HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso. 1987 - 165 - Approving the proposal to conduct spawning gravel studies for the lake redding power project between the city of redding and ea engineering science and technology inc 110
RESOLUTION NO. 7—/ '5
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING
APPROVING THE PROPOSAL TO CONDUCT SPAWNING GRAVEL STUDIES
FOR THE LAKE REDDING POWER PROJECT BETWEEN THE CITY OF
REDDING AND EA ENGINEERING, SCIENCE, AND TECHNOLOGY, INC. ,
AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO SIGN ALL NECESSARY
DOCUMENTATION.
WHEREAS, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) has
established a deadline of August 1 , 1987 , for the City of Redding
to complete a new salmon spawning habitat study for the Lake
Redding Project; and
WHEREAS, EA Engineering, Science , and Technology, Inc. (EA) ,
through the competitive RFP process, provided the lowest cost
proposal for preparation of the requested study; and
WHEREAS, staff has recommended that the study be limited to
Tasks 1 and 3 of the attached Proposal to Conduct Spawning Gravel
Studies for the Lake Redding Power Project, for a total cost of
$9, 209. 00;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of
the City of Redding as follows :
1 . That the City Council of the City of Redding hereby
approves entering into a Contract with EA Engineering, Science,
and Technology, Inc. to perform Tasks 1 and 3 as outlined in the
Proposal to Conduct Spawning Gravel Studies for the Lake Redding
Power Project, EA Proposal PRP 7327 dated April 24 , 1987, a true
copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by
reference, for a total cost of $9 , 209 . 00.
2. That the City Manager of the City of Redding is hereby
authorized and directed to sign said Contract and all necessary
documents on behalf of the City of Redding in connection
therewith, and the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed
to attest the signature of the City Manager and to impress the
111 •
official seal of the City of Redding on the aforesaid documents,
when appropriate.
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was
introduced and read at a regular meeting of the City Council of
the City of Redding on the 19th day of May , 1987 , and was
duly adopted at said meeting by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Fulton, Gard, Johannessen, & Dahl
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Carter
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
C--" n"1/4-4:-.0C.4—) C::)<:)1/4I"---'A-k..„
MIKE DAHL, Mayor
City of Redding
ATTEST: ,� ; L� -
X� �._::j
, _,
ETL A. NICHOLS, City C] rk
by Connie Strohmayer, Deputy
FORM APP VED:
/(I )0'. ,W ;71:,,e//
PANDALL A. HAYS, City Attorney
y Walter P. McNeill , Deputy
-2-
V
• •
En EA ENGINEERING, Western Regional Operations
SCIENCE, AND 41 Lafayette Circle
TECHNOLOGY, INC. Lafayette,California 94549
(415)283-7077
5 May 1987
Mr . Rick Coleman
City of Redding
Electric Department
760 Parkview Avenue
Redding, California 96001
Dear Rick:
This letter is intended to clarify a few points made ( or not
made ) in our proposal to you for spawning gravel studies
associated with the Lake Redding Project .
1 . There is a major significant different between Approach 1
and the other two approaches which may not have been
sufficiently clear in our proposal : All aquatic
measurements for Approach 1 will be made at a single flow
of about 9, 000 cfs in the Sacramento River at the time EA
sets out to make the measurements in June and July. The
present agreement with the agencies requires that two
flows ( one < 5 , 000 cfs and one > 40 , 000 cfs ) would be
measured for HEC-2 validation ( Task 4 ) and for IFG-4
model development (Task 7 ) . Under Approach 1 , neither of
these previous agreements could be kept, proceeding would
require obtaining agency agreement within 2 weeks of the
project authorization . Our past experience.—suggests that
achieving such an agreement , particularly in a short
timeframe , is unlikely , but without it , a July 30
deadline could not be met .
2 . As requested in the RFP , all calculated data will be
provided to the City of Redding, both in hard copy and as
ASCII files on IBM PC diskettes ( either 360 kb or 1 . 2 mb;
your choice )
3 . Task lb for both Approach 2 and Approach 3 should be
increased to $ 1 , 350 to correspond to their correct value
in Approach 1 .
4 . Task 7 should include the explicit statement that the
IFG-4 model , under Approach 1 , would be run at a single
flow ( whatever flow exists at the time measurements are
made ) rather than at the two flows previously agreed to
by the agencies .
BALTIMORE 0 CHICAGO 0 CINCINNATI 0 LINCOLN 0 NEW YORK 0 SAN FRANCISCO
411
EA ENGINEERING,
SCIENCE, AND
TECHNOLOGY, INC.
Rick Coleman
5 May 1987
Page Two
5 . All surveying (Task 5a ) will be done by Pace Engineering
for a total cost of $ 10 , 000 . All HEC-2 model runs under
Approach 3 , report preparation , and HEC-2 project
management will be done by Ott Water Engineers for a
total cost of $ 15 , 000 ( Task la , $ 2 , 000 ; Task 5b ,
$ 3 , 476 ; Task 6 , $ 1 , 1600 ; Task 7a , $ 3 , 000 ; Task 7b ,
$3 , 000 ; Task 12 , $ 1 , 924 ) . The total subcontractor cost
for the full project will be $25 , 000 , approximately 25%
of the total cost .
We wish to ad that the combination of HEC-2 and IFG-4 models
proposed and agreed to by the agencies was worked out in
extensive discussions between EA ' s certified instream flow
modelers and Robert Milhous of the U . S . Fish and Wildlife
Service Instream Flow Group. Other step-backwater models like
the WSP ( IFG-2 ) could be used, but were rejected in favor of the
potential for using the existing HEC-2 data and the advantage of
the IFG-5 model in not requiring that the new transects be
surveyed. These two features could save the City of Redding at
least $ 10 , 000 over the WSP alternative, as well as providing more
versatile modeling capabilities .
If you have further questions, please do not hesitate to call .
Sincerely yours,
-
J. Emil Morhardt, Ph. D.
Vice President
• •
IBAEA ENGINEERING, Western Regional Operations
SCIENCE, AND 41 Lafayette Circle
TECHNOLOGY, INC. Lafayette,California 94549
(415)283-7077
24 April 1987
Rick Coleman
City of Redding
Electric Department
2556 Heather Lane
Redding, California 96001
Dear Rick:
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, Inc. ( EA ) and our
subcontractor Pace Engineering are pleased to respond to your
request for proposal for spawning gravel studies for the Lake
Redding Power Project . Enclosed are two copies of the proposal
which offer a choice of three different approaches. We hope that
you will find one of these adequate to your needs .
Should you have questions please do not hesitate to call .
Sincerely,
J. Emil Morhardt, Ph . D.
JEM;cam
Enclosures
BALTIMORE 0 CHICAGO 0 . CINCINNATI ❑ LINCOLN 0 NEW YORK 0 SAN FRANCISCO
•
EA Proposal PRP 7327
PROPOSAL TO CONDUCT
SPAWNING GRAVEL STUDIES
FOR THE LAKE REDDING POWER PROJECT
Prepared for :
City of Redding
760 Parkview Avenue
Redding, California 96001
Prepared by:
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, Inc.
41 A Lafayette Circle
Lafayette, California 94549
in cooperation with
Pace Engineering
1730 South Street
Redding, California 96001
APRIL 24 , 1987
# •
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
1 . EA' s Interpretation of the Objectives and
Scope of Services Required 1
2 . Availability of EA to Begin Services under
this Scope of Work 2
3 . Description of the Intended Method by Discrete
Task for Undertaking the Objective 2
Task la - Project Management 2
Task lb and lc - Collection of Agency Data and
Development of Suitability Index Curves for
Chinook Salmon Spawning, Incubation and
Rearing 3
Task ld - Milestone Indicating Agreement with
the Agencies of SI Curves 3
Task 2 - Collecting Suitability Index Data 3
Task 3 - Selection of Transects 4
Task 4 - Verification of the Existing HEC-2
Model as a Basis for Running the IFG4 Model
at the Transects Selected in Task 3 4
Task 5 - Developing a New HEC-2 Model 5
Task 6 - Utilizing the HEC-2 Model Runs 5
Task 7 - Development of the IFG4 Model 5
Task 8 - Development of Conversion Factors for
Relating Spawning Conditions to Mean Column
Velocity 6
Task 9 - Determining Weighted Usable Area 6
Task 10 - Time Series Analyses 7
Task 11 - Actual Years Analysis 8
Task 12 - Report Preparation 8
4 . A Schedule for Sequencing the Proposed Work Tasks 8
5 . Identification of all Subcontractors 8
6 . Organization and Staffing Plan 8
7 . Costs of Services by Task 10
8 . Not to Exceed Costs 11
9 . Monthly Escalator 11
10 . Insurance 11
11 . Draft Contract 13
• 111
Page
12 . Exceptions or Limitations 13
13 . Written Communication 13
14 . Report Submission 13
15 . Report Format 14
16. Cost Management 14
17 . Over-Sized Materials 14
Attachment 1
Attachment 2
Attachment 3
Attachment 4
Attachment 5
Attachment 6
Attachment 7
Attachment 8
Appendix A
• •
1 . EA' S INTERPRETATION OF THE OBJECTIVES AND SCOPE
OF SERVICES REQUIRED
The Lake Redding Hydropower Project will include a new dam at the
site of the existing Anderson-Cottonwood Irrigation District
( ACID ) dam which will maintain the water levels immediately
upstream at the same levels presently occurring only at maximum
planned releases, with the levels diminishing to the existing
levels at normal flows toward Keswick Dam. The total volume of
water flowing from Keswick Dam past the new dam, and the timing
of releases, will be unchanged from present practice, but because
the water will usually be deeper, the velocity will usually be
diminished.
Chinook salmon presently use the 3 . 5 mile reach between the
Keswick and ACID dams for spawning, and require certain water
velocities and depths over their nests ( redds ) for spawning to be
successful . It is likely that the changes in velocity and depth
resulting from the new dam will alter the suitability of the
existing gravel for spawning and incubation. To find out, it is
necessary to know the depths and velocities required by chinook
salmon for spawning, to predict the changes in depth and velocity
that will occur with the new dam, and to know the extent and
suitability for spawning of the existing gravel beds.
The study plan presented in the Request for Proposals was
developed by EA under contract to the City of Redding and
includes studies to provide all necessary data. It also includes
a description of the data analysis and presentation that has been
agreed by the agencies to determine beyond a reasonable doubt the
changes in the amount of spawning habitat likely to occur as a
result of the proposed project . A microcomputer version of the
U . S . Fish and Wildlife Service PHABSIM model will be used to
characterize the suitability of the spawning gravel under
different depth and flow regimes. This model depends on either
direct measurements of depth, velocity, and substrate suitability
at various flows , or on simulations of depth and velocity
combined with known gravel suitability. Since the dam is not
presently in place, hydraulic simulations will be required. The
model also requires a knowledge of the specific type of gravel
needed and the depths and velocities preferred by the salmon.
Suitability Index curves exist, both in the manual prepared by
the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service ( Bovee 1978 ) and for the fall
run chinook salmon spawning in Battle Creek ( Vogel, unpublished ) .
However , the agencies do not feel that either set of curves
accurately reflect depth preference in the Sacramento River .
Consequently , the study plan includes the development of
Suitability Index curves for Sacramento River salmon , based
either on preliminary data from the U . S . Fish and Wildlife
Service and the California Department of Fish Game if a
sufficient amount is available , or on new data collected
specifically for this project .
1
• •
Gravel beds between Keswick Dam and the Market Street Bridge will
be mapped by the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service specifically for
this project. In the course of the mapping EA intended that they
would determine either the fraction of each bed that is usable,
or the relative usability of each bed on a scale from 0-1 . 0 for
use as one of the input variables in the PHABSIM model . Recent
discussions between them and EA indicate a hesitancy on the part
of Dave Vogel ( who will be doing the field work ) to put
quantitative values on the spawning gravel , so it may be
necessary for EA to convert Vogel ' s non-quantitative assessment
into quantitative terms.
Timing and the hierarchical nature of the study plan
The intention in designing the scope of services was to make it
entirely hierarchical in nature, requiring that all parties reach
accordance on each task prior to the implementation of the next
task. This approach has the potential for saving the City of
Redding money should accordance fail to be reached early on, but
has the two disadvantages that the contractor undertaking the
assignment will have little control of the schedule of the
project and that because of the probable availability of flows in
the Sacramento River, the project cannot possibly be completed as
designed within the time limitations presented in the Request for
Proposals .
In order to combine responsiveness with realism, EA has developed
an alternate work scope that allows meeting the proposed schedule
at the expense of maintaining the strict hierarchical structure
of the project . This is identified as Approach 1 . EA has also
developed, for costing purposes, two additional work scopes that
meet the hierarchical requirements of the RFP, but fail to meet
the schedule. One of these, Approach 2 , assumes that neither a
new HEC-2 model will be required, nor additional field work for
the development of Suitability Index ( SI ) curves . The other,
Approach 3 , includes all possible tasks.
2 . AVAILABILITY OF EA TO BEGIN SERVICES UNDER THIS
SCOPE OF WORK
EA will start work on the day that the contract is awarded
( presumably May 19 , 1987 ) .
3 . DESCRIPTION OF THE INTENDED METHOD BY DISCRETE
TASK FOR UNDERTAKING THE OBJECTIVE
Task la - Project Management
This task includes our estimate of the costs for overall project
management functions not related to specific tasks .
2
•
Tasks lb and 1c - Collection of Agency Data and Development of
Suitability Index Curves for Chinook Salmon Spawning, Incubation
and Rearing
At the award of contract EA will assemble all of the Suitability
Index curve data we have in hand for Chinook Salmon in
California, convert it to frequency histograms, and fit smoothed
curves to these using running mean and polynomial curve fitting
techniques . We will then hand carry the final ,curves to the
California Department of Fish and Game ( CDFG ) and U. S. Fish and
Wildlife Service ( FWS ) biologists who are presently contracting
SI curve work (John Turner ' s and Dan Odenweller ' s groups at DFG,
Dave Vogel ' s and other FWS groups ) . We will examine these
preliminary curves, and obtain any additional raw data they are
willing to provide, and we will solicit any input they wish to
give on the curve fitting techniques chosen. Unless there are
clear differences evident from the existing data, the data from
all races will be pooled prior to construction of the frequency
distributions.
Under Approach 3 , if the spawning or incubation frequency
distributions are not accepted because the data are insufficient
or somehow defective, EA will conduct Task 2 .
Task 1d - Milestone indicating agreement with the Agencies of
SI Curves
Task 2 - Collecting Suitability Index Data [contingent on failure
of Task 1 ]
EA will use a boat and divers between the ACID dam and Keswick
dam to attempt to identify locations of spawning salmon and to
locate redds , and will use a rod to measure depth , and an
electromagnetic current measure to measure velocities 5 inches
above the gravel at the locations of spawning chinook salmon ( for
spawning data ) and 5 inches above redds ( for incubation data )
until a total of 150 observations for fall or late fall run
spawning and incubation, and 150 observations for spring or
winter run spawning and incubation ( including those provided by
the agencies in Task 1 ) are obtained . The contract will be
awarded too late in the season for any salmon other than winter
run to be spawning or incubating , and there have been so few
winter run fish in recent years that it may be impossible to
collect any new SI curve data until late august when spring run
fish are present . It is probable that there are already
sufficient data for fall and late fall fish but if not these data
would be collected in a September-November time frame . The data
collected will be pooled with the existing data and will be used
to construct Suitability Index curves using the approach
described in Task 1 . Once the resulting frequency distributions
and curve-fitting techniques are approved by the agencies the
work will proceed to Task 3 .
3
• •
Task 3 - Selection of Transects
The USFWS anticipates completing field work on the identification
of gravel beds by June 15 , 1987 , and should, shortly after that
time, be willing to meet with EA and with representatives of the
other agencies at the project site to determine the exact numbers
and locations of transects for characterizing spawning ,
incubation and rearing habitat. The total number of transects,
however , will not exceed one per 7000 square feet of usable
spawning gravel or 40 transects in total . Transect selection
should take a maximum of two working days, but will be entirely
dependent on the USFWS and CDFG being willing to partake in the
decision, and they may be unwilling to until the final report is
completed and Submitted to Redding ( scheduled for July 10 , 1987 ) .
The schedule for Approach 1 is contingent on willingness for the
agencies to approve transect selection piecemeal as they go ,
rather than waiting for the final report . For the other
approaches, the availability of appropriate flows is far more
constraining than agreement on transect locations.
Task 4 - Verification of the Existing HEC-2 Model as a Basis for
Running the IFG4 Model at the Transects Selected in
Task 3
Pace Engineering in Redding will identify the locations of three
of the HEC-2 transects within one mile of Keswick Dam and will
measure the absolute water surface elevations either at whatever
flow exists at the start of the project ( under Approach 1 ) or at
two discharges: one less than 5 , 000 cfs and one greater than
40 , 000 cfs ( under Approaches 2 & 3 ) for comparison with the
water surface elevations previously predicted by the HEC II Model
at the same discharge and locations.
It is extremely unlikely that a flow of less than 5000 cfs will
be available at any of these transects prior to September 1987 ,
and even more unlikely that a flow in excess of 40, 000 cfs will
be available at any of these transects prior to February 1988 .
Furthermore it is not inconceivable that several more years could
pass prior to a 40 , 000 cfs flow occurring.
Whatever the timing, the results of this verification procedure
will be discussed with the staff of the U . S . Army Corps of
Engineers Hydraulic Engineering Center in Davis , and their
opinion about the current applicability of the existing HEC-2
model will be sought. If they conclude that the existing model
is adequate for predicting mean column depth of the instream flow
transects to within + 0 . 1 ft EA will proceed to Task 6 . If
the HEC staff does not believe the model is sufficiently accurate
at present EA will conduct Task 5 . Approaches 1 & 2 assume that
no new HEC-2 modeling will be required.
4
• •
Task 5 - Developing a New HEC-2 Model [contingent on failure of
Task 4]
EA will apply the HEC-2 modeling procedure in accordance with
U . S . Army Corps of Engineers ' manuals ( using the new HEC-2
Package ( PC Version ) released on 20 February, 1987 by the Corps '
Hydraulic Engineering Center ) for the section of the Sacramento
River between the ACID Dam and Keswick Dam. The procedure will
use the transects selected in Task 2 and any other transects
necessary at hydraulic controls for adequate performance of the
model.
EA will subcontract surveying in of the transects to Pace
Engineering , and will have Pace establish fixed benchmarks of
known absolute elevation at each transect headpin for future
reference and model calibration.
Task 6 - Utilizing the HEC-2 Model Runs
If the existing HEC-2 Model is used as described in Task 4 , the
City of Redding will supply the model results for the original
HEC II transects and EA will determine the water surface
elevations at the new gravel transects using linear
interpolation.
If a new HEC-2 model is developed using the gravel transects
selected in Task 3 , the model from Task 5 will be run for water
surface elevations at the ACID Dam site of 485 . 25 , 487 . 5 , 489 . 75
and 492 feet above mean sea level and under existing conditions
with the ACID Dam flashboards in place and removed at flows
between 2 , 000 and 20, 000 cfs in 2 , 000 cfs increments and at flows
between 20 , 000 and 60, 000 cfs in 4, 000 cfs increments .
Task 7 - Development of the IFG4 Model
EA will establish relocatable measurement points ( verticals )
along each transect selected in Task 3 such that no more than 5
percent of the total cross sectional flow will be represented by
any single measurement point, with measurements to be taken at 1 -
foot intervals over usable spawning gravel . At each vertical , at
one discharge no greater than 5 , 000 cfs and at a second discharge
at least 24 , 000 cfs , EA will measure depth and mean column
velocity. All measurements will be taken from one of EA' s boats
maintained stationary in the current . Distances from the
transect headpin will be measured from shore using a tracking
laser distance meter. The distance instrument will also assure
alignment along the transect . The shore operator will also
maintain 2 -way headset radio communication with the boat
operator.
At depths less than six feet, velocity will be measured using an
electromagnetic flow meter mounted on a top-set wading rod. At
depths greater than six feet , velocities will be measured by
means of a cable-suspended electromagnetic flowmeter . Mean
5
• •
column velocity will be approximated by a single measurement
taken at a distance sixty percent of the total depth from the
surface at total depths of 2 . 5 ft or less, or by the arithmetic
mean of two measurements, one taken at a distance twenty percent
and the other at a distance eighty percent of the total depth
from the bottom at depths greater than 2 . 5 ft .
Using the water surface elevations from Task 6 and the measured
depths and velocities , EA , using our own proprietary
microcomputer version of the IFG4 Model in its one-flow mode,
will prepare matrices of column depths and mean velocities at
each vertical along each transect at 2 , 000 cfs flow increments
between 2 , 000 cfs and 20 , 000 cfs and at 4 , 000 cfs intervals
between 20 , 000 cfs and 60 , 000 cfs for existing boards in and
boards out conditions at the ACID Dam and for water surface
elevations at the ACID Dam of 485 . 25 , 487 . 5 , 489 . 75 , and 492 feet
above mean sea level. This analysis will be done both for the
data collected below 5, 000 cfs and for the data collected above
24 , 000 cfs.
Task 8 - Development of Conversion Factors for Relating Spawning
Conditions to Mean Column Velocity
The conversion factors will be derived empirically by fitting
regression lines to scatter plots of velocity at 5 inches off the
bottom versus mean column velocity ( approximated by the
arithmetic mean of the velocities at 0 . 2 and 0 . 8 of total depth
for depths greater than 2 . 5 ft, or by velocity at 0 . 6 of total
depth for depths of 2 . 5 ft or less ) . The data for velocities 5
inches off the gravel will be collected along with the mean
column velocities during Task 7 at every vertical over spawning
gravel beds . Data will be grouped in 1 -ft depth intervals and
fitted separately to account for the effect of depth on
correction factors . The regressions will include 95 percent
confidence intervals for predicting velocities 5 inches off the
bottom. These conversion factors will be submitted to the
agencies for approval prior to calculation of the Weighted Usable
Area in Task 9.
Task 9 - Determining Weighted Usable Area
Using the SI curves from Task 1 , the percent usability or
suitability index value provided by the U. S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, the IFG4 model results from Task 7 , and the conversion
factors from Task 8 , EA will first convert all mean column
velocities to velocities 5 inches off the gravel ( for spawning
and incubation ) . The accuracy of these conversions will be
analyzed by comparing the predicted velocities 5 inches off the
gravel to the measured velocities 5 inches off the gravel for
values measured at both flows and predicted from both the model
based on the flow measurements < 5 , 000 cfs and from the model
based on flow measurements >24 , 000 cfs .
6
•
These comparisons will be made by regressing the predicted values
on the measured values. The predictive model will be considered
adequate if the slope of the resulting regression line is not
significantly different from 1 . 0 at the 95 percent level of
confidence, and if the 95 percent confidence interval about the
line at its narrowest point is no larger than + 10 percent of the
absolute value of velocity at that point: if these criteria are
not met initially, EA will attempt to alter the model to meet
them, possibly by using correction factors to achieve a slope of
1 . 0 , and by utilizing different conversion factors at high and
low flows. If the model still fails to meet these criteria, EA
will meet with representatives of the City to determine whether
to proceed.
Once the criteria are met, EA will determine Weighted Usable Area
for spawning , incubation , and rearing flows under present
conditions with the flashboards at the ACID Dam both in place and
absent and at water surface elevations at the ACID Dam of 485 . 25 ,
487 . 5 and 489. 75 and 492 feet above mean sea level, at 2 , 000 cfs
intervals from 2 , 000 to 20, 000 cfs and at 4, 000 ft intervals from
20 , 000 to 60 , 000 cfs.
Task 10 - Time Series Analyses
Weighted Usable Area for spawning, incubation, and rearing will
be determined by week for the median, upper quartile, and lower
quartile flows for existing conditions with ACID Dam boards in
and out , and for water surface elevations at the ACID Dam of
485 . 25 , 487 . 5 , 489 . 75 and 492 feet above mean sea level . The
weekly flows corresponding to median, upper and lower quartile
will be supplied by the City of Redding from Addendum No. 2 to
the license application.
These three flow years will be partitioned into spawning, incu-
bating , and rearing periods for fall , late-fall , spring , and
winter runs of chinook salmon, as was done in Addendum No. 2 . The
total amounts of spawning habitat at each case will be based on
the maximum amount of spawning habitat under each flow condition
that is sustained in suitable condition throughout a period of
time long enough for incubation to take place. Incubation times
used in the analysis will be 8 weeks for all runs . In this way,
peaks of spawning habitat availability that last only a week or
two and are followed by periods of lower incubation suitability
will not be considered , and incubation areas appearing after
spawning has finished, and are hence unavailable for spawning,
will not be considered. Rearing habitat will be calculated based
on the rearing time of 8 weeks for the fall run, 12 weeks for the
late fall run, 8 weeks for the winter run, and 10 weeks for the
spring run. Thus, EA will calculate the number of fry that could
have been produced each week based on spawning and incubation
criteria , then will determine the amount of rearing habitat
available for that group of fry for the specified rearing period.
