Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - City Council - 1980-11-03 412 1 D } City Council, Regular Meeting Police Dept. & Council Chambers Redding, California November 3 , 1980 7: 00 P.M. The Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag was led by Assistant City Manager Courtney. The invocation was offered by the Reverend Ralph Johnson, Pastor of Enterprise Community Church of God. The meeting was called to order by Mayor Pugh with the following Council Members present: Demsher, Fulton, Gard, Kirkpatrick, and Pugh. Also present were Assistant City Manager Courtney, City Attorney Hays, Director of Public Works Arness, Director of Planning and Community Development Perry, Director of Electric Simpson, Assis- tant City Engineer Lang, Senior Associate Planner Keaney, Traffic } Engineer Hamilton, Airports Manager McCall, Engineering Tech- , nician Duryee, and City Clerk Brayton. APPROVAL OF MINUTES MOTION: Made by Councilman Demsher, seconded by Councilman Kirkpatrick approving the minutes of the regular meeting of • October 20, 1980, as mailed to each Council Member. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes with Councilwoman Gard abstaining WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS Letter of Appreciation was received - from Carter House Science Museum thanking the City for the funding arrangement which was worked out this spring for the Museum. Councilwoman Gard noted that she has been receiving excellent feed-back from the community regarding the Carter House Museum. Request from Redding Yellow Cab Company - Renewal of Permits A request was received from Redding Yellow Cab Company for renewal of twelve vehicle permits for the year 1981. City Attorney Hays .sug,ges.ted that Council not renew twelve •)) Lp3permits as the company is not using all twelve. With the concurrence of Council, Mayor Pugh referred the request to staff for report and recommendation on the actual number of permits needed. Request from Popovics Productions - re Landing a Helicopter at the Civic Auditorium MOTION: Made by Councilman Demsher, seconded by Councilman Kirkpatrick approving the request from Popovics Productions ' I �� to land a helicopter for the purpose of delivering Santa �-17� Claus to the Popovics Christmas Gift Show, on November 22, 1980, subject to the City' s receipt of a certificate of insurance from Evergreen Helicopter, Inc. The Vote: Unan- imous Ayes LAKE BOULEVARD UNIT 5 SUBDIVISION ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1980-5 5,41 The following documents were submitted by Bond Counsel Sperry for 11/3/80 1 413 filing and adoption relative to Lake Boulevard Unit 5 Sub- division Assessment District No. 1980-5: Petition Certificate re Petition Resolution - Accepting Petition MOTION: Made by Councilman Kirkpatrick, seconded by Councilman Demsher that Resolution No. 80-261 be adopted, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding accepting petition in Lake Boulevard Unit 5 Subdivision Assessment District No. 1980-5. Voting was as follows : Ayes: Council Members - Demsher, Fulton, Gard, Kirkpatrick, and Pugh Noes: Council Members - None Absent: Council Members - None Resolution No. 80-261 is on file in the office ,of .the City Clerk. Boundary Map -- Resolution - Approving Boundary Map MOTION: Made by Councilman Kirkpatrick, seconded by Councilman Demsher that Resolution No. 80-262 be adopted, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding approving the boundary map in Lake Boulevard Unit 5 Subdivision Assessment District No. 1980-5. Voting was as follows: Ayes: Council Members - Demsher, Fulton, Gard, Kirkpatrick, and Pugh Noes:. Council Members - None Absent: Council Members - None • Resolution No. 80-262 is on file in the office of the City Clerk. Resolution - Expressing Preliminary Intent to Form Assessment District and Conduct Proceedings MOTION: Made by Councilman Kirkpatrick, seconded by Councilman Demsher that Resolution No. 80-263 be adopted, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding expressing preliminary intent to form assessment district and conduct special assess- ment proceedings in Lake Boulevard Unit 5 Subdivision Assessment District No. 1980-5. Voting was as follows : z. Ayes: Council Members - Demsher, Fulton, Gard, Kirkpatrick, and Pugh Noes: Council Members - None Absent: Council Members - None Resolution No. 80-263 is on file in the office of the City Clerk. APPROVAL OF PAYROLL AND ACCOUNTS PAYABLE REGISTER MOTION: Made by Councilman Kirkpatrick, seconded by Councilman Fulton that Accounts Payable Register No. 9 , check nos . 73395 through 73741 inclusive, in the amount of $1, 352 , 046 . 89 , be approved and paid, and that Payroll Register No. 9 , check nos . 136856 through 137402 inclusive, in the amount of $382 , 489 . 03 , for the period October 12, 1980 through October 25 , 1980 , be approved. Total: $1, 734, 535. 92 11/3/80 414 Voting was as follows: Ayes: Council Members - Demsher, Fulton, Gard, Kirkpatrick, and Pugh Noes: Council Members - None Absent: Council Members - None CLAIMS FOR DAMAGE AND PERSONAL INJURY - 1st Hearing George A. Bock, Jr. - Claim filed 10/22/80 MOTION: Made by Councilman Demsher, seconded by Council- woman Gard that Claim for Damages filed by George A. 0) 3 Bock, Jr. , on October 22, 1980, be referred to the City Insurance Committee, and that the City Clerk be instructed to place the claim on the Agenda for November 17, 1980 . The Vote: Unanimous Ayes Freda Burns - Claim filed 10/29/80 MOTION: Made by Councilman Demsher, seconded by Council- woman Gard that Claim for Damages filed by Freda Burns , on October 29, 1980, be referred to the City Insurance / 3 Committee, and that the City Clerk be instructed to place the claim on the Agenda for November 17, 1980 . The Vote: Unanimous Ayes Tamar W. Cunningham - Claim filed 10/29/80 MOTION: Made by Councilman Demsher, seconded by Council- woman Gard that Claim for Damages filed by Tamar W. Cun- ningham, on October 29 , 1980 , be referred to the City f y) -• Insurance Committee, and that the City Clerk be instructed to place the claim on the Agenda for November 17, 1980 . The Vote: Unanimous Ayes Carol M. Blankfield - Claim filed 10/29/80 MOTION: Made by Councilman Demsher, seconded by Council- woman Gard that Claim for Damages filed by Carol M. Blank- : f � field, on October 29, 1980, be referred to the City Insurance 3 Committee, and that the City Clerk be instructed to place the claim on the Agenda for November 17 , 1980 . The Vote: Unanimous Ayes ORDINANCE - re Limited Ambulances/Medi Cars MOTION: Made by Councilman Demsher, seconded by Councilman Kirkpatrick that full reading of Ordinance No. 1518 be waived and that the City Attorney be instructed to scan same. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes MOTION: Made by Councilman Demsher, seconded by Councilman 30 Kirkpatrick that Ordinance No. 1518 be adopted, an ordinance of the City Council of the City of Redding amending Chapter 6 . 10 of the Redding Municipal Code by repealing Section 6 . 10 . 010 and substituting therefor a new Section 6 . 10 . 