HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - City Council - 1982-08-02r -
196
City Council , Regular Meeting
Police Dept. & Council Chambers
Redding, California
August 2, 1982 7:00 P.M.
The Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag was led by Public Works Director
Arness.
The invocation was offered by Pastor Noble Streeter of the First Presby-
terian Church.
The meeting was called to order by Mayor Gard with the following Council
Members present: Demsher, Fulton, Kirkpatrick, Pugh, and Gard
Also present were City Manager Brickwood, Assistant City Manager Courtney,
City Attorney Hays, Public Works Director Arness, Planning and Community
> Development Director Perry, Superintendent of Public Works Galusha, Housing
and Redevelopment Administrator Henson, Associate Civil Engineer Mathis,
Senior Associate Planner Keaney, Personnel Officer Bristow, City Clerk
Nichols , and Minute Clerk Rupp.
CONSENT CALENDAR
The following matters were considered inclusively under the Consent
Calendar:
Approval of Minutes - Regular Meeting of July 19, 1982
Approval of Payroll and Accounts Payable Register - Accounts Payable
Register No. 03, check nos. 85676 through 86127 inclusive, in the
amount of $1 ,934,113.98, be approved and paid, and Accounts Payable
Register No. 02, check nos. 162828 through 163453 inclusive, in the
��� amount of $448,404.82, for the period July 4, 1982, to July 17, 1982,
be approved. Total : $2 ,382 ,518.80
Claims for Damage and Personal Injury - 1st Hearing
Violet Defehr - Claim for Damages filed 7/22/82
//°
/3 Recommend denial
Martin & Dorathy Montonye - Claim for Damages filed 7/15/82
2 Recommend denial and referral to City Insurance Carrier
Ralph McNeeley, as Father - Claim for Personal Injury filed 7/19/82
/ A,2 Recommend denial and referral to City Insurance Carrier
Ralph McNeeley, as Guardian - Claim for Personal Injury filed 7/19/82
Recommend denial and referral to City Insurance Carrier
Rosemary McNeeley, as Mother - Claim for Personal Injury filed 7/19/82
/ )g Recommend denial and referral to City Insurance Carrier
Vicki Byrd - Claim for Damages filed 7/19/82
3 Recommend payment in the amount of $187
Summons and Complaints
Snelson & Sigrid McGriff vs. City of Redding et al
Claim for Personal Injury11/
Settlement of Claim
Rick Collins - Claim for Damages filed 5/20/82
/),3 Settled in the amount of $76.45
a _
8/2/82
197
Joint Trench Agreement - Pacific Telephone and Telegraph
Recommend authorization for the City Manager to sign a Joint Trench
Agreement with Pacific Telephone & Telegraph for $6,514 for the City 5-6
of Redding' s share of the costs to complete a tie to Alta Mesa from
the recently constructed Western Oaks Subdivision.
Set Public Hearing - RZ-4-82, by City of Redding
Recommend that a public hearing be set for 7:30 P.M. , August 16, 1982,
/44
to consider Rezoning Application RZ-4-82, by City of Redding.
Acceptance of Improvements - West Side of Churn Creek Road
Recommend acceptance of sanitary sewer and storm drain improvements on , /7c'
the west side of the 3600 block of Churn Creek Road, as part of the 3/�
off-site improvements required for the proposed Montebello Subdivi- /0g
sion.
Acceptance of Improvements - Lake Boulevard East Subdivision, Unit 1 „Vg_.
Recommend acceptance of water and sewer line improvements in the Lake 5/
Boulevard East Subdivision, Unit No. 1 , as being satisfactorily o5
completed. ;
Notice of Completion - Bid Schedule No. 1349 a
Recommend that Bid Schedule No. 1349, construction of Airport Frontage
Road, between Airport Road and Meadow View Drive, be accepted as ,6o
satisfactorily completed, and that the City Clerk be instructed to
file a Notice of Completion.
Notice of Completion - Bid Schedule No. 1374
Recommend that Bid Schedule No. 1374, construction of portions of Alta ,?5-(-a
Saga and Amanda Drive, be accepted as satisfactorily completed, and
that the City Clerk be authorized to file a Notice of Completion.
Notice of Completion - Bid Schedule No. 1394 3
Recommend that Bid Schedule No. 1394, replacement of curb, gutter, and
sidewalk at various locations throughout the City, be accepted as _3 =;-/
satisfactorily completed, and that the City Clerk be instructed to
file a Notice of Completion.
Notice of Completion - Bid Schedule No. 1399
Recommend that Bid Schedule No. 1399, construction of Market/Calif-
ornia Alley, from Eureka Way to Trinity Street, be accepted as sat-
isfactorily completed, and that the City Clerk be instructed to file a
Notice of Completion.
Agreement - Servicemaster Building Maintenance
Recommend approval of a one year extension of an agreement with
Servicemaster Building Maintenance, to provide janitorial services at
a total cost of $5,551 per month for all City buildings as listed in
Exhibit A of the Agreement.
Resolution No. 82-115 - re Intention to Abate Property at 2669 Heather
Recommend adoption of a resolution of the City Council of the City of
Redding of intention to begin legal proceedings of abatement under
Chapter 9.36 of the Redding Municipal Code on certain real property in 3 25
the City of Redding (owned by Echo Moran and located at 2669 Heather
Lane) .
Resolution No. 82-116 - re Intention to Abate Property at 1031 Bond St
Recommend adoption of a resolution of the City Council of the City of
Redding of intention to begin legal proceedings of abatement under
Chapter 9.36 of the Redding Municipal Code on certain real property in
the City of Redding (owned by Arthur R. Steinbach and located at 1031 1
Bond Street) .
8/2/82
198
Resolution No. 82-117 - re Financial Consulting Services for Western
Ranches Water Assessment District No. 1981-5
Recommend adoption of a resolution of the City Council of the City of
Redding approving agreement for financial consulting services for
57 Western Ranches Water Assessment District No. 1981-5, with John Vande
F Pol and Associates.
