Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - City Council - unsigned - 1992-01-21 City Council, Regular Meeting Council Chambers Redding, California January 21, 1992 7:00 p.m. The Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag was led by City Attorney Hays. The Invocation was offered by Pastor Noble Street, First Presbyterian Church. The meeting was called to order by Mayor Dahl with the following Council Members present: Arness, Buffum, Fulton, Moss and Dahl. Also present were City Manager Christofferson, Assistant City Manager McMurry, City Attorney Hays, Director of Public Works Galusha, Director of Planning and Community Development Perry, Chief of Police Blankenship, Electric Utility Operations Manager Ryan, Fire Chief Bailey, Director of Finance Downing, Assistant City Engineer Curtis, Principal Planner Keaney, City Treasurer Linville, Public Works Operations Manager Russell, Superintendent-Wastewater Craig, Director of Information Systems Kelley, Housing Manager Maurer, Director of Airports Ruff, Associate Planner Morgon, Associate Planner DeMallie, Budget Services Officer Starman, Foreman-Wastewater Collection Tasello, Lead Systems Analyst Erwin, Industrial Waste Analyst Ames, Management Analyst Anderson, Chief Engineering Technician Coats, Public Information Officer Bachman, City Clerk Strohmayer, and Secretary to the City Council Rudolph. PUBLIC SAFETY TASK FORCE - Police Subcommittee Findings and Recommendations (B-080-600-425 & A-050-060-600) Judy Smith, Chairman of the Police Subcommittee of the Public Safety Task Force, presented Council with its Findings and Recommendations. Ms. Smith acknowledged the cooperation received from staff, particularly Chief Blankenship and Arlene Ward. In addition, she publicly thanked the members of the Police Subcommittee for their diligent efforts. She stated that the citizens of Redding are fortunate to have such a fine Police Department and that a growing community cannot expect to maintain the same level of public safety without increasing the resources available to provide the services. MOTION: Made by Council Member Fulton, seconded by Council Member Moss, that Resolution No. 92-22 be adopted, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding commending the 1991 Police Task Force for their dedication and service in the completion of their charge. Voting was as follows: Ayes: Council Members - Arness, Buffum, Fulton, Moss and Dahl Noes: Council Members - None Absent: Council Members - None Resolution No. 92-22 is on file in the office of the City Clerk. On behalf of Council, Mayor Dahl presented Ms. Smith with a framed resolution commending the 1991 Police Task Force for their dedication and service. PUBLIC SAFETY TASK FORCE - Fire Subcommittee Findings and Recommendations (B-080-600-200 & A-050-060-600) Don Rehn, Chairman of the Fire Subcommittee of the Public Safety Task Force, presented Council with its Findings and Recommendations. He related that the committee received valuable input, and thanked the members of the Fire Subcommittee for their efforts. MOTION: Made by Council Member Fulton, seconded by Council Member Moss, that Resolution No. 92-23 be adopted, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding commending the 1991 Fire Task Force for their dedicated service in the completion of their charge. Voting was as follows: Ayes: Council Members - Arness, Buffum, Fulton, Moss and Dahl Noes: Council Members - None Absent: Council Members - None Resolution No. 92-23 is on file in the office of the City Clerk. 29 01/21/92 On behalf of Council, Mayor Dahl presented Mr. Rehn with a framed resolution commending the 1991 Fire Task Force for their dedication and service. CALIFORNIA WATER POLLUTION CONTROL ASSOCIATION - Northern Sacramento Valley Section Collection System of the Year Award (A-050-300) Mayor Dahl stated that the City's Wastewater Division of Public Works received the following awards from the Northern Sacramento Valley Section of the California Water Pollution Control Association at its Annual Awards Banquet on January 11, 1992: (1) 1991 Collection System of the Year; (2) 1991 Supervisor of the Year - John Tasello; (3) 1991 Industrial Waste Inspector of the Year - Marcia Ames; and (4) 1991 Award for Outstanding Service - Steve Craig. He commented that this is a non-profit association comprised of public and private water pollution control professionals from throughout thirteen Northern California counties, from Davis to Mt. Shasta, and Clear Lake to Quincy. Mayor Dahl explained that the Collection System of the Year Award was received after undergoing a thorough inspection and evaluation of the City staff's collection operation and maintenance activities, such as equipment maintenance information, chemical and confined space safety procedures, service to the public, and staff efficiency, i.e., how many miles of sewer for each staff member. The Wastewater Collection staff includes: Steve Craig, John Tasello, Dwayne Norman, Willie Enyart, Bud Dean, Bob Wert, Bob Gullixson, Bob Unger, Steve Hollingsworth, Dan Lamb, Ken Owens, Rhonda Ohler, and Alex Bostick. Mayor Dahl related that the Supervisor of the Year was awarded to Wastewater Collection Foreman John Tasello for his ability to keep his crews enthused about serving the public and insisting on high quality work in the field. John and his crews have a "Can Do," very positive attitude about working in a profession with sometimes unpleasant tasks. Mayor Dahl indicated that Marcia Ames, Industrial Waste Analyst, earned the Industrial Waste Inspector of the Year Award by: (1) Singlehandedly being responsible for implementation of Federal and State industrial waste pretreatment requirements; (2) Insisting that these requirements be implemented through a series of educational forums where local businesses can be educated about the "hows" and "whys" of the ever-changing pretreatment and hazardous waste regulations; and (3) Working closely with other regulatory agencies to minimize conflicts and duplication of effort. Mayor Dahl said that the Outstanding Service Award was given to Steve Craig, Superintendent-Wastewater Division, for his efforts supporting low cost local staff training programs, and for hosting the September 18-20, 1991 California Water Pollution Control Conference in Redding. This training conference brought 600 public and private water pollution professionals from throughout California to Redding. Mayor Dahl presented John Tasello a trophy for the Collection System of the Year Award and also presented John Tasello, Marcia Ames and Steve Craig with plaques in recognition of their individual awards. CONSENT CALENDAR The following matters were considered inclusively under the Consent Calendar: Approval of Minutes - Adjourned Regular Meeting of January 7, 1992 Regular Meeting of January 7, 1992 Approval of Payroll and Accounts Payable Register (A-050-100-500) It is recommended that Accounts Payable Register No. 13, check numbers 177463 through 178035 inclusive, in the amount of $1,949,932.45, be approved and paid, and Payroll Register No. 14, check numbers 330408 through 331139 inclusive, in the amount of $1,157,530.17, for the period December 22, 1991, through January 4, 1992, be approved. TOTAL: $3,107,462.62 Treasurer's Report - December, 1991 (A-050-100-600) Total Treasurer's Accountability - $ 34,996,039.91 30 01/21/92 Total City of Redding Funds, Funds Held in Trust, and Funds of Related Entities - $ 51,809,818.40 Selection of Financial Advisory Services - re 1915 and 1911 Assessment Districts, Request for Proposals #2556 (A-170 & B-050-100) It is the recommendation of the Finance Director that Council approve the selection of Kelling, Northcross, and Nobriga, Inc. to provide financial advisory services to the City for the 1915 and 1911 Act Assessment Districts. All costs associated with the issuance of bonds and financial advisory services will be covered as a cost of issuance at the time an assessment district is formed. Financial advisory service costs should be offset by concomitant reductions in underwriter's services. Bid Schedule #2536 - Recommendation of Alternate Purchase (B-050-100) It is the recommendation of the Finance