7
• •
Task 11 - Actual Years Analysis
If requested by the City, EA will prepare an analysis similar to
that described in Task 10 for up to 10 actual flow years.
Task 12 - Report Preparation
The results of all of the analyses in the foregoing tasks will be
presented in 75 copies of a report for submission to the agencies
and to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission . The report will
contain detailed descriptions of Tasks 1 -11 , including tables and
figures sufficient to fully characterize the techniques, input
data and results of all of the analyses. The report will also
contain an introduction, an executive summary, and an abstract.
4 . A SCHEDULE FOR SEQUENCING THE PROPOSED WORK TASKS
Three Gantt charts , one for each of the three approaches are
included in Attachment 1 giving a schedule for the proposed work.
Approach 1 meets the schedule required by the RFP, but fails to
maintain the hierarchical requirements of the RFP. Approaches 2
and 3 maintain the hierarchical structure, but fail to meet the
RFP schedule. Approaches 2 and 3 differ by inclusion of work
products in Approach 3 which may turn out not to be required
depending on intermediate results.
5 . IDENTIFICATION OF ALL SUBCONTRACTORS
EA is a nationally recognized expert in instream flow modeling,
and has completed major research projects in this topic for the
Electric Power Research Institute. Consequently no consultants
are contemplated.
The only subcontractor proposed is Pace Engineering in Redding
which will do all the surveying work. The maximum cost of Pace ' s
services will be about 13% of the project cost .
6. ORGANIZATION AND STAFFING PLAN
EA is a national organization with over 200 scientists and
engineers and a reputation for scientifically rigorous and defen-
sible work . We have conducted a broad range of scientific inves-
tigations for over 70 percent of the public and privately held
electric utilities in the U. S. Our California office is highly
experienced in large-scale river projects , having performed
three-year fisheries studies for the Pacific Gas and Electric
Company ' s ( PGandE ) Pittsburg and Contra Costa power plants as
well as instream flow studies on complex basins such as the North
Fork Kings River, Bishop Creek, and Clayey River drainages .
8
111
•
EA is highly knowledgable regarding state-of-the-art instream
flow determinations . We have been active in instream flow
studies using the PHABSIM model since 1981 , compiling a list of
over 50 m hydroelectric-related projects (Appendix A) .
The technical staff assembled for the City of Redding Project
represent experienced engineers and quantitative ecologists . Our
selected project manager, Dr. J. Emil Morhardt, and assistant
project manager , Mr . David Hanson , are particularly well
experienced in open channel hydraulic modeling and habitat evalu-
ation having worked together on studies of this type since 1980 .
The field personnel that will be involved in the project
collectively possess experience in a wide array of fisheries
techniques , including seining ( fyke nets , gill nets , beach
seines ) , electrofishing ( boat , backpack ) , habitat evaluation
( stream surveying, habitat preference diving ) , and instream flow
sampling.
EA also possesses considerable experience in the use of the
single discharge IFG-4 hydraulic simulation model , having
recently completed IFIM studies for 105 transects in which the
modified version of IFG-4 was used . Additionally , EA is
presently serving on an advisory committee to the Niagara Mohawk
Power Corporation of New York for investigations into the
application of the IFG-4 model to the Salmon River, New York.
Dr . Morhardt and Mr . Hanson have also arranged and conducted
three EPRI-sponsored national seminars [Alexandria, VA, Seattle
WA, Atlanta, GA] on the PHABSIM family of models, specifically
comparing the HEC-2 , WSP , IFG-4 and one-flow IFG-4 hydraulic
simulation models and have written and scale listed many
technical papers and journal articles on the subject.
We feel we are uniquely qualified to perform the habitat
preference studies, having recently completed a major project of
this type for PGandE in the North Fork Kings River basin. The
data collection techniques and methods of analysis that were
developed during the Haas-Kings River Project will be of
considerable value in expediting completion of this segment of
the project and truly reflect the state of the art.
The project will be managed by Dr . J . Emil Morhardt and will
utilize all of EA' s California staff experienced in open channel
hydraulic modeling and instream flow field studies . Brief des-
criptions of the role of each team member and relevant experience
follow, and full resumes of the key staff are appended.
J. Emil Morhardt, Project Manager
Dr . Morhardt will maintain overall responsibility for the
project, principal involvement in the planning, data
analysis, and report preparation phases of the project . Dr .
Morhardt, a physiologist/ecologist, as director of EA' s
western regional operations has been involved with each of
EA' s over 50 hydroelectric-related fisheries projects . He
has served as project manager on several of our larger
9
• 110
instream flow studies for PGandE and Southern California
Edison. He also has experience testifying as an expert
witness in Superior Court on fisheries issues in Sierran
streams, and will be available for any testimony required in
the course of the project .
David Hanson, Assistant Project Manager
Mr . Hanson is a fisheries biologist with a strong mathemati-
cal modeling and statistical background. He is completely
aware of the objectives and proper field implementation of
many fisheries sampling techniques, including electrofishing
surveys and IFIM studies , having developed all of EA ' s
inhouse fisheries computer software. He has managed several
projects for EA, including large-scale instream flow studies
such as the Haas-Kings River Project.
Edward Cheslak, Instream Flow Modeler
Dr . Cheslak, will be responsible for the habitat time series
analysis studies . Dr . Cheslak , like Mr . Hanson , is a
graduate of the USFWS instream flow courses and is
experienced in the use of instream flow models and the appli-
cation of statistics to the analysis of applied ecological
data . He is also highly skilled in the use of temperature
modeling and water quality analysis, and has taught part of
the USFWS temperature modeling course in Colorado.
Edward Coleman, Hydraulic Simulation
Mr. Coleman, a registered civil engineer, will be responsible
for the assimilating HEC-2 data from the existing model runs .
Mr . Coleman ' s experience in engineering ranges from hazardous
waste management to construction management.
Brian Mattax, Paul DeVries, Keith Binkley, Kim Binkley,
Field Studies and Modeling
Mr. Mattax, Mr. DeVries, Mr. Binkley, and Mrs. Binkley will
be responsible for various aspects of the field and modeling
phases of the projects . Collectively their experience
includes a substantial amount of field work relative to
instream flow studies including transect sampling and habitat
preference measurements . Mr . DeVries and Mr . Mattax have
also assisted in hydraulic and habitat modeling related to
several of EA' s instream flow studies in California.
EA will not substitute key personnel unless approved by Redding ' s
Project Manager .
7 . COSTS OF SERVICES BY TASK
Attachment 2 summarizes the cost ( without the monthly escalation )
for each approach by resource. Approach 1 = $48 , 613 ; Approach
2 = $74 , 268 ; Approach 3 =$97 , 599.
10
• •
Separate schedules for each of the three approaches are provided
showing Dollars (without the monthly escalator ) (Attachment 3 )
and man-hours (Attachment 4 ) by task. Also included are detailed
cost and resource breakdowns by task for Approach 1 (Attachment
5 ) , Approach 2 (Attachment 6 ) and Approach 3 (Attachment 7 ) . All
labor dollars include base labor costs, government audited labor
overhead ( 118% of base labor costs ) , government audited general
and administrative costs ( 9% of direct labor plus labor over-
head ) , and 9% fee. Labor allowances for sick leave, vacation,
etc . , are included in the government audited labor overhead .
Direct costs except for the subcontractor are shown as 120% of
actual costs to cover administrative handling. Mileage is based
on a charge of $ . 45/mile for the large Suburbans used on this
project . Subcontractor ' s fees are not marked up.
8 . NOT TO EXCEED COSTS
The not-to-exceed costs of each of the three approaches are 110%
of the bottom line values of each of them plus the monthly
escalator identified in item 9 . For approaches 2 and 3 , not-to-
exceed costs will be approximately 110% of the values shown in
the costing sheets .
9. MONTHLY ESCALATOR
Beginning in January , 1988 , all costs will be escalated by
0 . 75%/month.
10 . INSURANCE
Upon award of the contract, EA will provide the following minimum
insurance and indemnification:
EA will furnish the City a policy or certificate of liability
insurance in which the City is the named insured or is named as
an additional insured with EA. Notwithstanding any inconsistent
statement in the policy or any subsequent endorsement attached
thereto, the City will be the insured or named as an additional
insured covering work or tasks associated with the contract ,
whether liability is attributable to EA or the City. The policy
will insure the City, its officers, employees, and agents while
acting within the scope of their duties on the work or tasks
associated with the contract, against all claims arising out of
or in conjunction with the work or tasks associated with the
contract .
The coverage shall provide the following minimum limits :
Bodily Injury $250 , 000 each person
$500 , 000 each occurrence
11
• •
$500 , 000 aggregate products
and completed operations
Property Damage $100 , 000 each occurrence
$250 , 000 aggregate
EA will save, keep, and hold harmless the City, its officers,
agents, and employees from all damages, costs, or expenses in law
or equity that may at any time arise or be set up because of
damages to property, or of personal injury received by reason of
or in the course of performing work or tasks associated with the
contract, which may be caused by any willful or negligent act or
omission by EA any of the EA employees , or any subcontractor
liability insurance policies shall bear an endorsement or shall
have attached a rider whereby it is provided that, in the event
of expiration or proposed cancellation of such policies for any
reason whatsoever, the City shall be notified by registered mail,
return receipt requested, giving a sufficient time before the
date thereof to comply with any applicable law or statute, but in
no event less than 30 days before expiration or cancellation is
effective.
Before execution of the contract by the City, EA will file with
the City the following signed certification:
"I am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the
Labor Code which require every employer to be insured
against liability for workers ' compensation or to
undertake self-insurance in accordance with the pro-
visions of that code , and I will comply with such
provisions before commencing the performance of the
work or tasks associated with the contracts . "
We will also comply with Section 3800 of the Labor Code by
securing, paying for, and maintaining in full force and effect
for the duration of the contract, complete Workmen ' s Compensation
Insurance, and shall furnish a Certificate of Insurance to the
City before execution of the contract . The City, its officers,
agents, or employees, will not be responsible for any claims in
law or equity occasioned by failure of EA to comply with this
paragraph .
All compensation insurance policies shall bear an endorsement or
shall have attached a rider whereby it is provided that, in the
event or expiration or proposed cancellation of such policies for
any reason whatsoever, the City shall be notified be registered
mail not less than 30 days before expiration or cancellation is
effective.
INDEMNIFICATION
EA will defend , indemnify and hold harmless the City , its
officers , employees and agents , from and against any and all
liens, judgments and claims of any kind or character arising out
of , in connection with, or resulting from our work under this
12
• •
contract, including, but not limited to, any damages, or claim of
damages, to property or personalty, or for personal injuries to
or death of persons . EA covenants and agrees to defend any suit
or to pay any judgment against the City resulting from any suit
for which EA has agreed to indemnify the City pursuant to this
paragraph; provided, however, that the City shall nevertheless
have the right, if it so elects and notifies EA to participate at
the City ' s expense in the defense of any such suit or suits in
which it may be a party, without relieving EA of the obligation
to defend the same.
11 . DRAFT CONTRACT
Attachment 3 is a draft contract that will be incorporated into
the final contract entered into by EA and the City of Redding.
12 . EXCEPTIONS OR LIMITATIONS
Task la provides the budget for project management meetings, and
represents our estimate of a reasonable sum to cover meetings
that may be required during the course of this project . Past
experience with the agencies on City of Redding projects has
indicated that the Agencies may require many more meetings than
we can anticipate. Thus this portion of the budget may require
additional funding for meeting attendance not under EA ' s
management control.
Tasks 2a and 2b consist of diving in the Sacramento River
looking for Salmon and measuring the physical characteristics
where they are found. The cost estimate makes the assumption
that they will be found and is based on prior experience of EA in
making such measurements . However , the size and timing of
Sacramento River Salmon runs is subject to variation not under
EA' s management control . If this task requires more time than is
budgeted, more funding would be sought.
All other tasks are under EA' s management control, and will be
done under the budget constraints in this proposal .
13 . WRITTEN COMMUNICATION
All external written communication regarding the project from and
to EA will be provided by EA to the City of Redding.
14 . REPORT SUBMISSION
The major deliverable of the project will be the final report
including the results of the hydraulic simulation modeling and
time series analysis. Depending upon the scope of work approach
agreed upon by EA and the City of Redding, the period of time for
13
411 •
draft report review by the project manager will range from two
weeks to one month . Submission of the draft review will be
appropriately timed to allow for the review period, and the time
required to incorporate the project manager ' s comments and
produce the final report.
15 . REPORT FORMAT
As is the case in all technical reports produced by EA the final
report to the City of Redding will be written in a clear , and
concise manner using standard scientific format including des-
criptions of methods such as field techniques and data analysis,
and results and conclusions. The report will also contain an
abstract and executive summary. Databases used in the analysis,
and detailed descriptions of the modeling procedures will be
included in appendices to the report thus allowing for a clear
description of the project in the manuscript.
16 . COST MANAGEMENT
Any work not performed by EA that is part of the not-to-exceed
cost estimate will either be credited to the City of Redding or
will be used to pay for any unforeseen changes in scope of
services mutually agreed upon between EA and the Project Manager .
17 . OVER-SIZED MATERIALS
Any materials appearing in EA' s final report that are greater in
size than 8 1 /2" by 13 " will also be supplied to the City of
Redding in the form of a single good quality mylar reproducible.
14
• •
ATTACHMENT 1
Gantt chart showing task scheduling and overlap for the three
approaches to this project.
Approach 1 : Meek schedule at the expense of the hierachical
structure imposed by the RFP.
Approach 2 : Meek hierachical structure imposed by the RFP,
but omits HEC-2 modeling and SI curve field data
collection which may not be needed.
The project is delayed under this scenario
principally by the need to await appropriate
flows.
Approach 3 : Same as Approach 2, but includes new SI curve
field data and a new HEC-2 model .
1110 •
Schedule Name: Lake Redding Project Spawning Gravel Studies Approach 1
Project Manager: J. Emil Morhardt, Ph.D., EA Engineering
As of date: 21-Apr-87 11:52am Schedule File: C:\TLDATA\REDDING1
Assumes complete immediate agreement between Redding and the agencies_., all
data collected at existing flows only, and early agreement on transects.
87
May Jun Jul Aug Sep
Who Status 26 1 8 15 22 29 7 13 20 27 3 10 17 24 31 6 14 21
Task la Management JEM . . . .
Task 1c SI Curves PED, DFH
Task lb Agency Data KMB OEM . •
Task 4a(l)HEC Existi .
Task id SI Agreement M .
Task 3 Select Trans. DFH, JEM
Task 4c HEC-2 Agreem M .
Task 6 HEC2 Existing EJC.
Task 7a IF64 Field W BLM,PAS,D+
Task 9, WUA Calcs DFH, PED p
Task 8 Conv. Factors EFC . . . . . o . . . . . . . .
Task 10 Time Series EFC,PED,D+ • . . . .OMINN . • •
Task 12 Report DFH,JEM,S+ pC . . . . . . . . .
Task 11, Actual Year EFC, PED . . . . . . . .11111 . . . . . .
Project Complete Mil C M.
•
D Done OM Task - Slack time (111---), or
C Critical 0•I Started task Resource delay (--M)
R Resource conflict M Milestone ) Conflict
p Partial dependency
Scale: Each character equals 1 day
TIME LINE Gantt Chart Report Strip , Paye 1
S •
Schedule Name: Lake Redding Project Spawning Gravel Studies Approach 2
Project Manager: J. Emil Morhardt, Ph.D., EA Engineering
As of date: 21-Apr-87 11:39am Schedule File: C:\TLDATA\REDDING2
Assumes full hierarchical structure, but no new HEC-2 model or SI curve
data.
87 88 89
Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct NovDec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb
( io Status 1 1 3 1 1 2 1 4 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 3 1
Task la Management JEM C .
Task lb Agency Data PED ON . . .
Task lc SI Curves PED, DFH ■ . . .
Task Id SI Agreement .M
Task 3 Select Trans. DFH, JEM .�
Task 4a(1)HEC 5kcfs �.
Task 4a(2)HEC 48kcfs . . • . ■ . • • • • .
Task 4c HEC-2 Agrees M .
Task 6 HEC2 Existing EJC �.
Task 7a )24kcfs IFG4 BLM,PAS,D+ . . .
Task 7b (5cfs IFG4 M BLM,PAS,D+ • • .
Task 8 Conv. Factors EFC • • ■
Task 9, OUP Calcs DFH, PED �■
Task 18 Time Series EFC,PED,D+ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ■
Task 11, Actual Year DFH, PED . .
Task 12 Report DFH,JEM,E+ . . . li■ .
Project Complete Mil • • M-
D Done MI Task - Slack time (1111--1, or
C Critical ... Started task Resource delay (--OM
R Resource conflict M Milestone ) Conflict
p Partial dependency
Scale: Each character equals 1 week
TIME LINE Gantt Chart Report Strip I. Pane 1
Schedule Name: Lake Redding Project Spawning Gravel Studies Approach 3
Project Manager: J. Emil Morhardt, Ph.D., EA Engineering
As of date: 21-Apr-87 11:85am Schedule File: C:\TLDATA\REDDING3
Assumes full hierarchical structure, plus new HEC-2 model and new SI curve
data. This is the maximum version of the project
87 88 89
Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct NovDec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb
Who Status 1 1 3 1 1 2 1 4 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 3 1
Task la Management JEM C .
Task lb Agency Data PED • • .
Task lc SI Curves PED, DFH ■ . . .
Task 2a Spring SI cu KMB,PAS,B+ .■ IR .
Task 2b Fall SI cury KMB,PAS,B+ ON . . .
Task 2c Develop new DFH, PED • .�
Task Id SI Agreement M
Task 3 Select Trans. DFH, JEM
Task 4a(1)HEC 5kcfs
Task 4a(2)HEC 48kcfs ■ .
Task 5a New HEC-2 Su . . .
Task 5b HEC-2 Model EJC,'DFH • • - .
Task 4c HEC-2 Agrees .M
Task 6 HEC2 Existing EJC • • .
Task 7a )24kcfs IFG4 BLM,PAS,D+ . . . OMB
Task 7b (5cfs IFG4 N BLM,PAS,D+ . . . .
Task 8 Cony. Factors EFC • • ■
Task 9, WUA Calcs DFH, PED
Task 18 Time Series EFC,PED,D+ . . ■
Task 11, Actual Year DFH, PED II
Task 12 Report DFH,JEM,E+ . . . r . .
Project Complete Mil . . . . M-
D Done ONO Task - Slack time (S—), or
C Critical •i. Started task Resource delay (—N)
R Resource conflict M Milestone ) Conflict
p Partial dependency
Scale: Each character equals 1 week
TIME LINE Gantt Chart Report Strip i, Page )
• •
ATTACHMENT 2
Cost summaries by resource for each of the 3 approaches ( not
including the monthly escalation which would go into effect in
January 1988 ) .
• 11111
Schedule Name: Lake Redding Project Spawning Gravel Studies Approach 1
Project Manager: J. Emil Morhardt, Ph.D., EA Engineering
As of date: 21-Apr-87 11:53am Schedule File: C:\TLDATA\REDDING1
Assumes complete immediate agreement between Redding and the agencies, all
data collected at existing flows only, and early agreement on transects.
Resource Rate Per Hours Cost
BLM 28,860 1 hour 120 3,463
Boat 100.000 1 day 84 1,050
CM 25.640 1 hour 24 615
Computer 23.000 1 hour 64 1,472
Copying 1,0
DFH 50.000 1 hour 154 7,700
EFC 50.000 1 hour 88 4,400
EJC 50.000 1 hour 32 1,600
Field Eqpt 150.000 1 day 96 1,800
JEM 78.750 1 hour 86 6,772
KMB 23.630 1 hour 160 3,781
KSB 18.300 1 hour 120 2,196
Mail 300
Mileage 4,275
Pace 1 1,100
Pace 2
Pace 3
PAS 14.900 1 hour 120 1,788
PED 10.1N 1 hour 140 1,414
PerDiem 50.000 1 day 436 2,725
Phone 300
SLS 9.860 1 hour 12 113
Vehicle 45.000 1 day 132 742
TOTAL 1,868 48,613
TIME LINE Cost Report by Resource/Cost Page 1 of 1.
III III
Schedule Name: Lake Redding Project Spawning Gravel Studies Approach 2
Project Manager: J. Emil Morhardt, Ph.D., EA Engineering
As of date: 21-Apr-87 11:40am Schedule File: C:\TLDATA\REDDING2
Assures full hierarchical structure, but no new HEC-2 model or SI curve
data.
Resource Rate Per Hours Cost
BLM 28.860 1 hour 240 6,926
Boat 100.000 1 day 168 2,1
CM 25.640 1 hour 24 615
Computer 23.000 1 hour 64 1,472
Copying 1,000
DFH 50.000 1 hour 224 11,200
EFC 50.000 1 hour 102 5,108
EJC 50. 1 hour 32 1,600
Field Eqpt 150.000 1 day 216 4,050
JEM 78.750 1 hour 109 8,612
KMB 23.630 1 hour 240 5,671
1(58 18.300 1 hour 240 4,392
Mail 500
Mileage 6,675
Pace 1 1,100
Pace 2 500
Pace 3
PAS 14.900 1 hour 240 3,576
PED 10.100 1 hour 180 1,818
PerDiem 50.000 1 day 856 5,350
Phone 5,—
SLS 9.860 1 hour 12 118
Vehicle 45.000 1 day 247 1,391
TOTAL 3,195 74,268
TIME LINE Cost Report by Resource/Cost Page 1 of 1.
III •
Schedule Name: Lake Redding Project Spawning Gravel Studies Approach 3
Project Manager: J. Emil Morhardt, Ph.D., EA Engineering
As of date: 21-Apr-87 11:06am Schedule File: C:\TLDATA\REDDING3
Assumes full hierarchical structure, plus new HEC-2 model and new SI curve
data. This is the maximum version of the project
Resource Rate Per Hours Cost
BLM 28.860 1 hour 320 9,235
Boat 100.',%% 1 day 248 3,1v,
CM 25.640 1 hour 24 615
Computer 23.'.',. 1 hour 96 2,208
Copying 1,200
DFH 50.'•'•, 1 hour 260 13,000
EFC 50.',',, 1 hour 182 5,1—,
EJC 50.000 1 hour 72 3,600
Field Eqpt 158.000 1 day 216 4,050
JEM 78.750 1 hour 109 8,612
KMB 23.630 1 hour 320 7,562
KSB 18.300 1 hour 240 4,392
Mail 500
Mileage 8,025
Pace 1 1,100
Pace 2 500
Pace 3 10,
PAS 14.900 1 hour 320 4,768
PED 10.100 1 hour 220 2,222 •
PerDiem 50.000 1 day 856 5,350
Phone
SLS 9.860 1 hour 12 118
Vehicle 45.',—, 1 day 327 1,841
TOTAL 3,743 97,599
TIME LINE Cost Report by Resource/Cost Page 1 of 1.
I •
ATTACHMENT 3
Dollar costs by resource and task for each of the 3 approaches .
• •
Schedule Name: Lake Redding Project Spawning Gravel Studies Approach I
Project Manager: J. Emil Morhardt, Ph.D., EA Engineering
As of date: 21-Apr-87 11:53am Schedule File: C:\TLDATA\REDDINGI
Assumes complete immediate agreement between Redding and the agencies, all
data collected at existing flows only, and early agreement on transects.
TASK BLM Boat CM Computer Copying DFH EFC EJC
Task la Management
Task lc SI Curves 1,600
Task lb Agency Data
Task 4a(1)HEC Existing Flow
Task Id SI Agreement
Task 3 Select Trans. 800
Task 4c HEC-2 Agreement
Task 6 HEC2 Existing 1,600
Task 7a IFG4 Field Wor 3,463 1,050 1,200
Task 9, WUA Calcs 552 1,800
Task 8 Cony. Factors 184 2,000
Task 10 Time Series 368 800 1,600
Task 12 Report 615 1,000 1,500
Task 11, Actual Years Analysis 368 800
Project Complete Milestone
TOTALS 3,463 1,050 615 1,472 1,000 7,700 4,400 1,600
TIME LINE Cost Report by Task vs Resource Page 1 of 4.