Application for Card Room Permit - Ramrod Card Room
Recommend approval of a Card Room Permit for Lewis Jerome Anderson,
dba Ramrod Card Room, located at 2655 Bechelli Lane. All necessary
fees have been paid for three tables and the conditions of the Plan-
ning Director have been met.
MOTION: Made by Councilman Pugh, seconded by Councilman Demsher that all
the foregoing items on the Consent Calendar be approved and adopted as
recommended.
Voting was as follows:
Ayes: Council Members - Demsher, Fulton, Kirkpatrick, Pugh, and Gard
Noes: Council Members - None
Absent: Council Members - None
Resolution Numbers 82-115 , 82-116 , and 82-117 , are on file in the office of
the City Clerk.
BRANSTETTER/CEDARS SEWER ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
With the concurrence of Council , this matter was taken out of sequence on
the Agenda.
(�0 The following documents were submitted to Special Bond Counsel Ness for
filing and adoption:
Engineer's Report
Resolution - Accepting Report and Setting Hearing
MOTION: Made by Councilman Pugh, seconded by Councilman Demsher that
Resolution No. 82-118 be adopted, a resolution of the City Council of the
City of Redding accepting report and setting protest hearing for 7:30 P.M. ,
September 7, 1982 , re Branstetter/Cedars Sewer Assessment District No.
1982-2.
Voting was as follows:
Ayes: Council Members - Demsher, Fulton, Kirkpatrick, Pugh, and Gard
Noes: Council Members - None
Absent: Council Members - None
Resolution No. 82-118 is on file in the office of the City Clerk.
Resolution - re Construction Bids
MOTION: Made by Councilman Pugh, seconded by Councilman Demsher that
Resolution No. 82-119 be adopted, a resolution of the City Council of the
City of Redding calling for construction bids to be received on August 24,
1982, re Branstetter/Cedars Sewer Assessment District No. 1982-2.
Voting was as follows:
Ayes: Council Members - Demsher, Fulton, Kirkpatrick, Pugh, and Gard
Noes: Council Members - None
Absent: Council Members - None
Resolution No. 82-119 is on file in the office of the City Clerk.
Notice Inviting Sealed Bids
Notice of Improvement
8/2/82
199
WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
Letter from Robert Rehberg - re Extension of Wastewater Collection
System
A request was received from Robert A. Rehberg, asking for Council 's
reconsideration of the question of access to the Redding Regional
Wastewater System for residents between the current boundary of ���
Redding and Keswick Lake. Mr. Rehberg felt that circumstances have 5
changed which would warrant reconsideration of the matter. He asked
that the matter be referred to staff for review and recommendation
after considering additional information which he would like to
present to them.
Councilman Pugh suggested that the request be considered only from the 1
standpoint of new or changed information.
MOTION: Made by Councilman Demsher, seconded by Councilman Fulton
referring the request from Robert Rehberg regarding access to the
Redding Regional Wastewater System, to staff for report and recommen-
dation, and that only new or changed circumstances be considered. The
Vote: Unanimous Ayes
Letter from California Assemblyman Larry Stirling - re Changing State
Budget Proceedings
A letter was received from Assemblyman Larry Stirling asking for
assistance regarding amending the current laws for finalizing the
State budget. He said that city and county governments are required 9
to finalize their budgets before they know how much money they are
slated to receive from the State. He asked that the City of Redding
advise him the date by which it would like to see the State budget
finished, including reasons for that specific date, the positive and
negative aspects associated with the current law; the expected fiscal
impact of the proposed change, the ways in which the new proposal
might alleviate old problems; the ways in which it might create new -
problems, particularly in the transition year.
Mayor Gard said she feels it would be appropriate to send a letter to
the State Legislature outlining the City' s problems in this regard.
Assistant City Manager Courtney noted that State-controlled deadlines
have been set but have not been abided by.
With the concurrence of Council , Mr. Courtney was instructed to
prepare a letter in response to Assemblyman Stirling' s letter dated
July 20, 1982.
Petition - re Formation of Assessment District from Property Owners 3
Fronting on Waverly Avenue
A petition was submitted from property owners of property fronting on (,0/
Waverly Street within the City of Redding, requesting that assessment
district proceedings be initiated for sanitary sewer improvements.
With the concurrence of Council , Mayor Gard referred the petition to
staff for report and recommendation.
Request from Veterans Day Parade Committee - re Parade Route
A letter was received from William McDaniel of the Veterans Day Parade
Committee requesting approval of the Veterans Day Parade to be held on
Saturday, November 6, 1982. The parade will organize on Center,
Trinity, and California Streets north of Eureka Way, proceed to a A
starting point at the intersection of Division and California Streets
using the access under the overpass thus not crossing Eureka Way,
proceeding southward along California Street to Sacramento Street.
The parade will start at 10:00 A.M. and should conclude by 11 :00 A.M.
and the route has been approved by the Chief of Police. 3
YC
1
1
8/2/82
200
1
r
MOTION: Made by Councilman Demsher, seconded by Councilman Fulton
approving the Veterans Day Parade route for Saturday, November 6,
1982 , as hereinabove stated. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes
ORDINANCE - re Rezoning Application RZ-3-82
MOTION: Made by Councilman Kirkpatrick, seconded by Councilman Demsher
that full reading of Ordinance No. 1590 be waived and the City Attorney be
[ instructed to scan same. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes
MOTION: Made by Councilman Demsher, seconded by Councilman Fulton that
Ordinance No. 1590 be adopted, an ordinance of the City Council of the City
F /6/41 of Redding amending Section 18.06.020 of the Redding Municipal Code relat-
ing to the rezoning of certain real property in the City of Redding
i (RZ-3-82) .
