HomeMy WebLinkAbout_9.6(a)--Consider approval of the City of Redding Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project.,
CITY OF REDDING
REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
MEETING DATE: April 4, 2023
FROM: Chuck Aukland, Public
ITEM NO. 9.6(a)
Works Director
***APPROVED
BY***
ukland, Public Warks Direct 3/10/2423
ry ippin, Ci ana e : 3/28/2423
caukland&i.redding.ca.us
btippin@cityofredding.org
SUBJECT: 9.6(a) --Consider approval of the City of Redding Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project.
Recommendation
Approve and authorize the following actions relative to the Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project:
(1) Adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Mitigation Monitoring and
Environmental Commitment Program (Attachment C);
(2) Approve the Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project as described, and find it satisfies the
requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines § 15074; and
(3) Direct Staff to return to City Council, once necessary permits are obtained, for further
direction relative to proceeding with the project.
Fiscal Impact
There is no fiscal impact as a direct result of approving the project and adopting the Mitigated
Negative Declaration (MND) and Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP).
The City of Redding (City) received $311,000 in grant funding from the Wildlife Conservation
Board's Public Access Grant Program for the planning, design, and permitting of the Turtle Bay
Boat Ramp Project (project). As matching funds, the City appropriated $30,000 from the Park
Development Fund for a total project budget of $341,000. The City will seek grant funding for
the construction phase of the project.
Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) may choose not to adopt the MND and the MMP and not approve
the project as described. The project could not proceed without the approval of these documents,
as, in that case, it would not comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
Guidelines.
Report to Redding City Council March 30, 2023
Re: 9.6(a) --Approval of the Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project Page 2
Background/Analysis
The Turtle Bay Boat Launch Facility and floating dock were originally built in 1969 and
improved in 2005 with a new floating dock and expanded parking with 25 pull-through boat
trailer stalls. In the last decade, boating activity in Redding has seen a steady rise, and this stretch
of the river provides a world-class fly-fishing experience. With the Sacramento River drawing
local, regional, and international visitors, the City's use data indicates the ramp's popularity has
contributed to an over -capacity condition, as the narrow launch ramp does not allow two boats to
efficiently launch at one time. The existing facility lacks capacity, a designated area to launch
drift boats, and an Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) compliant restroom.
The proposed project would include a widened, two-lane boat ramp, an extension of the existing
floating dock, and a new boating access beach adjacent to the ramp for drift boats and non -
motorized vessel launching. The project would also include: additional boat trailer parking stalls,
an ADA -compliant restroom, drinking fountain, wastewater line extension and replacement,
extension of the Sacramento River Trail and bike paths through the site, storm water and
irrigated landscape improvements, and an ADA access ramp to the new beach. Adjacent to the
trail will be a small overlook area with picnic tables.
If ultimately approved, the work would include earthwork, grading, new structures, drainage and
utility modification, tree removal, tree planting, paving, lighting, striping, gates, fencing, security
systems, and sign installation. Funding limitations may require some project amenities to be
phased.
An Initial Study (IS) was prepared to satisfy the requirements of the CEQA. It describes why the
project is being proposed and the potential impacts to the existing environment. The IS shows
that the proposed project could have a significant effect on biological resources, but with
implementation of mitigation measures, those impacts will be reduced to a level considered less
than significant. The mitigation measures and conservation measures to be implemented are
common practices and include, but are not limited to, biological pre -construction surveys, in -
water work windows, water quality monitoring, impact minimization, exclusionary fencing, and
erosion control.
Based on the conclusions made in the IS, an MND was prepared. The MND describes the
project, including mitigation measures, and makes the determination that there will be no
significant effect on the environment provided that the defined mitigation measures are
implemented as part of the project. In addition, an MMP has been written and incorporated into
the MND (CEQA Section 21081.6). The MMP will be used by City staff, contractors, agencies,
and monitoring personnel during and after the project to ensure effective implementation of the
adopted mitigation measures outlined in the MND.
The IS/MND/MMP documents were sent to the State Clearinghouse for a 30 -day public review
period and distribution to pertinent State agencies. They were sent to local resource agencies, the
Shasta County Clerk, and posted on the Public Works Department website. A public notice was
also sent to landowners in the vicinity of the project and posted in the local newspaper. Four
comment letters were received during the public review period. Approval of the project and
associated MND and MMP will allow staff to move toward final design.
Report to Redding City Council March 30, 2023
Re: 9.6(a) --Approval of the Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project Page 3
Environmental Review
The City of Redding is the lead agency for the project pursuant to CEQA. As the lead CEQA
agency, the Council is authorized to adopt the MND per Redding Municipal Code Section
§18.24.070.E and State law. Upon adoption of the MND and approval of the project by the
Council, a Notice of Determination will be filed with the Shasta County Clerk's Office and the
State Clearinghouse, thereby completing the environmental review process. The IS/MND is
available in the Public Works Department and is currently available online at
https://www.cityofredding,or�/der)artments/t,)ublic-works/environmental-Iggaggei-nent.
Council Priority/City Manager Goals
0 This agenda item is a routine operational item.
Attachments
/,Location Map
ITB; Boat Ramp - Rodeo lease exhibit
MND—IS—MMP for Turtle Bay Ramp Project
Pape Size ANSI A
6 015 63 645 9.6
�Ir�g
Map F ejection. Laanil Ccoforma! conic
F canzonW Datum h Amen cam 1983
GHd NAD 1983 SRaOlane Cafibrma 11 FIPS 0402 Feet
' rf Redding
N furtlay Boat Ramp
WE MEN Improvement Project
Vicjnq Ma
r -T• Cama axaen'r..fi lotan l'hKU"'4T1'.tdall—M LgpUw�..lTans{.aataU.,n i:rtx4e�, 61'SG`na�:y:, Ear a»Tk:�X
rGIN Ma¢ee'hUYd T%-'pvw Mai-Ik,4Ia,sGa'A"iso-Maw PA, E}95 KE RF G�f` 541 fvu.1RA LR3Cq,I
Project No. 12558750
Revision No. -
Date 31912622
OEMM
lw=UAU=
We M rzlKv4ypQ#-m
TURTLE BAY BOAT RAMP PROJECT
(STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NO. 2023020064)
SUBJECT
Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The City of Redding Community Services Department (City) is proposing the Turtle Bay Boat Ramp
Project. The existing facility lacks capacity, a designated area to launch drift boats, and an Americans
with Disabilities Act (ADA) compliant restroom. The proposed Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project (project)
would include a widened, two-lane boat ramp, an extension of the existing floating dock, and a new
boating access beach adjacent the ramp for drift boats and non -motorized vessel launching. The project
would also include additional boat trailer parking stalls, an ADA -compliant restroom, drinking fountain,
wastewater line extension and replacement, extension of the Sacramento River Trail and bike paths
through the site, storm water and irrigated landscape improvements, and an ADA access ramp to the new
beach. Adjacent to the trail there will be a small overlook area with picnic tables.
Work involves earthwork, grading, new structures, drainage and utility modification, tree removal, tree
planting, paving, lighting, striping, gates, fencing, security systems, and sign installation. Construction of
the project is anticipated to take approximately 10 months. Staging of equipment and materials would be
within the project boundaries. A narrow sliver of adjacent property would need to be acquired for the
project, and construction is anticipated to occur in 2025. Construction may occur earlier if all approvals
are obtained and funding is available; however, funding limitations may require some project amenities to
be phased.
ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
The project area is bounded by the Sacramento River to the north, Sundial Bridge and Turtle Bay
Exploration Park to the east, Redding Memorial Park to the west, and the rodeo grounds and associated
parking to the south. The project area primarily consists of two parking lots; a graded and graveled one to
the east (Figure 3), and a paved western lot that serves that boat ramp. The two lots are connected by Aoki
Way, a paved road. There is a fenced dirt area south of Aoki Way, which is part of the rodeo grounds.
The boat ramp is an excavated ramp sloping down to the Sacramento River. A riparian corridor and
forested hilly terrain exists along the Sacramento River and towards the western extent of the project area.
FINDINGS AND DETERMINATION
The City of Redding conducted an Initial Study (attached) that determined that the proposed project could
have significant environmental effects on biological resources. Implementation of specific mitigation
measures identified below will avoid or mitigate the potentially significant environmental effects
identified, and the preparation of an environmental impact report will not be required. If there are
Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project Page 1
March 2023
City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division Mitigated Negative Declaration
substantial changes that alter the character or impacts of the proposed project, another environmental
impact determination will be necessary.
Prior to approval of the project, the lead agency may conclude, at a public hearing, that certain mitigation
measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration are infeasible or undesirable. In accordance
with California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Section 15074. 1, the lead agency may delete those
mitigation measures and substitute other measures that it determines are equivalent or more effective. The
lead agency would adopt written findings that the new measure(s) is(are) equivalent or more effective in
mitigating or avoiding potential significant effects and that it would not cause any potentially significant
effect on the environment.
1) Based on the whole record (including the Initial Study and any supporting documentation) and the
mitigation measures incorporated into the project, the City of Redding has determined that there is no
substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment.
2) The Mitigated Negative Declaration, with its supporting documentation, reflects the independent
judgment and analysis of the lead agency, which is the City of Redding.
FOOTRUMNWITF =
The attached Initial Study documents the reasons to support the above determination.
The following mitigation measures will be incorporated into the project to minimize potential effects on
biological resources:
MM -1. All in -water work shall occur during April 1 through June 30 to avoid peak times when listed
juvenile anadromous fish would be present.
MM -2. Prior to any in -water work, qualified fish biologists, in consultation with CDFW, shall utilize
seine netting to work from the edge of water, outward just before berm construction to remove any
individuals that could be within the work area. No handling of fish shall occur. Prior to completion of the
gravel berm, the area will be surveyed and seined again by qualified fish biologists to ensure absence of
fish in the work area. The berm will serve as a barrier to the in -water portion of the project area. After the
gravel berm is constructed, the work pad may be constructed.
MM -3. Prior to any placement of gravel in water, heavy equipment operation practices shall be
implemented that minimize the potential for injury or death of listed fish species, including alerting fish to
equipment operation in the channel before gravel is placed in the water (i.e. slow, deliberate equipment
operation and gently tapping water surface prior to entering or placing gravels in the river channel).
MM -4. The gravel berm and work pad shall be constructed out of 3/4 -inch minus, silt free, clean,
spawning -grade gravel that meets Caltrans' cleanness test (California Test No. 227) with a value of 85 or
higher. Upon construction completion, the gravel berm would be breached and the gravel pad and berm
would be left in place to provide the benefit of approximately 236 cubic yards of spawning grade gravels
to augment spawning opportunities for salmon.
Page 2 Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project
March 2023
City of Redding
Mitigated Negative Declaration Public Works Department, Engineering Division
MM -5. Twenty-four hours (24 -hours) prior to initiation of ground disturbance or vegetation removal
within 50 -feet of suitable reptile and/or amphibian habitat (i.e., Sacramento River and riparian areas), a
qualified biologist shall perform a pre -construction survey for western pond turtle, their nests, and foothill
yellow -legged frog. If western pond turtles, their nests, or yellow -legged frog are encountered in the
project area during construction and could be harmed by construction activities, work will stop
immediately in the area and CDFW will be notified. Upon authorization from CDFW, a qualified
biologist may relocate the individual(s) the shortest distance possible to a location containing habitat
outside of the construction impact zone.
MM -6. If construction or vegetation removal occurs during the nesting season, February 1 through
August 31 for birds and November 1 through July 15 for raptors, a qualified biologist shall conduct a pre -
construction survey to locate active nests. The pre -construction survey will be performed no more than 7
days prior to the implementation of construction activities. If a lapse in construction activities occurs for 7
days or longer, another pre -construction survey will be performed. If an active nest is found, a qualified
biologist (in consultation with the CDFW) will determine the extent of a buffer zone to be established
around the nest.
MM -7. Removal of large trees (10 -inch dbh or greater) with cavities, crevices, or snags shall occur before
maternity colonies form (i.e., prior to March 1) or after young are volant (i.e., after August 15). If
construction (including the removal of large trees) occurs during the non-volant season (March 1 through
August 15), a qualified biologist shall conduct a pre -construction survey of the project area to locate
maternity colonies and identify measures to protect the colonies from disturbance. The pre -construction
survey will be performed no more than seven days prior to the implementation of construction activities.
If a lapse in construction activities for seven days or longer occurs between those dates, another pre -
construction survey will be performed. If a maternity colony is found a qualified biologist (in consultation
with the CDFW) will determine the extent of a construction -free buffer zone to be established around the
nest.
Draft copies or notice of this Mitigated Negative Declaration were distributed to:
■ State Clearinghouse
■ Shasta County Clerk
■ California Department of Transportation District 2
■ California Department of Fish and Wildlife District 1
■ California State Lands Commission
■ Central Valley Flood Protection Board
■ Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board—Region 5 (Redding)
■ California Highway Patrol
■ Native American Heritage Commission
■ State Office of Historic Preservation
■ All property owners within 300 feet of the property boundary
Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project Page 3
March 2023
City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division
r t
(X) Draft document referred for comments 21212023 — 31312023
Date
( ) No comments were received during the public review period.
Mitigated Negative Declaration
( ) Comments were received but did not address the draft Mitigated Negative Declaration findings or
the accuracy/completeness of the Initial Study. No response is necessary. The letters are attached.
(X) Comments addressing the findings of the draft Mitigated Negative Declaration and/or accuracy or
completeness of the Initial Study were received during the public review period. The letters and
responses follow (see Attachment D, Response to Comments).
Copies of the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the Initial Study, documentation materials, and the
Mitigation Monitoring Program may be obtained at the Public Works Department, Engineering
Division, City of Redding, 777 Cypress Avenue, Redding, CA 96001. Contact: Amber Kelley,
Environmental Compliance Manager, (530) 225-4046 or akelley@cityofredding.org.
i Digitally signed by Amber Kelley
DN: cn=Amber Kelley, o=City of Redding,
Date of AmberKel ou-Public Works, Engineering,
7- - email=akelley@cityofredding.org, c=US
Draft Report: February 1, 2023 By: Date: 2023.03.061631: 13-08'00'
Name/ Title: Amber Kelley
Environmental Compliance Manager
Date of
Final Report: March 6, 2023
Attachments:
A. Vicinity Map
B. Initial Study
C. Mitigation Monitoring and Environmental Commitment Program
D. Comments and Response to Comments (if any)
Page 4 Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project
March 2023
Vicinity Map
Pape Size ANSI A
6 015 63 645 9.6
�Ir�g
Map F ejection. Laanil Ccoforma! conic
F canzonW Datum h Amen cam 1983
GHd NAD 1983 SRaOlane Cafibrma 11 FIPS 0402 Feet
' rf Redding
N furtlay Boat Ramp
WE MEN Improvement Project
Vicjnq Ma
r -T• Cama axaen'r..fi lotan l'hKU"'4T1'.tdall—M LgpUw�..lTans{.aataU.,n i:rtx4e�, 61'SG`na�:y:, Ear a»Tk:�X
rGIN Ma¢ee'hUYd T%-'pvw Mai-Ik,4Ia,sGa'A"iso-Maw PA, E}95 KE RF G�f` 541 fvu.1RA LR3Cq,I
Project No. 12558750
Revision No. -
Date 31912622
Initial Study
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
1IMNUM-11tel
Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project
State Clearinghouse No. 2023020064
Prepared by:
CITY OF REDDING
Public Works Department
777 Cypress Avenue
Redding, California 96001.
March 2023
CITY OF REDDING
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
1. Project Title: Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project (proposed project)
2. Lead agency name and address:
CITY OF REDDING
Public Works Department
777 Cypress Avenue
Redding, CA 96001
Contact Person and Phone Number: Amber Kelley, Environmental Compliance Manager,
(530) 225-4046
4. Project Location:
The proposed project is in central Redding, Shasta County, California. The Project is at the
Turtle Bay Boat Launch located at 720 Auditorium Drive, Redding, CA 96001, in the Redding,
California, 7.5 -minute U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) quadrangle in Township 32N, Range
05W, Section 36 (40.59057, -122.38293). The Boat Launch is approximately 0.30 miles west of
the Turtle Bay Exploration Park.
5. Applicant's Name and Address:
Travis Menne
City of Redding
Community Services Department
777 Cypress Avenue
Redding, CA 96001
6. General Plan Designation:
■ Public Facility (PF)
7. Zoning:
Representative's Name and Address:
Amber Kelley
City of Redding
Public Works Department
777 Cypress Avenue
Redding, CA 96001
■ Public Facility — Specific Plan Overlay District (PF -SP)
8. Description of Project:
The Turtle Bay Boat Launch Facility boat ramp and floating dock were originally built in 1969 as
a launch point for fishing and non -motorized recreational watercraft on the Sacramento River.
The boat launch site currently covers approximately 59,720 square feet (sf) (1.37 acres [ac]) and
currently includes a single -lane boat ramp, boat access dock, public restroom, parking stalls, and
area lighting. In 2004/2005, the facility was upgraded with a new floating dock and expanded
parking with 25 pull-through boat trailer stalls. In the last decade, boating activity in Redding has
Page 1 Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project
March 2023
Initial Study
City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division
seen a steady rise, and this stretch of the river provides a world-class fly-fishing experience. With
the Sacramento River drawing local, regional, and international visitors, the City's use data
indicates the ramp's popularity has contributed to an over -capacity condition, as the narrow
launch ramp does not allow two boats to efficiently launch at one time.
According to the City, users of the facility have expressed concern for the lack of capacity and the
floating dock's inadequacy for use by drift boats, which are extremely common in the river. In
addition, the original on-site restroom does not have the capacity to serve the heavy use of the
prime fly-fishing season nor is it compliant with Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
standards. The City's Community Services Department is proposing to improve the existing
Turtle Bay Boat Launch Facility to increase the capacity of recreational boating offerings to meet
demand.
The proposed Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project (project) would include a widened, two-lane boat
ramp, an extension of the existing floating dock, and a new boating access beach adjacent the
ramp for drift boats and non -motorized vessel launching. The project would also include
additional boat trailer parking stalls, an ADA -compliant restroom, wastewater line extension and
replacement, extension of the Sacramento River Trail and bike paths through the site, storm water
and irrigated landscape improvements, and an ADA access ramp to the new beach. Adjacent to
the trail there will be a small overlook area with picnic tables. Work involves earthwork, grading,
new structures, drainage and utility modification, tree removal, tree planting, paving, lighting,
striping, gates, fencing, security systems, and sign installation.
The existing boat ramp would be resurfaced with a pre -cast concrete V -groove finish to improve
traction and safety among users and widened by approximately 3 -feet to include two 15 -feet wide
lanes. The proposed extended portion of the boat ramp is approximately 3 -feet wide by 34 -feet in
length.
The existing floating dock located on the eastern side of the boat ramp would be extended with an
additional section. An additional pile would be installed to hold the new extended dock section in
place. The proposed extended section is approximately 8.5 -feet wide and 24 -feet long, and the
new piling would be approximately 10.75 inches in diameter. The single piling would be installed
using a "cast -in -drilled -hole pile" method, or vibrationally pushed in via an excavator.
The proposed drift boat beach area is in an area of low-lying riverbank located west of the
existing boat ramp. Grading of the drift boat beach area would occur below the Ordinary High
Water Mark (OHWM), and would amount to disturbance of approximately 2,500 square feet.
Approximately 1.85 cubic yards of fill would be excavated and removed from the drift boat beach.
This material would be hauled to a nearby landfill. Geogrid fabric (or similar) would be
incorporated into the drift boat beach area and would be revegetated with grass. Higher elevation
wooded terrain occurs adjacent to the proposed drift boat beach area. A retaining wall would be
constructed within the elevated bank west of the existing boat ramp to create the drift boat beach
area. The retaining wall would require up to 65 piles to be inserted along the eastern and northern
margins of the drift boat beach area. Piles would be installed using a "cast -in -drilled -hole pile"
method. It is likely that each pile would be spaced five to six feet from the other and would be
pushed 16 feet below surface and remain 8 feet above surface. Pile driving would not occur.
Page 2 Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project
March 2023
City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division
Initial Study
To construct the in -water project elements equipment would utilize the existing concrete boat
ramp to reach work areas. However, if the equipment cannot reach work areas from the concrete
boat ramp, then a temporary gravel working pad would be constructed to enable equipment
access.
Prior to in -water work, seine netting of the boat launch inlet area would be conducted by qualified
biologists to clear fish out of the work area. The biologists would walk into the water holding a
large net and gently encourage the fish out of the work area. A gravel berm would then be
constructed in a semi -circle, at the mouth of the boat launch inlet, out of silt -free spawning grade
gravel to exclude fish from the work area and to provide sediment control for the project. The
berm would be approximately 150 feet long and 8 feet wide at the base. The berm would be
constructed using an excavator operated on the existing concrete boat ramp (as feasible) or from
the proposed drift boat beach area. Prior to completion of the gravel berm, a section of the gravel
berm would be intentionally left unfinished and seine netting would be conducted again to ensure
fish are not trapped within the work area. The unfinished portion of the gravel berm would be
filled in with gravel and completed following seine netting, resulting in a work area free of fish.
No fish would be handled during this process.
After the gravel berm is constructed, a temporary gravel work pad would be constructed within
the work area to enable an excavator to reach areas inaccessible from the existing boat ramp or
drift boat beach area. The temporary gravel work pad would also be constructed out of clean, silt -
free spawning grade gravel and would be approximately 18 -feet wide. The gravel berm and
gravel work pad would remain in place for the minimum time required to complete the in -water
work.
Following construction and once sediment from construction activities has settled, the gravel
berm would be breached using the bucket of the excavator, and the gravel berm and gravel work
pad would remain to be washed downstream during future high-water flows. Some of the gravel
may be moved further into the Sacramento River to enable a boating access pathway from the
boat ramp, floating dock, and drift boat beach area. The gravel (to be washed downstream) would
act as an enhancement to salmon spawning habitat.
An existing natural kayak launch, approximately 500 feet downstream, would be
decommissioned to protect salmonid redds. The area would be planted with native vegetation and
boulders (or some other barrier) may be used to prevent access. The new drift boat beach would
replace the existing kayak launch.
The existing parking lot would be expanded to the east, and in total the entire parking lot would
include storm water and landscaping improvements, new area lighting, 40 pull-through boat
trailer stalls and 5 standard parking stalls. Two of the pull-through stalls and one of the standard
stalls would be ADA accessible. The area of proposed parking lot expansion to the east includes
23,515 square feet (0.54 ac) of previously disturbed graveled area adjacent to the existing parking
lot. The expanded parking lot would be resurfaced with pavement to match the existing parking
lot.
An ADA -accessible pathway is proposed between the ADA parking stalls and the beginning of
the boat launch and drift boat beach area, and a shaded fish cleaning station may be installed. The
Page 3 Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project
March 2023
Initial Study
City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division
Sacramento River Trail is proposed to be extended through the project site to increase access
opportunities for users including cyclist and pedestrians. A new four -unit ADA accessible
restroom is proposed and will likely be located southwest of the boat ramp.
Higher elevation wooded terrain occurs adjacent to the proposed drift boat beach area. A
retaining wall would be constructed within the elevated bank west of the existing boat ramp to
create the drift boat beach area. The retaining wall would require up to 65 piles to be inserted
along the eastern and northern margins of the drift boat beach area. Piles would be installed using
a "cast -in -drilled -hole pile" approach, which typically includes drilling 36 -inch diameter holes
into the soil, followed by placement of the piles and filling the hole in the pile with concrete. It is
likely that each pile would be spaced five to six feet from the other and would be pushed 16 feet
below surface and remain 8 feet above surface. Pile driving would not occur. Geogrid fabric (or
similar) would be incorporated into the drift boat beach area and would be revegetated with grass.
