HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - City Council - 1979-10-15 311
City Council, Regular Meeting
Police Dept. & Council Chambers
Redding, California
October 15, 1979 7 : 00 P .M.
The Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag was led by Planning and
Community Development Director Perry.
The invocation was offered by the Reverend Roger Chamberlain,
Pastor of the Enterprise Community Church of God.
The meeting was called to order at 7 : 00 P.M. by Vice Mayor Fulton
with the following Council Members present: Fulton, Gard, Pugh,
and Kirkpatrick. Absent: Demsher
Mayor Demsher entered the meeting at 7 : 30 P.M. as hereinafter
noted.
Also present were City Manager Brickwood, Assistant City Manager
Courtney, City Attorney Murphy, Public Works Director Arness ,
Planning and Community Development Director Perry, Electric
Director Simpson, Director of Personnel and Labor Relations
Reynolds, Housing and Redevelopment Administrator Henson, Traffic
Engineer Hamilton, Senior Assistant Planner King, City Clerk
Brayton, and Deputy City Clerk Richter.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
MOTION: Made by Councilwoman Gard, seconded by Councilman
Kirkpatrick approving the minutes of the regular meeting of
October 1, 1979 and the adjourned regular meeting of October 9 ,
1979, as mailed to each Council Member. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes
WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
Downtown Mall Association
In a communication to Council dated September 24, 1979 ,
the Downtown Mall Association requested reversion of the
Improvement Area Tax Assessment to the amount levied in
1978. (�
The City Clerk noted that this requires a public hearing ,1�,,j`J
and submitted a resolution for Council consideration. ~
Resolution
MOTION: Made by Councilwoman Gard, seconded by Councilman
Kirkpatrick that Resolution No. 79-197 be adopted, a
resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding in
the matter of a decrease in rate in the Parking and Business
Improvement Area established pursuant to the provisions of
the Parking and Business Area Improvement Law of 1965 and
the provisions of Chapter 6. 18 of the Redding Municipal Code.
Voting was as follows:
Ayes: Council Members - Gard, Kirkpatrick, Pugh, and
Fulton
Noes: Council Members - None
Absent: Council Members - Demsher
Resolution No. 79-197 is on file in the office of the City
Clerk.
The Public Hearing was set for 7 : 30 P.M. , November 5 , 1979.
312
Veterans Day Parade
In a communication to Council, Mrs. Joy L. McCray, Parade
Chairman, requests permission to hold the Veterans Day
Parade on Park Marina Drive, from Cypress Square to the
Civic Auditorium, at 10 a.m. , November 10, 1979.
The Police Department has given its approval for this
event.
o-
MOTION: Made by Councilwoman Gard, seconded by Councilman
Kirkpatrick approving the aforestated request. The Vote :
Unanimous Ayes
Shasta County Committee on Moral Concerns
In a communication to Council dated October 8 , 1979 , Jo B.
Keeley, Chairman of the Shasta County Committee on Moral
Concerns, requested time before Council to make a presen-
tation on the purpose of the group and to present petitions
requesting regulations for X-rated and unrated movies .
Mrs. Keeley appeared before Council and stated that the
Shasta County Committee on Moral Concerns (SCCMC) is an
on-going organization of concerned citizens whose purpose
is to promote high moral standards for our community. She
said its current project is to work with the City Council ,
the City Attorney and the Board of Supervisors to establish
ordinances regulating adult movie entertainment in our area.
Mrs. Keeley submitted petitions containing 1590 signatures
of concerned citizens in Redding, and has petitions bearing
623 signatures of Anderson residents and 1394 signatures
from persons in Shasta County. An outline was also submitted
of a presentation given at the Holiday Inn in August pertinent
to the Committee and its thrust.
Council also received 17 letters from individual persons
supporting the position of the SCCMC.
Said petitions, letters, and outline are on file in the office
City Clerk.
Councilwoman Gard noted that the City Attorney and Planning
staff have indicated that a zoning ordinance, such as
Mrs. Keeley is recommending, would be an enforceable method
of regulating this type of activity.
City Attorney Murphy said it is not clear whether the Santa
Ana ordinance, which prohibits this type of activity, is
constitutional or not. He advised that zoning control for
selected areas will stand up when tested on State and Federal
Constitutional grounds. He noted that there are many test
cases pertaining to saloons and the use of alcohol, but that
movies are lawful and presently there aren' t many test cases
available to help Redding in its decision. He said that
control by zoning selected areas for this activity appears
to be the best method of control presently available. Mr.
Murphy said that possible locations will be submitted to
the Planning Commission for review and, when a decision is
reached, an ordinance will be drafted.
Councilman Pugh asked if there has been a clear determination
as to the definition of the subject matter noting that he
thought it was presently being contested.
313
City Attorney Murphy said this is an area he is not certain
of. He said the Supreme Court of the United States has used
a definition but it is very difficult to apply. He noted that
it depends on the standards set by the particular community. ,
Mary Tipton, 5161 East Bonnyview Road, said she was in favor
of the proposal of the SCCMC. She deplores the pornography
in the movies and on TV and feels this is one of the things
hurting our Nation today. She said we are getting away from
moral education and teaching the 10 Commandments in the homes ,
schools and government and, when this happens, the moral atti-
tude of the Nation deteriorates.
Vice Mayor Fulton referred this matter to the City Attorney
and staff.
WESTERN OAKS ESTATES SUBDIVISION, ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1979-4
Public Works Director Arness said that the prepared resolution
expresses a preliminary intent to form an assessment district for
Western Oaks Estates Subdivision. He said that the developer is
developing a 37-lot residential subdivision and upon construction
and installation of all improvements, desires that the City initi-
ate and take reasonable steps toward consummation of special
assessment proceedings and issuance and sale of improvement bonds
to acquire all improvements such as streets, storm drains, curbs
and gutters, sanitary sewer lines, etc. in this subdivision.
The proceedings will be conducted pursuant to the Municipal
Improvement Act of 1913 with bonds to be issued under the pro-
visions
of the Improvement Act of 1911. s i
Councilman Pugh asked if this request meets all of the criteria
established by Council for this type of financing of subdivision
improvements.
Planning Director Perry said that in order to qualify, the subdi-
vision must have less than 50 lots. He noted that the 37 lots are
a portion of a larger developmentconsistingof 88 lots.
Councilman Pugh questioned the development of large parcels and
circumventing the 50 lot minimum by applying for special assessment
proceedings in a piece meal fashion.
City Attorney Murphy replied that this is: a policy matter for Council.
He noted that if Council intends to limit development to 50 parcels
or less in order to benefit the small developer, as distinguished
from large developers, then Council will be faced with larger units
broken into smaller units and brought in separately. He said Council
must decide its attitude in this regard.
Mr. Perry apprised Council that the initial proposal was for 37 lots
because it was felt the area could not absorb any more; also, the
Redding Water. Quality Control Board withheld approval for additional
lots.
Mr. Murphy said that Council will have to recognize, in light of
the present interest market., that -the use of this device is growth
stimulating. If Council wishes to stimulate growth, a liberal
policy toward this type of financing of subdivision improvements
may be taken. If Council rejects this type of financing, it will
force developers back to the formal lines of credit.
Councilwoman Gard said that Council had discussed the possibility
that this type of financing would encourage development.
1
314
Councilman Kirkpatrick suggested that this matter be considered by
` the Growth Committee.
Mr. Arness said that the growth impact issue had been discussed
briefly at staff level.
Mr. Murphy noted that Council may wish to reserve its decision
until the issue is looked at more closely so that a precedent
is not set for future development of any large parcels.
Councilman Pugh said he feels the policy should be studied before
a decision is made on the present proposal. He noted that Council
was somewhat dubious about this method of financing during previous
discussions.
MOTION: Made by Councilman Pugh, seconded by Councilwoman Gard
referring this matter to the Growth Committee for study and con-
tinuing consideration of Western Oaks Estates Subdivision Assess-
ment District No. 1979-4 to the November 5, 1979 Council meeting.
The Vote: Unanimous Ayes
CASTLE COURT STREET ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
Public Works Director Arness reviewed his memo to Council dated
0 October 10, 1979. He stated that a formal petition requesting
( (� the formation of Castle Court Street Assessment District, showing
signatures amounting to 67. 7 percent of the land area, is on file
in the office of the City Clerk. It is requested that the Public
Works Department be authorized to hire special bond counsel in order
to begin the proceedings for this district.
MOTION: Made by Councilman Pugh, seconded by Councilman Kirkpatrick
approving the aforestated request to hire special • bond counsel.
The Vote: Unanimous Ayes
At this point, Mayor Demsher entered the meeting.
