HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso. 1981 - 171 - Approving official statement - Hartnell Avenue Assessment District No. 1980-3RESOLUTION NO. Yl -171
RESOLUTION APPROVING OFFICIAL STATEMENT
HARTNELL AVENUE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1980-3
The City Council of the.City of Redding resolves:
1. An Official Statement containing material information
concerning the proposed bond issue, the proposed improvement and
the assessment district has been prepared for the City. This Council
approves the Official Statement.
2. This Council ratifies the action of distribution of
the Official Statement by bond counsel in connection with the
invitation for bids for bond purchase which were received at 11:00
a.m. on Monday, August 17, 1981, in the office of the City Clerk.
3. This Council authorizes bond counsel to make appropriate
copies available to the underwriter awarded the sale of bonds.
4. The Official Statement is attached to this resolution
and made a part of it.
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was duly and
regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Redding, Shasta
County, California, at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 17th
day of August, 1981, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES • Councilmembers Demsher, Fulton, Gard, Kirkpatrick and Pugh
NOES: Councilmembers None
ABSENT: Councilmembers None
ETHEL A. RICHTER, City Clerk,
City of Redding, Shasta County,
California
D�O�� 1AL
Re: $1,746,241.20 Par Value Bonds
Hartnell Avenue Assessment District No. 1980-3,
City of Redding, Shasta County, California
Enclosed is an Official Statement respecting the subject 1915 Act bond
issue of the City of Redding. The Notice of Sale for the bonds was
distributed under separate cover on August�4, 1981.
On August 7, 1981, the owners (William and Norma Harter) of Assessment
Parcel No. 3 (assessment of $30,326.00) filed suit in the Shasta County
Superior Court (Action No. 70725), contesting the validity of that
specific assessment. A copy of the complaint, together with the exhibits,
is available at our office for those interested. In connection with the
award of sale of the bonds at the August 17 meeting of the Redding City
Council, the undersigned bond counsel will recommend,and it is anticipated
that the City Council will adopt, appropriate measures to isolate the
amount of the contested assessment and protect the remainder of the
project financing.
Further information respecting the assessment proceedings may be obtained
from the undersigned. Further information about the assessment district
construction project may be obtained from Paul Jones of PACE Engineering
in Redding (916)244-0202, Engineer of Work for the assessment proceedings.
While the City expects to receive one or more bids conforming to the terms
of the Notice of Sale, it recognizes that the current bond market condi-
tions may preclude that outcome. In the event no conforming bids are
received, the City reserves full discretion to negotiate the sale of the
bonds. Without limiting the entitlement of the City in conducting such
negotiations, it is anticipated that the City will give first considera-
tion to the party, if any, submitting the best non -conforming bid which
utilizes the maturity schedule in the Official Statement.
Notwithstanding that the cash payment period expired on August 10, with no
cash payments having been made on account of any one of the four assessments
levied, the City reserves the right, in connection with award of sale of
bonds on or after August 17, to reduce the principal amount of bonds sold.
The reason for reserving this right relates to ongoing negotiations with
the Harters and with the owners of Assessment No. 7, which may lead the
City Council to reduce either or both of those respective assessments,
thereby reducing the principal amount of bonds to be sold.
Very truly yours,
STURGIS, NESS, BRUNSELL & SPERRY
a rofessi al or ration
SAS:mm Samuel A. Sperr
Enclosure
LAW OFFICES OF
STURGIS, NESS, BRUNSELL F6 SPERRY
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
EUGENE K.STURGIS (1892-1976)
SUITE 1150,WATERGATE TOu'ER
EDWIN N. NESS
EMERYVILLE. CALIFORNIA 94608 MAILING ADDRESS:
ROBERT BRUNSELL
TELEPHONE (415) 652-7588 BOX 8808
SAMUEL A. SPERRY
EMERYVILLE, CA 94662
August 12, 1981
Re: $1,746,241.20 Par Value Bonds
Hartnell Avenue Assessment District No. 1980-3,
City of Redding, Shasta County, California
Enclosed is an Official Statement respecting the subject 1915 Act bond
issue of the City of Redding. The Notice of Sale for the bonds was
distributed under separate cover on August�4, 1981.
On August 7, 1981, the owners (William and Norma Harter) of Assessment
Parcel No. 3 (assessment of $30,326.00) filed suit in the Shasta County
Superior Court (Action No. 70725), contesting the validity of that
specific assessment. A copy of the complaint, together with the exhibits,
is available at our office for those interested. In connection with the
award of sale of the bonds at the August 17 meeting of the Redding City
Council, the undersigned bond counsel will recommend,and it is anticipated
that the City Council will adopt, appropriate measures to isolate the
amount of the contested assessment and protect the remainder of the
project financing.
