r1.a private open space easement for limited passive recreational acti,�� `{"therwise, the site is physically suitable for this type of developproperty can accommodate creation of the proposed lots in accordance wihF.ianned development plan without the need for any unusual grading or construction practices. Short retaining walls will be located between lots to accommodate the level building pad on each lot, however, the private driveway through the project meets the driveway grade requirements. d. That the site is not physically suitable for the proposed density of the development. The site is suitable for the development proposed, utilizing the density allowed by the General Plan designation of "Residential, 10 to 20 dwelling units per acre." The proposed project intends to use only that portion of the site which is suitable for development and is not encumbered by steep slopes which would restrict development. Steep -slope areas will be Findings; Lime Oak Estates S-2017-00239 Page l preserved within private open space. Adequate access and utility -service capacity is available to accommodate the project. e. That the design of` the subdivision or the proposed improvements is likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fzsh or wildlife or their habitat. The proposed improvements would not cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. Mitigation measures more fully set forth in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project address the minor loss of potentially jurisdictional waters and protection measures for migratory birds during construction. The subdivision design avoids the northwest portion of the property containing steep slopes and the northeast portion of the property adjacent to the creek co 0611 will provide protection of those areas from environmental t�#7ft < damage�t,�ectos an underground storm water detention and infiltration system thl; dill meet City��irements for quantity and quality prior to discharge to Churn C, avoiding enviror�ntal damage to fish or wildlife and their habitat. f. 9 - That t sdesign of the subdi% on or type of improvements is likely to cause serious public )% lth problems. The residential project does not present any adverse impacts to public The design of the subdivision includes two driveway locations that would provide s'a,�}71,he proj�ljy'�oordance with City requirements and avoid motor vehicle injurle:k� ,��ove�f along ,�,Alturas Road include an 8 -foot -wide bike lane sir and 8-foot-widesideway`''oviding sa`,jaccess for pedestrians and bicyclists. Two group gathering areas a��tesigned into t project, as well as an access to the public trail system along Churn Cry, which outdoor activity for residents of the project, promoting a hedtf lifesty ``f,he pr��t will provide 64 individual multiple family housing units in aceith a�Cthjo1vfa{with the existing General Plan and Zoning designations for the property, s{ij; r�, That the design for the the type easements acquired by the publ(90,11 r r for acces ,,I the proposed subdivision. In thinnec Jzt� r� finds that alternate easements for access or ore will substantially equivalent to ones previously acquired by apply only to easements of record or to easements esta competent jurisdiction, and no authority is determine that the public at large has acquiri, property within the proposed subdivision. De # rovq tents will conflict with 101" ugh z,t"use of, property within zing b�may approve a map if it be pded and that these will be thy`>` '`blzc Th, l��section shall 7 bldr nt of a court of 1 legislative body to for access through or use of 1e subdivision improvements will not conflict with easements acquired for access through, or use of, property within the proposed subdivision. Conditions of approval require dedication of appropriate rights-of- way and easements for Old Alturas Road and public utilities within the project. A public open -space easement for access and trail purposes is required with recording of the final map for the area in the northeast corner of the proposed subdivision adjacent to the Churn Creek corridor. Findings, Lime Oak Estates S-2017-00239 Page 2 1. The proposed development is consistent with the goals, objectives, policies, standards, and programs of this code and of the General flan and any applicable specific plan, including density and intensity limitations that apply. The project density falls within the limitations of the property's General Plan designation of "Residential, 10 to 20 dwelling units per acre." This project's density is... Further, the Housing Element identifies the need to construct additional 3 -bedroom units in the community, a product which will be provided by the project. 2. The site for the proposed development is adequate in size and shape to accommodate said use and all jfset acks, walls d areas; landscape ,,46 uaed The projedesign satisfies all sitestandards and residents 'f ature requirei,, the City Zoning Ordinance within the guidelines and pthe "PD" District tr rtndividual lot development includes a minimum 5 -foot buildi�„Side-yard setba"a minimum 10 -foot rear -yard building setback. All garag`srking space, anisle dimensions meet the minimum standards contained in the 's Off -Street Parking Ordinance. 3. The site fc {,r ��' d Bevel � i as adequate access considering the limitations of existing and�i'64�stree� ��t"liaf F`i�a` The project will have adequate public -street rf tz ��r , g p j q access to Old Alturas ONd`d accordml�`�� City standards. A 15 -foot right-of-way dedication for a total hal"ection of 42 f'i11 be required along 01d Alturas Road. An 84 -foot -wide right -of -V meet the�y�ty's planned arterial standard for the corridor of Old Alturas Road whT§h ill mcl�x`iree 1��it wide travel lanes (one west -bound, one east -bound and a ceni�a��i''ane) ��;�proposed roundabout at Victor Avenue and tying into the existing imthJ`,,attersection of Old Alturas Road and Browning Street. Conditions of aal also requil'onstruction of an 8 -foot -wide bike lane and an 8 -foot -wide sldewA shared use , as a posed to the typical 5 foot -wide sidewalk, consistent TAN_aft Act$� t,� ransp d ion Plan that will be considered for approval by the �t Cout 7 �rtr fut�}J The westerly driveway will include a center -turn lane for access while the easterly driveway will function as the fourth leg of the future r;about for Victor Avenue and Old Alturas Road. 4. Adequate public services exist or will be provs�r4dance with the conditions of development plan approval, to serve the prop0Mli dm opment; and the approval of the proposed development will not result in a reduction of such public services to properties so as to be a detriment to public health, safety, or welfare. Adequate public-service and utility capacity is available to accommodate the project without adversely affecting overall service levels or resulting in detrimental effects to public health, safety, or welfare. Water and sewer service will be provided by the City of Redding with connection to existing mains in Old Alturas Road. Adequate capacity for both utilities and service systems are available to the project. The City would provide police and fire protection under existing services levels. The size of the project would not mandate the need for additional facilities. The project is also subject to Chapter 16.20 of the Redding Findings; Lime Oak Estates S-2017-00239 Page 3 Municipal Code which requires new development to pay water-, sewer-, storm -drain, and fire -facilities impact fees calculated to mitigate a project's fair share of cumulative impacts to the City's water, sewer, storm -drain, and fire -protection infrastructure based upon improvements necessary to accommodate new development under the City's General. Plan. 5. The proposed development, as conditioned, will not have a substantial adverse effect on surrounding property or the permitted use thereof and will be compatible with the existing and planned land use character of the surrounding area. The project proposes lots in Phase l and 2 to be developed with a duplex on each lot and a fourplex on each lot in Phase 3 with a residential density consistent with the multiple -family zoning of the property. The ��,}��fbe compatible with the densities allowable along Old Alturas Road betw, Ai'wning �t and Victor Avenue. It is also compatible with the duplex ubdlvls� �l tit tc HiQ west, as well as the mix of uses, including an apartment project "I ool, and office x, across Old Alturas Road to the south. The site is physlseparated from th��';; Jngle-family residential properties in theQuail Ridge Subdi t on by approximately to 60 feet in elevation change. s . t t, 6. The am"", is required and the manner of development adequately address all natural tt_d with the proposed development and the project site, incl in' hot�'to, �/d, fire, and slope hazards. The proposed it�'SS1t 11 ti�iY� development plan avoid;as of steep ape and is adequately conditioned to address potential fire hazard s. ditions of apal require fire -fuel management of the steep slope and open space at� by the homers' �sociation, prohibit wood fences along the units abutting the o�>0'444ace, aclude } �uirement to allow pedestrian access for Fire Department person x�jtz z;`rivalt4� open space along Churn Creek i� yt�t 3� 't tit��; for fire -protection purposes. e efisted outside of the 1.00 -year floodplain for Churn Creek. "t 7. The proposed development carragtt tt Intent ofdevelopment provisions by providing a more efficient zip >bf the � �s U, t. zce11 of architecture and site design greater than that which could be acid throughj�l� application of the base district regulations. The project provides a more efficle��c`se of th��d� which will allow a duplex or fourplex on each lot with a moderate trt t,,` z tis{ are two-story with an attached ane- or two -car garage and �w111 in��fe fenced yards. The Planned Development Plan illustrates commo& sed for the development. A property owners' association would be foalntain the two group gathering areas, open -space area, front- and rear -yard landscape on all lots and all other common landscape areas. Final site development, architectural, and landscape plans are subject to approval by the Development Services Director, in part to ensure further consistency. Findings, Lime Oak Estates S-2017-00239 Page 4 Tentative Subdivision Map Application S-2017-00239 Planned Development Application PD -2017-00241 Rezoning Application RZ-2017-00240 Live Oak Estates Subdivision Draft Conditions of Approval *Conditions marked with an asterisk are to be indicated on the final map as notes. *Conditions marked with a double asterisk are also environmental mitigation measures. General Requirements I Tentatlu`rip '`approvitl t `INSIR"ggranted for the Live Oak Estates Subdivision, allowing dlvisi }$ acres to cre�'fq ,,6 multiple -family residential lots in three phases for deveo e of a total omultiple-family units as shown on the tentative subsion map (Sheet 2 'gp ) and Planned Development Plan. Phase 1 and 2 co 44 0 lots total to developed with a two-family dwelling unit (duplex umteach lot for a total of 40 units. Phase 3 consists of 61ots to be developed sj11n with N, unit on each lot for a total of 24 units. The final map shall be preparetEt�r}e witly t�`�ttive map as approved by the City Council on Thesglemeri�£ these conditions shall prevail in the event there is n a `01J"dltlon and information or data presented on the tentative map 1i11,tir.,�3 2. The standard conditic met, except as may be 3. The developer shall note that requires payment of a fee to the for an environmental docump project proponent. in Resolution 92-18 shall be 1-11.4 of the ti3Olote Fish and Game Code Clerk for 11 Notice of Determination nt of thitl,jr ' is th,;lsponsibility of the 4. In accordance with Chapter 18;40.040 of the Zoning Co�,fiComplantvlth Map 1't + i i� d i r t shr Requirements), all conditions applicable to postsptvis�� 1 o�truction (as marked with an asterisk) shall be noted on the fi 1 �� i1er "Statement of f�4 1 xir utr}.' Conditions" to provide notification to {��1 1 �'11 ttty owners of building limitations and other requirements for the sub`dtr"`. Planned Development Plan and Site Design Requirements 5. The standard requirements of Chapter 18 (Zoning) of the Redding Municipal Code and the zoning designation underlying the "PD" Overlay shall apply, unless a special development standard is allowed pursuant to these conditions and the approved planned development plan. S-2017-00239 Live Oak Estates March 22, 2018 Draft Conditions of Approval Page 2 6. All site and building development shall be consistent with the Live Oak Estates Planned Development Plan PD -2017-00241 dated March 2018. Final plans shall be approved by the Planning Division prior to recordation of a final map or building permit for any phase of the project. These plans shall consist of a final map and development details for landscape, decorative retaining and sound wall design, improvement in the common outdoor gathering areas, trailhead improvements, lighting, and final building architectural design consistent with the City's Design Criteria for Multiple Family. 7. Prior to recordation of a final map, the developer shall create and fund a private homeowners' association to provide for the maintenance of all common areas and �t improvement,'f�`J3��ci in the planned development plan in perpetuity. The articles ,�1�ti`corporatio�f�4 and covenants, conditions, and restrictions for the homeors' associati11 be reviewed by the City Attorney. The hom�ners' association `�1 all be responsible for the maintenance of impements, lands, and f ties, including, but not limited to, the following:* a {t, All landscape, irrigation, fences, walls, and other improvements and t �} emties within all areas maintained in common by the homeowners' and south group gathering areas, and the front- ani rear }' t�area of lot. b. Common utif services and' private stormwater system including the detention/in �tlon system ,` , ` ix4 4i t t r f 44t tfr r ttj 4� 7 s C. Internal private `d$r�';' com t rk'i' `#t rp r yeas, nonpublic sidewalk or pathways, and interior project=l�ting. d. Any project entrance fe} ,t`ncluding lard{'}zpe median and monument signs. ,.544> tfi iii{{rr rattly #i �� 44S Irk {S3ttd<t { e. Trash and recycling receptacle mar erS. f Open space trailhead improvements nd fire -fuel management of the private open s,�ace -ough 12 and adjacent to Lot 15. ttr i s,I,` Formation of a private homeowners' association will obligate each lot owner within the subdivision to participate in the association. The escrow instructions for the sale of each lot shall require that the purchaser and seller of each lot sign a statement that they have read and understand this condition of sale.* 8. The internal private driveways, common parking areas, north and south group gathering area improvements, including landscape and irrigation system, and open space trailhead shall be completed by the developer and approved by the City prior to issuance of any building occupancy permit. If the project is phased, only those S-2017-00239 Live Oak Estates Draft Conditions of Approval March 22, 2018 Page 3 improvements shown within the phase boundary shall be completed prior to a building occupancy permit in that developing phase. Phasing shall be as shown on the tentative map and as follows: a. Phase 1 — Lots I through 9. b. Phase 2 —Lots 10 through 20. C. Phase3 Lots 21 through 26. 9. Trash and a. b. g. 10 ice for the development shall include the following:* Phase I and 2 will have 2 roll out carts that will be �yvithin the development, one for garbage and one for Placement of the &Wits shall be as shown in the planned development plan with curb markers placed on the curb to identify the location for each ar1�lrPce carts and 6 feet from any other Enforcement A minimum of one trash requirements of Sectiop= only one enclosure t ` ail preferred location Isty o. drive aisle. Shade trees shall be placed such that the enclosure when mature. w Billing for Phase 1 and 2 would garbage service separately. ' association; for Phase 3 meeting the r�g,Iunicipal Code. If of 7 feet and the Muth side of the main hang the each duplex tenant to pay for Billing for Phase 3 would require one single account for garbage service paid by the homeowners' association. j. No green waste carts or pick-up will be provided for the development and all landscape maintenance shall be conducted by the homeowners' association. S-2017-00239 Live Oak Estates March 22, 2018 Draft Conditions of Approval Page 4 10. A minimum 6 -foot -high, solid decorative block or masonry wall shall be installed along the Old Alturas Road frontage of Lots 1 through 3 with construction of Phase 1 and along the top of slope adjacent to the units on Lots 23 through 26 with construction of Phase 3 as shown on the tentative subdivision map. The wall shall be extended along the west boundary of Lot 3 and the east boundary of Lots 1 and 23 a minimum distance of 15 feet. The wall shall be reduced to a height of 3 feet along the driveway entrance of Lots 2, 3, and 23. The wall shall incorporate the use of distinctive columns and horizontal design elements and be approved by the Development Services Department in conjunction with the subdivision improvements. 