Director that Council recognize that Lasher Auto Center and S & C Ford refuse to comply with the terms of their contract to deliver the required vehicles in relation to Bid Schedule No. 2536. It is further recommended that staff be directed to pursue the purchase of the vehicles from the next low bidder in compliance with the specifications as follows: (1) Unit No. 1 from King Chevrolet in the amount of $17,056.12; (2) Unit No. 2 from Crown Motors in the amount of $13,640.06; and (3) Item No. 3 from Green Valley Ford in the amount of $10,557.69, for a total amount of $41,253.87 including sales tax. Set Public Hearing - General Plan Amendment GPA-13-91 and Rezoning Application RZ-10-91, by B & L Development (3405 Glenwood Drive) (G-030-010 & L-010-230) It is the recommendation of the Planning Director that a public hearing be set for 7:00 p.m., February 4, 1992, to consider General Plan Amendment GPA-13-91 and Rezoning Application RZ-10-91, a request to rezone property to "RM-6" Multiple Family Residential District and "R2-B10" Duplex Residential District. Set Public Hearing - Rezoning Application RZ-8-91, by Western Acres, Inc. (West of Shasta View Drive and north of Rancho Road) (L-010-230 & S-100-782) It is the recommendation of the Planning Director that a public hearing be set for 7:00 p.m., February 4, 1992, to consider Rezoning Application RZ-8-91, a request to rezone the Western Acres Subdivision to "R1-BFM" Single Family Residential District with a combining district requiring minimum lot sizes as established on the recorded subdivision map. Set Public Hearing - Rezoning Application RZ-20-91, by Eckelman and Scarbrough (Rancho Estates Subdivision) (L-010-230 & S-100-609-600) It is the recommendation of the Planning Director that a public hearing be set for 7:00 p.m., February 4, 1992, to consider Rezoning Application RZ-20-91, a request to rezone property to "R1-BFM" Single Family Residential District. Set Public Hearing - Rezoning Application RZ-21-91, by Roy Thomas (2663 Victor Avenue) (L-010-230) It is the recommendation of the Planning Director that a public hearing be set for 7:00 p.m., February 4, 1992, to consider Rezoning Application RZ-21-91, a request to rezone property to "CO-15-B10-F" Office Commercial District. Set Public Hearing - Rezoning Application RZ-16-91, by the City of Redding (Ridgeview Subdivision, Units 4, 5 and 6) (L-010-230 & S-100-640) It is the recommendation of the Planning Director that a public hearing be set for 7:00 p.m., February 18, 1992, to consider Rezoning Application RZ-16-91, a request to rezone property to "R1-B10" Single Family Residential District and "U-F" Unclassified District with Site Plan Review. Set Public Hearing - Rezoning Application RZ-17-91, by the City of Redding (Westside Estates and Placer Hills, Unit 3) (L-010-230 & S-100-788 & S-100-600) It is the recommendation of the Planning Director that a public hearing be set for 7:00 p.m., February 18, 1992, to consider Rezoning Application RZ-17-91, a 31 01/21/92 request to rezone property to "R1-B10" Single Family Residential District and "U-F" Unclassified District with Site Plan Review. Set Public Hearing - Amendment of Redding Municipal Code Section 18.62, by the City of Redding (L-010-500-050 & P-030-230) It is the recommendation of the Planning Director that a public hearing be set for 7:00 p.m., February 18, 1992, to consider an amendment to Chapter 18.62 of the Redding Municipal Code regarding parking. Set Public Hearing - Addition of Chapter 18.55 to Redding Municipal Code, by the City of Redding (L-010-500-050 & S-020) It is the recommendation of the Planning Director that a public hearing be set for 7:00 p.m., February 18, 1992, to consider the addition of Chapter 18.55 to the Redding Municipal Code regarding trash enclosure containers. Resolution - Rejecting Bid Schedule 2588, Purchase of 3-Phase, Subsurface Type Distribution Switches and Authorizing Direct Negotiation (B-050-100) It is the recommendation of the Electric Utility Director that Resolution No. 92-24 be adopted, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding rejecting all bids (which were incomplete) in Bid Schedule 2588 for the purchase of three-phase, subsurface-type distribution switches; and authorizing the City Manager to negotiate with Trayer Engineering to purchase said switches in an amount not to exceed $35,271.31. Funds for this purchase are included in the 1991-92 budget. Resolution - Amendment to Contract for Professional Services from Economic Sciences Corporation re Technical Assistance with Phase II of the 1992 Electricity Report (E-090-160) It is the recommendation of the Electric Utility Director that Resolution No. 92-25 be adopted, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding approving an amendment to Consulting Services Agreement No. C-2763 between the City of Redding and Economic Sciences Corporation for technical assistance with Phase II of the 1992 Electricity Report (ER92) proceedings; authorizing the expenditure of an additional $25,000 under Phase II of the Agreement; and authorizing the City Manager to execute the necessary documentation. Sufficient funds for Phase II are included in the 1991-92 Budget, 9719-15. Resolution - Contract Amendment for Professional Services with Black & Veatch re Engineer's Technical Report for the Joint Financing of the Redding Power and IPT Projects (E-120-300-700) It is the recommendation of the Electric Utility Director that Resolution No. 92-26 be adopted, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding approving and authorizing the Mayor to sign the second amendment to Agreement No. C-2843 for caretaking and support services between the City of Redding and Black & Veatch Construction, Inc. for consulting services associated with the Redding Power Project. Funds for this request will be charged to Job Order Number 9146-31 and reimbursed from proceeds of the proposed financing for the Redding Power and IPT Projects. Resolution - Contract for Professional Services with Henwood Energy Services, Inc. re Develop Engineer's Financial Certification for the Joint Financing of the Redding Power and IPT Projects (E-120-300-700) It is the recommendation of the Electric Utility Director that Resolution No. 92-27 be adopted, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding approving and authorizing the City Manager to sign the Professional Services Agreement (Contract No. 920109) between the City of Redding and Henwood Energy Services, Inc., not to exceed $30,000.00, to provide an Engineer's Report for the joint financing of the Redding Power and IPT Projects. Funds for this request will be charged to Job Order Number 9146-30 and reimbursed from proposed financing proceeds. Bid Schedule No. 2535 - Purchasing Alternatives (B-050-100) It is the recommendation of the Information Systems Director that Council authorize individual departments with grant or special funding requirements to 32 01/21/92 make direct purchases of personal computers, in relation to Bid Schedule No. 2535, from Computerland of Redding. 