Further information respecting the assessment proceedings may be obtained
from the undersigned. Further information about the assessment district
construction project may be obtained from Paul Jones of PACE Engineering
in Redding (916)244-0202, Engineer of Work for the assessment proceedings.
While the City expects to receive one or more bids conforming to the terms
of the Notice of Sale, it recognizes that the current bond market condi-
tions may preclude that outcome. In the event no conforming bids are
received, the City reserves full discretion to negotiate the sale of the
bonds. Without limiting the entitlement of the City in conducting such
negotiations, it is anticipated that the City will give first considera-
tion to the party, if any, submitting the best non -conforming bid which
utilizes the maturity schedule in the Official Statement.
Notwithstanding that the cash payment period expired on August 10, with no
cash payments having been made on account of any one of the four assessments
levied, the City reserves the right, in connection with award of sale of
bonds on or after August 17, to reduce the principal amount of bonds sold.
The reason for reserving this right relates to ongoing negotiations with
the Harters and with the owners of Assessment No. 7, which may lead the
City Council to reduce either or both of those respective assessments,
thereby reducing the principal amount of bonds to be sold.
Very truly yours,
STURGIS, NESS, BRUNSELL & SPERRY
a rofessi al or ration
SAS:mm Samuel A. Sperr
Enclosure
•
HARTNELL AVENUE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1980-3
CITY OF REDDING, SHASTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
$1,746,241.20 PRINCIPAL AMOUNT
LIMITED OBLIGATION BONDS
ISSUED PURUSANT TO
THE IMPROVEMENT BOND ACT OF 1915
OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
BONDS DATED AND DRAWING INTEREST FROM SEPTEMBER 2, 1981
INTEREST PAYABLE JANUARY 2 and JULY 2
PRINCIPAL PAYABLE JULY 2 IN YEAR OF MATURITY
DENOMINATIONS $5,000 (EXCEPT BOND NO. 1)
REGISTRABLE AS TO PRINCIPAL AND INTEREST
CALLABLE ON ANY INTEREST PAYMENT DATE AT 105% OF PAR
PAYING AGENT: BANK OF AMERICA NATIONAL TRUST AND SAVINGS
ASSOCIATION, SAN FRANCISCO
INTEREST NON-TAXABLE IN THE OPINION OF COUNSEL
NO RATING SOUGHT
MATURITY SCHEDULE
Year Amount
July
2,
1983
$56,241.20
July
July
2,
1984
60,000.00
July
July
2,
1985
65,000.00
July
July
2,
1986
75,000.00
July
July
2,
1987
80,000.00
July
July
2,
1988
90,000:00
July
July
2,
1989
95,000.00
July
July 2, 1990. 105,000.00
Year Amount
2,.
1991
$120,000.00
2,
1992
130,000.00
2,
1993
145,000.00
2,
1994
155,000.00
2,
1995
170,000.00
2,
1996
190,000.00
2,
1997
210,000.00
TOTAL $1,746,241.20
BIDS TO BE RECEIVED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK,
CITY OF REDDING, 760 PARKVIEW AVENUE, REDDING, CALIFORNIA
BEFORE 11:00 A.M. O'CLOCK, ON MONDAY, AUGUST 17, 1981
0
OFFICIAL STATEMENT
1915 ACT IMPROVEMENT BONDS
CITY OF REDDING
0
HARTNELL AVENUE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1980-3
INTRODUCTION
I.The City of Redding, California, is issuing local
improvement bonds under the provisions of the Improvement Bond
Act of 1915 of the State of California, in the amount of
$1,746,241.20. These bonds, designated Series 1980-3, will
finance the construction of public road, sewer, storm drain,
water, and underground utility improvements, together with
related property acquisition and project incidental expense.
The bonds represent special assessmentslevied by the City Council
according to special benefits to land within the Hartnell Avenue
Assessment District No. 1980-3, City of Redding, Shasta County,
California, which was created for the project under the. Municipal
Improvement Act of 1913.
This official statement presents material information
concerning the bonds, the project and the assessment district.