PUBLIC HEARING - Request for Limousine Service (Elegant Journey, Inc. )
The hour of 7 : 30 P.M. having arrived, Mayor Demsher opened
the Public Hearing on the request of Elegant Journey, Inc.
to establish a limousine service in Redding.
The following documents are on file in the office of the City
Clerk:
Affidavit of Publication - Notice of Public Hearing
1�� City Clerk' s memo dated October •10, 1979.
The City Clerk advised Council that no written protests have
) been received.
Mrs. Brayton' apprised Council that the Public Hearing has
been called to allow Council to determine whether public
convenience and necessity require that a limousine permit
be granted to Elegant Journey, Inc. The following documents
were submitted to Council and are on file in the office
of the City Clerk:
Letter request of Arthur and Joyce Root
Report of Police Chief Whitmer regarding said request
Statement re liability insurance coverage
Financial Statement
315
After close of the Public Hearing, a determination should
be made whether to approve or deny the request.
Charles James, applicant who was issued a limousine permit
on September 17, 1979, raised the question of the necessity of
two limousine services in Redding. He said it is too early
to know what the demand for this service is, but noted that
there is only one taxi service in Redding. He said he would
enjoy the competition if Council approved a second permit.
Mr. James pointed out that he is complying with the require-
ments of the Municipal Code which stipulate: that he cannot
solicit by means of advertising or stands on the streets or
at the airport, but must rely on telephone requests only.
City Attorney Murphy apprised Council that Mr. James is the
successor to the limousine permit held by his predecessor,
Mr. Withers. He said that when Council adopted the ordinance
regulating limousine service, it was made clear that such a
service would not be like a mini-bus service from the airport
to a designated point within the City, but rather a luxury-type
service for weddings and special events. The limousine
operator does not have the right to do business at the airport.
Arthur Root, Elegant Journey, Inc. , stated that when they
had first contemplated this service for Redding, there was no
other service available. He gave the following statistics
on services in other cities:
Limousine
City Population Services Breakdown
Sacramento 264, 000 8 1 per 33 , 000
San Francisco 659, 000 72 1 per 9 ,150
Portland 363, 000 2 1 per 181, 500
San Jose 535, 000 11 1 per 48 , 650
Los Angeles 2, 700, 000 77 1 per 35, 000
Mr. Root said that it appears from looking at these numbers
that Redding' s population of 43, 500 can support two good
competitive limousine services. He pointed out that he
would not be equipped to serve the County.
Mr. Murphy noted that he could not service the County in
competition with the Inter-Mountain Bus Service.
Mr. James said that a PUC permit would have to be obtained
to do service within the County.
MOTION: Made by Councilman Fulton, seconded by Councilman
Pugh that the Public Hearing be closed. The Vote: Unanimous
Ayes
Councilman Fulton said he has not been convinced that there
is need for two services in the Redding area.
111 Councilman Kirkpatrick stated that the statistics presented
appeared to justify the operation of two services and noted
that apparently the former service wasn't operating at its
fullest capability. Mr. Kirkpatrick does not believe it is
valid to delay approval of a permit for the Elegant Journey
until Mr. James determines the extent to which this service
will be used.
Mayor Demsher said he isn' t certain there is a need for a
second service but feels Council is faced with the same
316
decisions here it has with the Ambulance Service. If
Council issues a permit to a limousine operator, it becomes
somewhat responsible to protect the survival of the operator.
He said he would prefer to see some tangible evidence that
there is need for a second service. He also felt the
characteristics of individual communities must be considered.
Councilman Kirkpatrick said that Mayor Demsher ' s comments
are valid; however, he feels Council should not be put into
the position of protecting one operator from competition;
adding that he does not favor approving limitless permits .
Councilwoman Gard noted that Elegant Journey has purchased
its limousine for Redding.
Council was advised that when the limousine was purchased,
the applicant was not aware of the need for Council approval.
MOTION: Made by Councilman Kirkpatrick, seconded by Council-
man Pugh approving the request of Elegant Journey, Inc. for
a limousine permit.
Voting was as follows:
Ayes: Council Members - Gard, Kirkpatrick, Pugh, and
Demsher
Noes: Council Members - Fulton
Absent: Council Members - None
PUBLIC HEARING - Bechelli Lane Assessment District
The hour of 7: 30 P.M. having arrived, Mayor Demsher opened
the Public Hearing re the Bechelli Lane/Church of the
Nazarene Assessment District.
The following documents are on file in the office of the
City Clerk:
Affidavit of Mailing and Posting - Notice of Public
Hearing
The City Clerk advised Council that no written protests
have been received, and the Mayor ascertained that there
were no protests from the floor.
f �
Public Works Director Arness advised Council that the
Bechelli Lane Assessment District is being proposed under
Chapter 27 of the 1911 Improvement Act. It is the staff
recommendation that Council adopt the prepared resolution
ordering the construction of curb, gutter and sidewalk
improvements on a certain portion of Bechelli Lane.
It was noted that the property owner involved in the
proposed improvements (Church of the Nazarene) has signed
a Consent to Waiver wherein they waive the right to construct
these improvements by private forces, and agree that the
City of Redding may proceed to construct said improvements
without the 60 day waiting period provided by Section 5879
of the Streets and Highways Code.
MOTION: Made by Councilman Pugh, seconded by Councilwoman
Gard that the Public Hearing be closed. The Vote: Unani-
mous Ayes
MOTION: Made by Councilman Pugh, seconded by Councilwoman
Gard that Resolution No. 79-198 be adopted, a resolution
of the City Council of the City of Redding ordering the
� . r.
317
construction of certain improvements on the east side of
Bechelli Lane, from Red Cliff Drive 630 feet north, in the
City of Redding, pursuant to Chapter 27 of the Improvement
Act of 1911.
Voting was as follows:
Ayes: Council Members - Fulton, Gard, Kirkpatrick, Pugh,
and Demsher
Noes: Council Members - None
Absent: Council Members - None
Resolution No. 79-198 . is on file in the office of the City
Clerk.
PUBLIC HEARING - Abandonment Application No. A-4-79, by Evans
Products, Inc.
The hour of 7: 30 P.M. having arrived, Mayor Demsher opened
the Public Hearing re Abandonment Application No. A-4-79
by Evans Products, Inc.
The following documents are on file in the office of the
City Clerk:
Affidavit of Publication - Notice of Public Hearing
Affidavit of Posting - Resolution. No. 79-174
Affidavit of Mailing - Resolution. No. 79-174
The City Clerk advised Council that no written protests
have been received, and the Mayor ascertained that there
were no protests from the floor.
Planning and Community Development Director Perry reviewed
his memo to Council dated October 11, 1979. He stated that
at its regular meeting of September 11, 1979, the Planning
Commission unanimously recommended abandonment of 33 feet
of right of way adjacent to 1045 Twin View Boulevard. The
area was shown on the Vu Graph. Mr. Perry said the land
lies within the right of way for the former State highway.
The existing right of way is 150 feet in width, which far
exceeds local street requirements. As proposed, 33 feet
would be abandoned and as other abandonments occur in the
area, the street would ultimately be reduced in width to
84 feet. Mr. Perry said that, if abandoned, the right of
way would revert to the adjoining property owner.
It is the recommendation of the Planning Commission and staff
that Council abandon the right of way subject to retention
of a utility easemenet. If Council concurs, a resolution
has been prepared for adoption.
MOTION: Made by Councilman Fulton, seconded by Councilwoman
Gard that the Public Hearing be closed. The Vote: Unanimous
Ayes
MOTION: Made by Councilman Pugh, seconded by Councilman
Kirkpatrick that Resolution No. 79-199 be adopted, a
resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding
ordering the vacation and abandonment of a portion of Twin
View Boulevard north of Midway Drive. (A-4-79)
Voting was as follows:
Ayes: Council Members - Fulton, Gard, Kirkpatrick, Pugh
and Demsher
Noes: Council Members - None
Absent: Council Members - None
Resolution No. 79-199 is on file in the office of the
City Clerk.
318
PUBLIC HEARING - Rezoning Application RZ-8-79 , by Jaxon Baker
The hour of 7: 30 P.M. having arrived, Mayor Demsher opened
the Public Hearing re Rezoning Application RZ-8-79 by
Jaxon Baker.
The following documents are on file in the office of the
City Clerk:
Affidavit of Publication - Notice of Public Hearing
AffidavitofMailing - Notice of Public Hearing
Planning Commission Recommendation dated 10/11/79
The City Clerk advised Council that no written protests
have been received, and the Mayor ascertained that there
were no protests from the floor.
