Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - City Council - 1996-12-12 317 Redding City Council, Adjourned Regular Meeting City Council Chambers 1313 California Street Redding, California December 12, 1996 5:15 p.m. The Pledge of Allegiance to the flag was led by Council Member Kehoe. The invocation was offered by Pastor Bob Pierce, North Valley Baptist Church. The meeting was called to order by Mayor McGeorge with the following City Council Members present: P. Anderson, R. Anderson, Kehoe, Murray and McGeorge. Also present were City Manager Warren, Assistant City Manager Perry, City Attorney Wingate, Fire Chief Wagner, Deputy City Manager Starman, Assistant City Attorney Calkins, Principal Planner Keaney, Assistant City Engineer Curtis, Superintendent-Wastewater Craig, Senior Planner King, Senior Planner Hanson, Transportation Coordinator Duryee, Associate Planner Morgon, Associate Planner Haddox, Management Analyst Sciarra, City Clerk Strohmayer, and Secretary to the City Council Rudolph. CONSENT CALENDAR Approval of Payroll and Accounts Payable Register (A-050-100-500) It is recommended that Accounts Payable Register No. 11, for the period December 3, 1996, through December 10, 1996, check numbers 242306 through 242501 inclusive, in the amount of $2,250,337.72, and Payroll Register No. 11, for the period November 17, 1996, through November 30, 1996, check numbers 429340 through 429875 inclusive, and electronic deposit transaction numbers 33753 through 34075, totaling $1,265,636.79, be approved. TOTAL: $3,515,974.51 Ordinance No. 2165 -Rezoning Application RZ-8-96, by Bill Rhyne (South of Meadow View Drive and west of Lockheed Drive) (L-010-230) It is recommended that Ordinance No. 2165 be adopted, an ordinance of the City Council of the City of Redding amending Section 18.06.020 of the Redding Municipal Code relating to the rezoning of certain real property in the City of Redding to "C2-F" Central Commercial District with Site Plan Review Combining District, "C2-F-FP" Central Commercial District with Site Plan Review and Floodplain Combining Districts, "PI-B50-F" Planned Industrial District with Site Plan Review Combining District, and "OS" Open Space District (RZ-8-96). Ordinance No, 2166-Rezoning Application RZ-9-96, by Don Lynn (North of Highway 44 and east of Shasta View Drive- abandoned Enterprise Skypark) (L-010-230) It is recommended that Ordinance No. 2166 be adopted, an ordinance of the City Council of the City of Redding amending Section 18.06.020 of the Redding Municipal Code relating to the rezoning of certain real property in the City of Redding to "R-2" Duplex Residential District (RZ-9-96). Resolution - Appropriating Funds for a Traffic Signal at Lake Boulevard and Tamarack Drive * (B-130-070 & T-080-700) It is the recommendation of Deputy City Manager that Resolution No. 96-222 be adopted, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding approving and adopting the 18th amendment to City Budget Resolution No. 96-130 to (1)appropriate $75,000 for the Lake Boulevard/Tamarack Traffic Signal; (2) accept $15,000 in revenue; and (3) reallocate $55,000 in existing appropriations. Award of Bid-Bid Schedule No. 3047, Airpark Drive/Placer Street Realignment and Signalization (B-050-020 & S-070-100) It is the recommendation of the Public Works Director that the following findings be made regarding Bid Schedule No. 3047 (ED-1-95): 1. Project is compatible with the Redding General Plan; 2. Project will not significantly alter existing land form; 3. Project is compatible with surrounding land use; 12/12/96 318 4. Project is compatible with the Code of the City of Redding, California; and approve the Negative Declaration authorized by the Development Services Department. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes It is further recommended that Bid Schedule No. 3047 (Job No. 9298), Airpark Drive/Placer Street Realignment and Signalization, be awarded to River City Construction in the amount of$324,612 for Schedules A and B combined, an additional $35,700 be approved to cover the cost of engineering and inspection fees, and $32,500 be approved to provide a construction contingency fund, for a total of$392,812. Resolution Accepting Streets and Acceptance of Final Map and Improvements - Central Park Subdivision, Units 1 and 2, aka Paramount Estates, Units 1 and 2 (S-6-93) * (S-070-230 & S-101-005) It is the recommendation of the Public Works Director that Resolution No. 96-223 be adopted, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding accepting for maintenance and operation Rincon Way, Paramount Way, and Posey Lane in Units 1 and 2 of the Central Park Subdivision, aka Paramount Estates, Units l and 2. It is also recommended that the improvements in Central Park