Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - City Council - unsigned - 1992-10-061 10/06/92 City Council, Regular Meeting City Council Chambers Redding, California October 6, 1992 7:00 p.m. The Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag was led by City Attorney Hays. The Invocation was offered by Reverend Reinhold Tilstra, Redding 7th Day Adventist Church. The meeting was called to order by Mayor Moss with the following Council Members present: Anderson, Arness, Kehoe and Moss. Council Member Dahl was absent. Also present were City Manager Christofferson, Assistant City Manager McMurry, City Attorney Hays, Director of Public Works Galusha, Director of Electric Utility Lindley, Director of Planning and Community Development Perry, Chief of Police Blankenship, Electric Utility Resources Manager Coleman, Fire Chief Bailey, Director of Finance Downing, Principal Planner Keaney, Public Works Operations Manager Russell, Director of Information Systems Kelley, Director of Personnel Bristow, Housing Manager Maurer, Senior Planner King, Airports Director Ruff, Assistant Director-General Services Kohn, Services Officer Starman, Route Supervisor Roach, City Treasurer Linville, City Clerk Strohmayer, and Secretary to the City Council Rudolph. HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE COLLECTION DAY - Presentation by Shasta County Department of Resource Management (P-150-050-500) Waste Inspector Cayler related that the second Household Hazardous Waste Collection Day was held on October 3, 1992. He indicated that the City and County worked closely on this event as its furthers the objective of providing a safe and environmentally sound hazardous waste disposal option. The City's role on Saturday was to head up the collection of all recyclable household hazardous waste, which is viewed as a natural extension of the permanent recycling activities at the Benton Transfer Station. Items collected included 1,770 gallons of used motor oil, 200 gallons of anti-freeze, and 990 gallons of latex paint. He commented that the latex paint would be recycled and returned to Redding and made available to non-profit organizations and governmental agencies. Carla Serio, Household Hazardous Waste Coordinator for Shasta County - Department of Resource Management, stated that the collection day prevents household hazardous waste from entering local creeks, storm drains, and ultimately the river. The collection day yielded 34 tons of household hazardous waste. Participation involved 707 residents from the area. The following is a breakdown by area: City of Redding - 60 percent; City of Anderson - 11 percent; and Shasta County - 29 percent. She thanked the City for its participation in this successful event and presented each Council Member with a T-shirt. In response to Mayor Moss' question regarding the continuance of the event, Ms. Serio indicated that the County reviews the activity on a year-to-year basis. Because a one-day collection event is not as cost effective as an ongoing program, the County is considering a mobile collection program. She related that the City has been working on possibly providing a permanent household hazardous waste collection facility at the material recovery center. RESOLUTION - re "Aviation Awareness Week" (A-050-060-600 & A-050-030) MOTION: Made by Council Member Anderson, seconded by Council Member Kehoe, that Resolution No. 92-406 be adopted, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding declaring the week of October 11 through October 17, 1992 as "Aviation Awareness Week" in Redding. Voting was as follows: Ayes: Council Members - Anderson, Arness, Kehoe and Moss Noes: Council Members - None Absent: Council Members - Dahl Resolution No. 92-406 is on file in the office of the City Clerk. 2 10/06/92 RESOLUTION - re "Fire Prevention Week" (A-050-060-600 & P-150-070) MOTION: Made by Council Member Arness, seconded by Council Member Kehoe, that Resolution No. 92-407 be adopted, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding declaring the week of October 4 through October 10, 1992 as "Fire Prevention Week." Voting was as follows: Ayes: Council Members - Anderson, Arness, Kehoe and Moss Noes: Council Members - None Absent: Council Members - Dahl Resolution No. 92-407 is on file in the office of the City Clerk. PUBLIC POWER WEEK ESSAY AWARDS (A-050-125 & E-090) Mayor Moss related that the topic of the third annual Public Power Week Essay Contest was "How Public Power Benefits Redding." He conveyed that the first place winner from each high school will receive a $500.00 scholarship upon graduation with a 2.8 minimum grade point average and acceptance at an institute of higher education. If the first place winner does not qualify academically, the scholarship would go to the second place winner, if qualified. Mayor Moss presented plaques to the following essay winners: 1) Enterprise High School - First Place - Amy C. Jones - Second Place - Michelle Marie Smith 2) Shasta High School - First Place - Jennifer Jones - Second Place - Davi Robison 3) Pioneer High School - First Place - Angela Fallon CONSENT CALENDAR The following matters were considered inclusively under the Consent Calendar: Approval of Minutes - Regular Meeting of September 1, 1992 Adjourned Regular Meeting of September 2, 1992 Regular Meeting of September 15, 1992 Special Meeting of September 21, 1992 Approval of Payroll and Accounts Payable Register (A-050-100-500) It is recommended that Accounts Payable Register No. 6, check numbers 185558 through 186127 inclusive, in the amount of $3,546,987.75, be approved and paid, and Payroll Register No. 6, check numbers 344343 through 345091 inclusive, in the amount of $887,197.21, and Automatic Payroll Deposits, check numbers 13551 through 13716 inclusive, in the amount of $240,672.90, for a total of $1,127,870.11, for the period of August 30, 1992 through September 12, 1992, be approved, and Payroll Register No. 7, check numbers 345092 through 345823 inclusive, in the amount of $853,315.26, and Automatic Payroll Deposits, check numbers 13717 through 13885 inclusive, in the amount of $239,291.67, for a total of $1,092,606.93, for the period of September 13, 1992 through September 26, 1992. TOTAL: $5,767,464.79 Tentative Subdivision Map S-8-92 - Mule Ridge Subdivision, by Chuck Lema (Southern terminus of Julian Street, south of Hacienda Heights Subdivision) (S-100) Council accepted the report containing the map and conditions of approval for Tentative Subdivision Map S-8-92 approved by the Planning Commission granting permission to divide 147 acres into 26 single-family residential lots and a 136-acre remainder parcel. Resolution Setting Public Hearing - Abandonment Application A-8-92, by the City of Redding (Olive Avenue at Sonoma Street) (A-010-100) It is the recommendation of the Planning and Community Development Director that Resolution No. 92-408 be adopted, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding declaring its intention to vacate and abandon surplus street right-of-way located along the west side of Olive Avenue at the intersection of Sonoma Avenue (A-8-92) and set a public hearing for 7:00 p.m., November 3, 1992. 3 10/06/92 Set Public Hearing - re Rezoning Application RZ-16-92, by Shehan Investments (West extension of Forest Hills Drive and south of Hartnell Avenue) (L-010-230) It is the recommendation of the Planning and Community Development Director that a public hearing be set for 7:00 p.m., October 20, 1992, to consider RZ- 16-92, a request to reclassify property from "U" Unclassified District to "R1- BFM" Single Family Residential District and "U" Unclassified District. Set Public Hearing - re Amendment of Tree Preservation Ordinance (A-050-220-075) It is the recommendation of the Planning and Community Development Director that a public hearing be set for 7:00 p.m., October 20, 1992, to consider the amendment of the Tree Preservation Ordinance, Redding Municipal Code Chapter 18.65. Resolution - Approving Contract for Professional Services with Power Engineers, Inc. to Perform a Routing Study and Environmental Impact Report for the South Airport 115/12kV Transmission Project Resolution - Authorizing City Manager to Sign Project Change Orders for Professional Services with Power Engineers, Inc. (E-090-160-600 & D-050-250-004) It is the recommendation of the Electric Utility Director that Resolution No. 92-409 be adopted, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding approving and authorizing the Mayor to sign the agreement for professional services between the City of Redding and Power Engineers, Inc. in the amount of $168,580.00 to prepare engineering routing studies and an environmental impact report to develop the South Airport 115/12kV Transmission Line Project. Funds for this project are included in the 1989 Electric System Financing Program, 9285-13. It is also recommended that Resolution No. 92-410 be adopted, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding authorizing the City Manager to sign project change orders up to an aggregate amount not to exceed $17,000.00 on the agreement 4 10/06/92 for professional services (GM69 09/22/92 BDI-33-035) between the City of Redding and Power Engineers, Inc. for the preparation of engineering routing studies and an environmental impact report on the South Airport 115/12kV Transmission Line Project. Award of Bid - Bid Schedule No. 2685, Purchase of Substation Steel Structures for the Redding Power/IPT Projects (B-050-100 & E-120-150 & D-050-250-005) It is the recommendation of the Electric Utility Director that Bid Schedule No. 2685, purchase of substation steel structures for the Redding Power/IPT Projects, be awarded to the evaluated low bidder, Energy Steel Corporation, in the amount of $193,503.67. Funds for this purchase are included in the 1992 Electric System Project Financing Program, 9706-25. Award of Bid - Bid Schedule No. 2687, One 45,200 GVWR Three-Axle Cab and Chassis Suitable to a Texoma 330 Pressure Digger (B-050-100) It is the recommendation of the Electric Utility Director that Bid Schedule No. 2687, one 45,200 GVWR three-axle cab and chassis suitable to a Texoma 330 pressure digger, be awarded to the low bidder, Riverview International Truck, in the amount of $47,048.43. Sufficient funds for this purchase are included in the 1992-93 budget, 9153-41. Electric Department Project Status Report - Fourth