The official statement is deemed to include the Notice Inviting
Bids for Bond Purchase as fully as if the Notice was set forth
herein.
muu RnMnQ
1. LIMITED OBLIGATION. Bonds issued under the Improvement Bond
Act of 1915 are limited obligation bonds. The bonds are not a
general obligation of the State of California, the City of Redding,
or any other local entity, and the full faith and credit of the
issuer is not pledged to the payment of bonds. Installments of
the principal and interest on special assessments within the
Hartnell Avenue Assessment District No. 1980-3, which are col-
lected as described in paragraph 5 below, are deposited in the
bond redemption fund maintained by the issuer as a trust fund for
the Series 1980-3 bondholders. These bonds and the interest on
them are payable solely from this special fund. The phrase "bond
redemption fund", as used in this official statement is a
reference to this special fund.
2. DATE, DENOMINATION AND MATURITIES. The bonds will be dated
September 2, 1981, and will be issued in denominations of $5,000,
except Bond No. 1. A portion of the bond issue matures on July 2
of each year in a 15 -year period commencing July 2, 1983. The
bonds bear semiannual interest represented by coupons attached to
each bond. Interest Coupon No. 1 will represent interest from
the date of the bond, September 2, 1981, to January 2, 1983, and
thereafter interest is payable on July 2 and January 2 until the
maturity date of each bond.
3. ADVANCEMENT OF MATURITY. All bonds are callable before their
normal maturity, on any interest payment date, after a 60 -day
published notice of call. Upon call, the bondholder is entitled
to accrued interest to the date of call and one hundred five
percent (105°x) of the bond principal.
4. REGISTRATION. All bonds are registrable as to both principal
and interest and may thereafter be transferred, deregistered and
reregistered at the expense of the bondholder.
5. COLLECTION ON THE PROPERTY TAX BILL. The installments of
unpaid special assessments represented by these bonds, together
with interest thereon, are collected as a separately stated item
on the property tax bill for each specially assessed parcel within
Hartnell Avenue Assessment District No. 1980-3. Installments of
these special assessments are collected at the same time and in
the same manner as general property taxes. They carry the same
penalty for non-payment and their payment is enforced in the same
manner as for general taxes. Upon receipt by the Shasta County
Tax Collector, they are transferred to the City of Redding for
deposit into the bond redemption fund.
6. ISSUER'S TAX SALE REMEDY. One-half of each annual installment
is delinquent if not paid on or before December 10 of each fiscal
year; the second installment is delinquent after April 10. Delin-
quent installments bear an immediate penalty of six percent (6%)
and, if not sooner paid, begin to accrue a penalty of one percent
(1%) per month on July 1 following the fiscal year of delinquency.
After a five-year redemption period, the delinquent property may
-2-
0 0
be sold by the tax collector and a pro rata share of the proceeds
deposited in the bond redemption fund and the general funds of
the taxing and assessing agencies.
7. ISSUER'S JUDICIAL FORECLOSURE REMEDY. As a cumulative remedy,
the issuer may begin a judicial foreclosure immediately after
delinquency in any installment of a special assessment. A judi-
cial foreclosure is instituted in the Shasta County Superior Court
and is conducted.in the same manner as a judicial foreclosure on
property delinquent in payments under a mortgage or deed of trust.
After the issuer establishes the right to foreclose to the court's
satisfaction, the court appoints a commissioner to conduct an
auction sale of the property.
Following the sale, the issuer receives the amount due on account
of delinquencies, plus attorneys' fees and court costs, and the
balance, if any, is held in trust by the court for the credit of
the property owner. Like the tax sale, judicial foreclosure affects
only delinquent assessment installments. The purchaser either at
the tax sale or at a judicial foreclosure takes the property subject
to future assessment installments.
8. COVENANT TO FORECLOSE. The City Council of the City of Redding,
by resolution adopted July.9, 1981, has authorized a covenant for
the benefit of Series 1980-3 bondholders, pursuant to Section 8830
of the California Streets and Highways Code, to commence and dili-
gently prosecute a judicial foreclosure of the lien of delinquent
assessment installments. The foreclosure proceedings shall be
filed not later than ninety (90) days following the date of
delinquency.
This covenant constitutes an assurance to bondholders that the City
will act quickly to minimize the periods of delinquency. In some
circumstances, particularly those involving the bankruptcy of a
delinquent property owner, the tax sale or judicial foreclosure
may be delayed. Such delays, if extended, could result in delays
in payment of principal or interest to bondholders.