Construction of the project is anticipated to take approximately 10 months. Staging of equipment
and materials would be within the project boundaries. A narrow sliver of adjacent property would
need to be acquired for the project, and construction is anticipated to occur in 2025. Construction
may occur earlier if all approvals are obtained and funding is available; however, funding
limitations may require some project amenities to be phased.
9. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting:
The project area is located on what was historically low-lying, gravelly, alluvial land, bordered
along the west by a river terrace. The terrace is about 30 feet above the project area. The terrain in
the project area is flat with elevations generally between 490 and 500 feet above sea level.
The project area is bounded by the Sacramento River to the north, Sundial Bridge and Turtle Bay
Exploration Park to the east, Redding Memorial Park to the west, and the rodeo grounds and
associated parking to the south. The project area primarily consists of two parking lots; a graded
and graveled one to the east (Figure 3), and a paved western lot that serves that boat ramp. The
two lots are connected by Aoki Way, a paved road. There is a fenced dirt area south of Aoki Way,
which is part of the rodeo grounds. The boat ramp is an excavated ramp sloping down to the
Sacramento River. A riparian corridor and forested hilly terrain exists along the Sacramento River
and towards the western extent of the project area.
10. Other public agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or
participation agreement):
■ U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
■ National Marine Fisheries Service
■ State Office of Historic Preservation
■ California Department of Fish and Wildlife
■ California Regional Water Quality Control Board
■ Central. Valley Flood Protection Board
■ State Lands Commission
Page 4 Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project
March 2023
City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division
Initial Study
11. Have California Native American tribes traditionally and culturally affiliated with the
project area requested consultation pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21080.3.1? If
so, is there a plan for consultation that includes, for example, the determination of
significance of impacts to tribal cultural resources, procedures regarding confidentiality,
etc.?
The City consulted with the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) and local Native
American groups and individuals pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21080.3. This
consultation included contacting the local Native American individuals identified by the NAHC
via letters, emails, and follow-up phone calls. Two local Native American tribes responded, and
consultation is ongoing. Additionally, NAHC conducted a review of its Sacred Lands database
for culturally significant properties and indicated that the results were negative.
Page 5 Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project
March 2023
DETERMINATION (TO BE COMPLETED BY THE LEAD AGENCY)
Based on the initial evaluation:
❑ I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and
a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
® I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment,
there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been
made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
will be prepared.
❑ I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
Page 6 Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project
March 2023
City of Redding
Initial Study
Public Works Department, Engineering Division
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at
least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Less than Significant Impact with
Mitigation Incorporated" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages.
Aesthetics
Agricultural and Air Quality
Forestry Resources
x Biological Resources
Cultural Resources Energy
Geology/Soils
Greenhouse Gas Hazards & Hazardous
Emissions Materials
.. ..
Hydrology/Water
Land Use/Planning Mineral Resources
Quality
Noise
Population/Housing I Public Services
..
Recreation
_
Transportation Tribal Cultural
Resources
... ..
Utilities/ServiceWildfire
x Mandatory Findings of
.. Systems
Significance
DETERMINATION (TO BE COMPLETED BY THE LEAD AGENCY)
Based on the initial evaluation:
❑ I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and
a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
® I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment,
there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been
made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
will be prepared.
❑ I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
Page 6 Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project
March 2023
City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division Initial Study
❑, I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially
significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been
adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has
been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached
sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the
effects that remain to be addressed.
1 find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment
because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR
or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided
or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR of NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions
or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required.
Copies of the Initial Study and related materials and documentation may be obtained at the
Engineering Division of the Public Works Department, 777 Cypress Avenue, Redding, CA 96001.
Contact Amber Kelley at (530) 225-4046 or akelley@cityofredding.org.
Amber Kelley Date
Environmental Compliance Manj
Public Works — Engineering
Page 7 Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project
March 2023
City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division Initial Study
EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
This section analyzes the potential environmental impacts associated with the proposed project. The
issue areas evaluated in this Initial Study include:
■ Aesthetics
■ Agricultural and Forestry Resources
■ Air Quality
■ Biological Resources
■ Cultural Resources
■ Energy
■ Geology/Soils
■ Greenhouse Gas Emissions
■ Hazards & Hazardous Materials
■ Hydrology/Water Quality
■ Land Use/Planning
■ Mineral Resources
■ Noise
■ Population/Housing
■ Public Services
■ Recreation
■ Transportation
■ Tribal Cultural Resources
■ Utilities/Service Systems
■ Wildfire
■ Mandatory Findings of Significance
The environmental analysis in this section is patterned after the Initial Study Checklist recommended
by the State of California's CEQA Guidelines and used by the City of Redding in its environmental
review process. For the preliminary environmental assessment undertaken as part of this Initial
Study's preparation, a determination that there is a potential for significant effects indicates the need
to analyze the development's impacts more fully and to identify mitigation.
For the evaluation of potential impacts, the questions in the Initial Study Checklist are stated and an
answer is provided according to the analysis undertaken as part of the Initial. Study. The analysis
considers the long-term, direct, indirect, and cumulative impacts of the development. To each
question, there are four possible responses:
® No Impact. The development will not have any measurable environmental impact on the
environment.
® Less -Than -Significant Impact. The development will have the potential for impacting the
environment although this impact will be below established thresholds that are significant.
® Less -Than- Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. The development will have the
potential to generate impacts which may be considered as a significant effect on the
environment; however, mitigation measures or changes to the development's physical or
operational characteristics can reduce these impacts to levels that are less than significant.
® Potentially Significant Impact. The development will have impacts which are considered
significant, and additional analysis is required to identify mitigation measures that could
reduce these impacts to less -than -significant levels.
Where potential impacts are anticipated to be significant, mitigation measures will be required so that
impacts may be avoided or reduced to insignificant levels.
Page 8 Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project
March 2023
City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division
Prior environmental evaluations applicable to all or part of the project site:
Initial Study
City of Redding General Plan, 2000
City of Redding General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report, 2000, SCH #1998072103
List of Attachments/References
Appendix A: Figure 1
Appendix B: Biological Resources Report, GHD Consulting 2022*
Appendix C: Biological Assessment, GHD Consulting 2022*
Appendix D: Technical Memorandum, GHD Consulting 2022*
Appendix E: Aquatic Resources Delineation Report, GHD 2022*
Appendix E: Archaeological Resources Study, Anthropological Studies Center, Sonoma State
University 2022*
* Appendices are on file in the Public Works Department — Engineering Division
Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project Page 9
February 2023
City of Redding
Initial Study Public Works Department, Engineering Division
I. AESTHETICS
Discussion
a) During the construction period, construction workers, vehicles, and equipment, including heavy
machinery, would be present and visible to recreational visitors in the area. Construction
activities involves earthwork, grading, new structures, drainage modification, utility
modification tree removal, tree planting, paving, lighting, striping, and sign installation. Once
construction is completed, the project area would be restored to pre -project conditions. The
proposed project would not represent a significant change to scenic vistas or the overall scenic
quality of the area. The impact would be less than significant.
b) The proposed project is not located within, or adjacent to, a state -designated scenic highway
(California Department of Transportation 2022) and would, therefore, have no impacts.
c) The proposed project would be compatible with the existing visual character of the property
and its surroundings. Project components would be consistent with the surrounding visual
environment, which has been subjected to urban development and recreational open space uses.
Further, construction staging areas would be temporary. The proposed project would not
conflict with the City's goal to maintain a "proper balance between development areas and the
natural environment" (City of Redding 2009); therefore, impacts of the proposed project on the
existing visual character and quality of existing views would be less than significant.
d) Construction of the proposed project may involve the use of temporary safety and security
lighting in staging areas. Temporary construction lighting will comply with the City's Zoning
Page 10 Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project
March 2023
Less -Than -
Potentially
Significant with
Less -Than -
Except as provided in Public Resources Code Section
Significant
Mitigation
Significant
21099, would the project:
Impact
Incorporated
Impact
No Impact
a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic
El
El
®
El
vista?
b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including,
but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and
El
El
El
M
historic buildings within a state scenic highway?
e) In non -urbanized areas, substantially degrade the
existing visual character or quality of public views
the site and its surroundings (public views are
those that are experience from publicly accessible
El
vantage point).? If the project is in an urbanized
area, would the project conflict with applicable
zoning and other regulations governing scenic
quality?
d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare
which would adversely affect day or nighttime
❑
❑
®
❑
views in the area?
Discussion
a) During the construction period, construction workers, vehicles, and equipment, including heavy
machinery, would be present and visible to recreational visitors in the area. Construction
activities involves earthwork, grading, new structures, drainage modification, utility
modification tree removal, tree planting, paving, lighting, striping, and sign installation. Once
construction is completed, the project area would be restored to pre -project conditions. The
proposed project would not represent a significant change to scenic vistas or the overall scenic
quality of the area. The impact would be less than significant.
b) The proposed project is not located within, or adjacent to, a state -designated scenic highway
(California Department of Transportation 2022) and would, therefore, have no impacts.
c) The proposed project would be compatible with the existing visual character of the property
and its surroundings. Project components would be consistent with the surrounding visual
environment, which has been subjected to urban development and recreational open space uses.
Further, construction staging areas would be temporary. The proposed project would not
conflict with the City's goal to maintain a "proper balance between development areas and the
natural environment" (City of Redding 2009); therefore, impacts of the proposed project on the
existing visual character and quality of existing views would be less than significant.
d) Construction of the proposed project may involve the use of temporary safety and security
lighting in staging areas. Temporary construction lighting will comply with the City's Zoning
Page 10 Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project
March 2023
City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division
Initial Study
Ordinance light standards that require light shielding (City of Redding 201.9). Project lighting
would be consistent with existing lighting sources used on area roads and trails. The lights will
produce light at 1.0 lux or less and will be shielded, directing light only to areas of intended
illumination. Potential glare from reflective signage, pavement striping, and trail surfaces
would be similar to levels emitted by existing parking areas and trails. Construction equipment,
machinery, and bright colored traffic control signage may temporarily increase light and glare
in the project area during construction. Operational and construction impacts on day or
nighttime views in the area because of project lighting would be less than significant.
Documentation
California Department of Transportation. 2022. California Scenic Highway Mapping System
— Shasta County. Available at:
http://www.dot.ca. og v/hq/LandArch/16 livability/scenic highways/.
City of Redding. 2019. Municipal Code — Zoning Ordinance Chapter 18.40.090.
City of Redding. 2009. General Plan — Community Development and Design Element.
Mitigation
No mitigation required.
II. AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY RESOURCES
In determining whether impacts to agricultural
resources are significant environmental effects, lead
agencies may refer to the California Agricultural, Land
Evaluation and Site Assessment Mode (1997) prepared
by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional
model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and
farmland. In determining whether impacts to forest
resources, including effects, lead agencies may refer to
information compiled by the California Department of
Forestry and Fire Protection regarding the state's
inventory of forest land, including the Forest and
Range Assessment Project and the Forest Legacy
Less -Than -
Assessment project; and forest carbon measurement
Potentially
Significant with
Less -Than -
methodology provided bin Forest Protocols adopted by
Significant
Mitigation
Significant
the California Air Resources Board. Would the project:
Impact
Incorporated
Impact
No Impact
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or
Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on
the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland
0
0
0
Mapping and Monitoring Program of the
California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural
use?
b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use,
El
El
El
or a Williamson Act Contract?
Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project Page 11
February 2023
Initial Study
City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division
In determining whether impacts to agricultural
resources are significant environmental effects, lead
agencies may refer to the California Agricultural, Land
Evaluation and Site Assessment Mode (1997) prepared
by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional
model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and
farmland. In determining whether impacts to forest
resources, including effects, lead agencies may refer to
information compiled by the California Department of
Forestry and Fire Protection regarding the state's
inventory of forest land, including the Forest and
Range Assessment Project and the Forest Legacy
Less -Than -
Assessment project; and forest carbon measurement
Potentially
Significant with
Less -Than -
methodology provided bin Forest Protocols adopted by
Significant
Mitigation
Significant
the California Air Resources Board. Would the project:
Impact
Incorporated
Impact
No Impact
e) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause
rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public
Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as
0
0
0
defined by Public Resources Code section 4526),
or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as
defined by Government Code section 51104(8))?
d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of
0
0
0
forest land to non -forest use?
e) Involve other changes in the existing environment
which, due to their location or nature, could result
0
0
0
in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use
or conversion of forest land to non -forest use?
Discussion
a -e) The project area does not include any designated farmland or timberlands. According to the
California Department of Conservation's Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program, no lands
within the project area are under Williamson Act contracts and no lands are mapped as
"Important Farmlands." The proposed project would not convert any farmland to non-
agricultural use, or any forestland to non -forest use; therefore, there would be no impact.
Documentation
City of Redding. 2009. General Plan — Natural Resources Element.
City of Redding. 2022. GIS Parcel and Zoning Map Viewer.
California Department of Conservation. 2018. Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program,
Shasta County Important Farmland.
Mitigation
No mitigation required.
Page 12 Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project
March 2023
City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division
III. AIR QUALITY
Initial Study
Where available, the significance criteria established
Less -Than -
by the applicable air quality management district or air
Potentially
Significant with
Less -Than -
pollution control district may be relied upon to make
Significant
Mitigation
Significant
the following determinations. Would the project:
Impact
Incorporated
Impact
No Impact
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the
El
El
El
applicable air quality plan?
b) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase
of any criteria pollutant for which the project
❑
❑
®
❑
region is non -attainment under an applicable
federal or state ambient air quality standard?
e) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant
❑
❑
®
❑
concentrations?
d) Result in other emissions (such as those leading to
odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of
❑
❑
❑
people?
Discussion
a,b) City standards implemented through the Grading Ordinance and Uniform Building Code
require implementation of conservation measures and best management practices (BMPs) that
contribute to achieving the City's goal of at least a 20% reduction in emissions or the best
reduction otherwise feasible. The following standard conservation measures and BMPs will be
used during construction to limit dust and particulate matter less than 10 microns in diameter
(PMIo) emissions:
■ AQ -1. Nontoxic soil stabilizers shall be applied according to manufacturer's
specification to all inactive construction areas.
■ AQ -2. All grading operations shall be suspended when winds (as instantaneous gusts)
exceed 20 miles per hour.
■ AQ -3. Water all stockpiles, access roads, and disturbed or exposed areas, as necessary,
to prevent airborne dust.
■ AQ -4. Pursuant to the California Vehicle Code (Section 23114(e)(4)) (California
Legislative Information 2016), all trucks hauling soil and other loose material to and
from the construction site shall be covered or shall maintain at least 6 inches of
freeboard (i.e., minimum vertical distance between top of load and the trailer).
■ AQ -5. All public roadways used by the project contractor shall be maintained free from
dust, dirt, and debris caused by construction activities. Streets shall be swept at the end
of the day if visible soil materials are carried onto adjacent public paved roads.
Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project Page 13
February 2023
Initial Study
City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division
Shasta County, including the far northern Sacramento Valley, currently exceeds the state's
ambient standards for ozone (smog) (CARB 2020). Consequently, these pollutants are the focus
of local air quality policy, especially when related to land use and transportation planning. Even
with application of measures to reduce emissions for individual projects, cumulative impacts
are unavoidable when ozone emissions are involved. For example, the primary source of
emissions contributing to ozone is from vehicles. Any project that generates vehicle trips has
the potential to incrementally contribute to the problem. The Environmental Impact Report for
the City's General Plan acknowledged this dilemma; and as a result, the City Council adopted
Findings and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for impacts on air quality resulting
from growth supported under the General Plan (City of Redding 2009).
Construction equipment would result in limited temporary emissions of Reactive Organic
Gases (ROG) and oxides of nitrogen (NOx), which are ozone precursors, and inhalable PMio.
The proposed project would be under construction for approximately 10 months. Because the
proposed project is a recreational project with a relatively small footprint requiring limited
construction activities and equipment for its construction, it would be classified as a minor
project in accordance with the City's General Plan findings. The adherence to standards and
BMPs set forth by the City further illustrates the size and scope of construction activities that
would result in unmitigated emissions less than the 25 pounds per day of NOx, 25 pounds per
day of ROG, and 80 pounds per day of PMIo Level "A" mitigation thresholds identified as part
of the City's General Plan. The proposed project would be consistent with the City's emission -
reduction goals of 20 to 25% established in the Air Quality Element of the General Plan.
The proposed project would have no impact on air quality plans or policies. The proposed
project's cumulative contribution to criteria pollutants in a non -attainment area would be less
than significant with the use of the conservation measures and BMPs (AQ -1 through AQ -6)
previously described).
c,d) Construction vehicles would generate fugitive dust and diesel exhaust emissions. There are
approximately 40 residences that would be adjacent to construction activities with several that
could be as close as 100 feet from the construction area. Additionally, recreational users at
Cascade Park could be considered sensitive receptors; however, these receptors would have
limited exposure since use of the park occurs in intermittent phases (rather than prolonged
exposure). Impacts on the neighboring residents as well as park users because of construction
emissions would be temporary, localized, and minor. Construction activities would occur in a
linear nature, and no sensitive receptors would be substantially affected for prolonged periods
of time. Adherence with City specifications outlined in BMPs AQ -1 through AQ -6 would
further reduce overall emissions exposure to residents and park users. No operational
emissions, including odor, would result from the proposed project. There are no other sensitive
receptors (e.g., hospitals, schools) in the immediate project vicinity. Therefore, impacts would
be less than significant.
Documentation
California Air Resources Board (CARB). 2020. Area Designation Maps/State and National.
Accessed at: https://www.arb.ca.gov/desi/adm/adm.htm. June.
City of Redding. 2009. General Plan, Air Quality Element.
Page 14 Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project
March 2023
City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division
Initial Study
City of Redding. 2000. CEQA Findings of Pact and Statement of Overriding Considerations
for the City of Redding General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report, as adopted by the
Redding City Council on October 3, 2000, by Resolution 2000-166.
Shasta County Air Quality Management District. 2003. Protocol for Review, Land Use
Permitting Activities, Procedures for Implementing the California Environmental Quality
Act. November.
Shasta County Air Quality Management District. 2003. Environmental Review Guidelines,
Procedures for Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act. November.
Mitigation
No mitigation required.
IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project Page 15
February 2023
Less -Than -
Potentially
Significant with
Less -Than -
Significant
Mitigation
Significant
Would the project:
Impact
Incorporated
Impact
No Impact
a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or
through habitat modifications, on any species
identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special -
status species in local or regional plans, policies,
❑
®
❑
❑
or regulations, or by the California Department of
Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service?
b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian
habitat or other sensitive natural community
identified in local or regional plans, policies,
0
0
®
0
regulations, or by the California Department of
Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service?
e) Have a substantial adverse effect on state or
federally protected wetlands (including, but not
limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.)
❑
❑
®
❑
through direct removal, filling, hydrological
interruption, or other means?
d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any
native resident or migratory fish or wildlife
species or with established native resident or
❑
❑
®
❑
migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of
native wildlife nursery sites?
e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances
protecting biological resources, such as a tree
❑
❑
❑
preservation policy or ordinance?
Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project Page 15
February 2023
Initial Study
City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division
Discussion
a) A Biological Resources Report (GHD 2022), including a summary of findings for the protocol -
level botanical survey, a habitat assessment survey for VELB, a biological reconnaissance
survey, and delineation of waters of the United States, was prepared to assess the impacts of the
proposed project on biological resources in the project area and vicinity.
Special -status Plants
Based on database and information review, habitat for numerous special -status plant species,
including one federally listed species, one state listed species, and one state candidate species
have the potential to occur in the project vicinity. Each plant species was reviewed in relation to
the habitat conditions in the project area, and the following three species were found to have a
moderate to high potential to occur in the project area.
■ Silky cryptantha (Cryptantha crinita)
■ Shasta snow -wreath (Neviusia cliftonii)
■ Maverick clover (Trifolium piorkowskii)
Two seasonally appropriate floristic surveys were conducted on May 11 and July 6, 2022, and
no special -status plants were found to occur within the project area (GHD 2022); therefore,
implementation of the proposed project would not impact special -status plant species.
Special Status Fish and Mollusks
The following federal and state listed fish species have a moderate to high potential to occur in
or adjacent to the project area:
■ Green Sturgeon, Southern DPS (Acipenser medirostris)
■ Steelhead - Central Valley DPS (Oncorhynchus mykiss irideus pop. 11)
■ Chinook Salmon - Central Valley spring -run ESU (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha pop. 6)
■ Chinook Salmon - Sacramento River winter -run ESU (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha pop.
7)
■ Western Pearlshell (Margaritifera falcate)
The proposed project is within and adjacent to the Sacramento River, which provides spawning
and juvenile rearing habitat for special -status fish and mollusks. The project area is within
Page 16 Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project
March 2023
Less -Than -
Potentially
Significant with
Less -Than -
Significant
Mitigation
Significant
Would the project:
Impact
Incorporated
Impact
No Impact
I) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat
Conservation Plan, Natural Community,
El
El
El
Conservation Plan, or other approved local,
regional, or State habitat conservation plan?
Discussion
a) A Biological Resources Report (GHD 2022), including a summary of findings for the protocol -
level botanical survey, a habitat assessment survey for VELB, a biological reconnaissance
survey, and delineation of waters of the United States, was prepared to assess the impacts of the
proposed project on biological resources in the project area and vicinity.
Special -status Plants
Based on database and information review, habitat for numerous special -status plant species,
including one federally listed species, one state listed species, and one state candidate species
have the potential to occur in the project vicinity. Each plant species was reviewed in relation to
the habitat conditions in the project area, and the following three species were found to have a
moderate to high potential to occur in the project area.
■ Silky cryptantha (Cryptantha crinita)
■ Shasta snow -wreath (Neviusia cliftonii)
■ Maverick clover (Trifolium piorkowskii)
Two seasonally appropriate floristic surveys were conducted on May 11 and July 6, 2022, and
no special -status plants were found to occur within the project area (GHD 2022); therefore,
implementation of the proposed project would not impact special -status plant species.
Special Status Fish and Mollusks
The following federal and state listed fish species have a moderate to high potential to occur in
or adjacent to the project area:
■ Green Sturgeon, Southern DPS (Acipenser medirostris)
■ Steelhead - Central Valley DPS (Oncorhynchus mykiss irideus pop. 11)
■ Chinook Salmon - Central Valley spring -run ESU (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha pop. 6)
■ Chinook Salmon - Sacramento River winter -run ESU (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha pop.
7)
■ Western Pearlshell (Margaritifera falcate)
The proposed project is within and adjacent to the Sacramento River, which provides spawning
and juvenile rearing habitat for special -status fish and mollusks. The project area is within
Page 16 Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project
March 2023
City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division
Initial Study
designated critical habitat for all of the above listed fish species. In addition, Essential Fish
Habitat exists within the Action Area for Chinook Salmon.
Green Sturgeon are known to spawn in the Sacramento River. This species has been recorded
downstream of the Anderson -Cottonwood Irrigation District Diversion Dam. Large numbers of
this species have been recorded in recent years in Red Bluff; there are no fish passage barriers
between Red Bluff and the Project Area. Suitable aquatic habitat exists in the Sacramento River
within the Project Area and BSA. Based on records and available habitat, the species has a high
potential to be present, spawn, and forage in the Project Area and BSA, though presence is
likely to be seasonal (associated with upstream migration and spawning).
