HomeMy WebLinkAbout _ 4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds GI �" Y � F
� � � ° � � � " � � CITY OF REDDING
REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
MEETING DATE: September 19,2023 FROM: Chuck Aukland, Public
ITEM NO. 4.11(e) Works Director
***APPROVED BY***
�
��n � .�.._ s.N,.��
� � � ���
ukl�n�l,H'ciblic Wc�aks L'��reGt ' �?l'7/2423 ry ip}�in,�C"i ana � 9,i11(2423
caulcland@ci.redding.ca.us btippin@cityofredding.org
SUBJECT: 4.11(e)--Accept Safe Streets and Roads for All Planning Funds to Update the
Local Road Safet Pro am and Ado t Budget Resolution Ap ro riatin Funds
Recommendation
Authorize and approve the following actions regarding allocation of an awarded federal grant
from the U.S. Department of Transportation Safe Streets and Roads for All Grant Program and
regional non-motorized grant funds for the following project:
(1) Accept the funds in the amount of$240,000 for the Local Road Safety Plan Update; and
(2) Adopt Resolution approving and adopting the 13th Amendment to City Budget
Resolution No. 2023-060 appropriating $240,000 for the project.
Fiscal Impact
The total estimated cost of the Safe Streets and Roads For All (SS4A) Local Road Safety P1an
(LRSP) update is $300,000. The attached budget Resol�ution will appropriate federal SS4A funds
in the amount of $240,000. The remaining $60,000 will come from in-lieu work from staff,
Citywide Transportation Impact Fee (TIF), streets funds, or other potential local funding sources.
SS4A requires a minimum 20 percent match from local sources in order to fund the grants. This
planning process is required in order to apply for project construction funding for future SS4A
cycles. This federal funding source is substantial and could fund multiple road projects over the
next few years, after the LRSP is updated to meet the SS4A goals.
Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) may choose not to accept the SS4A funds or approve the budget
Resolution. The City of Redding (City) would lose the SS4A funds in the amount of$240,000
and the projects may not be completed without additional funding sources and the City would be
ineligible for future cycles of the SS4A program.
Report to Redding City Council September 22,2023
Re: 4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All(SS4A)Funds Page 2
Background/Analysis
On February 15, 2022, the Council adopted an LRSP. The LRSP needs to be amended to
address new program goals, and add newly identified projects including public outreach and
preliminary engineering.
Federal funding is available through the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law for planning and
implementing SS4A projects in an effort to implement Vision Zero; a strategy to eliminate al1
traffic fatalities and severe injuries, while increasing safe and healthy mobility for all user of the
transportation system. Staff applied for and was awarded SS4A program funds in the amount of
$240,000 to update the LRSP and complete the necessary outreach and preliminary engineering.
These funds require appropriation with the attached budget resolution to allow for expenditures.
Many of the elements and small projects included in the current plan have been implemented.
The City desires to amend the LSRP to address larger road improvement projects, incorporate
more aggressive safety strategies and goals, and take a more regional approach including
incorporation of projects that include state facilities. The City also seeks to include more
innovative technologies or strategies that promote safety as well as equity within the project
identification, scoping and outreach process. The completed LRSP will incorporate SS4A goals
that lay out the Vision Zero plan for the City of Redding and, with the cooperation of the Shasta
Regional Transportation Agency(SRTA/MPO) and other local partners, address priorities within
the region. The completed plan will address equity challenges to ensure projects are developed
considering the overall impacts on all users of the system and our community.
Environmental Review
These actions are not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act, and no
further action is required at this time. Appropriating funding for the LRSP update will allow the
planning effort to move forward. Projects identified in the updated LRSP may be subject to
future environmental analysis.
Council Priority/City Manage� Goals
� Economic Development — "Facilitate and become a catalyst for economic development
in Redding to create jobs, retain current businesses and attract new ones, and encourage
investment in the community."
� Public Safety — "Work to improve all aspects of public safety to help people feel secure
and safe where they live, work, and play in the City of Redding."
• Budget and Financial Management — "Achieve balanced and stable 10-year Financial
Plans for all funds."
Attachments
^Resolution
Draft Agreement
021522 LRSP Staff Report
RESOLUTION NO. 2023-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF REDDING APPROVING AND ADOPTiNG THE
13Tx AMENDMENT TO CITY BUDGET RESOLUTION NO. 2023-060
APPROPRIATING THE SAFE STREETS AND ROAD FOR ALL GRANT OF $240,000
FOR THE LOCAL ROAD SAFETY PLAN FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
BE IT RESOL VED B Y THE CITY CO UNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING
THAT Budget Resolution No. 2023-060 be and is hereby amended as follows:
FUND DNISION DESCRIPTION 1NCREASE DECREASE
151 1671 Transportation Grant Projects $240,000
THAT account titles and numbers requiring adjustments by this Resolution are as follows:
USE SOURCE
OF FUNDS OF FUNDS
Decrease(Increase)Fund Balance
Federal Grant Operating-
151-1671-36010001-00000 Public Works $ 240,000
Increase Expenditures
Federal Operating Grant
151-1671-6190901-00000 Activities-Other $ 240,000
Total $ 240,000 $ 240,000
THAT the purpose is to appropriate the Safe Streets and Roads for All grant of $240,000 for the
Local Road Safety Plan for fiscal year 2023-2024.
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City
Council of the City of Redding on the 19`h day of September, 2023, and was duly adopted at said
meeting by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
MICHAEL DACQUISTO, Mayor
ATTEST: FORM APPROVAL:
SHARLENE TIPTON, City Clerk BARRY E. DeWALT, City Attorney
1. Award No. 2. Effective Date 3. Assistance
693JJ32340365 See No. 17 Below Listings No.
20.939
4. Award To 5. Sponsoring Office
City of Redding U.S. Department of Transportation
777 Cypress Ave. Federal Highway Administration
Redding, CA 96001 Office of Safety
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Unique Entity Id.: GRWNHECLZHFl HSSA-1,Mail Drop E71-117
TIN No.: 946000401 Washington, DC 20590
6. Period of Performance 7. Total Amount
Effective Date of Award through 12 months Federal Share: $240,000
Recipient Share: $60,000
Other Federal Funds: $0
Other Funds: $0
Total: $300,000
8. Type of Agreement 9. Authority
Grant Section 24ll 2 of the Infrastructure Investment
and Jobs Act(Pub. L. 117-58,November 15,
2021; also referred to as the `Bipartisan
Infrastructure Law"or`BIL")
10. Procurement Request No. 11. Federal Funds Obligated
HSSP230250PR $240,000
12. Submit Payment Requests To 13. Payment Office
See axticle 20. See article 20.
14. Accounting and Appropriations Data
15X0173ESO.00OO.OSSSR10500.5592000000.25305.61006600
15. Description of Project
The City of Redding has developed a Local Road Safety Plan (LRSP), that needs to be amended to
complete elements of the Action Plan. The LRSP engaged with a variety of public and private
stakeholders to develop plans and projects but to complete the Action Plan the City would eXpand the
scope of the plan,address additional projects and then re-engage and address the community to include
the public.
RECTPIENT FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION
16. Signature of Person Authorized to Sign 17. Signature of Agreement Of�cer
Signature Date Signature Date
Name: Barry Tippin Name: Carolyn Lethert
Title: City Manager Title: Agreement Officer
1 of 12
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
GRANT AGREEMENT UNDER THE
FISCAL YEAR 2022 SAFE STREETS AND ROADS FOR ALL GRANT PROGRAM
This agreement is between the Federal Highway Administration(the "FHWA") and the City
of Redding (the "Recipient").
This agreement reflects the selection of the Recipient to receive a Safe Streets and Roads for
All ("SS4A") Grant for the City of Redding Safe Streets Planning.
The parties therefore agree to the following:
ARTICLE 1
GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS
11 General Terms and Conditions.
(a) In this agreement, "General Terms and Conditions" means the content of the document
titled"General Terms and Conditions Under the Fiscal Year 2022 Safe Streets and Roads
for All Grant Program," dated February 8, 2023, which is available at
https:/lwww.transportation.�ov/�rants/ss4a/ r� ant-agreements. Articles 7-30 are in the
General Terms and Conditions. The General Terms and Conditions are part of this
agreement.
(b) The Recipient states that it has knowledge of the General Terms and Conditions.
Recipient also states that it is required to comply with all applicable Federal laws and
regulations including, but not limited to, the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost
Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (2 CFR part 200); National
Environmental Policy Act(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. § 4321 et seq.); and Build America, Buy
America Act (BIL, div. G §§ 70901-27).
(c) The Recipient acknowledges that the General Terms and Conditions impose obligations
on the Recipient and that the Recipient's non-compliance with the General Terms and
Conditions may result in remedial action, termination of the SS4A Grant, disallowing
costs incurred for the Project,requiring the Recipient to refund to the FHWA the SS4A
Grant, and reporting the non-compliance in the Federal-government-wide integrity and
performance system.
2of12
ARTICLE 2
APPLICATION, PROJECT, AND AWARD
21 Application.
Application Title: City of Redding Safe Streets Planning
Application Date: 06/0 U2023
2.2 Award Amount.
SS4A Grant Amount: $240,000
2.3 Award Dates.
Period of Performance End Date: See Section 6 on page 1
2.4 Budget Period.
Budget Period End Date: See Section 6 on page 1
2.5 Action Plan Grant or I�mplementation Grant Designation.
Designation: Action Plan
2.6 Federal Award Identification Number.
The Federal Award Identification Number is listed on page 1, line 1.
ARTICLE 3
SUMMARY PROJECT INFORMATION
3.1 Summary of Project's Statement of Work.
The City of Redding has developed a Local Road Safety Plan (LRSP), that needs to be
amended to complete elements of the Action Plan. The current plan employed a few low-
cost, high-impact strategies to improve safety, but the City desires to amend the plan
address the larger Vision Zero goals, incorporate more aggressive safety strategies, take
more of a regional approach, and incorporate projects that include State facilities. The
LRSP engaged with a variety of public and private stakeholders to develop plans and
projects but to complete the Action Plan the City would expand the scope of the plan,
address additional projects and then re-engage and address the community to include the
public. The City seeks to increase the project list in order to adopt innovative
technologies or strategies to promote safety and equity. The City has committed to a
Vision Zero goal, but needs to develop the Action Plan in order to implement the Vision
3of12
Zero Plan including new projects and strategies to meet the goal. The completed Action
Plan will layout the Vision Zero plan for the City of Redding and incl�ude a regional
approach with the cooperation of Shasta Regional Transportation Agency (MPO) to
address State facilities within the region. The completed plan will address Equity within
the region and ensure projects are developed appropriately throughout the region.
Significant areas of the City of Redding qualify as disadvantaged communities and have
serious safety concerns. The State transportation facilities through the region also have
significant safety concerns and the relationship of these facilities to the City of Redding
facilities needs to be addressed in the Action Plan. The regional cooperation between
Caltrans, SRTA and the City of Redding will allow this plan to meet the Action Planning
goals.
3.2 Project's Estimated Schedule.
ACTION PLAN SCHEDULE
Milestone Schedule Date
Planned Draft Action Plan Com letion Date: 12/31/2023
Planned Action Plan Com letion Date: 04/O1/2024
Planned Action Plan Ado tion Date: OS/O1/2024
Planned SS4A Final Re ort Date: 06/O1/2024
3.3 Project's Estimated Costs.
(a) Eligible Project Costs
Eligible Project Costs
SS4A Grant Amount: $240,000.00
Other Federal Funds: $0.00
State Funds: $0.00
Local Funds: $60,000.00
In-Kind Match: $0.00
Other Funds: $0.00
Total Eligible Project Cost: $300,000.00
(b) Supplemental Estimated Budget
Cost Element Federal Share Non-Federal Share Total Budget
Amount
Direct Labor $.00 $60,000.00 $60,000.00
Fringe Benefits $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Travel $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Equipment $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
4of12
Supplies $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Contractual/Consultant $240,000.00 $0.00 $240,000.00
Other $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Indirect Costs $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Total Budget $240,000.00 $60,000.00 $300,000
ARTICLE 4
RECIPIENT INFORMATION
41 Recipient's Unigue Entity Identifier.
GRWNHECLZHF 1
4.2 Recipient Contact(s).
Zach Bonnin
Transportation Planner
City of Redding
777 Cypress Ave. Redding, CA 96001
530-225-4049
zbonnin@cityofredding.org
4.3 Recipient Key Personnel.
� Name � Title or Position
� Zach Bonnin I Transportation Planner
;
4.4 USDOT Project Contact(s).
Darren Thacker
Safe Streets and Roads for All Program Manager
Federal Highway Administration
Office of Safety
HSSA-1, Mail Stop: E71-117
1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E.
Washington, DC 20590
202-366-6049
Darren.thacker(a�dot•gov
and
Sof12
Ashley Cucchiarelli
Agreement Officer(AO)
Federal Highway Administration
Office of Acquisition and Grants Management
HCFA-33
12300 W Dakota Ave
Lakewood, CO 80228
(720) 963-3589
ashley.cucchiar�lli(�dot.gov
and
Division Administrator
Agreement Officer's Representative(AOR)
FHWA California Division Office
650 Capitol Mall, Ste. 4-100
Sacramento, CA 95814
Hdaca(a>,dot•�ov
and
Ivy Attah
California Division Office Point of Contact
Operations Engineer
650 Capitol Mall, Suite 4-100
Sacramento, CA 95814
(916) 498-5860
iv .a�na,dot•�ov
Backup Calif. Div. Office POC: Maria.Bhatti(e�dot.�ov
ARTICLE 5
USDOT ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION
5.1 Office for Subaward and Contract Authorization.
U�SDOT Office for Subaward and Contract Authorization: FHWA Office of Acquisition
and Grants Management
SUBAWARDS AND CONTRACTS APPROVAL
Note: See 2 CFR § 200.331, Subrecipient and contractor determinations, for definitions of
subrecipient(who is awarded a subaward) versus contractor(who is awarded a contract).
6of12
Note: Recipients with a procurement system deemed approved and accepted by the Government
or by the AO are exempt from the requirements of this clause. See 2 CFR 200.317 through
200.327.
Note: This clause is only applicable to Action Plan Grants.
Unless described in the application and funded in the approved award, the Recipient must obtain
prior written approval from the AO for the subaward, transfer, or contracting out of any work
under this award above the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. This provision does not apply
to the acquisition of supplies, material, equipment, or general support services. Approval of
each subaward or contract is contingent upon the Recipient's submittal of a written fair and
reasonable price determination, and approval by the AO for each proposed contractor/sub-
recipient. Consent to enter into subawards or contracts will be issued through written
notification from the AO or a formal amendment to the Agreement.
The following subawards and contracts are currently approved under the Agreement by the AO.
This list does not include supplies, material, eguipment, or general support services which are
exempt from the pre-approval requirements of this clause.
(Fill in at award or by amendment)
5.2 Reimbursement Requests
(a) The Recipient may reguest reimbursement of costs incurred in the performance of this
agreement if those costs do not exceed the funds available under section 2.2 and are
allowable under the applicable cost provisions of 2 C.F.R. Part 200, Subpart E. The
Recipient shall not request reimbursement more frequently than monthly.
(b) The Recipient shall use the DELPHI eInvoicing System to submit requests for
reimbursement to the payment of�ce. When requesting reimbursement of costs
incurred or credit for cost share incurred, the Recipient shall electronically submit
supporting cost detail with the SF 271 (Outlay Report and Request for Reimbursement
for Construction Programs) to clearly document all costs incurred.
(c) The Recipient's supporting cost detail shall include a detailed breakout of all costs
incurred, including direct labor, indirect costs, other direct costs, travel, etc., and the
Recipient shall identify the Federal share and the Recipient's share of costs. If the
Recipient does not provide sufficient detail in a request for reimbursement,the AO may
withhold processing that request until the Recipient provides suf�cient detail.
(d) The USDOT shall not reimburse costs unless the Agreement Officer's :Representative
(the "AOR") reviews and approves the costs to ensure that progress on this agreement
is sufficient to substantiate payment.
(e) The USDOT may waive the requirement that the Recipient use the DELPHI elnvoicing
System. The Recipient may obtain waiver request forms on the DELPHI eInvoicing
website (http://www.dot.�ov/cfo/delphi-einvoicin�-system.html) or by contacting the
7of12
AO. A Recipient who seeks a waiver shall explain why they are unable to use or access
the Internet to register and enter payment requests and send a waiver request to
Director of the Office of Financial Management
US Department of Transportation,
Of�ce of Financial Management B-30, Room W93-431
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE
Washington DC 20590-0001
or
DOTElectronicInvoicin�,dot.�ov.
If the USDOT grants the Recipient a waiver,the Recipient shall submit SF 271 s directly
to:
DOT/FAA
P.O. Box 268865
Oklahoma City, OK 73125-8865
Attn: Agreement Specialist
(� The requirements set forth in these terms and conditions supersede previous financial
invoicing requirements for Recipients.
ARTICLE 6
SPECIAL GRANT TERMS
61 SS4A funds must be expended within five years after the grant agreement is executed and
DOT obligates the funds, which is the budget period end date in section 10.3 of the
Terms and Conditions and section 4 in Article 2
6.2 The Recipient acknowledges that the Action Plan will be made publicly available, and the
Recipient agrees that it will publish the final Action Plan on a publicly available website.
6.3 The Recipient demonstrates compliance with civil rights obligations and nondiscrimination
laws, including Titles VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Americans with Disabilities Act
(ADA), and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, and accompanying regulations. Recipients
of Federal transportation funding will also be required to comply fully with regulations and
guidance for the ADA, Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Section 504 of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, and al1 other civil rights requirements.
6.4 There are no other special grant requirements for this award.
8of12
aTTacxMENT a
PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT INFORMATION
Study Area: City of Redding City Limits
Baseline Measurement Date: 06/O1/2023
Baseline Report Date: 06/O1/2024
Table 1: Performance Measure Table
Measure Category and Description Measurement
Frequency
Percent of Funds to Underserved
Equity
Communities: Funding amount(of total End of period of
project amount) benefitting underserved performance
communities, as defined by USDOT
Project Costs: Quantification of the cost
Costs of each eligible project carried out using End of period of
the grant performance
Lessons Learned and Recommendations:
Description of lessons learned and any
Lessons Learned and End of period of
recommendations relating to future
Recommendations performance
projects of strategies to prevent death and
serious injury on roads and streets.
9of12
ATTACHMENT B
CHANGES FROM APPLICATION
INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING ATTACHMENT B: Describe all material
differences between the scope, schedule, and budget described in the application and the scope,
schedule, and budget described in Article 3. The purpose of this attachment B is to document the
differences clearly and accurately in scope, schedule, and budget to establish the parties'
knowledge and acceptance of those differences. See section 10.1.
Scope: N/A There have been no changes to the Scope as described in the application
Schedule: N/A There have been no changes to the Schedule as described in the application
Budget: N/A There have been no changes to the Budget as described in the application
The table below provides a summary comparison of the project budget.
Application Section 3.3
Fund Source $ % $ %
PreviouslyIncurredCosts � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Non-Eli iblePro'ectCosts) � � �� � � �� � � � � �� � � � � � � � �� � � � �� � � � � � �� � � �� � � � � � � � � �
Federal Funds
Non-Federal Funds
Total Previousl Incurred Costs
Future Eli ible Pro'ect Costs � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
S S4AFunds
Other Federal Funds
Non-Federal Funds
Total Future Eligible Project
Costs
Total Pro'ect Costs
10 of 12
aTTacxMENT c
RACIAL EQUITY AND BARRIERS TO OPPORTUNITY
1. Efforts to Improve Racial Equity and Reduce Barriers to Opportunity.
The Recipient states that rows marked with"X"in the following table are accurate:
A racial equity impact analysis has been completed for the Project. (Identify a
report on that analysis o�, if no report was produced, desc�ibe the analysis and
its �esults in the su ortin na�rative below.
The Recipient or a project partner has adopted an equity and inclusion
program/plan or has otherwise instituted equity-focused policies related to
X project procurement, material sourcing, construction, inspection, hiring, or
other activities designed to ensure racial equity in the overall delivery and
implementation of the Project. (Identify the relevant programs,plans, or
olicies in the su ortin narrative below.
The Project includes physical-barrier-mitigating land bridges, caps, lids, linear
parks, and multimodal mobility investments that either redress past barriers to
opportunity or that proactively create new connections and opportunities for
underserved communities that are underserved by transportation. (Identify the
relevant investments in the su o�tin narrative below.
The Project includes new or improved walking, biking, and rolling access for
individuals with disabilities, especially access that reverses the disproportional
impacts of crashes on people of color and mitigates neighborhood bifurcation.
Identi the new or im roved access in the su ortin narrative below.
The Project includes new or improved freight access to underserved
communities to increase access to goods and job opportunities for those
underserved communities. (Identify the new or improved access in the
su ortin narrative below.
The Recipient has taken other actions related to the Project to improve racial
equity and reduce barriers to opportunity, as described in the supporting
narrative below.
The Recipient has not yet taken actions related to the Project to improve racial
equity and reduce barriers to opportunity but, before beginning construction of
the project,wi11 take relevant actions described in the supporting narrative
below
The Recipient has not taken actions related to the Project to improve racial
equity and reduce barriers to opportunity and will not take those actions under
this award.
2. Supporting Narrative.
As a California city, it is required to have a DBE, MBE, WBE,plans that are required for
all purchasing or contracting.
11 of 12
12 of 12
GI �" Y � F
� � � ° � � � " � � CITY OF REDDING
REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
MEETING DATE: February 15, 2022 FROM: Chuck Aukland,Public
ITEM NO. 4.11(a) Works Director
***APPROVED BY***
�
��n � .�.._ s.N,.��
� � � ���
ukl�n�l,H'ciblic Wc�aks L'��reGt ' 2l'3/242? ry ip}�in,�C"i ana � 217(242?
caulcland@ci.redding.ca.us btippin@cityofredding.org
SUBJECT: 4.11(a)--Approve Local Road Safety Plan
Recommendation
Approve the following actions relative to the City of Redding Local Road Safety Plan (LRSP):
(1) Adopt Resolution approving the LRSP; and
(2) Find that the action is statutorily exempt from environmental review under the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)pursuant to Section 15262—Feasibility and Planning
Studies.
Fiscal Impact
An amount of$72,000 in state funds was allocated to the City of Redding (City) with a local
match from Street Division funds of$8,000, to cover the cost of the LRSP.
Alterna�ive Action
The City Council (Council) could choose to decline approval of the LRSP. This would
jeopardize the award of future grant funds.
Background/Analysis
Each state maintains a Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP), which is a data-driven safety plan
outlining measures to reduce traffic accident fatalities and serious injuries. The main components
making up the SHSP are Engineering, Enforcement, Education, Emergency Services, and
Emerging Technologies, also known as the five E's. An LRSP similar to the SHSP is a means for
local agencies to investigate and analyze traffic related safety needs and issues for local roads
and present systemic solutions for potential implementation. Sinee 2009, the City has been
successful in securing several federal grants through the Highway Safety Improvement Program
(HSIP) administered by California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), including safety
improvements to Victor Ave, Cypress Ave, Hartnell Ave, Churn Creek Road, and others. Due to
a ehange in state policy, an approved LRSP is now a mandatory requirement for HSIl' grant
application eligibility.
Report to Redding City Council February 7,2022
Re: 4.11(a)--Local Road Safety Plan Page 2
On November 19, 2019, the Council directed staff to apply for LRSP funding for the purpose of
creating an LRSP. On February 4, 2020, the Council accepted grant funding from the State of
Cali�ornia Local Roadway Safety Plan Program and staff hired GHD, Inc., to develop the LRSP.
In following the overall LRSP process, a Stakeholder Working Group was formed with the City
as the lead and individuals from local organizations representing the five E's noted above
including public safety agencies, engineers, school districts, County Health and Human Services,
and planners. This group gathered for meetings to discuss the overall collision analysis, goals,
priorities, safety recommendations, and development of the safety plan.
Based on the collision data analysis and the stakeholder working group input, the LRSP includes
a citywide analysis of the roadway system in Redding comprising of the current collision
patterns and high-risk roadway characteristics (systemic analysis). The goal of the LRSP is to
identify safety countermeasures to help mitigate the City's primary crash type trends and reduce
the overall collision severity, and to also address multiple SHSP challenge areas such as
pedestrians, bicyclists, distracted driving, intersections, and aggressive driving. The non-
engineering strategies were also developed through stakeholder engagement. The engineering
countermeasures in the plan coincide with HSIP funding.
Staff has reviewed the action and determined that it is Statutorily Exempt from CEQA pursuant
to Section 15262, Feasibility and Planning Studies, as the LRSP only involves planning studies
for possible future actions the Council has not approved, adopted, or funded. Any future action
would require approval, funding, and independent evaluation under CEQA. Adoption of the plan
would not result in physical alteration of the environment, and the action has no potential to have
a significant effect on the environment.
The Resolution has been approved to form by the City Attorney.
Council Priority/City ManageN Goals
� Government of the 21st Century — `Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and
challenges of today's residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make better
decisions today."
• Public Safety — "Work to improve all aspects of public safety to help people feel secure
and safe where they live, work, and play in the City of Redding.
Attachments
Resolution
Notic� of Exemption(unfiled) (available online)
Draft Local Road Safety Plan(available online)
Local Road Safety Plan Appendices (available online)
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CZTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING
TO APPROVE THE LOCAL ROAD SAFETY PLAN
WHEREAS, on February 4, 2020, the City Council accepted grant funding from the State o�
California Local Roadway Safety Plan Program to develop the Local Road Safety Plan; and
WHEREAS,the Local Road Safety Plan was created for the purpose of complying with new state
and federal requirements related to the Highway Safety Improvement Plan (HSIP); and
WHEREAS, the Local Road Safety Plan includes a citywide analysis of the roadway system and
identifies safety countermeasures to help mitigate primary crash trends and reduce the overall
collision severity by addressing multiple challenge areas such as pedestrians,bicyclists, distracted
driving, intersections, and aggressive driving; and
WHEREAS, the Local Road Safety Plan is a requirement for future HSIP grant applications; and
WHEREAS, the Local Road Safety Plan has been developed through the coordinated efforts of
City staff and consultants, stakeholder working group meetings, and input from the public;
NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Redding hereby:
1. Determines that adoption of the 2021 Loca1 Road Safety Plan is statutorily exempt from
the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA)pursuant to the Feasibility and Planning
Studies exemption (14 CCR 15262), as the plan would not result in physical alteration of
the environment and implementation of any future action would require approval, funding,
and independent evaluation under CEQA.
2. Approves the Local Road Safety Plan;
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular
meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the 15th day of February, 2022, by the
following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUlYCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
I�;RISTEN SCHREDER, Mayor
ATTEST: FORIYI APPROVED:
PAMELA MIZE, City Clerk BARRY E. DeWALT, City Attorney
NOTICE QF E+ XEMPTIQN
To; � Office of Planning;and Research FROMr City af Redding
1400 Tenth Street,Room 121 Public Works Departrnent
Sacramenta,'CA 95814 777 Cypress Avenue
Redding, CA 960Q 1
� Shasta County Clerk
County of Shasta
P.O. Box 990880, 1643 Market Street
Redding,CA 96099-0880
Pra,�ect Title: Citv ofReddxn�Lacal Road Safetv Flan J.O. #2656-10
Project Locatian—Specific: City of Reddin��Ci ide)
Project Locatian—City:Reddin� Praject Lacatit�n—County:;Shasta
Descrigtion of 1'raject:__The Citv af Reddrn� proposes to approve the Local Road Safe Plan (LRSP) The LRSP
includes a citvwide analvsis of tl�►e roadwa�system in Reddin�eomprisin�of the current collision patterns and higll-risk
roadwav characteristics (svstemic anal sis�. Tha goal of the LRSP is to identi safety countermeasures to help miti a�te
the Citv's tarimarv crash tvpe trends and reduce the overall collision severity and address multiple challen�e areas such as
pedestrians bicyclists distracted driving intersectians and a��ressive drivinp- The LRSF alsa includes non engineering
strate�ies. The LSRP is a mandatory rectuirement for Hi hwa�afety Improvement Plan (HSIP� rant applications and
will allow the City ta pursue HSIP �rant fundin�far future safety�rojects
Name af Public Agency App,raving Project: City of Reddin�
Name+�f Person or Agertcy Carrying�at Project; Ryan Bailev,Assistant Dlrectc�r of Public Works
Exempt Status; (check one)
❑ Ministerial [Section 210$0(b}(l)a 15268]
❑ Declared Emergency [Section 21080(b)(3), 15269(a}]
❑ EmergencyPraject [Secticsn 21080(b)(4); 15269(b}]
� Statutory Exemptians. State code number: Section 15262,Feasibility and Planning Studies
❑ Cornmon Sense Exemptian(This pro�ect does nofi fall within an exempt class,but it can be seen with certainty that there is
no possibilily that the activity may have a signgficant effect on the environment(14 CCR 15601[b][3]).
❑ Categorical Exemption. State iype and sectit�n number:
Based on an examination of this proposal and supporting informatian,the following statements are true and exceptians do not appfy:
• If this project falls within an exempt class3,4,5,6;or 11,it does not impact an environrnental resource of hazardous or critical concem where
designated,precisely mapped,and o�cially adopted pursuant to law.
+ Ther�will nat be a significant cumulative effect by this project and successive prajects ofthe same type in the sama place,aver time:
• There is nota reasonable possibility that tha project will have a significant effecton the environrnent due to unusual circumstances:
• This praject daes nat damage a scenic resource within an o�ciatly designated state scenic highway.
• This pro�ect is not located on a site included on any list compiled pursuant to Govk Code§5b962.5("Cortese List"}
• This project does nof cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historicai resource:
Reasons why project is exempt: A project involving only feasibilitv or lap nning studies for possible future actions
whi�h the a�ency baard or carnrnission has not a�praved adapted ar funded does not require the:preparation of an EIR
or Ne�ativa Declaration. The LRSP includes strate�ies and location data that mav be used to develap future�ro'e� cts.
however anv fature action wauld require appraval fundin� and independent evaluation under CEt�A Adoption of the
plan would ncrt result in�phvsical alteration of the environment and the action has no pQtential to have a si�nificant effect
on the environment.
Lead Agency Contact Persan:Amber Kellev Telephane: 530.225.4046
If Filed by Appiicant:
l. Attach certi�ed document af exemption finding.
Z, Has a natice of exemption been filed by the public agency appraving the project?a Yes a No
Signature; � �.� Date° .�"'� "
Title; Environmental Compliance Mana�er
o Signed by Lead Agency Date received for f ling at OPR:
❑ Signed by Applicant
�,
�
� � � �
� � � ��
. � �, $
���,��?� ��'�
.53�'`��,5�,�,�.. a'��.,�@�
..n ,.:Gzo-�v�.os.aaaa.wn s.....�w�..�' '.
_ „
—„„.�a�aw�< �
�;,
� t t � ?�t:�i
i '`��i��? '<'
u�``�'�a�Y ti���
*� � �
�^a���.e, � � �
-...��� .:"�, ,.�. .� ,�� � �,.,.. ..�
� ���� �� ���
������� �
��i�'°��..�w�a.l�,'��as�,x �.rt. t o�,��y�,z},�
c,�,.itjz ,. tk �,5.,;!�.'�i`�{�t;ttf�;i� .i.,�SCtttit4 4t fn..,:t, .
Zf
�:. � .�..,,rs
i
. .. .. . u�Mv" �`��.ei1,..`"�atin .,�..,`�i�:�,o�ar�.. ,�.
, , ,�'�s tie
d4��,�� ,
k�}
;,,��.��,;�t
� ��.�
��� '
City of Redding
�����
wYr"' ...
�;..
��� �
\ �� ���4
t�`� ;�� �� t � �� �
eE..� ���4 '�� 4��«�� �: ���` �z,3��
f s�r�4�� �S
,
�
' �Y tti'k��
r �t ���" h3�
4!'i� � �34 c:
�,
@ E.....
��
.:., .i '�(} '��..�� .
1Se
{YS�
z�. ti�7 ��;���,
...�r"
°@%%ti Y•• � o-����
� �'���
' � d
V I'''r
zs>�`������L������\�a
����� ,1 rr� ���\ �,�'
5�;� z,��t
..� �v°-, .
�, �
� �,::�
,.,4s,��2,„,ytyt , ..� , � ,
� v �, ��._
i"�
�
�, n�:
,
� �
,�
t
� -.f>ti ��`�1.�
� i�
1„� Y i i
���,�:�., .,d i,�� � > V
� � «
,,,. ,.i� <.�,
�. �. . � �� :.. .,:,,..,r= ..�
� .3...: ...... .... . _,. , , , t s�,.. ., . .,.r.�
This page was intentionally left blank.
�
A special thanks to all the Safety Partners that contributed to this plan.
City of Redding
Mayor and City Council
Public Works Department
Police Department
Fire Department
County of Shasta
Public Works Department
Health and Human Services
Shasta Regional Transportation Agency
Redding Unified School District
Healthy Shasta Partnership
Draft Qacument—Far Discussion Oniy—FinaE Version May Ctiffer Fram Ctraft
GHD� Redding�ocal Road Safety Plan� Page i
.. ..���5� �����f��� �.. ....q. W W� �i
� 4�4 b
• Y>
In 2019, the City of Redding was awarded a state grant from Caltrans to perform a Local Road Safety
Plan (LRSP). The �RSP is a requirement for Cycle 11 of the Highway Safety Improvement Program
(HSIP). The LRSP grant application included a citywide analysis of the roadway system in Redding
comprising of the current collisions patterns and high-risk roadway characteristics (systemic analysis}.
Furthermore, the Redding's goal is to identify safety countermeasures to help mitigate the City's primary
crash type trends and reduce the overall collision severity.
The �RSP is a collaborative process that is similar to a Systemic Safety Analysis Report(SSAR)except a
LRSP has a local leadership group that represents the 5 E's (not just engineering} and public outreach.
The 5 E's of traffic safety include Engineering, Enforcement, Education, Emergency Services, and
Emerging Technologies.
Thr� taf traf�ic safety
� � �
, -
�ngineering Enftarc�m�ni ��iucatieaw� �mergency �mergin�
Serv��es T�;chnnE����s
This holistic approach allows certain areas of concern not showing a crash pattern to be analyzed. Also, it
fosters local, state, and agency partnerships to advance local road safety.
In following the overall LRSP process, a Stakeholder Working Group (Working Group)was formed with
the City as the lead and local organizations from the 5 E's and anyone with an interest in improving the
City's roadway safety. This group gathered for meetings to discuss the overall collision analysis, goals,
priorities, safety recommendations, and overall development of the safety plan.
Based on the past 5 years collision analysis and the City's Stakeholder Working Group Meetings, this
LRSP will address multiple Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) Challenge (Emphasis)Areas including
but not limited to:
1. Pedestrians
2. Distracted Driving
3. Bicyclists
4. Intersections
5. Impaired Driving
6. Aggressive Driving/Speeding
7. Roadway Design
a. Additional emphasis area per Stakeholder Working Group not in SHSP
In addition, the vision, mission statement, and goals were established in guiding the development of the
LRSP. It was aiso decided that the LRSP for the City of Redding would be a living document with official
updated every five (5)years.
Draft Dacument—For Discussian Qnly—Fina4 Version May Differ Fram DraFt
GHD(Redding Local Road Safety Plan(Page ii
Data analysis, public input, and City feedback helped to determine the priority locations in the City. These
locations, along with their proposed countermeasures, are shown in the tables below.
�ri�rity Ir���r���t��r�� �n� ����rr�rr,�r�c��� ����t�rrr�����ar��
Impro�signal hardware:lenses, baek-plates with retroreflecti�bnrders;mountin�,
Systemic(9 locations) size;antl number ,
Impro�signal timing(coordinaYifln,phases,red,yellow,or operaYion)
Modify signal phasing to implement a Leading Pedestrian Interval(t.Pl} ';
5ystemic(49 Iocations) Modi#y signal phasing to implernent a Leatling Pedestrian Interiral(LPI) ;
Impro�signai hardware.lenses,back-plates wifh refroreflecti�borders;mounting,
size;and number
Install Ieft-turn lane and add turn phase in westbound d'rrecCion'
5outh St!California St
Modify signal phasing to implement a Leading Pedestrian Interuai(LPI}
Imprn�signal timing(coordination,�hases,red,yellow,ar aperati�n}
Improve signal hardware:lenses, back-plates with retroreflecti�borders;rnounting,
size;and number
Hartnell Ave/Bechelli proWde Aduanced Dilemma-Zone�etectiorr
Ln Install pedestrian rnedian fencing on approaches
Impro�:signaf timing(coordination,phases,red,yellow,ar aperation)
Impr�v�signal hardware:lenses,back-plates with retroreflecti�e borders;mounting,
size,and number
Impro�signal timing(coordination,phases,red,yellow,or operatic�n)
' Churn Greek Rd i
Wartnell Ave Modify signal phasing to implement a Leading Pedestrian Interval(LPI) ;
Increase Dlll enforcement
Cansolitlate driv�ways ;
Impro�sfgnal hardware:tenses,back-plates with refroreflecti�:borders;mountirtq,
size;and number
Victor Ave/Flartnell Impro�signaf timing(eoordinatio-n,phases,red,yellow,or operatian)
Ave
Modify signel phasing to impfement a Leading Pedesfrian Interval(CPI)
Churn Creek Rd f� ��pro�signal hardwar�:lenses,back-plates wifh retroreflecti�;borders�;mouriCirrg,
Cypress Ave size',and number
Cmprou�signal timing(coordinatfnn,phases,retl,yellow,or operation} i
Impro�signal hartlware:lenses, back-plates with retroreflecti�,2 borders;mounting,
Airport Rd i Preserve $��e;and number
Blvd �'rovide Aduanced Dilernrna-Zone De#ection,
Install advance stop 6ar before crosswalk(Bi�ycle E3ox)
Bicycie educ�tion aboui riding at night and:rules ofthe raad ��
Butte St/'Continental n/one(upcorning safety project addresses current collision trends)
St
Market St!Riverside ����all pedestrian crossing(S.L)
Dr
Imprfl�signa)hardware:lenses,back-plates with re�roreflecti�borders;mounting,
Willtop Dr/E Cypre$s size;and number
Ave Impco�signal timing(coordination,phases,red,yellow,or operation}
Install raisetl pa�ment rnarkers and striping(`fhrough Intersection)
E Cypress Ave/ �mprov�signal hartlware:lenses,back-plates with retroreflecti�bnrders;maunting,
Bechelli Ln size',and number
Impro�signal timing(conrdinatian,phases,red,yelCow,or operation}
Hartnell Ave i i Impr�t�:signal hardware:lenses,back-plates wifh retrareflecti�borders;mounting,
Northwoods Way �ize;and number
lncrease DUI enfarcement
praft Dacument—F�r Qiscussican Only—FGnaf Versic�n May Diffier From draft
GHD� Redding�ocal Road Safety Plan� Page iii
Pri�rity ��grn�r��� �r�� ����rnrn�r���� G��ar���rm����ar��
Add segment Ughting(East of 1-5 Interchange)
E Cypress Ave(Park Install raised median(Betw�en Hilltop Dr and Churn Creek Rd)
Marina�r fo Charn instafl bike Ian�slinstali separated bike ianes
Creek Rd) ConsnPdate exlst'rng dri�ways to limit the nurnber of aecess points
Instafl bike con�ict paintat intersections and��dri�ways:
Insialf raisecf inedien(Betw�en Da�ta Dr and Srowning Dr)
Willtop Dr(nYo �nstall edge-lin�s and ceriterlines(6etwsen Ross/Big-Lots Drivewayand Margatia Sf)';
' Browning Stto Install delineators,reflectors and/orobject markers
Maraglia St) ' pedestrian fencing along sidewaik to guide pedestrians to the enhanced crosswaik with '
RRFB
Raiiroad Ave(South St �nstall che�ron signs on fiorizontal cun�s ,
fa Buena�entura Blvd) �nstafl sidewalk/pathway�td atroid waiking along roadway)
instaff deiineators,reflectors,ancf/or object markers
Instafl dynarrriclvariabie speed waming signs
Ihsfall/upgrade pedes#nan crossing;at uncontroiled Tocations(wifh enhanced safety '
W CypressAve(Market features)
St to Park Marina Dr) �nstall muI#iuse path/shatrow on�:astbound approach to the intersection of W Cypress '
A�/Market St
Install bike conflict paint at intersections and'tlri�ways
Churn Creek Rd' Install dynamic/vanable speed waming signs i
(Presidio St to S'
Bonnyviaw Rd)'! Instafl bike conflict paint at intersections and'dri�ways
Hartnell Ave � Add$egment Lighting
1(Goodwater Ave fo Install curve advance waming signs
Airpart Rd) Increase DUI enforcernent
Add Segment�ighting �
Wilitop Dr(n/o Redding Road Diet(Reduce tr�vel'lanes frorn 4 to 3 and add a two way Ieft-tum and bike lanes) '
Hilltop Ap�rtmentsto �ns#all/upgrade pedestrian crossingiat uncontro[led loc2tions(with enhancetl safety
St Thomas Pkwy)
features)
Consolidate existing driv�ways to limit the number of access points
Bechelli Ln(E Cypress Install raisetl median(on the approaches to Hartnetl Ave)
Ave to n/o 3rd St) Cansolidate existing dri�ways to limit the number of access points
Railroad Ave(South St �nstall dynamic7variable speed waming signs
to Buenauentura Bfud)
S Bonnyview Ftd(S
Market 5t to Churn Irrstall Separated Bike Lanes
Creek Rd)
It is important to understand the upcoming funding opportunities in the successful implementation of these
safety projects. Most of the proposed countermeasures are HSIP fundable (next cycle 11 is scheduled to
open in April 2022). However, countermeasures can be implemented through other funding sources to
include
• Active Transportation Program (ATP)
o Next call for funding projects is scheduled to start in March 2022
• Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) program
• Sustainable Transportation Planning Grant(Sustainable Communities)
• Stimulus funding sources
Qraft Qacument—Far piscussian Qniy—F4na4 Versian May Differ Fram Draft
GHD� Redding�ocal Road Safety Plan� Page iv
• Capital Improvement Program or with on-going maintenance work
Draft Qacument—Far Discussion Oniy—FinaE Version May Ctiffer Fram Ctraft
GHD(Redding Local Road Safety Plan(Page v
� sts}s�� ,
,, �. ,....., i��i
.i...,��`��}��...
1. INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................................... 1
2. BACKGROUND............................................................................................................................2
2.1 Purpose and Need.............................................................................................................2
�.1.1 City Roadways..................................................................................................3
�.�.� California Strategic Highway Safety Plan.........................................................4
3. SAFETY PARTNERS/STAKEHOLDERS ....................................................................................6
�.9�1 Stakeholder Working Group Meetings .............................................................6
3.2 SHSP Challenge/Emphasis Areas.....................................................................................7
3.3 Guiding Principles..............................................................................................................7
�_�.� Vision Zero........................................................................................................7
���,� Vision................................................................................................................8
�.�.� Mission Statement............................................................................................9
���.� Goals ................................................................................................................9
4. ANALYZE SAFETY DATA......................................................................................................... 10
4.1 Recent/Planned Safety Projects...................................................................................... 10
�.`1.�9 Active Transportation Program (ATP} ............................................................ 10
4.�.� Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP}.............................................. 11
4.1,� SR 273 Multimodal Corridor Plan................................................................... 13
4.2 Collision Data................................................................................................................... 14
4.�.1 Collisions on City Roadways.......................................................................... 14
�:��� Collisions on Caltrans Roadways................................................................... 18
�.�.� Collisions Related to Challenge Areas........................................................... 19
4.2.3.1 Pedestrians..................................................................................................... 19
4.2.3.2 Distracted Driving ...........................................................................................21
4.2.3.3 Bicyclists.........................................................................................................22
4.2.3.4 Intersections ...................................................................................................23
4.2.3.5 Impaired Driving..............................................................................................24
5. PUBLIC OUTREACH.................................................................................................................25
5.1 Public Website.................................................................................................................25
Draft Dacument—Fc�r Discussian Qniy—Final Versian May Diifer From Draft
GHD� Redding�ocal Road Safety Plan� Page vi
��"I.1 Interactive Map...............................................................................................25
�.1.� Public Survey..................................................................................................27
6. IDENTIFY STRATEGIES...........................................................................................................31
6.1 Engineering Strategies.....................................................................................................31
�.1."I City Intersection Projects................................................................................31
�,1.� City Segment Analysis....................................................................................33
�.°�.� Speed Mitigation.............................................................................................34
6.1.3.1 Traffic Calming................................................................................................34
6.1.3.2 Assembly Bill No. 43.......................................................................................35
6.�.4 Systemic Safety Countermeasures................................................................35
6.1.4.1 Leading Pedestrian Intervals..........................................................................36
6..�1.� Projects Suggested through Public Input.......................................................38
�,1.� Additional Safety Projects...............................................................................38
6.2 Non-Engineering Strategies.............................................................................................39
�.�.1 Education........................................................................................................39
�,�a� Emerging Technologies..................................................................................39
�i.�o� Enforcement...................................................................................................39
�.��� Emergency Response ....................................................................................40
7. PRIORITIZE & INCORPORATE STRATEGIES ........................................................................41
8. EVALUATION PROCESS..........................................................................................................44
9. NEXT STEPS.............................................................................................................................47
10. REFERENCES...........................................................................................................................48
Figure 1 California SHSP (2020-2024)............................................................................................ 1
Figure 2 FHWA's �RSP Development Process............................................................................... 1
Figure 3 Fatal and Severe Injury Collisions in the City of Redding.................................................2
Figure 5 FHWA's �RSP Development Map.....................................................................................5
Figure 6 Traditional Approach vs. Vision Zero ................................................................................8
Figure 7 Recent and Planned Safety Projects in Redding ............................................................ 12
Figure 8 Total Collisions on City Roadways (2015-2019) ............................................................. 14
DraFt Dacument—For Discussion Oniy—Fina4 Versian(tqay Differ Fram Draft
GHD(Redding Local Road Safety Plan(Page vii
Figure 9 Top Violation Categories on City Roadways................................................................... 15
Figure 10 Collision Density on City Roads (2015-2019).................................................................. 15
Figure 12 Summary of City Collisions (2015-2019)......................................................................... 17
Figure 13 Collision Density on Caltrans Roads............................................................................... 19
Figure 14 Pedestrian Location at Time of Collision.........................................................................20
Figure 15 Density of Pedestrian Collisions......................................................................................21
Figure 16 Type of Inattention for Distracted Driving Collisions........................................................22
Figure 17 Top Violation Categories for Bicycle-Related Collisions.................................................22
Figure 18 Density of Bicycle Collisions............................................................................................23
Figure 19 Top Violation Categories for Intersection-Related Collisions..........................................24
Figure 20 Collision Types for DUI/BUI Collisions ............................................................................24
Figure 21 Public Website Home Page.............................................................................................25
Figure 22 Public Website Interactive Map.......................................................................................27
Figure 23 Public-Identified Roadway Issues ...................................................................................28
Figure 24 Responses to"Which of the following bikeways would you feel comfortable using?" ....28
Figure 25 Responses to"Would you be willing to use alternate modes of travel (walking, biking, public
transit, etc.)to get to work, schooi, shopping, etc.?".......................................................29
Figure 26 �ocations of Proposed �eading Pedestrian Intervals......................................................37
Figure 27 �ow Resource Neighborhoods and Priority Locations in Redding..................................46
� <: 5F i,��'�0
e�
. ,"� ', ,�7ik�}�..���
Table 1 Fatal Collisions on City of Redding Roadways (2015-2019).............................................3
Table 2 Comprehensive Collision Costs and EPDO Weights (2018 dollars}............................... 17
Table 3 Top Intersections, per Collision Analysis......................................................................... 18
Table 4 Top Segments, per Collision Analysis............................................................................. 18
Table 5 Priority Intersections and Crash Rates............................................................................32
Table 6 Priority Segments and Crash Rates................................................................................33
Table 7 Recommended Systemic Safety Countermeasures........................................................36
Table 8 Projects Suggested through Public Input........................................................................38
Table 9 Priority of City Intersection Projects ................................................................................42
Table 10 Priority of City Segment Projects.....................................................................................43
Draft Qacument—Far Discussian Qniy—Fina4 Versian May Differ Fram Draft
GHD(Redding Local Road Safety Plan(Page viii
. ., .�, ; {t�7`
ttFfi
1?di�
Appendix A Collision Data � �'� ���
Appendix B Stakehoider and Public Input
Appendix C Previous Safety Plans and Projects
Appendix D Recommended Projects
Draft Qacument—Far Discussion Oniy—FinaE Version May Ctiffer Fram Ctraft
GHD� Redding�ocal Road Safety Plan� Page ix
�t�~` i�Y���� :'��. �
�
1Y4�f���i�} a�@,....