Voting was as follows:
Ayes: Council Members - Demsher, Fulton, Kirkpatrick, Pugh, and Gard
Noes: Council Members - None
Absent: Council Members - None
Ordinance No. 1590 is on file in the office of the City Clerk.
ORDINANCE - re Rezoning Application PD-2-82
Councilman Pugh abstained from voting on this matter.
i MOTION: Made by Councilman Kirkpatrick, seconded by Councilman Demsher
that full reading of Ordinance No. 1591 be waived and the City Attorney be
instructed to scan same. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes with Councilman Pugh
abstaining
Iq q MOTION: Made by Councilman Kirkpatrick, seconded by Councilman Fulton that
Ordinance No. 1591 be adopted, an ordinance of the City Council of the City
of Redding amending Section 18.06.020 of the Redding Municipal Code relat-
ing to the rezoning of certain real property in the City of Redding
(PD-2-82) . III
i.
Voting was as follows:
Ayes: Council Members - Demsher, Fulton, Kirkpatrick, and Pugh
Noes: Council Members - None
Absent: Council Members - None
Abstain: Council Members - Pugh
Ordinance No. 1591 is on file in the office of the City Clerk.
AGREEMENT - re Advance Refund to City of Redding by M-S-R
Assistant City Manager Courtney submitted a letter agreement between the
M-S-R Public Power Agency, the Modesto Irrigation District, and the City of
Redding. He stated that the agreement provides that the M-S-R will pay to
the City of Redding an advance of Redding's proportionate share of the
refund to be made by the El Paso Electric Company to the M-S-R pursuant to
the Assignment Agreement dated December 1 , 1981 , and the Refund Agreement
approved by the M-S-R Commission on July 8, 1982.
ly
�� Mr. Courtney indicated that the City received the payment in the amount of
$1 ,500,000 on July 30, 1982 , and in order to avoid forfeiture of interest
income, this letter agreement has been executed by the City Manager and the
t check was deposited by the City Treasurer.
It is requested that Council ratify this agreement which has been executed
in advance by the City Manager. III
MOTION: Made by Councilman Demsher, seconded by Councilman Kirkpatrick
ratifying the Letter Agreement executed by the City Manager, between M-S-R
1 Public Power Agency, the Modesto Irrigation District, and the City of
F Redding, which provides for an advance refund to the City of Redding by the
El Paso Electric Company. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes
1
8/2/82
L _
201
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION - re Municipal Airport Plan
Planning and Community Development Director Perry advised that the Planning t
Commission has recommended adoption of the Municipal Airport Area Plan. A
copy of the recommended plan was submitted to Council and Mr. Perry noted 1
that Council previously received a copy of the final EIR. He stated that a
III joint public hearing has been scheduled with the Anderson City Council and 4
the Board of Supervisors on August 25 , and it is his recommendation that IBJ
Council hold a study session on the plan prior to that hearing. 4
1
It was agreed by Council Members that a study session would be held at 12
Noon on August 17 , 1982, in the City Hall Conference Room.
RESOLUTION - re Application of Roberti Z'Berg Bond Act Grant Allocation
Planning and Community Development Director Perry submitted a letter from
the State Department of Parks and Recreation advising the City that it will
receive $5 ,026 during 1982-83 under the Roberti-Z'berg Block Grant Program.
The City is eligible for these entitlement funds as a result of becoming a i
"Standard Metropolitan Statistical Area" with the 1980 Census. 1
It is the recommendation of staff that Council adopt a resolution authoriz-
ing application for the money to be used in Caldwell Park and designating
the City Manager as the City' s official representative. O ,
MOTION: Made by Councilman Kirkpatrick, seconded by Councilman Demsher
that Resolution No. 82-120 be adopted, a resolution of the City Council of
the City of Redding approving application for grant funds for Caldwell Park
project under Roberti-Z'berg Urban Open Space and Recreation Program, and ,
authorizing City Manager to execute such application on behalf of the City.
Voting was as follows:
Ayes : Council Members - Demsher, Fulton, Kirkpatrick, Pugh, and Gard
III Noes: Council Members - None
Absent: Council Members - None
Resolution No. 82-120 is on file in the office of the City Clerk.
REQUEST FOR INCLUSION WITHIN SPHERE-OF-INFLUENCE - Paul Stratte
Planning and Community Development Director Perry stated that when the City t.
Council recommended a sphere-of-influence line to the Local Agency Forma-
tion Commission on March 15, 1982, no action was taken on requests by
owners of approximately 240 acres lying south of South Bonnyview Road and
between the Sacramento River and Interstate 5 for inclusion within the
line. Instead, Council directed staff to meet with representatives of the
applicants to discuss their plans and to bring the owners ' requests back to
the Council . Mr. Perry submitted two letters to Council requesting inclu- //d d
sion, as well as correspondence between the applicants' attorney and the
staff since March, and a map depicting the location of the property.
The Planning Director advised that the properties consist of approximately
240 acres, of which 173 acres is not subject to flooding by a 100 year
flood. Access to the properties is via Sunnyhill Lane, a two-lane road
extending south from South Bonnyview and it is hoped that Sunnyhill will be
relocated to opposite Bechelli Lane in the future. Mr. Perry noted that if
urbanized, secondary access would have to be obtained from Smith Road to
the South. The properties are outside the Regional Wastewater Treatment
Plan Service area. p
III Mr. Perry pointed out that the issue of whether Churn Creek Bottom should d
or should not be included within the City' s Sphere of Influence was dis-
cussed at some length by both the City Council and the Planning Commission. 1
He said that the consensus after that discussion was that the City should j
not extend into Churn Creek Bottom and staff sees no reason to change that i
decision at this point in time.
