Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - City Council - 1997-12-09 287 City Council, Special Meeting Council Chambers 1313 California Street Redding, California 96001 December 9, 1997, 5:45 p.m. The meeting was called to order by Mayor Ken Murray with the following Council Members present: R. Anderson, Kehoe, and, Mayor Murray. Council Member McGeorge was excused. Also present were City Manager Warren, Assistant City Manager Perry, Deputy City Manager Starman, City Attorney Wingate, Public Works Director Russell, Director of Development Services Swanson, Planning Manager Keaney, Human Resources Manager Bachman, Personnel Analyst II Niemer, City Clerk Strohmayer and Executive Secretary Sherman. CLOSED SESSION (P-100-050-120) Mayor Murray stated that the City Council will adjourn to a Closed Session to discuss the following: CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54957.6 Agency negotiator: Randy Bachman Employee organization: Redding Peace Officers Association At the hour of 5:45 p.m., Mayor Murray adjourned the regular meeting to closed session. At the hour of 6:11 p.m., Mayor Murray reconvened the meeting to regular session. No action taken. CITY PRIORITIES - Future Use of Redevelopment and Community Development Block Grant Funds (B-130-070) City Manager Warren reported that earlier this year the City Council discussed future expenditures of Redevelopment and Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds. The discussion revolved around a significant amount of money($20,657,000 over a five-year period) and how it can best be used to achieve long term goals of the community. Mr. Warren related that use of redevelopment funds is decided by the Board of Directors of the Redevelopment Agency (Agency), and the Agency's Ten Year Capital Improvement Plan is integrated with the City's Capital Improvement Plan to maximize the use of available funds. The Agency focuses on project areas and the City focuses on projects outside of these areas. The money has been primarily used for infrastructure, i.e., streets, bridges, etc. Mr. Warren explained that CDBG funds are reviewed by the Community Development Advisory Committee each year, and the use of the funds for the following year is recommended by the Committee to the City Council after applications have been submitted by various nonprofit organizations and City departments. While both processes are good, the City Council discussed the need for greater public participation to review a wider spectrum of projects and to consider putting the limited dollars to the best use possible. Mr. Warren advised that the Report covers two sources of funding, with the balance of funding available for capital improvements listed in the City's Five- Year Capital Improvement Plan. Mr. Warren related that in order to begin the review process of projects and unmet needs, the City Council appointed a five member citizens' Priority Committee to work with the City Manager to identify the projects most needed and desired. The members of the Committee are Jim Chapin, Dee Domke, Dick Green, Jan Maurer-Watkins, and Preston Wyate. City Manager Warren acknowledged . the Committee members and commended them for their hard work and dedication to the process. • 12/09/97 288 Mr. Warren related that the expenditure of Redevelopment and CDBG funds is governed by state and federal law. Redevelopment Funds must be spent within a designated project area, or to benefit the project area. A Redevelopment Agency can spend money outside a particular project area if it will bring in people or businesses which will ultimately benefit the project area through increased tax increment or the potential for tax increment. Mr. Warren advised that CDBG Funds can be used throughout the City, but more often are used in eligible areas defined by the income level of the area residents. The use of CDBG funds must benefit low and moderate income households with such projects as parks, community centers, housing, street improvements, etc. Mr. Warren stated that the Committee reviewed the amount of revenue received from the two funding sources, and began soliciting public input by conducting surveys and reviewing several projects previously identified for their potential return on investment (ROI)value. Mr. Warren reported that the results of the surveys and two Town hall Meetings identified 32 projects that are needed or that the community would like to see completed. Mr. Warren said at the Priority Committee's last meeting, the Committee and he agreed on 14 projects to receive funding. Mr. Warren reported that at the direction of Council, he prepared a list of recommended projects placing emphasis on the desires of the community and the best strategy to accomplish goals and realize a high ROI. Mr. Warren said he developed five goals for recommending projects as follows: 1)Projects that will enhance the amenities and beauty of the City; and/or 2) Projects that will develop pride and continued involvement of the citizens; and/or 3) Projects that have a direct financial return to the City; and/or 4) Projects that create a synergy for other things to happen in the community; and/or 5) Projects that are required by the Federal government or for safety reasons. Mr. Warren explained the methodology used for rating them in three categories: High ROI, Medium ROI and Low ROI projects. He added that if the money is invested intelligently in projects with a high ROI, it may be possible to fund all the projects simply by funding the right projects first. Mr. Warren presented his list of projects and funding recommendations in his priority order as follows: Park Marina/$200,000; Open space/River access/Trail System, $400,000; Turtle Bay, $7,000,000; Downtown Improvements, $1,500,000; North and South Market Streets, $2,000,000; Sports Complex, $3,000,000; Development Partnerships, $3,500,000; Highway 44 On-Ramp @ Hilltop Drive, $1,500,000; Library, $200,000; ADA Improvements, $500,000; Westside Road, $250,000, Entry Features/Beautification Projects for$125,000; Cypress/Athens Improvements, $350,000; and the Drag Strip, $125,000. Mr. Warren noted the funding differences from the Committee's list and his list involve Park Marina, Turtle Bay, the Sports Complex, and Development Partnerships. Mr. Warren related that this is not a wish list, but a plan which will provide a good return on investment, create