Subdivision, Units 1 and 2, be accepted as satisfactorily completed, and the City Clerk be instructed to file the Map with the Shasta County Recorder. Award of Bid -Bid Schedule No. 3017, Analyze Wastewater, Surface Water, Sludge, Groundwater, and Landfill Leachate Samples (B-050-100) It is the recommendation of the Public Works Director that Bid Schedule No. 3017 (Job No. 5870- 21), analyze wastewater, surface water, sludge, groundwater, and landfill leachate samples, be awarded to the lowest qualifying bidder as follows: Groups A and F analyses to CH2M Hill/QAL, Group B analyses to Sequoia Analytical, and Groups C, D, and E to Frontier Geoscience. MOTION: Made by Council Member P. Anderson, seconded by Council Member R. Anderson, that all the foregoing items on the Consent Calendar be approved and adopted as recommended. Voting was as follows: Ayes: Council Members - P. Anderson, R. Anderson, Kehoe, Murray and McGeorge Noes: Council Members -None Absent: Council Members-None Resolution Nos. 96-222, and 96-223 and Ordinance Nos. 2165 and 2166 are on file in the office of the City Clerk. AGREEMENT - Buckeye Redevelopment Project Formation RESOLUTION - Designating Buckeye Redevelopment Project Survey Area (R-030-030) Assistant City Manager Perry provided an overview of the Report to City Council dated December 12, 1996, incorporated herein by reference, regarding the formation of the Buckeye Redevelopment Project Area. He related that for the past nine months, the City, the County, the Shasta County Redevelopment Agency, and the Redding Redevelopment Agency have been exploring the feasibility of establishing a joint redevelopment project along the Lake Boulevard/Oasis Road corridor. He stated that the proposed survey area comprises approximately 1,063 acres, 51 percent within the City and 49 percent within the County. Mr. Perry explained that apart from the removal of blight or conditions which cause blight, the project is seen as a way to enable local government to be a partner with private development in developing the improvements that are necessary for the area to become financially healthy without creating an unrealistic financial burden on either government or the private sector, or ignoring existing substandard conditions. Given the conditions that currently exist in the area and the needed improvements, it is the recommendation of staff that the City Council authorize the Mayor to sign the Project Formation Agreement and adopt the necessary resolution designating the Buckeye Redevelopment Project survey area boundaries. 12/12/96 319 MOTION: Made by Council Member Kehoe, seconded by Council Member R. Anderson, to execute the Project Formation Agreement for the Buckeye Redevelopment Project with the City of Redding, the County of Shasta, the Redding Redevelopment Agency, and the Shasta County Redevelopment Agency, and adopt Resolution No. 96-224, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding designating the Buckeye Redevelopment Project Survey Area. Voting was as follows: Ayes: Council Members - P. Anderson, R. Anderson, Kehoe, Murray, and McGeorge Noes: Council Members -None Absent: Council Members -None Resolution No. 96-224 is on file in the office of the City Clerk. PUBLIC MEETING AND RESOLUTION-re Intent to Establish the Downtown Redding Business Improvement District (A-170-015-002) Associate Planner Morgon provided an overview of the Report to City Council dated December 5, 1996, incorporated herein by reference, regarding the formation of the Downtown Redding Business Improvement District. He recalled that at its meeting of October 1, 1996, the City Council supported the formation of a new business improvement district (BID) in the downtown area by entering into an agreement, on behalf of the Downtown Redding BID Formation Committee, with David Kilbourne, for services to form the district. He explained that the next step in the BID formation process is to adopt the resolution of intention to establish the BID and to set a public hearing to consider the matter. Mr. Morgon stated that conversations with the City Attorney have indicated that Proposition 218 will have no effect on the formation of this district as it is an assessment against the business, not the property. Mr. Morgon indicated that a question which needs to be answered prior to drafting the ordinance establishing the BID is whether or not the City will retain a portion of the business assessment to cover the costs to administer the BID. He related that a letter was received from Mike Arnold, Chairman of the BID Formation Committee, requesting that the City not retain a portion of the assessments to cover the cost to the City for collecting the assessments. He explained that the basic thrust of the rationale is