Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - City Council - 1996-04-16 81 City Council, Special Meeting City Council Chambers 1313 California Street Redding, California April 16, 1996 6:30 p.m. The meeting was called to order by Mayor Kehoe with the following Council Members present: P. Anderson, R. Anderson, McGeorge, Murray and Kehoe. Also present were City Manager Warren, Assistant City Manager Perry, City Attorney Wingate, Director of Administrative Services Starman, and Human Resources Manager Sciarra. CLOSED SESSION - re Labor Negotiations (P-100-050-124) Mayor Kehoe stated that the City Council would be adjourning to closed session pursuant to California Government Code Section 54957.6 to discuss the following: Conference with Labor Negotiator Negotiator: Kurt Starman Employee Organization: Service Employees International Union - Clerical, Technical and Professional Employee Unit At the hour of 6:30 p.m., Mayor Kehoe adjourned the meeting to closed session. At the hour of 6:53 p.m., Mayor Kehoe reconvened the meeting to regular session. No action was taken. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, at the hour of 6:53 p.m., Mayor Kehoe declared the meeting adjourned. APPROVED: 041 . 41111. Mayo ATTEST: • City Clerk 04/16/96 82 City Council, Regular Meeting City Council Chambers 1313 California Street Redding, California April 16, 1996 7:00 p.m. The Pledge of Allegiance to the flag was led by Mayor Kehoe. The invocation was offered by Virgil Tomasin. The meeting was called to order by Mayor Kehoe with the following Council Members present: P. Anderson, R. Anderson, McGeorge, Murray and Kehoe. Also present were City Manager Warren, Assistant City Manager Perry, City Attorney Wingate, Director of Public Works Galusha, Director of Electric Utility Lindley, Development Services Director Swanson, Fire Chief Wagner, City Treasurer Linville, Principal Planner Keaney, Human Resources Manager Sciarra, Acting Building Official Gungl, Senior Planner King, Director of Administrative Services Starman, Fire Marshal Del Carlo, Associate Civil Engineer Mathis, Associate Planner Morgon, Housing Program Manager Garrity, Management Assistant to the City Manager Bachman, Assistant City Clerk Moscatello, City Clerk Strohmayer, and Secretary to the City Council Rudolph. RESOLUTION-Declaring Week of April 29, 1996, through May 3, 1996, as"Just Say No Week" (A-050-060-600) MOTION: Made by Council Member McGeorge, seconded by Council Member P. Anderson, that Resolution No. 96-069 be adopted, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding designating the week of April 29-May 3, 1996, as "Just Say No" Week. Voting was as follows: Ayes: Council Members - P. Anderson, R. Anderson, McGeorge, Murray and Kehoe Noes: Council Members - None Absent: Council Members -None Resolution No. 96-069 is on file in the office of the City Clerk. Renee Thomas, representing Sequoia School's "Just Say No" Club, invited the City Council to participate in the May 3, 1996, Walk Against Drugs starting just north of the courthouse and ending in Caldwell Park with a barbeque. She outlined some of the activities planned for "Just Say No" Week. Mayor Kehoe presented Ms. Thomas with a copy of the aforementioned resolution. RESOLUTION - Declaring Results of March 26, 1996, Consolidated General Municipal Election (E-070-050) City Clerk Strohmayer submitted the results of the General Municipal Election held on March 26, 1996, in accordance with California Elections Code Section 17081, which instructs the Clerk to canvass the returns for certification. It was noted that as the election was consolidated with the Statewide Direct Primary, the Shasta County Elections Department conducted the election and the County Clerk has canvassed the returns for certification. It is the recommendation of staff that the City Council adopt the necessary resolution certifying the canvass of ballots and declaring the results of the March 26, 1996, General Municipal Election, whereby Council Members R. Anderson and Kehoe and City Treasurer were reelected for a four-year terms, respectively. MOTION: Made by Council Member McGeorge, seconded by Council Member Murray, that Resolution No. 96-070 be adopted, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding declaring the results of the General Municipal Election held in the City of Redding on March 26, 1996, whereby David A. Kehoe and Robert C. Anderson were reelected for a four-year term to the office of City Council Member, and Peggie R. Linville was reelected for a four-year term to the office of City Treasurer. 04/16/96 83 Voting was as follows: Ayes: Council Members - P. Anderson, R. Anderson, McGeorge, Murray and Kehoe Noes: Council Members - None Absent: Council Members -None Resolution No. 96-070 is on file in the office of the City Clerk. OATHS OF OFFICE - City Treasurer Linville (A-050-100) City Clerk Strohmayer administered the Oath of Office to City Treasurer Linville. OATHS OF OFFICE - Council Members R. Anderson and Kehoe (A-050-060) City Clerk Strohmayer administered the Oaths of Office to Council Members R. Anderson and Kehoe. REORGANIZATION OF CITY COUNCIL (A-050-060) MOTION: Made by Council Member R. Anderson, seconded by Council Member Murray, to appoint Vice Mayor McGeorge to the office of Mayor for a one-year term expiring April 1997. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes Council Member Kehoe stated that his term as Mayor was a rewarding and fulfilling experience. He complimented staff for their assistance in making the Mayor's job easier. He noted that the City of Redding's successes are directly attributable to the efforts of the community's residents. The City Council presented Council Member Kehoe with a plaque expressing appreciation for his exceptional leadership, dedication, and service provided to the residents of Redding during his term as Mayor. Mayor McGeorge requested nominations for the office of Vice Mayor. MOTION: Made by Council Member Murray, seconded by Council Member R. Anderson, to appoint Council Member P. Anderson to the office of Vice Mayor for a one-year term expiring April 1997. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes MOTION: Made by Council Member Kehoe, seconded by Council Member R. Anderson, to appoint Council Member Murray to the office of Mayor Pro Tern for a one-year term expiring April 1997. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes CONSENT CALENDAR The following matters were considered inclusively under the Consent Calendar: Approval of Payroll and Accounts Payable Register (A-050-100-500) It is recommended that Accounts Payable Register 19, for the period April 2, 1996, through April 11, 1996, check numbers 231339 through 231809 inclusive, in the amount of$2,560,791.78, and Payroll Register 21, check numbers 416627 through 417290 inclusive, and electronic deposit transactions numbers 28856 through 29101, totaling$1,200,745.37, for the period March 24, 1996, through April 111 6, 1996, be approved. TOTAL: $3,761,537.15 Ordinance No. 2148 - re Amending Redding Municipal Code Chapters 9.20, Fire Prevention, and 16.08, Housing and Building Codes (Bates Bill) (P-150-070) It is recommended that Ordinance No. 2148 be adopted, an ordinance of the City Council of the City of Redding amending portions of Redding Municipal Code Chapters 9.20 (Fire Prevention) and 16.08 (Housing and Building Codes), specifically the implementation of the Bates Bill. 04/16/96 84 Asphalt Cowboys Request - Street Dance (A-110) It is recommended that the City Council waive the provisions of Redding Municipal Code Section 6.38.062 and permit the consumption and/or possession of alcoholic beverages at the Asphalt Cowboys' street dance on Wednesday, May 15, 1996, subject to the dance being coordinated with the Police Department. Transaction Listing - 1st Quarter 1996 (B-050-100) It is the recommendation of the Administrative Services Director that the City Council accept the 1st Quarter 1996 Transaction Listing of items between $5,000 and $25,000 approved by the City Manager. Purchase Order - re Personnel Services at Redding Community Access Channel (B-050-100 & B-080-120) It is the recommendation of the Administrative Services Director that the City Council ratify the City Manager's actions in approving the payment of the Purchase Order to Norrell Temporary Services in the total amount of$25,417.11. Resolution - re Amendment to Rehabilitation Loan Policy (G-100-080-380) It is the recommendation of the Development Services Director that Resolution No. 96-071 be adopted, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding approving elimination of the $10,000 loan cap to nonprofit organizations through amendment to the Rehabilitation Loan Policy adopted by City Council Resolution No. 75-86. License Agreement - re Air Show 96 Resolution - Prohibiting Parking at Air Show 96 * (P-030-250 & A-090-100) It is the recommendation of the Development Services Director that the City Council approve the License Agreement, for the period June 1, 1996, through June 17, 1996, with the Exchange Club of Redding regarding the use of Redding Municipal Airport for Air Show 96. It is further recommended that Resolution No. 96-074 be adopted, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding prohibiting parking at the Air Show 1996 celebration. Resolution - Authorizing Destruction of Documents (A-050-055-750) It is the recommendation of the City Clerk that Resolution No. 96-075 be adopted, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding authorizing the destruction of certain documents. Request by Simpson College - re Use of Special Reserve Funds in College Highlands Assessment District No. 1989-4 (A-170-120-115) It is the recommendation of the City Attorney that the City Council terminate College Highlands Assessment District No. 1989-4 Special Security Agreement Fund Agreement, pursuant to a Statement of Termination signed by the Mayor, with the balance remaining in the fund applied to assessments 17 and 18 in accordance with Simpson College's request. MOTION: Made by Council Member Kehoe, seconded by Council Member Murray, that all the foregoing items on the Consent Calendar be approved and adopted as recommended. Voting was as follows: Ayes: Council Members - P. Anderson, R. Anderson, Kehoe, Murray and McGeorge Noes: Council Members -None Absent: Council Members -None Resolution Nos. 96-071, 96-074 and 96-075 and Ordinance No. 2148 are on file in the office of the City Clerk. 04/16/96 85 GENERAL PLAN TASK FORCE ASSIGNMENTS (G-030) MOTION: Made by Council Member Kehoe, seconded by Council Member R. Anderson, to appoint Joan Gannon, a Director of the Centerville Community Services District, and Bob Dietz, General Manager of the Bella Vista Water District, to the General Plan Task Force. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes PRELIMINARY SCHEMATICS OF CIVIC CENTER (C-050-025) City Manager Warren provided an overview of the Report to City Council dated April 10, 1996, incorporated herein by reference, regarding the schematics for the Civic Center. He related that work has now progressed to the point where the architect is prepared to present some choices for the City Council's review and comment prior to developing the final preferred conceptual design. He stated that once the City Council's comments are received, changes will be made and the City Council will be asked to approve the preferred design concepts at its May 21, 1996, meeting. He indicated that concurrent with the City Council's review, members of the Shasta Builders Exchange and the citizens' Civic Center Committee will be invited to review and comment on the schematics. Jean Nichols, representing Nichols, Melburg & Rossetto, introduced Mike Luso who gave a view graph presentation of the Civic Center's preliminary schematics. The presentation included an overview of the following: (a)a site diagram dated April 16, 1996; (b) site design criteria dated April 16, 1996; (c) Schematic Site Plan A dated April 16, 1996; (d) Schematic Site Plan B dated April 16, 1996; (e) Schematic Site Plan C dated April 16, 1996; (f) Schematic Site Plan D dated April 16, 1996; (g)building design criteria dated April 16, 1996; (h) First Floor Plan Space Study dated April 16, 1996; (i) Second Floor Plan Space Study dated April 16, 1996; and (j) Third Floor Plan Space Study dated April 16, 1996. City Manager Warren asked that each City Council Member to give his/her comments to the City Manager's Office by May 7, 1996. He stated he would provide updates to the City Council as individual comments are received, i.e., site preference, etc. This was an information item and no action was required. AGREEMENT - re City-County Annexation Study RESOLUTION - Appropriating Funds * (B-130-070 & A-150) City Manager Warren provided an overview of the Report to City Council dated April 11, 1996, incorporated herein by reference, regarding the need to hire a consultant to perform a City-County annexation/service study. He explained that the heart of the issue is the cost of providing services for new development. He stated that the County has a cost and, if annexed, the City also has a cost. He related that these costs need to be identified for both the County and the City as they will, obviously, play an important part of any property tax exchange agreement. Mr. Warren summarized that he is encouraged by Shasta County representatives, the EDC General Manager, and the City coming together in an attempt to work out a cooperative, fair agreement for the benefit of the community. If done correctly, he stated that the report can serve as a model for other cities in the area. If successful, he noted that the study would more than pay for itself by having staff and elected officials working together, or at least better, rather than in an atmosphere of mistrust and at cross purposes. Mr. Warren pointed out that the proposed agreement with Crawford,Multari& Starr for such a study would not exceed $21,800, of which Shasta County's portion would be $9,700. He noted that the City is requesting additional work be performed relative to the Stillwater annexation. Mr. Warren read the County Administrative Officer's letter of April 16, 1996, incorporated herein by reference, into the record, wherein the Shasta County Board of Supervisors concluded it would be premature to support the study as recommended, and therefore, declined to fund a portion of the study costs. 04/16/96 86 Based on the County's decision, he outlined the alternatives available to the City Council: (1) not do the study; (2)the City funds the study itself, and (3)try and convince the County the proposed study is the best course of action. Council Member Murray voiced his disappointment in the County's position and the tone of its letter and cited the following points: 1) the lack of City/County cooperation is inhibiting the job recruitment process in the community as a whole and the study is an opportunity to solve this problem; 2) not having an answer to the annexation issue impacts the General Plan update process, i.e., infrastructure design, etc. He invited the County to make any necessary changes to the Scope of Work; 3) neither the County nor the City has enough money to meet all the community's demands; 4) the issue is what is best for the community; and 5) the Board of Supervisors serves individuals outside the City, as well as those inside the City. Council Member Murray recommended that the City Manager be directed to have additional dialogue with the County and determine whether the Scope of Work can be redefined to the satisfaction of both the City and the County. Council Member R. Anderson also expressed his disappointment in the County's letter. He did not favor the City proceeding with the study on its own, as it takes two parties to agree on an issue. He stated the County's letter could be interpreted to mean that the County does not want any more annexations to occur. He concurred with Council Member Murray that the City should not necessarily drop the concept of the study, but it must be supported by both parties. Council Member P. Anderson concurred with Council Members Murray and R. Anderson and encouraged citizens who are concerned about the annexation