a stronger economic environment, give Redding a stronger identity, and make our City more attractive. Mr. Warren cautioned that while he believes his estimates are conservative, there are no guarantees on the ROI's. Mr. Warren stated, with regard to Turtle Bay, that staff will work with Turtle Bay personnel to ensure they have a good plan in place and will not require additional funds. Mr. Warren emphasized that Council and staff are dedicated to preserving the City's ten-year plan and a stable general fund. Mr. Warren also expressed disappointment that the City will not be able to immediately fund other projects that need funding. However, these projects can be placed on the Group "B" list and eventually funded from the income generated by recommended projects. Mr. Warren explained that most successful cities have several things in common. These cities have improved themselves using Redevelopment and CDBG funds and grants from foundations. In addition, all have concentrated on a core area-usually the downtown. Mr. Warren advised that these cities also had money available for development partnerships which assisted greatly with infrastructure projects in the core area. Mr. Warren concluded that if Council approves this list or a modified version, staff will review the projects, funding sources, and timing. Mayor Murray thanked and commended the Priorities Committee members for their hard work and dedication to the process, and invited the members to react or comment on the recommendations made by the City Manager. Committee members commented from the audience that they were in accord with the City Manager's recommendations. Lee Salter, President of the McConnell Foundation, commended Council on behalf of the Foundation's Board of Directors for progressive consideration in the use of Redevelopment funds for projects which will improve the quality of life in Redding. Mr. Salter related that the Foundation recognizes and appreciates Council's hard work in bringing Redding to a stable and viable economic 12/09/97 289 position. Mr. Salter stated that the Foundation's Board supports the development of Turtle Bay and believes it will be a catalyst for improving the quality of life in our community. Mr. Salter advised that the McConnell Foundation is prepared to work with the City and Turtle Bay to successfully develop the potential of this project, and welcomes the opportunity to partner with the City and Turtle Bay in this venture. George Lewellen, asserted that the Redding Drag Strip can produce some economic return to the City. Mr. Lewellen advised that the Western United States views the Redding Drag Strip as an emerging drag strip, and urged Council to consider funding in time to have the improvements in place for the upcoming "Kool April Nites" event. Michael Dacquisto, President of"Friends of the Shasta County Library," emphasized that the library ranked high on all community surveys as a project in need of improvements and funding. Mr. Dacquisto acknowledged that the recommended funding illustrates Council's interest in the library, but urged Council to earmark certain moneys generated from funded projects to the library. John Fitzpatrick,President of the Board of Trustees for Turtle Bay and the Arboretum on the River, stated that approximately 400 individuals are involved in the promotion and operation of Turtle Bay. Mr. Fitzpatrick advised that attendance has increased this year which helped recover some of the operating costs associated with Turtle Bay. He remarked that the proposed commitment in funding Turtle Bay is a step toward a nationally-recognized museum and arboretum, and the Calatrava Bridge will be a highly visible landmark project and a key element in the revitalization of Redding. Mr. Fitzpatrick stated that the Board is convinced that with the guidance of a business plan, and the commitment of everyone involved in Turtle Bay, it will become an institution able to sustain itself into the future. He assured Council that the Board will continue to work toward phasing out City support over the next ten years. Frank Strazzarino, Redding Chamber of Commerce, commended the Citizens Priorities Committee and the City for incorporating and encouraging community participation into the funding process, and applauded the concept of ROI. Mr. Strazzarino added that the Chamber unanimously endorses the Turtle Bay Project. Marge Cantrell, expressed concern that the recommended funding of projects presented this evening was not in keeping with the Priorities Committee's recommendations, specifically with regard to the library. Ms. Cantrell stated that the community has consistently and overwhelming illustrated the importance of funding the library, and the amount of funding recommended is simply not sufficient. Bert Meyer, Meyer's Motels, stated that he had the opportunity to observe the Priorities Committee and staff as they went through the process of project selection, and commended staff and the Committee for a job well done. Mr. Meyer also stated that he looks forward to the time when the Sports Complex Committee can be reorganized to work together again for the betterment of the community. Council Member Kehoe expressed disappointment at the recommended funding amount for the library. He related that in speaking with members of the community, it is apparent that their concerns echo the statements received this evening. Mr. Kehoe recalled that the library was a high priority on all community surveys without regard to its monetary ROI value;but Council should consider its ROI with regard to community pride and fulfilling the wishes of the citizens. Mr. Kehoe stated that he is in favor of increasing the recommended amount. Mr. Kehoe further related that Council has been discussing appointing a Library Committee comprised of five representatives each from the County and City, and asked what the relationship will be between the findings made by the committee with regard to the future direction of the library, and the recommended amount of funding. Mr. Warren responded that the Committee will determine if and how the City can be more involved in the main library. Mr. Warren suggested that the funds recommended for allocation this evening be withheld until the Committee completes the study and determines the best use of the money. Mr. Kehoe further stated that he learned from local residents that there is concern and irritation with the condition of many City streets; the pot holes, and street maintenance in general, should be addressed. Mr. Kehoe opined that it seems incongruous to allocate $20 million to various projects without regard to the condition of the streets. 