HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso 2022-015 - Authorizing The Filing Of Three Grant Applications For Airport Improvement Program (AIP) Grant Monies u�soLUT1aN No. 2oz�-ois
A RES(?LUTI�N QF THE C'ITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING
AUTH4RIZING THE FILING OF TI3REE GRANT APPLICATIQNS FQR
AIRPORT IMPROVEMENT PR4GRAM (AIP) GRANT M()NIES TO
ACCOMPLISH CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN PRQJECTS AT
REDDING MUNICIPAL AIRPORT AND BENTON AIRPARK;
AUTHQRIZING THE I'ILING OF ONE APPLICATION FC?R
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT UF TRANSPQRTATION AIRPORT
IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM MATCHING GRANT FUNDS; AND
AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER, OR DESIGNEE, TO EXECUTE
T�IE APPLICATION AND ALL SUBSEQUENT DOCUMENTATION
NECESSARY TtJ QBTAIN FAA GRANT MONIES AND MATCHING
FUNDS FROM CALTRANS AND APPRQRIATE THE FUNDING TO THE
AIRPQRT FUND
�VHEREAS, the United States Department af Transportation, Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) District Offi�e has recommended that applications for unencumbered
Airpart Improvement Program (AIP} Entitlement Grand Funds be submitted; and
�HEREAS, there is a significant need far the Airport Master Plan Update and the
Drainage Master P1an Impravements Study at Redding Municipal Airport, and the Runway 15-33
MAGVAR and TAXI�VAY "A" Pavement Preservation Construction at Benton Airfield; and
WHEREAS, staff recc�mmends the City of Redding apply for FAA AIP Grants in the
amount of$2,208,658 to accomplish the projects out�ined in Exhibit A, a true copy of which is
attached hereto and incorporated herein; and
WFIEREAS, it is in the best interest of the City of Redding that a Federal AIP grant be
acquired;
NOW, THEREFORE, �3E IT RESOLVED that for the projects outlined in Exhibit A,
the City Council af the City of Redding hereby authorizes:
1. The filing c�f an application for an FAA Airport Improvement Program Entitlement Grant
and Caltrans Airport Improvement Program Matching Grant far the Bentan Airfield
project; and
2. The City Manager, or his designee, on behalf of the City of Redding, to execute the �
application to obtain the necessary FAA funding to complete the project identified in
Exhibit A for Redding Municipal Airport, including the subsequent Acceptance of the �
Grant Offer, if awarded, and to appropriate a11 funds obtained for these projects to the �
Airport Fund; and �
3. The City Clerk to attest the signature of the City Manager, or designee, and to impress the �
afficial seals of the City af Redding on the aforesaid documentation, when appropriate. �,
�
t
I FIEREBY CERTIFY that the foregaing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular
meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the 15th day of February, 2022, by the
following vote:
AYES: Cauncil Members—Dacquisto,Mezzano,Resner,Winter,and Schreder
N(aES: Council Members—1'Vone
ABSTAIN: Council Members—None
ABSENT: Council Members—Nane
�� ti�µ.'��,
�f1����� �'.���.t-�ef��.�.���,.�
�
KRISTEN SC +'DER,Mayor
ATTEST. FORM APPROVED:
�
PAMEI,A MIZE, Ci erk BARRY E.DeWA ,City Attorney
EXHIBIT A
PROJECT Lt?+CATIQN FAA PFC's STATE AIRPORTS T4TAL
Airpart Redding $1,053,385 $108,522 $0 �4 $1,161,907
Master Plan Municipai
Update
Drainage Redding $504,751 $52,000 $0 $0 $556,751
Master Plan Municipal
Update
Runway 15- Benton $441,040 $0 �22,450 $2G,950 �490,000
33 Airfield
MAGVAR
and Taxiway
«�»
Pavement
Preservation
EXHIBIT A - SCOPE OF SERVICES
REDDING MURItCIPA� AIRPORT (RDD)
REDDING, CALIFORNIA
AIRPQRT MASTER PLAN
INTRODUCTION
This Airport Master Plan Scope of Services for Redding Municipal Airport (RDD) is being prepared
prior to initiatian of the study, to establish the goals of the project and framework from which all
parties to the project may participate. The objective of the Master Plan is to provide the
Sponsor (City of Redding) with guidance for future development which will satisfy aviation
demands and be compatible with the environment. Caordination between the Sponsor, the
Federal Aviation Administration(FAA}, the Consultant{Caffman Associates)and other parties with
an interest in the airport will be essential to bringing together all facts and data relevant to the
project and to developing a mutual agreement regarding future development at the airport. A
Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) comprised of key airport stakeholders will be established for
the study.
Required and generalized master planning objectives in this Scope will include:
� To research factors likely to affect air transportation demand segments in the City of
Redding and regional area over the next twenty(20j years inciuding the develapment of forecasts
for passenger enplanements, operations (commercial service, air taxi, generai aviation, and
military), and based aircraft.
• To determine prajected needs of airport users for the next twenty (2d) years, taking
into consideration recent revisions ta FAA design standards and the airport's conforrnance
requirements, commercial passenger and cargo trends, and the impact of general aviation fleet
transitions on design standards.
• R terminal building anaiysis to determine the future needs of the structure based on the
commercial enplanement and operatians forecasts. The result will be a determination of the
adequacy of the existing facility and alternatives ta address any future areas of deficiency.
• To recommend impravements which will enhance the airports' ability to satisfy future
aviation needs taking into consideration the potential for increased commereial passenger traffic
and general aviation needs.
• To analyze the airfield system to determine the existing and ultimate runway lengths
required to satisfy the airport's critical aircraft(s). This analysis will include future improvements
necessary to the airfield system {i.e., runway configuration)to aid in supporting forecast demand.
Alsa,the analysis will cansider the potential for closure and removal of any airfield pavement(sj nat
Coffman Associates A-1 RDD Master Plan Scope—1.5.22
deemed necessary andJor justified for future capital expenditures.
• To produce accurate base maps of existing and proposed facilities and updated Airpart
Layaut Plan(A�P)drawings cansistent with the FAA's Standard Uperating Procedure(SOP} No. 2.00.
Qigital Geographic Information System(GIS)data will be submitted into FAA'sAirportinformation Data
Portal(Aa1P)system as an "airspace evaluation". This task will conform to the Survey Requirements
Matrix contained in FAA AC 150j53�0-18B. The data wil! be submitted to the FAA AGIS system per
the Airpart Layout Plan (ALP) column of Table 2-1.
• To review future use and zoning of airport property and approaches to each runway for
future protection. This will involve the development of new noise exposure cantours.
= Landside development options to maximize revenue streams, including bath aviation and
non-aviation related activities.
• To establish a schedule of development priorities and a program fQr improvements
proposed in the Master Plan, eonsistent with the FAA's capital irnpravement program planning.
• Consider sustainability efforts, specifically waste and recycling improvements as part af
FAA's updated standards. An energy audit assessment of airport-owned buildings will alsa be
conducted to identify and quantify potential energy savings measures.
FAA REVIEW QF AIRPt?RT MASTER P�ANS
The F�,A plays a substantial role in reviewing and evaluating airport master plans for which they
have provided financial assistance. According to FAA AC 150J5d7�-6B,Airpart Master Pians, "the
recommendations contained in an airport master plan represent the views, policies and
development plans of the airport sponsor and do not necessarily represent the views of the FAA.
Acceptance of the master plan by the FAA does not constitute a eommitment on the part of the
United States ta participate in any development depicted in the plan, nor does it indicate that the
proposed development is environmentally acceptable in accordance with appropriate public law.
The FAA reviews all elements of the master plan ta ensure that sound planning techniques have
been applied. Nowever, the FAA only appraves the following elements of airport master plans:
• Farecasts af Demand
• Rirport �ayaut Plan
SUMMARY C}F PRIMARY GUIDANCE DOCUMENT5
A variety of guidance documents are referenced for each element and task contained in this scope
of services. Attachment A1 presents a summary table of the primary reference documents by task
as outiined in this scope of work.
Caffman Associates A-2 RDD Master Plan Scope—1.5.22
ELEIYIENT 2-STUDY INITIATION ANDC?RGANIZATION
The purpose of this element is ta allow for proper time to manage the project including the project
website, project updates with the sponsor, team management, and overall QAjQC.
Task 1.1 Study Design
Description: ln accordance with Federal Aviation Administration guidelines far the preparation of
master plans contained in Advisory Circulars 150j5070-66, Airpnrt Master Plans, and
15QJ53Q0-13-A,Change 1,Airport Design, prepare an outline of the basic elements of the master
planning work effort. Identify respective individual work tasks which will be necessary to meet
both the requirements set by the FAA and the sponsor for each element of the Master Plan work
scape. Prepare detailed descriptions of each individual work task which describe the specific work
effort involved and identify the result or product of the workeffort.
Responsibilities:
Consultant: Prepare work scope and budget.
Sponsor: Review work scape and budget.
Product: Work ScQpe and Budget.
Expenses: None.
Task 1.2 Establish Technica)Advisory Committee (TACj and Conduct TAC Kickoff Meeting
Description: Potential members will be identified and asked to serve an a Technical Advisory
Committee{TACj for the Master Plan.The TAC will be composed of airport stakeholders which
may include: a) representatives of FAA as well as other local, regional, state, or federal
agencies; b� airport baard, users, and tenants; and c) lacal community representatives. The
TAC, which is a non-voting body, will advise the Consultant on the content and
recommendatians af the Master Plan study through meetings and review of draft working
papers. The TAC will not exceed fifteen {15) members.
The initial,or kickoff ineeting, of the TAC will be undertaken during the initial inventory trip by the
Consultant. The Consultant will prepare meeting materials and lead TAC discussion to flesh aut
key goals and objectives for the study.
Responsibilities:
Consultant: Prepare meeting material far the TAC and canduct kickoff ineeting.
Sponsor: Distribute invitations and initiation materials ta TAC and provide meeting
room.
Product: Conduct TAC kickoff ineeting and make all meeting materials available on the
project website. If necessary, a virtual aption will be made available for the
TAC meeting.
Expenses: Trave)for one(1)Cansultant from Kansas City{MCI)ta Redding{RDD). Trave)
far one(1)Cansultant from Phoenix(PHX)to Redding(RDd). Lodging for twa
(2} nights, rental car for three (3 days}, and per diem for three (3) days.