Steelhead have been recorded in the Sacramento River adjacent to the Project Area as recently
as 2010. Suitable aquatic habitat exists in the Sacramento River within the Project Area and
BSA. Based on records and available habitat, the species has a high potential to be present,
spawn, and forage in the Project Area and BSA, though presence is likely to be seasonal
(associated with upstream migration and spawning).
Chinook Salmon have been recorded in Sacramento River adjacent to the Project Area as
recently as 1995. Suitable aquatic habitat exists in the Sacramento River within the Project
Area and BSA. Based on records and available habitat, the species has a high potential to be
present, spawn, and forage in the Project Area and BSA, though presence is likely to be
seasonal (associated with upstream migration and spawning).
The Western Pearlshell is an aquatic freshwater mussel. Its geographic distribution spans the
western U.S. including Alaska, California, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, Utah,
Washington, and Wyoming. The mussel tends to prefer low velocity water. This species is
primarily threatened by water diversion, pollution, and siltation (NatureServe 2022). Western
Pearlshells have been recorded in the Sacramento River adjacent to the Project Area as recently
as 2008. Suitable aquatic habitat exists in the Sacramento River within the Project Area and
BSA.
A Biological Assessment (BA) was prepared to assess the potential for the proposed project to
impact listed fish (GHD 2022). Potential impacts on listed salmonids and sturgeon caused by
construction activities include, but are not limited to, spills and discharges of hazardous
materials, mainly fuels, lubricants, and uncured concrete from construction activities;
introduction of invasive species; removal of riparian vegetation and bank disturbances. Impacts
to special status fish and mollusks in the project area may include injury or mortality as a result
of construction of the gravel berm, exclusion via seine netting, or increased levels of in -water
sedimentation.
Installation of the gravel berm could adversely affect fish due to the placement of gravel,
however with inclusion of mitigation measures, the area would be seined prior to gravel berm
construction, and equipment operators would utilize methods to alert fish of forthcoming
movement to encourage fish to move out of the work area prior to placement of gravel.
Installation of the gravel berm would result in an isolated, fish -free work area. The seining
method will involve two (or more) biologists slowly walking a long net, from the shore to the
berm location. The fish would be encouraged to swim away from the net and out of the work
Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project Page 17
February 2023
Initial Study
City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division
area without capture. No handling of ESA or CESA listed species would occur during
construction of the gravel berm or in association with the project, and informal consultation
with NMFS under the ESA is anticipated. Upon construction completion, the gravel berm
would be breached and the gravel pad and berm would be left in place to provide the benefit of
approximately 236 cubic yards of spawning grade gravels to augment spawning opportunities
for salmon.
The BA findings conclude that the proposed project may affect, but is not likely to adversely
affect Central Valley spring -run ESU Chinook salmon, Sacramento River winter -run ESU
Chinook salmon, and Central Valley DPS steelhead, and southern DPS green sturgeon. The
findings also conclude that the proposed project may affect, but is not likely to adversely affect,
and would not destroy or modify, designated critical habitat for the four listed species.
Additionally, it is determined that Essential Fish Habitat exists within the Action Area for
Chinook Salmon (NOAA 2022); however, no Habitat Areas of Particular Concern (HAPC)
occur within the Action Area (NOAA 2022).
Mitigation Measures MM -I through MM -4 will be implemented to avoid or minimize impacts
on special -status fish and/or their habitat during construction. With implementation of the
measures, impacts on listed fish would be less than significant. In addition, standard
conservation measures and BMPs HAZ-1 through HAZ-5, WQ-1 through WQ-3, and BIO -1
through BIO -3 are incorporated into all projects that require earthwork and work near streams.
BI0-1. A Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (S)APPP), as required by the City of Redding
Stormwater Quality Management and Discharge Control Ordinance, will be prepared to address
BMPs that will be used to prevent erosion and sediment loss within the project site. BMPs such
as silt fence, mulching and seeding, and straw wattles will be placed where needed to prevent
sediment from leaving the site during and after construction.
13I0-2. Appropriate sediment control measures (e.g., silt fences, straw wattles) shall be in place
prior to the onset of construction activities near waters of the United States and in project areas
where there is a potential for surface runoff to drain into waters of the United States. Sediment
control measures shall be monitored and maintained until construction activities have ceased.
13I0-3. High visibility fencing, flagging, or markers will be installed along the edges of the
work zone near jurisdictional waters and riparian areas to prevent unauthorized access.
Special -status Wildlife
The following special status wildlife species have the potential to occur in or adjacent to the
project area:
■ Valley elderberry longhorn beetle (Desmocerus californicus dimorphus) - federally listed
as threatened.
■ Western pond turtle (Emyr marmorata) - state species of special concern.
■ Foothill Yellow -legged Frog (Rany boylii) — state species of special concern.
■ Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) - federally delisted, state listed as endangered,
state listed as fully protected.
Page 18 Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project
March 2023
City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division Initial Study
■ Osprey (Pandion haliaetus) - state watch list.
■ Great Egret (Ardea alba) — CA Dept. of Forestry, sensitive.
■ Bank Swallow (Riparia riparia) — state threatened.
■ Silver -haired bat (Antrozous pallidus) — IUNC, least concern
■ Hoary bat (Lasiurus blossevilla) — IUNC, least concern
Valley Elderberry Longhorn Beetle (VELB). Suitable habitat for the VELB is present adjacent to
the project area. Two elderberry shrubs were observed adjacent to the project boundary. The northern
elderberry shrub is approximately 75 -feet from the project's disturbance boundary, and the southern
elderberry shrub is approximately 50 -feet from the project's disturbance boundary. The northern
elderberry shrub exhibited VELB exit holes, however no VELB exit holes were observed in the
southern elderberry shrub.
The proposed project does not include the removal or modification of the elderberry shrubs.
Equipment would remain within the disturbance boundary, therefore project activities and/or
equipment would be at least 75 -feet and 50 -feet from the northern and southern elderberry shrubs,
respectively, at all times. No vegetation within 110 -feet of the northern and southern elderberry
shrubs, respectively, would be removed under the project. Therefore, habitat fragmentation in the
immediate vicinity of the elderberry shrubs would not occur.
Although no modifications or removal of the identified elderberry shrubs are proposed and no work
would occur within 75 -feet and 50 -feet of the shrubs, adverse effects to VELB could occur if
elderberry shrubs occur within 165 -feet of the project Area. Project activities planned to occur within
165 -feet of a shrub include demolition of the bathroom, disconnection of various utilities,
construction of the new bathroom, and removal of two trees. The trees to be removed are located
approximately 110 -feet from both shrubs, and 153 -feet from the northern elderberry shrub.
Five mature trees and a vegetative buffer would remain intact between the elderberry shrubs and
much of the proposed project work, including four mature oaks with 40- to 50 -inch dbh, thereby
providing protection from a portion of the project disturbance and remaining habitat continuity.
Direct and indirect effects to VELB are not anticipated due to the spatial and environmental buffer
between VELB habitat and Project activities via the large mature trees and existing vegetation. The
findings conclude that the proposed project will have no effect to VELB. The findings also conclude
that the proposed project will have no effect on designated critical habitat for VELB. The U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers is the federal lead agency for the project and will initiate Section 7 consultation
with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service as needed. While the project will have a less than significant
impact on VELB, the following conservation measures and BMPs have been incorporated into the
proj ect.
BI04. The construction area will be fenced, staked, or flagged as close to the limits as feasible.
BI0-5. A qualified biologist will provide training for all contractors, work crews, and any onsite
personnel on the status of the VELB, its host plant and habitat, the need to avoid damaging the
elderberry shrubs, and possible penalties for noncompliance.
Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project Page 19
February 2023
Initial Study
City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division
Western Pond Turtle. The Sacramento River provides potential aquatic habitat for the western.
pond turtle, and upland habitats in the project area may be used for nesting. Use of heavy
machinery could result in direct impacts such as injury or mortality of western pond turtle if
individuals are present in the project area during construction. Nesting could be indirectly
impacted by vegetation removal in upland habitats. Discharge of sediment into the river could
also indirectly impact this species. Implementation of Mitigation Measure MM -5 will reduce
impacts on western pond turtle to a less -than -significant level.
Foothill Yellow -legged Frog. The project could adversely affect foothill yellow -legged frog if
individuals were present in the project area during construction. Potential direct effects include
harassment, injury, and mortality of individuals due to equipment and vehicle traffic. The species
may also be affected if construction activities result in degradation of aquatic habitat and water
quality due to erosion and sedimentation, and accidental fuel leaks or spills. Based on records and
available habitat, the species has a moderate potential to be present, nest, and forage in the project
area. MM -5 will also be used to ensure any impacts on foothill yellow -legged frogs would be less
than significant.
Migratory Birds and Raptors. The project area and vicinity provide nesting and foraging
habitat for various birds, including raptor species. Special -status bird species that could use these
habitats include bald eagle, osprey, great egret, bank swallows, and a variety of migratory bird
species. A bald eagle nest is located approximately 0.5 mile southeast of the project area, and an
osprey nest is located approximately 515 feet north of the project area (directly across the river).
The nesting and breeding season for raptors is generally November through July, and a typical
avoidance buffer is 450 -feet for special status raptors unless a smaller buffer is approved by the
CDFW. The nesting and breeding season for migratory birds is February through August and
avoidance buffers vary based on the species.
Construction activities (e.g., vegetation removal, ground disturbance, and equipment noise)
would occur during the avian and raptor breeding seasons and could disturb nesting birds or
raptors in or adjacent to the project area, resulting in the loss of fertile eggs or nestlings or nest
abandonment. Foraging birds and individuals present in or adjacent to the project area outside of
the avian breeding season would not be adversely impacted by construction activities due to their
high mobility and available habitat outside of the project area. Given the heavy daily use and
activity in the area, the history of area construction without nest abandonment, and the distance of
the project from the nests, it is unlikely the known nesting raptors would be impacted.
New raptor and migratory bird nests may be assembled prior to construction; therefore, pre -
construction bird surveys will be incorporated. Mitigation Measure MM -6 will reduce the
potential impacts on raptors and birds to a less -than -significant level.
Special -status Bats. The silver -haired bat and the hoary bat have moderate potential to occur
within the project area based on the presence of suitable habitat, including mature trees, tree
cavities, loose bark, and foliage. Bats may roost individually or in small groups in tree cavities or
in riparian vegetation. Due to the ability of individual bats to move away from disturbance, direct
impacts on bats are not expected when the bats are not in a maternity colony. If a tree is removed
that contains a maternity colony, the removal could result in mortality or injury of individuals.
Page 20 Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project
March 2023
City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division
Initial Study
Indirect impacts may occur from construction disturbance if a maternity colony is present in or
adjacent to the project area. Significant noise disturbance could result in adults temporarily or
permanently leaving a maternity colony. Minor tree removal is proposed as part of the proposed
project. Mitigation Measure MM -7 has been incorporated to reduce potential impacts to bats to
a less -than -significant level.
b) A riparian corridor and forested hilly terrain exists along the Sacramento River and towards the
western extent of the project area comprised of valley oak (Quercus lobata), California live oak
(Juglans hindsii), interior live oak (Quercus wislizeni), willow (Salix spp.), white alder (Alnus
rhombifolia), and non-native species tree of heaven (Ailanthus altissima) and black locust
(Robinia pseudoacacia). Large mature trees (i.e. trees with diameters of 30 inches or greater)
exist along the hilly terrain above the riparian corridor within the western portion of the project
area and somewhat along the riverfront in the central and eastern portions of the project area.
These species includeg: valley oak, and Fremont cottonwood (Populus fremontii). The large
mature trees provide moderate shade over the southern bank of the Sacramento River. No large,
mature trees would be removed as a result of the project. The remaining areas within the project
area (parking lot, gravelled field, access roads) are highly developed. Trees within the parking
lot consist of cork oak (Quercus suber), cedar (Thuja sp.), valley oak, and white mulberry
(Morus alba).
Based on the assemblage of tree species, one sensitive natural community (SNC) was found to
occur in the project area; Valley Oak Riparian Forest and Woodland. Areas of vegetation along
the Sacramento River that do not consist of SNC assemblage species are considered riparian
habitat. Two valley oak trees (8 -inch diameter at breast height [dbh]) that are considered a
component of the Valley Oak Riparian Forest and Woodland SNC would be removed.
The project would require the removal of six trees in the riparian corridor consisting of four
native, and two non-native invasive species. Three of the riparian trees, which include two
arroyo willows (18 -inch dbh) and one California walnut (9 -inch dbh), are located immediately
west of the existing boat ramp on the lowest elevation of the hillside. These trees would be
removed to construct the widened section of the boat ramp and the drift boat beach. During
project development, the drift boat beach was modified to preserve numerous large trees. With
this design modification, the project impact on SNC, riparian habitat, and native species were
significantly reduced. One valley oak (20 -inch dbh) and two tree of heaven (18 -inch dbh) are
located at the eastern end of the project and sit in the southern most section of the riparian
corridor next to the parking lot. These three trees would be removed to construct the non -
motorized pathway. Removal of the riparian trees would have an insignificant effect to shading
on the River. At the western portion of the project, all of the large mature tree species sit on the
hillside above the riparian trees and constitute nearly all shading. At the eastern end of the
project, the valley oak and tree of heaven are located by the parking lot and do not contribute
shading to the river.
Nine additional trees would be removed, including three native trees (valley oak, 6 -inches dbh;
valley oak, 12 -inch dbh; and cedar, 14 -inch dbh) which are located in the parking lot and
upland area of the boat ramp. Six non-native trees would be removed, including five cork oak
in the parking lot and one white mulberry near the restroom.
Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project Page 21
February 2023
Initial Study
City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division
The project would have temporary impacts consisting of tree trimming for construction access,
and permanent impacts including the removal of nine native trees; two SNC, four riparian, and
three non -riparian. The removal of two SNC trees and four riparian trees will not result in a
significant adverse effect to SNCs given the location, elevation, and size of the trees, as well as
the abundance of surrounding mature vegetation being retained in the project area. The project
will have a less than significant effect on SNCs. The project also includes standard
conservation measure and BIO -1, which incorporates environmentally sensitive area (ESA)
fencing to protect surrounding habitat.
Although the project will have a less than significant effect, native tree planting will be
conducted. The project includes planting a minimum of 27 native trees (3 trees for every 1
native tree removed), within the project footprint and/or at the downstream kayak launch,
which is slated for decommission. Revegetation of the kayak launch would naturalize the area,
expand riparian habitat and increase shading over the Sacramento River. Planted trees will be
irrigated and monitored for a three year establishment period. A revegetation plan will provided
to the resource agencies during the permitting process.
c) A total of 1.45 acres of potential waters of the United States occurs within the project area
(GHD 2022) and consists of riverine "Other Waters of the U.S." (Sacramento River). The
project area does not include state or federal wetlands, or non-federal waters of the State.
The project would temporarily impact 0.13 acre of waters, and permanently impact 0.007 acre
of waters. Temporary impacts would result from re -surfaced boat ramp, grading for the drift
boat beach area, the gravel berm, and the gravel work pad. Permanent impacts would result
from the expanded boat ramp section, the floating dock pile, and the extended floating dock
panel.
Indirect impacts could occur due to erosion and sedimentation, accidental fuel leaks, and spills.
Conservation measures and BMPs BIO -1 through -3 (described above under Special -status
Fish), and HAZ-1 through -5 included in Section VIII, Hazards and Hazardous Materials will
be used to reduce potential impacts to federally -protected waters. The project would have no
adverse effect on protected wetlands and impacts would be less than significant.
Prior to construction regulatory permits will be obtained from the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Section 404 permit), the California Department of Fish and Game (Section 1600
Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement), the Central Valley Regional Water Quality
Control Board (Section 401 Water Quality Certification), and the Central Valley Flood
Protection Board (Floodway Encroachment Permit). A permit may also be required by the State
Lands Commission.
d) The Sacramento River supports a variety of salmon, trout, and other aquatic species, including
Chinook Salmon Steelhead, Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss), and other trout and bass
species. There are four distinct runs of Chinook Salmon in the Sacramento River: fall, late fall,
spring, and winter.
Riparian habitat can function as a wildlife corridor, and it is assumed that common and urban -
adapted mammals, such as Mule Deer (Odocoileus hemionus) and North American Raccoons
Page 22 Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project
March 2023
City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division
Initial Study
(Procyon lotor) utilize the riparian corridor within the project area. Additionally, the project
area and action area are located within the Pacific Flyway for migratory birds. The Sacramento
River can be considered a large expanse of high quality natural habitat that would support high
levels of migratory bird species stopover use, breeding, or wintering specifically, particularly
for wading bird and waterfowl.
No "essential connectivity areas," "natural landscape blocks," or "small natural landscape
areas" that would support other sensitive species have been identified or mapped in the project
vicinity by the California Essential Habitat Connectivity Project (CDFW 2022). The "terrestrial
connectivity" within the project area is considered to have "limited connectivity opportunity."
No new barriers to terrestrial wildlife movement would result, and the project would not
substantially interfere with migratory birds, bats, or other species. The project would
temporarily exclude fish from the wetted boat launch area; however, fish would be able to pass
the area via the open river. The project would have a less than significant impact on wildlife
corridors.
e) The City has adopted a Tree Management Ordinance (Chapter 18.45 of the RMC) that
promotes the conservation of mature, healthy trees in the design of new development. The
ordinance also recognizes that the preservation of trees sometimes conflicts with necessary
land -development requirements. There are no conflicts associated with the project that would
prevent implementation of the Tree Preservation Ordinance or other resource protection
ordinances. The project would have no impact on resource protection ordinances.
f) There are no Habitat Conservation Plans, Natural Community Conservation Plans, or other
approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plans covering the project area. The
project would have no impact on any habitat conservation plan.
Documentation
■ California Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2022. California Sensitive Natural Communities.
■ California Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2022. California Natural Diversity Database.
■ City of Redding Municipal Code, Chapter 18.45, Tree Management Ordinance
■ Biological Resources Report, GHD Consulting 2022
■ Biological Assessment, GHD Consulting 2022
■ Technical Memorandum, GHD Consulting 2022
■ Aquatic Resources Delineation Report, GHD 2022
■ U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2017. Framework for Assessing Impacts to the Valley
Elderberry Longhorn Beetle.
Mitigation
MM -1. All in -water work shall occur during April 1 through June 30 to avoid peak times when listed
juvenile anadromous fish would be present.
MM -2. Prior to any in -water work, qualified fish biologists, in consultation with CDFW, shall utilize
seine netting to work from the edge of water, outward just before berm construction to remove any
individuals that could be within the work area. No handling of fish shall occur. Prior to completion of
Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project Page 23
February 2023
City of Redding
Initial Study Public Works Department, Engineering Division
the gravel berm, the area will be surveyed and seined again by qualified fish biologists to ensure
absence of fish in the work area. The berm will serve as a barrier to the in -water portion of the
project area. After the gravel berm is constructed, the work pad may be constructed.
MM -3. Prior to any placement of gravel in water, heavy equipment operation practices shall be
implemented that minimize the potential for injury or death of listed fish species, including alerting
fish to equipment operation in the channel before gravel is placed in the water (i.e. slow, deliberate
equipment operation and gently tapping water surface prior to entering or placing gravels in the river
channel).
MM -4. The gravel berm and work pad shall be constructed out of 3/4 -inch minus, silt free, clean,
spawning -grade gravel that meets Caltrans' cleanness test (California Test No. 227) with a value of
85 or higher. Upon construction completion, the gravel berm would be breached and the gravel pad
and berm would be left in place to provide the benefit of approximately 236 cubic yards of spawning
grade gravels to augment spawning opportunities for salmon.
MM -5. Twenty-four hours (24 -hours) prior to initiation of ground disturbance or vegetation removal
within 50 -feet of suitable reptile and/or amphibian habitat (i.e., Sacramento River and riparian areas),
a qualified biologist shall perform a pre -construction survey for western pond turtle, their nests, and
foothill yellow -legged frog. If western pond turtles, their nests, or yellow -legged frog are encountered
in the project area during construction and could be harmed by construction activities, work will stop
immediately in the area and CDFW will be notified. Upon authorization from CDFW, a qualified
biologist may relocate the individual(s) the shortest distance possible to a location containing habitat
outside of the construction impact zone.
MM -6. If construction or vegetation removal occurs during the nesting season, February 1 through
August 31 for birds and November 1 through July 15 for raptors, a qualified biologist shall conduct a
pre -construction survey to locate active nests. The pre -construction survey will be performed no more
than 7 days prior to the implementation of construction activities. If a lapse in construction activities
occurs for 7 days or longer, another pre -construction survey will be performed. If an active nest is
found, a qualified biologist (in consultation with the CDFW) will determine the extent of a buffer
zone to be established around the nest.
MM -7. Removal of large trees (10 -inch dbh or greater) with cavities, crevices, or snags shall occur
before maternity colonies form (i.e., prior to March 1) or after young are volant (i.e., after August 15).
If construction (including the removal of large trees) occurs during the non-volant season (March I
through August 1.5), a qualified biologist shall conduct a pre -construction survey of the project area to
locate maternity colonies and identify measures to protect the colonies from disturbance. The pre -
construction survey will be performed no more than seven days prior to the implementation of
construction activities. If a lapse in construction activities for seven days or longer occurs between
those dates, another pre -construction survey will be performed. If a maternity colony is found a
qualified biologist (in consultation with the CDFW) will determine the extent of a construction -free
buffer zone to be established around the nest.
Page 24 Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project
March 2023
City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division
V. CULTURAL RESOURCES
Initial Study
Discussion
a, b, c) Archival research, consultation with the Native American community, and an intensive
archaeological survey are summarized in the Archaeological Resources Study (Sonoma State
University, 2022). The cultural resources inventory identified no cultural resources within the
project area.
The project area, except for the western edge and west of the boat ramp, lies on a historical
gravel point bar, the result of deposition at the bend of the Sacramento River. The lack of
vegetation indicated on the 1944 USGS maps and the lack of historical development suggests
this landform was low-lying and subject to flooding and reworking by the river. The current
ground surface may be the result of filling. Although the project vicinity was a locus of Native
American habitation, the project area's sensitivity for surface and buried archaeological
resources is low. In addition to being located on a historic gravel and sand point bar, the area
has been extensively disturbed with low potential for human habitation.
The main channel of the Sacramento River, at the project location, is natural, navigable, non -
tidal, and, therefore, State sovereign land under the California State Land Commission's
(Commission) jurisdiction. A lease will be required for the portions of the project extending
into the river below the ordinary low water mark. The title to all abandoned shipwrecks,
archaeological sites, and historic or cultural resources on or in the tide and submerged lands of
California is vested in the State and under the jurisdiction of the Commission (Pub. Resources
Code, § 6313).
While the proposed project is not anticipated to impact cultural resources, the following
standard conservation measures are included in every project. In the event of an unanticipated
discovery of artifacts, including human remains, impacts would be less than significant.
CR -1. If previously unidentified cultural materials are unearthed during construction, it is the
City's policy that work be halted in that area until a qualified archaeologist can assess the
significance of the find. Additional archaeological surveys will be needed if the proposed
Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project Page 25
February 2023
Less -Than -
Potentially
Significant with
Less -Than -
Significant
Mitigation
Significant
Would the project:
Impact
Incorporated
Impact
No Impact
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the
significance of a historical resource pursuant to
❑
❑
®
❑
Section 15064.5?
b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the
significance of an archaeological resource
El
El
M
pursuant to Section 15064.5?
e) Disturb any human remains, including those
interred outside of formal cemeteries?