issue to call their County Supervisor. Council Member Kehoe noted that the County may not be able to expend the $9,700 necessary for the study. If that is the case, he supported underwriting the County's share of the study. He noted that the key is determining the County's central issue, i.e., money, etc. Randy Franck explained that he owns property in the City, the County, and the City's sphere of influence. He indicated that he has worked with the City and County extensively, as well as the City of Martinez, Contra Costa County, and Cities of Santa Rosa and Sonoma. He stated he is successful in everything he attempts, as well as neutral. He indicated that the City Manager of the City of Arroyo Grande, Robert Hunt, would assist in supplying the City with the public documents relative to this same issue. Instead of hiring a consultant to perform this work, he offered to compile the necessary documents for the City. He related that he has the support of G. J. Thiesen, the ex-CEO of Turtle Bay and several other retired community members if he were to be chosen to perform this job. Mayor McGeorge concurred with Council Member Murray's recommendation that the City Manager discuss with the County the possibility of expanding the Scope of Work. He stated there is real merit to having facts and figures in order to determine whether the concerns of both parties are perceptions or realities. MOTION: Made by Council Member Murray, seconded by Council Member P. Anderson, to direct the City Manager to discuss the City Council's concerns and reactions to the County's letter with County Executive Officer Doug Latimer and conveying the City's willingness to do whatever it takes to seek resolution to this matter, including paying the County's share, allowing the County to redraft the Scope of Work, and meeting with the County directly. Motion was withdrawn. Council Member R. Anderson opined that the City needs assurance that the County will make a good faith effort to resolve this matter. He also recommended that all concerned parties contact their Supervisor and voice their concern regarding this matter. Council Member Murray extended an invitation for the public to contact any City Council Member to discuss this matter. He stressed his main objective is to seek a solution to the matter. 04/16/96 87 Council Member Kehoe did not want to predicate the City's decision based on the County's actions. He stated that if the study is beneficial to the City, then the City should make a decision whether to proceed. Council Member R. Anderson opposed proceeding with the study without the County's participation. MOTION: Made by Council Member Murray, seconded by Council Member P. Anderson, directing staff to proceed entering into an agreement with Crawford, Multari & Starr to perform the work 111 associated with Task No. 8 identified in the proposed study concerning the Stillwater Annexation Review and Financial Analysis and adopt Resolution No. 96-077, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding approving and adopting the 34th amendment to City Budget Resolution No. 95- 153 appropriating $2,400 to hire a consultant on the issue of the Stillwater Annexation. Voting was as follows: Ayes: Council Members - P. Anderson, R. Anderson, Kehoe, Murray and McGeorge Noes: Council Members -None Absent: Council Members -None Resolution No. 96-077 is on file in the office of the City Clerk. MOTION: Made by Council Member Murray, seconded by Council Member R. Anderson to defer consideration regarding entering into an agreement with Crawford, Multari& Starr to conduct a City- County Annexation Services Study until the meeting of May 7, 1996. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes At the hour of 8:52 p.m., Mayor McGeorge declared the meeting recessed. At the hour of 9:05 p.m., Mayor McGeorge reconvened the meeting to regular session. RESOLUTION - Amending City Council Policy No. 804 re Jobs Credits/Fee Deferral Program to Economic Incentives Program (A-050-060-555 & E-050) Assistant City Manager Perry highlighted the Report to the City Council dated April 5, 1996, incorporated herein by reference, which summarized the changes to City Council Policy No. 804, Job Credits/Fee Deferral Program. In addition to this policy, the City has two other incentives for industrial jobs creation, the Economic Development Rate for Electric Service and the waiver of Traffic Impact Fees. He stated that staff is proposing to consolidate these policies into one economic incentive package. Mr. Perry related that from staff's perspective, the City's program is designed to attract investment with a moderate amount of risk. He stated that the key to risk management is the security behind the loan. In today's world, the City needs something in place which is easy to interpret and administer, yet flexible enough to work without creating an inordinate amount of paperwork or referrals to the City Council for different kinds of businesses. It is the recommendation of staff that the City Council adopt a resolution amending the Job Credits/Fee Deferral Program to an Economic Incentives Program. MOTION: Made by Council Member Kehoe, seconded by Council Member R. Anderson, that Resolution No. 96-076 be adopted, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding amending its Policy No. 804 from a Jobs Credit/Fee Deferral Program to an Economic Incentives Program. Voting was as follows: Ayes: Council Members - P. Anderson, R. Anderson, Kehoe, and McGeorge Noes: Council Members - Murray Absent: Council Members -None Resolution No. 96-076 is on file in the office of the City Clerk. 