Coffman Associates A-3 RDD Master Plan Scope—1.5.22
Task 1.3 Develop Graphic Schema and Project Website
Description: bevelop a customized uniform graphic schema for all presentation materials. The
graphic schema wil!then be used for cover art,chapter headers and footers,exhibits, display boards
and pawerpoint presentations and any ancillary material. The graphic schema will be used
thraughout the process to provide a uniform and professional feel to all materials.
Variaus project materials wiil be hosted on a custom project specific website developed by the
Consultant to allaw public access to project materiais. During the planning process, draft chapters,
TAC presentations and TAC handout materials will be available on the website. The website will
have a public invalvement section which wi{I include an FAQ sectian, notices of public informatian
workshops, and a public camment sectic�n. All comments will be reviewed by the project team and
pertinent comments will be addressed within the Draft and Final Master Plan documents. The
project website wiEl be hosted by the Consultant and a link will be available an the sponsar website.
The praject website will be available for the duration of the project.
Respansibilities:
Consultant: Develop project specific website. Host the project materials on a project
specific website.
Sponsor: Review and provide comment.
Product: Website access to project materials. Encourage use of the website ta
comment on the draft materials during the planning process.
Expenses: None
E�EMENT 2- INVENTORY OF EXISTING CONDITIONS
The purpose of this study element is to assemble and arganize relevant information and data
pertaining to the Redding Municipal Airport and the surrounding area.A series of inventory efforts
are necessary ta collect and arganize a variety of specific histarical, technical, legal,financial,
and planning data as described in the following tasks.
Task 2.1 Introduction Chapter
Descriptian: Develop a draft introduction chapter which clearly states the purpose and need for
the Master Plan project. It will include goals and objectives far the project, baseline assumptions,
elements included in the study, anticipated schedule, public involvement opportunities, and an
initial SWOT analysis developed based an discussion during the kick-off ineeting.
Responsibilities:
Consultant: Draft narrative and graphics for inelusion in the Introduction chapter.
Sponsor: Review and comment.
FAA: Review and comment.
Praduct: Draft Introduction chapter.
Expenses: None.
Coffman Associates A-4 RDD Master Plan Scope—1.5.22
Task 2.2 Obtain New Color Aerial Photography, Mapping, and FAA A'rrports-GIS
Aeranautical Survey
Description:The Consultant will assemble new digital electronic colar aerial photography and new
topagraphicjplanimetrie and obstruction mapping of the Airport and its environs in accordance
with FAA Advisory Circutars 150j5300-168, General G'uidance and Specificatians far Aeronautical
Surveys: Establishment of �eodetic Control and Submrssion to the National Geodetic Survey;
15�j530a-17C, Standards for Using Remote Sensing Technologies in Airport Surveys; and .ZSt1j53t?D-188,
General Guidance And Specifications For Submission Qf Aeronautical Surveys To NGS: Field flata
Coilection And Geographic /nformation System (G1S) Standards. Data wiil be collected for as
required in 18B table 2-1 {5urvey Requirements Matrix) far the project type "Airport Layout Plan".
Topographic and planimetric mapping will be collected ta the limits of the subconsultant scope (see
Exhibit B}. Aerial photography of the airport including existing airport property, as well as the inner
approach surface areas, will be obtained by the Consultant. The digital calor �rthc� photography
will be used for base mapping, exhibits and a deliverable to the airpart. The horizontal datum will
be NAD83 and the vertical datum will be NAVD88. The contour interval will be 2 feet.
Submit a Statement of Work, any additional required pre work plans and post collection reports to
the Airport Surveying — GIS Program Manager via the Airports Data Information Portal (ADIP)
website for review and approval. The airport survey will be tied to the National Spatial Reference
System {NSRSj according ta AC 150j5300-16B. The survey data collected during the project will be
formatted ta allow the data to be loaded directly into the FAA's Airports GIS system via the FAA's
ADIP web portal.
Object data collection will be performed within the limits described in Exhibit B. These objects will
be used to perform obstacle analysis for existing and future FAR Part 77 surfaces and Engineering
Brief 99a surfaces. Obstacles for the surfaces in ZSOj53t?0-188 will be collected by surface and
submitted to the ADIP portal.
The object data points may be supplemented v,rith other existing feature data sets including, but
not limited to, the FAA Digital Obstacle File (DOF), the FCC Antenna Registry (ASR), and the NOAA
Universal [7ata delivery Format(UDDF). Additional feature data collection, such as a supplemental
data collection flight, are nat part of this scope.
Portions af Task 2.2 are to be sub-contracted to a firm that specializes in AGIS surveys. This scape
of work is outlined in Exhibit B.
Responsibilities:
Consultant: AGIS survey and uploading of all AGIS required data to the FAA ADIP web
portal.
Sponsor: Initiate AGIS project via the FAA ADIP web portal and allow direct access ta
the consultant. Facilitate airport access far ground survey crews.
Subconsultant: Martinez Geospatial will be responsible for collectian and processing of data.
Coffman Associates A-5 RDD Master Plan Scope—1.5.22
Product: New digital color Ortho photography and tapographicJplanimetric and object
callection for use in preparing base maps, airport layout plan, and airspace
and inner approach surface drawings. Survey data uploaded into FAA`s ADIP
system. Will meet the requirements of FAA ACs 150j53a0-16B, 17C,and 18B
cansistent with what is provided in Exhibit B (AGIS Scope af Work).
Expenses: None.
Task 2.3 Inventory Airport Faeilities
Description: Perform inventories af physicai facilities and existing land uses within the present
boundaries of the Redding Municipal Airport. These inventories will identify and describe
existing faeilities as to age,type,ownership,and eonditian,as weli as changes to building conditions
and uses sinee the completion of the last Master Plan,and will include,as a minimum,the following
items.
• Airfield: Runways, taxiways, aprons, lighting and marking, navigational aids.
• Terminal Area:Terminal building, access, and parking.
• General Aviation Areas: Square footage ofhangars, ramp areas.
• Military use areas (as applicablej: Ramp, access and parking.
• Air cargo: Sort building, ramp, access, staging.
• FBOJSpecialty Operatars: Leased area, airfield facilities.
• Support: Utilities, fire and rescue facilities (ARFF), fueling facilities, maintenance areas.
• Other areas: Airport tenants including military facilities (as necessary).
• Wildlife Hazards: summarize known wildlife issues.
• AdditionaCon—airportandoff—airpartlanduses.
In addition, all available plans, specifications, maps, photographs, drawings, and other data,
including FAA Master Records {or ather records maintained by the FAA}, or ather reports or
studies considered to be relevant, will be obtained for possible use during the study. This task
includes an on-site inventory trip to gather data, taur the airport facilities, and to conduct in-
persan interviews with airport staff and relevant airport tenants as necessary.
Responsibilities:
CQnsultant: Conduct a camplete inventary af the airport facilities to accumulate
pertinent data including an on-site tour c�f facilities and in-person interviews
with airport staff and airport tenants as necessary.
Sponsor: Pravide the Consultant access to the airport property and airport
records as necessary.
Product: Tabulated airport facilities inventory for input ta fater tasks, highlighting
changed canditians since the last Master Plan was prepared.
Expenses: Trip for two Consultants to RDD for inventory and TAC kick-off ineeting
included in Task 1.2.
Caffman Associates A-6 RDD Master Plan Scope—1.5.22
Task 2.4 Inventory Commercial Airline,Air Traffic Activity, and Airspace
Description: A detailed review of availabie informatian pertaining to air traffic and passenger
activity at the Redding Municipal Airport will be performed for the past 2d—year period. Data
collection wifl include an inventory count of aircraft based at the Airport by aircraft type,
enplaning and deplaning passenger data as reported to RDD, air cargo (as available} and fuel
sales maintained by the Airport or fixed base operators. The information will be collected in
various formats far forecasting purposes.
Air traffic activity data for the airport will be assembled and organized fram various sources such as
the FAA's Traffic Flow Management System Count(TFMSC�, FAA's National Based Aircraft inventory
Program (www.basedaircraft.com), GCR's Airport IQ and other validated and acceptable sources
per the �AA. Relevant data on commercial, general aviation (private and corporate}, air taxi, and
mlitary activity will be collected. Data will be obtained from the Sponsor, the FAA Western-Pacific
Region San Francisco Airparts District Office (ADO), and Fixed Base Operators (FBOs). The
assembled data will include, as available:
a) Nistorical operations, including local {touch-and-ga) and itinerant operational splits.
b) Based aircraft by type, as available.
c) Estimated use (by percentage} of each runway.
Review and perform inventories of airspace and air traffic procedures at the airport. Conduct
interviews with airport officials, FAA representatives, pilats, and t�thers as necessary or apprapriate
to develop a camplete description of the existing airspace environment and current airport traffic
procedures. Basic inventory items will include:
a) Airport traffie patterns.
b} Approach and departure procedures.
c) Military airspace near the airport.
d) National ParksjWilderness Areas.
Responsibilities:
Consultant: Assemble data.
Sponsor: Assist Consultant in obtaining available airport reeords.
Product: Input to subsequent tasks.
Expenses: Nane.
Task 2.5 Inventory Local Plans, Land Uses,and Demographic Data
Descriptian: Obtain availab{e information concerning local land use, economic develnpment and
environmental plans, and demographic or economic factors which are likely to have a significant
impact on the demand for air transportatian in the Lincoln air trade area as well as those factors
that involve potential impact characteristics of the airport environs. Key information will include
the area—wide eomposition, characteristics, distribution, and growth patterns of the following:
• Population
• Economic base (business, income, and employment)
Coffman Associates A-7 RDD Master Plan Scope—1.5.22
• Present and projected land uses
• Existing and planned surface transpartation
• Long range transpartation plan
• Zoning ordinance(s)
• Height and hazard ordinaneejmitigation measures
Responsibilities:
Consultant: Assemble data based c�n latest informatian available.
Sponsor: Assist in collection of data.
Product: Input ta later analysis.
Expenses: Nane.
Task 2.6 Obtain Tabulated Wind �ata and Create Wind Roses
Description: The Consultant will obtain the mast current ten years of wind data for Redding
Munieipal Airport from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration - National Climatic
�enter andjor on—airport weather reporting aids for use in preparing an updated wind rose for
the airport (ayout plan. Develop IFR, VFR, and All-Weather wind roses.
