Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - City Council - unsigned - 1992-02-04 City Council, Regular Meeting Council Chambers Redding, California February 4, 1992 7:00 p.m. The Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag was led by City Attorney Hays. The Invocation was offered by Pastor Dan Byus, Christian Life Center. The meeting was called to order by Mayor Dahl with the following Council Members present: Arness, Fulton, Moss and Dahl. Also present were Assistant City Manager McMurry, City Attorney Hays, Director of Public Works Galusha, Director of Planning and Community Development Perry, Director of Community Services Gorman, Principal Planner Keaney, Director of Information Systems Kelley, Housing Manager Maurer, Senior Planner King, Assistant Finance Director Sundin, Director of Airports Ruff, Budget Services Officer Starman, Assistant City Clerk Moscatello, City Clerk Strohmayer, and Secretary to the City Council Rudolph. City Attorney Hays introduced and welcomed Donna Kimball, a Junior from Central Valley High School, who will be observing the meeting this evening from the standpoint of the role the City Attorney plays in City government. Donna's 4-H group is undertaking a project which is to establish a mock City Council meeting, and Donna has been chosen to portray the City Attorney. CONSENT CALENDAR The following matters were considered inclusively under the Consent Calendar: Approval of Payroll and Accounts Payable Register (A-050-100-500) It is recommended that Accounts Payable Register No. 14, check numbers 178036 through 178593 inclusive, in the amount of $4,913,130.83, be approved and paid, and Payroll Register No. 15, check numbers 331140 through 331893 inclusive, in the amount of $1,147,959.87, for the period January 5, 1992, through January 18, 1992, be approved. TOTAL: $6,061,090.70 Resolution - Appropriating Funds for Shasta Area Safety Communications Agency (SHASCOM) * (B-130-070 & C-175-825-100) It is the recommendation of the Finance Director that Resolution No. 92-37 be adopted, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding approving and adopting the 54th amendment to City Budget Resolution No. 91-253 appropriating $85,830.00 for the Communications Division for the Shasta Area Safety Communications Agency (SHASCOM) and appropriating a like amount to the Police and Fire Departments for increased user charges. Resolution - re Purchase Offset Printing Press (D-050-400-100 & B-050-100) It is the recommendation of the Finance Director that Resolution No. 92-38 be adopted, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding rescinding Resolution No. 91-492 authorizing a Financing Agreement between the City of Redding and the Redding Bank of Commerce and approving the use of 1991 Equipment Financing Proceeds to purchase an offset printing press. Resolution - Recognizing and Appropriating Funds re Property Tax Audit Services Resolution - re Agreement with Municipal Resources Consultants to Perform Property Tax Audit Services * (B-130-070 & T-010-650) It is the recommendation of the Finance Director that Resolution No. 92-39 be adopted, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding approving and adopting the 56th amendment to City Budget Resolution No. 91-253 recognizing $15,000.00 in additional revenues generated as a result of a property tax audit and appropriating said amount for property tax audit services. 55 02/04/92 It is also recommended that Resolution No. 92-40 be adopted, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding approving and authorizing the Mayor to sign the Letter Agreement between Municipal Resource Consultants and the City of Redding dated January 17, 1992, regarding expanded revenue audit and information services. Redding Community Access Corporation - Annual Financial Report for Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 1991 (T-040-350-200) It is the recommendation of the Finance Director that Council accept the Redding Community Access Corporation's Annual Financial Report for Fiscal Year ending June 30, 1991. Set Public Hearing - re Rezoning Application RZ-15-91, by the City of Redding (Knollcrest and Stoneridge Estates) (L-010-230 & S-100-395 & S-100-707-710) It is the recommendation of the Planning Director that a public hearing be set for 7:00 p.m., February 18, 1992, to consider Rezoning Application RZ-15-91, a request to rezone property to "R1-BFM" Single Family Residential District and "U-F" Unclassified District with Site Plan Review. Set Public Hearing - re Rezoning Application RZ-1-92, by the City of Redding (Montebello Park Subdivision) (L-010-230 & S-100-490) It is the recommendation of the Planning Director that a public hearing be set for 7:00 p.m., February 18, 1992, to consider Rezoning Application RZ-1-92, a request to rezone property to "R-1" Single Family Residential District. Resolution - re Transmission Service by the Western Area Power Administration (E-120-900) It is the recommendation of the Electric Utility Director that Resolution No. 92-41 be adopted, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding approving Supplement No. 2 to Contract No. DE-MS65-83WP59008 dated January 16, 1984, with the Department of Energy, Western Area Power Administration, as set forth in Exhibit 2B, Transmission Rate of Delivery, dated December 9, 1991 and effective July 1, 1991, and authorizing the City Manager to sign same. Funds associated with this request are included in the 1991-92 budget. Resolution - re Proposed Purchase of Control Equipment for the Canby Road Substation Expansion (B-050-100 & E-090-140-180) It is the recommendation of the Electric Utility Director that Resolution No. 92-42 be adopted, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding approving the purchase of a Remote Terminal Unit (RTU), as a single vendor item, from ILEX Systems, Inc., in the amount of $18,952.92, to supplement the existing Canby Road Substation RTU, and authorizing the Mayor to sign all necessary documentation. Funds for this purchase are available in the 1991-92 Electric Department Budget and are included in the 1991-92 Capital Improvement Program. The source of funds is the 1989 Electric System Project Financing Program, 9025-36. Reject Bid - Bid Schedule No. 2565, Plastic Stacking Chairs (B-050-100) It is the recommendation of the Community Services Director that Council reject all bids associated with Bid Schedule No. 2565, plastic stacking chairs, due to unanticipated budget constraints. Reject Bid - Bid Schedule No. 2561, Tables (B-050-100) It is the recommendation of the Community Services Director that Council reject all bids associated with Bid Schedule No. 2561, tables, due to unanticipated budget constraints. Resolution - re Amendment to Airborne Express Lease (C-070-100 & A-090-100) It is the recommendation of the Airports Director that Resolution No. 92-43 be adopted, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding approving and authorizing the Mayor to execute the First Amendment to Lease between the City of Redding and Airborne Freight Corporation, dba Airborne Express, for lease of additional space in the passenger terminal at Redding Municipal Airport, at a rate of $431.59 per month, effective February 5, 1992. 