Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso. 1983 - 163 - Resolution ordering sale of bonds sunset west assessment district no. 1981-4 • • � Q� RESOLUTION NO. gj (, 3 RESOLUTION ORDERING SALE OF BONDS SUNSET WEST ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1981-4 The City Council of the City of Redding resolves: The City Council accepts the offer of DEAN WITTER REYNOLDS , INC. , (attached to this resolution and by reference incorporated in it) , to purchase all of the improvement bonds to be issued in Sunset West Assessment District No. 1981-4 . The City Council directs the sale and delivery of the bonds to the offeror in accordance with the terms and conditions stated in the offer. * I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Redding , Shasta County, California, at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 15th day of August 15 , 1983. AYES: Councilmembers Demsher, Fulton, Kirkpatrick, and Gard NOES : Councilmembers None ABSENT: Councilmembers None ABSTAIN: Councilmembers Pugh ETHEL A. NICHOLS, City Clerk, City of Redding, Shasta County, California By a 77,/,_.6-60 • August 15, 1983 i The City Council of the City of Redding Councilmembers: • For acceptance by you at your meeting on August 15, 1983, we hereby offer to purchase not less than all of the bonds of your proposed 1915 Act improvement bond issue to be known as Sunset West Assessment District #1981-4 City of Redding, Shasta County, California, on the following terms and conditions: We will pay 96% of the par value thereof, with accrued interest if any, from the dated date of the issue (September 2, 1983) to the delivery date of the issue. The bonds shall mature in such amounts and bear interest at the rates shown below: $34,816.00 due 7-2-85 @ 8.00 % 30,000.00 due 7-2-86 @ 8.25 % 35,000.00 due 7-2-87 @ 8.50 % 40,000.00 due 7-2-88 @ 8.75 % 40,000.00 due 7-2-89 @ 9.00 45,000.00 due 7-2-90 @ 9.25 % 50,000.00 due 7-2-91 @ 9.50 % 55,000.00 due 7-2-92 @ 9,75 % 60,000.00 due 7-2-93 @ 10.00 % 65,000.00 due 7-2-94 @ 10.10 % 75,000.00 due 7-2-95 @ 10.20 % 80,000.00 due 7-2-96 @ 10.30% 90,000.00 due 7-2-97 @ 10.40 % 100,000.00 due 7-2-98 @ 10.50 % 110,000.00 due 7-2-99 @ 10.50 0 The bonds shad be in $5,000 denominations except for bond #1 which will be in the denomination of $4,816.00. This bid is subject to the unqualified approving legal opinion of Sturgis, Ness, Brunsell & Sperry a professional corporation, to be furnished to you at your expense and printed on the bonds. Delivery of these bonds is to be made to us on or before September 15, 1983. If the bonds are not tendered for delivery to us accompanied by said approving legal opinion within the time stated in this proposal, we shall have the right, at our option, to cancel the contract of purchase. This bid is also made subject to the following terms and conditions: A) RDGISTRATICN: The Bonds may issued in fully registered form only, and will be interchangeable upon the telins set forth in the resolution authorizing issuance of bonds. B) CHANGE IN TAX EXRhhiPT.STATUS: At any time before the Bonds are 4 tendered for delivery the successful bidder may disaffirm and withdraw the proposal if the interest received by private holders frau bonds of the same type and character shall be declared to be taxable income under present federal income tax laws, either by a ruling of the Internal Revenue Service or by a decision of any federal court or shall be declared taxable or shall be required to be taken into account in computing federal income taxes by the terms of any federal income tax enacted subsequent to the date of this notice. C) Na -ARBITRAL CERTIFICATE: A certificate of the City certifying that on the basis of the facts, estimates and circumstances in existence on the date of delivery, it is not expected that the proceeds of the Bonds will be used in a manner that would cause the Bonds to be arbitrage bonds. D) NO LITIGATION CERTIFICATE: At the time of payment for and delivery of said Bonds, the City will furnish to us a certificate that there is no litigation pending affecting the validity of the Bonds. E) SIGNATURE CERTIFICATE: Certificate signed by officers and repre- sentatives of the Agency certifying that said officers and representatives have sieved the Bonds, whether by facsimile or manual signature, and that they were respectively duly authorized to execute the same. F) CERTIFICATE RE: CUSIP NUMBERS: It is anticipated that CUSIP identification numbers will be printed on the Bonds but neither the failure to print such numbers on any Bond nor any error with respect thereto shall constitute cause for failure or refusal by the purchaser thereof to accept delivery of and pay for said Bonds in accordance with the terms of the purchase contract. All expenses in relation to the print= ing of CUSIP numbers on said Bonds shall be paid by the City; provided, however, that the CUSIP Service Bureau charge for the assignment of said numbers shall be the responsibility of and shall be paid for by the purchaser. G) The bonds to be sold will be secured by unpaid assessments levied upon private property within said assessment district, and authorized by proceedings taken pursuant to the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913, being Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, and are to be issued pursuant to the provisons of the Improvement Bond Act + . of 1915, being Division 10 of said Code. Proceeds frau the sale of such bonds will be used to pay the costs of the improvement project ac authorized by said proceedings. H) Any bond may be redeemed on any January 2 or July 2 prior to its fixed maturity date, at the option of the Treasurer of the City, upon giving 60 days' prior notice, and upon the payment of the principal amount thereof and interst accrued thereon to the date of redemption, plus a redemption premium of five percent (5%) of the principal amount thereof. • I) In the event of any delinquency in the payment of any installment of an unpaid assessment, the City must order institution of an action in the Superior Court of the State of California to foreclose the lien of such-unpaid assessment, as authorized by Part 14, Division 10 of the Streets • • 4 401 • and Highways of the State of California. In such action, the real properties subject to the unpaid assessment may be sold at judicial foreclosure. The City has determined to authorize the judicial foreclosure in lieu of tax sale and the five-sale and the five-year redemption period within 150 days following the date of such a delinquency. J) A special reserve fund will be created to provide available funds frau which the City can advance and make payment on the amount of any delinquent assessments levied for these proceedings. Payments from such reserve fund shall be an advance to be reimbursed from the proceeds of redemption or sale of the properties with respect to which payment has been made. Said special reserve fund shall be maintained as a separate trust account distinct frau all other funds of the City. The reserve fund shall be in an amount equal to five percent (5%) of the bonds issued for the proceedings. The reserve fund shall be administered and payments shall be made all as authorized under the provisions of the Improvement Bond Act of 1915. K) There shall be no bonds issued secured by unpaid assessments levied upon any lot or parcel of land belonging to the United States, or to the State, or to any county, city, public agency, mandatory of the government, school board, educational, penal or reform institution or institution for the feebleminded or the insane, whether such lot or parcel of land is in use in the performance of any public function. This proposal is submitted in duplicate, one copy of which is to be officially signed and returned to us. Very truly yours, DEAN IMTER REYNOLDS, INC. _ t • i: John J. 4,th, Jr d First Vice President The foregoing proposal is hereby accepted on behalf of the City of Council of the City of Redding. I Date ( , /5 173 Authorized Signature A _�- ,�!,.. Ari Mayor