Responsibilities:
Cansultant: Obtain tabulated wind data.
Sponsor: Caordinate with the Consultant as necessary.
Product: Tabulated wind data for use in preparing an updated wind rose.
Expenses: Nane.
Task 2.7 Prepare Introductionjlnventory Working Paper
Qescription: A working paper will be developed whieh will provide up-to-date information in
tabular, narrative, and graphic format. This will include informatian on the airpor# facilities,
applicable air traffic activity, access, averview of airspace, air traffic characteristics, and an
operations data summary describing aireraft activity for use in subsequent analysis. This task
involves the use of existing data for the airport. This includes an Introduction chapter.
Respansibilities:
Consultant: Develop complete narrative and graphics for the working paper.
Sponsor: Review and comment.
FAA: Review and comment.
Product: PDFs of the draft material.
Expenses: None.
ELEMENT 3—AVIATIt?N DEMAND FORECA5TS
This study element is intended to update the estimate of future levels of air traffic by quantity
and by characteristics that will identify the demand that is projected on the Redding Municipal
Coffman Associates A-8 RDD Master Plan Scope—1.5.22
Airport and the local socioeconomic characteristics contributed by the local area. The follawing
work tasks will be carried out as part of this element.
Task 3.1 Review Regiona)Aviatian and Socioeconomic Forecasts
Description: Review and analyze current local and regional socioecanamic forecasts obtained in
the inventory element. Similarly review the foreeasts and assumptions of the aviatian forecasts
prepared by the FAA for its Terminal Area Farecasts. The forecasts prepared for the last Master
Plan will also be reviewed and analyzed.
Responsibilities:
Consultant: Review all socioeconomic material pertaining to the study and the region.
Sponsor: Assist in identifying potential saurces af information and assist Consultant
in obtaining identified sociaeconomic material.
Praduct: Forecasts of expected socioeconomic factors and aviatian activity at
Redding Municipal Airport and other regional airports.
Expenses: None.
Task 3,2 Prepare Aviation Demand Forecasts
Description: Develop aviation demand forecasts using both simple and more complex
methodolagies (as necessary}, taking into consideration forecasts from other sources such as the
FAA. Historicaf aviation activity statistics fQr the airport will be organized to evaluate airport
peaking characteristics and fleet mix ratios. The methodology used in this analysis wil{ involve a
variety of techniques that will factor in national transportation statistics, local socioeconomic
faetors, as well as the independent airport data. Potential analysis techniques will include
relatively simple correlation and graphical comparison, as well as more complex regression
analysis. The forecasts shall result in estimates of aviation demand for five,ten and twenty years
including:
• Commercial Airlines Passertger and Cargo Projections
o Annual volume and mix of aircraft operations
o Passenger enplanements
o Air cargo (as applicable)
o Air taxi {related to scheduled or non-scheduled operations hauing fewer than 60
passenger seats
• General Aviation Projections
o Based aircraft by aggregate and fleet mix
o Aircraft operations by aggregate, itinerantJlacal
o �ther air taxi to include Part 135 and fractional ownership operations
• Peaking characteristics for aperations for use in demand capacity evaluatians
o Air Carrier
o General Aviation
Coffman Associates A-9 RDD Master Plan Scope—1.5.22
o Total airport
Responsibilities:
Consultant: Prepare aviation demand forecasts for the 20—year planning horizon.
Sponsor: Assist Consultant in obtaining available airpart records.
Product: Complete incremental forecasts for the years 2026, 2031, anc! 2041. These
forecasts will be coordinated with the FAA(for their approval)to ensure that
the study praceeds based on generally supparted assumptions.
Expenses: None.
Task 3.3 Identify Existing and Future Airport Design Critical Aircraft
Description: Utilizing data provided by the airport and that abtained from FAA database resaurces,
identify the current critical and future aircraft for the airport. The aircraft identified will be the
most demanding aircraft, or family of aircraft, canducting a minimum of 5Q0 annual operations.
The anaiysis will include a projection of aircraft operations by runway design code{RDC}and airport
reference code (ARC)to determine future planning design standards.
This analysis will outline the RDC for commercial airline and general aviation. Moreover, the
analysis wil! be considered far each of the airport's two runways, as applicable, ta determine
sufficiency in later tasks.
Consultant: Determine current critical aircraft and projection of future critical aircraft by
RDC and ARC.
5ponsor: Assist the Consultant in obtaining available airpart recards.
Product: �etermination of existing and future critical aircraft for airfield design. This
task will be coardinated with the FAA during the forecast review and approval
pracess.
Expenses: None.
Task 3.4 Prepare Forecast Working Paper
Description: A working paper will be developed which will pravide detailed results of the
forecasting effart. Since this data will become an important parameter for input into the remaining
elements of this Study, it will be submitted to the FAA far review and approval before dependent
tasks are finalized. If the forecasts differ from the FAA's Terminal Area Farecast by more than 10
percent in the five-year periad, or 15 percent in the 10-year period, the forecasts may need to be
revised andjor coordinated with ather FAA offices. At the FAA ADO's discretion,the forecasts may
need further coordination with FAA HQ. This task also includes time required to coordinate, make
changes, and/or modify the forecasts based on FAA review, comment, and approval.
Responsibilities:
Consultant: Develop complete narrative and graphics for #he working paper. Camplete
FAA TAF worksheets. Request FAR forecast reviewjapproval.
Coffman Rssaciates A-10 RDD Master Plan Scope—1.5.22
Sponsor: Review and comment.
FAA: Review and cornment.
Product: PDF's of the draft material.
Expenses: None.
Task 3.5 Conduct TAC Meeting No.2 and Public Workshop No.1
Descriptian: Meet with the TAC to present the draft material from Elements 1 and 2. �ead
discussion of the draft material and review the projeet schedule, progress, and subsequent work
efforts. This task will include holding an open—house style format public information workshop
the evening of TAC meeting. The workshop will allow for interested public entities to review project
materials and interact with the Consultant. Prepare graphic display andJor handout information
necessary to adequately explain draft material to date.
Responsibilities:
Consultant: Provide presentation material and necessary graphics for the meeting. Also
provide documentation allowing for the sponsor ta publish notiee af public
meeting.
Sponsor: �istribute meeting notices and arrange for meeting roam. Publication of the
public meeting notice are a reimbursable expense for the Sponsor.
Product: Conduct second TAC meeting for Master Plan study and post all presentation
material to the praject website. If necessary, a virtua! option will be made
available for the TAC meeting.
Expenses: Travel for one(1}Consultant from Kansas City(MCI)to Redding(RDDj. Trave)
for one (1}Consultant from Phoenix(PHX}to Redding(RDD). Lodging for two
(2) nights, rental car for three (3 days), and per diem for three (3) days.
Ten (10j 36x24 foam core mounted display boards for the public information
workshap. FedEx (or similar) 2�d day delivery of the display boards.
ELEMENT 4—F�ICILITY REQUIREMENTS
The purpose of this study element is to determine available capacities of various facilities at the
Redding Munieipal Airport, their conforrnance or non—conformance with FAA standards, and
identify the facilities that will be needed to meet cornpliance requirements ar projected demand
over the next twenty years.
Task4.1 Establish Physical PlanningCriteria
Description: Identify physical facility planning criteria for use in assessing the adequacy of various
airport facilities to meet forecast demands. These criteria shall be based upon the latest FAA
requirements and standards as they apply to the level of activity identified, new technology, and
role of the airport. These criteria shall include dimensional standards for safety including runway
length, runway separation, height restrictions, etc. In addition, these criteria shall include require-
ments to maintain airspaceJair traffic control including approach and runway pratection zones,
safety areas, and ather general physical area requirements such as apron, terminaljoperatians,
Coffman Associates A-11 RDD Master Plan Scope—1.5.22
access circulation and parking, hangars and services,administrative,ARFF, and other airport service
and support facilities.
Respansibilities:
Consultant: Develop physical planning criteria.
Sponsor: Review.
Product: Detailed criteria for airport physical planning.
Expenses: Rlone.
Task 4.2 Determine Airfield Capacity and �elay
Description: Using the FAA's airfie(d capacityJdefay model, estimate current and future levels of
airfield capacity (annual service volume) and delay for RDD. These analyses will be based on the
existing airfield configuration, aviation demand foreeasts, and an analysis of airspace capacity
potentials and constraints, and will involve the investigation of management and operatianal
procedures in order to optimize the use of the runways, taxiways, and aprons.
Respansibilities:
Consultant: Estimate airfield capacity and delay utilizing FAA guidance.
Sponsor: Review and comment.
Product: Detailed description the airport annual serviee volume for the current, 5, 10,
and 20—year time frames.
Expenses: None.
Task 4.3 Determine Terminal Building Capacity
Description: Based on the forecasts for passenger enp{anements and commercial aircraft
operations, develap terminal building capacity needs by functional area. The functional areas
include arrival, departure, concessions, rental cars,and eirculation needs. The result of this analysis
will indicate what terminal building elements need to be enhanced to accommadate both current
and future need. The analysis will also contemplate the possibility of a replacement terminal
building, if justified.
Responsibilities:
Consultant: Identify specific terminal building capacities and requirements.
Sponsar: Provide technical drawing of the terminal building. Review and comment.
Product: Detailed description of terminal building requirements necessary to support
passenger demand through the year 2041.
Expenses: None.
Task 4.4 Prepare Airfield Facility Requirements
Description: Identify physical facility planning criteria for evaluating the adequacy of the airside
facilities to meet forecast demands and FAA confarmance requirements. These criteria shall be
Caffman Associates A-12 RDQ Master Plan Scape—1.5.22
based upon the latest FAA requirements and standards as they apply ta the level of activity
identified and the future role of the airport. Dimensional standards and runway length
requirements based on FAA guidance will be examined and cornpared to existing facilities. Airside
facilities to be examined will include, but not be limited to the foliowing.
• RunwaysJtaxiways (service volume, length, width, and configuration).
• Runwayjtaxiway design standard confc�rmance.
• Line-of-sight requirements (pavement grade).
• Airfield perimeter fencing.
• Airfield pavement strength (using best available data).
• Airfield marking and lighting.
• Airfield navigational aids and weather observation equipment.
• Airpart traffic contro) tower needs (ATCT).
• Instrument approach proeeduresJvisibility minimums.