11, Individual lol }40Y 6� ",`,"J"I"", t shall meet the following standards:* a , {t,, inlmum 5 -foot liWing side -yard setback. b Minimum 10 -foot r -yard building setback. c,{ All front --yard areas shall be landscaped prior to occupancy of the Landscape, Recre Fady, 12. The developer shall 1landscapejg the frontage of Old Alturas Road, in the front and rear yard o"Rh�rach unit, t�r��irth ap south group gathering area, and throughout the subdlv�� as 1 ��cted t,�,�'lanned Development Plan. As part of the final plan re�ss, landscape plan shall be prepared and submitted for apnprova $0,;,1 e Devel"R, tent Services Department. The plan shall address the require s, of Chaptdscape Standards), Chapter 18.41.100 (Off-Street��p� Screening, Ladscape) and Chapter 16.70 (Water Efficient La.'e) `f`? t the Rd'g Mp�lpal Code. These regulations require, in part, th`' L a. Landscape plans shall be prepared by a regiedlilce';'landscape professional and in stalled in accordance with ��'s lt ie installation guidelines, b. The required Landscape Documentati6fil a kage shall be submitted at the time of submittal of the landscape plans. C. The California Green Building Code Section 5.304.2 required a separate water meter for irrigation of landscape areas when a project includes more that 1,000 square feet of irrigated landscape. Utility and landscape plans shall depict the proposed location of the water meter and identify the total. area of landscape proposed with the project. S-2017-00239 Live Oak Estates Draft Conditions of Approval March 22, 2018 Page 5 d. The landscape planter along Old Alturas Road shall incorporate the use of bermed sod and/or shrubs, and trees with a minimum size of 15 -gallon at a minimum ratio of 1 tree for every 30 feet of frontage. e. Any area between the back of the sidewalk and the property line shall be incorporated into the adjacent street -side planter. f. Planter areas not having densely planted groundcover or utilizing turf shall include the use of high -quality -fabric weed barrier and appropriate mulch materials g. Newterior of the project must be planted based on a n�t�rr` of 1 r every 500 square feet of enclosed living area eloped. frees pl'S` ' d to fulfill this requirement shall have a minimum e of 15 gallons anti„� nsist of a combination of evergreen and deciduous h f, minimum of 1 tree per lot shall be planted in the front -yard area of each lapdscape planter provided for any required tree shall have a end minimum width of 6 feet. 13. The hhwest oI'Jio retaining wall along Lots -5 through 12 and the area adjacentx dot 15 shallbi"'it'designated on the final map with a private open -space easement"I� which limillrnd pa,ive recreational activities may be allowed including the �� ement� �,.,aiid/or benches. No tree removal r riltt�� h ,rt s it t�1 3 inches or greater will `teed m s e7:t�j nd no building, fences, or other structures may be erected. f 1 14. The area adjacent to Lot 15 shf}� f�'€ include a p� op�j space easement for access and trail purposes ded}Ne City i,7itle e area adjacent to the northeast corner of the rty q ek r setback of Churn Creek as identified in the resource evaluatio``�done for thedivision. All V ., 15. At the time of construction of Phase 2, a pedestri�cc,`_'lliead shall be provided between Lots 15 and 16 at the streetprove � js'O through the open space area to the public Churn Creek Open ent shall include 8 feet of paving or all-weather surface, iionlsignage, and fencing as necessary. The private open -space easement shall include provisions for pedestrian access for Fire Department personnel. 16. Design for the north and south group gathering areas shall include amenities such as benches, picnic or barbeque area, and/or shade structures for the outdoor enjoyment of the occupants of the development. The north group gathering area shall be constructed with Phase 2 and the south group gathering area shall be constructed at the time of Phase 3. S-2017-00239 Live Oak Estates March 22, 2018 Draft Conditions of Approval Page 6 17. Recreational -vehicle and boat parking shall be prohibited through the homeowners' association documents.* 18. This condition shall be recorded on the final map and noted in the title report. The escrow instructions for the sale of each lot shall require that the purchaser and seller of each lot sign a statement that they have read and understand this condition of sale. The property owner(s) shall consent to formation of a landscape maintenance district for all irrigation, landscape, and fencing improvements installed within the public right-of-way of Old Alturas Road and between the subdivision perimeter wall and the right-of-way, to be located within a landscape maintenance easement Formation shall be in accordance with the following:* t t�f �i ttt ti7 itt�tz itt att ff �4 a Prig# �:`$recordatio�; a final map, the property owner(s) shall submit a �01 � " maintenai"W"' 3 district petition and consent form, a landscape t�1} t if ,.' s � ts} ntenance agreement i form, and applicable application fees to the elopment Services {artment. The formation shall be completed and the ii a t st, idscape installed or' properly bonded for prior to issuance of a building mit for any structure within the developing phase of the subdivision. motion of the district will obligate each lot owner within the subdivision to UR paxh'��e dis$ri't'��{� ;3� t escalation clause will be included in the r fh, tr t Jz 'i assessor rrt` levy to � r mcreas p maintenance expenses due to inflation. ft },ir b. The landscape associate dgation system for the district shall be designed in ance w�it�=��'the sclfications available from the Development Se�sr Deet an3��d JA in accordance with the final plans as approved �j ThtId'`,,`and irrigation plans shall be submitted to the Development Se Departm'N at the time the subdivision improvement plans are submi�� to the PubhorjWorks Department and are subject to approval prior to art `t`�tion of a flnfaP c. The irrigation system „ `'all be W1 t' {uiid ac „'ed by the City in rt a �,,:;�, conjunction with the public improvements withm t� ubdivision� landscape improvements shall be installed and accepted by tl`t�ity print}} uance of any certificate of occupancy within the develol Jas r it Fs bdivision. d. The developer shall be responsible fort#� p��i�ntl` fees associated with the formation, installation, and connection t+r'Ci`ty water and electric utilities. Such fees include, but are not necessarily limited to, formation costs, meter fees, connection charges, benefit fees, inspection fees, and development fees. The developer shall also be responsible for maintenance of the landscape and irrigation system until such time as the district is formed and fees are levied. The minimum maintenance responsibility shall be 90 days for plant material and 1 year for the irrigation system from the date improvements are accepted by the City. S-2017-00239 Live Oak Estates Draft Conditions of Approval ,Streets and Circulation March 22, 2018 Page 7 19. At the time of recording of any phase of the subdivision map, street dedication shall be made including dedication of the appropriate right-of-way necessary to achieve a 42 -foot -wide half section along Old Alturas Road and additional right-of- way for construction of a future round -about at the intersection with Victor Avenue. 20. Design for necessary street widening and frontage improvements along Old Alturas Road shall be as follows: a. With'�� p, Phase 1, three 12 -foot -wide paved travel lanes (east- bo�,tVest-bound`,;ad a center left -turn lane) transitioning to the existing ement westof`�fp subdivision. East of the driveway entrance shall�sition to two 12 O* lanes (one in each direction). b ;��lPhase 3 is constructed` prior to the roundabout at the Old Alturas Road and gtvtor Avenue intersection, the three travel lanes shall continue along the ,age and transition to a left turn lane into the easterly project driveway at C. Minimum eight pwide paved t��pulder/bike lane on the north side of Old }'4 Alturas Road. 11 , ,i , r„r iit t it4 i rj I5t d. Minimum six-footlYe pav�,`t�oulde��ne and any necessary roadside pit drainage facilities ort �ft�' r `side 1 f e. Vertical curb, gutter, and 8 -fob � de sidewalk a hg Old Alturas Road. With construction of Phase 1, s�� width sha�tlnsitia to the 5 -foot -wide sidewalk to the west ant �} �' £ , c �tl �;xtendetl��erly 4 �e point at which it would connect with the �,timate to onstructed with the roundabout., `. f. A catch basin and storm drain extension across g. Any necessary reconstruction or overlay ”$�{,ing section of Old Alturas Road necessary to provide appropriate tie vmg and a uniform cross slope from centerline to the gutter. h. All necessary pavement transitions, signage and striping. 21. Access rights to Old Alturas Road, with the exception of the two private driveways shown on the tentative map, shall be waived via dedication to the City. 22. Streetlights shall be placed along Old Alturas Road in accordance with the specification of the Engineering Division and Electric Department. Streetlights S-2017-00239 Live Oak Estates March 22, 2018 Draft Conditions of Approval Page 8 installed in the interior of the project shall be owned and operated, and maintained by the homeowners' association. 23. Upon development of Phase 3, if the proposed roundabout at the Old Alturas Road and Victor Avenue intersection has not already been constructed, development shall include a temporary driveway access to be located entirely on the subject property with a minimum width of 20 feet. Construction shall include a raised curb on the east side of the driveway with a curb return at the travel lane. A depressed curb shall be constructed to allow access to the driveway from the property to the east at the intersection with the road through Phase 3. 24. FireDeparizdlz,, radius diameter of 45 feet outside and 30 feet inside is iequiredt�`'b ```provided t _ghout the site. The landscape median in the westerly drive ball be setbac� enough to meet the turning radius with access from Old,'�as Road. Grading 4#Drainage 25. Prior E<,��e begmnmg of any clearing, grading, or site improvement activities, {tramage, and utilities, and other required tJi t�t improvementsnahl be ,dyed by engineering Division and other concerned City of Redding Dept S. Thesel, s shall be in conformance with Redding Municipal Code (R1`Title 16 12 fsrior to the issuance of a clearing and/or grading permit, an Erosion Sedint Control Plan shall be included and approved by the �t�, Eng�g'j pat`, al clearing and grading permit applications. As -built i' ` 'petit pl?£ ;with' =l�� Engineer's declaration are required in conformance with RMC 1 C, 26. The final grading and drainagepcitall be m sulk ' } tialriformance with the approved preliminary grad mg; �� (S �t 3 of 4� �3pesn Old Alturas Road shall be kept at 3 to or less includo;�t�a reta�jg curb at the back of sidewalk and bermed landscape to the retaining wall, essary such that the arterial wall, if built on top of the retaining wall, does' 4t appet, $ feet in height. Ji ty }k1 tlY i :;3t 27. Trees identified within the hillside area in t� � q�fe}rii portion of the property shall be preserved. Placement of snow fenci. .. means of protection or identification along the boundary of the area shall be required at the time of grading to ensure equipment operators are aware of the limits of grading. This shall be confirmed in the field at a preconstruction meeting with Planning Division and Public Works staff. 28. A catch basin and storm drain extension across Old Alturas Road shall be constructed at the time of frontage improvements with Phase 1. S-2017-00239 Live Oak Estates Draft Conditions of Approval March 22, 2018 Page 9 29. All on-site storm drain collection and the underground detention/infiltration facilities shall be privately owned and maintained by the homeowners' association of the subdivision. 30. Storm -drain outlets into Churn Creek shall be designed to provide a sedimentation basin or filter strip between the drain outlet and creek channel in order to prevent erosion impacts and protect water quality. Plans and specifications for the basin and/or filter strip shall be submitted with the subdivision improvement plans and be subject to review by the Department of Fish and Wildlife. 31. Prior to Issuances of a grading permit that may cause the loss of jurisdictional waters of ��tij_`#�„�e developer shall secure all necessary permits and Co authori'{from thc}`'3;, r Y Corps Engineers,g �4Arm sof the California Regional Wates �;t ��lity Contrd the California Department of Fish and Wildlife. All �' 's and con ii the required permits and authorization, including mitton. shall be 32. In of to avoid impacts to nesting raptors or migratory birds, vegetation removal and ground .disturbance activities associated with construction shall be 51 conducte,ji'� {`f thettt #��g season, September 1 through January 31, otherwise are=constru�psurvestmg birds shall be completed during the nesting season of Febr �`` '`_`' 1 through � ust 31. The survey shall be conducted by a qualified biologist `t�more than or��``veek prior to vegetation removal If an active nest more tl half coeated during thesurvey, a non disturbance buffer shtl�=, estl�d by �``` Vilified biologist in consultation with the California Dept"� 'Fish VilNo vegetation removal or construction activities shall occur -disturbance buffer until the young have fledged, as determined thrq ` ` 110, additional rtormg by the qualified biologist. The results of the pre dad F£t4tction survey' 11 be j nt to the California Department of Fish and Wildh� �} t a „ se in cQ� ,fetion ities of 15 or more days occurs, then another pre wnstructio f �r tall be ucted.** Sewer, Water, and Electric Utilities 33. Final utility plans for development of the& subdir ill "be in substantial conformance with the approved Preliminaet 4 of 4). 34. The public wastewater line adjacent to lots 18 and 22 shall be located within a 15 - foot -wide public service easement with no structures or longitudinal private utility encroachment. 35. Water and wastewater lines shall be constructed and located in the drive aisle. Provide pavement and/or hammerhead turnaround for vehicular access to the sanitary sewer manholes. S-2017-00239 Live Oak Estates March 22, 2018 Draft Conditions of Approval Page 10 36. The existing overhead electric lines along Old Alturas Road shall be converted to underground facilities as specified by the Redding Electric Utility. This shall include removal of the existing pole directly west of the property boundary and relocation of the pole east of the property boundary to a location that will not conflict with the future roundabout. A ten -foot -wide public service easement shall be provided behind the back of sidewalk except for on Lots 1 and 2 where the public service easement shall extend from the back of walk to the arterial wall 37. Sufficient space near the intersection shall be provided for 12kv switchgear to serve the project. Improvement will require the developer to provide infrastructure to maintain existing services to the south side of Old Alturas Road. The cost of the conversion t� }tom �, f ponsibility of the developer. K3,1g, t �7+�44ta 38. Electxat� for all units sha'l l individually metered. Electric meter locations shall be i'ordancewith the ing Electric Utility requirements. j Fire and t', er--enev Service 39. A20�ts ll weather surface access road shall be installed and remain serviceable prior to ��{30111P, cons�� £� }Fare hydrants shall be installed and fire flow available for``"'�i`fi`htm`os es dot vertical construction. 40. The burning of constriction debris is pibited, all such material shall be disposed ,t �t of by transport to anptable land�l 41. Vegetation within the hid'}ef`'�ion of the project (covered with a private open -space easemenit be cleQ�# of up to 90 percent of combustible brush. Maintenance,annual 44 annual ba'� shall be required by the homeowners' association. �,� 42: Wood fences including post f`ire rolzr '0 pen -space areas on Lots 12 through 16. Fences must be constructed of noncostible material 43. The internal private driveways through the develops' it 'i`gned and/or �ift � tf £Y1 striped as necessary to the satisfaction of the Flre,��1 �to prohibit parallel 5� S shy, rr3,+. parking on any curb within the development`,', 44. The pedestrian access easement between Lots 15 and 16 shall include language to provide access for Fire Department crews through the open space. S-2017-00239 Live Oak Estates Draft Conditions of Approval STANDARD CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR SUBDIVISIONS EFFECTIVE MAY 24, 2011 March 22, 2018 Page 11 In accordance with City of Redding Ordinance 2469, Section 26, the following standard conditions of approval apply to all subdivision projects requiring a final map. Project - specific conditions of approval will take precedence in the event of a conflict with standard conditions. References to the Grading Ordinance are based on Redding Municipal Code (RMC) Title 16, Chapter 12. References to the Subdivision Ordinance are based on RMC Title 1.7. References to the Zoning Ordinance are based on RMC Title 18. FINAL MAP I A�£ l map shall be eared in accordance with Chapter 17.40 of the 111"R, g,£ Su 4"" Vision Ordinance. final map and all necessary supporting documents ani £lformation must be fil=dd with the City Engineer prior to the expiration date of `�£ tentative map as required by Section 17.40.020 of the Subdivision Ordite 2. In e Subdivision Ordinance, the property owner shall dedicate f�''°`the City alb 'fight of -ways and easements necessary to provide public accend utilities tct�$� subdivision as required by the tentative map approval. 3. Prior to the recording o1"£�,'i�ap, at4otet`fli'%,�,tcation shall be submitted to the City to apportion any special assent -districts£ (Improvement Bond Act of 1915) affected by the subdivisl eluding ticable fees, an assessment segregation diagram, and any ro additional irt�atio 7p1� 4. In -lieu park fees must be':aid price$£rs£��;,tecordin�'£,f the final map in accordance with Chapter 17.54 ofthe`'uinance, unless an equivalent parkland dedication is made in conform a} with th £7tive map approval. 5. Proposed street names must be submi'``%' rI `£and a enc review in p yl g y £� accordance with Section 17.64.020 of the§`'ivision Ordinance prior to the recording of the final map. The final map shall reflect only street names approved by the City. 6. A 5 -foot -wide public-service easement shall be dedicated on the final map abutting all public -street right-of-ways within the subdivision. 7. In the case where a regulatory floodplain exists on a subdivision site, the final map shall clearly delineate the limits of the 100 -year base floodplain and elevations. The floodplain identified on the final map shall be consistent with S-2017-00239 Live Oak Estates Draft Conditions of Approval March 22, 2018 Page 12 Section 18.51.020, Basis For Establishing Areas of Special Flood Hazard, of the Zoning Ordinance. 8. For residential subdivisions, covenants, conditions, and restrictions (CC&Rs) shall be recorded in conjunction with recordation of a final map which prohibit the storage of recreational vehicles in the front -yard or street side -yard -setback areas as described in Schedule 18.31.030-C(8) of Zoning Ordinance. CONSTRUCTION GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 9. In accordance with Chapter 17.70 of the Subdivision Ordinance, the developer � sit t s�i " {{, must sec -r �� subdivision improvement plans for grading and all street, utility rt ln�ructure from the City Engineer prior to the start of any coni �on. Sub division{'iprovement plans must be prepared by a registered ciand fullss the construction of all improvements required of th,bdivision under the oved tentative map. 10. Acsition of all off-site interests in title or easements necessary to satisfy the 1.4 requ ants of the subdivision approval shall be the responsibility of the } is ��,�er is unable to acquire such interests, the ,7 7f ( ;,fist bttt G iii 1ft X { developery petitso� t` ity cil for adoption of a resolution initiating eminent -domain proq�ngs over thnds needed for the off-site improvements. The developer shall ;`�ar all costs fit �hch proceedings, including attorney fees, court costs, and land�lue costs } �> NA" }rtt) tai tt�l tti11. Unless a project-spe4#if usl} r t 3S tt ,tsu tified and approved for the subdivision project with the tentatzv ' , all puhJo,improvements required of the subdivision shall comply with,;'Construction= ��ndards and other adopted standards specified under Se20 ofth,f�dlviton Ordinance and/or Al equivalent standards, as detedssary by.ltCity`�neer. 12. Prion to approval of subdivision improvement plans ai4?tissuance of a grading permit, the property owner shall secure all PIT" provals required by law from outside agencies also havingf',``dlt��;ro"the project, including, but not limited to: ,�sf, } i5it tt t� tit f 3ts {rigWIPz 2ittirrttltt� v t't$`(�rl a. Regional Water Quality Control Bo�ttdWQCB). In most cases, the developer must prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan and secure a Construction Activity Storm Water Permit from. RWQCB. b. Department of Fish and Game (DFG). Where a project would impact a waterway, a Section 1602 Streambed Alteration Agreement must be finalized with DFG. S-2017-00239 Live Oak Estates March 22, 2018 Draft Conditions of Approval Page 13 C. U.S. Army Corps of'Engineers (ACOS). Where a project would impact jurisdictional waters of the U.S., appropriate Nationwide or Individual Permit approvals shall be obtained from ALOE. Copies of required agency permits/approvals shall be submitted to the City Engineer. Any special development requirements of these agencies affecting improvements within the subdivision shall be reflected on the final improvement plans. 