010, pertaining to limited ambulances. Voting was as follows: Ayes: Council Members - Demsher, Fulton, Gard, Kirkpatrick, and Pugh Noes: Council Members - None Absent: Council Members - None • Ordinance No. 1518 is on file in the office of the City Clerk. ORDINANCE - re Speed Limits on Quartz Hill Road 113 rr MOTION: Made by Councilman Demsher, seconded by Councilman 11/3/80 415 • Kirkpatrick that full reading of Ordinance No. 1519 be waived and that the City Attorney be instructed to scan same. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes MOTION: Made by Councilman Kirkpatrick, seconded by Councilman Demsher that Ordinance No. 1519 be adopted, an ordinance of the City Council of the City of Redding amending Chapter 11. 12 of the Redding Municipal Code by adding to Section 11. 12 . 010, Subpara- graph B, a designated speed limit established for an additional street within the City. Voting was as follows : Ayes: Council Members - Demsher, Fulton, Gard, Kirkpatrick, and Pugh Noes: Council Members - None Absent: Council Members - None Ordinance No. 1519 is on file in the office of the City Clerk. ORDINANCE - re Penalties for Violations MOTION: -Made by Councilman Demsher, seconded by Councilman Kirkpatrick that full reading of Ordinance No. 1520 be waived and that the City Attorney be instructed to scan same. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes 3 UC/ MOTION: Made by Councilman Demsher, seconded by Councilwoman Gard that Ordinance No. 1520 be adopted, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding amending Chapter 1. 12 of the Redding Municipal Code by repealing Section 1. 12. 020 and substituting therefor a new Section 1. 12. 020, pertaining to penalties for violations . Voting was as follows: Ayes: Council Members - Demsher, Fulton, Gard, Kirkpatrick, and Pugh Noes: Council Members - None Absent: Council Members - None Ordinance No. 1520 is on file in the office of the City Clerk. �. GROWTH COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION - re Annexation Request No. 80-12, Western Ranches Area Planning and Community Development Director Perry reviewed the report of the Growth Committee dated October 30 , 1980, which is hereby made a part of these minutes by reference. The report stated that in terms of water use, the area can be subdivided into three areas, Western Homes Water Company, Shasta Ranchos Estates Water Company, and the Western Ranches area. The Western Ranches area has individual wells. A map of the area was shown 3 • on the Vu Graph. The report indicated that, though the mutual water companies are in good shape, they are deficient in fire hydrants and, in order to prevent any adverse impact on the City ' s fire rating, it is recommended that Council condition the annexation to require formation of a water assessment district for the improvements as indicated in the memorandum. It is further recommended that the water companies be transferred to City owner- ship after being brought to City of Redding standards , and for those properties being served by a mutual water system, that the water-connection fee be waived. The estimated cost per lot for the above improvements would be Western Homes, $530, Shasta Ranchos , $200 , and Western Ranches , $2226 to $2800 (with an additional $655 if water connection is requested for houses in Western Ranches area) . 11/3/80 416 It is the recommendation of the Growth Committee that staff be directed to mail an information letter and a petition to each of the residents in the area. If sufficient petitions are returned for formation of the assessment districts , the matter could then be returned to Council for commencement of annexation proceedings . Councilman Kirkpatrick stated that one thing that needs to be emphasized is that the large difference in the costs is due to the fact that the Western Ranches portion of the proposed annex- ation currently has no water system other than private wells . He noted this is the first time the City has considered such a large annexation area with no fire hydrants and with limited water lines . Councilman Demsher feels this is a logical annexation, but that water service has to be considered and provided for. He is in favor of staff sending letters and petitions to residents in the area. In response to an inquiry from Mayor Pugh, Mr. Arness advised that the assessment district would be all-inclusive even if residents did not wish to hook-up now, and there would be an additional $655 fee if water connection hook-up is requested for homes in the Western Ranches area. In response to an inquiry from Mayor Pugh, Mr. Perry advised that if there is enough interest in the area for the formation of an assessment district, staff will go out to the area and meet with the residents. MOTION: Made by Councilman Demsher, seconded by Councilwoman Gard approving the recommendation of the Growth Committee to mail information letters and petitions to each resident in the area, and if sufficient interest is shown for the formation of assessment districts, the matter would be returned to Council for commencement of annexation proceedings. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes { SET PUBLIC HEARING - re Rezoning Application PD-6-80, by Redding Hilltop Investments MOTION: Made by Councilwoman Gard, seconded by Councilman PP/ Demsher, that a public hearing be set for 7: 30 P .M. , November 17 , 1980 to consider Rezoning Application PD-6-80 , by Redding Hilltop Investments. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes ANNEXATION NO. 80-15 - by Thomas E. West Planning and Community Development Director Perry reviewed his memorandum to Council dated October 30, 1980 . He stated that a request for annexation has been received from the owner of 5S-5151 acres located between Interstate 5 and the Sacramento River south of Sunnyhill Lane. A map of the area was shown on the Vu Graph. He noted that the area has previously been considered for annexation by Council on two prior occasions and denied. Mr. Perry stated that based on both the existing and proposed land-use plans for the area and the relationship of the property to the Churn Creek Bottom area, it is the recommendation of staff that Council deny the request to annex. The request has been reviewed by the Growth Committee. In response to an inquiry from Mrs . Gard, Mr. Perry advised that the Residential Reserve in the County is a rural residential 11/3/80 417 zoning, allowing up to two dwellings per 6, 000 square foot lot, and the City ' s rural residential zoning allows one unit per 5 acres . Councilman Demsher commented that possibly the General Plan for. the Churn Creek Bottom area is one unit per three acres . He stated that while the City is in sympathy with the situation, it is not desirous of a high density subdivision in that area. Mr. Demsher further noted that the City has no reason to change its position since the previous requests for annexation. Councilwoman Gard stated that the General Plan shows the area as "Agricultural" , but the City has no agricultural zoning. Mayor Pugh stated that the area under consideration is termed as "Agricultural" by the County and he does not feel it fits into the City' s sphere to provide City services . Councilwoman Gard noted that the City has honored the Wastewater Treatment boundaries and should continue to do so as this property is outside of that boundary. Councilman Kirkpatrick expressed concern regarding the level of services that the City would be required to provide for the area. He stated that the Growth Committee felt that the City ' s • boundary for services would remain as it is at this time. Councilman Demsher noted that the City would only be able to provide electricity to the area. MOTION: Made by Councilman Kirkpatrick, seconded by Councilman Fulton that Annexation Request No. 80-15, by Thomas E . West, be denied. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes CHANGE ORDER - re Buckeye Community Park Planning and Community Development Director Perry reviewed the memorandum submitted by Parks and Recreation Director Riley and himself, dated October 28, 1980 . He stated that the contract for Buckeye Community Park was awarded to Tullis and Belli Con- tractors in May of 1980. It has been determined that additional grading will be necessary to prevent future water-related problems . The change order is $42, 493, $26, 00 of which is available in the Community Development Funds that can be applied to the project. The request is that $16, 493 be made available from the General Fund and that the City Manager be authorized to sign the change order. Councilman Fulton questioned the discrepancies in the beginning, when the bid was awarded. Mr. Perry advised that although staff has tried to stay within the budgeted amount, they were not aware of the need for a re- taining wall. MOTION: Made by Councilwoman Gard, seconded by Councilman Kirkpatrick approving a change order for the construction of Buckeye Community Park, in the amount of $42 , 493, and authorizing the City Manager to sign same, $26 , 000 from Community Development funds and $16 , 493 from the General Fund. Voting was as follows: Ayes: Council Members - Demsher, Gard, Kirkpatrick, and Pugh Noes: Council Members - Fulton Absent: Council Members - None 11/3/80 418 r } RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION - Victor Avenue Improvements Planning and Community Development Director Perry reviewed his memorandum to Council dated October 31, 1980 . He stated that in order to accomplish the future widening of Victor Avenue, between Highway 44 and Hartnell Avenue, the City must acquire 20 feet of additional right of way on the east side. He ad- vised that property at 1758 Manchester Drive is now up for sale and it would be an appropriate time for the City to acquire the property. 7 3c0 Mr. Perry advised that the Planning Commission has recommended ; �� approval of the acquisition; found that the project conforms to the Circulation Element of the Redding General Plan; and found that there were no significant adverse environmental impacts . It is recommended that Council authorize the City to proceed with the acquisition , ratify the negative declaration, and authorize the Mayor to sign the necessary documents . MOTION: Made by Councilman Kirkpatrick, seconded by Councilman Fulton that Council makes the following findings regarding the right of way acquisition at 1758 Manchester Drive, at Victor Avenue: 1. Project is compatible with the Redding General Plan 2. Project will not significantly alter existing land form 3. Project is compatible with surrounding land use 4. Project is compatible with the Code of the City of Redding, California and, ratifies the Negative Declaration approved by the Board of Administrative Review on October 28 , 1980 . The Vote: Unanimous Ayes MOTION: Made by Councilman Demsher, seconded by Councilwoman Gard approving the recommendation of the Planning Commission and staff to proceed with the acquisition as hereinabove stated and authorize the Mayor to sign the necessary documents . The Vote: Unanimous Ayes ANNEXATION NO. 80-16 - by C . H. Daniels and L. H. Tilden Planning and Community Development Director Perry reviewed his memorandum to Council dated October 30, 1980. He stated that two requests have been received for annexation, located at 2578 5s3 and 2610 Henderson Road. A map of the area was shown on the Vu Graph. He advised that the parcels are part of an island area surrounded by the City. • It is the recommendation of staff that Council commence annexa- ' tion proceedings for the two parcels on the west side of Henderson Road and one parcel on the east side, by adoption of resolutions to commence proceedings and to exchange property taxes . Resolution - Commencing Proceedings MOTION: Made by Councilwoman Gard, seconded by Councilman Demsher that Resolution No. 80-264 be adopted, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding consenting to commence- ment of annexation proceedings and applying to LAFCO for approval 11/3/80 419 of the annexation to the City of Redding of uninhabited territory designated City of Redding Annexation No. 80-16 , (Daniels and Tilden Parcels on Henderson Road) . Voting was as follows: Ayes : Council Members - Demsher, Fulton, Gard, Kirkpatrick, and Pugh Noes: Council Members - None Absent: Council Members - None Resolution No. 80-264 is on file in the office of the City Clerk. Resolution - Agreeing to Exchange of Property Tax Revenues MOTION: Made by Councilwoman Gard, seconded by Councilman Demsher that Resolution No. 80-265 be adopted, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding agreeing to exchange of property tax revenues for uninhabited annexation No. 80-16 to the City of Redding (Daniels and Tilden Parcels on Henderson Road) . Voting was as follows: Ayes : Council Members - Demsher, Fulton, Gard, Kirkpatrick, and Pugh Noes: Council Members - None Absent: Council Members - None Resolution No. 80-265 is on file in the office of the City Clerk. PUBLIC HEARING - re Appeal of Tentative Subdivision Map S-12-80 , by Ken Knighten and Shasta Lake Union School District Mayor Pugh abstained from voting and discussion on this item. The hour of 7: 30 P.M. having arrived, Mayor Pugh opened the public hearing regarding an appeal of Tentative / C S Subdivision Map S-12-80, by Ken Knighten and the Shasta I (i 9 P Lake Union School District. The following documents are on file in the office of the City Clerk: Affidavit of Publication - Notice of Public Hearing Affidavit of Mailing - Notice of Public Hearing Planning Commission Recommendation dated October 31, 1980 The City Clerk advised that no written protests have been received. Planning and Community Development Director Perry reviewed his memorandum to Council re appeal of Tentative Subdivision Map S-12-80, by Ken Knighten and the Shasta Lake Union School District, which memorandum is made a part of these minutes by reference. He noted that the appeal by the developer pertains to the water-system-improvement assessment; whereas the Shasta Lake Union School District is requesting that, under the California Environmental Quality Act, a fee of $875 per dwelling unit be assessed for the purpose of devel- oping temporary classroom facilities, alleging that this project will have a substantial impact on the Shasta Lake Union School District. Mr. Perry stated that, for reasons set forth in the above referenced memorandum, it is the recommendation of the Planning Commission that the appeal of the water-system- improvement assessment be denied. However, since the in- formation submitted by the School District was not con- sidered by the Planning Commission in either approving the 11/3/80 420 tentative map or adopting a negative declaration, it is recommended that Council refer the tentative map back to the Commission for report and comment on whether or not an EIR should be required. Leonard Bandell, attorney for the developer, addressed the water assessment appeal as follows : It is the opinion of Mr. Bandell that the water benefit fee proposed to be assessed is the same as the development fee provided for in the Redding Municipal Code, and is therefore a double charge. He noted that the Commission and staff have contended that development fees are a buy-in, and that benefit fees are for future growth, but he does not share this understanding. To support his theory, Mr. Bandell referred to Chapter 4. 