• •
Schedule Name: Lake Redding Project Spawning Gravel Studies Approach 1
Project Manager: J. Emil Marhardt, Ph.D., EA Engineering
As of date: 21-Apr-87 11:53am Schedule File: C:\TLDATA\REDDING1
Assumes complete immediate agreement between Redding and the agencies, all
data collected at existing flows only, and early agreement on transects.
TASK Field Eqpt JEM KMh KSS Mail Mileage Pace 1 Pace 2
Task la Management 3,150 300 1,200
Task lc SI Curves 675
Task lb Agency Data 945 225
Task 4a(1IHEC Existing Flow 1.100
Task id SI Agreement
Task 3 Select Trans. 1,260 675
Task 4c HEC-2 Agreement
Task 6 HEC2 Existing
Task 7a IF64 Field War 1,800 2,836 2,196 1,500
Task 9, WUA Calcs
Task 8 Conv. Factors
Task 10 Time Series
Task 12 Report 2,363
Task 11, Actual Years Analysis
Project Complete Milestone
TOTALS 1,800 6,772 3,761 2,196 300 4,275 1,100 0
TIME LINE Cost Report by Task vs Resource Page 2 of 4.
11111 •
Schedule Name: Lake Redding Project Spawning Gravel Studies Approach 1
Project Manager: J. Emil Morhardt, Ph.D., EA Engineering
As of date: 21-Apr-87 11:53am Schedule File: C:\TLDATA\REDDINGI
Assumes complete immediate agreement between Redding and the agencies, all
data collected at existing flows only, and early agreement on transects.
TASK Pace 3 PAS PED PerDiem Phone SLS Vehicle
Task la Management 300 45
Task lc SI Curves 323 90
Task lb Agency Data
Task 4a(1)HEC Existing Flow
Task ld SI Agreement
Task 3 Select Trans. 100 90
Task 4c HEC-2 Agreement
Task 6 HEC2 Existing
Task 7a IFG4 Field Wor 1,788 2,625 337
Task 9, WUA Calcs 606
Task 8 Conv. Factors
Task 10 Time Series 323
Task 12 Report 1133
Task 11, Actual Years Analysis 162
Project Complete Milestone
TOTALS 0 1,788 1,414 2,725 300 116 742
TIME LINE Cost Report by Task vs Resource Pape 3 of 4.
• •
Schedule Name: Lake Redding Project Spawning Gravel Studies Approach 1
Project Manager: J. Emil Morhardt, Ph.D., EA Engineering
As of date: 2I-Apr-87 11:53am Schedule File: C:\TLDATA\REDDINE1
Assumes complete immediate agreement between Redding and the agencies, all
data collected at existing flows only, and early agreement on transects.
TASK TOTAL
Task la Management 4,995
Task lc SI Curves 2,688
Task lb Agency Data 1,350
Task 4a(1)HEC Existing Flow 1,100
Task Id SI Agreement 0
Task 3 Select Trans. 2,925
Task 4c HEC-2 Agreement 0
Task 6 HEC2 Existing 1,600
Task 7a IFG4 Field Wor 18,795
Task 9, WUA Calcs 2,958
Task 8 Conv. Factors 2,184
Task 10 Time Series 3,091
Task 12 Report 5,596
Task 11, Actual Years Analysis 1,330
Project Complete Milestone 0
TOTALS 48,613
TIME LINE Cost Report by Task vs Resource Page 4 of 4.
• •
Schedule Name: Lake Redding Project Spawning Gravel Studies Approach 2
Project Manager: J. Emil Morhardt, Ph.D., EA Engineering
As of date: 21-Apr-87 11:40am Schedule File: C:\TLDATA\REDDING2
Assumes full hierarchical structure, but no new HEC-2 model or SI curve
data.
TASK BIM Boat CM Computer Copying DFH EFC EJC
Task la Management
Task lb Agency Data
Task lc SI Curves 1,600
Task Id SI Agreement
Task 3 Select Trans. 800
Task 4a(1)HEC 5kcfs
Task 4a(2)HEC 48kcfs
Task 4c HEC-2 Agreement
Task 6 HEC2 Existing 1,600
Task 7a )24kcfs IFG4 Field Wor 3,463 1,050 1,200
Task 7b l5cfs IF64 Measurement 3,463 1,050 1,200
Task 8 Conv. Factors 184 2,000
Task 9, WUA Calcs 552 1,800
Task 10 Time Series 368 800 1,600
Task 11, Actual Years Analysis 368 800
Task 12 Report 615 1,000 3,000 1,500
Project Complete Milestone
TOTALS 6,926 2,1 615 1,472 14000 11,200 5,100 1,600
TIME LINE Cost Report by Task vs Resource Page 1 of 4.
• •
Schedule Name: Lake Redding Project Spawning Gravel Studies Approach 2
Project Manager: J. Emil Morhardt, Ph.D., EA Engineering
As of date: 21-Apr-87 11:40am Schedule File: C:\TLDATA\REDDING2
Assumes full hierarchical structure, but no new HEC-2 model or SI curve
data.
TASK Field Eqpt JEM KMB KSB Mail Mileage Pace 1 Pace 2
Task la Management 4,990 500 2,100
Task lb Agency Data 225
Task is SI Curves 675
Task Id SI Agreement
Task 3 Select Trans. 1,260 675
Task 4a(1)HEC 5kcfs 1,100
Task 4a(2)HEC 40kcfs 500
Task 4c HEC-2 Agreement
Task 6 HEC2 Existing
Task 7a )24kcfs IFG4 Field Wor 1,808 2,836 2,196 1,500
Task 7b (5cfs IF64 Measurement 2,250 2,836 2,196 1,500
Task 8 Conv. Factors
Task 9, WUA Calcs
Task 10 Time Series
Task 11, Actual Years Analysis
Task 12 Report 2,363
Project Complete Milestone
TOTALS 4,050 8,612 5,671 4,392 500 6,675 1.100 500
TIME LINE Cost Report by Task vs Resource Page 2 of 4.
• •
Schedule Name: Lake Redding Project Spawning Gravel Studies Approach 2
Project Manager: J. Emil Morhardt, Ph.D., EA Engineering
As of date: 21-Apr-87 11:40am Schedule File: C:\TLDATA\REDDING2
Assumes full hierarchical structure, but no new HEC-2 model or SI curve
data.
TASK Pace 3 PAS PED PerDiem Phone SLS Vehicle
Task la Management 500 356
Task lb Agency Data 404 1600
Task lc SI Curves 323 90
Task Id SI Agreement
Task 3 Select Trans. 100 'tea
Task 4a(1)HEC 5kcfs
Task 4a(2)HEC 40kcfs
Task 4c HEC-2 Agreement
Task 6 fEC2 Existing
Task 7a >24kcfs IF64 Field Wor 1,788 2,625 337
Task 7b (5cfs IFG4 Measurement 1,788 2,625 337
Task 8 Conv. Factors
Task 9, WtJA Calcs 606
Task 10 Time Series 323
Task 11, Actual Years Analysis 162
Task 12 Report 118
Project Complete Milestone
TOTALS 0 3,576 1,818 5.350 500 118 1,351
TIME LINE Cost Report by Task vs Resource Page 3 of 4.
• •
Schedule Name: Lake Redding Project Spawning Gravel Studies Approach 2
Project Manager: J. Emil Morhardt, Ph.D., EA Engineering
As of date: 21-Apr-87 11:40am Schedule File: C:\TLDATA\REDDING2
Assumes full hierarchical structure, but no new HEC-2 model or SI curve
data.
TASK TOTAL
Task la Management 8,446
Task lb Agency Data 809
Task lc SI Curves 2,688
Task Id SI Agreement 0
Task 3 Select Trans. 2,925
Task 4a(1)HEC 5kcfs 1,100
Task 4a(2)HEC 40kcfs 500
Task 4c HEC-2 Agreement 0
Task 6 HEC2 Existing 1,620
Task 7a )24kcfs IFG4 Field Wor 18,795
Task 7b (Scfs IFG4 Measurement 19,245
Task 8 Conv. Factors 2,184
Task 9, WUA Calcs 2,958
Task 10 Time Series 3,091
Task 11, Actual Years Analysis 1,330
Task 12 Report 8,596
Project Complete Milestone 0
TOTALS 74,268
TIME LINE Cost Report by Task vs Resource Page 4 of 4.
• S
Schedule Name: Lake Redding Project Spawning Gravel Studies Approach 3
Project Manager: J. Emil Morhardt, Ph.D., EA Engineering
As of date: 21-Apr-87 11:07am Schedule File: C:\TLDATA\REDDING3
Assumes full hierarchical structure, plus new HEC-2 model and new SI curve
data. This is the maximum version of the project
TASK FLM Boat CM Computer Copying DFH EFC EJC
Task la Management
Task lb Agency Data
Task lc SI Curves 1,600
Task 2a Spring SI curve data 1,154 500
Task 2b Fall SI curves 1,154 500
Task 2c Develop new SI curves 460 800
Task id SI Agreement
Task 3 Select Trans. 800
Task 4a(1)HEC 5kcfs
Task 4a(2)HEC 40kcfs
Task 5a New IEC-2 Surveys
Task 5b HEC-2 Model Run 276 200 1,000 2,000
Task 4c HEC-2 Agreement
Task 6 HEC2 Existing 1,600
Task 7a )24kcfs IF64 Field Wor 3,463 1,050 1,200
Task 7b l5cfs IF64 Measurement 3,463 1,050 1,200
Task 8 Conv. Factors 184 2,000
Task 9, W(JA Calcs 552 1,800
Task 10 Time Series 368 800 1,600
Task 11, Actual Years Analysis 368 800
Task 12 Report 615 1, 3,000 1,500
Project Complete Milestone
TOTALS 9,235 3,100 615 2,208 1,200 13,000 5,100 3,600
TIME LINE Cost Report by Task vs Resource Page 1 of 4.
•
Schedule Name: Lake Redding Project Spawning Gravel Studies Approach 3
Project Manager: J. Emil Morhardt, Ph.D., EA Engineering
As of date: 21-Apr-87 11:07am Schedule File: C:\TLDATA\REDDIN63
Assumes full hierarchical structure, plus new HEC-2 model and new SI curve
data. This is the maximum version of the project
TASK Field Eqpt JEM KMB KSB Mail Mileage Pace 1 Pace
Task la Management 4,990 500 2,100
Task lb Agency Data 225
Task is SI Curves 675
Task 2a Spring SI curve data 945 675
Task 2b Fall SI curves 945 675
Task 2c Develop new SI curves
Task id SI Agreement
Task 3 Select Trans. 1,260 675
Task 4a(1)HEC 5kcfs 1,100
Task 4a(2)HEC 40kcfs 500
Task 5a New HEC-2 Surveys
Task 5b HEC-2 Model Run
Task 4c HEC-2 Agreement
Task 6 HEC2 Existing
Task 7a )24kcfs 1F64 Field Wor 1,800 2,836 2,196 1,500
Task 7b (5cfs IF64 Measurement 2,250 2,836 2,196 1,500
Task 8 Conv. Factors
Task 9, 1I1A Caics
Task 10 Time Series
Task 11, Actual Years Analysis
Task 12 Report 2,363
Project Complete Milestone
TOTALS 4,050 8,612 7,562 4,392 500 8,025 1,100 500
TIME LINE Cost Report by Task vs Resource Page 2 of 4.
• •
Schedule Name: Lake Redding Project Spawning Gravel Studies Approach 3
Project Manager: J. Emil Morhardt, Ph.D., EA Engineering
As of date: 21-Apr-87 11:07am Schedule File: C:\TLDATA\REDDING3
Assumes full hierarchical structure, plus new HEC-2 model and new SI curve
data. This is the maximum version of the project
TASK Pace 3 PAS PED PerDiem Phone SLS Vehicle
Task la Management 500 356
Task lb Agency Data 404 180
Task Ic SI Curves 323 90
Task 2a Spring SI curve data 596 225
Task 2b Fall SI curves 596 225
Task 2c Develop new SI curves 404
Task Id SI Agreement
Task 3 Select Trans. 100 90
Task 4a(1)HEC 5kcfs
Task 4a(2)HEC 40kcfs
Task 5a New HEC-2 Surveys 10,000
Task 5b HEC-2 Model Run
Task 4c HEC-2 Agreement
Task 6 HEC2 Existing
Task 7a )24kcfs IFG4 Field Wor 1,788 2,625 337
Task 7b (Scfs IF64 Measurement 1,788 2,625 337
Task 8 Conv. Factors
Task 9, WUA Calcs 606
Task 10 Time Series 323 •
Task 11, Actual Years Analysis 162
Task 12 Report 118
Project Complete Milestone
TOTALS 10,000 4,768 2,222 5,350 500 118 1,841
TIME LINE Cost Report by Task vs Resource Page 3 of 4.
• i
Schedule Name: Lake Redding Project Spawning Gravel Studies Approach 3
Project Manager: J. Emil Morhardt, Ph.D., EA Engineering
As of date: 21-Apr-87 11:07am Schedule File: C:ITLDATA\REDDING3
Assumes full hierarchical structure, plus new HEC-2 model and new SI curve
data. This is the maximum version of the project
TASK TOTAL
Task la Management 8,446
Task lb Agency Data 809
Task lc SI Curves 2,688
Task 2a Spring SI curve data 4,096
Task 2b Fall SI curves 4,096
Task 2c Develop new SI curves 1,664
Task Id SI Agreement 0
Task 3 Select Trans. 2,925
Task 4a(1)HEC 5kcfs 1,100
Task 4a(2)HEC 48kcfs 500
Task 5a New HEC-2 Surveys 10,000
Task 5b HEC-2 Model Run 3,476
Task 4c HEC-2 Agreement 0
Task 6 HEC2 Existing 1,600
Task 7a )24kcfs IFG4 Field Wor 1895
Task 7b (5cfs IFG4 Measurement 19,245
Task 8 Cony. Factors 2,184
Task 9, WUA Calcs 2,958
Task 10 Time Series 3,891
Task 11, Actual Years Analysis 1,330
Task 12 Report 896
Project Complete Milestone 0
TOTALS ---- - 97,599
Irm
TIME LINE Cost Report by Task vs Resource Page 4 of 4.
• 110
ATTACHMENT 4
Man-hours by task and individual for each of the 3 approaches .
• i
Schedule Name: Lake Redding Project Spawning Gravel Studies Approach 1
Project Manager: J. Emil Morhardt, Ph.D., EA Engineering
As of date: 21-Apr-87 11:54am Schedule File: C:\TLDATA\REDDING1
Assumes complete immediate agreement between Redding and the agencies, all
data collected at existing flows only, and early agreement on transects.
TASK ALM CM DFH EFC EJC JEM KME K3B
Task la Management 40
Task lc SI Curves 32
Task lb Agency Data 40
Task 4a(1)HEC Existing Flow
Task id SI Agreement
Task 3 Select Trans. 16 16
Task 4c HEC-2 Agreement
Task 6 HEC2 Existing 32
Task 7a IFG4 Field Wor 120 24 120 120
Task 9, WUA Calcs 36
Task 8 Conv. Factors 40
Task 10 Time Series 16 32
Task 12 Report 24 30 30
Task 11, Actual Years Analysis 16
Project Complete Milestone
TOTALS 120 24 154 88 32 86 160 120
TIME LINE Man-Hours Report by Task vs Resource Page 1 of 2.
• •
Schedule Name: Lake Redding Project Spawning Gravel Studies Approach 1
Project Manager: J. Emil Morhardt, Ph.D., EA Engineering
As of date: 21-Apr-87 11:54am Schedule File: C:\TLDATA\REDDING1
Assumes complete immediate agreement between Redding and the agencies, all
data collected at existing flows only, and early agreement on transects.
TASK PAS PED SLS TOTAL
Task la Management 48
Task lc SI Curves 32 64
Task lb Agency Data 40
Task. 4a(1)HEC Existing Flow 0
Task Id SI Agreement 0
Task 3 Select Trans. 32
Task 4c HEC-2 Agreement 0
Task 6 HEC2 Existing 32
Task 7a IFG4 Field Wor 120 504
Task 9, WUA Calcs 60 96
Task 8 Conv. Factors 40
Task 10 Time Series 32 60
Task 12 Report 12 96
Task 11, Actual Years Analysis 16 32
Project Complete Milestone 0
TOTALS 120 140 12 1,056
TIME LINE Man-Hours Report by Task vs Resource Page 2 of 2.
• •
Schedule Name: Lake Redding Project Spawning Gravel Studies Approach 2
Project Manager: J. Emil Morhardt, Ph.D., EA Engineering
As of date: 21-Apr-87 11:42am Schedule File: C:\TLDATA\REDDING2
Assumes full hierarchical structure, but no new HEC-2 model or SI curve
data.
TASK BLM CM DFH EFC EJC JEM KM8 Koh
Task la Management 63
Task lb Agency Data
Task lc SI Curves 32
Task id SI Agreement
Task 3 Select Trans. 16 16
Task 4a(1)HEC 5kcfs
Task 4a(2)HEC 40kcfs
Task 4c HEC-2 Agreement
Task 6 HEC2 Existing 32
Task 7a )24kcfs IFG4 Field Wor 120 24 120 120
Task 7b (5cfs IF64 Measurement 120 24 120 120
Task 8 Conv. Factors 40
Task 9, WUA Calcs 36
Task 10 Time Series 16 32
Task 11, Actual Years Analysis 16
Task 12 Report 24 60 30 30
Project Complete Milestone
TOTALS 240 24 224 102 32 109 240 240
TIME LINE Man-Hours Report by Task vs Resource Page 1 of 2.
• •
Schedule Name: Lake Redding Project Spawning Gravel Studies Approach 2
Project Manager: J. Emil Morhardt, Ph.D., EA Engineering
As of date: 21-Apr-87 11:42am Schedule File: C:\TLDATA\REDDING2
Assumes full hierarchical structure, but no new HEC-2 model or SI curve
data.
TASK PAS PED SLS TOTAL
Task la Management 63
Task lb Agency Data 40 40
Task lc SI Curves 32 64
Task Id SI Agreement 0
Task 3 Select Trans. 32
Task 4a(1)HEC 5kcfs 0
Task 4a(2)HEC 4Okcfs 0
Task 4c HEC-2 Agreement 0
Task 6 HEC2 Existing 32
Task 7a )24kcfs IFG4 Field Wor 120 504
Task 7b (5cfs IFG4 Measurement 120 504
Task 8 Conv. Factors 40
Task 9, WUA Calcs 60 96
Task 10 Time Series 32 80
Task 11, Actual Years Analysis 16 32
Task 12 Report 12 156
Project Complete Milestone 0
TOTALS 240 180 12 1,643 .
TIME LINE Mar-Hours Report by Task vs Resource Page 2 of 2.
o �►
Schedule Name: Lake Redding Project Spawning Gravel Studies Approach 3
Project Manager: J. Emil Morhardt, Ph.D., EA Engineering
As of date: 21-Apr-87 11:08am Schedule File: C:\TLDATA\REDDING3
Assumes full hierarchical structure, plus new HEC-2 model and new SI curve
data. This is the maximum version of the project
TASK ELM CM DFH EFC EJC JEM KME KSE
Task la Management 63
Task lb Agency Data
Task lc SI Curves 32
Task 2a Spring SI curve data 40 40
Task 2b Fall SI curves 40 40
Task 2c Develop new SI curves 16
Task id SI Agreement
Task 3 Select Trans. 16 16
Task 4a(1)HEC 5kcfs
Task 4a(2)HEC 40kcfs
Task 5a New HEC-2 Surveys
Task 5b HEC-2 Model Run 20 40
Task 4c HEC-2 Agreement
Task 6 HEC2 Existing 32
Task 7a )24kcfs IFG4 Field Wor 120 24 120 120
Task 7b (5cfs IFG4 Measurement 120 24 120 120
Task 8 Conv. Factors 40
Task 9, W1A Calcs 36
Task 10 Time Series 16 32
Task 11, Actual Years Analysis 16
Task 12 Report 24 60 30 30
Project Complete Milestone
TOTALS 320 24 260 102 72 109 320 240
TIME LINE Man-Hours Report by Task vs Resource Page 1 of 2.
• •
Schedule Name: Lake Redding Project Spawning Gravel Studies Approach 3
Project Manager: J. Emil Morhardt, Ph.D., EA Engineering
As of date: 21-Apr-87 11:08am Schedule File: C:\TLDATA\REDDIN63
Assumes full hierarchical structure, plus new HEC-2 model and new SI curve
data. This is the maximum version of the project
TASK PAS PED SLS TOTAL
Task la Management 63
Task lb Agency Data 40 40
Task is SI Curves 32 64
Task 2a Spring SI curve data 40 120
Task 2b Fall SI curves 48 120
Task 2c Develop new SI curves 40 56
Task Id SI Agreement 0
Task 3 Select Trans. 32
Task 4a(1)HEC 5kcfs 0
Task 4a(2)HEC 40kcfs 0
Task 5a New IEC-2 Surveys 0
Task 5b IEC-2 Model Run 60
Task 4c HEC-2 Agreement 0
Task 6 HEC2 Existing 32
Task 7a )24kcfs IF64 Field Wor 128 504
Task 7b (Scfs IFG4 Measurement 120 504
Task 8 Cony. Factors 48
Task 9, WUA Calcs 60 96
Task 10 Time Series 32 80
Task 11, Actual Years Analysis 16 32
Task 12 Report 12 156
Project Complete Milestone 0
TOTALS 320 220 12 1,999
TIME LINE Man-Hours Report by Task vs Resource Page 2 of 2.
• •
ATTACHMENT 5
Detailed costing by task, Approach 1 .
• •
Schedule Name: Lake Redding Project Spawning Gravel Studies Approach 1
Project Manager: J. Emil Morhardt, Ph.D., EA Engineering
As of date: 21-Apr-87 11:54am Schedule File: C:\TLDATA\REDDING1
Assumes complete immediate agreement between Redding and the agencies, all
data collected at existing flows only, and early agreement on transects.
1) Task la Management
Fixed In Future 10 weeks
Overall Project Management
Start: End:
Date: 19-May-87 8:00am 29-Jul-87 5:�•:pm
Resource: Amount: Cost:
J. Emil Morhardt 0.10 3,150.00
Telephone Charges 300.00 300.00
Federal Express 300.00 300.00
Mileage @ $.45/mile 1,200.00 1,200.00
Suburban @ $45/day 0.02 45.00
Total Cost 4,995.00
( 2) Task lc SI Curves
Fixed In Future 4 days
Convert the agency SI curve data to SI curves
Review them with Agencies
Start: End:
Date: 20-May-87 8:00am 26-May-87 5:00pm
Resource: Amount: Cost:
Paul DeVries 1.00 323.20
David F. Hanson 1.00 1,600.00
Suburban @ $45/day 0.50 90.00
Mileage 0 $.45/mile 675.00 675.00
Total Cost 2,688.20
Tasks which come before: Tasks which come after:
Task 3 Select Trans.
Task id SI Agreement
TIME LINE Task Detail Report race
• •
Schedule Name: Lake Redding Project Spawning Gravel Studies Approach 1
Project Manager: J. Emil Morhardt, Ph.D., EA Engineering
As of date: 21-Apr-87 11:55am Schedule File: C:\TLDATA\REDDINGI
Assumes complete immediate agreement between Redding and the agencies, all
data collected at existing flows only, and early agreement on transects.
3) Task lb Agency Data
Fixed In Future 1 week
Travel to agency offices to collect existing SI data
Start: End:
Date: 20-May-87 8:00am 27-May-87 5:00pm
Resource: Amount: Cost:
Suburban @ $45/day 0.80 180.00
Mileage @ 3.45/mile 225.00 225.00
Keith Binkley 1.00 945.20
Total Cost 1,350.20
Tasks which come before: Tasks which come after:
Task Id SI Agreement
4) Task 4a(1)HEC Existing Flow
Fixed In Future 1 week
Survey crew locates 3 HEC-2 transects and provides WSL's
Work done by Pace Engineering, Redding
Start: End:
Date: 20-May-87 2:00pm 28-May-87 2:00pm
Resource: Amount: Cost:
Surveying 3 sites, WSL's 1,100.00 1,100.00
Tasks which come before: Tasks which come after:
Task 4c HEC-2 Agreement
TIME LINE Task Detail Report Paget
Schedule Name: Lake Redding Project Spawning Gravel Studies Approach 1
Project Manager: J. Emil Morhardt, Ph.D., EA Engineering
As of date: 21-Apr-87 11:55am Schedule File: C:\TLDATA\REDDING1
Assumes complete immediate agreement between Redding and the agencies, all
data collected at existing flows only, and early agreement on transects.