\ Planning and Community Development Director Perry reviewed
his memo to Council dated October. 11, 1979. He stated that
at its regular meeting of September 11, 1979 , the Planning
Commission unanimously recommended rezoning property located
at the east end of Lancers Lane from "U" Unclassified District
to "R3-20-F" Multiple Family Residential District. The area
was shown on the Vu Graph. Mr. Perry noted that the property
was approved for a 16-lot multiple-family subdivision by the
Commission in 1977.
It is the recommendation of the Planning Commission and staff
that the property be rezoned "R3-20-F" , with the site plan
to stipulate that fifteen percent of the gross site area is
to be landscaped at the time of development of each parcel.
If Council concurs, it is recommended the negative declaration
be ratified and the prepared ordinance offered for first
reading.
MOTION: Made by Councilman Kirkpatrick, seconded by Council-
woman Gard that the Public Hearing be closed. The Vote:
Unanimous Ayes
MOTION: Made by Councilman Pugh, seconded by Councilman
Kirkpatrick that Council makes the following findings
regarding Rezoning Application RZ-8-79 , by Jaxon Baker:
1. Project is compatible with the Redding General Plan;
2 . Project will not significantly alter existing land form;
3. Project is compatible with surrounding land use;
4. Project is compatible with the Code of the City of Redding,
California, . .
and, ratifies the Negative Declaration approved by the Board
of Administrative Review on July 25, 1979. The Vote: Unani-
mous Ayes
MOTION: Made by Councilman Pugh, seconded by Councilman
Kirkpatrick approving the recommendation of the Planning
Commission and staff. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes
Councilman Fulton offered Ordinance No.. 146.6 for first reading,
an ordinance of the City Council of the City of. Redding
amending Section 18. 06. 020 of the Redding Municipal Code
relating to the rezoning of certain real property in the
City of Redding. (RZ-8-79)
319
PUBLIC HEARING - Annexation No. 79-10 (Arizona Street)
{
The hour of 7: 30 P.M. having arrived, Mayor Demsher opened
the Public Hearing re Annexation No. 79-10, Arizona Street.
The following documents are on file in the office of the
City Clerk:
Affidavit of Posting - Notice of Public Hearing
Affidavit of Mailing - Resolution No. 79-162
The City Clerk advised Council that no written protests have
been received, and the Mayor ascertained that there were no
protests from the floor.
Planning and Community Development Director Perry reviewed
his memo to Council dated October 11, 1979. He stated that
at its regular meeting of August 8, 1979, the Local Agency
Formation Commission approved annexing to the City of Redding
7. 6 acres located on Arizona Street. The area was shown on
the Vu Graph. Mr. Perry said the protest hearing is being
held this evening since all the property owners did not sign
the petition. To date, no protests have been received.
It is the staff recommendation that Council adopt the
prepared resolutions.
MOTION: Made by Councilman Fulton, seconded by Councilman
Pugh that the Public Hearing be closed. The Vote: Unanimous
Ayes
MOTION: Made by Councilwoman Gard, seconded by Councilman
Pugh that Resolution No. 79-200 be adopted, a resolution
of the City Council of the City of Redding determining that
protests have not been made by the owners of one-half of
the value of the territory within Enterprise Annex No. 79-10 .
Voting was as follows:
Ayes: Council Members - Fulton, Gard, Kirkpatrick, Pugh,
and Demsher
Noes: Council Members - None
Absent: Council Members - None
Resolution No. 79-200 is on file in the office of the City
Clerk.
MOTION: Made by Councilwoman Gard, seconded by Councilman
Pugh that Resolution No. 79-201 be adopted, a resolution
of the City Council of the City of Redding ordering the
annexation of certain inhabited territory designated
Enterprise Annex No. 79-10 to the City of Redding.
Voting was as follows:
Ayes: Council Members - Fulton, Gard, Kirkpatrick, Pugh,
and Demsher
Noes: Council Members - None
Absent: Council Members - None
Resolution No. 79-201 is on file in the office of the City
Clerk.
PUBLIC HEARING - General Plan Amendment No. GPA-3-79 (Upper
Churn Creek)
The hour of 7 : 30 P.M. having arrived, Mayor Demsher opened �
the Public Hearing re General Plan Amendment No. GPA-3-79. - 5s
320
The following documents are on file in the office of the
City Clerk:
Affidavit of Publication - Notice of Public Hearing
Affidavit of Mailing - Notice of Public Hearing
Planning Commission Recommendation dated 10/11/79
The City Clerk advised Council that a communication had
been received from Attorney Robert Rehberg, representing
Mr. & Mrs. Paul Gibson, which is referred to in staff ' s
memo to Council dated October 11, 1979. In addition, Mr.
Rehberg submitted a letter to Council this date on behalf
of Mr. Norman Levenson who owns property in the vicinity
of the Oasis Road-Twinview Boulevard intersection.
Planning Director Perry reviewed his memo to Council dated
October 11, 1979 concerning the area included in the General
Plan Amendment, which memo is hereby made a part of these
minutes by reference. Maps and a Vu Graph illustrating the
topography and the proposed densities were shown to Council.
Mr. Perry noted that the existing General Plan would allow
approximately 4 , 000 people in the area. The area is classi-
fied primarily as "Residential Reserve, " one unit per five
acres. The Planning Commission has recommended a more
urban plan which would permit 8, 000 people , based on interest
in development of the area, the densities allowed under the
Shasta County General Plan, the proximity of the area to
Interstate 5 and Highway 299, and the development the County
is permitting to the east of this area. Mr. Perry reviewed
the various classifications included in this General Plan
Amendment.
Mr. Perry pointed out a controversial area in the Plan,
which is the area on the north side of Mountain View Drive.
He noted that the present General Plan classifies the area
as 3. 5 units per acre, although the existing zoning is
"R3-40-F" Multiple Family Residential District. It is the
opinion of the Commission that the multiple family zoning
adopted in 1973 was inappropriate due to existing single
family residences to the south and east and to the narrow
streets in the area.
With respect to Mr. Rehberg' s letter pertaining to the
Gibson property, it is the opinion of staff that the
proposed 2 unit/acre classification is more appropriate,
because of lack of urban services, topography, and lack
of frontage on Collyer Drive.
Mr. Perry commented on the letter from Mr. Rehberg pertain-
ing to the Levenson property in which it is requested that
the commercial classification at the intersection of Twin-
view Boulevard and Oasis Road be expanded to the north and
east by about 60 acres. At the present time, approximately
20 acres of Mr. Levenson' s property is in an area classified
commercial. Mr. Levenson is considering developing his
property as a commercial center and feels that about 80 acres
would be required for this purpose. Mr. Perry added that this
area was included in the final E. I .R. in the alternative
section.
Councilman Pugh asked if both of the letters from Mr.
Rehberg were presented to the Planning Commission.
321
Mr. Perry responded in the affirmative, noting that to the
best of his knowledge, nothing new has been introduced in
the letters.
Robert Rehberg, Attorney, representing Mr. & Mrs. Paul
Gibson who own a 12-acre parcel generally located north
of Collyer Drive and east of Hawley Road, said that at the
time the Gibsons purchased this parcel, multiple-family
dwelling units were permitted under County zoning which
seemed reasonable because it would provide a buffer for
single-family dwellings to the north and also provide
housing for Shasta College students. He pointed out that
in considering the General Plan for this area, the Planning
Commission limited the area of multiple housing to a very
small area and the Gibson parcel was left predominantly
in the greenway with some irregular corners permitting 2
dwelling units per acre. He stated that this parcel is
within the Regional Waste Disposal area and can be served
by the regional facility to be operated by the City thereby
making its location advantageous for multiple family dwellings
for use by college students. He requested that the area desig-
nated for 9 dwelling units per acre be expanded to include
the Gibson property.
Mr. Rehberg said he also represents Norman Levenson and
would like to make further comments in addition to those •
made by Mr. Perry. The property is located near the inter-
section of Twinview Boulevard and Oasis Road and it is Mr.
Levenson' s proposal to expand the commercial area by approxi-
mately 60 acres in addition to the 20 acres he now has in
commercial. Mr. Rehberg stressed that the importance of
this commercial area is not limited to this specific area,
but it appears to be a City-oriented commercial area. He
feels that rather than look five-six years into the future
for this classification, it would be advantageous to have
it classified now as it will affect development proposals
in the surrounding area controlled by the City and County.
He pointed out that Mr. Levenson has owned this undeveloped
parcel for 20 years and during this time, it has been his
plan to develop it commercially. Mr. Rehberg requested that
if Council does not wish to select the alternative #2 for
a commercial designation as set forth in the EIR, it is
requested that the matter be referred to staff for further
study.