56 02/04/92 57 02/04/92 Resolution - Purchase of Election Supplies (B-050-100 & E-070-050) It is the recommendation of the City Clerk that Resolution No. 92-44 be adopted, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding authorizing the purchase of election supplies for the City of Redding from Martin & Chapman Co., in an amount not to exceed $11,800.00, and authorizing the City Clerk to execute the appropriate documentation. Set Public Hearing - re Additional Permits for Redding Yellow Cab (T-100-500) It is the recommendation of the City Clerk that a public hearing be set for 7:00 p.m., February 18, 1992, to determine public convenience and necessity for the issuance of six additional taxicab permits to Redding Yellow Cab. Request to Sell Alcohol - Richard Paulson, Paulson's Catering (A-110-100) It is the recommendation of the City Clerk that Council grant Richard Paulson of Paulson's Catering permission to sell alcoholic beverages at the Senior Citizen's Hall on February 22, 1992, from 9:00 p.m. to 1:00 a.m., in conjunction with Candy Fink's 50's party and dance. Request to Sell Alcohol - Redding Rancheria (A-110-100) It is the recommendation of the City Clerk that Council grant Redding Rancheria permission to sell alcoholic beverages at the Senior Citizen's Hall on February 8, 1992, from 5:00 p.m to 1:00 a.m., in conjunction with the Safeway Employees Association banquet. Award of Bid - Bid Schedule No. 2598, Dense Soda Ash and Sodium Hydroxide (B-050-100) It is the recommendation of the Public Works Director that Bid Schedule No. 2598 (Job No. 5340-35), dense soda ash and sodium hydroxide, be awarded as follows: (1) 20 tons of dense soda ash from the low bidder, Commerce Chemical Co., in the amount of $178.80 per ton plus sales tax, for a total of $3,835.26; and (2) 3,600 gallons of sodium hydroxide from the low bidder, Sierra Chemical Company, in the amount of $0.47 per gallon plus sales tax, for a total of $1,814.67. Funds for these purchases are available in the Wastewater Utility operating budget. Acceptance of Final Map - River Heights Planned Development (PD-1-90) (Southeast corner of Hilltop Drive and River Bend Road) (L-010-210-645) It is the recommendation of the Public Works Director that the Final Map for River Heights Planned Development, developed by Jerry L. Knighten, be approved, the Mayor be authorized to sign the new Subdivision Agreement, and the City Clerk file the Map with the Shasta County Recorder. Award of Bid - Bid Schedule No. 2592, 6-Inch Waterline Replacement on Beverly Drive, Leila Avenue and Ramona Place (B-050-020 & W-030-725) It is the recommendation of the Public Works Director that Bid Schedule No. 2592 (Job No. 9187), 6-inch waterline replacement on Beverly Drive, Leila Avenue and Ramona Place, be awarded to the low bidder, Cox and Cox Construction, in the amount of $71,750.00, an additional $8,250.00 be approved to cover the cost of engineering and inspection fees, and $10,000.00 be approved to cover the cost of contract change orders, for a total of $90,000.00. The project is being funded through the Water Utility Fund. Award of Bid - Bid Schedule No. 2590, Administrative Offices for Grant Resource Center, Big Brothers and Big Sisters, and American Red Cross (B-050-020 & C-070-100) It is the recommendation of the Public Works Director that Bid Schedule No. 2590 (Job No. 9881), Administrative Offices for Grant Resources Center, Big Brothers and Big Sisters, and American Red Cross, be awarded to the lowest responsive bidder, Cerami and Browning Construction of Palo Cedro, utilizing Alternate No. 2, in the amount of $343,587.00, an additional $26,510.00 be approved to cover the cost of design, building and connection fees and inspection fees; and an additional $20,863.00 be approved to cover the cost of change orders, for a total of $390,960.00. The low bidder did not meet the bid specifications. The 58 02/04/92 McConnell Foundation is providing a $380,000.00 grant, the tenants are funding $3,960.00 for cabinet work and there is $7,000.00 from interest earned on the grant, for a total of $390,960.00 available for the project. The Negative Declaration was previously ratified as part of the Diestelhorst Landing Office Park project. Resolution - Appropriating Funds for Water Utility Operating Material and Supplies Account * (B-130-070 & W-030) It is the recommendation of the Public Works Director that Resolution No. 92- 45 be adopted, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding approving and adopting the 55th amendment to City Budget Resolution No. 91-253 appropriating $100,000.00 for 348 bacteriological sample and retake stations and asphalt patch paving. Resolution Accepting Streets - Acceptance of Improvements for Ravenwood Subdivision, Unit 7 (South of Old Alturas Road and east of Shasta View Drive) * (S-070-230 & S-100-614) It is the recommendation of the Public Works Director that Resolution No. 92- 46 be adopted, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding accepting for maintenance and operation Lavender Way, Salmonberry Drive, Trumpet Drive, and Hominy Way in Unit 7 of the Ravenwood Estates Subdivision. It is also recommended that improvements in Ravenwood Estates Subdivision, Unit 7, be accepted as satisfactorily completed, and the City Clerk return the securities to the developer, Don Lynn Development. Resolution Accepting Streets - Acceptance