that the City will be making a business investment in downtown that will be returned in the form of increased sales tax, business license tax, and property tax. He stated that the collection and delivery of the assessments will be handled by the City Clerk's Office in cooperation with the Finance Division, at a cost of approximately $13,006 in the first year and $1,746 in subsequent years. It is the recommendation of staff that the City Council adopt the necessary resolution to set a public hearing for 7:00 p.m., January 7, 1997, to consider the establishment of the BID. For the purpose of preparing the ordinance establishing the BID for consideration, staff recommends that the ordinance provide that the City not retain a portion of the assessments to cover administrative and handling charges in the initial year, but that administrative charges be retained in subsequent years. In response to Council Member P. Anderson, Mr. Morgon related that additional programming is needed to expand the system and add additional data field entry into the program. Council Member P. Anderson urged staff to go back and reassess why the programming charge would be so high ($9,100). City Manager Warren stated that notwithstanding the programming cost, the question is whether the City Council wants to charge the full amount or something less in the first year for collecting the assessments. Council Member Kehoe questioned whether the Redding Redevelopment Agency could repay the City for the costs associated with collecting these assessments. Assistant City Manager Perry stated that he would have to research the matter further. Council Member Kehoe related that he received a telephone call from an individual in the downtown area questioning why the City was involved with the BID and why the businesses didn't voluntary ban together and assess themselves. 12/12/96 320 David Kilbourne,President of the California Downtown Association, stated that the best example of a BID is the City of Chico. He explained that the City of Chico's BID is merchant initiated and driven and has effectively marketed the downtown area for 20 years. He indicated that without the assistance of the City of Chico, it would not have been possible to put the BID together and have it be the success it is. In response to Council Member Kehoe, Mr. Kilbourne stated that the proposed BID in Redding has had over 70 percent of the affected businesses support its formation. He indicated that it is the strongest support base he has seen. In response to Council Member Murray, Mr. Morgon explained that the boundaries established for the BID are based on concerns about trying to have a disirict which is successful based on past experience. He noted that the district was kept small geographically, but as viable as economically possible. To date, he stated that feedback regarding the boundaries has been that they are appropriate. Council Member Murray opined that both sides of Market Street to the River, including South City Park, should have been included in the BID. Mike Arnold, Chairman of the BID Formation Committee, responded that the committee considered the amount of residential/business in those areas. He stated the committee believed that the boundaries chosen encompassed the major part of the commercial businesses in the downtown area. He noted that Oregon Street wants to be included in the BID and was told to gather the necessary support base before the district's boundaries are expanded. He noted that each year the City Council must reaffirm the BID. MOTION: Made by Council Member Kehoe, seconded by Council Member Murray, to direct staff not to retain any of the assessment associated with the Downtown Redding Business Improvement District in the first year,but retain the amount necessary in subsequent years to cover the City's costs, direct that these costs be repaid by the General Fund if it is determined that the funds cannot be provided by the Redding Redevelopment Agency, and adopt Resolution No. 96-225, a resolution of the City Council declaring its intention to establish the Downtown Redding Business Improvement District and setting a public hearing for 7:00 p.m., January 7,1997. Voting was as follows: Ayes: Council Members - P. Anderson, R. Anderson, Kehoe, Murray, and McGeorge Noes: Council Members -None Absent: Council Members -None Resolution No. 96-225 is on file in the office of the City Clerk. DISPOSITION OF CITY-OWNED PROPERTY (C-070-200) Assistant City Manager Perry recalled that the Director of Development Services was contacted by a Canadian firm interested in setting up a metal building fabricating business in the Redding area. He explained that the firm is focusing on City-owned land located on the north side of Metz Road,just to the