City Attorney Murphy noted that, geographically speaking,
the area requested for commercial designation will be
two and one-half times the size of the Mt. Shasta Mall.
Mike Wells, Attorney, representing D.W. Mullard, Anthony
Titoni, and Everett Hayen, property owners on the north side
of Mountain View Drive, said his clients are opposed to
the down-zoning of their properties from "R3-40-F" Multiple
Family to "R-l" Single Family. The parcels involved were
shown on the Vu Graph. Mr. Wells discussed each as follows :
Mr. Hayen purchased his property from Mr. Tefft in
July of this year and, in addition to completing a
single family residence which was in the process
of being constructed, he has plans to develop three
duplexes which are permitted under the "R3-40-F"
zoning district.
322
A
Mr. Wells said that Mr. Titoni purchased his property
in 1967 and has been the sole owner through the
zoning changes that occurred in 1973 . He noted the
staff report of September 7, 1979 , which states that
the zoning was changed in 1973 to allow multiple
family development because the shape of the parcels
made it difficult, if not impossible, to subdivide the
properties for single family development and it was
felt that the "R3-40" zoning was a reasonable compro-
mise and would provide a buffer between the commercial
and multiple family districts. He said that Mr. Titoni
presently has his proposal before the City for develop-
ment of multiple family units.
Mr. Mullard has owned his parcel for a considerable
number of years and has installed a sewer line which
would serve multiple family construction.
In summary, Mr. Wells said that his clients have spent time
and money on their properties on the basis of the 1973
"R3-40-F" zoning. He said that vested rights could be
discussed but feels it is just fair play for the City to
permit these property owners , who have made plans based on
existing zoning, to proceed with such development.
The following persons appeared in protest of the multiple
family zoning:
Bob Barber, 5723 Mountain View Drive
Lorraine Allen, 5916 Sierra Vista Drive
Luther Day, 941 Palo Vista Court
Robert Thompson, 950 Palo Vista Court
Festus Green, Palo Vista Court
Mrs. M. Hergoth, 5737 Mountain Vista Court
Robert Hill
The basic concerns expressed were: multiple family develop-
ment is inconsistent with the single family neighborhood,
the narrow lots will not lend themselves to multiple family
development, additional traffic, and the safety and well
being of the children.
Jack Tefft, 5678 Mountain View Drive, said that subdivisions
should have parks so that the children have a place to play,
and indicated that in this neighborhood, the land east of
the hammerhead street should be developed into a park. He
said that the multiple-family zoning should be limited to
construction of one bedroom apartments, which would house
either young couples with no children or one small child,
or retired persons .
City Attorney Murphy said that in 1970 , the General Plan
was adopted which allowed 3. 5 dwelling units per acre and
in 1973, the "R3-40-F" zoning designation was placed on the
property. At that time, zoning, as a matter of law, did
not have to be compatible with the General Plan; however,
during that same year, the State Legislature passed a law
requiring zoning to be compatible with the General Plan.
The City of Redding is required by law to make the General
Plan and zoning compatible and noted that the General Plan
ultimately controls the zoning.
Mr. Murphy commented on the vested right principle saying
that if an owner has made an investment in the actual con-
struction of improvements upon a parcel of property in
323
reliance upon an existing set of facts , that the passage
of an ordinance changing that condition is unlawful. He
said that in this case, there was an incompatible zoning
that needed to be resolved prior to construction of utili-
ties, etc. , and it is not a question of whether a lawful
non-conforming use exists on the property because the zoning
was incompatible with the General Plan before these improve-
ments were made. He said the law required that incompatibility
to be resolved. The Planning Commission is recommending a
denIsity per acre that is no less than what the existing
General Plan provided for in 1970 and 1973 . He pointed out
that if the "R3-40-F" designation is not modified by a
specific limitation, it would allow 1 unit per every 4000
square ft. and that is three and one-half times the density
permitted by the General Plan.
H.T. Barnard, 725 Parkview Avenue, said he owns property
in the Twinview area and noted that when the City took over
the Twinview Sewer District, the zoning of the area was not
to be changed. He said such changes affect life-time invest-
ments and feels that some times no plan is a good plan.
Evelyn Titoni, 5735 Cascade Drive, said that the streets
in this area dead end so that traffic should not be that
much of a problem.
Don, Mullard, Mountain View Drive, said he requested the
zoning change to R-3 on his three-acre parcel in 1973
noting that he has one residence and desires to build
three duplexes. He noted that, at that time, the adjacent
lots were included in the rezoning.
MOTION: Made by Councilman Fulton, seconded by Councilman
Pugh that the Public Hearing be closed. The Vote: Unani-
mous Ayes
City Attorney Murphy said that in making a decision on
the Mountain View Drive area, approval for triplexes would
satisfy the General Plan density requirements .
Mr. Perry said that presently a 3 . 5 multiple family zoning
district doesn ' t exist; however, a "U" Unclassified district
could be used. He also noted that the "U-F" area could be
expanded and made into a no credit area. He said that a
use permit would be necessary in the "U" classification.
Councilwoman Gard said there are several ways to split
the long lots noting that flag lots could be created.
Mr. Perry responded that existing buildings on the parcels
may negate some options. He said that the present zoning
alternatives are R-1, R-2 , and RM-6 in addition to the "U"
classification.
MOTION: Made by Councilwoman Gard, seconded by Councilman
Kirkpatrick that the recommendation of the Planning Com-
mission be adopted with respect to the classification of
the area on the north side of Mountain View Drive; i.e.
3. 5 units per acre.
Voting was as follows :
Ayes : Council Members - Gard, Kirkpatrick, Pugh, and
Demsher
Noes : Council Members - Fulton
Absent: Council Members - None
4�
324
In making a decision pertaining to the request for commercial
zoning in the Oasis-Twinview area, Mr. Perry said that in
his opinion the request is premature and that a request for a
General Plan amendment could be submitted at some future date.
Councilwoman Gard commented that Planning Consultant Lyle
Stewart has stated that the City is 400% over-zoned for
commercial.
Councilman Pugh said he feels 20 acres designated for
commercial development is sufficient now and that Hawley
Road could be developed as an access road accordingly.
Mr. Perry commented that four lanes are proposed from Hwy.
299 to Oasis Road.
MOTION: Made by Councilman Pugh, seconded by Councilwoman
Gard approving the recommendation of the Planning Commission
for the area generally bounded by Interstate 5 on the west,
Oasis Road on the north, Sunridge Road on the east, and
Highway 299 on the south (GPA-3-79) , with the exception of
the portion between the Gibson property and Collyer Drive.
Voting was as follows :
Ayes : Council Members - 'ard, Kirkpatrick, Pugh, and
Demsher
Noes : Council Members - Fulton
Absent: Council Members - None
MOTION: Made by Councilman Pugh, seconded by Councilwoman
Gard referring the request for inclusion of the Gibson
property in the multiple family on the north side of Collyer
Drive to the Planning Commission for review and recommendation.
The Vote: Unanimous Ayes
MOTION: Made by Councilwoman Gard, seconded by Councilman
Kirkpatrick accepting EIR-4-79 and finding that, in accord-
ance with Section 15088 of the California Administrative
Code that changes or alterations have been required and
incorporated into the project which mitigate or avoid the
significant environmental effects thereof as identified in
the final environmental impact report. The Vote: Unanimous
Ayes
MOTION: Made by Councilman Pugh, seconded by Councilwoman
Gard instructing the City Attorney to prepare the necessary
resolution pertaining to the approved General Plan amend-
ment upon Council ' s action on the Commission recommendation
re the Gibson property. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes
PUBLIC HEARING - General Plan Amendment No. GPA-5-79 (Sulphur
Creek)
The hour of 7 : 30 P.M. having arrived, Mayor Demsher opened
the Public Hearing on General Plan Amendment No. GPA-5-79 ,
(Sulphur Creek) .
\\-\ The following documents are on file in the office of the
} City Clerk:
Affidavit of Publication - Notice of Public Hearing
Affidavit of Mailing - Notice of Public Hearing
Planning Commission Recommendation dated 10/11/79
325
The City Clerk advised Council that a communication was
received from Mrs. Evelyn Blan- in dated September 28 , 1979
requesting consideration of her parcel with this General
Plan Amendment.
Planning and Community Development Director Perry reviewed
his memo to Council dated October 11, 1979 concerning the
area included in the General Plan Amendment, which memo is
hereby made a part of these minutes by reference.
Maps and a Vu Graph illustrating the topography and the
proposed densities were shown to Council.