of Improvements for Quail Ridge Subdivision, Unit 5 (North of Whistling Drive and east of Churn Creek Road) * (S-070-230 & S-100-607) It is the recommendation of the Public Works Director that Resolution No. 92- 47 be adopted, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding accepting for maintenance and operation Setter Drive and Setter Court in Unit 5 of the Quail Ridge Subdivision. It is also recommended that the improvements in Quail Ridge Subdivision, Unit 5, be accepted as satisfactorily completed, and the City Clerk return the securities to the developer, Lui & Cole Development Corporation. Resolution - Ordering Abatement on Property Located at 5406 E. Bonnyview Road, owned by Harrell and Louise Davis, Roger and Adrienne Cowling, and David and Kathleen Shoffner (A-030-070) It is the recommendation of the City Attorney that Resolution No. 92-48 be adopted, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding approving the report and findings of the Board of Appeals, and ordering the abatement of the unsafe and unsightly building(s) and debris on the property at 5406 E. Bonnyview Road, owned by Harrell Davis and Louise M. Davis, as to an undivided one-half interest; Roger H. Cowling and Adrienne F. Cowling, as to an undivided one-fourth interest; and David A. Shoffner and Kathleen S. Shoffner, as to an undivided one-fourth interest. Resolution - Ordering Abatement on Property Located at 2780 Reservoir Lane (rear house), owned by Samelia I. Weldon (previously owned by Andrew and Carol Vranich) (A-030-070) It is the recommendation of the City Attorney that Resolution No. 92-49 be adopted, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding approving the report and findings of the Board of Appeals, and ordering the abatement of the unsafe and unsightly building(s) and debris on the property at 2780 Reservoir Lane (rear house), owned by Samelia I. Weldon (previously owned by Andrew and Carol Vranich). MOTION: Made by Council Member Arness, seconded by Council Member Fulton, that all the foregoing items on the Consent Calendar be approved and adopted as recommended. Voting was as follows: Ayes: Council Members - Arness, Fulton, Moss and Dahl Noes: Council Members - None Absent: Council Members - None 59 02/04/92 Resolution Nos. 92-37, 92-38, 92-39, 92-40, 92-41, 92-42, 92-43, 92-44, 92-45, 92-46, 92-47, 92-48, and 92-49 are on file in the office of the City Clerk. APPOINTMENT TO CITY COUNCIL (A-050-060) Mayor Dahl requested Council's concurrence in appointing former Council Member and Mayor, Scott Carter, to fill the term expiring in April, 1992, at which time two new Council Members will be elected. He indicated that Mr. Carter is not a candidate in the upcoming election and he is familiar with most issues presently before Council. MOTION: Made by Council Member Fulton, seconded by Council Member Moss, to appoint Scott Carter to fill the term expiring in April, 1992. Voting was as follows: Ayes: Council Members - Arness, Fulton, Moss and Dahl Noes: Council Members - None Absent: Council Members - None Mayor Dahl indicated that Mr. Carter will be sworn in at the February 18, 1992, meeting. Council Member Moss stated that Scott Carter is an excellent choice to fill the Council vacancy. Mr. Carter commented that he is approaching this appointment with a great deal of trepidation; however, he will do his best to assist Council. He related that he appreciates Council's support in this appointment. PUBLIC HEARING - re General Plan Amendment GPA-13-91 and Rezoning Application RZ-10-91, by B & L Development (3405 Glenwood Drive) (G-030-010 & L-010-230) The hour of 7:00 p.m. having arrived, Mayor Dahl opened the public hearing regarding General Plan Amendment GPA-13-91 and Rezoning Application RZ-10-91. The following documents are on file in the office of the City Clerk: Affidavit of Mailing - Notice of Public Hearing Affidavit of Publication - Notice of Public Hearing Planning Department Recommendation Dated February 4, 1992 City Clerk Strohmayer advised that no protests were received. Planning and Community Development Director Perry related that the Planning Commission has conducted a public hearing on the requests and formulated a recommendation; however, through an oversight, an environmental impact determination was not conducted. It is, therefore, the recommendation of staff that the public hearing be continued to March 3, 1992. Mayor Dahl inquired if there was anyone present who wished to speak on the issue. Those in attendance agreed to attend the meeting on March 3, 1992 to voice their concerns. MOTION: Made by Council Member Fulton, seconded by Council Member Arness, to continue the public hearing regarding General Plan Amendment GPA-13-91 and Rezoning Application RZ-10-91, by B & L Development, to March 3, 1992 at 7:00 p.m. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes PUBLIC HEARING - re Rezoning Application RZ-8-91, by Western Acres, Inc. (West of Shasta View Drive and North of Rancho Road) (L-010-230 & S-100-782) The hour of 7:00 p.m. having arrived, Mayor Dahl opened the public hearing regarding Rezoning Application RZ-8-91. The following documents are on file in the office of the City Clerk: Affidavit of Mailing - Notice of Public Hearing Affidavit of Publication - Notice of Public Hearing Planning Commission Recommendation Dated January 29, 1992 City Clerk Strohmayer advised that no protests were received. Planning and Community Development Director Perry related that the Planning Commission recommended approval of a request by Rob Middleton, representing Western Acres, Inc., to rezone the Western Acres Subdivision from "U" 60 02/04/92 Unclassified district to "R1-BFM" Single Family Residential District with a Combining District requiring minimum lot sizes as established on the recorded subdivision map. The application was initiated to comply with a condition of approval of the Western Acres Tentative Subdivision Map. It is the opinion of staff that the "BFM" Combining District would best reflect the range of lot sizes within the subdivision and provide notice that further lot splitting could not occur. It is the recommendation of both the Planning Commission and staff that Council ratify the Negative Declaration, rezone the subject property to "R1-BFM" Single Family Residential District, and offer the ordinance for first reading. Mayor Dahl determined that there was no one present who wished to speak on this matter. MOTION: Made by Council Member Moss, seconded by Council Member Fulton, that the public hearing be closed. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes MOTION: Made by Council Member Arness, seconded by Council Member Fulton, that Council make the following findings regarding Rezoning Application RZ-8- 91: 1. Project is compatible with the Redding General Plan; 2. Project will not significantly alter existing land form; 3. Project is compatible with surrounding land use; 4. Project is compatible with the Code of the City of Redding, California; and ratify the Negative Declaration authorized by the Board of Administrative Review on September 18, 1991. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes Council Member Arness offered Ordinance 1988 for first reading, an ordinance of the City Council of the City of Redding amending Section 18.06.020 of the Redding Municipal Code relating to the rezoning of certain real property in the City of Redding (RZ-8-91). PUBLIC HEARING - Rezoning Application RZ-20-91, by Eckelman and Scarbrough (Rancho Estates Subdivision) (Northeast corner of Shasta View Drive and Rancho Road) (L-010-230 & S-100-609-600) The hour of 7:00 p.m. having arrived, Mayor Dahl opened the public hearing regarding Rezoning Application RZ-20-91. The following documents are on file in the office of the City Clerk: Affidavit of Mailing - Notice of Public Hearing Affidavit of Publication - Notice of Public Hearing Planning Commission Recommendation Dated January 27, 1992 City Clerk Strohmayer advised that no protests were received. Planning and Community Development Director Perry indicated that the Planning Commission recommended approval of the rezoning of 27 acres of property located at the northeast corner of Shasta View Drive and Rancho Road from "U" Unclassified District to "R1-BFM" Single Family Residential District. The rezoning application is required by the conditions of approval of the Rancho Estates subdivision, which will be constructed on the property. He related that factors taken into consideration included the existing General Plan classification of the property and the lot sizes proposed by the tentative map. A transfer of density to the subdivision occurred as a result of the impending gift of a school site to the Pacheco Union Elementary School District, resulting in lot sizes somewhat smaller than what would normally be anticipated under the existing General Plan classification. It is the recommendation of both the Planning Commission and staff that Council approve Rezoning Application RZ-20-91, rezoning the subject property to R1-BFM, ratify the Negative Declaration and offer the ordinance for first reading. Mayor Dahl determined that there was no one present who wished to speak on this matter. MOTION: Made by Council Member Moss, seconded by Council Member Arness, that the public hearing be closed. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes 61 02/04/92 MOTION: Made by Council Member Moss, seconded by Council Member Arness, that Council make the following findings regarding Rezoning Application RZ-20-91: 1. Project is compatible with the Redding General Plan; 2. Project will not significantly alter existing land form; 3. Project is compatible with surrounding land use; 4. Project is compatible with the Code of the City of Redding, California; and ratify the Negative Declaration authorized by the Board of Administrative Review on October 23, 1991. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes Council Member Moss offered Ordinance 1989 for first reading, an ordinance of the City Council of the City of Redding amending Section 18.06.020 of the Redding Municipal Code relating to the rezoning of certain real property in the City of Redding (RZ-20-91). PUBLIC HEARING - re Rezoning Application RZ-21-91, by Roy Thomas (2663 Victor Avenue) (L-010-230) The hour of 7:00 p.m. having arrived, Mayor Dahl opened the public hearing regarding Rezoning Application RZ-21-91. The following documents are on file in the office of the City Clerk: Affidavit of Mailing - Notice of Public Hearing Affidavit of Publication - Notice of Public Hearing Planning Commission recommendation dated January 27, 1992 City Clerk Strohmayer advised that no protests were received. Planning and Community Development Director Perry indicated that the Planning Commission recommended approval of the rezoning request by Roy Thomas to reclassify approximately 0.25 acre located at 2663 Victor Avenue from "U" Unclassified to "CO-15-B10-F" Office District. The site-plan-review criteria accompanying the zoning requires a minimum building site of 10,000 square feet. The "15" establishes a 15-foot, front-yard setback. It is the recommendation of the Planning Commission and staff that Council approve the rezoning of property to "CO-15-B10-F," subject to site-plan-review criteria, ratify the Negative Declaration and offer the ordinance for first reading. MOTION: Made by Council Member Moss, seconded by Council Member Arness, that the public hearing be closed. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes MOTION: Made by Council Member Moss, seconded by Council Member Arness, that Council make the following findings regarding Rezoning Application RZ-21-91: 1. Project is compatible with the Redding General Plan; 2. Project will not significantly alter existing land form; 3. Project is compatible with surrounding land use; 4. Project is compatible with the Code of the City of Redding, California; and ratify the Negative Declaration authorized by the Planning Commission on January 14, 1992. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes Council Member Moss offered Ordinance 1990 for first reading, an ordinance of the City Council of the City of Redding amending Section 18.06.020 of the Redding Municipal Code relating to the rezoning of certain real property in the City of Redding (RZ-21-91). PUBLIC HEARING - Appeal of Lot Split Application LS-33-91, by Shasta Enterprises (5976 Old Oregon Trail-Northeast end of Redding Municipal Airport) (L-010-150) The hour of 7:00 p.m. having arrived, Mayor Dahl opened the public hearing regarding the appeal of Lot Split Application LS-33-91. The following documents are on file in the office of the City Clerk: Affidavit of Mailing - Notice of Public Hearing Affidavit of Publication - Notice of Public Hearing Planning Commission recommendation dated January 30, 1992 City Clerk Strohmayer advised that no protests were received. 