southwest of the Clear Creek Sewage Treatment Plant. He noted that the firm's main interest in this property is the potential for a spur track. It was the recommendation of staff that the City Council direct staff to work with the company and begin the process of determining whether the property should be declared surplus. If the property were to be declared surplus, he suggested the following guidelines be followed: 1) that any sale be linked to the creation of at least eight new jobs within 18 months; 2) that if sold, improvements to the property begin within 12 months and completed within 18 months; 3) that this be a direct sale based on a fair market appraisal;4) if a sale is entered into, the title not be delivered until a building permit is ready to be issued; and 5) the City agrees to pay up to 5 percent real estate commission to the realtor who has been helping the company. City Council Murray opined that if spur track is needed, the City should be looking at running it along the entire property frontage in the same fashion it would oversize a sewer line for future development. Mr. Perry clarified that staff needs guidance on the basic parameters for marketing the property, i.e., direct negotiations, linking the sale to jobs, etc. 12/12/96 321 Council Member Murray saw no problem circulating the request to City departments. He did not, however, want to spend any funds on such things as an appraisal until the deal is certain. He also believed the sale should be linked to job creation. He stated that he did not believe the City should spend funds on a spur track unless it is for over sizing. He also had no interest in realigning Eastside Road at the City's expense if the company is only going to employ eight people. MOTION: Made by Council Member R. Anderson, seconded by Council Member P. Anderson, to direct staff to move forward with declaring the City-owned property on the north side of Metz Road, just to the southwest of the Clear Creek Sewage Treatment Plant, as surplus and entering into direct negotiations with the Canadian firm rather than utilizing a bid process. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes RESOLUTION - Appropriating Funds for Emergency Staffing in the City Treasurer's Office * (B-130-070 & A-050-100) City Treasurer Linville highlighted the Report to City Council dated December 5, 1996, incorporated herein by reference, regarding the need to appropriate an additional $2,330 for emergency staffing in the City Treasurer's Office due to an employee being out for a family medical emergency. MOTION: Made by Council Member R. Anderson, seconded by Council Member Murray, that Resolution No. 96-226 be adopted, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding approving and adopting the 19th amendment to City Budget Resolution No. 96-130 to appropriate $2,330 for temporary employee services for the City Treasurer's Office. Voting was as follows: Ayes: Council Members - P. Anderson, R. Anderson, Kehoe, Murray, and McGeorge Noes: Council Members -None Absent: Council Members -None Resolution No. 96-226 is on file in the office of the City Clerk. AWARD OF BID - Bid Schedule No. 3048, Fire and Rescue River Boat and Trailer AGREEMENT - McConnell Foundation Grant * (B-050-100 & G-100 & P-150-070) Fire Chief Wagner stated that staff is requesting the City Council to authorize the Mayor to sign a funding agreement with The McConnell Foundation in the amount of$30,000 to partially fund the acquisition of a river rescue boat and award Bid Schedule No. 3048, fire and rescue river boat and trailer, to the low bidder, Jet Craft of Oregon, in the amount of$37,526.78. He explained that the cost of the river boat and trailer, fire pump, and rescue equipment totals $54,500. He stated that $30,000 will be from The McConnell Foundation grant, $12,500 from the Buckeye Fire Projection District, $10,500 from the Fire Department's budget, and the remaining $1,500 from private individuals and public service groups. Fire Chief Wagner recognized Fire Captain Odhe for his work on the proposal which resulted in the $30,000 grant from The McConnell Foundation. Council Member Murray stated that he is going to oppose staff's recommendation because anything which is free now will ultimately result in costs. He explained that once the boat and necessary equipment is purchased, there is still costs associated with gas, workers' compensation, negotiating with the union to include language in the Memorandum of Understanding. He noted that while this purchase represents the beginning of a new service for the City, he believed there are a number of existing services where the money would be better utilized. Council Member R. Anderson questioned whether the Fire Department and the Union believes this is a higher priority than a three-man crew. Fire Chief Wagner replied that the matter had never been discussed in that context. He acknowledged that there will be annual costs associated with maintenance, upgrading equipment, and gas, but did not believe these costs would equal the annual cost of maintaining another three-person engine company. Council Member R. Anderson questioned whether this program will result in a request for additional personnel. Fire Chief Wagner did not foresee the need to request additional staffing for this purpose. 