04/16/96 88 REQUEST FROM REDDING COMMUNITY THEATER-re Additional Parking Lot near Old City Hall (C-070-010 & P-030-230) Assistant City Manager Perry stated that the Redding Community Theater is requesting that the City purchase a vacant parcel on the southwest corner of Market and Shasta Streets. He related that the parcel was the site of a former service station and a determination needs to be made on whether the property is free and clear of contamination and whether the soil has been recompacted. The Report to City Council dated April 5, 1996, incorporated herein by reference, outlined sources of funds for property acquisition and the cost of improvements. Mr. Perry related that two conclusions come to mind: (1) Old City Hall is an investment that will be owned by the public for a long time and nearby parking would be an enhancement for the property; and (2) this should be a partnership between downtown, users of the facility, and the City. It is the recommendation of staff that the City Council seek an option on the property for six months to determine value, risk, cost of improvements, and possible funding sources and commitments. It is further recommended that the City inquire whether the Redding Community Theater, the adjoining property owners, and Shasta County Arts Council would consider participating in the funding of the acquisition and improvements on a 30 percent private, 30 percent nonprofit, and 40 percent public split. MOTION: Made by Council Member P. Anderson, seconded by Council Member Murray, to direct staff to seek a six-month option on the property located on the southwest corner of Market and Shasta Streets to determine value, risk, cost of improvements, and possible funding sources and commitments and inquire whether the Redding Community Theater, the adjoining property owners, and the Shasta County Arts Council would consider participating in the funding of the acquisition and improvements on a 30 percent private, 30 percent nonprofit and 40 percent public split. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes DOWNTOWN PLAN (R-030-150) Assistant City Manager Perry provided an overview of the Report to City Council dated April 3, 1996, incorporated herein by reference, concerning the Downtown Plan. He stated that the Downtown Plan presents a framework for the future. It deals with how cars, people and places go together using design elements referred to as "kit of parts." He related that the plan addresses improvements to both public and private property. Mr. Perry explained that the Downtown Task Force has outlined eleven specific recommendations in the first fiscal year with a total estimated cost of$360,000. The City's share is $131,000 with the largest expense($75,000) representing one-half the cost to acquire a vacant parcel across the street from Old City Hall. It is the recommendation of staff that the City Council accept the Downtown Plan in concept and refer it to the City Manager for consideration as part of the City's budget process. Council Member Kehoe cited what he viewed as three important points to keep in mind: (1) What is the City trying to accomplish as far as a community; (2)Measurement of goal satisfaction, i.e., what do the citizens receive for the investment; (3) Public/Private Partnerships - One possible source of funds which has been identified is the formation of an assessment district. He suggested surveying business owners in the area to determine their willingness to participate in an assessment district. Mr. Perry stated that the initial feedback is that the business owners would like to put the assessment district into place themselves. He noted that staff has not formally responded to the Downtown Plan, but anticipated that staff would make a comprehensive list of recommendations for both the Redevelopment Agency's and City Council's consideration. MOTION: Made by Council Member Murray, seconded by Council Member P. Anderson, to accept the Downtown Plan in concept and refer the plan to the City Manager for consideration as part of the City's budget process. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes 04/16/96 89 SET PUBLIC HEARING - re Community Development Block Grant Program Committee Recommendation (G-100-030-041) Assistant City Manager Perry provided an overview of the Report to City Council dated April 16, 1996, incorporated herein by reference, relative to the Community Development Block Grant Program Committee's recommendations for 1996-97. Mr. Perry explained that the City Council, in the past, has chosen to limit the 15 percent cap to the annual grant award for public service activities. This decision was based upon the concern that the funds which are available to such projects as housing rehabilitation, public works projects, and economic development would slowly be eroded. Mr. Perry stated that the Committee is recommending that funded activities which do not show significant progress over an 18-month period should be returned to the Committee for redistribution. It is further recommended that a needs assessment be done to receive maximum value out of the CDBG funding for public improvements. It is the recommendation of staff that the City Council set the public