5) Task id SI Agreement
ASAP In Future MileStone
Start: End:
Earliest: 28-May-87 8:00am 28-May-87 8:00am
Latest Free: 28-May-87 8:00am 28-May-87 8:00am
Latest Total: 17-Jul-87 2:00pm 17-Jul-67 2:00pm
Total Slack: 7 weeks, 5 hours
Free Slack: 0
Tasks which come before: Tasks which come after:
Task lb Agency Data Task 3 Select Trans.
Task lc- SI Curves
6) Task 3 Select Trans.
ASAP In Future 2 weeks •
Does not assume that initial transects can be chosen, prior
to completion of all FITS studies
Start: End:
Earliest: 28-May-87 8:00am 10-Jun-87 5:00pm
Latest: 17-Jul-87 2:00pm 31-Jul-87 2:00pm
Total Slack: 7 weeks, 5 hours
Resource: Amount: Cost:
David F. Hanson 0.20 800.00
Suburban @ $45/day 0.20 90.00
Meals + Lodging @ $50/day 0.20 100.00
Mileage @ $.45/mile 675.00 675.00
J. Emil Morhardt 0.20 1,260.00
Total Cost 2,925.00
Tasks which come before: Tasks which come after:
Task Id SI Agreement
Task lc SI Curves
TIME LINE Task Detail Report Pace 3
• •
Schedule Name: Lake Redding Project Spawning Gravel Studies Approach 1
Project Manager: J. Emil Morhardt, Ph.D., EA Engineering
As of date: 21-Apr-87 11:56am Schedule File: C:\TLDATA\REDDIN61
Assumes complete immediate agreement between Redding and the agencies, all
data collected at existing flows only, and early agreement on transects.
( 7) Task 4c HEC-2 Agreement
ASAP In Future Milestone
Start: End:
Earliest: 28-May-87 2:00pm 28-May-87 2:00pm
Latest Free: 28-May-87 2:00pm 28-May-87 2:00pm
Latest Total: 5-Jun-87 2:00pm 5-Jun-87 2:00pm
Total Slack: 1 week, 1 day
Free Slack: 0
Tasks which come before: Tasks which come after:
Task 4a(1)HEC Existing Flow Task 6 HEC2 Existing
( 8) Task 6 HEC2 Existing
ASAP Inc Future 4 days
Assimilate HEC-2 Data from existing model run
Start: End:
Earliest: 28-May-87 2:00pm 3-Jun-87 2:00pm
Latest Free: 28-May-87 2:00pm 3-Jun-87 2:00pm
Latest Total: 5-Jun-87 2:00pm 11-Jun-87 2:00pm
Total Slack: 1 week, 1 day
Free Slack: 0
Resource: Amount: Cost:
Edward J. Coleman 1.00 1,600.00
Tasks which come before: • Tasks which come after•:
Task 4c HEC-2 Agreement Task 7a IF64 Field Wor
TIME LINE Task Detail Report e=rg- 4
• •
Schedule Name: Lake Redding Project Spawning Gravel Studies Approach 1
Project Manager: J. Emil Morhardt, Ph.D., EA Engineering
As of date: 21-Apr-87 11:56am Schedule File: C:\TLDATA\REDDING1
Assumes complete immediate agreement between Redding and the agencies, all
data collected at existing flows only, and early agreement on transects.
{ 9) Task 7a IFG4 Field Wor
ASAP In Future 3 weeks
Cannot be done until 40,000cfs HEC-2 validation is completed
Start: End:
Earliest: 3-Jun-87 2:00pm 24-Jun-87 2:00pm
Latest Free: 3-Jun-87 2:00pm 24-Jun-87 2:00pm
Latest Total: 11-Jun-87 2:00pm 2-Jul-87 2:00pm
Total Slack: 1 week, 1 day
Free Slack: 0
Resource: Amount: Cost:
Flowmeters,etc. 0 $150/day 0.60 1,800.00
Brian Mattax 1.00 3,463.20
Phillip A. Scordelis 1.00 1,788.00
David F. Hanson 0.20 1,200.00
Keith Binkley 1.00 2,835.6Z
Whaler 0 $100/day 0.70 1,050.00
Suburban 0 $45/day 0.50 337.50
Mileage 0 $.45/mile 1,500.00 1,500.00
Meals + Lodging 0 $50/day 3.50 2,625.00
Kimberly Binkley 1.00 2,196.00
Total Cost 18,735.30
Tasks which come before:
Task 6 HEC2 Existing
Tasks which come after:
Task 8 Conv. Factors
Task 9, WUA Calcs from end minus 1 week, 1 day
TIME LINE Task Detail Report ;ace
• •
Schedule Name: Lake Redding Project Spawning Gravel Studies Approach 1
Project Manager: J. Emil Morhardt, Ph.D., EA Engineering
As of date: 21-Apr-87 11:56am Schedule File: C:\TLDATA\REDDING1
Assumes complete immediate agreement between Redding and the agencies_•, all
data collected at existing flows only, and early agreement on transects.
( 10) Task 9, WUA Caics
ASAP In Future 3 weeks
Begin PHASBSIM calculations by transect when data start
arriving (5 days after first measurements).
Start: End:
Earliest: 16-Jun-87 2:00pm 8-Jul-87 2:00pm
Latest Free: 16-Jun-87 2:00pm 8-Jul-87 2:00pm
Latest Total: 24-Jun-87 2:00pm 16-Jul-87 2:00pm
Total Slack: 1 week, 1 day
Free Slack: 0
Resource: Amount: Cost:
David F. Hanson 0.30 1,800.00
Paul DeVries 0.50 606.00
IBM PC AT @ $23/hr 0.20 52.00
Total Cost 2,958.00
Tasks which come before:
Task 7a IFG4 Field War from end minus 1 week, 1 day
Tasks which come after:
Task 10 Time Series
TIME LINE Task Detail Report race
• •
Schedule Name: Lake Redding Project Spawning Gravel Studies Approach 1
Project Manager: J. Emil Morhardt, Ph.D., EA Engineering
As of date: 21-Apr-87 11:57am Schedule File: C:`,TLDATA\REDDING1
Assumes complete immediate agreement between Redding and the agencies, all
data collected at existing flows only, and early agreement on transects.
( 11) Task 8 Conv. Factors
ASAP In Future 1 week
Calculate Conversion factors for relating spawning condition
to mean column velocities
Start: End:
Earliest: 24-Jun-87 2:00pm 1-Jul-87 2:00pm
Latest: 24-Jul-87 2:00pm 31-Jul-87 2:00pm
Total Slack: 4 weeks, 1 day
Resource: Amount: Cost:
Edward F. Cheslak 1.00 2,000.00
IBM PC AT 0 $23/hr 0.20 184.00
Total Cost 2,184.00
Tasks which come before: Tasks which come after:
Task 7a IFG4 Field War
TIME LINE Task Detail Report Page 7
• •
Schedule Name: Lake Redding Project Spawning Gravel Studies Approach 1
Project Manager: J. Emil Morhardt, Ph.D., EA Engineering
As of date: 21-Apr-87 11:57am Schedule File: C:\TLDATA\REDDING1
Assumes complete immediate agreement between Redding and the agencies, all
data collected at existing flows only, and early agreement on transects.
( 12) Task 10 Time Series
ASAP In Future 4 days
Construct Time Series Analysis for wpawning, incubation and
rearing as was done in addendum 2
Start: End:
Earliest: 8-Jul-87 2:00pm 14-Jul-87 2:00pm
Latest Free: 8-Jul-87 2:00pm 14-Jul-87 2:00pm
Latest Total: 16-Jul-87 2:00pm 22-Jul-87 2:00pm
Total Slack: 1 week, 1 day
Free Slack: 0
Resource: Amount: Cost:
Edward F. Cheslak 1.00 1,600.00
Paul DeVries 1.00 323.20
IRM PC AT @ $23/hr 0.50 366.00
David F. Hanson 0.50 800.00
Total Cost 3,091.20
Tasks which come before:
Task 9, WUA Calcs
Tasks which come after:
Task 11, Actual Years Analysis
Task 12 Report from end minus 2 weeks
TIME LINE Task Detail Report Page c
• •
Schedule Name: Lake Redding Project Spawning Gravel Studies Apprc•ach 1
Project Manager: J. Emil Morhardt, Ph.D., EA Engineering
As of date; 21-Apr-87 11:57am Schedule File: C:\TLDATA\REDDING1
Assumes complete immediate agreement between Redding and the agencies, all
data collected at existing flows only, and early agreement on transects,
( 13) Task 12 Report
ALAP In Future 3 weeks
Start: End:
Date: 10-Jul-87 2:00pm 31-Jul-67 2:00pm
CRITICAL `no slack)
Resource: Amount: Cost:
David F. Hanson 0.25 1,500.00
J. Emil Morhardt 0.25 2,362.50
Sharon Safire 0.10 118.32
Carol Mosure 0.20 615.36
Copier Costs 00 $.123/copy 1,000.00 1,000.00
Total Cost 5,556.18
Tasks which come before:
Task 11, Actual Years Analysis from end minus 2 weeks
Task 10 Time Series from end minus 2 weeks
Tasks which come after:
Project Complete Milestone
TIME LINE Task Detail Report - re
11111
•
Schedule Name: Lake Redding Project Spawning Gravel Studies Approach 1
Project Manager: J. Emil Morhardt, Ph.D., EA Engineering
As of date: 21-Apr-87 11:57am Schedule File: C:\TLDATA\REDDINGI
Assumes complete immediate agreement between Redding and the agencies, all
data collected at existing flows only, and early agreement on transects.
( 14) Task 11, Actual Years Analysis
ASAP In Future days
Start: End:
Earliest: 14-Jul-87 2:00pm 16-Jul-87 2:00pm
Latest: 22-Jul-87 2:00pm 24-Jul-87 2:00pm
Total Slack: 1 week, 1 day
Resource: Amount: Cost:
Edward F. Cheslak 1.00 800.00
Paul DeVries 1.00 161.60
IRM PC AT 0 $23/hr 1.00 368.00
Total Cost 1,325.60
Tasks which come before:
Task 10 Time Series
Tasks which come after:
Task 12 Report from end minus 2 weeks
( 15) Project Complete Milestone
Fixed In Future MileStone
Start: End:
Date: 31-Jul-87 2:00pm 31-Jul-87 2:00pm
Tasks which come before: Tasks which come after:
Task 12 Report
TIME LINE Task Detail Report cage 10
411
ATTACHMENT 6
Detailed costing by task, Approach 2 .
• •
Schedule Name: Lake Redding Project Spawning Gravel Studies Approach 2
Project Manager: J. Emil Morhardt, Ph.D., EA Engineering
As of date: 21-Apr-87 11:42am Schedule File: C:\TLDATA\REDDING2
Assumes full hierarchical structure, but no new HEC-2 model or SI curve
data.
( 1) Task la Management
Fixed In Future 79 weeks, 1 day
Overall Project Management
Start: End:
Date: 19-May-87 8:00am 13-Dec-88 5:00pm
Resource: Amount: Cost:
J. Emil Morhardt 0.02 4,989.60
Telephone Charges 500.00 500.00
Federal Express 500.00 500.00
Mileage 0 $.45/mile 2,100.00 2,100.00
Suburban 0 $45/day 0.02 356.40
Total Cost 8,446.00
( 2) Task lb Agency Data
Fixed In Future 1 week
Travel to agency offices to collect existing SI data
Start: End:
Date: 20-May-87 8:00am 27-May-87 5:00pm
Resource: Amount: Cost:
Suburban 0 $45/day 0.80 180.00
Mileage 0 $.45/mile 225.00 225.00
Paul DeVries 1.00 404.00
Total Cost 809.00
Tasks which come before: Tasks which come after:
Task lc SI Curves
TIME LINE Task Detail Report Race 1
• •
Schedule Name: Lake Redding Project Spawning Gravel Studies Approach 2
Project Manager: J. Emil Morhardt, Ph.D., EA Engineering
As of date: 21-Apr-87 11:42am Schedule File: C:\TLDATA\REDDING2
Assumes full hierarchical structure, but no new HEC-2 model or SI curve
data.
3) Task lc SI Curves
ASAP In Future 4 days
Convert the agency SI curve data to SI curves
Review them with Agencies
Start: End:
Earliest: 28-May-87 8:00am 2-Jun-87 5:00pm
Latest Free: 28-May-87 8:00am 2-Jun-87 5:00pm
Latest Total: 25-Aug-87 8:00am 28-Aug-87 5:00pm
Total Slack: 12 weeks. 2 days
Free Slack: 0
Resource: Amount: Cost:
Paul DeVries 1.00 323.20
David F. Hanson 1.00 1,600.00
Suburban 0 $45/day 0.50 90.00
Mileage 0 $.45/mile 675.00 675.00
Total Cost 2,688.20
Tasks which come before: Tasks which come after:
Task lb Agency Data Task 3 Select Trans.
Task Id SI Agreement
4) Task id SI Agreement.
ASAP In Future MileStone
Start: End:
Earliest: 3-Jun-87 8:00am 3-Jun-87 8:00am
Latest Free: 3-Jun-87 8:00am 3-Jun-87 8:00am
Latest Total: 31-Aug-87 8:00am 31-Aug-87 8:00am
Total Slack: 12 weeks, 2 days
Free Slack: 0
Tasks which come before: Tasks which come after:
Task lc SI Curves Task 3 Select Trans.
TIME LINE Task Detail Report Pace
• •
Schedule Name: Lake Redding Project Spawning Gravel Studies Approach 2
Project Manager: J. Emil Morhardt, Ph.D., EA Engineering
As of date: 21-Apr-87 11:42am Schedule File: C:\TLDATA\REDDING2
Assumes full hierarchical structure, but no new HEC-2 model or SI curve
data.
( 5) Task 3 Select Trans.
ASAP In Future 2 weeks
Does not assume that initial transects can be chosen prior
to completion of all FWS studies
Start: End:
Earliest: 3-Jun-87 8:00am 16-Jun-87 5:00pm
Latest: 31-Aug-87 8:00am 14-Sep-87 5:00pm
Total Slack: 12 weeks, 2 days
Resource: Amount: Cost:
David F. Hanson 0.20 800.00
Suburban @ $45/day 0.20 90.00
Meals + Lodging @ $50/day 0.20 100.00
Mileage @ $.45/mile 675.00 675.00
J. Emil Morhardt 0.20 1,260.00
Total Cost 2,925.00
Tasks which come before: Tasks which come after:
Task id SI Agreement Task 4a(1)HEC 5kcfs
Task lc SI Curves
TIME LINE Task Detail Report Pape
• S
Schedule Name: Lake Redding Project Spawning Gravel Studies Approach 2
Project Manager: J. Emil Morhardt, Ph.D., EA Engineering
As of date: 21-Apr-87 11:42am Schedule File: C:\TLDATA\REDDING2
Assumes full hierarchical structure, but no new HEC-2 model or SI curve
data.
( 6) Task 4a(1)HEC 5kcfs
Fixed In Future 1 week
Survey crew locates 3 HEC-2 transects and provides WSL's
Work done by Pace Engineering, Redding
Start: End:
Date: 15-Sep-87 8:00am 21-Sep-87 5:00pm
Resource: Amount: Cost:
Surveying 3 sites, WSL's 1,100.00 l,100.0@
Tasks which come before: Tasks which come after:
Task 3 Select Trans. Task 4a(2)HEC 48kcfs
( 7) Task 4a(2)HEC 48kcfs
Fixed In Future 1 day
The second flow reading for verification of the HEC-2 model
(Done by Pace Engineering, Redding)
Start: End:
Date: 16-Feb-88 8:00a:n 16-Feb-88 5:00pm
Resource: Amount: Cost:
Measuring WSL's @ 40,00@ cfs 500.00 500.00
Tasks which come before: Tasks which come after:
Task 4a(1)HEC 5kcfs Task 4c HEC-2 Agreement
TIME LINE Task Detail Report Pape 4
1111/
Schedule Name: Lake Redding Project Spawning Gravel Studies Approach 2
Project Manager: J. Emil Morhardt, Ph.D., EA Engineering
As of date: 21-Apr-87 I1:43am Schedule File: C:\TLDATA\REDDING2
Assumes full hierarchical structure, but no new HEC-2 model or SI curve
data.
( 8) Task 4c HEC-2 Agreement
ASAP In Future MileStone
Start: End:
Earliest: 17-Feb-88 8:00am 17-Feb-88 8:00am
Latest Free: 17-Feb-88 8:00am 17-Feb-88 8:00am
Latest Total: 18-Aug-88 8:00am 18-Rug-88 8:00am
Total Slack: 25 weeks. 4 days
Free Slack: 0
Tasks which come before: Tasks which come after:
Task 4a(2)HEC 40kcfs Task 6 HEC2 Existing
( 9) Task 6 HEC2 Existing
ASAP In Future 4 days
Assimilate HEC-2 Data from existing model run
Start: End:
Earliest: 17-Feb-88 8:00am 22-Feb-88 5:00pm
Latest Free: 17-Feb-88 8:00am 22-Feb-88 5:00pm
Latest Total: 18-Aug-88 8:00am 23-Aug-88 5:00pm
Total Slack: 25 week=_.. 4 days
Free Slack: 0
Resource: Amount: Cost:
Edward J. Coleman 1.00 1,600.00
Tasks which come before: Tasks which come after:
Task 4c HEC-2 Agreement Task 7a )24kcfs IFG4 Field Wor
TIME LINE Task Detail Report Pace
• I
Schedule Name: Lake Redding Project Spawning Gravel Studies Approach 2
Project Manager: J. Emil Morhardt, Ph.D., EA Engineering
As of date: 2I-Apr-87 11:43am Schedule File: C:\TLDATA\REDDING2
Assumes full hierarchical structure, but no new HEC-2 model or SI curve
• data.
( 10) Task 7a )24kcfs IFG4 Field War
ASAP In Future 3 weeks
Cannot be done until 40,000cfs HEC-2 validation is completed
Start: End:
Earliest: 23-Feb-88 8:00am 14-Mar-88 5:00pm
Latest: 24-Aug-88 8:00am 14-Sep-88 5:00pm
Total Slack: 25 weeks, 4 days
Resource: Amount: Cost:
Flowmeters,etc. @ $150/day 0.80 1,800.00
Brian Mattax 1.00 3,463.20
Phillip A. Scordelis 1.00 1,788.00
David F. Hanson 0.20 1,200.00
Keith Binkley 1.00 2,835.60
Whaler @ $100/day 0.70 1,050.00
Suburban @ $45/day 0.50 337.50
Mileage @ $.45/mile 1,500.00 1,500.00
Meals + Lodging @ $50/day 3.50 2,625.00
Kimberly Binkley 1.00 2,196.00
Total Cost 18,795.30
Tasks which come before: Tasks which come after:
Task 6 HEC2 Existing Task 7b (5cfs IFG4 Measurement
TIME LINE Task Detail Report Pace 8
•
Schedule Name: Lake Redding Project Spawning Gravel Studies Approach 2
Project Manager: J. Emil Morhardt, Ph.D., EA Engineering
As of date: 21-Apr-87 11:43am Schedule File: C:\TLDATA\REDDIN62
Assumes full hierarchical structure, but no new HEC-2 model or SI curve
data.
( 11) Task 7b (5cfs IF64 Measurement
Fixed In Future 3 weeks
Cannot be done until 40,000cfs HEC-2 validation is completed
Start: End:
Date: 15-Sep-88 8:00am 5-Oct-88 5:00pm
Resource: Amount: Cost:
Flowmeters,etc. @ $150/day 1.00 2,250.00
Brian Mattax 1.00 3,463.20
Phillip A. Scordelis 1.00 1,738.00
David F. Hanson 0.20 1,200.00
Keith Binkley 1.00 2,835.60
Whaler @ $100/day 0.70 1,050.00
Suburban @ $45/day 0.50 337.50
Mileage @ $.45/mile 1,500.00 1,500.00
Meals + Lodging @ $50/day 3.50 2,625.00
Kimberly Binkley 1.00 2,196.00
Total Cost 19,245.30
Tasks which come before: Tasks which come after:
Task 7a )24kcfs IFG4 Field Wcr Task 8 Cony. Factors
TIME LINE Task Detail Report Pape 7
• •
Schedule Name: Lake Redding Project Spawning Gravel Studies Approach 2
Project Manager: J. Emil Morhardt, Ph.D., EA Engineering
As of date: 21-Apr-87 11:44am Schedule File: C:\TLDATA\REDDING2
Assumes full hierarchical structure, but no new HEC-2 model or SI curve
data.
( 12) Task 8 Conv. Factors
ASAP In Future 1 week
Calculate Conversion factors for relating spawning condition
to mean column velocities
Start: End:
Earliest: 6-Oct-88 8:00am 13-Oct-88 5:00pm
Latest Free: 6-Oct-88 8:00am 13-Oct-88 5:00pm
Latest Total: 14-Oct-88 8:00am 20-Oct-88 5:00pm
Total Slack: 1 week
Free Slack: 0
Resource: Amount: Cost:
Edward F. Cheslak 1.00 2.000.00
IBM PC ATI $23/hr 0.20 184.00
Total Cost 2,184.00
Tasks which come before: Tasks which carne after:
Task 7b {5cfs IF64 Measurement Task 9, WUA Caics
TIME LINE Task Detail Report Faoe
• •
Schedule Name: Lake Redding Project Spawning Gravel Studies Approach 2
Project Manager: J. Emil Morhardt, Ph.D., EA Engineering
As of date: 2141pr-87 11:44am Schedule File: C:\TLDATA\REDDING2
Assumes full hierarchical structure, but no new HEC-2 model or SI curve
data.
( 13) Task 9, WUA Calcs
ASAP In Future 3 weeks
Begin PHASBSIM calculations by transect when data start
arriving (5 days after first measurements).
Start: End:
Earliest: 14-Oct-88 8:00am 3-Nov-88 5:00pm
Latest Free: 14-Oct-88 8:00am 3-Nov-88 5:00pm
Latest Total: 21-Oct-88 8:00am 10-Nov-88 5:00pm
Total Slack: 1 week
Free Slack: 0
Resource: Amount: Cost:
David F. Hanson 0.30 1,800.00
Paul DeVries 0.50 606.0e
IBM PC AT 0 $23/hr 0.20 552.00
Total Cost 2,958.00
Tasks which come before: Tasks which come after:
Task 8 Cony. Factors Task 10 Time Series
TIME LINE Task Detail Report Pas
1111 •
Schedule Name: Lake Redding Project Spawning Gravel Studies Approach 2
Project Manager: J. Emil Morhardt, Ph.D., EA Engineering •
As of date: 21-Apr-87 11:44am Schedule File: C:\TLDATA\REDDING2
Assumes full hierarchical structure, but no new HEC-2 model or SI curve
data.
( 14) Task 10 Time Series
ASAP In Future 4 days
Construct Time Series Analysis for wpawning, incubation and
rearing as was done in addendum 2
Start: End:
Earliest: 4-Nov-88 8:00am 9-Nov-88 5:00pm
Latest Free: 4-Nov-88 8:00am 9-Nov-88 5:00pm
Latest Total: 14-Nov-88 8:00am -17-Nov-88 5:00pm
Total Slack: 1 week
Free Slack: 0
Resource: Amount: Cost:
Edward F. Cheslak 1.00 1,600.00
Paul DeVries 1.00 323.20
IPM PC AT 0 $23/hr 0.50 368.00
David F. Hanson 0.50 800.00
Total Cost 3,031.20
Tasks which come before: Tasks which come after:
Task 9, WUA Calcs Task 11, Actual Years Analysis
TIME LINE Task Detail Report Page 10
•
Schedule Name: Lake Redding Project Spawning Gravel Studies Approach 2
Project Manager: 3. Emil Morhardt, Ph.D., EA Engineering
As of date: 21-Apr-87 11:45am Schedule File: C:\TLDATA\REDDIN62
Assumes full hierarchical structure, but no new HEC-2 model or SI curve
data.
t 15) Task 11, Actual Years Analysis
ASAP In Future 2 days
Start: End:
Earliest: 10-Nov-88 8:00am 14-Nov-88 5:00pm
Latest Free: 10-Nov-88 8:00am 14-Nov-88 5:00pm
Latest Total: 18-Nov-88 8:00am 21-Nov-88 5:00pm
Total Slack: 1 week
Free Slack: 0
Resource: Amount: Cost:
David F. Hanson 1.00 800.00
Paul DeVries 1.00 161.60
IRM PC AT 0 t23/hr 1.00 363.00
Total Cost 1,325.60
Tasks which come before: Tasks which come after:
Task 10 Time Series Task 12 Report
TIME LINE Task Detail Report Pace 11
•
Schedule Name: Lake Redding Project Spawning Gravel Studies Approach.2
Project Manager: J. Emil Morhardt, Ph.D., EA Engineering
As of date: 21-Apr-87 11:45am Schedule File: C:\TLDATA\REDDING2
Assumes full hierarchical structure, but no new HEC-2 model or SI curve
data.