Discussion
a, b, c) Archival research, consultation with the Native American community, and an intensive
archaeological survey are summarized in the Archaeological Resources Study (Sonoma State
University, 2022). The cultural resources inventory identified no cultural resources within the
project area.
The project area, except for the western edge and west of the boat ramp, lies on a historical
gravel point bar, the result of deposition at the bend of the Sacramento River. The lack of
vegetation indicated on the 1944 USGS maps and the lack of historical development suggests
this landform was low-lying and subject to flooding and reworking by the river. The current
ground surface may be the result of filling. Although the project vicinity was a locus of Native
American habitation, the project area's sensitivity for surface and buried archaeological
resources is low. In addition to being located on a historic gravel and sand point bar, the area
has been extensively disturbed with low potential for human habitation.
The main channel of the Sacramento River, at the project location, is natural, navigable, non -
tidal, and, therefore, State sovereign land under the California State Land Commission's
(Commission) jurisdiction. A lease will be required for the portions of the project extending
into the river below the ordinary low water mark. The title to all abandoned shipwrecks,
archaeological sites, and historic or cultural resources on or in the tide and submerged lands of
California is vested in the State and under the jurisdiction of the Commission (Pub. Resources
Code, § 6313).
While the proposed project is not anticipated to impact cultural resources, the following
standard conservation measures are included in every project. In the event of an unanticipated
discovery of artifacts, including human remains, impacts would be less than significant.
CR -1. If previously unidentified cultural materials are unearthed during construction, it is the
City's policy that work be halted in that area until a qualified archaeologist can assess the
significance of the find. Additional archaeological surveys will be needed if the proposed
Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project Page 25
February 2023
Initial Study
City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division
project undertaking limits are extended beyond the present survey APE limits. The final
disposition of archaeological, historical, and paleontological resources recovered on State land
under the jurisdiction of the California State Lands Commission must be approved by the
Commission.
CR -2. If human remains are discovered during project activities, all activities in the vicinity of
the find will be stopped and the Shasta County Sheriff -Coroner's Office shall be notified. If the
coroner determines that the remains may be those of a Native American, the coroner will
contact the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC). Treatment of the remains shall be
conducted in accordance with further direction of the County Coroner or the NAHC, as
appropriate.
Documentation
■ Archaeological Resources Study (Sonoma State University, 2022).
Mitigation
No mitigation required.
Discussion
a) During construction, vehicles including worker commuter vehicles and heavy construction
equipment, would require the use of gasoline and diesel fuel for power. Construction is
anticipated to last approximately 10 months. Construction is estimated to result in a short-term
consumption of energy, representing a small demand on local and regional fuel supplies that
would be easily accommodated and would be temporary. The short duration of equipment
usage and incorporation of energy efficiencies would not create a wasteful or significant
increase in demand for fuel supplies; therefore, impacts on energy resources would be less than
significant.
b) The proposed project includes improvement of existing amenities and would not require the
additional use of energy for operations. The proposed project would not prohibit energy
conservation or the use of renewable energy (City of Redding 2009) and would not conflict
Page 26 Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project
March 2023
Less -Than -
Potentially
Significant with
Less -Than -
Significant
Mitigation
Significant
Would the project:
Impact
Incorporated
Impact
No Impact
a) Result in potentially significant environmental
impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary
consumption of energy resources, during project
construction or operation?
b) Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for
F]
F]
®
F]
renewable energy or energy efficiency?
Discussion
a) During construction, vehicles including worker commuter vehicles and heavy construction
equipment, would require the use of gasoline and diesel fuel for power. Construction is
anticipated to last approximately 10 months. Construction is estimated to result in a short-term
consumption of energy, representing a small demand on local and regional fuel supplies that
would be easily accommodated and would be temporary. The short duration of equipment
usage and incorporation of energy efficiencies would not create a wasteful or significant
increase in demand for fuel supplies; therefore, impacts on energy resources would be less than
significant.
b) The proposed project includes improvement of existing amenities and would not require the
additional use of energy for operations. The proposed project would not prohibit energy
conservation or the use of renewable energy (City of Redding 2009) and would not conflict
Page 26 Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project
March 2023
City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division
Initial Study
with or obstruct the City's plan for renewable energy. Because operations would be consistent
with existing conditions, there would be no operational impact. Construction of the proposed
project would have a less -than -significant impact on state or local plans related to renewable
energy.
Documentation
City of Redding. 2009. General Plan — Natural Resources Element.
Mitigation
No mitigation required.
VTI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS
Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project Page 27
February 2023
Less -Than -
Potentially
Significant with
Less -Than -
Significant
Mitigation
Significant
Would the project:
Impact
Incorporated
Impact
No Impact
a) Directly or indirectly cause potential substantial
adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury,
or death involving:
i) Rupture of a known earthquake, fault, as
delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo
Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the
State Geologist for the area or based on
0
0
®
0
other substantial evidence of a known fault?
Refer to Division of Mines and Geology
Special Publications 42.
ii) Strong seismic ground shaking?
iii) Seismic -related ground failure, including
liquefaction?
iv) Landslides?
b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of
El
topsoil?
c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is
unstable, or that would become unstable as a result
of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-
site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence,
liquefaction, or collapse?
d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table
18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994),
0
0
®
0
creating substantial direct or indirect risks to life
or property?
Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project Page 27
February 2023
Initial Study
City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division
Discussion
a, c, d) There are no Alquist-Priolo earthquake faults designated in the project area; and there are no
other documented earthquake faults in the immediate vicinity that pose a significant risk of
rupture, ground shaking, or otherwise unstable ground conditions. The closest active fault is
about 50 miles away from the project site. Implementation of the proposed project would not
increase the potential for ground shaking to occur. Ground shaking activities such as
earthquakes would have a negligible effect on the project, as it would be designed in
accordance with current California Building Code (CBC) seismic design criteria. This CBC
design criteria will be incorporated into the project design to help ensure that the project is built
to withstand any potential ground shaking that could occur in the project area. The impact
would be less than significant.
According to the City's General Plan, landslides could occur in the westernmost portion of the
City (City of Redding 2000); however, the proposed project is not located in an area prone to
landslides. The project area is relatively flat and would not pose a significant hazard. There
would be no impact related to landslides.
Other types of ground failure such as expansive soils and subsidence (i.e., the gradual settling
or sinking of an area with little or no horizontal motion) are not considered to pose a significant
hazard within the proposed project area as soils in that area are expected to have a medium to
low potential for expansion. The impact would be less than significant.
Soil liquefaction occurs when ground shaking from an earthquake causes a sediment layer
saturated with groundwater to lose strength and take on the characteristics of a fluid, thus
becoming similar to quicksand. Factors determining the liquefaction potential are soil type, the
level and duration of seismic ground motions, the type and consistency of soils, and the depth
to groundwater. Loose sands and peat deposits, along with recent Holocene age deposits are
more susceptible to liquefaction while older deposits of clayey silts, silty clays, and clays
deposited in freshwater environments are generally stable under the influence of seismic ground
shaking. According to the City's Health and Safety Plan element, the project area is in an area
having a high potential for liquefaction (City of Redding 2009).
Page 28 Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project
March 2023
Less -Than -
Potentially
Significant with
Less -Than -
Significant
Mitigation
Significant
Would the project:
Impact
Incorporated
Impact
No Impact
e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the
use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater
El
El
El
disposal systems where sewers are not available
for the disposal of waste water?
I) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique
paleontological resource or site or unique geologic
❑
❑
❑
feature?
Discussion
a, c, d) There are no Alquist-Priolo earthquake faults designated in the project area; and there are no
other documented earthquake faults in the immediate vicinity that pose a significant risk of
rupture, ground shaking, or otherwise unstable ground conditions. The closest active fault is
about 50 miles away from the project site. Implementation of the proposed project would not
increase the potential for ground shaking to occur. Ground shaking activities such as
earthquakes would have a negligible effect on the project, as it would be designed in
accordance with current California Building Code (CBC) seismic design criteria. This CBC
design criteria will be incorporated into the project design to help ensure that the project is built
to withstand any potential ground shaking that could occur in the project area. The impact
would be less than significant.
According to the City's General Plan, landslides could occur in the westernmost portion of the
City (City of Redding 2000); however, the proposed project is not located in an area prone to
landslides. The project area is relatively flat and would not pose a significant hazard. There
would be no impact related to landslides.
Other types of ground failure such as expansive soils and subsidence (i.e., the gradual settling
or sinking of an area with little or no horizontal motion) are not considered to pose a significant
hazard within the proposed project area as soils in that area are expected to have a medium to
low potential for expansion. The impact would be less than significant.
Soil liquefaction occurs when ground shaking from an earthquake causes a sediment layer
saturated with groundwater to lose strength and take on the characteristics of a fluid, thus
becoming similar to quicksand. Factors determining the liquefaction potential are soil type, the
level and duration of seismic ground motions, the type and consistency of soils, and the depth
to groundwater. Loose sands and peat deposits, along with recent Holocene age deposits are
more susceptible to liquefaction while older deposits of clayey silts, silty clays, and clays
deposited in freshwater environments are generally stable under the influence of seismic ground
shaking. According to the City's Health and Safety Plan element, the project area is in an area
having a high potential for liquefaction (City of Redding 2009).
Page 28 Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project
March 2023
City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division
Initial Study
Although soils in the project area have a high potential for liquefaction, key design features
would help ensure the pathways and associated project features are constructed to provide
structure stability and would be in conformance with state and federal building code
requirements. The impact would, therefore, be less than significant.
b) During construction, localized erosion could occur due to ground disturbance and stockpiling of
soil in the project area. Storm drain and wastewater modification would require soil trenching
and excavation. If not properly managed, substantial erosion of stockpiled soils could occur,
and sediment could be transported into sensitive receiving waters; however, the proposed
project is subject to certain erosion -control requirements and BMPs mandated by existing City
regulations which includes:
■ City of Redding Grading Ordinance. This ordinance requires preparation of an erosion
and sediment control plan for projects affecting more than one acre (Redding Municipal
Code Title 16). The erosion and sediment control plan requires preparation and
description of any BMPs that will be used during construction and post -construction, if
needed.
■ City of Redding Stormwater Quality Management and Discharge Control Ordinance.
This ordinance requires preparation of a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
(SWPPP) for projects affecting greater than 1 acre (Redding Municipal Code Title 14).
The objectives of the SWPPP are to identify the sources of sediment and other
pollutants that may affect water quality associated with stormwater discharges and to
describe and ensure the implementation of BMPs to reduce those sources of sediment
and other pollutants in stormwater discharges.
The potential for project construction to result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil
would be less than significant.
e) The proposed project does not involve the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater
disposal; therefore, there would be no impact.
f) A review of published data (Paleobiology Database 2018) indicates that there are no known
unique geologic features, fossil -bearing strata, or paleontological sites in the project area. The
proposed project will have no impact on paleontological resources.
Documentation
■ City of Redding. 2000. 2000-2020 General Plan. Health and Safety Element. October
■ Paleobiology Database. 2018. The paleobiology database. Available at:
httpsJ/paleobiodb.org/#l.
Mitigation
No mitigation required.
Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project Page 29
February 2023
Initial Study
VIII. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS
City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division
Discussion
a) Greenhouse gases (GHGs) are recognized by wide consensus among the scientific community
to contribute to global warming/climate change and associated environmental impacts because
of their ability to trap heat in the atmosphere and affect climate. The major GHGs that are
released from human activity include carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide (Governor's
Office of Planning and Research 2008). The primary sources of GHGs are from industrial
facilities, transportation vehicles (including planes and trains), energy/electricity plants, and
industrial and agricultural activities (such as dairies and hog farms) (CARB 2021).
GHG emissions from the proposed project would be generated offsite from the production of
project materials (e.g., lights, electrical systems), as well as onsite construction -related
equipment emissions. While the project would have an incremental contribution in the context
of the county and region, construction -related GHG emissions would be short term and minor.
BMPs AQ -1 through AQ -6 (Section III Air Quality) will be incorporated into the proposed
project which would reduce construction -related GHG emissions. Project operation would be
consistent with existing conditions. The impact would be less than significant.
b) The proposed project would not conflict with any applicable plans, policies, or regulations
adopted to reduce GHG emissions. As noted in impact "a" and in Section III Air Quality, the
proposed project is in conformance with the City's air quality policies and thresholds, follows
state guidelines and regulations, and incorporates BMPs AQ -1 through AQ -6. The proposed
project would have a less -than -significant impact on the City's applicable plans, policies, or
regulations related to GHG emissions. The impact would be less than significant.
Documentation
■ City of Redding. 2009. General Plan — Air Quality Element.
■ California Air Resources Board (CARB). 2022. Current California GHG Emission Inventory
Data. Available at: Current California GHG Emission Inventor) California Air
Resources Board. Accessed June 5.
Page 30 Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project
March 2023
Less -Than -
Potentially
Significant with
Less -Than -
Significant
Mitigation
Significant
Would the project:
Impact
Incorporated
Impact
No Impact
a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly
or indirectly, that may have a significant impact
on the environment?
b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or
regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the
emissions of greenhouse gases?
Discussion
a) Greenhouse gases (GHGs) are recognized by wide consensus among the scientific community
to contribute to global warming/climate change and associated environmental impacts because
of their ability to trap heat in the atmosphere and affect climate. The major GHGs that are
released from human activity include carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide (Governor's
Office of Planning and Research 2008). The primary sources of GHGs are from industrial
facilities, transportation vehicles (including planes and trains), energy/electricity plants, and
industrial and agricultural activities (such as dairies and hog farms) (CARB 2021).
GHG emissions from the proposed project would be generated offsite from the production of
project materials (e.g., lights, electrical systems), as well as onsite construction -related
equipment emissions. While the project would have an incremental contribution in the context
of the county and region, construction -related GHG emissions would be short term and minor.
BMPs AQ -1 through AQ -6 (Section III Air Quality) will be incorporated into the proposed
project which would reduce construction -related GHG emissions. Project operation would be
consistent with existing conditions. The impact would be less than significant.
b) The proposed project would not conflict with any applicable plans, policies, or regulations
adopted to reduce GHG emissions. As noted in impact "a" and in Section III Air Quality, the
proposed project is in conformance with the City's air quality policies and thresholds, follows
state guidelines and regulations, and incorporates BMPs AQ -1 through AQ -6. The proposed
project would have a less -than -significant impact on the City's applicable plans, policies, or
regulations related to GHG emissions. The impact would be less than significant.
Documentation
■ City of Redding. 2009. General Plan — Air Quality Element.
■ California Air Resources Board (CARB). 2022. Current California GHG Emission Inventory
Data. Available at: Current California GHG Emission Inventor) California Air
Resources Board. Accessed June 5.
Page 30 Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project
March 2023
City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division
Initial Study
■ Governor's Office of Planning and Research. 2008. Technical advisory: CEQA and climate
change: Addressing climate change through California Environmental Quality Act Review.
Sacramento, CA.
■ Shasta Air Quality Management District,
https://www.co.shasta.ca.us/index/drm—index/aq_index.aspx. Accessed December 2, 2022.
Mitigation
No mitigation required.
I AA a, EVAR19 Z.y10117 80 r_ywR 1114 11I1fyU /_r Y o1 IN El
Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project Page 31
February 2023
Less -Than -
Potentially
Significant with
Less -Than -
Significant
Mitigation
Significant
Would the project:
Impact
Incorporated
Impact
No Impact
a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment through the routine transport, use, or
❑
❑
®
❑
disposal of hazardous materials?
b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment through reasonably foreseeable upset
❑
❑
®
❑
and accident conditions involving the release of
hazardous materials into the environment?
c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or
acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste
El
El
El
within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed
school?
d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of
hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to
Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a
❑
❑
®
❑
result, would it create a significant hazard to the
public or the environment?
e) For a project located within an airport land use
plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted,
within two miles of a public airport or public use
❑
❑
❑
airport, would the project result in a safety hazard
or excessive noise for people residing or working
in the project area?
f) Impair implementation of or physically interfere
with an adopted emergency response plan or
❑
❑
❑
emergency evacuation plan?
Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project Page 31
February 2023
Initial Study
City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division
Discussion
a, b, d) The proposed project would not present a significant risk due to the use of hazardous
materials or emissions. The project area is not on any lists of properties known to contain
hazardous materials. A review of known hazardous materials sites databases identified one
nearby leaking underground storage tank (LUST) site within an approximate 0.5 mile. The
underground tank was removed and remediation actions were taken. The case was closed in
2013 and does not pose a threat to the proposed project in the form of hazardous material leaks
or spills.
Construction activities pose a slight risk for solvent or fuel spills or leaks. In accordance with
the City's Stormwater Management Program, and as a part of the Clean Water Act Section 402,
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System, a SWPPP is required when obtaining a
general construction permit. Compliance under water quality regulations and the SWPPP would
require use of the following standard conservation measures and 13MPs to avoid or minimize
the potential for accidental release of hazardous materials from spills or fuel leaks during
project construction:
■ HAZ-1. Hazardous materials, including fuels, oils, cement, and solvents, will be stored
and contained in an area protected from direct runoff and away from areas where they
could enter waters of the United States.
■ HAZ-2. Construction equipment will be inspected daily for leaks. Leaking fluids will
be contained upon detection and equipment repairs will be made as soon as practicable
or the leaking equipment will be moved off site.
■ HAZ-3. Secondary containment such as drip pans or absorbent materials shall be used
to catch spills or leaks when removing or changing fluids. Secondary containment will
be used for storage of all hazardous materials.
■ HAZ-4. Spill containment and clean-up materials shall be kept on site at all times for
use in the event of an accidental spills.
■ HAZ-5. Absorbent materials shall be used on small spills rather than hosing down or
burying the spill. The absorbent material shall be promptly removed and properly
disposed.
The implementation of the SWPPP required by state and local regulations would ensure that the
proposed project would not pose a significant risk for solvent or fuel spills. The potential for
Page 32 Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project
March 2023
Less -Than -
Potentially
Significant with
Less -Than -
Significant
Mitigation
Significant
Would the project:
Impact
Incorporated
Impact
No Impact
g) Expose people or structures, either directly or
indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury, or
❑
❑
®
❑
death involving wildland fires?
Discussion
a, b, d) The proposed project would not present a significant risk due to the use of hazardous
materials or emissions. The project area is not on any lists of properties known to contain
hazardous materials. A review of known hazardous materials sites databases identified one
nearby leaking underground storage tank (LUST) site within an approximate 0.5 mile. The
underground tank was removed and remediation actions were taken. The case was closed in
2013 and does not pose a threat to the proposed project in the form of hazardous material leaks
or spills.
Construction activities pose a slight risk for solvent or fuel spills or leaks. In accordance with
the City's Stormwater Management Program, and as a part of the Clean Water Act Section 402,
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System, a SWPPP is required when obtaining a
general construction permit. Compliance under water quality regulations and the SWPPP would
require use of the following standard conservation measures and 13MPs to avoid or minimize
the potential for accidental release of hazardous materials from spills or fuel leaks during
project construction:
■ HAZ-1. Hazardous materials, including fuels, oils, cement, and solvents, will be stored
and contained in an area protected from direct runoff and away from areas where they
could enter waters of the United States.
■ HAZ-2. Construction equipment will be inspected daily for leaks. Leaking fluids will
be contained upon detection and equipment repairs will be made as soon as practicable
or the leaking equipment will be moved off site.
■ HAZ-3. Secondary containment such as drip pans or absorbent materials shall be used
to catch spills or leaks when removing or changing fluids. Secondary containment will
be used for storage of all hazardous materials.
■ HAZ-4. Spill containment and clean-up materials shall be kept on site at all times for
use in the event of an accidental spills.
■ HAZ-5. Absorbent materials shall be used on small spills rather than hosing down or
burying the spill. The absorbent material shall be promptly removed and properly
disposed.
The implementation of the SWPPP required by state and local regulations would ensure that the
proposed project would not pose a significant risk for solvent or fuel spills. The potential for
Page 32 Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project
March 2023
City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division
Initial Study
project construction and operation to create a hazard to the public or the environment through
the accidental spill or pollutants would be less than significant.
c) There are no existing or currently proposed schools within 0.25 mile of the project area. There
would be no impacts on schools.
e) The proposed project is located 1.8 miles from the Benton Airpark; however, the project would
be outside of the airport influence area and the limited use at the Benton Airpark would not
result in a safety hazard or excessive noise for people working in the project area. No impact.
f) The proposed project is located at the end of Aoki Way, which is classified as a local driveway
or service road. The project area will be closed during construction; however, the site will
include an access road and would not interfere with any emergency response plan. No impact.
g) During the construction period, the use of construction equipment in and around vegetated
areas increases the potential for wildfire ignition. The project area consists of vegetated areas
that could be susceptible to wildfires. However, the proposed project would be constructed in
compliance with applicable local, state, and federal requirements, including the California Fire
Code, which would ensure that the potential for construction equipment to spark a wildland fire
is minimal. Operation of the proposed project would be consistent with existing operations and
would not increase the existing wildfire potential. The potential for wildfire ignition from
construction and operation of the proposed project would be less than significant.
Documentation
0 California State Water Resources Control Board. 2022. Geotracker available at:
http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov .
California Department of Toxic Substances Control. 2022. EnviroStor — Hazardous Waste
and Substances Site List (Cortese) available at: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/.
City of Redding Storm Water Management Program available at:
https://www.cityofredding.org/departments/Tublic-works/environmental-management/storm-
water-management.
Mitigation
No mitigation required.
X. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY
Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project Page 33
February 2023
Less -Than -
Potentially
Significant with
Less -Than -
Significant
Mitigation
Significant
Would the project:
Impact
Incorporated
Impact
No Impact
a) Violate any water quality standards or waste
discharge requirements or otherwise substantially
El
El
M
El
degrade surface or ground water quality?
Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project Page 33
February 2023
Initial Study
City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division
Discussion
a) The boat ramp and drift beach would require work within the Sacramento River. Equipment
would be operated from the ramp, beach, and a temporary gravel work pad, and would not enter
the river. The precast boat ramp would be installed without dewatering the construction area,
instead a gravel berm would be constructed in a semi -circle to contain the water in the work
area. Disturbed sediment would settle back to the bottom without entering the river.
The City's construction standards require that all projects prepare a plan to address water
pollution control and incorporate this plan into the project design. In accordance with the City's
Stormwater Quality Management and Discharge Control Ordinance, and as a part of the Clean
Water Act Section 402, National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System, the construction
standards and specifications for the proposed project will require that an Erosion and Sediment
Page 34 Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project
March 2023
Less -Than -
Potentially
Significant with
Less -Than -
Significant
Mitigation
Significant
Would the project:
Impact
Incorporated
Impact
No Impact
b) Substantially decrease groundwater supplies or
interfere substantially with groundwater recharge
❑
❑
❑
such that the project may impede sustainable
groundwater management of the basin?
c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of
the site or area, including through the alteration of
the course of a stream or river or through the
❑
❑
®
❑
addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner
which would:
i) result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or
F]
F]
®
F]
off-site;
ii) substantially increase the rate or amount of
surface runoff in a manner which would result
❑
❑
®
❑
in flooding on- or offsite;
iii) create or contribute runoff water which
would exceed the capacity of existing or
planned stormwater drainage systems or
❑
❑
®
❑
provide substantial additional sources of
polluted runoff, or
iv) impede or redirect flood flows?
❑
❑
®
❑
d) In flood hazard, tsunami, or sciche zones, risk
F]
F]
®
F]
release of pollutants due to project inundation?
e) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of a
water quality control plan or sustainable
❑
❑
®
❑
groundwater management plan?
Discussion
a) The boat ramp and drift beach would require work within the Sacramento River. Equipment
would be operated from the ramp, beach, and a temporary gravel work pad, and would not enter
the river. The precast boat ramp would be installed without dewatering the construction area,
instead a gravel berm would be constructed in a semi -circle to contain the water in the work
area. Disturbed sediment would settle back to the bottom without entering the river.
The City's construction standards require that all projects prepare a plan to address water
pollution control and incorporate this plan into the project design. In accordance with the City's
Stormwater Quality Management and Discharge Control Ordinance, and as a part of the Clean
Water Act Section 402, National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System, the construction
standards and specifications for the proposed project will require that an Erosion and Sediment
Page 34 Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project
March 2023
City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division
Initial Study
Control Plan (ESCP) be prepared by the contractor prior to construction. The ESCP would help
ensure that water quality standards are not substantially affected by the proposed project
through the implementation of sediment control measures and runoff prevention practices. The
ESCP, BMPs HAZ-1 through HAZ-5, as well as the following BMPs would be implemented:
■ WQ-1. All construction work and stockpiling of materials will be confined to the project
disturbance area.
■ WQ-2. Temporary stockpiling of excavated or imported material will be placed in upland
areas.
■ WQ-3. Excess soil will be used onsite or disposed of at a regional landfill or other
appropriate facility.
The proposed project would have a less than significant impact on water quality.
b) Project construction would not substantially deplete groundwater supplies because no
groundwater would be used, and no groundwater wells would be affected during construction.
The project would have no impact on groundwater.
c) The project would implement an ESCP and comply with a construction general permit or
NPDES that would result in minimal erosion or siltation from the construction of the project,
and result in a less than significant impact.
The project would expand the parking lot and widen the boat launch, which would alter the
drainage pattern in the project area. The improvements would not substantially increase the rate
or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or offsite, as
stormwater treatment facilities would create some retention. Vehicles using both the parking lot
and boat launch create the potential for pollutants to sit on the pavement; however, storm water
treatment features have been incorporated into the landscaping features. The treatment features
will capture surface flow, treat the flow by removing pollutants, and allow the flow to gradually
leave the feature and enter the storm drain system.
A Floodplain Encroachment Assessment (Pacific Hydrologic, 2023) was prepared to evaluate
potential impacts to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) regulatory 100 -year
floodplain and designated floodway. It was determined that the project and associated
improvements are not within the designated floodway or FEMA floodplain and the project
would not result in an encroachment or fill.
The project would not result in flooding, affect the capacity of existing or planned stormwater
drainage systems, or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff, therefore, the
project would have a less than significant impact.
d) The project area includes work within and adjacent to the Sacramento River. The northern
portion of the project area is shown in the designated as Floodway Zone AE (Federal
Emergency Management Agency 2011). Zone AE is a floodplain designation that has mapped
base flood elevations (BSE) determined, and is mapped as a special flood hazard area. The
existing boat ramp is partially inundated throughout the year, which allows recreational users to
launch their boats. While the boat launch would be widened to allow two boats to be launched
Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project Page 35
February 2023
Initial Study
City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division
at one time, the improvements are not anticipated to significantly increase use. The current boat
ramp configuration requires trucks to sit idling while waiting to access the ramp. The widened
ramp will provide efficiency and reduce the amount of time vehicles sit near the water. The
threat of a tsunami wave is not applicable to inland, central valley communities such as
Redding. Seiches could potentially be generated in either Shasta or Whiskeytown lakes during
an earthquake. If a seiche were to overtop Shasta Dam, or in the event of dam failure, the
project area would be within the inundation zone. However, regional history documents that the
potential for such a threat is low (City of Redding 2000). The project would have a less than
significant risk for release of pollutants due to project inundation.
Documentation
■ City of Redding. 2000-2020 General Plan. Health and Safety Element figures 4-1 (Ground
Shaking Potential) and 4.2 (Liquefaction Potential).
■ Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), Floodplain regulations, FIRM Map
06089C1539G, March 17, 2011.
■ Floodplain Encroachment Assessment, Pacific Hydrologic Incorporated, January 2023
Mitigation
No mitigation necessary.
Discussion
a,b) The proposed project would not divide an established community. The proposed project would
be constructed on existing City property and would enhance recreational opportunities for the
public. The proposed project would not conflict with any applicable policies and regulations of
the City's General Plan and Zoning Ordinance. There would be no impact.
Documentation
City of Redding. 2000-2020 General Plan.
City of Redding. 2022. Municipal Code.
Page 36 Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project
March 2023
Less -Than -
Potentially
Significant with
Less -Than -
Significant
Mitigation
Significant
Would the project:
Impact
Incorporated
Impact
No Impact
a) Physically divide an established community?
El
El
E
b) Cause a significant environmental impact due to a
conflict with any land use plan, policy, or
El
El
El
regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or
mitigating an environmental effect?
Discussion
a,b) The proposed project would not divide an established community. The proposed project would
be constructed on existing City property and would enhance recreational opportunities for the
public. The proposed project would not conflict with any applicable policies and regulations of
the City's General Plan and Zoning Ordinance. There would be no impact.
Documentation
City of Redding. 2000-2020 General Plan.
City of Redding. 2022. Municipal Code.
Page 36 Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project
March 2023
City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division
Mitigation
No mitigation required.
XII. MINERAL RESOURCES
Initial Study
Discussion
a,b) The project area is not identified in the City's General Plan as having any known mineral
resource value or as being located within any critical mineral resource overlay area. No impact
would occur.
Documentation
City of Redding. 2009. General Plan — Natural Resources Element.
California Department of Conservation. 2016. Mines Online.
https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/mol/index.html.
Mitigation
No mitigation required.
Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project Page 37
February 2023
Less -Than -
Potentially
Significant with
Less -Than -
Significant
Mitigation
Significant
Would the project:
Impact
Incorporated
Impact
No Impact
a) Result in the loss of availability of a known
mineral resource classified MRZ-2 by the State
El
El
El
Geologist that would be of value to the region and
the residents of the state?
b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally
important mineral resource recovery site
delineated on a local general plan, specific plan, or
other land use plan?
Discussion
a,b) The project area is not identified in the City's General Plan as having any known mineral
resource value or as being located within any critical mineral resource overlay area. No impact
would occur.
Documentation
City of Redding. 2009. General Plan — Natural Resources Element.
California Department of Conservation. 2016. Mines Online.
https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/mol/index.html.
Mitigation
No mitigation required.
Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project Page 37
February 2023
Initial Study
XIII. NOISE
City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division
Discussion
a,b) The proposed project would be located in a recreational area adjacent to the river. Existing
ambient noise and vibration includes trucks towing trailers along the roadway and utilizing the
boat ramp, as well as conversation from recreational users. Noise levels would increase during
construction due to the operation of equipment; however, this would be temporary in nature and
operation would occur during daylight hours. Construction noise would consist of grading and
excavation equipment, trucks, and construction personnel. The project includes cast in drilled
hole piles, but does not include pile driving or other percussive methods for construction.
Operation of the project would be similar to existing conditions. Widening of the ramp is not
anticipated to increase use, but to make the existing use more efficient. Operation of the drift
boat beach will allow more room and increase safety, so those using rafts or kayaks can launch
without using the vehicular boat ramp. No permanent or long-term noise impacts would occur
because of the proposed project. Noise impacts would be less than significant.
c) The proposed project is not located within an airport land use plan or near any airports;
therefore, there would be no impacts.
Documentation
■ City of Redding General Plan, Noise Element, 2000.
■ Redding Municipal Airport. 2004. Redding Municipal Airport Master Plan.
https://www.cityofredding.org/home/showdocument9id=865.
Page 38 Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project
March 2023
Less -Than -
Potentially
Significant with
Less -Than -
Significant
Mitigation
Significant
Would the project:
Impact
Incorporated
Impact
No Impact
a) Generation of a substantial temporary or
permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the
vicinity of the project in excess of standards
El
El
®
El
established in the local general plan or noise
ordinance, or applicable standards of other
agencies?
b) Generation of excessive groundborne vibration or
❑
❑
®
❑
groundborne noise levels?
e) For a project located within the vicinity of a
private airstrip or an airport land use plan or,
where such a plan has not been adopted, within
two miles of a public airport or public use airport,
❑
❑
❑
would the project expose people residing or
working in the project area to excessive noise
levels?
Discussion
a,b) The proposed project would be located in a recreational area adjacent to the river. Existing
ambient noise and vibration includes trucks towing trailers along the roadway and utilizing the
boat ramp, as well as conversation from recreational users. Noise levels would increase during
construction due to the operation of equipment; however, this would be temporary in nature and
operation would occur during daylight hours. Construction noise would consist of grading and
excavation equipment, trucks, and construction personnel. The project includes cast in drilled
hole piles, but does not include pile driving or other percussive methods for construction.
Operation of the project would be similar to existing conditions. Widening of the ramp is not
anticipated to increase use, but to make the existing use more efficient. Operation of the drift
boat beach will allow more room and increase safety, so those using rafts or kayaks can launch
without using the vehicular boat ramp. No permanent or long-term noise impacts would occur
because of the proposed project. Noise impacts would be less than significant.
c) The proposed project is not located within an airport land use plan or near any airports;
therefore, there would be no impacts.
Documentation
■ City of Redding General Plan, Noise Element, 2000.
■ Redding Municipal Airport. 2004. Redding Municipal Airport Master Plan.
https://www.cityofredding.org/home/showdocument9id=865.
Page 38 Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project
March 2023
City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division
Mitigation
No mitigation required.
XIV. POPULATION AND HOUSING
Initial Study
Discussion
a -b) The recreational improvement project would be constructed in an existing recreational area.
The project is bordered by the river, a cemetery, the rodeo grounds, and Turtle Bay Exploration
Park. All properties in the vicinity are zoned for public use or currently built -out. The project
would not induce population growth or displace people. The project would have no impact on
population and housing.
Documentation
■ City of Redding General Plan, Housing Element 2014.
Mitigation
No mitigation required.
a000EM-301.7,/[4lxy
Would the project result in substantial adverse physical
Less -Than -
impacts associated with the provision of new or
Potentially
Significant with
Less -Than -
physically altered governmental facilities, need for
Significant
Mitigation
Significant
Would the project:
Impact
Incorporated
Impact
No Impact
a) Induce substantial unplanned population growth in
Less -Than -
an area, either directly (for example, by proposing
Potentially
Significant with
Less -Than -
new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for
❑
❑
❑
example, through extension of roads or other
Impact
Incorporated
Impact
No Impact
infrastructure)?
❑
❑
®
❑
b) Displace substantial numbers of existing people or
housing, necessitating the construction of
❑
❑
❑
replacement housing elsewhere?
Discussion
a -b) The recreational improvement project would be constructed in an existing recreational area.
The project is bordered by the river, a cemetery, the rodeo grounds, and Turtle Bay Exploration
Park. All properties in the vicinity are zoned for public use or currently built -out. The project
would not induce population growth or displace people. The project would have no impact on
population and housing.
Documentation
■ City of Redding General Plan, Housing Element 2014.
Mitigation
No mitigation required.
a000EM-301.7,/[4lxy
Would the project result in substantial adverse physical
impacts associated with the provision of new or
physically altered governmental facilities, need for
new or physically altered governmental facilities, the
construction of which could cause significant
Less -Than -
environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable
Potentially
Significant with
Less -Than -
service ratios, response times or other performance
Significant
Mitigation
Significant
objectives for any of the public services:
Impact
Incorporated
Impact
No Impact
a) Fire Protection?
❑
❑
®
❑
Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project Page 39
February 2023
Initial Study
City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division
Would the project result in substantial adverse physical
Less -Than -
impacts associated with the provision of new or
Potentially
Significant with
Less -Than -
physically altered governmental facilities, need for
Significant
Mitigation
Significant
new or physically altered governmental facilities, the
Impact
Incorporated
Impact
No Impact
construction of which could cause significant
Less -Than -
environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable
Potentially
Significant with
Less -Than -
service ratios, response times or other performance
Significant
Mitigation
Significant
❑
objectives for any of the public services:
Impact
Incorporated
Impact
No Impact
b) Police Protection?
❑
❑
®
❑
c) Schools?
❑
❑
®
❑
d) Parks?
El
El
®
El
e) Other public facilities?
El
El
®
El
Discussion
a -e) The proposed project would not cause substantial adverse physical impacts on government
facilities or negatively affect public services. Similarly, access to schools, parks, and other
public facilities would not be affected since access will be maintained through the project area
during construction. Proposed contractor construction access in the area may temporarily
interfere with access to the boat ramp. The proposed project would not result in substantial
conflict or lack of emergency access. The proposed project would have a less -than -significant
temporary impact, and no permanent impact, on public services.
Documentation
■ City of Redding General Plan, Public Facilities Element, 2000.
Mitigation
No mitigation required.
Page 40 Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project
March 2023
Less -Than -
Potentially
Significant with
Less -Than -
Significant
Mitigation
Significant
Would the project:
Impact
Incorporated
Impact
No Impact
a) Would the project increase the use of existing
neighborhood and regional parks or other
recreational facilities such that substantial physical
❑
❑
®
❑
deterioration of the facility would occur or be
accelerated?
Page 40 Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project
March 2023
City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division
Initial Study
Discussion
a) The proposed project primarily involves boating and fishing recreation, and would not impact
the number of users at existing neighborhood or regional parks or the physical deterioration of
those facilities. The project would have no impact.
b) The larger project components include widening the existing boat ramp, creating a drift boat
beach, installing a new restroom, expanding the parking lot, and extending the Sacramento
River Trail approximately 650 feet. The proposed project will have a minor impact on native
trees and require fill in jurisdictional waters; however, these impacts would not have a
significant physical effect on the environment. The project would have a less than significant
impact.
Documentation
City of Redding General Plan, Recreation Element, 2000.
City of Redding General Plan, Public Facilities Element, 2000.
Mitigation
No mitigation required.
XVII. TRANSPORTATION
Less -Than -
Potentially
Significant with
Less -Than -
Significant
Mitigation
Significant
Would the project:
Impact
Incorporated
Impact
No Impact
b) Does the project include recreational facilities or
require the construction or expansion of
El
El
VIJ
El
recreational facilities which might have an adverse
physical effect on the environment?
Discussion
a) The proposed project primarily involves boating and fishing recreation, and would not impact
the number of users at existing neighborhood or regional parks or the physical deterioration of
those facilities. The project would have no impact.
b) The larger project components include widening the existing boat ramp, creating a drift boat
beach, installing a new restroom, expanding the parking lot, and extending the Sacramento
River Trail approximately 650 feet. The proposed project will have a minor impact on native
trees and require fill in jurisdictional waters; however, these impacts would not have a
significant physical effect on the environment. The project would have a less than significant
impact.
Documentation
City of Redding General Plan, Recreation Element, 2000.
City of Redding General Plan, Public Facilities Element, 2000.
Mitigation
No mitigation required.
XVII. TRANSPORTATION
Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project Page 41
February 2023
Less -Than -
Potentially
Significant with
Less -Than -
Significant
Mitigation
Significant
Would the project:
Impact
Incorporated
Impact
No Impact
a) Conflict with a program plan, ordinance or policy
addressing the circulation system, including
El
El
M
El
transit, roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities?
b) Conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines
section 15064.3, subdivision (b)?
Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project Page 41
February 2023
Initial Study
City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division
Discussion
a) Construction of the proposed project would generate vehicle trips associated with worker
commutes and material and equipment hauling. The increases in trips per day on local and
regional roadways within the City could affect roadway capacity and circulation by introducing
slower movements and larger turning radii of construction trucks compared to passenger
vehicles if the number of trips were to result in a significant increase from the current local
conditions.
The proposed project would generate construction traffic throughout the 10 -month construction
period with periods of heavier use (i.e., during grading) and periods of minimal vehicle use
(i.e., site restoration). The proposed project would not conflict with the City of Redding
General Plan policies or the City of Redding Parks, Trails, and Open Space Master Plan (City
of Redding 2018). The proposed project would not conflict with any program, ordinance, or
policy addressing the circulation system, and the impact would be less than significant.
b) Section 15064.3(b) of the current CEQA Guidelines shifts transportation impact analysis from a
level of service (LOS) standard to a vehicle miles traveled (VMT) standard that refers to the
amount and distance of automobile travel attributable to a project. However, VMT does not
currently include recreational uses. The proposed project would require some haul, vendor, and
worker trips over the 10 -month construction period. The technical advisory provided by the
Office of Planning and Research (OPR) provides that projects with less than 110 trips per day
are presumed less than significant (OPR 2018). The proposed project would result in less than
110 trips per day during construction and would result in no additional maintenance trips during
operation of the proposed project. The proposed project would result in a less than significant
impact.
c) The proposed project, once constructed, would be consistent with existing use and would not
result in changes to roadways causing an increase in hazards due to a geometric design feature
or incompatible use on any roadways in the area. During construction, equipment and vehicles
would be intermittently entering and exiting Aoki Way. This could pose a potential hazard from
interaction with the general public on this public roadway. However, construction activities
would be temporary and would largely occur within the closed boat launch area (i.e., away
from the public roadways) and would not result in a substantial hazard. The proposed project
would have no impact related to hazards from geometric design features.
Page 42 Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project
March 2023
Less -Than -
Potentially
Significant with
Less -Than -
Significant
Mitigation
Significant
Would the project:
Impact
Incorporated
Impact
No Impact
e) Substantially increase hazards due to a geometric
design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous
El
El
El
intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm
equipment)?
d) Result in inadequate emergency access?
F-1
F-1
®
El
Discussion
a) Construction of the proposed project would generate vehicle trips associated with worker
commutes and material and equipment hauling. The increases in trips per day on local and
regional roadways within the City could affect roadway capacity and circulation by introducing
slower movements and larger turning radii of construction trucks compared to passenger
vehicles if the number of trips were to result in a significant increase from the current local
conditions.
The proposed project would generate construction traffic throughout the 10 -month construction
period with periods of heavier use (i.e., during grading) and periods of minimal vehicle use
(i.e., site restoration). The proposed project would not conflict with the City of Redding
General Plan policies or the City of Redding Parks, Trails, and Open Space Master Plan (City
of Redding 2018). The proposed project would not conflict with any program, ordinance, or
policy addressing the circulation system, and the impact would be less than significant.
b) Section 15064.3(b) of the current CEQA Guidelines shifts transportation impact analysis from a
level of service (LOS) standard to a vehicle miles traveled (VMT) standard that refers to the
amount and distance of automobile travel attributable to a project. However, VMT does not
currently include recreational uses. The proposed project would require some haul, vendor, and
worker trips over the 10 -month construction period. The technical advisory provided by the
Office of Planning and Research (OPR) provides that projects with less than 110 trips per day
are presumed less than significant (OPR 2018). The proposed project would result in less than
110 trips per day during construction and would result in no additional maintenance trips during
operation of the proposed project. The proposed project would result in a less than significant
impact.
c) The proposed project, once constructed, would be consistent with existing use and would not
result in changes to roadways causing an increase in hazards due to a geometric design feature
or incompatible use on any roadways in the area. During construction, equipment and vehicles
would be intermittently entering and exiting Aoki Way. This could pose a potential hazard from
interaction with the general public on this public roadway. However, construction activities
would be temporary and would largely occur within the closed boat launch area (i.e., away
from the public roadways) and would not result in a substantial hazard. The proposed project
would have no impact related to hazards from geometric design features.
Page 42 Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project
March 2023
City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division Initial Study
d) Construction of the proposed project would not substantially interfere with emergency access.
Constriction activities would be short-term and temporary in nature with possible partial
closure and restrictions on Aoki Way. Construction will occur at the end of a dead-end road and
through traffic is not possible in the baseline condition. Emergency vehicles would be allowed
to come into and out of the construction area as needed. Once constructed, the proposed project
area would be open and would not impact emergency access. Therefore, the impact would be
less than significant.
Documentation
City of Redding General Plan, Transportation Element, 2000.
City of Redding Parks, Trails, and Open Space Master Plan, 2018.
California Office of Planning and Research (OPR). 2018. Technical Advisory On Evaluation
Transportation Impacts in CEQA. http://opr.ca.gov/docs/20190122-
743—Technical Advisory.pdf.
Mitigation
No mitigation required.
Would the project: cause a substantial adverse change
in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined
in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a
site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is
geographically defined in terms of the size and scope
Less -Than -
of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural
Potentially
Significant with
Less -Than -
value to a California Native American tribe, and that
Significant
Mitigation
Significant
is:
Impact
Incorporated
Impact
No Impact
a) Listed or eligible for listing in the California
Register of Historical Resources, or in a local
El
El
El
register of historical resources as defined in Public
Resources Code section 5020.1(k), or
b) A resource determined by the lead agency, in its
discretion and supported by substantial evidence,
to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in
subdivision (e) of Public Resources Code Section
5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in
❑
❑
❑
subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section
5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the
significance of the resource to a California Native
American tribe.
Discussion
a, b) A letter was sent to the NAFIC on February 10, 2022, requesting a review of their Sacred Lands
File and contact information for potentially interested individuals. A response was received on
Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project Page 43
February 2023
Initial Study
City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division
February 28, 2022, which reported that no Native American cultural sites are known in the
project area. On February 28, 2022, letters were sent to individuals/groups who may have
information regarding the proposed project area. On August 17, 2022, the City sent formal
notification of determination that a decision to undertake a project, and notice of consultation
opportunity, pursuant to Public Resources Code § 21080.3.1. Two local Tribes responded, and
consultation is ongoing. No tribal cultural resources were identified in the project area, and the
proposed project would have no impact on tribal cultural resources.
Documentation
Anthropological Studies Center at Sonoma State University. 2022. Archaeological Resources
Study of the Turtle Bay Boat Ramp.
Mitigation
No mitigation required.
XIX. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS
Page 44 Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project
March 2023
Less -Than -
Potentially
Significant with
Less -Than -
Significant
Mitigation
Significant
Would the project:
Impact
Incorporated
Impact
No Impact
a) Require or result in the relocation or construction
of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment
or storm water drainage, electric power, natural
El
El
®
El
gas, or telecommunications facilities, the
construction or relocation of which could cause
significant environmental effects?
b) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve
the project and reasonably foreseeable future
El
El
®
El
development during normal, dry and multiple dry
years?
c) Result in a determination by the wastewater
treatment provider which serves or may serve the
project that it has adequate capacity to serve the
❑
❑
❑
project's projected demand in addition to the
provider's existing commitments?
d) Generate solid waste in excess of State or local
standards, or in excess of the capacity of local
infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment
of solid waste reduction goals?
Page 44 Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project
March 2023
City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division Initial Study
Discussion
a) The proposed project would not require construction or relocation of water, electrical, natural
gas, or telecommunication facilities. The proposed project would require modification and
replacement of storm water and wastewater facilities due to the proposed new restroom and
expansion of the parking lot. The proposed project would not result in any other infrastructure
improvements or require relocation of existing infrastructure beyond what has been analyzed
herein; therefore, the proposed project would have a less than significant impact.
b) Construction and operation of the proposed project would not require the use of potable water.
Water required for construction use, such as for dust control and pipeline testing, would be
available from the City's existing water resources and would not require substantial amounts of
additional water supplies. Operation of the proposed project would not require water exceeding
existing use. The proposed project would have sufficient water supplies to serve the project,
and the impact would be less than significant.
c) The proposed project would provide wastewater conveyance capacity similar to the existing
capacity. The existing wastewater lines will be replaced and relocated. The existing restroom is
operated by a small wastewater lift station that serves only the surrounding businesses. The lift
station would not be improved and the project would not create additional wastewater capacity.
The project has no potential to induce growth and the project would have no impact.
d,e) The proposed project construction activities would generate a minor amount of debris requiring
disposal at a suitable facility, such as the City's West Central Landfill, which has sufficient
permitted capacity to accommodate the proposed project with 6,589,044 cubic yards of
remaining capacity and a maximum permitted capacity of 700 tons per day (CalRecycle 2019).
Standard construction specifications would require recycling of some materials such as
concrete to reduce landfill waste. Any potentially hazardous materials would be disposed of at
an approved landfill. Through construction specifications, the City will confirm that the
proposed project complies with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations pertaining to
recycling and disposal of solid waste. The impact would be less than significant.
Documentation
■ City of Redding General Plan, Public Facilities Elements, 2000.
■ CalRecycle. 2019. Facility Operations, West Central Landfill.
https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/SWFacilities/Directory/45-AA-0043/Detail/. Mitigation
No mitigation required.
Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project Page 45
February 2023
Less -Than -
Potentially
Significant with
Less -Than -
Significant
Mitigation
Significant
Would the project:
Impact
Incorporated
Impact
No Impact
e) Comply with federal, state, and local management
and reduction statutes and regulations related to
El
El®
❑
solid waste?
Discussion
a) The proposed project would not require construction or relocation of water, electrical, natural
gas, or telecommunication facilities. The proposed project would require modification and
replacement of storm water and wastewater facilities due to the proposed new restroom and
expansion of the parking lot. The proposed project would not result in any other infrastructure
improvements or require relocation of existing infrastructure beyond what has been analyzed
herein; therefore, the proposed project would have a less than significant impact.
b) Construction and operation of the proposed project would not require the use of potable water.
Water required for construction use, such as for dust control and pipeline testing, would be
available from the City's existing water resources and would not require substantial amounts of
additional water supplies. Operation of the proposed project would not require water exceeding
existing use. The proposed project would have sufficient water supplies to serve the project,
and the impact would be less than significant.
c) The proposed project would provide wastewater conveyance capacity similar to the existing
capacity. The existing wastewater lines will be replaced and relocated. The existing restroom is
operated by a small wastewater lift station that serves only the surrounding businesses. The lift
station would not be improved and the project would not create additional wastewater capacity.
The project has no potential to induce growth and the project would have no impact.
d,e) The proposed project construction activities would generate a minor amount of debris requiring
disposal at a suitable facility, such as the City's West Central Landfill, which has sufficient
permitted capacity to accommodate the proposed project with 6,589,044 cubic yards of
remaining capacity and a maximum permitted capacity of 700 tons per day (CalRecycle 2019).
Standard construction specifications would require recycling of some materials such as
concrete to reduce landfill waste. Any potentially hazardous materials would be disposed of at
an approved landfill. Through construction specifications, the City will confirm that the
proposed project complies with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations pertaining to
recycling and disposal of solid waste. The impact would be less than significant.
Documentation
■ City of Redding General Plan, Public Facilities Elements, 2000.
■ CalRecycle. 2019. Facility Operations, West Central Landfill.
https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/SWFacilities/Directory/45-AA-0043/Detail/. Mitigation
No mitigation required.
Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project Page 45
February 2023
Initial Study
XX. WILDFIRE
City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division
Discussion
a -d) The proposed project area is within a local responsibility area and is in an area designated by
CAL FIRE that is a `Non -Very High Fire Severity Zone". While all undeveloped areas are
susceptible to wildfire, the proposed project would be constructed in compliance withal
applicable local, state, and federal requirements, including the California Fire Code, which
would minimize the potential for construction equipment to spark a wildland fire. The proposed
project would not affect emergency evacuation plans, result in the uncontrolled spread of
wildfire, require installation or maintenance of associated wildfire infrastructure, or expose
people or structures to significant risks related to wildfires. The proposed project would result
in a less -than -significant impact related to wildfires. Construction and operational impacts
related to fire hazards would be less than significant.
Documentation
CAL FIRE. 2008. Very High Fire Severity Zones in LRA- Shasta County.
https://osfm.fire.ca.gov/media/6806/fhszl map45.pdf.
City of Redding. 2000-2020 General Plan. Health and Safety Element.
Mitigation
No mitigation required.
Page 46 Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project
March 2023
Less -Than -
If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands
Potentially
Significant with
Less -Than -
classified as very high fire hazard severity zones,
Significant
Mitigation
Significant
would the project:
Impact
Incorporated
Impact
No Impact
a) Substantially impair an adopted emergency
El
El
®
El
response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
b) Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors,
exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose
El
El
®
El
project occupants to, pollutant concentrations from
a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire?
e) Require the installation or maintenance of
associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel
breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or
other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that
may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the
environment?
d) Expose people or structures to significant risks,
including downslope or downstream flooding or
El
El
®
El
landslides, as a result of runoff, post -fire slope
instability, or drainage changes?
Discussion
a -d) The proposed project area is within a local responsibility area and is in an area designated by
CAL FIRE that is a `Non -Very High Fire Severity Zone". While all undeveloped areas are
susceptible to wildfire, the proposed project would be constructed in compliance withal
applicable local, state, and federal requirements, including the California Fire Code, which
would minimize the potential for construction equipment to spark a wildland fire. The proposed
project would not affect emergency evacuation plans, result in the uncontrolled spread of
wildfire, require installation or maintenance of associated wildfire infrastructure, or expose
people or structures to significant risks related to wildfires. The proposed project would result
in a less -than -significant impact related to wildfires. Construction and operational impacts
related to fire hazards would be less than significant.
Documentation
CAL FIRE. 2008. Very High Fire Severity Zones in LRA- Shasta County.
https://osfm.fire.ca.gov/media/6806/fhszl map45.pdf.
City of Redding. 2000-2020 General Plan. Health and Safety Element.
Mitigation
No mitigation required.
Page 46 Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project
March 2023
City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division Initial Study
XXI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE
Discussion
a) The proposed project would have minimal potential to degrade the quality of the environment,
affect wildlife populations or their habitats, or reduce the number or restrict the range of rare or
endangered plant and animal species. Although special -status wildlife species, including
Central Valley spring -run ESU Chinook salmon, Sacramento River winter -run ESU Chinook
salmon, and Central Valley DPS steelhead, including designated habitat for these species may
be impacted by implementation of the proposed project, standard conservation measures,
BMPs, and mitigation measures will be used to avoid adverse impacts on these species.
Additionally, implementation of the proposed project is not anticipated to impact cultural
resources, therefore the proposed project would not eliminate examples of history or prehistory.
b) As described in Section III, the proposed project could temporarily contribute to cumulative air
quality impacts. However, these impacts would be considered less than significant and under
policy of the City's General Plan, application of standard BMPs would eliminate the potential
for air quality impacts during project implementation. Upon project completion the proposed
project would not result in an increase in emissions and would therefore not be cumulatively
considerable. The project's potential cumulative traffic impacts would be less than significant.
Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project Page 47
February 2023
Less -Than -
Potentially
Significant with
Less -Than -
Significant
Mitigation
Significant
Would the project:
Impact
Incorporated
Impact
No Impact
a) Does the project have the potential to substantially
degrade the quality of the environment,
substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife
species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop
below the self-sustaining levels, threaten to
El
®
El
El
eliminate a plant or animal community,
substantially reduce the number or restrict the
range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or
eliminate important examples of the major periods
of California history or prehistory?
b) Does the project have impacts that are individually
limited, but cumulatively considerable?
("Cumulatively considerable" means that the
incremental effects of a project are considerable
❑
❑
®
❑
when viewed in connection with the effects of past
projects, the effects of other current projects, and
the effects of probable future projects)?
e) Does the project have potential environmental
effects which may cause substantial adverse
effects on human beings, either directly or
indirectly?
Discussion
a) The proposed project would have minimal potential to degrade the quality of the environment,
affect wildlife populations or their habitats, or reduce the number or restrict the range of rare or
endangered plant and animal species. Although special -status wildlife species, including
Central Valley spring -run ESU Chinook salmon, Sacramento River winter -run ESU Chinook
salmon, and Central Valley DPS steelhead, including designated habitat for these species may
be impacted by implementation of the proposed project, standard conservation measures,
BMPs, and mitigation measures will be used to avoid adverse impacts on these species.
Additionally, implementation of the proposed project is not anticipated to impact cultural
resources, therefore the proposed project would not eliminate examples of history or prehistory.
b) As described in Section III, the proposed project could temporarily contribute to cumulative air
quality impacts. However, these impacts would be considered less than significant and under
policy of the City's General Plan, application of standard BMPs would eliminate the potential
for air quality impacts during project implementation. Upon project completion the proposed
project would not result in an increase in emissions and would therefore not be cumulatively
considerable. The project's potential cumulative traffic impacts would be less than significant.
Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project Page 47
February 2023
City of Redding
Initial Study Public Works Department, Engineering Division
c) As discussed in this document, the proposed project does not include any activities that cannot
be mitigated to a less -than -significant level or that could otherwise cause substantial adverse
impacts on human beings, either directly or indirectly.
Documentation
■ See all sections above
Mitigation
MM -1. All in -water work shall occur during April 1 through June 30 to avoid peak times when listed
juvenile anadromous fish would be present.
MM -2. Prior to any in -water work, qualified fish biologists, in consultation with CDFW, shall utilize
seine netting to work from the edge of water, outward just before berm construction to remove any
individuals that could be within the work area. No handling of fish shall occur. Prior to completion of
the gravel berm, the area will be surveyed and seined again by qualified fish biologists to ensure
absence of fish in the work area. The berm will serve as a barrier to the in -water portion of the
project area. After the gravel berm is constructed, the work pad may be constructed.
MM -3. Prior to any placement of gravel in water, heavy equipment operation practices shall be
implemented that minimize the potential for injury or death of listed fish species, including alerting
fish to equipment operation in the channel before gravel is placed in the water (i.e. slow, deliberate
equipment operation and gently tapping water surface prior to entering or placing gravels in the river
channel).
MM -4. The gravel berm and work pad shall be constructed out of 3/4 -inch minus, silt free, clean,
spawning -grade gravel that meets Caltrans' cleanness test (California Test No. 227) with a value of
85 or higher. Upon construction completion, the gravel berm would be breached and the gravel pad
and berm would be left in place to provide the benefit of approximately 236 cubic yards of spawning
grade gravels to augment spawning opportunities for salmon.
MM -5. Twenty-four hours (24 -hours) prior to initiation of ground disturbance or vegetation removal
within 50 -feet of suitable reptile and/or amphibian habitat (i.e., Sacramento River and riparian areas),
a qualified biologist shall perform a pre -construction survey for western pond turtle, their nests, and
foothill yellow -legged frog. If western pond turtles, their nests, or yellow -legged frog are encountered
in the project area during construction and could be harmed by construction activities, work will stop
immediately in the area and CDFW will be notified. Upon authorization from CDFW, a qualified
biologist may relocate the individual(s) the shortest distance possible to a location containing habitat
outside of the construction impact zone.
MM -6. If construction or vegetation removal occurs during the nesting season, February 1 through
August 31 for birds and November I through July 15 for raptors, a qualified biologist shall conduct a
pre -construction survey to locate active nests. The pre -construction survey will be performed no more
than 7 days prior to the implementation of construction activities. If a lapse in construction activities
occurs for 7 days or longer, another pre -construction survey will be performed. If an active nest is
Page 48 Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project
March 2023
City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division
Initial Study
found, a qualified biologist (in consultation with the CDFW) will determine the extent of a buffer
zone to be established around the nest.
MM -7. Removal of large trees (10 -inch dbh or greater) with cavities, crevices, or snags shall occur
before maternity colonies form (i.e., prior to March 1) or after young are volant (i.e., after August 15).
If construction (including the removal of large trees) occurs during the non-volant season (March 1
through August 15), a qualified biologist shall conduct a pre -construction survey of the project area to
locate maternity colonies and identify measures to protect the colonies from disturbance. The pre -
construction survey will be performed no more than seven days prior to the implementation of
construction activities. If a lapse in construction activities for seven days or longer occurs between
those dates, another pre -construction survey will be performed. If a maternity colony is found a
qualified biologist (in consultation with the CDFW) will determine the extent of a construction -free
buffer zone to be established around the nest.
Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project Page 49
February 2023
City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division
Figure 1 — Project Vicinity
Figure 2 — Project Area
Figure 3 — Project Action Area
Figure 4 — Boat Launch Ramp Section
Initial Study
Map V GHD
Papw Size ANSI A
�rof Redding Project No 12558750
Turtie$ay Boat Ramp Revision No
Improvement Project Date 31912022
Gam, . FAC) W*A, LOGS, &area d l.,r9
flapw S�zo AN S� A �� Reddkk. Poject Na, 12558750
0
120 160 N 60 y B"t amp R6Mjon No,
r. 1...
Feet n
wp Lambert GwImm) con��
HomwMa� Uun ibMh Apvkm 1983
aid NAD 1983 SlateRlwe Cablunio I F 79 0401 Foal PI Oject Area FIGURE 2
T.Mqe— U558750 02'R%A—
P�d IN5
Paper Size ANSI A
0 100 200 300 400 500
Feet
Map Projection: Lambert Conformal Conic
Horizontal Datum: North American 1983
City of Redding Project No. 12558750
Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Revision No. -
Improvement Project Date 11/10/2022
Grid: NAD 1983 StatePlane California I RIPS 0401 Feet ' Action Area
\�ghdnet\ghd\US\Redding\Projeats\561\12558750\GIS\Maps\Deliverables\12558750_TuDgay.aprz-12558750_03_AA Data souno, World Imagery: City of Redding GIS, Maxer. Created by: ethompaon3
Natdete: 10 Nov 2022 -12:07
Paper Size ANSI A City of Redding Project No. 12558750
NPETurtle Bay Boat Ramp Revision No. -
Improvement Project Date 1111012022
Boat Launch Ramp Section FIGURE
1�ghdnet\ghd\US1Redding\Projeots\561\125587501GI8\Maps\Deliverables\12558750_TudBayaprz Data source:. Created by: ethomp-3
Print date: 10 Nov 2022 - 12.13
ATTACHMENT C
Mitigation Monitoring and Environmental Commitment Program
MITIGATION MONITORING AND
ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENT PROGRAM
TURTLE BAY BOAT RAMP PROJECT
(STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NO. 2023020064)
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM CONTENTS
This document is the Mitigation Monitoring and Environmental Commitment Program (MMP/ECP) for
the Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project (project). The MMP/ECP includes a brief discussion of the legal basis
for, and the purpose of, the program, discussion, and direction regarding complaints about
noncompliance; a key to understanding the monitoring matrix; and the monitoring matrix.
LEGAL BASIS OF AND PURPOSE FOR THE MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
California Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 requires public agencies to adopt mitigation
monitoring or reporting programs whenever certifying an environmental impact report (EIR) or a
mitigated negative declaration (MND). This requirement facilitates implementation of all mitigation
measures adopted through the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) process.
The MMP contained herein is intended to satisfy the requirements of CEQA as they relate to the
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the project. It is intended to be used by
City of Redding (City) staff, participating agencies, project contractors, and mitigation monitoring
personnel during implementation of the project.
Mitigation is defined by CEQA Guidelines Section 15370 as a measure that does any of the following:
■ Avoids impacts altogether by not taking a certain action or parts of an action.
■ Minimizes impacts by limiting the degree or magnitude of the action and its implementation.
■ Rectifies impacts by repairing, rehabilitating, or restoring the impacted environment.
■ Reduces or eliminates impacts over time by preservation and maintenance operations during the life
of the project.
■ Compensates for impacts by replacing or providing substitute resources or environments.
The intent of the MMP is to ensure the effective implementation and enforcement of adopted mitigation
measures and permit conditions. The MMP will provide for monitoring of construction activities as
necessary, onsite identification and resolution of environmental problems, and proper reporting to
City staff.
In addition to meeting the CEQA MMP requirements, this document incorporates environmental
commitments, standard practices, conservation measures, and best management practices (BMPs).
The environmental commitments may be part of the project design, standard contract specifications,
City requirements, or conservation measures. These commitments are part of the project, but they do not
constitute mitigation under CEQA as they have not been incorporated to reduce a potentially significant
impact.
Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project Page 1
March 2023
City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division
Mitigation Monitoring Program
MITIGATION MONITORING/ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENT PROGRAM TABLE
The MMP/ECP Table identifies the mitigation measures and commitments proposed for the project.
The tables have the following columns:
■ Mitigation Measure: Lists the mitigation measures identified within the Initial Study for a specific
potentially significant impact, along with the number for each measure as enumerated in the Initial
Study.
■ Environmental Commitment: Lists the commitments identified within the project that are not
related to a potentially significant CEQA impact, but further ensure environmental resource
protection.
■ Timing: Identifies at what point in time, review process, or phase the mitigation measure will be
completed.
■ Agency/Department Consultation: References the City department or any other public agency with
which coordination is required to satisfy the identified mitigation measure.
■ Verification: Spaces to be initialed and dated by the individual designated to verify adherence to a
specific mitigation measure.
NONCOMPLIANCE COMPLAINTS
Any person or agency may file a complaint asserting noncompliance with the mitigation measures and
commitments associated with the project. The complaint shall be directed to the City in written form,
providing specific information on the asserted violation. The City shall investigate and determine the
validity of the complaint. If noncompliance with a mitigation measure has occurred, the City shall take
appropriate action to remedy any violation. The compliant shall receive written confirmation indicating
the results of the investigation or the final action corresponding to the particular noncompliance issue.
Page 2 Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project
March 2023
City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division
Mitigation Monitoring Program
MITIGATION MONITORING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENT PROGRAM TABLE
TURTLE BAY BOAT RAMP PROJECT
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
(STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NO. 2023020064)
ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENTS
The following environmental commitments will be incorporated into the project to further protect environmental and biological resources:
Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project Page 3
March 2023
Timing/
Enforcement/
Verification '
Best Management Practices
Implementation
Monitoring
(Date and Initials),
Air Quality (AQ)
AQ -1. Nontoxic soil stabilizers will be applied according to manufacturer's specification to all
Construction
Construction
inactive construction areas.
Management
AQ -2. All grading operations will be suspended when winds (as instantaneous gusts) exceed
Construction
Construction
20 miles per hour.
Management
AQ -3. Water all stockpiles, access roads, and disturbed or exposed areas, as necessary, to prevent
Construction
Construction
airborne dust.
Management
AQ -4. Pursuant to the California Vehicle Code (Section 23114(e)(4)) (California Legislative
Construction
Construction
Information 2016), all trucks hauling soil and other loose material to and from the construction
Management
site will be covered or will maintain at least 6 inches of freeboard (i.e., minimum vertical
distance between top of load and the trailer).
AQ -5. All public roadways used by the project contractor will be maintained free from dust, dirt,
Construction
Construction
and debris caused by construction activities. Streets will be swept at the end of the day if visible
Management
soil materials are carried onto adjacent public paved roads.
Biological Resources (BIO)
BIO -1. As required by the City of Redding Stormwater Quality Management and Discharge
Preconstruction/
City/
Control Ordinance, an erosion and sediment control plan (SSCP) or will be prepared to address
Construction
Construction
BMPs that will be used to prevent erosion and sediment loss. The ESCP must also address dust
Management
control, spill control, pollution control, waste management, equipment maintenance and fueling,
and materials storage within the project site.
Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project Page 3
March 2023
City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division
Mitigation Monitoring Program
Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project Page 4
March 2023
Timing/
Enforcement/
Verification
Best Management Practices
Implementation
Monitoring
(Date and Initials)
BI0-2. Appropriate erosion and sediment control measures (e.g., silt fences, straw wattles) shall
Preconstruction/
City/
be in place prior to the onset of construction activities near jurisdictional waters and in project
Construction
Construction
areas where there is a potential for surface runoff to drain into jurisdictional waters. The
Management
measures shall be monitored and maintained until construction activities have ceased.
BI0-3. High visibility fencing, flagging, or markers will be installed along the edges of the
Preconstruction/
City/
work zone near avoided waters and riparian areas. In addition, equipment entry and exit points;
Construction
Construction
and staging, storage, and stockpile areas must be clearly marked prior to the entry of
Management
mechanized equipment or vehicles into the construction area.
BI0-4. The construction area will be fenced, staked, or flagged as close to the limits as feasible.
Preconstruction/
City/
Construction
Construction
Management
BI0-5. A qualified biologist will provide training for all contractors, work crews, and any
Preconstruction/
City/
onsite personnel on the status of the VELB, its host plant and habitat, the need to avoid
Construction
Construction
damaging the elderberry shrubs, and possible penalties for noncompliance.
Management
Cultural Resources (CR)'
CR -1. If previously unidentified cultural materials are unearthed during construction, it is City
Construction
City/
policy that work be halted in that area until a qualified archaeologist can assess the significance
Construction
of the find. Additional archaeological surveys will be needed if the proposed project undertaking
Management
limits are extended beyond the present survey APE limits. The final disposition of
archaeological, historical, and paleontological resources recovered on State land under the
jurisdiction of the California State Lands Commission must be approved by the Commission.
CR -2. If human remains are discovered during project activities, all activities near the find will
Construction
City/NAHC/
be stopped, and the Shasta County Sheriff -Coroner's Office will be notified. If the coroner
County Coroner
determines that the remains may be those of a Native American, the coroner will contact the
Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC). Treatment of the remains will be conducted in
accordance with further direction of the County Coroner or NAHC, as appropriate.
Hazards and Hazardous Materials (HAZ)
HAZ-1. Hazardous materials, including fuels, oils, cement, and solvents will be stored and
Construction
City/
contained in an area protected from direct runoff and away from areas where they could enter
Construction
waters of the United States.
Management
Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project Page 4
March 2023
City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division
Mitigation Monitoring Program
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT MITIGATION MEASURES
Resource -specific mitigation measures that will be used during project implementation include the following:
Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project Page 5
March 2023
Timing/
Enforcement/
Verification
Best Management Practices
Implementation
Monitoring
(Date and Initials)
HAZ-2. Construction equipment will be inspected daily for leaks. Leaking fluids will be
Construction
City/
contained upon detection, and equipment repairs will be made as soon as practicable, or the
Construction
leaking equipment will be moved offsite.
Management
HAZ-3. Secondary containment such as drip pans or absorbent materials will be used to catch
Construction
City/
spills or leaks when removing or changing fluids. Secondary containment will be used for
Construction
storage of all hazardous materials.
Management
HAZ-4. Spill containment and clean-up materials will be kept onsite at all times for use in the
Construction
City/
event of an accidental spill.
Construction
Management
HAZ-5. Absorbent materials will be used on small spills rather than hosing down or burying the
Construction
City/
spill. The absorbent material will be promptly removed and disposed of properly.
Construction
Management
Hydrology and Water Quality (WQ)
WQ-1. All construction work and stockpiling of materials will be confined to the project
Construction
City/
disturbance area.
Construction
Management
WQ-2. Temporary stockpiling of excavated or imported material will be placed in upland areas.
Construction
City/
Construction
Management
WQ-3. Excess soil will be used onsite or disposed of at a regional landfill or other appropriate
Construction
City/
facility.
Construction
Management
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT MITIGATION MEASURES
Resource -specific mitigation measures that will be used during project implementation include the following:
Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project Page 5
March 2023
City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division
Mitigation Monitoring Program
Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project Page 6
March 2023
Timing/
Enforcement/
Verification
Mitigation Measure (M)
Implementation
Monitoring
(Date and Initials)
Biological Resources (BIO)
MM -I. All in -water work shall occur during April 1 through June 30 to avoid peak times when
Construction
City/
listed juvenile anadromous fish would be present.
Construction
Management
MM -2. Prior to any in -water work, qualified fish biologists, in consultation with CDFW, shall
Preconstruction/
City/
utilize seine netting to work from the edge of water, outward just before berm construction to
Construction
Construction
remove any individuals that could be within the work area. No handling of fish shall occur.
Management
Prior to completion of the gravel berm, the area will be surveyed and seined again by qualified
fish biologists to ensure absence of fish in the work area. The berm will serve as a barrier to the
in -water portion of the project area. After the gravel berm is constructed, the work pad may be
constructed.
MM -3. Prior to any placement of gravel in water, heavy equipment operation practices shall be
Preconstruction/
City/
implemented that minimize the potential for injury or death of listed fish species, including
Construction
Construction
alerting fish to equipment operation in the channel before gravel is placed in the water (i.e.
Management
slow, deliberate equipment operation and gently tapping water surface prior to entering or
placing gravels in the river channel).
MM -4. The gravel berm and work pad shall be constructed out of 3/4 -inch minus, silt free, clean,
Construction
City/
spawning -grade gravel that meets Caltrans' cleanness test (California Test No. 227) with a
Construction
value of 85 or higher. Upon construction completion, the gravel berm would be breached and
Management
the gravel pad and berm would be left in place to provide the benefit of approximately 236
cubic yards of spawning grade gravels to augment spawning opportunities for salmon.
MM -5. Twenty-four hours (24 -hours) prior to initiation of ground disturbance or vegetation
Preconstruction/
City/
removal within 50 -feet of suitable reptile and/or amphibian habitat (i.e., Sacramento River and
Construction
Construction
riparian areas), a qualified biologist shall perform a pre -construction survey for western pond
Management
turtle, their nests, and foothill yellow -legged frog. If western pond turtles, their nests, or yellow -
legged frog are encountered in the project area during construction and could be harmed by
construction activities, work will stop immediately in the area and CDFW will be notified.
Upon authorization from CDFW, a qualified biologist may relocate the individual(s) the
shortest distance possible to a location containing habitat outside of the construction impact
zone.
Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project Page 6
March 2023
City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division
Mitigation Monitoring Program
Mitigation Measure (M)
Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring
Verification
(Date and Initials)
MM -6. If construction or vegetation removal occurs during the nesting season, February 1
Construction
City/
through August 31 for birds and November 1 through July 15 for raptors, a qualified biologist
Construction
shall conduct a pre -construction survey to locate active nests. The pre -construction survey will
Management
be performed no more than 7 days prior to the implementation of construction activities. If a
lapse in construction activities occurs for 7 days or longer, another pre -construction survey will
be performed. If an active nest is found, a qualified biologist (in consultation with the CDFW)
will determine the extent of a buffer zone to be established around the nest.
MM -7. Removal of large trees (10 -inch dbh or greater) with cavities, crevices, or snags shall
Construction
City/
occur before maternity colonies form (i.e., prior to March 1) or after young are volant (i.e., after
Construction
August 15). If construction (including the removal of large trees) occurs during the non-volant
Management
season (March 1 through August 15), a qualified biologist shall conduct a pre -construction
survey of the project area to locate maternity colonies and identify measures to protect the
colonies from disturbance. The pre -construction survey will be performed no more than seven
days prior to the implementation of construction activities. If a lapse in construction activities
for seven days or longer occurs between those dates, another pre -construction survey will be
performed. If a maternity colony is found a qualified biologist (in consultation with the CDFW)
will determine the extent of a construction -free buffer zone to be established around the nest.
Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project Page 7
March 2023
ATTACHMENT D
Comments and Response to Comments (if any)
Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project
Response to Public Comments Received on CEQA Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration,
State Clearinghouse #2023020064
In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), an Initial Study/Mitigated
Negative Declaration (IS/MND) for the Turtle Bay :Boat Ramp Project was made available to the public
and interested agencies for a minimum 30 -day review period. The agency review period was managed
by the State Clearinghouse (SCH) and closed on March 3, 2023. The public review period was managed
by staff and also closed on March 3, 2023. All written comments received during the public and agency
review period are attached, along with written responses to environmental issues raised by commenters
on the IS/MND. Comments received on the public draft IS/MND do not identify new significant impacts
or significant new information that would require recirculation of the draft IS/MND pursuant to CEQA
Guidelines Section 15073.5. This technical memorandum is being used to summarize comments and
support adoption of the public draft IS/MND.
Response to Comments
A total of four comment letters were received regarding the IS/MND. The comment letters were
submitted by the California State Lands Commission, the Redding Rodeo Association, Marj Cantrell,
and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife. The letters are attached to this technical
memorandum:
California State Lands Commission (Letter A)
1. Letter A was submitted by the California State Lands Commission and includes four comments
related to the figures and cultural resources.
Comment I and Comment 2. Maps and Figures.-
Response:
igures:
Response: The City of Redding looks forward to coordinating with you to obtain a new lease for
the boat ramp. Given the grant timeline and limited value in regard to public disclosure, the City
is not able to add revised mapping and figures at this time. However, the City will provide new
and modified maps and figures to your office during the lease coordination process.
Comment 3 and Comment 4. Cultural Resources.-
Response:
esources:
Response: The City has added the requested language to the final CEQA document.
Redding Rodeo Association (Letter B)
2. Letter B was submitted by the Redding Rodeo Association and includes 14 comments.
Comment 1. Events and Activities.-
Response:
ctivities:
Response: The boat ramp parking area is a public lot, outside of the Rodeo lease area. The
construction project schedule will address impacts to community events by limiting construction
activities during specified windows. With environmental restrictions and permitting, the in -water
work window is limited to between April 1 and June 30 of any given construction year.
Construction area footprints and activities will be limited during events in this window and
written into the construction contract.
Comment 2. Inclusion and Input:
Response: The IS/MND/MMP documents were sent to the State Clearinghouse for a 30 -day
public review period and distribution to pertinent state agencies. The documents were sent to local
resource agencies, the Shasta County Clerk, and posted on the Public Works Department website.
A public notice was also sent to landowners in the vicinity of the project and a Notice of Intent
was posted in the local newspaper. In additions, the :Rodeo Association has attended and hosted
project meetings during the development process.
Comment 3. Contractual Concerns:
Response: There are no funds allocated for construction at this time. Staff anticipates a build year
of 2027, the year in which the kayak launch at :Riverfront :Park can be decommissioned. There are
some impacts to the lease area, and staff anticipates negotiating the lease area should the lease be
renewed. Per the design team, the construction window is adequate for the work required to
complete the task. Should a delay occur, the same contract provisions concerning work windows
and facility availability would be in effect to minimize impacts to existing events and operations.
Comment 4. Declaration:
Response: The Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project has been in the planning process for approximately
3 -years. In addition to public outreach and consultation with state and federal resource agencies,
technical and scientific studies were conducted to identify, and allow the City to consider, any
direct and reasonably foreseeable indirect physical changes in the environment which may be
caused by the project.
Unfortunately the comment regarding missing, flawed, incomplete, or erroneous information
cannot be addressed, as it is not specific to an environmental resource and does not contain
detailed information that can be reviewed by the City.
The City provided the Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration in compliance
with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, Section 15072. Please see the
response to comment number 2 for detail.
Comment S. Incomplete Evaluation:
Response: All environmental factors were evaluated and considered in the Initial Study; however,
only those with a potentially significant impact were included in the table. The final environmental
document will be modified to include a statement indicating that these categories would have
potentially significant impacts.
2
Comment 6. Page Two of the Declaration:
Response: All environmental factors were evaluated and considered in the Initial Study. The
findings in the Initial Study are supported by consultation with state and federal resource agencies,
as well as the technical and scientific studies conducted for the project.
Comment 7. Hydrological Concerns:
Response: As described in the Initial Study, Section X(c). Hydrology and Water Quality, a
Floodplain Encroachment Assessment was prepared by Pacific Hydrologic Incorporated (PHI) to
evaluate potential impacts to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) regulatory
100 -year floodplain and designated floodway. PHI determined that the project and associated
improvements are not within the designated floodway or FEMA floodplain and the project would
not result in an encroachment or fill.
Comment 8. Water Quality and Pollution Concerns:
Response: The City has conducted multiple meetings with the regulatory agencies from which a
permit or approval will be required. These agencies include the California State Water :Resources
Control Board, the California Department of Fish and Wildlife, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,
and the National Marine Fisheries Service. Each of these agencies are familiar with the project
and have provided input regarding construction timing and methods to reduce impacts to water
quality. A discussion of potential water quality impacts and conservation measures can be found
in the Initial Study, Section X(c). Hydrology and Water Quality.
The proposed project is not anticipated to increase use, but instead it will better accommodate the
existing boat launch users. The boat ramp will be widened by 3 -feet which will allow two vehicles
to launch their non -motorized boats at the same time. The existing ramp allows only a single boat
to be launched, while the other vehicles sit while waiting to launch.
Water quality will be improved, as the City's Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4)
General Permit requires the project to incorporate storm water treatment features. The treatment
features will filter vehicle contaminants from the storm water before it leaves the parking area.
The construction will also address current sediment runoff issues stemming from the rodeo ground
in -field drainage system, reducing turbidity caused during rain events. The project will improve
habitat with new shaded aquatic zones, reduced runoff, and the removal of invasive species. The
California Department of Fish and Wildlife has requested that the City improve the existing boat
launch facility, so that other kayak and drift boat facilities can be decommissioned. The other boat
launch facilities need to be decommissioned as they are located in areas where human activity,
sediment, and turbidity are harming salmonid redds.
3
Comment 9. Concrete:
Response: The project does not include a dam, and the berm has been incorporated based on input
from the resource agencies. The berm will consist of clean washed spawning gravel, will prevent
construction sediment from creating turbidity in the river, and will be left in the river upon
completion to encourage downstream spawning. The widened boat ramp section will be pre -cast
concrete and placed in the river. The City is coordinating with the resource agencies and will
obtain all necessary permits and approvals.
Comment 10. Section 404 of the Federal Clean Water Act:
Response: While it is not required, the City has conducted early consultation with the appropriate
regulatory agencies. Please see the response to comment 8.
Comment 11. California Environmental Quality Act Compliance:
Response: The City is in compliance with CEQA. The CEQA Guidelines Section 15074(b) states,
"Prior to approving a project, the decision-making body of the lead agency shall consider the
proposed negative declaration or mitigated negative declaration together with any comments
received during the public review process. The decision-making body shall adopt the proposed
negative declaration or mitigated negative declaration only if it finds on the basis of the whole
record before it (including the initial study and any comments received), that there is no substantial
evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment and that the negative
declaration or mitigated negative declaration reflects the lead agency's independent judgment and
analysis." Adoption of the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation and Monitoring
Program, and approval of the project, is a requirement of CEQA, but does not ensure project
funding or future project approvals. Grant funding was used to perform the environmental and
design phases of the project; however, additional City Council approval(s) will be required if a
funding mechanism is identified for construction.
Comment 12. Mitigated Negative Declaration:
Response: CEQA Guidelines Section 15063(a) states, "Following preliminary review, the Lead
Agency shall conduct an Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on
the environment." If the agency determines that there is substantial evidence that any aspect of
the project, either individually or cumulatively, may cause a significant effect on the environment,
then an EIR is prepared. Neither the Initial Study nor the comment letter provide evidence of any
potentially significant impact that cannot be mitigated to a level that is less than significant.
Preparation of an EIR is not warranted.
Comment 13. Environmental Impact Report:
Response: Neither the Initial Study nor the comment letter provide evidence of any potentially
significant impact. Preparation of an EIR is not warranted and a formal alternatives analysis is not
required. Unfortunately the comment regarding flaws in the mitigation measures is vague and
provides no information regarding a specific environmental resource, mitigation measure, or why
4
the commenter believes it is flawed. Due to the generality, the City is unable to address this
comment.
Comment 14. Summary:
Response: The City has prepared the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, and Mitigation
and Monitoring Program based on public outreach, consultation with state and federal resource
agencies, as well as technical and scientific studies. Based on the whole record (including the
Initial Study, supporting documentation, and public comment) and the mitigation measures
incorporated into the project, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a
significant effect on the environment.
Marj Cantrell (Letter Q
3. Letter C was submitted by Marj Cantrell and includes 5 comments.
Comment 1. Public Input:
Response: City staff held a stakeholder meeting at the Redding Rodeo Grounds on March 24,
2022. The meeting included members of the fishing and guide community, the Rodeo
Association, representatives from the paddle sport community, Redding Memorial Park, Turtle
Bay, the Civic Auditorium and Shasta Living Streets. Additionally, two meetings were held with
Rodeo Association staff on August 2, 2022, and November 15`x', 2022. Several on site meetings
have taken place with Redding .Memorial Park staff and the Wintu Tribe of Northern California
on June 3, 2022.
Comment 2. Existing Facility and River Closure:
Response: In the last decade, boating activity in Redding has seen a steady rise, and this stretch
of the river provides a world-class fly-fishing experience. The City's use data indicates the
ramp's popularity has contributed to an over -capacity condition, as the narrow launch ramp does
not allow two boats to efficiently launch at one time. Those who use the facility have expressed
concern for the lack of capacity and the floating dock's inadequacy for use by drift boats, which
are extremely common in the river.
Comment 3. Expanded Parking:
Response: The Redding Rodeo Association leases land from the City, and the Turtle Bay :Boat
Ramp Project abuts the rodeo grounds. The project will impact a small portion of the lease area,
and staff anticipates negotiating the lease area should the lease be renewed. Additional parking
is needed to meet current recreational demands. The construction project schedule will address
impacts to community events by limiting construction activities during specified windows.
Comment 4. Alternate Location:
Response: This project is a refurbishment of an existing facility as well as a decommissioning of
an existing non -motorized launch. The California Department of Fish and Wildlife approached
5
the City regarding the Riverfront Park ramp requesting it be decommissioned to improve
salmonid habitat. Those users should be relocated to a similar position on the river, and the
existing boat ramp cannot handle the increased demand. Additionally, the aged facility requires
a major facelift to meet standards for ADA accessibility and to improve public safety.
Construction of a new boat ramp in a new location (Turtle Bay East off of Bechelli Lane or other)
would have a much greater environmental impact (fish, water quality, traffic, etc.). Widening the
existing boat ramp is cost effective and results in less environmental impact.
Comment S. Public Comment Period:
Response: In addition to the public outreach that was conducted for the project (see response to
comment 1), the IS/MND/MMP documents were sent to the State Clearinghouse for a 30 -day
public review period and distribution to pertinent state agencies. The documents were sent to
local resource agencies, the Shasta County Clerk, and posted on the Public Works Department
website. A public notice was also sent to landowners in the vicinity of the project and a Notice
of Intent was posted in the local newspaper. The grant timeline is strict, any variance from the
project schedule included in the grant contract may result in the loss of grant funding. Staff is
confident in the stakeholder engagement and that design of the facility will meet the needs of the
users, who have reviewed and commented on the project plans.
California Department of Fish and Wildlife (Letter D)
4. Letter D was submitted by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) and includes
1 comment.
Comment 1. Studies and Avoidance and Minimization Measures:
Response: The City appreciates the early coordination and input provided by CDFW staff.
0
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
CALIFORNIA STATE LANDS
COMMISSION
100 Howe Avenue, Suite 100 -South
Sacramento, CA 95825-8202
March 3, 2023
City of Redding
Amber Kelley
777 Cypress Avenue
Redding, CA 96001
VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL ONLY ake1Iey@)cityofredding.org
GAVIN NEWSOM, Governor
JENNIFER LUCCHESI, Executive Officer
916.574.1800
TTY CA Relay Service: 711 or Phone 800.735.2922
from Voice Phone 800.735.2929
or for Spanish 800.855.3000
Contact Phone: 916.574.1900
File Ref: SCH #2023020064
Subject: Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for Turtle Bay Boat Ramp
Project, Shasta County
Dear Amber Kelley:
The California State Lands Commission (Commission) staff has reviewed the
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) for the Turtle Bay Boat
Ramp Project (Project), which is being prepared by the City of Redding (City).
The City, as the public agency proposing to carry out the Project, is the lead
agency under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Pub. Resources
Code, § 21000 et seq.). The Commission is a trustee agency for projects that
could directly or indirectly affect State sovereign land and their accompanying
Public Trust resources or uses. Additionally, because the Project involves work on
State sovereign land, the Commission will act as a responsible agency.
Commission Jurisdiction and Public Trust Lands
The Commission has jurisdiction and management authority over all ungranted
tidelands, submerged lands, and the beds of navigable lakes and waterways.
The Commission also has certain residual and review authority for tidelands and
submerged lands legislatively granted in trust to local jurisdictions (Pub.
Resources Code, §§ 6009, subd. (c); 6009.1; 6301; 6306). All tidelands and
submerged lands, granted or ungranted, as well as navigable lakes and
waterways, are subject to the protections of the common law Public Trust
Doctrine.
City of Redding Page 2 March 3, 2023
As general background, the State of California acquired sovereign ownership of
all tidelands and submerged lands and beds of navigable lakes and waterways
upon its admission to the United States in 1850. The State holds these lands for
the benefit of all people of the State for statewide Public Trust purposes, which
include but are not limited to waterborne commerce, navigation, fisheries,
water -related recreation, habitat preservation, and open space. On navigable
non -tidal waterways, including lakes, the State holds fee ownership of the bed
of the waterway landward to the ordinary low-water mark and a Public Trust
easement landward to the ordinary high-water mark, except where the
boundary has been fixed by agreement or a court. Such boundaries may not
be readily apparent from present day site inspections.
The main channel of the Sacramento River, at the project location, is natural,
navigable, non -tidal, and, therefore, State sovereign land under the
Commission's jurisdiction. A lease will be required for the portions of the project
extending into the river below the ordinary low water mark.
Project DescriDtion
The City proposes to upgrade their facilities at the Turtle Bay Boat Ramp site to
meet the City's residents' increased interest in boating and fly-fishing.
From the Project Description, Commission staff understands that the Project
would include a two-lane boat ramp, an extension of the existing floating dock,
and a new boating access beach adjacent to the ramp for drift boats and non -
motorized vessel launching, all of which have potential to affect State sovereign
land.
Environmental Review
Commission staff requests that the City consider the following comments on the
Project's IS/MND, to ensure that impacts to State sovereign land are adequately
analyzed for the Commission's use of the IS/MND when considering a future
lease application for the Project.
General Comments
Comment 1 1. Missing base layer: In Figure 3, the map showing the kayak launch to be
decommissioned in 2027, the base layer is missing. Please include a base
layer to the map.
Comment 2 2. Additional Figure: Please include a figure that shows the potential locations
for the boat ramp and boating access beach. This will allow Commission Staff
to determine which components of the project will be in Commission
City of Redding Page 3 March 3, 2023
jurisdiction and better aid with determining potential environmental impacts
as a Responsible Agency.
Cultural Resources
3. Title to Resources Within Commission Jurisdiction: The IS/MND should state
Comment 3 that the title to all abandoned shipwrecks, archaeological sites, and historic
or cultural resources on or in the tide and submerged lands of California is
vested in the State and under the jurisdiction of the Commission (Pub.
Resources Code, § 6313). Commission staff requests that the City consult with
Staff Attorney Jamie Garrett should any cultural resources on State lands be
discovered during construction of the proposed Project.
Comment 4 Staff requests that the following statement be included in the IS/MND's Best
Management Practices, CR -1: "The final disposition of archaeological,
historical, and paleontological resources recovered on State land under the
jurisdiction of the California State Lands Commission must be approved by
the Commission."
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the IS/MND for the Project. As a
responsible and trustee agency, the Commission will rely on the adopted
IS/MND when issuing a new lease as specified above (see Section "Commission
Jurisdiction and Public Trust Lands"). We request that you consider our
comments before adopting the IS/MND.
Please send electronic copies of the adopted IS/MND, Mitigation Monitoring
Program, Notice of Determination, and approving resolution when they become
available. Please note that federal and state laws require all government
entities to improve accessibility of information technology and content by
complying with established accessibility requirements. (29 U.S.C. § 794d; 36
C.F.R. § 1194.1 et seq.; Gov. Code, § 7405.) California State law prohibits State
agencies from publishing on their websites content that does not comply with
accessibility requirements. (Gov. Code, § 115467.) Therefore, any documents
submitted to Commission staff during the processing of a lease or permit,
including all CEQA documentation, must meet accessibility requirements for
Commission staff to place the application on the Commission agenda.
Refer questions concerning environmental review to Christine Day,
Environmental Scientist, at Christine.Da @DsIc.cg --,, or (916) 562-0027. For
questions concerning archaeological or historic resources under Commission
jurisdiction, please contact Jamie Garrett, Staff Attorney, at
Jamie Qarrett@sIc.cg -goy or (916) 574-0398. For questions concerning
City of Redding Page 4 March 3, 2023
Commission leasing jurisdiction, please contact Ninette Lee, Public Land
Management Specialist, at.Ninette.Lee@slc.ca.gov or (916) 574-1869.
Sincerely,
'Ok" ��� -
Nicole Dobroski, Chief
Division of Environmental Science,
Planning, and Management
cc: Office of Planning and Research
C. Day, Commission
J. Garrett, Commission
N. Lee, Commission
REDDING
P.O. Box 992048
Redding, CA ••ii•
March 3, 2023
Amber Kelley
Environmental Compliance Manager,
Public Works Department, Engineering Division
City of Redding
777 Cypress Avenue
Redding, CA 96001
Mayor Michael Dacquisto & City Councilors
City of Redding
P. O. Box 496071
Redding, CA 96049-6071
Via email
Re: Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project
Dear Ms. Kelley, Mayor Dacquisto, and Honorable City Councilors:
The Redding Rodeo Association (hereafter, the "Association") has reviewed the project
documents, Initial Study, and the City Public Works Department's recommended Mitigated Negative
Declaration for the proposed Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project, and hereby submits comments for the
public record. The Association is an interested and affected party as the project directly impacts
Association operations and events and proposes a "taking of property" on the adjoining Redding Rodeo
grounds at 715 Auditorium Drive which the City currently leases to the Association.
Backivound
Since 1948, the Association and its affiliate and subsidiary organizations have hosted an event
steeped in Western Heritage and unique to Northern California. The 4 -day Redding Rodeo each May is
a major stop on the professional rodeo circuit, and the Rodeo was inducted to the Pro -Rodeo Hall of
Fame in 2016. This year, the Rodeo will mark its 75`x' anniversary. The Rodeo grounds is also used as
a livestock evacuation center during fires and offers a place for other community events such as the
Benefit Motocross Races. In recent years the Association has spent an unusual amount or time and
resources defending against numerous attempts to circumvent the Association's historical use of the
Rodeo Grounds.
Page 1 of 6 Redding Rodeo Association Comment on Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project.
The forward movement of the Turtle Bay :Boat Ramp project was surprising due to the fact the City
Council just voted to spend $1.2 million to hire a firm to complete this Riverfront Specific Plan. If
there is an opportunity to carve out areas from the Riverfront Specific Plan such as the Turtle Bay Boat
Ramp Project, the Association would like the same opportunity as related to the Redding Rodeo
Grounds.
Comments Specific to the Proposed Proiect
While we understand and support the need for boating and recreational access to the river, this
project is overly ambitious and should be reconsidered.
• Impact on Events and Activities. As proposed, the project will have a significant, and highly
Comment 1 detrimental effect on the Association and other community activities that take place on the
Rodeo grounds. The proposed timelines and construction activities are very problematic given
the scheduling of much of the work during the time the rodeo is held each year. The entire
contestant parking is marked as a part of the project on the maps included in the notice of public
comment. Project plans at this time offer no reasonable and suitable mitigating solutions.
• Lack of Inclusion and Input. The Association received no notice of the release of the Mitigated
Comment 2 Negative Declaration and heard about this from a concerned citizen. This lack of inclusion and
input raises public transparency concerns.
Contractual, Legal, and Liability Issues. The project plan fails to address legal, and liability
issues surrounding the City's long standing contractual arrangement with the Association for
Comment 3 management, operation, and use of the Rodeo grounds, which currently does not expire until
2026. The 10 -month project presupposes significant construction work at the time of year when
the Rodeo grounds are most utilized for events. The project also requires abandonment and/or
removal of critical Rodeo grounds infrastructure. Further, it is unreasonable to assume the
project can be completed in the 10 -month period allotted. For example, if construction reveals
previously unknown geological, hydrologic, or archaeological issues, the project could be
delayed long term.
If the Association had to cancel the Rodeo as as a result of the project it would incur a
substantial financial loss, damage to goodwill and reputation, and the local charitable and
community organizations and businesses who benefit financially from the events will suffer
hardship and economic loss.
The City should carefully weigh its contractual obligations, exposure to potential liability, and
the economic impact upon the Rodeo and the :Redding community at large, therefore, before
proceeding with the project.
Page 2 of 6 Redding Rodeo Association Comment on Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project.
Comments Specific to the Proposed Mitigative Negative Declaration
Comment 4 The Declaration's Project Description states: "....The City of Redding conducted an Initial
Study (attached) that determined that the proposed project could have significant environmental effects
on biological resources.... " That statement alone should signal a measured and well thought, well
planned approach should be taken by the City.
The proposed Declaration relies on City staff findings contained in the project Initial Study.
We acknowledge the work of by City staff, but based on our review, we believe both the Declaration
and the initial study may contain missing, flawed, incomplete, and/or erroneous information.
Additionally, the City appears to have failed to timely and adequately provide notice of findings
and its intent to all interested parties, or parties mandated by law to receive notification.
Specific Concerns:
• Incomplete Evaluation of Environmental Factors. Documents support questioning if the
adequately evaluated or considered all the potential environmental factors involved in the
Comment 5 project. Even to a layperson, the scope of the work described in the main project narrative
clearly affects many other environmental factors beyond those identified by the City's Public
Works Department (see table below), yet those were not addressed in the Declaration and Study
or described as mostly as "... less than significant impact".
City of Redding Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project Initial Study February 2023
ENNgRONNIIEENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED
The envirormiental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project.
Aesthetics
Agricultural and
Air Quality
Forestry Resources
x Biological Resources
Cultural Resources
Energy
Geology/Soils
Greenhouse Gas
Hazards & Hazardous
Emissions
Materials
Hydrology/Water
Land Use/Plarining
1 illeral Resoutrces
Quality
No€se
Population,"Housing
Public services
Recreation)
Transportation
Tribal Cultural
Resources
Utilities service
Wildfire x
Mandatory Findings of
systems
significance
Comment 6 Page two of the Declaration states: "... 1) Based on the whole record (including the Initial
Study and any supporting documentation) and the mitigation measures incorporated into the
project, the City of Redding has determined that there is no substantial evidence that the project
will have a significant effect on the environment.... "
Page 3 of 6 Redding Rodeo Association Comment on Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project.
Common sense dictates that no reasonable person could believe that the large excavation,
subsequent fill, in -water work, construction of a berm and ramp, infrastructure removal or re-
location, and expansion of parking, trails, and recreational areas, together with the increased
traffic and use of the new boat ramp and recreation area upon completion would not greatly
impact area environmental factors. We need not list those other factors; they are reflected in the
table above.
• Hydrological Concerns. If there is a constant with rivers and waterways, it is change. Rivers
change character along their courses and over time; what happens on one river segment affects
Comment 7 everything downstream. It is irresponsible for the City to assert that the proposed project will
have little impact on the river without the benefit of a detailed environmental impact
assessment.
• Water Quality and Pollution Concerns. The proposed project will generate increased boating
and shoreline activities, increasing the potential to introduce water pollutants such as petroleum
Comment 8 hydrocarbons (e.g. fuel and oil), toxic metals (e.g. anti-foulants and hull/boat maintenance
chemicals), other liquid and solid wastes, including debris, litter, pet wastes and sewage.
Boat ramps and launches can easily alter habitats at a site. Shoreline vegetation may be reduced
at some locations, and bottom sediments may be stirred up more frequently with boating
activity. The river at that location already experiences moderate turbidity and sedimentation
according to the EPA' and increased boating use may exacerbate the issue. The Turtle Bay
Boat ramp currently experiences 1,500 to 5,300 day uses per year, and expanding the facility
will only increase its impact on the river and local roads, residents, and other uses.
Comment 9 The project would require significant amount of concrete in the dam, berm, and above water
hardscape surfaces. Nationwide studies show that city streams and rivers carry dissolving
concrete constituent elements, including calcium and carbonate minerals, which flow into urban
waterways and affect their pH, or acidity, and therefore their ability to sustain aquatic life.'
The Turtle :Bay boat ramp already lies within an area designed by the EPA to contain imperiled
species and habitats.
• Adequate Required Notification Under Section 404 of the Federal Clean Water Act. The
Comment 10 Clean Water Act requires authorization from the Secretary of the Army, acting through the
Corps of Engineers (USACE), for the discharge of dredged or fill material into all waters of the
United States, including wetlands. The USACE Sacramento District Office has jurisdiction
over the Sacramento :River at the Turtle Bay ramp. Neither the Declaration or the Initial Study
reflect or infer that the City consulted with the USACE in the preparation of the study or the
Declaration. It seems reasonable to do so at the initial project stages, since the USACE will be
the permitting agency for the Clean Water Act permits necessary to the project; that agency
could likely offer comment and key advice.
1 US Environmental Protection Agency EnviroAtlas
2 National Science Foundation. "A river runs through it: U.S. cities` waterways show consistent patterns of evolution;
Urban waters record salt in food, cement in sidewalks. September 10, 2014
Page 4 of 6 Redding Rodeo Association Comment on Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project.
• California Environmental Quality Act Compliance (CEQA). CEQA is a statutory scheme
requiring cities and other public agencies to consider the environmental consequences of their
Comment 11 actions before approving plans or policies or otherwise committing to a course of action on a
project. By proposing to adopt a Mitigative Negative Declaration for the project, the City has
acknowledged the project is not statutorily or categorically exempt from CEQA compliance.
CEQA compliance must occur before a public agency approves a project. The term "approves"
however, does not mean final approval. Instead, "approval" refers to "the decision by a public
agency which commits the agency to a definite course of action in regard to a project intended
to be carried out by any person." Adopting the Mitigative Negative Declaration certainly
commits the City to a definite course of action.
In opting to seek a Mitigative Negative Declaration for this project, the City is attempting to
avoid preparing a CEQA Environmental Impact Report (EIR). The Initial Study, and the issues
Comment 12 raised in this letter, are substantial evidence and likely sufficient to meet the "fair argument
standard" which triggers an EIR.3 CEQA's purpose of informed decision making and
preference for environmental decision making have set a low threshold for requiring an EIR.
The low threshold has been upheld repeatedly by California courts.4
Even though conditions or mitigation measures are introduced in a Mitigative Negative
Comment 13 Declaration, they do not preclude the need to prepare an EIR if information meeting the fair
argument standard discussed above is introduced into the record.5 Additionally, we note that
CEQA requires consideration of project alternatives if an EIR is required; something that the
City's proposed Mitigative Negative Declaration apparently seeks to avoid. We believe the
proposed Mitigative Negative Declaration contains flaws in that it presupposes deferred
mitigative measures in the course of the project, which are generally impermissible under
CEQA.
We believe use of a Mitigative Negative Declaration by the City is inappropriate for this project
and violates the spirit, if not the law, with respect to CEQA applicability.
3 "If there is substantial evidence, in light of the whole record before the lead agency, that the project may have a
significant effect on the environment, an environmental impact report shall be prepared." Pub. Res. Code section
21080(d)
4 See Citizens Action to Serve All Students v. Thornley (1990) 222 Cal. App. 3d 748, 754; Citizens of Lake Murray
Area Assn. v City Council (1982) 129 Cal. App. 3d 436, 440; Mejia v. City of Los Angeles, (2005) 130 Cal. App. 4th
322, 332.
5 See Pub. Res. Code section 21064.5; CEQA Guidelines section 15070(b)(2).
6 CEQA Guidelines section 15130
Page 5 of 6 Redding Rodeo Association Comment on Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project.
Summary
As stated previously, the Association sympathizes with the City's desire to improve boating and
recreational activities on the Sacramento River. However, the Turtle Bay Boat Ramp project as
proposed presents many as yet unresolved issues and challenges. Not all of them have been raised in
this letter; we have attempted to point out only a few salient issues.
Comment 14 In our opinion, approval of the proposed Mitigative Negative Declaration by the City Council
at this time would be highly premature, and the City Council should return it to the City's Public
Works Department for additional research and further review while all factors of the Turtle Bay
Boat Ramp are reviewed and approved.
Thank you for the opportunity to submit comment and present our concerns. We also believe
improvements can be made to the existing Turtle Bay :Boat ramp while mitigating their effect on the
historic heritage of the Redding and the millions of dollars in economic impact our brings to the
Redding Community. The Association also wishes to express its desire for cooperation in present and
future projects to our mutual benefit and for the residents of the City of Redding and Shasta County.
Sincerely,
f�a
t"
d'
Cindy Schonholtz, General Manager
On behalf of the
The Redding Rodeo Association Board of Directors
Page 6 of 6 Redding Rodeo Association Comment on Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project.
DocuSign Envelope ID: A03E327D-844E-482C-9910-92E663F3D4FB
1-�� State of California — Natural Resources AgencV Comment Letter D GAVIN NEWSOM
IMAJUX] Governor
DEPAR MENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE CHARLTON H. BONHAM, Director
Northern Regio
601 Locust Street Nn
Redding, CA 96001
www.wildiffe.ca.-gov
Amber Kelley, Environmental Compliance Manager
City of Redding
Public Works Engineering Division
777 Cypress Avenue
Redding CA 96001
#" I g Lei o [#1114M L191 MRIEUMMYTionnif sm"Plar-Majoill
The California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) has reviewed the draft
Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration (ISIVIND), dated February 2023,
for the above referenced project which proposes to widen an existing boat ramp,
add a boating access beach for non -motorized boating vessels, add parking stalls,
add an ADA -compliant restroom, add a drinking fountain, add a small overlook
area with picnic tables, replace and extend a wastewater line, and extend the
Sacramento River Trail (Project). CDFW's review of this Project is pursuant to our
role as the State's trustee agency for fish and wildlife resources under the
California Environmental Quality Act, California Public Resources Code section
21000 et seq. Additionally, as a State responsible agency, CDFW administers the
California Endangered Species Act and other provisions of the Fish and Game
Code that conserve the State's fish and wildlife public trust resources.
CDFW acknowledges that the City of Redding appropriately analyzed potential
Comment I impacts to biological resources which includes a Biological Resources Report,
waters delineation, seasonally appropriate botanical surveys and the preparation
of a Biological Assessment for listed salmonids. CDFW concurs with the
avoidance and minimization measures, as listed in the ISIVIND, to minimize and/or
avoid potential impacts to biological resources due to the Project. Therefore,
CDFW has no comment.
We appreciate the opportunity to comment on the Project to assist the City of
Redding in adequately analyzing and minimizing impacts to biological resources.
11111 11 11��l I 1� 1��! 111
DocuSign Envelope ID: A03E327D-844E-482C-9910-92E663F3D4FB
Amber Kelley
City of Redding
March 3, 2023
Page 2 of 2
If you have any questions, please contact Erika lacuna, Environmental Scientist,
by email at R1 CEQAReddinq(a-)wildlife.ca.ciov.
Sincerely,
E -.j�r- DocuSigned by,
6ahcoc-A
--,74D273FEE784'E2
Curt Babcock for
Tina Bartlett, Regional Manager
Northern Region
ec: State Clearinghouse
State. Clearinqhouse(a)or)r.ca.qov
Erikalacona
rAlkS t E7AhqCM
kv�
NW& �Jllm
lam
.r
So"'kite
History
o Expanded parking and dock in 2004
2015- stakeholder collaboration & grassroots
funding effort begins
- Fly Fishing Film Tour
2016- Redding Riffle restoration grant
2021- Wildlife Conservation Board grant
2021- Design development and environmental
2022- Boat ramp design meetings and outreach
2023- 90% design & ready to file for permits
rAlkS t E7AhqCM
kv�
NW& �Jllm
lam
.r
rAlkS t E7AhqCM
kv�
NW& �Jllm
lam
.r
rAlkS t E7AhqCM
kv�
NW& �Jllm
lam
.r
rAlkS t E7AhqCM
kv�
NW& �Jllm
lam
.r
rAlkS t E7AhqCM
kv�
NW& �Jllm
lam
.r
r
r
rAlkS t E ,/r !
lam1 ,rr'X4111E I ME !FLF4 P, " 1, WE
rAlkS t E7AhqCM
kv�
NW& �Jllm
lam
.r
From: Members Council
To: Julie Winter; Michael Dacauisto; Jack Munns; Tenessa Audette; Mark Mezzano
Cc: Lawn. Barry; Bade. Steve; DeWaLBarry; Niemer. Kim; Barnhart. Erin; Mize. Pam; Tioton. Sharlene
Subject: Fw: Proposed Boat Ramp Approval - Item 9.6(a) on the 4/4/23 Council Agenda 9.6(a)
Date: Monday, April 3, 2023 1:53:46 PM
From: Carl Bott <carlbott@kcnr1460.com>
Sent: Monday, April 3, 2023 1:21 PM
To: Dacquisto, Michael; Mezzano, Mark; Winter, Julie; Audette, Tenessa; Munns, Jack
Cc: Tippin, Barry
Subject: Proposed Boat Ramp Approval
CAUTION: This email originated from outside the City of Redding; please be careful with links or attachments.
zu
I walked the area where the new boat ramp proposal is situated and I have a few questions:
1. It takes approximately 20k feet of the leased area of the Redding Rodeo. This will impact on
the parking and warm up areas for the contestants. Is there any mitigation with this? How do
you take 20k feet of leased area from the RRA?
2. The Council on a 3-2 vote would not extend the Redding Rodeo Association lease due to the
upcoming Watel-Front plan. How can you approve this change before the Waterfront plan is
finished?
3. Having talked to the fishing guides, it appears that the new boat ramp is not something they
asked for. Why does this have to take place as planned?
4. As you know the Redding Rodeo brings in approximately $9-$11 million a year. Why would
you do anything to detract from that? How much money does this boat ramp make a year?
5. Will there be Town Hall meetings discussing this project? The STR changes would seem like
a walk in the park compared to this.
6. Do you, as City Council members, want to keep the rodeo in its present location? Or even
keep the rodeo?
Anything that impacts on a 75 year tradition in our city should call for total transparency and
Town Halls so the people of Redding have a say in this.
Thank you,
Carl
Carl Bott
Free Fire Media Inc.
KCNR 96.5 FM and 1460 AM
Office: 530 605-4565
Studio: 530G05-4567
Fax: 58O6O5-4561
From: Members Council
To: Julie Winter; Michael Dacauisto; Jack Munns; Tenessa Audette; Mark Mezzano
Cc: Lawn. Barry; Bade. Steve; DeWaLBarry; Niemer. Kim; Barnhart. Erin; Tipton. Sharlene; Mize. Pam
Subject: Fw: Posse Grounds Boat Ramp Improvement - Item 9.6(a) on the 4/4/23 Council Agenda
Date: Monday, April 3, 2023 2:00:41 PM
Attachments: Club to CQR.odf
From: Kurt Mitchell <kurt4949@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, April 3, 2023 12:18 PM
To: Dacquisto, Michael; Mezzano, Mark; Winter, Julie; Audette, Tenessa; Munns, Jack
Cc: Kurt Mitchell
Subject: Posse Grounds Boat Ramp Improvement
CAUTION: This email originated from outside the City of Redding; please be careful with links or attachments.
Please review and consider the attached letter for the City Council Meeting on Tuesday April
4, 2023.
Thank you,
Kurt Mitchell
President
Shasta Trinity Fly Fishers
Shasta `Trinity Fly Fishers
3100 Venus Way
Redding, CA 96002
April 2, 2023
Statement from the Shasta Trinity Fly Fishers regarding ♦! for the Boat Launch adjacent to the
Rodeo Grounds, aka. Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Improvement 1?roject:
Shasta Trinity Fly Fishers is an active club of 200 plus members working, living and fishing in northern
California. We have been meeting for nearly 50 years and have contributed, often as the leaders, to many
conservation efforts in and around our water resources. We are interested in the natural beauty, aesthetics and
health of our world-class fisheries.
We strongly support the City of Redding's proposal for improvement to the Turtle Bay Ramp.
The Sacramento River is one of the most important resources for our community, for many stakeholder
groups including anglers, boaters, rafters, kayakers, hikers, bikers, and many more. The Turtle Bay Boat Ramp
provides important public access to the most popular stretch of this world-class river. In fact, this launch site
is the most used access on the river.
Fishing is an important economic driver for our community. Thousands of anglers from all over the country
— and all over the world — come to our area to experience the beauty, and incredible fishing, that the
Sacramento River has to offer. Yet for many of these out-of-town visitors, their first impression is a pot-
holed parking lot, an aging boat launch, and a bathroom facility that can be described as deplorable at best.
It is in dire need of improvement.
Moreover, the Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Improvement Project should not be confused with other debates about
potential development for this specific area.
The process to re -habilitate the Boat Ramp began over a decade ago, and many local stakeholder groups have
been advocating for this for many years now. The fly fishing community even raised funds to help get the
project started as far back as 2012. We have supported this project both financially and through advocacy, for
many years now, and look forward to final funding and implementation in the very near future.
Signed,
41 t
Kurt Mitchell
President
Shasta Trinity Fly Fishers
"ITMORMOM
Frank Schabaium (Vice President) Bob Williams Phil Ryan
Kris Durfee (Secretary) Judy Decker Inouye Jim Tornillo
Gerry Martin (Treasurer) Charlie Harper John Durfee
Deb Ksenzulak
From: Members, Council
To: Julie Winter; Michael Dacquisto; Jack Munns; Tenessa Audette; Mark Mezzano
Cc: Lawn. Barry; Bade. Steve; _Barnhart Erin; _Niemer rim; DgVAI_tBarry; Woodstrom. Camile; Tinton. Sharlene
Subject: Fw: Correspondence regarding item 9.6(a) Attached
Date: Tuesday, April 4, 2023 3:39:59 PIVI
Attachments: Grunt FI fishing -letter to Redding City Council 30 March 2023.docx
From: Matt Dahl <gruntflyfishing@grnail.corn>
Sent: Tuesday, April 4, 2023 12:25 PM
To: CityClerk; Munns, Jack; Winter, Julie; Audette, Tenessa; Mezzano, Mark; Dacquisto, Michael
Subject:
CAUTION: This email originated from outside the City of Redding; please be careful with links or attachments.
March 30, 2023
Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of Redding
777 Cypress Avenue
Redding, CA 96001
Re: Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Improvement Project
Hello,
My name is Matt Dahl. My wife Megan and I own and operate Grunt Fly Fishing (Grunt Fly
Fishing - Guided Fly Fishing Trips near Redding,, CA). We are a veteran -owned small business. I
served in the US Marine Corps including two deployments to Iraq. After finishing my enlistment,
I returned to my hometown of Redding. One reason was family. The other was the beautiful
environment I grew up in — the Sacramento River, mountain streams, and the many outdoor
activities Redding has to offer. My business supports our family, which includes three young
daughters. The Sacramento River guided trip is one of our most popular fly fishing tours and is
critical to our business.
The City of Redding has been diligently working on the Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Improvement
Project for several years. This project will greatly renovate and enhance the boat launch area,
relieve congestion, and provide safer access for fishing guides, drift boats, rafts, and kayaks.
The endeavor will also extend the river trail and replace the dilapidated restrooms. Equally
important, this will allow the raft launch to be at the ramp and not over sensitive salmon
spawning beds. It is imperative that the Redding City Council approve the next step of the
project, CEQA adoption, which will allow the submission of permit applications to applicable
agencies.
I respectfully urge you to approve this next critical step in the process. Please feel free to
contact me if you'd like to discuss this important project.
Sincerely,
Matt Dahl
Grunt Fly Fishing
11396 Eden Drive
Redding, CA 96003
mattdahlflyfish@gmail.com
(530) 941-5611
From: Members, Council
To: Julie Winter; Michael Dacquisto; Jack Munns; Tenessa Audette; Mark Mezzano
Cc: Lawn. Barry; Bade. Steve; _Barnhart Erin; _Niemer rim; DgVAI_tBarry; Woodstrom. Camile; Tinton. Sharlene
Subject: Fw: Correspondence regarding item 9.6(a) Attached
Date: Tuesday, April 4, 2023 3:39:59 PIVI
Attachments: Grunt FI fishing -letter to Redding City Council 30 March 2023.docx
From: Matt Dahl <gruntflyfishing@grnail.corn>
Sent: Tuesday, April 4, 2023 12:25 PM
To: CityClerk; Munns, Jack; Winter, Julie; Audette, Tenessa; Mezzano, Mark; Dacquisto, Michael
Subject:
CAUTION: This email originated from outside the City of Redding; please be careful with links or attachments.
From: Members Council
To: Julie Winter; Michael Dacquisto; Jack Munns; Tenessa Audette; Mark Mezzano
Cc: Lawn. Barry; Bade. Steve; DeWaLBarry; Niemer. Kim; Barnhart. Erin; Tipton. Sharlene; Mize. Pam;
Woodstrom, Camile
Subject: Fw: Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Improvement -- Item 9.6(a) for the City Council Meeting on 4/4/23
Date: Tuesday, April 4, 2023 11:22:50 AM
From: Janet <jancystone416@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, April 4, 2023 10:48 AM
To: Dacquisto, Michael
Subject: Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Improvement
CAUTION: This email originated from outside the City of Redding; please be careful with kinks or attachments.
Mr. Dacquisto
I have just learned of the council plan to enlarge the boat ramp and parking at Turtle Bay that the
council is to vote on this day.
I feel that this is being pushed through without public knowledge, perhaps as a back side to get rid of
the Redding Rodeo grounds.
This year will be the 75th anniversary of the Redding Rodeo and it is one of the largest Rodeo's,
drawing many high ranking contestants. It is highly rated in the
Rodeo Ranks and brings in millions of dollars Redding and surrounding communities. Will taking
out the parking and an important part of the contestant
area benefit our community in the same way?
I am not opposed to improving the boat ramp area, but I am opposed to destroying so much of the
rodeo grounds when there is a large boat ramp and parking
Just a mile or two down the river.
Please do NOT vote yes for the Boat ramp improvement as it stands.
Thank you,
Janet Stone