1
I
s
t
m
1
i
8/2/82 1
o
202
Mr. Charles Bell , attorney representing the applicant, stated that it is
their desire at this time to obtain the inclusion of this property into the
City' s sphere-of-influence, with the intention that a General Plan amend-
` ment and annexation proposal would be presented thereafter. He said their
` proposal includes the dedication of approximately 3/4 mile of river front-
age to the City. Mr. Bell explained that, if Council agrees to include the
r property, it is their intention to go forward with engineering and other
III
studies necessary to do a full EIR on the project. He explained that some
of the property is currently being used for cultivating strawberries but
this as well as other agricultural uses is becoming uneconomical , for the
r
top 2/3 of the property. He noted that there is more dispute about the
feasible uses for the Churn Creek land than there has been in 1977 when the
County Plan was adopted, and added that there has been some inclusion of
Churn Creek land by the City . Mr. Bell said that the Draft Sedway/Cooke
r Plan recognizes this as a development corridor.
Mayor Gard stressed that the precedent for river-front dedication has been
very strongly established by the City as a requirement for development.
She also noted that this area has Class I agricultural soil . Mrs. Gard
stated that the Draft Sedway-Cooke Plan honors the County's Churn Creek
r Bottom Plan, and no major changes have occurred.
Councilman Pugh said he still has some concerns about the area being
outside the Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant. He also noted that the
terrain is such that providing City services to the area would be very
involved.
Councilman Kirkpatrick stated that Council has discussed at length the
reasons for excluding the "bulb" , or Churn Creek Bottom area, from the
City' s sphere-of-influence boundary.
fCouncilman Fulton felt that the present owners will probably sell in fiveIII
acre parcels which could be retained as agricultural use.
Councilman Demsher indicated that the he likes the idea of getting the
river front property for the public interest. However, the City's
relationship with the County and it is the County's intent to protect the
area. He said the area will probably be more urbanized in the future. Mr.
Demsher stated that any discussions regarding its development should be
with the County.
Mayor Gard noted that she has concerns about the County removing the
"Habitat Resources Area" designation from the area.
Councilman Pugh felt that if the Stratte property is included then the
whole bulb area should be included, which would involve providing City
services to the entire area.
Councilman Demsher noted that if the City embarked on a program to annex
the entire Churn Creek Bottom area, it would encounter significant opposi-
tion.
i MOTION: Made by Councilman Kirkpatrick, seconded by Councilman Pugh that
Council decline to include the High-Low Nursery and Dr. and Mrs . Paul
Stratte properties in the City' s sphere-of-influence.
1. Voting was as follows:
Ayes: Council Members - Demsher, Kirkpatrick, Pugh, and GardIII
Noes: Council Members - Fulton
Absent: Council Members - None
I.
r
8/2/82
F
203
PUBLIC HEARING - re Report and Account of Cost of Abatement and Demolition
of Structures owned by Richard J. and Catherine J. Lucido, 2641 Oxford
Road.
The hour of 7:30 P.M. having arrived, Mayor Gard opened the public
hearing re report and account of cost of abatement and demolition of
structures owned by Richard J. and Catherine J. Lucido, 2641 Oxford 1
Road. 1
The following documents are on file in the office of the City Clerk:
Affidavit of Posting - Notice of Public Hearing
Affidavit of Mailing - Notice of Public Hearing
The City Clerk advised that no written protests have been received and
the Mayor ascertained that there were no protests from the floor.
City Attorney Hays advised that the total cost of this abatement 1
proceeding, amended by adding the cost of work completed by the City
of Redding Water Department at $363.37, is the sum of $2,198.37.
It is recommended that Council approve and confirm this report by the
adoption of a resolution.
MOTION: Made by Councilman Fulton, seconded by Councilman Kirkpatrick
that the public hearing be closed. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes
Resolution
MOTION: Made by Councilman Kirkpatrick, seconded by Councilman Pugh 1
that Resolution No. 82-121 be adopted, a resolution of the City
Council of the City of Redding approving and confirming report and
account of the cost of abatement of unsafe buildings and debris on the
Lucido property, 2641 Oxford Road.
Voting was as follows:
Ayes: Council Members - Demsher, Fulton, Kirkpatrick, Pugh, and
Gard
Noes: Council Members - None
Absent: Council Members - None
Resolution No. 82-121 is on file in the office of the City Clerk.
PUBLIC HEARING - re Amended Report and Account of Cost of Abatement, Unsafe
and Unsightly Building on property at 819 West Street, owned by Larry D.
Overman.
The hour of 7:30 P.M. having arrived, Mayor Gard opened the public
hearing re the amended report and account of cost of abatement, for
the unsafe and unsightly building on property at 819 West Street,
owned by Larry D. Overman.
The following documents are on file in the office of the City Clerk:
1 Q
Affidavit of Posting - Notice of Public Hearing
Affidavit of Mailing - Notice of Public Hearing
The City Clerk advised that no written protests have been received and
the Mayor ascertained that there were no protests from the floor. ti
City Attorney Hays advised that the total cost of this abatement
proceeding, amended by adding the cost of work completed by the City
of Redding Water Department at $59.61 , is the sum of $1 ,444.61 .
9
4
A
8/2/82
204
It is recommended that Council approve and confirm this report by the
adoption of resolution.
MOTION: Made by Councilman Kirkpatrick, seconded by Councilman Fulton
that the public hearing be closed. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes
Resolution
MOTION: Made by Councilman Kirkpatrick, seconded by Councilman Fulton
that Resolution No. 82-122 be adopted, a resolution of the City
Council of the City of Redding approving and confirming report and
account of the cost of abatement of unsafe buildings and debris on the
overman property, 819 West Street.
Voting was as follows:
Ayes: Council Members - Demsher, Fulton, Kirkpatrick, Pugh, and
Gard
Noes: Council Members - None
Absent: Council Members - None
Resolution No. 82-122 is on file in the office of the City Clerk.
PUBLIC HEARING - re Appeal of Tentative Subdivision Map, S-22-81 , Woodside
Park Subdivision
The hour of 7:30 P.M. having arrived, Mayor Gard opened the public
hearing re the appeal of Tentative Subdivision Map, S-22-81 , Woodside
Park, subdivision submitted by William Huggit.
