Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - City Council - 1982-03-15 f 56 City Council , Regular Meeting Police Dept. & Council Chambers Redding, California March 15, 1982 7:00 P.M. The Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag was led by Assistant City Manager Courtney. The invocation was offered by Pastor Clay Keen of the Gospel Lighthouse. 4 The meeting was called to order by Mayor Pugh with the following Council Members present: Demsher, Fulton, Gard, Kirkpatrick, and Pugh Also present were Assistant City Manager Courtney, City Attorney Hays, Public Works Director Arness, Planning and Community Development Director Perry, Electric Director Lindley, Housing and Redevelopment Administrator Henson, Senior Associate Planner Keaney, Associate Planner King, Chief Housing Counselor Maurer, City Clerk Richter, Deputy City Clerk Strohmayer, and Secretary to the City Council Rupp. APPROVAL OF MINUTES MOTION: Made by Councilman Demsher, seconded by Councilman Fulton approv- ing the minutes of the regular meeting of March 1 , 1982, as mailed to each Council Member. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS Letter from Churn Creek Mobile Park - re Business License Fees A letter was received from Carrol Hammar, Manager of Churn Creek Mobile Park in regard to the Business License Code requirements. He feels that the Code discriminates from one business or profession to r another and noted that some businesses are exempt. 1- Mayor Pugh suggested that the matter be referred to staff for review. i 114 City Attorney Hays advised that he has met with Mr. Hammar and ex- plained the legal basis for levying the license fees. In response to an inquiry from Councilman Fulton, Mr. Hays advised that certain types [ of businesses, such as insurance brokers, banks and savings and loans, are regulated by the State and the local agency is pre-empted. Councilman Kirkpatrick stated that such agencies do pay license fees but they are paid to the State. 1Council Woman Gard said she would be interested in knowing what the 1 revenue would be from those exempt businesses, and suggested that if the amount is substantial an effort should be made to contact our State representatives to ask for the right to require a City license. i Councilman Demsher concurred that some consistency would be helpful . Mr. Hays advised that the amount would not be very much since the City does not have a gross receipts ordinance but charges a flat rate. E Mr. Hammars was present and again advised Council that he believes the Code discriminates between businesses. With the concurrence of Council , Mayor Pugh referred the matter to staff and advised Mr. Hammars that some information will be providedIII to him explaining the basis for levying business license fees. Councilman Kirkpatrick asked for a report from staff regarding what the basis is for charging different types of businesses, different license fees. i 3/15/82 r 57 1 7 Letter from Myron A. Amerine - Supporting Bike Lanes, Bike Paths and Other Bicycle Needs A letter was received from Myron Amerine, biologist, college instruc- tor, lab technician, and bicyclist, discussing the bicycle and its ,-/(p role in transportation. He discussed design criteria and compared the `) various types of bikeways and their accident rates. He expressed his11/ support of the State' s design manual , "Planning and Design Criteria for Bikeways in California" , and stated that this is the legal docu ment that the City' s Bikeway Element should be based on. Mrs. Gard said she was interested in the Mr. Amerine's comment that there seemed to be a need for retraining of bicycle strategy taught by 5 the police to elementary school children. She suggested that there be J some coordination between the Police Department and bicycle organizations such as the ones Mr. Amerine represents. I Council concurred that the information provided by Mr. Amerine was t well documented and determined that copy of the letter should be forwarded to the Police Department. Request from Committee to Elect Carlton for District Attorney - re Serving Alcohol in the Posse Clubhouse 4 MOTION: Made by Councilman Kirkpatrick, seconded by Councilman Fulton approving the request of the Committee to Elect Carlton to serve ;[�� alcohol at the Sheriff's Posse Clubhouse on March 19, 1982. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes WESTERN RANCHES WATER ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1981-5 ‘ The following document was submitted on behalf of Special Bond Counsel , for adoption relative to Western Ranches Water Assessment District No. 1981-5: III Resolution - of Intention t MOTION: Made by Councilman Kirkpatrick, seconded by Councilman Demsher 11 that Resolution No. 82-28 be adopted, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding of intention to order improvements in Western Ranches Water Assessment District No. 1981-5. Voting was as follows: Ayes: Council Members - Demsher, Fulton, Gard, Kirkpatrick, and Pugh Noes: Council Members - None Absent: Council Members - None Resolution No. 82-28 is on file in the office of the City Clerk. CLOVER CREEK SEWER ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1981-3 The following document was submitted on behalf of Special Bond Counsel , for filing relative to Clover Creek Sewer Assessment District No. 1981-3: 616° Shasta County Resolution Granting Jurisdiction which was filed for record. APPROVAL OF PAYROLL AND ACCOUNTS PAYABLE REGISTER MOTION: Made by Councilman Kirkpatrick, seconded by Councilwoman Gard that Accounts Payable Register No. 18, check nos. 82976 through 83197 inclusive, Le i in the amount of $690,989.42, be approved and paid, and that Payroll ID Register No. 18, check nos. 156935 through 157493 inclusive, in the amount i of $418,376.38, for the period February 14, 1982 through February 27, 1982, III be approved. Total : $1 ,109,365.80 Voting was as follows: i Ayes: Council Members - Demsher, Fulton, Gard, Kirkpatrick, and Pugh Noes: Council Members - None Absent: Council Members - None TREASURER'S REPORT - January 31 , 1982 Councilman Kirkpatrick submitted the Treasurer's Report as of January 31 , 1 4 1982, which showed the Treasurer' s Accountability to be $11 ,031 ,470.74. V. 4 -,e 3/15/82 4 58 CLAIMS FOR DAMAGE AND PERSONAL INJURY - 1st Hearing t Ralph Dorrell - Claim filed 3/8/82 MOTION: Made by Councilman Fulton, seconded by Councilman Kirkpatrick 1 that Claim for Personal Injury filed by Ralph Dorrell on March 8, 1982, be denied and referred to the City Insurance Carrier. The Vote: I � Unanimous Ayes Diane Dorrell - Claim filed 3/12/82 III MOTION: Made by Councilman Fulton, seconded by Councilman Kirkpatrick that Claim for Personal Injury filed by Diane Dorrell on March 12 , 1982, be denied and referred to the City Insurance Carrier. The Vote: r I A Unanimous Ayes 4 Kim D. Zagaris - Claim filed 3/4/82 MOTION: Made by Councilman Demsher, seconded by Councilwoman Gard that Claim for Damages filed by Kim D. Zagaris on March 4, 1982, be 3 paid in the amount of $30.00 The Vote: Unanimous Ayes CLAIMS FOR DAMAGE AND PERSONAL INJURY - 2nd Hearing Dale A. Simpson - Claim filed 2/22/82 MOTION: Made by Councilwoman Gard, seconded by Councilman Kirkpatrick that Claim for Damages filed by Dale A. Simpson on February 22, 1982, A 3 be denied and the claimant so advised. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes SETTLEMENT OF CLAIMS City Attorney Hays advised that the following Claim for Damages has been IA 3 settled by the City Insurance Carrier: Elaine Hurst, Claim for Damages Settled in the Amount of $1 ,150 SUMMONS AND COMPLAINTSIII i. City Attorney Hays advised that the City has been served with the following Summons and Complaint: I Michael Lance Burke, Claim for Personal Injuries vs. City of Redding et al ORDINANCE - Amending Municipal Code Pertaining to Street Names MOTION: Made by Councilman Demsher, seconded by Councilman Kirkpatrick that full reading of Ordinance No. 1579 be waived. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes j ) i MOTION: Made by Councilman Demsher, seconded by Councilman Fulton that �I Ordinance No. 1579 be adopted, an ordinance of the City Council of the City of Redding amending Chapter 17.32 of the Redding Municipal Code by repeal- ing Section 17.32.080 and substituting therefor new Sections 17.32.080, 17.32.082, 17.32.084, and 17.32.086, pertaining to street names. Voting was as follows: Ayes: Council Members - Demsher, Fulton, Gard, Kirkpatrick:, and Pugh Noes: Coupcil Members - None Absent: Council Members - None Ordinance No. 1579 is on file in the office of the City Clerk. ORDINANCE - Amending Municipal Code Creating a Special Agricultural "A" [ Combining District. III MOTION: Made by Councilman Demsher, seconded by Councilman Kirkpatrick Q that full reading of Ordinance No. 1580 be waived. The Vote: Unanimous j0 1 Ayes MOTION: Made by Councilman Kirkpatrick, seconded by Councilman Demsher that Ordinance No. 1580 be adopted, an ordinance of the City Council of the :i r r 3/15/82 i a - - - .. 59 4 i4 4 4 City of Redding amending Title 18 of the Redding Municipal Code by adding thereto a new Chapter 18.37, creating a special Agricultural "A" Combining District. Voting was as follows: Ayes : Council Members - Demsher, Fulton, Gard, Kirkpatrick, and Pugh Noes: Council Members - None 1 Absent: Council Members - None 1 Ordinance No. 1580 is on file in the office of the City Clerk. ORDINANCE - Amending Municipal Code Pertaining to Radio, Television, and Satellite Television Antennas Mayor Pugh abstained from voting on this matter. MOTION: Made by Councilman Demsher, seconded by Councilman Kirkpatrick that full reading of Ordinance No. 1581 be waived. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes with Mayor Pugh abstaining MOTION: Made by Councilman Demsher, seconded by Councilman Fulton that Ordinance No. 1581 be adopted, an ordinance of the City Council of the City jO of Redding amending Chapter 16.24 of the Redding Municipal Code by repeal- ing Section 16.24.010 and substituting a new Section 16.24.010, and amend • - ing Chapter 18.56 by repealing Section 18.56.045 and substituting a new Section 18.56.045, pertaining to radio, television, and satellite televi- sion antennas. Voting was as follows: Ayes: Council Members - Demsher, Fulton, Gard, and Kirkpatrick Noes: Council Members - None Absent: Council Members - None Abstain: Council Members - Pugh Ordinance No. 1581 is on file in the office of the City Clerk. AWARD OF BID - Substation Testing MOTION: Made by Councilwoman Gard, seconded by Councilman Demsher that Bid Schedule No. 1372, substation testing, be awarded to General Electric Company on their low bid in the amount of $15,000. Voting was as follows: a Ayes: Council Members - Demsher, Fulton, Gard, Kirkpatrick, and Pugh Noes: Council Members - None Absent: Council Members - None REQUEST FOR USE OF OLD CITY HALL - by North Valley Art League Assistant City Manager Courtney advised that a request has been received from the North Valley Art League to use the Old City Hall as an art gallery and workshop for artists in the area. The use would be temporary until the building can be restored. Mr. Courtney said that in reviewing the request, it is the opinion of staff that this is a good interim use until funds are secured to restore the building and is far better than leaving the building empty. It is the recommendation of staff that the City Manager be authorized to have either a letter of agreement or temporary lease agreement prepared and executed with the North Valley Art League, according to the seven provi- 1 sions which are contained in the City Manager's memo to Council dated March a. 1 1 11 , 1982. Mr. Harold Snow of the Art League was asked how soon they would occupy the building and he advised that they would begin cleanup and painting within two or three days after the agreement is approved. REQUEST FOR REVENUE SHARING FUNDS - The Center, Martin Luther King, Jr. Memorial Center and Consumers Aid of Shasta, Inc. Assistant City Manager Courtney explained that the above agencies have a I 3/15/82 0 k- z 60 I e r 1 critical need for funding at this time and in order to provide operating funds for them for the remainder of the fiscal year ending August 31 , 1982, it is recommended that the following amounts be allocated: The Center z, $16,360 less the amount which has been advanced for this fiscal period. The recommended amount provides for a ten percent increase c- ,67/1 over the 1980-81 authorization. The amount requested was $18,970. III Martin Luther King, Jr. , Memorial Center $22,800 less the amount which has been advanced for this fiscal S-/ period. The recommended amount provides for a ten percent increase t IP4 over the 1980-81 authorization. The amount requested was $31 ,013. Consumers Aid of Shasta, Inc. $8,500 less the amount advanced for this fiscal period. The 1980-81 5�� authorization was $6,000; and the 1981-82 request was $9,100. Mr. Courtney requested that the Mayor be authorized to sign the revenue sharing agreements with The Center and CAOS and the operating lease agreement for Martin Luther King, Jr. , Memorial Center which includes the revenue sharing agreement. MOTION: Made by Councilwoman Gard, seconded by Councilman Fulton authorizing the Mayor to execute the appropriate documents for interim funding as hereinabove stated for The Center, Martin Luther King, Jr. , Memorial Center and Consumers Aid of Shasta County, Inc. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes SET PUBLIC HEARING - Planned Development Application PD-17-80, Benton Ranch Phase I , and Receive Final EIR MOTION: Made by Councilman Demsher, seconded by Councilwoman Gard that aIII �/ public hearing be set for 7:30 P.M. , April 5, 1982, re Planned Development j I Application PD-17-80, Benton Ranch Phase I , and to receive the Final EIR. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP - S-21-81 , Bonnyview Meadows West by Ward Investments Council was advised that the Planning Commission has approved a tentative map to divide 34 acres located east of East Waverly Avenue, south of Star Io q Drive and West of Olney Creek into 60 lots, subject to 34 conditions of approval . Council was provided a list of the conditions and a map of the rarea was shown on the Vu Graph. SET PUBLIC HEARING - 1982 CDBG Entitlement Grant and 1979-82 Housing iAssistance Plan Amendment 4 MOTION: Made by Councilman Demsher, seconded by Councilman Kirkpatrick that a public hearing be set for 7:30 P.M. , April 5, 1982, re the proposed 5,27 goals and objectives and projected use of funds for the 1982 Community Development Block Grant Entitlement Grant and the 1979-1982 Housing Assis- tance Plan Amendment. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes F COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT - Budget Revisions Planning and Community Development Director Perry submitted some tables depicting the proposed adjustments and the status of the various Community rDevelopment Program grant budgets. He advised that all grant activities P have been completed and funds expended in the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th year III Entitlement Grants and the 1st year Cascade Discretionary Grant. He added } 5,21 that all activities have also been completed in the 5th year Entitlement Grant with the exception of Sulphur Creek Park, which is expected to go to r bid in April . Mr. Perry stated that at this time, current estimates to s complete the improvements at Sulphur Creek Park are $8,000 over the budget amount. Administrative costs have also exceeded the budget amount by $2,458. I k r 3/15/82 61 It is recommended that unexpended funds on completed projects be trans- ferred to Sulphur Creek Park and Administration in the above amounts and that the remaining surplus funds be applied to the Contingency fund. Mr. Perry said these proposed budget revisions have been reviewed by the Community Development Citizens Advisory Committee and it is their recom- mendation that Council approve the revisions. Councilwoman Gard noted that the Community Development Citizens Advisory Committee has accomplished a lot for the community. MOTION: Made by Councilwoman Gard, seconded by Councilman Kirkpatrick approving the budget revisions as hereinabove stated and according to the A tables submitted to Council dated March 10, 1982. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes REHABILITATION OF THE REDDING HOTEL Planning and Community Development Director Perry reviewed his memorandum to Council dated March 10, 1982. He advised that the Redding Hotel , located at 1748 Market Street was built in 1922 and has a number of fire safety and building deficiencies which have been determined by the Building Official and Fire Marshal to potentially create life threatening situa- tions. Mr. Perry stated that staff has investigated possible use of CDBG funds in the form of a loan to assist the owner to make the necessary repairs. Funds are available for this purpose from unexpended contingency funds in 2 the 1979 CDBG Entitlement Grant, CDBG Housing Rehabilitation Program Income and the balance from Housing Rehabilitation in the 1982 CDBG Entitlement 9 Grant. Mr. Perry advised that the total cost of rehabilitation is $153,000 I and suggested that financing could be in the form of a loan at 10% interest111 �/ amortized over 15 years. He further suggested that a condition be placed I on the loan that rents would not be raised on current residential tenants for a period from July 1 , 1981 , to one year after the repairs were completed. The Community Development Citizens Advisory Committee and the Rehabilitation Loan Committee have reviewed the proposal and recommend funding. It is the recommendation of staff that Council approve a loan as described above to the owners of the Redding Hotel in the amount of $153,000. There was some discussion regarding the one year period limitation on raising the rent on current residential tenants. Mr. Perry advised that it was staff' s opinion that one year was sufficient and further advised that rehabilitation will take quite a while and the one year limitation does not begin until completion of the project. In response to an inquiry from Councilman Demsher, Chief Housing Counselor Maurer advised that there are currently 95 rooms in the hotel ; however, five will be removed in order to build a fire escape. She noted that rents would not be controlled on the vacant units, but would be controlled for the first year on the tenants that are there now. Mrs. Maurer explained that the corrections proposed will only bring the hotel to H.U.D. 's minimum standards; therefore, she feels the hotel will serve the same type of people it is currently serving. MOTION: Made by Councilwoman Gard, seconded by Councilman Demsher approving a City of Redding Housing Rehabilitation Loan to the owners of the Redding Hotel in the amount of $153,000, as outlined above. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes 4 3/15/82 a - 62 E i PUBLIC HEARING - re Appeal of Use Permit UP-308-81 , by Steve Smith and Orbie G. Robertson The hour of 7:30 P.M. having arrived, Mayor Pugh opened the public hearing re the appeal of Use Permit UP-308-81 , by Steve Smith and Orbie G. Robertson. The following documents are on file in the office of the City Clerk: III Affidavit of Publication - Notice of Public Hearing Affidavit of Mailing - Notice of Public Hearing The City Clerk advised that several written protests have been re- ceived as follows: Mrs. Lovella Pigg, 4251 Hiawatha Drive, Redding, CA 96003 Mr. & Mrs. Louis Robbins, 2461 Abernathy Lane, Redding, CA 96003 c Mr. & Mrs. R. D. Page, P. 0. Box 1037 , Central Valley, CA 96019 f Mr. Joe Eastman, 3782 Churn Creek Road, Redding, CA 96002 David & Romona Black, P. 0. Box 75, Bella Vista, CA 96008 �� Bruce Schlange, 3628 De Mac Drive, Enterprise, CA 96002 Ken Behnke, 5830 Fagan Drive, Redding, CA 96001 David Black, P. 0. Box 75, Belle Vista, CA (telephone protest) Planning and Community Development Director Perry reviewed his memo- randum to Council dated March 12, 1982. He stated that the Planning Commission, by a vote of four to one, granted Sonoma Investments permission to relocate an adult bookstore from an existing building to a new building under construction on property located at 2131 Hilltop Drive, in the C-3 zone. The C-3 zone allows for adult-entertainment uses under the City' s Adult Entertainment Ordinance. A map of the area was shown on the Vu Graph. Subsequent to that decision, an appeal was filed and as stated, the basis of the appeal is that the use permit was granted without benefit III c of an environmental impact report. Mr. Perry advised that a negative declaration was drafted on January 13, 1982, by the Board of Administrative Review and ratified by the Planning Commission on February 9, 1982. He explained that under CEQA, there is no appeal procedure for the issuance of a negative declaration or certification of an EIR once it has been rendered, except through judicial remedy. He emphasized that "environment" under CEQA means "physical conditions" not social or economic circum- stances. It is the recommendation of staff that the appeal be denied and that the appropriate findings be made. i P Orbie Robertson, 8012 San Souci Dr. , stated he is one of the signa- tories on the letter of appeal . He said they are speaking only to the EIR and feel irreparable harm is occurring as a result of the book- store. Mr. Robertson said numerous studies show that 80% of the people are opposed to pornography, and there is evidence that porno- graphy is responsible for an increase in aggressiveness by men against women. He also noted that it has been documented that .young boys and girls have been used for producing this type of material . Mr. III Robertson asked why an EIR provides protection to birds and animals I. but cannot consider what may happen to people. Mayor Pugh explained that laws controlling criminal acts are regulated by the State of California. He said that even though Council may be in agreement with Mr. Robertson' s statements, it