� � �, .v y�gtllll�::3.. �
AASHTO American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials
ADA Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
APS Accessible Pedestrian Signal
ATP Active Transportation Program or Plan
BCR Benefit to Cost Ratio
BUI Biking Under the Influence
CA MUTCD California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices
CIP Capital Improvement Program
CMAQ Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality
DUI Driving Under the Influence
EPDO Equivalent Property Damage Only
FHWA Federal Highway Administration
FSI Fatal or Severe Injury
HSIP Highway Safety Improvement Program
HSM Highway Safety Manual
�RSM �ocal Roadway Safety Manual
�RSP �ocal Road Safety Plan
SHSP Strategic Highway Safety Plan
SSAR Systemic Safety Analysis Report
SWITRS Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System
TIMS Transportation Injury Mapping System
Draft Qacument—Far Discussion Oniy—FinaE Version May Ctiffer Fram Draft
GHD(Redding Local Road Safety Plan(Page x
}a`
F�f t��
. � i���
The project involves the development of a Local Road Safety Plan (LRSP), which provides local agencies
an opportunity to address unique roadway safety needs in theirjurisdictions. This comprehensive
document will both help to guide City in safety countermeasures and allow eligibility for funding in future
HSIP applications. The process of preparing an LRSP creates a framework to systematically identify and
analyze local safety problems and recommend engineering safety improvements for future Highway
Safety Improvement Program (HSIP)funding.
�i ur� 1 C�lif�rnia (202Qd2024}
Preparing an �RSP facilitates local agency ��°�����������������"������ ��� `;`�����` `��` �����"�� ����`���"�
partnerships and collaboration, resulting in a �������$��
prioritized list ofi improvements and actions that �� � ��� �� �� ��'� �`�
��t��,���s.� �i�������� �.�
contribute to California's Strategic Highway Safety '��`"�`��� '��'�"����"°"��
Plan (SHSP}overall vision and goals. This SHSP
focuses on reducing fatal and severe injury collisions � s '��
�
(FSI collisions)with focused challenge areas with a <
�r�. .v�
� �`
focus on the Five "E's" of Tra�fic Safiety (see Figure ������ �� �� � ���"" '�
1). ��
The City and GHD will follow the Federal Highway Administration's (FHWA) �ocal Road Safety six (6)step
process as shown in Figure 2:
�i �ar�2 � '� L� � �v�l�p �rrt r���s�
�
. . � ��"{�����
.., .
����� � ���
�. � �� : �. ��� � �����
��
,
��,�.���
��� �� ������� "
; ., . �� ���
'� ���`: :4rs�1
�::: �� ��
� ,;::
In working with the first step of establishing leadership, Shelby Nadin, Traffic Operations Manager, was
identified as the Safety Champion/Lead for this project with a stakeholder working group that consisted of
the other E's (enforcement, education, emergency response, and emerging technologies} and other
important safety partners. This stakeholder working group was paramount in creating a comprehensive
safety plan that is tailored to address the local needs and issues.
Qraft Qacumenf—Far piscussion Qniy—FinaE Versian May Ciiffer Fram Draft
GHD(Redding Local Road Safety Plan(Page 1
2:`
({�)JT
� , ', 1�44,���.
, � ..'."..zviS�t.�i,�
� � �
The City of Redding has a current approximate population of 91,000 and is located in Shasta County,
California. Redding's "2000-2020 General Plan" evaluates how the City growth and development will
occur. The Transportation Element of this plan contains fifteen (15)goais for Redding's transportation
system. The goals include providing safe, efficient, and comfortable muitimodal transportation, creating
Complete Street systems, maintaining downtown's vitality, improving safety at railroad crossings,
promoting public transit, and protecting residential neighborhoods from excessive through traffic.
In focusing in on the roadway safety needs, the past five (5)years of collisions (2015-2019)were
evaluated for the City roadways and the fatal coilisions are discussed below. Figure 3 presents a map of
the twenty-four(24)fatal and ninety-three (93)severe injury collisions in the City from the past five years.
More information on fatal and severe injury (FSI)collisions is located in Appendix A: Collision Data.
�ige�r� 3 ���I �r� ���r� Ir�j�ry ��Ili�i�r�s �r� th� ��fiy�f �ddir�
�i'�' � ��.'` "� '. Le sna.. .
, �,,zs ,�-G n� l s
y � F� � c�ll�sw4n
� � ,:�` `�s ' Seu�raty
���.� "'i v �,�'� �e� �i�. Fakal
� � � 5 as FnFu+}'
,�?, ��I � � � � . C iy��W Ftetltl"� �.
�-.,, � C{yLmrl
..�� ��� t�e .
r �
� �a` � �
� I ��� ��� j � �' ��_ �.�
p i
Y '
7 � � �* I � a,.,,,ew�"":
r� � �� !� I �.x�"""��"�
'� 1 .: �� :�7 r � .
� 2 t, -
' � �� � t ��� '.
�"\�'o° ,j �}� i 1
,
�� 't
�
�
� �� � �,�� � � ; �- '
,
r; �'* ,., . s : _
..t� . . . . �.
�
�� � ` �� �..
� �� '^� ,
t ����, �a ��.'� � i
� '�o� u i ��� ; �
��� ; `�.�� �„ i` a �� L?Id k6t�eas lid
� � a � �'���.' _
� ,'�5,�„+a ,.,.«^'8£�""�;��+4 4 1"��. h � ,:� 'r
� � ��
'�-�' � �,�, � �'} }1 '� `� ��` �"��°� �` �, ; 1
, ��. �� y s �` , ��� � � � ; �' �
�,� a -� E Clmress Gtve. � ; _
�_ � � �� ��; �� �,� ,��� �
�� �� � ��� � , r, � H��n����W� �
� � , � ,� � �� �� .��
�� G_ ' � �� i' �,' ' � � �'�
� �= ;a � z,.. �
,, , � , , �,� �
`� �.�l E '� �� � �
�" ' ': �_ �'� � c._
� � c
� � i;'�
����� � c�-r�r �F � � � , w
r.. ' � � ��j fe '�� .�
� ����(�t.7 �.—,i�'s � r��.�..,
� �
,�, ,, ,. ,� ..a ._.
�� ��'� I
�y i j ��'`
�;� � � ��.
� �� m_`, � .
� � ��
, i`�. �
�� .�
! �> �
� _— , � , �
, � �� w , � u .
��� ��
, � � ;��
t
, _rc.
���� ��� � c�y_���t�`�
�r ���
�� � � �; � �i
prafit Doeument—For Discussian Only—F{naE V�rsian May Dififer Fram D�aft
GHD�Redding Local Road Safety Plan(Page 2
�.�.� City Roadways
During the five-year period (2015-2019), there were twenty-four(24)fatal collisions recorded for the
roadways under the City of Redding's jurisdiction. The fatal collisions on City streets had the following
characteristics (see Table 1 below):
1"�bl� 1 ��t�l �Ili���n� �n Ci�y �f �d ir�g ��dw��� �2015�2019}
� : � R- �"' ,p � : @ . »
2015 Hartnell A�enue, 147 feet west of Parport Road Overturned DUI Single vehicle
2015 Bechelli Lane, 1�9#eet s�uth of Beagle Lane ��hicle- Pedestrian Pedestrian was crassing not in a
F'edestrian �olatian ' crasswalk
Railroad Avenue, �264 feet north of ' t/ehicle-
'2015 ^ + - 'Pedestrian was not in the road
' Buenaventura Boulevard Pedesfrian
2015 Churn Creek F2oad and Hartnell Avenue Broadside Unsafe Speed Motorcycle callision
Automobile Right
2015 Butte Street and Continental 5treet Head On ��W�y Bicycle collision
2015 Airport Road and Pres�rve Boulevard Braadsid� Impraper Turning Bicqcle collision
2t?�5 delta Street at Santa Fe A�enue Broadside ��tomobile Right
of Way
2016 W���top Drive, 1062 feet north of Peppertree Vehicle- Pedestrian Pedestri�n was crassing not in a
Lane Pedestrian Uiolation crasswalk
2016 Cypress Avenue,360 feet west of Athens Vehicle-i Pedestrian Pedestrian was crossing not in a '
A�enue Ped�strian Uiolation crosswalk
2�16 ' Hartnell Avenue at Northwaods Drive Broadside " DUI
`2016 ;Buenaventura Bouleuard'ancl Lakeside Driue Broatlsid� �utomobile Right
of W ay
Hartnell Avenue,25Q feet east of Ghurn Ceeek ' ' Autornnbile Righf
'2�17 Road �raadside of Way Bicycle collision
Automobile Right
2017 Hartnell A�enue at Middleton Lane Broadside ;�#W�Y Motorcycle'collision
'2017 Churn Creek Road and Hartnell Avenue Rear End DUI J Unsafe
Speed
2017 Beltline'Roatl and Nbuntain Lakes Boulevard Broadside automobile Right
'of W ay"
�0'17 Nl�rket Street aY Riversid�;Dri�e ������e- Pedestrian
Pedestrian Uialation -
Churn Greek Road, 106 feet soufh of Presidia Unsafe Lane
'�201$ �� � Hit Object �Single vehicle
Street Change
2��8 Cypress A�enue, 165 feet west of Rasernary Vehicle- Pedestrian Right Pedestrian was'crassing in a
A�enue Pedestrian 'of Way crosswalk not at an intersecfion '
2d1$ 5outh Street and California Street. ' Broadside �raffic Signals
anc!Si�ns
2018 Hartnell A�enue and Bechelli Lane ��hicle- Pedestrian Pedestrian was crossing in a
Pedestrian Violatian' crosswalk at an intersection
2018 Railroad Avenue and Placer Street Vehi�le-' Pedestrian Pedestrian was crossing in a
Pedestrian Violatic�n crosswalk at an intersectic�n
Vehicle- Pedestrian was crossing in a
2019 Hilltop C?riv�,548 feet north of Mistletoe I�ane ' DUI
Pedestrian crosswalk at an intersection at night;
;2019 Hartnell Ave and Shotwick Trail Hit t7bject Unsafe Speed Single�ehicle collisions where
' motarcycle ran off fhe raad
Wrong Side of
2019 t"�Id'Eureka Way and Walnut Avenu� ' Hit Object ; Road Single�ehicle
In improving roadway safety for the City of Redding, it is important to focus on mitigating these high injury
collisions and loss of life.
Qraft Qacument—Far Qiscussion Oniy—FinaE Version May Differ From Draft
GHD(Redding Local Road Safety Plan(Page 3
� fi � i li
In developing the City of Redding �RSP, the following standards and guidelines were followed:
• "�ocal Roadway Safety, A Manual for California's �ocal Road Owners", Caltrans, Version 1.5, April
2020.
• 2020-2024 California's Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP), "California Safe Roads: 2020-2024
Strategic Highway Safety Plan", Caltrans.
• "Local and Rural Road Safety Briefing Sheets: Local Road Safety Plans," Federal Highway
Administration, November 2014.
• "Developing Safety Plans, A Manual for Local Rural Road Owners", Federal Highway
Administration, March 2012.
• "Systemic Safety Project Selection Tool," Federal Highway Administration, 2013.
• "Highway Safety Manual", American Association of State Highway Officials (AASHTO), 1St Edition,
2014 supplement.
• "California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD)", Revision 5, 2014.
�.�:.��1 California Strategic Highway Safety Plan
The �RSP will complement California's SHSP 2020-2024. Per this plan the recommended challenge
areas area shown in Figure 4. These chalienge areas are recommended emphasis areas in the
development of the plan.
�i ur�4 � �h�lt�r�g� r�a�
��������w���'�i�i�� ��������� ��r���r�Gws�s.
°a.�,.�s� ��� ���������� � t; �
° ��i����i�+��� ;,. �������� t. ����a��,��
: ,. .
° �E�Pi��L�r��E� ���TE�����9
�"�. ��1��'�Lp�1fS= , �
N�PAIR��Y�7RNW�`��� :" PE'�£STR��S��
�, ��V�r&���I�#����
_ �°��[I�LE� i�fi'���SE��t�f�S 1��R� ���E�
`: �IS'����TE� E�Rf'�Ii�G ;; L�k�E�E�"�RA�RES �_ °C�l����R��'���
���WER'Lf��E�S�[i^#�
� � '
The �RSP methodology followed the FHWA's �RSP development process as shown in Figure 5.
Below is a roadmap created by the Federal Highway Administration to show the process of creating the
�ocal Road Safety Plan. Here are the primary steps used to create this plan:
Qraft Qacument—Far piscussian Qniy—FinaE Versian May Differ Fram Draft
GHD(Redding Local Road Safety Plan(Page 4
1. Identify Stakeholders
a. Stakeholder Working Group was formed of the 5 E's and other safety partners.
2. Use Safety Data
a. Past 5 years of collisions were analysed with discussion of other high-risk locations.
3. Chose Proven Solutions
a. FHWA Proven Countermeasures and Caltrans safety countermeasures were used in
mitigation collision trends and risk characteristics.
4. Implement Solutions
a. Projects were identified for specific locations and systemically.
�ig�ar� 5 � '� L. �v�l�� �rrf a
����� ��; i°° ���� ,
tv.:
����'������;.. +�a � xu�tar.' � ,��.:
�.°,.I,i�r: ;�:��t�;'�.u..�,M.�-.:: u�`"w' ?��i
p@aN4l�r�C��Wh�iyteeu€ 'u��s.�+Aca�t
���
lkadtl Sn � i�ture aw`��A�e Ymd da .��� �.
Y�Ha�driaz�ns�sdvl9mns+te�datt�m�arda" �� �
� �
Y�Y�ac+•y,rtix%(trtvn9.#w9�,,trN,p& R',�.�.t�Y-ar�ma',.^;curax#vcCt.€+Ux}:
���
� AYkWktl
t �ti �
.edve��.stlK id" .ax . ' a +� n ,
rn�,n.�:a¢s.r w a. ��� �� �ww
.�"l. .n.'�
¢� ..� i trt a;'
� ��� �i �ii'��..�.m k*� °X ¢� a+ t,:
4��� � a 2�
�, ,rcea,��,�.
, 5�are
�,
'� �,�,��A�'.�p�,.�
` ��*�\`,��^�.
���`,v° ��tw '4 r�°t `�°� �', � ;..
g ; � �� �^�axr�`c,. � �
t � �� �, �'�,� t[�!q r�et r�e�N��varnc 5c+.t�re•
�G„� ��"� �
Source:Federal Highway Administration
Draft Dacument—Far Discussion Oniy—FinaE Version May Differ Fram Draft
GHD(Redding Local Road Safety Plan(Page 5
� � �;`.
� 4s,
� t 1 r � i � �
Based on community connections, the City of Redding led the formation of the LRSP Stakeholder Working
Member Group. This leadership group was crucial in the development of the LRSP and helped in
capturing the safety needs, goals, and priorities including �
�� �� � Q�.,�
safety countermeasures for the City of Redding. �,-� ��`�'�, �'� 7 '`�
ti �� �� Q�f
The �RSP Stakeholder Working Group included the � �. '�' �
following representatives: �{f�o�'t'+ ���� �'"�<,t�ptt+��
• City of Redding ` r ,
e� r
• Caltrans
�a�
• Shasta County Public Works �
; � •
• Redding Police Department
• Redding Fire Department g , �������
,
• Redding Unified School District
• Health Shasta Partnership and Shasta County Health and S �� T'�
BC({�C 6Ii�fGCS IIPBIf@�k��li€O�GS
Human Services
• Shasta Regional Transportation Agency (SRTA) �� ��; �"�'���������
� fl., ���� � ��
���_�'
��'1��1 Stakeholder Working Group Meetings ������� �����
Two meetings were held with the stakeholder working group and facilitated by GHD. The virtual meetings
were as follows:
1. December 10, 2020— 10 a.m. to noon
a. Discussed the LRSP overall process, stakeholder working group member's safety
priorities, past 5 years of collisions (City and Caltrans roadways), vision, goals, and
priorities.
2. May 3, 2021 —9:30 a.m. to 11:30 a.m.
a. Reviewed first meeting, discussed public comments and ways to address their concerns,
recent developments, safety countermeasures and projects, refined of LRSP's guiding
principles, and coordinated next steps.
The meeting summaries for the stakeholder working group meetings are in Appendix B: Stakeholder
and Public Input. The stakeholder working group also provided their feedback and comments on the
Draft Local Road Safety Plan document before the plan was finalized. With many of the safety
countermeasures to include engineering, enforcement, and emergency response, it is important to have
buy off from the stakeholders in understanding how the plan will be implemented.
Qraft Qacument—Far piscussian Qniy—FinaE Versian May Ciiffer Fram Draft
GHD(Redding Local Road Safety Plan(Page 6
� II � �i� � �
Based on the LRSP Stakeholder Working Group Meetings, this LRSP will address multiple Strategic
Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) Challenge Areas and additional emphasis areas, as suggested by the
stakeholders, including:
1. Pedestrians
a. Focus on pedestrian crossings and enhancing existing pedestrian crossings.
b. Safety around school zones
2. Distracted Driving
a. Rear end collisions due to distracted driving
3. Bicyclists
a. Reduce wrong-way cycling
4. Intersections
a. Find beneficial projects on west side of the City
5. Impaired Driving
a. Focus enforcement to mitigate DUI/BUI collisions
6. Aggressive Driving/Speeding
a. Speed management
i. Traffic calming devices to mitigate speed
7. Roadway Design
a. Geometric design to provide for all users
i. Identify lack of accommodations and connections for bike, ped, and transit
users
ii. Provide access management as appropriate
� i i �i �i f
The members of the stakeholder working group coordinated to establish the vision, mission statement,
and goals that guided the development of the document. Ideally, this document will help the City move
toward Vision Zero. The aim of Vision Zero is to eliminate all traffic fatalities and severe injuries, while
increasing safe, healthy, and equitable mobility for all. Traditionally, traffic deaths and severe injuries have
been considered as inevitable side effects of modern life. The reality is that these tragedies can be
addressed over time by taking a proactive, preventative approach that prioritizes traffic safety as a public
health issue.
����'1 Vision Zero
Vision Zero is a significant departure from the status quo in two major ways:
• Vision Zero recognizes that people will sometimes make mistakes, so the road system and related
policies should be designed to minimize those inevitable mistakes and reduce their likeliness to
result in severe injuries or fatalities. This means that system designers and policymakers are
Draft Dacument—For Discussian QNy—Final Versian May Differ From Draft
GHD(Redding Local Road Safety Plan(Page 7
expected to improve the roadway environment, policies (such as speed management), and other
related systems to lessen the severity of crashes. Roadway users are however still responsible for
their mistakes and should foilow all appiicable laws and use reasonable judgement when
conducting themselves within the public right of way.
• Vision Zero is a multidisciplinary approach, bringing together diverse and necessary stakeholders
to address this complex problem. In the past, meaningful, cross-disciplinary collaboration among
local traffic planners and engineers, policymakers, and public health professionals has not been
the norm. Vision Zero acknowledges that many factors contribute to safe mobility-- including
roadway design, speeds, behaviors, technology, and policies -- and sets clear goals to achieve the
shared goal of zero fatalities and severe injuries.
As shown in Figure 6, is the comparison of the traditional approach versus the Vision Zero approach.
�� ur� 6 `f���it��n�l ��r���h v�. Vi�i�n �r�
9 �� 4,
� � � =�N�� � � r�;,� �w •
y 'i R � � � e w a
,
,�,
3 � , ,.
,� �;�;# ; : : � ��� � . w m. . .. a m
: � . . . �
. , �w«
, y
��d�t �1��V �
� � � �� �
9 � � i
���� �u'� �
4 .
� �
,
r' � a� .�� >.
�. � �
�
- � `� Iy� � �
$ ,s �� 9
�t.��.� v�s�on
A vision statement describes what the Local Road Safety Plan is trying to achieve.
Redding will develop a comprehensive
safety plan with engagernent of
stakeholders and citizens that encourages
irnproved safety for all users,whether it is
walking,biking,and driving-because
every person in our community rnatters.
Draft Qacument—Far Discussion Oniy—FinaE Version May Ctiffer Fram Ctraft
GHD(Redding Local Road Safety Plan(Page 8
�.��� Mission Statement
The mission statement defines the purpose of the plan, what it does, and what it is about. The mission
statement was developed in collaboration with the stakeholder working group.
The City of Redding shall utilize a data-
driven approaGh ta provide a safe,
sustainabie,and equitable muitimodai
transpartatian systern for all users of the
public roadway network in Redding.
�,�,� Goals
Safety goals were development for the Local Road Safety Plan. It is important to capture realistic goals
that can be measurable or evolve over time.
QGoal: Reduce the potential for fatai and &
severe injury collisions citywide. ;�M'
� Goal: Create a safe, livable, and ����"���
��'..�Y� ,,;. i 'f i
welcoming community by developing a X�w '
� �. �� �� � �
roadway safety plan targeted to Redding's `�
transportation and roadway safety needs.
� „� ,
� ��
Goal: Improve safety around schools. "
QGoal: Reduce speeding collisions through
� engineering, enforcement, and education
strategies.
� Goal: Improve multimodal transportation
safety by expanding the City's non-
motorized transportation infrastructure.
OGoal: Improve the health and vitality of our community by working with community safety partners
� to create a roadway safety plan targeted to Redding's needs.
QGoal: Reduce rear end collisions citywide by implementing speed management strategies.
QGoal: Prioritize improvements that affect conditions/safety outcomes for identified disadvantaged
' populations.
Draft Dacument—Far Discussion Oniy—F4naE Versian May Differ Fram Draft
GHD(Redding Local Road Safety Plan(Page 9
LYr u Y� k.., . ..... .....�� �p 8�,.... ���B�
1
� . .d �sSl�
�1 � t/ 1 fet � j ct�
The City of Redding and Caltrans have conducted some previous safety analysis that has developed the
following planned safety projects. The primary source of funding for the current safety projects in the City
are the Caltrans' Active Transportation Program and Highway Safety Improvement Program. Refer to
Appendix C: Previous Safety Plans and Projects for specific project details and additional funding
sources for other safety projects.
4��1.� Active Transportation Program (ATP) ,
� �
The City of Redding received one (1)ATP grant from Cycle 1, two ��'� � ' °`��y �'��
�� , ' :, �.,. �,,....�� �.,.,,�
(2)ATP grants from Cycle 2, two (2)ATP grants from Cycle 3, and �
was recently approved for two (2)ATP applications for Cycle 5. � � � � ��
The details of the ATP projects are as follows: �� ° � � � °
1. An A°T�, Gy�l� 1 grant was awarded to Redding for the
"Placer Street Improvements" project from south of Boston Avenue to Mesa Street. These
improvements included sidewalk and curb improvements, signage and striping improvements,
and signal modifications. Construction is completed for this project.
2. Two A��9 ���I�2 grants were awarded for the "Diestelhorst to Downtown Non-Motorized
Improvements" project and "Quartz Hill Road Improvements" project. The "Diestelhorst to
Downtown Non-Motorized Improvements" project included signage and striping improvements,
Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon (RRFB) installation, and buffered bike lanes and will be in
construction in 2021. The "Quartz Hill Road Improvements" project limits are Quartz Hill Road
from south of Terra Nova Street to Brenton Drive and from west of Delta Street to State Route
273. This project includes road widening and pedestrian crossing improvements.
3. Two�T�, ��r�l� 3 grants were awarded for the "West Street Area School Safety Improvement
Project" and "Bechelli & Loma Vista Corridor Improvements" project. Both projects are currently in
design. The "West Street Area School Safety Improvement Project" includes curb and gutter
improvements, curb bulb-outs, pedestrian improvements, RRFB installation, additional bicycle
markings, buffered bike lanes, and lighting installation. The "Bechelli & Loma Vista Corridor
Improvements" project includes the construction of a mix of buffered bike lanes, separated bike
lanes, sidewalks, accessible driveways, curb ramps, enhanced crossings with rapid flashing
beacons, pedestrian refuge islands, pedestrian safety amenities including safety lighting, and
functional landscaping including shade trees and buffers from traffic.
4. Two�T�9 G��l� 5 applications were submitted for the "Turtle Bay to Downtown Gap Completion
Project" and the"Victor Ave &Cypress Ave Active Transportation" project. Both projects were
recently funded. The "Turtle Bay to Downtown Gap Completion Project" includes the installation of
a buffered 2-way cycle track, shared use path, raised intersection with curb extensions, bollards,
lane reductions, raised crosswalks with bicycie and pedestrian separations, and shade trees. The
"Victor Ave & Cypress Ave Active Transportation" project plans to construct shared use paths,
sidewalks, curb ramps, bike lanes, and protected intersections.
Draft Qacument—Far Discussian Qniy—FinaE Versian May Differ Fram Draft
GHD� Redding�ocal Road Safety Plan� Page 10
�.�1,� Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP)
The City of Redding received HSIP grants from Cycle 7, Cycle 8, and Cycle 9, and recently applied for two
(2)grants from HSIP Cycle 10. The details of the HSIP projects are as foilows:
1. An �i�l�, Gy�l� 7 grant was awarded for the "Hartnell Avenue Safety Improvement Project" and is
currently in construction. The "Hartnell Avenue Safety Improvement Project" includes striping
improvements, ADA upgrades, lighting improvements, and the installation of a raised median. The
project is located on Hartnell Avenue from Churn Creek Road to East Way.
2. An FI�1�, G�cl� � grant was awarded for the"Churn Creek Rd and Maraglia St Safety
Improvements" project and will begin construction in 2021. The "Churn Creek Rd and Maraglia St
Safety Improvements" project includes curb ramp improvements, additional lighting, and striping
improvements on Maraglia Street and Churn Creek Road from E Cypress Road to Hartnell
Avenue.
3. An Fi�1�, �y�l� � grant was awarded for the "Systemic Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements"
project at nine (9)different intersections throughout the City and is currently in design. The
"Systemic Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements" project proposed various enhancements at the
intersections including ADA upgrades, RRFBs, new striping and crosswalk markings, advance
warning signage, refuge island/concrete medians, and detectable warning surface upgrades.
4. Two Fl�l�g Gy�l� 10 applications were awarded for the "Systemic Protected Left Turn Project" at
four(4) locations throughout the City and the "Systemic Intersection Safety �ighting Project"at
nineteen (19) intersections in the City. The "Systemic Protected Left Turn Project" proposed
various upgrades such as micro-surfacing, striping improvements, installation of new traffic signal
pole and mast arm, and ADA curb return upgrades. The "Systemic Intersection Safety Lighting
Project" adds new or additional lighting to intersections.
The City was also awarded funding for Cycles 2 through 6 of the HSIP. These projects were not
considered for further analysis in the �RSP since they were awarded prior to 2015. These projects
include:
• Fi�E�, ���I� 2. Buenaventura Widening at SR 273
• Mi�l�9 �y�l� 3a Old Oregon Trail/Oasis Road Safety Project
• Fi�l�� ���I��n Lake Bivd. Safety Project and Buenaventura Bivd. Safety Project
• Fi�l�, ����� 5a East Cypress Ave. Median Project and Churn Creek Road Widening Project
• Fi���, �y��� 6: Victor Ave. Safety Project and Old Oregon Trail Widening Project
The recent and planned safety projects in the City are mapped in Figure 7. These projects include funding
sources from ATP and HSIP (as shown above)and other funding sources to include Affordable Housing
and Sustainable Communities Program, Sustainable Transportation Infrastructure (ASHC/STI}, Section
130, and the City's Capital Improvement Program funding. For more information on these safety projects,
see Appendix C: Previous Safety Plans and Projects.
Draft Qacumenf—For piscussian Qniy—FinaE Versian May Ctiffer Fram Ctraft
GHD� Redding�ocal Road Safety Plan� Page 11
.., ,,.
�° � �.,,.� > t ��� � � _
, _�����
,.. . ��" r.,.
�
k � ;
,
�� Legend
� ` �#� � �� �
r �
� � � t � �j �� � ""�� � �� , � :Project Type �
}t
y � ' ' tist {�' s �� " � �
.., �
;. t` �u F'{t s � �, .„ �� a,,a�`���� �g4 ��� e x=,v�'� � �re�� � # ' T , C�CI@�L
�� �
�
ATP
� � � ��4� � t � "�������w��� �� ��� �" A P y
r ,{, , �� �� �� ,, �� �/a , yC�@3
, ;
r��� ,
,
7 TP C
[ � '' ���� � � � �
��� t �,� �w� �' ��� , Cyc e
�
y � � � ATP I 5
_ �
� �, �, �, �,
�.
�
� �
�rr h,,," ��'�. � � t 1' . � •a � , e
�'��, � � � ,� H81P C cl 6 ,
� ,. _., f fu,,.� �., �. .• �� y
_
� � ,j , � �ti� �� � � ����� � HSIP, Cycle 7 �
L � , , „ , � , Y„_ ..,.
€ �:t's . � ' $ ,
t,' S �
�„ � � � �f.�_.�x ,������ �`m°�;��t�,€s4 �;°=s��� , Cyc e
, „ HSIP I 8
_� �. , � •= e
, r::t, . , ', ..� , }h'4l� t
,t,z � t ,;��`,��y��a�?�HSIP, Cycle 9
�t r ;
n��� . �� �� � �� ,
s'� �,' � � �; HSIP, Cycle 10
� t
F ... � .' ,,.. .,., ' �S . o�"Y • �
� ����;�����`��� `��`� _ �� � ASHC/STI �
�, �`����� 4 � �� � � Section 130 �
���� ,� .„� � � �� City CIP
, ��,��� �„ ��
� ,, a., t�� S.,r� �,� �� ° � �. �; �� 't f R d
t, � �� � �r,�� � � ���� i y o e i g
� � � I�
C d n
f �; ���� " City Limit ,
�� ��� . ��
�,
„ ,
� ���,,�� � .� . ; � � .., A�
�. ,. �
y � �� ���
�.,. _,.
� „�. ,�: � ° ; �
�
,�,�, ti
s �� r
�`> ���������
� z
�,� � � �,,�t�t� _
,�� � X ���������
� �� v�,r���� �
3� �� �.� 4 ��� �
��. ;�,�a�x�,��
� �
s� � � '�"... � �� r�.° ����� ��� �
� CITY OF � ����
� �� � , �
�� � �
..� . �
�
�� �
�� � �����a������ R E D D I N G ���� ��
� � �� �
�,
��
� �� .
r � �
,t.� �' � ��, � �� �� �
�' ����t�� �; �
[,,: � �� i
�� � ,�. ,n ..., -w.«
�v
� �t
_ � �'�: k,„,, �y���
;'
? . :
�: � <: ��� ��.� � �
����
`.
�:lc � �„�,�"� j
�
,�id sat'1 �� % ;
F }
.,'`������ 0. z
�' � F�,, �
'��
���.��,��� �� � �,
� ,�
� �� � �, �
. v�,�`. '�.' a � i
,�t � l���. '�,`,���,,. � ��. �
� � �� �
I Y �� ,�� �f k44 �
$ �.E�l �a..,. � ��...,�``" ;$n, 5;�:
. , k �A�� � � 2
�, �
�. ,,,. ..,., � , �.
t
, a'� ,_ ,'at.;, �
u35> .�,�t� ����,� � ; �� �� i
�� . . ,��. ,. . ,�. „x . `
<.
�f
, � .
� �
'...�a�� v ° ' P
a
f+
� M,ti:����.�`a��0,..�,i;&��'�'�,'"�"��'�
S
�.
�
; �... i
��'- �
' .z, �i4�,��. si , „ �
�� ' � .,�., yt i•. 4 .
�R��� x.. ���. � �.�1'+a�Y'a `,�i� ��.. �
���N � �*
\
8
.,,, S � t :�S ' ' v'�?Ji i
� 1
� ��
��.,t� � ..:, �.v� w�.. Y
n,, s
�
z�
, i ��.: � ..,�, .: �.. ..
1
��' S�t . ...
��:. � �Y�!vn S . .
�
' .5� ,. +�u, u.:. .�:.. us
�e " °
��
_ �v�"�4Y ., t
� � ,
'1 ���`3. .,, kXi� �
'e` sm „�, ""
( � ����
v�
�
�.
�, ,�
�� k
„�`a' ^' �,ra. .,i» ir �` R
k �„w
t
� �
� n �.,,
v i �tyt, � $4t a.
r"
`r i :) �if;.' s ., „ .
>;
��
e
. � �u..� "` ,.
�
s
�. ..' , . . 5 ,, i ,,.,. �. � . . �.. `...
, , x � .. ... . ,
v, v2 .� i. g'as . .., b.
$
x � pt� �.... �' .a
[ ' st [J}'„{, '. f' u�� �r;��u�
.
__
,
� �
. �
:;. �
•,., �.. , ���fi���$;���,
`�
y
� . t j �, �
� t 2
h � ,
�� �
„:,, a �, � ���� �
= t
� 4�; i::
����� ������i��l ' �'���rs�
�,`� ��';���a�?��c�� �
����' �� '# $�:#�=r����,,s3����3 s�r����r�� - �
, `
�
� ,�. � r,� �� � � ��� �
t
�
�a� �
���t r ,s��4�"'� � , ,. ;. ��� r.� t �
� j � ,�, � �'� "�"���,:�,:+"�r+..t��,,,��a� .. }
a �
� = t,r
.,�� ;� �,� . . ,;,:
� x
„ v wk
,Y z
, � �x
r
2., +' 4 �
�x
6� �� t' �y5 �° `� i' . �
:,. „ ,� � , t �. ,s �e �..� , ��
_'.
3
�
i t� � � � ` ���� ' k'"� i
.4 �3".�t��,�t 5 "�+a„t t;,�: ' '% "�;,;"�f ',,�41 y }�ge,� �tt,.k, �,,,r '"�' ,
t � �� � � �
��Y k i t1 M1a� ti .
. . S � �� � $ . . . . . � . . . �
.zx ....YN..�... . ..,.....A ...�.=+.:r � . . . ..u.,....�.u.-a
. ......s.,..:.. w,..�,.; .1: 4:.�,.,.�,.., . . . . �
. . ........,e� ....,...,.�.. ..<.,,�.�, ...�.�,�.. w.........�... ,.�„�,..� ...�,.,�. ...,..�,.�.. ...r..�,�., .,.,�..�,.�. ��,.. ..--.4,L�,� .....�„_<.. �.,.,� ..�....� ....�......, ...�,P.v. .
�
`
I{�"��`S"�,."�,."\�.��000\\�\"�,."�,."\���������000\"\�.����������000\"�,,"�,."\���"��`�5.�'�'�."�,."�,."�,,"\�����O.ti`'�.�"�.'\�."\�.�\"�,."`�,�5�"�C\.�"\5�S'�,'\."\�`�..'�'ti\00\\"�,."\�\O\"�,,"�,."�,."\�\.��\"\��000\\"\����"\�`�...`tit�`S�\"\�.�`5������������000\\"\�"�`S'�'�."�,.�'�'�,"�,."\������\`\t.��'.�"�,."�,."�,,"�,,"�,."\�.�\"�,."�,."\�.�\\"\�.S"\��«`S"�,."�,."\��00\"\��`���``�""�,,"�,,"\��\"�,,"�,."\�.�`�«<`S"\��«"�����`�'�'�."�,,"�,."\���"000\\"\�.�\"�,."\�\.`��««"�««<`S"�,."\��«""\�"ti�"�,."\�"\�.S"\�.�\\��`S"\�.������«`S"�,.�'�'�."�,."`,�\.`��«`�\�\"\�.�'`.,.'\�."\�"\��..5����OS�``4���.�����\�"\�.���"�",o'�,."\�.�\ti�.�"�,."\�\.SS"„�."�,."�,."\�\.`�\O
Paper Size ANSI B CITY OF REDDING Project No. 11215289
0 o.s o.s o.s t.2 N LOCAL ROAD SAFETY PLAN(LRSP) Revision No. -
��������`�`�``� Date 0311112021
Map Projection:Mer�catorAuxiliary Sphere ����������
CURRENTIUPCOMING SAFETY
Ho��zonca�oatum:w�s�ssa PROJECTS IN THE CITY OF REDDING
Grid:WGS1984WebMercatorAuxiliarySphere FIGURE 7
N�.W515an Luis ObispoNrojects15611112152891GI51MapslWorkinglUpcaming Safety Pmjectsno �a�e somce�.5tetewide Integreted Treffic Recards System(SWITRS)2015-2019,Somces'.Esri,HERE,Garmin,Intermap,incrementP Corp.,GEBCO,USGS,FAO,NPS,NRCAN,GeoBase,IGN,KadesterNL,
labelsmxd Ordnanee Survey,Esri,lapan,METI,Esri Chirra(Hong Kong),(c)OpenStteetMap conhibuNrs,and Me GIS User Community,Crea�ad by:adarke
Print date:23,iw 2021-07 46
�4.'1�� SR 2?3 Multimodal Corridor Plan
In 2020, Shasta Regional Transportation Agency(SRTA)was awarded
$500,000 for the State Route 273 Multimodal Corridor through a Strategic
�-
Partnerships Grant with Caltrans. This grant was for the northern section of
SR 273 through Redding(northern terminus to Canyon Road). Caltrans also
awarded a$500,000 Special Studies Grant for work on the southern section
of SR 273(Canyon Road to southern terminus).
SRTA hopes to combine the funding for both projects to create a 95�,y
comprehensive multimodal corridor plan for SR 273. If approved by Caltrans,
SRTA will coordinate the scope of work with Redding and other affected ��,,.�5�
cities.This project will likely include several multimodal and safety
improvements on SR 273 that will benefit the City of Anderson.
Draft Qacument—Far Discussion Oniy—FinaE Version May Ctiffer Fram Ctraft
GHD� Redding�ocal Road Safety Plan� Page 13
� Ili i t
The City of Redding collision data was gathered using the Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System
(SWITRS)and Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS). The Redding Police Department provided
additional detail to several of the collisions from the SWITRS database. Each data set was analyzed,
crosschecked, and compiled into one complete comprehensive data set. This process was done to ensure
that all reported collisions occurring within the City are accounted for and to provide additional information
that one system may not have captured. The data set contains five years'worth of collisions spanning
from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2019.
These collisions were classified based on roadway jurisdiction (City or Caltrans}. During this period, a total
of 3468 collisions were reported in the City of Redding. Collisions were further categorized into
intersection related collisions and roadway segment related collisions with a separate focus on the City
streets and Caltrans roadways.
The pie chart in Figure 8 depicts the number of City collisions by collision location (intersection or
segment). The highest number of collisions was at City intersections (1320 collisions).
�ig�ar� T`ot�l ��Ili�a�n� �n ���y ��ci �y� (2015-2 19}
����
Tatal Gc�llisions
in the City of Redding
�2afi�-2o��>
�R���1 Collisions on City Roadways
There were 2364 collisions recorded on the City roadways between 2015 and 2019. The top five violation
categories in order(not including unknown or not stated collisions)for City roadways are shown in the
Figure 9. As shown on the collision density map (see Figure 10 below), areas with high density of
collisions are mostiy concentrated in the downtown area and on the foilowing arterials: E Cypress Avenue,
Churn Creek Road, and Hartnell Avenue. There were twenty-four(24)fatal collisions and ninety-three (93)
severe injury collisions on the City roadways. Broadside collisions were the most common collision type.
Qraft Qacument—Far Discussian Qniy—FinaE Versian May Ciiffer Fram Ciraft
GHD� Redding�ocal Road Safety Plan� Page 14
�ig�ar�9 T`��Vi�l�ti�n ��t� �rie� �n ��t� ��dw�y�
Urts�f�Speed �u`��, `���������.\�`�����:.������������',`�.''���,.����������.'�"',������`.s���"�',.,�..�.,.`:,..� ».,.� i` �. ...
. . ..... . .. . . . ..a.�r. .. . .. .. ....... . `� � .... .
C?[JPi'F.`�U( ��, ��, i���. �'...."_-':' '�
kutc�mehile Ric�ht Gf`filay � ���:.�,�:� '�� '�
Wranq Skde c�f Re�arS ���:. ,•. �„ ° ��� '�
Pm�a�kp�ri.�rning a ��,������ '� '�
f� i�t7 ?C�Q 3Cit� 4€7Q 5UG 6QtJ
a�Ht�ad 4"�n s��icles�vip� �.hac;ar�nef ;;.Br�aads{cae �Nif C'Jbjeet �f�,varturned �lfehirt�-Pc+;4�=.r�tr��re �C>thertNot Sk�terf
�ig�ar� 10 ��Ili���r� �r��ifiy�r� �i�� �a � (2015�2Q19�
�� �� ��,.u:���,� ��;d -
� � <1'� c�a��tm�,
rz � � ��
� �� � u
� ��
i�. �� � ��". "�
� � �����
i , �,��� ��,,��,<
,
' ���� � �
�.. �� ,� �� �
������ , � .0
. ,'�F� ! e . - o
���� �� ���� � �� m�� �
,i � ���a 3������� �� ������
�' �� ������ ������ �
� �� c � �
�4� c�,���'�'��"����`�'��� � ���" �
��� � �i'�`����� � ��� �t� � �� �� '
� � � �������`p��` " ��'���`� ���"r oie aae��as Re
?� �� a. i�` '�� rxi.,� �,.� �:. j:
.��, ���� ���"� �. �� ��� ��`��"'�� �� '
�� o
� �� �
� � ������� . ���" ��� �� �� �
����'��` � `��``�.�t �``����t������ ��`���.,,..,�� � ;
v"`w ' ��� � � '`` ���� ��a ���4 ���� �a��x� �i,a �
� � � �� �4 � �<,��,� � � ,��
� `�' � �,� ��' �� ��� :��� , ��� .�
�,�� �� ���: �� e , �
�� ������,�"�� t �' �a`�
� �
� � � � ���� �, � ��
1:. �[TY+C3� ��� � �� ��,'� � � � �
f2E�LDING �� s� �� �������� ��������� �:��������
4•� �: ���i� ��� ��
��r';
�
� �y. 'h� � .) :3�.`
Vg
�� , �� . .) ..�
(
�
d�.'�,'�,�?; �� �: *�.`�.+,.`` §�� ' � ,,.�� �� ����y .
� �� �
r �
� ( ��
„ 1 .
Draft Document—For piseussion Only—F4na!Version May DifEer From Qrafk
GHD� Redding l.ocal Road Safety Plan� Page 15
Figure 11 presents a collision density map of the FSI collisions on City of Redding roadways between
2015 and 2019. As seen through this map, the intersection of Churn Creek Road and Hartnell Avenue has
a high density of FSI collisions.
�i �r� 11 ��Ili�iar� �rr��f�����t�l �r�ci ���r� I��e�ry ��16i�i�r�s �r� Gity �� � (2 95�2Q19}
� � ����� ��r,�t_..w.
} T �
� �a�l�s�ar
�S l .�;,� �.� , ;Lreit�aty
` �' ,� � �`y�„Lax�
,� t ' '. ,, , ,�,: _ ; �� � ` 1-.1
?'t i > � �
" � � ' � � w h�w�3
i � , �� �� � tt�:�
u u � �
; � r
,� 3 � ,
. i �rcy�rt�mm.,g .
r � '� "
c ry��mst
x s
�� I �. �.�� � y���� i �i C �
� �,.� �� ���v � �" � i�,�.
� � s ' "� I w?�. � ��i
�
� � �� � � ( i
� �x��� �� � i ��
����t�e � � �� �
i �
,�t , a �� """"' 1 w -1 i �
, ���` � �� �`�
t , ��,r��;� —
� ,� �`��� �.a� ° � ' �
� t i
�� § 5 �' � ��� � , 1
� � . �''� r �.�., " � flRd ARIur75 R�! �' i��.�
�, �°' w '� ��� � ' � ��t
�� v�,.tr�:«� �-�
'� z d-�`�, �w °'�, � I
^�"`�`.�.� �.�� � �, .z� ;,. a�' ����. �.���"��"� �. C `i� .� �
��,���� � ,y�s�� �" �� i t������i ���� �� ( � °�-
� �
'� � � ���� � ��,���.w��`'e ,��� E C7'F*re�a kwe,�. �. � �:
' �� ` f '� �� ��� � ��r ��� 1 t
� '�.���a '��..��'��� 'v,.*�. ;,� 'H�rt�7�e�1 s4ve 1 ,t.