The following documents are on file in the office of the City Clerk:
Affidavit of Publication - Notice of Public Hearing
Affidavit of Mailing - Notice of Public Hearing
The City Clerk advised that no written protests have been received.
Planning and Community Development Director Perry reviewed his memo-
randum to Council dated July 29, 1982 , which is incorporated herein be
reference. He stated that this is the second hearing on the appeal of
the tentative subdivision map for Woodside Park. He reviewed the
action of Council on April 5 , which upheld an appeal and asked the
developer to submit a revised map to the Planning Commission, with the
knoll area to remain undeveloped. The appeal by adjacent property
owners concerned development on the knoll at the southeast end of the
property.
To comply with the action taken by Council , Mr. Perry explained that
the applicant submitted a revised tentative map, which deleted from
the project Lots 53 , 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59 , and 60, or eight lots.
The applicant also advised staff that he did not wish to relocate any
of the lots within the existing limits, of the subdivision due to the
integrity of the present tentative ma . Mr. Perry advised that the
applicant also requested amendment of the tentative map to delete Lot
1 and to relocate Lot 2 to a different location in order to make this
area available for a future planned development being prepared for the
balance of the property.
Mr. Perry advised that on June 8, 1982 , the Planning Commission voted
to recommend that the map remain as originally approved by the Commis-
sion and took no action on the amendment request. The general feeling
of the Commission was that the map as approved by the Commission, was
entirely consistent with past City actions and requirements for
dedication of open space. The Commission also felt that the issues
raised before the Council had been addressed by the Commission when it
8/2/82
205
approved the map on February 23, 1982. Mr. Perry explained that if
Council does not wish to modify its earlier action, then the area of
the knoll needs to be delineated.
Mr. Perry explained that the applicant is now seeking judicial relief
to overturn Council ' s decision of April 5, 1982; thus, the delineation
of the knoll area may determine what the suit covers. Maps of the
area were posted and shown on the Vu Graph. Several options were
presented showing how the knoll could be delineated.
City Attorney Hays indicated that if the Court decided in favor of the
developer, it could instruct the City Clerk to file the tentative map g
as approved by the Planning Commission.
Jim Fisher, 1721 Court Street, attorney for the developer, stated a
suit has been filed against the City of Redding regarding development
of the 18 acres on the knoll area of the property. He noted that the
area has been zoned two units per acre on the General Plan. Mr.
Fisher felt that the only support for the argument of the property
owners is that Council tentatively required the developer of the
previous map, Golden Heights, to dedicate this area. He emphasized
that the .Planning Commission has approved development of this area.
Mr. Fisher explained that Woodside Park is a "high in" subdivision,
with large lots which are designed to fit into the hilly terrain. He
stressed that relocating 10 lots within the subdivision would destroy
the integrity of the project. He noted that it is an entirely differ-
ent type of subdivision than the Golden Heights Subdivision. '
1
Mr. Fisher stated that all environmental and other concerns have been
satisfied. He said that some property owners contend that they relied
on the greenbelt area remaining undeveloped when they purchased their
homes on Panorama Drive. Mr. Fisher emphasized that the tentative map
showing this area as a greenbelt was never finalized and he feels it
is unrealistic for surrounding property owners to expect that it
remain undeveloped. He felt the appeal is unjustified under the
circumstances.
Mr. Fisher stated that the concerns for riparian habitat have not only
been mitigated but enhanced. He said that all requirements for the
map have been met and it is consistent with the General Plan. He
emphasized that the obvious choice is that Council approve development
of the 18 acres as originally approved by the Planning Commission,
with the conditions as listed. 4
Steven Dean, 1716 Court Street, attorney representing the appellants,
stated that prior to 1979, the knoll area was designated as greenbelt G
on the General Plan. He added that after the tentative approval of
the Golden Heights Subdivision, property owners felt that the knoll
would remain undeveloped and proceeded accordingly. Mr. Dean reviewed
some of the previous hearings for this area and said that Highland
Estates was considered on the same night as Golden Heights and it was
determined at that time that the canyon area was to remain intact. He
said that all property owners have been taking actions based upon the 4
idea that the area was going to remain as open space. Mr. Dean said
that water quality in Sulphur Creek, the fire hazard, and aesthetics
are concerns of the property owners. He pointed out that EIR-5-79 was
not an EIR for this specific development but was only recertified for
the project and that some of the issues were not completely addressed.
He felt that the runoff from the homes on the knoll would create a
natural flume into the Creek, bringing insecticides , fertilizers, etc.
into Sulphur Creek. He cited the five percent grade of the street
8/2/82
206
r
i
C
running both ways. Mr. Dean emphasized the fire hazard on the
E cul-de-sac street. He said this leaves only one exit in a high fire
F hazard area, for residents to exit as fire trucks are trying to enter
the area; that houses there would restrict the use of aircraft from
fire fighting. He repeated that the knoll should remain as open space
as originally intended and asked that Council reaffirm its previous
decision to uphold the appeal . Mr. Dean stated that he concurs with
the staff recommendation that the knoll consists of the area south of
Lot 63. III
Scott Thompson, 3077 Panorama Drive, stated he is a concerned home
owner and it was his assumption that the knoll area would remain as
open space. He agrees with the dedication of the knoll area south of
tLot 63. Mr. Thompson said he has continued to invest in his property
based on that area remaining open space.
s"
Howard Schlemmer, 3065 Panorama Drive, said he purchased his property
} after the Golden Heights Subdivision was approved and has increased
i his investment based on that approval . He feels the integrity of the
canyon should be maintained.
Larry Wakefield, 3041 Panorama Drive, said he purchased his home in
1980 and has spent several thousands of dollars improving his property
based on Council previous decision to require dedication of the knoll .