12/12/96 322 In response to Council Member R. Anderson, Fire Chief Wagner stated that the boat would be on-call and would be manned utilizing existing staffing. He stated that staff would not be allowed to pilot the boat unless they were adequately trained. MOTION: Made by Council Member Kehoe, seconded by Council Member R. Anderson, to authorize the Mayor to sign the Memorandum of Understanding with The McConnell Foundation in the amount of$30,000, and award Bid Schedule No. 3048, fire and rescue river boat and trailer, to Jet Craft of Oregon in the amount of$37,526.78. Voting was as follows: Ayes: Council Members - P. Anderson, R. Anderson, Kehoe, and McGeorge Noes: Council Members - Murray Absent: Council Members -None SACRAMENTO RIVER REGULATIONS - re Speed Limits (R-200-600) Assistant City Attorney Calkins provided an overview of the Report to City Council dated December 5, 1996, incorporated herein by reference, concerning the additional regulation of uses on the Sacramento River. Mr. Calkins summarized the conclusions reached as a result of the research since the City Council meeting of August 20, 1996, as follows: 1) prohibiting the operation of all motorized vessels on any portion of the Sacramento River could invite further litigation; and 2) it was the consensus of the Sheriff's Department and the Department of Fish and Game that the adoption of an ordinance authorizing a speed limit of 25 mph in the "channel," while restricting speed on the periphery to 5 mph would be difficult, if not impossible, to enforce. Given the above, Mr. Calkins explained that staff has proposed an ordinance which provides for the following: 1) a speed limit of 25 mph from the southerly boundary of the City to the south side of the Highway 299/44 bridge; and 2) a speed limit of 5 mph would be in effect from the south side of the Highway 299/44 bridge to Keswick Dam. Mr. Calkins noted that the proposed ordinance was discussed with members of the River Management Plan Ad Hoc Committee. He stated it was the general consensus of the committee members and citizens present that the proposed ordinance represented a good beginning and would promote the goals of the City Council in ensuring the protection and preservation of the Sacramento River. It is the recommendation of staff that the City Council, as an interim measure, accept the proposed ordinance as written, direct staff to complete the necessary environmental review, and bring the ordinance back for further consideration after the necessary review period. It is also recommended that staff be directed to continue to pursue the more long-term solution which includes: 1) a detailed study that produces factual data supporting more restrictive regulations; and 2) the elimination of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife regulation that resulted in a federal right of access. To this end, it is • recommended that the City Council authorize the Mayor to send letters to Congressman Wally Herger, Senator Dianne Feinstein, and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife. Council Member Murray stated that it was not clear whether the interim ordinance had been approved by the ad hoc committee. Mr. Calkins related that it was the consensus of the ad hoc committee members present at the meeting that the proposed ordinance was a step in the right direction. He indicated that others felt they would like an opportunity to review the ordinance. Council Member Murray indicated that unless there is a pressing reason to move forward, he would like to hear a recommendation from the ad hoc committee. Council Member R. Anderson concurred. Council Member P. Anderson believed that the ad hoc committee would be providing a recommendation as a result of the City Council's action. Senior Planner Hanson indicated that the ad hoc committee had expressed a desire to be involved with the ordinance, and staff will move forward in that direction. 