must work with the 3/15/82 63 existing regulations. He said Mr. Robertson' s ideas are well versed • and well expressed but State legislation controls what local govern- ments may and may not do about pornography. Mayor Pugh emphasized that according to the California Environmental Quality Act, social or economic effects of a business cannot be considered. Arthur Wells, Attorney for Sonoma Investments, stated that there are constraints on municipalities concerning adult bookstores and the S State has said that communities must provide access for such materials. He stressed that his client is seeking to comply with the law and will be moving into an area that allows this type of use. Mr. Wells said the EIR is not the answer, but that this group is trying to ban the bookstore anywhere in the City. He feels adult material does not cause the alarming situation that everyone thinks it does. John Fitzgerald, 1610 West Street, stated that he owns the property adjoining the adult bookstore. He expressed the problems he has had with patrons of the bookstore parking on the lots in the rear of his property and walking through the lot to go in the back door of the 1 bookstore so as not to be seen. He said they also drive through his parking lot and enter the parking lot of the bookstore across the rear of his property. Mr. Fitzgerald anticipates that with the bookstore moving to the rear of the property, traffic will increase. He requests that a fence or barrier be erected between his property and the adult bookstore property owned by Mr. Nichols. Steve Smith, 855 Fell Street, encouraged Council Members to visit the bookstore and see what is actually happening there. He feels the material destroys the minds of men and degrades women. Mr. Smith said this type of activity should not be allowed in the City. He was also concerned about enforcement to keep minors out of the store. He suggested that the store be moved to some other location away from Hilltop Drive. ; Mike Vannoy, President of the Shasta County Foster Parent Program, said he feels there is an underlying detrimental effects on the community. He asked that Council educate themselves as to what is going on in the bookstore and stressed that we have the right to protect our community. Mr. Vannoy felt the State is wrong to allow adult bookstores and communities should let their opposition be known. Jim Valdez , resident of Shasta County, proposed that bookstore owners should be responsible for sex crimes committed within a short time after entering their stores. He felt the police should ask this question when interrogating perpetrators of sex crimes. He also stressed that sex offenders should be restricted from entering the store. Mayor Pugh requested that speakers limit their discussion to the matter at hand, which is the Use Permit application. Frank Nichols, owner of the property of the current location and the new location of the bookstore, said he has spent a great deal of money in legal costs to resolve this problem and there has been a lot of damage caused to some of the other tenants in the building. After negotiations with the owners of the bookstore, he said the best solution seemed to be for them to move to a location in the back where they would not be harmful to the other tenants. He emphasized that a continuation of this matter will only cause more harm and cost more money. Mr. Nichols noted that none of these people who oppose the bookstore have helped him monetarily and added that the best thing to do is get it resolved as soon as possible. Mr. Nichols said he has 3/15/82 4 4 , 0 64 i r t also been concerned about the traffic problems across his and Mr. Fitzgerald's property and suggested that he get together and form a L common barrier to the benefit of b th properties. Dave Hildreth, 2029 Sacramento Street, said it is time to get the matter resolved. He pointed out , hat morality should be left up to the individual and should not be - egislated. Mr. Hildreth felt that III the owners of the bookstore have made every effort to appease the community. Jim Holly, 1116 Harpole, noted that at earlier meetings, there was discussion regarding what the standards should be for adult bookstores and asked if this had been tabled. Mayor Pugh explained that those determinations have been made by State law and local laws would have no enforceable effect. He added that the State Legislature has taken over the determination of what is obscenity and what is not. Mr. Wilkinson, 3210 Mandarin, asked why can't the people in local governments have some influence in the State Government' s standards. Mrs. Gard stated it is totally a propriate for organized groups to contact their State representatives and try to influence legislation. 1' Council Member Demsher stated that the zoning laws established in the City of Redding are in accordanc with the laws of the State of t California. Dave McCoy, 4059 Remington Drive, said the Supreme Court has said each community can regulate pornograpiy and asked why Shasta County couldn' t take a vote to abolish it. City Attorney Hays advised that the Supreme Court did not say each III community could establish its own standards but that the standards would be community-wide and not set by the Supreme Court. He stated that the State of California has determined that a state--wide standard will be used and it will be the State who decides what is obscene and what is not. MOTION: Made by Councilman Demsh r, seconded by Councilman Fulton that the public hearing be closed. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes In response to an inquiry from Mrs. Gard, the City Attorney advised that the State law is the same now s it was when the City adopted the adult entertainment ordinance. Council Member Gard said she does not agree with pornography but Council must work within the adopted ordinance. She emphasized that the ordinance was constructed to be as restrictive as it could legally be. In response to an inquiry from Mr. jDemsher, Mr. Perry advised that if this appeal is upheld, the bookst re may stay where it is with no change. Council Member Kirkpatrick questioned Mr. Perry about adding a condi- tion requiring that a fence be built on both the north . and south property lines. Mr. Perry advised that Council could deny the appeal and modify the condition requiring a fence on the north property line to include a fence on the south property line. III Mr. Nichols agreed that he would b: willing putup an to appropriate barrier. 3/15/82 r 65 ; a 1 S. i I MOTION: Made by Councilwoman Gard, seconded by Councilman Fulton that the appeal of Use Permit UP-308-81 , be denied, modifying Condition No. 13 to require a fence along the south property line, and making the following findings: , III 1 . That council has reviewed the environmental-review record con- cerning the application and found it to be adequate. 2. That under Section 18.70.050 of the Municipal Code, the Council finds that the establishment or operation of the use of the ? building applied for will not, under the circumstances of this i particular case, be detrimental to the health, safety, peace, morals, comfort and general welfare of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use or be detrimental or injurious to property. 