12/09/97 290 Council Member Anderson stated that he concurred with City Manager Warren's recommendation, but expressed concern that Turtle Bay Museum and Arboretum will require $400,000 in ongoing operating expenses each year. Mr. Anderson suggested that the City look toward phasing out assistance over a specified period of time. He also stated that the Cypress Street Bridge will require expansion within the next five years or sooner, especially if Turtle Bay is successful, because most motel accommodations are on the east side of the river. Mayor Murray advised that he also is in favor of the recommendations made in the City Manager's Report to Council, with some reservations. Mayor Murray complimented the process used to determine the City's priority projects, citing its business-like approach which has served the City well in the past. Mr. Murray stated with regard to the library funding, he views the problem to be operating funds, not capital funds. Mr. Murray hoped that the proposed City/County joint Library Committee will be able to come forward with solutions for continued operating funds because Redevelopment Agency money is not the answer. For this reason, Mr. Murray stated he is comfortable with the recommended funding amount. Mr. Murray shared Mr. Kehoe's concerns with pot holes and street maintenance - stating that many City streets are in very poor shape and this should be targeted during the next budget process. Mr. Murray questioned the recommended $3 million funding for the Sports Complex suggesting that this figure could be reduced if the City engages in a public/private partnership rather than relying strictly on public funds. He said the Sports Complex Committee determined long ago that the Complex could be built for $2.1 million, and that was based on a public/private partnership. Mr. Murray challenged the incentive for the Committee to spend less if$3 million is allocated. Mr. Warren responded that the Committee and staff are very responsible individuals and will attempt to get the best and the most for the money allocated. Mr. Warren recalled that when the Draggoo Study was conducted two years ago, one option suggested was a three-field complex at a cost of$2 million. However, public demand dictates a sports complex with five fields which, along with escalating prices, drives up the cost. Mr. Murray also expressed interest in some type of improvement for the Cypress Street Bridge in light of the fact that the City is not going forward with construction of the Parkview Bridge. Mr. Murray suggested that the Cypress Street Bridge project be moved to the Group "B" list of recommended projects. Mr. Murray also stated that there must be an understanding that any ROI realized from CDBG and Redevelopment funded projects will be allocated toward the projects which did not make the priority list. Mr. Murray also expressed concern that the City has accomplished a great deal with regard to open space/river trail access on the west side of the City, but very little on the east side. He suggested that something be added to the trail system in the Enterprise area so that the whole community can enjoy the benefits. Council Member Anderson concurred with Mr. Murray, stating that he would like the Cypress Street Bridge project placed at the top of the Group "B" list, and requested clarification on the project objectives. Public Works Director Russell responded that the overall appearance of the bridge will remain basically the same. The project consists of adding two lanes to the downstream side of the bridge and eliminating the gap between east and west traffic. Council Member Anderson requested that staff incorporate appearance enhancement provisions for the bridge project, citing that Redding's bridges are a highly visible feature and should have aesthetic appeal. Council Member Kehoe concurred that it made sense to extend the trail system to the east side and recommended that the open space/river access/trail system category be augmented by another $200,000 from development partnerships. He also recommended that up to $1 million be reserved for the library. Council Member Anderson countered that he would rather defer earmarking additional funding for the library until after the Committee has developed a definite plan. Mayor Murray also expressed concern about setting aside funds for an indefinite period of time without a firm capital plan for the library. While Council Member Kehoe agreed, he did not want Council to foreclose on an opportunity for a capital expansion for the library. Motion: Made by Council Member Anderson, seconded by Council Member Kehoe, approving the City Manager's project funding recommendations as outlined in the Report to Council dated December 2, 1997, with the following modifications: 1) Park Marina= $200,000 * 2) Open Space/River Access/Trail System = $600,000 (Staff recommendation was $400,000 - Council augmented amount by another $200,000 from Item No. 7, Development Partnerships) 3) Turtle Bay= $7,000,000 12/09/97 291 4) Downtown Improvements = $1,500,000 5) North and South Market Street = $2,000,000 6) Sports Complex = $3,000,000 * 7) Development Partnerships = $3,300,000 (Staff recommendation was $3,500,000 - Council diverted $200,000 to Item No.2) 8) Highway 44 On-Ramp @ Hilltop Drive = $1,500,000 * 9) Library = $200,000 (Council agreed that funds can also be earmarked for library capital improvements from Item No. 7, Development Partnerships) 10) ADA Improvements = $500,000 11) Westside Road = $250,000 12) Entry Features/Beautification Projects = $125,000 13) Cypress/Athens Improvements = $350,000 14) Drag Strip = $125,000 Council further directed that the Cypress Street Bridge Project be placed at the top of Project List "B", and that these items be brought back to the City Council at future meetings on an incremental basis, and presented to the Redevelopment Agency for consideration and action. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, at the hour of 7:54 p.m., Mayor Murray declared the meeting adjourned. APPROVED: Airy( .'„ ay.r Ken urray ATTEST: // City Clerk 12/09/97