�
\ � t � � `3� �� ��7 � �`"�.',�.,��
�
�. � � � � � �,r �
�. �.
" f �� 1
1 � �
.�, j � 7 � �. t (
S-�,a�.��{,�j i �� '� � `� (
� +�ITY` {�F � ; ' i
�� �EL��11�1+� ���. µ��� '-��� � �,�
�,:_ �;� � ';`
�
� ��'. I
�.
3
z� �
1� ,
,�� � �� `,
� � �1 {;i:��'
M£, ; x..
����� n�,i i� �,
;(' �" �� �� �_
i �`n '<. �.
Figure 12 summarizes the City collisions based on severity and type.
Qraft QacumenE—Far Qiscussion Oniy—FinaE Version May Differ Fram Drafk
GHD� Redding�ocal Road Safety Plan� Page 16
�igtar� 12 u ary�f�ity Colli�i�n� �2Q15�2Q19�
f�lheetNot StalecE
VehGc(etF�ed ��1
`228��„h
f�v�rturned-. :. •
62
��,
,
! ��
������� �
����.: a
�� .�:
',
�atas
, :
za
�s���e�€�,���y
s�
The total number of collisions and Equivalent Property Damage Only (EPDO) rating were assessed to
determine the top study intersections (refer to Appendix A: Collision Data}. Per the Caltrans Local
Roadway Safety Manual, it is recommended to rank locations with higher severity as higher focus. The
Highway Safety Manual (HSM) methodology of Equivalent Property Damage Only(EPDO) rating assigns
a weight to collisions in capturing the relative severity in equivalent property damage only (PDO =1}.
Table 2 provides the comprehensive collision costs and EPDO weights that were used in ranking the
collisions. Collision costs include both direct and indirect costs. Direct crash costs include ambulance
service, police and fire services, property damage, insurance, and other costs directly related to the
crashes. Indirect collision costs account for the value society would place on pain and suffering or loss of
life associated with the crash.
T`� I� 2 �� r�h�r��iu� alli�iarr ����� �r�ci �� �i h�� (2 1� ci�llar��
i,
� . . � r � gi
Fatal (K} $6,41$,40U 544
'Severe Ir�jurY(A) $345,8d0 30'
Minar InjurY(B) $126,500 11'
Nan-visible Injury (C) '; $71,900 6
P�tJ (0) $11,800 ' 1
Based on Table 7-1,Highway Safety Manual, 2010,Adjusted to 2018 dollars.
Table 3 shows the top intersections, per collision analysis. The intersection of Churn Creek Road and
Hartnell Avenue had the highest EPDO score at 1223 and the highest number of collisions at 32.
Draft Qacument—Far piscussian Qniy—FinaE Version May Ctiifer Fram Ctraft
GHD� Redding�ocal Road Safety Plan� Page 17
T`� I� 3 T`�� �r�t�r���ti�r��, ��r��16i�i�n r��ly�i�
- . � r • � , .
Churn Creek Ftd/Hartnell Ave ' 1223 32
South St/California St 588 10
Hartnell Ave/Bechelli Ln 587 9
Airpart Rd/ Preserve Bl�rd 562 4
Butte St/Cantinental St 562 4
Market St/ Riverside Dr 551 3!
'Hartnell A�e/Narthwoods Way 544 1
Churn Creek Rd I E Cypress A�e 169 29
Victor Ave/Hartnell Ave 151 22
Hilltop �rl E Cypress A�e 127 22
E Cypress A�e/Bechelli �n ' 85 2�
The segment collisions were also analyzed by EPDO and total number of collisions. Table 4 shows the
top segments, per collision analysis. Churn Creek Road between Presidio Street and S Bonnyview Road
had the highest EPDO rating (1021)and number of collisions (73).
"T� I�4 "T�� � �n�s, ��r Galli�i�r� n�l��i�
� . e . a m ��� r � '� ' � a� � a ='
Churn Creek Rd (Presidio St to S Bonny�iew Rd} 102f1 73
E Cypress A�e (Park Marina Dr to Churn Creek Rd)' 876 51
Hilltop ar(n/o Browning St to Maragli� St) 835 45
Bechelli �n (E Cypress A�e to n/o 3rd St) 711 29
W Cypress A�e(Market St to Park Marina Dr) 657 15
Railroad Ave(South St to Buenaventura Bl�d) 651 10
Wartnell Ave (Goodwater Ave ta Airpart Rd) 618 7
'�� Wilttop�r{�n/o Redding Willtop Apartrnen#s#o St ' 604 1���1
Thomas Pkwy)
Hartnell Ave(Northwoads Way to Kenco A�e) 193 30
S Sr�nny�iew Rd (5 Market St t�Churn Creek Rd) , 163 25
Further detailed collision analysis is in Appendix A: Collision Data.
4���� Collisions on Caltrans Roadways
There were 1104 collisions reported to SWITRS at roadways under Caltrans jurisdiction between 2015
and 2019, including mainline collisions. As seen by the collision density map provided by TIMS (see
Figure 13), the area where State Route 273 intersects State Route 299 has a high density of collisions.
This map excludes property damage only collisions. Caltrans does not currently have any planned safety
improvements at this location.
Draft Qacument—Far Discussion Qnly—F€na4 Versian May Ctiffer Fram Ctraft
GHD� Redding�ocal Road Safety Plan� Page 18
�ig�ar� 13 �olli���n �r►��ty�r► Caltr�n� ��d�
P.�4 s�.`p`t*F"a`S"iA
,�'> bP�i11WKn,�vb .:96CF`6G..§�?i ali�.�i ��.1.°i.��k 6I,};.x
,. iftt�'.t ' � ��.. ��4k' �i1
k`s.;+ �.�"2 �,s;i ,2.�:.5h ..I. ...3.}�#� .f. ,t.t
r e�
,,.�� ,# =, r .�:
F�"z<';C ix��:'s4 t
ti�'; ��. 4l�`lYIu3�., t, H:
�
�t.rka�rEm s.,,'�r..�._e�.l�w.
`„Caa hi[6 E,� i.'I�`=�.
Ya",VidU . . Yd}x + kaPi3i =.0 C iL�c
[S'.P�Bi� P �� �.
"'+m"�ali�M�':t8c�:,i F axi'2t RL'..k. t �I;��� s N�,ir�.l�3 1
{4 eJ � F k "s ki E'4 C. A C ��.
=tY 5�b�,, ' T sC t `t t S E P�
�ilk�}pk t.;}tv�. •��, ,.. �� 5 :
y x;�:a �� � :a fi. �.,s2
.—- �,:�. ,o .. .
' v ..2i: � . e..
r � tdh; f3S4�sf;} ` F€
I.ihV . tC t..;=, 4 1"�i£irk�.
,y" rt T,�€.v. �.� `"��
�e.t':;�a, w t� ��� ��� Fi�:
i �
,y.'s"S �4t, �. �. eF4l3���i�.��:..i
3�kN '?..Llxi f 2��
'6V3 {trc" �� � �
� i �s �t �i,� ��?•a, '��
t..�, � i z
� �. k t.�r�+d �''W t E
kE �.5t..e " Cvth?v,s13�k$^k;. hf, eYC.*�`: '.
7CF !E
1ScAe,- �aJtn4`i :�dC`N M1d�: , ta
i£��v,w � FIt,¢� 21r, �� �� k�C:
��� Y I"{'E vaLYESt<kfr;
�CI,+I�I:.th�. .1<141'ftehk .t�Y.v
� R.3 ,k'C,t t.;,
�«r�
�.�.� Collisions Related to Challenge Areas
4.2.3.1 Pedestrians
There were one hundred and sixty-three (163)total pedestrian collisions on City roadways. The
pedestrian location at the time of collision, along with corresponding severity, is shown in Figure 14.
There were nine (9)fatal and fifteen (15) severe injury collisions with pedestrians involved between 2015
and 2019.
Most pedestrians were crossing in a crosswalk at an intersection, but many were crossing not in a
crosswalk. The top violation category for pedestrian collisions was pedestrian violation (44% of all
pedestrian collisions}. This category includes violations such as pedestrians failing to yield right of way to
vehicles at areas without a marked crosswalk, crossing without a crosswalk at the mid-block of two
adjacent signals, and walking on the wrong side of the road when no pedestrian facilities are provided
outside of a business or residence district.
Draft Dacument—Far Discussion Oniy—F4naE Versian May Differ Fram Draft
GHD� Redding�ocal Road Safety Plan� Page 19
�ig�ar� 14 �d��trian L���ti�r► at"Ti e�f�olli���n
t�c�e stae�� ', ' ' ' '
I��.#ir.Rrw�ad ... .��. .� ,,,,, , ',. ',. ,
In�asac�,lncfud�nq Shc*uEd�r ���. ���. ; �; �'. '�..
Cressirrg Not�n Crosswaik : .. .. .,.. ;.,� :"." :' '." ',. '..
Crcxs=#ng In�rc��w�Vk Ne�t a8 Int:ars.au:t�as1 ��. ... .., '... '...
Cra;,�in;��n�rcas�w�(k st Enfearse�ctE�r� �� r.: ' '
C! 1q "�� 3f} 4C� 10 �'7
a�F�resperty G�amage C�n(y �Ccamplairt c�Y Pa�n .:V(�i°�Ce ir�}ury �Scaverc l¢�ycary �F afat
As seen in the collision density map (Figure 15), areas with high densities of pedestrian collisions include
West Street at 11t'' Street, E Cypress Avenue near Beverly Drive, and Churn Creek Road at Hartnell
Avenue.
Draft Qacument—Far Discussion Oniy—FinaE Version May Ctiffer Fram Ctraft
GHD� Redding�ocal Road Safety Plan� Page 20
�ig�ar� 15 �n�it��f �d��trian ��Ili�i�n�
�. r�� ,� Leg�e��. _. ..
�:� � ���M�esaon
�_,� ,�er�sety
� �La��
..., . .._ , �, . . �.
�
v
„� �"7
.'� �t t�A`�`
'•.� utt��c.t�xax��g
i �
���,�st
�a �� �� �. rr;.
t � �y � ¢ �
�i. ���,� � �
�,�
���
r, �� , t�
� '
��.�� � ��`h
�;? ��� �r$�
�
' �@ �`� �, �� 'I �
�� .�h,: . . : ,.:.. ������;�.
.�.: � d79d d4.C"�urr�s R�1
,... {.�� � 'i
r•
n . ,,. .� ���,. .
�S , .
� �,,, , 6 al�"t ��Y;� .. `w`
� `' � ��� i��1�
'��`�� �i� �.�„�� � �� (i
�� � � � �
��� � ����
f � � �,
��� �;��� � '� � � .� �.,,���,������r��.
� �� �3 ,,
� ��� �� �� �� � �
� �r '�., ,:'`*, �5...�'��`a 't�..'��i�,.,,:3 �+x,ra'.l�lartnde9l f4a�a:
�1 ��1 ��qn �"� s,
u �� �*M=� �m� �`� e
� i �
;
+' �y.,r �,��, � ..
, , ........
'', .` . , �_' b„'�. 't,C ��. i.
E i �����F � :,,RS ,kw.� .��+�'
C�
F�EC�C�IM� ���: ;
� �
i
,
�
� ��` �
� ���
�
4.2.3.2 Distracted Driving
Distracted driving is categorized in collision data as inattention. Categories for inattention include cell
phones (handheld or hands-free), electronic equipment, smoking, eating, children, animal, personal
hygiene, and reading.
There were fourteen collisions due to distracted driving on City roadways between 2015 and 2019. This is
one percent(1%)of all collisions on City roadways. Most of these collisions were rear end collisions and
no distracted driving collisions resulted in fatal or severe injury. Figure 16 presents a breakdown of the
types of inattention for the fourteen distracted driving collisions.
Draft Qacumenf—Far piscussian ONy—FinaE Versian May Differ Fram Draft
GHD� Redding�ocal Road Safety Plan� Page 21
�ig�ar� 16 "Ty � �f In�tt�r►�i�n f�r ���ra�t�d riving C�Ili��on�
��11 F�hsar��
4��€��iheld ��dl F'hc�r��
1 N�r�ds�r��
1
�� �I�ct�c�nrc
� � �qca�pm�n#
1
� ,�
N��
z
��"i��f5'k� .'.
.� „,.. .
� w
4.2.3.3 Bicyclists
There was a total of one hundred and twenty-two (122) bicycle collisions for City roadways. The top
violation categories for bicycle-related collisions, along with collision severity, are shown in Figure 17.
There were three (3)fatal and fifteen (15)severe injury collisions with bicyclists invoived between 2015
and 2019. The primary collision type for bicycle collisions is broadside collisions. The top violation
category for bicycle coilisions was travelling on the wrong side of the road (34% of all bicycle collisions}.
�ig�ar� 17 T"o�Vial�tior� ���� �ri��f�r i���l�� �I�#�� ��IIA�i�r��
wF����{���,��a�a
,a�,c�,��ffG�����,���w�,� '
u��r�s���� � �'
c � �o �� �r� �� �u �� �c? ��
e�Ptop�rty C���nage Ge2Iy �Corr���kaint cf Pain V�s€bC�*€njury ms Seerere kr�j�€ry �EatiaP
As seen in the collision density map (Figure 18), areas with high densities of bicycle collisions include
Hilitop Road at Browning Street and Bechelli Lane near Markwood Drive.
Draft Qacument—Far C7iscussian QNy—FinaE Versian May Ctiffer Fram Ctraft
GHD� Redding�ocal Road Safety Plan� Page 22
�igtar� 1� �n�it��f i�y�l� ��Ili�i�n�
�'� ���� � ' � ��' ������� . w.
' f��' ;c�w����a�
; � � .
������
q � �
` � ' ���
� � , , ;
,��
, u
�: r tW�
, �
1�, ��, ��� . = rj N�n
�'�"� � � �, �y ra��.� (
� �� .
h � ..�� �t , .. . ti.;9y LtmS
x
, "yi µ'i.` I ( �lE
��; , i i
`
i � � 'h i � � .�..�"" �""+��"`��.•F't
� i �•`�.7�� ���'"+^� '�,".� � a�.�_�(
i �i��� � i i
���� ��
;y,.�.;�
�b �� ' S , �� � � ���
��
� � � ' ��� � �
� �p �° � �� �� � � i�l�
� � �� �� � ; �� c��a�:�turas�� � �
� "�r ,�"`�. "��' �1�*��i"r �,�.`,�S�'�� , �'. �
..�`*.. �, ���� �� " �``� .� 1�
����M.. ������ � � � i
�o ��;
@� �i�� � �
�a
�< � � �
� �`t � ��� �,�`�i ECy&�es�s�Ave ; (
�
� � � � y i
'�r�-- '� ���` �`- �� _��� Harinedl,Cve ( (:
� ;� ;�r�^�"� �„�� �� ��..,�' �
�� �
( �� �a'Ls ,�
`, �: � �
� �� � � ��
�ITY �3F ����� �°� �� �� � �
R�L�[711�I� �:.� �;� � u�
����� ;'
i ;
l
���,� ; �_�
� �,�m �
�� � �,�
``��� F ��
� �� �_�w
� ry��� ��� �
- `a7' i� .71�
7
4.2.3.4 Intersections
One-thousand three-hundred and twenty(1320} collisions in the City of Redding between 2015 and 2019
were at intersections. This is fifty-six percent(56%)of all collisions on City roadways. As seen in Figure
19, the majority of these collisions were due to an unsafe speed violation, resulting in a rear end collision.
Draft Dacument—For piscussian Oniy—FinaE Versian May Differ Fram Draft
GHD� Redding�ocal Road Safety Plan� Page 23
�ig�ar� 1 "T�p Vi�l��i�n �a�eg�ri��f�r Int�r���fii�n� �lat�d �Ili��on�
u�,:��������c ,���������"��. .4`��������������������:.: �� . :�����,`.�' '
t3,utcsrs�c�bile Ric�ht ca�L'��ay ��, '
C)€.kltFsU€ �����"������.�� °°:.°: �'
Tr�ffic Sign�z(s and�igns ,
Imga�cs�Ser�Terrrt�rg �
Q 5C� 'PGQ 'f�4 2C1C1 25C; 3C�C� 35t7 �QQ
�He��3CSn a�S€deswi� �f2��rEnci •E�r�ads€c�e �HitGb��ct �Csvertui°rsec� �lF`ehic[e-Pec4est€€an �G7tP�er?NotStated
4.2.3.5 Impaired Driving
Seventeen percent(17%) of all City collisions between 2015 and 2019 were due to driving or biking under
the influence of drugs or alcohol (DUI/BUI). Fifty-five percent of these collisions occurred during the
weekend (Friday through Saturday). As shown in Figure 20, the top collision type due to DUI/BUI
collisions is hit object.
�ig�ar�2Q �alli�i�rr T"y �s f�r 16 1 ��Ili�i���
Yehic4efPed �t�erl[�ot StaBeci
� ��v
C7w�rttarrr�d
i8
�`� � ;. �����' ���
k �
� �� �:
��;�
�,
�
�
��` �x ��
k� . �� ���b �.���
:.,��
Draft Qacument-Far Discussion Only-FinaE Version May Ctiffer Fram Ctraft
GHD� Redding�ocal Road Safety Plan� Page 24
� � .q,... .Y y. .Y�y� .��y��
ty� ��.:,`�p,. � y r
� , �� t�;S�� �' �� �, ,�
, ;. ,rl,{4���.
� �IC 1�
A project website was created on the Social Pinpoint platform to inform the public about the LRSP and
provide a platform for input. Figure 21 displays the homepage for the website found at
Irsp.mysocialpinpoint.com/redding. The project website had Google Translate enabled that was able to
translate the webpage in over 100 languages and detect the user's browsers settings to automatically
display the website in their language preference. In addition, the user could toggle the preferred language
on the upper right corner of the webpage. Visitors to the page were invited to provide comments on an
interactive project map and share their thoughts through a project survey. Comments from the interactive
map and detailed results from the survey are included in Appendix B: Stakeholder and Public Input.
�ig�ar�21 ���li� � �it� � � a �
� �� �
� ���. � � �
i �;`,��`� ����.
�� t����;� �
,AR,t;,r . ..{L ,
��� �� .6��
�
�_
7 ,;,-t��` � .�,��
�� ; � �� >
" �� ,
� , r�t .�, �,.w. ��_
�;.€�t�,,{ �� ������ir�� �c.���I F����c�� ��������,� �nt,. , .
�I�;���
��c��.�r.w€���
� �� �
� ,a �� ,,,.
'����.;.
3i� .a.a�t c jr_�°,9x( F _ ��7e��," -,
`�`��l`�qa�"�`���*?�s� �������`�����
����5�..�'��,�`,'S�..�`:,`�.y.� fi.,.'�..`�'�,`�'"�,.`�,'o,"��,.34��c�s.`.�.�u.,`
�
�.��� Interactive Map
The interactive map feature on the website allowed the public to drag icons to a location within the City
and leave a comment regarding driving, pedestrian, or bicycle suggestions at that location. Figure 22
Qraft Qacument—For C7iscussian ONy—Fina4 Versian May Ctiffer Fram Ctraft
GHD� Redding�ocal Road Safety Plan� Page 25
shows the interactive map feature from the website. Forty-four(44)comments were recorded as of June
23, 2021. Some of the public comments collected from the interactive map are as follows:
• Adding multi-use paths at various locations throughout the City
o Oasis Road near Midland Drive
o Old Oregon Trail near Old 44 Drive
o Connecting Magnolia neighborhood to Airpark Drive and Gold Street
o Along ACID canal
o S Bonnyview Road near S Market Street
o Buenaventura Boulevard between Placer Road and Starlight Boulevard
• Improving quality/maintenance of bicycle facilities
o Placer Street near Buenaventura Street
o Near Juniper School
o Along bridge on E Cypress Avenue
o On western end of S Bonnyview Road
• Congestion at intersections
o Hartnell Avenue at Alta Mesa Drive
o E Cypress Avenue at I-5 Ramps
o Old Alturas Road at Victor Avenue
• Safety of pedestrian crossings
o Crossing Buenaventura Boulevard near Lakeside Drive
Draft Qacument—Far Discussion Oniy—FinaE Version May Ctiffer Fram Ctraft
GHD� Redding�ocal Road Safety Plan� Page 26
�ig�ar�22 t�blic � �it� Int�ra�tiv� ap
� �� � � i , � �. ���� Prv �
���i i ,i.. � � �:r u �°���. _� ���� . �. ��- . �;,. � ,..,
`��
;�Ett��tet Rrttk�
�� �,
n
�"'
�
��14C kd'4f`
i ;
s �'� S p
� ��... : �'���fis.���f.
�;�, v� wp.. Iriv"`fi
r� rtk
� I�*'i� I 5� i�:u...mz
u�
�
Y 5 i e,7t
� i
�' ����`�ei^!kf I�7
X
�.'a ���l P:Y t�
{��r �,. .°,.s:Ei k,�°i�rr�i�
�c9t���t�w s t.tE�r a�t,
zfi .��� �� �
��
R �n g `$
Q'. �JkYt„i.I=1[
? ti t'
n:2 n
'$:,v. ,� �.
E . �»
s
.t�° t�a,. S�
�
� f i�a�
a t
�.�,�;� �� �
E � " p
� � �� � ��
� ? } !
; *� 3 a
`� � S
raifR�; , i ��,r�di�t'� ,
� � � fi � r�€r�t�r� �
t' z = �
x
� s' e
a �� � �`
v..4. .�, �s
�,�a�j r�, �,v,=>
s ,
ss
�.°1.� Public Survey
The City of Redding Public Survey asked eight questions relating to the �RSP. As of June 23, 2021, the
survey received 12 responses. According to the survey, the primary safety issue for Redding is a lack of
infrastructure (see Figure 23 for a graph with the responses).
Draft Qacument—Far Discussion Oniy—F4naE Version May Ctiffer Fram Draft
GHD� Redding�ocal Road Safety Plan� Page 27
�ig�ar�23 t�blic�ld�r►�ifi�d ��dway ���u��
�PtFaer�:a ���
c
Cnters��S�t�ns.F
���c�m�f l�f���[r�a¢'tsa�:re(s�dea�valks,'�ike lan�s,Cur�n I:a��:m�s,��a}� 1i4 �..„....
- �icy�l��s�lli�i�ras:1�
.' -,`. Pe���trkam Caa61�s��ae��.s:�
L��str�c�ed L}P�vim�;� � Spe��d R�B�LerS Ct�01ms�..:l�na�s:S
When asked about level of comfort with bicycling, three responses were"Enthused and Confident" and
nine were "Interested but Concerned". The majority of responses indicated they were were most
comfortable with bicycling on a shared use path (see Figure 24).
�ig�ar�24 ����n���t� " hich �f the f�lt�wing ik�way��+�eald y��a f��l ���f�rt� I� ts�ir� °?9P
� �°; "�� ��"� � � �
z°r��,�,�, .�:�� e w,�� �:� `� � ��, �� �
�
'�� , ��� � � � �� � �� � � � '� �
_ _..�:L .���r,�a�� c,.�t:ipe��s��.tf�� '�� '�, '�
f� .r,�.�i ���s�s�� ...,.
:? � �. . � !� , a:, l i:1
Additionally, three of twelve of responses were unfamiliar with ATP projects, four of twelve of responses
were unfamiliar with HSIP planned projects, and two of twelve were interested in learning more about the
ATP and HSIP projects. Some roadway issues identified through the survey are listed below.
• Safety of crosswaiks near Shasta Regional
o Suggestion to add a lighting system
Qraft Qacumenf—Far Discussian Qniy—FinaE Versian May Differ Fram Draft
GHD� Redding�ocal Road Safety Plan� Page 28
• Speeding on Grandview Avenue
• High speed limits
• Signal timing downtown
• Safety for bicyclists at Shasta View Drive and Hartnell Avenue
• Crossing Buenaventura Avenue at �akeside Drive
Figure 25 shows the responses to the question "Would you be willing to use alternate modes of travel
(walking, biking, public transit, etc.}to get to work, school, shopping, etc.?". The majority of responses
were "Maybe". Some improvements that responses suggested to encourage increased use of alternate
modes of travel include:
• Improved maintenance of roadways (fixing pot holes, cracking, etc.)
• Improved transit schedules from Anderson to Redding
• Adding new bicycle facilities, specifically shared use paths
• Improved travel times
• Improve and maintain bike lanes
• Less speeding, distracted driving, and impaired driving
�ig�ar�25 ����n��� t� 66 �t�ld yoc� b�willir�g �� t��� �I��rnat� ��d�� �f tr�v�l ���Ikin , ikin 9
�t��li�fr�n�it, �t�e}ta �t t�w�rk, ��h��l, �h� pin , ���e°?"
r��;� �,
. 'Y�S:3
� �
et
6�
,� G �
',
;
+
�t
�+1���e:� ."
Some additional suggestions collected by the survey are summarized below.
DraFt Dacument—Far piscussian ONy—F4naE Versian May Differ Fram Draft
GHD� Redding�ocal Road Safety Plan� Page 29
• Develop bicycle facilities to connect Redding to nearby communities
• Connect the Girvan neighborhood to downtown with bike paths
• Resurface roadways to increase bicycle comfort
• Additional pedestrian crossings and bike paths
Draft Qacument—Far Discussion Oniy—FinaE Version May Ctiffer Fram Ctraft
GHD� Redding�ocal Road Safety Plan� Page 30
1x��� �'„ ..
"� "� {h) �: �'`��Si`�,,p�"o-dg�...
� .�, .
Through coordination and feedback from the City of Redding, LRSP stakeholder working group, and
public outreach, safety projects and strategies were identified for the �ocal Road Safety Plan.
The LRSP will reference specific location engineering projects and systemic safety applications. In
addition, safety strategies and projects that address the other E's to include Enforcement, Education,
Emergency Response, and Emerging Technologies will be discussed below.
�1 i e rin t� fi i �
Locations to implement engineering strategies were determined through collision analysis and relative
severity, public comments, recent safety improvements, and City feedback and recommendations.
Countermeasures were proposed for signalized intersections, two-way stop-controlled intersections, and
roadway segments for roadways under City of Redding jurisdiction.
���.�1 City Intersection Projects
Per the HSIP program, engineering countermeasures are available for grant funding. Per the most recent
HSIP Cycle (Cycle 10}the approved countermeasures and crash reduction benefits were quantified in the
HSIP analyzer. The recommended countermeasures for the intersections with the highest Equivalent
Property Damage Only (EPDO) rankings are presented in Appendix D: Recommended Projects. Since
the next HSIP Cycle 11 is in 2022, further safety analysis should be conducted at that time in refining the
collision data and subsequent safety projects and Benefit to Cost Ratios (BCRs).
Countermeasures were evaluated and prioritized based on benefit to cost ratios as prescribed in Caltrans
most recent Local Road Safety Manual (LRSM). Refer to Appendix D: Recommended Projects for the
list of countermeasures from Caltrans LRSM. The benefit value of a crash is the expected reduction in
crashes with the countermeasure and the associated costs with the crash. Caltrans has opted to use 5
years of observed crashes in estimating future expected crashes. A benefit in reduction of cost can
include benefits derived from savings of societal cost(emergency response, medical cost, and property
damage}. Cost associated with a project is based on pianning levei estimates of construction cost,
planning and environmental cost and costs associated with right-of-way and utilities.
The locations of the priority signalized intersections and their corresponding crash rates are listed in Table
5 below.
Draft Qacument—Far Discussion Oniy—FinaE Version May Ctiffer Fram Draft
GHD� Redding�ocal Road Safety Plan� Page 31
"T� I� 5 ri�rity �r�t�r���ti�n� and �ra�h �t��
W �
� � �
�
Churn Creek Rd/Hartnell Ave 0.4265 0.24
South St/California St 0.24
Hartnell A�e/ Beche(Ii �n 0.1613 0.24
Airport Rd/ Preserve B(vd 0.1809 0.24
Butte St/Continental St 0.�300 0.24
Market St/ Ri�erside`Dr - 0.2a
Hartnell Ave 1 Northwoods W ay 0.0363 0.24
Churn'Creek Rd/ E Cypress Ave 0.4752 0.24
Victor Ave/ Hartnell Ave 0.3742 0.24
Hilltop Dr/ E Cypress Ave 0.3174 0.24
; E Cypress Ave/Bechelli Ln 0.2977 0.24
* Rates highlighted in bold are higher than average crash rates for similar
facitities
**California statewide average crash rate from "2098 Crash Data on Catifornia
State Highways", Cattrans, 2020.
Some proposed countermeasures at City signalized intersections are shown below.
tmprov�Signal Timing(red and � :: PViodify�wg�tal Phasirtg to�dd
y�tiow ctearance int�rval�}andfc�r � a Lea�l�ngl��destri�n Inte �l
Upgrade Signats(r�#roreflective sttSP ChaE�enye�,re�a:�eciestri�ns
tap�czn back plate�,�add nnne� • Ghurn Greek Rd 1 Martnell�ve
�+,ri,,,�„„„�„,;.b„�,� ' F�ead�,ped�s!kri�n coun4dc�wn arrd . South St f Califomia St
�""�<" �PS butf�ns,u rad�an 8" .
P9 Y Victar Ave t Hartnell Ave
� h�ads}
SHSP ChallengeAre�:t�sterseetaons
� Churn Greek Rd I Narkr�ell Ave
m, � SQuth St!California St
�.-.�.; • Hartnell flve J Bechelli Ln
, Afrpart Rd 1 Preserve Blvd
• Narntell Ave t Northwoods Way
� Churn Creek Rd!E Cypress Ave
• Victar Ave 1 Hartnell Ave
• Hilltop Qrl E Cypress Ave
• E Cypress Ave 16echelli �n
The City currently has advance dilemma zone detection on many high-speed roadways approaches.
Some additional countermeasures to consider for signalized intersections are ADA improvements,
installing bicycle boxes, and installing guide marks through the intersection for left turns.
Additionally, there were seven (7)two-way stop-controlled intersections that had fatalities in the past five
years. Some potential systemic countermeasures for these intersections could include a change of traffic
control (multiway stop (if warrants are met)or roundabout), improved signage and pavement markings,
and bicycle and pedestrian enhancements. The two-way stop-controlled intersections with fatalities are
listed below.
DraFt Qacumenf—For piscussian Qnly—Final Version May Differ Fram Draft
GHD� Redding�ocal Road Safety Plan� Page 32
• Hartnell Ave/Shotwick Trail
• Buenaventura Bivd /Lakeside Dr
• Hartnell Ave/ Middleton Ln
• Old Eureka Way/Walnut Ave
• Mountain Lakes Bivd / Beltline Rd
• Delta St/Santa Fe Ave
• Placer St/ Railroad Ave
�."1.� City Segment Analysis
Throughout the analysis period, there were 1044 collisions reported on City of Redding roadway
segments (non-intersection related). A breakdown of roadway collisions on City streets are included in
Appendix A: Collision Data. The priority segments that were determined through data analysis and
stakeholder coordination and their corresponding crash rates are listed in Table 6 below.
'T� I�6 ri�ri�y � �r�t� �nd Gra�h at��
m - � �. - � .
GHURN GREEK RD from PRESIDIO ST to S BONNYVIEW RD t ' 4-Iane undivided 0.5375 0:8d72
E CYI'RESS AVE from PA�2K MARINA DR to CHURN CREEK RD 6-lane undivided" 0.7648 0.8072
HI�LTOP DR from N/O BROWNING ST to MARAGLIA ST 4-Iane undivided 0.4676 0,8072
BEGHEL�I LN from E GYPRESS AVE to N/O 3RD S7 4-lane undivided 1.5918 0.8072
W CYPRESS AVE from fV1ARKE7 ST to PARK MARINA DR 6-lane divided - 0.5404 0.8141
RAI�ROAD AVE#rom SOUTH ST to BUENAVENTURA B�W ? 2-lane undivided 0.3'I58 1.7391
HARTNELL AVE from GOODWATER AVE to AIRPORT RD 2-Iane undivided' 1.7391
HILLTOP DR from'NIO REDDING HILLTUP APARTMENT to ST THOMAS PKWY' 4-Iane undi�ided l 0.6606 0.$072
HARTNEL.L AVE from NORTHWOODS WAY to KENGO AVE 4-Iane undivided' 0.9143 0.8072
S BONNYVIEW RD from S MARKET ST to�HURN CREEK RD 4-lane divided ' 0.2157 0.8�41
* Rafes highlighted in bold are higher fhan average crash rates for similar facilities
**Shasta Cou�ty average crash rate from"2018 Crash Data on Califomia State Highways",Caltrans,2020.
Proposed mitigation measures for roadway segments are shown below. Detailed countermeasures for
each priority segment are shown in Appendix D: Recommended Projects.
Draft Qacument—Far Discussion Oniy—FinaE Version May Ctiffer Fram Ctraft
GHD� Redding�ocal Road Safety Plan� Page 33
j'� � r j �' i��.
� x ' S '�
a �
� �� �� E,.,.�t i�
� �; � ' t, .J " ,
E �
� �> t � „��
i j � �,
t �, � ,
j � f
\ ' �,
f'``�
1 �)( �
( � j,
� 1 i
W k �,
� y
i t
��.. .��.... �,�. `_.,....*� . � �,r �i . . ... . . . .. .. ... .... .. .. .... . ..
C . '��:,`.�...�.v..ai)� .�,.
Acc��� � gernent -In�tall �i��d Install �p��d Fe�db��k �€gn�
��i�¢� • Churn Creak Rd{Presidio St to S Bannyvi�w Rd}
• E Cypress Ave{P�rk M�rin�Dr to ChUrtt • Install on 25 mph speed Iimitsigns for school zana near
CI'eek RCl) Enterprise Nigh Sehool
• Flilitop Dr{nlo 8rowning St to Maraglia St} ' ��YP�'ess Rve (Market�t to Park Marina Dr}
• �eChG>Ili Ln(E Cypress Ave tc�nlo 3rd St) Install on 25 mph speed Iimitsigns fae school zone near
Gypress Elementary
� Railroad Ave {Sauth St to Buenaventura Blvd}
• Instali on horizontal curv�warning sign and advisory speed
on southern end af segment
.��; �
� �y�y '' �r
zt ��.v, � �h ,
n,;�., � ;�:�> ll � � � ��,�.
�
:ii",'�°' /
���
�
.
.a^u�'�" ,,, � •,:
��� , �
A �r � ` P
��
ti � � �
x t � i"
4
„ �.�v eu�. ,
c y �
� � � ' A , . � F��s
5c.,�x,a,x�r:...,,s� �''.���..�£�`5. ;?,.,3iT...,,, ,
In�talt �ike �or�flict P�in�at P�ciestrian 11�r+�r�ct�s
Inter��cti�r�s �nd�riv�ways sNSFcn�ti�n��ar��:���estrian�
s�sa cnaf��n���ar��:�iaya�ists • Hilifiop Dr(ntc�Br�wning St to Ma�agiia St)
• Churn Greek Rd{Prasidio St to S » Pedestrian fencing along sidewalk ta guide pedestrians to crosswa4k
����Yu1eW ��) � W Cypress Ave (Mark�t St ta Park Marirra Dr}
• E Cypress Ave{Park Marina Dr to • InstalE crosswalk
Churn Greek Rd} � Instalf multiuse pafh
• W Gypress Ave {Market St to Park • Railroad Aue (South St ta Busnaventura Blvd)
Marina Dr} R Install sidewalk
� Hilltop Dr(North of Hilltap Dr to St Thomas Pkwy}
� Instalf crosswalk
��"1.� Speed Mitigation
6.1.3.1 Traffic Calming
The collision analysis from the past five years indicated that the top violation category for the City of
Redding was unsafe speed. The stakeholder working group meetings and public website also gathered
many comments related to speeding concerns. One way to help mitigate speed is to implement traffic
calming measures. Some examples of traffic calming devices that can be used in the City of Redding to
mitigate speed at areas of concern are shown below.
Draft Dacument—Far Discussion Oniy—FinaE Versian May Differ Fram Draft
GHD� Redding�ocal Road Safety Plan� Page 34
£�
st� �
�� � � � �: . � `. +��*,�� ����
� � � �G.` u�'.�„� �A�
, �' .,.---�-
�
.. � .;
y , , !
�. � �
, x.
� - �� �
�
�� �.� �;
��
� \' .' t o�r.. y5v,o` it.
�"n.
m *,
�� ��y �� �� „,
., e �„x . , ..
}��`�,4,��siy,ewx� �� �, ��
�, �
� . , ���� ���� � :... ��°� � . � ..� �
��1���� �� �tt�,�,��,s��^�,�,,..�
���? �
�' �� � �
Chic�nes (create ara���haped tra�eC w��.ft�r;;'
'Speed Tables ��hicles)
� � �e �+ . �.+�.., "r c � t , :
� �
� � � .,y �������� �.. � Y�h:
4 e �� � � 'y �� � �``�
' � �
�.•` �"� r'�. ,.�• � fi r.�, � 1�=`,"
h.
�M �
, . :. . . ,k �, �`�, z
„
* .' s
�, , �
"
�9�,
y r' .' , ,, �p a .."..
s • w
4 & ��, �
�
v � {
� }�� '>.,.� ;
� ..�m � `y� . > ..r�
.l � ,..,1�bii�,.�'
� .�:_..�..�.� `
�"�c ..s�..�:;'��C ka-,�..
�rMa ��.��"�� �f z �
'�TrafiFic Cir�les �arfi�,t�i�t�����(i�sur� `
The City of Redding has a Traffic Calming Program in place where residents can apply for a speed table
to be implemented in their neighborhood. This program is neighborhood driven and requires support from
67% of the affected residents for installation of the speed table(s).
6.1.3.2 Assembly Bill No. 43
Assembly Bill (AB 43}was signed into law by Governor Newsom on October 8, 2021. This bill will change
several aspects of speed setting and enforcement in California with a goal to make roadways safer for all
road users. The new law is set to go into effect by June 30, 2024 and allows agencies more flexibility with
keeping the previous speed limit, allows business and residential districts to have 15 and 20 mph speed
limits, and allows the agency to round down the proposed speed limit based on an engineering study due
to a high presence of bicycles or pedestrians.
��"��� Systemic Safety Countermeasures
When selecting countermeasures,just focusing on locations with a current collision issues is a reactive
approach to roadway safety planning. A reactive approach targets recent hot-spots and specific problems
that are associated with these locations; as a result of this approach, locations with low traffic volumes but
with similar safety issues as hot spot locations are not addressed. In order to mitigate collisions in a both a
reactive and proactive approach, Caltrans' Local Road Safety Manual suggests agencies utilize a
comprehensive approach that inciudes systemic and hot spot location improvements in developing a
safety plan.
Some systemic safety countermeasure options, per the �RSM, at signalized intersections and segments
for the current high-risk roadway characteristics are shown in Table 7. These systemic countermeasures
C7raft C7acument—For Discussian Qniy—F4na€Versian May Ctiffer Fram Draft
GHD� Redding�ocal Road Safety Plan� Page 35
could be added to a series of signalized intersections and segments through our recommendation or City
coordination. Some additional systemic countermeasures for bicycle and pedestrian improvements can
include leading pedestrian intervals and accessible pedestrian push buttons (APS)andlor pedestrian
countdown signals, green conflict markings for bike lanes, and enhanced crossings (e.g. high visibility
crosswalks, median refuge areas, rectangular rapid flashing beacons at midblock locations, and
pedestrian hybrid beacons (must met CA MUTCD warrants).
T`� I�7 ��� �r���� ����� i� �af�t� ���rrf�r �a��r��
.,
�'
� � • � �-a �
S02' 15% �mpro�signal hardware: lenses; back-plates with retrareflecti�borders,
Signalized Intersea�ions ��� mounfing, size,���and number
S03+ 15°In�'�� Impro�signal timing(coordinati�n, phases, red,'�yellow, or operation)
Segments R26 30% Install dynarnie/�rariable speed warning signs
For HSIP funding, the goal will be to balance the need to have a competitive BCR (i.e. last call minimum
BCR was 3.5 but funding was awarded for a minimum BCR closer to 12)and maximizing as many
locations as possible that can benefit from similar safety countermeasures. However, HSIP does have set
asides that require no BCR and therefore a systemic approach of these projects can be identified as long
they meet the funding requirement (e.g. HSIP Cycie 10 had set aside funding were as follows: $250K per
agency available for pedestrian crossing enhancements, $1 M per agency for guardrail upgrades, and
$250K per agency for installing edgelines}.
6.1.4.1 Leading Pedestrian Intervals
One potential systemic project for signalized intersections is installing leading pedestrian intervals for
pedestrian and bicycle crossings. This countermeasure benefits both pedestrians and bicyciists by
allowing them to enter intersections a few seconds earlier than vehicles. According to the National
Association of City Transportation Officials (NACTO), this has been proven to reduce vehicle-pedestrian
collisions by 60% and increase visibility for pedestrians and bicyclists when entering the intersection.
Redding currently has leading pedestrian intervals at the following six signalized intersections:
• �ake Boulevard and Tamarack Drive
• Lake Boulevard and Clay Street
• Lake Boulevard and Masonic Avenue
• Court Street at Tehama Street
• Placer Street at East Street
• Hartnell Avenue at Parkview Avenue
The City compiled a list of locations that could benefit from this countermeasure. The specific locations for
the recommended leading pedestrian intervals are shown in Figure 26. If a1149 locations are compiled
into a systemic HSIP application, the estimated benefit-to-cost ratio will be approximately 57. Additional
collision data for these locations is in Appendix D: Recommended Projects.
Draft Dacument—For piscussian Oniy—FinaE Versian May Differ Fram Draft
GHD� Redding�ocal Road Safety Plan� Page 36
�
� ,.. ...
, ���
[��r� z .�� � ��= ���
�.
•
F ��� ,�. � ��
��
�r� �, ���� :�„' t
��
� �� '�" � ��bk r��" � ' u �� �
n
.�
� , . �.
�� �
9
� ., �., �.� z � ����.. �` �� �
�Lege d °
�
�; ," „ Y� . . .
�
? , y�'` ,., ,�:
� ,�.v ': ,.... � � ?�s ''� ` �, srt .� .,.:,� ; .. �: �
�,.r� � � r
• t
� � rt�n ��� '� � � ; �"�, �
�ocation fo
�� ���,. Propos ��
u.
� t,: �t��'{ ��� � � � Leading d �
t k
� � � � ran �
.,, ��' , �.:, rJ k ' .
' .i.. r. �4 t� � 2
r rz, u,:.' 4 �
x ..,. . 1
�
Pedesti
� �,,� t� � .t ,
n erva
< � � � ��
`�..���°�� � � �
a
r„
�
It I
� ' �
,� � �
�.,�n �' ��. � � t
;� Z C 00
r� , �� .,,, n S h I
r.=r,� ���'��������� ���� �
>1��� � �� „ �' �� ., � �����;� � ��� City of Redding e
,� �' � � �... Q
$ �� M
�s � � � � ,_. ,� � �� t
a t ��� � � � �� �.� , i
�;,: � ��. ��� � �
� �� � � � � �
� � City �imit
� � � �. �� ��� „
, � ,x N �
� � �. �,� � � �� , ��� �� ,�� ,. �
�
���b � r, s � � �
�z��,,,
... �,
� � �
t:
,
,��s� �� � r, � �� �,x u
����� � s���' � �
,�� �"� .., ,,� � � ������ �;�r, �Z
Ar z
� ,
:. ��
��....>,. 2 '� � �t.���� s. � � "
� .. �������"��,. '�,
��. �t
t. �:` � '� ,�� ��������� t
�. >..
,
�
, t � r ���
�- t �. „
;t p��s 3 4 ,� �� ,���� � k
y.
�-.
'� ,� i��� �v�`
n �� �
� �
��,.3:����
��:.� �".. �,
�,,� ,�„ �, L ��������
t,� €
�, `��� �s t „ ti
z��s .�m r��ax„�n� 4 `M�
� " , r
1 � e
�t.., , � 5 6 47 � �
• ��<,. � �
��. . �
� Z � ��
, w „
�� � � CITY OF a �
�,,� t L 4o z
� . , REDDING z
� �
�
�
� z
�, �� z z � �
�� �.�����{��t'�� � � � `" � aa �� �
��������A *`5 �s � � '
���5� ��,� { �� j� ,� ��� ��zs as {� `
� ����srs y� j � ���,,_, , � r,� �
,ti ����� , .0 �� �5 �36 35�� � �: `
� �� � �� � �� � � 3 t
x= ' ���"����, �#� �� ,C 27
3N
�, b.�n�� „� ' ,. ��a 1� � ��,
' .:,.:.�' . � ` ��� � � �. ��
ID �� Primary Road Secondary Road 13 �� y , 28� � �;�� � ��,�� ��� ��, �
1 Lake Blvd Hiatt Dr ' �$ � � � �� � '
� � 29� ���� � � � � t
2 Lake Blvd Oasis Rd �14 L ��g �19 �30 � 4 �� ��h ;
3 Lake Bivd Tamarack Dr '� 5 3� '
� t�
4 Lake Blvd Clay St yp `�� ��"`°" °°�� � � �
�s,
5 Lake Blvd North Point Dr ��1 ' � ��€
6 Lake Blvd Masonic Ave � t � �'�
7 Hilito Dr Pe ertree Ln � 22�j 31� 34 �ti 4� ��
P pp � "��� � �� � � " � �...�.�; i
8 Placer St Pleasant St �� �� ��_- �� _
��:,.� .w�, �� � � t
9 Court St Tehama St � � .32 � �
10 Court St Shasta St �j
11 Court St Placer St � j
12 Court St South St 44;
13 Placer St Airpark Dr � � '� �� �
14 Buenaventura Blvd Placer St ' t t �33 j
i 15 Butte St Continental St
� 16 Placer St Continental St �� � � � x
17 Placer St East St � �
fi ��
3� r; �. _
23 Y:, °
18 Cypress Ave Civic Center Dr ;: � � ' `
19 Athens Ave Locust St 49 � � r
� �_
Z �
20 Hartnell Ave CobblesCone � ����' ' �43��� � �
21 Hartnell Ave Parkview Ave 3 "� ���'��'" "` � �� �
� � », 4
22 Hartnell Ave Bechelli Ln � �k a�`.�`�` � 2�4 ' �
�,,.: - �L
� j� v �. ���
w
�.�,w� �`°�°�
23 Bechelli Ln Biue Shield ���`"°�� � �-�����°" �' ��' ' '�� ���� � . ��� � i
�.