Responsibilities:
Consultant: Identify specific airside facility requirements.
Spansor: Review and comment.
Product: Detailed description of facility requirements necessary for airside
development to support forecast aviation demand through the year 2041.
Expenses: None.
Task 4.5 Prepare Landside Facility Requirements
Description: Using infarmation pravided by the aviation planning criteria established under
preceding tasks, develop a set of facility requirements addressing the landside facilities neeessary
to support the airfield and its related activity. The follawing are ineluded in the landside facility
analysis:
• Airline Passenger Terminal Capacity and ftequirements: Based on the aviatian demand
forecasts(primarily enplanements),determine current and future terminal building capacity
canstraints by functianal area {i.e., ticket caunters, labby, circulation, TSA security, hold
room, gates, departure processing, apron area, arrivals processing, concessions, building
systems, administratian, and operations).
• Access and Circulation Capacity Requirements: Includes analysis af airport entrance roads,
terminal loop road, ather airport aceess roads.
� Vehide Parking Capacity and Requirements: petermine vehide parking needs for the short
and lang term to include public parking, employee parking, rental car readyjreturnjservice,
and administration parking.
� Air Cargo Capacity Requirements: Analyze existing air cargo facilities on the airport for
individual parameters that will limit their capacity and estimate the maximum capacity af
each parameter. Based upon this information together with the foreeasts of air cargo,
develop an estimate of the type, size, and number of air cargo facilities that will be needed
in the future, including apron, building, vehicle, and truck parking. This exarnination will
include an evaluation of fleet mix changes that may be possible.
Coffman Associates A-13 RDD Master Plan Scope—1.5.22
• General Aviation Requirements: Analyze the need for additional general aviation landside
requirements inciuding an estimate of new hangar spaee (square feet), aircraft parking
apron and tie-down space, FBD facilities, access and parking.
• Support Requirements: Analyze the adequacy of existing support facilities and establish
projectians Of future needs. Elements to be analyzed include fue) storage capacity, ARFF
equipment and facilities, Snow Removal Equipment and facilities, airport maintenance
facilities, revenue support infrastructure.
Responsibilities:
Cansultant: Identify specific landside area facility needs.
Sponsor: Review.
Product: Detailed description of facility requirements necessary for landside
development to support forecast aviation demand through the 20-year
planning period.
Expenses: None.
Task 4.6 Prepare Facility Requirements Working Paper
Description: A draft working paper will be develaped v,rhich will provide detailed results of the
facility requirements effort. The draft working paper will document assumptions and
methodologies used in preparing facility requirements. Prepare narratives describing the
assumptions and methodologies used in preparing the facility requirements. Present facility
requirement informatian in tabular andjor graphical format.
Responsibilities:
Consultant: Develop complete narrative and graphics for the working paper.
Sponsar: Review and cornrnent.
FAA: Review and comment.
Product: PDF's c�f the draft material.
Expenses: None.
E�ENIENT 5-AIRPORT DEVELC?PMENT ALTERNATIVES
The purpose of this study element is to develop those airpart develapment alternatives that
appear most feasible and evaluate them to determine the mast prudent and feasible alternative
concept available for the airport.
Task 5.1 Establish Alternative �evelopment Issues
Description: Based upon the results of the facility requirements necessary to meet projected
demand, identify those issues which will impact the development of alternatives for the various
functianal areas of the airport. This task will provide insights into the potentials for and policies
constraining the development af specific land uses within the existing or future airport boundaries,
incfuding those areas which are unconstrained and meet current functional potential, thereby
requiring no additional development.
Coffman Associates A-14 RDD Master Plan Scape—1.5.22
Responsibilities:
Consultant: Establish alternative development issues.
Sponsor: Review and comment.
Product: Alternative development issues.
Expenses: None.
Task 5.2 Evaluate Potential AirfieldAlternatives
L?escriptian: The airfield facility requirements develaped in the previous evaluations will be
translated into a series of alternative plans for comparative evaluation in relation to the
established planning criteria. The analysis will address a maximum of three possible airfield
alternatives (in addition to the "do nothing").The alternatives with greatest potential for meeting
airside demand in the most prudent order will be evaluated. This analysis will focus on the
runway/taxiway system. Numerous graphic exhibits will be prt�duced to adequately show each
alternative.
Responsibilities:
Consultant: Deve{apment of airfield development alternatives.
Sponsor: Review.
Product: A series of development options, each af which will attempt to meet the
forecast airfield facilitydemands as well as FAA airfield criteria.
Expenses: None.
Task 5.3 Terminal Building Alternatives
Description: The terminal alternatives analysis will review the current and long-term plans for the
terminal building in relation to the updated forecasts and facility requirements from this study. If
growth levels over the planning period show that the terminal building needs to be expanded, up
to three expansion alternatives will be shown. These alternatives will address any functianal area
inadequacies (current and future) identified in Element 4 related ta the terminal building. This
analysis will be conducted consistent with FAA AC 150j5070-6B,Airport Master Plans, and FAA AC
15Qj5360-13A,Airport Terminal Plannrng.
Responsibilities:
Consultant: Review current and long-range terminal plans, identify and evaluate up to
three (3) alternatives addressing remaining terminal development issues.
Sponsor: Review and comment with input for refinements and preferences. Provide
detailed schematic drawing of the existing terminal building.
Product: A series af airline terminal impravement alternatives and documented
comparative evaluation.
Expenses: Nane.
Coffman Associates A-15 RDD Master Plan Scope—1.5.22
Task 5.4 Evaluate Potential �andside Alternatives
Description: Based on the facility requirements determined under the previous element, formulate
preliminary development alternatives. These alternatives will be based on concepts for
development within airpart boundaries which show ail necessary development during the planning
period and beyond. This task will be conducted simultaneously with other tasks in this element and
result in a series of overall development options for the airport.
Specific landside alternative issues tc�examine will include:
• Commercial air cargo facility development optians.
• Genera! aviation development opportunities.
• Support facility improvements to meet the demand outlined in Element 4.
• Nonaviation land development options for potential land use release
Respansibilities:
Consultant: Develap up to three (3) landside development options, one being the "no-
build" concept alternative.
Sponsor: Review.
Praduct: A series af landside alternatives which fulfill the facility requirements to meet
forecast demand levels.
Expenses: None.
Task 5.5 Prepare Alternatives Warking Paper
Descriptian:A working paper describing the variaus airside and landside development alternatives
will be prepared for submission to the TAC for review and comment. The working paper will detail
the analysis invaived in the assessment of the aiternatives and outline the advantages and
disadvantages of each to enable the logical and systematic evaluation of each alternative concept.
Responsibilities:
Cansultant: Develop complete narrative and graphics for the working paper.
Sponsor: Review and comrnent.
FAA: Review and comment.
Product: PDF's af draft material.
Expenses: None
Task 5.6 Conduct TAC Meeting No.3 and Pubic Workshop Na.2
Description: Prepare graphic display andjor handout information necessary to adequately explain
the draft material. Meet with the TAC to review the draft material, as well as to review the
praject schedule, progress, and subsequent work effarts. This task will include holding an
open—hause style format publie information workshop the evening ofTAC meeting. The workshop
will allow far interested public entities to review project materials and interact with the consultant.
Responsibilities:
Coffman Associates A-16 RDD Master Plan Scope—1.5.22
Consultant: Provide presentation material and necessary graphics for the
meeting. Also pravide documentation allowing for the sponsor
to publish notice of public meeting.
Spansar: Distribute meeting notices and arrange for meeting room.
Product: Conduct second TAC meeting for Master Plan study and post all presentation
material ta the praject website. If neeessary, a virtual option will be made
available for the TAC meeting.
Expenses: Travel for one(1}Consultant from Kansas City(MCI}to Redding{RDD}. Travel
for ane{1)Consultant from Phoenix{PHX}to Redding(RD�}. Ladging for two
(2) nights, rental car for three {3 days), and per diem for three (3} days.
Eight (8) 36x24 foam core mounted display bpards far the public informatian
workshop. FedEx(or simi{ar) 2nd day delivery of the display boards.
E�EMENT 6—RECOMMENDED MASTER PLAN CONCEPT AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PRC3GRAM
The purpose of this study element is to present a single consolidated Master Plan concept that
cambines both airside and landside recommendations. The recommended concept may be one of
the airside and landside alternatives studied in the alternatives section or, more likely, it will be a
composite utilizing the best elements of eaeh. A 20-year capital improvement programs identifies
potential projects is also presented.
Task 6.1 Recommended Nlaster Ptan Concept
Description: Following input from airport administratian, the TAC, and the public on the
alternatives prepared in the previous element, present a detailed comparative evaluatian and the
supporting rationale to sufficiently describe the single recommended program for development and
use af airport faciiities. The recommendation far the most prudent and feasible Master Plan
eoncept will become the basis far the final refinement af developrnent costs and scheduling.
Responsibilities:
Consultant: �evelop a recommended Master Plan concept.
Sponsor: Review.
Product: A detailed graphic that reflects the recommended Master Plan concept.
Expenses: None.
Task 6.2 On-Airport�and Use Classification
Description: Based upon the recammended concept presented in Task 6.1, an on-airport (and use
plan will be developed in graphic and narrative form. The on-airpart land use plan will first identify
all airport property needed now and in the future for aeranautical purposes. Any remaining land
will be identified as either aeronautical reserve or available far non-aeronautical revenue producing
purposes.
Responsibilities:
Caffman Associates A-17 RDD Master Plan Scope—1.5.22
Consultant: Develop an on-airport land use plan.
Sponsor: Review.
Produet: A detailed graphic that reflects the recommended an-airport land uses.
Expenses: iUone.
Task 6.3 Prepare Capital Pragram
Deseription: Develop a recommended 20—year airport capita) improvement program for Redding
Municipal Airport. The airport capital improvement program will identify individual projects for
each year thraugh the first five years of the plan, then prioritize projects through the intermediate
(6-10 year) and long term (11-20 year) periods. The list of prajects will be focused on those that
are eligible for FAA grant funding through the Airport Improvement Program.
Responsibilities:
Consultant: Qevelop a detailed capital program and list of projects to be considered aver
the next 20-years.
Sponsor: Provide review and input.
Product: Capital program for the 2C?—year planning period.
Expenses: None.
