Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso. 1985 - 183 - Approving the report and findings of the board of appeals and ordering the abatement of the unsafe and unsightly buildings and debris • 111 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING APPROVING THE REPORT AND FINDINGS OF THE BOARD OF APPEALS AND ORDERING THE ABATEMENT OF THE UNSAFE AND UNSIGHTLY BUILDING AND DEBRIS ON THE PROPERTY AT 3257 QUARTZ HILL ROAD (OWNED BY DAVID AND HEATHER ARMANTROUT) . WHEREAS , on June 3 , 1985, the City Council adopted Resolu- tion No. 85-103, a resolution of intention to begin abatement proceedings under the provisions of Chapter 9. 36 of the Redding Municipal Code, affecting property owned by David and Heather Armantrout at 3257 Quartz Hill Road in the City of Redding, being Assessor' s Parcel No. 066-100-17, and more particularly described in said Resolution No. 85-103; and WHEREAS, notice of hearing by the Board of Appeals on this abatement proceeding has been posted on the subject property and served by mail on the owner of record; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on July 25 , 1985 before said Board of Appeals as provided in said Municipal Code and testimony was received by the Board; and WHEREAS, at its meeting of July 25 , 1985 , said Board of Appeals, having heard testimony from the Building Official and the Fire Marshal that the required work had not taken place, found that good and sufficient cause does not exist why the unsafe and unsightly building on said property should not be abated; and • • WHEREAS , said Board of Appeals, having filed with this City Council its report of the hearing and its recommendation for abatement by demolition; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Redding that the report of the Board of Appeals of its findings that the unsafe and unsightly building existing on the property at 3257 Quartz Hill Road should be demolished and removed, be and said report is hereby approved. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council that the Fire Marshal of the City of Redding is hereby directed to abate said unsafe and unsightly condition after a period of thirty (30) days , by having the unsafe and unsightly 'building demolished and removed, and he and his authorized representatives are hereby expressly authorized to enter upon the subject property for that purpose and are directed to keep an itemized account of the cost of abating the said nuisance, to be assessed against the property if not paid by the owner. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this resolution shall be served upon the property owner in accordance with the pro- visions of Section 9. 36 . 060 of Chapter 9. 36 of the Redding Municipal Code, and the property owner shall have the right to have such unsafe and unsightly building abated at his own ex- pense, providing the same is done prior to the expiration of thirty (30) days . I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was intro- duced and read at a regular meeting of the City Council of the -2- • • City of Redding on the 19th day of August , 1985 , and was duly adopted at said meeting by the following vote : AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Demsher, Fulton, Gard, Pugh, & Kirkpatrick NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None r �1 HOWARD D. KIRKPA , 'ICK, Mayor City of Redding ATTEST: ETHEL A. NICHOLS, City Clerk FORM APPROVED: RANVALL A. HAYS , Cita Attorney -3- . „ REPORT OF THE BOARD OF APPEALS OF THE CITY OF REDDING PURSUANT TO SECTION 9. 36. 070 OF THE REDDING MUNICIPAL CODE (PROPERTY AT 3257 QUARTZ HILL ROAD, OWNED BY DAVID AND HEATHER ARMANTROUT) . TO THE HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING: The Board of Appeals of the City of Redding held a public hearing on July 25 , 1985, at 3: 00 p.m. in the City Hall Confer- ence Room to consider the abatement of an unsafe and unsightly building on the property located at 3257 Quartz Hill Road in the City of Redding, under the provisions of Chapter 9 . 36 of the Redding Municipal Code. The findings of the Board of Appeals in regard to said unsafe and unsightly building are as follows: 1. That the property located at 3257 Quartz Hill Road is more particularly described as follows: A. P. No. 066-100-17: • The real property situate in the City of Redding, County of Shasta, State of California, described as follows: Parcel 1 : The southerly 130 . 00 feet of the northerly 205. 00 feet of the westerly 165 . 00 feet of the west one-half of the north- west one-quarter of the northeast one-quarter of the south- west one-quarter of the northwest one-quarter of Section 14 , T. 32 N. , R. 5 W. , M.D.M. ; said southerly 130. 00 feet and said northerly 205 . 00 feet and said westerly 165 . 00 feet to be measured at right anglesto the northerly and westerly lines of said west one-half respectively. Excepting therefrom all oil, gas and other mineral deposits reserved in the Patent to Archie O. Rude dated August 28 , 1959 and recorded September 4 , 1959 in Book 611 of Official Records at page 295, Shasta County Records. Parcel 2 : An easement for road purposes to be used in common with others over a strip of land 20 . 00 feet wide lying 10 . 00 feet on each side of the following described line: Beginning at the northeast corner of the first above des- cribed parcel; thence parallel with the westerly line of the • west one-half of the northwest one-quarter of the northeast one-quarter of the southwest one-quarter of the northwest one-quarter of said Section 14 , southerly to the south line of said west one-half. 2. That the owners of record of the property are David and Heather Armantrout. 3 . That the City Council of the City of Redding adopted Resolution No. 85-103 on June 3 , 1985, a Resolution of Intention to begin legal proceedings of abatement under Chapter 9. 36 of the Redding Municipal Code, as to the subject property. 4 . That jurisdiction has been obtained by the posting of the required notices upon the property and by the service of notice to the property owner of record, who is mentioned afore- said. 5 . That a building (s) exists on the subject property which P is in a deteriorated condition and is vacant and hazardous and rehabilitation is not considered by the Chief Housing Counselor because of the need for substantial repairs. 6 . The Board of Appeals recommends that the building which is the subject of this proceeding be demolished and that the costs of abatement, if not paid by the owner, shall be a lien upon the property. Submitted, � 'ohn Fitz�gg0 ' ld, `C11.4"rman (, oard of 2`pVeals -2-