The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutReso 1987-040 - Approving the agreement between the city of redding and professional associated consulting engineers, inc i � ' I � � I I i RESOLUTION NO. �� A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING APPROVING THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF REDDING AND � PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATED CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. , DBA PACE ENGINEERING, FOR AN UPDATED MASTER SEWER PLAN, AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO SIGN SAME. BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Redding as ifollows : � l . That the City Council of the City of Redding hereby approves the attached Agreement, not to exceed the sum of I $40 , 000. 00 unless prior authorization is given for work in excess of that defined in the Work Plan, Exhibit A, between the City of � Redding and Professional Associated Consulting Engineers, Inc. , doing business as Pace Engineering, a true copy of which is � attached hereto and made a part hereof by reference; and 2. That the Mayor of the City of Redding is hereby , authorized and directed to sign all necessary documents on behalf ; of the City of Redding, and the City Clerk is hereby authorized �, and directed to attest the signature of the Mayor and to impress � the official seal of the City of Redding on the aforesaid documents, when appropriate. I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was introduced and read at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the 2nd day of February , 1987, and was duly adopted at said meeting by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Carter, Dahl , Gard & Fulton NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Johannessen ' ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None ' ,��e �' �� . LEE D. FULTON, M.D. , Mayor � City of Redding I ATTEST: � FORM PPROVED: � 1 �' r � � ETHEL A. NICHOLS, City Clerk RA DALL A. HAYS, ity Attorney i � � I � ' ,�i' I , , • � , � .. �' � Af��!�qEI�"Y9 i I i � THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of , �.987� �iy �r�d between CITY OF REDDING, Redding, i I Califc��nia he�ein�fte� �e�erred. �o �� the; CLIENT; �nd Prafe�-� - � � sional Associate� Co��u�.tZng Enga�n�e�s� Inc. , (d/b/a PACE � Engi.n.�cring) c�f 1130 Sou�h ��ta '��ac�i,.r�c�F Ga�,i.fc��r,:�.�, 1�ere%n-- � after ref�rrec� to as the ENGINEER. � � � �AITNESSE�H '� ; THAT WHE�A�, tYy.e CI.sIEI�IT' r��u� �e� enc�in�era:nq service� far j � the master planning of improvemen�s to its sewage collection � system. � � � AND �'HEREA�� L-�.e EN�INEFR �� E��_y :Li.c�nsed a� a rea5_s�ered . , Profes�ic�i�aZ E�g�.n�� i� �hc Sta�� i �`��I.ifc�inia a1�,c� is � qualif�.ed and �xp�r.ienc�a to provic�e suc�Y� enqir,.eerinc� service�, � an.� h�� vie��I.:� �x��.�r°�� s�rr<�.�_.�;.x,. �t:ts«�. :Ea.r. i��k,c �a_t�F :��r, j 197�. I �a�,�� `�HE�:fi��}��d �:�� IENT' �.��c� �'�� 7:��;t�CYtt�7FFrt f�c�z i::r;c I � consid�ra�ion I�e��:einaft�� named, a.c��ee- a� ��iiUwse I � ARTICLE I : ENGINEER' S SEItVICES � � � The ENGINEER shall perform those services which are i descrfbed in the PACE l�tt�r dated Janu�ry 28, 1981 a�zd tl�,e ; . attached WORK PLANE Pa�ts I and 2� � cop�T af each af� which is � attacYT�a heretc as Er'�Iz�EI� `�.A°` anc� �i_r.ice�l,'�>or..�aieo. �he�l��..�;. i�y� t��h.z.y � , reference. ', I i � � � ! £ , �� ,.• � : � i � I i ARTICLE II EL�IGINEER' S FEE � For services performed the ENGINEER shall be compensated on ; the basis of the rates established in the STANDARD CHARGES FOR � PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, effective through December 31, 1987, a ; copy of which is attached hereto as EXHIBIT "B" and incorporated � herein by this reference. The standard charges may not change except as a result of annual salary increases or decreases. The I maximum fee shall not exceed an amount of $40,000, unless prior � authorization is given for work in excess of that defined in the i ' WORK PLAN, EXHIBIT "A". ', ARTICLE. III PAYMENT FOR SERVICE5 i For services performed on a time and expense basis, the ' CLIENT agrees that he shall pay for the services performed by ! the ENGINEER as the work progresses, based upon work completed. � ; Invoices �hall be submitted by �.ne �NGINEEP, at the beginning of each month for services performed during the previous month. ' Payment will be due upon receipt of invoices and shall be made ; within a period of 30 days following receipt of invoices. ' ARTICLE IV COMPLETION OF SERVICES The ENGINEER agrees that he will do all work within a time � period of 150 calendar days beginning with the execution of this i � contract, except final reproduction will be completed within a period of 30 caler�dar days following completion of the other work. It is agreed between the parties to this AGREEMENT that � the ENGINEER cannot be responsible for delays occasioned by � factors beyond his control, nor by factors which could not reasonably have been foreseen at the time the AGREEMEIJT was : prepared. � � i , � i l I i . � , .. t ,•' � � � � . � I ARTICLE V EI�TGINEER'S RESPONSIBILITY � The ENGINEER agrees that his services shall be performed in ; accordance with generally accepted engineer•ing practices, but makes no other warranty either expressed or implied. The � parties agree that estimated construction cost figures furnished ' in the master plan by the ENGINEER are estimates only and the � ENGINEER is not responsible for fluctuations in cost factors. i . ARTICLE VI CONTRACT AND COL�TTRACT PROVISIONS � � � , This AGREEMENT shall include the City of Redding "Contract ' and Contract Provision", Item I in the attached EXHIBIT "C". � The term consultant in that document shall refer to PACE � Engineering. � . IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have hereunto executed tY+is AGREEM�,IVT the day and year fa.rst above written. I CITY OF REDDING I APPROVED AS TO FORM: I BY: . Mayor ; �° Att rney I PACE ENGINEERING ! ATTESTED: � � BY: ` �i - - Managi Enginee _ Secretary � i � I � ! .. . . �I .d',� `,..: . � Professiona� � ' Associated ' Consulting ' ' ENGINEERING E"9'"ee'S � Incorporated ' ' January 28, 1987 0.04 � � � � , . Mr. Robert Galusha i Superintendent of Public Works City of Redding � 760 Parkview Avenue j Redding, CA 96001 '� Dear Mr. Galusha: Subject: Engineering Services for an Updated Master Sewer Plan Pursuant to your request, we have prPpared a work plan for the ' development of an updated Master Sewer Plan for the area tribu- ; tary to the City of Redding, Clear Creek Wastewater Treatment , Facility. The project would be a joint effort of . the City of �edding Public Wor'{s sta`� and PP.^� En;in��r;.;�g. It would update the 1979 Master Sewerage F�ian, but it would also include �; an analysis of future needs at the Clear Creek Regional Waste- water Treatment Plant . It would not include analysis of the � newly defined Stillwater basin. However, it would include an : analysis of the financial impact of diverting the northeast part of the service area into the new Stillwater system. In summary, the study would review and identify the existing , capacity of the sewer system for each reach of sewer, and would ' further identify the ultimate flows for each reach of sewer serving the sub-areas. A comparison would also be made of the ; existing and future capacities with existing measured sewage plus I&I flows at monitoring stations and pump stations. To , evaluate the ultimate flows, the entire service area would be divided inte sub-areas as necessary to identify �he need for � 10-inch and larger sewers . Existing service areas from the 1979 ', Master Plan would be reviewed and possibly modi�ied. Additional ; service areas would be added between the old regional sewer ' boundary and the present LAFCO �oundary, where sewering was � considered feasible. The service area for study purposes would be defined as the present LAFCO boundary less the Stillwater j basin. (However, as mentioned, we would also include an ; analysis of the effects on the Clear Creek sy�tem as a result of � diversion o£ part ot the flow to Stillwater. ) The common � denominator used for determining sewer flows would be household ' equivalents (HEs ) plus measured or projected I&I flows. All � I I /730 SOUTH STRFET • REDDItJG, CA 9G001 0 (9161 24�i-0202 � � '.� ; �� r� � , � � . Robert Galusha January 28, 1987 Page 2 0.04 commercial, multi-family, and industrial flows would be , converted to these units. Each sub-area would have its existing and ultimate household equivalents identified in tabular form. ' Previously established estimates of growth and HEs in each : service area would be reviewed and revised where applicable to match the current general plan. Each main sewer serving the , sub-areas would be included in the master plan and would be �, sized based on the accumulation of the ultimate equivalent , household units, using appropriate consumer flows and peaking factors for that reach, plus estimated I&I flows, and use of , either minimum or obtainable sewer slopes. Sewage pump stations and the Clear Creek Treatment Plant wauld ' be evaluated as to both capacity, reliability, and utilization � of present day technology in controls and equipment. An electrical engineering consultant may be used in this effort. Costs would be emphasized for major facilities needed in the next 10-year period, and these costs would be prioritized into a ; year-by-year staged construction program. Costs would also be developed for items proposed beyond the 10-year period. i , The sewer systsm (existing and future) would be modeled using ' the computer program "HYDRA" which will be purchased by the City � of Redding. Most of the computer input will be done by City ; staff using the City' s computers. One City staff engineer will � be assigned this responsibility. PACE will work with that staff � member to see that the input and results are consistent ,with its ' usual master planning practice. At this point it is envisioned � that the computer model will identify all those parameters established in the 1979 Master Plan plus it will generate cost and sizing data for parallel or replacement sewer.s, where needed. Manhole invert and finish grades will be input at the ends of each reach of sewer identified. At this point it is proposed that the following five design years will be modeled: 1987, 1992, 1997, 2007, and ultimate. Special emphasis will be placed on determining recommended I construction stages at the treatment plant to keep pace wi$h ! growth; but at the same time distribut� construction casts�' �s much as possible, rather than in a single stage. However,` � economy of scale will also be considered in the, staging. � � , Writing the report and reproduction will be a PACE respon- sibility. The City will do all drafting. Any mapping reduc- ; tions or enlargements done photographically will be coordinated ' by and at the expense of the City. 1 _ • � ; � �� , • , ; Robert Galusha January 28, 1987 i Page 3 0.04 I � Enclosed are Parts 1 and 2 of the work plan. Part 1 consists of a detailed breakdown of staffing reauirements for each major I task in the project . The staffing requirements developed in � Part 1 are summarized below: � MAN- MAN- PACE