Bud Warren, 3091 Panorama Drive, said he opposes development of the
E knoll area as it would break up the integrity of the area. He would
like to see the knoll remain as open space.
x
r MOTION: Made by Councilman Demsher, seconded by Councilman
1 Kirkpatrick that the public hearing be closed. The Vote: Unanimous
1 AyesIII
Mayor Gard said she attended all the public hearings in 1979. She
pointed out that concerns such as water quality, fire hazard, and
wildlife habitat were carefully considered at that time and the
T dedication was required for good reason.
Councilman Demsher recalled that dedication of the knoll area was the
principal area of discussion at previous public hearings and was a
compromise situation.
Councilman Kirkpatrick agreed that Council probably left an area of
doubt at its April 5 meeting by not defining the knoll precisely, but
other than that, he feels no new information has been submitted.
Mayor Gard reaffirmed that the issues are water quality, wildlife
habitat, and fire hazard. She stressed that the fire hazard is a
major concern.
Councilman Pugh stated that one of the primary issues in regard to
i. water quality and fire hazard was the matter of the access route. He
i said the Planning Commission has said that the route has been changed
and has mitigated these problems; however,he still has concerns about
[ grading and extension of the road into the open space area.
Councilman Demsher felt that considering all the discussions beginningIII
F with the General Plan amendment to the present time, a decision was
made to require the knoll to remain as open space and that decision
should remain intact. He acknowledged, however, that Council was not
precisely clear about the exact location of the knoll .
P
f
L
k 8/2/82
207
Councilman Kirkpatrick reiterated that his definition of the knoll
would be the staff's recommendation of the area south of Lot 63.
MOTION: Made by Councilman Kirkpatrick, seconded by Councilman Fulton
reaffirming its decision of April 5, 1982, and determining that the
limit of the knoll area as presented in the staff recommendation, is
111 the area south of Lot 63, and that said knoll area will be dedicated
to the City of Redding, and approving the amended map subject to the
following findings:
In accordance with the Government Code of the State of California , the
City Council finds and declares that, as set forth in Government Code
Section 66474, none of the conditions as listed in (a) through (g)
exist with regard to this proposed subdivision and that the proposed
subdivision is consistent with the Redding General Plan and applicable
specific plans; and that the tentative map be approved subject to the
35 conditions of approval . Further, in accordance with Section 1508
of the Public Resources Code, the City Council find and declare
changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into the
project which mitigate or avoid the significant environmental effects
thereof as identified in the Final Environmental Impact Report
EIR-5-79.
In addition, the following findings are made: A
1 . The development of less than 111 units in the subdivision is at
the request of the developer.
2. The reasons for requiring dedication of the knoll area are:
a. Its relationship to other existing and proposed dedications.
b. The proximity of the knoll to Sulphur Creek, the potential
for sedimentation and degradation of water quality in the
Creek, and the resultant impact on riparian habitat and the
Bella Vista Water District as a product of clearing, road
construction, increased run-off, insecticides and ferti-
lizers.
c. The additional street length required to serve the knoll
area for the number of lots involved will increase main-
tenance and services cost for the City due to additional
street and utility lengths and additional driving distances.
d. The lots proposed for development on the knoll can be
relocated to the main area of the subdivision without
affecting the overall integrity of the tentative map nor
reducing the total number of lots requested; thereby,
minimizing the above concerns.
3. The restriction on a cul-de-sac length is a mitigative measure as
identified in the final EIR on Page 38 under Wildland Fire
Hazards.
4. The knoll area is not physically suitable for the proposed type
and density of development.
Voting was as follows:
Ayes: Council Members - Demsher, Fulton, Kirkpatrick, Pugh, and
Gard
Noes: Council Members - None
Absent: Council Members - None
8/2/82
208
Council Members concurred that it is their position that because of
! the nature of the adverse conditions which have been recognized, the
r knoll area cannot be developed.
Mr. Perry clarified that Council Members agree that they would allow
the relocation of the 10 lots from the knoll elsewhere within the
F subdivision.
III
PUBLIC HEARING - re Rezoning Application RZ-2-82, by Ben Mattox
Council Member Pugh abstained from voting and discussion on this matter.
The hour of 7:30 P.M. having arrived, Mayor Gard opened the public
hearing re Rezoning Application RZ-2-82, by Ben Mattox.
The following documents are on file in the office of the City Clerk:
r
Affidavit of Publication - Notice of Public Hearing
1 Affidavit of Mailing - Notice of Public Hearing
Planning Commission Recommendation dated July 29, 1982
The City Clerk advised that no written protests have been received and
t Mayor Gard ascertained that there were no protests from the floor.
Planning and Community Development Director Perry reviewed his memo-
randum to Council dated July 29, 1982. He stated that the Planning
Commission has unanimously recommended rezoning of two lots totaling
ILiLi approximately 21 ,000 square feet located on the south side of Shasta
Street just east of the railroad tracks, from C-4 Retail Core Commer-
t cial District to C-3 Heavy Commercial and Light Industrial District.
Maps of the area were shown on the Vu Graph and Council was given a
copy of the draft negative declaration.
III
Mr. Perry advised that the requested rezoning is consistent with the
cGeneral Plan designation and also consistent with the existing uses
being made of the property.
z It is the recommendation of both the Planning Commission and staff
that the area be rezoned from C-4 to C-3-F, with the site-plan-review
criteria listed below:
1 . All street frontages shall be landscaped with a five-foot-wide
planter, except for driveway curb cuts.
f
o 2. All utilities are to be located underground for any new develop-
ment.
3. The property shall be limited to two driveways on Shasta Street.
It is further recommended that the negative declaration be ratified
1 and an ordinance be offered for first reading.
i MOTION: Made by Councilman Demsher, seconded by Councilman Fulton
that the public hearing be closed. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes with
kCouncilman Pugh abstaining
r
a MOTION: Made by Councilman Kirkpatrick, seconded by Councilman Fulton
that Council makes the following findings re Rezoning Application
RZ-2-82: III
1 . Project is compatible with the Redding General
Plan.