( 16) Task 12 Report
ALAP In Future 3 weeks
Start: End;
Earliest: 15-Nov-88 8:00am 6-Dec-88 5:00pm
Latest Free: 15-Nov-88 8:00am 6-Dec-88 5:00pm
Latest Total: 22-Nov-88 8:00am 13-Dec-88 5:00pm
Total Slack: 1 week
Free Slack: 0
Resource: Amount: Cost:
David F. Hanson 0.50 3,000.00
J. Emil Morhardt 0.25 2,362.50
Edward F. Cheslak 0.25 1,500.00
Sharon Safire 0.10 118.32
Carol Mosure 0.20 615.36
Copier Costs 6 5.123/copy 1,000.00 1,000.00
Total Cost 8.536.18
Tasks which come before: Tasks which come after:
Task 11, Actual Years Analysis. Project Complete Milestone•
17) Project Complete Milestone
ASAP In Future MileStone
Start: End:
Earliest: 7-Dec-88 8:00am 7-Dec-88 8:00am
Latest: 14-Dec-88 8:00am 14-Dec-88 8:00am
Total Slack: 1 week
Tasks which come before: Tasks which come after:
Task 12 Report
TIME LINE Task Detail Report ka{_ 12
ATTACHMENT 7
Detailed costing by task, Approach 3 .
1111/ •
Schedule Name: Lake Redding Project Spawning Gravel Studies Approach 3
Project Manager: J. Emil Morhardt, Ph.D., EA Engineering
As of date: 21-Apr-87 11:09am Schedule File: C:\TLDATA\REDDING3
Assumes full hierarchical structure, plus new HEC-2 model and new SI curve
data. This is the maximum version of the project
( 1) Task la Management
Fixed In Future 79 weeks, 1 day
Overall Project Management
Start: End:
Date: 19-May-87 8:00am 13-Dec-88 5:'.pm
Resource: Amount: Cost:
J. Emil Morhardt 0.02 4,989.60
Telephone Charges 500.00 500.00
Federal Express 500.00 500.00
Mileage @ 8.45/mile 2,100.00 2,100.00
Suburban @ $45/day 0.02 356.40
Total Cost 8,446.00
( 2) Task lb Agency Data
Fixed In Future 1 week
Travel to agency offices to collect existing SI data
Start: End:
Date: 20-May-87 8:00am 27-May-87 5:00pm
Resource: Amount: Cost:
Suburban 0 $45/day 0.80 180.00
Mileage @ 8.45/mile 225.00 225.00
Paul DeVries 1.00 404.00
Total Cost 809.00
Tasks which come before: Tasks which come after:
Task lc SI Curves
TIME LINE Task Detail Report Pace 1
• i
Schedule Name: Lake Redding Project Spawning Gravel Studies Approach 3
Project Manager: J. Emil Morhardt, Ph.D., EA Engineering
As of date: 21-Apr-87 11:09am Schedule File: C:\TLDATA\REDDING3
Assumes full hierarchical structure, plus new HEC-2 model and new SI curve
data. This is the maximum version of the project
( 3) Task lc SI Curves
ASAP In Future 4 days
Convert the agency SI curve data to SI curves
Review them with Agencies
Start: End:
Earliest: 28-May-87 8:00am 2-Jun-87 5:00pm
Latest Free: 28-May-87 8:00am 2-Jun-87 5:00pm
Latest Total: 18-Sep-87 8:00am 23-Sep-87 5:00pm
Total Slack: 15 weeks, 4 days
Free Slack: 0
Resource: Amount: Cost:
Paul DeVries 1.00 323.20
David F. Hanson 1.00 1,600.00
Suburban 0 $45/day 0.50 90.00
Mileage 2' $.45/mile 675.00 675.00
Total Cost 2,688.20
Tasks which come before: Tasks which come after:
Task lb Agency Data Task 2a Spring SI curve data
TIME LINE Task Detail Report Page
1110 11110
Schedule Name: Lake Redding Project Spawning Gravel Studies Approach 3
Project Manager: J. Emil Morhardt, Ph.D., EA Engineering
As of date: 21-Apr-87 11:10am Schedule File: C:\TLDATA\REDDIN63
Assumes full hierarchical structure, plus new FEC-2 model and new SI curve
data. This is the maximum version of the project
4) Task 2a Spring SI curve data
ASAP In Future 1 week
This assumes we can get 300 observations on spring run
salmon during one field week
Start: End:
Earliest: 3-Jun-87 8:'.'am 9-Jun-87 5:00pm
Latest: 24-Sep-87 8:00am 30-Sep-87 5:00pm
Total Slack: 15 weeks, 4 days
Resource: Amount: Cost:
Whaler 0 $100/day 1.00 500.00
Keith Binkley 1.00 945.20
Phillip A. Scordelis 1.00 596.00
Brian Mattax 1.00 1,154.40
Mileage 8 $.45/mile 675.00 675.00
Suburban 0 $45/day 1.00 225.00
Total Cost 4,095.60
Tasks which come before: Tasks which come after:
Task lc SI Curves Task 2b Fall SI curves
TIME LINE Task Detail Report Face
•
Schedule Name: Lake Redding Project Spawning Gravel Studies Approach 3
Project Manager: J. Emil Morhardt, Ph.D., EA Engineering
As of date: 21-Apr-87 11:10am Schedule File: C:\TLDATA\REDDING3
Assumes full hierarchical structure, plus new HEC-2 model and new SI curve
data. This is the maximum version of the project
( 5) Task 2b Fall SI curves
Fixed In Future 1 week
This assumes we can get 300 observations on Fall run
salmon during one field week
Start: End:
Date: 1-Oct-87 8:00am 7-Oct-87 5: pm
Resource: Amount: Cost:
Whaler @ $100/day 1.00 500.00
Keith Hinkley 1.00 945.20
Phillip A. Scordelis 1.00 596.00
Brian Matta 1.00 1,154.40
Mileage @ $.45/mile 675.00 675.00
Suburban @ $45/day 1.00 225.00
Total Cost 4,095.60
Tasks which come before: Tasks which come after:
Task 2a Spring SI curve data Task 2c Develop new SI curves
TIME LINE Task Detail Report Page 4
• 110
Schedule Name: Lake Redding Project Spawning Gravel Studies Approach 3
Project Manager: J. Emil Morhardt, Ph.D., EA Engineering
As of date: 21-Apr-87 11:10am Schedule File: C:\TLDATA\REDDING3
Assumes full hierarchical structure, plus new HEC-2 model and new SI curve
data. This is the maximum version of the project
6) Task 2c Develop new SI curves
ASAP In Future 1 week
Using the new Fall and Spring Run data
Start: End:
Earliest: 8-Oct-87 8:00am 15-Oct-87 5:00pm
Latest Free: 8-Oct-87 8:00am 15-Oct-87 5:00pm
Latest Total: 18-Jan-88 8:00am 22-Jan-88 5:00pm
Total Slack: 13 weeks, 2 days
Free Slack: 0
Resource: Amount: Cost:
David F. Hanson 0.40 800.00
Paul DeVries 1.00 404.00
IBM PC AT 0 $23/hr 0.50 460.00
Total Cost 1,664.00
Tasks which come before: Tasks which come after:
Task 2b Fall SI curves Task 3 Select Trans.
Task Id SI Agreement
4 7) Task id SI Agreement
ASAP In Future MileStone
Start: End:
Earliest: 16-Oct-87 8:00am 16-Oct-87 8:00am
Latest Free: 16-Oct-87 8:00am 16-Oct-87 8:00am
Latest Total: 25-Jan-88 8:00am 25-Jan-88 8:00am
Total Slack: 13 weeks, 2 days
Free Slack: 0
Tasks which come before: Tasks which come after:
Task 2c Develop new SI curves Task 3 Select Trans.
TIME LINE Task Detail Report Pane
Schedule Name: Lake Redding Project Spawning Gravel Studies Approach 3
Project Manager: J. Emil Morhardt, Ph.D., EA Engineering
As of date: 21-Apr-87 11:11am Schedule File: C:\TLDATA\REDDING3
Assumes full hierarchical structure, plus new HEC-2 model and new SI curve
data. This is the maximum version of the project
( 8) Task 3 Select Trans.
ASAP In Future 2 weeks
Does not assume that initial transects can be chosen prior
to completion of all FWS studies
Start: End:
Earliest: 16-Qct-87 8:00am 29-Oct-87 5: pm
Latest Free: 16-Oct-87 8:00am 29-Oct-87 5:00pm
Latest Total: 25-Jan-88 8:00am 5-Feb-88 5:00pm
Total Slack: 13 weeks, 2 days
Free Slack: 0
Resource: Amount: Cost:
David F. Hanson 0.20 800.00
Suburban 0 $45/day 0.20 90.00
Meals + Lodging @ $50/day 0.20 100.00
Mileage @ $.45/mile 675.00 675.00
J. Emil Morhardt 0.20 1,260.00
Total Cost 2,925.00
Tasks which come before: Tasks which come after:
Task ld SI Agreement Task 4a(1)HEC 5kcfs
Task 2c Develop new SI curves
TIME LINE Task Detail Report age E
• •
Schedule Name: Lake Redding Project Spawning Gravel Studies Approach 3
Project Manager: 3. Emil Morhardt, Ph.D., EA Engineering
As of date: 21-Apr-87 11:11ara Schedule File: C:\TLDATA\REDDING3
Assumes full hierarchical structure, plus new HEC-2 model and new SI curve
data. This is the maximum version of the project
( 9) Task 4a(1)HEC 5kcfs
ASAP In Future 1 week
Survey crew locates 3 HEC-2 transects and provides WSL's
Work done by Pace Engineering, Redding
Start: End:
Earliest: 30-Oct-87 8:00am 5-Nov-87 5:00pm
Latest: 8-Feb-88 8:00am 12-Feb-88 5:00pm
Total Slack: 13 weeks, 2 days
Resource: Amount: Cost:
Surveying 3 sites, WSL's 1,100.00 1,100.00
Tasks which come before: Tasks which come after:
Task 3 Select Trans. Task 4a(2)HEC 40kcfs
( 10) Task 4a(2)HEC 40kcfs
Fixed In Future 1 day
The second flow reading for verification of the HEC-2 model
(Done by Pace Engineering, Redding)
Start: End:
Date: 16-Feb-88 8:00am 16-Feb-86 5:00pm
Resource: Amount: Cost:
Measuring WSL's 0 40,000 cfs 500.00 500.00
Tasks which come before: Tasks which cone after:
Task 4a(1)HEC 5kcfs Task 4c HEC-2 Agreement
Task 5a New HEC-2 Surveys
TIME LINE Task Detail Report Pape
• •
Schedule Name: Lake Redding Project Spawning Gravel Studies Approach 3
Project Manager: J. Emil Morhardt, Ph.D., EA Engineering
As of date: 21-Apr-87 11:12am Schedule File: C:\TLDATA\REDDINS3
Assumes full hierarchical structure, plus new HEC-2 model and new SI curve
data. This is the maximum version of the project
( 11) Task 5a New HEC-2 Surveys
ASAP In Future 2 weeks
Pace Engineering Surveys in 40 transects and measures WSEL's
Start: End:
Earliest: 17-Feb-88 8:00am 1-Mar-88 5:00pm
Latest Free: 17-Feb-88 8:00am 1-Mar-88 5:00pm
Latest Total: 28-Jul-88 8:00am 10-Aug-88 5:00pm
Total Slack: 22 weeks, 4 days
Free Slack: 0
Resource: Amount: Cost:
Surveying of 40 Transects 10,000.00 10,000.00
Tasks which come before: Tasks which come after:
Task 4a(2)HEC 40kcfs Task 5b HEC-2 Model Run
TIME LINE Task Detail Report Page E
• •
Schedule Name: Lake Redding Project Spawning Gravel Studies Approach 3
Project Manager: J. Emil Morhardt, Ph.D., EA Engineering
As of date: 21-Apr-87 11:12am Schedule File: C:\TLDATA\REDDING3
Assumes full hierarchical structure, plus new HEC-2 model and new SI curve
data. This is the maximum version of the project
( 12) Task 5b HEC-2 Model Run
ASAP In Future 1 week
Using New Micrcomputer model supplied by HEC
Start: End:
Earliest: 2-Mar-88 8:00am 8-Mar-88 5:00pm
Latest Free: 2-Mar-88 8:00am 8-Mar-88 5:00pm
Latest Total: 11-Aug-88 8:00am 17-Aug-88 5:00pm
Total Slack: 22 weeks, 4 days
Free Slack: 0
Resource: Amount: Cost:
Edward J. Coleman 1.00 2,000.00
David F. Hanson 0.50 1.000.00
IBM PC AT 0 $23/hr 0.30 276.00
Copier Costs 0 $.123/copy 200.00 200.00
Total Cost 3,476.00
Tasks which come before: Tasks which come after:
Task 5a New HEC-2 Surveys Task 4c HEC-2 Agreement
( 13) Task 4c HEC-2 Agreement
ASAP In Future MileStone
Start: End:
Earliest: 9-Mar-88 8:00am 9-Mar-88 8:00am
Latest Free: 9-Mar-88 8:00am 9-Mar-88 8:00am
Latest Total: 18-Aug-88 8:00am 18-Aug-88 8:00am
Total Slack: 22 weeks, 4 days
Free Slack: 0
Tasks which carne before: Tasks which come after:
Task 5b HEC-2 Model Run Task 6 HEC2 Existing
Task 4a(2)HEC 40kcfs
TIME LINE Task Detail Report Page
•
•
Schedule Name: Lake Redding Project Spawning Gravel Studies Approach 3
Project Manager: J. Emil Morhardt, Ph.D., EA Engineering
As of date: 21-Apr-87 11:12am Schedule File: C:\TLDATA\REDDING3
Assumes full hierarchical structure, plus new HEC-2 model and new SI curve
data. This is the maximum version of the project
( 14) Task 6 HEC2 Existing
ASAP In Future 4 days
Assimilate HEC-2 Data from existing model run
Start: End:
Earliest: 9-Mar-88 8:00am 14-Mar-88 5:00pm
Latest Free: 9-Mar-88 8:00am 14-Mar-88 5:00pm
Latest Total: 18-Aug-88 8:00am 23-Aug-88 5:00pm
Total Slack: 22 weeks, 4 days
Free Slack: 0
Resource: Amount: Cost:
Edward J. Coleman 1.00 1,600.00
Tasks which come before: Tasks which come after:
Task 4c HEC-2 Agreement Task 7a )24kcfs IF64 Field Wor
TIME LINE Task Detail Report Page 10
i .
Schedule Name: Lake Redding Project Spawning Gravel Studies Approach 3
Project Manager: J. Emil Morhardt, Ph.D., EA Engineering
As of date: 21-Apr-87 11:12am Schedule File: C:\TLDATA\REDDING3
Assumes full hierarchical structure, plus new HEC-2 model and new SI curve
data. This is the maximum version of the project
( 15) Task 7a )24kcfs IFG4 Field Wor
ASAP In Future 3 weeks
Cannot be done until 40,000cfs HEC-2 validation is completed
Start: End:
Earliest: 15-Mar-88 8:00am 4-Apr-88 5:00pm
Latest: 24-Aug-88 8:00am 14-Sep-88 5:00pm
Total Slack: 22 weeks, 4 days
Resource: Amount: Cost:
Flowmeters,etc. @ $150/day 0.60 1,800.00
Arian Mattax 1.00 3,463.20
Phillip A. Scordelis 1.00 1,788.00
David F. Hanson 0.20 1,200.00
Keith Hinkley 1.00 2,835.60
Whaler @ $100/day 0.70 1,050.00
Suburban @ $45/day 0.50 337.50
Mileage @ $.45/mile 1,500.00 1,500.00
Meals + Lodging @ $50/day 3.50 2,625.00
Kimberly Hinkley 1.00 2,196.00
Total Cost 18,795.30
Tasks which come before: Tasks which come after:
Task 6 HEC2 Existing Task 7b (5cfs IF64 Measurement
TIME LINE Task Detail Report Page 11
1
Schedule Name: Lake Redding Project Spawning Gravel Studies Approach 3
Project Manager: J. Emil Morhardt, Ph.D., EA Engineering
As of date: 21-Apr-87 11:13am Schedule File: C:\TLDATA\REDDINE3
Assumes full hierarchical structure, plus new HEC-2 model and new SI curve
data. This is the maximum version of the project
( 16) Task 7b (5cfs IF64 Measurement
Fixed In Future 3 weeks
Cannot be done until 40,000cfs HEC-2 validation is completed
Start: End:
Date: 15-Sep-88 8:00am 5-Oct-88 5:00pm
Resource: Amount: Cost:
Flowmeters,etc. @ $150/day 1.00 2,250.00
Brian Mattax 1.00 3,463.20
Phillip A. Scordelis 1.00 1,788.00
David F. Hanson 0.20 1,200.00
Keith Binkley 1.00 2,835.60
Whaler @ W aday 0.70 1,050.00
Suburban @ $45/day 0.50 337.50
Mileage @ $.45/mile 1,500.00 1,500.00
Meals + Lodging @ $50/day 3.50 2.625.00
Kimberly Binkley 1.00 2,196.00
Total Cost 19, 45.30
Tasks which come before: Tasks which come after:
Task 7a )24kcfs IFG4 Field Wor Task 8 Conv. Factors
TIME LINE Task Detail Report Page 1=
1
Schedule Name: Lake Redding Project Spawning Gravel Studies Approach 3
Project Manager: J. Emil Morhardt, Ph.D., EA Engineering
As of date: 21-Apr-87 11:13am Schedule File: C:\TLDATA\REDDING3
Assumes full hierarchical structure, plus new HEC-2 model and new SI curve
data. This is the maximum version of the project
( 17) Task 8 Cony. Factors
ASAP In Future 1 week
Calculate Conversion factors for relating spawning condition
to mean column velocities
Start: End:
Earliest: 6-Oct-88 8:00am 13-Oct-88 5:00pm
Latest Free: 6-Oct-88 8:00am 13-Oct-88 5:00pm
Latest Total: 14-Oct-88 8:00am 20-Oct-88 5:00pm
Total Slack: 1 week
Free Slack: 0
Resource: Amount: Cost:
Edward F. Cheslak 1.00 2,000.00
IBM PC AT @ $23/hr 0.20 184.00
Total Cost 2,184.00
Tasks which come before: Tasks which come after:
Task 7b (5cfs IFG4 Measurement Task 9, WUA Gales
TIME LIME Task Detail Report Paye, 13
• •
Schedule Name: Lake Redding Project Spawning Gravel Studies Approach 3
Project Manager: J. Emil Morhardt, Ph.D., EA Engineering
As of date: 21-Apr-87 11:13am Schedule File: C:\TLDATA\REDDING3
Assumes full hierarchical structure, plus new HEC-2 model and new SI curve
data. This is the maximum version of the project
( 18) Task 9, WUA Calcs
ASAP In Future 3 weeks
Begin PHASBSIM calculations by transect when data start
arriving (5 days after first measurements).
Start: End:
Earliest: 14-Oct-88 8:00am 3-Nov-88 5:00pm
Latest Free: 14-Oct-88 8:00am 3-Nov-88 5:00pm
Latest Total: 21-Oct-88 8:00am 10-Nov-88 5:00pm
Total Slack: 1 week
Free Slack: 0
Resource: Amount: Cost:
David F. Hanson 0.30 1.800.00
Paul DeVries 0.50 606.00
IBM PC AT CQ #23/hr 0.20 552.00
Total Cost 2,958.00
Tasks which come before: Tasks which come after:
Task 8 Conv. Factors Task 10 Time Series
TIME LINE Task Detail Report Gale 14
• •
Schedule Name: Lake Redding Project Spawning Gravel Studies Approach 3
Project Manager: J. Emil Morhardt, Ph.D., EA Engineering
As of date: 21-Apr-87 11:14am Schedule File: C:\TLDATA\REDDING3
Assumes full hierarchical structure, plus new HEC-2 model and new SI curve
data. This is the maximum version of the project
( 19) Task 10 Time Series
ASAP In Future 4 days
Construct Time Series Analysis for wpawring, incubation and
rearing as was done in addendum 2
Start: End:
Earliest: 4-Nov-88 8:00am 9-Nov-88 5:00pm
Latest Free: 4-Nov-88 8:00am 9-Nov-88 5:00pm
Latest Total: 14-Nov-88 8:00am 17-Nov-86 5:00pm
Total Slack: I week
Free Slack: 0
Resource: Amount: Cost:
Edward F. Cheslak 1.00 1,600.00
Paul DeVries 1.00 323.20
IRM PC AT 0 $23/hr 0.50 368.00
David F. Hanson 0.50 800.00
Total Cost 3,091.20
Tasks which come before: Tasks which cane after:
Task 9, WUA Calcs Task 11, Actual Years Analysis
TIME LINE Task Detail Report Pap. 15
•
Schedule Name: Lake Redding Project Spawning Gravel Studies Approach 3
Project Manager: J, Emil Morhardt, Ph.D.,' EA Engineering
As of date: 21-Apr-87 11:14am Schedule File: C:\TLDRTA\REDDING3
Assumes full hierarchical structure, plus new HEC-2 model and new SI curve
data. This is the maximum version of the project
( 20) Task 11, Actual Years Analysis
ASAP In Future 2 days
Start: End:
Earliest: 10-Nov-88 8:00am 14-Nov-88 5:00pm
Latest Free: 10-Nov-88 8:00am 14-Nov-88 5:00pm
Latest Total: 18-Nov-88 8:00am 21-Nov-88 5:00pm
Total Slack: 1 week
Free Slack: 0
Resource: Amount: Cost:
David F. Hanson 1.00 800.00
Paul DeVries 1.00 161.60
IBM PC AT 0 $23/hr 1.00 368.00
Total Cost 1,329.60
Tasks which come before: Tasks which come after:
Task 10 Time Series Task. 12 Report
TIME LINE Task Detail Report nage 1;
• •
Schedule Name: Lake Redding Project Spawning'Gravel Studies Approach 3
Project Manager: J. Emil Morhardt, Ph.D., EA Engineering
As of date: 21-Apr-87 11:14am Schedule File: C:\TLDATA\REDDING3
Assumes full hierarchical structure, plus new HEC-2 model and new SI curve
data. This is the maximum version of the project
21) Task 12 Report
ALAP In Future 3 weeks
Start: End:
Earliest: 15-Nov-88 8:00am 6-Dec-88 5:00pm
Latest Free: 15-Nov-88 8:00am 6-Dec-88 5:% pm
Latest Total: 22-Nov-88 8:00am 13-Dec-88 5:00pm
Total Slack: 1 week
Free Slack: 0
Resource: Amount: Cost:
David F. Hanson 0.50 3.000.00
J. Emil Morhardt 0.25 2,362.50
Edward F. Cheslak 0.25 1,500.00
Sharon Safire 0.10 118,32
Carol Mosure 0.20 615.36 •
Copier Costs 8 $.123/copy 1,000.00 1,000.00
Total Cost 8,556.18
Tasks which come before: Tasks which come after:
Task 11, Actual Years Analysis Project Complete Milestone.
( 22) Project Complete Milestone
ASAP In Future MileStone
Start: End:
Earliest: 7-Dec-88 8:00am 7-Dec-88 8:00am
Latest: 14-Dec-88 8:00am 14-Dec-88 8:00am
Total Slack: 1 week
Tasks which come before: Tasks which come after:
Task 12 Report
TIME LINE Task Detail 'Report Page 17
• •
ATTACHMENT 8
Draft Contract
• .
DRAFT CONTRACT
ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO THIS day of , 1987 .
CLIENT: City of Redding
Address : 760 Parkview Avenue
Redding, CA 96001
BY:
Mayor, City of Redding
and
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, Inc.
41 A Lafayette Circle
Lafayette, California 94549
BY:
J. Emil Morhardt
TITLE: Vice President
The RFP dated April 17 , 1987 , and entitled:
Request for Proposal to
Conduct Professional Service
Regarding the Lake Redding Project for
the City of Redding,
and the proposal submitted, dated 24 April 1987 , are incorporated
in and made a part of this contract.