ENGINEERING DAYS CITY OF REDDING DAYS ' Managing Engineer (LGK) 24 Director of Public � ; Principal Engineer (SLS) 44-1/4 Works (CA) 1-3/4 I Technician III (T-3) 1 Superintendent of Public Steno 12 Works (RG) 13 Staff Engineer (BR) 40-1/2 i Staff Engineer-others(SE) 2 ' Sewer Superintendent (JT) 3 � Plant Superintendent (SC) 4 � Draftsman (D) 28 Technician (T) 44 Planning Staff (PS) 1 - Others 1 ; � The efforts have been snlit on the basis c�f maximizing the use ' of City staff without disrupting normal duties . I � Part 2 of the work plan consists of a cost break down f or the � PACE Engineering effort . The total estimated cost is in the i amount of $39, 800. The maximum amount will not exceed $40,000. ; This includes outside services for electrical engineering (if � needed) , reproduction, and an allowance for contingencies. PACE ! Engineering is prepared to enter into a contract with the City ' of Redding to do this work on an hourly charge-out basis (per diem) and further will agree that the cost will not exceed the ; maximum amount for our portion of the work and the outside services as defined h�rein. Enclosed is a listing of our , standard list of eharges for 1987, � We propose to have the work completed and ready for final repro- i duction in � 5-month period from the date of notice to proceed. ' Assuming initiation o£ the project on February 15, 1987, comple- � tion would be July 15, 1987. We pro�ose that I , Larry Kepple, Managing Eng.ineer of PACE, will act as project manager for the study. Enclosed is a resume of my experience. Of special interest to you is that I acted as � Design Engineer on the 1965-66 Redding Sewerage Improvements a.nd I on the 1966 Capital Improvement Program for the Enterprise ; Public Utility District, and project manager of the 1973 Sewer i , , ! � r I , � ' I •, • ` • • ' i �. � Robert Galusha January 28, 1987 i Page 4 Oo04 , , � ; � System Feasibility Study for the Cascade Community Services District, and project manager on the 1979 Master Sewer Plan for Redding. Because of these four projects, and other design � efforts, I am quite familiar with the Redding sewer system. � I Mre Sam Smith would act as project engineer and would provide � backup for me as well as doing much of the planning and design work. A resume of Mr. Smith is also enclosed. As you know, Mr. Smith also has considerable sewer experience and he was i project engineer on your 1979 Master Sewer Plan. � ' Enclosed are four signed copies of an Engineering Agreement for , the proposed work. If these are acceptable, please execute all copies and return one copy to us for our file. ' I will be pleased to meet with you or other City representatives at your convenience to discuss any aspects of the work plan. We I are prepared to proceed with the study immediately following , your notice to proceed. ; Sincerely, � 7. � � � Larry G. Keppl Managing Engineer L6-9/LGK/dh ; enclosures ��, � � ,; � � � i � � = � � � � � , , I i . i , • ,s , . . . . ` i � '. EXHIBIT "A" PART 1 OF WORK PLAN , DETAILED TASIC STAFFING BREAKDOWN 1987 MASTER SEWER PLAN Task PACE Engineering City of Redding No. Task Description Staff Man-Days Staff Man-Days ; 1 Review work plan approach, Kepple-LGK 1 Galusha-RG 1/2 ; � existing sewer system, (Proj.Mgr) Russell-BR 2 � records, I&I information, Smith-SLS 1 � and previous sewer reports< (Proj.Eng) 2 Field review of existing LGK 1-1/2 RG 1-1/2 � sewer system and pump SLS 1-1/2 Tassello-JT 1-1/2 stationso 3 Field rPview of Clear Creek LGK 1 Plant Super- � Wastewater Treatment Plant SLS 1 . intendent-SC 1 � 4 Initial coordination meet- LGK 1./2 Arness-CA 1/4 ings to review weak and SLS 1/2 RG 1/2 � troublesome facilities in BR 1/2 � system and discuss mapping. JT 1/2 � Zoll-HZ 1/4 , 5 Review existing service SLS 1 BR 2-1/2 sub-areas boundaries versus Drafting-D 2 existing sewer system and � topography on maps to be � used for planning. I 6 Develop new service sub- LGK 1/2 BR 1-1/2 � areas on existing 1"=800' SLS 2 D 2 sewer maps to be used for planning and in report for � areas not previously identified. ; 7 Research and compilation LGK 1 RG 1/2 � of basic design criteria. SLS 1-1/2 BR 1 � 8 Determine existing HEs for LGK 1/4 BR 3 � existing service areas . SLS 1 Technician-T 6 9 Coordinate with Planning LGK 1/4 BR 1 , Dept . and assign ultimate SLS 1/4 Planning HEs to each service areao Staff-PS 1 � T 5 I , , i . i � i i I . � • . v � ' � ' � � � , � i i ' EXHIBIT "A" , PART 1 OF WORK PLAN ; DETAILED TASK STAFFING BREARDOWN �987 MASTER SEWER PLAN (continued) i , Task PACE Engineering City of Redding No. Task Description Staff Man-Days Staff Man-Days � 10 Determine (planimeter) acreages T 1 � of each new service area. , 11 Prepare service area tabu- LGK' 1/4 BR 2 lation. SLS` 1/4 T 3 12 Determine which sewers LGK 1/2 RG 1/2 will be evaluated in SLS 1-1/2 BR 2 � computer model. �. 13 Assign manhole or point LGK 1/4 BR 6 , numbers to all desired SLS 1 T 18 points on sewer reaches � in model and tabulate size, � type, Manning N, length, � slope of assumed hydraulic � gra!�� line, r.:anr�le invert and grade eievations, surface, ' condition, or other cost factors. 14 Review computer program LGK 1/2 BR 3 i for usage and input para- SLS 1/2 RG 1/2 � meters. � � 15 Prepare sewer service area LGK 1/4 BR 1 � tabulation on computer using SLS 1/2 T 1 PACE program or HYDRA equiva- : lent. 16 Prepare input for existing BR 2 ; sewer system for computer model. T 2 ! 17 Evaluate output from com- LGK 1/4 BR 1/2 � puter model of existing SLS 1 T 1 j system. i 18 Prepare input for 1992, �LGK 1/4 BR 5 , 1997, 2007, and ultimate SLS 1/2 T 5 conditions. 