13. Required subdivision improvements shall be properly and fully constructed, inspected and a ,cepted by the City in accordance with Chapter 17.74 of the Subdivisi}pr��p� any incomplete improvements shall be secured under the provist'4��tj�� Schedit,`7 40.060.13 and Chapter 17.74 of the Subdivision Ordi� Final surve1{ -built improvement plans, and related engineering cer�t�� tions are �require%��,�t the completion of work in conformance with Sed pns 17.70.070 and �0.080 of the Subdivision Ordinance and Section 1613r x.230 of the Grading `inance. -S Grading, Erosion 14. 15. 16. Subdivision clearirlg� conformance with tft shall be consistent plans considered with Theprojectdeveloper shall prepay Water Pollution Prevention P� Storm Water Permit from tb''en Board in compliance with`j�:' regi Activity Storm Water Permit. Best the SWPPP shall be utilized an( activities. REQUIREMENTS sion-control plans shall be in full T , final grading improvement plans dJffig, ..plan and any tree -preservation e -specific Storm :ruction Activity Quality Control rat Construction All trees identified for p reservation shall b 1 �;; citified on the subdivision p4,,x improvement plans. A tree construction/pioloion plan shall be prepared by a qualified (tree) professional in accordance with Chapter 18.45, Tree Management, of the Zoning Ordinance and included as part of the subdivision grading improvement -plan package. Tree -protection measures identified in the tree construction/protection plan shall be reflected in the final subdivision improvement plans and followed during construction. S-2017-00239 Live Oak Estates March 22, 2018 Draft Conditions of Approval Page 14 Drainage System 17. Storm -drain facilities shall be designed consistent with the requirements of City Construction Standards, the City of Redding Storm Water Quality Improvement Plan, and the City of Redding Phase lI NPDES Permit from the California Regional Water Quality Control Board (Water Quality Order No. 2003-05 - DWQ). Project design shall incorporate Best Management Practices (BMPs) to minimize the polluting of stormwater, both during construction and long-term. Should the maintenance costs of the long-term pollution -control measures exceed typical storm -drain -system costs, such costs shall be borne by the project by way of a landscape J maintenance district, escrow account, or other such financing 18.Prior, improvement-pI JJ, approval, the developer must obtain approval for gan prod`, Y,"' anagement of stogywater peak flows in accordance with City Council Pc l 1806 and the spee@tations of the City Engineer. Such measures shall iYi jYJ �J ad s impacts from the ��-, 25-, and 100 -year -storm events. Projects shall add peak flows to maintain predevelopment levels at all locations downstream of tl'errplect AJrrainage report shall be prepared to the format outlined by the Engineef�Jtn, st�J signed by a qualified engineer, and provided k #, itr, a>s tint F � ,i Y}i'il to the Englrieening Diyl�nwith suk)ttal of project improvement plans. J „ �J JJ�J Utilities 1 Y yJ } J IYlYt 19. Essential utilities, mcttg, biarJt limia sanitary sewer, water, electric, natural gas, and comrn�'t1 distriYn ` Ih�� including main lines and service laterals, shall be extended anf,,' d appropi to serve each lot and to provide logical extensions of servie�J�fsubsequent pJ es and adjacent properties in accordance with Section 17��0 of the 5� �sio�, Ordinance. These �YISYEI J f�,� utilities shall be installed in � Y rdan� Ywith the % city, Jstruction, metering, and testing standards of the Y{pity and `i0`,, fed pri, utility company(s), including applicable utility master plans. NAY'}. �.J.. ,} ,Y sgy 20. Any necessary off-site utility extensions shall be treet right-of- way or public-service easement in a location approy $�� e°<`.City Engineer and other responsible utility companies. Veor maintenance purposes shall be provided to all utility infraste a public right-of-way as determined necessary by, and in a manner approved by, the City Engineer. 21. New "dry" utilities, including electric, telephone, and cable television, must be installed underground in accordance with Section 17.60.090 of the Subdivision Ordinance. Any existing overhead facilities within a proposed subdivision and along peripheral streets must also be placed underground, unless waived under the project -specific conditions. S-2017-00239 Live Oak Estates Draft Conditions of Approval March 22, 2018 Page 15 22. Electric -supply facilities shall be furnished and installed in accordance with the Redding Electric Utility Service Policy Resolution currently in effect at the time the developer's plans are approved by the City. 23. The developer shall be responsible for all costs associated with the relocation or modification of existing utility facilities or structures necessitated by the construction of the project or of improvements required as a condition of approval of this project, including reimbursement of any costs to the affected utility for work performed to support the project. 24. After the Initial review of project improvement plans by the Engineering Division, the devwith the Redding Electric Utility (REU) for ;rr=tss its r2 prepar�,�`ii an elee,;tservice plan. A copy of the electric -service plan, devel� and approve { by REU, shall be incorporated into the final imps ment plans.N. "; t N 25 S�tlights shall be pro in accordance with applicable Redding Electric rel , Ut] onstruction Standards 553.0, et seq. Fire 26. Fire hydrants shall,, �" installed accordance with theelg " lifornia Fire fire hydrants shall `�twe a mmia California Fire Code aa�neet�4 hydrants and necessary= �tnt oversized lots shall also be installed 27. Brush piles resulting from site prior to the start of t removed immediately. Air Quality cations throughout the subdivision in e as approved by the Fire Marshal. All fire J-1,pw meeting Appendix -B of the �� r' demand for the area. "On -lot" �t tit xt_ tt�ce`=ytelopment on flag lots or q'itired by tjii"It, ire Marshal. z t activity sh be full;y removed from the or, i,1111", Ming fire season, be 28. The following Air Quality Element Standard Mitigatt lures shall be applied during grading and construction activities t,f`and PMio emissions: a. Nontoxic soil stabilizers shall be applied according to manufacturer's specifications to all inactive construction areas (previously graded areas inactive for 10 days or more). b. All grading operations may be suspended by the City Engineer when winds (as instantaneous gusts) exceed 20 miles per hour. C. Temporary traffic control shall be provided as appropriate during all phases of construction to improve traffic flow (e.g., flag person). S-2017-00239 Live Oak Estates Draft Conditions of Approval March 22, 2018 Page 16 d. Construction activities that could affect traffic flow shall be scheduled in off-peak hours. e. Active construction areas, haul roads, etc., shall be watered at least twice daily or more as needed to limit dust. f. Exposed stockpiles of soil and other backfill material shall either be covered, watered, or have soil binders added to inhibit dust and wind erosion. g. All trucks hauling soil and other loose material shall be covered or should feet of freeboard (i.e., minimum vertical distance t}en top e load and the trailer) in accordance with the k ;r ili"uirements of Section 23114. This provision is enforced by local w,t,tlaw enforcement armies. h 3t} f'` { All public roadwW used by the project contractor shall be maintained "' xr free from dust, dirt, and debris caused by construction_ activities. Streets ' Nfij ` swept at the end of the day if visible soil materials are carried onto PI X111 lIC p �' t� � � { Wheel washers shall be used where vehicles enterand exalt paved ro�. onto paved roads, or trucks and any AMR equipment shy z 'e washed of `,wing the site with each trip. i. Alternativest ppen bumf kyegetative material on the project site shall be u�R) d u�X�ved by the Planning Division, Fire Marshal l t ' Co ; „'A �' M llty Management District. 7 z l'��i� i�t Suitable alternatives include r; ' } �`ure not lint �d to, on-site chipping and mulching and/or hauling tgixt`"mass fuel site,'.! Cultural Resources 29. If, during the course of development `" `any archald' historical, or paleontological resources are uncovered or otherwrrr;t detectetlf 4,' observed, ct° sti( 7} r711"'t2�t construction activities in the area affected shall c a�{��'��ity shall be notified immediately. A qualified archa ologica ��ps'onal must then be retained by the developer to investigar��`��4��ered cultural object to determine its significance. If the cultural obef�'sdeemed potentially significant by the archaeologist, appropriate treatment and measures shall be followed in accordance with applicable laws, as reviewed and approved by the City, prior to the resumption of work in the affected area. Miscellaneous 30. Issuance of building permits for structures on lots resulting from the subdivision will not occur until a final map is recorded and necessary public -street and utility improvements are available. An exception may be granted at the discretion of the S-2017-00239 Live Oak Estates Draft Conditions of Approval March 22, 2018 Page 17 Building Official allowing issuance of a building permit for the construction of model homes and other special circumstances in accordance with Section 17.04.090 of the Subdivision Ordinance. 31. Permanent and temporary signs related to the subdivision shall comply with Chapter 18.42 of the Zoning Ordinance. 32. In the event of any confusion, conflict, vagueness, typographical error, or special circumstance where implementation of any standard or project -specific condition is in question, the Development Services Director has the authority, in accordance with Section 17.04.080 of the Subdivision Ordinance; to determine an appropriate �s irz� remedy a �� y1� sure that the intent of the condition and related tentative map ap��ul"'is mei ii�cordance with applicable laws and policies, and as nece` to ensure orderl,velopment. 33. Th+ teveloper/applicants� note that pursuant to Chapter 16.20 of the Redding ipal Code, City devilment impact fees are required to be paid at the time of''tilding occupancy/final inspection for new construction, building enlar`�cnt, or other improvement These fees are structured to mitigate the project' t��'�'�� of ��1� Impacts to the City's transportation fire - 517,002, 1 t s su ression "fitit t �, arks intructure stems based upon necessary pp y p ry impronew%yelopment under the City's General Plan. The develo er/a��''{` p pp1�nt is hereby,r f otlfled that he/she has the right to protest/appeal impos` 1 i n of any of 1 'e fees ,o fee amounts. Any protest/appeal tf� must comply with theylsior p�,ovep bode Section 66020(a).* REPORT TO REDDING PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: March 27, 2018 FROM: Linda Burke, Associate ITEM NO. 4(b)2Planner [S-101-152-000] ***APPROVED BY*** "j Li rk ti n r }x/22/20 8 ti t a411,a,, lan ng ger 3I22/2t}1�3 Ihurke@ci.reddCus phellman@eityofredding.org SUBJECT: tative Su h ision Map Application S-2017-00239, Planned Development `n Application PD -201`7-00241; and Rezoning Application_RZ-2017-00240, by Omni Fina nci��4LC, requesting approval of a tentative subdivision map and planned development plat e !zcres meq �r�ltlple-familyresidential lots for development of 64 multiple -family re �� w`t lts �'`ie' proJ includes a rezoning to add the "PD" Planned Development Overlay District to isting 9W2" Residential Multiple Family District. it4r}{3t �#ii J;u I � Yi SS Sit Pt .i Recommendation Conduct a public hearing and, upon Mitigated Negative Declaration and Development project consisting of Planned Development Plan Applicati 00240. Project Description ecommend t the City Council adopt the Live OakA tes subdivision and Planned bdlvlslol ' 4ap pu tion S-2017-00239, ` }Rezot)1 Application RZ-2017 Planned Development Subdivision. Omni Finan, l� a , { �t 8ting approval to subdivide approximately eight acres into 26 multiple -family' `F{tial lots in three phases for development of 64 multiple -family units. Phase 1 and 2 consist of 20 lots total to be developed with a two-family dwelling unit (duplex) on each lot for a total of 40 units. Phase 3 consists of six lots to be developed with a four-plex on each lot for a total of 24 units. Duplex units are a mix of two- and three-bedroom units with either one- or two -car garages. Amenities include common landscape throughout the development and two group gathering areas with walkingg paths, benches, and picnic or barbeque improvements. A property owners' association would be formed to address common ownership and maintenance needs. Rezoning. The project site is zoned "RM -12" Residential Multiple Family District. The application includes a rezoning request to add the "PD" Planned Development Overlay District to the property. The subdivision would be developed under a Planned Development Plan in accordance with Chapter 1.8.53 of the Zoning Code to allow construction of the project with Report to Redding Planning Commission March 22, 2018 Re: 4(b)2-- S-2017-00239, Tentative Subvision Map, Live Oak Estates Subdivision and Planned Development Page 2 reduced lot sizes and public street frontages, custom -lot configuration, and reduced building setbacks. PARCEL, SizE Two parcels totaling eight acres. TERRAINNEGETATION The property is relatively flat along Old Alturas Road to gently sloping in the northwest corner of the property with topography ranging from 555 feet above mean sea level (msl) to 615 msl. The site is characterized as blue oak woodland in the northwest corner and annual grassland throughout the rest of the property, with minimal barren habitat type surrounding the existing and previous residential buildings on the site. Churn Creek is located outside the northeast boundary of the site. EXISTING LAND U, GENERAL PLAirDsIGNATION ZONING DES ' AT& "RM -12" t, tr G SURROUNDINi,ND USES North: Sine-fame, , _' dal s East: Single-family home and South: Montessori school, older; Jgft West: Duplex Subdivision. Background units 10 to 20 dwelling units per acre" and "Greenway" Multiple Family IrIlrl#i City open space along Churn Creek. qm land desl`� ted "RM -12 adjacent to Churn Creek. family has, and vacant land across Old Alturas Road. The eight -acre property consists of two parcels,,,,,",,, 'hated northw� of the Old Alturas Road and Victor Avenue intersection. The westerly p�'��`'� as previous��,€eveloped with a single-family home site and structures that dated to the l��s;',�bwever, all6 mgsrt� e recently demolished and removed. The easterly parcelcont�jwo��11 re��ts ani,{fdetached garage located close to the intersection.` The subdivision's design concept is very sievelopment subdivision located at the intersection of Old Alturas Roa1�� rning Street. This subdivision includes duplex units developed on lots w�i a a1 driveway system and common landscape and amenities. Planned Development Process. Chapter 18.53 ("PD" Planned Development District) of the Zoning Code provides a process; or "zoning tool," that can be used where greater flexibility in design is desired to allow a more efficient use of land than would be possible through strict application of conventional zoning standards. The PD process can be used to customize use and development standards to fit a project, as long as specific findings can be made, which largely center on consistency with the General. Plan. PD projects are also expected to provide appropriate amenities and design enhancements, thus providing something extra/unique to support justification for variation from standards. Report to Redding Planning Commission March 22, 2018 Re: 4(b)2-- S-2017-00239, Tentative Subvision Map, Live Oak Estates Subdivision and Planned Development Page 3 To be eligible for the PD process, a site must be zoned to include "PW as an overlay district. Preparation of a Planned Development Plan, such as that attached, is required to illustrate the standards that are specific to the project. In this case, the proposed subdivision must incorporate the "PD" Overlay District with the "RM" District to allow development of the duplex/four-plex project on individual lots with less than 10,000 square feet (standard "RM district minimum), variation in lot configurations, street -frontage requirements, and building setbacks. Design Concept. The planned development would allow for development of a subdivision of duplex and four-plex units based on the following design principles: ■ Reduced lot sizes and building setbacks are provided to facilitate the development concept.'