Mr. Perry advised Council that the request for an Amendment
to the General Plan was initially filed by Nancy Marty and
Everett Whitney, owners of separate parcels on either side
of Sulphur Creek. The Amendment was expanded by the Plan-
ning Commission to include the area along Sulphur Creek
northwest of the Southern Pacific Railroad. Mr. Perry
said that the Planning Commission unanimously recommended
amendment of the General Plan for the area generally bounded
by Quartz Hill Road on the west, Keswick Dam Road and Lake
Boulevard on the north and the Southern Pacific main line on
the east.
It was noted that the key issues identified in the EIR were
slope, flooding, fire hazard, school overcrowding, water
quality in Sulphur Creek, sewer capacity, and circulation,
as well as the proposed Quartz Hill Road Water District
west of the City.
The existing plan, which predominantly classifies the areas
as residential (3. 5 units per acre) and greenway, will allow
a population of approximately 6, 150 people. The recommended
plan will allow for a population of about 5 , 463 people by
reflecting existing development, redistributing excess units ,
and reconciling the plan more closely to topography. A
tabulation showing the various classifications and the acreage
and units involved is included in the memorandum to Council.
Mr. Perry apprised Council that Mrs. Blandin' s property was
not advertised for consideration during any of the public
hearings to date. It is recommended that Council refer her
request to staff for consideration during the overall General
Plan update.
It is the staff and Planning Commission recommendation that
Council approve the proposed amendment.
Brad Blandin, 1635 Lake Boulevard, representing Mrs . Evelyn
Blandin, apprised Council that in addition to owning the 2 . 6
acre parcel located at the southwest intersection of Lake
Boulevard and Quartz Hill Road, she has recently purchased
1. 2 acres adjacent to this parcel to the north fronting
on Quartz Hill Road. He advised that the original parcel
was zoned commercial in the County and was later down-
zoned to "Rl-B20" and "C-1-F" in the City. Although the
entire parcel was not included in this General Plan Amend-
ment,
Mr. Blandin requests that it be included for commercial
consideration.
Henry Moore, 1025 Henry Moore Lane, felt it was unreasonable
to consider this entire area in one amendment because of
326
the topography. He feels that no change should be made
prior to construction of a road from Keswick Dam Road
down Sulphur Creek to Market Street. He noted that this
should be the route the sewer would follow also.
Gerald Haughton, 1010 Ona Lane, said he has resided in this
area for years and objects to multiple development because
it isn' t compatible with the terrain and because of the fire
danger. He noted that people in the general area purchased
property with the understanding that the development would
remain single-family residential. He concurs with Mr. Moore
that the road should be developed.
Robert Rehberg, Attorney, representing Everett Whitney,
advised Council that his client doesn' t contemplate multiple
development but is requesting that the density for 3 dwelling
units per acre be extended to the tops of the ridges .
Henry Moore explained to Council that the property owners
were invited to the Buckeye School at one time to view Mr.
Whitney' s proposal which contained much more multiple family
development than has been discussed this evening. He objects
to multiple family development in the canyon below his resi-
dence and questioned if this proposal has been deleted.
Everett Whitney, applicant, responded that he had an EIR
prepared which reflected what he proposed for the area. His
( original proposal was for development of 200 units on 190
acres. He now desires 2-3 dwelling units per buildable acre.
Mr. Perry noted that the Commission and staff recommend 2
units per acre for the Whitney property.
Betty Hagberg, 3162 Quartz Hill Road, opposed 2 units per
acre on property adjacent to Quartz Hill and Keswick Dam
Roads due to the increased traffic it would create.
MOTION: Made by Councilman Pugh, seconded by. Councilwoman
Gard that the Public Hearing be closed. The Vote: Unanimous
Ayes
MOTION: Made by Councilman Pugh, seconded by Councilwoman
Gard referring the letter request from Mrs. Blandin to staff
for study. The Vote: .Unanimous Ayes
MOTION: Made by Councilman Pugh, seconded by Councilman
Kirkpatrick accepting EIR-5-79 and finding that, in accord-
ance with Section 15088 of the California Administrative
Code that changes or alterations have been required and
incorporated into the project which mitigate or avoid the
significant environmental effects thereof as identified in
the final environmental impact report. The Vote: Unanimous
Ayes
MOTION: Made by Councilman Pugh, seconded by Councilman
Fulton approving the Planning Commission recommendation
re General Plan Amendment GPA-5-79 (Sulphur Creek) , and
instructing the City Attorney to prepare the necessary
resolution. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes
APPROVAL OF PAYROLL AND ACCOUNTS PAYABLE REGISTER
MOTION: Made by Councilman Pugh, seconded by Councilman Kirkpatrick
that Accounts Payable Register No. 7, check nos. 66003 to 66185 ,
inclusive, in the amount of $659, 470. 34 be approved and paid, and
that Payroll Register No. 7, check nos. 119355 to 119872 , inclusive,
327
salaries in the amount of $337, 221. 51 for the period September 16 ,
1979 through September 29, 1979, be approved. Total $996 , 691. 85
Voting was as follows:
Ayes : Council Members - Fulton, Gard, Kirkpatrick, Pugh, and
Demsher
Noes: Council Members - None
Absent: Council Members - None
TREASURER' S REPORT
Councilman Pugh submitted the Treasurer' s Report as of August 31,
1979 which showed the Treasurer' s Accountability to be $12 , 223 , 486 . 22
CLAIMS FOR DAMAGE - 1st hearing
Kerry Michael Rutledge - Claim filed 10/1/79
MOTION: Made by Councilman Pugh, seconded by Councilman
Fulton that the Claim for Damage filed by Kerry Michael
Rutledge on October 1, 1979 be referred to the City
Attorney and the City Insurance Carrier, and that the /a3
City Clerk be instructed to place the Claim on the agenda
for the meeting of November 19, 1979. The Vote: Unanimous
Ayes
James L. & Christina Rynhart - Claim filed 10/9/79
MOTION: Made by Councilman Pugh, seconded by Councilman
Fulton that the Claim for Damage filed by James L. &
Christina Rynhart on October 9, 1979 be referred to the 3
City Insurance Committee, and that the City Clerk be
instructed to place the Claim on the agenda- for the meeting
of November 19, 1979. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes
CLAIMS FOR DAMAGE AND PERSONAL INJURY - 2nd hearing
Evelyn Harris - Claim filed 9/11/79
MOTION: Made by Councilman Pugh, seconded by Councilman
Kirkpatrick that the Claim for Damage filed by Evelyn
Harris on September 11, 1979 be denied, and that the
claimant be so advised. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes
Michael Dean Kladt - Claim filed 8/15/79
MOTION: Made by Councilman Pugh, seconded by Councilman
Fulton that the Claim for Damage filed by Michael Dean
Kladt on August 15, 1979 be denied, and that the claimant ' 3
be so advised. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes
Vagn Kristensen - Claim filed 8/21/79
MOTION: Made by Councilman Pugh, seconded by Councilman
Kirkpatrick that the Claim for Personal Injury filed by
Vagn Kristensen on August 21, 1979 be denied, and that
the claimant be so advised. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes
Addie L. O'Kelley - Claim filed 8/21/79
MOTION: Made by Councilman Fulton, seconded by Councilman
Pugh that the Claim for Personal Injury filed by Addie L. / aq
O'Kelly on August 21, 1979 be denied, and that the claimant
be so advised. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes
Dennis Halkides, Attorney, on behalf of Shelley Otto -
Claim filed 9/7/79
MOTION: Made by Councilman Pugh, seconded by Councilman
Kirkpatrick that the Claim for Personal Injury filed by
Dennis Halkides, Attorney, on behalf of Shelley Otto / 1:2_
on September 7, 1979 be denied, and that the claimant
be so advised. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes
328
SETTLEMENT OF CLAIMS
City Attorney Murphy advised Council that the Claims for Damage
filed by the following persons have been settled by the Insurance
Carrier as outlined:
Kenneth Kladt - $355. 18
California State Automobile Association on behalf of
Michael Cossolotto - $134. 35
Maxine Comer - $187. 21
ORDINANCE - re PD-1-79
MOTION: Made by Councilman Pugh, seconded by Councilman Kirkpatrick
that full reading of Ordinance No. 1463 be waived, and that the
City Attorney be instructed to scan same. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes
MOTION: Made by Councilman Pugh, seconded by Councilman. Kirkpatrick
that Ordinance No. 1463 be adopted, an ordinance of the City Council
of the City of Redding amending Section 18. 06 . 020 of the Redding
Municipal Code relating to the rezoning of certain real property
\\.)\ in the City of Redding. (PD-1-79) -
Voting was as follows :
Ayes : Council Members - Fulton, Gard, Kirkpatrick, Pugh, and
Demsher
Noes: Council Members - None
Absent: Council Members - None
Ordinance No. 1463 is on file in the office of the City Clerk.