This contract includes the attached General Terms and Conditions .
ATTEST:
City Clerk, Redding
FORM APPROVED:
City Attorney
• •
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, Inc.
GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS
1 . It is understood that this proposal is valid for a period of
ninety ( 90 ) days . Upon the expiration of that period of
time , EA Engineering , Science , and Technology , Inc . ( EA )
reserves the right to review the proposed basis of payment
and fees, to allow for changing costs, as well as to adjust
the time of performance to conform to workloads .
2 . Invoices will be submitted on a monthly basis , terms net
thirty ( 30 ) days . Past due balances shall be subject to
interest at the rate of 1 . 5 percent per month or the maximum
permissible under state law, whichever is less. In addition,
EA may, after giving seven ( 7 ) days written notice, suspend
services under any agreement until all past due accounts have
been paid.
3 . The proposed fees constitute our best estimate of the charges
required to complete the project as defined. Except as pro-
vided in Paragraph 4 , the project scope will not be altered
without mutual written agreement . For many projects such as
those involving process development work, planning work, or
environmental impact assessments, all activities are often
initially not fully definable. As the project progresses,
the facts uncovered may dictate a change in direction which
may alter the scope. EA will promptly inform the client of
such situations so that negotiation of change in scope can be
accomplished as required.
4 . Costs and schedule commitments shall be subject to renegotia-
tion for unreasonable delays caused by the client ' s failure
to provide specified facilities or information, or for delays
1
• I
caused by unpredictable occurrences, or force majeure, such
as fires, floods, strikes, riots, unavailability of labor or
materials or services, process shutdown, acts of God or of
the public enemy, or acts of regulations of any of the above
may result in additional cost ( reflecting a change in scope )
beyond that outlined in this proposal .
5 . Where the method of contract payment is based on a time and
material basis , the minimum time segment for charging of
field work is four ( 4 ) hours. The minimum time segment for
charging of work done at any of EA ' s offices is one-half
hour . Where applicable , rental or use of specialized
apparatus, instrumentation, or technical equipment and the
calibration thereof will be changed to the project .
6 . Salary increases will become effective immediately upon
company authorization and will be reflected in the next
invoice submitted to the client .
7 . Expenses properly chargeable to the work shall include :
travel and living expenses of personnel when away from the
home office on business connected with the project; shipping
and production costs ; identifiable drafting and word
processing supplies; equipment usage and rental fees; and
expendable materials and supplied purchased specifically for
the project . A 9 percent handling and administrative charge
will be added to all project expenses except the charges for
the subcontractor.
8 . This agreement may be terminated in whole or in part in
writing by either party in the event of substantial failure
by the other party to fulfill its obligations under this
agreement through no fault of the terminating party ,
providing that no such termination may be effected unless the
other party is given : ( 1 ) not less than thirty ( 30 ) calendar
days written notice of intent to terminate , and ( 2 ) an
2
•
opportunity for consultation with the terminating party prior
to termination .
A final invoice will be calculated on the first ofthe month
following receipt of such cancellation period (the effective
date of cancellation ) .
a. Where method of contract payment is "lump sum" , the final
invoices will be based on the percentage of work
completed to the effective date of cancellation, plus 5
percent of the billings to such date as a closeout cost .
b. Where method of contract payment is based on time and
materials, the final invoice will include all services
and direct expenses associated with the project up to the
effective date of cancellation, plus 5 percent of the
billings to such date as a closeout cost .
c. Where method of contract payment is cost plus a fixed
fee, the final invoice will include all costs to date of
termination and a pro-rate share of the fixed fee plus 5
percent of the billings to such date as a closeout cost .
The closeout cost referred to in subparagraphs 6a, b, and c
is not to be considered as a penalty , but represents an
allowance for demobilization of personnel and equipment and
costs not available on short notice.
9 . All specifications, drawings, operating procedures, and tech-
nical information held proprietary by EA and furnished by EA
in connection with this agreement , but not developed as a
result of work under this agreement or under prior agreements
between client and EA, shall be held confidential by client,
be used only in connection with the performance of the agree-
ment or in litigation to which the objectives of the
3
410 i
agreement pertain , and be returned to EA at completion of
performance or conclusion of litigation.
All inventions, techniques, and improvements held by EA to be
proprietary or trade secrets of EA prior to use of same on
behalf of client, as well as all inventions, techniques and
improvements developed by EA during but independent of the
services rendered to client under this agreement , shall
remain the property of EA or other clients of EA as
appropriate.
10 . EA will prepare all work in accordance with generally
accepted professional practices, and it is not the intention
of EA to provide or offer to provide services inconsistent
with or contrary to such practices, nor to make an warranty
or guarantee, expressed or implied, nor to have any agreement
or contract for services subject to the provision of any
Uniform Commercial Code. Similarly, it is not the intention
of EA to accept those items and conditions offered by the
client in its purchase order , requisition , or notice of
authorization to proceed except as set forth herein or as
expressly accepted in writing.
11 . If the services covered by this contract are subject to local
or state taxes or fees ( except state income taxes ) such
additional costs will be charged to the project and subject
to reimbursement .
4
111
•
APPENDIX A
EA Hydroelectric Experience
• •
EA ENGINEERING,
11E6 SCIENCE,AND
TECHNOLOGY.INC.
EA HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Proiect Owner/Engineer Proiect Description EA Services
Lavezzola Creek Alternative Energy New Small Run-of-the-River Instream Flow, Botany, and
Hydroelectric Project Development Corp. Hydroelectric Project Wildlife Studies; Prepara-
Sierra County, CA ration of FERC Exhibit E
Spring Creek Pumped Black and Veatch, New Pumped Storage Project Environmental Studies,
Storage Project City of Redding (400 MW potential) Near and, if the site is
Lake Shasta feasible, FERC Exhibit E
Boyd County Pumped Chas. T. Main, Inc. Proposed Development of Environmental Impact
Storage Project Nebraska Public Power 1336-MWe Pumped Storage Studies and Baseline Data
Boyd County, NE District Project Collection for Water Qual-
ity Ecological Impact, and
Other Factors, Including
Protection and Mitigation
Strategies
Rush Creek Diversion City of Los Angeles Continuing Diversion of Detailed Stream Mapping;
Mono County, CA Lower Rush Creek to Mono Groundwater Studies;
Craters Tunnel Population Studies; Expert
Testimony in Superior
Court Hearings
Lake Redding Hydro- City of Redding New 15-MW Low Head Environmental Impact
electric Project Electric Department Hydroelectric Project Report, Design of Fish
Shasta County, CA on Sacramento River Facilities, Hatcheries,
and Mitigation Plan; IFIM-
type Studies on Salmon
Spawning Gravel
Red Bluff Diversion Dam City of Redding Addition of 10-MW Power FERC Exhibit E and Input
Hydroelectric Project Electric Department Plant and Extensive Fish for Council on Environ-
Tehama County, CA Protective Facilities to mental Quality (CEQ) EIS;
Bureau of Reclamation Fisheries Evaluations;
Diversion Dam Recreation Plan; Design
New Fish Screen Facilities
Critical Analysis of Electric Power Analysis and Evaluation National Workshops,
Existing Instream Flow Research Institute of All Existing Instream Detailed Model Analysis,
Methodologies Flow Methodologies Prepare Major Report,
Develop New Methods
Research Needs for Electric Power National Workshop and Conduct Workshop and
New Instream Flow Research Institute Report Write Report
Methods
Hawks Nest/Glen Ferris Elkem Metals, Inc. Address Deficiencies in Fishery Inventories Appli-
Hydroelectric Project, Reapplication for FERC cation of IFIM; Entrain-
WV Operating License ment Sampling at Power-
house
Entrainment Mortality, Great Northern Paper, Predict Survival of Forage Design and Implement
McKay Hydroelectric Inc. Fish Passing Through State-of-the-Art Samp-
Station Existing McKay and ling Gear to Monitor
Millinocket, ME Proposed "Big A" Mortality of Fishes
Powerhouses Passing Through Turbines
Dynamo Pond Hydroelectric Henwood Associates, New Hydroelectric Project Instream.Flow Studies and
Project Inc. Technical Report
Mono County, CA
Nelson Creek Hydro- Henwood Associates, New Hydroelectric Project Instream Flow Studies and
electric Project Inc. Technical Reports
Shasta County, CA
• •
EAEA ENGINEEFING,
SCIENCE.AND
TECHNOLOGY,INC.
EA HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT EXPERIENCE (CONT.)
Pro4ect Owner/Eneineer Protect Description EA Services
DeSabla-Centerville Pacific Gas Relicensing of Existing Analysis of Instream Flow
Hydroelectric Project and Electric Hydroelectric Projects Methodologies
Butte County, CA Company
Bear River Hydroelectric Parsons, Brincker- Addition of Hydroelectric Assessment of Instream
Project hoff, Quade, and Facilities to Existing Dam Flow Needs for Young
Yuba County, CA Douglas, Inc. Salmon
Jones Fork Hydroelectric Sacramento Municipal Lake Tap of Ice House Federal Energy Regulatory
Project Utility District Reservoir, Tunnel, Pen- Commission (FERC) Environ-
El Dorado County, CA stock, 10-MW Powerhouse mental Exhibits (R,S,V,
and W): Environmental
Impact Review (EIR);
Instream Flow Studies
South Fork Rubicon Sacramento Municipal Diversion Dam and FERC Environmental
River Diversion Utility District Pipeline Exhibits (R,S,V, and W);
El Dorado County, CA EIR; Instream Flow
Studies
Upper American River Sacramento Municipal Recreation Facilities for FERC Exhibit R
Hydroelectric Project Utility District the FERC 2101 4-Reservoir (Recreation Plan)
Recreation Plan Hydroelectric Complex
El Dorado County, CA
Safe Harbor Hydro- Safe Harbor Water Testing of Aeration Dissolved Oxygen Gas
electric Plant Power Corp. Efficiency Systems and Measurements, Mortality
Conestoga, PA Effect of Turbine Passage Studies, Flume Sampling,
on American Shad for Five- and Design of Sampling
Turbine Expansion of Hydro- Gear
electric Facility
Granite-Big Creek 220- Southern California 77-Mi Transmission Line California Public Util-
keV Transmission Line Edison Company Alternatives in the Upper ities Commission Siting
Madera & Fresno Counties, San Joaquin Drainage Environmental Report
CA
Mammoth Pool Dam Raising Southern California Raising of an Existing Water Quality, Fisheries,
Madera & Fresno Counties, Edison Company Hydroelectric Dam Socioeconomics, Land Use,
CA Aesthetics, and Recreation
Studies for FERC Exhibit E
Vermillion Dam Hydroelec- Southern California Addition of Power Plant Studies and Technical
tris Project Edison Company and Penstock to Existing Reports on Water Quality
Fresno County, CA Dam and Aquatic Biology for
FERC Exhibit E
Jose-Mill Creek Hydro- Southern California New Run-of-the-River Instream Flow and Aquatic
electric Project Edison Ccmpany Small Hydroelectric Biological Studies
Fresno County, CA Facility (IFIM)
Democrat Dam Powerhouse Southern California Addition of Hydroelectric Aquatic Biological and
Kern County, CA Edison Company Facilities to Fish Water Water Quality Portions
Release on Existing to FERC Exhibit E
Diversions
Bishop Creek No. 1 Southern California Proposed Hydroelectric Instream Flow Studies
Hydroelectric Project Edison Company Project (IFIM)
Inyo County, CA
Bishop Creek Nos. 2-6 Southern California Relicensing Existing Stream Surveys and Mapping;
Hydroelectric Project Edison Company Project Instream Flow Incremental
Inyo County, CA Methodology, Stream Popula-
tion Studies, Reservoir
Studies
Kern River Hydroelectric Southern California Relicensing Existing Technical Studies for FERC
Project Edison Company Project Exhibit E, Instream Flow
Kern County, CA Studies (IFIM)
• •
RESUMES
( ALPHABETICALLY ARRANGED)
4IkA Engineering, Science, &e chnology, Inc .
KEITH MICHAEL BINKLEY
Fisheries Biologist
EXPERIENCE:
Assisted in researching the ecology of the San Francisco
Bay/Delta estuary : gathered biological data through beach
seining , crabbing , trawling , and other methods, compiled
statistics on species, abundance, size, and sex for shrimp,
crabs , and all life stages of fish . Entered data into a
computer base for trend analysis.
Carried out wildlife and fish habitat studies and
improvements , range analysis, and compliance checks, big game
inventories , and studies of plant regeneration and
succession .
Assisted animal geneticists in research area of gene
regulation : performed matings and maintained stock for
referral .
Assisted wildlife sanctuary manager in environmental
education programs , wildlife management activities , sanctuary
maintenance , exhibit construction , and administration .
Collected deer and dissected to determine herd health by
noting heart and kidney fat , presence of flukes in liver ,
lung worms and parasites in abomasum. Aged , sexed , and
measured health indices such as kidney fat , heart fat ,
presence of lung worms, antler beam diameter and and spread ,
and doe reproductive condition in hunter-killed deer in North
Carolina .
Supervised 38 persons : hiring , firing , scheduling , and
training of all personnel associated with the operation of
the lifts at a ski resort .
PREVIOUS EXPERIENCE:
CALIFORNIA DEPT. OF FISH AND GAME, Stockton ,
California
Fisheries/Wildlife Aid 1985
U .S. FOREST SERVICE, Wasatch-Cache National Forest ,
Evanston , Wyoming .
Range/Wildlife Technician 1983
NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL
HEALTH SCIENCES , Research Triangle
Park, Raleigh , North Carolina .
Biological Aid 1982
NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY , Buckley Wildlife
Sanctuary , Frankfort , Kentucky .
Assistant to Sanctuary Manager 1983
likA Engineering, Science, •echnology, Inc .
Keith Binkley/page two
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE , FISH AND WILDLIFE DIVISION ,
Fort Bragg , North Carolina .
Study Assistant , Assistant in Operations 1981-1982
PARKWEST SKI RESORT, Park City, Utah
Lift Supervisor 1984
EDUCATION:
B.S. ( fisheries/wildlife science) , North Carolina
State University, Raleigh , North Carolina 1982
•
EDWARD F. CHESLAK
BioSystems Analysis, Inc. Date of Birth: February 26, 1947
GGNRA/GGEC Bldg. 1064 Place of Birth: Duluth, Minn.
Fort Cronkhite Height: 5' 10"
Sausalito , CA 94965 Weight: 160 pounds
Bus. (415) 332-5880 Health: Excellent
Res . (415) 237-4436 Marital Status: Married
Education:
Ph.D. Wildlife/Aquatic Ecology 1982 Utah State University
M.S. Biology/Ecology 1976 San Diego State University
B.S. Zoology 1971 San Diego State University
Edployment:
1984-present BioSystems Analysis, Inc. Senior Aquatic Ecologist
Responsibilities and Experience: Project management;promotion/proposal
writing; supervision of aquatic staff; research on the application and
improvement of the Instream Flow Incremental Methodology; stream
temperature, PHABSIM and HEP modeling; development of aquatic and
terrestrial models for evaluating impacts of electrical generating
options; advisement on and application of statistics to analysis of
applied ecological data; field work in fisheries , IFIM analysis ,
temperature modeling, and water quality analysis; application of
microcomputers to environmental and fisheries science.
1982-1984 Texas Tech University Visiting Assistant Professor
Responsibilities and Experience: Member of graduate faculty; advised
and served on graduate committees of Masters and PhD candidates; taught
General Biology of Animals , Wildlife Population Dynamics and Analysis ,
Ecology and Conservation of Natural Resources, Wildlife Investigational
Techniques , and Biometry; research on affect of contaminants on aquatic
ecosystems, fishery community composition, and affects of herbicides on
small mammal communities.
1974-1982 Utah State University Research and Teaching Assistant
Responsibilities and Experience: Research assistant on an EPA Clean
Lakes Project on Bear Lake, Utah which evaluated the effect of nutrient
loading on its trophic status; worked on a variety of water quality
projects in lakes, streams and aquatic microcosms; served as a research
assistant on the IBP Desert Biome ecosystem modeling staff. Teaching
assistant for Ichthyology, General Ecology, Limnology, Natural Resource
Analysis , and Introduction to Natural Resources.
1
•
1973-1974 Abraxas Experimental High School Science Department Chairman
Responsibilities and Experience: Organized science curriculum in
private alternative education high school. This wasa coordinated
multidisciplinary program designed to stimulate, reward and improve
scientific knowledge and abilities. Taught general science, biology,
and advanced biology to students of varying age, ability, and
motivation.
1971-1973 San Diego State University Research and Teaching Assistant
Responsibilities and Experience: Research assistant for IBP Tundra
Biome Project; conducted studies on the feeding ecology of the brown
lemming for Masters Thesis. Also helped in a series of experiments on
lemming food preference and digestive efficiency, home range size,
population density and social behavior. Teaching assistant for General
Biology Laboratory, and General Ecology.
Publications, Reports and, Presented Papers:
Cheslak, E. F. , and J. Garcia. 1987. An evaluation of the affect of various
smoothing and curve fitting techniques on the accuracy of suitability
functions. In K. Bovee (ed. ) Proceedings of the Habitat Suitability
Criteria Workshop. Dec. 10-12, 1986. Colo. State University, Fort Collins,
CO. (In press) .
Carpenter, J. , and E. F. Cheslak. 1987. 1986 Annual Report: DeSabla- Centerville
Project (FERC 803) . Butte Creek Interim Temperature Monitoring Study.
Pacific Gas and Electric Co. , Dept. of Engineering Research. San Ramon, CA.
42pp.
Garcia, J. et. al. 1987. A draft technical report on riverine fishery studies
conducted in support of the Big Creek Expansion Project. Interim Draft
submitted to: Southern Calif. Edison Co. , Rosemead CA. 4 volumes.
Hagar, J. , and E. F. Cheslak. 1987. Development of statistical models for Butte
Creek water temperatures. Report submitted to: Pacific Gas and Electric Co,
Dept. of Engineering Research. San Ramon, CA. 18pp.
Orloff, S . , and E. F. Cheslak. 1987. Avian monitoring, study at the proposed Howden
windfarm site, Solano Co.: Phase 1. Report submitted to Howden Wind Parks ,
Inc. San Rafael, CA. 34pp.
Cheslak, E. , and J. Carpenter. 1986. Tailwater Ecology: Literature compilation.
Report submitted to: Dr. S. Campbell , Bureau of Reclamation, Denver CO.
130pp.
Cheslak, E. , and J. Carpenter. 1986. Tailwater Ecology: General introduction.
Report submitted to: Dr. S. Campbell , Bureau of Reclamation, Denver CO.
33pp.
2
• •
Cheslak, E. , and J. Carpenter. 1986. Tailwater Ecology: Upper Missouri region.
Report submitted to: Dr. S. Campbell , Bureau of Reclamation, Denver CO.
37pp.
Cheslak, E. , and J. Carpenter. 1986. Tailwater Ecology: Lower Missouri region.
Report submitted to: Dr. S. Campbell , Bureau of Reclamation, Denver CO.
25pp.
Cheslak, E. , and J. Carpenter. 1986. Tailwater Ecology: Southwest region. Report
submitted to: Dr. S. Campbell , Bureau of Reclamation, Denver CO. 17pp.
Cheslak, E. , and J. Carpenter. 1986. Tailwater Ecology: Upper Colorado region.
Report submitted to: Dr. S. Campbell, Bureau of Reclamation, Denver CO.
49pp.
Cheslak, E. , and J. Carpenter. 1986. Tailwater Ecology: Lower Colorado region.
Report submitted to: Dr. S. Campbell, Bureau of Reclamation, Denver CO.
19pp.
Cheslak, E. , and J. Carpenter. 1986. Tailwater Ecology: Pacific northwest region.
Report submitted to: Dr. S. Campbell, Bureau of Reclamation, Denver CO.
35pp.
Cheslak, E. , and J. Carpenter. 1986. Tailwater Ecology: Mid-Pacific region. Report
submitted to: Dr. S. Campbell, Bureau of Reclamation, Denver CO. 29pp.
Cheslak, E. F. , and J . Hagar. 1986. Environmental impacts of electricity generating
options: A methodology for incorporating site-specific information.
Michigan Electricity Options Study. Ann Arbor Mich. 31pp.
Garcia, J. , D. Abell, E. F. Cheslak, S. Orloff, and J. Lane. 1986. An analysis of
iron accumulation in Vermilion Valley Dam drain waters and effects on
benthic invertebrates of the Mono Creek drainage. Southern California
Edison Co. Rosemead, CA. 37pp.
Hagar, J. , F. Demgen, and E. F. Cheslak. 1986. Biological assessment of the Mt. View
Sanitary District wetlands enhancement program. Interim report submitted to:
D. Bogaert, Mt. View Sanitary District. Martinez, CA. 31pp.
Meyer, P. , E. Cheslak, G. Andrews, J. Garcia, and J. Hagar. 1986. Calculation of
environmental costs and benefits associated with hydropower development in
the pacific northwest. U.S. Dept. of Energy. Bonneville Power
Administration. Portland Oreg. DE-AC79- 83BP11546. 198pp.
Cheslak, E. F. , Y. Owusu, and J. Hagar. 1985. Effects of fish flow releases on Bass
Lake fisheries. Pacific Gas and Electric Co. San Ramon, CA. 7Opp.
Cheslak, E. F. , D. Stone, G. Miller, W. Davilla, G. Clifton, and J. Garcia. 1985.
Bellevue Mine Project: Environmental assessment. Environmental Management
Services Co. Fort Collins , CO.
3
• •
Garcia, J. , E. F. Cheslak, and T. Payne. 1985. Instream flow and related studies
for the San Joaquin River below Mammoth Pool Dam. Southern California
Edison. Co. Rosemead, CA. 147pp.
Johnson, B. , and E. F. Cheslak. 1985. Raptor abundance and distribution in relation
to a large wind turbine generator. Pacific Gas and Electric Co. San Ramon,
CA. 16pp.
Owusu, Y. , E. F. Cheslak, and J. Garcia. 1985. A preliminary analysis of bed scour
at the outlet channel of the Vermilion hydroelectric project. Southern
California Edison. Rosemead, CA. 16pp.
Owusu , Y. , M. Parton, T. Payne, E. F. Cheslak, and J. Garcia. 1985. A habitat
mitigation design recommendation for the outlet channel below the Vermilion
Valley Dam. Southern California Edison Co. Rosemead , CA. 16pp.
Cheslak, E. F. , and V. A. Lamarra. 1981. The residence time of energy as a measure
of ecological organization. Pages 591-600 in W. J. Mitsch, R. W. Bosserman,
and J. M. Klopatek, editors. Energy and ecological modeling. Elsevier
Scientific Publishing Co. , New York.
Innis, G. S. , and E. F. Cheslak. 1975. Systems ecology: An introductory course
sequence. Pages 25-34 in G. S. Innis, editor. New directions in the
analysis of ecological systems, Part 1. Simulation councils Proceedings
5(1) , La Jolla, CA.
Cheslak, E. F. 1985. The ecological benefits of peace: a best case scenario. Paper
presented at the 18th Annual Comparative Literature Symposium. War and
peace: perspectives in the nuclear age. Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX.
Jan 24-26 , 1985.
Cheslak, E. F. 1979. Activity patterns and runway utilization of the brown lemming,
Lemmus sibericus (=trimucronatus) . Paper presented at AAAS meeting in
Moscow, Idaho.
Professional Societies, Certificates and Honors:
Sigma Xi
American Fisheries Society
The Ecological Society of America
Certification in the USFWS Habitat Evaluation Procedure (HEP) .
Certification in the use of the USFWS PHABSIM Model (IFG 210) .
Certification in the use of the USFWS Instream Temperature Model.
Guest Lecturer (Jan. 1987) USFWS training course on use of Instream Temperature Model.
Graduate Tuition-Waiver Scholarships. 1976-1978. Utah State University.
References: Available upon request.
4
• •
EDWARD J. COLEMAN
1936 Hoover Ave.
Oakland, CA. 94602, U.S.A. (415) 530-6125
REGISTRATION:
New York State Professional Engineer, License Number 059425-1.
Applied for Comity Registration in California.
EDUCATION:
B.S. , Civil Engineering, State University of New York at Buffalo, 1977.
Majored in Environmental and Soils Engineering. Completed one-third of
course work for a Masters in Civil/Environmental Engineering.
CAREER:
BECHTEL GROUP INC.