Quarter, October, 1992 (A-050-125) It is the recommendation of the Electric Utility Director that the Electric Department's Fourth Quarter, October, 1992, Project Status Report be accepted. Resolution - Amending Contract with Concept Administrators Providing for Facsimile Signatures on Claim Checks Resolution - Accepting Facsimile Signature Agreement with First Interstate Bank of California on Health and Dental Checking Account (P-100-150-030) It is the recommendation of the City Treasurer that Resolution No. 92-411 be adopted, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding approving and authorizing the Mayor to execute Amendment #11 to the administration agreement between the City of Redding and Concept Administrators, Inc., providing for the usage of facsimile signatures on claim checks. It is further recommended that Resolution No. 92-412 be adopted, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding approving and authorizing the City Treasurer to sign the Facsimile Signature Agreement with First Interstate Bank of California on Account No. 672-2-98037, City of Redding Health and Dental, Concept Administrators. Resolution - Authorizing Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Reimbursement for Firefighting Services (P-150-070) It is the recommendation of the Fire Chief that Resolution No. 92-413 be adopted, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding authorizing application to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) for reimbursement of firefighting services incurred on a 60-acre fire on August 21, 1992 in the Eastside Road area. Resolution - Adjusting Appropriations for Airport Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Funded Projects * (B-130-070 & G-100-070-095 & A-090-020) It is the recommendation of the Airports Director that Resolution No. 92-414 be adopted, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding approving and adopting the 21st amendment to City Budget Resolution No. 92-306 adjusting appropriations for various Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Funded Airport Projects to provide for engineering services of the Benton Airport Runway Safety Overrun. Resolution - Agreement with Motorola, Inc. for 800 MHZ Two-Way Trunked Radios with Siren and Light Bar Control for Police Department (B-050-100 & C-175-750) It is the recommendation of the General Services Director that Resolution No. 92-415 be adopted, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding authorizing the bypass of the formal bidding process; awarding a contract to Motorola, Inc. (single vendor) for the purchase of seven new 800 MHZ two-way 5 10/06/92 trunked radios with sirens and light bar controls for the Police Department in the amount of $31,000.00; and authorizing the City Manager to sign the necessary documentation. Funds for this purchase are available in the 1991 Equipment Financing. Resolution - Authorizing Rental Agreement with Glenn Hawes for Stillwater Barn (C-070-100) It is the recommendation of the General Services Director that Resolution No. 92-416 be adopted, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding approving and authorizing the Mayor to execute the month-to-month rental agreement effective October 6, 1992, at a monthly rental rate of $50.00 per month, between the City of Redding and Glenn E. Hawes for hay storage in the barn located on City-owned property on Airport Road (formerly owned by Sandrock). 6 10/06/92 Resolution - Prohibiting Parking and Vehicular Traffic for Greater Redding Chamber of Commerce Christmas Parade on December 5, 1992 (P-030-250) It is the recommendation of the City Clerk that Resolution No. 92-417 be adopted, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding prohibiting parking and vehicular traffic around Parade Route 2 for the Redding Chamber of Commerce Christmas Parade to be held December 5, 1992. Resolution - Appropriating funds for Minder Park Project, Bid Schedule No. 2548 * (B-130-070 & P-050 & B-050-020) It is the recommendation of the Recreation and Parks Director that Resolution No. 92-418 be adopted, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding approving and adopting the 20th amendment to City Budget Resolution No. 92-306 appropriating an additional $9,500.00 for the Minder Park development, Bid Schedule No. 2548. Resolution - Approving Enterprise Community Park Agreement Amendment with Austin Hansen Group for Environmental Assessments (P-050-145) It is the recommendation of the Recreation and Parks Director that Resolution No. 92-419 be adopted, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding approving the First Amendment of the Client-Consultant Agreement for preparation of a Park Master Plan and updated environmental assessment for the Enterprise Community Park, including the newly acquired 8.62 acre parcel, bringing the total contract price to $29,173.00. The 1992-93 budget has allocated sufficient funds to pay for the additional services from In-Lieu- Park Fees for the Master Plan. Public Works Department Planning Report - Fourth Quarter (A-050-300) It is the recommendation of the Public Works Director that the Public Works Department's Fourth Quarter Planning Report be accepted. Acceptance of Final Map - Churn Creek Heights Subdivision, Unit 1 (S-35-90) (East of Churn Creek Road at the easterly terminus of Arizona Street) (S-100-084) It is the recommendation of the Public Works Director that the Final Map for Churn Creek Heights Subdivision, Unit 1 be approved, the Mayor be authorized to sign the Subdivision Agreement, and the City Clerk file the Map with the Shasta County Recorder. Acceptance of Final Map - Sanford Estates Subdivision (Tract 1783) (North of Highway 299E and east of Ridgewood Road) (S-100-686) It is the recommendation of the Public Works Director that the Final Map for Sanford Estates Subdivision (Tract 1783) be approved, the Mayor authorized to sign the Subdivision Agreement, and the City Clerk file the Map with the Shasta County Recorder. Award of Bid - Bid Schedule No. 2694, Traffic Signal Installation at Victor and Cypress Avenues (B-050-020 & T-080-700) It is the recommendation of the Public Works Director that Bid Schedule No. 2694 (Job No. 9137), traffic signal installation at Victor and Cypress Avenues, be awarded to the low bidder, Charles McKinney, in the amount of $97,124.00, an additional $19,876.00 be approved to cover the cost of engineering and inspection fees, and $10,000.00 be approved to cover the cost of contract change orders, for a total of $127,000.00. There is currently $138,000.00 budgeted for this project. Resolution Accepting Streets and Acceptance of Improvements - Dunfries Subdivision, Units 1 and 2 (North of Collyer Drive and west of Twin Towers Drive) * (S-070-230 & S-100-155) It is the recommendation of the Public Works Director that Resolution No. 92- 420 be adopted, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding accepting for maintenance and operation Cally Court in the Dunfries Subdivision, Units 1 and 2. 7 10/06/92 It is also recommended that the improvements in Dunfries Subdivision, Units 1 and 2, be accepted as satisfactorily completed, and the City Clerk instructed to return the securities to the developer, Azi Barzin. Acceptance of Improvements - River Heights Planned Development (PD-1-90) (Southeast corner of Hilltop Drive and River Bend Road) (L-010-210-645) It is the recommendation of the Public Works Director that the improvements in River Heights Planned Development (PD-1-90) be accepted as satisfactorily completed and the City Clerk be instructed to return the securities to the developer, Jerry L. Knighton. 8 10/06/92 Resolution - Approving Program Supplement No. 004 to State-Local Transportation Partnership Program Agreement with State of California re Traffic Signal at Intersection of Victor and Hartnell Avenues Resolution - Approving Program Supplement No. 005 to State-Local Transportation Partnership Program Agreement with State of California re Traffic Signal at Intersection of Victor Avenue and Mistletoe Lane (G-100-170 & T-080-700) It is the recommendation of the Public Works Director that Resolution No. 92- 421 be adopted, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding approving and authorizing the Mayor to sign Program Supplement No. 004 to State-Local Transportation Partnership Program Agreement No. SLTPP-5068, Project No. SB92-5068(019), by and between the City of Redding and the State of California, Department of Transportation, to construct a traffic signal at the intersection of Victor and Hartnell Avenues. Total project cost is estimated to be $195,000.00, with State funding estimated at $43,229.00. Funds would flow back into the traffic impact fee account from where the projects were funded. It is also recommended that Resolution No. 92-422 be adopted, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding approving and authorizing the Mayor to sign Program Supplement No. 005 to State-Local Transportation Partnership Program Agreement No. SLTPP-5068, Project No. SB92-5068(020), by and between the City of Redding and the State of California, Department of Transportation, to construct a traffic signal at the intersection of Victor Avenue and Mistletoe Lane. Total project cost is estimated to be $113,189.00, with State funding estimated at $33,979.00. Funds would flow back into the traffic impact fee account from where the projects were funded. Notice of Completion - Bid Schedule No. 2493, Install Third 115/kV Transformer at Canby Substation (B-050-020 & E-090-140-180) It is the recommendation of the Public Works Director that Bid Schedule No. 2493, install third 115/kV transformer at Canby Substation, awarded to Mass Electric Construction Company, be accepted as satisfactorily completed, and the City Clerk be authorized to file a Notice of Completion. The final contract price is $461,571.00. MOTION: Made by Council Member Kehoe, seconded by Council Member Anderson, that all the foregoing items on the Consent Calendar be approved and adopted as recommended. Voting was as follows: Ayes: Council Members - Anderson, Arness, Kehoe and Moss Noes: Council Members - None Absent: Council Members - Dahl Resolution Nos. 92-408, 92-409, 92-410, 92-411, 92-412, 92-413, 92-414, 92- 415, 92-416, 92-417, 92-418, 92-419, 92-420, 92-421 and 92-422 are on file in the office of the City Clerk. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS LETTER OF RESIGNATION - Redding Community Access Corporation-Channel 28 Board Member-at-Large Thomas L. Langkau (B-080-120) MOTION: Made by Council Member Anderson, seconded by Council Member Kehoe, accepting the resignation of Thomas L. Langkau from the Redding Community Access Corporation-Channel 28 Board as a Member-at-Large effective immediately. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes PUBLIC HEARING - re Land Use Element Update (G-030-070) The hour of 7:00 p.m. having arrived, Mayor Moss opened the public hearing regarding the Land Use Element Update. The following documents are on file in the office of the City Clerk: Affidavit of Publication - Notice of Public Hearing Planning Commission recommendation dated September 21, 1992 City Clerk Strohmayer advised that no protests were received. Planning and Community Development Director Perry recalled that Council at its meeting of November 19, 1991, continued consideration of the update of the 9 10/06/92 Land Use Element of the General Plan for essentially the following three reasons: (1) Demands by Dan Frost and the Sierra Club that Council obtain an environmental impact report (EIR) on the update; (2) Concern that the Land Use Element and development in the City would be used as a vehicle to leverage the City by opponents of the softball complex; (3) The possibility that the State would require changes to the City's Housing Element that would result in changes to the City's Land Use Element in order to maintain consistency. Mr. Perry stated that this has proven to be the case, as changes would now be required to the Land Use Element, based on the adoption of the Housing Element, and were included in the Report to City Council dated September 21, 1992, incorporated herein by reference. Mr. Perry stated that with regard to the softball complex, the lawsuit has been resolved, and Council determined not to award a bid to build the project. In addition, all changes made to the Housing Element to date have been incorporated into the draft Land Use Element. He explained that the one remaining factor concerns obtaining an updated EIR. Depending on the level of comfort desired, an EIR could cost anywhere from $25,000.00 to $50,000.00. Covering a 100- square-mile area, it would be very nonspecific with a focus on secondary effects. Most of these secondary effects would be addressed in updates of area plans, the Circulation Element, etc. Mr. Perry explained that State law does encourage the preparation of an EIR on a General Plan. In the case of this update, the maps and classifications are not being changed. The update deals with text, statistics, format, policy clarification, and incorporation of policies developed over the last ten years that are generally more restrictive than the existing Land Use Element. The update neither increases the density nor the intensity of land use that now exists with the present Land Use Element. Like the present Land Use Element, it does represent a change from what exists today, which is the crux of the issue. As was the case with the Housing Element, one of the action programs, specifically updating and consolidating the City's current area plans, has the potential to change current land use classifications. Each area plan update, however, is subject to a separate detailed and specific EIR procedure. It is the opinion of staff that the mere listing of the work program in both the Land Use and Housing Element does not have a direct environmental effect. Mr. Perry stated that in order to adopt the update while the revised information is still timely, to work on updates of other General Plan elements and area plans, and to have a more current and defensible General Plan, the City needs to make a decision regarding the proposed Land Use Element. From staff's perspective, it would be desirable to make the decision-making less subject to attack with an EIR and would be interesting from a professional perspective. However, from a more practical perspective, taking into consideration what is being changed, it also would not accomplish much that is not already being accomplished with individual project review or area plans. Mr. Perry indicated that the General Plan could be subject to attack if an EIR is not prepared; however, he was not certain the update as prepared by the City falls into the same category as a complete rewrite, a whole new General Plan, or an amendment that allows more intensity or greater density in land use. The problem with general plans is their purpose is to be long-term documents to guide land-use decision making. Conversely, amendments, changes, etc., that occur are often based on community values, politics, and conditions at a particular moment in time. The result is high volatile decision making from month-to-month versus a long-term, stable policy document that should only be amended in the public's interest. In this case, there is consensus that the text and statistics need updating, which should not require an EIR. There is not consensus that a complete change in direction is needed, which would occur through a major revision of the entire General Plan and an EIR. Therefore, it is the recommendation of staff that Council ratify the Negative Declaration, approve the update with the changes needed to be consistent with the amended Housing Element and recent Council actions, and direct staff to prepare a resolution for consideration at a later date. Brian Paddock, Managing Attorney at Legal Services of Northern California, expressed concern that the Land Use Element does not contain the necessary changes in zoning and housing densities to carry out the Housing Element's commitment to create a greater amount of low- and very-low income housing. He 10 10/06/92 understood that area plan changes would be made. He indicated that controversy is greater when working within a confined geographic area and area plan, and the changes become more visible. He acknowledged the City's commitment to carrying out the goals of the Housing Element, however, the City would need to make some intensive and arduous decisions with regard to the Land Use Program in order to make the lowest-cost housing available to the community. He commented that it is not necessary for the City to delay taking action on the Land Use Element, but he will be reviewing future area plans to provide suitable sites for low- and very-low income housing. Kelley Clark, Chair of the Shasta Group of the Sierra Club, read his letter of October 6, 1992, incorporated herein by reference, into the record. Prior to future public hearings of this nature, he suggested that the City publish, in advance, the maps and zoning changes or place them in an area where the public can compare the text of the plan to the map and how they relate to certain parcels. He stated that the Sierra Club would be looking for internal consistency among the City's various elements in the immediate future. He explained that the adoption of the Land Use Element update without having the Congestion Management Plan or the Air Quality Element in place would require additional staff hours in order to make these elements internally consistent. Mayor Moss determined that there were no additional individuals wishing to speak on the matter and closed the public hearing. MOTION: Made by Council Member Anderson, seconded by Council Member Kehoe, that Council make the following findings regarding the Update of the Land Use Element of the Redding General Plan: 1. Project is compatible with the Redding General Plan; 2. Project will not significantly alter existing land form; 3. Project is compatible with surrounding land use; 4. Project is compatible with the Code of the City of Redding, California; and ratify the Negative Declaration authorized by the Redding Planning Commission on October 22, 1991. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes MOTION: Made by Council Member Anderson, seconded by Council Member Kehoe, approving the Land Use Element Update in concept with the changes necessary to be consistent with the amended Housing Element and recent Council action, and directing staff to prepare the necessary resolution for consideration at a later date. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes PUBLIC HEARING - re Rezoning Application RZ-15-92, by Don Lynn and the City of Redding (Ravenwood Unit 10, Candlewood Estates, Oak Mesa Estates, and Heritage Oaks Estates) (L-010-230 & S-100-614 & S-100-067-100 & S-100-536 & S-100-270) The hour of 7:00 p.m. having arrived, Mayor Moss opened the public hearing regarding Rezoning Application RZ-15-92. The following documents are on file in the office of the City Clerk: Affidavit of Mailing - Notice of Public Hearing Affidavit of Publication - Notice of Public Hearing Planning Commission recommendation dated September 28, 1992 City Clerk Strohmayer advised that no protests were received. Planning and Community Development Director Perry related that the Planning Commission, at its meeting of September 8, 1992, recommended approval of the rezoning of property located at the southwest corner of the intersection of Old Alturas Road and Shasta View Drive from "U" Unclassified and "U-FP" Unclassified District with Floodplain to "R-1" Single Family Residential District and "U-F" Unclassified District with Site Plan Review for the open- space areas. The rezoning involves the subdivisions of Ravenwood Unit 10, Candlewood Estates, Oak Mesa Estates, and Heritage Oaks Estates, in addition to 24 acres of vacant or large residential parcels. Mr. Perry commented that the proposed rezoning would establish consistency with the City's General Plan designation and provide more complete land use information to potential buyers and residents. It is the recommendation of the Planning Commission and staff that Council certify the Negative Declaration and offer the ordinance for first reading. 11 10/06/92 MOTION: Made by Council Member Arness, seconded by Council Member Kehoe, that Council make the following findings regarding Rezoning Application RZ-15-92: 1. Project is compatible with the Redding General Plan; 2. Project will not significantly alter existing land form; 3. Project is compatible with surrounding land use; 4. Project is compatible with the Code of the City of Redding, California; and ratify the Negative Declaration authorized by the Planning Commission on August 25, 1992. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes Council Member Arness offered Ordinance No. 2024 for first reading, an ordinance of the City Council of the City of Redding amending Section 18.06.020 of the Redding Municipal Code relating to the rezoning of certain real property in the City of Redding (RZ-15-92) to "R-1" Single-Family Residential District and "U-F" Unclassified District with Site Plan Review Criteria. PUBLIC HEARING - re Appeal of Denial of Tentative Subdivision Map S-7-92, by Robert Michiels (South of South Bonnyview Road and north of Sacramento and Riverside Drives on the west bank of the Sacramento River) (S-100) The hour of 7:00 p.m. having arrived, Mayor Moss opened the public hearing regarding the appeal of denial of Tentative Subdivision Map S-7-92. The following documents are on file in the office of the City Clerk: Affidavit of Mailing - Notice of Public Hearing Affidavit of Publication - Notice of Public Hearing Planning Commission Recommendation dated September 23, 1992 City Clerk Strohmayer advised that one additional protest was received from Jeannine Moseman after the Report to City Council dated September 23, 1992. Planning and Community Development Director Perry summarized the Report to City Council dated September 23, 1992, incorporated herein by reference. He explained that the applicant, Robert Michiels, submitted a tentative subdivision map to divide 261 acres into 57 single-family lots and a 225-acre undivided remainder. The property is located south of South Bonnyview Road and north of Sacramento and Riverside Drives on the west bank of the Sacramento River. The property is currently zoned "U-FP" Unclassified District with a Floodplain Combining District. The General Plan classifications for the area are "Residential, 2.0 units per acre," "Greenway," and "Park." The remainder area is classified as "Residential, 2.0 units per acre," "Residential, 6.0 units per acre," and "Retail." Mr. Perry related that the Planning Commission, at its meeting of September 8, 1992, found Mr. Michiels' subdivision application inconsistent with the Redding General Plan in the following areas and denied the tentative map: (1) Density; (2) Removal of Valley Oaks; (3) Land Use; (4) Open Space; (5) Park Dedication; and (6) Floodplain encroachment. Other issues raised, and not addressed, were fire, access, traffic circulation, and floodplain encroachment. The General Plan for the property was adopted in 1978 as part of the Cascade Neighborhood Plan and was developed after the annexation of the Cascade Community Services District by a citizens advisory committee appointed by the City Council. Involved were an environmental impact report, neighborhood surveys, and public hearings before the Planning Commission and City Council. Mr. Michiels, et al., later submitted a planned unit development proposal on the property for 794 units. That was approved, but was too expensive to develop because the necessary infrastructure was not in place such as the waterline across the river, the Westside sewer line, and the Bonnyview Drain. The planned development was approved for 690 units and an eight-acre retail center. The park area along the river was to be dedicated. In addition, another 8.4 acres was zoned "RM-6," to allow a 104-unit senior citizens apartment project. It is the opinion of the Planning Commission and staff that the proposed project is not consistent with the Redding General Plan classifications of "Greenway" and "Park" or the policies and goals established in the Land Use Element, the Open Space and Conservation Element, or the Recreation Element. The Subdivision Map Act states that "no local agency shall approve a tentative 12 10/06/92 map..., unless the legislative body finds that the proposed subdivision...is consistent with the General Plan." Inconsistency with the General Plan is grounds for requiring the preparation of an environmental impact report, which neither the Commission nor staff has recommended. Unless the applicant would be willing to modify the tentative map to provide for the dedication of areas designated "Greenway" and "Park" and to eliminate fill in the floodplain, the City should not approve the map. Accordingly, it is the recommendation of staff that the appeal be denied and the action of the Planning Commission upheld. Eugene Nutley was concerned about the proposed plans which require filling in the floodplain area. He commented on the amount of erosion created by the currents and eddies in this area of the river, particularly at releases above 14,000 cubic feet per second. John Wilson, 6281 Center Drive, stressed that one of the stipulations to the proposed development should be the extension of Creekside to Bonnyview Avenue. Due to associated traffic problems, he would rather see development on the east end rather than in the interior of the Girvan area. Bruce Watkins, Evergreen Engineering, engineer for the applicant, argued that the proposed fill would not be in the flow of the river itself, but in the floodway which is a backwater situation. The fill would be behind the riparian habitat and should not create additional erosion problems. At a 79,000 cubic foot per second release, the proposed fill areas would only be under approximately a foot of motionless water. Ted Klaseen, 2295 Oak Ridge Drive, who worked on the soil maps for this area, stressed that any fill in the floodplain area would cause increased grade and erosion. In response to Mr. Klaseen, Mr. Perry depicted the area in which the fill would be located and related that the initial proposal indicated a fill area of approximately 3.3 acres, however, was later amended to approximately 2.5 acres. Lloyd Hayes, 4820 Sunnyhill Way, cited the following reasons the area should maintain the park designation: 1) The bank is quite erodible; 2) Flooding and washing occurs at high water levels; 3) Area supports a considerable amount of wildlife; 4) Island is a habitat and sanctuary for deer; and 5) Provides access for fishing. He referenced the Fish and Game Department's letter of July 3, 1992 wherein denial of the project was recommended. He noted that if the area is retained as park, Mr. Michiels should be compensated for the property taken and noted several agencies from which public monies might be available. He urged Council to retain the park designation for the area in question. Pat Graff concurred with Mr. Hayes' comments and urged Council to maintain the park designation. She stated that there is sufficient space in Shasta County for development of homes to occur without harming animals and wildlife. Gene Pickett opposed the proposed development due to the removal of all habitat from the designated park areas and construction of homes occurring in this area. He opined that the removal of 100 valley oaks from an area such as this is against the law. He also objected to the filling of the 100-year floodplain area and urged Council to deny the appeal. Frank Coughlin, representing the developer, related that the developer is sensitive to the migratory pattern of the deer in this area. The intent is to leave an area along the river with no fences, not only for bank protection, but also for habitat protection and to provide a corridor for deer. He noted that some of the valley oaks would be removed, but that the habitat would be protected as much as possible. In response to Mr. Coughlin, Mr. Nutley related that he has done no development below the 79,000 foot level. Bob Michiels, 5967 Riverside Drive, commented that he purchased the property some 20 years ago when it was in the Cascade District and there was no South Bonnyview, no boat ramp, and no fee for a park in this area. To date, two 13 10/06/92 well-planned subdivisions have been constructed which bring in substantial tax returns to the City. He noted he sold property for South Bonnyview, the boat ramp and a school. He viewed the City as trying to take his land without providing compensation. To date, he has seen no benefit from placing his property within the redevelopment plan and noted that the proposed development would create a tax basis for the redevelopment agency. He opined that the owner of the property should have a voice in where a park should be located and proposed that the park be more centrally located, for example west and south of the Creekside Road extension to South Bonnyview. He pointed out that the currently proposed location would cause additional traffic congestion on South Bonnyview Avenue. In response to Mayor Moss, Mr. Michiels did not believe he attended the Cascade Neighborhood Advisory Committee meetings, as he was not living in the area at that time. He indicated that the park designation was part of the planned development which never occurred. He explained that the primary reason the development did not occur was because the "Park" designation utilized the best part of the property. In response to Council Member Kehoe, Mr. Michiels replied that he would be willing to continue working on anything which is feasible. He noted that he had not had the opportunity to speak to Mr. Perry on this project, which is something he believed should have been done before the matter reached the Council level. Sharon Kennedy, 6833 Riverside, commented that being a canoeist, she is familiar with the water marks of the area. She suggested that paths be developed to the park area, thereby eliminating car traffic. She urged Council to consider the future of the entire City and not just by specific subdivision as there is very little river left. She noted that she has witnessed salmon spawning in this area. Mayor Moss determined that there were no additional individuals wishing to speak on the matter and closed the public hearing. Council Member Anderson voiced concern over designating a prime piece of property "Park" without fair compensation. He favored having staff and the developer discuss the project further to see if a consensus could be reached, noting that it would probably involve some type of General Plan Amendment. Council Member Kehoe explained that it was obvious that the appeal needed to be denied. As indicated in the Report to City Council, he noted that some adjustments to the proposal might be possible. He also shared Council Member Anderson's concern about not providing adequate compensation; however, he noted that the first proposal clearly designated the area which was to be "Park." Mr. Perry related that both Mr. Michiel's partner and Mike Wyantt, representing the property owners, were heavily involved with the Cascade Area Plan and the area had been designated "Park" prior to the planned development. Council Member Arness expressed concern regarding the issue of compensation. He noted, however, that the City is working within the confines of both the Map Act and the Subdivision requirements. He suggested that another alternative might be a General Plan Amendment, but was not sure the extent to which the plan could be modified without impacting the area. Mayor Moss stated that he has become accustomed to the fact that when a parcel is divided, the City has to deal with the parcel as a whole, working within the guidelines of such things as the City's own rules, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and the Map Act. He related that when the planned development was approved, the density was increased and the area which was previously designated as "Park" was redesignated as such. He stated that the park site location is perfect and the City has already taken constructive action in that direction through the securing of funds and construction of the boat ramp. He suggested that Council deny the appeal and instruct staff to work with the applicant in developing a possible alternative. In response to Council Member Arness, Mr. Perry replied that if Council were to deny the appeal and the applicant decided to submit a different tentative 14 10/06/92 subdivision map, a new processing fee would be required. To date, the applicant has only paid the $1,400.00 application fee for processing the tentative subdivision map. Council Member Anderson inquired if the value of the property is taken into consideration when determining how much land should be designated as "Park." Mr. Perry clarified that if the City were to purchase the property it would have to be for a purpose consistent with the General Plan. He stated that the Quinby Act provides for the dedication of a park or the requirement of payment of in-lieu park fees. The City would normally give credit on a per unit basis or make a park dedication requirement. If the City were to purchase the property, the developer would still be required to pay in-lieu park fees at the time of subdivision, as it is a City-wide ordinance. Council Member Kehoe raised the question whether a precedent would be set by waiving the reapplication fee for the tentative subdivision map. Mr. Perry replied that fees have been waived in the past, however, in a budget year such as this, money would have to be taken out of another area of the Planning Department's budget. MOTION: Made by Council Member Arness, seconded by Council Member Kehoe, that the appeal regarding Tentative Subdivision Map S-7-92 be denied and in the event of the refiling of the Tentative Subdivision Map that the reapplication fee be waived. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes APPOINTMENTS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION - Appointment (B-080-150) MOTION: Made by Council Member Arness, seconded by Council Member Anderson, that Stan Smith be appointed to the Economic Development Corporation for a term expiring June 30, 1994. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes ELECTRIC UTILITY COMMISSION - Reappointments (B-080-160) MOTION: Made by Council Member Kehoe, seconded by Council Member Anderson, that Azi Barzin and William Potter be reappointed to the Electric Utility Commission for four-year terms expiring October 31, 1994. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes ORDINANCE NO. 2022 - re Rezoning Application RZ-14-92, by Kaufman and Broad (East of unopened portion of Victor Avenue and west of current terminus of El Vista) (L-010-230) MOTION: Made by Council Member Arness, seconded by Council Member Anderson, that the full reading of Ordinance No. 2022 be waived and the City Attorney be instructed to read the full title. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes MOTION: Made by Council Member Anderson, seconded by Council Member Arness, that Ordinance No. 2022 be adopted, an ordinance of the City Council of the City of Redding amending section 18.06.020 of the Redding Municipal Code relating to the rezoning of certain real property in the City of Redding to "R-1" Single-Family Residential District (RZ-14-92). Voting was as follows: Ayes: Council Members - Anderson, Arness, Kehoe and Moss Noes: Council Members - None Absent: Council Members - Dahl Ordinance No. 2022 is on file in the office of the City Clerk. ORDINANCE NO. 2023 - re Amendment of Planned Development PD-1-88, by Escorial Development (2111 Airpark Drive) (L-010-210) Council Member Kehoe abstained from voting on this issue. MOTION: Made by Council Member Arness, seconded by Council Member Anderson, that the full reading of Ordinance No. 2023 be waived and the City Attorney be instructed to read the full title. Voting was as follows: Ayes: Council Members - Anderson, Arness, and Moss Noes: Council Members - None 15 10/06/92 Absent: Council Members - Dahl Abstain: Council Members - Kehoe MOTION: Made by Council Member Arness, seconded by Council Member Anderson, that Ordinance No. 2023 be adopted, an ordinance of the City Council of the City of Redding amending ordinance No. 1846 by adding conditions numbered 40 through 45 inclusive to the conditions of approval contained in said ordinance relating to the rezoning of certain real property in the City of Redding (PD- 1-88). Voting was as follows: Ayes: Council Members - Anderson, Arness, and Moss Noes: Council Members - None Absent: Council Members - Dahl Abstain: Council Members - Kehoe Ordinance No. 2023 is on file in the office of the City Clerk. RECOMMENDATIONS RELATIVE TO RESHAPING OF MEET-AND-CONFER EFFORTS AND COUNCIL GUIDELINES ON BUDGET DIRECTION (P-100-050 & P-100-060-600 & P-100-200 & B-130-070) City Manager Christofferson reviewed his Report to City Council dated September 23, 1992, incorporated herein by reference, outlining staff's work to date with regard to the meet-and-confer process on the following issues: (1) freezing of salary steps; (2) freezing of COLAs; (3) Reduction in retirement costs through three alternative actions; (4) reduction in health insurance costs through four alternative measures; (5) layoffs and (6) furloughs. He suggested that if Council should wish to de-emphasize any of the objectives and intensify efforts on the remainder, it would result in a refocusing of staff efforts in such a manner as to make the probability of success in the areas remaining somewhat higher. In discussing a possible two-tier benefit system, Mr. Christofferson provided examples of a two-tier system with regard to sick leave, holidays, vacations, and group insurance, as well as retirement. The critical elements in addressing such changes were noted as (1) the extent to which the City would remain competitive under the second tier program with respect to future recruitment; and (2) the 16 10/06/92 extent to which such changes could be negotiated. He noted that the City's benefit program (despite some opinions to the contrary) are not out of line with other comparable employers, including comparable cities in the North State and major employers locally. Mr. Christofferson indicated that the purpose of this report was to provide Council an opportunity to refocus on the meet-and-confer process and to provide staff with whatever new direction it may desire. In response to Mayor Moss, City Attorney Hays indicated that most of the City's Memorandums of Understanding (MOU) have evergreen clauses and are not retroactive. Mayor Moss opined that the current meet-and-confer efforts are a waste of time and money. He suggested that the meet-and-confer process be terminated and staff be instructed to move forward with a two-tier system. He stated that this would allow long-term gains to be considered and a fair system of remuneration and benefits established. Through negotiations with the bargaining units, staff would work to pull the contracts as close to the two- tier system as possible. He noted that staff has worked on the concept of furloughs for three or four months and, apparently, no one is interested and layoffs appear to be the only tool left to work with if further reductions are required. Council Member Anderson concurred with Mayor Moss that a lot of time has been spent on the meet-and-confer process and almost none of the goals have been accomplished. He moved that the meet-and-confer process be terminated with all bargaining units and that staff continue to work on reducing personnel costs by implementing a two-tier system at the time of contract negotiations with all bargaining units. In response to Assistant City Manager McMurry, Council Member Anderson clarified that the changes, such as the two-tier system, would be implemented at the time of contract negotiations. He acknowledged that the two-tier system would have to be negotiated and that he was addressing what he felt Council's position ought to be in the negotiations. He requested that all legal obligations be followed in terminating the meet-and-confer process. Mayor Moss clarified that Council Member Anderson's motion applied to terminating the extraordinary meet-and-confer efforts currently underway. Council Member Arness raised the question of whether it would be logical to consider a compensation schedule that competes with the local marketplace. He noted that, like the City, the fire districts hire fireman, the Sheriffs hire policeman, businesses hire engineers and everyone hires clerk typists. City Manager Christofferson inquired if Council Member Arness was suggesting that a survey be completed. He stated that he was not sure Council would want to perform a survey, but that it was the only way to make a comparison. Mayor Moss did not believe anyone was suggesting that a survey be conducted at this point. Council Member Anderson suggested that the issue of compensation be considered at a Council workshop. Council Member Arness concurred. MOTION: Made by Council Member Anderson, seconded by Council Member Kehoe, to terminate the meet-and-confer process with all bargaining units at the earliest legal date and that staff continue to work on reducing personnel costs, specifically working on, but not limited to, a two-tier system to be implemented at the time of contract negotiations with all bargaining units and that future Memorandums of Understanding are to include a method and procedure and timing of a means for reducing personnel costs, whether it be by layoffs or whatever is negotiated at that time and at whatever time is deemed necessary to make such reductions by the City. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes Council Member Kehoe noted that for some time Council has been speaking about the efficacy of accomplishing a Work Force Management Plan. He referenced his letter of October 6, 1992, incorporated herein by reference, which provided an explanation and outline of the Work Force Management Plan. He commented that 17 10/06/92 it would be to the City's advantage to initiate Work Force Management Planning. In response to Council Member Arness, Council Member Kehoe commented that the Work Force Management Plan could be completed by management employees and the Personnel Department, as they have a base level of information. The Work Force Management Plan would enable information about the City's workforce to be depicted in an organized, conspicuous way. Council Member Arness stated that the budget each year identifies the number of individuals within a department by classification and questioned whether or not this was sufficient. Council Member Kehoe replied that if that information is already available, the Work Force Management Plan should not be an arduous task. He commented that he has previously requested the City's organization charts, but to date, has not received them. As Public Works Director, Council Member Arness recalled trying to determine the different skill levels of individuals within the department. He noted that great skills were available for utilization in case of an emergency. Council Member Anderson noted that the Work Force Management Plan would identify the skills of different employees so that if an opening were available in a more desperately needed position, individuals could be shifted. Council Member Arness cautioned that some of the current MOUs identify specific lines of progression. Mayor Moss concurred with Council Members Anderson and Kehoe regarding the implementation of a Work Force Management Plan. He asked whether Council Member Kehoe would be receptive to reviewing an outline to ensure staff was proceeding in the right direction. Council Member Kehoe acknowledged that he would be willing to work with staff on the Work Force Management Plan. MOTION: Made by Council Member Kehoe, seconded by Council Member Anderson, that the City of Redding implement a Work Force Management Plan. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes In response to Council Member Anderson, Mr. Christofferson noted that wherever legally possible within departments funded by the General Fund, COLA's, step increases and pay-for-performance increases have been frozen. Council Member Anderson expressed concern that the reductions made to date have been to defer expenses and utilize beginning reserves. Little progress has been made toward reducing personnel costs, which is now approximately 72 percent of the General Fund. He moved that a hiring freeze be placed on any new full-time or permanent part-time employees who are funded partly or entirely by the General Fund. This would not prohibit the transfer of existing employees but would not allow the total number of employees to increase. In fact, the total number of employees would decrease as positions became vacant. He encouraged staff to transfer employees from less needed positions to an open position of greater need thereby leaving the less needed position open. Mr. Hays clarified that new meant new person, not new position. In response to Mr. Christofferson, Council Member Anderson replied that if a Police Captain were to retire, he would hope that staff would promote from within, leaving the least needed position vacant. The determination regarding the least needed position would be left up to the Chief of Police and the City Manager's discretion. Mayor Moss clarified that the intent of Council Member Anderson's motion was to place a hiring freeze on all General Fund positions, or positions partially funded by the General Fund. Nothing in the motion precludes natural promotions. The motion would require a reduction in the workforce by attrition. He commented that if a clerk typist within the General Fund were 18 10/06/92 to leave, individuals could be transferred but there would be one less clerk typist within the total City scheme. Mr. Christofferson was not sure how workable the freeze would be and indicated that at some point if the process did not work, he would have to come back to Council. Council Member Kehoe opined that the Work Force Management Plan dovetails very nicely into Council Member Anderson's recommendation. Mayor Moss opined that he and Council Member Arness were naive when they voted to increase City staff by some 52 employees and viewed it as a mistake. He indicated that Council Member Anderson's suggestion to reduce the City workforce by attrition is probably the fairest method of reducing any workforce. If a vital position is vacated, staff would need to look internally to filling that position. Council Member Anderson indicated that the upcoming budget year would be difficult and it is necessary to start moving in the right direction rather than hiring an individual and laying off an existing employee six to eight months from now. For the benefit of the public and staff, Mayor Moss stated that the recession has cut deeply into the City revenues and no long-term personnel reductions have been made to assist with next year's budget. He noted that it is imperative that the City begin looking for a long-term reduction in the City workforce and the utilization of attrition is the fairest method. MOTION: Made by Council Member Anderson, seconded by Council Member Kehoe, that effective immediately, a hiring freeze be placed on any new full-time or permanent part-time employees who are funded partly or entirely by the General Fund. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes 19 10/06/92 MOTION: Made by Council Member Anderson, seconded by Council Member Kehoe, directing the Finance Department to begin preparing a Monthly Summary Financial Statement for the General Fund showing revenues and expenditures in relation to the adopted budget. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes RECONSIDERATION OF LEAF PROGRAM (S-070-200) Council Member Arness presented a viewgraph depicting the areas within the City which are generally flat and have a substantial number of trees: Mountain View, Benton Tract, Magnolia, Garden Tract, Kutras Tract, Parkview, Shasta Meadows and Westwood Manor. He explained that the leaf vacuuming system is less labor intensive than having sanitation crews picking up the leaves and hauling them to the compost area. If the leaves remain in the streets, the chance of flooding becomes greater. He commented that the Governor signed a Maintenance of Effort which would result in an additional $300,000.00 being available for the City's street arena. He commented that the negative side of the issue is that the Sierra Club is suing the Regional Transportation Planning Agency which could result in a loss of approximately $200,000.00. Conversations with Public Works Director Galusha indicate that the leaf vacuuming program would not be the highest item on his list of things to complete with the remaining budgeted funds. As a result of the Maintenance of Effort being signed and additional monies being available, Council Member Arness suggested that the leaf vacuuming program be reinstated. In response to Mayor Moss, City Manager Christofferson related that he had spoken with both the Governor's Office and the League of California Cities and both confirmed that the Maintenance of Effort had been signed. Mayor Moss stated that if the City were to maintain the hiring freeze for the remainder of this year, he estimated realized savings of $300,000.00. He related that he has received several calls regarding the elimination of the leaf vacuuming program. With the additional personnel related reductions made this evening, he noted that the City now has the opportunity to look more favorably on such issues and favored the reinstatement of the leaf vacuuming program. He noted that another such issue would be on the next Council agenda regarding the re-roofing of the Senior Citizens complex, estimated at $15,000.00. Council Member Kehoe related that if a finite amount of money is available, Council should consider establishing priorities. He suggested deferring discussion on the leaf vacuuming program until the next meeting, allowing time for additional requests to be considered. Mr. Christofferson explained that staff would be presenting an item at the next Council meeting regarding the roof on the Senior Citizens complex. The proposal provides for the Senior Citizens paying to have the work completed at a substantially lower cost and entering into an arrangement with the City for compensation at a later date. Council Member Anderson shared Council Member Kehoe's concern that a list of priority projects should be established rather than approving one project at a time. He questioned whether it was necessary to make a decision on the leaf vacuuming program at this particular meeting. Mr. Galusha replied that if the leaf vacuuming program were to be reinstated, staff would need to know as soon as possible in order to notify the public and hire temporary employees. He provided a viewgraph depicting items he viewed as priority in nature and the number of manhours needed to complete the tasks. He explained that he does not currently have enough personnel to complete the tasks at hand. If he were unable to hire any additional personnel, he would rather have the additional monies go into a paving program rather than the leaf vacuuming program. Council Member Anderson clarified that the hiring freeze would not apply to temporary employees. The motion made by Council Member Arness to reinstate the leaf vacuuming program for one year died due to a lack of a second. STRATEGIC FISCAL PLANNING EFFORT - Proposal for Exploration of a Citizen Survey 20 10/06/92 (B-130-070) City Manager Christofferson related that one of the panelists at the recent Annual Conference of International City Management Association was Dr. Edward C. Weeks of the