ORDINANCE - re RZ-9-79
Councilman Pugh abstained from discussion and voting on this item
MOTION: Made by Councilman Kirkpatrick, seconded by Councilwoman
Gard that full reading of Ordinance No. 1464 be waived, and that
the City Attorney be instructed to scan same. The Vote: Unanimous
Ayes with Councilman Pugh abstaining
MOTION: Made by Councilman Kirkpatrick, seconded by Councilwoman
� Gard that Ordinance No. 1464 be adopted, an ordinance of the City
Council of the City of Redding amending Section 18 . 06. 020 of the
Redding Municipal Code relating to the rezoning of certain real
property in the City of Redding. (RZ-9-79)
Voting was as follows: -
Ayes: Council Members - Fulton,. Gard, Kirkpatrick, and Demsher
Noes: Council Members - .None
Absent: Council Members - None
Abstain: Council Members - Pugh
Ordinance No. 1464 is on file in the office of the City Clerk.
ORDINANCE - Adopting 1979 Uniform Fire Code
MOTION: Made by Councilman Pugh, seconded by Councilman Kirkpatrick
that full reading of Ordinance No. 1465 be waived, and that the
City Attorney be instructed to scan same. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes
MOTION: Made by Councilman Pugh, seconded by Councilman Kirkpatrick
that Ordinance No. 1465 be adopted, an ordinance of the City Council
of the City of Redding amending Chapter 9. of the Redding Municipal
Code by repealing Section 9. 20. 010 and substituting therefor a
new Section 9. 20. 010, pertaining to Uniform Fire Code.
Voting was as follows:
Ayes: Council Members - Fulton, Gard, Kirkpatrick, Pugh, and
Demsher
329
Noes: Council Members - None
Absent: Council Members - None
Ordinance No. 1465 is on file in the office of the City Clerk.
REVENUE SHARING COMMITTEE - Report and Recommendation
Committee Chairman Fulton reviewed the Revenue Sharing Committee
report to Council dated September 30, 1979, as it pertains to
funding, with the exception of that portion pertaining to the
Family Service Agency, which memo is hereby made a part of these
minutes by reference. At the outset, it was noted that the present
Revenue Sharing program will expire in September, 1980 , and it has
been proposed by some members of Congress that State and local
government revenue sharing allocations be reduced or eliminated in
order to reduce the Federal budget deficit.
Pertaining to the 1979-80 City of Redding Revenue Sharing allo-
cation, it was estimated that $1, 302, 300 would be available for
Revenue Sharing expenditure programs. The City of Redding Revenue
Sharing allocation for 1979-80 has been reduced from $883 , 630 to
$876 , 034, and carry-over funds from 1978-79 were reduced when the
construction contract for the Parkview storm drain was awarded
at a unit price of $158, 390. The revised estimate indicates that
$1, 184, 750 will be available for expenditure during 1979-80 .
Tabulation of the initial budget allocation and the current
recommendation of the Revenue Sharing Committee is as follows :
Revenue Sharing
.S72
Budget Committee
Allocation Recommendation
Contract Programs for
Recreation and Social
Services $ 64 , 800 $ 68 , 975
Park Land Acquisition
(Turtle Bay) 37, 500 37 , 500
Park Improvements
(Alta Mesa Park) 30, 000 30 , 000
Water System Improvements
(Water Treatment
Facilities) 900, 000 900, 000
Storm Drain Improvements 270, 000 148 ,275
$1, 302 , 300 $1,184 , 750
Council was advised that requests for revenue sharing funds for
contract programs were received in the total amount of $193 , 799 .
Historically, most social programs financed by local government
have been funded from the County tax base. The reduction in
property tax revenues imposed by Proposition 13 affects the
budgets of both the City of Redding and the County of Shasta,
and a new evaluation of priorities should be considered. Some
attention needs to be given to the relationship between local
government funding and the funding of community services through
United Way and other volunteer fund raising sources
A statement indicating the amount of funds requested and the
allocations recommended by the Committee was submitted to
Council.
330
MOTION: Made by Councilman Kirkpatrick, seconded by Councilwoman
Gard approving the recommendation of the Revenue Sharing Committee
as it pertains to all funding except for the Family Service Agency.
The Vote: Unanimous Ayes
( Discussion re Funding for Family Service Agency
Mayor Demsher abstained from discussion and voting on this portion
of the item
Committee Chairman Fulton said he is in favor of supporting the
Family Service Agency again this year, having granted them
funding for the past two years, noting that they do a very neces-
sary and valuable service for our community. He feels this service
fills a gap in the mental health care for Shasta County. He noted
that they are in need and County funding has been cut back.
Council Member Gard stated that during this consideration last
year when it was realized that the Revenue Sharing Program could
be phased out, it was agreed that the Committee would not offer
funding for new requests. The Family Service Agency had been
\C\ previously funded by contract for a particular program which they
no longer offer. They were explicitly advised that they would not
be included in any new funding. She noted that there are other
critical areas in need of assistance if it is felt that new requests
should be considered for funding. She added that "The Attic" , a
{ thrift-type store, has been a tremendous source of financial help
for the Family Service Agency. Based upon the two-year policy of
no new funding, Mrs. Gard said she did not favor any support for
the Family Service Agency.
Councilman Pugh noted that the reason the Family Service Agency
was given support last year was because of the budgetary strings
(Contract) they were under at that time, and they were advised
not to anticipate future funding. Mr. Pugh said that in light
of the upcoming election and Proposition 4 , the City cannot get
into the position where such agencies rely on it for support.
Councilman Kirkpatrick said it was his understanding that there
would not be any funding for the Family Service Agency this year.
MOTION: Made by Councilman Kirkpatrick, seconded by Councilman
Pugh that the Family Service Agency not be funded with Revenue
Sharing funds for the 1979-80 fiscal year.
Voting was as follows:
Ayes : Council Members - Gard, Kirkpatrick, and Pugh
Noes. Council Members - Fulton
Absent: Council Members None
Abstain: Council Members - Demsher
ABANDONMENT APPLICATION A-3-79 - John M. Kravitz
Planning and Community Development Director Perry reviewed his
memo to Council dated October 11, 1979. He stated that at its
regular meeting of September 25, 1979 , the Planning Commission
unanimously recommended abandonment of a portion of Ridge Road
located between Doris Street and Interstate 5. The area was
shown on the Vu Graph.
It is the staff recommendation that Council adopt the prepared
resolution setting the public hearing for 7 : 30 P.M. , November 5 ,
1979.
MOTION: Made by Councilman Pugh, seconded by Councilman Kirkpatrick
that Resolution No. 79-202 be adopted, a resolution of the City
331
Council of the City of Redding declaring its intention to vacate
and abandon a portion of Ridge Road between Doris Street and
Interstate 5.
Voting was as follows:
Ayes : Council Members - Fulton, Gard, Kirkpatrick, Pugh, and
Demsher
Noes : Council Members - None
Absent: Council Members - None
Reolution No. 79-202 is on file in the office of the City Clerk.
PETITIONS RE STREET BARRICADE ON VALENTINE LANE
Planning and Community Development Director Perry reviewed his
memo to Council dated October 11, 1979. He stated that the /C.4
barricade at Valentine Lane and Rivella Vista Drive was installed
in compliance with a condition of the Tentative Map for Rivella aS��
Vista Estates approved by the Planning Commission in August of 1977 .
At that time the Commission stipulated that "a barrier is to be
installed at the end of Valentine Lane and that the barrier shall
be removed at the time Dove Street is connected or upon the approval
of the Planning Commission. "
Mr. Perry said that since the barrier was installed at the direction
of the Commission, it is the staff recommendation that Council refer
the two petitions submitted at the October 1, 1979 Council meeting,
to the Planning Commission for report and recommendation concerning
the barricade.
MOTION: Made by Councilman Pugh, seconded by Councilman Kirkpatrick
approving the aforestated staff recommendation. The Vote: Unanimous
111 Ayes
DEFERRED PAYMENT HOUSING REHABILITATION LOANS - Application under
SB 966 Funding
Housing and Redevelopment Administrator Henson reviewed his memo
to Council dated October 5, 1979. He stated that as a result of
participation in the California Housing Finance Agency HOHL
Program, the City of Redding is now eligible to apply for another
source of housing rehabilitation financing through the California
Department of Housing and Community Development. This program
was authorized through SB 966 and initial applicants were funded
last Spring; however, some funds were reserved for other agencies
that might receive a California Housing Finance Agency tandem
designation later in the year. Redding is one of these localities.