12/12/96 323 Harry Delanty, 3357, Harlan Drive, provided the City Council with a copy of a sign which exists along the arboretum's property regarding the need to not disturb the animals. He believed the City is trying to create a trail and arboretum where there is a quiet zone and people can be alone and quiet. He endorsed staff's recommendation, however, he recommended that the City Council rethink whether the ordinance should be sent back to the committee. He explained that the committee has a considerable amount of work to do relative to the General Plan. Ray Bumbaugh, 8587 Future Drive, stated that most multiple uses of the Sacramento River will generate controversy. He did not understand how a legitimate decision could be reached without adequate information and how staff could arrive at a recommendation based on the same type of information which was dismissed as subjective. He requested that the City Council reject staff's recommendation until such time as quantifiable information is available. Richard Baumann, 6941 Riverside Drive, stated that he has attended the ad hoc committee meetings and there were one to two individuals opposed to staff's recommendation. He believed the main opposition to the ordinance is from the fishing guides. He noted that there will not be a 100 percent consensus on this matter. He indicated that there are less than 12 fishing guides using that specific section of the river and the only inconvenience will be having to slow down. He stressed that the City Council needs to balance inconvenience against the wishes of a community. Sandra Johnson, 3000 Valentine Lane, urged the City Council to support a 5 mph speed limit south of the Highway 299 bridge or extend it farther to the Bonnyview or Cypress Avenue Bridges. She noted that the City Council has an opportunity to improve the environment and she encouraged them to take advantage of it. David Mandis, 19199 Kamloop Road, stated that he relocated to this area because of its prestige. He indicated that he has fished on party boats and both the animals and people deserve a better break than what they are currently getting. He opined that staff has done a good job in keeping the 5 mph zone as small as possible. He believed that the zone should extend to Cypress Avenue and instead of 5 mph, it should be no wake. He explained that the object is to keep noise and wakes down. He stressed that the City is doing a good job in making Redding a good place to live. He encouraged the City Council to approve the 5 mph speed limit. Brad Jackson, 107 Village Drive, stated that condominium owners for the most part see no problem with the jet boats. He indicated, however, that he would abstain from a recommendation until the ad hoc committee makes its recommendation. He urged the City Council to restrict the mileage above the Highway 299 bridge. He encouraged the City Council to move cautiously in whatever recommendation it selects. Eric Marler, 634 Springer Drive, stated he was a member of the ad hoc committee and thanked the City Council for clarifying the committee's direction. Dave Scott, 1056 River Ridge Drive, related that he was also a member of the ad hoc committee. He believed the purpose of the ad hoc committee was to address this very issue before the City Council this evening. At the second meeting, however, he indicated the committee was told this ordinance would be going to the City Council. He stressed that both he and the committee are prepared to address this issue. Scott Ferris stated that he has been a resident of Shasta County for 50 years and is a river user and fishes the area under consideration for the 5 mph speed limit. He opined that the 5 mph speed limit will defeat the very idea of trying to keep things quiet. He explained that a 5 mph speed limit will create more noise and a tremendous wake. He indicated that power boats have been on the river for a long time and the animals have survived. He urged the City Council to consider the effects of the 5 mph speed limit, as he did not believe it would solve the problem. Hank Maitz stated that the 5 mph speed limit will create unsafe situations for both bank fishermen and boaters. He indicated the 5 mph speed limit will not be easy to adhere to as the river is moving between 10 and 15 mph itself. Having attended the last committee meeting, he was surprised to see the committee's composition, as he viewed it as being lopsided. He believed that many of the speakers in favor of the speed limit are the homeowners. 