HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso. 1984 - 172 - Pertaining to the grievance procedure for employees not covered by the provisions of a memorandum of understanding • •
RESOLUTION NO. Fj07,1
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING
PERTAINING TO THE GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE FOR EMPLOYEES NOT
COVERED BY THE PROVISIONS OF A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING.
WHEREAS, the grievance procedure for employees not covered
by the provisions of a Memorandum of Understanding is presently
provided in Resolution No. 81-125; and
WHEREAS , staff has recommended certain changes in the
grievance procedure for said employees, as included in the
co
attached Exhibit "A" , incorporated herein by reference; and ;' 6
WHEREAS, the City Council deems it to be in the best inter- o "'
ests of the City of Redding to adopt such recommendations; ksp
OD
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
n.
City of Redding as follows:
co
1 . Resolution No. 81-125 is hereby rescinded, effective d1
July 15 , 1984 , and shall be of no further force and effect. c
2. The aforesaid Exhibit "A" is hereby approved and shall
become effective July 15 , 1984 .
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was intro-
duced and read at a regular meeting of the City Council of the
City of Redding on the 20th day of August , 1984 , and
was duly adopted at said meeting by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Demsher, Fulton, Gard, Pugh, & Kirkpatrick
NOES : COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
• •
4 w2.,-zegN4, ei
tj
OWARD D. KIRKPAT ICK, Mayor
City of Redding
ATTEST:
ETHEL A. NICHOLS, City Clerk
FORM A ROVED:
'de,c,65" e7 61" /01,;___, .
RAN ALL A. HAYS, Cit >/Attorney
-2-
. .
• . •
GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE
Any grievance which may arise between a regular employee or
his representative and the City with respect to the
interpretation or application of any of the terms and conditions
of employment, and with respect to such matters as the alleged
discriminatory or arbitrary discharge , demotion or discipline of
an individual employee, shall be determined by the provisions of
this procedure, except that such matters which are included in
the definition of impasse as set forth in Resolution No. 4217 are
not a grievance.
Step 1
The initial step in the adjustment of a grievance shall be a
discussion between the employee or his representative and the
immediate Supervisor directly involved, Division Head or Depart-
ment Head as applicable , who will answer within ten (10) days .
This step shall be started within thirty (30) days of the date of
the action complained of or the date the grievant became aware of
the incident which is the basis for the grievance. This step may
be taken during the working hours of the employee.
Step 2
If a grievance is not resolved in the initial step, the second
step shall be a discussion between either the employee or his
representative and the Director of Personnel Services who shall
answer within ten (10) days. This step shall be taken within ten
(10) days of the date of the Department Head ' s answer in Step 1 .
Step 3
If a grievance is not resolved in the second step of this proce-
dure , the third step shall be the presentation of the grievance ,
in writing, by the employee or his representative, to the City •
Manager who shall answer, in writing, within ten (10) days. The
third step shall be taken within ten (10) days of the date of the
answer in Step 2 .
Step 4
• (a) If a grievance is not resolved in the third step of this
procedure , the fourth step shall be referral by either the
City or the employee or his representative to arbitration,
or the employee may elect, at his or her option, to appeal
to the City Council in private or public personnel session
pursuant to the authority contained in the Redding Municipal
Code. The fourth step shall be taken within twenty (20)
days of the date of the answer in Step 3 .
110 4110
(b) An Arbitration Board shall be appointed on each occasion
that a grievance is submitted to arbitration. The Arbi-
tration Board shall be composed of one (1) member appointed
by the City, one (1) member appointed by the employee or his
representative, and one (1) member chosen by mutual agree-
ment of the City and the employee or his representative.
Such third member shall act as Chairman of the Arbitration
Board. In the event that City and the employee or his
representative are unable to agree on the selection of a
Chairman of the Arbitration Board, they shall request the
State of California Mediation and Conciliation Service to
nominate five (5) persons for Chairman. The City and the
employee or his representative each will alternately chal-
lenge two (2) of such nominees , the party having the first
challenge to be determined by lot. The remaining nominee
shall be accepted as Chairman of the Arbitration Board and
his compensation and expenses shall be borne equally by the
City and the employee. The City and the employee shall pay
the compensation and expenses of their respective appointees
and witnesses. At the employee ' s or his representative ' s
request, the City shall release employees from duty to
participate in arbitration proceedings.
(c) The Arbitration Board shall hold such hearings and shall
consider such evidence as to it appears necessary and
proper. The majority decision of the Arbitration Board
shall be final and binding on City and the aggrieved employ-
ee and his representative, provided that such decision does
not in any way add to, disregard or modify any of the
provisions of City policies, resolutions or ordinances.
Failure by the employee to meet any of the aforementioned
time limits as set forth in Steps 1 , 2 , 3 and 4 (a) will result in
forfeiture; except, however, that the aforementioned time limits
may be extended by mutual agreement. Grievances settled by
forfeiture shall not bind either party to an interpretation of
City policies, resolutions or ordinances, nor shall such settle-
ments be cited by either party as evidence in the settlement of
subsequent grievances .
-2-