Task 6.4 CIP Cost Estimates
Description: Develop cost estimates(current dollars}for each project based on recent project casts
in the region. This task will be undertaken by the current airport engineer who is a subconsultant
on this praject. The cost estimates are to be planning level and subject to refinement when the
project becomes ripe for implementatian.
Responsibilities:
Consultant: Provide C!P list to subconsultant and review final cost estimates.
Subconsultant: Cost estimates to be developed by the current airport consulting engineer,
Mead and Hunt.
Sponsor: Review and provide input.
Product: Detailed cost estimates for each project in the CIP.
Expenses: None.
Task 6.5 Prepare CIP Develapment Schedule
Qescription: Prepare the airport development schedules for the recommended Master Plan
concept for Redding Municipal Airport. Prioritize projects based on FAA priorities (i.e. safety),
airport priorities,and anticipated grant funding. Items that are eligible for funding underthe Airport
Improvement Pragram will be identified in accordance with FAA {Jrder 5100.38D, Airport
lmprovement Program (A1P) Nandbook.
Responsibilities:
Coffman Associates A-18 RDD Master Plan Scope—1.5.22
Consultant: Prepare an airport development schedule and estimated costs.
Sponsor: Review.
Product: Development schedules and eost for the improvements proposed as a part
of the selected Master Plan concepts.
Expenses: None.
Task 6.6 Prepare Funding Source Outline and Implementation Plan
Description: Common sources of funding for implementation of the capital projects identified in
the study will be discussed. The primary funding source will be through FAA AIP. Other sources
including state grants and local sources wili be presented.
Responsibilities:
Consultant: Identify the primary funding sources for capital improvements.
Sponsor: Provide review and input.
Product: A guidance document for airport management to fallow vvhen considering
financing of capital projects.
Expenses: None.
Task 6.? Prepare Master Plan Concept, CIP, and Implementation Plan Warking Paper
Description: Prepare a detailed CIP and financial plan working paper which outlines the overall
airport capital improvement program for the selected airport development alternative. flrganize
narrative and graphical presentations Qf the information in this working paper to allow for a final
review and adjustment of the overall airport development concept.
Responsibilities:
Cansultant: Develop complete narrative and graphics for the working paper.
Sponsor: Review and comment.
FAA: Review and comment.
Product: PDF's of draft material.
Expenses: None.
ELEMENT 7—LAND USE COMPATIBILITY AND ENVIRC}NMENTAL ANA�YSIS
Task 7.1 Define 5tudy Area Boundary
Description: Using data and imagery acquired in Task 2.2, the boundaries af the area selected for
detailed analysis will be established. The study area will comply with guidance provided in Caltran's
Airport �and Use Planning Handbook and will generally follow boundaries of locally established
census tracts or traffic analysis zones, physiographic features, or political boundaries and
encompass an area somewhat farger that the Part 77 horizontal surface for the airport.
Responsibilities:
Coffman Associates A-19 RDD Master Plan Scope—1.5.22
Consultant: Define the land use study area boundary.
Sponsor: Review and comment.
FAA: Review and comment.
Praduct: A defined airport land use study area.
Expenses: None.
Task 7.2 Existing Land Use Analysis
Description: Review existing GIS land use maps, serial photography, general plans, and other
documentation of existing land uses in the area.
Responsibilities:
Consultant: Define the land use study area boundary.
Sponsor: Furnish Consultant with land use maps and data, as needed. Review the
existing land use maps produced.
FAA: Review and comment.
Praduct: Existing land use map for inclusion in the Master Plan.
Expenses: None.
Task?.3 Prepare Aircraft Noise Exposure Contours
Description: Refine the operational fleet mix as necessary in preparation for running noise
contours. Identify an estimate of the number of operatians by specific aircraft type. Compile
computer batch files for development of existing and future naise exposure contours using FAA's
Airpart Environmental Design Taol (AEDT) Provide computer plat of 65 QNL and higher contours, at
5 DNL increments, and areas (in square mi(es and acresj within each contour. Community Noise
Equivalent l.evel (CNEL) will also be plotted. Two computer modeling runs will be developed- one
for existing conditions and one for future conditions. The noise contours will be plotted on base
maps utilizing aerial photagraphy, if available,andfor best available mapping. No population impact
counts will be developed under the task. Information on foreeast operations will be obtained from
the forecast analysis in the Master Plan. Infarmation on traffic patterns and runway utilization rates
will be reviewed with the airpart sponsor. The results of the analysis will be included in the airport
plansf land use compatibility working paper. Digital copies of the AEDT analysis can be pravided to
the sponsor at the conclusion of the analysis if requested.
Respansibilities:
Consultant: Develop existing and future noise exposure contours.
Sponsor: Review traffic pattern and runway utilization assumptions.
Product: Existing and future noise exposure contours for the airport.
Expenses: None.
Task 7.4 Land Use Controls and Plans
Qescription: Review and summarize existing zoning ordinances, subdivision regulations, building
Caffman Associates A-20 RDD Master Pfan Scope—1.5.22
codes, and land use and transportation plans, and land use management documentatian in the
study area. Prepare tables and exhibits of the zoning, future land planning designation, and
improvements.
Responsibilities:
Consultant: Review reports and documents from area planning agencies and prepare
summary tables and exhibits.
Sponsor: Review and comrnent.
Product: Tabfes and exhibits for analysis in later tasks.
Expenses: Nane.
Task 7.5 Non-compatible Development Analysis
Descriptian: Based on information colleeted in Task 6.2, areas with the greatest potential for non-
compatible development when compared to updated noise exposure contours and Part 77
approach surfaces will be identified. It is anticipated that this area will not extend beyond one mile
from each runway end. Additionally, land use control inconsistencies will be identified. Growth-
risk areas will be categorized by type of land use.
Responsibilities:
Consultant: Responsible for this task.
Sponsor: Review and comment.
Product; Growth risk anafysis including mapping of non-compatible growth areas.
Expenses: None.
Task 7.6 �and Use Management Teehniques
Description: Identify various land use management techniques that could be applied in the airport
vicinity. These techniques may include,but not necessarily be limited to:ehanges in existing zoning
districts, creation of new zoning classifications, modification of other development regulations and
building codes, property and easement acquisition, and other mitigation measures. A review of the
California Division of aeronautics Land Use Guidance and its applicability ta planned improvements
at the airport will be included.
Responsibilities:
Consultant: Responsible far this task.
Sponsar: Review and comment.
Product: A list of recommended land use management techniques that rnay be
effective in promoting land use compatibility.
Expenses: None.
Task 7.7 Identify Airport Compatibility Issues and Policy Alternatives
Coffman Associates A-21 RdD Master Plan Scope—1.5.22
Description: Identify important naise, overflight, safety, and airspace compatibility issues based on
existing land use patterns, potential future development patterns, existing and forecasted noise
contours, and the compatibility guidelines from Caltrans Airpor# �and Use Handbaak. Based on
these issues, identify land use compatibility palicy alternatives for discussion and further
consideratian. These policy will be developed and subject ta refinement in Element S.
Responsibilities:
CQnsultant: Responsible for this task.
Sponsor: Review and cornrnent.
Product: A discussion of airport land use compatibility issues and policy alternatives
for inc{usion in a supporting appendix.
Expenses: None.
Task 7.8 Recycling Plan
Descriptian:The FAA Modernization and Reform Act af 2012 includes a new requirement for
airpnrt master plans to address recycling by:
• Evaluating the feasibility of solid waste recycling,
• Minimizing the generation of waste,
• Identifying aperations & maintenance requirements,
• Reviewing of waste management cantracts, and
• Identifying the potential for cost savings or revenue generation.
To develop a recycling plan that meets this FAA requirement, the Consultant will:
1. Collect baseJine information on the air,norYs waste management program. Meet with Airport
staff to understand how waste is managed at the airport and what current education efforts far
passengers, employees, contractors and tenants are already in place. In addition, callect
information such as waste callectian contracts, monthly wastejreeycling invoices, and the waste-
related costs for waste and recycling (containers, hauling, disposal, and laborj.
2. Assess existing waste management program.TQ understand the sources,composition,and
quantities of waste generated at the airport, conduct a facility walk-through, and an examination
of monthly wastejrecycling invoices.
3. Assess Qpportunities for expansion of recycling program. Review current waste collection
contracts and conduct research on current market conditions to determine whether there are any
logistical limitations to expanding the recycling program.
4. Develap recommendatinns ft�r improving the recycling prdgram. Based on the above
assessment af t h e a i rp o rt's waste and recycling program, develop recommendations for
improving the airport's recycling program as well as minimizing waste generated at the airpart.
Recommendatians will include identification of potential cost savings or revenue generation.
Coffman Associates A-22 RDD Master Plan Scope—1.5.22
Responsibilities:
CQnsultant: Develop Recycling Plan
Spansor: Assist in collection of data.
Product: Recyeling Plan
Expenses: None.
Task 7.9 Land Use Compatibility and Environmental Analysis Working Paper
Description: Prepare a detailed off-airpart land use compatibility and enviranmental analysis
wrorking paper. The land use compatibility analysis will provide information related to off-airport
land uses,theircompatibility with airport envirans,and recommendation to enhance the protection
of the airport from encroachment of incompatible land uses. The enviranmental analysis will utilize
the information from Task 1.3 and analyze the NEPA categories and the impact to them from the
recommended Master Plan caneept. The environmental analysis is intended to identify any projects
that raise an environmental "red-flag" that may require additional analysis or time to implement.
Additional environmental analysis such as an environmental Assessment may be required to
implement a project.
Responsibilities:
Consultant: Develop complete narrative and graphics for the working paper.
Sponsor: Review and comment.
FAA: Review and comment.
Product: PDF's of draft material.
Expenses: None.
Task 7.1Q Coordination Meetings (2x)
Description: Detailed land use analysis and policy recornmendations requires extensive
coordination with airport spansors. Two separate and dedicated meetings are planned to review
and coordinate the land use element of the Master Plan.
Respansibilities:
Consultant: Provide presentation and necessary graphics at the meetings.
Sponsor: Distribute meeting notices and arrange for meeting roQm.
Product: Coardination meetings focused an-airport land use compatibility and post all
presentation material to the projeet website. If necessary,a virtual option will
be made available for the meetings.
Expenses: Trave!for one(1}Consultant from Kansas City{MCI)to Redding(RDD). Travel
for one{1)Consultant from Phoenix(PHX}ta Redding(RDD). Lodging for two
{2) nights, rental car for three (3 days), and per diem for three (3) days.