26 of the Redding Municipal Code, Planning Commission minutes of January 24 , 1978 , and the Martsen Report on development fees , Page ii . He requested Council to defer the water benefit fee or agree to reimburse the fee at the time the development fees are no longer im- pounded. Assistant City Manager Courtney noted that in June, 1978 , Council adopted construction taxes that in part applied to water and sewer connections. The construction tax was repealed approximately one year later and was replaced by water and sewer connection charges . The purpose of such charges was to establish a buy-in into the water and sewer systems . Ken Matias, Superintendent of the Shasta Lake Union School District appeared with regard to the appeal filed by said District re Tentative Subdivision Map S-12-80 , by Ken Knighten. Mr. Matias submitted a Demographic Study of the School District and apologized for the tardiness in present- ; ing the District' s concerns, noting that there was a change in District Administration in July 1980 and the fact that he was unaware until recently that a portion of the District i was in the City of Redding. He stated that he appreciated staff ' s findings in this matter. ti Councilwoman Gard questioned whether the fee should be established at $875 for both single-family homes and apart- ments. Mr. Matias stated that the County used $875 as a base factor and added that a split fee structure is diffi- } cult to manage, but feels that this is up to the District. S Mr. Bandell said he does not feel that this appeal is properly before Council. He noted that the Board of Administrative Review issued a Negative Declaration on the Tentative Sub- division Map on August 16, and a Notice of Determination was filed on October 4. In his opinion, the District' s only re- course is with the Courts. Mr. Bandell added that SB 201 pre- empts CEQA with respect to the school situation. He referred to Government Code Sections 65970, 65971, and 65974 in this regard. He further stated that there is no indication that the school is impacted at the present time and that Council must make this determination. Mr. Bandell referred to Leroy F. Green Funds which are available to assist impacted school districts. In conclusion, Mr. Bandell requested that, 11/3/80 _ 421 if the fees are instituted, Council provide that such fees be paid with the issuance of an occupancy permit. In response to an inquiry from Councilwoman Gard re criteria for Leroy Green Funds, Mr. Bandell responded that he did not know. MOTION: Made by Councilman Demsher, seconded by Councilwoman Gard that the Public Hearing be closed. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes with Mayor Pugh abstaining. Councilman Kirkpatrick said he felt that Mr. Bandell had brought up some points that should be addressed. City Attorney Hays stated that Mr. Bandell has brought up three points; i.e. 1) the matter of jurisdiction, 2) how fees are to be obtained by the School District, and 3) the interpreta- tion of SB 201. Mr. Hays said he was not prepared to respond to these issues tonight and recommended that Council defer action on this matter until the meeting of December 1 . Councilman Demsher noted that Leroy Green Funds are difficult to obtain. He does not think such funds are in conflict with SB 201--he believes they are supplemental to SB 201. Councilwoman Gard asked what the usual procedure was under CEQA if a final Notice of Determination has been filed. Mr. Hays replied that he would assume that the Courts are the next avenue. MOTION: Made by Councilman Demsher, seconded by Councilman Kirkpatrick that action on these appeals be deferred until the meeting of December 1. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes with Mayor Pugh abstaining CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING - re Rezoning Application RZ-10-80 , by Kenneth Knighten Mayor Pugh abstained from voting and discussion on this item. The hour of 7: 30 P.M. having arrived, Mayor Pugh opened the continued public hearing re Rezoning Application RZ-10-80 , by Kenneth Knighten. i y The following documents are on file in the office of the City Clerk: Affidavit of Posting - Notice of Continued Public Hearing Planning Commission Recommendation dated October 30, 1980 The City Clerk advised that no written protests have been received. Planning and Community Development Director Perry reviewed his memorandum to Council dated October 30 , 1980 . He stated that at its regular meeting of September 23 , 1980, the Plan- ning Commission unanimously recommended rezoning of property located between Ridge Road and Twin View Boulevard from "R-1" Single Family Residential District to "RM-9" Medium Low Density Multiple Family Residential District and "U-F" Unclassified District. A map of the area was shown on the 11/3/80 { 422 Vu Graph. Mr. Perry described the General Plan classifica- tion for the area and advised that the developer ' s proposal is a combination of single-family and multiple-family uses . It is the recommendation of the Commission and staff that Council approve the rezoning, that the negative declaration be ratified and that the City Attorney be asked to prepare an ordinance. Mr. Perry noted that unlike the subdivision application for Valley View Subdivision, which was considered earlier this evening, this application will create a substantial adverse impact on the School District. The General Plan allows 149 units on the property, which is the number proposed; the zoning will dictate the type of unit, whereas the tentative map will create lots for development. Mayor Pugh invited comments from the floor at this time. Steven O 'Dell, 5445 Doris Street, stated he missed the Planning Commission meetings on this application because he just moved to his home in July of this year. Mr. O 'Dell objected to the rezoning because of the negative effects that an apartment complex could have on the neighboring single-family dwellings . He was concerned about the impact of additional traffic and the possibility of insufficient off-street parking. In essence, he does not believe apart- ments and single-family dwellings are compatable. Roger Froslie, engineer for the developer, discussed the matter of additional traffic. He doubted that any of the residents of the proposed development would go out by way of Ridge Road. He further noted that the proposed development is separated by an R-1 area and is several blocks away from Mr. O 'Dell' s property. Hazel Martin, 5476 Midway, objected to Doris Street being opened up. She stated it has been the City ' s contention in the past that Doris would never be opened. She suggested Y that Boulder Creek be used for a second exit. Mrs . Martin noted the steep grades in the area and feared that it would } become a playground for teenage drivers and would become a police problem. Councilwoman Gard stated she recalls the hearings in which } Doris Street was discussed, but noted that a totally different proposal was being considered at that time. Mr. Perry stated that the steepness of Doris Street should discourage through traffic. Mayor Pugh ascertained that there were no further comments from the floor. MOTION: Made by Councilman Kirkpatrick, seconded by Council man Demsher that the public hearing be closed. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes with Mayor Pugh abstaining Councilwoman Gard stated that the subject proposal is a much better one than has been considered previously. She does not like the steep grade on Doris Street but feels 11/3/80 423 a second access is important for safety reasons , and noted that the City has not allowed a subdivision for several years without two means of access. She also noted that this pro- ject is a much lower density than in the Boulder Creek de- velopment referred to by Mr. O 'Dell. !_ Councilman Demsher pointed out that the number of cars per unit is lower than for a single family dwelling. MOTION: Made by Councilman Demsher, seconded by Councilman Kirkpatrick that Council makes the following findings regarding Rezoning Application RZ-10-80: 1. Project is compatible with the Redding General Plan 2 . Project will not significantly alter existing land form. 3. Project is compatible with surrounding land use 4 . Project is compatible with the Code of the City of Redding, California and, ratifies the negative declaration approved by the Baord of Administrative Review on September 3 , 1980 . The Vote: Unanimous Ayes MOTION: Made by Councilman Demsher, seconded by Councilman Kirkpatrick approving the recommendation of the Planning Commission and staff that Rezoning Application RZ-10-80, by Kenneth Knighten, be approved and that the City Attorney be instructed to prepare an ordinance. The Vote: Unan- imous Ayes with Mayor Pugh abstaining PUBLIC HEARING - re Appeal of Tentative Subdivision Map for North- ridge Gardens, by Shasta Lake Union School District, S--15-'80 Mayor Pugh abstained from voting and discussion on this item. The hour of 7: 30 P.M. having arrived, Mayor Pugh opened the public hearing re appeal of Tentative Subdivison Map for Northridge Gardens , by Shasta Lake Union School District The following documents are on file in the office of the IG City Clerk: c v Ill Affidavit of Publication - Notice of Public Hearing Affidavit of Mailing - Notice of Public Hearing Planning Commission Recommendation dated October 31, 1980 The City Clerk advised that no written protests have been received. Planning and Community Development Director Perry reviewed his memorandum to Council dated October 31, 1980. He stated that at its regular meeting of September •23 , 1980, the Planning Commission unanimously granted Keystone Investments permission to divide 8. 23 acres located east of the Twin View - Interstate 5 off-ramps into 25 single-family lots . A map of the area was shown on the Vu Graph. Mr. Perry noted that subsequent to the Commission ' s action, the Shasta Lake Union School District appealed the tentative map to the City Council. 11/3/80 �.. 424 S Mr. Perry stated that the situation here is analogous to the appeal of the Valley View Subdivision discussed earlier in the } agenda. In this instance, there would be ten to eleven } students expectedtobe generated by the subdivision. He further stated that in conjunction with Valley View Subdivi- sion and other development within the School District, there could be overcrowding. He noted that, at this point, the appeal of the School District is as much an appeal of the negative declaration as it is the tentative map by asserting an adverse environmental impact on the School District if mit- igation measures in the form of fees are not imposed. As a practical matter, the School District will likely submit find- ings of overcrowding to the City in April of next year, pur- suant to SB 201. Since the information now submitted by the School District was not considered by the Planning Commission in either approving the tentative map or adopting a negative declara- tion, Council should refer the tentative map back to the Planning Commission for report and comment on whether or not an EIR should be required. Mr. Perry noted that in the alter- native, the developer could agree to the mitigation fee re- quested by the School District. Mayor Pugh invited comments from the floor at this time. Mr. Len Wingate, attorney representing the developer, Richard Pulcini . appeared before Council. Mr. Wingate briefed the Council relative to his work assignment for the City of Redding, that of Amicus Curiae in the Winberry case. Council recognized the conflict disclosure and Mr. Wingate was allowed to proceed. Mr. Wingate stated that in the matter before Council this evening regarding the impacting of the School District, mitigating measures would probably have to be under the direction of CEQA because SB 201 has not been followed through on this project. He stated that SB 201 does not have to be tied to the project but school districts can, } within 60 days, ask that impact fees be imposed. Mr. Wingate referred to Section 65981 of the Government Code . He added that the Leroy Green Act is very important and discussed the } provisions briefly. Mr. Wingate stated his client is not opposed to paying a reasonable fee if that is what is needed for the benefit of the School District, but urged that it not be done in a hurry-up fashion. If the City is going to go along with the School District' s request, he asked that Council make a determination and that public hearings be held pursuant to SB 201, to allow said fees to be imposed as building permits are issued. He stated he would agree to a continuance to December 1. City Attorney Hays recommended that this request be held over to December 1, for further research on the matter. Mr. Matias noted that recent legislation regarding the Leroy Green Act has rescinded the regulations noted by Mr. Wingate. He concurred with the continuance to • December 1, 1980. Mayor Pugh ascertained that there were no further comments from the floor. 11/3/80 r 425 MOTION: Made by Councilman Demsher, seconded by Council- woman Gard that the public hearing be closed. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes with Mayor Pugh abstaining MOTION: Made by Councilman Demsher, seconded by Council- woman Gard that deliberation and voting on the appeal of Tentative Subdivision Map for Northridge Gardens , by Shasta Lake Union School District, be continued to December 1 , 1980 . The Vote: Unanimous Ayes with Mayor Pugh abstaining CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING - re Planned Development PD-11-80 , by Keystone Investments Mayor Pugh abstained from voting and discussion on this item. The hour of 7: 30 P.M. having arrived, Mayor Pugh opened PILI the public hearing re Planned Development Application PD-11-80, by Keystone Investments. ( LOP The following documents are on file in the office of the City Clerk: Affidavit of Posting - Notice of Continued Public Hearing Planning Commission Recommendation dated October 31, 1980 The City Clerk advised that no written protests have been received and the Mayor ascertained that there were no protests from the floor. Planning and Community- Development Director Perry reviewed his memorandum to Council dated October 31 , 1980, which is hereby made a part of these records by reference. He stated that the Planning Commission recommended approval of rezoning property located at 1111 Twin View Boulevard from "U-F" Un- classified District and "C-2" Central Commercial District to "PD" Planned Development District and "R-1" Single Family Residential District. A map of the area was shown on the Vu Graph. He noted that the Shasta Lake School District has appealed the tentative subdivision mapto the City Council due to overcrowding. The School District has also expressed concern with the impact of the 135-unit planned development in the letter submitted to Council . Mr. Perry stated that the situation is the same here as it is with Valley View Subdivision and Northridge Gardens Subdivision, with respect to overcrowding of schools . He stated, however, that staff does not feel a two-bedroom "PD" unit will be the equivalent of a single-family dwelling and therefore recommends that a fee of $407 per unit would be appropriate . Since the information submitted by the School District was not considered by the Planning Commission in either approving the tentative map or adopting a negative declaration, Council should refer the tentative map back to the Commission for report and comment on whether or not an EIR should be re- quired. He noted that in the alternative, the developer could agree to a mitigation fee. MOTION: Made by Councilman Demsher, seconded by Council- man Kirkpatrick that the public hearing be closed. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes with Mayor Pugh abstaining MOTION: Made by Councilman Demsher, seconded by Council • - man Kirkpatrick that deliberation and voting on Rezoning 11/3/80 } 426 Application PD-11-80, by Keystone Investments , be continued to December 1, 1980. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes with Mayor Pugh abstaining PUBLIC HEARING - re Rezoning Application RZ-8-80 , by the City of Redding The hour of 7: 30 P .M. having arrived, Mayor Pugh opened the public hearing for Rezoning Application RZ-8-80 , by the City of Redding. The following documents are on file in the office of the City Clerk: Affidavit of Publication - Notice of Public Hearing Affidavit of Mailing - Notice of Public Hearing Planning Commission Recommendation dated October 30 , 1980 The City Clerk advised that no written protests have been received and the Mayor ascertained that there were no protests from the floor. Planning and Community Development Director Perry reviewed his memorandum to Council dated October 30 , 1980 . He stated that the Planning Commission recommended approval of this rezoning on property located at 833 to 985 Mistletoe Lane from "C-3" Heavy Commercial and Light Industrial District to "C-2" Central Commercial District. A map of the area } was shown on the Vu Graph. He described the area as being along the south side of Mistletoe Lane, between Canby Road and Hilltop. • Mr. Perry stated that in reviewing development occurring along both sides of Mistletoe Lane and the fact that the street serves as an access road to a large residential area to the east, it is the opinion of both the Planning Commission and staff that the existing zoning should be changed to a more retail-oriented district. It is further recommended that the negative declaration be ratified and that the ordinance be offered for first reading. r i MOTION: Made by Councilman Kirkpatrick, seconded by Council- woman Gard that the public hearing be closed. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes MOTION: Made by Councilman Kirkpatrick, seconded by Council- woman Gard that the following findings be made re Rezoning Application RZ-8-80: 1. Project is compatible with the Redding General Plan 2. Project will not significantly alter existing land form. 3. Project is compatible with surrounding land use. 4. Project is compatible with the Code of the City of Redding, California and, ratifies the Negative Declaration approved by the Board of Administrative Review on August 27, 1980 . The Vote: Unanimous Ayes 11/3/80 427 MOTION: Made by Councilman Kirkpatrick, seconded by Council- woman Gard approving the recommendation of the Planning Commis- sion and staff with respect to the rezoning of subject pro- perty. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes Ordinance Councilman Kirkpatrick offered Ordinance No. 1521 for first S reading, an ordinance of the City Council of the City of Redding amending Section 18. 06. 020 of the Redding Municipal Code relating to the rezoning of certain real property in the City of Redding (RZ-8-80) . PUBLIC HEARING - re General Plan Amendment Application, GPA-2-80 , by Redding Roofing Supply The hour of 7: 30 P.M. having arrived, Mayor Pugh opened the public hearing re General Plan Amendment Application GPA-2-80 , by Redding Roofing Supply. The following documents are on file in the office of the • Li City Clerk: Affidavit of Publication - Notice of Public Hearing Affidavit of Mailing - Notice of Public Hearing Planning Commission Recommendation dated October 30 , 1980 The City Clerk advised that one petition of protest had been received from residents of Reno Lane. Said petition was submitted to Council. Planning and Community Development Director Perry reviewed his memorandum to Council dated October 30 , 1980 . He stated that the Planning Commission recommended denial of the request to reclassify property located at 2660 South Bonnyview Road from "Residential, " two units per acre, to "Commercial Service. " A map of the area was shown on the Vu Graph. He noted that neither a negative declaration nor an environmental impact report was prepared for the project, as the Commission determined to recommend denial of the use permit. Mr. Perry advised that in reviewing the application, the Commission expressed concerns in several areas . Those in- cluded compatibility with adjoining aesthetics, noise, glare from storage areas, and traffic. In addition, the request is tantamount to spot zoning and a forerunner of extending strip commercial further to the east along South Bonnyview. He stated that the Commission felt that an application of this type should not be handled on a piecemeal basis, rather, it should be part of an area-re-evaluation or part of a General Plan update. It is the opinion of both the Commission and staff that the above application is both inconsistent with the goals of the Cascade Plan and inappropriate for the area, and recommends its denial. 