24 S Bonnyview Rd Fre Hall4 � ``� �� � � � � ��° �` �-� � �
�.,.
., °r'
o ,t , �\ � , . � 2
25 E Cypress Ave Alfreda Way � � �� ��� ', j � �
26 Churn Creek Rd Old Alturas Rd y „��'� � �:� 45
27 Churn Creek Rd Presidio St t ' � §'�
� t
28 Chum Creek Rd Mistletoe Ln � � ��
� �� ..
tr� , �
� ,:. e�t . , s;, ��`�i:�$8t�`"%�a `
29 Chum Creek Rd Industrial St ;' �' ,���.�;`' � � � �r
$ y.
�. �< t
y
; 30 Chum Creek Rd Merchant St a � �� ���� � � �}� a ��°` �� � " �� � �
„ �v, �
r'
�.,e - K,� `w•�� k .,x ��.a_ ;.. �
; 31 Hartnell Ave Northw oods Way � � �r � °` � �
3x ��
; 32 Churn Creek Rd Shirley Ln �� � � ��. � � �°��� � '. � � �
33 Churn Creek Rd Loma Vista Dr ���������,� ������ '
..�., v:,., r. „ >f� c � F
34 Shasta View Dr Hartneil Ave � �� �' ��� �*�� � ����, 4�,� ���������� � 3g�� �
� �. ����.. �����,t�t,.�, �� �k������ :.�: � 3
� . � ;
� ��:�� �:� �°`.:. � �
35 Dana Dr Victor Ave � � r,�� r.; � y, •' � :,
36 Dana Dr Bradford Way �'" �'� �`
, �_,
37 Victor Ave E Cypress Ave ��� �, �� i
38 Old Alturas Rd Friendly Rd � �y� �..�� �����'����j��������
„
,' � , ��� �t �
39 Airport Rd Knighton Rd �°� n��� ,� � , .��� � `�'� � � ��� � �
40 Shasta V iew Dr Hemingw ay St � � �: f,. � ,,.,,3t�,� �' r r���,�$ ` � .:; ; �� � �� ��
41 Shasta View Dr Tarmac Rd �� ���� � ���,� , �;" "' � ����� �� � ; _ ` � �
42 Old Oregon Trl Old 44 Dr ' r, �t ' ��"� ��� � �� �
ti� �� t ?�. � � ?
43 Airport Rd Rancho Rd �' �s � � �� `" �� � �«' � � � r
. 4 �,. �: .. "
„
Y �� 1 . r� ..� , �..lx.ve '.' � �h+
44 Airport Rd Preserve Blvd ����� �'� ����� �, " � � ���
>.: ��,.,� ra j i .'` ��
45 Airport Rd Shasta View Dr `
,,rFis� { ,,t �����`��� �� ,a
46 Market St Riverside Dr ' �� � �
47 Lake Blvd Hilltop Dr ��"����" �������� ° °�° �' , � � r�� ���� ��
48 Hilitop Dr Brow ning St °� ��`��
�
�
49 Churn Creek Rd S Bonnyview Rd �r � � ��� � � �
� _ _ ,,ss.0 ���,��.. �
— — — � w.��.� n��� v.�,. �w�� �� �,,...� �w�
�._��. �..� �w r.w� M.�,,,H. ww.� �..�� ��.�. ���.. � ,,�.�.u��:��
� �
�
i�!.��4�VVAAAAAAAAAAA��OtiV�1�5`.l�`.*.�����VAAAAAAA`,.1�.��������������������A`*:`ti��������������'�V\A\A\AV�0�.��������������O.ti�\A"�,,"V��'�`�,"�,."�,."�,."V��«���'�"V�S.`�000AA"�,,"�,."V�"V��S"V�AOAA"V�"V���`:..�'t.�;�..�"t.ti�.����A�\.�'�'�."�,."�,."\�.������44�VV�A�CV�."\�"\h."�L..:...�000AA"�,,"�,."�,."�,.�'�'�."�,."�,."�,."V��O.ti��«�����000AA"V�AOAA"�,."V�"V��S"V����OS�C����"\��"�,."�,."\�.����«��\�«�S."`y�,`,`�,'''`..ti"�,."�,."V�"V���5'S��"V��S.�S��VOAA\A�V"\�.�C��4`�\A"V��«S"�,,"V��"\�"V��S"V��«««��A"V��««S"�,."V�000AA'�.'\...���00A"\�.���««««S'.,"�,,"�,."V���A'�'�."�,."V�"V���"V��S"V��«�S"V��««�S"�,."\�.��'��...�`"��"�."�,."\h,.
Paper Size ANSI B CITY OF REDDING Project No. 11215289
0 o.s o.s o.s t.z N LOCAL ROAD SAFETY PLAN(LRSP) Revision No. -
���������`�� Date 08I0312021
���as �,�� � � � LOCATIONS FOR PROPOSED
Map Projection:MercatorAuxiliar S here ������`�����
Y p LEADING PEDESTRIAN INTERVAL
Ho��zoncai oatum:w�s�ssa PROJECT
Grid:WGS 1984 Web MercatorAuxiliary Sphere FIG U RE 26
N�.W515an Luis ObispolProjects15 61111 2 1 5 2 8 91GI51MapslWorkinglLPl Lacallons.mxd �ate somce�.5tatewide Integreted Treffic Recards System(SWITRS)2015-2019,Somces'.Esri,HERE,Garmin,Intermap,increment P Corp.,GEBCO,USGS,FAO,NPS,NRCAN,GeoBase,IGN,KadesterNL,
Printdate:OG Aµq 2021-07:58 Ordnance Survey,Esri,lapan,METI,Esri China(Hong Kong),(e)OpenSheetMap canMbutors,and the GIS User Community,Created by:edarke
�,�1.� Projects Suggested through Public Input
The interactive map tool on the public website for the plan gathered many suggestions from residents of
the City for areas of improvement. These suggestions were summarized and are shown in Table 8 below.
T`��I� � F'r�j�c�� ���g����d thr���h ���li� Ir��c�t
. « �a- �
E Gypress Ave bridge Restripe pavement markings
E Gypress'Ave bridge
Placer St near Buen�ventura Blvd Sweep/rnaintain bike lanes
S Bonnyview Rd beiween S Market St and Sacramento Ri�er
Old Oregon Trail between Uiking Way and SR 44
Parallel to Alrnond Ave beiween Shasta St and Placer St
Parallel to Buenaventura Blvd along goat path between Placer St
and Star(ight r�eighborhood
Along ACID Ganal between Radio Ln and N Bonnyview Rd �nstall multiuse path
` S Bonnyview Rd beiween 5 Market St and Sacramento River
Old Oregon Trail,north of'Akrich St
North side of Old Alfuras;Rd from Shasta View Dr to Browning St
Buenaventura Blvd at�akeside Dr Install enhanced pedestrian crossing
' Ellis St near Juniper School �rnpro�e K rail maintenance and '
appearance
' Cedars Rd Continue bike lanes on S Bonnyview`
Shasta St at Olive Ave Educate public about traffic circles
�ake Bivd at Keswick Darn Rd Evaluate installation of traffic signal
Shasta View Dr near Alden Ave
Benton Dr near Delta St Install sidewalk
Benton Dr near Delta St
Old A(turas Bridge
Shasta View Dr from SR 44 and Hartnell Ave ' Install bike lanes
�ctor Ave from SR 44 and Cypress Ave
Rancho Rtl
Churn Creek Rd from I-5 to Victor Ave
Churn Creek Rd at Rancho Rd ` Evaluate visibility and speed
countermeasures
'Goodwater Ave Evaluate traffic calming measures
Freeman Way
Freebridge St at Smile PI Evaluate installation of stop signs
Tehama St at Oregon St
Eureka Way at Almond Ave ' Install safety lighting
California St at Gold St Evaluate left turn movements
Market St at Gold St Evaluate right turn movemenfs
Old Alturas Rd at Uictor Ave ! Evaluate installation of roundabout
���o� Additional Safety Projects
A comprehensive approach to selecting countermeasure recognizes that not all safety issues can be
addressed through infrastructure improvement. The comprehensive approach to safety involves the `5 E's
of traffic safety. Besides engineering safety countermeasures, it is important to recommend safety
countermeasures to coincide with the other safety E's.
Qraft C}acument—Far piscussian Qniy—FinaE Versian May Ciiffer Fram Ciraft
GHD� Redding�ocal Road Safety Plan� Page 38
� i �i t� fi i
�r.��� Education
Education strategies are listed below.
• Campaign to prevent distracted driving and walking
• Safe route to school maps and outreach at schools
• Social media blasts with quick education tool for all users
• Partner with existing agencies for public education campaigns
�.�.� Emerging Technologies
Possible emerging technologies strategies are listed below.
• ITS infrastructure, web/mobile application (apps) and smart cities practices
���
� • Crash warning system
• Communication with traffic signals
• Changeable message signs
• Automatic bicycle/pedestrian counters
• Improving signal operation
o This helps increase traffic flow and can help with safety by decreasing
delay, greenhouse gas emissions, crashes, etc.
�i.�.� Enforcement
Enforcement strategies are listed below.
• Targeted speed enforcement
o Focus on areas of concern for residents based on public feedback
• DUI saturation patrols
• Increasing number of traffic enforcement officers
• Distracted driving enforcement
Draft Dacument—Far Discussion Oniy—FinaE Version May Differ Fram Draft
GHD� Redding�ocal Road Safety Plan� Page 39
�.��� Emergency Response
Emergency response strategies are suggested below.
• Emergency signal installation
• Ability to administer life saving measures on-site of a collision
• Emergency vehicle pre-emption at signalized intersections
• Improvements to roadways to increase access and potentially shorten response times
Draft Qacument—Far Discussion Oniy—FinaE Version May Ctiffer Fram Ctraft
GHD� Redding�ocal Road Safety Plan� Page 40
;t
� , , » , . .,�.
In evaluating how to implement safety projects, prioritized lists of projects are shown in the tables below.
The City of Redding can look for opportunities to incorporate safety enhancements with the Capital
Improvement Program. However, it is noted that funding is very limited and typically used from roadway
paving. Additional funding opportunities can come through grant funding to include HSIP, ATP, and
CMAQ.
Table 9 contains a prioritized list of the proposed intersection projects on City roadways based on their
respective benefits. Table 10 shows a prioritized list of the proposed segment projects for City roadway
segments based on expected benefits. The lowest fundable Benefit-to-Cost ratio for HSIP Cycle 10 was
12. To help show the competitiveness of the proposed projects, the tables also display the maximum
project cost for a benefit-to-cost ratio of 10.
�ow-cost, systemic countermeasures are preferred by Caltrans in the HSIP process.
Draft Qacument—Far Discussion Oniy—FinaE Version May Ctiffer Fram Ctraft
GHD� Redding�ocal Road Safety Plan� Page 41
"T� I� ri�rity�f�ity �r�t�r���fii�r► �r����t�
improu�signaf hardware:lehses,back-piates with reCrorefl�ctive bord�rs,moun�jng,
Systemic(9 size,and rrumbee $1,584,138 $ 15,841,375 $$ 50%
locatians***) Impra�e signal timing(eoordination,pfiases,red,���yeilow,oroperaYon}
Madify;signal phasing to implement a Leading Pedestri�n Interuai(LPI)
Sysfeinic(49 �adify'signai pHasing to implement a Leading Pedestrian Intervai(�PI) $2,075,100 $ 2�,751,Q00 ,$$ 100%
locati�rns**��)
Irnprn�signef hardware:tenses,back-piates with retroreflectiv�borders,mounting,
size,and number
Instail Ieft-turn lane and add turn phase in westbound direction $ 522,238 $ 5,222,178 $ 90°10
South SE/California�St
fulodify signai phfising to implernent a Leading PedesCrien Ihtervai(LP�
improv�signai timing�coordination,ptaases,red,'yeqow,or operationj -
impro�signal hardware:le�ses,beck-piates wi€h retroreflective 6ord�rs,mounting,
size,and number
I�ravide Advanced Dilemma-�one Detection
Hartnell Ave/Bechelli $ 403,067 $ 4,030,510 �$$ 9010 '
�n Instaii pedestrian'median fencing on approaches'
hnprou�signal tirning(coorc3ination,pfiases,red,yeilow,or ap�ration)
impra�e signai hardware:lenses,back-plates with retrorefle�tive borders,rnounting,
size,and number
Improve signai timing(coordinatian,phases,red,,yeilow,or aperation) $ 302,756 $ 3,027,557 , $ 50°1
' Churn Creek Rd/'
Hartnell Ave Modify'signei phasing to implement a Leading Pedestrian Intervai(LPI}
Increase[7UI enforcement
Conso(idate dri�ways
Impro�signel hardware:lenses,back-pietes with retroreflecti�borders,mounfing,
size,and number
Vicfor Ave/Hartnell Impra�signai timing(coordinafion,phases,red„yeilow,oroperetion) g ��5,421 $ 2,154,205 , $ 50%
Ave
Modifysignal phasing to implement a Leading Pedestrian lntenai(LPI}
��Chum Creek Rd/� �mpro�signal hardware:lenses,back-piates with retroreflecti�borders,mounting,
CypressAve $����and number $ 211,949 $ 2,119,490 $ 50°10
lmpro�t:signai timing(caordination,phases,red,�;Yeilow,or op�raCionj
Irnpro�signai hardware:lenses,back-piates with retrore8ecti�borders,mo-unting,
size,and number
Airpott Rd/Preserve $ 203,324 $ 2,033,242 $$ 100% '
B��� Prouide qdwncet�Dilemma;Zone DetecCion
Instail acluanee sfap bar before crosswaik(Bicycle�ax)
Bieycle educatioer about riding at night anci ruies�:of the road -
Butte Sf I�ontinental None(upcoming sateiyproject atldresses current collision trentls) ;
St
MarketSt�Riverside �nstail pedestrian,crassing(S.I.} ;$ 159,000 $ 1,590,000 ' $ 10�% '
Dr
Impro�;signal hardware:lenses,beck-piates with retroreBecCive borders,mounCing,
Hilltop Dr/E Cypress size,and number � �q7,�66 $ 1,17�1 664 $ 50°!
Ave impro�signal Ciming(coar�nation,phases,red,+yellow,or operaYian}
Install reised pa�ment markers and striping(Through Intersection}
E Cypress Ave/ ampra�signal hardware:lenses,back-piates with retroreflecY�barders,rnourtting, �
Becheili�n size,and number $ 63,192 $ 631,924 $ 5010
Impro�;signai timing(coordinaYion,pt�iases,red,'ysllow,oroperatian)
Impro�signai hardware:Tenses,back-piates wiffi retroreflecGve 6ortlers,rnounYing, � �a
Hartneil Ave/ $ 47,700 $ 477,001 $ 10fl10
Northwoods Way ��ze,and number
Increase DUI enforcement - - - -
� Impro�signal timing(coordination,phases,red,yellow, or operation); HSIP Funding Eligibility:50%
Install left-turn lane and add turn phase (signai has no left-turn lane or phase before); HSIP Funding Eligibility:90%
Install pedestrian median fencing on approaches; HSIP Funding Eligibility:90%
"$=Estimated cost below$250,000
$$=Estimated cost around$250,000 to$1,OOO,000
$$$=Estimated cost abo�$1,000,000
*"Locations for systemic mitigations:Chum Creek Rd/Hartnell A�,South St/California St,Hartnell Ave/Bechelli Ln,Airport Rd/Preser�Blvd,
Hartneil Ave/Northwoods Way,Churn Creek Rd/E Cypress A�e,Victor A�e/Hartneil Ave,Hiiltop DdE Cypress A�e,E Cypress A�/Bechelii Ln
"'�See Figure 26 for proposed locations
Qraft Document—Far Discussian Qr�iy—FinaE Versian May Ciiffer From CYraft
GHD� Redding�ocal Road Safety Plan� Page 42
'T� I� 10 ri�rity�f�ity �g �nt r���ct�
Add segment lighting(East of I-5 Mterchange)
E Cypress Ave(Park Install raised median(Betw�en Hiittop Dr antl Ghum Creek Rd) $2�Z71,587 $ 22 716,865 $$$ 90%
'Marina Dr to Churn Instail bike ianes/Install separeted bike ianes
Greek Rd) Consolidate existing dri�;vi�ay�3v limit the nurriber ofiaccess points'� - -
Instail bike conflict paint at intersections and dri�x.ways -
Irrstail raisetl median(Betw�en Dana±Dr and Browni»g Dr)
Hiiltop Dr(n/o ; Instail edge-lines and centetlines(belw2en Rnss/8ig-Lcrts Drivewayand Margalia St) $1,763,889 $ 17,638,888 $$ 90°10
Browning St to Instail;delineators,reflectors and/or objecf markers
Maraglia 5t) � Pedestrian fencing along sjdewalk fo,guide pedest�ians to the enhenced crosswalk wiYh�����
RRFB
Railroad Ave(SouthSt Install��che�ror�signs on horizbntal eun+�s � � ��
to Buenaventura Blvd) Instail'sidewalk7pathway(tt�awid walking along roatlway) $1,288,251 $ 12,682,508', $$$ 90% '
Instail delineator�,reflectars,andlor object mark�rs
Instail;dynamic/vanabie speed wamir�q signs �
Instail/upgrade pedestrian crassing at uneontrolled locations(with enhancetl safety $ 902,440 $ 9,024,397 $$ 90% '
W CypressAve(Market features)
St to Park Marina Dr) InstaiLmui�iuse path/sharrow dn eas#bound approach to the intersecGon of W!Cypress
A�t;l Market St -
Install'bike conflict paint at intersections and dri�ways
Churn Greek Rd i Insteil dynamic/uariable speed waming signs $ 910,518 $ 9,105,1&0 $ 100% '
{Presidio St to S
Bbnnyyiew Rd); Installibike eanflicf paint af intersections and dri�ways - -
Hartnell Ave ' Add Segment Lighting o
i�Goodwater Ave ko Install4cun�e advanee warning signs $ $77'729 $ 8'�77'2�5 �� 10d�°
Airport Rd) Increase DUI enforcement -
Add�egment Lighting
Hilltop Dr(nlo Redding Road DieY(Reduce tta�l Ianes from 4 to 3 antl add a two way Ieft-tum end bike lanes) , b
HiiltOp Ap2utmerttS to $ $20,64$ $ 8,206,4$3' $$$ 90%
' St Thomas Pkwy) Instaillupgrade pedestrian crossing at uncontrolied locations(with enhanced s�fiety
features)
Consolidate exi5ting dri�ways to Ifrr[it the nurrrber of access poinfs��� -
Beehelli Ln(E Cypress Install'raisetl metlian(on the approaches to I-lartrrellAueJ $ 620,150 $ 6,201,500 $ 90% '
Aue to n/o 3rd SE) Consolidete exi�ting tlri�Ways to Iirriif the numberofaccess pointsi -
Railroad Ave(South St Insta(I dynamictuariabie speed waming signs + $ 431,490 $ 4,314,901' $ 100%
to Buenaventura Blvd)
+S Bannyview Rd(S
'Market St to Churn Install Separeted Bike Lanes ' $ 53;622 $ ' 536,220 $$ 90°/n +
Creek Rd)
' Install raised median; HSIP Funding Eligibility:90%
Install bike lanes; HSIP Funding Eligibility:90%
Install Separated Bike Lanes; HSIP Funding Eligibility:90%
Road Diet(Reduce tra�l lanes from 4 to 3 and add a two way left-turn and bike lanes); HSIP Funding Eligibility:90%
Install/upgrade pedestrian crossing(with enhanced safety features); HSIP Funding Eligibility:90%
Install sidewalk/pathway(to awid walking along roadway); HSIP Funding Eligibility:90°/
**$=Estimated cost below$250,000
$$=Estimated cost around$250,000 to$1,000,000
$$$=Estimated cost abo�$1,000,000
Draft Dacument—Far Discussion Oniy—FinaE Version May Differ Fram Draft
GHD� Redding�ocal Road Safety Plan� Page 43
4� ."� ;9' ........ ..i.d ..
� � lt����
•= .�.,
To evaluate the success of this plan, yearly coliision analysis, along with requests for
public feedback, can take place and be compared to the established goals.
� �
OGoal: Reduce the potential for fatal and severe injury collisions citywide Q �
o Measure of Success: This can be achieved by smaller reductions of 1
fatal or severe injury(FSI) collision reduction per year.
QGoal: Create a safe, livable, and welcoming community by developing a roadway safety plan
targeted to Redding's transportation and roadway safety needs
o Measure of Success: If this goal is successful, residents will express an increased feeling
of safety while using Redding's transportation systems and the number and severity of
collisions each year will decrease.
QGoal: Improve safety around schools
o Measure of Success: Results of public feedback shows that there are areas where
pedestrian access and safety can be improved around schools in the City of Redding. An
evaluation of the improvements of multimodal transportation infrastructure around schools
will capture effectiveness of this goal.
QGoal: Reduce speeding collisions through engineering, enforcement, and education strategies
o Measure of Success: A reduction in collisions with "Unsafe Speed"violations after
implementing engineering, enforcement, and education strategies will determine if this goal
is met.
QGoal: Improve multimodal transportation safety by expanding the City's non-motorized
transportation infrastructure
o Measure of Success: Public feedback results show that there are areas where pedestrian
and bicycle accessibility can be improved or installed. Improvements and installations of
non-motorized transportation infrastructure will capture this goal.
OGoal: Improve the health and vitality of our community by working with community safety partners
� to create a roadway safety plan targeted to Redding's needs
o Measure of Success: Community stakeholders will have increased participation in
conversations about safety improvements in the City of Redding.
QGoal: Reduce rear end collisions citywide by implementing speed management strategies
Qraft QacumenE—For piscussian Qniy—Final Version May Differ Fram Draft
GHD� Redding�ocal Road Safety Plan� Page 44
o Measure of Success: This goal will be effective if there is a decrease in "Unsafe Speed"
collisions after implementing speed management strategies outlined in this plan.
QGoal: Prioritize improvements that affect conditions/safety outcomes for identified disadvantaged
' populations
o Measure of Success: An increase in the projects implemented in disadvantaged
populations would achieve this goal. See Figure 27 for the locations for recommended
projects, in relation to the locations of low resource neighborhoods in Redding.
Draft Qacument—Far Discussion Oniy—FinaE Version May Ctiffer Fram Ctraft
GHD� Redding�ocal Road Safety Plan� Page 45
�}yi. c.�5c g.sS..�.S��is50...3i q»s;`50�v o.�...�N�.S 1?. .3 Y L.}11�c o.c•ic�1"3� `Y\ �� \�v1i.1q....„r>rnretm•.h�..�s: ..„a..�,� 5S7)`N4s�s �N>c� s1t\J, 4 `�. ,t 1 }
,) \l l . , t .t t... J ) ) ,\\t . 12 1 E tt2 1 t<, � ..2 ... \ 11 , .. .: . 9 . � � S ..;�...>.:
�� �?� . 1 . ,,. .�}u...JJ{7 t< i} X. �11..� 222, r?.2 i 2� \ �. \. ?S\ '�+ �.:��3 ,�1�. 1
i i 77 }� \ ,, d , ,. ..�.<> :� .l 2 {ZZZ ?l.� ,l, .2 ` \ � }. ., .� '.� . ...t..
t. @\ i. \ � , . , ,... ., .� ,,., .}; � � .L{ 3 ..�;?,s � . ii�3 \ti Z 4 .<` ._.. � .> , 1 14
, � . � .. .t..> ., , .� .< „t < .., k Z i �. , l � 1`�, � .b , � Y t, .s ,s ?
��,.�. Z,. + 7 2 .. t ,� „,�, > 1 l Z 3. .s� � .. ,� Z.}, �� '�`. .3 � .,...
t
, �, � � � `, ,,.r,� �, . `� ?,� , .. .. ? \ \ � � , , ,.., 1. ;�4
� t � ,�. � s° e �\ ., s a 3 �� , 3 l � , t , t
s �. , ,t , . , t. �, � � , „ d
s ti� �� � � s r ti.,.�,\ti. � �, x , � 4=�1, �. � �
1 1 , a�, } a 3 ti ^i{ cr #
., � �, `3 t 1 ti �.. s. �, , ,3: t � ,« �
s '��,, l � .t r r. ��� s ,. � �
� .,t� � a s. � L i E). � �, t
. � u � � `� � � , , f , t �,�. , ., � z.
, �"\ � �.. , s \.,.�. � .� . \ .t, s ,)<., �.t, .�, .,. , l
. , ,, 5 a �" � .� t -, t.i��, # �., ,. � 5. c\ .��u: „ (� , , . , � ,. � �� ....
� ... i , � � , , ti. , t � t � � , �a �`, 3 . �� t `� t,.
3.� ti � < v`� ,< ,,., i. , F1 ,, �, „ r.. ��...n`� s ti . � � ,.,. ., �. *: ,.
,. ..s t �,. ,. , , >, v 7, . .. � � �t,,,., .� � , , , , e.t , ,. ., s, t
. �.. �, t ti�,>.. � „ : i `�� ,,.�. � . \ �.C .. s Y si..
,. £. \ 1 � v � . >, �. r � � . �. .�'t� ., i .� � _.. .t
a:.. : \ , ., � .. ,.<i i ,��.r� .�..., .,r ,\, ..,.. ,� ti .,. „ �
.,, , � t. .<r t � � 1..} *.. . :... 7 < .i� . < t „ . ...�„ ..,..
� , M < t ..�. f. .t, 11 'e<� ., � ; , .,� t r, � r � . � �'3 t t. ..�
. ,e .,�i, > � .< , .n �l �£ „ � ,�..s 1 �4 � W�c�, ..a,t, 1 4 .....
.,.... , �' s». ,� ��.. �. \ , \�,.... ., st ri��s <`�,. f; t ��Y
t �
,,,,n. i �: .0 .. u t,z . �..z. , .'. .P , � \ �.(. �, }'.,.'. . „u...�te..�,.� T�tns,..,,....�� ...4��. Y
t�. F ,, ., z .,.,..�_�,� , .t� .�. � � ..i, f. .,� � t1u i .., 5�. ,.<:.. . . ... . .. .. .. .. ....a,,..,,......
(ti. S �.? �, t .,�1.4. � 1�3.e � .{ e� � '� .\r 1. ,:fJ,.+��'�ti.kF„,
,,, 7 �e��aS .., ''`. .,, i.Co .� l �c, i t ��., �. �1 ,. .� `i i x �4s�, t`, ��.� ,f s �d. .4t.
t .y, ''wi...,,.s.,�� .., � �� , � �� t. t ..�� .'i t�.��i,{���a� . <, � �. ... .,:. .. .,. ,,":re
,.r. .5. .. .,,..`ti `i r �, .,�`YF .Ya��i , �:�� � t. } ,�1"l\.. ���S�3� `Y n, � s�(
..}F.''x��` ���.. �.�� .0 �, �4��, ��.\13.. �� �l '.'�a "1S �. s„\<�l � .l�`.. 4
��� � � �. t � �,
`. E c �..s
�.. r.. � '�, t �,z ,� ,t
t t x.�, S� � �..5� c `,
� �;, } 4 t� � ,� , r,, � �.. !,
'�4 . } `�, ,� .'� '� �,�.�.
�. t 1 �� l�,
� �s, � , � \ t .� .�„ �,7, t ';z
.:h� t, aa u '� ,.t ,
� � .� � t 2,.1 `�
,}tc 4. ? �1 ,�.Y i v:S
.�':i+fl��'; ,"3 i4 � ��
.:,1"' � rt P s .i-.'
n r
, 4 .1 t � ... ".,� .'� ���t x� 4s,�: '' t .}Y , ..i ,..c� �,��,t..�. ....? �....�. t,,,:.• }: .. .,, t
� r . ,. �t ,r �. t, l� � 4a 2n. : } z,.,,.
i. ,, �a t �� f � i � � e ,
,> >� ..,,1, ,.., �� £ : r , � "� �, �. ,s .,�
c 1 �. .ti �S I',.rt .� ,a .� s,,tt �
5� �i r. �. .^,, , c. 7� .`�t e,� i,"'n� �,
�.`r �7,.s. ����.. �.� t i�� S„
.C �.. �„�11�i 4 .ik `: .}'�. ��\�� S`.
�. ,t �� S �i*� `„ � a> �t, # ..}
<.�.u.i -., ,.., � ,�:.r. . �., .c:,s ,3 � '�f P �. .1 .� .„� .,, r,, , c, , .:: ��Y .;,t„
ai:�" . , � .,..s x. , �t� '�:.., s . . . �. t „ .,.. ..�.
s . E,°,`� ,.. � .t � 3 .t , , \ „ . � `� fi , ,t
`� �a .� Y. .t ��i P 1 �� � 2 �`: �4 J
,� 1, 3�.< �', u > �1rr l ��? ��� 3r
,ti� ti t, �`� ``5, �i ,�„� ��t t � ,z,`� \t.
\, ��., � �. c�, f,. �,c„a, ��� b. t.� \ .l
n �.� :�n � s �. �.� t
t �4, l l}. �. ? .}.: t
\ a t. �. t(� t a �^� .o ,-4 4`Z.� '3i,�<
4. t �l. � t�i
\ � r, . 4.. � �? .� �t. F y�:,. � ti , �_ � , .. „
� , ��. � „ r� �.. , '� tt,.;,..
\. t,. i. 4'fi t } � `j }
.t', a. 3. h �t� i ��3
�. �,,� �.� 4t ,.� `l e�., ..�,. Zt x >�.�
� 4 �.,l i r" t 2. '`u `.� t,.,,,
.ht.r .'�.., t. {� l, v'i: � l. `,S �rE
t �,r� ,i„ c� c �v .�,t
,'v. ,`i.. t, r�
S i 6 �1" t� ,tra�,", ,.3. �d s,� U z�1.
�, t.,� ur �, 2
� .�: �<,. �e: � t, > � ti
t�, .`,,.. �3 '�. .r �l.
� � 4., � ,a
t �. z � � l,� r ti
.`� ..`1 'i '.i�.t
.\. �- .2...'1. ) �� � � 'W
:�,.z.,..., .s U t.� ,\ �
�, i.,R 3 t,�.: .z rt �?,.s`\�:.ti �� <�.a» \ �"�,,,�, i`.sr..,,:}�
3. �;i .`� Z � # . :`.'��:?',.
.��ii�s� � t. .1. �3 .� '� �i�.��..�.,, t r
oa �'�.�. ,,, ��
,44. >� a= � r, .�s�:,r� ���t � � �.. i �'l �.� .<,< �,�.<��.� �iL.� '
� , } k, s �� � � t � � �5 4n � � . _ � � n. L n t
� �_ �� s� � ��Y , , � sr} � t ,, ,. � , � .���� ,3 . � e e d
� , ,
4 �t7 �x ,t `'� ;iti . s t �1 4 f h�l,.� �`l�Y �.�:4;���0,.,z`��.,�, .. 5
1. ,� �� � �1 v.,� \ 1 z`/ � � Nt �� �2��������.����c��. $,.. ^} i..�i
,}. � .�, J.�, � �4i.. .� s�� t .2.< z .?� ��z..�. �� t„
� ��.�.4 t. �. � i, R � «t z. �ttt �,`.'��i'�. .rT ,,5,
� ts«�� � 3 t � , �, � � , 9
r�, tF, �� 12 :� .r�i,,,n�ti?.�
�t s»�i t . x t.3 �, , , ,c . s, , u t r.,, 4 ;• s;,,t:,,
;#�r o.,, .�s' � ti12�.� :4 1� s�.s` `,v�,a,',�� ) ) r� .:3
,a ,; ..:��..z . t :�.1�. � am u! s� .,.'ti h,.t t c.. , i
��, t l� � .tr., �.. it,. �. � }
'` .��ro, t l. .�t '(��. t 1�� s� f ,k'
ot'' � z 7� .,� .:� ��� ,t�,;�.
�,.� �'.. �`..�, .�:� � .s�>, �� .5:.,. `� ,. t, , ,''7 S'; C. .,>, s @�` Y.s .�,,,, i,..,:
s1 �i,.�„ �, �, ,,3� � S 1 r e. t {Z t s^� 4 `� ��. s r,..a
7�f t ':�,�Mi����\, Z.v i .1�, }: l 7. �.. .te .2..
S T `�.�, f }, .{ .{� § Y.
.z a..,c x��
,rS` �,�"1r, c '�: �s .t' .� { i.
�?�J� Y..l.. v, £. . �,..,� Y. ,b:;4'.K4�'h�
�;,.� 'n". ti 4 i �. ����
�). .� ������ { ) � ����a� . ) F S. ,'�.
t� z.���,3 � , fi ,4 4. �, ,.=t,
r i. t � �. l ,Z � u �`�. '' �. s .�, �,.;
„us L .�.7 ��;. .r t �: ? h� §�t .���.,��. ^..,,k} �
„�l. t �>. i. ,t s ..5 t �,.
�. � �7
�r1 }, �s
> ,t{,,., � L,:,�
� ,., t �, r
,...s t , 5 ... t» S .�� ..�., s i': x .i ti< f�e � � � � <
,....�..�'�,� � �, �. .. .t ,s i:. . S'� .x > c'`. t i. .. .>;��.i, �. .. s <,', .:,.,,5 r . . +,„s�
.�,.. .�s r � Y ,... �l�ss .. ...r� „ ..f. t .i � r�..,,i ,c��,�, � '
.t z �. ,�.,� 3. x`d .r .�a`i7 ��1� . l\.�>.t ,�t, t�
i� `�, h4 t, t t � �,,
r � � ! € t �. �
.k..�k s t *,� �.s} t � e,. '�, 5
�. .`� �. .ri, r r.� .�.. 1 .�����
..:t..�, ,�? }.
�, ,ti:r ,� } ti 1 �`„
},, ,�5, i 1. :l ,� t. �� �
�,,.S. .r . . �= r�1 �,. .,. . �.. �� ..,. z3.� � i 4,�;:�,�.. ti. .��=�z,�� `'� ., t t „ . ..., .�f '�t..:.,'"r
�. �t � 4�S'. a ., .�i .t (.. .�,... a...�.c�..t,.�,�\ �i�,ii u..,�.�>, t,�,� ..,....., ut� ,.,:
.f� t .s, �S�< .,..�1� .:.,. G, ai.t r .ti� i.c 3..,�.�� ``���,,.,��'? \..��..,.5,}'l t.„.'�,� .�.s..
r:.r s `�. 4l, ��. s },l1:, a. £S t:t� t r ,5,.)n,,. � ,3, ��,.r ss z \ k s
s � 1 � � � � t � ����`,.t-�,t � t... �
�.. �r, � � � � � , 5..t, � � � g� �n � Pnont �.
f �� , � �r �, ,. t i�t �� �� ���
,to 1; �'1 �:r, �n�t .a � <<'w.�t«z�l�' �i,» 4iie,n:..`' ..'� ,„�
r,:, .J .( .1t4 ��,�,. y ... ....v.. C�7, ��`. ,...� ?,,.��.'c -��- s ., ,�.`, '�c. <,.�� )�`��<��,a G� " ��� � y
,.t i�`�t;� .:� , a� y,, ��4e,.f.,,�nt,, �s�3 ,t.�;.c : t ln ���,�. ��1 ti 1�t�«
�� .l�.h. y .���.<r.a�„tt,t,,�.��# £`� 't �.,�� ��.,�,,t ,t <>,�i �
.� �Z. � �. .;'i t. .3.'; �.t � Z���3�`i..., `�'�,:� e.. }a
.�i S. ��. ,as t a ��, .k���.,,,'�i \ �F a
,1<,. 4 i`s, �-�. "''�ri1, l i. & t l T`�� r `ii 1� �,. �,��� .1.
.+. t ��ti,r J. s'i;� s,{ �.,.�, f
� 1, �.:,�r� � U,
Y� �, 1 i l .��
1. \ � f
,i;i� '°2)" .. � itn,n1z . �. ,: � ".
.r l : >i1 ��tf f ��;>==r,� r�vw� �: ��.•,,., " �..� ..I ' '`��
�. Ls �Y �k"���, �zt. �,3 t .��� �.� � �,� ,�.w l, ���4'fi.;�..��...7,.���„�„?.i, v.,.
', ..s.��ul< �."�,, � .v f�. �,ta: i �} .c ti�� 1��,. ,S, � .r. t..tr, `� E..,..,,,, ��:,�t�c
,t 1 .ti � <>:a,`� �:s„ �a: t ) �r.i�,.�..,,��„\'i�.� �. .�. ��„i� t
'., �..� s, �st.,. .�r .s � `,.,�,3�: 4��..t1.1a,,
�. ,�.s ,<> t � � .r ��,t Z �..,t,
¢ z ,�� ,� ,� � � � � � ,{ Intersection
Iiu �.t�i"�� 'S�i `,+ 31 r\���tzt� .,} (. �.. .4 ��N},���,1��..� ��. �r Z. s. k �
a.,,:�.�3 s h d � �� ,'1.�� ; 2�d 3T'� �;k ✓( �>�}t5 �Sz�v 'z�. � S�.r ;'�?'�
...,t .'€. L#����t�' '��'',rs .�. >,�� ��4 y.,4�� .; s ��e� .>:�ti�i o- .,,y;<.
};t .1 s`�1��;,?� } .��r����'� t � s i�z �a�, 3 �
=',r�`� :� ,iS, -lt� u„� `{P �'e\ ''iv ��t�t i I a{5 r�,:,.. � \ i rF,.'i44 �'+
� .�£'�.t �'`�i` t�C�r t�y.,�„ �,:.tit� ..� #7 � ,1*.'`�' /
.c� 7 �t 1.�, ��,, ��,�.`�x�7�?>. '1 r... �.. �N` `V ..� ,�`$
,�i�c..`��4 `. �ss,`�� � ti z. �8a>�u'`t,
it� 1....1 f,.'i." �.�`, u ii� �3. :4 c �.,��1 ¢�yitl�4�' x;t t k �,Nt`�'k»u �.az� J� nalized
�.S:� :..�5r.a�4�„i,�,�;.;, ��`��; '�t?t. ���+.,,3t. ti.`��Sh r,�,`� ��.��sa, ,s ,.ftty'�,'..: c,'. \ g � ::-;�
n �� s� \`,
�'l ti1�;,�}��„�s 3t �;,�v����� � �, m:'�.t5�`"� \ `M'�}'��7�st �la� k.t,�
�S ��{ E.�����}� �..� ���'r` ��t t � ���t�y�{ �} �` .. .�
;,t�r 1�c� � i t>?i�.��x £.,,ei S. �n�� �i i, �^" ,;;,i, '� �` .
�„s �t,}�. :�,�. 7S�?f � :.l ,� -'� .'�.. c ��;a�, �S'�.t�'x�ti ,,,� � � ;�
..�s?. £ :�r�,., r£. �.t1 ;$3. �.'�,.,. "?�c; .s�r,� .:i .�..? �i+;',�.,, �»
� ,Y, t=„F ��� �� , ,.�. � ;, � } � � �: Priorit �:::f,
,f�,,� ���t;,, , ��ti �,��,=i, �`� ��, t �
��s 77`Ug,. .��. t1 lGt,.b t��.as�.�.., '�.,� ,eil� tL}tg, e�f:\{?���'�� 4�,x ��i ;�o� y .:;t
`Sa.�i,,..�..}t?i � �. 4`aVjY �f,'L �ti., �,t �:.`;� y�' ;i. „�'� ;`���.
� �t'�,�t;�c;�r ��,y 1� >3� �. ��. "oa� 'b s��� t'�{?� �ls�}¢��.a^� 3;%Y ,.;x�„ '�,
�� i,,t,.� .x�, it r ,,;.4:�'t,�`,� 42. � n�tt '�2�,� 'i
3.r�:.., ' �?�.h.i� t '.�if��.���� s .. 1 .3� 'S .t7 ��C, ;� Intersection
�;��s t,�.l �.ts.'�;'t�k., z£����� ��.s�'�t�,,� 217 �,` f�x. }.1?<,t.,..,c, ��.�t£� ,�'s�t „�<%�., �s�
,, ;..., .: � ,
5�:�,�5�E ��a.t> Yr �. fj r.C� ��R .z:�t� .�;� t„��.�,:, .�{{,i41� t�.t si�� s��:��. .�`'t
) .4¢t �`r .5.,��'�u,»�,��z�.t,,,>,,a, ..��4 5 .�it ?.r� �1:�,ti�i,'� �a:" :��� � �t.dy
:,
G ���? t�2� � C� �}r sri?%�� �1���'�4 ���2`�3 �2�. :. �° �` ,t��;,+ sEl.,r
����,�..,.� �,s,� . �.�721.t�S�. t �:�3:..r�{t §a t5`�'ii;�„fsi��} tt'�����k� �.�:: . ..
,\���fi.1i� �,t�.iti' s���� 1�� �3�,1' .:� � �; t��. � ,,;1}� � .�€�"'� .a� (Two-Way Stop >i}>k•i
.. .., ' `,.'�, ' �'...
��'f,;' ��}���+�ti'� t�s,�j �.- ,?��!. ,i.t;,; \�. °�ta� � ��4 ,
`rmFr{'�!jtst��.1{�;5s�tt5� 3'„ r� �? ��� r4 '���� Ci011tfO��@C� '''
a:'; �r�;�,?�i��r'1,��}�l� ? f �,���1;�� ���i` <,��.. �;� � <
���?3i7?s'ti4{} J sy�����``a�11� 1t:2�,c�n,,,s 'S,> �4;}�7rss�,i �`�i}st
� s S}7..# .lir?: }c!�)7�1'�s� ..�,r,; � :1=s������`�lJt+1,£, "k U:�.&c y ��u�
exF`,�3 }t s1.tf l'.�,.��'` �t. b' ��,�,�.'�"��,`, .c� �t£ 4i w*�,�.<
'� nut � s���,�.iFttf}!r�z?zyt�z<i,n,;�� ,�� �� ��n;1 ��� t � `�' `' .�a.
�' �� �t� rj, ,��r7t; �, ;<t „, t� � �,,,�,,���4�e �� t Priorit
�;.�U�}. �.1 ��i `h`�`�� t��. 4f .., \ �f�. ���}44}�i..,,>, ;r �1
•,�,.�.\) �r.�?i:Rjhz".,�,, �,t�i t}i �� �s it t,.,�}i s<,.� i
,�. .2,� �. ����i4,2.x, v, ,.�Z...�i. ^.����:� ;�\`s � ,�kif
.,ut,: �.l ��`�. ��`iti. t .�,r. �a��� `�� ..��,`��� i �.,,: f#,r. .i�ti,�
E 1 ..�t�� �,.. ���5,. ��,,t' w* tit t��s�;���r l t.:� t
�
i
s
,,.
��. �. >�.� 1t� ;� .\r r1 � <?
*�e:^-.�i J.. .l'z. � .,.:, �. `�„r�� .,\ .� �t �.:.a,
� � s � 1 ;� � �� h� 1� �� QE. w... .,.r;... , w;�r�v,., ww $� �,�°:t� � �,,i s.� � Se ment ;.,.�
";a..\ t t.,.�r .� 4 �J.��r, , �sit �s`� 1��:�'��t`� C�z �...�`$<'�.���Yy, .t...�,,. .. : . ,. �?�>,�,`$k'w, ��..:, e i,..d�F.F�., �.wi,,� ,. g :,�
,'`'���.��I�y'�r'�..'lm��i 4�rtl`����}i+�",>� ,��t�;��,' ?��4,,.��t��"t��ry'�,��c���`4��7�}S t��, st,..� �� ��
,���t�, z�z }.'.y�?.��?t 4�� `��;\�,� �i ����;��� } �
4s t r
�'��4t'��`i}3}�ci4S�i�s�� �'��;;a���,� � ; �,�1 ��z:�''� ,,, i��:.�li���}7�t ?''`a��}�`�� � 3: � ;w��
� � � �,� �t�;��� �ow Resource 'i�
`�l,il i ���c��. ���`���s:a,�?i 't��;�`�xth��` �}t j{ ��.�ii3 � `;..i
,,�`���} 4 ,.,,,5�r ��i}��'1�i � r;:. ��,"2s u k 2m'4 �`?%:�4..a�'`�3���.��;,„�t ;� . .
..�; Y � �i'�,s»`.� ti,�.�^`t tt:t :1�. ��4
�, ��� t�� � s t�� � , � rrs �., �„} Nei hborhood .::_;,.
.��.;.3 t�5� �.`".�a*d��titc lE crc .�z,}�r��"�"c� �?�: .�.��Sl� �: g.y i g
.�� � { .�.. � i} 11. � '�ti:;� c..y�,�,;, �Y��.�<� ;.4� � ; i�
:��`; :1 �..�41Z �.},. .4� , '�ti'.��`�ti,.�.s( `�«fi; 'l: �:'`�,«sti��.v �� `�
� rsr r �z{z t� ,s�� � .�7�, � �s � ��<�5�a�� �t,.
.s �v'34�t S r .�.�y1ur s"�a�, .uw \., ��?�. 33� f�<„ "�<St�
�� �t:�a�t 4r r�tj,.� c:.k�. �ir�tt�G 4t.E� � .�7`�����'h��'t�s�„tilatie.� 4�"
�,�'i: ..7 tS��� ... �,��,i.t . i�..'t}. `�`t,:v���`��€>�.: \�:�. �s�.,� ��.��i, ,
�\. �t t 4: r:'�t>..�' �,� �n„t,���r„r�rt s �tR 1 S� '�`14�� t ��,.. s`,;r...
t�. s`��: r{tt ,t.:..},�S f} �,.�.zT;,,,ru t,<a:; � � ``ts ;{������
�s `� ����L.��� .z�.��� §t4 ��i��;,1n.fr��„ �..4ii� �„��. �����. ��:s
,,r$ �,fk �� �, � ���k� � ���tr�;��;����,�t� ��� City of Redding ,�#.}�,;.