33 01/21/92 Purchase of Encoder/Decoders for Knox Boxes (B-050-100 & P-150-070) It is the recommendation of the Fire Chief that Council approve the purchase of one encoder to be installed at fire dispatch command center and 17 decoders to be installed in various fire engines throughout the fire stations in the City, in the amount of $7,464.98, from The Knox Company. Funds for this purchase are included in the 1991-92 budget. Resolution - Corporate Taxiway Project at Redding Municipal Airport * (B-130-070 & G-100-070-095 & G-100-170-200 & A-090-100) It is the recommendation of the Airports Director that Resolution No. 92-28 be adopted, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding approving and adopting the 52nd amendment to City Budget Resolution No. 91-253 authorizing receipt of $141,000 from the Federal Aviation Administration and State of California and appropriating $141,000 for taxiway construction. Resolution - Airport Construction and Acquisition Projects * (B-130-070 & G-100-070-095 & G-100-170-200 & A-090-100) It is the recommendation of the Airports Director that Resolution No. 92-29 be adopted, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding approving and adopting the 53rd amendment to City Budget Resolution No. 91-253 authorizing receipt of $2,023,220 from the Federal Aviation Administration and the State of California and appropriating $2,023,220 for airport construction and acquisition projects. Award of Bid - Bid Schedule No. 2586, Subsurface Environmental Investigation at Redding Municipal Airport (B-050-100 & A-090-100 & A-050-150-150) It is the recommendation of the General Services Director that Bid Schedule No. 2586, subsurface environmental investigation at Redding Municipal Airport, be awarded to the low bidder, RESNA Industries of Rancho Cordova, in the amount of $13,445.00. Sufficient funds are available in the 1991-92 budget. Acceptance of Improvements - Home Club (East of Churn Creek Road and north of Old Alturas Road) (L-010-390) It is the recommendation of the Public Works Director that the water and storm drain improvements for Home Club, Use Permit 33-89, be accepted as satisfactory completed. Resolution - Contract with Bureau of Reclamation, Buckeye Water Treatment Plant (W-030-425) It is the recommendation of the Public Works Director that Resolution No. 92- 30 be adopted, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding authorizing entering into a contract with the Bureau of Reclamation for its engineering review, inspection, and administrative costs related to the Buckeye Water Treatment Plant, estimated at $15,000. Funds for this work are available in the Water Utility Account 143-869-4606. Presentation of Street Master Plan (T-080-500) It is the recommendation of the Public Works Director that Council hold a joint meeting with the Planning Commission and the Traffic and Parking Commission for a presentation of the Street Master Plan Study on January 28, 1992 at 5:15 p.m., in the United Way Conference Room. Sivachenko Easement (C-070-010) It is the recommendation of the City Attorney that Council approve the agreement regarding an easement between with the Sivachenkos as presented in the Report to City Council dated January 14, 1992, incorporated herein by reference. MOTION: Made by Council Member Fulton, seconded by Council Member Moss, that all the foregoing items on the Consent Calendar be approved and adopted as recommended. Voting was as follows: Ayes: Council Members - Arness, Buffum, Fulton, Moss and Dahl Noes: Council Members - None Absent: Council Members - None 34 01/21/92 35 01/21/92 Resolution Nos. 92-24, 92-25, 92-26, 92-27, 92-28, 92-29 and 92-30 are on file in the office of the City Clerk. PUBLIC HEARING - Potter Ranch Assessment District No. 1991-6 (A-170-050-420) The hour of 7:00 p.m. having arrived, Mayor Dahl opened the public hearing regarding Potter Ranch Assessment District No. 1991-6. The following documents are on file in the office of the City Clerk: Certificate of Posting Notice of Improvement Affidavit of Publication - Notice of Public Hearing Public Works Recommendation Dated January 16, 1992 City Clerk Strohmayer advised that no protests were received. Public Works Director Galusha explained that this is an acquisition type assessment district to build public improvements on a parcel located generally east of Alta Mesa and south of Hartnell Avenue. Total improvements consist of the widening of Clover Creek through the property, the completion of Shasta View Drive in that area, and the site preparation for the construction of 397 residential lots. Mr. Galusha recalled that on August 20, 1991, Council accepted the petition, approved the boundary map and the agreements for legal and engineering service, and adopted the resolution of intention. On December 17, 1991, Council accepted the Engineer's Report and set a public hearing for January 21, 1992 on the resolution of intention and the engineer's report. Mr. Galusha stated that it is the recommendation of both Sam Sperry, special bond counsel for the City on this assessment district, and staff to proceed with the public hearing on the resolution of intention and the engineer's report. Mayor Dahl determined that there was no one present who wished to speak on this matter. MOTION: Made by Council Member Moss, seconded by Council Member Buffum, that the public hearing be closed. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes MOTION: Made by Council Member Arness, seconded by Council Member Moss, that Resolution No. 92-31 be adopted, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding approving Report and assessment and ordering improvement, Potter Ranch Assessment District No. 1991-6. Voting was as follows: Ayes: Council Members - Arness, Buffum, Fulton, Moss and Dahl Noes: Council Members - None Absent: Council Members - None Resolution No. 92-31 is on file in the office of the City Clerk. PUBLIC HEARING - re General Plan Amendment Application GPA-3-90, by Nolan Brewer and the City of Redding (Enterprise Skypark and adjoining property to the north) (G-030-010) The hour of 7:00 p.m. having arrived, Mayor Dahl opened the public hearing regarding General Plan Amendment GPA-3-90. The following documents are on file in the office of the City Clerk: Affidavit of Mailing - Notice of Public Hearing Affidavit of Publication - Notice of Public Hearing Planning Commission Recommendation dated January 15, 1992 City Clerk Strohmayer advised that one protest has been received from Randy L. Thompson. Planning and Community Development Director Perry recalled that at its meeting of November 20, 1990, Council considered a recommendation from the Planning Commission for the denial of a request by Nolan Brewer for an amendment of the General Plan on property north of the Enterprise Skypark within the Ravenwood Estates Subdivision, which is also within the northerly clear zone of the Skypark runway. Mr. Brewer is requesting a reclassification from "Airport 36 01/21/92 Service" and "Greenway" to "Residential, 3.0 units per acre." A related General Plan Amendment Application by George Farley for the consideration of the Enterprise Skypark was withdrawn. In its place, the Planning Department initiated an amendment to the Skypark property to address the lack of improvements as required in the Columbia Area Plan. The Planning Commission also recommended denial of the City-initiated amendment which proposed to reclassify the Enterprise Skypark from "Airport Service" to "Service Commercial" and "Residential, 9.0 units per acre." Mr. Perry explained that when Council considered the General Plan amendment, it deferred consideration and asked the Airports Commission to review the land-use compatibility of the Skypark and its potential for meeting future needs of the aviation community. The Council referred the General Plan amendment back to the Planning Commission, in conjunction with a report prepared by the Airports Commission concerning the community need for general aviation facilities. Mr. Perry related that the Planning Commission received this report at its October 22, 1991, meeting and conducted a public hearing on December 10, 1991, to reconsider its previous recommendation on the General Plan amendment. At the conclusion of the hearing, the Planning Commission reversed its previous position and forwarded a recommendation to Council for a reclassification of the property from "Airport Service" and "Greenway" to "Service Commercial," "Residential, 9.0 units per acre," and "Residential, 3.0 units per acre." Mr. Perry commented that the primary issues dealing with the General Plan amendment have been identified as the project's impact on the Enterprise Skypark, land-use compatibility, circulation, and the failure of the Enterprise Skypark to meet the requirements of the Columbia Area Plan that were deemed necessary to operate as a general aviation airport. Mr. Perry indicated that the Planning Commission also received testimony that the Flying Club has filed for a Chapter 11 bankruptcy, which indicates it will be unable to make any progress on meeting the requirements of the Columbia Area Plan in the immediate future while its finances are being reorganized. Prior to this filing, the property owner filed a legal suit against the Flying Club for breach of the lease agreement. Mr. Perry stated