-3-
9. ISSUER'S OBLIGATION RE REDEMPTION FUND DEFICIENCIES. The
amount of the annual installments of the several unpaid assess-
ments, together with the interest thereon, is equal to the prin-
cipal amount of bonds maturing the next succeeding July 2, together
with the interest payable during that year on all outstanding bonds.
Accordingly, delinquency in the payment of annual installments by
any of the property owners will result in a temporary deficiency
in the bond redemption fund. In anticipation of this occurrence,
the Improvement Bond Act of 1915 imposes a limited obligation upon
the issuer, at the end of the fiscal year of such delinquency, to
advance to the bond redemption fund the amount of the delinquencies.
These advances are then recovered by the issuer when the delinquent
property owners redeem their delinquencies or when the issuer pursues
its tax sale remedy or judicial foreclosure remedy, as described in
paragraphs 6 and 7 above, to the point of cash sale proceeds.
The issuer's obligation to make advances to the bond redemption
fund is strictly limited, however, to available funds not immediately
needed. Aside from moneys in the reserve fund from time to time,
the City of Redding can give no assurance that it will have avail-
able funds from which to make advances on account of delinquent
installments. In fact, as the City adjusts its budgeting and
appropriation procedures to meet the requirements of Articles
XIIIA and XIIIB of the California Constitution (enacted in 1978
and 1979, respectively), it is less likely that the City will have
such available funds. For the purpose of providing available funds
for advancement to the bond redemption fund, the City has created
a reserve fund as described in paragraph 11.
10. REPEAL OF TEN -CENT LEVY. Section 8809 of said 1915 Act
presently provides that, where sufficient funds are not available
to the City of Redding from which to make the required transfers,
the City Council must levy a special tax city-wide at a rate of
up to ten cents ($0.10) per one hundred dollars ($100) of assessed
valuation in order to obtain funds for the transfer. However,
under the provisions of Section 2237 of the Revenue and Taxation
-4-
0 •
Code (enacted by Section 27, Chapter 332, Statutes of 1978,
effective June 30, 1978), the authority of local agencies in
California (including the City of Redding) to levy any ad
valorem property tax has been abrogated (with certain exceptions
not applicable to this bond issue). Accordingly, in the opinion
of counsel, Section 8809 has been repealed by implication, and
no investor in the subject bonds should rely on either the
authority or the duty of the issuer to levy an ad valorem tax
to provide "available funds".
11. RESERVE FUND. Out of the proceeds of assessments levied,
the City Council has set aside a reserve fund in the amount of
$87,312.06. This fund will be used to make temporary advances
to the bond redemption fund when made necessary by delinquencies
in the payment of assessment installments. Advances from the
reserve fund will be restored to that fund upon redemption or
auction sale of the delinquent property. When the reserve fund,
together with its interest accruals, is sufficient to pay all
remaining principal and interest on the bond issue, whether by
advance retirement or otherwise, the reserve fund will be used
for this purpose and the balance of the special assessments will
be cancelled. Prior to that time, the City Treasurer is required
to apply the fund's interest accruals to annual assessments to
the extent necessary to prevent the amount of the reserve fund
from exceeding U.S. Treasury arbitrage limitations.
12. DEBT SERVICE SCHEDULE. The following table shows a debt
service schedule based on an interest rate of ten percent (100)
per annum.
-5-
0
•
DEBT SERVICE SCHEDULE
HARTNELL AVENUE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1980-3
CITY OF REDDING
DATE OF BONDS: SEPTEMBER 2, 1981
YEAR RATE
1982-83
10.000
1983-84
10.000
1984-85
10.000
1985-86
10.000
1986-87
10.000
PRINCIPAL
$56,241.20
60,000.00
65,000.00
75,000.00
80,000.00
INTEREST
$320,144.22
169,000.00
163,000.00
156,500.00
149,000.00
TOTAL
$376,:85.42
229,000.00
228,000.00
231,500.00
229,000.00
1987-88
10.000
90,000.00
141,000.00
231,000.00
1988-89
10.000
95,000.00
132,000.00
227,000.00
1989-90
10.000
105,000.00
122,500.00
227,500.00
1990-91
10.000
120,000.00
112,000.00
232,000.00
1991-92
10.000
130,000.00
100,000.00
230,000.00
1992-93
10.000
145,000.00
87,000.00
232,000.00
1993-94
10.000
155,000.00
72,500.00
227,500.00
1994-95
10.000
170,000.00
57,000.00
227,000.00
1995-96
10.000
190,000.00
40,000.00
210,000.00
1996-97
10.000
210,000.00
21,000.00
231,000.00
TOTALS:
$1,746,241.20
$1,842,644.22
$3,588,885.42
PRICE FCR BONDS:
85.0000%
DISCOUNT OR
PREMIUM: $261,936.18
NET
INTEREST
COST: $2,104,580.40
NET
INTEREST
RATE: 11.4215%
am
13. INSTALLMENTS NOT A PERSONAL OBLIGATION. Exhibit A to this
Official Statement is a table of the seven separate assessment
parcels, showing the amount of the assessments levied and unpaid
in the subject assessment proceedings, as well as the property tax
valuations established for the 1981-82 property tax roll. Exhibit
B is a copy of the three-page assessment diagram, showing the con-
figuration of the seven separate assessment parcels.