2. Project will not significantly alter existing land
form.
1
i.i-
i
F
Co
8/2/82
209
3. Project is compatible with surrounding land use.
4. Project is compatible with the Code of the City of
Redding, California.
and, ratifies the negative declaration approved by the Board of
Administrative Review on June 9, 1982. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes with
Councilman Pugh abstaining
MOTION: Made by Councilman Kirkpatrick, seconded by Councilman Fulton
approving the recommendation of the Planning Commission as hereinabove
stated re Rezoning Application RZ-2-82. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes
with Councilman Pugh abstaining
Councilman Fulton offered Ordinance No. 1592 for first reading, an
ordinance of the City Council of the City of Redding amending Section
18.06.020 of the Redding Municipal Code relating to the rezoning of
certain real property in the City of Redding (RZ-2-82) .
PUBLIC HEARING - Rezoning Application RZ-5-82, by City of Redding, Cascade
Area
The hour of 7:30 P.M. having arrived, Mayor Gard opened the public
hearing re Rezoning Application RZ-5-82, by City of Redding, Cascade
Area.
The following documents are on file in the office of the City Clerk:
Affidavit of Publication - Notice of Public Hearing 4
Affidavit of Mailing - Notice of Public Hearing 7 V
Planning Commission Recommendation dated July 29, 1982 / 7 4
The City Clerk advised that no written protests have been received and
the Mayor ascertained that there were no protests from the floor.
Planning and Community Development Director Perry reviewed his memo-
randum to Council dated July 29, 1982. He stated that the Planning
Commission has unanimously recommended the rezoning of two small
pockets of residentially developed property in the Cascade Area. The
first area consists of the Waverly Subdivision and property adjacent
to the north side of Ely Lane and is proposed to be rezoned from U
Unclassified District to R1-B2 and Rl-B10 Single Family Residential
Districts. The second area is generally located adjacent to and north
of Star Drive, east of Eastside Road, and south and west of Olney
Creek and is proposed to be rezoned from U Unclassified District to
Rl-Bl and R1-B10 Single Family Residential Districts. Maps of the
area were shown on the Vu Graph.
It is the recommendation of both the Planning Commission and the staff
that the area be rezoned as outlined, that the negative declaration be
ratified and an ordinance be offered for first reading.
MOTION: Made by Councilman Kirkpatrick, seconded by Councilman
Demsher that the public hearing be closed. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes
MOTION: Made by Councilman Kirkpatrick, seconded by Councilman
Demsher that Council makes the following findings re Rezoning Appli-
cation RZ-5-82, by City of Redding:
1 . Project is compatible with the Redding General
Plan.
2. Project will not significantly alter existing land
form.
1
8/2/82
210
3. Project is compatible with surrounding land use.
4. Project is compatible with the Code of the City of
Redding, California.
and, ratifies the negative declaration approved by the Board of
Administrative Review on June 16, 1982. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes
L MOTION: Made by Councilman Kirkpatrick, seconded by Councilman
III
/' Demsher approving the recommendation of the Planning Commission and
staff as hereinabove stated • re Rezoning Application RZ-5-82, by City
of Redding. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes
Councilman ,Kirkpatrick offered Ordinance No. 1593 for first reading,
9
an ordinance of the City Council of the City of Redding amending
k Section 18.06.020 of the Redding Municipal Code relating to the
rezoning of certain real property in the City of Redding (RZ-5-82) .
PUBLIC HEARING - re Rezoning Application PD-3-82, by Irvin Scarbrough and
7 Henry Eckleman
Councilman Pugh abstained from voting and discussion on this matter.
The hour of 7:30 P.M. having arrived, Mayor Gard opened the public
hearing re Rezoning Application PD-3-82, by Irvin Scarbrough and Henry
Eckleman.
i.7
The following documents are on file in the office of the City Clerk:
E
Affidavit of Publication - Notice of Public Hearing
{ Affidavit of Mailing - Notice of Public Hearing
Planning Commission Recommendation dated July 29, 1982
f The City Clerk advised that no written protests have been received andIII
f/ the Mayor ascertained that there were no protests from the floor.
J ��i Planning and Community Development Director Perry reviewed his memo-
randum to Council dated July 29, 1982. He stated that the Planning
Commission has unanimously recommended approval of PD-3-82, a proposal
to create a 116-unit planned development on 30.2 acres located north
of Girvan Road and west of Olney Creek. A map of the area was shown
on the Vu Graph.
Mr. Perry advised that the environmental review of the Lockwood
Subdivisions , which are located on the same site as this project,
consisted of EIR-2-78, prepared as a supplemental environmental impact
report for the Cascade Neighborhood Plan. Due to the similar impacts
of the planned development, Mr. Perry noted that the Board of Adminis-
trative Review recommended that EIR-2-78 be recertified for this
project.
r It is the recommendation of the Planning Commission and staff that the
rezoning be approved as recommended and that an ordinance be offered
for first reading. It is further recommended that certain findings be
made in accordance with the Government Code of the State of
California, that the in-lieu park fee be waived for lots backing onto
the area dedicated along Olney Creek and that the EIR be recertified.
MOTION: Made by Councilman Kirkpatrick, seconded by Councilman FultonIII
i that the public hearing be closed. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes with
Councilman Pugh abstaining.
MOTION: Made by Councilman Kirkpatrick, seconded by Councilman
Demsher approving the recommendation of the Planning Commission and
staff re Rezoning Application PD-3-82; and, in accordance with the
r
i-
t
r 8/2/82
211
Government Code of the State of California, the City Council finds and
declares that, as set forth in Government Code Section 66474, none of
the conditions as listed in (a) through (g) exist with regard to this
proposed subdivision and that the proposed subdivision is consistent
with the Redding General Plan and applicable specific plans; and, in
accordance with Section 18.18.36.050 of the Redding City Code, Council
makes the following findings:
1 . That the number of units and the improvements proposed will not
overburden the capacity of drainage channels, utility lines, or
streets.