Coffman Associates A-23 RDD Master Plan Scope—1.5.22
ELEMENT 8—ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
Task$.1 Environmental Inventory
Description:The purpose of this task is to obtain information regarding environmental sensitivities
on or near airport property. Sources of information will include past environmental dacuments,
agency maps,existing literature,and relevant internet sources.An inventory of existing conditians
for all resource categories outlined in FAA Order 1Q50.1F, �esk Reference, will be provided. The
resource categories are included in Table 1. Informal consultation with varic�us federai and state
agencies will occur only if needed informatian is not available through resourees (isted above. The
informatian obtained in this task is intended to identify any significant environmental resources
prior to the alternatives evaluation process in arder to lessen or eliminate environmental
requirements for potential project development. To be included in the Inventory chapter of the
Master Plan.
Table 1
FAA�rder 10S0.1F,Desk Referenee
Resource Categories
1 Air Quality 9 �and Use
2 Biological Resaurces 1Q Natural Resources and Energy Supply
3 Climate 11 Noise and Noise-Compatible Land Use
4 Coastal Resources 12 Socioeconomics, Environmental Justice, and
Children's Environmental
5 Department of Transportation Act, 13 visual Effects
Sectian 4(fj
6 Farmlands 14 Water Resources
7 Hazardous Materials,Solid Waste, 15 Cumulative Impacts
and Pollution Prevention
g Histarical,Architectural,
Archeological, and Cultural Resources
Responsibilities:
Consultant: Assemble data based on latest informationavailable.
SpQnsor: Assist in collection of data.
Product: Input into later analysis.
Expenses: None.
Task 8.2 Environmental Overview(NEPA)
Description: The purpose of this task is to identify pfltential environmental issues associated with
the airport development alternatives and recommended development concept, including
mitigatian measures that may be needed for proposed projects.
Coffman Assaciates A-24 RDD Master Plan Scope—1.5.22
Once a recommended Master Pian concept has been developed, a preliminary environmental
overview will be canducted using the information caliected to identify any potential enviranmental
concerns that must be addressed prior to program implementation. This evaluation will be
structured in a table format and will include an analysis of potential impacts on enviranmental
resources as defined within FAA's Order 1050.1F and its accompanying Desk Reference. Prajects
which may require further fUEPA analysis (i.e., Environmental Assessment or Environmental Impact
Statement) will be identified. This evaluation is not intended to serve as a formal Environmental
Assessment under NEPA.
Responsibilities:
Cansultant: Assemble data based on fatest information available.
Sponsor: Assist in collection of data.
Product: input to later analysis.
Expenses: None.
Task 8.3 Airpart Energy Audit
Description: Quest Energy, as a subconsultant, will perform an energy audit for the Redding
Municipal Airport as part of the Airport Master Plan project. The energy audit will identify,
prioritize, and quantify potential energy efficiency measures (EEMs) as well as renewal energy
opportunities. The energy audit will include all airport owned facilities. Qne on-site visit to the
airport is anticipated by the Subconsultant.
Responsibilities:
Consultant: Pravide guidance to the Subconsultant.
Subconsultant: Quest Energy, as a subconsultant, will do this analysis and supply the
summary report for inclusion in the Master Plan.
Sponsor: Assist in collection of data.
Product: Stand-alone energy audit document.
Expenses: Nc�ne. (Cost for subconsultant to trauel to RDD for a presentation is included
in the fixed fee cost of this task.)
Task 8.4 Environmental Analysis Working Paper
Description: Prepare a detailed environmental analysis working paper based on the recornmended
development concept determined in Task 6.5. The environmental analysis will utilize the
information from Task 8.1 and analyze the NEPA categories and the impact to them from the
recommended Master Plan concept. The environmental analysis is intended to identify any projects
that raise an environmental "red-flag" that may require additional analysis or time to implement.
Additional environmental analysis such as an Enviranmental Assessment may be required to
implement a project and will be prepared separately from this Master Plan.
Respansibilities:
Cansultant: Develop complete narrative and graphics for the working paper.
Coffman Associates A-25 RDD Master Plan Scope—1.5.22
Sponsor: Review and comment.
FAA: Review and camment.
Product: PDF`s of draft material.
Expenses: Nc�ne.
Task 8.5 Conduct TAC Meeting#4 and Public Information Workshop#3
description: Prepare graphic display andjor handout information necessary to adequately explain
assumptions and rationale supporting the recommended concept, CIP, financial plan, compliance,
environmentai overview, and recyeling plan. Meet with the TAC to review the materials, as weli as
to review the project schedule, progress,and subsequent work efforts. This task wiil include holding
an open-house style format pubiic information workshop the evening of TAC meeting. The
workshop will alfow for interested public entities ta review project materials and interact with the
consultant. Task includes preparation time for the TRC and workshop.
Responsibilities:
Consultant: Pravide presentation and necessary graphics at the meeting.
Sponsor: Distribute meeting notices and arrange for meeting room.
Product: Conduct fourth TRC meeting for Master Pian study and post all presentation
material to the project website. If necessary, a virtual option will be made
available for the TAC meeting. Conduct third Public Information Workshap.
Expenses: Travel for one(1)Consultant from Kansas City{MCI)to Redding(RDDj. Travel
for one{1}Consultant frorn Phaenix{PHX)to Redding(RDD). Lodging for two
(2) nights, rental car for three (3 days}, and per diem for three (3} days.
Five (5} 36x24 foam core mounted display boards for the public information
workshop. FedEx (ar similar) 2"d day delivery af the display boards.
ELEMENT 9—AIRPORT PLANS
The purpose of this study element is ta prepare a new Airport Layout Plan (ALP) set for Redding
Municipal Airport. All plans will be prepared in a farmat which camplies with the content contained
within FAA's current guidelines for the preparation of an airport layout plan as defined by the FAA
Airports ARP SQP 2.fl0 Standard Procedure for FAA Review and Approva( af Airport Layout Plans
(October 1, 2013), and which is readily acceptable to the FAA and can be utilized by the Sponsar in
carrying out implementation. All plans will be produced digitally using the data collected in Element
2 and any additional data the spansor may have or want to include. The digital plans and pdf files
of each sheet will be a deliverable item to the Sponsor at the completion of this project in CAD or
GIS format at the sponsors discretion. The ALP will be included as an appendix in the Master Plan
documents. A narrative consistent with FAA AC 150J507Q-6B-Section 202c wil) also be included in
the appendix that describes each drawing included in the A�P set.
The drawing set will include the depiction af all applicabie design standards contained in the latest
version of FAA AC 150J5300-13A, Airport Design, including but not limited to landing areas,
movement areas and aircraft parking areas (e.g., runways, taxiways, helipads, aprons, etc.),
Coffman Associates A-26 RDD Master Plan Scape—1.5.22
required facility identifications, description labels, imaginary surfaces, RPZs, taxiway safety areas,
runway and taxiways abject free areas, runway obstacle free zones and basic airport and runway
data tables. if necessary, data tables will be included on a separate sheet.
Task 9.1 Airport Layout Plan drawing
Descriptian: Following the Recommended Airport Master Plan Concept developed under the
preceding elements and FAA AC 15flJ5Q?a-6B, an A�P drawing far the airport will be prepared. The
ALP wiil reflect updated physical features, location of airfield facilities (runways, taxiways,
navigatianal aids),and existing landside develapment. Development of recommended landside and
airfield facilities, including runways and taxiways;property and runway protection zone boundaries;
and revenue support areas will also be shawn. Guidelines for the preparation of an airport layout
plan as defined by the FAA Airports ARP SOP 2.00 Standard Pracedure for FAA Review and Approval
t�f Airport Layout Plans(�ctober 1, 2Q13)will be followed. A Title Sheet and Airport Data Sheet will
alsc� be prepared and included with the full Airport Layout Plan set.
Responsibilities:
Consultant: Prepare a new ALP for the airport.
Sponsor: Review and comment.
Product: A new ALP drawing for the airport which meets federal guidelines.
Expenses: None.
Task 9.2 Terminal Area Drawing(s)
Description: Prepare Terminal Rrea Drawing(s) reflecting development resulting from the
recommendations of this study. Depending on the future recommended develapment for the
general aviation areas, more than one drawing may be required to adequately reflect the detail of
develc�pment within the area. The drawing(s) wilf include detailed planning leve! information sueh
as access taxiways, apron areas, hangar layouts, aircraft tie-down areas, customer and employee
parking areas, and vehicular circulation and access for the shart, intermediate, and long-term
planning periods.
Responsibilities:
Consultant: Prepare Terminal Area drawing(s}.
Sponsor: Review and comment.
Product: Terminal Area Drawing{s)reflecting the selected development alternative for
these facilities at the airpart.
Expenses: None.
Task 9.3 Part 77,Approach and Inner Appraach Surface Plans
Description: Prepare Part 77,Approach and Inner Approach Surface plans in conformance with FAR
Part 77 and FAA Airports ARP SOP 2.00 Standard Procedure for FAA Review and Approval of Airpart
Layout Plans (October 1, 2013). As necessary, height of patential abstructions will be researched
Coffman Associates A-27 RDD Master P(an Scope—1.5.22
and identified on the drawing along with an obstruction chartjtable indicating the obstruction
description,their top elevation,affected Part 77 surface,the penetration,disposition and corrective
actian to eliminate or mitigate the obstruction. Submittal of any identified obstructions to OEjAAA
for FAA airspace review is not included in this scope of serviees.
Respansibilities:
Consultant: Prepare a new Part 77, Approach and inner Approach Surface plans far the
airport. File new obstructions via the OEAAA system
Sponsor: Review and comrnent.
Product: Part 77, Approach and Inner Approach Surface plans for the airport to meet
federal guidelines. Product will include aerial phatography of the inner
approach surfaces and runway pratection zones.
Expenses: None.
Task 9.4 Qeparture Surface Drawings
Description: Prepare new departure surface drawings in aecardance with guidelines as defined by
the FAA Airports ARP SOP 2.00 Standard Procedure for FAA Review and Approval Qf Airport Layout
Plans (October 1, 2013). Obstruction information will be obtained fram the Part 77 obstruction
analysis completed in Task 9.3, appraach plans, and the current Airport �bstruction (OC) chart (as
available). This drawring wili follow guidelines in FAA Engineering Brief No. 99A, Changes to Tables
3-2 and 3-4 of Advisory Circular 150j530Q-13A, Airport Design.