1 3. That the use conforms to Chapter 18.53 of the Municipal Code and the findings required under Section 18.53.030 (2) as follows: a. That the proposed use will not be contrary to public i interest or injurious to nearby properties, and that the 3 spirit and intent of this chapter will be observed, and b. That the proposed use will not enlarge or encourage the < development of a skid-row area, and c. That the establishment of an additional use of this type in the area will not be contrary to any program of neighborhood i conservation or improvement, either residential or nonresi- dential . III 4. That the regulation of this use is within the power granted to x the City under Section 65850 of the Government Code. 1 1 The Vote: Unanimous Ayes STATE DEFERRED LOAN PROGRAM - Amendment Number 2 Planning and Community Development Director Perry reviewed his memorandum to Council dated March 10, 1982. He stated that the State Department of Housing and Community Development has allocated a total of $125,000 to the ; City of Redding under the State Deferred Payment Loan Program. He advised that there is a balance of $20,100 left in the program and it is necessary to amend the agreement with the State to allow the balance of funds to be used in other areas of the City. 6 °1 7 i It is the recommendation of staff that Council approve a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute Amendment No. 2 to Standard Agreement No. 79-026, HRL-18. Resolution MOTION: Made by Councilwoman Gard, seconded by Councilman Demsher that Resolution No. 82-29 be adopted, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding authorizing the execution of an amendment to Standard Agreement No. 79-026, HRL-18 of the Deferred Payment Rehabilitation Loan Program of the State of California. III Voting was as follows: Ayes: Council Members - Demsher, Fulton, Gard, Kirkpatrick, and Pugh Noes: Council Members - None Absent: Council Members - None Resolution No. 82-29 is on file in the office of the City Clerk. i 1 3/15/82 1 A 66 r r yS SET PUBLIC HEARING - Appeal of Tentative Subdivision Map S-22-81 , by P William Huggit MOTION: Made by Councilman Demsher, seconded by Councilman Kirkpatrick D setting a public hearing for 7:30 P.MJ , April 5, 1982, to consider the appeal of Tentative Subdivision Map S-2 -81 , by William Huggit. The Vote: [ Unanimous Ayes III1 Mrs. Gard requested a field trip to this area. ,- CENTERVILLE COMMUNITY SERVICE DISTRICT - re Service Boundaries fPlanning and Community Development Direc or Perry advised that a letter has been received from the president of the Board of Directors for the Center- 7. ville Water District, as a follow up to the District' s comments on the "Urban Boundary and General Plan Alternatives Report" and several meetings between the District and City staff. Council was given a copy of the letter. Mr. Perry feels that the District 's letter is very positive i I0 1 regarding the provision of water service and would serve to establish a workable agreement between the two agencies. It is the recommendation of staff that Council acknowledge receipt of the letter and authorize staff to pursue the subject with the District. Council Members agreed that it would be a very positive step to get to- gether with adjoining agencies and work 8n common problems. L. t MOTION: Made by Councilman Kirkpatric , seconded by Councilman Demsher fr acknowledging receipt of the letter from the Centerville Community Service a District and authorizing staff to pursue the subject with the District. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION - re Plan Area, Sphere of Influence and Sedway-Cooke Plan t Planning and Community Development Director Perry reviewed his memorandum to Council dated March 11 , 1982, including a map of the proposal , which is incorporated herein by reference. Mr. Perry stated that the Planning Commission unanimously referred to the City Council , Plan-Area and ASphere-of-Influence boundary for the City. The Commission also referred to 169/ �f the Council a draft letter to the Board of Supervisors prepared in response to the draft Sedway-Cooke plan. Mr. Perry explained that the basis of these recommendations was developed from the "Urban Boundary and General Plan Alternatives Report" circulated in January, 1982 , the draft Sedway-Cooke plan for the County and the input received in response to the circulation of the report to various public agencies and input received at the public hearing. He noted that gener- ally, the recommendation relates to Urban Boundary Alternative No. 5 in the Urban Boundary Report. Under the recommendation, the plan area of the City would include approx- imately 159-square miles. This consists pf about 4.1 percent of the entire county. The City presently occupies about 1 .0 percent of the County' s land area with a plan area of about 102-square miles. Mr. Perry continued that the Sphere-of Influence line encloses approx- imately 134-square miles. The area within the Sphere-of-Influence line is the area expected to be annexed to the City. This line would also be submitted to the Local Agency Formation Commission for adoption. The City occupies or will occupy shortly much of the land inside the Phased-UrbanIII - } Area line. Mr. Perry indicated that the Planning Commission opted to exclude the Churn Creek Bottom area from the sphere of influence area as the County has an established policy for the area in the Churn Creek Bottom plan and the draft Sedway-Cooke plan emphasizes "Agricultural" even more. The Commis- 3/15/82 - _ 67 f2 sion felt the area either should be classified as "Agricultural" or "Urban" , to avoid the creation of smaller parcels in a haphazard fashion. Included in the Sphere-of-Influence recommendation is the concept of a Phased-Urban Boundary and the creation of area plans. Mr. Perry explained that if the County accepts the proposal that the City be the lead agency for General Plan purposes within the City's plan area, the City would have no need to make additional comments on the draft Sedway-Cooke plan. He added that if this proposal is accepted by the County, it will involve a considerable commitment on the part of the City and the County to each other. The City will also prepare follow-up master sewer, storm drainage and water plans for portions of the plan area to be urbanized. 1 A If the Board of Supervisors accepts the proposal , follow-up activities will include: 1 . A joint-powers agreement. 