that staff concurs with the Planning Commission's recommendation and it is the opinion of staff that a General Plan amendment in the area of the Skypark is warranted. Given that a General Plan should be a look into the future, staff believes the "Airport Service" and "Clear Zone" designations are inappropriate and that long-term, land-use designations should be applied now to provide proper circulation, utility, and land-use- compatibility considerations to accommodate existing and future development. He explained that approval of the General Plan amendment is not an act in itself which will close the air field. He stated that as long as the Flying Club has a lease with the property owner and is licensed by the State, it could continue to operate as a pre-existing nonconforming use. It is the recommendation of both the Planning Commission and staff that a negative declaration be adopted and the property reclassified to "Service Commercial," "Residential, 9.0 units per acre," and "Residential, 3.0 units per acre," as shown on Alternative "A,", dated May 3, 1990, incorporated herein by reference. Mr. Perry indicated that if Council concurs with the recommendation, it will be necessary to amend the Columbia Area Plan text to reflect this long-range intention; and a public hearing should be scheduled by the Planning Commission to that effect. In response to Council Member Arness, Mr. Perry conveyed that if the General Plan is amended, Mr. Brewer would then have the right to apply for a subdivision, however, it is unknown if it would be approved. The Planning Commission has, however, set aside an area that cannot be subdivided that would otherwise be the clear zone. Dan Frost, attorney for Mr. Brewer, conveyed that he and Mr. Brewer support staff's recommendation. Lars Stratte, President of the Redding Area Pilots Association, recalled that at the Planning Commission meeting of October 14, 1990, former Planning 37 01/21/92 Commissioner Burrell reminded the Commissioners that when the subject area was originally designated "Greenway" for a clear zone, Mr. Brewer was given densities on other portions of his property to compensate for the lack of development in this area. He further commented that as long as the airport is in operation, it is incumbent upon the Commission to maintain the clear zone, and that failure to exercise that option was not the Commission's responsibility. He questioned if Council's action will be submitted to the Airports Land Use Commission (ALUC) for review as required by Public Utilities Section 2165.1(b). He stated that the Redding Area Pilots Association maintains that if this action is approved by Council that it will be a violation of State law and requests that the General Plan amendment be denied. Doug Balfour, 2336 Airstrip Road, stated that he is opposed to the high density residential zoning recommendation. He opined that it would be poor planning to place a proposed number of units in the middle of an industrial area. In addition, the noise generated by the industrial area would be a detriment to any high density housing. Tom Cross, President of Enterprise Flying Club, explained that when the Columbia Plan was adopted, the intent was to have a buffer zone of some nature and the airport was considered to be the buffer zone between residential development on the west and commercial development on the east. He indicated that part of the Ravenwood Subdivision borders the north end of the airport and the lot line of the subdivision backs up against heavy industry, currently Redding Auto Center. He referenced the Redding Municipal Master Plan completed for the City in 1987 which indicates that the City should restrict touch and goes at Benton and eliminate student training and high performance multi-engine aircraft. He commented that IASCO, at the present time, does not provide student training, thereby, placing the burden upon Benton and Enterprise. He agreed with the Airports Commission's observation that due to poor planning, Enterprise cannot be considered a viable airport 20 years from now and that a permanent airport needs to be established, however, in the interim Enterprise should be maintained. In talking with the State, he indicated that Enterprise can still meet the necessary requirements if a subdivision is allowed, however, homes will be flown over, as the airport maintains an open space easement. He related that there are options to be considered, however, to change the zoning at the present is not a good option. Carl Stone, member of the Enterprise Flying Club, related his concern about some 15 feet of dirt which has been placed across the end of the runway and the problems associated if an airplane were to experience power failure at takeoff. Suzanne Blackburn, former member of Enterprise Flying Club, opined that the passage of the proposed zoning would eventually cause the closure of the Flying Club, thereby, adversely affecting Benton Airport with increased noise and traffic, and requested that Council not adopt the proposed recommendation. Jim Wyatt, representing Mr. and Mrs. Farley, owners of the property which Enterprise Flying Club now leases, stated that the prospects of the Flying Club remaining on the property are not good. He related that there is pending action seeking $86,000 in unpaid back rent from the Flying Club, performance of the lease, as well as termination of the lease, and indicated that less than 24 hours before the case was to proceed to trial, the Flying Club filed reorganization under Chapter 11, thereby, placing a stay on all pending litigation. He related that the Flying Club currently pays $1,100 per month to lease the property on which it is located. He added that Mr. Cross previously indicated that the Flying Club has approximately 50 to 52 members which pay dues of $25 per month, as well an annual $50 initiation fee, and allows them to park their planes at the airport, use of club facilities, and use of the club plane. He also commented on problems the Flying Club is encountering with the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board in regard to the sale of alcohol to non Club members. He explained that the Flying Club's only major expenses appear to be rent and insurance. He stated that Mr. and Mrs. Farley will pursue this matter until such time as they obtain the rightful rent due them and proper insurance protection. In addition, he related that the Farley's do not desire to lease their property for airport use any longer and are taking the necessary steps to litigate the matter and Council should not base any decision upon the long term existence of the Flying Club. 38 01/21/92 Randy Thompson, Vice President of the Enterprise Flying Club, questioned how Planning Commissioner Gelonek was permitted to vote on an issue when she arrived late and did not hear any of the public comment. He related that the Flying Club is not in arrears on rent payments, as it has been paying the $1,100 agreed upon. He also stated that the insurance coverage carried by the Club has been challenged in court and the necessary coverage obtained. He explained that at the time the social membership of $1 was established, the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board (ABC) had concurred with the concept and he related that this is just another attack on the Flying Club. In addition, ABC is contacted each time the Flying Club is involved in an event to ensure proper compliance. He reiterated that even though the Flying Club is in bankruptcy, the rent is still being paid. Dave Emerson, member of Enterprise Flying Club, stated that he chose to buy a residence next to the airport and has also started a helicopter flight instruction and maintenance service at Enterprise. He explained that he had considered locating at either Benton or Redding Municipal, however, it was too costly. He related that because of the controversy surrounding Enterprise, it is difficult to make any long range business plans. In response to Council Member Buffum, Mr. Emerson stated that it is his understanding that the other two airports do not provide helicopter training. Dwight Abbott, related that he favors high density residential zoning, as