111 Mayor Pugh invited comments from the floor at this time. Mr. E. C . Emory, 5835 Reno Lane, spoke on behalf of petitioners from Reno Lane. He noted that the problems which exist are 11/3/80 11 428 drainage and traffic, and felt that with continued develop- ment in the area, something will have to be done . He asked that Council take this into consideration prior to approv- ing future development in the area. Nel McClory, realtor representing the property owners , stated they were advised to apply for a "C-3" zoning, but she felt this was not needed. She stated Redding Roofing Supply would not be a heavy commercial usage and felt they would be an asset to the area. She further noted that Redding Roofing Supply does not intend to use Reno Lane for access . Mrs . McClory stated that the speed limit on South Bonnyview is now 55 mph and truck traffic is already present in the area. It is her opinion that the property is not conducive to residential use. Mrs . McClory submitted Mr. Shufelberger 's plan for Redding Roofing Supply. In response to an inquiry from Mayor Pugh, Mr. Perry advised that the proposed use would require a "C-3" zoning or an industrial zoning. Perry Bennett, 5820 Reno Lane, stated he has no objection to the rezoning but has concerns regarding the width of Reno Lane. He fears that if the rezoning is approved and the street is not widened, it will have an environmental effect on the area. } Mrs . McClory stated that if the City wishes to have Reno Lane widened, there is a 40 foot easement along the road. She stated that if the Bennetts wish to dedicate 10 feet, her clients would also dedicate 10 feet to widen the road. Mayor Pugh ascertained that there were no further comments from the floor. MOTION: Made by Councilwoman Gard, seconded by Councilman Demsher that the public hearing be closed. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes Public Works Director Arness noted that the drainage problems in this area are discussed in the Master Storm Drain Plan. MOTION: Made by Councilwoman Gard, seconded by Councilman Kirkpatrick that General Plan Amendment Application, GPA-2-80 , by Redding Roofing Supply, be denied. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING - re Bechelli Lane Curb, Gutter, and Sidewalk Improvements Assessment District (Chapter 27) Councilwoman Gard abstained from voting and discussion on this item. The hour of 7: 30 P .M. having arrived, Mayor Pugh opened the continued public hearing re Bechelli Lane Curb, Gutter, and I Sidewalk Improvements Assessment District (Chapter 27) . i The Following documents are on file in the office of the City Clerk: Affidavit of Posting - Notice of Continued Public Hearing The City Clerk advised that no written protests have been received. 11/3/80 429 !' S As requested by Council at the Public Hearing held on October 20, 1980, on the above matter, Public Works Director Arness prepared data with respect to five alternate plans which can be considered for the Bechelli Lane Project. This information is set forth in his memorandum to Council dated October 30, 1980, which is hereby made a part of these records by reference. Staff recommends Alternate No. 1, as illustrated on Exhibit No. 5 submitted to Council, which provides for curb, gutter, and sidewalk, and recommends restriping of the parking lot as illustrated in Exhibit No. 7. He noted that the City would modify the existing asphalt surface in the parking lot as necessary to fit the driveways in the recommended plan and control drainage. Mr. Arness concluded that staff believes the use of Chapter 27 of the 1911 Improvement Act is appro • - priate in this situation. Mayor Pugh invited comments from the floor at this time. Mr. A. W. Miner, property owner in the subject area, suggested that the sidewalk be placed between the wheelstop and curb in Alternate No. 4. Gene Rother, the other property owner in the subject area, was present but made no comments in addition to those made at the first public hearing. Councilman Kirkpatrick questioned the possibility of trading right-of-way for the improvements and stated it seemed to be a fairly equal trade-off. Public Works Director Arness stated that offer could be made and there would be no out-of-pocket money from either property owner. Mayor Pugh ascertained that there were no further comments from the floor. • MOTION: Made by Councilman Kirkpatrick, seconded by Council- man Demsher that the public hearing be closed. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes with Councilwoman Gard abstaining { In response to an inquiry from Mayor Pugh, City Attorney Hays advised that if a trade-off agreement is made, it would no longer be considered a Chapter 27 Assessment Dis- trict. • • Councilman Kirkpatrick stated he hopes something can be worked out other than the Chapter 27 procedure . MOTION: Made by Councilman Kirkpatrick, seconded by Council- man Demsher to defer action until the December 1 meeting re adoption of the resolution pertaining to the Bechelli Lane, Curb, Gutter, and Sidewalk, Chapter 27 Assessment District, and direct staff toproceedon the basis of using Alternate No. 1, and ascertaining if an agreement can be reached with the property owners dedicating land and the City making the improvements, such trade to be of equal proportionate value. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes with Councilwoman Gard abstaining 11/3/80 430 PUBLIC HEARING - Determining Public Convenience and Necessity tre Establishment of Bus Service in Redding Area The hour of 7: 30 P .M. having arrived, Mayor Pugh opened the public hearing to determine public convenience and necessity re establishment of busservice in the Redding F area. The following documents are on file in the office of the City Clerk: 3 Affidavit of Publication - Notice of Public Hearing The City Clerk advised that no written protests have been received; however, a letter was received from the attorney for John Hoeflich, confirming a discussion with the City Attorney that Council open and continue the public hearing to November 17, 1980. In the interim, Mr. Hoeflich will direct a specific plan of transportation to the transpor- tation department. MOTION: Made by Councilman Demsher, seconded by Council- man Kirkpatrick that the public hearingto determine public convenience and necessity re establishment of bus service • in the Redding area, be continued to 7: 30 P.M. , November 17, 1980. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes PUBLIC WORKS PLANNING REPORTS Public Works Director Arness submitted the Public Works Planning 3 / b Reports for November, 1980 . NOTICE OF COMPLETION - Downtown Street Trees , Bid Schedule No. 1173 MOTION: Made by Councilwoman Gard, seconded by Councilman Fulton accepting the downtown street trees project, Bid Schedule No. 1173 , i LI as being completed satisfactorily and instructing the City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes NOTICE OF COMPLETION - 12 KV Underground Distribution Feeder Circuit Extension at Canby Substation, Bid Schedule No. 1226 MOTION: Made by Councilman Demsher, seconded by- Councilman 3 Kirkpatrick accepting the 12 KV underground distribution feeder 4 circuit extension at Canby Substation, Bid Schedule No. 1226 , as being completed satisfactorily and instructing the City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes STORM DRAIN PROBLEMS - Adams Lane Area Public Works Director Arness reported on the communication received from Mr. J. T. Sickman regarding the impact on his street (neighbor- hood) of the storm drainage improvements being installed by the Northwoods Planned Development. The area in question was shown on the Vu Graph. 