2. Preparation of annexation policies and Phased Urban Boundary for the City. 3. Amendment of both the City' s and County's General Plans. YY Mr. Perry emphasized that a response must be obtained from the County prior to their beginning public hearings. This is to avoid the City's letting slip by the chance to provide specific input into either the plan or the EIR on the plan if the Board rejects the proposal . He added that as presently drafted, the Sedway-Cooke plan would be difficult for the City to a work with. Council was given copies of letters from Thomas West and Mr. & Mrs. Paul Stratte, requesting that their properties in the Churn Creek Bottom area, be included in the City' s Sphere-of-Influence. In response to an inquiry from Dr. Fulton, Mr. Perry advised that the West' s were represented at the Planning Commission public hearings by Mr. Grves who was present tonight. Mr. Perry explained that the Churn Creek Bottom area was excluded because it is in an identified geographic area of the County and is included in the County' s Churn Creek Bottom area plan. Mrs. Gard expressed concern that the land in this area is prime agricultural soil and that there was some State mandate to LAFCO to protect these areas. Mr. Steve Bell , attorney representing the West' s and the Stratte' s , said he was present and available for questions at the proper -time. Mayor Pugh said he has some mixed feelings about the over-all size of the plan and the major commitments on present residents for areas to be served in the future. He is concerned about the capital investment program, mainly in the southern area, and the intrusion into neighboring boundaries on areas that might better be served by another entity. The electrical needs to service these areas is also a great concern. Council Member Gard said the electrical power question is her greatest concern. She commented that some of the cooperative ventures between service districts is good for the City and may allow the formation of benefit districts for service. She added that the plan area as recommended will require a great financial commitment. She feels the time is probably right. f e 1 3/15/82 68 1, r Councilman Kirkpatrick expressed that many times in planning efforts , the City puts itself in a position that is much too small . He noted that it is ' an extremely large jump but it will give the City the opportunity to lay the proper groundwork for future planning and decision-making. He added that it would be more logical to include Churn Creek Bottom at some time. C Councilman Demsher agreed with the plan in concept but feels a more L complete study should be done of costs of development, such as providing III r water, sewers , and electricity. He expressed concern regarding how the City would provide the necessary power and how this will effect the current power rates. He also questioned whether the City would be absorbing land that should belong to Anderson. z Councilman Fulton expressed strong reservations with the plan as recom- mended. He felt it would greatly tax the current residents of Redding and he favored the Phased Urban Area as being more realistic and affordable. Councilman Kirkpatrick remarked that as afar as sewers are concerned, either 1 we plan for a new regional sewage treatment plant or individual areas will I go into piece meal sewer districts. Mayor Pugh questioned if an area is within the City' s plan area , will the City be able to make requirements for developing property before it is annexed. Mr. Perry advised that the pr posal does address that issue. He explained that this would require some negotiation with the County and refinement on the part of the City. He added that if the City could establish criteria and justify them, it could influence other jurisdic- tions. In response to an inquiry from Mayor Pugh, Mr. Perry stated that if Council accepts the plan area and the County agrees , that land would be put into a "holding zone" to avoid piece meal development. Mr. Perry added that a plan of services will be adopted when eaeh annexation occurs. Councilman Demsher said he would be inclined to agree that the Phased Urban Boundary would be more able to service the area and noted that the Sphere- of-Influence is almost 80% more territory. In response to a question from Mayor Pugh, Mr. Perry advised that the City does have a functional Circulation Element for the area within the phased urban line. Councilwoman Gard stated that properties in the Shasta College area are already committed for urban development. Mr. Demsher asked Mr. Perry which of the proposals he feels is the most advisable at this time. Mr. Perry said he favors the larger plan area but is concerned about electrical service. He added that the phased urban boundary would be 'a compromise. Mayor Pugh noted that the sewer problem exists with either plan. 1. MOTION: Made by Councilman Kirkpatrick, seconded by Councilwoman Gard approving the recommendation of the Planing Commission regarding the Plan Area, Sphere of Influence and Sedway-Cooke Plan as hereinabove stated, authorizing the Mayor to forward the proposal to the Board of Supervisors, and instructing staff to submit the Sphere of Influence Boundary to LAFCO for approval . III Voting was as follows: Ayes: Council Members - Demsher, Gard, Kirkpatrick, and Pugh Noes: Council Members - Fulton Absent: Council Members - None Mr. Perry reminded Council of the requests for inclusion of the Churn Creek Bottom land in the City's Sphere-of-Influence. Mr. Kirkpatrick noted that there would be some advantages such as dedication of riverfront land. 5 3/15/82 69 Councilman Demsher suggested that the planning staff contact Mr. West and Mr. & Mrs. Stratte to discuss their proposal and bring that proposal back to Council for review. ti Mr. Bell said he would also like to discuss the matter with staff. It was his understanding that the City Council wanted to have the opportunity to discuss this with him prior to the adoption of the boundary line. ANNEXATION REQUEST NO. 82-5 - Goodwater Avenue Planning and Community Development Director Perry reviewed his memo to Council dated March 11 , 1982. He advised that the request for annexation is from the owner of a parcel located at Goodwater Avenue to the east of Shasta View Drive. A map of the area was shown on the Vu Graph and Council was given a copy of comments from other departments. It is the recommendation of staff that annexation proceedings be commenced with the annexation modified to include the parcel immediately to the west. It is also recommended that staff be authorized to contact the owner of the parcel to the south to see if he wants to be included. Previously, he opposed annexation. If Council concurs, it is recommended that the City ) Attorney be asked to prepare resolutions to commence proceedings and to 3 exchange property taxes for the next regular City Council meeting, that the request be referred to the Board of Administrative Review for environmental impact determination, and that the standard plan of services be modified to reflect provisions of electrical service after acquisition of PGandE facilities. MOTION: Made by Councilman Demsher, seconded by Councilman Kirkpatrick approving the recommendation of staff as hereinabove stated pertaining to A Annexation Request No. 82-5, Goodwater Avenue. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes ANNEXATION REQUEST NO. 80-17 - Country Oaks Planning and Community Development Director Perry submitted a new petition from property owners in the Country Oaks Subdivision located in the north- east quadrant of Interstate 5 and Highway 292. In a previous request for annexation of a smaller portion of Country Oaks, it was the consensus of 5- Council that the subdivision should be brought up to City standards prior to annexation. It is the recommendation of staff that the annexation request be referred to the following departments for report and recommendation: 1 . Police 2. Fire 3. Public Works 4. Electric Mayor Pugh suggested that all the residents in this type of annexation be k made aware of the requirements to install , curb, gutter, sidewalks, street lights, etc. , before spending staff time on them. MOTION: Made by Councilman Demsher, seconded by Councilman Kirkpatrick approving the recommendation of staff as hereinabove stated re Annexation - Request No. 80-17, Country Oaks. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes ANNEXATION REQUEST NO. 82-7 - North Hawley Road MOTION: Made by Councilman Demsher, seconded by Councilman Kirkpatrick _ that Annexation Request No. 82-7 , North Hawley Road, be referred to the 5 0' Police, Fire, Public Works, and Electric Departments for review and recommendation. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes ANNEXATION REQUEST NO. 82-6 - Wilshire Drive Area Planning and Community Development Director Perry reviewed his memorandum to Council dated March 11 , 1982. He stated that a new petition has been 6'53 received from property owners in the Wilshire Drive area requesting annexa- 3 3/15/82 1 F 70 r 4 tion to the City. The residential area, together with a large parcel being used for agricultural purposes to the south, is an island area entirely surrounded by the City. Mr. Perry explained that the only significant concerns with the annexation are acquisition of PGandE facilities , avoiding electrical severance costs and pedestrian safety on Wilshire Drive. i Mr. Perry reported that since this developed area is half in and half out of the City, and needs to be annexed to provide reasonable-cost-electrical III service to the properties to the north, it is the recommendation of staff that annexation proceedings be commenced for the developed areas. Said proceedings would be subject to the prgperty owners forming an assessment district to pay for the costs of acquiring PGandE facilities if these costs S exceed what the City would have to pay t provide electrical service to the area along Henderson Road. It is the recommendation of staff that after Electric makes a cost determi- nation, the City Attorney be instructed to prepare a resolution to commence proceedings and exchange property taxes for the next regular meeting, that the request be referred to the Board of Administrative Review for environ- mental impact determination, and that the standard plan of services be ?r. modified to reflect provisions of electrical service after acquisition of PGandE facilities or that the property owners be advised that the City is willing to annex if they form an assessment district to acquire PGandE facilities concurrently with the annexation. L Discussion ensued regarding the water supply in the area and the need for 3 fire hydrants, street resurfacing, the possibility of the annexation having a detrimental effect on the City' s fire insurance rating, and the equity with other annexations. MOTION: Made by Councilwoman Gard, seconded by Councilman Kirkpatrick that Annexation Request No. 82-6, Wilshire Drive Area, be continued to April 5, 1982, pending report from Public Works and Electric Departments for posIII - sible assessment district proceedings. -he Vote: Unanimous Ayes ANNEXATION REQUEST NO. 82-8 - Branstetter Lane MOTION: Made by Councilman Demsher, s?conded by Councilwoman Gard that Annexation Request No. 82-8, Branstetterl Lane, be referred to the Police, ,5S 3 Fire, Public Works, and Electric Departm nts for report and recommendation. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes ANNEXATION REQUEST NO. 80-18 AND 81-3 - airport Area Planning and Community Development Director Perry reviewed his memorandum to Council dated March 11 , 1982. He submitted a map depicting the present boundaries of the Airport annexation al commenced by Council , and other property owners in the area who have requested to be included in the :i annexation. Council was given the commgnts from various City departments �j concerning the annexation and its expansion. Mr. Perry recommended that Mr. Alan Hills property be kept in the annexa- tion for now, rather than proceeding with a separate uninhabited annexation i- for his property, as that could reduce the potential property tax revenue for the City and could cause greater difficulty in annexing the Airport. With respect to the other requests on the south side of Rancho Road, it is III x recommended that the annexation be modiflied to include them. In addition F it is recommended that staff be authorized to contact the rest of the owners on the south side of Rancho Road to see if they want to be included. For the requests on the north side of Rancho Road, it is recommended that this area be treated as a separate anneXation, which would include forma- tion of an assessment district to purchase PGandE facilities north of Rancho Road. It may also be necessary to install fire hydrants in this area. 3/15/82 71 • For Wooded Acres, it is recommended that that area also be treated separ- ately since it involves discussion with the City of Anderson, which presently provides water to the area on a contract basis. Annexation of this area should include transference of the water system to the City, providing an adequate fire flow system and formation of an assessment district to purchase PGandE facilities in the subdivision. Mr. Perry stated that it is recognized that this procedure may result in a piece meal acquisition of PGandE facilities and some delay in providing electrical service to some parties; however, there is not a sufficient number of registered property owners in favor of the annexation to annex the entire electrical service area. Concerns involved in the annexation of this large area include additional travel costs, expansion of the street system, fire response, provision of water and sewer, the City' s relation- ship with Anderson, and purchase of PGandE inventory. Mr. Perry also noted flooding in the new portion of Wooded Acres north of Rancho Road. MOTION: Made by Councilman Kirkpatrick, seconded by Councilman Demsher approving the recommendation of staff as hereinabove stated regarding Annexation Request No. 80-18 and 81-3, Airport Area. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes 4 ANNEXATION REQUEST NO. 82-1 - Oasis Road Planning and Community Development Director Perry reviewed his memorandum to Council dated March 11 , 1982. He advised that a letter has been received requesting annexation from property owners south of Oasis Road and 4 west of the Interstate 5 interchange. The area consists of 9.35 acres and consists of five mobilehomes and two conventional dwellings on individual lots. The area is contiguous to the City on the east. 6- S:5 Mr. Perry outlined some of the problems with the annexation and recommended that Council advise the property owners that it is willing to annex the area if the property owners do the following: 1 . Form an assessment district to transfer PGandE facilities to A the City. 2. Form an assessment district to upgrade the water system to ISO standards. MOTION: Made by Councilwoman Gard, seconded by Councilman Demsher approving the recommendation of staff as hereinabove stated regarding Annexation Request No. 82-1 , Oasis Road, and requesting a report from the Public Works Director on possible water system improvements in the area. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes ANNEXATION REQUEST NO. 82-3 - Eastside Road Planning and Community Development Director Perry reviewed his memorandum to Council dated March 11 , 1982. He advised that the land in question lies south of Clear Creek between the Sacramento River and Highway 273. Council was given the comments from several City departments. 