Mr. Henson said that this program provides funds to a locality in
the form of a deferred payment loan program for the purpose of
housing rehabilitation. The State will loan the money to the City
of Redding at 3% interest and the City, in turn, will loan the
money at the same interest rate to eligible persons in the Cascade
and Linden Rehabilitation areas. As the loans are collected, the
City will repay the State. The City' s financial obligation is
limited to that amount actually recovered from each loan.
It is the staff recommendation that Council, by resolution, authorize
the City Manager to file said application requesting funds in the
amount of $100, 000 from the Deferred Payment Rehabilitation Loan
Program.
MOTION: Made by Councilman Pugh, seconded by Councilman Kirkpatrick
that Resolution No. 79-203 be adopted, a resolution of the City
Council of the City of Redding authorizing the City Manager to file
7
332
an application with the State Department of Housing and Community
Development for Deferred Payment Rehabilitation Loan Program Funds .
Voting was as follows :
Ayes: Council Members - Fulton, Gard, Kirkpatrick, Pugh, and
Demsher
Noes : Council Members - None
Absent: Council Members - None
Resolution No. 79-203 is on file in the office of the City Clerk.
{
YELLOW LOADING ZONE - Market Street, south of Placer Street
Traffic Engineer Hamilton reviewed his memo to Council dated
October 9, 1979 . He stated that in regular session on October 9 ,
1979 , the Traffic and Parking Commission considered a request of
Mr. Longstaff of Pacific Telephone and Telegrah for a loading zone
in front of their new location to facilitate the pick up and
delivery of employees. After discussion, the Commission voted
\\\ unanimously to recommend to Council that a yellow loading zone,
effective 24 hours a day, be established on the west side of
Market Street, from 60 feet to 95 feet from the south curbline
of Placer Street.
It is the staff and Commission recommendation that the prepared
resolution be adopted.
MOTION: Made by Councilman Pugh, seconded by Councilman Kirkpatrick
that Resolution No. 79-204 be adopted, a resolution of the City
Council of the City of Redding establishing a yellow loading zone
on the west side of Market Street from 60 feet to 95 feet northerly
of the south curbline of Placer Street.
Voting was as follows:
Ayes: Council Members - Fulton, Gard, Kirkpatrick, Pugh, and
Demsher
Noes: Council Members - None
Absent: Council Members - None
Resolution No. 79-204 is on file in the office of the City Clerk.
PARKING PROHIBITION - Portion of North Side of Cypress Street
Traffic Engineer Hamilton reviewed his memo to Council dated
October 9, 1979. He stated that in regular session on October 9 ,
1979, the Traffic and Parking Commission considered a request from
the Wells Fargo Bank to prohibit the remaining parking on their
frontage to improve visibility from their driveway. Staff recom-
mended that the prohibition be expanded to include the remaining
two parking spaces in front of the North Valley Bank to the corner
of Larkspur Lane. Mr. Hamilton said that although the Manager of
the North Valley Bank indicated opposition when contacted, no
representative appeared at the meeting.
The Commission concurred with staff and voted unanimously to
recommend to Council that parking be prohibited at all times on
the north side of Cypress Avenue from Larkspur Lane to 237 feet
west of the west curbline of Larkspur Lane. A resolution has been
E prepared for Council consideration.
MOTION: Made by Councilman Pugh, seconded by Councilman Kirkpatrick
that Resolution No. 79-205 be adopted, a resolution of the City
Council of the City of Redding prohibiting parking at all times
on the north side of Cypress Street west of Larkspur Lane.
Voting was as follows:
Ayes: Council Members - Fulton, Gard, Kirkpatrick, Pugh, and
Demsher
Noes: Council Members - None
Absent: Council Members - None
Resolution No. 79-205 is on file in the office of the City Clerk.
1
333
PARKING PROHIBITION - West side of Westside Road
Traffic Engineer Hamilton reviewed his memo to Council dated
October 9, 1979. He stated that in regular session on October 9 ,
1979 , the Traffic and Parking Commission considered a request and
staff recommendation to prohibit parking at all times on the west
side of Westside Road from El Reno Lane to Hospital Lane to afford
better visibility when exiting driveways. Mr. Hamilton said there
have been five reported accidents since early in 1977 due to this
conflict. Allen Mancasola, owner of Farmers Market, has indicated
his opposition to parking removal but did not appear at the meeting.
The Commission agreed that this is a problem area and voted unani
mously to recommend the parking prohibition to Council. A resolution
has been prepared for Council consideration.
MOTION: Made by Councilman Kirkpatrick, seconded by Councilman Pugh
that Resolution No. 79-206 be adopted, a resolution of the City
Council of the City of Redding prohibiting parking at all times on /3
the west side of Westside Road from El Reno Lane to Hospital Lane.
Voting was as follows :
Ayes: Council Members - Fulton, Gard, Kirkpatrick, Pugh, and
Demsher
Noes: Council Members - None
Absent: Council Members - None
Resolution No. 79-206 is on file in the office of the City Clerk.
AWARD OF BID - Construction of Reservoir Lane Storm Drain
MOTION: Made by Councilman Pugh, seconded by Councilman Kirkpatrick
that Council makes the following findings regarding Bid Schedule
No. 1142, Construction of Reservoir Lane Storm Drain:
1. Project is compatible with the Redding General Plan;
2. Project will not significantly alter existing land form;
3. Project is compatible with surrounding land use;
4. Project is compatible with the Code of the City -of Redding,
California,
%S�
and, ratifies the Negative Declaration approved by the Board of
Administrative Review on March 14 , 1979. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes
MOTION: Made by Councilman Pugh, seconded by Councilman Kirkpatrick
approving the recommendation of the Department of Public Works
that Bid Schedule No. 1142 , Construction of Reservoir Lane Storm
Drain, be awarded to Dexter L. Rogers on their low bid in the amount
of $141, 614.
Voting was as follows :
Ayes : Council Members - Fulton, Gard, Kirkpatrick, Pugh, and
Demsher
Noes : Council Members - None
Absent: Council Members - None
Note that this project will be funded by Community Development
Block Grant Funds.
AWARD OF BID - Rio Street Assessment District (Chapter 27)
MOTION: Made by Councilman Pugh, seconded by Councilman Kirkpatrick
that Council makes the following findings regarding Bid Schedule
No. 1143, Rio Street Assessment District (Chapter 27) proposing to
improve access and drainage along a proposed extension of Rio Street
to the west of Freebridge Street:
1. Project is compatible with the Redding General Plan;
2. Project will not significantly alter existing land form;
334
3. Project is compatible with surrounding land use;
4. Project is compatible with the Code of the City of Redding,
California,
and, ratifies the Negative Declaration approved by the Board of
Administrative Review on September 19, 1979. The Vote: Unanimous
Ayes
MOTION: Made by Councilman Pugh, seconded by Councilman Kirkpatrick
approving the recommendation of the Department of Public Works that
Bid Schedule No. 1143, Rio Street Assessment District (Chapter 27) ,
be awarded to Hayward Construction on their low bid in the amount
of $10, 023.
Voting was as follows:
Ayes: Council Members - Fulton, Gard, Kirkpatrick, Pugh, and
Demsher
Noes: Council Members - None
Absent: Council Members - None
NOTICE OF COMPLETION - Finish Coating on Enterprise High School
Tennis Courts
MOTION: Made by Councilman Pugh, seconded by Councilman Kirkpatrick
accepting the Finish Coating on Enterprise High School Tennis Courts,
Bid Schedule No. 1138, as being completed satisfactorily, and
instructing the City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion. The
Vote: Unanimous Ayes
PINEHAVEN COURT - Acceptance of Improvements
Public Works Director Arness reviewed his memo to Council dated
October 10, 1979. He stated that the developer, John W. Wenger,
has satisfactorily completed the installation of improvements
which were a condition of his Lot Split LS-93-77 and paid the
fees for the street name sign as of July 9 , 1979 . This lot split
is located off Herbscenta Way and Ryan Lane in the Quartz Hill
area. The lot split was originally approved in April 1978 and
in May of 1978 was amended by the Planning Commission. The original
approval required the road to be graded and graveled only, and the
amendment required that the road serving the lots be 24 foot wide,
graded and graveled with AC surfacing and 4 foot graded shoulders .
It is the staff recommendation that Council accept the water line
extension and underground utility improvements installed to serve
Lot Split LS-93-77 as satisfactorily completed and that by resolution
the 24 foot paved section of Pinehaven Court, the street serving
the lot split, be accepted for maintenance.