3i� Council was provided with prints showing the extent of development in the area, the existing storm drain system starting on Adams Lane and extending east across Churn Creek Road, installed to • the existing catchbasins and storm drain pipe in Adams Lane. Mr. Sickman indicates that the area has historically flooded and that water has had a problem entering the existing basins . Mr. Arness reported that the Master Storm Drainage Report for the Cascade and Enterprise Areas, prepared by PACE Engineering, indi- cated that the existing 18" drainage system is inadequate on the 11/3/80 431 basis of the 10-25 year design storm. He noted that at the time the construction drawings for the Northwoods Planned Development were approved, staff had not received the Master Storm Drainage 1 Report and Mr. Arness said he is uncertain whether the developer would have been required to construct a 30" storm drain from Adams Lane to Churn Creek Road. He added that, to correct the drainage problem would require the replacement of the existing 18" line with approximately 700 LF of 30" pipe, which would cost $30, 000. Mr. Sickman addressed Council on this matter and noted that water runs curb to curb in an average rainfall and during a heavy storm, water has been 18" deep. Mr. Sickman noted that his neighbors have installed leach lines to the street to drain water from their backyards. He stated there is no storm drain on Alexander, but referred to a 24" culvert from Alexander to Adams installed by persons unknown. Mr. Sickman states that he has no objection to the Northwoods development, but feels the City has the re- sponsibility of correcting the drainage problem that exists on Adams Lane. He stated that if it is not done, he will hire an attorney and sue the City of Redding. Mayor Pugh asked Mr. Sickman if the neighbors in the area have gotten together to attempt to solve the problem. Mr. Sickman advised that they have and that they have -pleaded with the City to do something. He advised that before the develop- ment along Alexander Street, flooding did not occur. In response to an inquiry from Councilwoman Gard, Assistant City Engineer Lang advised that the storm drain improvements have been completed for Northridge. Public Works Director Arness stated that onepossibility would be the formation of an assessment district. Mr. Sickman advised that he would not agree to an assessment district because of an improper drainage pipe being installed illegally. Mrs. Gard noted that it would be difficult to ask residents of Northridge, where' improvements have just be completed, to join an assessment district for the area. Mr. Arness suggested installing standard sweep basins on Adams Lane and School Street. He advised that they would cost approx- imately $2, 000 per basin. • Councilman Kirkpatrick suggested that since this problem will not be solved before the rainy season this year, staff keep an eye on the situation and observe what is happening. With the concurrence of Council, Mayor Pugh referred the request back to staff for monitoring of the situation during this upcoming rainy season and report back to Council in the 'spring. RESOLUTION - re Abatement of property at 580• Markwood .Drive, owned by Bentux, Inc. City Attorney Hays advised Council that Roger Cowling, attorney for this property owner, .:has assured the City that his client will abate the unsafe and unsightly conditions on the property by 3,7Z6 January 9, 1981, by making certain repairs to the building and cleaning up the premises, but requested that they be permitted • 11/3/80 432 to continue to use the building for a period of three years , at the end of which time they will demolish and remove it. Mr. Hays stated that the Board of Appeals, in order to assure that said repairs and cleanup are not delayed, recommends in its report that the abatement procedure go forward by adoption of the Reso- lution Ordering Abatement. If Council adopts the Resolution, Mr. Hays will notify Mr. Cowling that as long as the repair and cleanup work progresses in a satisfactory manner, with the Building Department inspecting periodically, the matter will be held in abeyance, but if the work is not completed as promised by January 9 , 1981, the City will :invite bids for demolition. MOTION: Made by Councilwoman Gard, seconded by Councilman Demsher that Resolution No. 80-266 be adopted, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding approving the report ,and findings of the Board of Appeals and ordering the abatement of the unsafe and unsightly building and debris on property at 580 Markwood Drive (Bentux, Inc. ) . Voting was as follows: Ayes: Council Members - Demsher, Fulton, Gard, Kirkpatrick, and Pugh Noes: Council Members - None Absent: Council Members - None Resolution No. 80-266 is on file in the office of the City Clerk. RESOLUTION - Approving Application to Appropriate Unappropriated Water for .the Whiskeytown Power Project MOTION: Made by Councilwoman Gard, seconded by Councilman Kirkpatrick that Resolution No. 80-267 be adopted, a resolution of (() (0)— the City Council of the City of Redding approving and ratifying application to appropriate unappropriated water for the Whiskey- town Power Project. Voting was as follows : Ayes: Council Members - Demsher, Fulton, Gard, Kirkpatrick, and Pugh Noes: Council Members - None Absent: Council Members - None Resolution No. 80-267 is on file in the office- of the City Clerk. RESOLUTION - Approving Application to Appropriate Unappropriated Water for the Red Bluff Diversion Dam Power Project MOTION: Made by Councilman Demsher, seconded by Councilman Fulton that Resolution No. 80-268 be adopted, a resolution of the City ! Council of the City of Redding approving and ratifying application to appropriate unappropriated water for the Red Bluff Diversion Dam Power Project. Voting was as follows: • Ayes: Council Members - Demsher, Fulton, Gard, Kirkpatrick, and Pugh Noes: Council Members - None Absent: Council Members - None Resolution No. 80-268 is on file in the office of the City Clerk. ORDINANCE - Amending Conditions of Approval re PD-8-79 City Attorney Hays advised Council that the conditions of approval 1-\ relating relating to PD-8-79 were previously included in Ordinance No. 1478, and some of those conditions were amended by Ordinance No. 1512 . 11/3/80 433 • It is recommended that all Of said conditions on PD-8-79 be in- corporated into one ordinance, which is being submitted to Council • this evening for first reading. Councilman Kirkpatrick offered Ordinance No. 1522 for first reading, an ordinance of the City Council of the City of Redding amending the conditions of approval relating to the rezomng •of certain real property in the City of Redding (PD-8-79) . - PARKING AND BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT AREA - Budget for 1981 MOTION: Made by Councilman Demsher, seconded -by Councilwoman Gard approving the 1981 budget for the Parking and Business (6;3 Improvement Area. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes ROUTINE REPORTS AND COMMUNICATIONS Application for Alcoholic Beverage License: / c29 El Patio, 1099 Hilltop Drive R.U.C . Application: P .G. &E. re decrease in electric rates J 'f) c ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, at the hour of 10: 10 P.M. , *Mayor Pugh declared the meeting adjourned. APPROVED: �- or � ATTEST: )7)11-edlA / be() i Cit. Clerk /