„ ■ All duple'ts,"are ■ All fou'r' units will have All unfit will have fenced, pri with unit>onstruction. A system of parking, utility have an attached one- or two -car garage. parking space. backyards. All front and rear yards will be landscaped will facilitate all shared vehicle access, Amenities include two yup gathering" to be constructed with Phases 2 and 3. Both will include walking tragi benches, pni" or que area, and/or shade structures for the enjoyment of the residt, 4J,z1 djestri $J;�l�d access will be provided to the private open space in the nort$t4}corner �,lhe'`suh'dlo(ion that will provide access to the adjacent public Churn Creek open sp'}a"rea. ■ A private homeowners' a improvements and landscape ■ A landscape maintenance district would be foi along Old Alturas Road. Issue all common landscape Staff has not identified any issues of inconsistency wit the City General Plan or standard development policies or significant environmental concerns. General Plan Consistency. The proposed subdivision supports 64 units over a net developable area (excluding steep slope, open space, and right-of-way dedication) of approximately 5.5 acres. This represents a net density of 11.6 units per acre, which falls within the range allowed by the General Plan classification for the site of 10 to 20 units per acre. Overall, staff feels the project advances General Plan Community Development and Design Element (CDD) Goal 11 and Policy 11D, to ensure new residential developments are well -located and well designed with a mix of residential density and dwelling types and CDD Goal 12 and Policy 12A, to ensure Report to Redding Planning Commission March 22, 2018 Re: 4(b)2-- S-2017-00239, Tentative Subvision Map, Live Oak Estates Subdivision and Planned Development Page 4 attractive, safe, and well-maintained neighborhoods by promoting neighborhood quality though project amenities and establishment of a homeowners' association. Traffic/Circulation. Access to the subdivision would be derived from Old Alturas Road in two locations. Phases 1 and 2 would take access from the westerly driveway shown on the tentative map. Phase 3 of the project would necessitate a required second access that would be located at the intersection of Old Alturas Road and Victor Avenue, essentially forming the fourth leg of the current all -way stop intersection. Construction of a roundabout at the Old Alturas Road and Victor Avenue intersection, in conjunction with a roundabout corridor along Old Alturas Road to the east, is identified as a future project in theCity'{pttal Improvement Plan; however, timing and funding availability is undetermined at ��wtnr� T` t��rehminary design layout for the roundabout, utilizing the tentative subdivslpl� iap layout, b�ver, was recently completed by Omni Means in order to ensure adequat�jit-of--way for futu'kmprovements is provided as a condition of recording the finalsubdivistoarnap. If develop Phase 3 moves forward and the roundabout has not yet been �; a temporary dri ,would need to be constructed to access the project and project and provide prop ,,k,ncondar access. Tree Preservat+r�pen Spce. The the sloping hillside' r,4fJ jld'rio�' �� area, the site is relativelyflat wlrl�`a'�;"t°le vege and utility demands, some an`nt of trees constructed behinOL identified as blue oak; however ere are seu t the area of the previous and curret�5'�1 most located on the sloping hillside. Alt¢pre= northeast corner of the site consisting of the will include a trailhead to provide residents,10".1"'I Creek open space area and future trail sys,�''` Environmental Determination a moderate to dense covering of trees located on kof the subdivision. With the exception of this p or tree cover. Due to the project's grading be removed and a_retaining wall will be The majority of existing trees (279) are pmep shade tree varieties found mainly in The �0% " E {�Tf trees (211) would be preserved, „zit{ 1 an open�� ace easement is the area in the ,k from the }} mCreek corridor. The area t development kith access to the public Churn Based on the Initial Study prepared for the tentative map and pj ed d�,',6 ti t plan, staff prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration, which was distrted,�t tdfrounding property owners and appropriate public agencies for review (tse ed). Mitigation measures were incorporated into the project to address��'tt`ftd'biological resources pertaining to protection of nesting raptors and other migratory birds"during construction and the loss of a minor amount of potentially jurisdictional waters. Public Comment As of this writing, staff has not received any public comments on the application as a result of notification of the intent to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Planning Commission hearing today. Project Conditions Report to Redding Planning Commission March 22, 2018 Re: 4(b)2-- S-2017-00239, Tentative Subvision Map, Live Oak Estates Subdivision and Planned Development Page 5 The recommended conditions of approval for the project are attached. Required Findings There are three categories of findings that apply to the project: (1) environmental/CEQA findings; (2) subdivision map findings; and (3) planned development plan findings. All required findings must be found to be in evidence to support approval of the proposed project. These are outlined and provided as an attachment to this report. Planning Commission �w. The Planning Cot��sion has the `�ority to approve tentative subdivision maps under Section 17.120.100 of {S ity's Subdivisiori fdinance and planned development plans under Section 1.53.050 the;t,F�`{ y's Zoning Ordin In this case, however, the City Council has the responsibiht}', approval of the r��tng application that the tentative subdivision map and Tanned deve } � p li�txient plan are dependent upon. The Planning Commission, therefore, is asked to make a recomiplation on the project to the City Council. Alternatives The following alternatives are offed for consid�lion: «_ 1. Based upon a determination., That the neck findp are in evidence, recommend that the City Council adopt the Ming', t��eclIla � rpared for the project and approve Tentative Subdivision Map ` Applation i��'' i-002199Planned Development Plan Application PD -201.7-00241, and Rezonm y'F`'lication ,��i 17-00240, subject to the draft conditions of approval. (Staff Recomion) 2. Recommend the project for appt'`withf `�sadlfit `"to thY'raft conditions that the ry Planning Commission deems necesto supe�por modifications may be incorporated into a motion for approval. 3 lt�k y "gai 3: Recommend denial to the City Council of the tentative map��'Y,vejopment plan, and rezoning applications. Such action must be b,sed up�'�{}��ding that the project is inconsistent with the General Plan or other City r _��t standards or poses a threat to public health, safety, or welfare. Staff has not identified any justification for denial of the project. Conclusion It is the opinion of staff that with application of the attached conditions of approval, all necessary findings for approval related to CEQA compliance, the tentative map, and the planned development plan are in evidence. The proposed rezoning to include the "PD" overlay district is appropriate to facilitate the project. The project also advances General Plan. Community Development and Design Element Goal 11 and Policy 11D, to ensure new residential developments are well -located and well designed with a mix of residential density and dwelling Report to Redding Planning Commission March 22, 2018 Re: 4(b)2-- S-2017-00239, Tentative Subvision Map, Live Oak Estates Subdivision and Planned Development Page 6 types and CDD Goal 12 and Policy 12A to ensure attractive, safe, and well-maintained neighborhoods by promoting neighborhood quality though project amenities and establishment of a homeowners' association. c: Martin Boone, Omni Financial, LLC Tim MacLean, Sharrah Dunlap Sawyer, Inc. Attachments Findings Draft Conditions of Approval Aerial Location Map Zoning Map 11 NZ1,11,11"i", Mitigated ation ial Study Tentative I heets I though'),,, Planned Develi", ent Plan AMO Ri l - J �, �� , ..� _J l _. - G c) O t . r r TN -r 1 t t S 1 IV - RIDGE D r 1 .I SRF j F w, . l AD • _.._ , ,T a , s o os} r r Q, r � 1 3_ 1 ` ij t tJ,t tt J , ED GE O O D D r R t r 1320 C ,Mtiural Rd ° r' Ittat> �,ts t t I n t t t }, .... z �' ( ctt, tt)t�}s�ttittfit7itr�t�r��ttit'hi}4}x�{J4: t �t�t x to �a 4 ��trstiiAltt�rttr rr`3 isr{; y74r~t Irti�Jrt� s � S 14{irt tt�tstrrrt fiFu {� 1368 Old Alturas Rd `'. ttt }ti3Ut4 �ttY 1� �f{tit {it s¢�4t�}'tit}}$rti `�t }I �f 44;i44tr S;�`;tti i\; 1 lt� J} 51 rt ifrt tCiit t tt tj r7ijtritft (t t rfr f2rtr r Ist t {� $sitttaa r 4 t4 i}tt i rtrt Fra }# II; r,:, ,� tf.tit� r � »j titr �,t ttrG r<}tf($} is iti urtt�i �t s}t rr �t trt tr£ t 1 t � r �,,, r,t� 4i5tf r4it�; s �,4 It it rlr ttt r}1 4}4t �{ iri St�it�rt�� 4 j i ttrt#4 r1;a �1 , r7t ii t� rr,, 4#}. tttFt}��{r rt t�tt>i d 1' t� (jt fy i t C r 44} tint trj yt{vr\;i } � l /� I -��" R V s �. - 't t� tt ( tt t i }f r tli � rt Str t r r tt{ tt rl i tt t r a tti. I � �� — t .. t r t r, sJ ti }3I} r i t14 tt rf�r t R� J _ _l n i r f LO_.._.._ iA Vk AL t rt 'S'o � WYr>t i }—�,, } �} ft f t_ 1 LL. � {. >�•' G 414 t} Y 1{{ � {Yt 1 7 �it ..: IV ul }` 0�� of R&.3 3+ l trt{t t;i itytt I t i }fury`• _.__.._ .,, _ _� — DANA DR " S ---- .. '4 .... OSt� 7 uj ARROYO MANOR DR 4 O I ry 114 j m I�t N GIS DIVISION ZONING MAP MTG.DATE: INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT W+ E, DATE PRODUCED: S-2017-00239 / RZ-2017-00240 / PD -2017-00241 ITEM: MARCH 5, 2018 LIVE OAK ESTATES S o 200 400 Feet 1320 & 1368 OLD ALTURAS ROAD ATTACHMENT: AP# 071-270-012 & -021 P:\PlanninMMapDocuments\Commission Ma s\S\S-2017-00239.mzd AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF REDDING ADOPTING AN AMENDMENT TO THE CITY OF REDDING ZONING MAP RELATING TO THE REZONING OF THE LIVE OAK ESTATES SUBDIVISION AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PLAN PROPERTY (APN# 071-270-021 AND 071-270-12) CONSISTING OF 8 ACRES LOCATED ALONG OLD ALTURAS ROAD NORTHWEST OF THE VICTOR AVENUE INTERSECTION IN THE CITY OF REDDING (RZ- 2017-00240) THE CIT)NJI11"",11 THE CITY OF REDDING DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . of fact: the,,.,05, finds and declares as follows: A. Thi r oning Map of the City of Redding is incorporated in and made part of the Re le 18, known as the City of Redding Zoning Ordinance. is B. Th y noticed public hearing pertaining to the a imously recommended that the City Council adopt the MitigatNeg ation prepared for the Live Oak Estates Subdivision and Pfi�Developri t and k,t e attached amendment to the Zoning Map. ........... C. The City Council held a dul y notic 4, hearingMay 1, 2018, prior to the first d reading of this Ordinance. D. The proposed amendment th the General Plan and any applicable specific pla E. Adoption of this ordinance will not impact the we] the citi,7,,,,,,, f Redding and its surrounding region. AW 0 ,11.. . . ... . ... Section 2. On the basis of the initial 01f,"It", Application RZ-2017-00240 A"I", 01-1 'Nwh, 9"' pp prepared by the Development Services Department, the Ci 1'w 6 ncil finds that the subject rezoning will not have a significant effect on the environment and approves the Mitigated Negative Declaration with the following findings: 1. The City of Redding has completed a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the rezoning. Based on the analysis of the potential impacts associated with the rezoning, the project will not have a significant effect on the environment. 2. The Mitigated Negative Declaration and its supporting documentation reflect the independent judgment and analysis of the City of Redding. Section 3. The boundaries of the districts referred to in Section 18.01.050 of the Redding Municipal Code, as designated on a map entitled "Zoning Map of the City of Redding, California" dated January 7, 2003, are hereby altered as set forth on the map attached hereto and made a part hereof by: REZONING: 8 acres along Old Alturas Road FROM: 44RM-12" TO: "RM -12 -PD" Residential Multiple Family District with a Planned Development Overlay Section 4. This ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after the date of its adoption; and the City Clerk shall certlf i ,adoption of this ordinance and cause its publication according to { law.i.it}, jsi tt,l r ss� { {��fi irk 11tft r! k }4 }ll l4 f�f3t 5 ,�$S 4{f I HEIFI' that tli'ardinance was introduced and read by the City Council of the City of RecJttg ata regular meet; on the lsc day of May, 2018; and was duly read and adopted at a re�fur meeting on the opte day of , 2018, by the following vote: AYES CG; i` f z IL M}E�IBERS NOES: CO U, ABSENT: COUNCIL MEM13, ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MES: chreder, Mayor Attest: E,,iii nn' . fed: Pamela Mize, City Clerk `081 Attorney OAKMONT DR O O SG ��.. �� .. , ` SOUTH RIDGE D J,r F ui F ST co } 1 y t t tti}t t} t�t R— S;i t tt( fst s{i; rst }�35y} tji xsl .� } tr rt r t t f t i t t s'2 Y 3 t� t tf alt;�itS it it tt itt3 tl S1Ft1t tj } } 13 £ ti.�—.....__ szti , t} �r2 {zrtti tls t��t➢�'sx}i 7.;�lr tii i`�ita tt att r2 t�f f�£{if ��i: tt ;t tt t} i 't t t f lat tit c5ifyx 1 t �kt �, >•••" sr t } a 44 r27 t� u t(s f I t itt� t { tt `� yt ttl tti7 {t tit 17 fr r ( r tl1 s� t t f� t it `t 1368 Old Alturas Rd 1320 Old Alturas Rd rs ttrt ,fzl�r p7, tlttt�tt�§ tttl;lt� Mill 121. F 1 7�� tii si;ri d;ttsi � � r{�iti t� r rWet' WYLA WALK IN illti ` J . t�1r ..f i�4 `,'7 —F— _ rt4 t4f `_ --- DANA DR'hty WARROYO MANOR DR O ry r r co N MTG. DATE: INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT W+ 7 E DATE PRODUCED: ITEM: APRIL 17, 2018. S-2017-.00239 / RZ-2017-002401 PD -2017-00241 LIVE OAK ESTATES S o zoo 400 Feet 1320 & 1368 OLD ALTURAS ROAD ATTACHMENT: AP# 071-270-012 & -021 OAKMONT DR O O SG ��.. �� .. , ` SOUTH RIDGE D J,r F ui F ST co } 1 y t t tti}t t} t�t R— S;i t tt( fst s{i; rst }�35y} tji xsl .� } tr rt r t t f t i t t s'2 Y 3 t� t tf alt;�itS it it tt itt3 tl S1Ft1t tj } } 13 £ ti.�—.....__ szti , t} �r2 {zrtti tls t��t➢�'sx}i 7.;�lr tii i`�ita tt att r2 t�f f�£{if ��i: tt ;t tt t} i 't t t f lat tit c5ifyx 1 t �kt �, >•••" sr t } a 44 r27 t� u t(s f I t itt� t { tt `� yt ttl tti7 {t tit 17 fr r ( r tl1 s� t t f� t it `t 1368 Old Alturas Rd 1320 Old Alturas Rd rs ttrt ,fzl�r p7, tlttt�tt�§ tttl;lt� Mill 121. F 1 7�� tii si;ri d;ttsi � � r{�iti t� r rWet' WYLA WALK IN illti ` J . t�1r ..f i�4 `,'7 —F— _ rt4 t4f `_ --- DANA DR'hty WARROYO MANOR DR O ry r r co N MTG. DATE: INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT W+ 7 E DATE PRODUCED: ITEM: APRIL 17, 2018. S-2017-.00239 / RZ-2017-002401 PD -2017-00241 LIVE OAK ESTATES S o zoo 400 Feet 1320 & 1368 OLD ALTURAS ROAD ATTACHMENT: AP# 071-270-012 & -021 MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION # 0 Tentative Subdivision Map Application S**2017w*00239 Rezoning Application RZ-2017--00240 Planned Development Plan Application r to + SUBJECT Tentative Sub, t t.{�{;a irlkr £'t+ ti itak +a kt Mata to ij }ts kt t3 {jji}}Y}J tt ,, tt it JY};jyaY £+}Yti tay4}a € i " r {js t ,14 It ?. tr�s is it+i ai � +t froa tl tai{a a t {4a, i}tt tttt yy�+ £}t Yis>s Y i+ at 7 }c t t tt;t tta £3{ttl£i tr} +t+#y 3a ri+t tra tr if klr ,itr,€ ttl ,�l��l �,'�ast I t t 4 tt{ti s.a try rit sat � t( t}tkrr } isi 7i) r; }s;�ai4 Ir t; t 4ti t ttptik'a r +{t{}IY k tf+. �. i t i+Sr}at t t` sst€t £ to asat {�r{£kyr+`••••t1}I }iar�{s �+{tta as+j kt }+1 i 7 a k i7s}( t+kkt{'� t#Itt t rt .t fI kt tit is ter t++£+ t{ {s } a i{k1 t t}St i sa ionApplicatrt'r di Application -2 1 Planned Dev" � ent Plan Applicat D-2017-002411 by Orcuu* Fm*ancial, I t it ry PROJECT t k tt tt+ t, t '� {i k tttthf y+tk £ } T at J +a I+ } a a S TION a rt t AW '. . mitigated tffi i i t Page I It .: to lot # 91DO 1Ill Stu �c 7— qy , i�sWon tM �bove ddq4omatt fir win 1 Fif Mitigated Negative cl t n Page 2 PUBLIC REVIEWDISTRIBUTION Draft copies or notice of this Mitigated Negative Declaration were distributed to: Oul:rsrs .qunral £ Paul Hellman, P1' ££llti{f£s tt i�� 4 s,�yt r s£tt tFFF}t 3�} s iF i£�}F�s` i iJ SI Fss{} rit t> tsyt Fti i� Fy sts,, £iF �Fyi l2 siF4yrtiF F£s sF 7ss F}£1 £F�j � it 1h t Ft s�t�sjs F7 tt F !ttvtstl4 rr�sts {s st;l�; F,v;= sF�a ist n F ��t Fi st t s�� ti tai}tt}t }Ft sF tt j.t sr t�Ftr+., Mitigated l 'r t n Page 3 KM A O T DR t O h' w r +. �w SOLItk RIDGE D e t ttt 7 \, 1 wL QST I \ t �--_ O_ 1 1 � /o r` t r r 0 f ! r � EDGEWo6c DR wr ii .—.C. .._.,... O 1320rasRd ST 1368 Old Alturas Rd RD £ £ t i£7£ �It tr f\ r£t1 }fit jy ii }£tii4f iitui� i i i }(t 11 jot t , �. ttt?1 r yi7 trt£rt£ £s lid tttti ss2r.#££ its, ttl tjti£irt t( $$$ y£try £i r{ I �� , - ,, 1 y' ft � y;i S; t tri t{ t tirt 41r� tl {2. � � £E1 t t c7t�£:. i �� ti`�x5 ia}+$i� ftl `�•. i� t�, 1 t tit tt 131i} k t7t~ f £ i£1 sr rii t £ � {7f`i�'it i�l(it£t4£ �i t('�titt+rid\�yi OLQ �£tJRAS F i ,.4 � 1 4 d WY!A WALK l 1 I� O%'O i S 4£r rv"N orf £ t lu- ,.w•`/� _. �` z G i `.,. _i i. lilt ti £t £ DANA DR j } — ARROYO MANOR DR „I . D s > I I N GIS DIVISION LOCATION MAP MTG. DATE: INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT W+ E DATE PRODUCED: S-2017-00239 / RZ-2017-00240 / PD -2017-00241 ITEM: MARCH 5, 2018 LIVE OAK ESTATES S o 200 400 Feet 1320 & 1368 OLD ALTURAS ROAD ATTACHMENT: AP# 071-270-012 & -021 P:\PlanninMMapDocuments\Commission Maps\SIS-2017-00239.mxd ID#"LP"kO�l7�"wO024:L N lam 2* Lead agency name and address. CITY OF REDDINGDevelopment Serv'ces Department, Planning Division 777 Cypress Avenue, R s� t szt .t t i5£ts44s.#i�;i�t ttR� �tC slit tt ari t 75(�tijt5 ti yiilr� t a Its}7�}t t (r �� 7 }i� J .t w. Live Oak Sijbdivision On the basis of the initial evaluation: D t find that the proposed project COULD P w V w w1w" IB Iff Linda Burke Development Services Department 0 This section analyzes the potential environmental impacts associated with the proposed project. The issue areas evaluated in this Initial Study include: Aesthetics Agricultural Resources Air Quality Biological Resources Cultural Resources Geologyand Soils Greenhouse Gas Emissions Hazards Hazardous i l Utilities Service st t rti}�� sit liYl�� s�'�££si?. tt'`s sr i's'k as txt Sl tis �Sr tys sit stt Xti, �> . ssi s 4s{r rs7s,7,'t}aaz,t,�}.;�},f)i ,t<�„(,;,��., 13 Than $1gilifficant Impact. TheAo) be bjelow establiM ed threshoW that *roneheotal impact 0( t environment, + # �S k th t v otetitialf6r�*tmpaatngtne ,r► nvironmetil��iic�iI ough hisimpactwill IpctsWhic ... ,..A 1t;, a wx� iNik �edi so that impacts may beavoiaed �ol f t s S-2017-00239Uve Oak Subdivisibn S ... ,..A 1t;, a wx� iNik �edi so that impacts may beavoiaed �ol f t s S-2017-00239Uve Oak Subdivisibn „,<.,,a,r.rtt rr,l�✓�.St v:j.sy.0+,< t�sm �x }.,,>,� tx ;.Ne :U, ,, .. Lill =0 , NUM flat �"”" 0 *0 40 4W A it ►lap VIM, wa, ,AMR ► S-2017-00239Live Oak Subdivision M 0 0 0 0 ItIptiloW ..Pt s 'gntI fI� � i G � ri Jill 1111 , 11 (Farmland), .;yI4l t Ca }�it{ t{tJtrt":r t r Yx.s4t}l 11{f f<. vry £r �s t;�t lit S {t it ant to to e Farmland } f h ( }4} fi' f ; t ra )r 5J I s i}rSf stf r tj t t j}t ,. t tt G;{ t I ttt attittl ft} is J't4 S alt >s ``Yt srt lt.; it{ st, lt;t }t ;tjt rt; at}{.« Monitoring., � � i Y ; } Y � 4 } €y { i ryr� s . the o x n r r ttttY:{ t yt{ t{ l{ 4" r �taj� 2 J{a4 t, i zy "sources l t. :�taf 7jtt;i}al `"'. rttYfY ttia'4 trt .' ttUtit ttitSf J _ tit r€srt a�tta tt 2'.} at t t{a Str,. non-agricultural .use.? }it till { �tstJfY lttt } }{jet �c tats {#t3i tt r t f /7} rat Ut }rta rt1J tttyk. ?.. i ¢ Ii�Jtttatrrt;t" rr r jt r;r11 trs54trt€( ;t it5t ti f t} tt$1;it tfj} r i t f;� tit �{ t 1 ;its'}�l t if tt iti } t Yt t } � t r tet 4 r (t r t { i t r y tt, jtt: 4 r (ftly,Y `tf t t a7r ttt{ t4 i It aJ }t taS Ir{ , tet' lr tt}ft ttttiili3ti�tii; tars I Ssltt i joist Stat b)�, Conflict with ex str tt `yttt ttttttrt for agricultural us /t Williamson Act �}� t ij x' ontril rtt t 4 7 � tY i illi tjst i�# 7 riaj` i ¢ F }if ${{Y ttt jilt t Jr Yt� t r is I c t t �. c Involve other char � e existing environment which, c� due to their y#! ills Yt } locat* � � nature „t itr�t Y�ya JY t a "� � t ersion of � d to no:n th .u1 rtytr �. �rS�a� „t�IY,t f t }'{r }li�tjttt is � t Itr�tf itt 5. r ttl„ yr }ti tv ji? ir; t# jS rti" 7 tP t s agricultural . uab�e'Ni .,.,{rj t ,... } r , rz.,,. L.. # ,k Y s....:t .a : ?