hearing for May 7, 1996, to comment on the annual Action Plan, that the City Council give the Community Development Advisory Committee directions to implement the 18-month time period for CDBG funded activities to show significant progress toward implementation, to retain the existing method of determining the 15 percent public service activities cap, and to do a needs assessment. In response to Council Member Murray, Mr. Perry stated that the needs assessment would teach staff which activities are eligible for CDBG funding, define the needs within the community which are the City's responsibility, and develop a program to meet those needs. Council Member Murray stated that the City has an adopted City-wide Capital Improvement Program in place. He related that staff should already be aware of how to apply for CDBG funding. Mr. Perry believed the needs assessment would dovetail in the City's Capital Improvement Program and work hand in hand. In response to Council Member Kehoe, Mr. Perry related that funding for the fire truck was reduced to allow monies to be utilized for the handicap ramp program, which is an ADA requirement. MOTION: Made by Council Member R. Anderson, seconded by Council Member P. Anderson, to set a public hearing for 7:00 p.m., May 7, 1996, to comment on the annual Action Plan, and authorized Community Development Advisory Committee to implement the 18-month time period for CDBG funded activities to show significant progress toward implementation, and to retain the existing method of determining the 15 percent public service activities cap. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes RESOLUTION - Ordering Abatement of 513 N. Market Street, owned by Clyde Dean (A-030-070) Acting Building Official Gungl provided an overview of the Report to City Council dated April 5, 1996, incorporated herein by reference, concerning the abatement of the Cedar Lodge Motel at 513 North Market Street owned by Clyde Dean. Mr. Gungl related that a demolition permit has been issued to Mr. Dean, however, progress has been slow to remove the debris from the site. It is the recommendation of the Board of Appeals and staff that the City Council adopt the necessary resolution to abate the nuisance by demolition or repair with the standard 30-day time period to complete demolition or repair. Since the owner has already been working on the demolition more than 60 days, this option would allow staff to have the debris removed from the site in 30 days should the owner fail to complete the work by that time. Randy Franck stated that he did not want the City to act on the matter too quickly, as it appears the property owner is acting in good faith to clean up the location. He opined that the abatement act is not lawful and requires a trespass for the abatement officer to abate the property. 04/16/96 90 Council Member R. Anderson emphasized that staff's recommendation would allow the property owner an additional 30 days to clear the debris from the site. MOTION: Made by Council Member R. Anderson, seconded by Council Member Murray, that Resolution No. 96-072 be adopted, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding approving the Report and Findings of the Board of Appeals, and ordering the abatement of the unsafe and unsightly building(s) and debris on property at 513 North Market Street, owned by Clyde Dean. Voting was as follows: Ayes: Council Members - P. Anderson, R. Anderson, Kehoe, Murray and McGeorge Noes: Council Members -None Absent: Council Members - None Resolution No. 96-072 is on file in the office of the City Clerk. RESOLUTION-Intention to Begin Legal Proceedings of Abatement on Property at 1756 Eugenia Avenue, owned by Corilyn Stygar (A-030-070) Acting Building Official Gungl highlighted the Report to City Council dated April 1, 1996, incorporated herein by reference, regarding property at 1756 Eugenia Avenue. He related that the structure is abandoned and numerous and major items of disrepair have been noted throughout. To date, the owner has taken no action toward making the necessary repairs. It is the recommendation of staff that the City Council adopt the necessary resolution of intention to begin legal proceedings of abatement on said property. MOTION: Made by Council Member R. Anderson, seconded by Council Member P. Anderson, that Resolution No. 96-073 be adopted, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding to begin legal proceedings of abatement on the real property located at 1756 Eugenia Avenue, owned by Corilyn Stygar. Voting was as follows: Ayes: Council Members -P. Anderson, R. Anderson, Kehoe, Murray and McGeorge Noes: Council Members - None Absent: Council Members - None Resolution No. 96-073 is on file in the office of the City Clerk. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MANAGER (A-050-122 & P-100-320) Development Services Director Swanson provided an overview of the Report to City Council dated April 4, 1996, incorporated herein by reference, concerning the creation of an Economic Development Manager in the Development Services Department. He stated that the City Council has expressed a strong interest in creating a first class economic development program. At the same time, there is a pressing need for a position to manage the City's real property assets, so as to maximize the return on the City's investments in land and buildings. He explained that by hiring an experienced professional to perform these tasks,the City will be able to increase the level of service to its existing businesses and to deliver a more effective response to new business inquiries, while utilizing its property assets to reinforce the City Council's civic, economic and fiscal goals. It is the recommendation of staff that the City Council establish the position of Economic Development Management in the Development Services Department. If the City Council concurs, it is further recommended that necessary resolution be adopted creating the new classification of Economic Development Manager with a salary range of$3,679 - $5,804 per month; that the existing plan checker position be reclassified to Economic Development Manager; and that staff be authorized to begin the recruitment process. Council Member Kehoe asked staff to clarify the interface between the proposed Economic Development position and the activities currently funded through the Economic Development Corporation (EDC) and Superior California Economic Development District (SCEDD). 04/16/96 91 Mr. Swanson acknowledged that the City currently contracts with EDC and SCEDD to accomplish basic marketing and outreach activities, as well as financial packaging, for business prospects. He stressed that the City needs an individual to take the hand off from these entities, manage the project, provide information to the business, coordinate the various responses, and handle any activities necessary to make the transaction occur. He did not anticipate the Economic Development position would be involved in market activities, except as a liaison to the EDC. In response to Council Member Kehoe, Mr. Swanson related that the individual would be responsible for acting as a liaison with not only City departments, but non-City agencies and ensuring that the individual's/firm's needs are met. Mr. Swanson anticipated that the City would still continue to have appraisals prepared by outside firms. Council Member Murray believed that the City could, in fact, save in excess of$50,000 annually on appraisals if they were managed more appropriately via an Asset Manager. He believed the Asset Manager would be, at minimum, a full-time job and the position is essential in terms of obtaining the necessary money to construct the new City Hall. He opined that in the near term asset management is more important than economic development. He recalled the three-year financial commitment that the City made to the EDC. He preferred moving forward with the hiring of a full-time Asset Manager and sharing the economic development activities between the Director of Development Services and the City Manager's Office. Council Member R. Anderson indicated the title was not as important as the how the individual's work is prioritized, and he felt the individual's primary focus should be asset management. City Manager Warren related that Mr. Swanson is doing a good job in development services, however, the intention has always been to focus on job retention. The City needs an individual who visits businesses before there is a problem. He concurred that there may be a need for two positions, however, due to budget constraints, he is not ready to make that commitment. He related that the recommended action would allow the City to move forward with its economic development program. Council Member P. Anderson pointed out that asset management is currently being done utilizing existing staff, however, the tasks listed under economic development are not being done. She favored moving forward with staff's recommendation. Mayor McGeorge acknowledged that while both positions are necessary, he believed asset management was the priority at this point in time. He noted that some items in the job description appear to be a duplication of effort, wherein the EDC already produces the necessary brochures and handbooks. Council Member Kehoe concurred that the individual's time should focus primarily on asset management. In response to Council Member Kehoe, Mr. Warren stated that if building activity increases, it may be necessary to request additional personnel if the workload is too much. Council Member Murray stated that the City does not currently have appraisals on any of its surplus property. He noted, however, that this City Council has made significant progress in the area of economic development, and he, therefore, preferred hiring an Asset Manager. He suggested that the Senior Planners visit the various businesses and attempt to assist in the area of job retention. MOTION: Made by Council Member P. Anderson, seconded by Council Member R. Anderson, to create the position of Economic Development Manager in the Development Services Department in accordance with the job outline contained in the Report to City Council dated April 4, 1996. Voting was as follows: Ayes: Council Members - P. Anderson and R. Anderson Noes: Council Members - Kehoe, Murray and McGeorge Absent: Council Members -None Motion Failed. 04/16/96 92 Council Member P. Anderson believed the job descriptions were too detailed. Mayor McGeorge concurred that asset management is important and did not believe the motion adequately addressed it. MOTION: Made by Council Member Murray, seconded by Council Member Kehoe, to refer the creation of an Economic Development Manager in the Development Services Department to the City Manager for additional clarification for consideration at the May 7, 1996, meeting. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes AWARD OF BID - Bid Schedule No. 2983, Lake Redding Bridge Project (B-050-020 & S-070-050-100) Public Works Director Galusha provided an overview of the Report to City Council dated April 12, 1996, incorporated herein by reference, concerning the analysis and recommendation regarding Bid Schedule No. 2983, Lake Redding Bridge Project. Mr. Galusha highlighted the letter from the Department of Transportation dated April 15,1996, incorporated herein by reference, concerning Caltrans opinion relative to the Lake Redding Bridge project. Mr. Galusha stated that staff believes it is very important to move forward with both the Lake Redding Bridge and Court Street extension projects in order to meet the City's transportation needs. Therefore, it is the recommendation of staff, with Caltrans concurrence, that the City Council award Bid Schedule No. 2983, Lake Redding Bridge Project, to MCM Construction, Inc., in the amount of$6,904,926, and $345,246 be approved to cover the cost of the contingency of contract change orders, and an additional amount of$515,250 for construction management services, engineering services during construction, staff engineering and materials testing, for a total project cost of $7,765,422. In response to Council Member R. Anderson, Mr. Galusha stated that the contract must be awarded prior to any negotiation occurring with the contractor. City Manager Warren provided a summary of his memorandum to City Council dated April 15, 1996, incorporated herein by reference, outlining his reasons for supporting the award of the bid as recommended by staff. Randy Franck stated that the current bridge which will adequately accommodate the traffic, and he, therefore, opined a pedestrian bridge is the only item required at this time. He did not favor spending the additional monies on the proposed bridge. Council Member Murray voiced his frustration regarding the letter from Martin& Kane and the fact that historical data was utilizied when a state-of-the-art bridge was being designed. He hoped that the City could develop a better method of handling consultant contracts. He stated that he is supportive of stars recommendation due to the recent vote regarding retrofitting within California. He was concerned that if the bridge was rebid, the project could ultimately cost more for less bridge due to Caltrans projects. Council Member Kehoe noted the significant number of uncertainties associated with the project. He questioned whether the contractor could request a change order if these uncertainties become reality. City Attorney Wingate stated that the contractor should have taken these uncertainties into consideration when bidding the project. Therefore, the contractor cannot request a change order for any items that have been factored into the bid price. 04/16/96 93 MOTION: Made by Council Member Murray, seconded by Council Member R. Anderson, to award Bid Schedule No. 2983, Lake Redding Bridge Project, to MCM Construction, Inc. in the amount of $6,904,926, and $345,246 be approved to cover the cost of the contingency of contract change orders, and an additional amount of$515,250 for construction management services, engineering services during construction, staff engineering and materials testing, for a total project cost of $7,765,422. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes EMINENT DOMAIN PROCEEDINGS - re Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (Use Permit No. 44-95) 111 (L-010-390 & C-070-010) Mayor McGeorge abstained from discussion and voting on this matter. In the Report to City Council dated April 9, 1996, incorporated herein by reference, concerning Use Permit No. 44-95 issued to Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. City Attorney Wingate stated that one of the conditions of the Use Permit was that the City would provide its power of eminent domain for acquisition of right-of-way. All costs of acquisition, including appraisals, attorneys' fees and purchase prices are to be paid by the developer. The developer, however, is entitled to deduct all such costs from traffic impact fees it must otherwise pay. It is the recommendation of staff that the City Council approve the use of the City's power of eminent domain to acquire right-of-way for the widening of Dana Drive in accordance with Use Permit 44-95. MOTION: Made by Council Member Murray, seconded by Council Member R. Anderson, to approve the use of the City's power of eminent domain to acquire right-of-way for the widening of Dana Drive in accordance with Use Permit 44-95 issued to Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. Voting was as follows: Ayes: Council Members - P. Anderson, R. Anderson, Kehoe, and Murray Noes: Council Members -None Absent: Council Members -None Abstain: Council Members - McGeorge PUBLIC COMMENT (T-080-300) Randy Franck provided the City Council with a letter stating his concern regarding traffic in the Quartz Hill Road area and the need to develop a path system. He also stated his concern regarding Proposition 62 and the potential problems associated with continuing to collect Transient Occupancy Tax at the current rate. No action was required. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, at the hour of 10:50 p.m., Mayor McGeorge declared the meeting adjourned. APPROVED: • ./��11 Mayor T ATTEST: dir,,ee: City Clerk 04/16/96