Advanced Technology Division, Hazardous Waste Staff Engineer, San
Francisco, CA. 1985 - present: Responsible for preparation of Preliminary
Safety Assessment Report ( the Dept. of Energy's equivalent of a RCRA
Part B ) for Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory's new mixed waste
processing facility. Supervised field work, wrote contamination
investigation reports, feasibility studies and remedial action reports
for sites on California's "Superfund" list. Analyzed proposed nerve and
mustard gas incinerator for environmental impact, provided all
engineering input for RCRA permit and reviewed and coordinated the design
to insure that environmental protection requirements were met.
Hydro and Community Facilities Division, Construction Engineer, Saudi
Arabia, 1982 - 1984: Responsible for the construction management of
contractors building the infrastructure for a community of 2,000 homes on
5,000 acres. Total value of contracts were U.S. $200 million. Reviewed
work of on site A/E's. Temporarily assigned as Office Engineer to correct
major administrative problems. Supervised staff of 9 at 75-man office.
Instituted proper management controls and improved efficiency.
ACRES AMERICAN INC.
Buffalo, N.Y.
Staff Civil Engineer, 1980 - 1982: Evaluated, selected, designed and
prepared contracts for chemical and radioactive hazardous waste disposal
sites. Responsible for preliminary design, estimating costs and utility
demands for camps housing a total of 21,000 people at four large, remote
projects.
NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Buffalo, N.Y.
Assistant Civil Engineer, 1979 - 1980: Designed and prepared contracts
for highway and safety projects. Junior Engineer, 1977 -1979: Field
inspector and surveyor on a freeway construction project. Designed
drainage systems and erosion controls.
REFERENCES ON REQUEST
• •
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, Inc.
DAVID F. HANSON
Senior Scientist
Mr . Hanson is responsible for mathematical modeling, statistical
analysis and data base management in scientific projects. His
general expertise lies in the area of quantitative aquatic
ecology--in particular, instream flow modeling.
EXPERIENCE:
HYDROELECTRIC/INSTREAM FLOW: Developed inhouse computer
software patterned after U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Instream Flow Incremental Methodology ( IFIM ) including two
hydraulic simulation models, a habitat evaluation model, and
a stream network program. Participated in instream flow
studies covering 21 separate streams, at levels of
involvement including project management, agency
consultation, data aquisition, analysis and modeling, and
report production. Participated in a forum to review the
study plan of an interagency project to develop multivariate
habitat suitability functions for trout populations in
eastern Sierran streams. At request of USFWS Instream Flow
Group, directed field crew in collecting hydraulic data for a
project designed to evaluate feasibility of applying IFIM
WSP/HABTAT models to Eastern U. S. streams.
Participated in a series of national, EPRI-sponsored seminars
to discuss results of an EA comprehensive review of
methodologies used in instream flow studies.
MATHEMATICAL MODELING: Developed mathematical models of ( 1 )
trout reproductive success in the Truckee River, involving
reservoir management, temperature prediction, and early life
stage survival submodels, ( 2 ) trout habitat in sierran
streams, patterned after the IFG4/HABTAT models of the USFWS
Instream Flow Group, and ( 3 ) survival and percentage
reduction in populations of larval fish resulting from the
operation of one or more estuarine or riverine power plants .
Applied one-dimensional temperature prediction models to
river systems in Sierra Nevada. Applied stock-recruitment
( Beverton-Holt, Ricker, Schaefer ) models and Leslie matrix
population projection model to populations of striped bass of
the Sacramento San Joaquin Delta. Developed refinements to
the equivalent adult model for application to pacific herring
and northern anchovy populations in conjunction with San
Francisco Bay power plants. Reviewed three USFWS National
Power Plant Team publications dealing with mathematical
models used to assess power plant impacts on fish populations
for the Edison Electric Institute.
•
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, Inc.
David Hanson/page 2
BIOSTATISTICS/DATA BASE MANAGEMENT: Transferred 10 years of
California Department of Fish and Game Sacramento-San Joaquin
Delta fish and invertebrate survey data from Burroughs
computer to EPA IBM-based STORET storage system. Loaded six
years of California Department of Water Resources survey data
into SAS data sets from which two-and three-dimensional
graphical displays were produced, regression and ANOVA
analyses were performed, and a critical examination of the
current sampling design was statistically evaluated.
Developed single and multivariate statistical models defining
suitability of stream depth, velocity, cover, and substrate
to riverine trout populations. Experienced with IBM
mainframe computers working under TSO and WYLBUR, using SAS
and STORET packages. Experienced with microcomputers under
CP/M and PC-DOS operating systems. Proficient in the
programming languages FORTRAN, BASIC, and Pascal and the
software packages dBASE III+, SUPERCALC 4 , GRAFTALK,
STATGRAPHICS, and TURBO PASCAL.
DESERT ECOLOGY: Participated in review of the mathematical
model for the Desert Biome component of the International
Biological Program, including the testing of hypotheses
regarding interrelationships between plants and animals of
desert ecosystems. Worked as a consultant for the Pyramid
Lake Paiute Indian Tribe, studying and recommending
management alternatives for a desert lake/river ecosystem.
Assisted in a study of the statistical properties of
population estimates of desert birds and mammals using
various field sampling techniques.
EDUCATION:
M. S. (wildlife science/fisheries ) Utah State
University, Logan. 1978
B.A. ( zoology ) University of California, Santa Barbara . 1973
SELECTED PROJECTS:
Stream Habitat Suitability Research Project Currently
managing a research project designed to investigate
hypotheses commonly employed in IFIM studies regarding
preferred stream habitat of resident trout species.
Investigating the relationships between utilized habitat and
available habitat in the context of ecological niche theory,
in an effort to develop the appropriate algorithm for
defining preferred habitat . Examining the feasibility of
using multivariate statistical models such as bivariate
exponential polynomial models to describe habitat utilization
by resident stream trout .
• •
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, Inc.
David Hanson/page 3
Clayey River Project Currently managing fisheries and
instream flow components of environmental studies on the
Clayey River. Instream flow studies involve application of
the single-velocity IFG-4 hydraulic simulation model to seven
study reaches on the Clayey River and its tributaries,
including application of a stream network program.
Temperature modeling involved use of USFWS temperature
prediction model to predict instream temperature throughout
the entire Clayey River basin.
Lake Redding and Lake Red Bluff Hydroelectric Power Projects
Involved in data analysis and computer fisheries modeling
associated with these two proposed low head projects.
Haas - Kings River Project Managed instream flow study on
seven streams of the North Fork Kings River drainage,
involving a total of 18 study reaches . The study involved
the collection of hydraulic, substrate, and cover data for
use in the IFIM IFG4 and HABTAT models in conjunction with
habitat suitability functions derived from a concurrent
habitat preference study.
Eastern Sierra Instream Flow Study Performed an instream
flow study on five river basins in the eastern Sierra Nevada
range involving 22 reaches. In each case applied single-
velocity IFG4 hydraulic simulation model in conjunction with
HABTAT model . Developed stream habitat mapping techniques
utilizing aerial photographs in conjunction with ground
surveys .
Edison Electric Institute Review Project Managed a critical
review of several U. S . Fish & Wildlife Service National Power
Plant Team publications. Personally reviewed three
publications dealing with mathematical models for calculating
levels of impact on fish and invertebrate populations due to
the operation of estuarine and river power plants. Each
review contained a detailed description of the computational
steps used to arrive at an estimate of impact, a discussion
of the basic hypotheses and assumptions invoked, and
sensitivity analyses performed on selected input variables .
Aughwick and Sherman Creek Project Managed field data
collection effort for a U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service -
funded project designed to test the feasibility of applying
the IFIM to Eastern U. S. streams . Hydraulic data were
collected in 12 separate study reaches for analysis in the
WSP hydraulic simulation model .
• •
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, Inc.
David Hanson/page 4
Pittsburg and Contra Costa Power Plant 316( b) Projects
Developed mathematical model for calculating percentage
reduction in populations of larval striped bass associated
with the operation of two power plants in the Sacramento -
San Joaquin Delta. Developed an index of abundance for
young-of-the-year striped bass for use in a statistical
analysis of correlation between young-of-the-year and various
physical parameters of the Delta .
PREVIOUS EXPERIENCE:
W.F. SIGLER AND ASSOCIATES, INC. , Reno, Nevada,
Scientist 1977-1978
PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES:
American Fisheries Society
Society of Pacific Fisheries Biologists
SELECTED PUBLICATIONS AND REPORTS :
Morhardt, J.E. , D.F. Hanson, and P.J. Coulston. 1983 .
Instream flow analysis : increased accuracy using habitat
mapping, in Waterpower ' 83 , An International Conference
on Hydro- electric Power, pp 1294-1304 . Univ. Tenn. ,
Dep. Conferences, Knoxville.
Innis, G. S. , D.F. Hanson, and S. Haefner. 1981 . A
simulation xmodel of management alternatives in a
freshwater fishery. Ecological Modeling 12 ( 4 ) : 267-280 .
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, Inc. 1985 . Haas-
Kings River Hydroelectric Project Instream flow study.
Prepared for Pacific Gas and Electric Company.
Ecological Analysts, Inc. 1980 . Review of Selected U. S. Fish
and Wildlife Service/Office of Biological Services
Publications. Prepared for Edison Electric Institute.
111
EA Engineering, Science, & Technology, Inc.
J. EMIL MORHARDT, Ph.D.
Vice President, Director Western Operations
Dr . Morha:rdt is in charge of EA' s Western Regional Operations.
His technical expertise includes vertebrate physiology, ecology,
and population biology; computer modeling of habitats and
populations; and experimental design and data interpretation. He
has many years of experience representing clients in public
hearings, as well as experience as an expert witness.
EXPERIENCE:
HYDROELECTRIC POWER AND WATER RIGHTS: Overall project
responsibility for over 30 hydroelectric impact and
licensing studies conducted by EA during the last eight
years . Field experience in all disciplines on the major
projects, and a detailed technical knowledge of biological
and recreational issues and feasible mitigations. Extensive
experience in discussions and negotiations with agencies
regarding instream flow and recreational facilities, and in
presentations before the public and special interest groups .
Project Manager, City of Redding Hydroelectric projects on
the Sacramento River. Project Manager, City of Los Angeles
projects in the eastern Sierra. Principal investigator,
Electric Power Research Institute evaluation of instream
flow methods. Program Manager for instream flow studies on
Pacific Gas and Electric Company' s Haas-Kings River Project ,
and for Southern California Edison Company ' s eastside Sierra
projects . Program Manager, Modesto and Turlock Irrigation
Districts ' Tuolumne River Salmon Studies.
COMPUTER MODELING DATA ANALYSIS: Has written a variety of
computer models predicting the effects of stream flow
regimes on energy capacity, turbine mortality and fish
population dynamics. Developed expert systems for water
allocation and fisheries management decision making.
Experience in model sensitivity analysis, Monte Carlo
simulations, risk analysis, statistical inference and multi-
variate techniques.
AQUATIC ECOLOGY: Worked for California Department of Fish
and Game in inland trout management , including lake and
stream sampling, mark-and-recapture studies, and hatchery
and stocking operations . Designed and conducted nuclear
power plant environmental licensing studies at Missouri
River sites; interpreted marine biological data base of
Southern California Bight. Participated in intake/nearfield
data collection and analysis from over ten coastal and
estuarine power plants in California. Participated in
fisheries and macroinvertebrate studies in Sacramento/San
Joaquin Delta, Millerton Lake, and San Francisco Bay, as
well as offshore studies at Crescent City ( CA ) and
Winchester Bay ( OR ) .
•
EA Engineering, Science, & Technology, Inc.
Emil Morhardt/page 2
TERRESTRIAL ECOLOGY: Experienced with experimental design
and techniques of terrestrial plant and animal censuses,
inventories, and population size determination. Conducted
vegetation analyses in eastern U. S. deciduous forests and
flood plains, as well as Sonoran, Mojavean, and great basin
deserts; and in Sierra Nevada mountains. Conducted formal
surveys of mammals, birds, reptiles, and amphibians in these
habitats as well as in western and midwestern grasslands and
Pacific coastal settings. Conducted both locational
(tracking ) and physiological ( heart rate, body temperature )
radiotelemetry from unrestrained mammals and birds in the •
field. Mapped vegetation and habitat types from
monochromatic, true-color, and false-color infrared aerial
photography and from satellite imagery.
PHYSIOLOGY/TOXICOLOGY: Taught upper-division undergraduate
and graduate physiology for seven years at Washington
University. Conducted research in comparative vertebrate
and invertebrate physiology, with emphasis on tolerance to
environmental stress and perturbation including introduction
of toxic and hazardous substances; in mammalian, including
human and medical , physiology and pharmacology; and
performed anaesthesiology and surgery in small mammals and
birds .
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT: Wrote EISs, EIRs, and
various regulatory environmental exhibits ( such as 316( a )
and ( b) demonstrations; FERC Exhibits R, S, V, W, and E;
U. S. Air Force 19 . 2 environmental documents; and U. S. NRC
4 . 2 environmental assessments ) for projects ranging in size
from nuclear power plants and very large-scale missile
deployment to proposed residential developments, minor road
alignment, and flood control activities . These have
included siting and impact studies of pipeline and
transmission line corridors, as well as impacts associated
with new dams, new landfills, and POTW marine outfalls .
CRITICAL REVIEW: Referee for technical papers submitted to
the Journal of Applied Physiology, Physiological Zoology,
Journal of Theoretical Biology, and Canadian Journal of
Zoology, as well as for grant proposals submitted to the
National Science Foundation and the Electric Power Research
Institute.
EDUCATION:
Ph .D. ( physiology, ecology, biochemistry ) Rice University,
Houston, Texas. 1968
B.A. ( zoology, ecology ) Pomona College, Claremont,
California. 1964
• •
EA Engineering, Science, & Technology, Inc.
Emil Morhardt/page 3
PREVIOUS EXPERIENCE:
HENNINNGSON, DURHAM AND RICHARDSON, INC. , Santa Barbara,
California
Chief Scientist 1975-1978
WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY, St . Louis, Missouri
Assistant Professor of Biology 1967-1975
RICE UNIVERSITY, Houston, Texas
Teaching Assistant 1964-1967
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME, Bishop, Calif .
Seasonal Aide 1962-1964
PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES:
American Fisheries Society
American Society of Naturalists
Ecological Society of America
American Society of Mammalogists
American Association for the Advancement of Science
Society of the Sigma XI
PUBLICATIONS :
Morhardt , J.E. and E.G. Altouney. 1986 . Instream flow
requirements below reservoirs : Conclusions from the EPRI
study. Proceedings of the 1985 North American Lake
Management Society International Symposium.
Morhardt, J. E. and D. Hanson. 1986 . The impossibility of
converting habitat utilization data obtained from natural
populations into accurate preference functions. In K. Bovee
( ed. ) Proceeding of the Habitat Suitability Criteria
Workshop. Dec. 10-12 , 1986 . Colo. State Univ. , Fort
CJollins, CO. ( in press ) .
Coulston, P. , D. Hanson, and E. Morhardt . 1985 . Habitat
Preference Studies for Trout in Westside Sierra Streams .
Paper presented at the 16th Annual Conference of the
California-Nevada Chapter of the American Fisheries Society.
Hanson, D. , J. E. Morhardt, and P. Coulston. 1985 . Curve
fitting techniques for use in habitat preference studies .
Paper presented at 16th Annual Conference of the California-
Nevada Chapter of the American Fisheries Society.
Morhardt, J.E. and E.G. Altouney. 1985 . Instream Flow
Requirements: What is the State-of-the-Art? Hydro-Review
Winter 1985 , pp. 66-69 .
111
•
EA Engineering, Science, & Technology, Inc.
Emil Morhardt/page 4
Morhardt , J. E. 1984 . Environmental considerations on
hydroelectric development. Paper delivered at the Pacific
Gas and Electric Company Energy Expo. , 1984 .
Morhardt, J.E. , D.F. Hanson, and P.J. Coulston. 1983 .
Instream Flow: Increased Accuracy Using Habitat Mapping.
Conference Proceedings Water Power ' 83 . International
Conference on Hydropower. Volume 3 : 1294-1304 .
Morhardt, J.E. , P. Coulston, and S. Moock. 1982 .
Comparative use of transmission line corridors and parallel
study corridors by mule deer ( Odocoileus hemionus ) in the
Sierra Nevada mountains of central California. Third
Symposium on Environmental Concerns in Rights-of-Way
Management ( February 1982 ) .
Morhardt, J.E. 1981 . Water releases and trout habitat : the
relationship in some Sierran streams. In: Proceedings of
Waterpower ' 81 , International Conference on Hydropower,
Washington, D.C. June 1981 . pp. 443-452 .
Morhardt , J. E. 1981 . Environmental effects associated with
the construction of new dams for small hydroelectric
facilities. Invited paper : Engineering Foundation
Conferences, Small Hydroelectric Development, New England
College, Henniker, New Hampshire, July 1981 .
Morhardt, J.E. , R. Davies, and R. Thompson. 1976 .
Environmental effects of Hyperion treatment plant sludge and
liquid effluent in Santa Monica Bay, in Report on Mini-
conference on Sludge Disposal Alternatives in the Ocean off
Southern California ( M. S. Isaacson and N.H. Brooks, eds ) .
Environmental Quality Laboratory, California Inst . Technol .
Memorandum, No. 19 .
Morhardt, J.E. 1975. Preferred body temperatures of small
birds and rodents: behavioral and physiological
determination of variable set points, in Ecological Studies,
Analysis and Synthesis: Biophysical Ecology ( D.M. Gates,
ed. ) , pp. 475-490 . Springer-Verlag, New York.
Morhardt, J.E. , T.H. Fleming, J.A. McCrum, P. Molt, and C.H.
Miller . 1975 . Metabolic rates of small homeotherms
immersed in a waterbath. Comp. Biochem. Physiol . 52A: 355-
357 .
Morhardt, J. E. and P. Molt . 1975 . Body temperatures and
heart rates of laboratory rats and belding squirrels during
behavioral thermoregulation. Comp. Biochem. Physiol .
52A: 701 -705 .
• •
EA Engineering, Science, & Technology, Inc.
Emil Morhardt/page 5
Morhardt, J.E. , D. Lattanzi, and C. H. Miller . 1975 .
Metabolic responses of unanesthetized rates to manipulation
of skin temperature. Am. J. Physiol . 228 : 575-580 .
Morhardt, J.E. 1973 . Temperature transmission from
biopotential radiotelemetry transmitters. J. Appl . Physiol .
33 : 397-401 .
Morhardt, J. E. and S. S. Morhardt. 1972 . Correlations
between heart rate and oxygen consumption in rodents. Am.
J. Physiol . 221 : 1580-1586 .
Morhardt, J. E. and S.S. Morhardt . 1970 . Correlations
between heart rates and oxygen consumption in birds and
rodents . Am. Zool . 10 : 516 .
Morhardt, J. E. 1970 . Heart rates, breathing rates, and the
effects of atropine and acetylcholine on white-footed mice
during daily torpor . Comp. Biochem. Physiol . 3 : 441 -457
Morhardt, J. E. 1970 . body temperature of white-footed mice
during daily torpor. Comp. Biochem. Physiol . 33 : 423-440 .
Morhardt , J. E. and S. S. Morhardt . 1969 . Field measurements
of mammalian metabolic rates using radiotelemetry of heart
rates . Am. Zool . 9 : 1093 .
Morhardt, J.E. and J.W. Hudson . 1966 . Daily torpor induced
in white-footed mice by starvation. Nature 212 : 1046-1049 .
OTT OTT WATER ENGINEERS, INC. rY'.
ftett
1 , •
C.
J 2334 Washington Avenue Redding, CA 96001 916/244-1920
£.� t ,,C l MAY 0 ? �s87 L
�I cE.
TRANSMITTAL ;:;p\. r: neo
�l'!.ti.=k:1T1oNs
TO: Mr. Emil Morhardt
EA Engineering Science & Technology, Inc.
41 lafayette Circle
Lafayette, CA 94549
DATE: May 4 , 1987
PROW: 8340 . 00
QTY DESCRIPTION
1 copy Scope of Work for Tasks 4 , 5 and 6 and Proposal
Information included in the Lake Redding
Project submitted to the City of Redding,
April 27 , 1987
1
COMMENTS: If you have any questions please do not hesitate
to call me - or Jack Humphrey of this office_
cc: Signed James C. Peterson, P.E.
Regional Manager
0 Handcarry 0 Greyhound/UPS 0 Spec. Del. q 1st Class 0 Express
Anchorage Bellevue Redding Santa Ana
/ • ••
Al 3 '
IOTT1GTT WATER ENGINEERS, INC.
...�`-
2334 Washington Avenue Redding, CA 96001 916/244-1920
1
A
April 27, 1987
1 R340 . 00
I
Mr. Rick Coleman
1 City of Redding Electric Department
760 Parkview Avenue
Redding, CA 96001
Dear Rick:
EA Engineering Science and Technology, Inc. , has retained Ott
IWater Engineers, Inc. , to work with them on the Lake Redding
Project salmon habitat analysis.
1 We will be working on Task 4 through 6, as well as providing
1 survey personnel on an as-needed basis. EA will utilize our
office as a local field office during the project.
I OTT staff hydraulic engineers set u
C-2
model for the upper Sacramento Rivercalibrated eE
in 1978 as referenced
RFP. We are aware of the limitations and assumptions of the
1 hydraulic model and can most efficiently improve the accuracy of
the HEC-2 simulation to meet Agency requirements. Please refer to
Mr. Dennis Dorratcague ' s resume for more information on specific
modeling experience of the Sacramento River.
I
We feel that the addition of our experience in hydraulic modeling
of the Sacramento River, as well as our local presence make the
EA/OTT teamwell qualified to complete the work in a timely
fashion.
Please add this letter and attached qualifications to the EA
proposal for your consideration.
Sincerely,
1
James C. Peterson, P.E.
Regional Manager
np
Enclosures
cc: Dr. J. Emil Morhardt, EA
Anchorage Bellevue Redding Santa Ana
• •
PROPOSAL TO THE
CITY OF REDDING
LAKE REDDING PROJECT
SALMON HABITAT ANALYSIS
TASK 4 - VERIFICATION OF THE EXISTING HEC-2 MODEL
Identify locations of three of the HEC-2 transects within 1 mile
of Keswick Dam and measure absolute water surface elevations at
two discharges: one less than 5, 000 cfs and one at the greatest
release the Bureau will make during the May through July 1987
study period (normally not over 15, 000 cfs, although 40, 000 cfs
would be desirable) . Water surface elevations predicted by the
HEC-2 model will be compared with those observed at the same
discharges and locations. The results of this verification
procedure will be discussed with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
at the Hydrologic Engineering Center and with other interested
agencies. The Corps will determine the existing and potential
accuracy of the model for predicting water surface elevations. If
the Corps concludes that significant model improvements are
possible using more cross-section detail, than we will perform
contingent Task 5.
TASK 5 - DEVELOPING A NEW HEC-2 MODEL
This task is contingent upon proving the existing model can be
significantly improved to within 0. 1 foot mean error (if possible) .
Set up and calibrate HEC-2 model on section of Sacramento River
between ACID dam and Keswick Dam. The transects available in Task
3 and other appropriate new transects will be added to the model .
New cross-section locations and expected improvement in model
accuracy will be documented at the Crops meeting in Task 4 .
• •
TASK 6 - UTILIZING THE HEC-2 MODEL RUNS
If the existing HEC-2 model is approved in Task 4 , the City of
Redding will supply the model results for the original HEC-2
transects and water surface elevations will be determined at the
new gravel transects using linear interpolation.
If a new HEC-2 model is developed in Task 5, the model will run
for water surface elevations at the ACID dam site of 485. 25,
487 . 5, 489 . 75, and 492 feet and under existing conditions with the
ACID Dam flashboards in place and removed at flows between 2 , 000
and 20, 000 cfs in 2 , 000-cfs increments and at flows between 20, 000
and 60, 000 cfs in 4 , 000-cfs increments. This represents alterna-
tives with 20 flow conditions and 6 dam conditions for , a total of
120 alternatives.
OTT WATER ENGINEERS, INC.
' OTT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
USING HEC-2
BY JOHN H. HUMPHREY AND
DENNIS E. DORRATCAGUE
Location Client Purpose
Paynes Slough William C. Johnson Floodplain Analysis
Red Bluff, California
Cow Creek County of Shasta Bank Protection
California
Olney Creek City of Redding Floodplain Analysis
California
Browns Creek USFS, Redding Fishery Enhancement
California
Arroyo Road City of Livermore Bridge Design
California
Grey Eagle Mine Noranda Mining, Floodplain Analysis
California Inc.