the area has a large number of dirt roads which need to be paved and sewer would be beneficial as drainage is poor. Diane Abair spoke in favor of Mr. Brewer's subdivision and opined that it is Council's duty to be concerned about the safety of property owners in the vicinity of the airport. Beverly Tickner, Secretary to Redding Area Pilots Association, acknowledged that property owners have rights, however, the airport has been there for some 20 to 25 years. She indicated that Mr. Brewer probably purchased the land knowing the airport's location. She concurred with the Airports Commission's recommendation that the airport should remain in the current location, as there is no where else for these planes to go. John Wise stated that he is a property owner which has lived in the clear zone for 35 years and opined that the airport is not up to current safety codes. He indicated that he would gladly sell his property to the airport, however, if they are not currently able to make their payments, how are they going to afford to purchase more property, which is a requirement for the clear zone. Keith Rose, Chairman of the Airports Commission, related that the Commission's report focused on the following recommendations: (1) Criticism of the City regarding possible violation of PUC regulations; and (2) Recognized that Enterprise Skypark will not be a viable airport in 30 to 50 years, but recommended that the City and Shasta County work toward developing an airport, possibly in the Millville plains area. Until such time as another airport is established, Enterprise should remain and slowly phase out once a new airport is operating. If Enterprise closes, Benton will experience increased traffic which will probably result in residential complaints. In response to Council Member Buffum, Mr. Rose explained that IASCO is not in total compliance with the criteria established for the fixed based operation, but is in the process of satisfying all requirements. At present, IASCO is not currently offering flight instruction or aircraft rental. Dan Frost, attorney for Mr. Brewer, stated that Mr. Brewer has no objection to the airport remaining in place as long as the clear zone is acquired from him. He related, however, that he has heard no offer from the Flying Club to meet the conditions which were required to be met two years ago. MOTION: Made by Council Member Fulton, seconded by Council Member Buffum, that the public hearing be closed. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes In response to Council Member Buffum, Mr. Perry explained that the action before Council this evening is one of conceptual approval, as it needs to go before ALUC for review. In addition, if Council approves the Planning 39 01/21/92 Commission's recommendation, the Columbia Area Plan will need to be amended to be consistent with the Land Use Plan for the area, which would come back before Council in the form of a General Plan amendment. MOTION: Made by Council Member Fulton, seconded by Council Member Buffum to deny General Plan Amendment Application GPA-3-90, by Nolan Brewer and the City of Redding. 40 01/21/92 Voting was as follows: Ayes: Council Members - Buffum and Fulton Noes: Council Members - Arness, Moss and Dahl Absent: Council Members - None MOTION: Made by Council Member Arness, seconded by Council Member Moss, that Council make the following findings regarding General Plan Amendment GPA-3-90: 1. Project is compatible with the Redding General Plan; 2. Project will not significantly alter existing land form; 3. Project is compatible with surrounding land use; 4. Project is compatible with the Code of the City of Redding, California, and ratify the Negative Declaration authorized by the Board of Administrative Review on April 4, 1990. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes MOTION: Made by Council Member Arness, seconded by Council Member Moss, to approve in concept the following reclassifications in regard to General Plan Amendment GPA-3-90: 1) Enterprise Skypark property and adjoining lands from "Airport Service" and "Greenway" to "Service Commercial," "Residential, 9.0 units per acre," and "Residential, 3.0 units per acre;" 2) Nolan Brewer's property (northerly clear zone) from "Greenway" to "Residential, 3.0 units per acre;" and 3) Property north of the northerly clear zone from "Residential, 0.5 unit per acre" to "Residential, 3.0 units per acre;" direct staff to prepare the necessary amendments to the Columbia Area Plan text to reflect the long-range intention; and submit to the Airports Land Use Commission (ALUC) for review. Voting was as follows: Ayes: Council Members - Arness, Moss and Dahl Noes: Council Members - Buffum and Fulton Absent: Council Members - None PUBLIC HEARING - re Rezoning Application RZ-11-91, by David Freyne and the City of Redding (Bordered west by Interstate 5 and to the east by Churn Creek Road) (L-010-230) The hour of 7:00 p.m. having arrived, Mayor Dahl opened the public hearing regarding Rezoning Application RZ-11-91. The following documents are on file in the office of the City Clerk: Affidavit of Mailing - Notice of Public Hearing Affidavit of Publication - Notice of Public Hearing Planning Commission Recommendation dated January 15, 1992 City Clerk Strohmayer advised that no protests were received. Planning and Community Development Director Perry related that the Planning Commission at its December 10, 1991 meeting recommended approval of a request to rezone approximately 12 acres from "U" Unclassified District to "RM-12" Multiple Family Residential District. The area to be rezoned is bordered to the west by Interstate 5 and to the east by Churn Creek road. The rezoning would make the property consistent with the General Plan and with the current uses on the properties to be rezoned, with access off Churn Creek Road. Mr. Perry explained that the original request was for only a 0.23 acre parcel, however, the Commission recommended the boundaries be expanded to 12.8 acres in order to include the existing surrounding properties. The majority of these properties have already been developed with multiple-family residential uses. It is the recommendation of both the Planning Commission and staff that the property be rezoned to "RM-12" Multiple Family Residential District, the negative declaration ratified and the ordinance offered for first reading. Mayor Dahl determined that there was no one present who wished to speak on this matter. MOTION: Made by Council Member Fulton, seconded by Council Member Moss, that the public hearing be closed. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes 41 01/21/92 MOTION: Made by Council Member Arness, seconded by Council Member Buffum, that Council make the following findings regarding Rezoning Application RZ-11- 91: 1. Project is compatible with the Redding General Plan; 2. Project will not significantly alter existing land form; 3. Project is compatible with surrounding land use; 4. Project is compatible with the Code of the City of Redding, California; and ratify the Negative Declaration authorized by the Planning Commission on December 10, 1991. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes Council Member Arness offered Ordinance 1984 for first reading, an ordinance of the City Council of the City of Redding amending Section 18.06.020 of the Redding Municipal Code relating to the rezoning of certain real property in the City of Redding (RZ-11-91). PUBLIC HEARING - re Rezoning Application RZ-14-91, by the City of Redding (Highland Oaks Subdivision, Saratoga North Estates, Western Oaks Estates, and Western Ranches) (L-010-230 & S-100- ) The hour of 7:00 p.m. having arrived, Mayor Dahl opened the public hearing regarding Rezoning Application RZ-14-91. The following documents are on file in the office of the City Clerk: 1. Affidavit of Mailing - Notice of Public Hearing 2. Affidavit of Publication - Notice of Public Hearing 3. Planning Commission Recommendation dated January 14, 1992 City Clerk Strohmayer advised that no protests were received. Planning and Community Development Director Perry indicated that the Planning Commission recommended approval of the rezoning of properties located within the subdivisions of Highland Oaks, Saratoga North Estates, Western Ranches, and Western Oaks from "U" Unclassified and "U-FP" Unclassified with floodplain to "R1-B10," "R1-B20," and "R1-BFM" Single Family Residential District. The purpose of the rezoning is to establish consistency with the City's General Plan designations and to provide more complete land-use information to potential buyers and residents. It is the recommendation of the Planning Commission and staff that Council approve the change in zoning to "R1-B10," "R1-B20," and "R1-BFM" Single Family Residential District, recertify the negative declarations and offer the ordinance for first reading. Mayor Dahl determined that there was no one present who wished to speak on this matter. MOTION: Made by Council Member Moss, seconded by Council Member Fulton, that the public hearing be closed. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes MOTION: Made by Council Member Moss, seconded by Council Member Buffum, that Council make the following findings regarding Highland Oaks Subdivision (S-5- 89): 1. Project is compatible with the Redding General Plan; 2. Project will not significantly alter existing land form; 3. Project is compatible with surrounding land use; 4. Project is compatible with the Code of the City of Redding, California; and ratify the Negative Declaration authorized by the Board of Administrative Review on April 19, 1989. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes MOTION: Made by Council Member Moss, seconded by Council Member Buffum, that Council make the following findings regarding Western Oaks Estates, Units 2, 3, 4 and 5 (S-9-82): 1. Project is compatible with the Redding General Plan; 2. Project will not significantly alter existing land form; 3. Project is compatible with surrounding land use; 4. Project is compatible with the Code of the City of Redding, California; and ratify the Negative Declaration authorized by the Board of Administrative Review on November 3, 1982. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes 42 01/21/92 MOTION: Made by Council Member Moss, seconded by Council Member Buffum, that Council make the following findings regarding Western Ranches, Unit 9 (S-4- 80): 1. Project is compatible with the Redding General Plan; 2. Project will not significantly alter existing land form; 3. Project is compatible with surrounding land use; 4. Project is compatible with the Code of the City of Redding, California; and ratify the Negative Declaration authorized by the Board of Administrative Review on March 5, 1980. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes MOTION: Made by Council Member Moss, seconded by Council Member Buffum, that Council make the following findings regarding Western Oaks Units 2, 3, and 4 (Currently Saratoga North Estates) (S-24-87): 1. Project is compatible with the Redding General Plan; 2. Project will not significantly alter existing land form; 3. Project is compatible with surrounding land use; 4. Project is compatible with the Code of the City of Redding, California; and ratify the Negative Declaration authorized by the Board of Administrative Review on January 27, 1988. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes Council Member Moss offered Ordinance 1985 for first reading, an ordinance of the City Council of the City of Redding amending section 18.06.020 of the Redding Municipal Code relating to the rezoning of certain real property in the City of Redding (RZ-14-91). APPOINTMENT TO SENIOR CITIZENS FACILITY ADVISORY COMMISSION (B-080-450) Mayor Dahl indicated that due to the recent reorganization of the Senior Citizens of Shasta County, Inc., the President of that organization, Bob Kynaston, is being replaced by Allan C. Dunk. He explained that the Redding Municipal Code provides that the President of the Senior Citizens of Shasta County, Inc. shall serve as a member of the Senior Citizens Facility Advisory Commission. Mayor Dahl asked Council's concurrence in appointing Allan C. Dunk to serve on the Senior Citizens Advisory Facility Commission for the unexpired term through May 1, 1992. MOTION: Made by Council Member Moss, seconded by Council Member Buffum, that Allan C. Dunk be appointed to the Senior Citizens Advisory Facility Commission for the unexpired term through May 1, 1992. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes ORDINANCE NO. 1981 - Rezoning Application RZ-12-91 (South side of Rancho Road, west of Goodwater Avenue) (L-010-230) MOTION: Made by Council Member Moss, seconded by Council Member Buffum, that the full reading of Ordinance No. 1981 be waived and the City Attorney be instructed to read the full title. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes MOTION: Made by Council Member Fulton, seconded by Council Member Buffum, that Ordinance No. 1981 be adopted, an ordinance of the City Council of the City of Redding amending Section 18.06.020 of the Redding Municipal Code relating to the rezoning of certain real property in the City of Redding (RZ- 12-91). Voting was as follows: Ayes: Council Members - Arness, Buffum, Fulton, Moss and Dahl Noes: Council Members - None Absent: Council Members - None Ordinance No. 1981 is on file in the office of the City Clerk. ORDINANCE NO. 1982 - Rezoning Application RZ-13-91 (Mary Lake Subdivision, Units 1 through 11) (L-010-230 & S-100-454) MOTION: Made by Council Member Moss, seconded by Council Member Buffum, that the full reading of Ordinance No. 1982 be waived and the City Attorney be instructed to read the full title. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes MOTION: Made by Council Member Moss, seconded by Council Member Buffum, that Ordinance No. 1982 be adopted, an ordinance of the City Council of the City of 43 01/21/92 Redding amending Section 18.06.020 of the Redding Municipal Code relating tot he rezoning of certain real property in the City of Redding (RZ-13-91). Voting was as follows: Ayes: Council Members - Arness, Buffum, Fulton, Moss and Dahl Noes: Council Members - None Absent: Council Members - None Ordinance No. 1982 is on file in the office of the City Clerk. ORDINANCE NO. 1983 - Miscellaneous Boards and Representatives, Community Development Advisory Committee (B-080-600-100) MOTION: Made by Council Member Moss, seconded by Council Member Buffum, that the 44 01/21/92 full reading of Ordinance No. 1983 be waived and the City Attorney be instructed to read the full title. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes MOTION: Made by Council Member Fulton, seconded by Council Member Moss, that Ordinance No. 1983 be adopted, an ordinance of the City Council of the City of Redding amending Redding Municipal Code Chapter 2.73, Miscellaneous Boards and Representatives, by repealing Section 2.73.020 in its entirety and adding a new Section 2.73.020, Community Development Advisory Committee. Ordinance No. 1983 is on file in the office of the City Clerk. RESOLUTION - Increase in Parking Citation Bail Schedule (P-030) Finance Director Downing related that staff has analyzed the City's parking citation program, reviewing all revenues and expenditures of the program, including the cost of administrative services not currently charged to the program. It was determined that in fiscal year 1990-91, the program suffered a net loss of $22,898 and the net loss is expected to increase to $30,000 in the current fiscal year, with the shortfall coming from the General Fund. It is estimated that the parking citation bail would need to be increased by $3.32 to cover the shortfall. For every $10 citation collected, Shasta County receives $5 with the remaining $5 going to the City for administration. Ms. Downing explained that the Parking Fund owes the Electric Utility Fund $738,600 and the General Fund $217,500 and has not been able to make any payment on this debt for a number of years. She related that Council could increase the bail by an amount greater to allow for repayment of this debt (i.e., an increase in bail of $5.00 would result in approximately $15,000 becoming available for debt service. Ms. Downing stated that, if approved, the proposed parking citation bail schedule increase would require the approval of the Presiding Judge of the Redding Municipal