1 � � I I `` � . • � ' , ' . � � � �. . . , � i ! EXHIBIT "A'° PART 1 OF WORK PLAN DETAILED �ASR STAFFING BREAKDOWN � 1987 MASTER SEWER PLAN , (continued) I Task PACE Engineering City of Redding � No. Task Description Staff Man-Days Staff Man-Days 19 Evaluate output from future LGK 1/2 BR 1 ' run conditions. SLS 1-1/4 � 20 Prepare input and evaluate LGK 1/2 BR 1 I costs for ultimate condi- SLS' 1/2 T 2 � tion including portion � planned to be diverted to ; Stillwater. , 21 Evaluate existing pump LGK 1/2 RG 1 stations, force mains, SLS 2 , and other support structures. 22 Evaluate alternatives for LGK 2 SC 2 i staging of already planned SLS 1/2 second phase of treatment � plant. Consider any modi- fications to second phase � addition as a result of , current operational conditions . I 23 Evaluate effects on treat- LGK 1-1/2 SC 1 ' ment plant costs and stag- SLS 1/2 � ing assuming the portion , of service area planned to be discharged to Stillwater ' was instead taken to Clear Creek Plant. � j 24 General planning for master LGK 1 RG 1 plan. SLS 2 BR 1 � 25 Prepare mark-up of master LGK 1/2 � plan sewer map (an over- SLS 2-1/4 lay over existing 800-scale sewer maps) . . 26 Prepare markups of other LGK 1 figures to be included in SLS 2 report, including service area maps, population pro- �, jections, capacity diagrams ' fnr major pump stati.ons, ', treatment plant, and design iconceptual plans, if any. � � . � v f ,. ; ! � � EXHIBIT "A'° PART 1 OF WORK PLAN DETAILED TASK STAFFING BREAKDOWN 1987 MASTER SEWER PLAN � (continued) � i ' Task PACE Engineering City of Redding No. Task Description Staff Man-Days Staff Man-Days � 27 Draft master plan overlays, . LGK 1/4 D 20 ; service area map overlays, SLS 1 ; and other figures. � 28 Prepare cost estimates, LGK' 1 RG 1/2 summaries for 10-year SLS- 2 period, and determine ! staging of improvementse ; � 29 Determine average cost LGK 3/4 1tG 1/2 ' impact as a result of SLS 1/2 BR 1/2 making planned partial diversion to Stillwater . j 30 Prepare draft report. LGK- 1 SLS 7 � 31 Review draft report and LGK 1 CA 1 figures, SLS 1 RG 2 BR 2 SE 2 I JT 1 , 32 Complete and review LGK 1 RG 1/2 final report. SLS 1-1/4 ! 33 Complete, review, and LGK 1/4 D 2 � coordinate final figurese SLS 1 RG 1/2 I 34 Report typing (draft Steno 7 ' and final) . ; 35 Reproduction (30 copies) . LGK 1/4 I SLS 1/2 � Steno 3 1 36 Meetings, consultations, LGK 2 CA 1/2 , and miscellaneous . SLS 2 RG 1-1/2 T 1 BR 1 5teno 1 Others 1 i ,` . � � • • , ; , , EXHIBIT "A" ; PART 1 OF WORK PLAN DETAILED TASR STAFFING BREAKDOWN , 1987 MASTER SEWER PLAL�T (continued) � Task PACE Engineering City of Redding No. Task Description Staff Man-Days Staff Man-Days I 37 Re-worka LGK 1/4 RG 1/2 ; SLS 1 BR 1 Steno 1 D 2 �, 38 Supervision. LGK 1/2 RG 1 ' SLS ' 1 SUMMARY LGK 24 CA 1-3/4 SLS 44-1/4 RG 13 T-3 1 BR 40-1/2 � ; Steno 12 SE 2 JT 3 ' SC � i D 28 � T 44 ; - PS 1 � Others 1 I ! i � I i I j � i I i . I . j � ' � � � �, , . • • � , I i 'I EREiIBIT "A" I PART 2 OF WORR PLAN ' PACE ENGINEERING EFFORT 1987 MASTER SEWER PLAN ' 1987 I LABOR Man-Days Rate/Hr Total i Managing Engineer (LGK) 24 $67 $12, 864 � Principal Engineer (SLS) 44-1/4 $61 21, 594 � Technician (T-3) 1 $36 288 ; Steno (S-2) 12 $24 2, 304 - Subtotal $37,050 ; � EXPENSES Incidental Expenses at 5 percent $ 1,852 OUTSIDE SERVICES , Elec�rical Engineering 2MD at $480 $ 960 ' j Total Estimated Cost $39,862 � MAXIMUM FEE $40,000 � I , � I ; I � � � � I i , . . �; • , • . Professional• • I � �� Associated Conwlting ' ENGiNEERiNG E,�'�po�,t� � STANDARD CHARGES FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES � Effective through December 31, 1987 � I�ABOR . Title/Rating Hourly Charge � Managing Engineer (E-7) o . . . a e e o o � o � � � o o . $67.00 � Principal Engineer (E-6) . . . o . e o < e o e e o . = o . $61.00 ISenior Engineer (E-5) . a . . o o e � . � � � � . � . . $55.00 Associate Engineer (E-4) . . . . . . e e e o . � o . . .< . $50.00 Staff Engineer/Grade 3 (E-3) . . . . . . . e o . . . � � e e . $46.00 � Staff Engineer/Grade 2 (E-2) e : � o � o . � � � � � � � o . : $42.00 Staff Engineer/Grade 1 (E-1) . . . a a o . < $38.00 I Technician 4 - Draftsman/Eng. Tech./Constr. Observer . . < . . $41.00 � Technician 3 - Draftsman/Eng. Tech. /Constr< Observer � e o . . $36.00 Technician 2 - Draftsman/Eng. Tech./Constr. Observer o . a . : $31.00 Technician 1 - Draftsman/Engineering Aide . . . . . � o . . $26.00 ' Word Processor/Administrative Secretary (Grade 3) a e . . . . $26-�00 ' Word Processor/Administrative Secretary (Grade 2) . . e o . . $24. 00 , Word Processor/Administrative Secretary (Grade 1) e . � o e . $22.00 Cl�rk/Typist . . . . e . e . e . . . . . . . . . e a a . e . . $16.00 ' Three-Man Survey Party . . • • • • • • . . . • �. . � • < . . . $99.00* Two-Man Survey Party . . . . o . . . . . . . . . . . . . e . . $75 .00* j Survey Supervisor-Licensed Land Surveyor . . . . . . � e � . . $45 .00 � Welding �nd St_::ct�:�a? S*e�1 Fabrication Constr. Observer . . $50.00 Soils Technician Including Nuclear Gauge . . . . e < e . o . . $46.00 _ , EXPENSES � Meals: At cost (out-of-town work only) e I Lodging: At cost. ' Air Transportation: At cost. I Vehicle Transportation: Included in five percent allowance for incidental expenses unless specifically indicated otherwise in Agreement. Outside Services & Fees: At cost plus seven percent administrative fee. � Computer: Included in hourly rates � Electronic Distance Measuring Instrument: Included in survey party rate. � Incidental Expenses**: Charge will be five percent of labor fee � (plus any separately identified major expenses) . � *When prevailing wages are required