�rirjt .<,rtt7 Milt a ji t.rtajttri }tts{{4; { sa,t,?, t5.fr � k t ttr t { tit itf 1 s St {{ tl ` Sl tt£rrt i #tirtrtt i�t s� �, rt �12j(rJ �t"fit ut{t Gi�t �itrtt t 7 }7t t tt i( � to P {J i { 1 yt�t?Ttrjr fttr€ tot }; ij;iyJt tar{�' tit{iter Itas tat iJs Ertl r>t {rli t r11tYt�{ a tl (tri �5 t�tirltJa r} {rt Sa})gir tt2t S�� tr it is tt tY k r t 'ill t tt; Discussion. � 1 ji} 4 i iat{j i3trt{t j+#a}t t}rtrE` S ti S4r 7. tt r2 ttS Itti rrStt2t" t jSz t�t tt "` t i k t t. t f r k £ t f yas t Z tr}t tttj: a2t4 £ttt{.�t�:. 7„t{lat ya 1}77f„' f 1 a a -c) The project tbeen l� . M : t tt t • prime ttl lit �Ytt t�l �ft,.��r4t} tyt V{t{... f t i tt r tJ ti t} }t s t 11 t t production. � tt itatt It{{ r j{ it it f tit tY>{t 5 i j trial { rtt r+St t at,'S {ttr} � t iu r' xttttttt;t i `t tt�t{tt ��}tt�`lt to atdatrit }r}7 in �t st tt €}a sjt{{ i rSIJ{ t{ria Itt lttt iia tr. r,=` }icj S t }4 tett .t� i t }Si ijjl tlt t(tit ¢ tt#t`, tt rtyit�r tt ttrY 7}t pr,= t� it t yt ;}fit Jt�as Stjt ttj�tiit ltti}tttit�tiktttt t?s#t t;tt�iiaa rtk�ti to ., tit�i [” t t t t ii t It It t i r #itis t t~t r 1t t t E{a;i� ih� t { 7 �. ti 7S t to s tS Jrr S �t r};£€ sf t tta: lrrl tr � t tt�{tr f Jtfs� tS rit� �t'r i} t t t t f it! tar Iz,€i f tt ft rlr� }; tt tut { rt € zt tt ttit It 5{ r,jia tt jr tt r, t}i rt Nt t{ lEi, I}tt2t r } J t# s t S SS StrJt airr tt :alt aY is}t yr �t t,{t„ t{,. Y test t rt tt ftfyttr t}}}, rte sf ) i,,. Yt4 tt t lti It Itj {tlak tr t'..t is }t aJiair,` S,,IrStst to Iift latt�tii t..'t } til. } sa }}} }x... ocumetation ■ �tt't'�t tJ tr tri #i<z st( t�tjft 7; i rtit r it ta# ttt rt.:. Si{# s{k �t t�} ttt it i§tlir tlt t{>ts t:.� r tt lti tett ;tt Era .r} 1 r s€ t ie,} 2 r5d i alt t1 } X t .t ltt �r) rel r7 �tiir tf at i}a{;i{ Irat at if}}t tt tt�r If.nt. a2t7}t tsrtt(�yt tt tri tr.t{Y r{ t �tr i�kr, �.,'s Y tt st ' ii}t ttty Cityo ee ddin General Plan Natural Resources E t t t4 E tt St rYtrt J {Gitt}ll Jthf Cityo Redding General Plan Background eo Chapter .41 Awji }I4 7 {�t ter., J�r�� Lands t,. tt } t#�at tys to rir # 3 4California Department f Conservations Farmland Mappinga ring t t Progra eta } 2 t; tt air .7 {t €a Yyt 7 } as r# �ft t }t 7�J titrtt3 ttititrtt{? alt €ttt€tt{.{i` d Forest St ttj t t b :. FIted States Department of iculture,, Soi M of Shasta County Area. mittgatlon. >,,t. t” { its i£ t,r.t} r 2 t , r,.,.: �i t ✓ ", t s €, eft } i tit rt117rft ; 7 1, sal t4tti?`t�s4{Y 1 tj tt�.ir ttr } ttat tal;•i£ i£t{: ({St ilii tt tjrJr }71 {t Sj 7 t b"� r 25 r r } ; ttt r1 ; it tl7 its aJitt aJ r t t,ta Itfa lt'a S#a its t'}ti- ja t(t i}tt tea ittt ft2 �,{tr ittitiy ,�� it ti i�tt» t 5 tt 7 1 # ttf 4Jjat t t tttt to rt fat€ �. r t t } 4 t rt:{ ;! J� 1{ i y It tit { }#'raft r tita:tr �t t} #r rytutrjt 2r5 i{ r t tttr "7 "' { tt 4ia�ar tea ti t S2{ t {r t r t tr £} il;�l,4;tisk' ,ti.l Sj tftt £t�ti � 1 tat t ;a i : st tr tJ t {t ttt�r { StY�ti i t{t� tj "tst}rifE t..' �,ttt :.�Y a rtttttr tat ? {;t�r� {{ia.t ti sS}ti :,i: t25t i}t y} "at4it lrc t"J Ytts to fi a t 4. i ata; # tJt a.. s ; a t 57. ,,,, 1%! ttll rt t � tt irk t �t`t{}J#i1 t trirjtt{ t}}#t yt 4�lyrt {J It„ti atir tttJ{t' j y.4r .. f a k{y t t4tt}. t i f}�att lttl3tt tt:ttt,£z. t Yt it tii t;aj art �' ' ti {,; t#rt$}st; {its of to 17 r a ,.rt Sy t :;41�tt jt tri' t tystl r i � tt ” 3 None necessary.t Irasr it}t t S 5� { jtf,,tyta YEJst4 t;ttt rel ttt4 yt ttt lJ ,a S-2017-00239 Live Oak Subdivision 6 Ike o" LSIUMV ,» rYtit� t i f•',t Z 4 t t } } 71t toTal'O'nissions(lbs./da j vJIM UkBEMIS air qtjahtyco mputer model r EMLq",v, M� it ;tt s#3 t 7� t 1t y7 t t tt}�t)�71}}t}t�f d' air, t[t ' 4F a� ► ale a� eN} ♦ 1t b�e�*$iiboivtsion a #I� rYtit� t i f•',t Z 4 t t } } 71t toTal'O'nissions(lbs./da j vJIM UkBEMIS air qtjahtyco mputer model r EMLq",v, M� it ;tt s#3 t 7� t 1t y7 t t tt}�t)�71}}t}t�f d' air, t[t ' 4F a� ► ale a� eN} ♦ 1t b�e�*$iiboivtsion a 4K*M�lb 49 # 0 v w receptors) from fogitive� a, A d �Use that coula generate opj� WIN Sijbdivklon a f " -number ,VgVrj4.pVM oil I „ ! lw V IN ncorpvratec! 11 �liit 40 lmwr No endan & .d threatened., or rare [ant w w lw �► + # 0 w AM 91 41W�'`IV 0# � 0 0 40 9 040 ► M IF w v' Live Oak Subdivision tog v ► aka► w�Ak Ar 0 MINI FOR in addition to tree II e retention eff6r S the df f n: Iq 4 is ,imp•� „ ow IMF" 40 r 1 0 4 w S-2017-00239 Llive Oak Subdivision 10 ,� „�, � aws �► ' arr '� � add Centm A 1 S-2017-00239 Live Oak Subdivision 11 mitigAtion. r 409 �u Ak '' , i queb oil mummmm 411* .. , o" ► Ar 0 m Aw 4w 0 '" '' S-20V�0089 Live Oak 56 bdiv!Mon IX A The project *Is subject to certain erosion -control requirements mandated by exist'ing 01ty and State' requirements include. lik 46 40 40 M AF 4wMR 40 sof 40 = WIF w '► o The proposed ! a3 fa 47J734 Mill, 7f t 3 � ! ! ilJ !JY §ft atas a ; fa � rt a � a1�t i}s £ t3 r tl 1744} t i ! aas ,af fr! I77f ata }} 33�!{ sf$t £a t t t I3 s} f 41Ya } s}t# tf #j }a! } 1 Y f 174 }?sat f3 5 It sla3 f !Y 3!r s t, Gro:. u . a s E. (Liquefaction Potential) cityof ReddingHealthand Safety Element, fig ............................. C Shytis� Redding j �b'�!€� ��General Pln Final��r�+ ��e�� + � i� .e�jj ?t3triY aCttl rt 3 t tl{ atf£ rs3. tf1}a f r st ,h _f tit jy, tt}ltt tai :) I to to ! } (} f ,y J£ f City Redding Genera Plan Background Report,rt �� .,.,,<r l.,}<Ia,Iaa„f?a, a }if ! 1l ft 371 rtl�,}3•a,t' r tjlt} }ff i Yl �� }} ra Mair£ - lad a sa{ t lir f �t Ci o Redding Gr d'Is n Ord'ia a ce, RMC Chapter 16.12 r r. S a t<, r s3rt f!t l{Jil11 ftf r t r t f st!! f t t! t s tt It # d}tst } t3 �1 tay 3 7 i{a 1 i 3}}yst �ttt! !i Yl c- Jritats t } f t Sy �wrN`1Y�Jk !' tslt rsS l lrlfl Fft! rt � sa' ! flat is atit }jlt 3{ �ik a �� n Standard � edifications Gra 4�CAL�� P ctt*c s: � ! a l�tj17f 7ysi st I1 .4 y3{ Yt 1}.i rt t31r1'r �.:.. ... a�ra f} !J a}3f 1 t! a ra 4 tali 5 a3 sit£{11 i !Y. J it 73a t£�£�If taai 417{w7 �a� ,3st at3r li37a tYt t tt atas t aft f1aSa�- 1147 4131 Ir if ltr ff,l, i �. 73 a�37{a3s tt ,f ,f 'L f}Ca; Sa£ft „r. -- y lng Standard Co n d � . ±! -.. Aos fApproval for 4�ewlyy^^�� aF � ! fy �.: 2 4 a, y3. 2 3ltf'i1 tt, tYk `if`,; 3t 74417 if#su% ft al1�, 3#I!j of , t 1 ' t s trt t r ? .'ti fat Ira fr 31 a t 1 t4:. 33 tt fffa . ° u �i � c :z tk 7{r gist aSfftf toss if tf ,�„a„ tf 7 -7a is > �>, s}43 i{l�sJ :ii tri tt Yill f. SoH Survey of Shasta County Area, Un'I'ted States Depart, re, So,jil, vat JJ rest Serv*ce, August 1974 F a rk, I } t { f ftt} ... t .. ti .r t. ��i iR� a� �� NiAsIon ��s an Geology �"� a.Pub�#{ca�FJ1lon 4#�.. ,.. � �U sStfa3 s tj 7 ifraf! farf3',tr}if t 3f ! 1!{te<'luraf, ast 3 fa}a3i f;a !lt a 3}s!a f t t } ! t fr uct'l'on Act*v*ty Storm Water Perm*ts and State Reg`ional Water Qualfty Control Board, Central Valley Reglon, Reg... t elated to s �* Storm Water Pollution revenfi n Plans 3( it Ija tsif;!'” ttaf if \tlY}l3 sY tt� {Ifis facf r! }I$fr' £!qt tlti}�}3314 lfat tr! Letter from Central Valley Reglonal Water Quallfty Control Board, dated March 16,, 2011, i l f a t#} sI f t J if ff ! Cr 1 K 1 rltt} £f fa !! 1t f ! ffr E! fi}` t! tt l.. i(kl it aft z sa{!f 3}t}s, }aft fS jft}£tr}a3f:£{!i{`17r ..�tY�f 7a ll f*t�+<s, f 1.., i s ff7 t,3rffs ,a..ttt Yf, 1 t it i i £ t } 5 { Y ! si 3 313 �3tft}f sf !{tt5 1,3 ilf! t l slfla 7 t3 >3 tfYf Al a tiff 3lf sYi£r !. tE3 a to 4.147 13 ((taV 17377 f} eY 4 f tat rt3 fYf tt to lr#I 3t 11 t( f ! 3 s f o f 3 a all,a "!A ��.. 4311{fit jt t 4147 � }ya�f!{{aa3r};t£� } tt it;t, ft �iato� 1 to 371 It a. Y3ft Y 3 f }fls! i t 437 .+ f :! `., f 5 sit a fs fi a !a tj a lt(} ,t £ b 2I f £ r a iC f 3 17 ff (trI fa } tlf �Il t: f 7i 1 {1fI t,"'f"F. WAS", tr1! ! t lata of 3 tf a s tf 2 t! s t �r f I sa ttiY l t f( 1, ��:Nonenecessary. jj i�ecessa r `,yrt k 2 1 I taf f laafr to tt rr lY t7 sfl43 Ill saf f rytfj �a, a, aff;t {3 314 ft tt rt. tar f f! 1 } t t 13t1tF! I ¢t ,� t tr sf s f f a .t ¢af i s a s t a� 4 �f 3447 r } t t}3a ! }tta9 t< f§ 3 jefs3 I tCat tr t rjf,tl ! !ff t a1j{i't� !�a fjltl4t��! tfsf}'!'}t,e1l,l,,, Potentially Less -Thee Less -Than- .. N II G R EENHODS E GAS E M ISSI Would the project Signiffikant Significant With Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, e ther" d rectly r'n ectly that may x have a significant *ipact on the environ end b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the x purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? S-2017-00239 Live Oak Subdivision 1 rolmR.M.". �sit e At ``" r , v I= 1 Live Oak Subdivision vso `' SMF ''►41+ i + ►"` on ia(gerscal�o�-th(z� CAl `w w.r.` S-2017-00239Live Oak Subdivision1 Its lot SAW `'' ®` .4W lw .' EE I ME S-2017-00239 Live Oak Subdivision 1 t � t �t �ttfftj t ir4�sz,,�#�. loorp Orated fl Otborwise b�tanL grade injor� or ,A�=n 3 tt r Y ff4'7j�s� i r �,y t n so x 13 g, hI ij The 1.00 -year floodplain boundary of Churn Creek is Just outside the northeast property boundary. No encroachment in the floodplain will occur with the project. w Old Alturas Multi t�amlly Enti Milli 11 1111 llplll�pllll� illiql1lill 11, 111 ii 11 Live Oak Subdivision 18 Milli 11 1111 llplll�pllll� illiql1lill 11, 111 ii 11 Live Oak Subdivision 18 Noqe necessaryl IM! The� project �Sjte is no O *,* "M Cr(Tica[Knerzil RON ''7 4�fi �fikii hi t t }7771. t21'tatui7 i1>�i 1£i Documentation, t #7f tf. tt sit tfit s s f{ kt r N p} i71 tl{ i f i f! City of oReddingG neral atu ra l Resources Element 2000 t fi k surf t}t ' i47} {ft } t itd �It is It tiitfYc tf;if sit}tits;l 7 {tts� t i tt tti t i tilt 4t atfi If Irifj tt iti it t} sik4 tot z f 4 s t a1 t t71 7 i t si t 4s ?'c Ii£' t I sl lite i tall{f {i�(iixS 4i i}zJ f)ttit tiattt tctlt t4 ttsti itif}c t1 }tirt { 14th✓t}ifi iii Sf 1`t f.:it Nit {ti asst �4tt ^£� ik}7 trf s } i iyt££7>!i sal �3ff sf}ttt tst k�tt `'y tstr ftvJ: ,7 iY£ k£rt £�t {fit tk}ti£f t'i 7tii sktti�7.. t{7{tt� t,� Ig'2 f £t fr {74fi sf�fif t`417 ii tc:.,7 lit} .tts 7 7 tr ;tt itt ta'f 44 i1 �� I�i�#tit t iy isf t{t$$it ti .,,� t ittyf SlY Mitigation.s,,stftrlt krt4 r7IIx .:lfti t{ ii 27 s:.7 t5t1 k44fs it 7u{ i4 fs rl r, ti itfls7 t i 43 f f}7t{t't tttfr l7 tt it s ittt if pit ,tct�t� rsiij, stt3ttr t7 f;�tfttk tftf,,��.i ,.. .r ss si Sttl ssft ttti ctt� tifti£ rrrli�tir Srl)}ct}i7{�7r,. iiit �}7 rs i Ir tct Sri kt31 { ft I's f.t #Ili { t s k tIi i fist c ti titi t I Ea{it tt� 1 rk 1 3{ t t i I t It t ,ri- }t i# t 7 7 ti y itt tt t Sl7i } t t i7jAst t s t yt74`} tt c i ist t{ s �i t t i.. None necessary. 15 rzsr<S It ti i)� t,t st t � t 5 it 7{i t itis' ttaf�' � S t� }.t itis i . 77tj ttii{z tlti{ � r. S7 Ott iiitit; ttk+ytf tt it tri 7f 4l;tY 17i 7 �t} is 4t ; � y ti 1 07 7 ct tt 1 { 1 ittt{ ttr77 t t Y Y k tt t c s t � t 1 t t < tr c { }t tt 4 14£I tilt kt I1i7 i 7 r t,4 th f} i ft1 tt 7 fr,s t i r ){ ii tit i If 17 f k tt rPotentially Less -Than- No sitil li k477Pffffl�t} t fifes, SIj 4?r state . .. }tt 7l �t c� sft}i r 7+1, 4fktf a} 4{; LssThan XIL { t 7t 4th ' S NOISE: Would the project.. a t ttt.t t tr tt1 c �Ir : i$t ttst t n ff *tcant nIficant Significant . g g Impact. tit i f,,. r£kc t4 t£ :: fl} i sf. 72;t 4tt4 tt 7tzsi {I i77{clt7trft i`t 7 �t t: (y1 fkis ti � y,, i;i ;1,;{�} > t� r i With � Impact c'1 £tft}4f tf t' ttrkt ; c t42f i}i4 tt irr tt}ii$ rlfpSi7 if yt of Ijtcti(slsf tilt t i a{ f 1c4 „.it tt �4t It :flit t Uc Yii£f Nit itiittt )tt �tity `tlr tU} 7tc tl irf.,it771 itJc ;{7¢f >i j}1 #��` i }tr:,t tt {it4t .. Sc�i fa.7 t ft,1i1 i:$f t .t47fs7 yitt 27 (4t 1 iatio �ii;.s t SS if 1'ft t i tis .:. it 7c}f t �i t1 a17it t�:}17 }tip ±t" i i IU i Yy t t t :. 17 t71 i X;744 {1fi t I {i, { },t 's�r, 71t7 Ir ria t' t{ { }s ie} iir t f t x 7 t t shit tri {:7 1 177 ;It ii 7 i t41c s11{} ti tc I } i... 1't7Jk4 jilt }:I jti t%f.,.a k11 `�tti '. 11£ kit if iI} ,l1 7{`£ttk ..: �. t7is} l',.71iY iiif iliJ � lr f'.:. tic ti tt � ��, s } i.f. ttt7 $a.t t7 i:t }t ita ttt £,i. rt tfj417 sr l:„tIt it s tlt:.: tt a�� t 4 cit t ; 7tt s r 7 a t�t{ kf } tt ftkitit it f �t,t.7,1 77 17 � t tl7t 177s i ii is t k tr.h�kt j +� itr .. i til;tt7't: ! ) r} It r4 ttl It i .tt tct ci 7 £ Itiit .a lit i t Incorporated 7�,7rt 71tii r4 if t:. t) cttr {i{ tr4TIIt t7}if r'4s, �ilasttti741siit {{Ic.' ff t��jrttitittjtlttt tf t ttk til t 112 if 1ik k rt iit}7i is i3 Itttctt' 4st', to ;fitft t7yj72t i� �t �cJiz lift f7 Its ial�Z 111 7-. Itiif 1t a) Exposure of persons to r generation o no$ in se levels ex 3�{�{ t t{ f t1{ r fic4fri k1 to it i t t tl It is tt IVti rt f standards established in the localgeneral plan t stai{ 7 X. +� 9� 1 a..tc t =it 1 <t1P z v } i, ((i f 55( ,td t ir. orainance,, or +�piicable standards of other J11 :tst�4 lits sk;, k 72;117 :t s} c, k4l £s ft �fi � {#{ftk. ga 14$t i, t�f1 �, t,rs tt tit;t". tr„tt f,, ttt yt .. 1�, t#�,ft�tl irfi ). it11777 �,ii sy c!t t{}',d „t1� iki ttiofls'�t tl�;,, rsb) Exposure of persons to or generat'on of excebb7;,= i Itp (:rtt K, �, r s r a }�, It.,aa t tt � :a” 1 tt e1,� . r 4 u t }' 1 c� .�1 s 7 t t t .:, S 1 Ii, r t,. r � k f' t e, 3 ,.. ,,.� �. -.x r i t t r.t 1 3, r ( f borne vk rafin or ground -borne noise levels I'll 0, 01,600--m-M t )i f k1 ri k. 01 00 M 0 0 0 M 0 0 10 £ k11 Itci{ t1 {i44i, c) A substanti'al permanent � 'increase N% �� i ila r�jt (t4i .5123 t i,. tic }tSit tE t fit t t 71 3 7. tt k t r rrt 5 7 iz n . a �� r se levels i t It t}. tit 7t t 7i it t f .,£ i 7 i4tttir itit i t �fi' t it t at tt t t„ rt It7 s f t 771 d ttj 21 V3It :-tf Ics. ,.,1= i X the proiect iF 11^ lMIty above levels !¢ existing w ect? kz 17t 2 .f: a ,t r Q j � ,i tli {t tt 1 � t e`t. t 4i 7 tr�it�S 2 } 7 t �7t } 2t 4 =ftti�l7{i14`t Ij, i{;77 xc}7 t las. tk; tt tr t tit is t� i t r 3r r7 d A tit t4st 7 i t t s i 3j1 �k t 7 }f 4 i4 it t , f f its} a# t3 f t jt is I l f t{ 1 4r rt t t ,,ts 3 ,'i4fii t f sifs i it zt )a jsf t}r7t fir i�£�1'f st tli 2ftl 7?t ss+bsta nt eA a te m p o ra ro r peri*od r: is i c �n creasein a rnbient ��o,��se tits (:. tt tt f ;ti t11 `•t 2.3(t istk {,, f,u-s•>i.. tt i4i 2lsf �tk rsftfi 2 7�i: trill! rr}f3ti z}I�t i3 )4{f s,:c. I eve Is j ng wit h o ut t h e. t�4 ' r:, c�Ir-, e 4, 3.,. fl tri ki 3175,. { t rt Ill t.:. I;tf .:.pit n th e p, ti€ ect !11 11 n a bove I evels M -a� � i c .. i i .,, , t1,t� 7 t t 4 (f ) r.1is�,.. tt 7 .7 1 t t t'. t.. 1 t... 7 3t. t i t. 1 ': t S7 } Y t { k t.. k:. i1 t. s f,. 4, i, 1 t iE I f � t 7 � t k. Y t c t zt s t '- t t! 1 �7`c Y t t.�t 1 t S ,�... 1 �� 'rt f f s 7 t� ..i t L 75I tit t Ia It i :), til rY tt�� tk7 tt t}7r t ))tial ft 7 ilrct rr ,,is t It c i t 7 F{ tit tit r t is tt{t7 fit fk:{ft ysti7 {±� t t, ;?{y it# itiit t ttt st it{ s iii fik ;7, 137t } t? rte rt to r1 tt 4 t; i¢.,W projec � t 0 0 WON 004'M e) 7t t ra For a project located w th n an airport land use plain or ., where such. a plan has not been adopted, Mithtn two Iles of public r fir : r public use i t r ,, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive i levels.? `. people.......... f) For a project within the vid'n'tty of a pr"Ivate al*rstrtp,, Would the project expose r i r r the project & aarea to excessive noise ievels? a a 5 ago'' „look; sureswould be There a�mno no vIV ►`` 'OF v # ' 4w Mitigation. None necessaT rl y y{ff yl�'i��tt tyyt riy§4y 4y�it�,�d,jt y' t t t i y a�z {t�ti4tr4} y4 tt�s#j�ilr �ft� 2017-S-00239 Live Oaku id`s 2 D 13 i'i 1 y 4*' } y y{ff yl�'i��tt tyyt riy§4y 4y�it�,�d,jt y' t t t i y a�z {t�ti4tr4} y4 tt�s#j�ilr �ft� 2017-S-00239 Live Oaku id`s 2 D 13 i'i yl S sj?I } t i <f l r 113 y y y{ff yl�'i��tt tyyt riy§4y 4y�it�,�d,jt y' t t t i y a�z {t�ti4tr4} y4 tt�s#j�ilr �ft� 2017-S-00239 Live Oaku id`s 2 D 13 i'i a Doome0ation, Oty �f Redd4ig GMewl P16ni Housing Element 2014 and P61ko P�oti��n* j. JAW ,Jngs�eNftO 'IeVels. The $ize of the S-2017-00239 Live Oak Subdivision I OM Mitigation. a, tess ban - tp � tai �' f � I a� Y ��f�I ,11 Signific-arlt With Signifitant m psi., . 1 MP aDIY Wt tion N impact " d lerated? I I Mil— ' Raw lw lw ' ,r► aw AL S-2017-00239 Live Oak Subdivision 2 4.. 7 i / t pp S 1 $t t t jtyli )st`tt,�;s . f a * "' Aft Live Oak Subdivision and traffic -control infrastructure based upon 'improvements necessary to accommodate new development under the City's Genera! Plan. • V w a 0 0a 40 "" +1 as aM� �► i� ew ` duM as Nag A III Mitigation. f {� S-2017-00239 LiveOak Subdivision 24 "ota MIally aM ss4hamw L6$��Thotivw Significant Signifkant With Impact ig tion ImpaO Inc0 ar f6d live ow Iw ow -. ►' ,e 40 DocumenOtIon: Cultural �Resourcj��-Msje�ment prepared Esm mmm II tlaornia RativeAmerican tribes th�t 4�4 2011 and May 51 2017; respectively. S-2017-00239 Live Oak Subdivision 2 Live OakSubdivision 26 mitigatiom None 40tessary, Ba5od on the ana ysis undertaken as �Jtial stod)� t m lot �` • i�W It��li �I than significant. i As discussed herein, the project does not have characteristics which could cause sub directly or indirectly. 3 S2017-00239 Live Oak Subdivision 27 0 a n sfgntftaht� 0 0 0ac *11111 WIN *=4 ils +tot <4}ttlp (tl1 tytrliti }}tf � t' r({77 i Avoids impacts macti altogether by noLrt aii n ac, ' t � ar �an action, r4iS',l 4jr il,t Vst ;,t +t 1� t tPttttS�kzt45�t t4 r�t�E4 � l�4 � . .:. ,. :� t ,.,., it ..::,,:i LSA S 4 y f a tt : ti t � f{a'a 71 . 7 v �f�t 4 � t�,f f ti -rr ,,,,. � t 3 :. 7 �yi. t �,. £ o a 7 &, }. .est v.. �,. .. s ,,. t t .. �. t f t ...:,4 w„� ,..s .,.t. ,r :t ,. .,. t .x:::: I t. t,,, , „� t t t� ,:- � t S .r {{1//y�x w�ix ».�i� �1111� ).. R�[. S { .: V S :,. ��iX� a��ay.. j1111 .4.. J.. �.� the ��w�.. �'�I}'�` w��wM"� Minimizes impacts by � "b� . � �� I�Y�” �' } i 1' Y } uM �#Y� j. .:.:i„si, ��.:: t t Ott t�S tsj412t t�'4` �` t{ t t 4 Siyt. f i t tt(.. t( r: �t r 3 4 :£ rst14 tttY f t j.t4t t tit}t£t �r t��;l�� trtti ia£c44t tai Ott eft t£t4�7ri�tt4 tst;,; ``t. t r 4 a t t i 3 3 t z t t � 1 f J ” 1�£}J 4�5 �{�yS tJy4t 4£�tttykY Ott}{ a}}t its {.i{i .Sv it� implementation. impactsRectifies '.. y repairing, renaoilitating r restoring, : }�4y t) i � iroliment, Jlt lx toy � t } tr 7ittt q't kz��'... t {tt j r t t ttt t( {t }lt tt� 4st34fttt r ltjtzt, r}t } a y t 1 �! 4 t i t zt tt2 Sit �t 3� t f ti t 4t t t 7 t t t i r S t time b Reduces r e li inates impacts r .�: ;t sfft{ 2137 r; t tr4 £ttz� it t�rai tis:.si i ti"i jt �ztJt4lt ,�t{ j4y{isttS . maintenance : operations 1 { t 1 , cluri the ll* fe of the project. It 4 * Compensates for i cTsoy replacing ' r provictingsubstitute resources ' or environments. III 111111jill! ill —I— ". F -I T-Tiow3mm or phasc� the mitipidot ftieas= will be Awr "g,"P t , rt Mitigation Monitonlig Program, Live OakSubdivisifoll arch 1, 2018 AM "g,"P t , rt Mitigation Monitonlig Program, Live OakSubdivisifoll arch 1, 2018 Im MIM 1�9V�D tl f u fi' i i (IV 1M i i w 4w dpi '!k IL qw tiff t +ri t�k '1F > t� it IP +k 'Na ►OF 40 ow rw AAW AM No 11 0 lam" 4; 1�9V�D tl f u fi' i i (IV 1M i i w 4w dpi '!k IL qw tiff t +ri t�k '1F > t� it IP +k 'Na ►OF 40 ow rw AAW AM No 11 0 From: Harris. Michael R.