Under the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913 and related provisions
of law, each of the unpaid assessments constitutes a fixed lien on
the parcel assessed. However, an unpaid assessment does not con-
stitute a personal indebtedness of the respective owners of the
parcel to which it applies.
There is no assurance that the owners of any parcel will be finan-
cially able to pay the installments on their parcel or that they
will pay such installments even though financially able to do so.
THE ASSESSMENT PROJECT
14. PRELIMINARY. The assessment proceedings for Hartnell Avenue
Assessment District No. 1980-3 are to provide for the construction
of an extension of Hartnell Avenue as a four -lane arterial street
through the assessment district, together with extensions of the
City's water, sewer and electrical systems into the area, and con-
struction of substantial storm drainage improvements. As shown on
the assessment diagram (Exhibit B), Hartnell Avenue bisects Assess-
ment No. 2 and fronts on the other three parcels which have been
assessed a portion of the total project cost.
The assessment district is situated adjacent to the Sacramento River
in central Redding (see Exhibit C for a vicinity map). Assessment
Parcel No. 2, a 66 -acre parcel, was purchase in 1979 by developer
Gary Stokes and associates (hereafter "Stokes"), and it is presently
being developed as the Cobblestone Planned Development. See para-
graphs 18 and 19 below for further information concerning the
Cobblestone project. It was the Stokes purchase and development
plans which provided the primary impetus for the assessment project.
-7-
15. THE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT IMPROVEMENTS. The improvements to be
funded by a combination of assessment district financing and City
cash contributions relate primarily to the extension of Hartnell
Avenue through the assessment district area. In addition, the City
will install extensions to the City's water system, sanitary sewer
system and electrical system to serve the property within the assess-
ment district, together with substantial storm drainage improvements.
The City has invited and received construction bids for the improve-
ment project on June 30, 1981, and the low bid was received from
Marshall Worley Construction, Inc. The City staff and Council are
very pleased with the bidding results and are anxious to award a
contract so that work can be commenced. The specifications for the
construction project provide for a construction period of 180
calendar days.
16. ESTIMATED COSTS. The following is a summary of the estimated
costs, as set forth in the Amended Engineer's Report approved by
the City Council on July 9, 1981, which was amended to reflect the
actual construction bid from Marshall Worley Construction, Inc:
I. Acquisition Costs
A. Right-of-way $125,450.00
B. Facilities 1,,840.00
C. Appraisal Fees 2,379.90
II. Construction costs per bid
Contingency
TOTAL I & II
III. Less City Contribution:
$ 129,669.90
1,291,859.20
75,000.00
$ 1,366,859.20
A. Construction costs and
engineering services 176,078.24
B: Acquisition 127,829.90
NET PROJECT COST $ 1,192,620.96
IV. Incidental Expenses 204,372.00
V. Bond Reserve - 5%
Bond Discount - 150
TOTAL AMOUNT OF BOND ISSUE
87,312.06
261,936.18
$ 1,746,241.20
17. ASSESSMENT DISTRICT PROPERTY. As shown on the assessment
diagram (Exhibit B), there are seven separate parcels within the
assessment district, but only four were deemed specially benefited
by the proposed project improvements. Those four parcels and the
amounts assessed against each are set forth in Exhibit A.
Assessment Parcel No. 2 as mentioned above constitutes the 66 -acre
parcel owned by Stokes, which is the subject of the proposed
Cobblestone Planned Development.
THE COBBLESTONE PROJECT
18. GENERAL. The primary impetus for undertaking this assessment
district at the present time relates to the efforts initiated
approximately two years ago by Mr. Stokes to develop the Cobblestone
property. On March 16, 1981, Stokes and the City of Redding entered
into a Cooperation Agreement to provide for the terms and conditions
under which the respective parties would cooperate in providing
the required improvements and related matters. A copy of the
Cooperation Agreement is available upon request from the City.