University of Oregon who has recently completed a comprehensive study of citizen attitudes and opinions as they relate to the fiscal and budgetary problems of the City of Eugene. The budget problems of the City of Eugene 18 months were strikingly similar to the situation the City of Redding has faced over the past eight or nine months as a result of recessionary trends. He indicated that the City of Eugene reasoned that a true solution to the problem would require broad citizen support and that such support would come only from a well-informed citizenry and a highly participative process in dealing with the fiscal problems at hand. Dr. Weeks and his associates devised a very sophisticated research design that involved the utilization of several instruments rather than a single one in order to determine the true status of public opinion, not only with regard to city services themselves but the much more complex issue of prioritization and funding of those services. Mr. Christofferson explained that the recently approved Community Needs Assessment Report provides an excellent foundation for additional work that would necessarily fold in fiscal considerations, prioritization and long-range strategic planning if it were to be of maximum value to the City Council and to the community over the long run. While the Eugene, Oregon process was aimed entirely at the budgetary crisis, he sees great merit in shifting the focus sufficiently to provide a strategic fiscal planning blueprint for the rest of this decade. He related that if Council believes the present fiscal situation in California is more long term than short term and believes that the City organization would be impacted over the next several years, as opposed to a relatively rapid recovery, he said that a strategic fiscal planning effort would be highly desirable and a high level of citizen participation would be essential to that effort. Toward this objective, Mr. Christofferson proposed that Council authorize staff to undertake discussions with Dr. Weeks, with an eye to formulating a strategy for the conduct of such a study of citizen opinions and attitudes, with the objective of shaping an overall fiscal strategy for the rest of the decade. Council Member Arness asked to see the report prepared for Eugene, Oregon and any papers which might have been prepared for the International City Management Association's meeting. Mr. Christofferson replied that a paper had not been prepared for the conference. He noted that there were actually five different instruments to test public opinion and two reports which might fall into the category he was referencing. He indicated that the thrust of the process would be to determine the attitudes of the public in areas which relate to the financing of City services. He related that staff could inquire if there is one instrument which could be utilized to determine what the public really wants, how it feels about public services, and how much they would be willing to pay. He stated that the documentation would be available for Council's review. In response to Council Member Arness, Mr. Christofferson related that the process would require the public to prioritize the City's many different services. Council Member Kehoe related that he would also like to review the report prepared for Eugene, Oregon before taking any action and suggested that the item be deferred for at least two weeks. MOTION: Made by Council Member Kehoe, seconded by Council Member Anderson, that the matter requesting Council to authorize staff to contact Dr. Edward Weeks regarding a proposal for the exploration of a citizen survey as a basis for a strategic fiscal planning effort be deferred for at least two weeks to allow Council an opportunity to review the report prepared for Eugene, Oregon. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes Council Member Anderson requested that the Mayor contact the Mayor or Council Members of Eugene, Oregon for feedback regarding the report which Dr. Weeks prepared. 21 10/06/92 Mr. Christofferson replied that Council Member Anderson's request would be part of staff's process. RESOLUTION - Appropriating Funds for Shasta Alliance for Resources and Environment (SHARE) Dues * (B-130-070 & A-050-060) Council Member Kehoe abstained for discussion and voting on this matter. Finance Director Downing recalled that Council, at its meeting of September 15, 1992, approved the payment of dues to the Shasta Alliance of Resources and Environment (SHARE) for fiscal year 1992-93 in the amount of $1,000.00. As no funds were appropriated for this expenditure, it is the recommendation of staff that Council adopt the necessary budget resolution. MOTION: Made by Council Member Anderson, seconded by Council Member Arness, that Resolution No. 92-423 be adopted, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding approving and adopting the 19th amendment to City Budget Resolution No. 92-306 appropriating $1,000.00 for the 1992-93 membership dues for the Shasta Alliance for Resources and Environment (SHARE). Voting was as follows: Ayes: Council Members - Anderson, Arness and Moss Noes: Council Members - None Absent: Council Members - Dahl Abstain: Council Members - Kehoe Resolution No. 92-423 is on file in the office of the City Clerk. At the hour of 9:37 p.m., Mayor Moss declared the meeting recessed. At the hour of 9:45 p.m., Mayor Moss reconvened the meeting to regular session. 22 10/06/92 BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT (BLM) LAND EXCHANGE WITH THE AMERICAN LAND CONSERVANCY, INC. (F-200-200-040) Planning and Community Development Director Perry related that on August 27, 1992, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) published a notice of a pending land trade between the BLM and the American Land Conservancy (ALC), a nonprofit land preservation organization similar to the Trust for Public Land. The BLM is proposing to trade approximately 1,383 acres for 800 acres owned by ALC along the Sacramento River at Bend, north of Red Bluff. The Report to City Council dated September 18, 1992, incorporated herein by reference, outlined the parcels proposed in the trade which are located near north and west Redding and identified as Parcels 15, 19, 32, 34 and a portion of 31. Mr. Perry related that staff was bringing the matter before Council to ensure that it was aware of the trade and afford it an opportunity to make any statements regarding intended uses for this land. It is the recommendation of staff that a response be prepared which includes the following: 1) Power- line easement on Parcel 34; 2) Noise-easement restriction on Parcel 31 to provide some protection for the Record Firing Range; and 3) Reaffirm the City's applications before BLM for the necessary right-of-way for Buenaventura Boulevard on Parcel 34. Mr. Perry noted that letters have been received from Stewart Oliver regarding the Record Range area and a buffer zone. In addition, a letter was received from Dr. Lang Dayton suggesting that the ridgetop west of Redding be considered as a potential bike trail. Dr. Lang Dayton, 935 Hallmark Drive, related that the ridge west of Redding, included in Parcel 31, is unique to the area. While the portion included in Parcel 31 is relatively small, he noted that the ridgetop itself is approximately two miles long. He requested that Council recommend that the BLM preserve public access along the entire length of the ridge. As development moves west from Ridge Drive toward the ridge, he also asked staff and Council to consider maintaining public access throughout the planning process so that bikers, hikers and joggers would retain access to the ridge. Council Member Arness inquired if homes could be constructed on the ridge. Dr. Dayton replied that the cost of developing homes along this ridge would be substantial. He noted that any future trail system or park should include the acquisition of at least one of the ridge top knolls which would provide a 365 degree view. In response to Council Member Anderson, Mr. Perry indicated that the property in question is not within the City limits of Redding. Based on conversations with Associate Planner Hanson, Dr. Dayton was of the opinion that the ridge top itself is outside the City's sphere of influence. He felt it would be beneficial for the City to communicate to both the County and the BLM the fact that the ridge top is a unique scenic area and should be preserved. Council Member Anderson related that the BLM could sell the property with a deed restriction. Before this can occur, Dr. Dayton replied that either the City or the County has to request an easement for public access. In response to Council Member Kehoe, Mr. Perry explained that usually land can be acquired from the BLM for a nominal cost when acquired for recreation and parks. Historically, the BLM wants improvements made to the land being purchased and did not know whether a mountain bike trail would qualify. He noted that when BLM property reverts back to private ownership, the owners seek to maximize the land's usage. He did not believe the City would want to acquire more than an easement for a bike trail, as the City would be required to pay taxes on the property. Conversely, he noted that if the City does not own fee title to the property, arguments are going to occur as to where the appropriate place for the trail should be and who has priority. Mayor Moss noted that the 800 acres of riparian river frontage are currently owned by the American Land Conservancy, Inc., which is trying to obtain BLM land for resale in order to purchase additional properties. He indicated that the BLM has other acreage which could be traded and did not feel that 23 10/06/92 obtaining property from the BLM for future trail purposes would jeopardize the pending sale. Mr. Perry stated that staff places a higher priority on acquiring public land along the Sacramento River, regardless of its location, than some of the potential uses for the lands. Mayor Moss indicated that the American Land Conservancy, Inc. is focusing on this property because of its proximity to an urban area and its development potential. He suggested that Council consider obtaining the ridge line and anything which could be of public interest to the citizens of Redding. If the City were to gain fee title to the property, it could develop a trail wherever it wants. Mr. Perry explained that if the City wanted to acquire the property for the purpose of resale, it would be required to pay fair market value. Council Member Anderson inquired if the City could purchase the necessary property and acquire the necessary easements to retain public access to the property. Mr. Perry acknowledged that it could be done; however, it would require some staff work and survey work and Council should be aware that some costs in terms of time and materials would be required. He noted that a response is required by October 13, 1992. He emphasized that a budget amendment would be necessary in order for staff to carryout Council's directions. Mayor Moss related that he would visit the location and if he felt it had merit, he would transport Council Members to the location as well. MOTION: Made by Council Member Kehoe, seconded by Council Member Anderson, directing staff to prepare a response to the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) for the Mayor's signature which includes the following: 1) A request to set aside a power-line easement on Parcel 34 as requested by the Redding Electric Department; 2) A request for a noise-easement restriction on Parcel 31 to provide some protection for the Record Firing Range; 3) Reaffirm the City's applications before BLM for the necessary right-of-way for Buenaventura Boulevard on Parcel 34; and 4) Obtain the necessary property to develop a trail system along the ridge top areas which provide a natural skyline to the west. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes Mr. Perry noted that the property necessary for a trail system would probably involve more than just Parcel 31. RESOLUTION - re AB325, Landscape/Irrigation Conservation Ordinance (W-030-075) Planning and Community Development Director Perry reviewed the Report to City Council dated September 17, 1992, incorporated herein by reference. He recalled that Assembly Bill AB325 requires local agencies to adopt a water- conservation landscape ordinance or make findings based on water availability or climatic, geological, and topographical conditions which state that a water-efficient landscape ordinance is unnecessary. Absent making such findings, a local agency shall adopt its own ordinance by January 1, 1993, or the model ordinance developed by the State shall have the same force and effect as if adopted by the local agency. Mr. Perry related that the intent of AB325 and the State's Model Ordinance is to: 1) Promote the values and benefits of landscapes while recognizing the need to invest water and other resources as efficiently as possible; 2) Establish a structure of designing, installing, and maintaining water- efficient landscapes in new projects; and 3) Establish provisions for water- management practices and water-waste prevention for established landscapes. Mr. Perry explained that the recommendations prepared by the task force formed by Council are summarized in the Report to City Council. The seven member task force concluded that Council should exempt the City from adopting any ordinance that mandates landscape irrigation conservation. It further concluded that the vegetative growing differences throughout the community are so varied that it would be impossible to establish enforceable and equitable standards. The task force also found that there is adequate water supply for landscape irrigation, and that the water allocation limits and irrigation 24 10/06/92 auditing are impracticable and unnecessary for the Redding area. The task force's conclusions have been documented in a resolution for Council's consideration. The resolution further supports findings of exemption, based on variable evapotranspiration rates, climatic conditions, and topographic variations; all of which, in the opinion of the task force, make it impossible to regulate irrigation needs by an ordinance. It is the recommendation of staff that Council accept the task force recommendation, adopt a resolution concerning AB325 and the necessary findings of exemption, and submit the findings of exemption to the State Department of Water Resources. If the State does not accept the findings, the City would be required to adopt an Irrigation Conservation Ordinance or the State's Model Ordinance becomes effective. Mr. Perry noted that this particular project involved approximately two to three weeks of Senior Planner King's time and is an example of a State mandate for which the City receives no reimbursement but involves a substantial amount of time. MOTION: Made by Council Member Anderson, seconded by Council Member Kehoe, that Resolution No. 92-424 be adopted, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding setting forth findings that exempt the City of Redding from the necessity of adopting a Landscape Water Conservation Ordinance, including the State's "Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance." Voting was as follows: Ayes: Council Members - Anderson, Arness, Kehoe and Moss Noes: Council Members - None Absent: Council Members - Dahl Resolution No. 92-424 is on file in the office of the City Clerk. 25 10/06/92 MOTION: Made by Council Member Anderson, seconded by Council Member Kehoe, that the findings of exemption from AB325, Landscape Irrigation Conservation Ordinance, be forwarded to the State Department of Water Resources. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes GRANT APPLICATION - 1993-94 HABITAT CONSERVATION FUND (G-100-170) Planning and Community Development Director Perry recalled that in February, 1992, staff submitted a grant application to the State requesting matching funds under the 1993-94 Habitat Conservation Fund to acquire 8.62 acres of property on Churn Creek adjacent to the Enterprise Community Park. Mr. Perry explained that on September 25, 1992, staff received a letter from the State Department of Parks notifying the City that its application had been selected and that actual funding was dependent upon legislative approval for the 1993 State budget. Mr. Perry commented that the Redding Redevelopment Agency purchased the property earlier this year to hold it pending action on the grant application. The $28,000.00 grant amount would be combined with $28,000.00 in Park Development Funds to acquire the property from the Redevelopment Agency. The property would be incorporated into the master plan for the Enterprise Community Park. This was an information item and no action was required. PROPOSED NOVEMBER, 1992 ELECTRIC UTILITY RATE ADJUSTMENT (E-090-100) Electric Utility Resources Manager Coleman highlighted the Report to City Council dated October 2, 1992, incorporated herein by reference, concerning the proposed November, 1992 Electric Utility rate adjustment. The following areas were reviewed: 1) Mechanism for activating consideration of Electric Utility rate adjustments; 2) Rate adjustment mechanism summary or parameters; 3) Power costs per kWh sold; 4) Electric customers: Inflation adjusted average cost per kWh; 5) Rate adjustment history - forecast for last year; 6) Historical reserves; 7) Electric utility operating reserves as a percent of revenue funded expense; 8) Rate structure; 9) Commercial rate structure; 10) Bill comparison - Commercial service versus Incentive Rates; 11) Projected expenses of Electric Utility; 12) Projected Expenses - Absent Administration and General and Operating and Maintenance; 13) Estimated reserves assuming no future rate increase; 14) Projected average retail rates; 15) Electric Utility, Power Production - Resource Commitments and Future Needs; 16) What if future needs are not met? 17) Western Rate Increase Analysis - Staff projection versus WAPA rate case (Percent); 18) Western Rate Increase Analysis - Staff projection versus WAPA rate case (MILLS/kWh); 19) Fiscal Year 1992-93 Rate Adjustment - Sensitivities; and 20) Electric Utility Fiscal Year 1993 Rate Adjustment Schedule. Council Member Anderson inquired as to the reserves required by the bond covenants. Mr. Coleman related that the bond covenants require the City to meet a 1.0 debt service coverage ratio. If the 1.0 debt service coverage ratio is met, the City must also meet a 1.2 debt service coverage ratio. The extra 20 percent can be made by dedicating reserves. The dedication of reserves must be done before the year starts. This was an information item and no action was required. TRANSFER STATION/MATERIAL RECOVERY FACILITY - Request for Proposal for Design (B-050-100 & S-020-650) General Services Director Masingale recalled that Council, at its meeting of April 7, 1992, selected Viking Way as the preferred site for the proposed Transfer Station/Materials Recovery Facility (MRF). The Transfer Station would save the City approximately $600,000.00 annually in fleet charges and overtime by reducing the 26 additional miles traveled to West Central over Benton Landfill. Mr. Masingale explained that in order to have the Transfer Station/MRF on-line by late 1993, the design process should be started as soon as possible. The design of this facility would be contracted to an engineering consulting firm 26 10/06/92 and would include the preparation of contract documents (plans and specifications) suitable for bidding for the construction of a Transfer Station/MRF. Plant design would also include the off-site work. The contract with the consulting engineering firm would have provisions for the City to terminate the contract at any time. It is the recommendation of staff that Council authorize Requests for Proposal (RFP) to be prepared for the design of the Transfer Station/MRF at the Viking Way site. For the record, Council Member Arness opined that the Transfer Station/MRF is being constructed at the wrong location and would result in more costs in the long run. 27 10/06/92 MOTION: Made by Council Member Arness, seconded by Council Member Kehoe, authorizing Requests for Proposal (RFP) to be prepared for the design of the Transfer Station/Material Recovery Facility at the Viking Way site. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes ROUTINE REPORTS AND COMMUNICATIONS Alcoholic Beverage License Applications (A-110-140) Rico's Pizza (Jac II, Inc.) 200 Hartnell Avenue Anza Market (De La Torre, Felix, Serafin & Tobias) 1322 Pine Street ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, at the hour of 10:39 p.m., Mayor Moss declared the meeting adjourned. APPROVED: ____________________________ Mayor ATTEST: _______________________________ City Clerk