Court. It is the recommendation of staff that Council adopt a resolution and request court approval to proceed with increasing all bail amounts on the parking citation bail schedule in the amount of $5.00 to cover 100 percent of the City enforcement operational and administrative costs of the parking citation program and to provide for approximately $15,000 in annual debt service on existing advances payable in the Parking Fund. Council Member Fulton stated that, if an increase is warranted, he would only support increasing the fee by the least amount possible. Mayor Dahl pointed out that the taxpayer is already subsidizing the program, in the amount of $3.25 per ticket. In response to Council Member Buffum, Ms. Downing related that State legislature allows the County to attach fees through a passage of a resolution. If the City were to do away with the program, there would be no fees for the County to attach. Council Member Buffum concurred with Council Member Fulton in only increasing the citation by $3.50. MOTION: Made by Council Member Moss, seconded by Council Member Arness, that Resolution No. 92-32 be adopted, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding authorizing an increase in the Parking Citation Bail Schedule by $5.00. Voting was as follows: Ayes: Council Members - Arness, Moss and Dahl Noes: Council Members - Buffum and Fulton Absent: Council Members - None Resolution No. 92-32 is on file in the office of the City Clerk. FINANCIAL POSITION OF GENERAL FUND (B-130-070) Finance Director Downing related that Council has been provided with the following items: (1) General Fund Summary indicating the expected General Fund balance, as well as proposed budget reductions and proposed revenue 45 01/21/92 enhancements; (2) A listing reflecting the affect of an across-the-board 3% General Fund reduction; (3) A memorandum providing background regarding the concept of an in-lieu franchise fee. With regard to the in-lieu franchise fee she indicated that one possible alternative to the in-lieu franchise fee would be to make reductions in the utilities which the fee would be applied against. She also indicated that the City will have PERS money coming back and Council has discussed the amount and how it relates to the General Fund; however, she indicated that there will also be monies coming back to the utilities which could be used to offset any franchise fees in the current year. She also indicated that the utilities have built up adequate reserves; and (4) Listing of all remaining General Fund capital projects. Ms. Downing explained that staff is requesting direction as to how to proceed. She indicated that Council will be provided with monthly reports on revenue and expenditures and that discussion will continue during 1992-93 budget study sessions. Mayor Dahl related that if Council concurs with the proposed reductions, there will still be a General Fund deficit of approximately $341,000 and proposed that Council meet again in two weeks to consider another round of reductions. Council Member Buffum stated that the reductions look appropriate and could support the recommendation as presented. Council Member Arness concurred with Council Member Buffum, with the understanding that Council will need to meet again to consider further reductions. In response to Council Member Moss, Ms. Downing related that staff has prepared a listing reflecting a three percent reduction to all General Fund uses. She indicated that staff has no control over some items listed and that money will need to be made up by other departments. In response to Mayor Dahl, City Manager Christofferson stated that this is a starting point and that he will be meeting with department heads tomorrow morning to discuss how these reductions can be accomplished. He explained that some smaller departments, such as the City Treasurer, will not be able to accomplish the three percent reduction and the difference will need to be made up by larger departments. In response to Council Member Arness, Mr. Christofferson indicated that the reductions before Council this evening are in addition to the $800,000 already approved by Council. Council Member Fulton stated that he agrees with the proposed reductions. Ms. Downing indicated that even if these reductions are approved, an additional $300,000 is still needed to bring the General Fund to zero, thereby, providing no reserve. Mr. Christofferson explained the importance of the reserve is the year-end balance which becomes the starting balance for the following year. He stated that this year, the City started the fiscal year with $2,400,000. Council Member Moss stated that Council has already decided to keep the PERS refund money in the reserve, which is approximately $1,600,000. He related that Council had hoped to start the reserve next year with the PERS money, as it is a one time shot. Instead of waiting two weeks to make additional reductions, he suggested that instead of an across-the-board three percent reduction, possibly it should be five and one half percent or six percent, thereby, bringing the General Fund to a zero balance. Mr. Christofferson interjected that Council is not really keeping the PERS money back. He indicated that staff will not really know the effects of the proposed reductions until the departments have time to review their budgets for possible reductions. He stated that Council has indicated that it wants to avoid furloughs and layoffs and he is uncertain just how much that can be accomplished under these guidelines. 46 01/21/92 Council Member Moss related that Council's objective is to achieve a balanced budget and suggested that Council make the appropriate reductions this evening 47 01/21/92 to bring the General Fund to zero. By doing so, if furloughs or layoffs are required, staff can begin the process sooner. Council Member Buffum concurred with Council Member Moss. Mayor Dahl suggested that the across-the-board reduction be increased from three percent to four percent. MOTION: Made by Council Member Moss, seconded by Council Member Buffum, to increase the Across-the-Board General Fund reductions from three percent to four percent and approve the following budget reductions: (1) Travel and Training ($25,000); (2) Police Vehicles ($118,000); (3) Park Maintenance/Recreation Programs ($50,000); (4) Exhaust Extraction System ($20,900); (5) Traffic Safety Program ($83,000); (6) Overtime ($100,000); (7) Stem Walls ($2,000); and (8) City Hall Funds ($130,000). Voting was as follows: Ayes: Council Members - Arness, Buffum, Moss and Dahl Noes: Council Members - Fulton Absent: Council Members - None MOTION: Made by Council Member Moss, seconded by Council Member Buffum, to make travel trailer parks subject to transient occupancy tax. Voting was as follows: Ayes: Council Members - Arness, Buffum, Fulton, Moss and Dahl Noes: Council Members - None Absent: Council Members - None It was the consensus of Council to not place the proceeds from surplus property sales in the amount of $750,000 into the General Fund. RESOLUTION - EDA Grant Application for Airport Industrial and Business Park (G-100-070 & A-090-100) Planning and Community Development Director Perry related that Council authorized staff to submit a preapplication to the Economic Development Administration (EDA) for funding of the public improvements in the Airport Industrial and Business Park. The EDA has notified the City that the preapplication has been approved and that a full application may be submitted. The total cost of this project is estimated to be $1,920,000, with the grant application request being $1,152,000 and the City's balance being $768,000. If the final application is approved, funding should become available around May 1, 1992. Mr. Perry explained that typical funding provides a 50 percent grant, with a 50 percent match from the application, although a higher contribution is sometimes provided. In this case, however, EDA has agreed to consider providing a 60 percent grant with a 40 percent match from the City. It is the recommendation of staff that Council adopt a resolution authorizing the filing of an application with the EDA for a grant in the amount of $1,152,000. In response to Mayor Dahl, Mr. Perry indicated that $389,125 will be utilized from the Surplus Property fund in the form of a loan, with the balance coming from the water, sewer, and storm drain reserve funds, enabling Council to have some future flexibility should it decide to do some projects. Assistant City Manager McMurry related that the proposed transaction, utilizing utility funds, is much cleaner, as the loans will be used specifically for the purpose intended. Council Member Arness disagreed with Mr. McMurry and stated that a private enterprise would not put the money into the project. Mr. McMurry said he would agree with Council Member Arness if it were not a loan. Council Member Moss explained that it will be difficult for the wastewater fund to payoff some $20,000,000, unless this type of activity is created around the airport. 