2. That the density and design of the project is compatible with
adjoining development.
3. That there are no unmitigated substantial adverse environmental
impacts.
4. That the development shall conform with the goals and objectives
of the General Plan.
5. That the development accomplishes the objectives of the "PD"
District; ;
and, further that the in-lieu park fee be waived for lots backing onto
the area dedicated along Olney Creek and that, in accordance with 1
15088 of the Guidelines for the California Environmental Quality Act,
the City Council find that changes or alternatives have been incor-
porated into the project, which mitigate or avoid the significant
environmental effect thereof as identified in the final EIR.
The Vote: Unanimous Ayes with Councilman Pugh abstaining
Councilman Kirkpatrick offered Ordinance No. 1594 for first reading,
an ordinance of the City Council of the City of Redding amending 7
Section 18.06.020 of the Redding Municipal Code relating to the
rezoning of certain real property in the City of Redding (PD-3-82).
A
SET PUBLIC HEARING - re Request by Shasta Lake Union Elementary School
District re Findings of Overcrowding
Planning and Community Development Director Perry advised that the Shasta
Lake Union Elementary School District has filed findings of overcrowding
with the City and it is the recommendation of staff that a public hearing
be set for 7:30 P.M. , September 7, 1982 , to consider the findings.
MOTION: Made by Councilman Demsher, seconded by Councilman Kirkpatrick
that a public hearing be set for 7:30 P.M. , September 7 , 1982, re findings
of overcrowding in Shasta Lake Union Elementary School District. The Vote:
Unanimous Ayes
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING - International Fire Fighters Association
AFL-CIO
Personnel Officer Bristow submitted the Memorandum of Understanding between
the City of Redding and the International Fire Fighters Association
AFL-CIO, and briefly reviewed the highlights of the memorandum. He recom- 3 g)•
mended its approval .
MOTION: Made by Councilman Pugh, seconded by Councilman Demsher approving
the Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Redding and the Inter-
national Fire Fighters Association AFL-CIO, as submitted. The Vote:
Unanimous Ayes
4
i
r
x
8/2/82
212
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING - Peace Officers Association of Redding
Personnel Officer Bristow submitted the Memorandum of Understanding between
the City of Redding and the Peace Officers Association of Redding, and
briefly reviewed the highlights of the memorandum. He recommended its
approval .
7
r MOTION: Made by Councilman Pugh, seconded by Councilman Demsher approving
III
the Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Redding and the Peace
Officers Association of Redding, as submitted. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes
Councilman Pugh thanked the Personnel Officer, the City Manager and staff
of the Police and Fire Departments for their cooperative efforts on these
?• agreements. Mr. Brickwood noted that Assistant City Manager Courtney
t should also be added to that list.
} PUBLIC WORKS PLANNING REPORTS - August 1982
r Public Works Director Arness submitted the Public Works Planning Reports
/6 for August 1982.
AWARD OF CONTRACT - Regional Sewerage Study, Stillwater Drainage Area
Councilman Kirkpatrick abstained from voting on this matter.
Public Works Director Arness submitted the Contract between Ott Water
Engineers , Inc. and the City of Redding, acting as the contracting agency,
�` in a fixed fee amount of $84,410.
x It is the recommendation of the Public Works Director that the Mayor be
authorized to execute the Contract.
3 MOTION: Made by Councilman Demsher, seconded by Councilman Pugh authoriz-
ing the Mayor to execute the Contract between Ott Water Engineers, Inc. ,
and the City of Redding, for the preparation of the Regional Sewerage
Study, Stillwater Drainage Area, in the amount of $84,410. The Vote:
Unanimous Ayes with Councilman Kirkpatrick abstaining III
Mr. Arness noted that a meeting is scheduled for 3:30 P.M. , August 9, in
the City Hall Conference Room to meet the consultant and the fiscal consul-
tant, and all agencies involved in the Stillwater Drainage Area are invited
to that meeting.
1982 MASTER WATER PLAN
Public Works Director Arness presented the 1982 Master Water Plan prepared
by PACE Engineering under contract with the City. He noted that the plan
is being presented for review and it is recommended that the Plan be
3 3`7/i adopted at the City Council Meeting of August 16.
NOTICE OF COMPLETION - Bid Schedule No. 1379
Councilman Pugh abstained from voting on this matter.
MOTION: Made by Councilman Demsher, seconded by Councilman Kirkpatrick
that Bid Schedule No. 1379, Installation of Engine-Generator Set at Pump-
-3 3 7 house No. 3, be accepted as satisfactorily completed and instructing the
City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes with
Councilman Pugh abstaining
ROUTINE REPORTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
Alcoholic Beverage License Applications:
i Salido' s Pizza-Deli (Robert & Ginger Salido and Gloria and
Douglas Huffman) III
2945 Churn Creek Road
Straw Hat Pizza (Pizza Palace, Inc. )
2495 Athens Avenue
1
r
C
8/2/82
213
Italian Cottage Restaurant (Berton & Judy Katz)
1630 Hilltop Drive
Civil Aeronautics Board:
Order Seeking Carrier Proposals
7
Shasta-Cascade Wonderland Association:
Publicity 4
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, at the hour of 8:50 P.M. , Mayor Gard J
declared the meeting adjourned. s
APPROVED: 1
i
I /
$t... ♦ ►=_ i//_ , 1.. `l 1
.
.....
.yor
ATTEST:
Y
Cie ,� e..z. 1
City Clerk d
a
i
1
4..
i
I
l'
i
1'
i
1
3
c
4
i
4
1
i
1
J
ti
1
1
8/2/82