� � s}� <t , s; , �,� � z���������� N��
� �.t . � .t''. :,�i,<s,'y�`a a R �17�'�. � `Zi 7�.: ,S r'�omm. mmmi. i:}{;z�
� .is �s �1ttt.�t €i �`,}� �l �.�:,,»�lfr�.����U1{�: �*, �',, � � u,a
.� � ,� ..3 �f,;3.,.,,v�z,,,,a��� '�.�r� ��Ti z�.,,.�.,;,;;�\, ti Stit � :;}.�n
� .,
,,.,
�,,,, �vt,+�.hu,.v�2F t ��t��}.r ����j;Cs �c�s�lr....y5.�� .��`?�. ���s����,,> �f '�.: '�,�.; p��i City �imit �„,it,�,,..
� r t. � ���i��>.>..;`zl�'vti�t�$z ;.t�t 1��z�12� '�a�,.� ����� ��� ,,�,;�,.
, i
e
S c� I , � s,�. � � �,> , .�,r,° µ,.. ,1
r:, ti 1 � ro3 � J<,r. ,..., ., ., t a c 3�f,� i F r 1�
.... �., '�..} r i'. i.Z. r,.I�t.�� 4} ..a...'�s �� ) t,�., �, :,' t
. \ ,S ���7,5'aat3l.�� �,.�:`".�. .J 4 t3<< ,.� .y F":�",U•5:
\.li. .i�n i}�}. .1..i�: c4Jt k`� ..N.ZJl �4.� :�"+':� ,ar .�. } E
., � :.tt.�. I-..�,.��., F.�+,e�a;r^�.:u .��.t z z.,��'... �4 `t. � � , ..,, , ,.:
"�a. s s i'S,,r.�.` .t.<,� , ,..�... a Z�t t,�.��� , �. ,.., .�, k.��.. �, ..„,,; r t
t� ..t � 4tt�a�,t. .,s, :Sfii, �.'� �i��;7 �, � `�\ �i,�,� ,. .., ,.. �v ,,,., ti,«y.` 4 �t�'v't;
�.,. � S k 4f .Si�.. 4 � 7�. .2��1`,,:V j'a � �1�1..Q �
�.�4 s ..l ��s �a�� t �: ,{ �, t ,� , } ..s z Sy �r ,�:�
\� .5'' � � i sk.o<� �s ..�, \`�� Y1 mx�*, . �?�� '�v<j
���\� '�;,� k.. t �� �,.t�.� nt a, �« �� ^�... ".- . . ,.n.,' ..,� .., :,,; `t F.
� s ., i,ss3� n �,z�.w�{���r0 ,";,°, k e l3i �. � s s
.� F 't. sti4v� 1,}tS. .`s�.�`3 ti 3�t t �.: �� .�:.s i � ;ts rr�'t�..
't- l fI�� 2. >..ti ti, ��F� �.l �<� m',.;. . ��. � t
�"i, s t. n J '�,�S.ti�t .F. �. `�„z ��a'��,�'",i�s� �'o.� ti�.;*, "t,. >. t �,.� t �.<;'e
`� � 1 tS
1�t t��� \�'�;�tt �„� Y s �
I.,,.,�„ #.;�1 ,t �,�. t ��n h��a�i`�� ..���s �} �^ "�k 4�.�, �ss3 b�?i,S��s�.
�«�tf � �; � , r� 2 l,1 �
?Fu£ 1.3 .f�i�})�i'2 ) vt:t '�t)Z .:.;.c�c �,:..a£ <:�4, .1. Y
i.,; t. � x �t:s ti �;S`�t, m�.,, �;: .F t �� �:t
t � ;�. 2�2 } .�E s �5 2:.z a�2:E'�x"',��tttt�;�„�*;,�4'i3; °� ... ��: i �' y � 1. �'.
!iJ;�ii ��i�.� t3� i; �����'t�'�'�1�.ra�,"�� "� . � t t� i1�22:
s s )SS t }.:�t4.,�,�, 4�s�,x.,;is {t .��.` 7{ s ,,3
y� � ,.. �,a�;���t:�.1 t'�� � .7�. �� ,.`a;4:�e�"a, � ✓ ,� ,t t t i:�.�t :1�:-.
:)t�t f � l }t..-�F t S s.� � § xusf,,f3^��,-�' Y° '"�'�'�,:SF t �?�t .� r�rt 1..1
,,.�i�. `�U } f 4 i� r �'� �u�4.�;���zn't"s�, ,3 � �.�.f � �i t'.:i �c �,� r.. '}
i�:;,s �S�c s4s r44 ,�;�1 t ' '+ � {�rJ r�,�,�t.. ,�:, .4�,�,, �j 5 ��� s4� ��l�h`�'�� t �� ;s
t
;. ri
� � 4
3 � � y 2
,� =
t ,.. € ;°' � �
,;.��r t i i rt,r�. 1 �' ^g�u4t'�t 11��?�s� . 49 ,� r,>. , , �� t } .\ ; ��:s.
i{�;��<f�i {'�`�'.,i������ t�t i �i '� .:� .��,. ;. ,t ..,��:,z` . ' ' . � etss\ �' � y�ki� �t `��
�„� rti"��t t. {f r � t:.�c�,, i i �; ., � ,. ..:,t . .
Y'?' i At <�, � `4t3 34�4\1 � . ': , '{�� `cF. } F i t`:��'£s{}%'.:���f?�* i
� � Ct. � � � 1 1 �
�, 07 4 `i. � �'� . 's �,r ys<..,,' ' ', �� r r c l t t� 5,��3xf�''�" i
i t z � � <„ l s ��,�
��ti S�'�t+y� rca i1}titi4 y� c}31txiYt �` "�'�:v€'1&.�i:S,�n;���� r�tfjit sr'` 1�°'�i"b�
' t�. �i�:�� 4 r �t s t3�t�' " '� �� ;. ' ,'�. �' ) 4£� t't'''m�`°�' 4
�s;� t j� }� � t �� k at��t? i�� 11. ' ��twt��S"";��,; �+�,i�"
� i � a� ��'
�2t Str��"�iNis`��3f���V�Yt 1}i�!;x. ,.i ,.r t���,�v. �.� s��
��,,,� `�e „�,�;���.�....�
`�\z�a3l � t�a�➢ t r �ty '����''� c '�. �' .�
�fY�le 2���.�' r7 � � r �c td�'� PrzJ�B c'�`,�� . , �,
����� ��s 3iti i�� � tt��� tj5� � r`,1> t ���� ��eax'A'��.+,.�""�.�.ma�wv..
.'� 1t ttxd'�'��} j �.Y'A#1..
E�t\Ytqjl��i}��'i}i��, r�}1 Y'J � hJ}F Z�S,���'t lii�`��1� � �,�
��'�,}�r'4��('`'��js�lzs,��,§;ti�t�s ���,§ti, 11�j�����`���4i},�� ���3.e�-�"a�
} � � ���
;;�t<2"�'�Z��,�:�4.,��s�\��Fr"��u�)�:2� � }: r �itSi�;��3�r �z� � ^`s��' ��..
�_' \`�� t��r �S�,{�tr� 4sis� �`�"�u,.rs, f}iJ3�``��'��,�� ,.
�', �\�y ,�:J����`"i}L��-� �� �S�},.:A3'`"'�'��2..��� 4}`� ..
�t ��.� �+ °�L�*a � � "�i„`�,
t
ls� � � 4
; ,� t 3 ..<., t
�
„ r� � �.v.
x, � t.,: " y "h
, s
'��i�� �,Y' ��'�,� . .. �,w`¢ �'� .
�: �r � ,
. .tv. h. � �- ��� �a
,y� �r �,s; 't��'; s�
.. "� ��`"��'� �:
s,���s ..,", .,, �.w .0 .��.y .
$�:. � <
� t CITY OF � �� ����
� � �� �� �
� ����
76 0398 R E D D 1 N G ��
� k ��
� 4
, ,k,.. ,,.., �
N} „''*l,. �,1,. ,,� , . '�. ., i..
�����2����i�� 4. � } �
��,�! �35 � 039E °
,
� ���u�'�e,i,,,�I r
237. ;;�260 �
;:
� � ,
; �...
�.,. ��
�'�������.,� 291� �� �
�77 305 � "" �� ,
v � � �
• �� � �, ;�
'���„ �` �tt. ;
�� � 039E � ,.. � ���
4; ', 11'4A� s." ,ra �� �
��
� 3 341 <` � 115 130 � � ,� �� ti
�. <
.., ,t ��...,
<..,. � �..x �� .
h�. .<�„��, k. ��,, 1r14B ''' �.,w� ;.:.� ,.vM �� ;
$` :A� �;
� k
�� �� x
}f t�� 1408 3���1248 �, 373 ��� 378 � �� �?� � ",
< � �
{
� s� � �., � � � ��� 1228 210,,� , r.,.,t ;�� �
�' ,
, , �� 1'22D � ,... .��..��
� ����}�fl�� 37'I 133 ��„..� �
.
� ���'����s�� � ��
s.� �,
;, ��� �i` ,�� � �: ���a��s���€�'"�
�����,��
�?' : c.�g k } �,„v S . r
� ... � �T�
t
y S �
(���`'�` ���� �` .. s
�,.:.:
i� � �n��4 �,`�,� 171
�� � � ��,v����a�� r �:: t044D � � �, ��
�z'a��w�, t � ����
$ � P � � �
�t. �}����� a �`'
����4S ti�� \�:
tl��t� t.,.
��1�t�
�: ��tif����`'�� �;' � Y
� � ���s ��a
�,� ���� s, & �
� ,
;
�,� � �
� �N
x � �,��� �,����� �: ��; `��? �x� � �
�
�����h� �
�� �, � -�„ > t��� ,,� 's ����
� �, :,. m.r, �, �< � , �
3
t�.,.
�,� � �
a�. ;� �. �,, t
���^� ��� � ��� i �
� �� �.
i: b �� 1t':'`� . ����. ,,._� '.:.� � ..... .�� Y�} � S �
Intx_ID NS_Road EW_Road � {��
�`4 S �1
„ �� i t4if # r
�� S� I
t
t£S��„k t �� �.
35 Market St Riverside Dr ���t ��r�t��{ ,
49 Mountain Lakes Blvd Beltline Rd ; ��„�f tE��r r's's
�«:��.
�;���tt�{fl°1�����4��', � 3
76 Deita St Santa Fe Ave 1� n1;�`�
�{�1 i��r�'�'rv?`''Ov��y��Y� ,, i
77 Buenaventura Blvd Lakeside Dr �; ��r,z������ �.
115 Hilltop Dr EGypress Ave ����`��Y��i� ���� � � � ,
� r}s ���
130 Churn Creek Rd E Cypress Ave � � ����,����,`�t ,�,'
� x � � � ��� �
{�,�i�^,1l 1 F t�s
133 ChumCreekRd HartnellAve `,� �����;�}�s;k,F�` t���t� `� ` � � f
� .s �� t�t� � t f�
� r,
171 Airpor�Rd Pteserve Blvd : �;� ����„sri��; � ���,���� � .��,a���,�, �"` �
, + '
t.�s.�,��k.�,,,, �
210 Victor Ave Hartnell Ave SEGMENT_ID 3TREET FROM TO
237 Old Eureka Way Walnut Ave 039B HILLTOP DR N/O HILLTOP DR ST THOMAS PKWY
260 Butte St Continental St 039E HILLTOP DR N/O BROWNING ST MARAGLIA ST
291 Placer St Railroad Ave 044D CHURN CREEK RD PRESIDIO ST DANA DR � �
305 South St California St 114A W CYPRESS AVE MARKET ST PARK MARINA DR ' �� ;� �
K�
341 E Gypress Ave Bechelli Ln 114B E CYPRESS AVE PARK MARINA DR CHURN CRF�K RD � � �
370 Hartnell Ave Shotw ick Trl 122B HARTNELL AVE NORTHWOODS WAY KENCO AVE � {
����"�������;����1� ,�r
371 Hartnell Ave Bechelli Ln 122D HARTNELL AVE GOODWATERAVE AIRPORT RD ��� �
,i 3, s i r, ��t
373 Hartnell Ave Northw oods Way 124B BECHELLI LN E CYPRESS AV E t�UO 3RD ST 't �''�; r� �,����
378 Hartnell Ave Middleton Ln 140B RAILROADAVE SOUTH ST BUENAVFSITURA BLVD ��k�� � �t�,���
�- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - � '} t��
�
�
�����������������������,1tioti��������������������������������o��������������������������������������������������������������ti�ti��������������������������������������������������ti�««««««�������������������������������������������������������������ti�����������������������������������������������������������,�������o����������������������������������������������������������o�ti���������1tioti���������������������o�ti������������������������o�ti������������������ti�«������««���
Paper Size nNsi e CITY OF REDDING Project No. 11215289
0 o.s o.s o.s t.2 N LOCAL ROAD SAFETY PLAN LRSP Revision No. -
���`����'��� LOW RESOURCE NEIGHB�RH�ODS �ate o5�o5Ezoz�
Miles � i'�; � ` � �.
�apP�o;a��on:�,a��ato�A�x���a�yspna�a ��������� AND PRIORITY LOCATIONS
Ho��zon�ai oatum:w�s�ssa IN REDDING
Grid:WGS 1984 Web MercatorAuxiliary Sphere ��/'►�p� ��
V R
N�.W515an Luis ObispolProjects15 61111 2 1 5 2 8 91GI51MapslWorkingl�isadvantaged �ate somce�.5tatewide Integreted Treffic Recards System(SWITRS)2015-2019,Somces'.Esri,HERE,Garmin,Intermap,increment P Corp.,GEBCO,USGS,FAO,NPS,NRCAN,GeoBase,IGN,KadesterNL,
Cammunitie5mxd Ordnance Survey,Esri,lapan,METI,Esri China(Hong Kong),(e)OpenSheetMap canMbutors,and the GIS User Community,Created by:edarke
Prm�aa�a:oa a�zoz�-os;o�
t}�b�
� .9 � ,�#4�\
. "� ,ia,sx �
The City of Redding plans to send the Local Road Safety Plan to City Council on February 15, 2022. This
safety plan will be a living document and will guide the City's roadway safety needs for the next five years.
It will be updated as needed and the goals will be monitored.
Draft Qacument—Far Discussion Oniy—FinaE Version May Ctiffer Fram Ctraft
GHD� Redding�ocal Road Safety Plan� Page 47
t}��
45�
. � {t�S2�
. ..'...,�....r5,r.���. . .
Recent/Upcoming Projects
• "Shasta County Projects", Caltrans, District 2.
• "Oasis Road Specific Plan: Final Master Environmental Impact Report", RBF Consulting, April 2006.
• "Administrative Draft EIR: Traffic Impact Analysis", City of Redding, Oasis Specific Plan. Kimley-
Horn and Associates, Inc., June 2005.
• "Girvan Road Railroad Crossing Improvements and South Redding Bikeway and Pedestrian Trail
Project", Dokken Engineering, November 2020.
• "West Street Area School Safety Improvement Project", City of Redding, Public Works Department,
May 2020.
• "Trinity Street Bikeway Project", City of Redding, Public Works Department, November 2020.
• "Shasta Street R.R. Crossing Improvements Project", City of Redding, Public Works Department,
June 2020.
• "Systemic Protected Left Turn Project", Application Form for Highway Safety Improvement Program
(HSIP)Cycle 10. City of Redding, Public Works Department, October 2020.
• "Systemic Intersection Safety �ighting Project", Application Form for Highway Safety Improvement
Program (HSIP) Cycle 10. City of Redding, Public Works Department, October 2020.
• "Systemic Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements", Application Form for Cycle 9 Highway Safety
Improvement Program (HSIP}. City of Redding, Public Works Department, August 2018.
• "Airport Road Improvement Project", City of Redding, Public Works Department, April 2019.
• "Bechelli �ane & Loma Vista Active Transportation Corridor Improvements", Active Transportation
Program (ATP) Cycle 3 Application Form. City of Redding, Public Works Department, June 2016.
• "Hartnell Avenue Safety Improvement Project", City of Redding, Public Works Department, March
2020.
• "Diestelhorst to Downtown Non-Motorized Improvement Project", City of Redding, Public Works
Department, June 2020.
• "Placer Street Improvements (ATP)", City of Redding, Public Works Department, May 2016.
• "Quartz Hill Road Improvements", City of Redding, Public Works Department, January 2018.
• "Churn Creek Rd & Maraglia St Safety Improvements Project", City of Redding, Public Works
Department, September 2020.
• "California Street Bikeway", Active Transportation Program (ATP) Cycle 5 Application Form. City of
Redding, Public Works Department, December 2018.
• "Turtle Bay to Downtown Gap Completion Project", Active Transportation Program (ATP) Cycle 5
Application Form. City of Redding, Public Works Department, July 2020.
• "Victor Ave & E Cypress Ave Active Transportation Project", Active Transportation Program (ATP}
Cycle 5 Application Form. City of Redding, Public Works Department, July 2020.
Draft Qacument—Far Discussion Qniy—F4na4 Versian May Differ Fram Draft
GHD� Redding�ocal Road Safety Plan� Page 48
• Shasta Regional Transportation Agency, "SR-273 Multimodal Corridor Plan",
https://www.srta.ca.gov/353/SR-273-Multimodal-Corridor-Plan
Traffic Data
• City of Redding Collision Data, Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System, 2015-2019.
• City of Redding Collision Data, Transportation Injury Mapping System, 2015-2019.
• "2018 Crash Data on California State Highways", Caltrans, October 2020.
Manuals/Articles
• "Developing Safety Plans, A Manual for Local Rural Road Owners", Federal Highway
Administration, March 2012, http://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/local_rural/training/fhwasa12017/.
• 2020-2024 California's Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP), "California Safe Roads: 2020-2024
Strategic Highway Safety Plan", Caltrans.
• "�ocal Roadway Safety, A Manual for California's �ocal Road Owners; Caltrans, Version 1.5, April
2020
• "Highway Safety Manual", American Association of State Highway Officials (AASHTO), 1St Edition,
2014 supplement.
• "California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD)", Revision 5, 2014.
• "Designing for All Ages &Abilities: Contextual Guidance for High-Comfort Bicycle Facilities",
National Association of City Transportation Officials (NACTO), December 2017.
• Geller, Rodger. "Four Types of Cyclists", Portland Office of Transportation, 2009.
• "2000-2020 Generai Plan", City of Redding, Public Works Department, October 2000,
https://www.cityofredding.org/home/showpublisheddocument?id=5513.
• "California Statewide Collision Overview", Caltrans, https://dot.ca.gov/-/media/dot-
media/programs/safety-programs/documents/shsp/shsp-ca-datafactsheets_a 11 y.pdf.
• "�ocal and Rural Road Safety Briefing Sheets: Local Road Safety Plans," Federal Highway
Administration, November 2014.
• "Systemic Safety Project Selection Tool," Federal Highway Administration, 2013.
Websites
• California Department of Transportation, "Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP)",
https://dot.ca.gov/programs/safety-programs/shsp.
• California Department of Transportation, "Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)and Systemic Safety
Analysis Report Program (SSARP)", https://dot.ca.gov/programs/local-assistance/fed-and-state-
programs/highway-safety-improvement-program/local-roadway-safety-plans.
• California Department of Transportation, "HSIP Cycle 10", https://dot.ca.gov/programs/local-
assistance/fed-and-state-programs/highway-safety-improvement-program/apply-now.
Qraft Qacument—Far piscussion Qniy—FinaE Versian May DEffer Fram Cirafk
GHD� Redding�ocal Road Safety Plan� Page 49
• City of Redding Local Road Safety Plan, https://Irsp.mysocialpinpoint.com/redding.
• City of Redding, "Traffic Calming",
https://www.cityofredding.org/home/showpublisheddocument/24813/637438934889970000.
• National Association of City Transportation Officials, "Urban Street Design Guide",
https://nacto.org/publication/urban-street-design-guide/intersection-design-elements/traffic-
signals/leading-pedestrian-interval/.
Surveys
• Local Road Safety Plan Project Survey, https://Irsp.mysocialpinpoint.com/redding.
Draft Qacument—Far Discussion Oniy—FinaE Version May Ctiffer Fram Ctraft
GHD� Redding�ocal Road Safety Plan� Page 50
���������,*
���"�� � ,�
��������������
� � �
� � �� �
� � � �� �
� �� ��� �
� � ���
� ', � � . �
� �
� ��• � � � : � � « �
�� � � � � � � �-
� � �
� � � � � �
n � � � ♦ �
m a «
� � � • �
Zi i ��i
� a
�� � � � � �
� � L� !�
GHD�Redding Local Road Safety Plan�Page 51
COLLISIONS BY YEAR
By Severity
■Praperty C3a�ri��a Jrrly ■��tal �wu�usr��njur� _�Bnjury�CC:�lI7�r'4!i�ak�I�) ��n]4ary{�r�m�I�inE a4 P�in,l
�#��
'��� ', s „ ,,, ".
r^ ' �
��
, ; .� .�� : e:
��
�
� v
„ ,, , ;� . ,,.,
, . . , : :�,....,.
, .. .,. ,.,;., , ,. , ""§
,.. :,.„�., ;,
... . .,,.....:�
„
......T "> .:,.i..,,...; ..,�...�
.._.� ....._�J
...�
�C�1'a 2Q 16 2Q 17 �C�13 2�19
By Coilision Type
■!�€���Qn �5i�4�swi��e ■Re�rEnd �Bro���i�9p �Ffit-f�kaje�P �C7verturn�d ■f�ther�'Na3S#�te€3
°_13 `I$
`—'V2 _�
11
2Q1� Zd1�r ZQ17 2Q1� 2Q19
Collisions at Selected Intersections
� ,a�„
": , >
!
r;
gi
� . e � . � e
a . . a .e � � A .a
1 Lake Blvd Oasis F2d '< 1 1 ' 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 '- 19 2 4
2 Oasis Rd Vigil Ct 1 1 1 6 1 1
3 Oasis Rd Beltline Rd 1 ' 1 1 6 1 1
4 Oasis Rd Daut Rd 1 1 1 30 1 1
5 Oasis Rd Oak L.eaf Ln 1 1 9 30 1 1
6 Oasis Rd Sandstone Dr 1 1 1 1 0 1
7 Oas�s Rd Twin View Blvd 2 3 ` 1 1 4 5' 1 3 2 1 41 5 6
8 Oasis Rd Oid Oregon Trl 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 ' 24 3 4
9 Oid Oregon Tr1 Paso Robles Ave 1 1 2 1 ,1 17 2 2
1 D Oid Oregan Trl Frontier Rd 1 1 1 ' 30 1 1
11 ��ke Blvd 1Nilrni�gton Way 1 1 1 1 6 1 1
12 Lake Bivd Keswick Dam Rd 1 3 ' 3 1 5 1 1 '1 2 3 32 4 7
13 Lake Hlud Magnums Way 1 1 1 30 1 1
1d Lake 61vd Santa Rosa Way 1 1 1 1 1' 1 1 17 2 2
15 L.ake Blud Tamarack Dr 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 33 3 3
16 Lake Blud St Nicholas Ave '2 2 3 ' 1 1'+ 1 '1 1 1 ' 34 4 4
17 L.ake Blud St Mark St 1 1 1 1 0 1
18 Lake Blvd Ciay St 1 3 '1 3 - 1 2 1 29 4 4
19 I�ake Blud North t�oint Dr 1 9 3 S 1 "1 3 ' 1 ' 1 2 '1 1 59 5 5
20 Lake 81vd Masonic Ave 1 6 1 1 3 3 1 2 3 2 1 2 48 7 8
21 L ake Blud N Market St 2 2 4 1 3 4 - 2 2 2 2 38 4 8
22 Lake Blud Hilltop Dr 1 2 4 1 1 l3 2 1 1 1 1 2 3 1 ': 77 7 8
23 Lake Blvd �ricksan Way 2 1 1 1 1 7 22 2 2
24 Lake Blud Black Marble Way 2 3 ' 1 5 1 1 1 2 2 ' 41 5 6
25 Lake Blvd Churn Creek Rd 1 1 1 1 0 1
26 Twin View Blvd ' Oasis Ct 1 1 1 6 1 1
27 7win View Blud i Ca#erpillar Rtl '1 1 2 2 12 1 2
2$ Twin View Blvd , Midway dr 1 '1 1 6 1 1
29 7win Uiew Bl�tl ' N Market St 1 2 - 3 1 2 23 3 3
30 North Po�nt Dr Redwood Blvtl 1 1 1 1 0 1
31 N Market St Caterpillar Rd 9 1 1 1 1 1 12 1 2
32 N Market 5t Benton Dr 2 2 ' 4 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 '' 38 4 8
33 N Market St Arboretum'br 1 1 '1 6 1 1
34 N Market St Quartz Hill'Rd 2 " 2 1 1 12 2 2
35 MarketSt R�versideDr `1 1 1 1 1 1 1 s1 1 -1 551 2 3
3fi Market'St Trinity St 1 '2 1 1 3 2 1' 1 1 2 1 ': 59 4 5
37 MarkefSt EurekaWay 2 2 1 2 '3 1 14 2 4
38 MarkefSt ShastaSt 1 3 1 2 1 1 3 14 1 4
39 MarketiSt Tehama St 1 1 4 1 1 4 3 2 1 21 2 6
4D Market'St Placer St 1 : 1 1 6 1 1
4i Market5t South St i 2 2 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 1 35 4 5
.i2 MarkeYSt Lincoln St'I 1 1 1 1 0 1
43 S Market St Califomia St 1 ' 2 1 1 1 1 2 -1 8 1 3
4 ��iui,ii,7i.'i'i,,�i f I
�� �,�' t
�� 1 �1',
•
' , p � . ' «
. o � m o ..e � � � a m m m �
A4 S Markef St Fell St 1 '; 1 - 1 6 1 1
45 5 Market St Grange St 1 1 1 6 1 1
46 S Market St Sufter Sc ' 1 1 1 1 0 1
d7 S Market St Wyndharn Ln 1 1 ' 1 1 1" 1 1 17 2 2
4� S Market St S Bonnyview Rd 3 1 1 1 1 2 3 0 3
49 Mauntain�akes 81vd Beltiine Rd' 1 1 1 544 1 1
50 Mountain Lakes Bivd Charles Dr 1 1 1 1 11 1 1
51 White aiuer br �eltiine Rd 1 1 1 1 0 1
52 Wfiite River Dr Jaxorr Way 1 1 1 1 0 1
53 Wright'Dr Mountain Shadows Biud '1 1 1 1 11 1 1
54 Mountain Shadows Blud Aitler St i 1 1 1 ' 1 0 1
5� Midway br Ridge Rd 1 1 1 1 0 1
56 Boulde7 Creek Dr��� Bo�itler Ceeek Ct 1 1 1 1 0 1
57 Black Marble Way Bouitler dr 2 1 1 1 1 2 0 2
5$ Boulder Dr Rhyonite Dr 1 1 1 1 0 1
59 Redwaod Blvd But#ernut Ln 1 1 2 1 -1 12 1 2
60 Ridgewood Rd Rugby Hill Dr 1 1 1 1 0 1
�ii Collyer br Hawley Rd: 1 1 1 6 1 1
62 Collyer Dr Ridgewaod Rd 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 1 2
63 Country�ak Dr Mica Ct 1 1 ' 1 1 0 1
6d College View Dr Cfiurn Creek Rtl 1 1 1 1 2 3 18 2 3
65 College View Dr ' Tidrnore Ln 1 1 1 11 1 1
66 College View Dr ' Shesta Uiew Dr 1 3 '1 3 1 1 1 '1 9 1 4
67 Quartz;Hill Rd Riuer Ritlge Dr 1 �� 1 1 �� 1 2 7 1 2
68 Quartz'Hill Rd Mount Bonnington Dr 1 ' 1 1 6 1 1
69 Quartz;Hifl Rtl Snow Ln 1 1 7 11 1 1
20 Quartz"Hill Rtl Benton Dr i 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ': 9 1 4
71 Quartz'�Hil1 Rd ttio I�r 1 �� 1 1 1 0 1
72 Snow Ln Lake Redding Dr 1 1 1 3 0 1
73 Benton Dr Delta St ' 1 1 1 1 0 1
74 Bentan Dr Barbara Rd 1 1 1 1 0 1
75 Benton Dr Loma St 1 1 2 2 7 1 2
]6 Delia St Santa Fe flve 1 1 1 544 1 1
Z7 Buenauentura Blvtl +Lakeside Dr 1 1 1 1 1 1 550 2 2
"78 Buenaventura Blvd Westgate Dr 1 ' 1 1 6 1 1
79 Buenaventura Bfvd Placer St 1 2 1 2 1 ;1 1 8 1 3
$0 Buenaventura Blvd Tetnn Dr 1 1 1 '` 1 0 1
81 Buenaventura Blvtl Summit Dr 1 1 ' 1 1 2 17 2 2
82 Buenaventura Bivii Railroad Aue 1 2 1 2 - 1 1 2 1 3 1 24 3 4
83 N Court St Middle Creek Rd 1 1 1 30 1 1
84 N Court St 11th St 1 1 1 1 1 '1 7 1 2
�5 Coud St Euerka Way 2 1 3 1 2 13 2 3
86 Coutt St Shasta St 3 2 2 6 1 1 1 = 2 3 2 47 5 7
87 Court St 7ehama St 3 2 3 1 5 ' 2 2 2 1 4 1 48 5 8
88 Caurt St t3utte Si ' 2 2 2 2 0 2
4 ��iui,ii,7i.'i'i,,�i f I
�� �,�' t
�� 1 �1',
•
' , p � . ' «
. o � m o ..e � � � a m m m �
89 Coutt St Yuba St f s 1 ; 1 1 ; 1 - 1 ' 2 , 7 1 2
90 Court 5# Placer St 1 72 6 ' 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 3 1 3 1 1 88 9 9
91 Caurt St Sacramen#o�t 2 ' 1 3 >2 1 13 2 3
92 Court St South St 1 ' 2 1 2 ' 1 1 1 8 1 3
93 Court Si Gold 5t 2 2 ' 1 1 4 3 1 1 ' 35 4 5
94 Court St Terrace St' 1 1 1 3 I' 3 18 2 3
95 Caurt St Sonoma St 1 1 1 1 6 1 1
96 Court St Schley Aue '1 1 1 1 1 1 12 1 2
9i Coutt St Rosealine A�e 1 1 1 1 ` 1' 1 1 7 1 2
98 Hilltop Dr Ridgecrest'Trl 1 1 1 6 1 1
99 Hilltop Dr Peppertree�n 2 1 1 r1 '1 2 0 2
100 Hilltop Dr Ntercedes Ln 1 1 1 6 1 1
101 H'rlltnp Dr St ThomesiPkwy 1 2 1 2 1 1 71 13 1 3
1b2 HilltopC7r Santlpoint[7r 1 1 1 1 0 1
103 H11top Dr Palisades Ave 2 2 3 5 2 1 4 2 37 4 7
104 Hilftop Dr I-5 1 1 1 6 1 1
105 Hilltop Dr Browning St 1 4 5 ' 4 1 8 3 1 1 ' 1 2 3 >2 4 2 3 108 10 14
106 HPlltop Dr Rockaway Dr 1 1 2 I' 1 1 7 1 2
107 Hifltap Dr E Palisades,4ve 1 1 1 6 1 1
108 Hilltop Dr b�na Dr i 1 1 1 5 1 3 3 1 1 2 1 1 4 ' S2 3 8
109 Hilltop Dr Presidio St s`1 2 1 1 3 1 2 1 24 3 4
110 N'rlftop br Mistietoe l.n 1 1 1 1 0 1
111 Hilltop Dr Rzaiea Ave 1 1 1 ' 11 1 1
112 H"rlltop Dr Industrial St 1 5 ' 1 2 2 ' 1 1 1 3 2 60 6 6
113 HiII[op Dr Comrnerce St 1 ' -1 1 6 1 1
114 Hilftop Dr Grove St i 1 4 1 1 2 3 '' 1 1 2 2 36 5 6
115 Hilltop Dr E Cypress A�e 6 9 7 2 3 11 3 - 3 1 4 4 3 =6 5 ' 127 15 22
116 HilRop Dr Ntaraglia St 1 1 1 1 0 1
117 Churn Creek Rd Golden Gate Tri 1 1 1 11 1 1
118 Churn Greek Rd Palacio br 1 1 1 7 30 1 1
119 Churn Creek Rd ' Bodenhamer Blud 1 1 2 4 2 2 53 4 4
120 Chum Creek Rd ' Whistling Dr 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 29 3 4
121 Churn Greek Rd ' Browning St 2 1 ' 1 1 3 2 >2 29 3 4
122 Churn Creek Rd : Lancers Ln 1 1 2 ' 1 1 41 2 2
123 Churn Greek Rtl Old Alturas Rd 1 3 3 1 4 2 2 1 3 2 1 ` 81 7 7
124 Churn Creek Rd ' Dana Dr ' '5 7 � 2 3 4 8 ' 1 ' 1 3 4 6 5 ': 104 12 19
125 Churn Creek Rd Presidio St 4 2 1 2 2 ' 1' 1 1'+ 2 1 1 1 1 26 4 6
126 Churn Creek Rd Mistletoe Ln 1 5 7 2 2 2 4 1 3 '2 3 43 6 8
127 Churn Greek Rtl Indusirial St 2 1 1 1 1 ' 2 0 2
128 Churn Creek Rd ' Merchant St '1 5 ; 2 1 5 2 ' 1 1 1 2 1 3 43 6 8
129 Churn Creek Rd Wali St 4 1 1 -2 2 3 1 1 25 4 5
130 Churn Creek Rd E Cypress Ave 8 12 9 3 2 6 12 2 2 1 1 1 6 ;8 7 5 3 169 20 29
131 Churn Greek Rd Marag(ia St 1 2 ' 2 1 1 ' 3 23 3 3
132 Churn Creek Rd ' Parsons Dr 2 2 - 1 1 1 1 1 1 ' 1 2 2 35 4 5
133 �hurn Creek Rd ' Hartnell Ave 2 3 15 12 1 2 21 4 r 1 2 1 2 1 8 5 5 9 5 1223 20 32
4 ��iui,ii,7i.'i'i,,�i f I
�� �,�' t
�� 1 �1',
•
' , p � . ' «
. o � m o ..e � � � a m m m �
134 Churn Greek Rd i Bond S# f s 1 ` 1 1 "1 -; I; 1 ,; 1 ' 7 1 2
13� Churn Creek Rd Le Brun L n; 1 ' 2 1 2 ' 2 1 8 1 3
136 Churn Creek Rd ' Del Sal Pl 2 1 2 1 1 1 = 2 1 23 2 3
137 Charn�reek Ftd ��� Shirley Lrt'� 1 1 ���1 1 �1 1 ���� 12 1 2
138 Churn Creek Rd ; Camino CY���� 1 �: 1 �1 �� 1 1 1 7 1 2
139 Churn Creek Rd Echo Rd 4 2 1 1 1 2 -1 4 0 4
140 Churn Greek Rd Harpole Rd 2 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 13 2 3
141 Churn Creek Ftd ' be Molf br 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 1 2
142 Churn Greek Rd Loma Vista Dr 3" 2 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 ' 20 3 5
9d3 Chum Creek Rtl benton Way 1 1 ' 1 1 11 1 1
144 Churn Creek Rd A�izona St- 1 : 1 1 6 1 1
145 Churn Creek Rd Hillmonte Dr 1 1 1 1 0 1
146 Churn Creek Rd ' S Bonnyview Rd 1 4 5 1 3 4 2 1 1 3 4 1 1 ': 59 5 10
1d7 Churn Creek Ftd liartmey Ln 1 1 1 1 0 1
148 Churn Creek Rd ' Victor Ave 1 1 ` 1 3 2 1 ' 37 2 3
149 Churn Creek Rd Ranchea Rd 1 1 3 1 1 2 1 1 1 3 20 2 5
150 Shasta View Dr ' Palacio Dr 11 1 '1 11 1 1
151 Sha$ta'Uiew Dr Inspiration PI 3 3 1 31 1 3 0 3
152 ShastalView Dr ' Old Alturas Rci 5 2 ' 3 3 2 4 1' 4 1 3 1 1 ': 70 7 10
153 Sfiasta Uiew br Atrium Way `1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 23 3 3
15�1 Shasta��Uiew Dr �king Way 1 ���� 1 � 1 6 1 1
155 Shasta View br Goodwater Rve 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 13 2 3
155 Shasta View Dr I Kerry Ave ' 2 2 1 1 2 0 2
157 Shasta Uiew br Christian Ave 1 1 ' 2 1 1 17 2 2
158 Shasta uiew Dr Wilson Ave 1 3 2 2 ; 1 1 1 1 48 4 4
139 Shasta Uiew Dr ' Hawn Ave 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 37 2 3
960 Shasta View Dr Fiartnell Ave 1 1 4 1 2 2 2 3 1 21 2 6
161 5hasta V�ew Dr �: Alden Aue� 1 �� 1 ���1 1 ��1 1 ���� 7 1 2
1fi2 Shasta View Dr Leonard St 1 2 1 < 2 2 1 13 1 3
163 Shasta'Uiew Dr 5eturn Skwy 1 1 1 1 0 1
164 Shasta�View Dr Gaiaxy Way 1 ': 1 � 1 6 1 1
165 Shasta View Dr Western Oak C7r 9 1 1 1 11 1 1
'166 Shasta Uiew Dr Rancho Rd' 1 3 2 2 2 1 1 9 1 4
1fi7 did Oregon Trl Viking Way 1 1 1 1 11 1 1
168 did Oregon Trl Oid 44 Dr 1 1 1 1 1 1 : 12 1 2
169 Old Oregon 7rl Airport Rd.' 1 2 3 1 2 23 3 3
170 Oid Oregon Trl Raneho Rd 1 1 1 11 1 1
1T1 Airpod'Rd Preserve Bivd '1 9 1 1 2 2 1 2 1 1 562 3 4
172 Airpott;Rd Ranctro Rd 1 1 1 2 ' 31 1 2
1�3 AirpdrtRtl �IecfraWay 1 1 1 1 '1 1 12 1 2
174 pirport Rd Knighton Rd 3 ' 1 1 2 ' 1 1 1 1 1 19 3 4
175 Airport Rd Meadow View br '1 2 1 2 ' 1 12 1 23 3 3
176 Airport<Rd Fg Tree Ln 1 ��� 2 1 1 :� 1 1 �1 1 8 1 3
177 AirportRd Marvei Ln 1 1 1 30 1 1
17S Airport Rd Skyway St 1 1 1 1 0 1
4 ��iui,ii,7i.'i'i,,�i f I
�� �,�' t
�� 1 �1',
•
' , p � . ' «
. o � m o ..e � � � a m m m �
179 Airpatt;Rd ; �; Lassen Uiew Ln 1 ; 1 ` ' 1 ': 6 1 1
18tl Airport Rd Terry in 1 1 1 1 30 1 1
1$1 YOIIa Bolly Tri Chaos Waik 1 1 1 1 0 1
182 Fountain Cir Olympic St' 1 1 1 1 0 1
'[83 Fauntain Cir Richfand Way 1 '1 1 11 1 1
184 Whis#lirtg t7r Springer dr 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 1 2
185 eobwhite Wey Grouse Dr 1 1 1 1 0 1
186 Browning 5t Mi$sion de Oro Dr 1 1 1" 1 6 1 1
187 Browning St Canby Rd' 4 2 1 1 3 1 4 0 4
188 Brc�wn�ng St Lancers Ln 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 13 1 3
189 Browning St Friendly Rd 2 - 1 3 ' 1 1 '1 13 2 3
190 Browning St Old Alturas Rd 1 1 1 1 0 1
191 Oid Alturas Rd Canby Rd i 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 18 3 3
192 O(d AlEuras Rd Friendly Rd 1 �1 1 1 1 1 ���� 41 2 2
193 OId Alturas Rd Bradford Way 1 5 2 ' 1 7 4 1 >2 1 97 8 8
194 Oid Alturas Rd Victor A�e 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 23 3 3
195 O@ Alturas Rd Arroyo Manor Dr 1 1 1 0 1
196 Old Alturas Rd ' L.ema Rd ' 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 18 2 3
197 Oid Alturas Rtl Modoc Ln 1 1' 1 11 1 1
198 bana br Mt Shasta Mall 2 2 1 1 1 1 3 1 14 2 4
199 Dana Dr Friendly Rd 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 37 2 3
20tl Da�a Dr Bradford Way 2 1 1 1 9 2 0 2
201 Dana Dr Victor Ave 1 '' 1 1 6 1 1
202 Victor A�e Vicior AWe 1 ' 1 1 6 1 1
203 Uictor Ave Aspin Aue' 2 3 5 1 1 1 1 1 15 2 5
204 Victor Ave 5R 44 WB Ramps 1 1 1 6 1 1
205 Victor Aue SR 44 EB Ramp� 1 9 1 1 0 1
206 VictorAve MistletaeLn 3 ' 5 1 4 2 2 1 2 11 2 23 3 8
207 Vic[or Ave �erby Ln ' 1 1 1 11 1 1
208 Victor Ave Cascade Ln 1 1 2 1 1 7 1 2
209 Vicior Ave E Cypress Ave 3 2 ' 2 6 1 3 2 2 47 5 7
210 Victor Aue Wartnell Ave 1 <6 8 ' 7 4 1 10 5 ' 2 2 2; 5 3 6 '4 4 " 151 15 22
211 Victar Ave Bramble PIl 3 '1 1 1 1 1 1 s 3 0 3
212 Uictor Ave Mariene Ave 1 1 1 1 7 1 31 1 2
213 Uictor Ave Uega St 1 1 1 11 1 1
214 Victor Ave Galaxy Way 1 '1 1 4 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 2 3 51 3 7
215 Victor Aue EI Vista St' 1 1 1 1 0 1
2'16 Victor Ave Aita Saga br 1 1 1 6 1 1
217 Sierra Vi�ta Dr Hallrnark Dr 1 1 � 1 1 0 1
218 Sunset Dr Retl Bud Dr 1 1 1" 1 11 1 1
219 Royal Oaks Dr Scenic Dr 1 1 1 ' 1 0 1
220 O�erhill Dr Pioneer br' 1 1 1 1 0 1
221 Eureka Way Overhilf Dr' 1 1 1 1 1 1 ' 7 1 2
232 Euerka Way Wfiiskeytown Ct 1 1 1 6 1 1
223 Eureka Way Aimond Aue 1 1 1 6 1 1
4 ��iui,ii,7i.'i'i,,�i f I
�� �,�' t
�� 1 �1',
•
' , p � . ' «
. o � m o ..e � � � a m m m �
224 Eureka Way Walnut Ave ' 1 ; ` 1 - 1 ': 6 1 1
225 �ureka Way Orange Aue 1 1 1 1 1 0 1
226 Eurek�Way Rose Aue 1 1 1 1 1 1 12 1 2
227 Eureka Way West St ' 1 1 1 1 0 1
228 Eureka Way California St 3 1 1 1 1 2 1 18 3 3
229 Eureka Way �ine St �� 3 3 1 1 ���1 3 0 3
230 Eureka Way Continen[al St 1 3 2 2 1 1 2 9 1 4
231 West St 10th St 1 1 1 6 1 1
232 West St 11th St 3 2 ' 2 1 1 1 4 2 2 1 45 5 5
233 Trinity St Center St ' 1 1 1 1 0 1
234 Trinity�t Pine 5t 2 �1 1 � 1 �1 2 0 2
235 Foothiil Blud iLes Animas Dr 1 1 1 1 0 1
236 Monte Beilo Dr Las Animas Dr 1 1 1 1 0 1
237 Oid Euteka Way ; Walnut Ave 1 1 1 1 1 1 545 1 2
238 Monte Belicr Dr Manzanita'Hills Ave 1 1 1 1 0 1
239 North St �Iive Ave t 1 1 1 1 0 1
240 Shasta St Lombard Trl 1 1 1' 1 11 1 1
241 5hasta St Aimond Ave 1 1 1 6 1 1
242 Shesta St Dliae Ave - ;1 1 1 1 1 1 12 1 2
243 Shasta St Orange Ave 1 2 2 ' 1 1 1 1 1 23 3 3
244 Shasta St Magnolia Ave 1 1 - 1 1 0 1
245 Shasta+St Willis 5# 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 8 1 3
246 Shasta St lNest St 1 ': 1 1 �� 1 1 1 >1 7 1 2
247 Shasta St Oregon St i 1 I 1 1 6 1 1
248 Shasfa St Genter St ' 1 ` ; 1 ' 1 1 6 1 1
249 Shasta 5t Cali#ornia St 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 -1 8 1 3
250 Shasta St Pine St 2 5 ' 2 1 7 ; 1 ' 1 1' 4 3 2 " 54 7 9
251 Shasta 5E East St 3 ' 4 3 '2 1 1 1 2 1 A 22 3 7
252 Auditorium Dr Sundial Bridge Dr 1 1 1 11 1 1
253 7ehama St Oregon St 1 $ 1 8 '- 2 1 3 3 14 1 9
254 Tehama Sf Galifornia St ��1 1 1 ; 1 ' 1 1 1 : 12 1 2
255 7ehama St i�ine St 1 4 5 ; 1 A 6 ' 1 5 3 1 1 1 105 10 11
256 Tehama St East St 5 1 2 1 3 ' 1 2 2 2 31 5 6
257 Butte S# Magnolia Aue 1 1 1 1 0 1
258 Butte St West St ' 2 1 1 1 1 ' 2 0 2
259 Butte St East St 1 2 2 2 1 2 2 1 1 2 1 44 3 5
260 eutte S# Cantinentat St +1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ' 1 2' 2 1 1 562 3 4
261 Butte St Sequoia St 1 1 1 1 0 1
262 Bufte St Sundial Bridye Dr 1 1 1 1 0 1
263 Park Marina Dr Athens Aue 1 2 2 I' 1 2 1 8 1 3
264 Park Marina Dr Olympus Ave 1 1 1 11 1 1
265 Park Marina br South St 2 1 ' 1 2 > 2 1 28 3 3
266 Park Marina Dr ' Washingtan/hve 1 1 1 1 0 1
267 Park Marina Dr L.ocust St 1 ' 1 1 6 1 1
268 Yuba St Railroad Ave 1 1 1 6 1 1
4 ��iui,ii,7i.'i'i,,�i f I
�� �,�' t
�� 1 �1',
•
' , p � . ' «
. o � m o ..e � � � a m m m �
269 Yuba St California St r 1 1 '; 1 , 1 0 1
270 Yuba St Pine St 3 ' 2 4 1 1 1 3 1 20 3 5
271 Yuba St East St 1 ` 1 1 1 6 1 1
?72 Yuba St Liberty St 1 1 1 1 6 1 1
273 Tralee`Ln Tralee Ln 1 1 1 1 0 1
274 Oconnar Ave Wicklow Ct 1 1 1 1 0 1
275 Oconnor Ave Nantucket Dr 1 1 1 ' 1 0 1
2?6 Mary�ake Dr Carlaw Way '1 1 1 1 11 1 1
277 Placer Rd Boston Aue 1 1 '1 11 1 1
278 Piacer'Rd Oconnor Ave 2 2 1 3 .i 2 2 34 A 4
279 Piacer Rtl Aimatlen�r 1 < 1 1 11 1 1
28� Piacer St Cottonwood Ave 1 1 1 1 0 1
281 Piacer St Oak St 1 1 1 6 1 1
282 Placer St Mesa St 1 1 ' 1 6 1 1
283 Piacer St Walnut Ave 1 1 1 11 1 1
284 PlaeerSt Jay 5t 1 1 � 1 1 0 1
285 Piacer St Oiiue Ave ' 1 '' 2 1 2 1 '1 1 ' 8 1 3
28B Placer St Magnolia pue 1 5 7 1 4 2 1' 2 1 4 42 6 7
287 Piacer St Willis S# 3 1 1 1 1 1'- 1 2 33 3 3
288 Placer St Chesnut 5t 1 1 1 1 0 1
289 Piacer St West St I 3 4 3 2 6 2 2 1' 1 4 2 2 1 ` 60 7 10
290 Piacer 5t Oregon St 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 92 2 19 2 4
291 Piacer St Railroad Ave 1 1 1 1 544 1 1
2Q2 Placer St Center St 1 1 1 1 0 1
293 Piacer St California St 7 1 1 2 3 1 3 3 ' 7 0 7