Sacramento River Tehama County Floodplain Analysis
California
Shasta River County of Siskiyou Floodplain' Analysis
California
Eel River Pacific Lumber Co. Bank Protection
California
Clear Creek Charles A. Dams Bank Protection
California
Bear Creek TKO Power Floodplain Analysis
California
American River City of Water Temperature
California Sacramento Model
Churn Creek Jaxon Enterprises Floodplain Analysis
California
Cottonwood Creek James Westlake Levee Design
California
\ Ott Water Engineers, Inc. i
r . 111 4
PROJECT EXPERIENCE USING HEC-2
Location Client Purpose
Salt Creek Virgil Weld Floodplain Analysis
California
South Cow Creek Nicholas Whitney Bridge Design
California
Shasta River ECC Engineers Bridge Design
California
Nicomas Drain City of Bridge Design
California Sacramento
Fourth of July Creek City of Seward Levee Design
Alaska
Russell Creek Alaska Dept. of Levee Design
Alaska Fish and Game
Eklutna Water Project Municipality of Pipeline Crossing
Alaska Anchorage
Little Susuitna River USCOE, Anchorage Levee Design •
Alaska
Tanana River USCOE, Anchorage Levee Design
Alaska
Tanana River City of Nenana Bank Protection
Alaska
Snake River Idaho Falls Hydraulic Analysis
Idaho
Missouri River Dan Rice Bank Protection i
Great Falls, Montana
Columbia County USCOE, Portland Floodplain Analysis
Oregon
Lacomb Hydropower TKO Power Floodplain Analysis
Oregon
Wakiakum County USCOE, Seattle Floodplain Analysis
Washington
White River Puget Sound Hydropower Design
Washington Power & Light
Elwha River USCOE, Seattle Levee Design
Washington
Ott Water Engineers, Inc.
/, - - 111
OTT
RONALD F. OTT
EDUCATION
Ph.D. , 1972, Civil Engineering/Water Resources, Stanford University
Engineer , 1969 , Civil Engineering , Stanford University
M.S. , 1967 , Civil Engineering , Stanford University
B.S. , 1966 , Civil Engineering , California State University, Chico
EXPERIENCE
As President and Senior Engineer/Scientist at OTT Water Engineers ,
Inc. , Dr. Ott directs and participates in technical aspects of
numerous projects. His broad background and expertise is reflected
in his diversity of water related projects in the fields of hydro-
power, hydrology, hydraulics, water resources, water quality , water
rights , groundwater, agricultural engineering and mining technology.
At OTT, and during his previous work at other major ' engineering
companies, Dr. Ott has completed projects for federal , state and
local government agencies , municipalities, water districts, research
organizations , industries and private development corporations. Dr .
Ott' s experience includes considerable work with the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission (FERC) and other agencies on hydroelectric
power projects , numerous detailed water quality and dynamics
modeling studies for private and agency clients as well as several
major water resources investigations involving basin-wide planning
and design, including water supply and wastewater.
Dr. Ott founded OTT Water Engineers , Inc. in 1978 as an organization
to provide water related scientific and engineering services to
governmental and private clients . That goal has been realized , as
the firm now offers a multi-office capability spanning the West
Coast and Alaska. Dr. Ott continues to perform key technical roles
on major projects. Major projects on which Dr. Ott has served as
Project Director or Senior Consultant are as follows :
o Performed a review of the Orange County Hydrology Manual for
the Orange County, California, Environmental Management
Agency. Dr . Ott also analyzed project feasibility for a
proposed 90-megawatt hydroelectric project in Central
California for the Orange County Water Agency.
o Directed combined sewer overflow (CSO) studies for the
Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle in a joint project with
Culp, Wesner and Culp Engineers. The study involved hydro-
logic analyses of storm events, hydrologic routing and
modeling and alternative analysis.
785A 1
# I
RONALD F. OTT
o Directed studies for major anadromous fish passage projects
at Dryden Dam and Tumwater Falls , Washington, and at White
River Falls , Oregon, for Bonneville Power Administration.
These projects involve fish ladder rehabilitation, design of
new ladders and design of trap and haul facilities as well as
environmental analysis and permitting .
o Led feasibility studies including on-site work for two small
hydroelectric projects in Washington for the Washington State
Energy Office , the Town of Index and the Colville
Confederated Tribes.
o Initiated a research and development with the U.B. Department
of Energy on efficiency improvements on cross-flow turbines
for certain classes of hydroelectric power projects.
Obtained R&D grants and conducted tests of appropriate
turbine configurations on a hydropower site in Northern
California.
o Designed water quality monitoring studies and performed water
quality modeling , using a QUAL-III varient, on 'the Fox and
Wisconsin Rivers , Wisconsin, the James River, Virginia, and
the Swannee River, Georgia.
o Directed studies for permitting and environmental analysis
for a FERC license on a 40 megawatt hydropower project on the
Pit River in Lassen County , California.
o Conducted hydropower site selection and feasibility studies
for the Toulumne Regional Water District. Seven sites were
studied for hydropower potential in the Toulumne and
Stanislaus River systems , totaling over 20 megawatts (mW) .
Detailed work plans were developed to prepare FERC licenses
and construct the projects at the two largest sites.
o Provided FERC licensing for four power projects and two dams
for the Oroville/Wyandotte Irrigation Districts. Projects
totaled over 60 mW and are located on the Feather River
System.
o Performed hydropower site selection and feasibility studies
on streams in Alaska, California, Oregon, Washington, and
Nevada for energy development companies.
o Completed FERC licensing State and regulatory permits for a
1.4 mW hydroelectric project on Winchester Dam on the North
Umpqua River in Roseburg , Oregon. Design, construction, and
management were conducted for the Winchester Water Control
District and Elektra Power Corporation.
785A 2 /�
RONALD F. OTT
o Provided design, FERC licensing , and State and local
permitting for a 1 . 2 mW project on Hat Creek, California.
Also completed predesign, FERC licensing , and power purchase
contracts for a 3. 6 mW hydroelectric project on Battle and
Digger Creeks in Northern California.
o Filed FERC short-form licenses, exemptions for private energy
companies on streams and dams throughout California, Alaska ,
Oregon and Nevada.
o Filed and had granted over 200 preliminary FERC permits to
generate hydropower on streams , lakes, and dams in California
for municipalities, private energy companies, and
individuals .
o Served as Project Manager on the Bailey Creek Hydroelectric
Project in Northern California. This was the first project
in the Western United States to receive a FERC exemption
under the 5 mW status of the 1980 FERC ruling for a
run-of-river project. The project is now generating power to
PG&E.
o Directed hydropower feasibility study for tailings dam for
Noranda Mining , Inc. , in the Klamath River Basin in Northern
California.
o Served as open-ended contractor providing assistance to
Department of Energy to provide technical assistance on small
hydroelectric projects in Oregon , California, and Nevada .
o Provided dam safety inspections and hydraulic analysis for
six dams in Utah for Utah Division of Water Rights.
o Directed water resource study for Municipal and Industrial
water supplies and needs in the Truckee River Basin,
California and Nevada, for the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation.
o Researched hydrological and environmental issues on the
Sacramento River and tributaries for hydropower, litigation,
and planning purposes.
Prior to forming Ott Water Engineers, Inc. , Dr. Ott was a Senior
Manager and Engineer for ten years for a major engineering firm.
The last six years were as Director of the Environmental and
Hydrologic Sciences Discipline. Representative projects in which he
was involved were:
o Performed hydraulic studies for a hydropower plant on the
Sacramento River for the City of Redding , California.
o Developed comprehensive quality and quantity models for
streams , rivers , lakes , and estuaries for Lake Washington
785A 3
-- -- - — - i
• •
RONALD F. OTT
and Green River drainage basins in the Seattle, Washington
area. Models included firm yield operation models for
hydropower and water supply reservoirs.
o Developed major stormwater runoff study and analyzed effects
on combined sewer overflow events for Milwaukee , Wisconsin.
o Represented the California Attorney General 's Office in an
interagency task-force to develop hydrologic models for the
Sacramento River to be used in flood damage litigation.
o Developed models to predict runoff and runoff quality from
forest, agricultural , and urban lands and their effects on
the San Joaquin River , Sacramento River, and the Delta for
the California Water Resources Control Board . Models
included water releases from hydroelectric and other dams
around the rim of the Sacramento and San Joaquin Valleys.
o Managed hydrologic studies and floodplain mapping of
estuaries and rivers at various locations across the U.S . for
the Federal Energy Management Agency ( FEMA) .
PUBLICATIONS
Fish Screens on Small Hydropower Projects (with R. Leidy, R.
Hunn) Northwest Small Hydroelectric Power Association
Proceedings. Portland , Oregon, November 1984.
Instructed course on Building and Operating a Small-Scale
Hydroelectric Power Plant at the University of California,
Berkeley, January 27-28 , 1982 , 1983 and 1984 .
National Water Feature Projects; Impacts and Mitigation (with R.
Hunn) Hydro Review II (4 ) Winter 1983 .
Small-Scale Hydroelectric Technology for Placer Mining , paper
presented at Alaska Miners Association Conference , Anchorage ,
Alaska , October 19-22 , 1983 .
Modeling Water Temperature in Lake Washington and Green River
Drainage , (with T. W. Holz and G. D. Farris) , paper presented at
the Ninth American Water Resource Association Conference ,
Seattle , Washington, October 14 , 1983 .
Small-Scale Hydropower Development on the Flathead Reservation ,
paper presented at "Energy Independence: A Challenge for Native
American Communities" , American Indian Studies , University of
California , Los Angeles Center, April 15-16 , 1983 .
Environmental Barriers to Hydro Development - The Instream Flow
Problem, paper presented at the National Alliance for
Hydroelectric Energy , San Francisco, California , May 4 , 1982 .
785A 4
RONALD F. OTT
Storm Analysis and Combined Sewer Overflow Storage , paper presented
at Pipeline ' 78 ' Conference , sponsored by SEWCPA, Milwaukee,
Wisconsin, February 16, 1978.
A Simulation Model for Water Quality Management in the Upper
Duwamish River Estuary, (with J.A. Layton, T. J. Bechtel , and J. M.
Buffo) paper presented at the Symposium on Modeling Techniques for
Waterways , Harbor and Coastal Engineering , San Francisco,
California, September 3 , 1975.
Water Quality Simulation and Application, (with Pio S. Lombardo) ,
paper presented at the Eighth American Water Resources Conference ,
St. Louis , Missouri , October 30 , 1972.
"Streamflow Frequency Using Stochastically Generated Rainfall" ,
(with Ray K. Linsley) , Proceedings of the International Symposium on
Uncertainties in Hydrologic and Water Resource Systems, Tucson,
Arizona , December 11-14 , 1972.
Streamflow Frequency Using Stochastically Generated Hourly Rainfall ,
Technical Report No . 151 , Department of Civil Engineering , Stanford
University , December 1971.
A Steady State Simulation of Small Amplitude Wind-Generated Waves ,
(with E. Y. Hsu and Robert L. Street) , Technical Report No. 39 ,
Department of Civil Engineering , Stanford University , August 1968.
REGISTRATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS
Engineer: California, Montana , Nevada, Washington, Wisconsin
Water Rights Surveyor: Nevada
PROFESSIONAL MEMBERSHIP
American Society of Civil Engineers
International Water Resources Association
Sigma XI
COMMUNITY SERVICE
Sacramento Valley Water Task Force , 1983
Board of Director & Vice President , Redding Chamber of Commerce ,
1979-1981
California Chamber of Commerce , Natural Resources Committee
Senate Water Resources Committee for Northern California
Technical Paper Reviewer, Environmental Journal , ASCE , 1976-Present
Member , Rotary International , Redding-East
SPECIAL SKILLS
Computer: Programmer and modeler in Fortran
Surveying : Registered Water Rights Surveyor
785A 5
DENNIS E. DORRATCAGUE
Hydraulic Engineer
Y
I �
•
EDUCATION
M. S . , 1974 , Civil Engineering, Colorado State University
B. S . , 1968 , Aerospace Engineering, University of Notre Dame
EXPERIENCE
Mr. Dorratcague is a principal of Ott Water Engineers. He has been •
working in the field of hydrology and hydraulics since 1972 . His
main area of concentration has been hydropower, urban runoff, sewer
system studies, computer modeling of hydrology, hydrodynamics, and
water quality. His experience on projects includes the following: •
o Project Manager and Engineer for the HEC-2 hydraulic
study of the Sacramento River between ACID diversion and
Keswick Dam. This project is the original 1978 study
referenced in the RFP. Mr. Dorratcague was the only •
staff on this study while at CH2M Hill Engineers .
o Employed hydraulic and hydrologic computer analyses for a
flood control feasibility study of the Humboldt River and
its tributaries in Nevada utilizing HEC-1 and HEC-2 .
Computed ficod and flcodway boundaries . Evaluated,
sized, and costed spillways for three flood control
reservoirs .
o Managed the hydraulic analyses for flood insurance
studies in Columbia County, Oregon and Wahkiakum County,
Washington. The work included HEC-2 backwater analyses
to compute flood levels and floodway widths .
o Designed two miles of levee along the Matanuska River in
Alaska . Work included scour computations , seepaca
analysis , and design of the levee, bank protection and
flood gate.
o Project Manager for the preliminary design for a 2000-cfs
fish screen project and a 13-foot high, 200-foot wide
barrier dam in Western Washington. The work included
hydraulics, civil , mechanical , and electrical preliminary
design for the structure and its automatic regulating
gates and screen cleaning mechanisms .
486SP 1
Ott Water Engineers, Inc.
• 411
1 DENNIS E. DORRATCAGUE
o Project Manager for the design of a 372-foot long, 17-
foot high concrete ogee section dam. Dam was designed
for a 200-year, 150 , 000-cfs flood. Plans and
specifications were prepared.
o Manager of a drainage study for the greater CFesent City
area in Del Norte County, California. Work included
runoff modeling, flood routing, and the sizing of
culverts, storm sewers, and flood channels.
o Developed and applied hydraulic models for unsteady flow
simulation of the Fox River, Wisconsin, and the ship
canal in Stockton, California. Output from these models
were used for input to the water quality models. Mr.
Dorratcague applied a similar model to determine tidal
flood levels on Hood Canal, Washington.
o Performed two-dimensional hydrodynamic and water quality
modeling of Lake Wisconsin. Currents due to reservoir
operation and winds were modeled. Nine water quality
constituents were also simulated and the resulting model
} was employed to evaluate waste discharges from' a proposed
industrial plant.
•o Project Manager on a hydrology and fisheries study of the
Lemhi River in Idaho. This project was perforted for the
Bonneville Power Administration and included characteriz-
ing the low flows at critical reaches on the River.
Various alternatives were developed for facilitating fish
passage and developing fish habitat.
I I
o Designed several drop structures of various types ,
inverted siphons and check structures for irrigation
canals in Nebraska, Oregon, and California.
PUBLICATIONS
"Determination of Flood Levels on the Pacific Northwest Coast for
Federal Insurance Studies" , (Coauthors R. Black and
J. Humphrey) . Proceedings , Hydraulics Specialty Conference,
College Station, Texas, American Society of Civil Engineers,
1977 .
486SP 2
Ott Water Engineers, Inc.
111
• DENNIS E. DORRATCAGUE
i I
"Numerical Simulation of Storm Surges on the Pacific Northwest
Coast" , (Coauthors J. Humphrey) . Proceedings , Conference on
Coastal Meteorology, Virginia Beach, Virginia, American
Meterological Society, Boston, Massachusetts, September 21-23 ,
1976 .
"Remote Sensing of Mississippi River Characteristics" , (with J. F. •
Ruff, M. M. Skinner, D. B. Simmons, and B. R. Winkely) ,
Journal of Waterways , Harbors, and Coastal Engineering_
Division, American Society of Civil Engineers, May 1976 .
"Fish Screens for Hydropower Development" , (with George R. Leidy
and Ronald F. Ott) , Waterpower ' 85 , An International Conference on
Hydropower, Las Vegas, Nevada, 1985 .
"The Pacific Northwest Hydropower Data Base Study" , (with Jeffrey
King, G. Bradford Shea, and Paula M. Arsenault) , Waterpower
' 85 , An International Conference on Hydropower, Las Vegas,
Nevada, 1985.
REGISTRATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS
Professional Engineer in Washington, Oregon, Alaska, California
PROFESSIONAL MEMBERSHIPS
American Society of Civil Engineers
Tau Beta Pi--Honorary Engineering Society
I i
I I
I f
1If�1 i
486SP 3
Ott Water Engineers, Inc.
JOHN H. HUMPHREY
OTT Hydrologist •
Hydraulic Engineer
1
EDUCATION
Ph.D. , 1972 , Hydrology, University of Nevada, Reno
B.A. , 1963 , Meteorology, University of California, Los Angeles
EXPERIENCE
Dr. Humphrey' s experience includes 5 years as a Meteorologist with
the U.S . Air Force, after which he spent 4 years as, a graduate
research fellow in hydrology at the University of Nevada, where he
developed a snow cover computer model for predicting snowmelt, water
content , and temperatures. For Ott Water Engineers, Inc. ,
Dr. Humphrey has provided expertise on a variety of projects,
including the following:
o Project Manager for hydrologic modeling and flood plain
mapping studies on the Sacramento River and its sloughs
in Tehama County, California.
o Expert witness testimony in litigation on Clear Creek bank
erosion; Trinity County irrigation systems ; Red Bluff indust-
rial development flood hydrology, City of Redding highway
drainage, Eel River bank erosion, and Yuba River levee failure.
o Technical analysis of bed scour and lateral migration of
crossings of the Anchorage Eklutna River water transmission
line.
o Project Manager of the Northern California Coastal Flood
studies for the Federal Emergency Management Agency conducting
storm surge wave and tide analyses to determine coastal flood
hazard zones.
o Wind and wave analysis for Shemya Dock which involved meteoro-
logic and storm system investigations in the Aleutian Islands,
Alaska.
o Storm event analysis and hydrologic modeling for Metro ' s
(Seattle) Combined Sewer Overflow Project.
o Hydrologic analysis and fisheries enhancement studies for Lemhi
River, Idaho.
o Developed computer model algorithms for the Northwest Power
Planning Council hydrologic assessment of hydropower1projects.
o Flow-duration statistical analysis and synthesis of long-term
daily flow records for hydropower facilities design at hundreds
of locations in the western states .
`
786C Ott Water Engineers, Inc.
C i 111
JOHN H. HUMPHREY
i r
o Synthesized design storms and depth-duration-areal frequencies
of precipitation for stormwater runoff analysis and determined
flood peaks and volumes by computer simulation and graphical,
empirical, and regional methods.
o Analyzedsurface and subsurface runoff, groundwater recharge, •
and evapotranspiration for different land uses.
o Set-up, calibrated, and verified snowmelt runoff models for
use in operational river system simulations.
o Evaluated controls for diffuse waste sources contributing to
water pollution including agricultural return flow and urban •
runoff.
o Selected and installed hydrological and meteorological instru-
ments, including telemetry equipment, and analyzed meteoro •
-
logical factors affecting project siting, design, construction,
operations, and air pollution. •
o Hydrologic, hydraulic, and meteorologic impact 'studies and
environmental impact report preparation for an open pit gold
mine in northern California and associated permit activities .
o Baseline data acquisition and environmental impact study
preparation for water quality and meteorology for a lead-zinc
mine in northwest Alaska.
o Performed climatological , hydrologic, and water quality
impact analyses in environmental assessment reports for the
mining industry.
PUBLICATIONS
•
"Hydraulic Characteristics of Steep Mountain Streams During Low and
Hich Flow Conditions and Implications for Fishery Habitat" (co-
authors B. Shea, and R. Hunn) , Proceedings Syrnposii:m on Small
Hydropower, American Fisheries Society, Denver, Colorado, May
•
1985 .
"Modeling Design Flood Hydrographs for Glaciated Basins; in Alaska"
(co-authors R. Black and C. Newton) , Proceedings Cold Regions
Specialty Conference, April 1984, Edmonton, Department of Civil
Engineering, University of Alberta, Canada.
"Influence of Temperate Glaciers on Flood Events in Maritime
Alaska" (co-authors R. Black and C. Newton) , Manacring Water
Resources for Alaska ' s Development, Proceedings American Water
Resources Conference, Chena Hot Springs, Fairbanks, Alaska,
November 1983 .
786C 2 J
Ott Water Engineers, Inc.
111 •
JOHN H. HUMPHREY
"Estimating Flows in Unstable Channels Using Indirect Methods"
(co-author M. Randall) , Rivers ' 83 , Proceedings of a Hydraulics
Specialty Conference in New Orleans, Louisiana, October 1983 ,
American Society of Civil Engineers.
"Determination of Flood Levels on the Pacific Northwest Coast for
Federal Insurance Studies , "
( co-authors R . Black and
D. Dorratcague) , Proceedings Hydraulics Specialty Conference,
American Society of Civil Engineers, College Station, 'Texas, 1977.
"Numerical Simulation of Storm Surges on the Pacific Northwest
Coast" (co-author D. Dorratcague) , Proceedings Conference on
Coastal Meteorology, Virginia Beach, Virginia; American Meteoro-
logical Society, Boston, Massachusetts, September 1976.
Variation of Snowrack Density and Structure with Environmental
Conditions (co-author C. Skau) , Center for Water Resources
Research, Desert Research Institute, University of Nevada System,
Reno, Nevada, 1974 .
Allocation of Water Resources in the Lake Washington-.Cedar River
Basin, Washington, (co-author W. Blood) , presented at the Ninth
•
American Water Resources Conference, Seattle, Washington, 1973 .
• Numerical Prediction of Snowrack Temperatures in the Eastside
Sierra Nevada Using a Surface Energy Balance Model, (Ph. D. disser-
tation) University of Nevada, Reno, 1972 .
REGISTRATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS
Civil Engineer, California (C030512)
Civil Engineer, Alaska (CE7144)
Certified Consulting Meteorologist
Forensic Engineer (Member No. 208)
PROFESSIONAL MEMBERSHIP
National Academy of Forensic Engineers
American Society of Civil Engineers
National Society of Professional Engineers
American Water Resources Association
American Meteorological Society
International Glacialogical Society
U. S . Air Force Reserve (Lt. Colonel)
SPECIAL SKILLS
Computer: Programmer in Fortran and Basic
Reads Technical Papers in German
786C
Ott Water3ngineers, Inc. ,)
------ ----------
Alor______
110
CAROLE N. CROWE
T
EDUCATION
B.S. , 1979, Renewable Natural Resources, University of California,
Davis
EXPERIENCE
Ms. Crowe has participated in a variety of projects involving
surface water hydrology, water quality, and biological and physical
sciences. Her specific experience includes the following:
o Provided hydrologic analyses for various hydropower sites in
California, involving data collection and analysis, and
synthesis of hydrographs and flow-duration curves. Analyses
have been made in conjunction with projects such as the Big
Kimshew Creek project in Plumas National Forest for the
Oroville-Wyandotte Irrigation District.
o Performed field analyses for erosion studies in northern
California watersheds.
o Prepared flood studies to determine peak storm runoff, probable
maximum floods, and flood frequencies, . including a study of
Magic Dam Hydroelectric Project, Blaine County, Idaho.
o Determined design floods for glaciated basins using meteoro-
logic and hydrologic data to model synthetic hydrographs.
r
o Completed site selection, design, and installation of approxi-
mately 20 stream gaging stations utilizing float-type records
as well as electronic pressure sensing transducers and
recorders. Maintains gaging stations and prepared stage-dis-
charge rating curves, and reports mean daily discharge.
o Collected data and analyzed water quality for several projects
which involved coordinating work with various laboratories,
analyzing results, and performing biological and chemical
analyses.
o Assisted in site reconnaissance, data collection, and analysis
and design for various drainage control project's including
several mining projects.
o Assisted in coastal hydraulic analyses using storm surges,
tides, and waves to project coastal flooding.
o Conducted botanical evaluations for the identification of rare
or endangered species throughout northern California.
o Participated in instream flow studies used to determine
appropriate flows for fish habitat.
786C 1
CAROLE N. CROWE
o Thorough knowledge of techniques and operation of various
field equipment such as current meters, stream gage recorders,
water quality meters, fluorometersnoise meters, meteorologic
gages, sediment samplers, electrofisher, and survey equipment.
PUBLICATIONS
Humphrey, J. H. , C. J. Newton (Crowe) , and R. D. Black, Influence of
Temperate Glaciers on Flood Events in Maritime Alaska, 1983 .
Black, R. D. , J. H. Humphrey, and C. J. Newton (Crowe) , Modeling
Design Flood Hydrographs for Glaciated Basins in Alaska, 1984.
786C 2
— --- —