Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso. 1981 - 053 - Requesting jurisdiction of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Shasta in connection with Hartnell Avenue Assessment District no. 1980-3RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING REQUESTING JURISDICTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF SHASTA IN CONNECTION WITH HARTNELL AVENUE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1980-3. The City Council of the City of Redding resolves: The City Council proposes to adopt an Amended Resolution of Intention, a copy of which is annexed hereto, marked Exhibit A, and by reference incorporated herein as though fully set forth. That a portion of the property proposed to be assessed lies within the unincorporated territory of the County of Shasta. The area of the County of Shasta which lies within the proposed assessment district will, in the opinion of the City Council of the City of Redding, be benefited by the improvements referred to in the proposed Amended Resolution of Intention, and that the purposes sought to be accomplished by the work can best be accomplished by a single, comprehensive scheme of work. The Amended Resolution of Intention, attached as Exhibit A, is hereby adopted as the proposed Amended Resolution of Intention for the improvement referred to. The consent of the County of Shasta, through its Board of Supervisors, is hereby requested to the formation of the district described in said Amended Resolution of Intention, to the improvement described, and to the assumption of jurisdiction by this City Council for all purposes in connection with the formation of this assessment district, the improvements to be made, and the assessment of property within the boundaries of the Proposed district. It is also requested that for the purposes of allowing such hookups to the Redding Regional Wastewater System, that the Board of Supervisors agrees V' -1- tEat it,will not approve a project that would connect to the sewer line that exceeds the density or uses shown on the amended Redding General Plan for the following reasons: 1. To avoid development that would exceed line capacity; 2. To avoid construction of a parallel line before full development of the area; C.o 3. To reserve adequate capacity' for'al�l'property owners in the defined service area-;, 4. To obtain the longest life of the line; 5. To avoid someone being left 'out as' a -product of approval of increased density for someone else. In addition, it is also requested"that the Board of Super- visors agrees to those sewer connections or sewer benefit fees that the City may levy from time to time for the purpose of treatment plant expansion, trunk line construction, provided that any levies would be the same for connectors both within and outside the City limits. The City Clerk is hereby directed to transmit a certified copy of this resolution with the proposed Amended Resolution of Intention attached, and a certified copy of the map showing'the boundaries of the district, to the County Clerk of the County of Shasta. I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was introduced and read at a regular meeting of'the City Council of the City'of Redding on the 6th day of April 1981, and was duly adopted at said meeting by the following vote: -2- AYES: COUNCILMEN: Demsher, Fulton, Kirkpatrick, and Pugh NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Gard MILDRED L. BRAYTON, City Clerk City of.Redding, Shasta County, California -3- •RESOLUTION NO. • AMENDED RESOLUTION OF INTENTION TO ORDER IMPROVEMENT IN HARTNELL AVENUE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1980-3 The City Council of the City of Redding resolves: Following adoption by this City Council of its original Resolution of Intention in these proceedings, as Resolution No. 80-271, adopted on November 17, 1980, it has been determined, and this Council hereby finds and determines, that additional property situated outside the boundaries of the City of Redding, and not originally included in the assessment district, is benefited by the proposed acquisitions and improvements of this assessment district. For that reason, as required by the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913, this City Council has requested consent of the Shasta County Board of Supervisors to conduct proceedings pertaining to the area, as modified, to include the parcels outside the City of Redding, and said consent has been granted. This Council intends to order the following improvement under the authority of the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913: A. Construct Hartnell Avenue from East Cypress Avenue to Bechelli Lane complete with sewer, water, storm drain, electrical, street lights, telephone and CATV. B. Construction a sewage pump station, sewer force main, and gravity sewer main to convey sewage from the assessment district to the City of Redding Pump Station No. 2 (on Bechelli Lane approximately 2,700 feet south of Hartnell and Bechelli intersection). C. Construction and installation of storm drain facilities, as necessary, to carry storm drainage runoff from the Stokes property, the extension of Hartnell Avenue, and the third - party parcels fronting on the extension of Hartnell Avenue to the Sacramento River, either via the Henderson Ditch or by an alternative method acceptable to the City. 10..40". WW.11 This Council finds that the land specially benefited by the improvement is shown within the boundaries of the map entitled, "Amended Boundary Map of Hartnell Avenue Assessment District No. 1980-3, City of Redding, Shasta County, Calif." This amended map has been approved by the Council and is now on file with the City Clerk. The land within the exterior boundaries shown on the amended map shall be designated Hartnell Avenue Assessment District No. 1980-3, City of Redding, Shasta County, California. This Council intends to levy a special assessment upon the land within the described district in accordance with the special benefit to be received by each parcel of land, respectively, from the improve- ment. There shall be omitted from special assessment all public streets, alleys and places and all land belonging to the United States, the State of California, and this City now in use in the performance of a public function. This Council orders that a contribution be paid from the general fund of the City toward the cost of the improvements in the Hartnell Avenue Assessment District No. 1980-3. Said contribution remains to be determined as an aspect of the design process. The balance of the cost shall be specially assessed. Where any disparity occurs in level or size between the improvement and private property, this Council determines that it is in the public interest and more economical to eliminate the disparity by doing work on the private property instead of adjusting the work on public property. Accordingly, work may be done on private property for this purpose with the written consent of the landowner. -2- 0 0 This Council intends to enter into an agreement with Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Company and Viacom Cablevision under the pro- visions of Section 10110 of the Streets and Highways Code, inasmuch as certain facilities included in the improvement are to be under their ownership, management and control. Serial bonds representing unpaid assessments, and bearing interest at a rate not to exceed ten percent (10%) per annum, will be issued in the manner provided by the Improvement Bond Act of 1915 (Division 10, Streets and Highways Code), and the last installment of the bonds shall mature fourteen years from the second day of July next succeeding ten (10) months from their date. This Council finds that the Special Assessment Investigation, Limitation and Majority Protest Act of 1931 (commencing with Section 2800, Streets and Highways Code) does not apply to these proceedings. This Council appoints Pace Engineering, Incorporated, as Engineer of Work for this project, and directs the preparation of the report required by Section 10204 of the Streets and Highways Code. In the opinion of this Council, public interest will not be served by allowing owners of assessable lands to enter into a contract for the work of improvement, as otherwise permitted in Section 10502.2 of the Streets and Highways Code. The amount of any surplus remaining in the improvement fund, after completion of the improvement and payment of all claims shall be transferred to the general fund if the surplus does not exceed the lesser of one thousand dollars ($1000) or five percent (5%) of the -3- 0 0 total amount expended from the fund. Otherwise the entire surplus shall be applied as a credit on the assessment as provided in Section :1.0427.1 of the Streets and Highways Code.