@ ildlife To: BVL&g__UndA Cc: _Hellman Paul/ Henderson, Arny@Wildlife Subject: Live Oak Subdivision located on Old mtumaRoad Date: Wednesday, March m,zoma:1+:ooAM Dear Ms. Burke, My staff and I have discussed the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Live Oak Subdivision located onOld A|turasRoad. The Department appreciates the City ofRedding utilizing residential infill opportunities for this parcel. However, the Department has some concerns over the CE[V\ process followed as well as some minor comments regarding the project itself. M. State Clearinghou Per CEQA s s ctions 15205, the CEQA Lead Agency must submit odraft environmen pact report III e declaration (ND), or mitigated negative declaration (MND) to |earinQhouse vvnyofthe following are true: °D r ft ugg Lead Age Ig Responsible Agency, gency, or o m Draft EIRS NDs on P, cts identified," area wide significance � Draft E|Ss,env|ronmenT | pursuant tnNEPA, the Fed (Titt CDFVVisalways a trustee agency whenever a.,g state even ifthat effect |sconsidered | ss should have gone through the State Cie,,",', I Wetlands bvastate agency where such agency isa bvapublic agency where astate agency isa /ise has jurisdiction by law with respect to the on 15206 as being of statewide, regional or ignificant impactprepered commencing with Section ect on fish and wildlife of �antby h a8eQ�,,therefone, the project ,ocess. AN A small wetland feature in thePreliminary 07, 24, 2016, and prepared by Gallaway Enterprises, but no forma ttb n was conducted. In order for the Department to analyze and comment s, it is imperative we have all the necessary information. The first question t er or not there are jurisdictional wetlands present onsite, and if there are, if those wetlands will be impacted. If the answer toboth ofthose questions isyes, then the amount ofwetland impacted should bedisclosed as well as the proposed mitigation. The Department considers any impacts towetlands significant and opposes development or conversion of wetlands unless the mitigation assures there will be "no net loss" of wetlands. Mitigation for wetlands typically begin ata I:1 ratio and go higher if listed species are present. |fwetlands are present, and are proposed for development, avoidance, minimization or mitigation measures need to be developed prior the approval of the project. Special Status Species The PRE states the general botanical survey was conducted outside the bloomingh d for most flowering plants. One special status species, Reddingcheckerb|oom /Sidblccoce/oto\, a California Rare Plant Rank 3 species was noted as having the potential to occur within the oak woodland portion. The PRE goes ontnsay nnfocused surveys were necessary because this portion ofthe site will beavoided. Theoakwood|andereaproposedforavoidencevvi||become"privateopenspece°, which means the homeowners and/or renters will be able to utilize the open space for hiking, dog walking, etc. Direct and indirect impacts to the open space were not discussed in the K4ND. The Department recommends botanical surveys be conducted at the appropriate blooming time to determine the presence and/or absence of special status plant species. If special status species are found, appropriate avoidance and minimization measures shall be developed to reduce any significant impacts to less than significant. Additionally, h | Study states, "the status as a California Rare Plant Rank3(more does not currently by[o�/orn/oDepurtn�en1ofF�hand Wildlife "All of rnia Rare Plant Ronk 3 meet the definitions of the "W'Wo Endangered SA�&s Act a the California Deportment of Fish and G 'itode and are eligibl r state listing. Impacts to these species or their during Preparation of environmental h to t must be to CE Y, ps they meet the definition of Rare or Endangered under CEQA The Department experts throughout the state to in an Invei " I similar Special Vascular Plants, 131,61111 ytes, and Lid includes plants, ecological corn N"! ities and the #4 te advises public agencies during th", ,QAprocp not significantly impact such reso6 Y1 appropriate rare plant rank in the In pro review to ensure compliance with CEQA. .011011 |fyou have any questions, please Michael Harris Senior Environmental Scientist California Department ofFish &Wildlife Northern Region Interior Conservation Planning (530) 225-2306 UD http://www.cnps.org/cnps/rarepIants/ranking.php kfornia Native Plant Society and with botanical ,y of Rare and Endangered Plants, and the ii`ob, L S ies on these lists may meet the ist. pec 6#1agency for the wildlife of California, which 1,which they depend, the Department h the actions they approve do lead agency during project ,at(S3O) From: aluke�� To: Subject: Live Oak Estates Date: Thursday, April 5,uUzox:ss:z6xM Attachments: bo�l.�� Good morning Amy, We are in receipt of comments from Senior Environmental Scientist, Michael Harris, --regarding �the Mitigated Negative Declaration for Tentative Subdivision Map S-2017-00239 and Planned Development Plan PD-2O17-0O241,Live Oak Estates. Below isa brief response tothose comments. Please let meknow ifyou have any further questions orconcerns you would like todiscuss. Thank you, Linda State Clearir The City of Rd,"d,"ding's past practice has"""' typically sent all Negative Declarations through the State ,,,ticularl oject would warrant a Lake or Streambed Alteration Permit for ter outfall, as is the case with this project. If the project involve "If ,,esources, however, the City would be in contact al '10"ing stages with the DFW through the early iltthe environmental document would be sent through the State Clearinghousdi, this case, ageq,,,,,ppy,,,,, comments were requested in March 2017, however no comments were re and there o incli� W ,,ption that anything other than standard operating procedure should be f6fted. Wetlands -- The wetland area was disclosed in the Prelimi Enterprises as being .001 acres. However s�g II4,',J�i narrative that the grading plan shows property line. The mitigation nneasunevvWeddeda�� grading plan needed to be modified and fill necessary anticipate filling the wetland. )urceEva|u ledged it area \ conducted bvGalloway ca yin The applicant' iacent tothe west /ent the preliminary neer however does not Special Status According to California Department of Fish and Wildlife Klatural Diversity Database (CNDD8)and California Native Plant Society information, aCalifornia Rare Plant Rank 3are those for which more information is needed to assign them to one of the other lists or reject them. The definition states that many, but not all Rank 3 plants meet the definition of the California Endangered Species Act and are eligible for listing. |nthis case, the area ofavoidance that will be designated "private open space" will be separated from the usable portion of the lot by a 4 to 5 - foot -high retaining wall and is a rather steep slope, and therefore not suitable for hiking ordog walking, affording protection topotential Rank 3plant species. Linda Burke, .Associate Planner ____-, _ __ __ 11 __ - 41iiiiiii-ii,.. mo"��m�_ ___ ______ -,------ �-, 4 I "�� "I'll, I-- ", 1, -_ I) 11 f1-: # "I'l"''I'll""I'll'll'"'I'll""II ____ . .. ... � . ..... � .. ...... . ',____,__,,____,__ 11 _-1-1 I - " 77-7-7 -, - " , ! - -,,- . " , � l , ", __7�, � 11�� "I I J!,� i,, � ", 1, ", All i� , 4 0 ,if I- I � ," -, 6 ", � svill� 'jw!,1',v;." 11 I'll, I , , 'I,"`,)"" i ,� III 11 ill 1111,11,iiii ." I �T,,l I , I, I , jl� I , ,l , :�,I,,�`,,Ii`," �� 0 I, , � -_1 ", , " " 'I'l , , ,i ,,,- ,, I I" I , 11 ", - �, � �, 4 I � I'll, i " � _� � , "?" I _1 _,,,�,I, " , " I � I 1��__ , 1, , , " \ I , - ,"I I", 11 , , I", I'll "' 11 Ill "I " "I'll" i ..... 11 0 7 "i I i �, I!, ?" I -Jr: �ll-i,� i'4�l . ..... --',,;, , , "If I 11 \ s � 1- , �,, I "I I ,- , , "" ,"",I ', , , � 'I'l, I� 1�""11 ',;, t1i' I I I ck� \ , I - 11. =1=11 lvll_ � �, I I f " - -, 4, 1�,,� , �� " , f I I I I ", , , , � 1, - [ , i ", i , I t", . I � - I \ \ I ,�l , , "" ,-11 ,,'� , I" I I I ' 1*411- ", - , , " " _ I I �,',i, j, ill 4k - , " "i : ",% k,"", , `1 .1 I " 11 , I � , , " ,,7. -L--, -l: , I I I I "I", , , I iI I "t , "I I 6, , , 6o, 17 i "I'l � 'L I ,I I I I I � I I I I I'll, I "I _'i " ,. I � � , 1, ,� �,�Il �, "I' 1.�., "' ; _ __,_ , I I , 11 -11- , i# ,, - ", _�7_1 �, �: " t I , "J'I ., 1_�11 " � w, il , , " , �5 11 �_, , -, I I \ I \., � , , � - - 'I., r -- i, " I .1 , �, i; 11, I i, " - -1 11 � "' 1 , ", , " 11 , f \ 1, , , i I ":, I "I'll � ,, i : ! - � "; - !, "� �,::,,i - _ -1,14 � t ' il i � , , � , � �, I I I , , " I � ,�,,v,j,_,,, �1 ( ` I ..i Il - A I I I ` I/ I I k, , I 11 ) , , ,j_ ! - �- )'�,, , I " " ,,� , � "", �, 11.11 � 4 4I, : "', ,i � � _,'Ilk�,i, "', T.", 1, ii,'� I - � ,, , ,I `z 4 , - � `� - , ti �,,q ... �,;J I , I,i! '. j , �, I i : " I � I � " I �', ,"--, _�,ll , - � 11 - , ,, . " I " ; , I I � 1, �, " , - "Il 11 � , I I , i ��111 � _,� , ,� �, i I I � I I I I I I �,, 7'', 0'' "'i'i " T',_ -_r i; �',i-4, "'Y'j; I I ie � i, i, ,, ,, � I I � I '�` 1-1- * "' - , , 11 � , __ . .. - , . " ,, , , I;.J, , " I I I _11, _fj� ,.I 11 " � � "'l, 7 I .. .. ... ... _-, � I � 11 I w 8 tS S J 00 st ill I, I A f *' i I': I � I I �, ,�"",:I, I ,t-" I , !, ��,,':,il In � I \1 , �7 ; 4 , , , ill" ,-'I. ;:'i "I I "41, I " " I [�� I � � -#, 4 1 , t , , � I , � I I I i 11 11 ,,,_,_" I I 1, I � 1� 11� , -� " - ,,, ". 'I " 4 "T",,, -, �1 ' ", I � 0 Iii mj I I I I .11, I *P** 0 -008 � I I I x I " I I I *�"l I I ,, 0, , 1 ,i , ii, 4N 11 I "' NII-1�11111"lliz"i, I , I "'i': " , " I - V �,�": I I f, - - _ 11, I "CC / _), A #1 t 0 *= 1 1 �i", 55 LEGEND ,k' $ 1 �- fi^ � � S �,,�l ",,i ''i ;: , \ 1\ / � I I I V' I I , "" , ." I i ill, - It I � � I I Z ;; I I , ,6e 11 11 � Iii 1, '' %$ I I , � 1.� , I � 1, �, X1,11 11 ", I � , ", it ii� , ,, " _] _,_, - I I I 0 WVAML4l D ST i � I � C ' 3 PRIVATE OPEN SPACE I � , I I ", 4 , "w4i ""O'' "'' I "' 0ii'll ill", :1 If_ I"-, -, , " I, .1 _ll ;:,r" -f"", �, � " 1� , -3 1_111 , , , I I 11" I -_ "I "" - ''I I'll 11 " SITE ... ... "I ��' I I � II I I I v E Il ,, , , , I-V �!, � / " , , I I I I � � I , , � - I 11 � I'll I'� I ,�_ , , I � I t � ,,,� , � , " 14, �� 11" �, f 4' " ", "I"7j"k \ i/1 I I an I , , w , , ,,,,, , " �,,�' 'ii "i - " , I "' / � RED311"i '%'#*^* 96003 ''I , I I I I 1, I I _� ... :T'�, ", 1, \ 'N"", I I i , &__ I , , , , " I, " "I 1i , I I , , , "I , , "I , - `41 il " I e i i I I V it's r V^ -, , � ,. "I'll , 11" , ", , I v 17 __ k 1 �_z_ , " �%, ,,, � , ; I I � I I Nol * ^# Oi I I lill I - I , ____, , "_ , ,i,,`,<,,,, , , � 4t ill", , � " ,,, I I I , : � , RED"I'lli1% I t I I , 1 -4 - ,,,�,I` / � I; , ,I I �, I I I 1111�111 - I , 1 _'_'1,,I,,f!1`_ :?," I, ""I "'Z, � 11 z ,", , " , Ilkl,,l _,,11 ,I' " I I I " I mill 11 O'� � ,,I, - _,,_,l , , V, I -'A"', t.'"z"11,42 I" 1=1' I J.Z � L I ,,, " i ......... k , , - � ", , , I 11 �S.,;, 1 , 11 ", 11, " __ ""'lli ." � I I , � I f,,`,,, PHASINI) LINE 1 , 11.j I � .... � ,,, 1 # : 11 I lo",;,�N",liP" I I , I , , .. . 4 0, 1.7171 .. .. . .......... - 11 I 1111 I i � I 1, I ' " vkt*., ,_ I I I "I i ,.lij " 'i , , tl- 4_1"Ij *W' "i"- �1 I I ,,, ""`�`z '111`�' ii I I I i, �, 1,1 � '� "' "� I - � ....... . , : I ��_ 11 IF 1 , "'i': ", I I 11.11,11, 1_11111.". - _ '"', _-.,, I , , , I , I � I " �, / 11 - - � I I I " I . i's )& I I V, 11 I I ,",I'? � , I I , , I , I "p i I 11 T-111, x " _-1i -, I i'' i r-1 � -,"I'- -1, � ___1 F, I I - 4 , �' - I i I I---- --11-1111 -, , "I ,_1111'lll I i 111-11, I 'I, `)f ", -1- - , ill ...... � _1� l i I , � -7; 'Ir i, v " 4 I " , ...... mi , 'I � i I I .... -, 1-v"'i I , �, , , �, I I I -, " ��, , --il , , , , , , 1, I I I 1, I i - il,, ii,-�,, � ;�,I,,�, � -l- I'll, "" m � i I I 1-1 ii � I i1pl, I I I , , , ", , I i is, ill I , I I ,", " I , \ !; y I" iiii 4 . .. .. . . - " I I I I 1111, I '' I i � ... : I - -, I I ._J, f: "i., I ,,,, "', , '' , i ,V: ,,i,31, I " , V", I I I I—' k , ,,`,l� I 1"; # I i"i"I'll '111 > 11 Il ill 'I' " "i , '_ "I i ": , , ____1,= ' I I% 'I'l, l ..... _l I I , .I,�_:'":',,� ... , �1_11, -1, I 1;'I"411, . I 'ilt,-, I I , �::'I � I'll I � " ''_= ":''= � _ " -77,11111, "i --11 ',,� - I � I_g��,j�i . . . . . . . ��""'�,,,,,,,,��,,,,,,,",e"�,�', 20% " " i � I I, ''I, " ff I " ,, ,, I, 1 , "I I �____� ..... . , L ,,,, i, I ,-DAN , &`t,`,�:� I t 11 , ", A igall!""',""', ig "" fl, liw is i I 11 - �,,", - -17 ll - '_ -z Ti I '' i� , I , I I ',�, t, li, I'll, '�L , I . .. I I, - "'I'l ""I'll,�'ll�"I","""""",:I , "I , 11 11 I, "" , .#,�"_ 41'' 1, t 4 I , 1, 1-i",ii""', 0", I . ....... , N, 'im , gi _,�= � "I i: i,�,ft, �, �/` "I , I - 0, , gil �f Ill 1 1 1 "Ill, , - I f i Oii,,L�'Ill , �,11111! I"", , " " " , 1�111i, , , I v ,,, f I _11 _,____'� :7.= I 1, �� , ,�,iil 1 � i- 'l .... . . ,,,,, ""","�,�"""��,,��"""i� I I ,,', ,,, I ,� , fv i ll� I, ", � I'll i , , " � I I I I , "' -�lq _� - I -_ , I i "' I ,,,, � _, , %i"',,'1lI,P,1 - �� a I I , 1, �"""�I,� ,�,,,,,,�,,,,,,,""",?"","� " _11-1.1" , , i ,, ii, "l " Ill, 11,11111,110 I , , - 'lli'�Fi,�ll�l'l'Til"O 711 lllllll� I � , , I l: "I'm ii I - �, I `_ i 11, I, "'Asl W , �tg ,,,, :,,,�, i i Ni �`Il "', ) ", , ,; "I ", 111 �, , f I, , , 'j, ""j, - ,�"" , , " I I I -11111111 "I 11 \"11,11-- �, i 11 , - , I I �'_, , i", � , I - 1, ,� �, , l, ", ; "", , L, iiA � ,,, , " "I i,", I I i , ", , " �i� I I i 11111mill , , , 11� I I I I'll ... I 1111- _!,-4__" �) I I � I I � ___ I 12ii .... . ... : , , ii, 1110 / 1-1, � "ili, , , ''a 21 11'' I'l , 1�i, � I" I I I �, I I I _ I �- , ,,� I, , , " , '_1�.'_..__'__ " i , I'll "l ... ... i I I 11�11 I I "ol , 1�1'ii`,,','Ill'�� , I, j " \,:� 11, � I 11 I '� A, � "'."": i � I,, , I I � I ,"', I� � i � "I I 11, 1, ,,,,,, I 111-- I li, 1, � , , , - _%". ��i, , '11111�1111 I I I JIM ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL " t,"r . �` 11 "". _. , - " m 1111V 1,1,I,;i,,'ii % .. I. . ...... > "I"" I 'i I , " 7�� 1", , ��,,,;',,,,,,,,,,,,��,,,,,�,;,��,'�''�, "I'll"""""",""11",""', I I � 11_* -4., -, " vill, ,,,, I� -v,','pj' 'm , , �i ,,, , � k"i""v, 4��,�,,�,,��",�,�,,�,�""I"":"�,,�,'�ll""Ii",",",I'l�'ll,��l ,,, ,�', f - __ , "" i i"'"''"'11111Y, -1 , �_ , A "I I Will, Ii I , " " ' T � wl# -J, - i � I l �,1,11'111 I, �,i I I? I I 11 � "IF' " �F, I I", , ,l"'-'11111 k, i 11 ,� N ", " " " , F11`11 . ' illiv,fi, I , I , r I I "" " ii "'i"'gi i �, ��:� ji, I i I I ,, 1111 0 1---j! -1 I I ,,',. I , i� _'LilLt"�' ir �I,P,11111"l "I"i","ix � , ) �i, '' 11 ,,,,, , %, . . . . . . .. �,,��,,",�:�:""�,!",:��',,,�,,,,,�",>"""",,�",i,��""",�""k!I , \ i 1111,;!II�Il " ,I, 1111;1""I"11"'!, 1%. - ,�, -- " � 1% � " "' ", "", " � ", I ", "g 41 "I W� �1_1,11,_ �,I T 1-41 lill,"i " , "' � � , I 4, ll I 1A,ji 1�11 _5 � 1, � Nl , i I , t: fj,,�11'1111111 ... l; ", "", )M,"�,% ,11,1,1� � .", , I " , , ,,I"",",i,A " 1 I I , I ,,, , , , " yj , 'I t � - i:I, � I i , ,4 � , ", , i I 11 il� 4 Ill, 1 i " , ", -4 , : I 1;, , , """ IN 1 p tv il , I , i " , � 1"'t I ", i p ""', I, ii�� I , � ��l�l;�� :ii,"'� fxu � ,� I * ", "'' l'ill ,`,ii�ii " "", ", "'I"I", ,`iI,qpI'ii 11 � I'll, """ , _iI'1',',',,;lI�, ,,,,,, ", , , ,'I',I� , , , ,% jo,'!,l"'�,,",,',',',',, - I I I ____ _-�- -,--j !if "n , - - , " , � WO 11 , " �� I ," � ","��,','�,,;',,,��,,�,�,�',,,,,,,,,,!I"""', 11 I '"' �, ", i, 1 1 _! , I "s,"',iii ,,,,,,,,�,�,,�>,,,��l"",";��,,'�3�,,,,,,��""",�, "'! I I i'l-11 _3 , I I � > , ,- �,2_, 11� 1,111111, 11"I"'I"z, I I " , , 11 , 11 11� ,', i,"I " I 11 `�7�47i,�, """"" "' I 11,:�� .'_K',�"Il, *_:�_' .. . - � I _�, _::"��_":" ��A,I ,, , "" , I�!l I I , I � W , "Ill' 11 , � , i- , I I i", I " "I'', -111111 I ; 11 li SIDEWA � "; ''I'll'' " le I I LK , - " li� � " �1, " � . .. . . I �llil"111'1 i I 0 ,,`,,`I,I,,�, ""","","","",�',',,�,',',�""","', , I ,111,1'1'1� 1"' "._4 I'm e, -1---i � I r- " " i � \l � , , " " , w- I - � " �", , , , I, ' _� , f , " i ii ILP ", , u ` J_r ", ..... , , , i ,,, \�1:;,,----f, 1",-," , Ili IN,: I � I ;,,,',�,�,,�,�,��,�,,,�,�l,,,,�,',,,',, x I I 1,1111"', I 'j, ,�� ,� �;, , i I ."ll," 1:,"', " , , , , , 141�1 I �, :�,',",' 'N - i- �,��, ", ili� , , : , I, 1�1 I �I I,il I "I " "I, � �'Irl,l ,11:=, v , ii 11 29 4 30 1, \ ,,',I , "" Li"i �%" f, i , i , ,� 1i � 1, �14 11 - ,,",,,'1,,,%',,,, - 114 ", 11-11111,111-1 I ',,,', ZlE411 1 ; r-, il I , If, � 3 26 27 1 28 `11 " � ,,�," tt "/ , 1, I ,� ,ail ��,,,i,,,,6,�, , I t, , I `�, 0, , � � ,I , A ,, ""Z1,177, , , * I -11 I _1 , 11 �'T'! � I I 411,�__ ii, _01- , t 1,14', "! ., ,iiii, 'I I , , , , I , 'I I i I � , 4, . I ,,, , I " t 4 - 11 _� ,� - 'I L_�J -1 , I_ , , _4 � " t IT . I I �,' ,' f �, ii , , 1 t-,-,iil , -h-- -�,_:4 ,% � - ". " , " 'L I - I ,, I � 1, , , " -, P", , , ___ " ", �, � !!� �g ";�, , " '11,11 , 011 ,'I, ii 11 " . 1111111 , Ap*4 01#4,01)"O'0*0 I I I ,� i 1111-1114 I:� I , illi,�Ill LEI , 1* " 0 "'u, ,!',, '' " , , OLD -OF-WAY DEDICATION I , , 1 , rut," 0- 1-�&.70-006 , " ALTURAS ROAD RIGHT , ,% Il , �1 "' Ap - -*0 ',,,,,,,f",!�,i""""","",""�',�',',�""","",�""","",",,,�i��,,,,',,��,, ,"111-1111-i", it r� i I", III: �,, � I I` t ' G,F" 41-21 -020 ""i I", � 'I, I IM � _11 " , " I T I I " i 'i�i,,, , W13, �__, I � � i "-,I,- -, `f, , `" _4 , `_,_ , I 11 I 1, , `r,�, 'r�.\ i I ,,, VII . .. . lli , , kil to* j PUPRE CHRISTOOPHER J 11 � I'll , I li, "l _` , I'll i , m*0141*04*114 JOHIN , DUPRE tflfffls *#0pfI_1 t J " ��I'l 11 I " I I I 1, � I "_.=�, -1 ` __ ,��,,l - "'._ 'I'll -7- ii J , ,,, 'i i , " , IR��11,1111111 I 1�1 i I � " , ,,-z,"":'l 11 , i , , 2 § , -j I 1, , ,, ,4c)lms Hu op"i #3 Iii, i,,i', I 1,,';1t I 111, I , , "I :1111 ,lj-,: ': I ,'I ;, 11, 11 'I'll , I # -:4 0 0 *. & SARA E , � )0 I I v, 11 l"? I'l i Jr I j!,,7,-,,I,i,IlI 1 iii, � , ''I"""', -___ Ill 3 "I " I 1� , 4 14 t I 1 114 E. , k SARA E x ";,I , , "", " '_ . ..... .. , � il"""I'll, I """', ,,,,I I � I ALL -, > I I I i I l_ .il , -ri'l "i'l 106004 16 "",l' ST 11 4" " ""'I'li'l,"', " ,,,,,I 11/11 %:Zzc==Z �:��iii:::��ii:��:��iil:��:�1111113� RETAINING W . �____ -11 I REf", *4^ 70 , Uh�� I I ^f%1#6 G*, ^* `06 MALUA.Rv% Sir 11-11, I " 4 , 96003 1 v , , i1ii ,�,'li I 11 REVV " I I v 1111(i '( I'll, � Ill l, ,!", ", I ", i . ... 11111I , Im", 111, I , I 2, I I'll 1 EDO " I 11"I"'I"I'll"I", 11 11 , " I i � 11 I "I I I 11 ii �",�,,��,,�""I'l""",�,�"",",Y 1 Am , J%, I I ... I L I , I > � R CA 96003 1111", I I ii- � � - - VICINITY MAP I 11 ""l '' "il �,O�I, ""I'l'i,ii II 11 I - ,; .- 0 1 " ', t I 10 , " �1, I --N."", _1`1 "I" "I",�ll,��,"","",��i�,,� iN I " � I I I 9 I I li��11111 11,!,gg ---l '', f .. ..... , I T` 11-1_1 -__--__j_ I I , i I aw i I 0-1% I I SCALE- NITS , I— 111_1____',____, """ Ill, I � I "I "'N./i �,,,�',,,,,I 'll , f I - ---,. 111il ; I I I " tp I [ '' , "'ll ,11�?,, I I i 111111-1- "I 11", 4 --$Ili -'am 11�1'11 I 1, I �:! "i"", �,',`,,`l ii,,iv,,,i I r * 1� I _ , #=_fm___f% .... .. i 4i __�_�,,l 1 `(()0.5)_ol " h'i"I'li""'II 111,11"i I i "l i , I , Ut � - - `illllll�. -1 " - I I I ""I � , i" ` 'i""",iiii , , "I � �', , , _ . .. .. i l 11 ,l ,, !1`11A,Iil'�, NI�,11`11'11 I I orr 11 ii "I'll �__o` 11 " I 1%,"I II I 4; ,; � , % ,I " , , " I I I I IIi, I'll 14 -31,,v 111"","��,`%',' Ill 11,11ill 1'111� 1 AK I'll , I ", "" I 11 _0 N,i ��,l,j� `�, �' I i""", , 11 I �11 'i t, , � , I, 1, li,,$'i , 11 ,l ,,, I'll, 11111i I I , IiIi?l! - RI,,� � I I", 'L " I I LOT NUMBER , ''I � , , _/ #11""' � - 51, , I 'im we.,li *11 k ii'' t I k 31 , "I , 7� ,� �l, !, I ", 1, � I "i I I I', 1 Al "A " i I ; 13 (* 1 Ill , � J� , 111,11"11,11"'i ��Ii I %� , , I I*-, I, \ 1! I I I I 11 - I I I �ll,�l>"""""""",�ll'I'l"�","P I '��111 I I , / ll CUENT: " 1, I �i � �0"', E�:,��, ji,,�, ; N; , I 10 UNIT NUMBER w -MM", "" , I cvq,� I I 'I' _____1"`_�11"1 _11l'N I "Ill,"?,�lli�P�,"I'�,�,,"�,,,',,',,,,'ei"�,,��,,,,", ",>""''>","",",�""","","",",� I ", ,,, " jl�, " I , ,,,,, "I , >1 � 0 1 �� , lk� , ,,,��', . ... ... . " 111" � " ", ", 11 , I", ,,, I I I "I��,�,,,,,,,�,,,ic��f"",T"",�,!!"""",�,�,,,��,,,,,,��,,I " , , , , 11 ""'. - lk@�',, , e) %, It", 01w , I %1,1,�io " "! I � i :�i I'D I I OMNI FINANCIAL LLC 11 ... ....... . ....... , 1',��.7-11l'T",�",,"",�),,,",",,,�,,�,,,�,,,,�,g�,,,�,a�/"", :l I ", "'m " A illim "",;, I zi I ( I 'Illym 'l , 'IV, ,I i"I'�,"'g,"l -__11_11 .1111, i 11 11 1, "" " , ( I W/l ,gps , '0111 11 , I, ''I I I'll IN ", ,:S)/ , � , "'"'l i", '' ,i,�l 1,1110 t 4" � , Ill, 10 i"', " 1 J iE U6 "Ill "'l � �''1""��,,,",'�,:"'"',:",��, ''I I cw ijTl 1�l '(%. # .