{ MOTION: Made by Councilman Pugh, seconded by Councilman Kirkpatrick
�c accepting for maintenance the water line extension and underground
utility improvements installed to serve Lot Split LS-93-77 . The
Vote: Unanimous Ayes
MOTION: Made by Councilman Pugh, seconded by Councilman Kirkpatrick
that Resolution No. 79-207 be adopted, a resolution of the City
Council of the City of Redding accepting Pinehaven Court for mainte-
nance and operation by the City.
Voting was as follows:
Ayes: Council Members - Fulton, Gard, Kirkpatrick, Pugh, and
Demsher
Noes: Council Members - None
Absent: Council Members - None
Resolution No. 79-207 is on file in the office of the City Clerk.
_ —_ ._ _ __ _ _ ___.___�._ —_ _..._.. n.. �..._.__.. __..�_......_�.�.�_wA i.�✓._sl�...1.w_...�..w._ti_ �uL_ �w _
1
335
OAKWOOD PLACE SUBDIVISION, UNIT NO. 2 n
At the request of the Public Works Director, this item was not 10i7
considered this evening.
WATER TREATMENT PLANT - Contract Inspection Services
Public Works Director Arness reviewed his memo to Council dated
October 11, 1979. He submitted a copy of Amendment No. 3 to the
Agreement between the City of Redding and CH2M Hill dated
January 3, 1978. The purpose of this Amendment is to secure
assistance in contract inspection for the new water treatment
plant.
Mr. Arness advised that the City proposes to assign two employees
to this project - a resident engineer and a construction inspector.
Under the contract amendment, CH2M Hill will provide technical
assistance in areas where the City does not currently have expertise
as follows:
1. Office Services - Interpretation of contract drawings
and specifications and shop drawing review.
jc�
2. Field Inspection - The design team will provide 24
technical assistance in specialized areas such as
soils, concrete, electrical and mechanical con-
struction, and performance testing.
3. Training and Operations Assistance - Provide 0 & M
Manual and pre-start up training for the water plant
operators.
Mr. Arness advised that the figures shown for each task were
reached during two meetings with the consultants to estimate the
amount of their time that would be required during the construction
of the plant. The compensation recommended is for a "price not
to exceed" with payment made on a salary times a multiplier. He
said the payment to the consultant will be for that assistance
requested by the City. Mr. Arness said the Planning Report to
Council will illustrate payment made for the various tasks during
the progress of the work. If additional funds are needed, Council
will be apprised.
It is the staff recommendation that the Amendment No. 3 be approved,
and that the Mayor be authorized to sign same.
MDTION: Made by Councilman Pugh, seconded by Councilwoman Gard
approving the aforestated recommendation of the Department of
Public Works. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes
LOCAL AGENCY STATE AGREEMENT NO. 02-5068 - Program Supplement No. 06
Public Works Director Arness reviewed his memo to Council dated
October 10, 1979. He stated that the program to install thermo-
plastic crosswalks and stop bars on various City streets by City
forces will be reimbursed 100% by Federal funds. It is the staff
recommendation that Council adopt the prepared resolution approving
this program.
MOTION: Made by Councilman Pugh, seconded by Councilman Kirkpatrick
that Resolution No. 79-208 be adopted, a resolution of the City
Council of the City of Redding approving Program Supplement No. 6
to Local Agency - State Agreement No. 02-5068 , covering installation
of thermoplastic markings.
Voting was as follows :
Ayes: Council Members - Fulton, Gard, Kirkpatrick, Pugh, and
Demsher
336
Noes: Council Members - None
Absent: Council Members - None
Resolution No. 79-208 is on file in the office of the City Clerk.
RESOLUTION - Abatement of Property at 823 Twin View Boulevard
MOTION: Made by Councilman Pugh, seconded by Councilman Kirkpatrick
that Resolution No. 79-209 be adopted, a resolution of the City
Council of the City of Redding of intention to begin legal proceedings
/ of abatement under Chapter 9. 36 of the Redding Municipal Code on
certain real property in the City of Redding. (Owned by Ellis S .
and Veronica J. Foster, 823 Twin View Boulevard)
Voting was as follows :
Ayes : Council Members - Fulton, Gard, Kirkpatrick, Pugh, and
Demsher
Noes: Council Members - None
Absent: Council Members - None
Resolution No. 79-209 is on file in the office of the City Clerk.
RESOLUTION - Prohibiting Roller Skating and Skate Boarding in
Certain Public Areas
City Attorney Murphy said that Council is requested to approve
the prepared resolution prohibiting certain public areas from
street skating.
Mike Martin, street skate rental operator, questioned what areas
Council is considering for this skating prohibition.
City Attorney Murphy replied that it is proposed that the follow-
\ ing parking lots be posted:
Both levels of the Parking Lot west of the Downtown Mall
between Tehama and Placer Streets
Lot on the east side of the Downtown Mall
Dicker' s underground Parking Lot
Lot adjacent to the Pine Street Liquor Store (Northern
Liquors)
Councilwoman Gard asked who initiated the complaint about the
skaters.
City Attorney Murphy replied that the Police Department feels
that skating in the City streets and on the lots has become a
hazardous situation and is reaching epidemic proportion. He
noted that skaters, pedestrians, and motorists don' t mix safely.
Councilwoman Gard asked if the City couldn' t designate one lot
for the skaters.
Councilman Pugh noted that liability is a problem for the City
in this regard.
City Attorney Murphy said that the City' s present ordinance does
not prohibit skating on the sidewalks. He suggested that Council
might wish to visit Pine Street at about 10 : 30 on Friday or
Saturday nights and watch the activity. He said that there is
a conflict with the skaters interfering with pedestrian and vehicle
traffic.
Mrs. Gard said that it appears that when the young people find
an activity they enjoy, the City feels it must be prohibited but
never provides an alternative for them.
..
337
J1
Mr. Murphy said that possibly the lot across from the Wells Fargo
Bank could be considered for skating.
Councilman Fulton suggested that Council postpone a decision on
this matter pending an alternate proposal.
Mr. Martin said that volunteer skate patrols have worked in other
areas. He requested that Council determine a way to regulate this
activity rather than banning it entirely.
MOTION: Made by Councilman Pugh, seconded by Councilman Kirkpatrick
referring this matter to a Committee for study and recommendation.
The Vote: Unanimous Ayes
With concurrence of other Council Members, Mayor Demsher will
appoint the members to the Committee.
RESOLUTION - Yield Sign on South Bonnyview Road
MOTION: Made by Councilman Pugh, seconded by Councilman Kirkpatrick
that Resolution No. 79-210 be adopted, a resolution of the City
Council of the City of Redding amending the Traffic Control Map
by establishing a "Yield" sign on South Bonnyview Road at Eastside
Road. ���
Voting was as follows :
Ayes: Council Members - Fulton, Gard, Kirkpatrick, Pugh, and
Demsher
Noes: Council Members - None
Absent: Council Members - None
Resolution No. 79-210 is on file in the office of the City Clerk.
RESOLUTION - Stop Signs on Athens Avenue
MOTION: Made by Councilman Pugh, seconded by Councilwoman Gard
that Resolution No. 79-211 be adopted, a resolution of the City
Council of the City of Redding amending the Traffic Control Map
by establishing "Stop" signs on Athens Avenue at Olympus Avenue
and Paris Avenue, on Olympus Avenue at Athens Avenue, and on Paris
Avenue at Athens Avenue.
Voting was as follows:
Ayes: Council Members - Fulton, Gard, Kirkpatrick, Pugh, and //3 .
Demsher
Noes: Council Members - None
Absent: Council Members - None
Resolution No. 79-211 is on file in the office of the City Clerk.
AGREEMENT - Recreation Facility Construction, Maintenance and Use
Agreement
MOTION: Made by Councilman Pugh, seconded by Councilman Fulton
approving the agreement between the City of Redding and the Enter-
prise School District pertaining to recreation facility construction,
maintenance and use, and authorizing the Mayor to execute same. The
Vote: Unanimous Ayes
ROUTINE COMMUNICATIONS
Applications for Alcoholic Beverage Licenses
Belly-Up Deli, 900 Dana Drive, Space 12A
The Grub Steak, 1135 Pine Street
Arcade Flowers, 1111 Hilltop Drive
China House Restaurant, 2315 Eureka Way
338
Document re PUC
Application of Inter-Mountain Stage Company for authority
to increase passenger fares
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, at the hour of 11: 00 P.M. , Mayor
Demsher adjourned the meeting.
APPROVED:
Mayor
ATTEST: