The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutReso. 1980 - 209 - Approving amendments to the Shasta County Solid Waste Management Plan • RESOLUTION :" e2 y f. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL. OF THE CITY . OF...REDDING APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO. TIE SHASTA COUNTY SOLID.rWASTE • MANAGEMENT PLAN. • • WHEREAS; Amendments ,toi thee. Shasta _`-county Solid •Waste Management Plan have been developed as shown in "Exhibit A" • attached hereto, and • WHEREAS, said amendments have been approved by the County of Shasta and by the ,City of Anderson, and require approval by the City of Redding, and • • WHEREAS, the required public hearing has been held • in connection .herewith and good cause has not been shown why said :amendments should not 'be approved, • NOW, THEREFORE,---BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of 'the City of Redding hereby approves the Amendments to the ' Shasta County Solid Waste Management Plan, shown in "Exhibit A" attached hereto. I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was introduced and read at a 'regul-ar meeting of the City Council of ' the City of Redding on the 2nd day of September , 1980 , and. was duly adopted' at said meeting by the following vote: AES: COUNCILMEN: Demsher, Fulton, Gard, Kirkpatrick, and Pugh. ' NOES.: COUNCILMEN: None • ABSENT c COUNCILMEN: None /�• = AT! EST: -ARC E . PUGH • ,� 4 Ma . of the City of Redding • T DRED . BRA y Clerk • FORM APPROVED: • / /. • • 74NDALL A, HAYS, it Attorney • III • , EXHIBIT "A" AMENDMENT TO THE SHASTA COUNTY SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN - AMENDED - March 1980 Pages 17, 18 & 19 • II • • • )he City �of r'cr1c1incr can maintain a variable site life berarr;'• cont r(l l Cif '. iava 1 lal'1 )1 t:y of et n'cr r:rl t-(:+r"• and of the. ap1 r-o,li•( • hejnht surcharge. A five-year life has recently boon c-ons.ider(x2 . reasonable and nominal tire. The city has no del-minds to uti li::e the preperl:y for other than its twin desires since it is a lone;-tire owner of the land. At the present Lire no ultimate use has boen proposed or. studied. It is fair to suocost, however, that derrnnd, will be foisted upon the cit:y to meet public desires. Private The Simpson Lee Paper Company owns and operates a private Class 11 Landfill Site under a permit granted by the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Board. I:xeannion of Private Facility Anderson Solid Waste, Inc. , a private owner and operator, proix)Ses to expmnd the scope of its present limited Class II-2 landfill to accept household garbage and a limited amount of certain hazardous Group 1 wastes. The hazardous wastes will only be disposed in a preselected pit upon the direction and control of the Regional Water c)u a l i t y Control Boa rd. The Anderson Solid Waste, Inc. , landfill corm) nced operations in the spring of 1977. It was originally conceived mainly as a disposal site for wood wastes, and for materials such as large tree limbs or tree stumps that are not acceptable at the nearby county transfer station. A major part of the fill is soi 1 and wood waste from lu.ri-- r mills, including Champion International, Kirri rl.y Clark, Paul Bunyan Lumber, and others. Various contractors add demolition wastes, and yard refuse is hrouaht in by individuals. Users are dlarged by the cubic yard, and receipts indicate that the current loading is 20,000 cubic yards per month. The landfill property covers about 130 acres, and the canyons propc..)sed for filling have an area of about 35 acres. The canyons have a volume car»city of roughly three million cubic yards. Present loading is 240,000 cubic yards of relatively dense waste per year. If this cerivicts to half its volume, the site would fill in about 25 years. Upon completion of the permit prcx'ess, it: is possible that Anderson Solid Waste, Inc. will accept the total combined city and county ;olid waste. Based a on the combined projected volumes the site will have a landfill life of eight years. If the County of Shasta establishes a landfill operation i r:71r•(b ate ly north of the Anderson +C)l)d Waste, Inc. landfill, a c' r'l.)eti.tive prrr:ess Illy rest)lt. The county disposal rates are controlled by the hoard of Suy.n.-vi Sors whereas the private operator tiny 1-e c ont ro)l led by economic consid- erations. ']'hr' fin.-al a-(-•r;u )t- my lx- vi.lb),:.' ),-,nafiI ) operations with total combined la `(' of 30 to 40 years. It vel l t 1r:1),v.•,ve the ':onnt y t c) pro\.“..e '.Ort• means O" ( ('tit r(, ), c'ont rac t-m..1 l ly or ot l,er- a•:is; , to insure the existence of the t))tinote landfill disposal to nurini) _thenermit_orye ss for _the County r),tv hr,ve need us;c t.ia.is ;pc•iv:atr fr,c�l it;'; l,yr. .:i } 1 _,1 usens seon is the t:,-:st centrll_ _•;it.e 1 --):m:•s <,1;: ,t ic,i,r, l The County reit ic;,-at-o impact: upon the city by mainten:,tic,: (,t ,-,uth Street a:u or County' L: l.i tlts�r control Int u,.r Y.,r,). • • • • I•r, 11 • ir:Iv1 Itecrinna1 land i ) ] Site The sitinet of a long-term regional sanitary landfill has been a 1:ri.rnry eoaa l in Shasta County Solid Waste Manaaerent Plan. As rentioned in the intrcxluction to solid waste rrnnagerent discussion • on paoe 4, studies have 1-x-en perform(' to select candidate sites. c:c•nrra l ly, the S t:es are dropped due to subjective disputes or daLori a I condi t ii-ms. 'lt.> obtain a riore corprehensive_ study with an objective vi,:-.,/ a site selection study by an independent consultant was recently !x'rforred. This study looked at. 31 sites wi.th various r.uu: jen criteria. The u1t.irrnte ranking categorized the sites into t Ilre.e groups. The highest group, Group A, was considered as possible rut ore disi.osal facilities and are presented herein. The corplete • ::i t,' selection study is attached as AT)} cndix A. . - 1-'111 r,,,• 1'aci lit_ics west Central Site: The West Central site is situated 12 miles west of State Highway 273 and south of Central Redding. It lies within Sections 2 and 3, T. 30 N. , P. 6 W. , M.D.13. 6 M. Si t-e access wi 1 l be from Gas Point Road to the south, Clear Creek Road from the east, Placer Road from the northeast and Platina Road from the'west. The primary access route will be Clear Creek Road from whi.c_'h wi 1 1 be constructed an access road to the landfill sito. • Section 3 contains two rain east-west trendina canyons which are unnamed tributaries to Dry Creek. The southern canyon is proposed to he uti lized as the landfill site. The canyon has a storage . volurn' Of 17 million cubic yards with a storage area of )65 acres. TiIi s translates to about 40 years of landfill life. roc,i,_ rs,,n _Si_tes: 'I he Anderson location is sore 4 mi les southwest : : . ' .____ ____ ______ . i outhw st- r i„• Ci ty of Anderson and south of Central Reddi net. It lies • • hi n ::eel ions 2' and 30 of T. 30 N. , R. 4 W. , M.D.B. & t?. 'The d open i,IIrni no ,lull, was located in Section 30. ::i IP ,acc_c ss wi. l ) lx from West Anderson Drive I • , the northeast and I:.cr: 1bi nt Road from the south. The site .i.� ocatod north of (%1I'Lrido. Pri.ve, a dead-end county road The prirut}• access raid wi 1 i Ir• c)lilhda Road and West: hndn mac. h )rjye from State highway 273. "1 The An;!,'uron location prov.id,11 •• ) s:i t:Cs: is i. A:idcr _on Site - ' uthern portion of Section 30. This portion f-_ contains an . sting solid waste transfer station and regional 1 :.c•ptacw Itis. With the acquisition of 240 acres plusexist- .% i net ( nt:y o. ger ship, the total storage ‘olure ,,.ie Ids 6 rd. l l i on 't c' e yards •in a`storage area of nil acres. This e.nia is abut ,A 20 years of ).andf i l ) li fe. ,:g-• l A `:' A= • • �I • • • • ,• I I 2. Anderson Addi t:i.ona ) Site - Sec-tion 72. With the aecluisiti.r of this 555 acre property, the cort,i ncd total landfill . .e would be in r:Xcess of 40 years. ' I Poth of these locations contain rajor easterly-wester trending c•:rnvon.; which have Anna r ed intermittent t ri.hutari cr -o Anderson (•rr•(}'. Crock Site: The Oat Creek Site is loc-. c'd about 2 rules north +� of the corvuni.l:v of Psi l lvi ] Jc anc-1 apprnY .rnIe)y ]0 miles east of c..•nt ral l Redding. It lies within See‹,c is 26 and 27 of T. 32 N. , R. • i t r access wi l l he gained by Oestia,ct.ion of a one-half mile •((•(•, road off of 0a.J.: Pun oad. Primary reds serving the Oak Run • t'().>rl access are leschutc Road and State. Highway 44. (lit. Cr( el•- Canyon i a large east-west trending canyon and it is pi-closed that or the upper reaches in Sections 26 and 27 be included in t • proposed landfill site. Crit Creek is an intermittent tributary - Co..; Crede which joins the Sacrarento River near Anderson. t -.a) canyon has a storage vo lurre of 14 ri l lion cubic_ yards wi a storage area of 100 acres. This capacity is nearly 40 years • landit J 1 life. Protected Vo]urre of Solid Waste Me landfill life of each site under consideration was determined • on the basis of the corhined city and county volures. The current • c•orh.i ned voiure is 430 tons daily. Projected v,•olure for the year 2020 is f'30 tons daily. The projected tyre and source of solid w.n;Ie is expected to retain the sarc corlto>sition as the present • r( iden t.ial, cor ,Iercia1, etc. , typr-_s. • I:ut „r('_ I';,:;t Shasta County Facilities 'Il((' County of Shasta proposes to alter the current operation of the I ivee eastern Shasta Count-v transfer staLions. These stations are ;1t Purney, Fa l J I?fiver Mills, f?iq h'+e.nd, Hat Creek and Old Station. •t',c• (»ntrat for. the Fastern Shasta County solid waste facilities • • wi 11 he offered in the forr of four Alternate l'rc osa Is. The ('(,:,t 1-.A(AUs shall agree to receive at each receiving site proposed I, I l,c• hid a ) l rcfuSe brouc>tit to that site. 'ltie runner of final •l i:a .,,,a l shall he deter-ii ned l;y the bidder !>c;t: shall lr described bid submitted. In considering the award, • the County wi11 itself that: the rcthed of final di•;ir,s,:I ) i.:, feasible. of the alternatives follows: A It c•rnat_e I - Prire Site only • ). Pursuant- t:o this proposal, Contractor wi 1 ) cf-r•rat:e only one pr i.no sit:e. l')