HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - City Council - unsigned - 1992-06-30 - Special1
06/30/92
City Council, Special Meeting
Council Chambers
Redding, California
June 30, 1992 5:34 p.m.
The meeting was called to order by Mayor Moss with the following Council
Members present: Anderson, Arness, Dahl, Kehoe and Moss.
Also present were City Manager Christofferson, Assistant City Manager McMurry,
City Attorney Hays, Director of Public Works Galusha, Director of Planning and
Community Development Perry, Chief of Police Blankenship, Fire Chief Bailey,
Finance Director Downing, Director of Information Systems Kelley, Director of
Utilities/Customer Service Vokal, Budget Services Officer Starman, City Clerk
Strohmayer, and Secretary to the City Council Rudolph.
Mayor Moss explained that due to the large number of individuals present,
Council would move the public comment period to the beginning of the agenda
and afford the public an opportunity to address Council.
City Attorney Hays advised that in accordance with the Brown Act, the public
comment period is a period for those individuals in the audience to address
the Council on any subject they desire. However, it is not a point in time
that Council can discuss, act on, or in any way consider the item. If Council
wants to have the item considered in a form where it can be discussed, it
would then need to be placed on a subsequent agenda.
PUBLIC COMMENT
(B-130-070 & A-050-270)
Neal Sternberg, 2223 Larkspur Lane, stated that he represents the local group
homes, as well as the Rotary Foundation Against Substance Abuse, which funds
drug prevention programs in Northern California. He voiced support of the
Redding Police Officers' Association and the need for Council to consider
maintaining all areas of public safety currently available on City streets.
He has witnessed the growth of Redding in the past ten years and the need for
public safety, particularly in the area of drug prevention. Because of the
concerted efforts of local law enforcement in working with children in the
area, any change or reduction in the police force will have a dramatic impact
on the Police Department's ability to provide the children with the necessary
tools to make positive decisions in their lives. He indicated that it is a
privilege to live in a community that has such a safety conscious police force
which is not only concerned with the public in general, but children and drug
prevention as well. He requested that Council consider these issues when
making very difficult decisions concerning public safety.
Father Lester L. Westling, Jr., 573 Royal Oaks Drive, stated that he attends
professional seminars where police departments throughout the United States
and Canada are represented. It is obvious to him that Redding has one of the
best police departments in the country. He stated that the officers being
laid off are among the "cream of the crop" because of Redding's excellent
reputation. He indicated that Council needs to realize that the City's
current public safety efforts are just ahead of organized youth gangs and drug
activity. However, unlike Sacramento and Portland who can only react to those
criminal elements, Redding has not yet lost its initiative. He related that
any reduction in the Police Department's human resources will impact the
proactive crime analysis unit, professional training, the number of officers
on patrol, and the teamwork which is so distinctive of the Redding Police
Department. He called Council's attention to the fact that the Police
Department has exercised creativity by mobilizing a large volunteer force and
soliciting outside gifts from such resources as the McConnell Foundation and
the Redding Rotary Club. He stated that public safety must be a primary
consideration in Redding. He explained that he frequently rides with these
officers and observes their actions, and indicated that the City can be proud
of this department and encouraged Council to retain all of these dedicated
individuals. As a citizen, he expects Council to exercise creativity, as well
as pursuing other alternatives, before laying off any of these dedicated
individuals. He made the following suggestions: 1) Implement across-the-
board salary reductions in order to maintain the police officers; or 2) When
the next tax initiative comes along, viably present the case of public safety.
He indicated that if the City does not have a plan in place to ensure its
2
06/30/92
future, it will grow without a plan. He urged Council to view this as an
emergency situation and rise to the occasion.
Michael Arnold, 2231 Oak Ridge Drive, urged Council to make the Police
Department and law enforcement activities a number one community priority,
which is the key to the area's economic success and its ability to attract
business. He indicated that the services the Police Department provides in
educating the young people and servicing as role models is imperative. As a
business owner, he is concerned about the safety of his employees. He
understands that there are individuals that would rather see the City build
more recreational facilities, but the City needs to be able to make them safe
places. He explained that the City is currently sending messages that it will
not tolerate drunk driving or gang activity and that it supports education.
He urged Council to support law enforcement and the leaders within the Police
Department who have helped to make it a respected and well organized part of
the City.
3
06/30/92
Martin Rauch, 7207 Encina Drive, President of the Redding Police Officers
Association, indicated that he, as well as the Association, is confused about
the need to lay off officers when they believe there is potential for other
funding within the organization, if the City Manager or the Chief of Police
were so instructed. He presented Council with petitions containing over 8,500
signatures stating opposition to layoffs within the Police Department. He
explained that layoffs within the private sector are due to the lack of work;
however, layoffs within the public sector are due to a lack of funding. In
fact, the work is actually increasing due to annexations and continued growth.
He questioned whether the City Manager and the Chief of Police have the
latitude to utilize existing funding within the Police Department to offset
the expired grant funding and, if not, requested that Council provide such
direction.
Mayor Moss stated that Council's agenda on July 7, 1992 will have an item
providing Council an opportunity to discuss the comments made this evening.
At the hour of 5:55 p.m., Mayor Moss declared the meeting recessed.
At the hour of 5:59 p.m., Mayor Moss declared the meeting reconvened to
regular session.
MEDICAL DISPATCH FEES
- Presentation by the Ambulance Groups
(C-175-825-100)
City Manager Christofferson conveyed that the purpose of this item is simply a
place keeper to afford the ambulance operators an opportunity to address
Council. All ambulance groups affected by the medical dispatch fees were
advised that this would be their last opportunity to speak to Council before
the fees became effective July 1, 1992. He noted that there were no
individuals present wishing to address Council on this item.
CLOSED SESSION
- re Real Property Negotiations for the Acquisition of the
Lorenz Hotel from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
(C-070-010 & H-150-675-300)
Mayor Moss stated that Council would adjourn to closed session pursuant to
California Government Code Section 54956.8 to discuss real property
negotiations for the acquisition of the Lorenz Hotel from the U. S. Department
of Housing and Urban Development.
MOTION: Made by Council Member Dahl, seconded by Council Member Arness, to
advise the U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) that the
City of Redding was not interested in acquiring the Lorenz Hotel on the terms
and conditions offered by HUD. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes
CLOSED SESSION
- re Pending Litigation
(L-100 & R-200-600)
Mayor Moss advised that Council would adjourn to closed session pursuant to
California Government Code Section 54956.9(a) to discuss pending litigation
regarding the following matters:
1) Patrick Buckley and Personal Watercraft Industry Association v. City of
Redding, Shasta County Superior Court Case No. 110777;
2) City of Redding v. Stardale Corporation, et al., Shasta County Superior
Court Case No. 101081;
3) City of Redding, et al., v. City of Anderson, et al., Shasta County
Superior Court Case No. 87481.
Mayor Moss indicated that it would not be necessary to conduct the closed
session regarding a personnel matter.
At the hour of 6:02 p.m., Mayor Moss declared the meeting adjourned to closed
session.
At the hour of 7:00 p.m., Mayor Moss declared the meeting reconvened to
regular session.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, at the hour of 7:00 p.m., Mayor Moss declared
the meeting adjourned.
APPROVED:
4
06/30/92
_________________________________
Mayor
ATTEST:
______________________________
City Clerk