Responsibilities:
Consultant: Prepare new departure surface drawings for the airport.
Sponsor: Review and comment.
Product: Departure surface drawings for the airport which meet federal guidelines.
Expenses: None.
Task 9.5 Airport Property Map
Description: Update the Exhibit A-Rirport Property Map, ineluding the appropriate graphics and
informatian to indicate the type of acquisition(i.e.,federal funds,surplus property, lacal funds only,
etc.) of various land areas within the airport's boundaries. The primary intent of the drawing is to
identify andjor delineate all designated airport property owned or to be acquired by the airport
owner. The drawing will inventory all parcels which currently make up the airport or are praposed
for acquisition by the airport sponsor. In addition, the drawing wili also show any property that has
been disposed of by the airport in the past. petails will be limited to the depiction of existing and
future facilities (i.e., runways, taxiways, runway pratection zones, and terminal facilities) which
would indicate aeronautical need for airport property. This work effort will utilize information
obtained from the current "Exhibit A- Property Map" as well as ather sources. The Property Map
will be updated in eonforrnance with the guidelines autlined in FAA Airports ARP SOP 3.00 Standard
�perating Procedure (SC}P}for FAA Review of Exhibit 'A'Airport Property Inventary Maps(Oetober
1, 2023). This task does not include a formal property deed search, instead the airport will provide
Coffman Associates A-28 RDD Master Plan Scope—1.5.22
histarical infarmation regarding the acquisition of existing airport property and easements,as well
as boundary surveys, as needed. If the sponsor is unable locate all the informatian needed to
complete the Exhibit A — Property Map ta FAA SOP 3.0 standards, then only an Airport Property
Map as defined in FAA SOF 2.0 will be developed.
Respansibilities:
Cflnsultant: Update the Airport Property Map for the airport.
Sponsor: Provide appropriate historical data and review Airport Property Map.
Product: Updated Airpart Property Map for the airport.
Expenses: None.
Task 9.6 On-Airpart Land Use Plan
Description: An on-airport land use plan for will be developed based on the identified averall
development concept. This will include general aviatian areas, terminal complex, ground access
and vehicular circulation system service areas, industrialJcommercial development areas, and
distinctions between aeronautical and non-aeronautical uses. The drawing will outline any non-
aeronautical land use plans so that future revisions to the ALP are not required shauld a land use
release is requested.
Responsibilities:
Consultant: Prepare On-Airport Land Use Plan.
Sponsor: Review and comment.
Product: On-Airport Land Use Plan and �ff-Airport Land Use Plan.
Expenses: None.
Task 9.7 Preparation of Draft ALP Drawing Set
Description: Preparatian of up to faur (4} capies of the "Draft" ALP drawing set for submission to
the Spansar, and subsequent comprehensive ageney review by the FAA. The ALP Drawing Set will
be prepared in conformance with FAA Airports ARP SOP 2.00 Standard Proeedure for FAA Review
and Approva(of Airport Layaut Plans (October 1, 2013). Drawings will be a minimum size of 24" x
36". FAA review will be concurrent. Drawings will be submitted with ar prior to publication af the
"draft" Final Master Plan.
This task includes time required to make changes during sponsor and FAA review and approval
process.
Responsibilities:
Consultant: Provide up to four (4} copies of the full Airport Layout Plan drawing sets,
depicting the sponsor selected "Recommended Plan" for sponsar and FAA
use.
Coffman Associates A-29 RDD Master Plan Scope—1.5.22
Sponsor: Provide up to four (4) unsigned capies of A�P drawing set to FAA for review.
Include signed transmittal letter indicating the changes from the last
approved ALP drawing. Provide two(2)fuil set af drawings to FAA for review.
Product: Up to four (4j copies of the fufl A�P drawing set as well as a completed FAA
A�P Checkiist. PDF and print capies.
Expenses: Printing of the A�P set.
Task 9.8 Preparation of Fina)ALP and Final ALP Drawing Set
Description: Revise the Draft Airport Layaut Plans and Drawings prepared in the previous task to
reflect comments received from the FAA review. Upon approval from the Sponsor, pravide four(4j
copies of the revised full ALP drawing sets to the Sponsor for their signature. The Sponsor will
forward the signed drawings to the FAA far finai approval. Electronic copies will be made available
and may be used for final appravals.
Responsibilities:
Consultant: Provide up to four (4) revised copies of the full Airport Layout Plan drawing
sets.
Sponsar: Review and sign all drawings. Forward all drawings to the FAR for final
approval.
Product: Up to four(4) copies of full ALP drawing set.
Expenses: Print costs for final ALP sets.
Task 9.9 ALP Working Paper
Description: Prepare a detailed wc�rking paper that describes each drawing in the ALP set. The
working paper will include the FAA standards being applied and the rationale for their application.
This working paper is a cancise summation of the Master Plan findings and a technical presentation
of haw those finding are depicted in the RLP set.
Responsibilities:
Consultant: Develop complete narrative and graphics fc�r the working paper.
Sponsor: Review and comment.
FAA: Review and comment.
Praduct: PDF's of draft material.
Expenses: None.
ELEMENT 10—PROJECT MANAGEMEIVT
Task 10.1 Project Management
Description: Prajects such as this demand a refined approach to project management to achieve
success. This effort includes communication among the project team far purposes of tracking
progress, administering records, launching project activities, maintaining the project schedule,
Coffrnan Assaciates A-30 RDD Master Plan Scope—1.5.22
managingjmitigating risks and solving challenges, invoicing and monitoring project budget,
preparatian of progress reports, and project close out. The project timeline and coardination are
anticipated to take place over a period of eighteen (18) months. Praject coordination in the form
of semi-regular pr4ject coordination conference calls/on-line communication is also included. This
task does not include on-site meetings {included in other tasks}. Approximately eight hours per
month are anticipated for project management, invoicing, and other project monitoring tasks.
Responsibilities:
Consultant: Provide project management far scheduled 18-month timeline.
Sponsar: As necessary aid consultant.
Product: Project management services.
Expenses: None
Task 10.2 Airport Management/Document Sharing Application
Description: This airport management application will be used to support and enhance certain
components detailed in the (Vlaster Plan to assist airport staff in the collection, organizatian, and
use of infQrmation including the AGIS survey (Task 2.2). The application is accessed through a
secure web page. Once lagged in, the users can establish new user accounts,set permissions,view
maps and modules, and run customized reports. Available madules include a base map and tasks
related data quality eontrol,airspace analysis,lease management,and wildlife hazard management.
This task includes the setup associated with the application website, logins, and 18-months use of
the application.
Responsibilities:
Consultant: Prepare and host the Master Plan management and doeument sharing
application.
Sponsor: Review and utilize during the Master Plan process.
Product: Applieation setup and 18-months use of the application.
Expenses: �ne time set up fee.
ELEMENT 11—�PTIONAL TASKS
The master planning process is dynamic and new informatian can emerge during the process that
requires additional analysis. Therefore,two optional tasks are included in this scope of service that
may be required if directed by FAA.
Task 11.1 Safety Risk Management(SRM)5upport Services
Description: An 5RM is a formalized and proactive approach to system safety applied through an
integrated collection of practices, procedures, and programs through risk management. FAA�rder
5200.11A, FAA Airports (ARP) Safety Management System, provides detailed guidance on the
potential actions that may trigger the need for an SRM process. One of those triggers is FAA's
Coffman Associates A-31 RDD Master Plan Scope—1.5.22
responsibility to review and approve a new or updated Airport Layout Plan (A�P). A new AL.P is a
deliverable of this Master Plan which may trigger the need for an SRM. All large, medium,and smail
hub airparts are required to incorporate SRM inta their planning documents. The FAA may elect ta
conduct an SRM at non-hub (i.e., RDDj and general aviatian airports as appropriate.
The purpose of this element is to compiete a safety assessment following guidance in FAA Order
5200.11A, should it be required by FAR. This will include assembling a panel of stakeholders and
safety experts to examine the hazards and risks associated with the recommended development
concept identified in Element 6. The panel meeting will not result in recommendatians for the best
or safest development cancept, instead the panel will determine mitigation measures, if necessary,
ta ensure the recommended development concept can function within acceptable risk levels.
Preliminary Coordination
Deseription: Coardinating teleconferences with FAA and RDC? to develop a plan and schedule for
the SRM. Caordination will include:
• Panel participant list and coordinatian requirements
• Meeting time and place
• Nandouts and visual aids
• General meeting structure and agenda
Conduct SRM Panel Meeting
Descriptian: The planning consultant, Coffman Associates, will pravide facilitatian services
(through a sub-consultant specializing in SRM facilitatian) and wc�rk with the FAA project manager
ta complete the SRM panel and subsequent documentation in accordance with FAA guidance. A
meeting note taker will be pravided by Coffman Associates (or the designated facilitatian sub-
consultant}. Caffman Associates will prepare and present an overview of the master plan and
alternatives to the panel during the SRM meeting. The purpose is to present a clear and concise
description of the alternatives and the recommended development eancept to allow ARM panel
members to quickly understand the relevant operational and safety factors. The presentation will
include an overview of the SRM process and description of the SRM requirements.
The meeting will be completed in ane day (either virtually or in-person). The meeting will result in
a draft Safety Assessment Screening for Airport Planning and Development Projects (SAS-1}. A
Safety Assessment Screening far Modification of Standards (SAS-2) will also be completed if
necessary. SAS for signatures will be obtained at the conclusion of the meeting.
Fina/Reports
Descriptian: Coffman Associates and the facilitation sub-consultant will prepare a draft final repart
on the deliberations and finding of the panel. The report will include final copies of the SAAS-1 and
SAS-2 {if necessary). The draft report will be circulated amang the FAA project manager, Coffman
Associates, and Airport management. A Final Report will then be produced that incorporates any
relevant comments.
Responsibilities:
Coffman Associates A-32 RDD Master Plan Scope—1.5.22
Consultant: Work with FAA project manager, and Airport staff to identify members of
the SRM panel. Identify and contract with facilitator sub-consultant.
SubconsuCtant: Meeting facilitator will attend SRM panel meeting, organize notes, and
prepare the draft report.
Sponsor: Provide location for the meeting unless one virtually.