The assessment proceedings have been conducted in conformity with
the terms and conditions of the Cooperation Agreement.
The plans for development of the Cobblestone property have been
sufficiently defined to enable Stokes to present to the City a
proposed parcel map to reflect breaking the 66 -acre parcel into
five separate parcels conforming to the development program. The
map has been given tentative approval subject to conditions relating
almost entirely to the improvements which will be installed by
the assessment proceedings.
While the overall plans in the Cobblestone development are still
tentative, they have been the subject of the Environmental Impact
Report which was processed by the City and certified as complete in
June of 1981. As described in the EIR and related documents on file
with the City, the present expectation is to develop a.116,000 sq.ft.
shopping center on a 10 -acre site, single family and multi -unit
residential and professional office space areas. See Exhibit D
for the locations of the contemplated components of the development
program.
19. SHOPPING CENTER SITE. On Tuesday, July 28, 1981, the Redding
Planning Commission approved, with conditions, a use permit for
construction of the shopping center. Mr. Stokes further advised
that agreement has been reached for sale of the shopping center to
Connley Development, an experienced shopping center developer in
Oakland, California, for a price in excess of $1,000,000. It is
presently contemplated that construction will commence in the
spring of 1982.
SPECIAL RISK FACTORS
20. DEVELOPER'S CASH FLOW. While agreement has been reached for
sale of the shopping center site, escrow has not yet closed. In
the event that the transaction was not completed as contemplated,
the record owners of Assessment Parcel No. 2 would be deprived of
cash resources from which to pay assessment installments on a
timely basis. While no difficulty in completing the transaction
is anticipated, it could happen, with the related possibility of
delinquency in payments on account of Assessment Parcel No. 2,
which constitutes approximately 920 of the total unpaid assessments.
Related to this is the similar prospect that Stokes may experience
difficulty in either selling other parcels in the Cobblestone
development or developing them himself, whichever he chooses to
do. This risk is possible in view of the current high interest
rates.
-10-
Assessment &
Diagram No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
HARTNELL AVENUE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1980-3
CITY OF REDDING, SHASTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
Amount of
Assessment
$ 37,707.27
1,608,898.34
30,326.00
69,309.59
Property
Description
107-430-03
107-420-01
107-460-04
107-460-09
107-460-13
70-240-10
70-240-08
Assessed Value
Land Improvements
$ 78,030 ---
1,009,800
10,090
10,600
91,800
26,450
95,490
$ 10,200
17,430
27,590
208,200
5,630
566,030
EXHIBIT A
1
O/9'7'at/cT n;
GCX//1'O.rRY Q
oa rz'/sir' ' 1 e
L:sem/�
a . /o'r►'vo' I'
A r SI.sY'
C'J
>C
x
H
w
H
H
i
W, 4A9 --
�/oJ
O/ST,CiCT
Jet
/
!a
471
C✓27. JD,
a. y7'WRl-
�Q'�li/EW �
La
AVE
W
�P
1
o
iVF
,a
\ S
L •
d e.r'.Z' 05
�. rsree•
.AP
J!1-Zf 1
I
C-rT)
1
O/9'7'at/cT n;
GCX//1'O.rRY Q
oa rz'/sir' ' 1 e
L:sem/�
a . /o'r►'vo' I'
A r SI.sY'
C'J
>C
x
H
w
H
H
i
O
- Je�•tJ'n' .vm•t/'s✓ ' EAST Cyp/f'ESS AVE.
./s ace � se>•/7'd•' sr./s'
•J)�.L' �• � � NJ)' a'W /lL �I'
ser �
9/ JS
AP /07-1-79= LtS
1 .433ESSMENT
9l•o
>•39
Jvo'
O/ST,CiCT
a . >i• rte' 01,.
/
!a
A? 1
A'
�Q'�li/EW �
p.JE
AVE
O
- Je�•tJ'n' .vm•t/'s✓ ' EAST Cyp/f'ESS AVE.
./s ace � se>•/7'd•' sr./s'
•J)�.L' �• � � NJ)' a'W /lL �I'
ser �
9/ JS
AP /07-1-79= LtS
1 .433ESSMENT
9l•o
>•39
Jvo'
O/ST,CiCT
/
tfOrwLNR✓
A? 1
A'
/
\ S
J!1-Zf 1
I
C-rT)
d . /J' 75' 7"
I .
L • , c9'
T- .fv M'
1
Ola
!Y�`
�1
-I9'
Q
543' a
1
2
1�1
AI
it
'f'. y ,Ar'
2 \\
Pau \
II
E ,Pro \
I
T.
filed I. in* otrice of the city Clark, city of P*"&".
county of c? ago, state n! California tato L
day of lsu.
en1e�A_Q,ctararc c.ty r -moi"
c.—,yy oor sn.a., e.lt'—ternl*
P-1rdad In the office ehn A--- or PF 11e Forks,
thi..c-ne,_ day of.r till.
( .
Dile Marta, Clty of e.ddln•
count, of Gave•. California
in u• ...ane ,•.
.I'd by the city C-11of en. Uty of rledd lnq on lot., plot.. and pared• of land
•ne.m on cM... t dl.q— Said r..—.t ++
l.,/ad en tn. � eay et tlnf�oa
sone office
or9w,t a a•.....,Titip Tk [. the
ercit
le [M efrle• of ttw Dlr•etor e! hb le Fork• of tM Clty
of ■adding on tN �G�r_r day e[- Ilrl. ■ef•[-
• 1• wad• ee tM *e nt rel �j c (n enr etrlw
of the photic, of Public Fork. for the ro•rt *.Dunt of
eth . root 1., 1" a•.i,.t —h panel of Land •neem ew
th.
♦tHstAD<HRQf C.— of
el .t.. California
rll.e to 0 day or L 1911, at tD• nour
:ant
In ■opef Fapa Ma-
Mnt ra riots at pave ut In t LTi -0T71te of 11:11-41
Ptemrdor of the County a[ CTa.e., State of California.
t
f� ar7o v ry, vmy FPcord.r
(11 wuner o cnaaea. t•tuorhe.
LEGEND
OZ ASSESSMENT NUM6Ef
177--/LO-O/ COY/MY 4"e$301V/5 Alp. M. NWMEG
---- i4SSES5MEN7- rV,SJ lCT GDUNG79411'
NOTE: S71'£ET .P16//7,i-OF-WO✓ A.rC A17T //ICIUC eV'
—727/f ASSESSMENT AL,tAb3E5 ANO ARL GX-
CLUOEO Ar,>47 7NE A-SSGYSMENT LION
J
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
OF
HARTNELL AVENUE
•
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
NO. 1980-3
CITY OF REDDING
SHASTA COUNTY, CALIF.
8Y
ENGINEERING _
s al;l.,.,C tlr Oa•ia
J "A RIL; 1981 SCALE IF•100' SHEET I •OF 3
too• WLC 185.03. .
u w '
N i
,Q
�w
1- O
AJJGl.'U1G \�
Q'1T�li! T
OOC/A'LLI.f ✓ � .
e
A
R
1
\�J
t2i
x
H
l"b
H
H
/ \ A!tls.TMlNr
asrci�r
AGr.WO•fQY I
/ L � J97jCL�l
L • /117L C
i O \
3 \
C \
T• 7.73'
d• S/'OS �O
'Cn
3,
4a SEE SHEET.9 - , --
i.
NB9' S4' S9'G '/D3.•9S' — ASSE SMENT DIAGRAM - ----.
of
HARTNELL AVENUE ~
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
No. 1900-3 -
CITY OF REDDING
SHASTA COUNTY, CAUF.
by
l?EERING
APRIL 1981 SCALE 0.100' .SHEET 2 OF 3
N'LC 165.03
le
0
9EE SHEET 2
ASSESSMEA/T D1572/LT
BOUNLAA;-Y "
N,�rNSA,u '4'rsQ,eco4AIeerd-
IAOX
/
/07- 480 -O8
L
/07-420- O•
/07 - f&O - 04
4
/07 - 440 - 09
J1,07
-4G0- /R
70 - t40- /D
HARTNELL AVENUE
240 - OL
0
I[]
70- 2.0- Oe
n v I
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
370 0"
1
107-
HARTNELL AVENUE
N W I
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
/07
-
e• s•ii ii Q
r/�-��
NB9'S> J9"E L/
.4. O•/G TB"
•e..S 042.' t • 74.iS
N• Jam,
c•iJP �t
111.7Q
..
N//LS
/
�-.Af0.0
d •90•/7'33'
v
1
s4:s9•£
KNELL AliE.�'
cool
R• 3Y7.00"
L •472e'
\N69's4J9F Et�fB'
--.4004'29'
Nom•-��E
1].B1'SO'JO-
/•
SB9•S4'S9'M'
A�. 00
--i
— — — — -
APRIL , 1981 SCALE I "• 10d SHEET 3 OF 3
hl
eco.