7 Mr. Perry outlined some of the concerns expressed regarding the annexation ,5-33 1 and recommended that Council advise the property owners that the City is willing to annex the areas provided the owners do the following: 1 . Dedicate 60 feet of right of way for the extension of Eastside Road from the southern to the northern end of the annexation. 2. Note that the City will not maintain the road until it is brought up to City standards. 3. Form an assessment district to install fire hydrants in the area as per ISO standards. 4 3/15/82 72 r I t r r MOTION: Made by Councilman Demsher seconded by Councilwoman Gard approving the recommendation of staff as hereinabove stated regarding i. Annexation Request No. 82-3, Eastside Rdad. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes i r ANNEXATION REQUEST NO. 82-4 - River Ranch Road Planning and Community Development Director Perry reviewed his memorandum to Council dated March 11 , 1982. He advised that a petition has been received signed by owners and renters of 78 parcels in the River Ranch Road III area. Council was given copies of the comments from various City depart- ments concerning the annexation request. 3 Mr. Perry outlined the disadvantages with the annexation and recommended that Council advise the petitioners tha: the City is willing to annex the r area provided the property owners do the following: 1 . Form an assessment district to install fire hydrants in the area as per ISO requirements. r2. Form an assessment district to acquire and transfer ownership t. of PGandE facilities to the City. Mr. Perry stated that at present, cost estimates have not been prepared for either of the above nor is the source of water supply known. He further i stated that it should be understood that the City would not extend sewer r service to the area nor maintain streets or storm-drain channels unless brought up to City standards. Discussion ensued regarding the uncertainty of the water supply and sewer services and it was the consensus of Council that the area may be more suitable for annexation to the City of Anderson. MOTION: Made by Councilman Demsher, seconded by Councilman Fulton AnnexaIII - tion Request No. 82-4, River Ranch Road, be denied. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes ANNEXATION NO. 82-2 - Clear Creek Road Planning and Community Development Dire for Perry reviewed his memorandum to Council dated March 11 , 1982. Hedvised that a letter requesting annexation has been received from the oIner of approximately 577.3 acres located in two parcels on the north side of Clear Creek Road. Mr. Perry pointed out that the property is not contiguous to the City nor within the boundaries of the Redding Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant. Mr. Perry outlined the advantages and disadvantages expressed by the -' various City departments and recommended that Council advise the property 1' owner that it is willing to annex if the property owner will carry out the nine conditions as outlined in the staff report which is incorporated herein by reference. MOTION: Made by Councilman Fulton, seconded by Councilman Demsher denying the recommendation of staff as hereinabove stated regarding Annexation Request No. 82-2, Clear Creek Road, until such time as intervening property is included to make the annexation contiguous to the City. Voting was as follows: Ayes: Council Members - Demsher, Fult n, Gard, and Pugh Noes: Council Members - Kirkpatrick Absent: Council Members - NoneIII ORDINANCE - Amending Municipal Code re Fire Prevention City Attorney Hays submitted an ordinaice at the request of the Fire Marshal , to make certain sections of our Code consistent with the Uniform Fire Code. f 3/15/82 Z I 73 j S 1 t 1 1 Councilman Fulton offered Ordinance No. 1582 for first reading, an ordi- nance of the City Council of the City of Redding amending Chapter 9.20 of /1 the Redding Municipal Code by repealing Sections 9.20.030, 9.20.040, D 9 9.20.050, 9.20.060, and 9.20.090, and substituting therefor new Sections 9.20.030, 9.20.040, 9.20.050, 9.20.060, and 9.20.090, pertaining to fire 4 prevention. i ill/I CONSENT CALENDAR MOTION: Made by Councilman Demsher, seconded by Councilman Kirkpatrick 1 that the following items be approved: 1 Lease Agreement - A five year extension of a Lease under which the Experi- 4 mental Aircraft Association occupies the quonset hut and operates at Benton I / / 1. Airpark. Lease Agreement - A one year extension of the City' s Lease Agreement with the Shasta County Chapter, American Red Cross, which has occupied the /4 building at 844 Parkview Avenue for several years. Lease Agreement - A new Lease Agreement under which Republic Airlines is / / operating out of the new terminal building at Redding Municipal Airport. Resolution No. 82-30 - A resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding approving the report and findings of the Board of Appeals and :50z5. ordering the abatement of the unsafe and unsightly building and debris on property at 1122 Willis Street (Owned by Luise Y. Reed) . , Resolution No. 82-31 - A resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding approving the report and findings of the Board of Appeals and ordering the abatement of the unsafe and unsightly building on property ' '2 A identified as A.P. 108-120-17 , south of 4735 Cedars Road (Owned by Schroeder/Culp) . Resolution No. 82-32 - A resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding rescinding Resolution No. 81-295, which declared intention to begin 3 a legal proceedings of abatement on property at 4531 Churn Creek Road (Owned 4 by Faith A. Scott) . Resolution No. 82-33 - A resolution of the City Council of the City of S Redding confirming a division of land and bond for Assessment No. 2 in Hartnell Avenue Assessment District No. 1980-3. 4 Resolution No. 82-34 - A resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding agreeing to exchange of property tax revenues for uninhabited Annexation Nos. 81-5 , 81-7, 81-8, 81-9, 81 -10, 81-11 , and 81 -12, to the 1g 0 4 City of Redding, and rescinding previous Resolutions No. 81-55, 81-57, -9 81-89, 81-199, 81-230, 81-261 , 81-242, and 82-22. A reement - An Agreement providing for payment by the City of the sum of 25,200 to the Shasta Natural Science Association for the operation of the 403 1 Junior Science Museum at Carter House during the period from May 1 , 1982, to April 30, 1983. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes 1 Resolution Numbers 82-30, 82-31 , 82-32, 82-33, and 82-34 are on file in the office of the City Clerk. PARKING AND BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT AREA - 1982 Budget 1 City Clerk Richter advised that the Advisory Board for the Parking and Business Improvement Area has submitted their budget for the year 1982 and 1/If'313 recommends its approval . She noted that Section 6.18.030 of the Redding 1 e I 1 I 3/15/82 a w 74 1 L Municipal Code states that the City Council shall have sole discretion as to how the revenue derived from the additional tax should be used. Mrs. Richter reported that the budget has been reviewed by staff and appears to be in order. c MOTION: Made by Councilman Demsher, seconded by Councilman Kirkpatrick approving the Parking and Business I''nprovement Area 1982 budget as submitted to Council . The Vote: Unanimous Ayes ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, at the hour of 10:45 P.M. , Mayor Pugh declared the meeting adjourned. APPROVED: ATTEST: City Clerk A Ir C`c 3/15/82