on public works projects and are ; greater than normal wages, survey field rates will be adjusted accord- , ingly by adding additional salary costs plus fifteen percent for over- , Yiead and prof i t. i **Incidental expenses normally included in the five-percent fee are as follows: vehicle transportation, long-distance telephone calls, normal ; mailing charges, printing and copying, photos, recording fees, incidental material purcha�es, stakes, pins, taxi and ].imousine fees, tips, and other similar incidental expenses related to the project. Vehicle mileage will be at $0.25 per mile if shown as a sepazate pay item in contract. i L�7-3 (12�86) 1730 SOUTN S7REET • REDDING, CA 96001 • (9161 244-0202 EXHIBIT B � ' , � ' ' ' � • . i I , H. CON TANT SELECTION ! The cons ltant will be selected on a number of fac��ors including: i �" � ' 1. Releyan experience. � ` 2. References. � o� ' d and exformance in meeting deadlines. � 3. When work wou be complete p� � 4e Cost of worko � � � 5. Proposed work plan. �' � � 6. Consultant' s understan 'ng of the project. � f � � _ 7. QuaTity of written prQpos , s 8. Budget performance�:� � 9, Perceived abi ty to work with 'ty and committee. i - , • � 10. Consultan staff capability. � After rec ', t of the proposal s , three con 1 tants wi 11 be sel ected to be � intervie�� d. From the interviews , one co ultant will be seTected to prepar ttie t_ntat�ve subd�v�sion man. Inter 'ews, if deemed necessary, ' will e conducted by tne Girector of !'l�nr,,^g a^� �mmunity Develooment and th irector of Public Works. ; I. CONTRACT AND CONTRACT PROVISIONS _ � The contract will be a written agreement between the consultant selected. . � and the City setting forth scope of wnrk, time line, payment schedules , ' City ownership of 4rork, and cost of work. The contracts will be fixed with a not-to=exceed amount unless a change order is approved in advance of ' additional �r�ork being per`ormed. The contract sha11 include the following provisions: 1< Compensation and Method of Payment � Payment would be based on task with a not-to-exceed limit for the final ; price. � 2. Changes The City may, from time to time, request changes in the scope of the hereunder. Such chan es , � services of the consultants to be performed 9 including any increase or decrease in the amount of the consultant' s � compensation, which are mutually agreed upon by and between the public ibody and the consultant, shall be incorporated in written amendments to � this contract. � � � , � i , �.�c t�r� r r C ; , .. . .. . _.�....._. _ _.._._ ._. .. ..... i . I ' ; ' '; � •� ' ' ' • • � ' 3, Termination of Contract for Cause ; ; If, through any cause, the consultant shall fail to fulfill in a timely ' and proper manner his obligations under this contract or ir �the consul- ' tant shall violate any of the covenants, agreements, or stipulations of ' this contract, the City shall thereupon have the right to terminate � this contract by giving written notice to the consultant of such -- � termination and specifying the effective date thereof, at least five � days before the effective date of such termination. In such event, the i consultant shall be entitled to receive just and equitable compensation for any satisfactory work completede � 4e Responsibility In submitting a proposal for° planning work, the consultant shall name � the follawing: a, The person who sha11 administer the contract and who shall be" i responsible for the day-to-day work. ' b, Those individuals who will be working on the project and their � role. . �. Any subcontractors and their responsibilityo , 5. Conflict of Interest � The contractor agrees that it presently has no interest ar�d shall. acquire no interest, d�rect or indirect, that would conflict in any manner or degree with the performance of its services hereunder. The �I contractor further agrees that, in the performance of the agreement, no ! person having any such interest shall be employed. i � 6o Assignability ' . I � The corsultant shall not assign any interest in this contract and shall not transfer any interest in the same (whether by assignment or nova- � tion) without the prior written approval of the City, provided , ; however, that claims for money due or to become due to the consultant , � from the City under this contract may be assigned to a bank, trust company, or other financial institution, or to a trustee in bankruptcy, ' without such approvale �lotice of any such assignment or transfer shall � be furnished promptly to the City. 7. Personnel , The consultant represents that it has, or will secure at its own expense, all necessary personnel reauired to perform the services under � this contract. Such personnel shall not be employees of cr have any � contractual relationship with agencies providing funds for the project. ; � ;I , �c}�f�1�' C- � � _ . . ,; . .. , � . � � � .