294 Placer St Pine St 2 7 - 10 3 2 5 8 ' 1 1 3 4 5 5 2 74 9 19
295 Placer 5t East St 1 4 6 4 2 1 3 1= 3 1 4 1 2 - 41 5 11
296 Placer St Continental St 1 1 1 1 2 2 41 2 2
297 Pieasant St Yuba St 1 1 1 1 0 1
��8 Sacrarnento St ChesnutSt 1 1 1 1 0 1
299 Califoriiia St Sacramento St 1 " 1 1 1 2 ' 7 1 2
300 Pine St 5acramenta St 1 1 1 11 1 1
3f11 Gontinenial 5t Sacramenta St 3 '1 ��� 2 2 1 3 0 3
302 Airpark Dr Gold St 1 1 1 1 0 1
303 So�th St Oregon St' 1 1 1 11 1 1
30d South 5t iRailroad Ave 1 1 1 6 1 1
305 South S# California St 1 1 5 ' 3 '1 6 ' 1 2 2 1' 2 >3 1 4 588 7 10
306 Sauth St Pine St 1 2 - 2 1 A 2 1 2 25 3 5
307 South St Easf St 4 3 1 1 1 4 ' 2 ' 1 1 ` 1 1 1 2 3 63 7 8
308 South St Gartlen Ave 1 1_ 1 1 0 1
309 South 5t Canel Dr '� 1 1 :� 1 ' 30 1 1
31d South St Athens Ave 1 1 1 1 1 1 12 1 2
311 Florence St Garden Aue 1 1 1 6 1 1
312 Piorence St Sequoia St 1 1 1 1 0 1
313 Gold St Waldon�t r 1 1 1 1 0 1
4 ��iui,ii,7i.'i'i,,�i f I
�� �,�' t
�� 1 �1',
•
' , p � . ' «
. o � m o ..e � � � a m m m �
314 Gold St Cali#ornia 1 ': < 1 1 ' 1 0 1
315 Gold St East St 1 ' 1 1 1 1 1 7 1 2
316 California St Sonorna St 2 1 1 1 1 2 0 2
317 Pine St Lincoln 5t 1 1 1 11 1 1
3'IS Pine St East St 2 1 1 2 2 0 2
318 Pine St Cypress Ave 1 2 3 2 3 2 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 72 6 8
320 AthensAue Locust St 4 1 2 2 4 ; 1 ' 1 3 4 ; 52 5 7
321 Azela Ave Iris br 1 ' 1 1 1 0 1
322 Mistletoe Ln Shasta Pines Way 1 '' 1 1 6 1 1
333 Mistletoe�n Penn Dr 1 1 1 11 1 1
324 Mistletae Ln Shady Ln 1 1 1 1 0 1
325 Mistletoe Ln �indeena Ln '1 1 7 11 1 1
318 Lerkspyr Ln Executiue UUay 1 1- 1 1 0 1
327 �arkspur Ln Industrial St 1 1 1 1 0 1
3�i$ dxford'Rtl Yale Ct 1 ' 1 1 1 0 1
329 Marigold Way Dewberry Dr 1 1 1 1 0 1
330 Tarmac Rd Tu�cany Way 1 1 1 1 0 1
331 7armac Rd Selzburg 7rl 1 1 1 1 0 1
332 Tarmac Rd Charade Way 1 1 1 1 1 2 41 2 2
�33 Tarmac Rd Abernathy Ln 1 1 1 1 0 1
334 Cypress Aue Ciuic Center Dr 4 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 26 4 6
335 Cypress Ave Athens Aue '1 2 3 ` 2 1 1 4 2 ' 1 1 2 1 2 3 72 6 8
336 Park Marina Dr Athens Ave 1 2 1 1 1 ' 1 1 1 1 : 8 1 3
337 Cypress Ave Hartnell Aue 1 3 6 5 1 8 4 ' 1 1` 1 2 2 6 1 4 104 10 15
338 E Cypcess Ave Lowden Ln 1 1 1 1 0 1
339 E Cypress Ave ' Beveriy br' '1 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 18 2 3
340 E Cypress Ave Rosemary Ave 2 ' '1 1 ' 2 1 '1 12 2 2
341 E Cypress Ave Bechelli l n' 1 11 8 5 10 2 ' 1 1 1 1 6 13 4 3 4 85 12 20
342 E Cypeess Ave I-5 1 1 1 1 6 1 1
343 E Cypress Ave LarkspurLn '2 2 2 3 2 ' 1 2 2 3 1 36 4 6
3�4 E Cypress Ave E Cypress Aue 1206 'I 1 1 1 1 0 1
345 E Cypress Ave Aifreda Way 1 2 1 3 1 1 3 1 24 3 4
3�6 E Gypr�ss/ave Irwin Rd � 1 �: 1 1 6 1 1
347 E Cypress Ave Heather Ln 9 1 1 ' 1 2 17 2 2
34$ E Cypress Ave Oxford Rd f 1 1 2 1 I 1 1 17 2 2
349 Parkuiew Aue Angelo Ave 1 1 1 1 0 1
350 Parkview Ave Fa�retta Ave 1 4 1 1 ; 3 3 2 1 1 1 ': 35 5 5
351 Parkview Aue �rape Aue 1 1 1 1 6 1 1
352 Parkuiew Ave Akard Aue i 1 2 3 ' 1 2 2 1 1 2' 2 2 1 '1 70 6 6
353 Parkview Ave 5tate St 1 1 1 1 0 1
354 State St Leland Ave 1 1 1 11 1 1
355 PeII St �avretto Aue 9 1 1 1 11 1 1
356 Fell St� Leland Ave 2 2 1 1 2 0 2
357 l.eland Ave Severtson C7r 1 1 1 1 0 1
358 Teton Dr Allegheny Gt 1 1 1 1 0 1
4 ��iui,ii,7i.'i'i,,�i f I
�� �,�' t
�� 1 �1',
•
' , p � . ' «
. o � m o ..e � � � a m m m �
359 Auburn Dr ponnor Ct: r1 -; 1 - 1 ' ,; 1 ' 11 1 1
3fi0 Court 5t Railroad/ave 1 1 2 1 1 17 2 2
3G1 Railraad Ave Sheridan St 1 1 1 1 1 12 1 2
362 Railroad Ave Eugenia Ave 1 1 1 11 1 1
363 Railroad Ave Laurel Ave 1 '9 1 6 1 1
364 Larkspur Ln Maraglia Ave 1 1 1 11 1 1
365 Yana Ave Carieton St 1 1 1 11 1 1
366 East Way Vale dr 1 1 1" 1 11 1 1
367 King St Hawn Aue' 1 1 1 1 0 1
388 Goocfwater Ave 1Nilson Aue ;"1 1 1 1 1 1 12 1 2
369 Hartneil Aue Parkuiew Ave 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 18 2 3
370 Hartnell Ave 5hotwick Trl >1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 551 2 3
371 Nartneli Aue Beehe(Ii Ln 1 2 3 : 3 1 2 4 1 1- 2 1 ` 3 1 2 3 587 6 9
372 Hartnell Ave C St 1 1 1 1 1 2 12 1 2
373 HaKneil Aue Northwoods Way 1 1 1 544 1 1
374 Hartnell Ave School St ' 1 1 1 1 0 1
375 Hartnell Aue Lawrence Rd 2 ' ' 1 1 1 1 12 2 2
378 Hartnell Aue Invin Rd 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 1 2
377 Hartnell Aue Reservoir Ln 1 ' 1 1 ` 6 1 1
378 Hartnell Ave Middleton t.n `1 1 2 ' 1- 1 1 550 2 2
379 Hartnell Aue Fairway Aue 3 ' 1 2 '1 2 18 3 3
380 Hartnell Aue �airway Ave 2 1 1 1 1 1 12 2 2
381 Hattneil Aue Kenco Ave 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 1 2
382 Hartnell Ave Yana F,c+e '�� 1 �� 1 h 1 0 1
383 Hartnell Aue East Way 1 1 9 1 0 1
384 Hartnell Ave Churn Ct 2 1 1 1 1 12 2 2
3$5 Hartnell A�+e Aita Mesa Dr 2 2 1 1 12 2 2
3$6 Hartnetl Ave Leonard Sti 1 1 1 1 6 1 1
387 Hartrtell Aue Rrgyle Rd 1 ��- 1 : 1 6 1 1
388 Canyon Creek f2d Blazingwood br 1 1 1 6 1 1
389 Wyndham Ln Rivella Vista Dr 1 'r 1 1 1 6 1 1
398 Wilshire Dr Henderson Rtl 1 1 1 11 1 1
391 Bechelli Ln Groue St 1 1 1 1 0 1
392 Bechelli Ln Leila Ave `3 1 1 2 ' 1' 1 1 2 39 4 4
393 Bechelli Ln Parsons Dr 1 1 2 3 1 1 2 1 19 2 4
394 Bechelli i� tNitshire Dr 1 1 1 11 1 1
395 Bechelli Ln 3rd St 1 1 1 1 6 1 1
396 Bechefli Ln 2nd St 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 29 3 4
397 Becheili Ln Layton Rd' 1 1 " 1 1 ' 1 1 17 2 2
398 Bechelli�n Cheryi Or ' 1 1 7 1 0 1
399 Bechelli Ln Loma Vista Dr 2 1 '' 2 1 1 1 1 28 3 3
d00 Bechelli�n Chinook Dr 1 1 1' 1 6 1 1
401 Bechelli Ln S Bonnyview Rd 2 1 ' 4 1 5 1 ' 1 1 '3 1 1 1 ': 32 3 7
402 C St 5aginaw St 1 1 1 6 1 1
d03 C St 'i 5th Si 1 1 1 6 1 1
4 ��iui,ii,7i.'i'i,,�i f I
�� �,�' t
�� 1 �1',
•
' , p � . ' «
. o � m o ..e � � � a m m m �
d04 LaytonjRtl ; �; Ricardo Ave 1 1 - ` 1 ': 1 0 1
4tl5 Camino Ct Adams Ln 1 1 1 1 0 1
406 Mariene Ave Ftintwood Way 1 1 1 1 0 1
407 Mercury Dr Jupiter Ter' 1 1 1 1 0 1
408 Vega St Mercury Dr 1 1 1 1 0 1
4U9 Cockerill Dr Button PI 1 1 1 1 0 1
470 Gelaxy,Way Meteor St i 3 1 1 1 ' 1 '1 1 ' 3 0 3
d11 Aita Mesa Dr Saturn Skwy 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 1 2
412 Galaxy Way Polaris Way 1 1 1 1 0 1
di3 Venus Way Caprrccarn Way 1 1 1 1 1 1 12 1 2
A14 Whimbletlon C7r Lauer St 1 1 '1 1 0 1
415 Airport'Rd �kypark Dr 1 1 1 1 0 1
416 Capricorn Way Britlger Dr 1 1 1 1 0 1
d17 Sunglow Dr Oak Glen Dr 1 1 1 6 1 1
418 Howeri�Dr �rances Dr 1 1 � 1 1 0 1
419 Cedars Rd iFtiuiera Dr 1 1 1 1 6 1 1
428 Cedars Rd Kenyon dr' 1 1 1 11 1 1
421 Wesisizie Ftd Kenynn Dr 1 1 1 1 0 1
d22 Easiside Rd Wilsey Dr ' 1 '1 1 1 ' 11 1 1
423 �astsic�e Rd Radio Ln ' 1 ; 1 1 1 1 1 7 1 2
424 Radio Ln Veterans Ln 1 1 1 ' 1 0 1
425 Rad�a Ln N Bonnyuiew Rd 1 1 1 ' 1 1 1 7 1 2
426 E Bannyview Rd ' Pioneer Ln 1 1 1 1 0 1
A2� E�onnyview 12d Barrel Ct 1 1 1 1 0 1
428 S Bonnyview Rd E Bonnyview Rd 1 '' 3 '4 1 2 '1 9 1 4
439 Westside Rd Canyan Creek Rd 2 2 1 1 2 0 2
430 Estate St Traverse St 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 1 2
431 Joaquin Aue Fticardo Aue 2 1 1 1 1 2 0 2
432 Pottai Dr Joaquin Aue 1 1 ' '1 1 2 17 2 2
433 Portal br Loma Vista Dr 2 1 1 2 22 2 2
434 Ethan Ln Monterra Ln 1 1 1 1 0 1
d35 Lofty Oak Dr HeaueNy Oek Dr 1 1 1 1 0 1
436 Anzona St Statthmore Dr 1 1 1 1 0 1
437 Screech Owl Ln Squirrel Run Ct 1 1 1 1 0 1
438 Dandelion Dr Buttercup Ln 1 1 1 1 0 1
439 Aita Mesa Dr EI Uerana St 1 1 1 1 ' 1 1 17 2 2
A40 Branst�tterLn Branstetter�Ct ��1 1 ' �1 11 1 1
441 Cedars Rd Branstetter l.n 1 1 1 2 ' 1 2 1 18 2 3
442 Cedars Rtl Rcorn Ln ' 1 1 1 11 1 1
4d3 Cetlars Rtl Concord Ln 1 1 1 30 1 1
444 Westside Rd Cedars Rdi 1 1' 1 30 1 1
d45 S Bonnyview Rd ' Eastside#�d 1 4 3 s 5 2 5 4 2 2 2 5 4 " 97 8 13
446 S Bonnyview Rd ; Indianwaod Dr 2 1 ' 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 - 29 3 4
447 Churn Creek Rd I-5 1 1 1 1 2 7 1 2
448 Rancho Rd Aita Mesa Dr 2 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 14 2 4
4 ��iui,ii,7i.'i'i,,�i f I
�� �,�' t
�� 1 �1',
•
' , p � . ' «
. o � m o ..e � � � a m m m �
d49 Rancho Rd Surrey Dr ; 1 ': "1 ` ' 1 1 0 1
450 Rancho Rd Saratoga br 1 ' 1 1 6 1 1
451 Rancho Rd GoodwaterAue 1 1 '' 1 1 2 17 2 2
452 F2ancho Rd Persistence Ln 1 1 2 1 1 41 2 2
453 Rancho Rd Rancho Uista Way 1 1 1 6 1 1
454 Lofty Oak Dr Airose Ln ' 1 1 1 1 0 1
4$5 Westwood Ave Jewell Ln i 1 1 1 1 0 1
456 Westside Rd Westtvood Ave 3 2 ' 2 1 33 3 3
d57 Camino Dr Wilder Dr 1 1 1 1 0 1
458 Eastside Rd North Dr 2 - 1 3 1 2 1 13 2 3
459 Eastside Rd Secramento Dr 1 1 1 6 1 1
460 Eestside Rtl Star Dr 2 2 1 1 2 2 ' 1 1 3 35 4 5
461 Westside Rd Geingary Dr 1 1 1 0 1
462 Eastside Rd Girvan Rd 1 1 1 1 6 1 1
463 Girvan Rd Pit Rd 1 1 1 1 0 1
4fi4 Girvan Rd Hemlock St 1 1 1 1 11 1 1
465 Girvan'Rd Creekside 5t 1 1 1 6 1 1
d66 Creeks�de St Brooksitle Ln 1 1 1 1 0 1
467 Craekside St Mulien Pkwy 1 1 1 1 0 1
468 Knighton Rtl Lockheed dr 2 1 1 1 '1 12 2 2
A69 Churn Greek Rd Kallerup Dr 1 1 1 30 1 1
d70 Mistletoe Ln Deerfield#ve 1 1 1 1 6 1 1
d71 Hilliop Dr Hwy 44 1 " '1 1 ' 6 1 1
472 Piacer�t Wiscons"rnAve 1 1 ��� 1 ,�� 1 0 1
d73 Eureka Way Oiiue Ave 1 1 1 1 0 1
474 East St Locust St i 1 1 1 1 0 1
475 Ora St Travona Sf 1 '1 1 1 0 1
476 Churn Greek Rd E Entrance fo Fflotl Max 1 1 1 6 1 1
477 Churn Greek Rd Linda Ln 1 1 1 1 1 '1 7 1 2
478 7ehama St Liberry St 1 1 1 11 1 1
4"79 Sacramento dr Hemlock St 1 1 1 11 1 1
480 PerkuiewAue �reebndge;St 1 1 1 1 9 11 1 1
A$1 Kenyon Dr Calarasas Hts 1 1 1 1 0 1
d83 OId Oregon 7rl Lois Ln 1 1 1 6 1 1
483 Sacramento St Garden Ave 1 1 1 1 0 1
484 Market St Hill S# 1 1 1 1 1 0 1
Total 15 43 275 478 509 120 111 393 417 150 13 68 1 91 67 281 272 251 264 252 - - 1320
Collisions at Selected Segments
�",,,� ,f'
i `
�
� °i
. . > � . o. � � . .e
:062A AKRICH ST � RAINTREE LN OASIS RD 1 �.�1 3` "�3 2 1 ���3 1 �� 20 2 5
003A KESWICK DAM RQ W CITY LIMIT L.AKE BLVD �� 1 1 �� 1 ��1 1 1 � 41 2 2
004A ORSIS RD LAKE BCVD ` . ALEE LN :� 1 1 1 �s -1 1 1 s�. 1 3 � 42 2 3
tl046 OASIS RD DAUT RD OAK t�EAF�.N 1 �r ��: 1 1 ��: 1 0 1
004C OASIS RD OLD OASIS RD RANDOGPH RD 1 1 �s�. 1 1 ��: 11 1 1
D04D OASISRD BACERRD �t AKRICH�ST 2 1 �s� �-1 ��1 1 ��1 2 � 23 2 3
p05A 6L6 OREGON TRL AKRICH ST ��.. MID�AND DR 1 �s �� 1 >1 1 0 1
0056 OLD OREGON TRL MIDLAND DR'� N CITY LIMIT 1 :�2 S '�: 3 1 -3 �:. 1 1 �-3 3 1 ��: 28 3 8
OO6A CASCADE BIVD N�ITY LIMIT. OASIS RD :�:.1 2 ��:� 1 ��1 - 1 >1 2 :�� 8 1 3
007A LAKE B�VD ��� GLENWOOD DR OASIS RD :�2 2 � 1 ��1 1 ����1 � 12 2 2
0078 LAKE B�VD � OASIS RD '� KESWICK�AM BLVD 1 1 �s� ��1 1 s�. 1 1 ��1 �� 12 1 2
007C LAKEBL.VD '� KESWICKDAMB�VD SANTAROSAWAY�� 3 1 �s 1 �2 1 2 >1 1 � 34 3 4
007D LAKE BI.VD �: SANTA ROSA WAY ST MARK ST 1 =1 3�:�: 1 � ��2 1 s�. 1 1 2 >1 >1 1 ��: 20 2 5
607E LRKE BL�/D �� ST MARK ST��. MOUNTp,IN SNADOWS BLVD � :� 1 2 - 1 -�1 1 - 1 �1 1 1 >1 �� 52 3 3
OO7f LAKE B�VD I M6UNTAIN SHAI70WS B�VD N MARKET ST �:� 1 :�7 6 =� 1 =7 2 �-1 2 �� 1 2 �-1 3 '�3 1 -4 3 '� ?8 8 14
007G LAKE B�UD �� BLACK MARBCE DR W/O CAMPERS CT! �:�� 1 1 .�:��2 S;�: 3 ���5 1 ��1 ��1 ��3 5 '� 58 4 9
OO8A SIZ 299 L.AKE B�VD � E/O 15 NB RAMP� : =1 1 ��s =2 1 1 - ? 1 2
009A MAGNUMS WAY LAKE B�VD ���. ST NICNO�A5 AVE��: 1 ��:� 1 �� ��1 1 0 1
01flA SANTR ROSA WAY MAGNUMS WAY �AKE BLUD 1 = -1 1 ��: 1 0 1
091k ST��MARKS ST�� N��EN6 �AKE BLVD ;-1 1 s�. 1 �1 6 1 1
012A NpOPA PATH��: LITTLE DEE,R LN CAKE BIVD 1 �s -1 1 1 0 1
013A BEGT�INE ftD i GdPHER LN i WHiTE RIUER 6R '�. 2 1 �s 1 �1 1 1 1 :1 � 23 2 3
A1AA CATEFtPIL.�AR�RD BE�T�IN6 Rd N MFlRKET ST 1 ...1 1 �s 2 - 1 -2 1 ��: 18 2 3
015A TWiN VIEW BLUD OASIS RD ��. C6NSTITUTI�N WAY :-2 �� 1 ��1 ���1 1 � 12 2 2
0156 7WtN VIEW BLUD N�MARKET ST MOUNTAIN VIEW 6R 1 :�:��3 2 ��� 1 � 1 ���1 1 = 2 2 �-3 1 � 31 4 6
015C TVQIN VIEW BI�VD TWIN VIEW BLV6 TWN PEEKS MOBILE HOME PKWY 1 :�� �1 1 1 0 1
016A ST:ANDREWS�DR Gt7LD MI.�S CT S END ': 1 �� 1 1 � 11 1 1
017A WHITE RIUER DR BEGT6INE RR REDWOC7D BLUd '�. � 1 �- 1 -2 1 >1 �� 36 2 2
d18A REDWOOt7 B�VD CFlTERPIL.�.Aft RD NORTH POINT DR i �:�1 2 ��:� -2 1 s�. 1 �>1 �-1 8 1 3
019A NORTH POINT':DR LAKE B�VD ': N MARKET ST 1 �s -1 1 1 0 1
U20A VRL�EYRIDGE DR TkV(N VIEW BLV6 RI6GE RD ���1 �� 1 :h 6 1 1
021A N BOULDER DR UAI.�EYRIDGE 6R �AKE BLVD 1 �:��1 1 �s 1 1 ���1 1 �1 1 ��: 18 2 3
022A BOULDER CREEK DR N'80ULDER DR E END ���. 1 ��:� -1 1 1 0 1
023A BEAUMONT Dft W END E END '�: 1 �s 1 1 1 0 1
024A MOUNTAIN UIEW DR TWIN UIEW B�UD TERRA LINDA WAY�� 2 �- 1 1 � 1 1 ��: 2 0 2
025A HAW�EY RD �i N:END CEAF l.N 1 s� ��: 1 ���1 1 0 1
026A BGACK�AK LN W END HAWLEY ftD 1 �r 1 � 1 1 0 1
027A CO�i.YER DR��. GHURN CREEK RD POISON:OAK CN 2 ��:� :��1 -1 1 1 ��: 2 0 2
028A COCLEGEUIEW DR BETHEL LN I W/O OLD 6REGON TRL 2 :��3 1 �s 1 =2 1 ��1 1 2 1 �:2 1 ��: 41 5 6
tl29A QUARTZ HILL RD RIUER RIDGE DR S/O MT B�NNINGTON 6R 1 1 �s� �1 1 ���2 � 12 1 2
029B QUARTZ HILL RD 5/O MT BONNINGTON DR N MARKET ST :�2 1 �s 1 �1 1 s�. 3 � 13 2 3
030A 6ENT6N DR ��� M16DLE CREEK RD RIUERSIDE DR 1 �r 1 - 1 1 ��: 1 0 1
0306 BENT(JN DR : MIQDLE CREEK RD N MRRKET 5T 1 .�:��3 4:�: 1 ����2 1 �3 ��: 1 -1 1 -4 2 1 ��: 33 4 8
031A LOiUiA ST QUARTZ HILL RD BENTOM1J DR 1 �� 1 :1 � 11 1 1
032A BUENAUENTWRA BCVD I N CITY LIMIT� 5 END ? 1 �s� ��1 :�1 1 0 1
033A 6ELTA ST BETON DR '� 4UART�Hil.�RD '� 1 �s� -1 1 ���: 1 0 1
034A ARBORETUM DR ARBORETUM DR E END �. :�1 1 ��1 6 1 1
035A BUGKEYE Tft�: GLAY ST DOGW006 CN 2 ��:� 1 � �1 ��:1 1 ���: 2 0 2
036A DOGWOOD LN W END E END ��� :�� 1 1 �� 1 �1 ��1 �2 � 41 2 2
037A MASONIC AVE�: LAKE B�UD f 5 END : 1 :s 1 1 c: 1 0 1
038A N MARKET ST'�: LA,KE BGVD � BENTON DR 1 .�:��1 1:r ::2 �� 1 1 �>1 1 � 18 2 3
8386 N MARKET ST�: BENTON DR���: QUARTZ HII.0 RD �: 1 2���:� ::1 �2 �>1 >1 1 ��: 13 1 3
. , � . ,. � � ,
038C MARKET ST �: QUARTZ HILL RD EUREKA WAY 2 �:�1 3'� 1 3 - 1 1��:: 1 1 'J�1 �.�:�:�2 2��� 31 3 6
fl38D MARKET ST ���� EUI2EKA WAY TEH/iMA S'f 1 �: �1 1 �: 1 0 1
03$E MARKET 87 ��: PLACER S7 � GOLD 57 2 -�. 1 � .'1 �.1 1 �.� 2 0 2
03$F S MARKET ST�: GOLD ST GEARY ST :"2 1 - 1 �:��.1 1 ;2 1 � 13 2 3
039A HILL70P DR '� LAKE BLUD : N/O HILLT6P DR '�. - 1 7 r:2 4 �� 6 �4 2 1 ��: 1 1 3 �"2 6 1 2 ���� 123 10 14
fl396 HILL70PDR Y N/ONILLTOP'��DR STTHOMASPKWY�: 1:�� 2 '�:6 2 �:�: 2 �. 5 �2 1 1 '� 1 �7 3 �.�3 2 3 = 604 9 11
039C HILL70P DR �: ST THOMNS PKUVV S/O f2NER BEND RD 1 2 ���� 7 1 ���1 ��1 �:�2 � 13 1 3
03JD HILL70P DR I S/O RIVER BEND RI3 N/O BROWNING 5T�: 2 4 :: 1 2 �.��1 1 �1 ���:1 3 1 :�.1 1 ��:: 26 2 6
039E HILLTOP DR N/O Bf2oWNING ST MARAGLIA ST 1' 3 9 i 74 19 1 11 4 12 10 4 4 5 3 13 10 11 4 8- 836 27 46
OAOA PEPPERTREE�:LN HILLTOPDF2� WOODCLI��'DR 1 ��.�: �:�1 1 ��� 1 0 1
OA1A WOODHILL Df2 WOODCLIFF��DR TEAKWOOD QR 1��� 1 1 1 0 1
042A BLACK MARBLE WAY LAKE BLUD �: S END �' �:��.7 1 1 1 6 1 1
043A CAMPERS C7��: B6ULDER DK2 S END �� 1 1 � 1 � 11 1 1
Od4A CHURN Cf2EEK C2D G��LEGE VIEW DR BR6WNING ST "� 1 2 �:�3 ': 1 ���3 1 ::�� 1 �-1 2 �1 1 >1 1 �:�: 70 6 6
0448 CHURN CREEK RD BROWNING ST DANA DR ��. 1 4 :�1 4�:�: 1 �� 4 "2 "�: 3 �"1 3 �3 -1 3 ��: 84 6 10
D44C CHtIF2N CFtEEK RD DANA{3R PRESIDId ST 1 ���.�. 1 ��::1 �:1 2 ���� 17 2 2
04dD CHURN CREEK RD PRESIDIO ST S BONNYUIEW RD 1' 4 14 23 28 10 8 [9 21 74 4 I 4 5 5 17 94 14 11 14 984 42 70
tl4dE CHURN CREEKRD 5'.64NNYVIEW F2C7 HAF2TMEYER W �:� 2 �:��:7 1 1 �:1 12 2 2
tl44F CHURN CREEK RD HARTMEYER��LN S/�I2P.NCHO RD I 1 ��'2 3 -' 1 �� >3 2 �:3 1 2 '�: 3 0 6
OA5A DAKOTA WAV���: 71DMOt2E lN� E/O DANBUf2Y DR ' 1-:�. 1 �:7 1 0 1
UABA CHANGELOR E?LVD PALACIO DR�' HACIENbA DR 1 "� 1 1 :� 1 0 1
Od7A SHAS7A VIEW���.D12 HEMINGWAY ST IN5F'IRA710N PL 1 '�1 1 -�. 2 �1 "7 2 1 � 18 2 3
0476 SHASTA VIEW�:DF2 INSPIRATION PL ATf2IUM�:WAY �.:� 1 1 1 6 1 1
Od7C SHASTAVIEW�:DR AT(21UM WAY G0017WATE12AVE� 3��: 7 ��2 �:1 1 7 ��� 3 0 3
tl47D SHASTA VIEW+6R GOODWAT�R AUE LE6NARD ST 1 2 2 3 1 2 3 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 3 67 5 8
047E SHASTFl U1EW���C7F2 LEONARD ST CA37LEWOOD[7C2' 1 �"� ��:1 1 1 0 1
047� ShIASTRVI�W�:DI2 CASTLEWOODDR RANCHORD 2 :�: 1 1 ��1 1 ��� 2 0 2
04$A OLD OREGON�TRL S1t5 LO(5 LN�. E C1TY LiMl7 �: 1 �"1 �:7 6 1 1
0986 OLD OREGON��:TRL ACCIDENT LN VIKING WRY S 1 '�1 >1 �� 30 1 1
04$C �LD OREGON 7I2L HARVEY LEIGHTON RD'�. OLD 44 DR 1 ��'�2 5�:c 1 �'2 1 <3 ;� 1 2 ':2 4 ��� 28 3 8
Od8D OLD OREGON:TRL OLD 44 DR �: HARTNELL AUE ;-2 1 :"� 1 `2 "1 2 ': 13 2 3
OA8� OLD OI2E(`iON TRL MISTY LN RANCH6 RD 1 1 :�� �2 2 � 12 1 2
048F OLD OREGON�:TFtL RANCHO RD��� DESPARAC70 TaL ����. -1 -1 1 6 1 1
OA9A MIS51(7N SIEC2FiA CT MISSION DE OR6 DI2 E END : 2 :: 1 1 1 ��1 2 0 2
050A MISSION CYE C7RCY Dfi MIIL VALLEY�PKWY BR�WNING ST 1 1 :1 � 11 1 1
051k CANBY RD SPRINGEFt Df2 BROWNING S7 1 ��1 ��1 � 11 1 1
0526 CANBY RD BROWNING S7 OLD AITURAS RD '� 1 �:7 1 6 �:1 1 '�1 1 �:1 1 �:��. 18 2 3
053A BI20WNING ST NtLL70P DR: CflNBY 12D 2"��� 1 ��.1 2 2 0 2
0538 BROWNING ST CHURN Cf2EEK 12D OLD AITURfYS C2fl '�: 1 ��:� 1 1 1 0 1
054A SPRINGER Dt2 S/O BOBWHiI`E WAY WH(STLING C5F2 ����.1 1 �: 1 :1 6 1 1
055A WNISTLiNG DR SPRINGER Dt2 S/6 PARTRIDGE DF2 1 ���. ".1 1 1 0 1
056A WINGSE7TER WAY PRRT(2IDGE D12 PAf2TRIC7GE DR 1 �:� 1 1 �� 11 1 1
057A LANCERS LN '�. CHURN Cf2EEK RC} BFtOWNING ST 1 1 ��:� 1 � 1 -�. 1 �:1 1 �� 12 1 2
d58A BRAND6N CT: N�END S END '�. 1 ': 1 ':1 1 0 1
059A C+ROUSE DR �: WHISTLING DR N/O PAI27RIDGE(7F2 1 2 ::� 2 -1 �:1 1 1 �' 13 1 3
O60A EDG�WOOD Dit N��END OLD ACTURAS RD �: 1 ��� �1 1 1 0 1
661A OLDALTURASIRD GANBYRD : BR�WNIN�ST 3 `�.2 4 :��. 1 3 ��1 3 1 ���1 1 s3 1 ��2 2 ��:� 49 5 9
OS16 OLDRLTUI�ASiRD BROWNINGST LEMARD 2 -1 1 :�� -3 1 1 `1 2�.�� 29 3 4
082A ARFt0Y0 MANOR C7R �LD ALTUI2AS RD CASA VEt2EDA WAY 1 1 1 � 11 1 1
063A DANA6R HILLT6PDR'�. BRADFORDRD 1 -7 6 `�� 1 ��'2 6 �3 1 �s 1 1 �-1 3 �3 1 1 6 r: 59 8 14
OB36 DANA DR BF2ADFORD RD UIC70R��:AVE 1 ���:1 :�:2 1 1 � 17 2 2
:08dA E PALISADES AVE VIEW AVE �: HILLTOP DF2 :�- 1 1 � 1 6 1 1
D65A PR(ENDLY RD: C7LD AL7URA5 RD DANA DR 1 �:�2 :' 1 2 "1 1 1 1 ��` 23 3 3
. , � . ,. � � ,
O68A SALMONBERRYDR MA171GOLDWAY EIOIMPERIALDR ' 1 1 :��1 � 11 1 1
067A VICTOR AVE ��: [7ANA DR AZOULAY CT 2 ��� 1 �1 1 1 �:� 2 0 2
0676 VICT012AVE c AZOULAYCT MI5TLE'fOELN ����. 1 1 ��- 1 ��1 �1 7�:��� 31 1 2
067C VIC70R AVE �; MI5TLETOE LN BURKSGARDEN ST'I :�.2 1 �:"� 1 -2 1 1 7 ;:� 13 2 3
OBid VIC76RAVE : BURKSGARDENS7 ECYPRESSAWE ��� 1 ��:' 1 1 ���� �:1 1 ��1 1 1 �1 1 � 37 2 3
867E VICTORAVE ��: E���.CYPRES5 AVE S/O BUNKER ST 1 2�.��: �. 1 ::: 2 .�1 ::1 �:1 7 ��� 13 1 3
067F VICT6RAVE �: S/OBUNKER�ST GALAXYWAY 3 �:".5 3�-�� 1 '3 ��4 1 1::: 1 1 2 ��-2 3 �1 3 ° 66 8 11
067G VICTOR AVE �+ EL V157A ST'� CHURN CREEK RD! -��1 :�.1 1 6 1 1
068A LEISNA LN W END E END �: 1 (�� �:1 �1 1 0 1
069A WE3TST 7TWST EUREKAWAY 1 ��� 1 �1 "1 � 11 1 1
070A 11TH ST EUF2EKA WAY N CCSURT ST 1 :���1 :�� 1 1 . �::1 1 �:�. 17 2 2
071A RtUERSIDE DR N'COURT ST��. N MARKE7S7 ��"�1 1 = 1 1 � �;1 1 ;� 7 1 2
072A CEN7EC2 ST '� FtIVEF251DE CYC2 EUREKA WAY 1 �:� 1 1 ��:� 1 0 1
073A CALt�ORNIASI' f2IVERSIDE6R Tf21NITY��:S7 1 ���: 1 1 �.�:� 1 0 1
0738 C/�LIFORNIA Sl` EUREKA WAY TEHIIMA ST 1 �:�� 1 1 1 0 1
073C CALI�ORNIA ST TEHAMN S7�± G6Ld ST �t 1 1 ��� "1 " 7 1 .�1 7 1 2
073D CALI�ORNIA ST GOLD ST S MARKET ST 1 1 � �-1 11 1 1
074A CONTINENTA�S7 N/O TRINITY ST SOUTH ST -1 .:�.7 1 6 1 1
075A AUDIT0121UM l7R W END SUNDIAL 6t21DGE DR 1 ��� �1 1 1 0 1
076A SUNDIAL BRIDGE DR SUNDIAL BRIDGE dR SUNDIAL BRIDGE DR �'1 1 = .:1 :"� 1 <2 7 1 2
tl77A PAG5ADES AVE HILLTOP 6R���. S END ��. 2 =� -�1 1 1 �-1 2 0 2
078A ASPINAVE VICTORFlVE�: EENC7 �� 1 ����. �1 1 1 0 1
079A SHINING S7AR WAY TUSCqNY WAY VIENNA�:WAY 1 :: 1 1 1 0 1
0$DA TARMAC RD ��� TUSCANY WAY CROSSFIRE VJAY �: 1 :-�. 1 1 1 0 1
0$1A ABERNATHY W TARMAC RD I HWY4A���. 1 �:1 '1 � 11 1 1
D82A AIRSTI2IP RD ��i 7RUMI�E7 DR S ENCS �: ' 1 1 ��1 � 30 1 1
083A VIKING WAY �'�. AfRS7RIP RD N STAR DR 1 ;'1 :��.1 1 1 1 ��: 17 2 2
08dA OLD 44 DR t7LD dI2EGON T(2L BRANDY LN 1 ��� 1 1 1 0 1
0$5A LYNBR60K LOOP GARSON DR: CARSON DR 1 1 ���. 1 1 '� 11 1 1
tl88A EUR�KA WAY i RIDGE DR ' N COUR7 ST ' 1 1 1 '( 1 ���1 1 1 2 b 42 2 3
0868 EUI2EKA WAY�� N�CCSURT S7: N MAf2KET ST 2 �:�. 1 1 �:�2 ��.1 1 1 �:1 �� 28 3 3
0$7A RIDGE Df2 EUREKA WAY LAKESIDE Df2 1 �: �:1 1 1 0 1
08$A BUENAUEN7URA BLUD ' EUf2EKA WAY LAKESitSE C7F2 1 ��:� 1 1 1 0 1
08$B BUENAVENTUt2A BLVD ��� TE70N DI2 ; CANYC7N CREEK RD ����: 1 2 -: 1 ��1 1 :2 �1 8 1 3
0$8C BUENAVENTURA BLVD �; CANYON CREEK RD RAILROAD AUE 2 ���1� 1 ��:�� 1 1 ."1 �� 22 2 2
089A G/aLWAY DR '�� N/O BRINN DF2 N10WANE DR 1 ��:� �:�1 1 1 0 1
090A F2EC6F2D LN ' W CI`fY LIMIT E END '� 1 �:�. ���:1 ��:1 1 0 1
0$1A KIL6Af2E DR I OCONNOR AUE Nt0 KILDAI2E C7 1 .- >�.1 1 1 0 1
092A LAKESIDEDR; KILK�EDR ���: BUENAUENTURABLVD �.:�1 ��1 1 ��. 6 1 1
tl93A MANZANI7R HILLS AVE �� K�OOTMLL BLVD SHASTA ST 1 �� 1 1 ��� 1 0 1
09dA ALMOND AVE�: EUREKA WAY PLACEF2 ST 1 �: 1 1 1 0 1
095A SHASTA ST � �OOTHICL BLU6 ��. WES7 S7 �'. 1 3�- 3 � 1 1 1 2 "�� 9 1 4
0958 SHASTRS7 ': WE57ST CA�IF'ORNIRST 1 ���1 2 �� 2 � 1 �-1 2 1 1 ���� 19 2 4
095C SHA57A 5T '�� MFlRKET 5T'�� PINE ST.: 2 �..' 2 .. 1 1 ���� 2 0 2
095D SHAS7A ST ��� PINE 5T CIBEF2TY ST ��"1 1 1 6 1 1
0$6A WILLIS ST EUREKA WAY pLACER ST 2 1 ��� 2 � 1 "�� 7 1 2 - 23 2 3
d97A CHESNU7 ST��: SHAS7A 57 ± S/O AMELIA CT 1 .- 1 � 1 :.'. 1 0 1
09$A OLIVE AVE EUREKA WAY PLACER ST �.� 1 1 �: ::1 ��1 1 �1 1 7 1 2
099A N GOURT ST : RNERSIDE DR BUREKrI WAY 1 �:: ����1 1 1 0 1
0998 COURT 5T EUREKA WAV YUBA ST 1 6:�. 3 ���.2 1 �:7� 2 �.�:1 3 �1 � 17 1 7
099C CC7UI2T5T YUBAST PLACERS7 ����� 1 '� 1 �-7 6 1 1
D99D COUR7 ST PLACER�7 i G6LD S7 1 2��: 1 1 .1 ����1 1 1 "�1 � 13 1 3
tl99E C(7UI2T S7 GOLD 5T SCHLEY AVE 1 �:�: 1 ���. 1 1 1 1 ����: 17 2 2
. , � . ,. � � ,
1tl0A PWEST SHASTAST �: CYPRESSAVE 3 �:�1 5-:� 3 - 3 =�2 1-:: 1 �-2 1 2 :':3 3- 44 4 9
101A EX�5T ST TEHAMA ST; PLACER S7 1 ��� 1 ��1 �� 11 1 1
1016 EAST 57 SFlCF2AM�N'f�ST LINCOLN ST 1 :�: 1 �� �.�1 1 0 1
i01C E/�tST S7 LINCOLN ST'�. PINE ST: :-1 1 = 1 "1 1 1 7 1 2
102A LIF3ERTY ST � BUTTE ST ��: PLAC�R 5T 1 �1 �1 �� 11 1 1
103A YUBA S7 COURT ST : CAIIF�RNiA 5l" 1 1 �.��. 1 1 ��1 9 ��1 �� 12 1 2
tU36 YU�A ST PINE 5T CONTIMENTAL ST '. 1 ]�. 1 :1 1 0 1
104A PARK MARINA'�DR SEQUOIA 5T�� SUNDIAL BRID�E 6R 1 .���1 `:4 -1 1 �-1 � 17 2 2
1048 PARK MAI21N.4'�DI2 SUNDIAL Bi2I[7GE DR ROME AUE 1 �::2 1 ��� 1 : �:��2 1 :1 1 2 �:�� 24 3 4
104C PAF2KMARWA��.DR F20MEAVE �' WASHINGTONAVE���: �:�7 2 ���� 1 �:�2 1 1 ��1 8 1 3
1646 PARK MARINA�:DR WASHINGTON AUE LOCUS7 S7 "�:1 ���1 1 6 1 1
70AE PAFtK MARiNA��.DR LOCUST 5T ���: PARKVIEW AVE 2 2 �2 : 22 2 2
105A TEHAMA 5T : MARKET S7�: CONTINENTAL S7 '�. 1 1 �'1 . 11 1 1
1UBA PLACEI2 5T '�. BOS70N AVE CllMBEi2LAND DR �� ���2 3 ��: 1 1 -3 1 �:4 15 2 5
i66B PLACER S7 '�: GUMBERLAND DR HIGHLAND/XUE 6 :�:4 3 ' 1 `4 2 :3 3`: 3 1 �-4 1 ��2 5 `� 93 10 13
�66C PLACER ST ' HIOHLAND AVE JAY ST�i 1 "�. 1 ��1 1 0 1
106D P�ACER ST JAY S7 EAST 57 3 3 10 1 5 4 2 1 2 7 2 4 6 2 1 3 61 6 16
1tl6E PLACER S7 '�: EpST 5T E�ND ; 2 9�. 2 �. "1 "1 2 0 2
107A SACRAMENTO ST CALIFQR.NIA ST EAST ST 2 ��� 1 �-1 1 "1 2 0 2
108A SOU7N ST COUR7 ST �: EA57 ST ��:-1 3�::: 1 � �.3 1 �� 1 1 2 ��.1 �� 33 1 4
10$B 80UTN ST EAS7 ST ATHENS AVE 1 �: 1 1 1 �"1 �1 1 � 17 2 2
14$C SdUTH ST ATHENS AUE PAFtK MAF2INA 17F2 ': 2 ���� 1 �� �1 2 2 0 2
109A SEQUOIA ST ; BUT7E ST ' SOUTH ST 1 �.' 1 1 1 0 1
110A ATHENS AVE '� PARK MARINA DR SdUTH ST 1 `� 1 1 1 0 1
1106 ATHENS FlUE '� SOUTH ST ��: CYPRESS AUE "� 1 2��� 1 �!1 '��1 2 1 8 1 3
111A CANAL DR SOUTH S7 '�. LOCUS7 ST 1 �' ::1 1 1 0 1
112A LOCUST ST : EAST ST ATHENS AVE 3 '� 1 `:2 1 �1 7 �� 3 0 3
113A CtVIC CENTER DR LOCUST 5T'� CYPRESS AVE 1 '�1 4 ° 2 � 1 �'1 - 2 1 "1 :3 1 ���� 21 2 6
11dA W CYPRESS AUE MARKET ST'�. PARK MARINA OR �I 1�.��1 5 ��4 4 :: 2 �'3 1 4 1 4 7�: 4 �'2 4 ��3 2 ��2 A': 657 11 15
1146 E CYPRESS AVE PARK MARINA DR CHURN CREEK RD 1: 3 8 23 16 4 7 -6 24 s3 1 2 4 4 5 8 6 9 <13 15 876 35 51
114C E CYPf2ESS AVE CNURN C(2E�FC t2D �� ALFREDA WAY :�� 1 3�:�: 1 2 �. 1 1 ��.��.2 7 ��:.� 9 1 4
114D E CYPRESS AVE ALFREDA WAY VICTOR��:AVE 3 �:2 2�':� 1 1 3 �:2 �:1 2 2 -2 7 "� 47 5 7
914E �CYPRE$5 AVE VICT6Ft FlVE�: E END '� 1 ::� 1 ���� 1 1 0 1
115A MISTLETOEW CNUf2NCREEFCF26 EEND I ��: 1 2 ���2 3 :� 1 2 ��4 1 ..: 1 .�:9 �:1 �4 3 ��: 67 5 8
116A INI7USTRIAL ST CHUf2N CREEK 12D E END '+ 1 �:�: 1 1 1 0 1
917A CI�NBY RD N EIVD MI5TLEfOE LN 1 ::: ') 1 1 0 1
11$A OXFORD RD � N/O OAKDALE LN E CYPRESS AWE 1 '�� "9 1 1 0 1
119A MFlNCHESTER DFt VICTOC2 AU���: E END �: 1 :�� :��� 1 7 ���. 1 0 1
120A GOODWATER AVE W END SHASTA UIEW DR ��� 1 �� 1 �-1 1 � 11 1 1
1266 GOODWATERAVE SHASTAUIEWD(2 HAI2TNELLAVE �:1 1 1 �:�: 6 1 1
121A NENdEf2SON RD N END WILSHIf2E DR �:�: 1 ��.1 1 �:�: 2 ��:�. 1 1 2 ��: 37 2 3
122A HARTNELL AUE E CYPRES5 AVE C ST 3 %3 7 1 2 t3 1 -4 1 <' 1 1 1 4 2 2 2 3 58 6 13
1228 HARTNEC�RVE NORTWW0065WAY KENCOAVE 1�- 3 6 :-9 13�s 2 5 -4 11 �6 4 '�. 6 -��2 2 �:�11 10 [5 4�: 767 19 32
122C HAR7NELL/�UE YANAAU� + 5HASTAVIEWDR ��: 2 �-2 4 ���. 2 ��2 2 `-1 - 1 `1 '3 1 �2 2 �.�. 38 4 8
122D H1lR7NEl.L AVE GOCSDWAI'ER AVE AIRPOF21"f2D 1��.:� 2 "�:2 2�:. 1 � 1 B� 2 3 �:2 �.�1 1 �:�� 618 5 7
123A HlkRTNELLAVE YANAAVE '�: CHURNG7 2 1 1 1 :-1 1 ��: 22 2 2
12d,4 BECHELLILN: S/67UR7LE:BAYPARK: ECVPRESSAUE � 1 ����� 1 4 ��� 1 ���.3 1 1 1 �:3 2 �:�. 21 2 6
i246 BECHELLILN'. E���.CYPRESSAUE Nl03R657 1�r 1 4 -14 9 :� 4 4 :`3 14 :s1 2 1 �:��. 1 -4 5 �[8 5 ��5 6 t 711 20 29
124C BECHELL(LN�: 3RD57 CWINOOK{5R 2 ���3 5:�.: 1 :��:1 3 ��2 3 1 ��:1 3 5 �:� 45 5 10
i24D BECWELLf LN��� CHINOtSK DFt N10 S BONNYVIEW RD �"�1 1 ����. 1 1 1 1 7 1 2
124E BECHELLI LN'�: NIO S BONNWIEW Rd �: S B�NNYVIEW RD 'I ����1 ��'1 1 ��: ��3 1 1 �-1 � 37 2 3
i24F BECWELL(LN: S:BqNNYVIEW RD SUNNYHILL LN 1'�:�. ��1 1 1 0 1
125A JUNE ST MARAGLIA S7 S END �: 1 1��:' 1 .�:9 "2 �� 12 1 2
. , � . ,. � � ,
126A LARKSPUR LN�� MARAGLIA ST PARSONS DR �:�1 -1 1 6 1 1
1268 LARKSPUR LN'�. INCIUSTRIAL S7 E CYPI2ESS AVE ����:1 .:1 1 6 1 1
127A ALFREDAWAY E'��CYPI2ESSAVE WARTNELLAVE 1 �: -1 �1 1 0 1
128A F2ESEI2VOIRLN E�:CYPf2E5SAVE HARTNELLAVE 1 �.�: ::1 1 1 0 1
929A S08RE CT �CYPRESS A�E S END + 1 1 -� 1 1 � 11 1 1
130A WfLSON NVE ' WIO JASMiNE WAY GOODWATER AVE�� 1 1 ' 1 I��1 1 1 �. 12 1 2
13iA DARTMtSUTH C7R RAINIER DR��: E/O SIENA AUE 1 1 1 � 11 1 1
132A WASATCH DR�. CUMBEf2LANt'S17F2 E EN6 : 1 �� ���1 1 1 0 1
133k BLU�BELL DR kSPEN GLOW LN �END �� 1 "� 1 �:7 1 0 1
13dA STARBURST DR BLUE BELL 17R CANYON CREEK C2D 1 �'. �1 :�1 1 0 1
135A AIf2PA12K DR ; PLACEFt S7 ��. (20SALINE AVE ��.:1 ��:1 1 6 1 1
136A ROSALINE AVE AIRPARK DR�. COUR7 ST 1 1 �< 3 1 ��1 �� 12 1 2
137A LINDEN AV� �� W END WES7 ST .�� 1 1 �:1 � 30 1 1
138A WE5TS7 ROSALINEAUE LAUREL�AVE .�� 1 1 1 6 1 1
139A LAUREL AUE ��� N/EST S7 12AILROAD AV� 1 :�� ��1 1 1 0 1
146A RAI�ROFld AVE YllBA ST PLACER ST 1 ���. �:1 1 1 0 1
1dOB RAIL.ROH6AVE SOUTHST i BUENAUENTURAB�UD 1�� 2 2 �-4 1 �s� 1 ���1 3 -2 2 � 1 2 3 ��2 1 ���2 2 �:� 651 9 10
141A PARKUiEWAVE S�:MARKETST STATEST ��� 1 :�1 2 �� 1 ��2 1 s� 1 1 >1 ���1 1 :�. 38 2 4
1416 PRRKVIEWAUE STATEST ': FREEBRIDGEST �� :�1 �� 1 1 1 6 1 1
A41C PARKVIEW AUE FREEBRIDG�ST GYPRESS AUE 1 .::1 2 >1 1 � 17 2 2
142k FAVRETTO AVE PARKUIEW kVE GRANGE ST 1 �s 1 1 1 0 1
143A FEL.L.ST S���MARKETST CE�NAD��.AVE 1 ��:� 1 ��1 1 0 1
1ddA LELAND AVE '�. PARKUIEW AVE GRANGE ST 1 �s =1 1 1 0 1
iA5A fREEBRIDGE 5T STviILE PL RIO ST 1 1 �s� 1 � ���1 1 0 1
146A NAMI�TON ST'�. FREEBRIDGE ST E END '� 1 �s 1 � 1 1 0 1
147A RIO ST W END MANAN ST 1 ��:� 1 ��:1 1 0 1
148A GEARY ST 5:MARKET ST POLK ST 1 = -1 1 ��: 1 0 1
949A TESCA,S SPRINGS RD 5'�.CITY GIMIT BRANSTETTER LN< 1 �1 1 �: 11 1 1
150A BRP,NSTETTER LN TEXAS SPRINGS RD S MqRKET ST 1 �s 1 � �1 1 0 1
151A HOWAftD 17R; 5UNGC6W DR EL RENO LN ��1 1 �s� 1 ��1 1 �1 ? 1 2
952A SUNGGOW DR�� WINTER GREEN CT OAK GCEN 6R :.�1 �� 1 1 6 1 1
153A RIVIERADR : OAKGLENDR CEDARSRD 1 :-1 1 ���1 �1 1 1 ��: 17 2 2
954A KENYON DR �< W END E16 CHANTILLY GN�� 1 �s 1 1 1 0 1
155A CE6AR5 RD '�. EL.RANCHO RD S MNRKET ST 1 2 ��:� 1 -2 2 1 - 13 1 3
158A WESTSIDERD'� GANYONCREEKRD CE6ARSR6 2 7 ��� 1 1 ���2 ���5 2 ��2 1 ��:2 2 :�� 29 2 9
1568 WESTSIDE RD'� JEWEL��N �: WESTWOOD AVE '� 2 ���. �-2 1 �>1 2 0 2
158C WESTSIDE RD1 WESTW60D�.AVE GCENGARY DR 1 -1 1 ��: 11 1 1
7560 WESTSIDE RD'� CCEkR CREEK RD SR 273�: :-1 �� 1 ��1 6 1 1
157A SEVEftTSON DR LELAND AVE'�: E END �'�� 1 1 �:�. 1 ��1 �� 11 1 1
758A ENSTSIDE RD�: Ut+YN�HP,M LN N/0 S BONNWIEW RD �:� 1 :-2 2 ��� 1 2 ; -1 1 3 '2 � 44 3 5
1588 ERSTSIDE RD� Ni0 S 66NNYVIEW RD ' S BONNYUIEW RD �'�: �:�1 1 �h 6 1 1
758C EA�TSIDERD: S��BONNYVIEWRD GIRVAN'�.RD 1 �:��5 9:- 2 -4 1 2 1 5 �:2 S '2 1 ��: 50 6 15
159A E BONNYVIEW R6 RP;DIO LN ' S BONNYUIEW RD II 1 .�:��1 1 ��s 1 �-1 1 1 ��2 � 18 2 3
160A BQNNYVIEW RVE BONNIE DR ! N BONNYVIEW RD - ;�1 �1 1 6 1 1
167A N BONNYVIEW RD EAS7SIDE RD E/O E BONNYUIEW RD : 1 1 -1 1 � 30 1 1
�82A 614WE�L RD '�: N END N B�NNYV(EW RD : 1 �s �1 >1 1 0 1
163A RENO LN N�END 5 BONNYVIEW RD � 1 �s� �1 ��1 1 0 1
16Ak OLD BARN WAY FARM HOUSE LN BARREL CT 1 �s -1 1 1 0 1
165A C ST NARTNEG�AVE GAYTON RD 2 ��� 1 1 �� 1 ��1 2 0 2
186A SA�NAW 5T ', W END C ST 1 s� 1 ��1 1 0 1
16'7A 2ND ST BECHELLI GN C ST 1:�:� 1 � ��1 1 0 1
968A RIGARDb AVE� LAYT6N RD` JOAQUIN AVE 2����:� 2 :. >1 -�1 2 0 2
169A LOMA UISTA DR BECHELLi LN ETHAN LN 1 1 ��s�. 1 1 c: 11 1 1
. , � . ,. � � ,
170A DIANE S7 GNARLENE WAY WOODACRE DR -�� 1 �:� 1 7-�� 30 1 1
171A KERRI'JEN CT W END RICAFtDO AUE 1 �:� 1 �. 1 1 0 1
772A LE��BRUN W � CHURN CC2EEK RD �AWRENCE RD ��:�2 3 ���� 3 "�2 7 2 1 2 �:�� 15 2 5
173A L4WRENCE RD HARTNE�L AVE MADEWOOC7 LN 1 1 ��� ��7 ��� 1 1 1 - 12 1 2
174A NAC2PC7LE 12D��: GHURN CREEK FtD EIO RLIvtA AVE 1 �:�� ��1 1 �:� 1 0 1
7T5A HARFtOW DR �: hIARPOLE C2D S END '�: "�7 :. 1 :�1 6 1 1
176A SUNWt70D DC2 N!(7 VEGA S7 Mdl2NINGSUN Di2 '�: 1 ��: 1 1 1 0 1
1?7A DOMtNION DR'� DENTON WAY JAMES PL 1 :�� 1 `1 1 0 1
978k CONIFER WAY WIt7 UICTOR AWE E/C1 UIC70R AVE 1 �" :9 :1 1 0 1
179A ALTA ME5P 6F2 HAf2TNELLAVE I?ANCH6 R6 3 1 �- ��3 1 �: 1 1 2 1 ��: 34 3 4
18tlA ALDEN AVE � Ct7CKEF2ILL ST SH1lS7AUlEW DR �� - 1 ��:1 �"1 6 1 1
181A SUZET'fE AUE�: ALTA MESA DR LARAMIE S7 1 ��: 1 .��.1 1 0 1
1$2A SATURN SKWY MERCURY DR SHASTR UIEW DR ��� ��� 7 1 ���� 1 �9 ��1 1 "� 7 1 2
1$3A SCORPIUS WAY SATUF2N SKWY GFlLAXY WAY 1 1 :�: 7 1 2 �. 12 1 2
1$4A ORION WAY '�. SATURN SFCWY \/ENUS WAY �"�1 `�. 1 1 1 6 1 1
1$5k POLA121S WAY'� SA7URN SKUUY S/O NEBULA ST 1 �:��. 1 . 1 1 0 1
788A GALP,XY WAY���. MORNINGSUN DR MEA[70W OAKS WAY 2 �:��1 �-1 1 1 � 22 2 2
i$7A N�BULA ST ` VIRGO$7 � PDLARIS WAY 1 '( 9 `9 1 0 1
1$$A EL��VEfiANO ST COLIJMBINB�C5F2 ST CHARLES DR 1 �:�1 �:�1 � 11 1 1
189A CASABELLA DI2 S7'CHkRLE5��DFt W/0 TEMPLETON DR 1 :�. 1 1 �: 1 0 1
196A R}kNCHO i2D �: BO PEEP LN�. SHAS7A VIEW DR ��: 1�.�:�� �1 1 ���: 1 0 1
1908 RANCHO RD �: GOODWATEtt AVE OL6 OREGON TF�L� :: 1 1 �-1 2�:�� 1 1 ��:��1 �1 �:�. 1 �1 1 '1 2�:: 49 3 5
191A LEONRC2D ST�: NARTNELL RVE N/O FORE57 H�MES C712 1 :: 7 1 1 0 1
192A ARGLE FtD hIAf2TNELL AVE AIRPOFtl"f2D 1 1:�: 1� :�: 1 2 �.' 12 1 2
193A AIRPORT RD ` PRESERVE BLVD N/O BIILY JEAN LN� 1 ". 1 1 `" 11 1 1
1938 AIRPORT RD : ENGINEERS W MILL LN��: 1 ���5 1 �` "�4 1 �:1 1 1 :4 1 1 �� 42 6 7
193C AIRP�RT R6 ' S/0 SYLUTA LN S CI7Y L1MIT 1 1 2 3 2 1 2 1 -2 1 1 1 2 2 1 3 72 6 8
19dA ELECTRO WAY AIRPORT RD��: E END ��. 1 �"� 1 -1 1 0 1
195A KNIGHTON RD SW CITY LIMIT AIRPOF2T RD 1 .�: �:9 �:1 1 0 1
196A WpODRUM CIR MUNICIPAL BL�/D MUNICPAI BLV6 � ":� 1 1 ".� 7 :-1 6 1 1
197A S BONNWIEW RD S�.MARKET ST CHURN GREEK RD�: ���. 2 5 %'6 13��� 2 6 -6 3 �c8 1 =3 2 �4 5 �"9 6 :: 164 13 26