62 02/04/92 Principal Planner Keaney related that Shasta Enterprises has appealed the decision of the Planning Commission concerning two conditions of approval for Lot Split LS-33-91 on property located at 5976 Old Oregon Trail, at the northeast end of Redding Municipal Airport. The appealed conditions concern road improvements and an open-space easement for emergency aircraft landing. The project site is located within the Redding Municipal Airport Area Plan, is zoned "U" Unclassified, and has a General Plan designation of "Planned Industrial" with an acquisition overlay. Mr. Keaney explained that the lot split application was approved by the Board of Administrative Review (BAR) on October 30, 1991, and granted the applicant, Shasta Enterprises, permission to divide 4.78 acres into three industrial lots. The applicant then appealed to the Planning Commission for reconsideration of two conditions of approval. The Commission at its November 26, 1991, meeting upheld the appeal and modified the two conditions challenged by Shasta Enterprises. Although not explicit in the letter of appeal to Council, staff assumes the same two conditions considered by the Planning Commission are the main issue of the appeal. Mr. Keaney indicated that the applicant's main concerns are Conditions 4 and 5 of the lot split: (1) Condition 4 - The Planning Commission, due to the isolated location and rare pedestrian or bicycle usage, amended the condition to reduce the improvements of the off-site portion of the roadway from a 32-foot width of paving to a 24-foot width. This off-site portion extends northerly and then westerly from the project site for a distance of approximately 2,600 feet to connect to the existing paved portion of Old Oregon Trail. Mr. Keaney conveyed that the applicant contends that the City should share in the cost of the road improvements as it shares access in order to reach its facility south of the project site (previously Evergreen Helicopters). The applicant has suggested a cost-reimbursement mechanism and feels that the off- site improvements are unreasonable to attach to the development of a small parcel. The Planning Commission disagreed and felt the subdivision should have paved access. (2) Condition 5 - The requirements were reviewed by the Planning Commission to at least partly accommodate the concerns of the applicant. Originally, the conditions required the 64-foot strip along the west property line be an open- space easement. An open-space easement would mean no use of the area including nonstructural uses such as parking. As amended by the Planning Commission, the condition is a building setback line and restricts structures but no other uses. The main point of the appellant seems to be that it is inappropriate to apply restrictions at the time of parcel map recording since it unfairly reduces site design options for the developer. It is the opinion of staff that applying restrictions at the time of subdivision is precisely the intent of the Airport Area Plan safety policies and gives the applicant and his architect clear design guidelines. It is the position of Planning staff and the Airports Director that the open space be reserved at the time of land division in order to attain a feasible, contiguous, emergency-landing zone adjacent to the taxiway, rather than a disjointed, unusable open-space area dictated by the future placement of structures on a lot. Policy 3e of the Airport Area Plan states that the open space be provided at the time of "subdivision, land division, and design review." This is consistent with City action on subdivisions and lot splits. It is staff's opinion that Council should deny the appeal as described in Alternative 1, in the report to City Council dated January 30, 1992, incorporated herein by reference. Planning staff acknowledges that the requirement to pave 2,600 lineal feet is extremely expensive for the development of one parcel, however, should not be used as a basis to delete the condition. If the Airport proceeds to develop the east side of the main runway, the Airport will have to build the road; but that development is many years away. Shasta Enterprises always has the ability to pursue forming an assessment district with other involved properties. A reimbursement agreement is outside the conditions of the parcel map and should be pursued separately with the Airports Commission and Council. 63 02/04/92 In response to Council Member Moss, Public Works Director Galusha related that staff would rather see a 32 foot roadway, versus a 24 foot roadway, which provides two 12 foot driving lanes and is considered minimal. Jim Elkins, of Pace Engineering, representing Shasta Enterprises, explained that the existing and ultimate primary user of the gravel road is the City of Redding, and the cost of the road development is being put entirely upon this parcel map. He related that the 64-foot building setback line is unnecessary, as the setbacks between the Airport Area Plan are doubled compared to the planned industrial district. The required conditions would increase open space requirements for setbacks from 15 percent to 30 percent. Given the substantial buffer zone around the entire perimeter of the property, and the fact that the setbacks in the Municipal Area Plan are double those of a planned industrial district, the additional setback is viewed as being unnecessary. In response to Council Member Arness, Planning and Community Development Director Perry stated the intent of focusing on the westerly property line was to eliminate buildings being developed in case of an airplane crash. He indicated that the open space can be used for such things as car parking, and in this case, aircraft parking, with the only requirement being that the area be structure free. Don Hildebrand, Shasta Enterprises, stated that the subject parcel map differs from a tentative subdivision map in terms of the Map Act. He related that it is his understanding that the City has tolerated the use of this roadway for many years for its own benefit, and now an applicant files a small parcel map and is imposed with over 2,600 feet of road improvements. He stated that there is an existing road which is being utilized, and to have one small two acre property owner, upon development of his property, improve the roadway to the extent required is unreasonable. He asked Council to uphold the appeal. He related that due to the fact that the City would receive benefit from this roadway, it is felt that the City should sponsor some type of reimbursement/shared cost mechanism. He said that Shasta Enterprises is willing to pay for its share of the development, but feels that those individuals who utilize the roadway and would benefit from its development should also participate, otherwise the cost burden of development would be unreasonable. MOTION: Made by Council Member Moss, seconded by Council Member Arness, that the public hearing be closed. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes Council Member Arness stated that possibly the project is premature; however, there is a definite benefit to the property by developing the roadway. He questioned if there was some type of acquisition assessment district which could be developed, whereby subsequent users of the roadway would be required to pay a proportionate share of the cost. Council Member Fulton stated that he partially agrees with Council Member Arness, however, stated that the conditions placed upon the applicant are demanding a great deal. He related that something needs to be done to make the project more realistic for the property owners. Council Member Moss concurred with staff's recommendation as to the alignment of the clear zone, so as to get the maximum benefit. He indicated that he has problems with Shasta Enterprises being required to construct a half mile of roadway through other private lands, who will benefit from a windfall savings of development costs. He also inquired as to some type of district being created, whereby Shasta Enterprises could receive back a proportionate amount of the cost. Mr. Perry stated that a benefit district could be created, which basically allows the City or an agent to pay the up-front costs and then obtain reimbursement as other parties develop. Another option would be for Shasta Enterprises and other properties owners in the area to establish an assessment district to pay for at least a center line, with parking lanes, curb and gutter, and sidewalk put in as adjoining properties are developed. He indicated that water will also need to be brought into the area. 64 02/04/92 Council Member Moss stated he has problems with the City participating in a benefit district, as it has invested several million dollars in the area, which have made these properties considerably more valuable. Council Member Arness related that possibly the owners in the area should also consider bringing water and sewer into the area. 65 02/04/92 MOTION: Made by Council Member Arness, seconded by Council Member Moss, to deny Shasta Enterprises' appeal of Lot Split Application LS-33-91 on both the roadway and setback requirements. Voting was as follows: Ayes: Council Members - Arness, Fulton, Moss and Dahl Noes: Council Members - None Absent: Council Members - None REDDING COMMUNITY ACCESS CORPORATION - Appointments and Reappointments (B-080-120) Mayor Dahl recalled that the Redding Community Access Corporation recently amended its bylaws which included a provision for three year terms, with a limitation of six consecutive years of service. Mayor Dahl requested Council's concurrence in making the following appointments and reappointments: (1) Appoint Council Member Fulton to serve as Council Representative to the Redding Community Access Corporation for a three year term expiring February 1, 1995; (2) Appoint Namaste to serve as Member at Large for a three year term expiring February 1, 1995; (3) Reappoint Tom Langkau to serve a two year term expiring February 1, 1994; (4) Reappoint Mark LeBlanc to serve a three year term expiring February 1, 1995; and (5) Reappoint John Mancasola to serve a three year term expiring February 1, 1995. MOTION: Made by Council Member Moss, seconded by Council Member Arness, that the appointments and reappointments be approved to the Redding Community Access Corporation as hereinabove recommended. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes REDDING AREA BUS AUTHORITY - Appointment (B-080-650-550 & R-010) Mayor Dahl requested Council's concurrence in appointing Council Member Moss to fill the vacancy on the Redding Area Bus Authority Board. MOTION: Made by Council Member Fulton, seconded by Council Member Arness, to appoint Council Member Moss to fill the vacancy on the Redding Area Bus Authority Board. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes ORDINANCE NO. 1984 - Rezoning Property in the City of Redding (RZ-11-91) (Churn Creek Road) (L-010-230) MOTION: Made by Council Member Moss, seconded by Council Member Arness, that the full reading of Ordinance No. 1984 be waived and the City Attorney be instructed to read the full title. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes MOTION: Made by Council Member Moss, seconded by Council Member Fulton, that Ordinance No. 1984 be adopted, an ordinance of the City Council of the City of Redding amending Section 18.06.020 of the Redding Municipal Code relating to the rezoning of certain real property in the City of Redding (RZ-11-91). Voting was as follows: Ayes: Council Members - Arness, Fulton, Moss and Dahl Noes: Council Members - None Absent: Council Members - None Ordinance No. 1984 is on file in the office of the City Clerk. ORDINANCE NO. 1985 - Rezoning Property in the City of Redding (RZ-14-91) (Highland Oaks Subdivision, Saratoga North Estates, Western Oaks Estates and Western Ranches) (L-010-230 & S-100-282 & S-100-687 & S-100-783 & S-100-785) MOTION: Made by Council Member Moss, seconded by Council Member Arness, that the full reading of Ordinance No. 1985 be waived and the City Attorney be instructed to read the full title: The Vote: Unanimous Ayes MOTION: Made by Council Member Fulton, seconded by Council Member Moss, that Ordinance No. 1985 be adopted, an ordinance of the City Council of the City of Redding amending Section 18.06.020 of the Redding Municipal Code relating to the rezoning of certain real property in the City of Redding (RZ-14-91). Voting was as follows: Ayes: Council Members - Arness, Fulton, Moss and Dahl Noes: Council Members - None Absent: Council Members - None 66 02/04/92 Ordinance No. 1985 is on file in the office of the City Clerk. ORDINANCE NO. 1986 - re Clearing, Grading, Fills and Excavation (A-070-055) MOTION: Made by Council Member Moss, seconded by Council Member Arness, that the full reading of Ordinance No. 1986 be waived and the City Attorney be instructed to read the full title. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes MOTION: Made by Council Member Arness, seconded by Council Member Fulton, that Ordinance No. 1986 be adopted, an ordinance of the City Council of the City of Redding amending Chapter 16.40 of the Redding Municipal Code pertaining to Clearing, Grading, Fills and Excavation. Voting was as follows: Ayes: Council Members - Arness, Fulton, Moss and Dahl Noes: Council Members - None Absent: Council Members - None Ordinance No. 1986 is on file in the office of the City Clerk. ORDINANCE NO. 1987 - re Handbills (C-110-100) MOTION: Made by Council Member Moss, seconded by Council Member Arness, that the full reading of Ordinance No. 1987 be waived and the City Attorney be instructed to read the full title. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes Council Member Moss related that a great deal of concern has been expressed by the citizens of Redding concerning the proposed handbill ordinance. He opined that the City does not have the right to issue permits for people to trespass. He indicated that he spoke with the City Clerk and agrees that it would be quite expensive to maintain a file of those individuals who do not wish to receive handbill distribution. He stated that if the City finds it cannot restrict the distribution of unsolicited handbills, the ordinance should then be brought back before Council for revision. City Attorney Hays stated that private property owners can prohibit distribution on their property by posting no solicitation signs. He related that the issue before Council is whether or not government has the right to exercise prior restraint and the courts position is that local government should not be involved with right of speech. Council Member Moss explained that the City is not fulfilling its obligation if it allows a permit to be issued without notifying the distributor of those individuals who do not wish to receive handbill distributions. Mr. Hays commented that a provision can be added, whereby the licensed distributor would not be permitted to make distributions at residences where the property owner has posted a sign indicating no solicitation. Mayor Dahl suggested that the ordinance be adopted and reviewed in six months. Mr. Hays stated that the handbill ordinance needs to be a cooperative effort between the residents and the City to ensure proper compliance. Council Member Arness stated that he would not favor the City Clerk's office being the recipient of calls from individuals who do not wish to receive handbill distributions. Bill Neikirk, President of Tanglewood II Homeowners Association, related that individuals which he has spoken with oppose the new ordinance and discussions with City staff indicate that many phone calls have been received in opposition. He views this as being an invasion of privacy, as permission is not being given by the property owners to allow distribution upon their property. He commented that the new ordinance will cause public nuisance, contribute to litter, and create more trash for the City landfill to process. In addition, he stated that it will create a liability for the private property owners if an individual is injured on their property while making a distribution. He opined that the distributor should be required to first mail out a self-addressed envelope asking if the property owner would like to receive the distribution. He opined that no one has the right to force unwanted information upon individuals, just as no one has the right to force an individual to turn on the radio or television. He requested Council not amend the handbill ordinance. 67 02/04/92 68 02/04/92 MOTION: Made by Council Member Arness, seconded by Council Member Moss, that Ordinance No. 1987 be adopted, an ordinance of the City Council of the City of Redding amending Redding Municipal Code Chapter 6.36 pertaining to handbills, by amending Sections 6.36.020, 6.36.040, and 6.36.050, and adding Sections 6.36.100, 6.36.110, 6.36.120, 6.36.140, and 6.36.150 and directing staff to review the ordinance in six months to assess if any amendments are necessary. Voting was as follows: Ayes: Council Members - Arness, Fulton, Moss and Dahl Noes: Council Members - None Absent: Council Members - None Ordinance No. 1987 is on file in the office of the City Clerk. RESOLUTION - re Fiscal Impact Statements (A-050-060-555 & B-130-070) Mayor Dahl recalled that several weeks ago Council concurred with the recommendation that a Fiscal Impact Statement requirement be developed by the Council's Finance Committee and submitted to the full Council for consideration. It is the recommendation of the Finance Committee that a resolution be adopted requiring that a Fiscal Impact Statement accompany every major proposal considered by Council, indicating how much each new law or regulation is going to cost the City. MOTION: Made by Council Member Moss, seconded by Council Member Arness, that Resolution No. 92-50 be adopted, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding establishing and adopting a policy entitled "Fiscal Impact Statements," requiring a fiscal impact statement to accompany every major proposal considered by City Council. Voting was as follows: Ayes: Council Members - Arness, Fulton, Moss and Dahl Noes: Council Members - None Absent: Council Members - None Resolution No. 92-50 is on file in the office of the City Clerk. LEGISLATIVE MATTERS (L-040-070 & L-040-150) Assistant City Manager McMurry related that AB183 was defeated last week by the Assembly Ways and Means Committee; therefore, no action is required on the part of Council. Mr. McMurry indicated that the Statewide Growth Conference is scheduled in Sacramento on February 20-21, 1992. In light of reducing travel expenses, he requested Council's direction as to if a staff member should plan on attending this conference. Council