12/12/96 r- 324 Jerry Largent, 5431 Green Acre, stated that 25 mph is not a safe speed limit and he urged the City Council not to support its adoption. Patrick Buckley, 1557 Lakeside Drive, supported the ordinance as written. He believed the ordinance was written to address the perceived conflict between high and low intensity uses. He stated that there is a 70 to 100 percent mortality rate of fish due to erosion. He indicated that the City needs to take a more aggressive enforcement stance on grading violations. Richard Johnson, 3000 Valentine Lane, stated that the City Council has the opportunity to create a 5 mph speed zone which will go a long way toward keeping that portion of the river a low-intensity use. He urged the City Council to adopt the 5 mph speed limit from Keswick Dam to Cypress Avenue and 25 mph from Cypress Avenue to the south City limits. John Harrison, 10699 Old Oregon Trail, stated that most river users are responsible and he opposed the proposed ordinance. Gary(Dino) Jeartet, 920 Springer Drive, opined that the property owners along the river are being selfish. He stated that the Sacramento River is very special and to not allow jet boats in the area would be a crime. In his opinion,jet boats are not going to cause the banks to erode. Kenneth Begley, 1885 Diamond Street, opposed the 5 mph speed limit. Council Member R. Anderson stated that he did not intend to vote on the proposed ordinance this evening. He believed the number one objective of the ad hoc committee was to review the issue of speed limits on the river. He indicated that the City Council should clarify the ad hoc committee's charge. John Can indicated that he was a member of the ad hoc committee. He stated that it was clear to him that the committee was not going to be allowed to vote on the ordinance when it was presented to them by staff. He personally believed that all motorized craft should be restricted from Highway 299 to Shasta Dam. He supported the implementation of a 5 mph speed limit. After reviewing environmental erosion, he believed it was obvious that the City's regulations are not being adhered to and he stressed the importance of monitoring development. Melinda Brown, 9951 Tilton Mine Road, stated that she was a supporter of local economic development and outdoor recreation. She indicated that now is the time the City should be putting proper protections into place. She opined that staff's proposal was reasonable, however, she wished it extended to the Bonnyview bridge. John Sanderson, 20327 River Valley Drive, noted that 800 people per day are transported on the Rogue River and one of the highlights is the wildlife. He requested the City Council to direct the ad hoc committee to contact the Grant Pass Chamber of Commerce to ascertain how it handled the situation. City Manager Warren stated that staff was looking at interim measures and having the committee look at long-term solutions. In response to Council Member Murray, Mr. Hanson stated that if the ad hoc committee were to review the speed limit issue prior to finishing its work on the General Plan, the April deadline for the General Plan work might be missed. Mayor McGeorge viewed the ad hoc committee's priority to be the speed limit issue and any other work secondary. Council Member P. Anderson stated the ad hoc committee's main focus should be the river, speed limits, signage, etc. Council Member P. Anderson and R. Anderson concurred that public education should be part of the ad hoc committee's objectives. Council Member Kehoe stated that it was not his intent for the ad hoc committee to take on an expanded role. 12/12/96 325 MOTION: Made by Council Member Murray, seconded by Council Member R. Anderson, to authorize the Mayor to sign the letters to Congressman Herger, Senator Feinstein, and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife as depicted in the Report to City Council dated December 5, 1996, direct that the proposed ordinance be referred to the ad hoc committee to be reported back on as soon as possible, and direct staff to prepare a report regarding the ad hoc committee's scope of work for the City Council's consideration at the first meeting in January. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes LETTER OF APPRECIATION (A-050-250-030 & A-050-300) Mayor McGeorge stated that a letter was received from Brent Owen complimenting City Building Inspectors and Public Works staff for their exceptional service. This was an informational item. No action was required. CLOSED SESSION - re Labor Negotiations (P-100-050-070) Mayor McGeorge stated that the City Council would be adjourning to closed session pursuant to California Government Code Section 54957.6 to discuss the following: Conference with Labor Negotiator - Agency Negotiator: Randy Bachman; Employee Organization: Local Union 1245 of International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers AFL-CIO - Electric Employees. At the hour of 7:30 p.m., Mayor McGeorge adjourned the meeting to closed session. At the hour of 7:50 p.m., Mayor McGeorge reconvened the meeting to regular session. No action was taken. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, at the hour of 7:50 p.m., Mayor McGeorge declared the meeting adjourned. APP: !VED: oi Mayor / ATTEST: "i City Clerk 12/12/96