79$A SACRAMENTQ DF2 E70 CENTER�.DR W/6 RNERSIDE DR� 1 1 ��� ��3 �1 1 12 1 2
199A CLEAR CREEK RI� E!Q SW CITY�LIMIT S1W CITY LiMIT 2 �.: 1 1 ��� ���2 ��2 2 1 1 =� 29 3 4
1956 CLEAR CF2EEK RD SW CITY LIMIT SR 2�3��: 1 :: 1 �1 1 0 1
200A Cf2EEK8IDE ST MULLEN PKWY GIRUAN���:f2D 1 �.= 1 1 1 0 1
201A GIRVAN RD �. EASTSIDE RD CREEKSIDE S7 1 1 �.�� 1 ����1 1 �:1 � 12 1 2
202A PI7 RD N10 BRCSOCH CT 510 PLATINUM WAY 1 ��� 1 1 ���� 11 1 1
203A f2EDDING(2ANCHERIA 12D'�. W END �2T 273; 1 :�: 1 � 1 �:� 1 0 1
204A CANYON RD '�. RT 273 S/O S CiTY LIMI7 I ��� 1 ����2 3- 1 �:4 1 '�: 1 1 f2 1 2- 45 3 6
305A VALLEY VIEW FtD N END CANYON C2D 1 �-� -1 1 1 0 1
206A JULY WAY YUL.E7IDE AVE E/O PA'fTERSt3N C'T 1 :�. :�.1 ��1 1 0 1
267A GOLDST CRLIPOt2NIPST MARKEI`ST 1:��:� :1 1 1 0 1
207� GOLD ST MARKET ST�. PINE S7i 1 :�9 1 � 11 1 1
208A EGHO RD CHURN CRE�.K F2D OC71N CT 1 �:.�� 1 �1 1 0 1
209A 120tviEP.UE A7HENSAVE PARKMARINAC7R �. 1����. ��" 7 1 1 0 1
21DA SACRAMENTO RNEF'2 Tk2L MIDDLE CREEK C2D 6VERNILL Df2 �:�� 1 1 -1 1 �� 30 1 1
211A pAl2SC7NS DI2��: HAf2TNELL AV� CHU12N GREEK RD'�: 1 �.�. 1 �� ��1 1 0 1
212A DOWNAi'2D LN��: CHUI2N CREEK RD E END ��: :�. 1 1 1 6 1 1
213A GOLD ST WEST ST COURT ST 1 :: 1 1 >- 1 0 1
Total 9� 50 221 �285 477 112 158 154 195 261 49 60� 53 71 55 208 215 217 1�81 �221� - - 1044
.$g4k1\�.�\\\�����\���
��i � � �� Meeting
����������,����� Summary
,�.,
December 18, 2020
To: Shelby Nadin Project: City of Redding Local Road Safety
Plan (LRSP)
From: Kathy Kleinschmidt(GHD} Ref/Job No.: 11215289
CC: Farid Rahman (GHD) File No.: �RSPMS0001.docx
Emily Darke (GHD)
Subject: Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP) Meeting#1 Summary— December 10"', 2020
The foltowing is GHD's understanding of the discussions and decisions for the above referenced rrteeting. Please
notify GHD of any discrepancies in the information recorded.
This meeting record has been prepared to serve as documentation for the virtual meeting conducted on December
10th, 2020 via Microsoft Teams platform.A PowerPoint presentation was used to focus the discussion.
All participants attending virtually, no sign-in sheet was circulated. Rather, the list af attendees will be provided at the
end of this document.
1. Introductions
A. Attendees of LRSP meeting
1. Self-introductions of ineeting attendees
a. Attendees are listed at the back of the document
2. Meeting Summary
A. Background
I. �ocal Road Safety Plan (LRSP)
a. Similar process to a Systemic Safety Analysis Report(SSAR), but
replacing the SSAR process by Caltrans and FHWA
b. Consistent with the State's Strategic Safety Plan (SHSP)and focuses
on the 5 E'S of traffic safety— Engineering, Education, Enforcement,
Emergency Response and Emerging Technologies (new addition)
c. Circular process with a living document—updated periodically.
d. Will be required for next cycle of Highway Safety Improvement
Program (HSIP)- Cycle 11.
B. Current Emerging Technologies
1. Signal preemption for emergency response and a project is being investigated
regarding preemption (transit priority at signals)for buses
II. Signal coordination along corridors
III. Communication with traffic signals
C. Focus Challenge Areas per SHSP-Challenge areas will be identified based on collision
data and interactive poll with the �RSP group participants were taken during the meeting.
Top 5 challenge areas identified in the poll are shown below. Results of the interactive
poll are attached to this meeting summary.
1. Pedestrian
���
669 Pacific Sfreet Su{te A San Luis Obispo California 93401 United States
'T+1 806 242 OA61 �V www.ghd.com
t �������`�r
������ 1 j ~ ;�
`SYt+a\������~�.�.
II. Distracted Driving
IIi. Bicyclists
IV. Intersection
V. Impaired Driving
a. Mark Montgomery (Redding Police Department) mentioned that PD is
implementing DUI checkpoints to address impaired driving
b. 6 required checkpoints per Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) grant
c. Effectiveness of DUI checkpoints are somewhat diminished by social
media release of locations of checkpoint. Drivers are aware of where
the checkpoints will be. Some unlicensed drivers are caught at DUI
checkpoint.
d. Some impaired drivers are apprehended in the periphery of the
checkpoints by patrolling officers.
e. DUI saturation patrols is the most effective way of apprehending DUI
drivers
D. Overall Collision Analysis
1. Collision density map of all City of Redding collisions shows concentration of
collisions along the following corridors.
a. Hartnell Avenue
b. Cypress Avenue
c. Churn Creek Road
d. Hilltop Road
e. Lake Boulevard
f. Rancho Road—S Bonnyview Road
II. Collision Density map of City of Redding fatal and severe injury collision shows
concentration of collisions along the following corridors.
a. Cypress Avenue
b. Hartnell Avenue
c. Lake Boulevard
d. Churn Creek Road
III. Caltrans collision analysis shows high density of collisions along SR 299, SR 44
and SR 273, at the intersection of SR 299 (Eureka Way)and SR 273 (S market
Street)and at the intersection of SR 44 (Tehama Street) and SR 273 (S Market
Street).
IV. Collision Severity and Type On City roadways
a. Within the City there were 25 fatal and 93 severe injury collisions in the
last 5 years (2015-2019).
b. Main types of fatal collisions are broadside and pedestrian-vehicle
collisions.
c. Top five collision types are broadside, rear ends, hit-object, sideswipe
and head-on collisions
i. There are advanced dilemma zone detection at some of the city
intersections.
ii. Distracted driving is a contributing factor in rear-end collisions.
d. Reflective back plates at signals is another countermeasure that can
be implemented at signalized intersection to reduce rear-end collisions.
i. Currently Caltrans is implementing this countermeasure at
locations that are likely to experience power outage due to
weather conditions. Data on effectiveness of this
countermeasure is limited. (confirmed by Jesse Solorio
(Caltrans))
�RSPMS0001/11214205 2
t �������`�r
������ 1 j ~ ;�
`SYt+a\������~�.�.
ii. City of Redding does not have any intersection with this
countermeasure.
e. Hit object collisions can be mitigated by installing delineators on fixed
objects inside the clear recovery zones.
E. Environmental Factor
I. Most collisions were in dry condition when there were no unusual condition in
roadways.
I I. There were three collision reported as"streetlight not functioning". These
collisions (two in 2019 and one in 2018}were located at the following locations:
a. Hilltop Drive 85' east of Mercedes Lane
b. Churn Creek Road at Hillmonte Drive
c. Hartnell Avenue at Victor Avenue
d. GHD will coordinate with the City with the details of this information
F. Violation Category
1. The top 5 violation category for City collisions are: unsafe speed, DUI/BUI,
automobile right of way violation, wrong side of the road driving and improper
turning.
I I. Unsafe Speed at busy intersections couid be because other vehicles are in slow
speed conditions (stop and go type traffic)where unsafe start would maybe be
more applicable
G. Pedestrian Collisions
I. There were 163 total collisions pedestrian related collision recorded in the City of
Redding roadways. Pedestrians involved in crossing were crossing in crosswalk
at intersection, crossing not in a crosswalk and walking in road, including
shoulder.
IL Collisions were observed along Lake Boulevard, S Market St, E Cypress Avenue,
Hartnell Avenue, and Placer Street
III. Mark Mantgomery(Redding Police) mentioned that pedestrian collisions at
segment could be caused by certain population not recognize crossing at
designated locations (pedestrian violations). There are mitigation measures
(crossing)at some of the highlighted segments already.
a. Potential education program can be implement to combat this.
IV. A location of concern along SR 273 is near the Win-River Resort and Casino.
Redding police reports that some pedestrian wearing dark clothing are crossing
SR 273 (S Market Street) mid-block(not at crossing) north of the intersection of
SR 273 (S Market Street)at Redding Rancheria Road.
a. Pedestrians are crossing near the south end of the bridge over Clear
Creek and walking along the west side of the bridge (pedestrians are
walking northbound opposite direction of traffic flow) near edgeline
where no sidewalks are present. Lighting is also limited at this location.
b. There is a transient trail across the street which is creating the demand
for a crossing.
c. Pedestrians crossing are often under the influence.
d. Caltrans has a few projects in the area including
i. Enhanced crosswalk at Girvan Rd which will adjust some grades
at the railroad crossing
ii. A grade separated path is planned on the west side of SR 273
but the path will merge with the bridge.
iii. John Abshier(City of Redding Public Works) has sent the plans
for the improvement to GHD to be included in the LRSP process.
H. Bicycle Collisions
�RSPMS0001/11214205 3
t �������`�r
������ 1 j ~ ;�
`SYt+a\������~�.�.
I. Broadside is the most common bicycle collision type; there are a total of 122
bicycle collisions recorded in the City of Redding roadways.
II. Wrong Side of Road is top violation category
a. Some bicyclists travelling the wrong way on the sidewalk and coming
off into intersection
b. Concentration of bicycle collisions on Lake Blvd
i. Possibly due to high concentration of driveways
I. Collision source
1. The current analysis takes into account all collisions reported to SWITRS.
a. The city has their own database of collisions.
b. Redding Police Department is recording collisions on the Spillman
database
i. This database does not include property damage only (PDO)
collisions.
J. Current Safety related projects
I. HSIP Projects
a. Hartnell Avenue from Churn Creek Road to Victor Avenue— in
planning/construction
i. Construction of curb, gutter and sidewalk
ii. American with Disability (ADA)compliant curb ramp and other
facilities
iii. Restriping of roadway to include 2 travel lanes in each direction,
a Two-way-left turn lane and buffered bike lanes.
iv. Enhanced crossings across Hartnell Avenue with refuge island at
Alfreda Way and east of Reservoir Lane.
v. Consolidation of driveway(access management)to reduce
vehicular conflict
b. Churn Creek Road Hartnell Road and Cypress Avenue— In
planning/construction
i. Construction of curb, gutter and sidewalk
ii. Restriping of roadway to include bike lanes
iii. Enhanced crossing across Churn Creek Road at the intersection
of Margalia St
iv. Possible installation of speed reduction tables at Maraglia Street
at Blueview Street and at�arkspur Lane near Parsons Middle
School
c. Systemic intersection lighting—submitted Cycle 10
i. Focused on broadside collisons and night collisions
ii. Benefit to Cost Ratio (BCR)was 30+ (very competitive)
d. Protected left turn phasing in downtown area—submitted in Cycle 10
i. Focused on broadside collisions
ii. BCR was 17-18 (very competitive)
II. ATP grant application
a. Victor Avenue from E Cypress Avenue to Hartnell Road.
i. Protected intersection Hartnell Road and Victor Avenue
ii. Roundabout at E Cypress Avenue and Victor Avenue
iii. Shared use path and bike lanes on west side of Victor Avenue
b. E Cypress Avenue from Alfreda Way to Victor Avenue
c. Alfreda Way north of E Cypress St
d. Sundial Bridge Drive shared used path (Downtown to Turtle Bay)
i. Currently there is a gap in the path that connects Sacramento
�RSPMS0001/11214205 4
t �������`�r
������ 1 j ~ ;�
`SYt+a\������~�.�.
River Trail to downtown at the Sundial Bridge Drive Bridge
across SR 44 (South of the intersection of Sundial Bridge Drive
and SR 44 Westbound Off-ramp).
III. Other Projects
a. Trinity Street Bikeway Project
i. Proposed Cycle track along Trinity Street, South on Continental
Street and East on Butte Street(becomes Park Marina Dr)
ii. This will connect to the Sacramento River trail once the Sundial
Bridge Drive cycle track is constructed.
1. City is doing due diligent analysis before
implementing cycle tracks.
2. Bike signals are not included in downtown for
now.
b. Sundial Bridge Drive improvements around Redding Civic Auditorium
i. Tighten up and raise (vertically)the intersection of Sundial
Bridge Drive toward the parking lot and Sundial Bridge Drive
toward Sheraton Redding Hotel.
ii. North leg of the intersection will be one-way traffic. This will be
part of a loop that will increase circulation when there are events
at the Auditorium.
c. Other raised intersection in Downtown.
d. Shelby Nadin (City of Redding)will send GHD the HSIP applications,
ATP applications and plans associated with planned and proposed
safety related projects.
K. School related Issues
1. There is only way in and out for Boulder Creek Elementary School (through
Whistling Drive)so there is a lot of traffic nearby
II. Turtle Bay School is the most populated campus on the west side of Redding
a. Several mitigation projects but still poses some issues
L. Priority list of locations
1. Beside the number of collisions, top locations are also identified based on
Equivalent Property Damage Only (EPDO) scale. EPDO weights locations based
on collision severity as well as number of collisions.
II. Locations with collision history can also be ranked based on collision rates. This
process will normalize the number of collisions based on the daily traffic.
III. Top Study Intersections
a. Churn Creek Road at Hartnell Avenue is the top intersection in term of
EPDO and total collisions.
b. Cypress at Hilltop had red-light enforcement project(around 2012}
which helped to bring it lower down on the list
i. Highest volume intersection in Redding
IV. Top Study Segments
a. Churn Creek Road from Presidio to S Bonnyview Road is top segment
i. During the meeting, this segment was identified incorrectly as
Churn Creek Road from Presidio to Dana Drive.
M. Countermeasure Development
I. Comprehensive approach will be applied which incorporates systemic and hot
spot approach.
II. Proven Countermeasures
a. Caltrans has a list of countermeasures (published in the �ocal Road
Safety Manual (LRSM))that can be funded by the HSIP.
�RSPMS0001/11214205 'rJ
t �������`�r
������ 1 j ~ ;�
`SYt+a\������~�.�.
III. Leading Pedestrian Intervals
a. John Abshier(City of Redding Public Works) has provided GHD with a
list of six city intersections with leading ped interval (LPI).
N. Vision, Goals and Priorities
I. Members of the LRSP working group will coordinate with Kathy Kleinschmidt
(GHD) in forming vision, goals and missions. Example of vision goals and
mission are shown below
a. Vision:
i. Toward Vision Zero—The aim is to eliminate all traffic fatalities
and severe injuries, while increasing safe, healthy and equitable
mobility for all.
ii. Working together in creating a comprehensive roadway safety
plan that encourages improved safety for all users, whether it is
walking, biking and driving—because every person in our
community matters.
b. Goal example:
i. Strive to achieve zero deaths and life altering injuries on local
roadways
ii. Increase safety with roadway infrastructure improvements
iii. Identify countermeasures to correlate to emphasis areas (5—
E's)
iv. Increase walking, biking, rolling (wheelchair, skateboard, scoter,
etc.)to downtown district, to work and to school)
c. Mission example:
i. Redding will provide a safe and sustainable multimodal
transportation system for all users of the public roadways in the
City of Redding.
II. Performance measures should be specific, measureable, achievable, relevant
and time constrained (SMART).
III. Mitigation strategies should correlate with challenge areas.
O. Public Outreach
I. Social Pinpoint Website
a. City prefers sooner rather than later to launch website
3. ext Steps
A. Finalize Vision, goals and mission
B. The report wiii be a living document that will be update periodically
C� GHD will compile current and planned safety projects
D. GHD will Develop Safety Projects
I. Benefit/Cost analysis based on HSIP analyzer
II. Will be ready for the next HSIP Cycle
E. Website will be made publically available after review from City staff.
1. Public outreach results will be presented at the next meeting
F. Next LRSP meeting will be virtual near the beginning of 2021.
List of ttendees
1. Shelby Nadin—Associate Engineer, City of Redding
2. John Abshier—Assistant Director of Public Works, City of Redding
3. Mark Montgamery—Sergeant, Redding Police Department
4. Jesse Solorio—Traffic Operatians Engineer, Caltrans
5. John Heath—Associate Engineer, Shasta County Public Works
�RSPMS0001/11214205 6
t �������`�r
������ 1 j ~ ;�
`SYt+a\������~�.�.
6. Robert Fellinger—Chief Business Official, Redding Unified School District
7. Sara Sundquist— Healthy Shasta Coordinator, Healthy Shasta Partnership and Shasta County
Health and Numan Services
8. Sean Tiedgen—Shasta Regional Transportation Agency
9. Kathy Kle[nschmidf—Project Manager, GHD
10. Farid Rahman—Transportation Engineer, GHD
11. Emily Darke—Transportation Engineer, GHD
�RSPMS0001/11214205 7
.$g4k1\�.�\\\�����\���
��i � � �� Meeting
����������,����� Summary
,�.,
May 3, 2021
To: Shelby Nadin Project: City of Redding Local Road Safety
Plan (LRSP)
From: Kathy Kleinschmidt Ref/Job No.: 11215289
CC: Emily Darke File No.: �RSPMS002.docx
Subject: Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP) Meeting#2 Summary—May 3, 2021
The fo/lawing is GHD's understanding af fhe discussions and decrsrons for the above referenced meeting. Ptease
notify GHD of any discrepancres in the information recorded.
This meeting record has been prepared to serve as documentation for the virtual meeting conducted on May 3, 2021
via Microsoft Teams platform.A PowerPoint presentation was used to focus the discussion.
All participants attending virtually, no sign-in sheet was circula#ed. Rather, the list of attendees will be provided at the
end of this dacument.
1. Introductions
a. Safety Champion/Project Manager for the City—Shelby Nadin
b. LRSP stakeholder group members
2. Summary of 1St Stakeholder Meeting
a. Meeting Summary
i. Challenge/Emphasis areas
1. Pedestrians
2. Distracted Driving
3. Bicyclists
4. Intersections
5. Impaired Driving
6. Speeding (associated with Aggressive Driving)
7. Add `Roadway Design'
ii. Collision analysis
iii. Projects in the City
b. Vision, Mission, and Goals
i. Sent form to stakeholders to provide input
3. Recent Developments
a. Review of collision analysis
i. Top violation category was unsafe speed
1. Many of these collisions resulted in rear ends
2. Usually the default primary collision for rear ends with police department
ii. Input from fire department
1. Priorities
a. Road widths
���
669 Pacific Sfreet Su{te A San Luis Obispo California 33401 United Sfates
'T+1 806 242 OA61 �V www.ghd.corrr
t �������`�r
������ 1 j ~ ;�
`SYt+a\������~�.�.
b. Ability to get around obstacles (mountable curbs, etc.)
c. Traffic calming devices
d. Roads in high fire hazard severity zones
i. To evacuate during a wildfire event
2. City does not currently have a largescale evacuation plan
a. In progress
3. Heatmap of collisions
a. Look into collision density in relation to collision rates
b. Public website engagement
i. Summarized interactive map comments
1. ACIQ canal request for multi-use paths are known to the City
a. Difficult to do since it is different agency
2. Magnolia neighborhood has come up in recent conversations
a. City has had requests for more projects on west side of town
3. Congestion at E Cypress Ave at I-5 ramps
a. Difficult intersection
b. Timed recently
c. Would benefit from a 2nd northbound lane on on-ramp
d. Proposal was previously considered along corridar for
signagelstriping
4. Crossing for pedestrians Buenaventura at Lakeside
a. In safety lighting project
b. Nothing specific to pedestrian crossings
5. Traffic circles on Shasta St
a. Many questions when they first went in
b. Potentially related to student drivers
i. High school is in close proximity
6. Lake Blvd at Keswick Dam has design for traffic signal
a. Been looking at funding to complete the project
7. Sidewalks near Hartnell and Alta M�sa
a. Big project to connect discontinuous sidewalks at pinch point
ii. Summarized survey results
1. Primary safety concern from public was a lack of infrastructure
2. Residents preferred shared use paths far bicyclists
3. Most people were familiar with ATP and HSIP projects and wanted to
learn more
a. Have mailing list from people who responded
i. Can reach out to people who wanted more information
4. Most people might be willing to use alternate mades of travel
iii. Other comments from the public
1. Concern about safety along Palisades Ave
2. No current plans to make improvements
3. Many people spend time at trailhead
4. Was sometimes confused with on-ramp to I-5
5. Seems to be a few specific drivers that frequent this area
c. Safety projects in the City
i. HSIP Cycle 10 projecfis
ii. ATP Cycle 5 projects
1. Will likely be constructed around 2024-2026
2. Design will start this year
iii. South Redding Bikeway and Pedestrian Trail Project
�RSPMS002/11215289 2
t �������`�r
������ 1 j ~ ;�
`SYt+a\������~�.�.
1. Could potentially add pedestrian fencing along roadway or additional
enforcement
a. Between bridge and casino entrance
4. Safety Projects
a. Methodology
b. Priority locations
c. Recommended countermeasures
i. Priority intersections
1. Most signal heads have been updated to 12"
2. Most pedestrian signals have countdown timers
a. Working through incrementally to get these replaced
3. City has advance dilemma zone for high-speed approaches
4. Decision was previously made by the City to not install retroreflective
tape
a. City runs on its own power
5. Consider alternate routes as a countermeasure
a. Sometimes the improvements can funnel active transportation in
areas that are not as desirable as alternate routes
b. Can view data for bike/pedestrian routes in the City
c. SRAT hired a travel data collection company
i. Around 30 active transportation video counts around the
City
ii. Under contract to do these counts in intervals in the next
few years
ii. Priority segments
1. Bechelli Ln has ATP project to add bike lanes and reduce area for
vehicles
a. Around 1 more year until construction
b. From Cypress to S Bonnyview Rd
2. Hartnell Avenue curvature
a. Considered HSIP project but couldn't find one that would be
competitive
b. Might be good bike corridor
i. Parallels SR 44 and connects to development
d. Potential funding sources for projects
i. Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP)
1. Benefit-to-cost ratio projects
2. Set-aside funding
ii. Active Transportation Program (ATP)
e. Non-engineering safety projects
i. Education
1. Agencies to partner with
a. Information Gatekeepers, Shasta Living Streets, Public Health
Department
ii. Emerging Technologies
1. Automatic bicycle/pedestrian counters
a. City has current vehicle counters from decades ago but not
utilized often
iii. Enforcement
iv. Emergency Response
�RSPMS002/11215289 3
t �������`�r
������ 1 j ~ ;�
`SYt+a\������~�.�.
1. Speed tables don't dramatically affect response times and are not as
harsh on equipment
5. L SP Timefra e
a. Living document that is updated as needed
b. Official update every 5 years
c. �RSP schedule for completion
i. Final �RSP around June/July 2021
6. ext Steps
a. Provide input on vision, mission, and goals
b. Dan will provide shapefile of areas with disadvantaged communities to overlay over areas
with recent/upcoming/proposed projects
c. Gontinue to share the LRSP website with the public
d. Review of draft LRSP document
List of ttendees
1. Shelby Nadin—Associate Engineer, City of Redding
2. John Abshier—Assistant Director of Public Works, City of Redding
3. Craig Wittner— Fire Marshal, Redding Fire Department
4. Jesse Solorio—Traffic Operations Engineer, Caltrans
5. Robert Fellinger—Chief Business Official, Redding Unified School District
6. Sara Sundquist— Healthy Shasta Coordinator, Healthy Shasta Partnership and Shasta County
Health and Human Servic�s
7. Micha�l Kuker—Associate Transportation Planner, Shasta Regional Transportation Agency
$. Dan Wayne—Senior Plann�r, Shasta Regional Transportation Agency
9. Kathy Kleinschmidt—GHD
10. Emily Darke—GHD
�RSPMS002/11215289 4
Interactive Map Comments
m' �
' ' Bridge shouiders need to be swept more frequently and thoroughly.Aiso,the fog; This suggestion is recorded in the'"Public Suggestions"tabie in the Local Road
1 3/26/2021 9:13 , Biking Comment Iine has worn away almost completely.tt woultl be easy to restripe and maybe gafety-Pian.
even add bike lane buffers
2' 3/26/2021 9:14 briving Comment Congestion occurs during peak periods.Recommend installing a roundabout Relatetl to congestion at fhe intersection of Hartneil Ave af Aita Mesa 6r.
3 3/26/2021 9:15 ' briving Comment Congestion occurs during peak periods.Recommentl installing a roundabout Related to congestion at the intersection of Oid Aituras Rd at victor Aue.
The(arguabiy)worst congestion in Retlding occurs near the I-5JCypress Ave
4' 3/26l2021 9:18 Driving Comment Related to congestion at the US 101 interchange at Cypress Ave.
interchange.Are there any long-term improvements planned?'
This area wouid be idea for a muitiuse patli.There are many families who live in This suggestion is rec�rded in the"Public Suggestions"table in the�ocai Road
5' 3/26/2021 11:44 Biking Comment Stillwater Heights that attend Coiumbia 5chool(and would iike ta go to the Big ! Safety;Plan.
League).
Improve access to EHS for residents through back of school to avoid traffic at front
6' 3/26/2021 11:45 ' Pedestrian Comment Related to traffic flow near Enterprise High School.
of school.
Difficult for bikes to trigger signal and crtrss Market esp heading eastbound.Signal
7' 3/26/202'I 11:50 Biking Comment does not have a protectetl Ieft.Consider adding sign/sharrow or other ' Relatetl to roadway under Caitrans jurisdiction(SR 273 at California St). i
improvements for bikes heading westbound up CA street hilL `
8 3/26/2021 11:52 ! Biking Comrnent a pafh through this area would be idea to get people±from Magnolia n�ighborhood This suggestion`is recorded in the"Public Suggestians"tabie in the Cocal Raad
over to AirparWGoid to head to hospital area and downtown. Safety;Plan.
Signalized ceossing of some sort would help bikes,peds,drivers and school traffic.
This area preferred over Suns�t Terrace for signai as this area lacks site distance,
9 3/26/2021 11:55 Biking Comment has high speeds,and trait access is close(trail to Manzanita)and River Trail on Related to roadway under Caltrans jurisdiction(SR 299 at Overhiil Dr).
south side of 299.Gould be a great conneGtion for a�.great de�l of students
(Shasta,Pioneer,Uprep,Manzanita,Coop:..)
Unsafe to cross with high speeds,multiplerlanes esp peak traffic hours.Lots of
' school time fraffic.Many residents(aiong Buenaventura and Lakeside subdivision) -�his suggestion is recorded in the"Public Suggestions"table in the Local Road
10' 3/26/2021 11:57 Pedestrian Comment Iike to walk/bike to Mary Lake and Westsitle trails.many tlrive'as they do not feel, Safety Plan.
safe driving.One of my;neighbors moved to Mary�ake because he didn't like
crossing Buenaventura for his daily morning waiks.
11+ 3/26/2021 11:58 � Biking Gomment Lots:of gravel in Bike Lane due fo bufferecl bike lane:Needs fo be swept to curb on This suggestion is recorded in ffie"Public Suggestions"table in the Local Road
a more frequent basis. Safety Plan.
' Welf defined goat path here.Residents living off Starlight walk/bike to market. This suggestion is recorded in the'Public 5uggestions"tabie in the Locai Road
12' 3(2612021 12:00 Petlestrian Comment Would be nice to define this multiuse path(Iots of goat heads as a goat path!)No Safety Plan.
good for bikes(rocky and goat heads).
K rail is put in odd spots for bikes to enter/exit roadway block to eliminate cut
through traffici IYs also pooriy maintained and feeis unsafe.I don't think'it is �his suggestion is recordetl in the"public 5uggestions"'tabie in the l.ocai Road
13 3/26l2021 12:03 ! Biking Comment unsafe,it feels unsafe and couid be improved through art,paint,landscaping Yo Safety'P(an.
make this an incredibie bike way with low traffic.Low hanging;fruit,good
neighborhood�Juniper 5chool project!
14 3/26/2021 12:06 Biking Comment ACID Canai would make an amazing bike path for N/S commuters and kids gaing This sugge$tion is recorded in the"Public Suggestions"'table in the Local Road
to school(Sequoia,Cypress,Bonney Uiew;Sycamoce-and schaols in Anderson) Safety Plan.
15 3/26/2021 12:08 ' briuing Comment Intersection is huge.Difficult far aIl users. Related to roadway under Caltrans jurisdiction(8R 273 at S Bonnyview Rd).
16 3/2612021 12:09 ' Biking Comment High Speeds for regulac bike lane.Needs muitiuse path or alternative route for This suggestion'is recorded in the"Public Suggestions"tabie in the Locai Road
cyciists.Wiil,get busier when Costco comes. Safety;Plan.
17 3/30i2021 7:26 ' Biking Comment ��Would be nice to see more frequent maintenance of the eastbound bike lane,the This suggestion is recorded in the"Public Suggestions"table in the Local Road
roadside vegetation encroaches into the lane reducing the usabie width for cyclists. Safety-Pian.
18 3/30/2021 7:38 Biking Comment The westbound bike lane on South Bonnyview ends at Eastside Road. It wouid be This suggestion is recorded in the"Public Suggestions"table in the Locai Road
nice to have bike facilities continue on South Bonnyview to Cedars Road. SafetyjPian.
m�
19 3/30l2021 7:40 Biking Comment There is a Bike Route sign on Cedars at Westside Road. It would be nice to iink' This suggestion is recorded in the"Public Suggestions"tabie in the Local Road
this bike route witn the bik�Ianes on South Bonnyuiew Road ' Safety Plan.
20 3/30/2021 7:41 ' Biking Comment This is a chailenging Intersection'for westbound cycl�sts Refated to roadway under Caltrans jurisdiction(SR 273 at S Bonnyview Rd).
21 3/30/2021 i 5:40 ' Biking Comment No bike Iane or pedestrian walkway advailable.Please develop such a path on this This suggestion is recorded in the"Public Suggestions"table in the Local Road
stretch of road.Unsafe coad for bicyclists and pedestrians. Safety;Plan.
Generally a confusing intersection-sensors don't get tripped,;road gets blocked,'
cars turn o�red at wrong time. '
22 4/12/2021 14:06 Driving Comment Relatetl to roadway under Caltrans jurisdiction(5R 273 at Breslauer Way).
I do not know what needs to be done to fix this intersection,but I know it's an
extremely frustra#ing and potentially tlangerous one.
Ifs not that I do not appreciate hauing traffic circles in my neighborhoodi It is that'
others are unaware of the right of way in a traffic circle.
So'many times I've had to slam on my brakes as I'm making a left turn'afready in
23 4/1612021 22:54 Driving Comment the intersection as someone tries to beat me to go straight through the ' This suggestion is recorded in the"Public Suggestions"tabie in the Locai Road
intersection.Too many iclose calls to counY: Safety Pian.
If the city was abie to inform/educate the pubiic 0 maybe there won't be so many
incidents in these areas.