� � � , I . � ' All of the services required hereinunder shall be performed by the { consultant or under its supervision, and a11 personnel engaged in � performing the services shall be fu1 ?y qualified and authorized or � permitted under State and local ]aw to perform such services. All ' ! professional personnel , including subcontractors engaged in performing � services Tor the consultant under this contract, are to be indicated in � a personnel listing contained within the consultant's proposal attached � hereto and, by rer"erence, incorporated herein. ' Except as hereinabove agreed, no other portion of the services nor any _ � right, title, or interest herein under this contract shall be assigned, ! transferred, conveyed, or subcontracted without the prior written ' approval of the City. � Any changes or substitutions in the consultant's personriel as set forth ' herein must be made known to the project director prior to execution and writ�en approval granted by same before said change or substitution � can become efr"ective. � 8. Independent Contractor � Consultanz, in accordance with his s�atus as an independent contractor, � covenants ar.d acreps that tie wil� conduct himself consistent with �uch status , thaz he will neither hold hirrself out as, nor claim to be, an officer or emoloyee of the Ci�y by reason hereoT, and that he will not , bv reasen hereof ma�e any claim, demand, or application to or for any ' rignt or privil�ge apFi'c�51e to ?n of=icer or emoloyee of the City, including, bUt nOt il(Tllt24 tU, WGt'RiT21i� � C��::+�Sd�l0t1 coverag�, unem- ployment insurance bener"its , social security coverage, or retire�nent � membership credi�. � . , 9. Seitlement of Disputes--arbitration . a. All claims , disputes, and other matters in question between the . � City ano the consultant arising out of, or relating to, the con- ; tract documents or tne breach thereof, except for claims that have been waived by the making or acceptance of final payment, shall be decided by arbitration in accordance with the Construction Industry � Arbitration Rules of the American Arbitration Association then obtaining unless the parties mutually agree otherwise. No person i other than the City or consultant, shall be included as an original - � third party or additional third party to an arbitration, whose ! interest or responsibilit�/ is insubstantial . Any consent to ' arbitration involving an additional person or persons shall not icenstitute consent to arbitration oT any dispute nct described , herein or with any person not named or described therein. The foregoing agreement to arbitrate and any other agreement to i arbitrate with an additional person or persons duly consented to by , the parties to the City/Consultant Agreement shall be specifically � enr"orceable under the prevailing arbitration law. : The award • rendered by the arbitrators shall be final and judgement may be ; entered upon it in accordance with applicable law in any court � having jurisdiction thereof. i ! � � x��a�r G I � i . • .. . � � � � • � � b. Notice of the demand for arbitraticn shall be filed in writing with i the other party to the City/Consultant Agreement and with the ' American Arbitration Association. The demand for arbitration shall ' be made within a reasonable time after the claim, dispute, or other � matter in question has arisen, and in no event sha11 it be made � after the date when institution of legal or equitable proceedings , � based on such claim, dispute, or other matter in question, would be _ � barred by the applicable statute of information. ! c. Unless otherwise agreed in writing, the consultant shall carry on � the work and maintain its progress during any arbitration proceed- ings, and the City shall continue to make payments to the consultant in accordance with the contract documents. 10. Insurance Consultant sha11 , at a11 times that this agreement is in effect or the ! premises are occupi-ed by consultant, cause to be maintaired in force � and effect an insurance policy or policies that will insure and indemnify both City and consultant against liability or financial loss resulting from injuries occurring to persons or property in or aoout the premises or occurring as a result of any acts or activity or consul tant. The 1 i abi 1 i ty unde►'erson i nnuredn or �300c000 hfor any o�e less than �100,000 ror any one p J accident and g50,000 for property damage. The policy shall be writ�en � by a responsible company or companies , to be approved by the City, and sha11 be noncancelable except on ten days ' written notice to the City. ' Such Nolicy shall name the City, its orficers , agents, and empl^;�es �s � additional ins�red, and a copy of such policy sha11 be fi ied wiin t�:e City Clerk. . Evidence of blorker' s Compensation Insurance shall be provided. It shall name the City of Redding as additional insured but only with respect to employees hired by and included on the payroll or the consultant while performing work for the City. � • 11. Oa�nership, Publication, Reproduction, and Use ' � . ' � All documents and materials prepared pursuant to this agreement are the � property of the City. The City shall have the unrestricted authority to publish, disclose, distribute, and otheraiise use, in whole or in � part, any reports , data, or other materials prepared under this i agreementa i ' 12. Verbal Agreement or Conversation i � No ver�al agreement or conversatir�n with any officer, agent, or employee of the City, either before, during, or after the execution of this contract, sha11 affect or modify any of the terms or obligations iherein contained, nor shall such verbal agreement or conversation , entitle the consultant to any additional payment whatsoever under the � terms of this contract. , � � FX��BtY L. i � --•- ---- -- • ----- -- _ .,,�........� ....-,.