1/Oct'
,!O'M is'N 30Gb'
SOO'✓'T3 %✓
APrb-Z40-O�
2/0 GO'
I
m
� I
0
I[]
70- 2.0- Oe
n v I
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
of
HARTNELL AVENUE
N W I
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
N0. 1980-3 ,
..
N//LS
/
i y i
CITY OF REDDING
SHASTA COUNTY, CALIF.
v
'TD• \o ' I
d=35 1G AB
Z•r �Z. rZZ.67
ENGINEERING
/•
SB9•S4'S9'M'
A[omwo, CAUfpPYIA
--i
— — — — -
APRIL , 1981 SCALE I "• 10d SHEET 3 OF 3
WtC 16507
0
I[]
Scale: \
0 1:' .5mile
(approx-) _
1E?D J
ARK. o�wJtira....K < 61 rngSt. 'T--
�p t. r•rerry
P 1 �. \ ®RODEO Chis / os` Polisodes
C\
GROUNDS Atditori•tw Ave old Iturtl
Q r„ Sa•
� 1Uj wood+d. i
Vti Po A
Sooac W
-V EPEE 1 t St' n i .R Du"is a °
rtyi a ¢° 6 orter Wo o c '-a
° 11 i p/. ,{ MNud • c C• Norman •
t� tg St. r^� / �,4 � t. D' V � c c \ •+ti N neu '
` MislletW
Ookd
1' I 1 �� hY r - Eel ve. Gris Ct. K Mleee �o dol Ct o
r°Hi P f = D1
H f pA J c onor s Dr. c "'w c Smit I
f KVTR 5 • - �' Ind vstriol Sl St.
m Wv. Derb In ` 1
::?ARK' or
O Remor Sr. M-`ta st. I
rn f/y rt'it nt St wado3
E s l
C'iTY _
tel+ l..rro 0lerrbr
h rnrp to ° �CJty Han E rov St. rope II '.� j AC.&..)
c I
Msr7 r � � Sr / oP r�M = VPRESS $ < St AVENVE r st
k EElmw Q t o O eilo O
_T
voe^1O j,v II V '^y,� E J ; Fe.t•1'
c;;
Kelley
e Mo-on
ao = Nbr la St. Dorrurd 3 C ,IM •ee^I >
_jr _ > ! � ¢ <
per << v. c C
is °rNE •AVE. a HA TNELL ° ¢ Y
RTNEL _
- - w ° ° p St. I
,�•ry t • c o l� c Or ttedr- L- Q -. 1
_ it
�'OQ le r nCt \ I �-
:drool I. m r S.4_'. lo-
e C t
thl t Ln Del Sd PI. c /
— drh t '�' c � J
G wa i sD i; ' - Shine iwr•ry^• v
- i 110
rcic tro Ho sc" •�� 0 1
reek 'li t' , 7nd 51 "C no Ct.
T—
O'-
9 O '1•agpon � %� � J Trr a r. � r I
Estate IDyi . Horpn a Rd I I
w
> ..°`J.. ( I $ .: Sdre•1
Mcho I Harp We
akl
•P .l El
Rd. •� t Lone
ro
C ,,�rirrde Ceaary 1 r.-+•�� -- ACA Shau
cl
General Vnto r l_ +
c —
°w>rd°Lo^° nc ln. Hospiu �;VVIEW;1 Dr r•�e ,.. Lorr.ine Dr. 1
-
��--lewn[e'U•`r.� G��" vr. ' ell Dr. 11
G u atY Ln. 8 _ L tl W.: Bol jr{ v Rofoe St.t C�D,-
i'1 Denton WY
odacre Curdnn Ln. = 1
aL
> I � � F •t \. \i AC. 11 J � I 411
Rorr.y.re•
O` c 1 Sckool
S;
Ke�v°r' , H�e`rr m nny lone ��' Douglus 1
T H$ gonnV = lone
3 C c wwr"el
EXHIBIT C
I
lot,
IIS
E.�J
n Q D PRODIS ASSOCIATES AIA INC.
UM M^ Mft&X MN .0M CALMMM
EXHIBIT D
Z
lot,
IIS
E.�J
n Q D PRODIS ASSOCIATES AIA INC.
UM M^ Mft&X MN .0M CALMMM
EXHIBIT D