Member Arness stated that he plans to attend the conference; however, he recommends that a staff member also attend. Mayor Dahl directed staff to determine which staff member should attend the Statewide Growth Conference. TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP S-11-91 - Stillwater Heights Subdivision (S-100) Council was advised that the Planning Commission has granted permission to divide 37.29 acres into 63 duplex lots and 27 fourplex lots, located north of State Highway 44 and south of Old 44 Drive, described as Tentative Subdivision Map S-11-91. A map of the area and a copy of the conditions of approval were submitted to Council. This was an information item. TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP S-28-90 - Highland Oaks, Units 4 and 5 (S-100-282) Council was advised that the Planning Commission has granted permission to divide 67.2 acres into 65 single-family residential lots, located east of Shasta View Drive and west of Goodwater Avenue, described as Tentative Subdivision Map S-28-90. A map of the area and a copy of the conditions of approval were submitted to Council. This was an information item. 69 02/04/92 Resolutions - Property Tax Exchange Agreements re Annexation 90-14, Fairway Oaks Mobile Home Estates, Annexation 90-16, Viking Way Area, Annexation 90-18, Power Line Road Area, Annexation 91-2, Rancho Road II, and Annexation 91-4, Keswick Dam Road (T-010-650 & A-150- ) Planning and Community Development Director Perry recalled that Council, at its November 5, 1991 meeting, directed staff to initiate revised Property Tax Exchange Agreements on all annexations pending at LAFCO. The Agreements give Shasta County 100% of the Base Year Tax and 100% of all annual tax increment revenue that was allocated to Shasta County prior to annexation. The Agreements provide Redding 100% of the Base Year Tax and 100% of all annual tax increment revenue that was allocated to the Shasta County Fire Protection District before annexation. Mr. Perry explained that the County can continue to collect Proposition B monies from those parcels annexed into the City, which basically contractually obligated itself to pay that money, and can be collected by the County until such time as the debt is paid in full. Operating under this premise, the properties annexed into the City will continue to pay Proposition B monies to the County, $20.00 per parcel, until such time as the debt is paid in full and does not need to be specifically referenced in the Property Tax Exchange Agreement. He indicated that the $20.00 is separate from the seven percent the City is scheduled to receive. MOTION: Made by Council Member Moss, seconded by Council Member Arness, that resolutions of the City Council of the City of Redding be adopted involving property tax transfers between the County of Shasta and the City of Redding as follows: (1) Resolution No. 92-51 re Annexation No. 90-14, Fairway Oaks Mobile Home Estates; (2) Resolution No. 92-52 re Annexation No. 90-16, Viking Way Area; (3) Resolution No. 92-53 re Annexation No. 90-18, Power Line Road Area; (4) Resolution No. 92-54 re Annexation No. 91-2, Rancho Road II, and (5) Resolution No. 92-55 re Annexation No. 91-4, Keswick Dam Road. Voting was as follows: Ayes: Council Members - Arness, Fulton, Moss and Dahl Noes: Council Members - None Absent: Council Members - None Resolutions No. 92-51, 92-52, 92-53, 92-54, and 92-55 are on file in the office of the City Clerk. OFFER TO SELL LAND TO CITY ON CHURN CREEK - by Gene Hill (C-070-010) Planning and Community Development Director Perry explained that the City received a letter in November, 1991, from Gene Hill offering to sell property on Churn Creek, adjacent to the proposed Enterprise Community Park, to the City. In response, the City Council referred the offer to the Planning Commission, the Recreation and Parks Commission, and the River and Waterways Commission. The Planning Commission and the River and Waterways Commission both recommended acquisition of the property and the Recreation and Parks Commission recommended acquisition subject to not using City funds. Mr. Perry indicated that potential sources of funding to acquire the property include the following: (1) Park development funds; (2) In-lieu park fees (Enterprise area); and (3) Grant application. He stated that the grant application could be a 50/50 grant request to a new State program, under the Habitat Conservation Fund. The application for this program would need to be filed by March 1, 1992; however, if approved, funds would not be available until October. If the grant were not approved, the City would have to rely on its own funding. Mr. Perry stated that from staff's perspective, it is not desirable to have a potential house adjacent to the future multi-use park with access through the park. It is, therefore, recommended that staff be authorized to obtain an appraisal and that staff be directed to submit an application for partial grant funding if Mr. Hill can work within the grant time frame. He related that a request for proposals is being circulated to prepare a master plan for the Enterprise Park, and whether or not the property is part of the park will be important to the overall design. 70 02/04/92 MOTION: Made by Council Member Moss, seconded by Council Member Arness, directing staff to obtain an appraisal on Gene Hill's property, comprised of 8.62 acres, located on Churn Creek Road and authorizing staff to submit an application for grant funding. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes ROUTINE REPORTS AND COMMUNICATIONS Alcoholic Beverage License Applications (A-110-140) Marie Callenders (Wong, Anna W. and Joseph) 1987 Hilltop Drive Red Robin Burger & Spirits Emporium (Red Robin International, Inc.) East Section of Dana Drive and Churn Creek M & M's Filipino Cuisine to Go (Nixon, Elenita, Pabalan, Rosaleta) 105-E Hartnell Application to Public Utilities Commission by Page-U, Inc. re Authority to Expand Paging Operations (S-050-350) Application to Public Utilities Commission by Pacific Bell for Temporary Rate Increase (S-050-350) ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, at the hour of 8:22 p.m., Mayor Dahl declared the meeting adjourned. APPROVED: _________________________________ Mayor ATTEST: ______________________________ City Clerk