24 4/17/2021 10:43 ` Driving Comment �have seen too many close calls at this intersection.There needs to be`traffic This suggestion'is recorded in the"Public Suggestions"table in the�ocal Road
Iights here. Safety Plan.
25 4/28/2021 16:09 Pedestrian Comment This:area really needs a sitlewalk,or at fhe very least gratle it and make it easier' This suggestion is recorded in tfie"Public Suggestions"table in the Local Road
for peaple to walk,push a baby carriage or use a wheel chair. Safety;Plan.
26 A/28/2021 17:53 ' Pedestrian Comment Need sidewalks on this street and bike lanes as well!Uery unsafe. This suggestion is recorded in the"Public Suggestions"table in the Cocal'Road
Safety Plan.
Very footish to close this major street. During the Carr fire,it was a vitally
27 4/29l2021 7:23 Driving Comment important escape route: Hard to figure out<why this shartsighted decision was How should the`response#o the clossure of Riverside Dr be phrased?
made.
Cars tuming Ieft onto Rancho Rdihave very fast traffic coming around a blind curve
28 4/29/2021 17:26 Driving Comment from Churn Creek Rd.Have witnessed many close calls.Anyane unfamiliar with ' This�uggestion is recorded in the"Public Suggestions"table in the Local Road
the road and the traffic,is greatly at risk of a serious�njury accident at this 5afety Plan.
intersection as well as those who are familiar as well.
Congested intersection tlue to commuter traffic and pedestrian traffic.Traffic IighY
29 4/30/2021 8:13 ' briving Comment Releted to congestion at the intersection of Placer St at Airpark Dr.
skips AirparkDr.frequently.
Lanes seem too narrow for most cars.I have witnessed so many drivers driving ' The area arountl the E Cypress Ave britlge has been identified as a priority
30 5/7/2021 16:25 Driving Comment Iocation in the Local Roed Safefy Plan.Countermeasures for this Iocation are
over the white lines because they look foo close to other vehicles. presented in the;plan.
Too much drag racing and speeding done an Goodwater Ave,endangers children
walking&waiting at the numerous bus stops for elementary and high school
31' 5/8/2021 8:39 briving Comment �tudents and pedestrians on walks or bike rides with children.iOne house on this This suggestion is recorded in the"Public Suggestions"'table in the Local Road
road fence was damaged from car racing,Recommend severai speed bumps be( Safety Plan.
placed to discourage speeding and racing vehicles.Including freeman Way which
has the same problems and many families:
Freebridge at'Smiie is tlesperately in need'of a STOP Sign.Either a 4 UUay stop or
Stop signes on Freebridge Entering Freebridge from Russel to Smile making a
32 5/14/2021 21:38 ' Driving Comment �eft or a right tum , ' This suggestion is recorded in the"Public Suggestions"table in the Local Road
is dangerous and has biind spots of seeing traffic coming at a high rate of speed Safety Pian.
from the south on Freebridge and also from Parkview heading South on
Freebridge.
Turning from Eureka way,left onto Aimond at night is confusing and dangerous �his suggestion is recorded in the"Public 5uggestions"tabie in the Local Road
33 5/14l2021 21:43 ; Driving Comment because there is no street Iight.7his is exacerbated by the Iights of East bound ; Safety(Plan.
traffic on Eureka way. ;
m�
Old Alturas Bridge Iacks proper bike lanes;requiring'bikes and cars to share the
iane.Traffic travels at high speeds in this corridor.This narrow bridge is my biggest
34' 5/17J2021 9:39 ' Biking Comment safety concern when biking to and from work(Shasta View to Downtown). This suggestion is recorded in the"Public Suggestions"tabie in the Locai Road
Replacing the bridge and provitling adequate facilities would be a huge Safety Plan.
improvement.Better yet,would be a multi-use path on the north side of 0Id Rlturas
from Shasta View brive to Browning StreeY.
35 5/1712021 12:59 Driving Comment Lotsiof congestion on 5haste View between 44 and Hartnell.Road shouid be This suggestion is recorded in the"Public Suggestions"table in the Locai Road
widened with bike Ianes and sidewalk improvements: Safety Pian.
36 5I17/2021 12:59 I briving Comment �-Orts of congestion on Uictor between 44 and Cypress.Road should be widened This suggestion is recorded in the"Public 5uggestions"table in the Locai Road
with-bike lanes and sidewalk improvements. Safety;P(an.
Double signal;at Mistletoe and 44,always causes backups.Recammend installing
37 5/17/2021 13:01 Driving Comment Related to roadway under Geitrans jurisdiction(SR 44 at Mistletoe Ln).
very large roundabout to cover the ciose intersection of al)the'roads.
Left turn onto Airport Road or ieft turn onto 44 westbound ramp can be tlifficult
38 5/17/2021 13:03 ' Driving Comment during peak traffic times.Consider intersection improvements such as a Related to roadway under Caltrans jurisdiction(SR 44 at Airpod Rd).
roun�labout. ��
When trying to turn left here onto Gold,it's often di�cult to judge whether or not a This suggestion'is recorded in the"Public Suggestions"tabie in the�ocai Roed
39 6/17/2021 15:11 briving Comment car will be going straight onto California or turning Ieft onto Gold. It would be great Safety;Plan.
if there was a definitive way to tell the difference.
Twice in the past 2 weeks 1've been in the far right lane fo turn right and had
40 6/17/2021 15:13 Driving Comment another car to the right of ine use the bike iane. Typicaily this means they are This suggestion'is recorded in the"Public Suggestions"tabie in the Cocai Road
parking,but two separate drivers appear to have been confused and then tried to Safety Plan.
get into the lane i was in.
41 6f17/2021 15:14 Driving Comment It would be great if the stop signs here became permanent. This suggestionlis recorded in the"Public Suggestions"tabie in the Locai Road
Safety Plan.
' Thissecfinn of Oid Alturas is dangerous for pedestrians and bikers. The bridge is This suggestion'is recorded in the"Public Suggestions`'table in the Locai Road
42 6/17(2021 16:47 Pedestrian Comment too narrow as well as the shoulders on both sides of'the street.Intersection of Oid Safety Pian.
Alturas and Victor begs for a roundabou#.
43' 6/18/2021 6:58 Biking Comment Bike lanes don't continue to Rancho Road. Pienty of room to add whiteiiines. ' This suggestion'is recorded in the"Public Suggestior�s"tab(e in the Cocai Road
Safety Plan,
' This'stretch of road has very smail shoulder. It would be great if road couid be , This suggestion is recorded in the"Public Suggesfions"table in the Locai Road
44i 6/18/2021 7:01 Biking Comment expanded in this stretcfi from Victor to 15 so I could ride ta work and thelgrocery ; Safety Pian.
store.
'
�x� � tY� �
�t i � t , �'��: .��, �,„� _ . , . . ,.
yc;, ,<
, t . ..
� �
, �� � �� Legend a
, � fl�� 4 t i
�� �� � � � � � � �
� � , �� �� ��,�� . �, � �� ro�e �y�
,�} s z,i, �P
n "
m � � # 4 ', �.� ` �� � ' T , ycle 1
�
�
� { Si� } ��`��;.`i�+;z�," ,;��g;� 4.,;xc zu� ��;,�.� a� �# A �
e
ATP C cl 2
� r �'�`' � �� ATP, Cycle 3
�; � �� 2
�� � � a��� �
, � � �fi ��
�:� x �� ��^��� ,� �� ATP, Cycle 5 �
� �^ ��
� �t� t "�`� �, � H81P, Cycle 6 i
,
� ti f}> �.�
�
r u < �
� > v
�.� .,�.,�� t� �
�°"
.�:. , �t� � . ,,. �� � �� �, r r � HSIP, Cycle 7 `
���� �, ,�:�: ���., � � �z�,,����,.t,. ,���� HSIP, Cycle 8
� �. , _� 2
G � �
�
�r,:�
��`���5��HS I P C cle 9 �
�� Yrr. 12 3 Y ', ' ;�.. ,�s� . :�Y��� i 7
i ,i'.„ .. � , �SS., , �
r . �� , 10
w
:. ,f� �}.,.� �
,.
� � � � e
€
. �
HSIP, C cl z
� � �.� � � � � �
h �R � � � ASHC STI
�wt3,.�'A�@"� X��'ST �,�"f ho-y r � Yaw,
t
a, „
„ M ,
� ,{ �"��� �_ ������ a� �� Sec�ion 130
�,. ., ��� . � � . $ �� � 2
�' �'��� �� � �` CItyC�P
�� �'��� � �.�� "� � ��� I�,City of Redding
�
� � 6 � ;,� �>� °°^� City�imit �
a,.r � �� w�
� � � � �
�€. �'��� � �, . � � �_
"����,r���,�,� • ���a. �t � ���a�w�� �
„ M �.
�
� � �a�a����� €
m 6 sy z �tr� ��.� z
� � ���� ,_
��� 6 ' ��,x���������"x;7�N ;
�" �� '` � ,�� �+;`����
�: �1 � CITY OF �w���4 ���
r
� ��rr .������v����k RE D D 1 N G l�
� � � �
�� � � �.
��� � u� � � ��
� � �.
��' � ����� ��
,, �
t � w
'
� � :. , : �; � �fi�; � �
��:a:� � ������ � r
� ,.� u� n.; .,.t�. t. �� ��
e.,
��. a.<��<.w %
�� �, � �: ��
� :
€, 13; ����w
�� �- �,�
��
�` ,' ��7
� ���3� �
�
��� �,�
�� ..:.
�„ � �'� 3 �. ��7 �.
; � �,� � � '; ; ,,, ,��,;, � �� �;: � � � � � � ;� � �
'�, � . �g �a;7 � k
� 15 `
������``�3�� � �� �;x ��
5 � ��
� �
7 s � �� $
;}, l, 6 ts� 5 ��$ � o-Wa r r
t�
��2, 7 � � �.
�ki � ��
Y
�� � 17 s t� _ �
_ � �� � ,,,,
� . �
,
� . �. �t � ti
�� .� ,,,,• ��� �7� 4 ����e���, �:� �� �
Y �
� 14 �6 � �� � a
� � �,
� � , �; �., �� ,
�t ,��� �0 6�6 �� �..., � "'� � ��
P; � � ,
;, s � ���
�k '
�' �il? t ,. � .°, "�2 ..; . . , `$��� t
,
�� f ., �e;� R�
p` � `x 6 ��,,�r� �;
� 4 a�
[ t % � ��
2. ... �, t � � k
¢ �7
' �N�, 6 ;
k'' c�t 7 z
� � �� � � �
��;�� �,�, �.�, }
,� •�
; � �
� .
„
��
U
� �.R� r
�;. � � �
..} � m ,O �4 ;
.,. r.: yN�, .
' Q � � «..., i..
� « � � �.. �
� �� 7 �
°t� � � < _;,; �,.:, .. .. ��. � , t
� � ���,.E � �
`� 6 �,w �
� � � 6 � � 6 6� � �
�, , �.
„ � �,.. . ti ,
������� � �� � �� �. .�. ��,. �� � � ���� �
� �.�,
���.� �.� � �
� �
r �� ,.
,..
� �
.,. . � : �„ �� � ,
�� � �,� � a
� �. �w
�:.
�
�
f,. � �
,�' ��,, _� : � �
� _ �
� � �� �
�.,,,� t
�,
. r .��„
, � •,. _. � �� 4
�: :. . �
'
�. �� ���`s s. «=x� w
z
�, ��
V �
�,,+,�,s C, r; ,",,,fi',' 3::n�'�a�l-.
t y d
' ,.
v
M
g:; t �.:il�s l�..��'�4i5.;� 3.,< �
,. ..t ,. ,. .. „' ,. , a tt�,:} , `* �t�a
y ''
,. .: ,1i t„�.,.� , , �
.. j$h `°,,, �
� <J.
�
.
�,
�"' �dk ... `��' �$ �,,, n�'� , �� :
^�*�, ,�.,�. „ .
` $ t
ty
(
,r.. ,� �ra'
�� �vhs �„ ,
�,. .. s� a .�
, ,�4ti`tkq� � � � . .,� �
, � . ... � Y �, ni, '., .>� r.
��� � `
_..� . ., ��`Yh�!'�; a
�. �
a � � '
�," w.
,. � ,. � � � � ��r������5��t�'�� �tW����������,.: �
,-
�
; �"�s��s��" ;
„: � „ r�� ���. _ �i,
, .
� v.�� h,.�
,�- �
� a �, ��� � � . �,
E.
�
� �,
��
E
y � �,
w �,� �
�M t,� i . .f .
�,;� :��jt S 1: 3� �: '� d �i
ts,.
n
� ���
' r,., l�s , ', t cY£�a,�+.``�lfi�e�i....,gi#�`
f�' . �.,,., � ,
r '
,t ��," ',r ..;, ,, .. � y; , 4,,
�
,,_
,'
„'
� �
r�. .,�.� t .� � ,, ay��.��e . t � :
s t�" ��'� �� .
i) .�'�'4 �.
4 sr t �`� cs �• �...� : ''i�'� ' �
^'°,a 0, Y" , ro
7. ?
�_„
' >i ,.�;�'. ,,,,, 4 h "�,@' z = &"��� �S. �,,`t ��
�a �
at ,• c�i• , ;• l�'3iY�,y$ro a u �: a ��
i�� �Jni„ i � ���;:.. � � '� � '�
� �
p3 � � „
,.:. ... .....,. .�...,,.. ....... .,.�.,..,,.� .�...:,,.-. Ur .....,.... .,.W.�:�. t.��...... .-.m.,,, v,..�..-. _..,....,. ...... "'�:,x...� �.,....... ......... ,.......,. �a�,,..... ,.,....:.., ..,..,...... .��.. „�....�.. ........ ...,�.. .........,...-..�..
�
?���������������«`\C\�.��\O\\"\��«`S"�,."\��\�`�O\"\�.�`000\\"\�.���«`S"�,,"\��««""\��..5'`y�,`,`\"���4�5'00\\000\\"\�.�\"��`�\��45"�000\\"�,."\�\O\\���`S`000\"\�.�C\�.S"\���000\\"�,."�,."\�000\\"\��«`�S."\�\.ti�`�..�'`.,.'\�."\��000\S"`..�.'''`..ti�\\"�,."\��000\"\��.'��..."\�"\�.S"\�`S��'�.'\�."\����'s��"�,.�'�'�."�,."�,."�,."�,."�,."�,."�,."�,."�,."\�.�\.���"\�`S"�,."\��`S"\�.���OS�C\�."\��«`S�"\�.��\"�"��.�"�,."\��4�\\\\\"`..,"`,..\�C\�.�\\"�,.�;,.."��.",,,."�,."�,."�,."�,."�,."�,."�,."\���`S"�,."\�����������000\\"\��«<`S�\."\�\.�.\�'�'�."�,."\���«`S�.\``�.'�,'''`..ti"�,."\��`S"�,."\�.�`'�4�\\\\\."\�\."000\\�'��..."\�000\\"\�`�l�'��..."\�.�C''\�"ti�..�\O\\"\�.``,..L..�`."�,."l,,"`y�,`,`�.,."�'\\\
Paper Size ANSI B CITY OF REDDING Project No. 11215289
0 o.s o.s o.s t.2 N LOCAL ROAD SAFETY PLAN(LRSP) Revision No. -
������������ Date 0311112021
����� � �� �� CURRENTIUPCOMING SAFETY
0,�"�4���`��'��������
Map Projection:MercatorAuxiliary Sphere
Ho��zonca�oatum:w�s�ssa PROJECTS IN THE CITY OF REDDING
Grid:WGS 1984 Web MercatorAuxiliary Sphere FIGU RE C.�
N�.W515an Luis ObispoNrojects15611112152891GI51MapslWorkinglUpcaming Safety Pmjectsmtti �a�e somce�.5tetewide Integreted Treffic Recards System(SWITRS)2015-2019,Somces'.Esri,HERE,Garmin,Intermap,incrementP Corp.,GEBCO,USGS,FAO,NPS,NRCAN,GeoBase,IGN,KadesterNL,
Printdate:11 Mar 2021-15:18 Ordnanee Survey,Esri,lapan,METI,Esri Chirra(Hong Kong),(c)OpenStteetMap conhibuNrs,and Me GIS User Community,Crea�ad by:adarke
Safety Projects in Progress/Recently Compieted in the City of Redding
City Roadways
.
, � • •• West Streef Area School Safety Wesf 5t,7tfi St,8th St,9th St,10th St, �urb and gutter improvements�,curb bulb-outs,pedestrian
1 ATP,Cycle 3 '�May 20 In design �� � improvements,mstalli�g RRFB,adding bicycle markings,buffered�:
'3mprovement Project Magnolia Ave �
bike lane,installing lighting ...
2 HSIP,Cycle 6 "Oct-18 3n design ��.Old Oregon����Trail Widening �Old Oregon:Trail from Paso Roble$Nve W�dening roadway
�.to Bear Mountain Rd
Tnnity St,S�:on Continental St,E on Butte
3 ASHClSTI '�Nov 20 In design Trinity Street Bikewey Projeot .�.St Installing buffered�:cycle track,installing green conflict paint
4 Section 130 ��:Jun-20 Construction IShasta Street R.R Crossing �:Shasta St at Railroad Crossing Pedestrian improvements at railroad crossing
:�this year <improvements Pro�ect ���
:�:Systemic Protected�eft�:Tum
5 HSIP�Cycle 10 '� Oct 20 �Funded :Coutt St(SYiasta St to Butte St) Micro surFacing,striping improvements
����Prnject
5 HSIP C cie 10 'Oct 20 '�Funded '�Sysfemie Protecfed LeftTum 'South St Railroad Crossin to SR 273 Stri in im rovements,ADA curb return u�� rades,micro surfacin ��'.
Y ( 9 ) p .9' P p9 9.
Project
�:Systemic Protected�eft�Tum
5 HSip,Cycle 10 ��Oct-20 -Funded ��.Placer St(Market St to Gontinental St} Microsurfacing,striping improvements,ADA curb return upgrades '
IPro�ect
�Systemic Protected LeftlTur� " ' Micro-surfacing,striping improvements,mstailation of new traffic �
5 HSIP�Cyole 10 �Oct-20 ���Eundetl �Butte Si at Gontinental St � �
��'Pro�ect signab:pole and mast arm,ADA curb return upgrede
6 HSIP,Cycle 10 ��Oct 20 �'Funded �Systemic Intersection Safety �"geltline Rd at Mountain Lakes Bivd` Install-new intersection lighting on Beltline Rd
;��:Lighting Project
�:Systemic fntersection Sefety
6 NSIP Cycie 10 �Oct-20 �Funded = 'Lake Bivd at Wiimington:Way Install�new mtersection lighting on Lake Blvd
;:Lighting Prdject
6 HSfP,Cycle 10 �:Oct-20 �Funded ��Systemic Intersection Safety !�ake Bivd at Keswick Dam Rd Install:new intersection Iighting on Keswick Dam ftd and Lake Blvd-:
.�:�igf�ting Pro�ect
6 HSIR Cycle 10 � Oot-20 'Funded �Systemic I�fersection Safety '�ake Bivd at Magnums Way Insfell��new intersectio�fighting on Magnums Way
;;Lighfing Project
6 HSIP�Cyc(e 10 ':Oct-20 �:Funded 'Systemic Intersection Safety :guenaventura Blvd at Lakeside Dr '� Install'new intersection lighting on Buenaventura Blvd�.
:',Lighting Project
���Systemic Intersection Safety
$ NSIP,Gycle 10 ��.Oct-20 �:Funded � :Hilltop Dr at�lntlustriat SE Instail�new inYersectwn lighting on Hititop Dr and Intlustrial St
:ILighting Pro�ect
6 HSIP Cycle 10 ��:Oct-20 �:Pundetl Systemic Infersection Safety `Churn Creek Rd at Harpole Rd Instal6:new mtersection lighting on Churn Greek Rd and Harpole ftd'.
;�(�ighting Pro�ect
ISystemic Intersection Safety ' � Install�new intersection lighting on Shasta View Dr and�:Chnstian
6 HSIP;Cycle 16 :Oct-20 'Pundetl �� 'Shasta View Dr at Christian Ave
�:��LighfingProject Ave -��
�;Systemic Intersection Safety
6 HSIR,Cyc(e 10 f OcC-20 '�FunCled �. Shasta Vlew Dr af Wilson Ave Installlnew interseCtlon IighYing on
:.Lighting Project
6 HSIP,Gycle 10 �Oct 20 "Funded ��Systemlc In2ersesfion Safety Shasta View Dr at Hawrt Ave fnstalf�:new intersebtion 6ghting on Shasta View Dr et Hawn Ave
5':Lighting Prq�ecl
':Systemic Intersection Safety
6 HSIP,Cycie 10 ��:Oct20 ��Funded � Shasta View Dr at Alden Ave Installrnew mtersection lighting on Alden Ave at Shasta View Dr
-lL.ighting Project
��'Systemic Intersectioa Safety
6 NSIP Cycle 10 �� Oct-20 :Funded � �Shasta View Galaxy Way Instalhnew intersection lighhng on Galaxy Way
;�:Lighting Project
6 HSIP�Cycle 10 ��Oct 20 �.Funded ��Systemic Intersection Safety ;Rancho Rd at Alta Mesa Dr Install��.new intersection lighting on Raneho�Rd and Alta'Mesa Dr
��.'�,Lighting Project
8 HSIR,Cycie 10 `�Oct-20 �"Funded ��Systemic Intersection Safety {�ancha Rd�t Atta Camino Dr Install��new interse�twn lighting on RanchoRd
:':Lighting Project
��:Systemic Intersection Safety
6 HSIP Cycle 10 ��:Oct-20 �:Funded -� �Rancho Rd at Alta Rico Rd Install��.new intersection lighting on Ranchd`Rd at Aita Rico Dr
:�ILighting Pro�ect
6 HS1P,Cycle 10 �Oct-20 �Funtled �Systemic(tersectioa Safety '�Rancho Rd at Saratoga br Instell:new intersecfion lighting o�Saratoga br and Rancho Rtl
;:Gghting Pro�ect
�:Systemic Intersection Safety
6 HSIP,Cycte 10 ��Oct 20 �.Funded �� :Rancho Rd at Goodwater Ave Install��.new intersection lighting on Rancho�:Rd antl Goodwater Ave:�
�lighting Project
�;Systemic Intersection Safety
6 HSIP,Cycle 10 :Oct-20 '.Funded - f2ancho Rd at Persisten�e Ln lnstall'.new mtersection lighting on Rancho'.Rd and Persistence Ln':
;:Lighting Pr6ject
��:Systemic Petlestrian Crossing New striping and crosswalk markings,ADA upgrades,RRFBs,
7 HSIP,Cycfe 9 �Aug-1$ In design :;�nhancements '��Piacer St af West St advance warningsignage
�:Systemic Pedestnan Crossing ' New stnping and crosswalk markings,detectable waming surface ��'�
7 HSIP Cycle 9 �:Aug-18 In design .'�.�nhaocements '�Gold St at Gourt St ,upgratles,RRFBs�;refuge:island/concrete median
�:Systemic Pedestnan Crossing �� �� ADA Gpgrades,RRFBs,new stnping and crosswaik markings,
7 HSIP,Cycle 9 :Aug-1$ 1n design � ��Parkview Ave at State St � ��
-Enhancements � advance warning;Signage,refuge island/concrete median
�:Systemic Pedestrian Crossing � ADA upgrades,RRFBs,new striping and crosswalk markmgs,
7 HSIP,Cycle 9 ��Aug-18 In design !�nhancements �:Hilltop Dr at�:Sandpant Dr advance warningsignage
���:Systemic Pedestnan Crossing �� ` ADA upgrades,RRFBs,new striping and crosswalk markings,
7 HSIP,Gycle 9 ���Aug-18 ln design � �.Chum Creek St at Palacio Dr � �
�.'�.Enhancements advence warning signage
7 HSIP,Cycle 9 �:Aug-18 �.In design �Systemic Pedestnan Crossing :growning St at Lancers Ln ADA upgrades,RRFBs,new striping and crosswalk markings,
�.�Enhancements advance warning signage,new lighting
� � ��:Systemic Pedestnan Crossing � � New stnping and crosswalk markings,detectable warning surface ':
7 HSIP,Cycle 9 :Aug-18 In design 'Old Alturas Rd at Beadford Way upgrades,RRFBs;ADA upgratles,refuge island/concrete median,:��.
�:Enhancements �� ��
newllghting,advance warmngsfgnage
'�:Systemic Pedestrian Crossing �� � ADA upgrades,RRFBs,new striping and crosswaik markings,
7 HSIP Cycle 9 ,Aug-18 In des�gn � �Churn Creek Rd at Michael Ln � �
-":Enhancements advance warning signage,�new lighting
` � � ��:Systemic Pedestrian Crossing � ' New stnping and crosswalk markings,detectable warning surface ��:
7 HSIP,Cycle 9 ��.Aug-18 In design � 'Saturn Skyway at Shasta View Dr -. upgratles,RRFBs;ADA upgredes,refuge Island/noncrete median,j
��.E�hancements �� �
advance warning:signage
�8 City CIP ;Apr 19 Constructed ���:Airport Road Improvement Project �Airport Rd(Billy Jean Ln:to Electro Way) Road widening
Consttuction of a mix of bufferetl bike lanes,separated�bike lanes,;
� � � $echeili&Loma Vista Corridor � sidewalks,accessible driveways,curb ramps,enhanced crossings;
9 ATP Cycle 3 �Jun-16 In design � Bechelli Ln,:Loma Vista Ave with rapid flashing�..beacons,pedestrian refuge islands,;pedestrian �r'�
:Improvements safety:amenities:including safety lighting,and functional
landscaping induding shade trees and boffers from traffic.
10 HSIP,Cycle 7 '�Mar 20 �` �n '�.Hartnell Avenue Safety'� �Hartnell Ave from Chum�Creek Rd to Striping improvements,ADA upgrades lighting improvements.
construction Ilmprovement Project �East Way..�: Installl raised median.
Constraction 'Diestelhort to Downtown Non- �� �� Signage and striping improvements,rostell;RRFBs,buffered bike �`
11 ATP,Cycle 2 '�Jun-20 � �Diestelhort to Downtown
sthis year ��'Motorized Improvement�� lanes{
12 ATP Cycle 1 :May-15 Completed .�:Placer Street Improvements �'�Piacer St(S'�.of Boston Ave to Mesa St) Sidewalk antl curq improvements,signage:and striping
improvements,;signal moditications
:Quartz Hill Rd(S of Terra Nova St to
13 A7P,Cycle 2 �Jan-18 Completed �Quertz Nill Road Improvements Road witlening,pedestrian crossing improvements
.. . . .. . . . . :�:Brenton Dr):'. . . . . . . � . . . . . .
.
13 ATP,Cycle 2 ':Jan 1$ Completed ��:Quartz Hill Road Improvements :Quartz Hill Rd(W of Delta St to SR 273) Pedestrian crossing improvements
tA HSIP,Cycle 8 '�Sep 20 Construction ��Churn Creek Rd&Marag6a St Churn Creek(E Cypress to Hartnell); Curb ramp improvements,additional lighting,striping '
`this year ��.Safety Improvements �� 'Maraglia improvements
In��design but C. Construction of two-way Class IV bikeway and pedestrian eccess:���:
15 ASHC/STI `Dec 1$ appiied for �'.Califorma Street Bikeway r'California St(Eureka Way to Yuba St) improvements along California Street,between Division Street and��:��:
?more$ Yuba�:Street.
� :Turtle Bay to Downtown�.Gap Buffered 2 way cycle track;shared use path;raised intersection
16 ATP,Cycie 5 �� Jul-20 ��Funded Turtle Bay .. with curb extensions,bollards,7ane reductions;raised crosswalks ':�
��.Compietinn�project � �� ���
with qike/ped separations,and shede trees
� ; '� � Victor Ave(sYa Hartnell Ave to Gypress q�ong:Victor Ave,Cypress Ave,and Alfreda Way,construat shared:�
:Victor Ave&Cypress Ave Active Ave),Cypress Ave(Victor Ave to,4ffretla
17 ATP,Cycle 5 '� Jul-20 �.Funded � use paths,sitlewalks,curblguttedcurb ramps,bike lanes,and
�Transportation Way),Alfreda Way(Cypress Ave to Del � -
Monte St) ' protected intersections.
Girvan Roatl Railroad CPossing
Construction � � � Sft 273,Westside Rtl,Girvan Rd,
18 Section 130 'Oct-20 ;this year '��mprovements a�d South Redding .>�astside Rd Bicycle and pedestrian crossing improvements
:�:Bikeway Pedestrian Trail Project
Priority Intersection Characteristics
,
,
�
�
Ghurn Creek Rd t Hartneli Ave 1223 32 044265 S(gnalized Rear End(21) Unsafe 5peed(13) 13 4 2 1 1 d 7 s
Traffic Signals and '
South St/Cali#ornia St' 588 10 - Sit�nalized Broadside(6} 2 '1 2 1 ' 1 0 1
" SPgns(5)
'Unsafe Speed
Hartnell Ave/Bechelli L.n 5$7 9 0:1613 Signalized Hit Object(4} (2)lOther Than Driver 3 1 2 ' 1 3 1 1
(or Pedestrian)(2)
Airport Rd 1 Preserve BNd 562 4 0:1809 Signalized Rear End(2)/ NIA(ali unique) 2 0 0 1 0 b 1
Broadsicle(2)
N/A(aN �ther Hazardous ���
Bufte Sf!Continental St 562 4 0:2300 3ignalized ' 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 '
unique) Violation{2)
N/A(�l1
Market St/Riverside Dr 551 3 - Signalized ' N/A(ail unique) 2 1 1 0 1 1' 1
unique)
Flar#nell Ave/Narthwacrds Way 544 1 0:0363 Signalized Broadside(1} dUi/BUI(1} 1 1 0 0 0 �I 1
Ghurn Creek Rd/E Cypress Aue 169 29 0'.4752 Signalized Broadside(12) ���ffic Signals and ' �� � � � � Q, � ;
Signs�(7)
! Victor<Ave/Hartnell Ave 151 22 0.3742 Signalized 'Rear Entl('[0} Unsafe 5peed(7) 13 �12 2 2 1 1 6
Hilltop Dr/E Cypress Ave 127 22 d:3174 Signalized Rear End(11) Unsafe Speed(10) ; 9 4 0 1 3 0 5
E Cypress Ave/Becheili Ln 85 20 0':2977 Signalized IRear Entl(10) Unsafe Speed(9} 3 ;3 1 1 1 0' 2
Priority Segment Characteristics
d�"
�
gi
.�
CHurn Creek Rd(Presi�o St to 3 ` ' Automobile Rigfit of+
Bonnyview Rd) 1021 73 d:5606 3.11 Braadside(21) �ay���) 23 9 5 ' 2 5 18 13
E Cypress A�e(Park Marina'Dr to $�� 51 0�7648 1.12 Broadside(24) Automobile ftight of 10 8 4 ' 2 5 4 4 '
Churn Cre�k Rd) Way(17)
Hilltop Dr(n/o Browning St to ' Automobile Righ#of
835 45 0:4574 1.86 Broadside(12) 15 7 5 4 3 13 15
INaraglia;St) Way(11)
Bechelli Ln(E Cypress Ave to n/o �11 29 1:5918 0.84 Broadside(14) Automobile Right of 6 1 1 1 4 2 3
3rd St) Way(7)
W Cypress'Ave{Market St to Park ' Hit Object ' '
Marina Dr) �5i 15 0.54d4 0.72 (4)Nehicle Unsafe Speed(4) 6 3 4 ' 2 2 4 4
'Pedestrian(4)
Railroad A�re{South�#to ��� �0 0.3758 1.8 Brc�adside{3) N/A(ali unique) 4 1 2 1 b 2' 1 '
Buenaventura Blv�t)
Nartnell Ave(Goodwater AYe to s1$ 7 +0.87 Hit Object(3) DUUBI�I(5) 4 '1 0 ' D ' 0 5 5
Airport Rd}
H�Iltop Dr(North of Hil►tap Dr to Automobile Right of
St 7hamas PkwY) ; 604 11 O;B606 0.65 Broadside(5) WaY t3) 5 � 1 ' 1 1 1 2
Hartnell Ave(Naethwoods Way#o Autamobile Right of
Kenco Ave) 193 30 Os8571 0.94 Broadside(11) Way(1fl) 9 6 6 4 2 4' 4
S Bonnyview Rd tS Market St ta 163 25 0:2074 2.01 Fiit t7bject{8) Unsafe Speed(8) ; 7 4 0 ' 0 3 10 7 '
Churn Creek Rd)
Priority Intersection Mitigations
`P 'P
' ��� �u �u
� � m e^� e � e
Impaired Driving - Increase�UI enfarcernent 7 DUI collisions.
Impro�e signal hardware;lenses,6ack-
S02 15°lo plates with retroreflective barders, 21 rear end and 4 broadside collsions, '
moun#ing,size,and number '�
Intersections ' 'n Improve signal timing(coordination, Z study intersections and 1 study
Churn Creek 12d/ ��� ���° p�ases,retl,yellow,or operation; segment on Ghurn Creek Rd.
Hartnell A�e ' Multiple dri�reways in close proximity to
- Consolidate dri�eways intersection.
Pedestrians S21 PB 60d/o �°dify signal phasing to implement a 2 pedestrian eollisions,.At cornmercial
Leading Pedestrian Inter�+al(LPI) district and near Mr Shasta Mall.
Improve signal hardware:lenses,back-
S02 15°l0 �lates wi#h re#roref3ecti�e borders, 6 broadside collisions;
mnunting,size,and number '
'fl Irnpro�e sigrral timing(coordination,
Intersectians S03 1510 �oca#ed in downtown.
Sauth St/ phases,red,yellow,or operation;
Califarnia St 6 broadside collisions.No current left
506 55°Jo Install left-turn lane and add turn phase turn lane or phase on north leg c�#
California St.
Pedestrians S21 PB 60°10 �O�ify signal phasing to implement a 2 pedestrian collisions. Located in
Leading Pedestrian Inter�al{LPI; downtown.
Impro�e signal hardware:lenses,back-
S02 15°lo plates with retrc�reflective borders, 2 rea�-end coflisions. �i
mounting,size,and number '
Intersections 'o Improve sit�nal timing'(cot�rdination, 2 study in#ersections and 1 study
� S03 '��/ phases,red,yellow,or operafiifln; segrrsent on hlartnell Ave.
Flartnell Ave/ ' Provide Aduanced Dilemma-Zone 2 rear end collisons. Nearest '
� Bechelli Ln �� ��� 4���° De#ection intersection is arounc!D.Srni away
fl Insta(I pedestrian median fencing on �Ped�strian collisians.Fatal pedestrian
Pedestrians S13P6 3510 collision due to the pedestrian entering' '
approaches traffic,not in a crasswalk.
Improue signal hardware:lenses,back-
S02 15°10 plates with retroreflective borders, 2 rear end and 2 broadside collisions.
mounting,size,and number
Int�rsectians �� ' � � 2 rear end and 2 broadside collisians. In�
Prouide Advanced Dilemma-Zone
Sfl4 40°!o rura(area.Nearest signalized
C7etection
' Airport Rd/ intersection arnund 1 mi away.
Preserve Blud '� Irrstall advance stap bar before 2 bieyele eallisions.No bike
S20PB 15/o �rosswalk(Bicycle Box) accomodations at intersection.
Bicyclists ' 2 bicycle collisions.Fatal collisian was at
Bicycle education about ritling at night' night fr�m bike improperfy turning wesf
and rules of the road while'vehicle was proceeding sauth.
Butte St/ _ _ �on�(upcoming safety project addresses current collision trendsJ
Continental St y
Market 5t/ ' ; , 1 fat�l pedestrian collisian due to
Riverside Dr �'edestrians S18P6 25°lo Install pedestrian crossing(S.I) petlestrian crossing not at crosswalk.No'
pedestrian crossing on north leg.
Imprcr�e signal hardware:lenses,back-
Hartnell A�e! Intersections S02 15°lo plates with retroreflective borders, 1 fafal broadside collision.
Narthwoods Way mounting,size,and nurnber
Impaired Driving - Increase dUl enforcernent 1 fatal collision due to;DUl.
`; � ,ti ��I„ �„���
, f t
gi � � �-� � �
Improve signal hardware:lenses,back-
S02 15°lo plates with re#roreflective borders, 12 broadside and 6 rear end collisions.i
Churn Creek Ftd/'E mounting,size,and number ;
, Cypress Ave I �ntersections , 2 study intersections and 1 study
��3 ��fl�n Irrrprove signal timing,(coardination, ' segment on Churn Creek Rd.3 study '
phases,red,yel(ow,or operation) intersections and 3 study segments on:
Cypress Ave.'
Impra�e signal hardware:lenses,back-
S02 15°lo plates with retroreflective borders, 1�rear end and 5 broadside collisions.
' UictorAve/ Inters�ctions ! ' mounting,size,and nurnber ' '
Hartnell A�e c��� .��o�o ��Pro�e signal timing(coordination, 2 study intersectit�ns and 1 study
phases,red,ye(low,or operation; segment on Hartnell Ave.
Pedestrians ���pg gp% Motlify signal phasing to implement a �p�des#rian collisions.
Leading Pedes#rian Interv�l(LPI,
Improve signal hardware:lenses,back-
502 15°lo plates with retroreflecti�e borders, 11 rear end and 3 broadside callisions.
mounting,size,antl number
2 study intersections and 1 study
Hilltop Dr!E ' o Irnprove signal tirning,(coordination, s�grn�nt on Churn Creek Rd.3 study
Int�rsections �03 1�/o
Cypress Ave ph�ses,red,yellow,or operation) intersections and 3 study segrnents on
Cypress Ave.<
o Install raised'paWement markers and �night and 4 wef roadway collisions.All
S09 10/fl approaches ha�e multiple left-turn
striping{Through Intessectinnj ��n�,
Irnprove signal hardware;lenses,back-
S02 15% plates with retroreflective borders, 10 rear end and 2 broadside collisions.
E Cypress A�e! ' mounting,size,and number , !
Bechelli Ln Intersections 2 study intersections antl 1 study
S03 15°Io ��proue signal timing�(coordination, �� segment on Churn Creek Rd.3 study �
phases,red,yellow,t�r operation) intersections and 3 stutly segments on;
�YPress A�e.;
City Segment Mitigations
!�� d d df� rVn n���
f
1
o' Install�iynamicfuariable speed warning
Churn Creek Rd - R26 30/0 10 unsafe speed violations.'
{Presidio Stto S signs
' Bonnyview Rd}
Install bike eonflTct pain#at
Bicyclists��� - �� - � . �� 5��bike collisions,4 were broadsitle. '�
mtersections and driv�ways
'� Add segment lighting (Easf of/-5���
R01 35°10 10 night collisions. '
Inferch�nge)
' Consolidate existing dri�eways to limit �� broadside collisions.8 improper turning
' the number of access points ��d 17 autiomobile�ight of-way�iolations.
E Cypress Ave(Park HigFr density of driveways along cnrridor.
Marina Qr to Ghurn Install�aised rnedian (Between Hil/tr�p 4;head on collisions.8 impraper turning and
R08 25%
Creek Rtl) Dr and Churn Greek Rd) 17 automobile righf-of-way violations.
R32PB/ 35°10l Inst�ll bike lanes/Instail separ�z#ed bike 5 bike coNisians.No consistent bike facilities
Bicyclists ��3PB 45% lanes alonq#he carridor.
i lnstall bike conflict paint at 5 bike collisians.High density of driveways
intersections and driueways along carridor.
Install raised median (Between Dana
RO$ 25% 1 head on collisian:
Dr antl Brawning br)
� 1ns4a11 delineatars,reflectors andfor
R27 15% � 13 fixed-objecf collisions.
Wiiltcrp Dr(n/o - object markers
Browning St to o lnstall edge-lines and centeriines
Maraglia St) R2$ 2510 (between RvsslBig-Lats Drir�eway and No e�cisting Iane markings, '
Margatia St}
Pedestdan fencing ai�ng sidewalk to
Pedestrians guide pedestrians to the enhanceci 5'pedestrian callisions.
crosswalk with RF2FB
' lnstall raised median (on the
R08 25°!0 4 head on'callsions.
Be�helli Ln(E Cypress approaches ta Hartnel/�1ve)
A�e to n!o 3rd St) Consolidate existing driveways to lirnit 14 broadside collisions.6 improper turning
the number of access points and 7 automabile right-of-way collisions.
o lnstall dynamicluariable speed warning
- R26 3d l0 4'un�afe speed colGsions.
siqns '
Pedestrians R35PB 35°10 anstall/upgrade pedestrian crossing 5 pedesttian collisions.
W Cypress Ave ; (with enhanced+safety features} i
(Market St to Park ' Instali rnultiuse path/sharrc�w on '
Pedestrians,
Marina�r} - eastbound approach to the intersecfiion 5 pedestrian and 2 bicycle coilisions'
Bicyclists' of W Cypress Au�I Marl��t St
install bike conflict paint at
Bicyclists 2'bicycle collisions.
intersections and driWeways
��� ��a�o Install chevron signs on horizontai 2��hit object coilisions.Many several sharp
curves curves at end of segment. '
Railroad Aue(South St - }��� 3�% lnstall dynamic/variable speed warning 2 hit object collisions.Many several sharp
#a Buenaventura Blvd) signs ' cur�es a#end of segment.
��� ,�5a�� Instali delineators,reflectors,and7or 2����hit object coll�sions.Many several sharp
ab�ect markers+ curve�at end of seqment.
Pedestrians R34PB g0�/o �nstall sidewaik/pathway'(to auoid 2',pedestrian collisions(1 fatal)on southern '
walking alang roadway} end of segment.
!�� d d df� rVn n���
f
1
a^e
Hartnell Ave _ ��� 35°1a Add Segment Lighting 4lcoilisions at night:
(Goodwater Ave'ta R24 25°1� Instali curve advance warning signs 5 hit object collisions.Severai sharp curves.
Airport Rd) Impaired ' '
Driving - - ' Increase DUI enforcernent 5 collisions with alcohol inuol�ed.
R�1 3510 Add Segment Lighting ; 5 collisions at night,Limited Gghting on
narthb+�untl fanes.
Consolidste existing driveways to limit 5'broadsitle collisions antl 3 autornobile right''
the number of access points of way�iolations.
Hilltop Dr(North of 5 broadsitle collisians,3 automobile right c�f '
Hilitop Dr to St Road Diet(Redu�e travel lanes frarn 4 way violations,and 1 bicyclist coliision.
Tharnas Pkwy) Bicyclists R14 30% to 3 and add a two way left-turn and Vefiic(es furning left on#o roadway from
bike lanes}1 dri�eways currently need to'cross 2 lanes of
traf#ic.Area with hiqh density hausinq.
lnstalllupgrade pedestrian erc�ssing at
Pedestrians, ' 0 1 pedestnan and 1 bicycle collision near
R35P6 3510 unconYrofied locations(with eni�ancetl
Bicyclists'� � RidgeYop Drive.
safety features)i
Hartnelt Ave
(Northwoods Way to - - None(upcaming safety project addresses current callision trends)
Kenco Ave)
S Bnnnyview Rd,(S �������sts„ ' 0 3 6ike collisions.Several public commenYs to '
Market St to Churn R33PB 451a Instali Separated Bike Lanes
Cre�k Rd} ; P�destrians increase bicycle safety on this segment.
'Traffic volumes in the segment must be evaivated to ensure that the road diet wouid sustain current and future traffic
Locations for Proposed Leading Pedestrian Interval Project
- . � �
- �. � � . . � . a � � � . .
r �
�
Lake Blvd Hiatt Dr -
Lake Bl�d Oasis Rd 0 0 0 ;0 0 '
�ake Blvd �`arnarack Dr ' 0 b 1 0 0
�ake Blvd Clay St 0 0 0 0 0 `
Lake Blvd North Point Dr 0 1 0 0 0
Lake Bivd Masonic Ave 0 0 0 2 0 ` '
H'illtop Dr Peppertree Ln ' 0 0' 0 0 0
Placer St Pleasant St -
Court St' Tehama St 0 0 2 0 0
Court St Shasta St 0 0 2 0 0
Court Sf Placer St 0 0 1' '2 0 i
Court Sfi South St 0 0' 0 n 0
PJacer St Airpark Dr/ Fig Ave - -
Buenaventura Blvd Placer St 0 0 0 0 0
Butte St Continental St 1 0 1 1 0 ",
Placer St Continental St 0 1 1 0 � ;
Placer St East St 0 0 0 0 0 ' '
Cypress A�e C'ivic Center Dr 0 0' 0 'I 0
Athens Ave Locust St 0 0' 1 0 0
H'artnell Ave Cobbfestone - - -
Hartnell Ave Parkview Ave 0 0' 0 '1 0 '
Hartnell Ave Bechelli Ln 1 0 1 1 0 `
�echelli Ln Blue Shield - - - -
S'Bonnyview Rd Fire Hall 4 - - -
E Cypress Ave Alfreda Way 0 0 0 1 0
Cnurn Creek Rd OId Alturas Rd ' 0 0 1 1 0 '
Churn Creek Rd Presidio'St ' 0 0 0 2 0
C'hurn Creek Rd Mistletoe �n 0 0 0 1 0 `
Churn Creek Rd Industrial St 0 0 0 '0 0
Churn Creek Rd Merchant St 0 0 1 0 0
Hartnell Ave Northwoods Way 0 0 0 0 0 '
Churn Creek Rd Shirley Ln 0 0' 0 0 0
Churn Creek Rd Loma Uista Dr ; 0 0' 0 '0 0 '
Shasta View Dr Hartnell A�e 0 0 0 0 0 '
Dana Dr �/ictor Ave 0 0 0 `0 0 +
Dana Dr Bradford Way I 0 0' 0 0 0 i
Victor A�e E Cypress Ave 0 0; 0 0 0 '
Old AI#uras Rd Friendly Rd 0 0 0 '0 0
Airport Rd Knighton Rd 0 0 0 0 0
5hasta View Dr Hemingway St - - - -
Shasta View Dr Tarmac Rd -
Old Oregon Trl Old 44 Dr 0 0 0 0 0
Airport Rd Rancho Rd 0 0 0 0 0
Airport Rd Preserve Blvd 1 0 0 0 0
Rirport Rd Shasta View Dr - - -
Total 3 2 12 13 0