- .. .._._.,_._....._...... ..,. •----- •---- ___._,, . ry . ,ti i �, . �.. ' • � j 13, Indemnification ! Consultant agrees to protect, defend, indemnify, and hold harmless � City, its officers, agents, and employees from and against any and all ! liability, damages , claims , suits, liens , and judgements, of whatever ' nature, including claims for contribution and/or indemnification, for ; injuries to or death of any person or persons, or damage to the ; property or other rights of any person or persons, caused by consul- tant. Consultant's obligation to protect, defend, indemnify, and hold � harmless , as set forth hereinabove, shall include any matter� arising out of any actual or alleged infringement of any patent, trademark, �; copyright, or service mark, or any actual or alleged unfair competi- tion, disparagement of product or service, or other business tort of � any type whatsoever, or any actual or alleged violation of trade � regulations. Consultant further agrees to protect9 defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents, and employees from � and against any and all claims, liability for compensation under the � Workmen's Compensation Act arising out of injuries sustained by any employee of consultant. � 14e Default or Failure to Perform IIf through any cause, the contractor shall fail to fulfill in a timely and proper manner its obligation under this agreement or if the can- tractor shall violate any of the covenants or stipulations of this � agreement, the client shall thereupon have the right to terminate this ' agrEement oy giving wr;t�cn nctice to the contractor of such termina- ition and speciTying the er'fective date tnereof, at lezs� ?� days before � the effective date oT such terminat�on. In such event, all fin�shed � and unfinished documents and aiork papers prepared by the client beccme j its property, and the contractor shall receive just and equitable ; compensation and reimbursement for the work completed. m i Except with respect to defaults of subcontractors to the centractor, the contractor shall not be in default by reason of any failure to ' perform this agreement in accerdance with its terms (including any � failure by the contractor to make progress in the performance of the. � work hereunder which endar,gers such performance) , if such failure � arises out of causes beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the contractor. Such causes may include, but arP not restricted or limited to, acts of God or of the public enemy, acts of th� government in either its sovereign or contractual capacity, fires , floods, epidemics, quarantine, restrictions, strikes , freight embar- j goes, and unusually severe weather, but in every cause the failure to ' perform must be beyond the control and without the fault or negliaence � ot the contractor or its subconsultant or its subcontractor. If the . failure to perform is caused by �he failure of a consultant or sub- j contractor to perform or make progress, and if such failure arises out ! of causes beyond the control of boti� the contractor and the subcon- � tractor and witheut the fault or negligence of either of� them, the contractor shall not be deemed to be in default. � � I i �x �� r c � } i , , . , � . . . ' • � PACE ENGINEERING • ' PROFESSIONAL RESUME � � � LARRY G. KEPPLE iManaging Engineer i � i I .._... �..� � �_ R`� EDUCATION ' �� MS, Sanitar En ineerin Universit of California, 1965 � .F£ "r�,�,�_ Y g� g� Y '�� `'�,`ti,,� BS, Civil Engineering, Chico State College, 1963 i �t:�;. 1�r ,,�: j ` `�,� , � �� PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION ' �� .4�:�.:.1Y� i . _ � ° California, Civil Engineer — 1967 �.,�, : � ti €,�� , ..� �=-. :,, ;� i � ' EXPERIENCE • PACE Engineering, Managing Engineer, 1976 to date � As managing engineer and president of PACE Engineering, Mr. Kepple is responsible for all projects and other functions of the firm. In addition, he is responsible as project manager for certainprojects involving special water ' and waste expertise. While at PACE, Mr. Kepple has served as project manager on both the Redding and Red Bluff master water plans; Redding's cross-town water transmission main, a $1.8 million project; the Yreka Main Street � interceptor sewer; the Jon�� Valley Water Pro;ect; and the expans',on of the Anderson Wastewater Treatment i Plant. He has �:sa ser��ed as district er.ginecr for th�WeaverviL� Sar.i�ary Dist:ict, a,^.d as t.cat:�:ent plar�t consultant � for the communities of Yreka, Anderson, and Weaverville. While at PACE, Mr. Kepple developed a ]ateral air ' tester and was co-inventor of a portable sewermeter. Mr. Kepple is a major stockholder in the firm. � • CH2M HILL, 1963-76 Manager, Wastewater Treatment Division, Redding, 1975-76 Mr. Kepple was responsible for numerous projects, including the design of the Tahoe-Truckee advanced waste � treatment plant, a $25 million project. Manager, Water and Waste Treatment Department, Redding, 1971-75 ! As manager of this department, Mr. Kepple supervised the design of ac[ivated sludge treatment plants for the com- � munities of Anderson, Yreka, Weaverville, and Oroville in California; a fully enclosed sewage treatment plant for � Juneau, Alaska; and two plants for the Whiskeytown Recreation Area. � As project manager, was responsible for the design of a 22.5 mgd advanced waste treatment plant for the Upper � Occoquan Sanitary Authority in Virginia, an $80 million project. As a sanitary enginecr w�th responsibility for advanced waste treatment design, was responsible for the invention of a new ammonia removal and recovery process. This process has been used in the Upper Occoquan and the Tahoe- , Truckec advanced waste treatment plants. I i Projcct F.nKinecr, 196G-70 , Supervised the design of a 3 mgd activated sludge treatment plant, water pump stations and storage reservoirs, and � a major lake pump station, all for Incline Village, Nevada; a 0.4 mgd wastewater treatmciit plant for ponner Sum- ! mit Public Utility District; reviewed and assisted in the design of water filtration plants; prepared the Redding � master water plan and designed the pumping plant addition on the Sacramento River; prepared the master water ' and