$ ! "r " , , """" 11 I I'll I ;`0 "I'll, ��,, ":l'"', , I , "I ?, 1��'11111V I , I � ,I, , " �,,' i"":?�,""", 1, � I , � iE � 11>111, � * _j , � I I ol 117 ,, I "I'll, I r a i kz ,", " I V "' I I ..1-i I I " 11 Ill I EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN- 211 1260 41ST AVENUE ..."�' I , � � Ile 10,011"�,,�;,",",,�""�"I'l"I I zkl, � ). l),i1y9f,,,,vs " �, , �'�'l 11 � �,:I, ttl il , , k, ,,- I \11 fth,� 11 Z? 11 -1,11,111111M 4 ;, � I _ " I 'I'll- ',�� , I I �li � J.", " 14 � lii',,'j",,g I � 0, '', 5 1 " , ", 11 "'lig W, I "II �l I"i SUITE 0 0 I 2, �,, ""' 32 , , "I , ,A_` I'll 4Q �11` 111111,110 " 1 :`)l 1 """' "' "WN I '" I I I "I'll, ."All", , '' k 111, i", 3c __ I" I'll 'i, -11,111, I "I "I"', .! IN �,Iw&,, " -1 ��,,Illill�"111 I, i I i, � ,, I " ! "' I I i ", "',% ��:�i��, "" %,xj, N"i �Ii " I "I'll'' � ," 'w"A411 1 I �; I ii ""'111"I"I'li, I `11111 "'i"111 " I "I I I 1 1 -4 , " I I CAPITOLA 11 /,,':�',, �11�,,,,l��I%',Ii�'q `,k,TW , J, I �' 1-i"111111 � I X4' EXISTING TREES TO 8E REMOVED- 68 ,# CA 95010 , I , "I'll'! "i "'N"", , , "cIi"i, 111� t 11111111111>11 I � I 1111,11 'ON, 'k , 11 2 ,,,:,V , 0, I "I'M Iii 1"11111 - ,j,,lj , " I'll, ,!,� , I 1 I , " , - J-s I'_ ll i'l'�"','Ii�,� , ,,,, .. .. .. . i'll I �, �X_' �,, � I , , 11,11." I 1-111111 i'll"'I"I"'I , ? , "I I I I Nil I '��'i'l�'I'll""I'l,li�ll,��""""""",�""I'I , i, " I'll- 11-1 1-11 , 4 ,ii. ;", , " I 1, ,,,%.,_ I �1, I ,I, , I', ", , \ � " "', '0 I r "Ill"', ��: "', �,, , -1 11 - I , I 1, __ I- _ 61, " 0" " ""', , " 11"A"I'l 11 , I � � ____,____, '' _.__ � ...... . . ____ _.- '11", ll , , , '' ": "', '11I '", , "" ", .111111--1 lilift , , , , ill! i I " i;I:,�`,ii:.. , ,, I� ,,,,�,,,',,,",�,�"";�,,�,:",�""",, !", I i\, ;7 �tl%,, ,,`,� , I I I I ", , ,ii , ,,, , I / ' ,�� , , 1� I , '17m,"I'""'i, �, , 11�,I, , , %,", t , I , I I ", - 1-11.1111 1111 I I , I i , """ ll� , I , i"I - , N, , �11' __ I 11 I " # I I , , I 1-11", '.11411 , I I I � I I> I I _�1�1`11111i:,11'1""i� .;, 1, 1-1 %, �`,',,' i,f;', * ", , , 'll!"'I"""", I , � I I OWNER I 1�1", ` , " vil i�l oo4l Ir C _� k, I', \i , I 1- � 1 I 000, 1 � '' A R � ' �, "--",. , ': ,,,-,!, " "'I'll" - ", I ; , 11 � I I I 11 I 1,11 Ili ,,,,, , , " ii, I V"""', I 11 I I ; ','I 11 OMNI FINANCIAL LLC , , , I ill " ' T111 I � , I , "'I'lill poi, A, ,cig , �, f I 1111% 11 "s4'o',%._'_,__.�� 33 1 111111 '11l11_,I11ii:li : l""""""""', ii% , . 11 11 , [I"11,11"I" ", � ,ol , I , , ", �j,,',II%',, , ��l , 4 � "; , 1,17 4 N , -, � I I I,�, � 5I: , "I I I , 4 , I i I -_ ,__ � ii ` , "I I ,I%j, , " -t- I ___ � , , I Nj,s, , Ili, , , "g, - , __ , 11 , , I'II "I �% , "" � it, I I I, 11 i �, _ ,�� i, t�,! , ,,',jN&,,iik,,, V :11,111, ,111 1, I I'll, 11 � , "ll,ii ... ", � � I I 1�, ", ", . GROJP " 1260 41ST AVENUE .. .. " i , � "","'i"", I ,;,IIIIII�l IZI , I �, I � GATHERING " , 1, I I,, `i`� ,(l , i", I� , " I , , , ll ", �.#, � 111MANvill"j,""lil, , 1, 111, I , I �illl:l!,! *� � I' I `_ , "' I ,� I "I'll I - ii,kw 1!`I,',,3�,1 I'll, i�� 1, I I " , �,,,, ii"'T "I'A ""' , , I I I , "I'l, ", "Ve,14 11 , ", I ! AREA 11 SUITE 0 1 , ,,� I 1111N� 1�"4 ��:'11:,, , 1,01, 1 7 1 II�iiclii%, "i "" "��,, , , 11 I" I I _)-�_ I , il " .. N , 4, li�l 11 I I "91 ," �,,�,',,�',,',,,""",""�",:��,",',,",� N -i CAPITOLA, CA 9501 0 , N """ I ,�,�`, 11511-1 11 "I k�,,,,',""",�;�i�,�,,�""",:', ,, - 1,1111-1,11-.. i`�I,r " 1 I I I, I I .... . . "o ,_,I ... . ... , "M ... . ... - 't�sl , ,',,,,',,, , ,V I, "'Cq, ""'l i1i"llill,f wl��,Pp' ''I'll I ", I I , "'I , I I I Ill ,,,, 14i ", il I l , i ,,;,� /\ I ,", I > I Ili , "I CV , III,, 'i I 1 ,, ii '(SM"'j, 111� I , : ,:��,,,,� I ,:��,,,,� ,:��,,,,� ,:��,,,,� ,:��,,,,� ,:��,,,,� 1:�,,,,� i.,i, I I I ",:I'� ", I "I',"", "l ", 1, li '71) ", "i "'l , , e, "% V03, ", , 017,"' # �,,,, all , , I,; ;)'I,'i�lii I I 1,111 I "i I 'M '' ��, , 2 , ""'siM IIII"""" , 1, ,,,,, " 4 ,3n I "��ll""i""��""I'�",�,11:�, "I", I "' A %'i . . .... ,0, `liI , 34 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS --I'll, "I ,11" "Ile , * :�11','," "A"M ,I, � ,& ,�""",,��,,,,,,,,�i"�,,�','i'�,,�""",",�,,,',��,,,�',,,,� " " ", l7m,'11V�.11i, K , ", . . . .. . . 11""I"I'll �! "', iki � � v , , I , 11111:,,�,,�,t,,',,',,I ", 111i ... loil ""*" I I " "l, I 11,�1;11 �, 1, Y""' , % � I " 1, � "RAl ,,, I * , , , , Z ', 41 � 0 , 'I I I " 1, I At " ,,V,',,,' ,,'N� i','iQi I , ", " Ii �:i5 "", .... . - "I 0 , , ___ -, J, t ,,,, � "� , , A 'i,f,�;�;��,��',",,�,",�",,",,,�� ">"";"7",�,�""I�:;��;,:"",""","","","",',,,,,, � , , " , ENGINEER ,I�l , "', , ".5i ,g in U" q, 1, i'll ", " 1"I'l , It ", ",", "?l i'l -1 " i -I � %10,�, i ,,, 11" I I , � 4k ,�_ 1, , �,l ',_ AgiNi"I""'Il , IV " I ", lt'l ... . .. , ,"', 'to * Ill .�; " I fg�,A ilIVI"',iii, I ''I I 11 "I'll" I 1, 1 11 11 11 ----i -1 I " ,,, 11""'I"", "il, DUPLEX UNITS: Ill ""',' r_:i>1tN11%11I% i . .......... . . 1, " " "', �,'� � i , 1__� "i t llllv�'11" , "'I, , 1&;1`i',,* ,4,'�:, � ,, I 1� ""jzw"l ,,, I , ��,� � �, i !�ll I � � , I I w , Ii, , , " . ",I � "%,��""",,�""",,�""","","","I � " , 4111111 I'll, " 1'r , '�' I PI'i t �5 J v - 11 I', I -,,,._ - , 11-11-1 1-1-1-1111 -STORY BUILDINaS � I 1, j�'w"'1`qi`,i-* l�,,,,,Ul�,,",��, I'll �� W " , - ,,,,�!�,�,,:�',,�,�,,,��,,,�,,��",�""",,�"",�� " I "(�1".-tili, �'," , "l "I'll, 11121 2 -.11 1, ,;, , I 11 , I , ,� 1 " I � I'll �� I `�� , '. 3J,6' "I'lil"11,111,l, ...... : SHARRAH DUNLAP SAWYER, INC. " , ,;!;!� 4 ;1 v ill 1, , 4 , , , 11 , t' ''I ,"AP"'t I , "'i"�l"i'l " "I I " '' , gliP I'll , 1! ii�', 11 ,,,, 11 , " I "I Ill f 'I- 1 -5 , I im",c"S.1, � #� , �,,��',',,"',,��",�""Ill"%,','I� I ", i I 1110 _", " 11 I '% ,�,, , X,�f,, ,,',::',,,,, , :1�1,1 " It - .- ", p, , ) """"i /'�,,.,"Illl A I "I'll, 114 , ,, I * JAI - - I I'll I I I - Al Ili I "s'' ii",��, " , , 'Ill I 11 i ,� ,A� ,,, ,V I �:,,�,,�`l, _", t I ieo I I , � i""""'t li" ,',I,,, �I,I,',,,�I, I v REDDING, CA 96002 ",I I \ oc'), _01!2 /�1,111 "", s"", _y","�,'O" " ,',,,,,',,,,�,',",,,�,�,,',��,',,,�"I , , ''I, ,Tly~ , � 1' " , , , l", " , I 1W,""ll F"�,,,,,,�,,,',,'!,,'��,�,��,!,,,'�4,, *T ?, al giii"Il , '' I'l fM lA 'I'l , " "k, "I' , ,,,, I ... ..... ''", I "'i I k.iii, f I I111111p, ,ii, " ", I,_ , I 111, I'll "Il 20' DRIVEWAYS ,,�i , li , , . , � l'i�;��i ,, ,,,,,,,""",",!",,',,,,"""""", ,, I Ili 4--or'-y"cl, i I'll , , 1'', , � , , I " ,l,,,,� i ,, I I I _,_0_11-�__:;,,f,_07�_ �?,�,�,',',',"",j,�,�?��,",I�""-"""""", ,i, ', I I Il " i � "I I ll� I , I ij,"t"i'll " , iI,,,,,, ,,lii .. ... .. l, I I " -111,11, I 11 ... ... . __ ?I" , 'i I 1, 4 " I " I ; � fili ON Vt 1-280-001 I ,�l 'i,lli� "i"I"'I'll"111,1111, 11 , 1 """Itm ", , I 11 ''I I "ll, " mii , "''I", I ?"""'71,11il Ali,lh �'I,I?Iiil , , I , \7 _N,*�il),., 1%*,71.l ",I f"I"I"', 1, ", � ", , """', 10 MINIMUM BUILDING SEPARATION " , " , , , " mill, I " I'm '' I t,,� , I I i i��_, , , I 91p, I I l" I I �I,,,',, >l� % ,I�,, I I 4k \,"i .... . Ili -):,.,I,, , - �* \ , " ,ili ,,,,,, , , -, �� 1, �' l , ''? , tiliM 11 , " t , in, " "'', , ", ! i5 i"l�ll,"""��,��""I��"I'l�,,�""�I I, , , ", " � tlli,�� ,�:�I�71" "'Ph � SITE DATA ME , "l , " !"ii I , "'A R, �', "' ''�,,�, N i .. . ... ", "'O Im , A "" 11 � � 11, '21", , " li� " "I "",!"�", " , -, ,', , j,-',1 ,,�, � __ ... - I N I .1k ,,,, ,,, , 11 ,� . .... . " "" I " I �Ik'lj 11 I I * RISOIN R"B"` J RVi* 'TRUST, 2010 ,,,,, ii�; "', ,I ":, NObliNA '' "I � . '' , I lab I lil I rwi,l '' , 1, , ;,i i - 111NI'll , ,, , , I 111 ","", ', .. ... .. � "", , 'li;"',"'J` �,, I - f, , iliin ... , � , ;,i,wl fIi , ,,,,i �' I I , '11, "I,' - � 1� 11, rz mpg , " , , , 'L N", N 0 ,,Vp'� I I ,,I, 0, ", "I , AT "I ,mi,,, I I A. 2�.# 071-270-012# 071-270-021 , , 'k, "'i, 1N;1,�'1'11'11kgil11'1' , ,I I ,w , 1% ... . .. I , i" , "", si,_., "' I , ii "I 4 # "i # ^A 11% l?g _\ ,"', , 1: 1, ", I �1\ 19 1`1___l , , I " I �,"'( ""I">"�'I'll'I","",,�'�iI I I I'll � 1,11"ol 'Ilil I I ,,,, APARTMENT BUILDINGS- 1 �,�',Il "' I , 1% �""": I , , "I , '' 1 Nqui 0 1 "I PAS Rv^v - RESIDENTIAL I 0 TO 20 1w ", "I'll 1111�11 I 11 4, iZ,.,,��, `iO Ill li:," "' �""", "it � I "q ", 4 i "I I'll 1 "i , , ii, , " i, 015,111 I I 11, 1111,11111 " , �,, , . , 115 w " ''I, -4` J. , el 111-iii,ii,raii, """, 11l"'ka", -'p iW " f , i -, I V. " CENERAL PLAN , " " ,,, 11 , I ''I � `�ll::,i":'' , 0*zN N -STORY BUILDINGS " "': ", '"', , I I 'N ... . ... ", , "" 'l, , ,,,,,,,,, All Elif"m I '\ "I"A".11 11 " .dli i"liali"'ll wl,`Rrn�Ii,l�,llI �, 1, ", I I it", f � 11111,111II1,11 , 7" J, " "/ �i "'Ol "" ,, , ", !1', ", REdtl= 2 , .A,,','�, �*111 'I'll""" _ l ", , l, L , "", . . . . . I I I'll , IIII I I "I lil ii III iii, I 2 I 1:11 � , I ,71r , , ,_��"il i�j,�,�li'l:I i' , ,,,, ',1�,i,:ll":" ,,, 11 I "I"," I , , , iii, 11 ii, i I "i ,,Iii,i,,�ii, "'' , f", %ii �i """ ", N'lli '"'i kov 1 "", " , � ''I � I& I , ''I i; , ,,�""",,f"�,',,,�(""�,,�""",,��;,��,, "" "" ii I � I'_':��I�:ii,� > "" �_ " qlil�, 11 "" "" ", 1 it�l ,��,`,�11 - % � , i", " 1"""I" " """", � , , "", �,:� iiii ,,V,�;I I `1 36 1 8 .3!s Il�, I 10' MINIMUM BUILDING SEPARATION ji,q ,,I(, ,11 IS1,11, " , """ 1)'iiJ:, " Kl�, ,, " I k "ilill � � - VACANT AND SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL .... .. . , " ", , ,� I , , 11 I "", ""","",",Ii"",,�""I",�,�,::,�, 4, j,"i I , , , , 'i ,,,,, �� I I I ": ,�""","t",:"",",""","",", "",(�,,,i I � ., ", I �,; "I"alt" �!,;"",�""I'lei�,�"I'�,,�',�j ''i"', '' EXISTING USE � F I `%,, '�'�� iiji Ill �ii� , , �",�,,,�,,','�"",��",��,�,,,,,� , RM -12 - '', 1 77%)V1 -i_ �'1'11"11'1'11111'11111 IV , \1 il I ZONING: t�'oil .lil "i I , 40 11 35 ,,, ill I I � , , ii '', ''" '', ... im"`�, " � "'I, ft"', I 4 I`!"; � 11 ,, : , , "la ��,,,,,,,�"I",""",""��:,�� ... . .. "", � 1� , " I , I; 1211 - 'l, z _ - , �,,, il, , " "'i'l v"Ili?i �i', , I,,��",;ii�l X 18i", � , " , �i � ii "" I " '' Nviil, -;,1i,; ,,1111I1 ,,� ��,�,,',,,,,,,�""",;"�i""",",�,�,':,�,�""","'',', 11 4 UNITS PER BUILDING ,,,,,, � I ,,,,,,, I I ,,, ,, I'll , vg��" i N - "", 1, 1,4_1 1411,�� I . I . ... i I; ,,oi, , IN il I'll I I 1"," � � i, " , , ,,, "", 1, f", , , INI�lt� , 41"i" ii� I I�1'11,,� ,11 1% PROPOSED USE- ' , , , , , , "I'll , 1, " " ,,,, il mot I I � 'll � " ii, , " , ,, I , "i " 11 lillil-11111 1, "I "`�M � , � * � "I ii�� I ',�,,, , , - I " li � il - 11 , 11 If , �",iill .1� , `� 11 I �, I ,;,� � I , "I PIZ, , ", I � I . ... . I , , A, i , , ""i"r,"o l7 , "'I'l, �, "I Il , , I "if 4 � I ,� , , 0 i , , " � ,P %5) ,!�, ,1'i,,�Ii� 'il I , I "I �i I 1"I" i 1 64 UNIT MUL7171-FAMILY RESIDEN71AL DEVELOPMENT 4, "r -l""""', ""' � I n� 1�,I' , �I5 i�! � IN, 1�1111111'1'�,�,,' 1 , I �,'�, , �, I'll " 'i'; I� " ""'I", , "" "','l *, , "", I I I , p" ,:,i"; T, � , "' " -, ''��,,�,�,,�,�,!f"l"","",�;,�'I'�,�,,,'',,, ...... : % I I DUPLEX PARKING: "I " 1� I�:', ,,,,,,, ""��,";,,',,i""",�',,,,,,,,'��'��,� Fli'l /I ''."1111 ""I", , I IN, , , " , , I !��N,�',T,,,,,��,',,',,",,,',', ,Vf�ii!,� , � dib , ` 111:1111"I'll"", ill � , , r"ll '$ I il "I 11, ql�l ,,'l I , , , Z li"'l ., 11 I '' , ''ll" _�, I q I I "" I � ll� III " , , i Ili � � I��W, III "I" Il ilP I I ;, ;�: ;,;'1111;1>1�i`�,�;, ilFl`�'Ild "i"I""i, >"Il � , ll,,' 11 ",',,I l, 141�` � , , " ,I 11 , I iIII"', I I I 1 (40 DUPLEX UNITS & 24 APARTMENT UNITS) ,W""'"',","�"""�l"'',', 1,11"11114 ,", ("', ", 11, , I � , , A 11 t Ii vil, �� I " I , -.l '%I , I GARAGE SPACES so M �, i l!" ", - i 1, ,!��"",�",;"""�,,,�;�"""��, ", i, ,_a,,,,,,:�,�::� I I I , �� ., TOTAL SITE AREA- 8.0 AC 1� , i 11" 9 I � 11 I I �111 � I (ul"I" I I 40 � "', I , I -1 i �el \ ,ki � , RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION- 0.3 AC 01 ii ", ,,:�, > � \ I I "I w , I lill ,lill", I , �pl 4 - 11 , I I ,�� I'�l"i�""Il",,��"il-!""","""",� TOTAL- 90 "' , , , ,� Ilk ,,� ,I . .... . "" .,ii . . . ... f: / i, I Il'o'', ,,,, I /---i , I i'll I '' "il , f I � ! (2.25 SPACES PER UNIT) � )"'I'll"ll!"11, 'i ,�a I TREE, SLOPE, AND OPEN SPACE PRESERVA710N. 2.2 Ac I I'll, 11 '11"111"",11" I � "",!;j BUILDABLE AREA: 5.5 AC , 4 I il 11 >, I , �111 fl, 0 11 45 "I I, � 1 -111-1 I 4's TOTAL PROJECT UNITS- 64 , I 0 W 'A '15 tT " A. I h "", I I \51 i I'll \ ""I, A I I : ,,, 'I'll"', "I'l, 1 � I APARTMENT PARKING- - 11.6 D.U./AC , �"'111 'i", � II 111-11 'IVI \l PROJECT DENSITY. "I � `1" ,\, �* ELECTRICIT'l- REDDING ELECTRIC U71LITY , 11 I !l , (11"'i - 1 (2 SPACES PER UN17) fl, I `11�1 - I I � I �� , I -\\-,A R- CITY OF REDDING ,I�,I,Ili ", -Ick(", I- -41r 43 '- I I I , """""' k", 9 , I Ac ` , fif, I 6 13 r 14" V '\1% g"i ,,�.�','_�','�,,�, I (�,,,,,l !,% "'."i I I I I I Add 1111\ I l! I!& , , I , " WATE . I �,�,� SEWER- CITY OF REDDING "21' "'l -I , I ,,, -1- I I "I'll" -1111 � ` I I """', � AN", -1 11 ,�Ikkl � I 9 , , "i"', I " 11 mi, I i �t% I imlIll 1, A � "I I , '' m ", " � � - �. I Im \ u " f 11 �%,, , I TELEPHONE- AT&T I fi, 111-1111 11-11 'm I � lid I I 'it", 11�1 `_N, , do 1 - I 'y 1� I ' I,; \ IF '111111,11i'll"! , I i j;p,, 11 1 A , , I 11; I " ,,!,l � 11 '_ i In 11 6' DRIVE AISLES 11 __ I., �� I 'ifp�,�qpp,", I (%,,, 1 2 11 � I , 01 I 1-1, %il z I I I I io,_- "I � 0 \ " , wo I .1 , ___ i1f, " 11 i I / I �;� I 9.25t iMDE PARKING SPACES 'I I , 0 ,� ' I 1i a I %. I 0 0 1 1 1 NI " idd s "'l I 111"I"IL. I - -, I" ''J",-11 -1 .1 I '' 1) I I re X, I""""'I, , I \' 1,1551"I'll _ I11111"i " ""","","","�,',',,,,,,,,? 1, "I i 111,11,111, "1�111, 1011111l "i/1"i"11,1111 "', ""' """"' I ,., "l, -- __ , , qiblgl #4", . ` ,I I , ""', , , i "I'l g'x I I -, _-, is .1,11, 196, lo''x I _11_._,_1__ ,_11111111 __,___ -i wr ------r- ____ " A ''I ` _;, ,,I A � '111i'll I'l, ____ "�,:'�mma i , - � 1-11,11, , [___."',_ I , I, __ 111-_11_"___, I1111111,11 i""I""i, � _sk ,, "I I'll, 11 Nl ,,7 0111( � . I ____ I "i m�i, AAW """ / I " I � I I I � I , 4,�'.',\, 1 - if �_1,1111,, " - "mi 1"" , 11,�,115� 1 , I p L I I I 1 � I 11 "i , i0 II 11 111,111i 7 j _/111*4, I'll 1-1-1-1111 .... �� 1111ill'i Kll,.'i 6f 11 - , i ,It), FrI= _Ilrsi �1 1"I""'IN " ----,- I I IN 1 494 r V`11�11!10 � J�,'lq oe 9w "I IE � lill / A1,0111111 I P, I*_ I (vr,11 " , " , I \il / I C I I . , a - , 1"" I � , , � s lid , ,-,-.- - " I � '" I i I i Ii, 11 / 6 k ,4_ , __ - iii" P, I Lt ' ' __ - ___ 'Ile I I 1, 0111" l: I I , *Ap � " 1. , 111 I I 63 ,11 , "', 'v F , "" 11 Fs",;- R,j,,1, _ I'll, " I I w"I'll I "118 ,,, I I ,lig 1,11� 11 "I'll-", "'I", R, "I"I""", --111- I 11,50 ,I 1111`11011111,11, , I Ill' i 14, , 'I 101"I"1111" I I llliil - I I _ . .. ... , li, "i � "' 1-1 , ", i 11, ,11 "'1111, i I ''i ,i ,I'll-/ 1- "" AII, " � ,iffl 11 1,1111,1111111 I 11111i" ", Ill I """"I "" , 62 1 -Ir I 1 6 , " I " "", I Illi , fli,� 11 11 i � I/ I , 11 I lil"I'll, , Ir I ! ", � I , 11 I I !11 ) "IV 11 , - � I i 'k I, , 11 �11'1111 111,11" I "11`1'11`111111`11�1 , > " ilIff �, I I , __ I'll , I ''i 'llill All PRI J , 615 - I ",l i"I" � I,- , __ " ", , '', 4 I I It I / ik", � 1% I , A11111111, N i I I I , I 1 2 Ill 58 ,1 53 51 64 -� 4 QQQEI�W , ", , "" " "I 3 2 I -1 11 � 11 *0 I , -1-11111--l- � I u 21 . (") I _,.�-- --- " , I QI I I— _'ll 4 1 ill I "I , 1 5 9 1 k 'IF I'l _._-__1 , 1 60 I 1 55' � - _111l I , M., I # i 51 52 1-71 1 - 11 11 *1 I I i I (",,"', ''i", I I %_� " I �, I 1� 7. V'1.'*,.' I 11, i E, i", ,' if, ,7.. �� i, 1 I I 1,,, I I " I I 11 li'll"I'lill"I'll, I 1�1, I I I � .", 4 1 , 1, , g,p,l, i "y , � " 11 1, i ""llillillill'u � 11,11, 11 11 I " �,111,111��,_, m"M � I 1i ,ij , 1 - q �- "Mri"'E"'; 1 ," - 1, sm , 11 I I , " 0 R, ff"I -, E f"I ,,,, "i I 1, ill, ""","�,,,,,>�"5",�""",Ty I�, ill 0 I , g """�,,,,,""!,,,,,",,",,�,)!�I ';�%li mi,iiii""I, " . . .... I -, , ,,,,,, a � ll� , N�,Ali 0,mwl Ai " i � �_ , ',,,�,illi 14 A, , , I ,,,,,,,, , _� �� ,��,,,,>,,,"""\",�""",,�, I ; - _11-110111ma, "" ,, "I "'i"")f", 1 y,", 11 'I"ll - I'll, I I , , "" "ll I 11 "I'll, ,"w;,,,qpiql 1111 1,111 j-", � ...... i !4IF"'m � � I"'i ,,,,,,,��,,,,,,""","",,�,,,;�",','��'?�""i 'TT-l'i'l- � ii:r , '* 11 ," ,,, 1 l,",,,',',,,',,,',,,""I'll;"'I .�� I , �, 111,1� . ,,,� I " ,� ' il"I"Ifil", go', """I" " " , ",, , I � � � 't i # 0-�e", ,, , , , I _ _# 1� I 11, "li �, ""I" 11 "', 11 11, 1� __ � I "" I 1111i ,1% pil I ii;, �t � � I " \ ,,,,, "'1111 1# ,,I,, I- I 1 " I I—- i "I � I -1 omm,,,,,"",?""�t,,�'J","",t,?"� iiii "ll "" " , .."ll: � I ""I'l "ll ""' 11 I - "I'll-, ! ll� I ___1_11 "I'll, I " 11 11 I "I m��,i,m�� 1p `� I " I I xo_, 1;, I I iii .. ..... . ," ""', 1 ",""Ill., , ", ", � lialli I ,"i, � , , I 'd , i"wil - " " , .4-i 1 I,!;ill 1111"I"I"111-P"I'm '', I .- - I I I 1, �, � I i , ", � . .. . .... .. ls , I i;1 - 11 I " �*� � � I I I I ""'I iiiiiiiii'll"I'll �, I ,-*A-.- 111,011, 11 - I I � I p I I I 11� -11,111, I , , " " .- I ", "ll "11,11 I , � I . , I "I", I LIVE OAK ESTATES ___-____ I "" \ " 11 � , 11 I I 1� I I I __ _-, - __ -, ,- ___ , I V! I _ __ ___ -111", ,> i =z2vi=iiiiiiiiiiiiiiii� - , " - _11-1- . ..... 11.1-11-, I 1 - '- ,"I'l � TENTATIVE MAP i:! ,!!, - � I � I----- I 2a ill I _`-.__1___ � To- ,:%_ I "i" I l " l"'I'll I I 11 -"-------------- I il"!"I'll ''I "i 1,11,11"I 1, _/1" 11 mw Aw IiIIII1,1101, ,__�.:,r`,' ,,�__�� --i, - I 11 I I I - � ______"""_______� I ,"111- - 1-11 "-", , ___11-1-1-1 -1111 1-111, �111 I ,� :Z� __,_ ___� I 11 14$0040'_,,� _', * S,",-2017-00239 """w",', _`_� I I'll- 1-____-____ ''I - � 1*1 I 11 I'll 11 *ftw - 11 "I 1-1-1 11 _�_ 411 #/ F�' *"-_-`l _,"i I :l.. li ,:1, I __� � __`l ""i"i" MI111", __�, I I i /viiiii - -1 "I RZa ... 2017-00240 -11-i i i �� i - --i w ... A-` �, I Ill ::�,A. N'i .... I" I " - I I I - I I ""--I "I 1- , -1 I - _1�1 I - -#'*-*I N-.� ,��-',il�. " - .�_1111111 - _1.1__`- APNI C,f # A-60-084 1 1 1 1 � 11 11 I - -1. 11 �15C)5 -, `- 11 _77� ""--7" , �,__ :___� � _,_ 9-1 wSao 1-1 11-1- I - , I—— GRAF` J`IES R SEPARATE APON' 07i60-060 A p *k, wl 0 714 - 2- 6 0 - 0 00 1 3 Apt,*, 0,71 -260-009 � -.1- " , 1-11 11,: ,,-, - I I i = ' ro" "I I—— _ 11 goo_-_ .. I 1. " , I- , I I _,", ''::`�211 �___� t if!� ' I 111-11 I - :: - I __ '��::::, , - " PROPER�#( TRV I * A "I'll, -�:�_ .. . � - I _ I , _ - , I HARRISON JAN'E 14 ALM=114' FIDEL J & 8R1J'(3'^LE7#AA JOS & GRACE , "I'lill __ I 171�� , �. I, " - __ I , I ^ & * v - - _ - (51;0) .