Product: Meeting agendas, PowerPoint presentatian, completed SAS-1 and Sas-2(if
needed}, and the final repart.
Expenses: Travel for one(1) Consultant from Kansas City{MCI)to Redding{RDD). Travel
for one (1)Consultant from Phoenix(PHX)to Redding(RQD}. Ladging for two
(2)nights, rental car for three(3 days},and per diem for three(3)days. Travel
for one (1) Subconsultant from Kansas City(MCI) to Redding (RDD}. Lodging
for Subconsultant for two {2) nights, and per diem for three (3) days).
Task 11.2 RPZ Alternatives Analysis
Description: If the recommended concept identified in Element 6 includes any changes to the size
or location of the RPZs that wouid expand ar introduce incompatible land uses within any RPZ,then
the consultant wili develop a specialized RPZ Alternatives Analysis white paper as required by FAA.
The white paper will follow guidance in FAA Memorandum, fnterim Guidance on Land Uses Within
a Runway Protection Zone. The white paper will then be coordinated with FAA for review. The
result of the FAA review may require changes ta the recommended development concept. The
white paper wiil be included as an appendix to the master pfan. It shauld be noted that Draft FAA
AC 150j5190-4B, Airport Land Use Compatibility Planning was published for publicjindustry
comment on June 22, 2021. Should this draft AC be adapted during the ct�urse of this Master Plan,
then the relevant RPZ alternative analysis process presented in the AC will be followed.
Responsibilities:
Cansultant: Develop complete narrative and graphics for the RPZ Alternatives Analysis
white paper.
Sponsor: Review and comment.
FAA: Review and comment.
Praduct: PDF's of white paper.
Expenses: None.
ELEMENT 12—APPROVALS AND FINAL REPURTS
Task 12.1 Prepare Draft Final Master Plan Report
Description: A "Draft" Final Master Plan Report doeument will be prepared. This document will
incorporate appropriate comments, edits and corrections received during the review period. Ten
(1Q) copies of the "Draft" Final Report will be provided. The FAA will receive one {1} of the ten
capies. These copies are intended for the sponsor approval process and are not intended to be
distributed to the TAC. The "Draft Final" will be made available on the project website.
Coffman Associates A-33 RDD Master Plan Scope—1.5.22
Responsibilities:
Consultant: Prepare and print up to ten (10) hard copies of the Draft Final
Master Plan study and an eleetronic (PpF� version.
Sponsor: Review and comment.
Product: Ten (14} Draft Final Master Plan Reports.
Expenses: Cost to print ten (10) Draft Final Master Plan documents.
Task 12.2 Obtain Master Plan Approvals
Description: Coordinate final appraval of the Master Plan and ALP with the Airport staff. This task
wili include a presentation to the Redding City Council (or ather approving body} seeking approval
of the Master Plan. The Airport action desired is to direct the consultant ta obtain approval of the
ALP from the FAA. Includes preparation time for the presentation to City Cauncil.
Responsibilities:
Cansultant: Make a presentation to the Redding City Council (or other approving body}.
Sponsor: Caordinate presentation time and locatian.
Product: Redding City Council (or other approving body) approval.
Expenses: Travel for one (1} Consultant from Phoenix (PHX) to Redding (RDD). lodging
for one (1) night, rental car for two (2) days, and per diem for two {2j days.
Task 12.3 Prepare Executive Summary Brochure
Description: Prepare an executive summary brochure. The executive summary is anticipated ta be
an overview of the entire study, as presented in earlier technical memorandums. The executive
summary brochure is anticipated to be an 11x17 bi-fold brachure. 100 printed copies of the
executive summary broehure and an electranic PDF will be provided to the sponsor.
Responsibilities:
Consultant: Prepare the executive summary brochure.
Subconsultant: None.
Sponsar: Review and comment prior to distribution.
Product: Summary Report (printed and PDF).
Expenses: 100 executive summary brochures.
Task 12.4 Prepare Final Master Plan Repart
Description: Following the final review period for the "Draft" Final Master Plan Report, a Final
Master Plan Repart document will be prepared. This document will incorporate appropriate
comments and corrections received during the review period. Ten (10) copies of the Final Report
will be provided, as well as an electronic copy in a PDF format. One (1}of the printed copies(and a
digital copy)will be provided to the FAA. Note: FAA requires all deliverables in electronic format.
Responsibilities:
Coffman Associates A-34 RDD Master Plan Scope—1.5.22
Consultant: Prepare the Final Master Plan report incorporating all appropriate edits, and
comrnents reeeived during the review period.
Sponsor: Coordinate distribution of the final report.
Product: Ten (10} copies af Final Master Plan Report. Intended distribution is nine (9)
—Airport, one (1)— FAA.
Expenses: Ten (10) printed copies of Finai Master Plan Repart.
ELEMENT 13 — CA�IFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT {CEQA) DOCUMENTATI�N FdR
MASTER PLAN APPROVAL
The Redding Municipal Airport Master Plan Update CEQA documentation element has been
prepared to provide a detailed element and task description af the environmental study efforts
required to comply with CEQA. The objective of the Environmental Review and Documentation is
to provide the Sponst�r, community, and public officials with proper guidance regarding CEQA
environrnental documentation for the future development as autlined in the A,irport Master Plan.
Caordination between the Sponsor, State of California, FAA, and the Consultant will be essential to
bringing together all facts and data relevant to the project and to developing a mutual agreement
regarding the extent of the required CEQR environmentai documentation.
(Nvte: Etement 13 is not eligible for AIP funding as part of the Master Plan UpdateJ
Task 13.1 Initia) Study{CEQAJ
Description: Prepare an Initial Study, per the Sponsor's guidance, as the basis for the Sponsor's
determinatian whether the Master Plan qualifies for a Negative Declaration, a Mitigated Negative
Declaration, or wili require the preparation of an Environmentaf Impact Report (EIR). Utilizing the
aviation forecasts developed under a previous task, identify potential aperational issues assaciated
with the alternatives. Prepare an assessment of biological, wetland, noise, traffic, and air quality
impacts. The air quality emissians will be determined tasing the most current version of the EPA-
appraved Emissions Dispersion Modeling System. (Note: a dispersion analysis is specifically not
proposed under this task; should a dispersion analysis be required, it will be prepared under Task
12.4, Special Studies. In addition, additional environmental studies may be required to support
adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration, as well as preparation of an EIR. It is not possible ta
determine the scope or nature af such additianai studies at this time.)
Responsibilities
Consuitant: Develop narrative and graphics for Initial Study.
Sponsor: Provide Initial Study checklist and format. Review and comment on the Initial
Study prior ta submission.
Product: Initial Study.
Expenses: Cost to print Initial Study (up to 20 copies}.
Task 13.2 Deterrnine Environmental Documentation (CEQA)
Coffman Associates A-35 RQD Master Plan Scope—1.5.22
Description: Based on the initial Study, the Spansor will determine the appropriate form of CEQA
documentation for the proposed Master Plan Update. In the event that the completed Initial Study
shows that there is no substantial evidence that the proposed Master Plan may have a significant
impact on the environment, ar that mitigation measures incorporated into the Master Plan or
agreed to by the applicant wauld avoid any significant impacts, the Spansor may adopt a Negative
[?eclaration or Mitigated Negative Declaratian. If the Spansar determines on the basis of the
completed Initial Study that there is substantial evidence the Master Pian may have significant
environmental effects, ar that it is unclear whether the Master Plan would have such effects and
there is serious public contraversy andjor disagreement among experts cancerning potential
signifieant effects, a Notice of Preparation wil! be distributed indicating that an EIR will be prepared
for the project.
Responsibilities:
Consultant: Assist Sponsor in determining and distributing the Initial Study and any
Notice of Determination (for Negative Declaration ar Mitigated Negative
Declaration) or Natice of Preparation (for Environmental Impact Report).
Prepare twenty (20) copies of the combined Initial Study and Natice of
Determinatian or Notice of Preparation.
Sponsor: Determine whether ta adopt a Negative Declaration or IVlitigated Negative
Declaratian, or to prepare an Environmental Impact Report.
Product: Twenty(20)copies of the fnitial Study and Notice of Determination ar Notice
of Preparation.
Expenses: Cost for printing 2t�copies of the Initial Study and Notice af Qetermination or
Notice of Preparation.
Task 13.3 Additional Environmental Documentation (CEQA)
Descriptic�n:This task allows for the preparation of an EIR for the Master Plan Update as determined
under Task 12.2. The EIR document may be focused to address a limited number of potentially
significant impacts, as may have been identified in the Initial Study. The final scape of serviees and
cost for this task will be based on additional negotiations between the Spansor and the Consultant.
Responsibilities;
Consultant: Prepare an EIR as appropriate.
Sponsor: Negotiate the final seape of services and cost for the preparatian of the
additional environmental documentation.
Product: An Environmental Impaet Report (EIR}.
Expenses: Cost to print EIR as necessary (2Q copies)
Task 13.4 Specia)Studies
Description: During the course of the preparation of the Initial Study, consideration of the required
CEQA documentation,or preparation of an EIR(should either prove necessary},the need for special
studies may be identified. These may potentially include a biological assessment, air emissions
Coffman Associates A-36 RDD Master Plan Scope—1.5.22
dispersian analysis,aesthetics analysis,socioeconomic(demographics)analysis,and traffic analysis.
This section Qf the Scope is intended to accommodate the preparation of these special studies,
should they be required. Prior to initiation of any of these studies, the Consultant will notify the
Sponsor, providing justificatian for work ta be performed and a statement of reasonable cost to
ailow the Sponsor to evaluate the need for the special study and its necessity. Subsequent to this
determination, the CansuEtant wili obtain the written authorizatian af the Sponsor prior to
praceeding with each study. The final scope of services and cost for each special study prepared
under this task will be based on negotiations between the Sponsar and the Consultant.
Responsibil'rties:
Cansultant: identify the need and scope of each special study. Contract with a qualified
individual or firm for the preparation of each special study. Coordinate the
preparation of the special study.
Spansor: Suggestjrecammend qualified individual or firms. Negotiate the final scope
of services and cast for the preparati�n of each special study. Authorize the
preparation af each special study.
Product: Special studies as required.
Expenses: Cast of printing special studies (up to 2�copies)
Coffman Assoeiates A-37 RDD Master Plan Scope—1.5.22