sewerage plan for lncline Village, Nevada, and for Sierra Lakes County Water District; served as district ; enginecr for the Sierra Lakes County �'�'ater District and the Cascade Community Services District. � Stafi' H:nkineer, 1963-66 Designed the Red t3lut�f water system improvements, assisted in a report covering water and sewerage system improve- , ments for the Enterprise Public Utility District, and designed a 30 mgd pumpins station and 100-acrc oxidation ; Pond system for thr Ftedding sewerage system. I � 4-FS 1 . ' � ' • . � • � . . . . . � . . . . � ' • California Division of Highways, Engineering Aide, 1960-63 ; Surveying, design assistance, and inspection. � MEMBERSHIP IN ORGANIZATIONS - ; American Society of Civil Engineers American Water Works Association i California Water Pollution Control Association � California Council of Civil Engineers and Land Surveyors i I � ' APPEARANCES, PUBLiCATiONS, AND TECHNICAL CONT'RIBUTIONS "Operational Problems with Pond Systems for Sewage Treatment," presented at the California WPCA Annual Con- , ference, Santa Rosa, California, April 1968 � "Ammonia Removal Using the ARRP Process," presented at Bay Area Chapter ASCE, 1974 � "Tahoe-Truckee Advanced Waste Treatment Plant," presented at the FWPCA Conference at South Lake Tahoe, March 1976 "Infiltration Measuremen: in Sanitary Sewers by Dye Dilution Method," coauthor Stanley L. Smith, Water and ' Sewage Works, January 1971 ' "Ammonia Removal and Recovery Becomes Feasible," Water and Sewage Works, April 1974 � "AWT Plant Gets Tough with Ammonia," coauthor L. Gene Suhr, Water and Wastes Engineering, March 1975 "Ammonia Removal and Recovery of Industrial Wastes," coauthor Ray Prettyman, ASHRAE Journal, September I 197G � "A Closer Look at Laterals," coauthor Sam Smith, Operations Forum (WPCF), December 1984 � I I � ' i , , C i � i i � � i e ti . �� ' + • � • � ' , � PA�E ENGINEERING PROFESSIONAL RESUME I SAMUEL L. SMITI-I 1 Principal Engineer I ,:�y.s�� I ��f ' EDUCATION ��d..�_�.�.��s„r ;_,� MS, Sanitary Engineering, Oregon State University, 1972 �='? BS, Civil Engineering, Chico State College, 1970 i �� ; F � PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION . '' California, Civil En ineer — 1973 , ,: ; � �- g ' �:i�:�- _ r' � . I � EXPERIENCE � • YAC� Engineering, Principal Engineer, 1983 to date; Associate Engineer, 1978-83 � Mr. Smith is responsible as project manaber for water and waste project reports and designs. While at PACE, Mr. � Smith has served as project manager on the City of Redding master sewer plan; a major expansion of the Clear I Creek Community Services District water distribution system, including interim filtration; rehabilitation of sewage � lift stations for the Cities of Redding, Red Bluff, and Dunsmuir; and ir.filtration/inflow reduction programs for � Tehama Counry Sanitation District No. 1 and the Cities of Dunsmuir and Weed. He w�as also responsible for plan- ning and design of the Palo Cedro Sewage Disposal Project for Shasta County Service Area No. 8 and preparation of numerous water and se�ver feasibility studies. While at PACE, Mr. Smith was co-inventor of a portable sewer- i meter. Mr. Smith is a stockholder in the firm: � ; • C�I2M HILL, 19"1U-78 � Manager, V�'ater and Waste Treatment Department, Sacramento, 1977-78 � Mr. Smith was project administrator for design of the City of Merced wastewater project, which consisted of a$13 � million treatment plant expansion and a separate $4 million canning wastewater treatment system. ' Project Engincer, Redding, 1973-77 i As project engineer, was design coordinator for the phased design and construction of the 22.5 mgd advanced waste treatment plant for the Upper Occoquan Sanitary Authority in Virginia and participated in the Tahoe- � Truckee advanced waste treatment plant project with responsibilities for preparation of the preliminary design � report which included evaluation and selection of treatment processes. i As project manager, was responsible for design of a 0.5 mgd modified activated sludge wastewater treatment plant, including land disposal of effluent, for Weavecvitle Sanitary District; and for design of 10 mgd sewage pumping stations for.the City of Folsom and Folsom Prison in California. � Staff Engineer, Redding, 1970-71 and 1972-73 I Coordinated project specif'ications and assisted in the design of the conventional treatment processes and solids � handling system for the Upper Occoquan Sanitary Authority advanced waste treatment plant. Also designed im- i provements for the City of Redding oxidation pond wastewater treatment plant, designed a 15 mgd water pumping station for Incline Village in Nevada, and prepared a project repc�rt for sewerage improvements for the City of ! Folsom, Folsom State Prison, and Northeast Sacramento County Sanitation District in California. i MEMBERSHII' IN ORGAN['LATIONS American Socicty of Civil Engineers — Past President, Shasta Branch of Sacramento Section California Watcr Pollution Control Association Water Pollution Control Federation i APPEARANCI�,S, PUI3LICA7'IONS� ANU TI:CHNICAL CONTRIBUTIONS , ! "Septage Farility Design," California Water Pollution Control Association, Northern California Regional Con- � ference, Redding, California, October 1972. � "Trucked �L'astes: h4ore Unifarm Approach Nceded," coauthor Jerry C. Wilson, {i�ater and 6Vastes F_ngi�reerir�g, , March 1973. �, "Aerobic Digestion Re�iew," California Water Pollution Control Association, Northern California Regional Con- � ference, Red�lin�, California, October 1978. "A Closer Look at Latcrals," coauthor Larry G. Kepplc, O�ycrations f�or�arn, December 1984. S�NS