__.;;�� I—" , _______ � I— 1 404 ',*,'ES',r STREUt IT "w' --i - 1-1-1 I �,o '' " _ _ 11 -111 -1111111- I "' 01% %$ CIA A * G -w ,I, I I _"__-_-_r_-, '"""" I � "i , _ _-, "y ''�� THE NORTHEAST A4 OF SEC"nON 321i 'lli 4 o�t- t 55 � '11i,,ll` - =:;;�__ - ,_ - � I ` I , w #110 REDDIlk"If,31, ta*^* 1.06002 Pill =*i 64 *9308 GREEINt AC,4RES 114 'i' ___I'1`1_'__1--.1�l -11 � 11 RED"i # to '�� 5T_1___1:_1::_ "I i Pill ii R I T Us's 7_______ (", , r A POR71ON OF THE SOUTHWEST A OF 1668 *.',ASCA^E 1AN'E IR .-.1i I � - I 11 � "ll 'i I ^ APIN KELL0Gf*3 GtkWt D & - 11 , 11 `�,'�__111_111( TOWNSHIP 32 NORTH, RANGE 4 WEST* 1 -1 I 11 P,il CEDRO, CA *00 6 G'Ot3 REu^frv%1#%I4G# **'*'%V^* 0960=2 APON 0171-2.60-0311i "i I I JL, , M.D.M., CITY OF REDDING, SHASTA GEpullimItNE P r#^At. .1 %I,# * I "Q - . # IWJr, * i"'i D "i , _1_1___;;_ - 40 O_,____1111111201 ''I'll", 410 "i 01D AL"J"VRAS RD I I ,_� I COUNTY# CALIFORNIA *. 4 I _1 __1111, 4#4#20 "vl=R r,*%*V'E *A I � I `111"G. 1 1 --I'll I REDD I *.#^ vva RED01ING, COA 96,W�3 I - � ___ ___ I I FOR , I I I I , 1 INCH = 40 FEET OMNI FINANCIAL LLC i!; 13Y SHARRAH DUNLAP SAWYER, INC. 1i "'Itrp-,ii ",$#4.111., ',"I *8,,w,,§v1l %t,,A%,*f1I,c ", k"t-A li Ami'll'tti;ft illirs't-moi-Ti'll r_iGr4#r,-_, til'A��,tr,,,�if�",kt,�ii,lt�.V,t,v�i,,t , 't", *�_, 1k I;- �Y?,'., !w'I �*�Ij 41,4_1 ,Iir,,�I,v # 1F,h1Z,9 z1WIfG,, iiii"Cl,if ,J* ,ij, - ,�., � I , I I It " I ru"�' * "' I I (,�, / 'j \ ( "' G" '* �E , I I / *p"I'l # Il 'ill' '* .4 1�0 P^ ^ I k f, ) . v IFI? N lle� 11 EODDIttl 4 , 1 '" ""', ^ , " , I "'A "' "I I I � 11 " I " I , I *,"i", I I � -4� - -1 _<_ ki�,�,.,�,,�,�ivr�,,��"V,i,",�i't,ii� i \ - lil rr 7�TF ,f-", I , , , , , I � I I I I i i I 4# I'll _1__1-11___N_- ilimillmilli, is I I I I I I I I I I I 11 11 11 'I'l'','','',I,Illl'' 'I'lli'lli'lli'lli'lli'lli'll''''I'I ,_,_,, DATE,- JANUARY 10. 2018 SCALE: 1 =40' SHEET I OF 4 , iommiii,iii" -0101- I'llilillillillillillillillilillilli�illillillillillillilliillillillillillilliilillillilillillilI iiiiii!iiwwi�oommomi womilimm"441i lllillillivillillilliillillillillillillilliilillillilillill�illillillillillilI - I �, MiUmilli I ill 11 iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiilililillillillillilliillillilillillillill,'11111111111111111111,11,11111111111IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII1111111111"1111 uUmmilm"willimimm"Imm rl."'llim--n. 14014 lf,d*,a , I 11 11 I I' I - ! - ��"� I'll - I A Ii I I I t t ` ..�:.«.�_"'"*. ......�... SSSS. .,„• 77 OL 40 0 20 40 ,. FEET 4 x y + « .m F x 64 LOT LINE DIMENSION LOT NUMBER (ORO 1- 083 (OROS4 S) LOT SQUARE FOOTAGE (OROSS) 4,040 (RET), StS22 o4o) LOT ARE FOOTAGE ( -)T24 T 26 UNIT NUMBER DRIVEWAY CURB FACE & CURB BACK WPICAL LOT LABELS `. N.T.S. WACAR YARD 2+5 63.25 71 52 5 MIN. SIDE YARD (10* BUfLDIN0 SEPARATION) .tijs tt t }! ItYr} jt>{ts= _ ,SSSS r t ` ..�:.«.�_"'"*. ......�... SSSS. .,„• 77 OL 40 0 20 40 ,. FEET 4 x y + « .m F x 64 LOT LINE DIMENSION LOT NUMBER (ORO 1- 083 (OROS4 S) LOT SQUARE FOOTAGE (OROSS) 4,040 (RET), StS22 o4o) LOT ARE FOOTAGE ( -)T24 T 26 UNIT NUMBER DRIVEWAY CURB FACE & CURB BACK WPICAL LOT LABELS `. N.T.S. WACAR YARD 2+5 63.25 71 52 5 MIN. SIDE YARD (10* BUfLDIN0 SEPARATION) Im ii�t }jtls 1374 }, ti}t{!} ! 4tssi )t�i}{lost ! t trys f1.t{=GEND .tijs tt t }! ItYr} jt>{ts= 44 i4 {f 1S F }is`!!`s73 PRIVATE OPEN SPACE r 20” DRIVEWAYS s t !1 k i7 cit r TYPICAL MINIMUM LOT DIMENSIONS {}j i4fsf!!I� DUPLEX LOTS t i.t Im ii�t }jtls 1374 }, ti}t{!} ! 4tssi )t�i}{lost ! t trys f1.t{=GEND .tijs tt t }! ItYr} jt>{ts= 44 i4 {f 1S F }is`!!`s73 PRIVATE OPEN SPACE TYPICAL BUIMNG SS APOATMENT UNITS an ri p I Mi¥ r+#¥YRW " +r r A i .,,,ne. ay°. .d.*•.�K i vd,�d°�fig ' vJA,y � ,:+r y;IR': �M , • Furrp#rwraa u•r** .t ,!'*�^,. *�,r�:?" :p>«#�: rrs.�fi ;a ,':. # rw a a I , + x a eoil r : w ~«• + r+ ».n: .« .. » s.. YMP�F NNwd.ru�:waawa. " 3 , , Iu 1 a• + lw ¥ + + , * 1 r I� I k IN a s , x„✓ .tia•a. s k *J” v* aY � » k , w y lv u r � ex r y w# l fl �lrl � s a.. # 91 k �F ♦ « .r + r* : �R fib. �► 1' M ! ay mo Aw NMI , � I f Y r tt moi. n R I I rt . I II��1 , I c I 9 f, r arrwlrr :: elurrr irerg. y 1 1 CI k IIN :! , f I t II I W f t I. « + E 1: 14:y +NM'+NM'.r atert�t'4�+° 1, I Y r I M I I, L M I I Irl I ,rri � Gf �,. II f9„ IM "' a # + a .._LIVE OAK EST' TIES .... .',}y t {,}t3.. tt:{ t { .:54 r 1M ♦. 4 ,,.. 4 •t, }, } t t r t f t, { 2 is Y tri r t t , t t t { i E 3 } t, r r it Y + } z f t F r * r t #, E S t, v. .. t r i � t k t t, { c t'; { t 1 t i 3 c = t { t.�•Y,5 t .t 4. t PRELIMIN"ARY GRADN"I r' { t i i t t Y r t E •t t 3 r. y t t t. rz t 3 t Sr r, z x. war• e:+. w :.+r «: ,., i f t.. t {1 t t i ? { t 1 t ,s f + Y S A Y•; J f } ..i r.. S. fi E t t t t r.. r f r u w x+x +x .. .iv ...} •t. 1 } a { t sS"w"2017* > }r t t z t k t �S F, .5 r l # # t. }..t tE --00239 # ,RZ---*2017"wwOO24u' x # ,. R'nON OF E SOU A OF T # THE LAST iF+ 32* :. TOWNSHIP 32 NORANCE 4 WESTv .D.M. CITY Of DING"' , HAST COUNTY, CALIFORNIA FOR OMNI FINANCIALs LLC By 2,10 40 SHA RAH DUNLAP SAWYER, INC. 1. INCH 40 FEET JANUARY ¥ e 1 41 91 IL X N Ile 16 Mlwka W4, v 114 A;. Nv 5) Ox - vel -"n nw- el 1A All R'N731,*w wl *NL V71 f m ;1A 4'Al 40) % N 10 17 c .3 Ell SO, 10 12 IN -A .......... . WTR 7 VOW k sb� 62 1.e 6 .110 4 lift 64 4 I.--- 3 I 1-s �17 mod - t,ng, a LEGEND 20% AND GREATER SLOPES vw I , * wo AREA OF UNDERGROUND DETENTION SIDEWALK OLD ALTURAS ROAD RIGHT—OF—WAY DEDICATION PROPOSED SEWER EASEMENT RETAINING WALL COVERED PARIONO PROPOSED STORM DRAIN PIPE PROPOSED STORM DRAIN CATCH BASIIN PROPOSED STORM DRAIN AREA DRAIN PROPOSED WATER LINE (WITH TEE, VALVE, AND BLOWOFF) PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT (WITH TEE A14D VALVE) ss TH MANHOLE) PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER LINE (VA LOT NUM43ER 10 UNIT NUIM9ER r EXISTINO TREES TO REMAIN: 223 EXISTING TREES TO BE REMOVE()*- 56 SLOPE DRAfNAI ARROWS ja�M) TRASH AND RECYCLING ENCLOSURE oe Ll VE OAr\ ESTATEO PRELIMUNARY "TILITIEO '01'7"*"w 002 0`9 ATf -00240 APP R Z"mw 2 017 7 7 PORTION or THE SOUTHWEST Y4 or A qT THE NORTHEAST Y4 OF SECTION 32 _H TOWNSHIP 32 NORI , RANGE 4 WESTt M.O.M,s CITY OF REDOING. S14ASTA 40 20 40 COUNTY* CAUFORNIA 1L FOR 0 1 INCH 46-rEET OMNI FINANCIAL, LLC By SHARRAH DUNLAP SAWYER, INC. =40! SHEET 4 OF 4 JANUARY 10* 2018 SCALE- i SAM TV A % % t,ng, a LEGEND 20% AND GREATER SLOPES vw I , * wo AREA OF UNDERGROUND DETENTION SIDEWALK OLD ALTURAS ROAD RIGHT—OF—WAY DEDICATION PROPOSED SEWER EASEMENT RETAINING WALL COVERED PARIONO PROPOSED STORM DRAIN PIPE PROPOSED STORM DRAIN CATCH BASIIN PROPOSED STORM DRAIN AREA DRAIN PROPOSED WATER LINE (WITH TEE, VALVE, AND BLOWOFF) PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT (WITH TEE A14D VALVE) ss TH MANHOLE) PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER LINE (VA LOT NUM43ER 10 UNIT NUIM9ER r EXISTINO TREES TO REMAIN: 223 EXISTING TREES TO BE REMOVE()*- 56 SLOPE DRAfNAI ARROWS ja�M) TRASH AND RECYCLING ENCLOSURE oe Ll VE OAr\ ESTATEO PRELIMUNARY "TILITIEO '01'7"*"w 002 0`9 ATf -00240 APP R Z"mw 2 017 7 7 PORTION or THE SOUTHWEST Y4 or A qT THE NORTHEAST Y4 OF SECTION 32 _H TOWNSHIP 32 NORI , RANGE 4 WESTt M.O.M,s CITY OF REDOING. S14ASTA 40 20 40 COUNTY* CAUFORNIA 1L FOR 0 1 INCH 46-rEET OMNI FINANCIAL, LLC By SHARRAH DUNLAP SAWYER, INC. =40! SHEET 4 OF 4 JANUARY 10* 2018 SCALE- i SAM TV A 22 Ellm 26 9 IMINVI N 32 am _ 32 21 Z) Y,rk l 3 EA 34 40 3 16 15 t E{7 � v tk`3t s t t ii 4§7 ,i 8 x� �,�.r �:, � � �� .. � m� 0 Trash can (I per unit) Trash and recycling enclosure Recycling can (I per unit) M M H Subdivision OfTW family residential Phases 1 and2-. 20 * 2.2 acres of private op Development Services Department 5/2/2o18 PhaseIf prior o of e roundabout, the three Old Altur 11 transition to * left -turn lane into' easterly ' + a ` stop controlled Development Services Department 5/2/2o18 qq ��, '� -a, ��y '1 to hm•� nr a✓w S t 1..'tt Ott tit�r� s It { s "s _ aSaaswe l,� TMQ,mm I i All ✓ II wl X L t wt 1 444 i } ----------- ra�aav,r � �a rAcm r` AL LOT LABELS 'f k Cep —.- I qti r_, 3 �i"ff'ICkt KfAPk9 LOT D7WEk5kWS dYpGL $10,DW, rlbF /�j t a k£GfHW y > 5 LIVE OAK ESTATES TENTATIVE MAP 5-2017-00239 _ 1k: t a f atsadma ��k .0 is waa ,sx'. Rplttl FHdJJiC LLC s m'ktkS .V4#£�»RY w® SGAtF e'w6" n� xC 9 df i ... ..:._............... .,.,u....z. +r: northwest portiono '. duplexes Fenced,garages and fourplexes t" per unit. private,! a,! groupTwo gareasathering. Privatebenches, picnic or B BQ areas, ag open space in the northeast corner., site including a trailhead,to the adjacen public Churn Creek open space area. Development Services Department 5/2/2o18 Conduct a pu adopt the Ordinance approvin,,,.� for f irst reading, and. upon conclusionA 19m Ini rf-L�60 w2mim- gn Nar 11 " I' , 15Ils 1�i I� !"SION , OCT, e FkQ, TWNT ZONING MAP w "' �,- wrnrie a rt + S-2017.002391 RZ-2017-00240 I PD-2017-OD241 T FM LIVE OAK ESTATES 1320 & 1368 OLD ALTURAS ROAD AP# 071-270-012 & -021 ATI:.,,H?W',NT lit z4 i'i t a t � 5 t� �qi Sz,1• a "S'l'ash can (I per unit) kcc-Flirngcan it rerunitti IriaMi end re.3 u -,g _s� ,5ure _.. j 12 1 113+.: ( 14 15 Y t tit � F 16 r,Ft„s,� r lit z4 i'i t a t � 5 t� �qi Sz,1• a "S'l'ash can (I per unit) kcc-Flirngcan it rerunitti IriaMi end re.3 u -,g _s� ,5ure _.. CERTIFICATE OF PUBLICATION RECORD SEARCHLIGHT REDDING CITY OF — .�.�.. PURCHASING DEPARTMENT REDDING CITY OF 777 CYPRESS AVE REDDING CA 96001 REFERENCE': State of California County of Shasta I hereby certify that the 1a d Searchlight is �j lj t a newspaper of genera,',fi�k within he 7t{� r�t'r ��=a Sy provisions of he G( Cod' the State of 0? California, printe1111�t��d published the city of 4 Redding, County ol,41OPh asta, State off'#rx�aliforniaf t I am the print p��r,;lerk of the pr��t�r of said 0 newspaper; that �5 notice of whit', he annexed c clipping is a;tru"zt;trinted copy was published inAl said newspaper on dates, elates, to wit, FILED ON:04j20/18 PUBLISHED ON: 04/2012018 ��CmnpA_ �j lj t t 's 4 j�cyt ter x. *nig MAWS ;fi S } xWl � LA ri i� t� rt J�jt jf�,� RECEIVED OJ APR 7, 4 2018 I certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct, at Redding, Califon is ,o the above date. C17Y CLERICSOFFICE x# _ RECORD SEARCHLIGHT MAY 0 4 2018 101 Twin View Blvd, Redding, CA 96003 ,r By: r Cates, Anette (good morning, Anett , The JO # is 7914-2; Also, l just wanted to ma Thanks, Linda' Burke, Linda Wednesday, April 18 2018 8:56 AM Cates, Anette Sheetz, Sarah; Mize, Pam RE: 1991468 RE: 1 Ad for Legal Ads for April 20, 2918 From: Cates, Anette Sent: Wednesday, Apri3 AM iv: Purke, Unda err { } Cc. Sheetz, Sarah; Mize, Para t r Subject: FW: 1991468 RE; {good morning Linda;` Attached please find the confirmation for Please provide me with a Q#? Thank you, �m Ane t Executive Assistant POMMMM property owner notice as well. Sue is preparing the labels nov�.M 0 Cates, Anette From: GRSC-West-Legals mbx <GRSC-West-Legals gannett.Lcm> Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2018 8:17 AM To: Cates, Anette Subject: 1991468 RE: 1 Ad for Legal Ads for April 20, 2018 Attachments: REDDINGCIT-12-1991468-1:pdf e. t 1,#r00TT5T Tne .• Your ad is set to run in: pis tNa3 G Record Searchlight on The total cost is $85.47 whO eludes ars affidavit�fich will be mailed to you after the ad publishes. t The deadline to get with any change is�,� ��1118 by Spm. Thank you,f, , Valerie Jankowski Public Notice Coordinator Ef..t��Z (t s� xt,f i{ a� �itrt�yj tr �tr�s l��. tt,r€t " , s Record Search ight � It tea r 'r PMT Of THE USA TODAY NE Ttr' OP 4 530-246-2626 option 3 2 �ki l4iiiF}�i tf £74 From: Cates, Anette [IT mitt:acates@ci.r{ dding.ca tFS Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 20181.27 PM `'f; fit ,f � `Jt ilt ridyi }�, �{tlJE �j ir" To: RR6-RSIegals <rslegals redding.com> ,�rar`N.0 S 3 Cc: Sheetz, Sarah <ssheetz ci.redding.ca.us>, Mize, Pam <pmize cx ci.reddln .ca i Subject: 1 Ad for Legal Ads for April 20, 2018 Attached for publication as a legal ad on Thursday April 19, 2018, is Live s ting regarding the fallowing: Please confirm receipt via email and furnish this office with Affidavits of Publication in duplicate. If you have any questions or can't access the document, please contact me at 225-4439. Thank you! i Anette Cates Executive Assistant Officecity clerk"s Cypress777 P.O. 496071 Redding, CA 96049-6071 * a FAX (530)225-44, FYi Jt i iii i y4 Z t S i e'relrs e i y I w i41 i �i'tii^ is ii itf Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, includy attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any u S r!zed rey�w, use, disc,p �r , or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, t it ¢i iii . tii i Si tr i $ •p, please contact the sender by re I �j Astro a ori anal massa e. �i b g �e tz,a,eft t i4 i$i,Fi 1I rtS fi }J } ii$lzri t}{ i iili�i r.f r{ At said time ' ' }place, persons irtt t thereon.� DATED: April 19,2018 W may appear before the City Council and be heard f �' 4 7160006100 71260045000 71460021000 ALMAZAN FICDFL J & PATRICIA A AMITY 12OPE TIES'LLC BENNETT STEVEN A & PENNY L PO BOX 61 134 GOOSE SAY VIEW TRAIL 1192 GROUSE C ALO CFL,DRO, CA 96073 CHESTER, CA 96020 REDDING, CA 96003 71460020000 1206 GROUSE DR REDDING; CA yY X71260065000. DPidH 3...SmC 1405 BRADFORD A`f REDDING, CA 96001 71460007000;, � JACOBSON DENNIS K & 716 MALLARD ST REDDING, CA 96003 71360013000 LC N SEAR LIVING TRUST 1749 FOCFWOOD 0 REDDING, CA 96003 71360012000 MA`I"THEWS DAN 0 & SF ERYL A TIS 1761 EDGEW OD DR REDDING, CA 96003 71390001000 OBANION DENISE 1400 ARROYO MANGER CDR REEDING, CA 96003 71360046000 REDDING CITY OF 760 PARKVIEW REDOING, CA 96001 71360015000 RHODES STEVEN RICHARD & LINDA 2846 EAST ST ANDERSON, CA 96007 71260009000 r 71270019000 706 MALLARD REDDING,A 96003 Em 714650009000 i lz 47, 792700420 It t„t}av, 71270021000 OMNI FINANCIAL LLC CAPITOLA, CA 950110 79150055000 REDDING CITY €3F 760 PARKVIEW AV REDDING, CA 96001 71390025000 SANTALA MITCHELL R & LI Ali 1445 VICTOR AVE SUITE S REDDING, CA 96003 71460011000 725 MALLARD ST F 71260084000 #` # a REDDING,wpm 1404 WEST STREET 71260049000 1321 OLD ALTU AS RD REEDING, CA 96003 71260002000 MARTINEZ DANNY 6265 F SPRING STREET STF 525 LONG BEACH, CA 00306 713800 16000 ;,DEAL MICHAEL 1713 EDGEW OD OFA REDOING, CA 96003 } Ji 321,80014000 RICE € OBE T L JR & MISTY T T 1737 EDGEWOOD D REDDING, CA 96003 71490012000 RG DEVELOPMENT 4255 ALTA CA PO DRIVE REDDING, CA 96002 71460010000 SENN CALVIN W & PAMELA J 719 MALLARD ST REDDING, CA 96003 71260038000 71460004000 71460006000 SHADY OAKS LLC STEPHENSON BRIAN R & K I T'A A TERRAZAS ADRIAN & GUADALUPE A 437 TEAKWOOD DR 734 MALLARD 6T 723 MALLARD ST REDDI G, CA 96003 REDDING, CA 96003 REDDING, CA 96003 7139002400 71280019000 TIS �C;LEA��I T`HIBO FAMILY TRU WELLS DELL ER MARILYNT IM MAC 1 C7iJP�LAF� A INC `15212 t IDDLETOWN PARK OFA '1566 COLO ALT J Rid SHALOCKHEEDCid&�tE EDDIING, 0A 96001 CSI , A 96003 6590 CA 96002 ) \. U) ±f � ƒ(5 ƒƒ co «. �ƒ/ .\»rC14 OLU, \f 0 ,E . 8 < CITY OF REDDING 777 CYPREss AVENUE, REEDING, CA 96001 P.O. Box 496071, REDDING, CA 96049-6071 NOTICE OF PUBLIC ' NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that at a regular meeting of the Redding City Council on Tuesday, May 1, 2018, at 6:00 p.m., in the City Council Chambers, located at 777 Cypress Avenue, Redding, California, the City Council of the City of Redding will hold a public hearing to consider Tentative Subdivision Map Application S-20117-00239, Live Oak Estates; Planned Development Plan Application PD -2017,7,} ,� ,{j Rezoning Application RZ-2017-00240, by Omni Financial, LLC, requesting u to sine approximately 8 acres into 2E multiple -family residential lots in three ph ��i eir developind 64 multiple -family units on property located. along Old Alturas Road iwest of the inters ftn with Victor Avenue, A project iption and exhibit available for review at the Development Services N Department it Center, 777 Cypress Avenue, Redding, California, and questions may be directed to z, ,,'cmate Planner Linda Burke at (530) 225.4027 or through email at lburke cit ofre` , t � t�''}f "RIP! P$ x#i t t }� ,t. � At �me and place, person r E . erected nppear before the City Council and. be heard thereon. F 7 � ffiJ s 7 1 t f4 EEs-tai. rE�Et�t E7� � �IEI��S � E��rt E{`' {E� fit is �E( ElE zit E1 try Elft r AME ' City Cdding DATED: April 19, 2018 t,,ar,Er „5, 7 Jt}1 itr' „t, J41 01 f � t.;u� z E E� �Ei� � E - tai! E;E {n� {�+L$Er � �Sa1, t''tttttEt t'F f }j'�4{ { E{;tttt5; s f rel E,t t t } EirdGV@`iJid6,.F i.xR q 0pay� � (� 1L7 l.t l4.d ,�'rClii� 1363 Old Alturas R d gWNR B 02 �t4t r j 1# It a tt D it t jj" tf Qt 4 JY 5�1)tt F jiff l it�{ t t r t js it t��it� �� sr4+�t�t�tytt t t� .,ie.U�..t7 tai r tir jtt tt�t� t� it {lft tl tt Sr tt VVYLA WALK§ O �i nisi r # �tfj s t tYt r�� j`�.' t§ . g Luu i t, Yi DANA; DR 'sN, ARROYO MANOR bR 0 cc uj m co T GIS DLOCATION MAP IVISIONMTG. DATE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT W+ DATE PRODUCED: MARCH 5, 209$ S-2017-00239 1 -2017®00240 / PD -2017-00241 ITEM: LIVE OAK ESTATES s 200 400 Feet u"mmc==mmmm== 1320 & 1368 OLD ALTURAS ROAD ATTACHMENT. P::K'IOIiPltfb 1898}�OCUXE3@5lf5iC4tikiillSSIOFi�9r'4, Sii`�S-i{}iT-(HS'$39.Cit7Cti P`"6C` 46Y 0`F Sd'iif "'bd. S DATE: April 1 , 201 TO Pain Mize, City Clerk INTERNAL CODE: S-101-152-000 L-010-211-054 L-010-230-000 FROM: Paul Hellman, Planning Manager SUBJECT: Public t `�j, t ''` � �st fc�� Tentative �ab�ivisio Map Application S-2017- 002 t�Y,k need Dei 4 pent Plan Application PD -2017-00241, and Rezoning A�t�crn RZ-2017-��0 Live Oak Estates The Planning r �, , sion requests that tl�� }'s'' ty Clerk set the following item for public hearing at the May 1, 201st ity Council meeting.r tt{ hii��pF(�!rV I,, •T '1 requesting approval of a tentati, +e e e e Previous Action: 7n March 27, 2018, the Pla �n �� r ��ission con a i hearing and, upon 1 �� p �j { tt � t f t conclusion, recommended th��Esj �e �� Cozrr� �t4 do t �� Mitigated Negative Declaration and approve T uve �� }��r � �ap ��C��ztion `-2017-00239, Planned Development Flan Appplication 1'D-2` 17-��241 ,��d Rezonin application R -2017-00240):;,�, r t �f SFt t t 't 3t7 t t Action: Conduct a Public Dearing and, upon cosron,��'�e Vitiated Negative Declaration, approve Tentative Subdivision, ,"A 'iion S-2017.0239, Planned Development flan Application '.D-2017-0024' `�'c�' Rezoning Application RZ-2017- 01240, offer an Ordinance amending Title 18`Qf'the Redding Municipal Code (Zoning Map of`tire City of Redding) for first reading by title only, and authorize ize the Cite Clerk to publish a summary ordinance. If you have any questions, please call Linda Burke at 225-4027. LB Attachment c: Erie. Thomas, Planning; Division Sue MacSween, Planning Division Lily Toy, Planning Division Sarah Shetz, City Clerk's Office OAKMO T lel 0 vo SOUTH RIDGE D tuc 0 HIM O c� s l4fy{ {t s,z" s}f4 t EDGEUVOOD DR f 4 f1fi� IN t ,{ 0 Old Alturas Rd i it ' � 1368 Clad Altura S Rd 1"- :.: tt ti4 s fif�ru" t LOAD S RD 1s � itri.. 1y,1yj11 ` %Q 3's11'1i ;�i tf ins iN1 { t tit414' {f yF1r k}t ti ttt �. t f�# err ,r; , AFiRGYQrt s.��gst ti CSR Jiytt .�`'r ij j t J .4 1 7,11}i syr .FOR;FGIS T CH OU DIVISION LOCA "ION I AP G �'. FE W+ 1 ¢1n r;cv c S-2017-002391 RZ-2017-00240 / PD-2017-00241 F73-11�.�uEs�ta v LIVE OAK ESTATES o w �a F�e1 1320 & 1368 OLD ALT RAS ROAD A-71 ACAMENT r LP �rn.n u. z�+L1c�,r Yrs.r,:omm ss+wn tA�o�;.t:-.017 {� X33 rr��E AP# 071.270-012 & -021