48 01/21/92 MOTION: Made by Council Member Fulton, seconded by Council Member Moss, that Resolution No. 92-33 be adopted, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding authorizing the filing of an application in the amount of $1,152,000 with the Economic Development Administration, United States Department of Commerce, United States of America, for a grant under the terms of the Public Works and Economic Development Act of 1965, as amended for construction of the Redding Municipal Airport Industrial and Business Park. Voting was as follows: Ayes: Council Members - Arness, Buffum, Fulton, Moss and Dahl Noes: Council Members - None Absent: Council Members - None Resolution No. 92-33 is on file in the office of the City Clerk. OFFER BY RICHARD BEAN TO SELL LAND ON RIVERLAND DRIVE (C-070-010) Planning and Community Development Director Perry related that the Board of Supervisors has indicated that it has no interest in acquiring Mr. Bean's property on Riverland Drive and that the City would be required to pay taxes on the property if it were acquired. Mr. Perry stated that he has met with Mr. Bean and discussed some possible City owned land that appears to be surplus and he has expressed an interest in that. He indicated that Council also has an option to use Park Development Funds. The question, at this point, is Council's interest in the property now that a decision has been made to not proceed with the Softball Complex at this time. Council Member Arness related that he saw no advantage in acquiring this property. Council Member Moss concurred with Council Member Arness. He commented that he has always been supportive of acquiring riparian property along the river, however, does not feel acquisition of this property is necessary at the present time. MOTION: Made by Council Member Arness, seconded by Council Member Buffum, authorizing staff to advise Richard Bean that the City is not interested in acquiring the property at the present time. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP S-17-91 - Vista Ridge Subdivision, Unit 2, by Paul Rosenbaum (S-100-778) Council was advised that the Planning Commission has granted permission to subdivide 5.8 acres into 26 single-family lots, east of Interstate 5, north of Tanglewood Drive, and east of Montcrest Drive, described as Tentative Subdivision Map S-17-91. A map of the area and a copy of the conditions of approval were submitted to Council. This was an information item. PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 1991 YEAR END REPORT (A-050-250) Planning and Community Development Director Perry submitted the 1991 Year End Status Report for the following work areas: (1) Annexations; (2) Building; (3) Cable; (4) Housing; (5) Planning; and (6) Redevelopment. This was an information item and no action was required. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION GPA-12-91 AND REZONING APPLICATION RZ-9-91 - by Richard Bean (G-030-010 & L-010-230) Planning and Community Development Director Perry recalled that Council at its December 17, 1991 meeting closed the public hearing and deferred action until Council had an opportunity to visit the site. In addition, the portion of the amendment request that is south of Mr. Bean's property was referred back to the Planning Commission to evaluate the slope of the area in relation to the recommendation. Mr. Perry related that the Planning Commission at its January 14, 1992 meeting, based on a survey conducted by the Public Works Department, determined that the majority of the area has a slope in excess of 20 percent and felt that the existing "Greenway" classification is appropriate and should 49 01/21/92 not be amended. It was the recommendation of the Commission and staff that the area south of Mr. Bean's property be deleted from both the General Plan amendment and rezoning application boundaries. Mr. Perry indicated that recent changes in State law require each Airports Land Use Commission (ALUC) to adopt a Comprehensive Land Use Plan (CLUP) for each airport in the County by January 30, 1991. Until such time as a plan is adopted, the City must submit all actions, regulations and permits to ALUC for review and approval within a two-mile radius of the airport. Mr. Bean's property is situated within two miles of Benton Airpark, for which a CLUP has not yet been developed. In order to expedite the development of a CLUP for Benton Airpark, staff has begun work on the Westside Area Plan, GPA-10-91, which is intended to serve as both a CLUP for Benton Airpark and an Area Plan for the west side of Redding. Associate Planner Morgon commented that the property consists of approximately one and one-quarter acres with two developable sites, one at the north end and one on the upper level. He stated that Mr. Bean has indicated he would like to build a two-story four-plex on the upper level. Approximately 65 signatures have been received in opposition to the General Plan amendment. In response to Council Member Moss' inquiry, he related that the property was rezoned to RM-9 in 1981, as a result of trying to implement the recently adopted Panorama Buenaventura Neighborhood Plan. Mr. Perry indicated that if the General Plan amendment is approved as requested, it will create an opportunity for up to four units on the upper level and possibly two or three units to be developed on the lower portion of the property. Site plan review criteria is submitted with the zoning recommendation that would preclude a road crossing through that steep bank area, with access to the upper portion occurring off of West Street. It is the recommendation of the Planning Commission and staff that Council approve the reclassification of the developable areas from "Residential, 3.5 units per acre" and "Greenway" to "Residential, 9.0 units per acre" and "Greenway" and the rezoning from "R-1" Single Family Residential District, and "RM-9" Multiple Family Residential District with site plan review criteria for the developable areas and "U-F" Unclassified District for the steep slope areas to preserve the "Greenway" status, in concept, as depicted in the Report to City Council dated January 21, 1992, incorporated herein by reference, and ratify the negative declaration. If Council concurs, it is further recommended, that subsequent to the review of the application by the ALUC, that staff be directed to submit a resolution to amend the General Plan along with other General Plan Amendments in the spring quarter, and also be directed to prepare an ordinance to implement the zone change. Council Member Buffum stated that for the record, she visited the site with property owners from the area. In response to Mayor Dahl, Mr. Perry indicated that under current zoning, Mr. Bean could apply for a building permit which would allow him to construct a four-plex and then apply for a use permit for up to three or four additional units, whether or not under the same roof. Council Member Arness asked if it were possible to require that the ridge be so many feet lower than the deck immediately west of the property. Mr. Perry acknowledged that this is permissible. Council Member Buffum stated that the area has problems with access, grade and slope and opined that the project is too much and too tall. Council Member Moss related that he can support a mitigated four unit structure on the upper level, but opposes carving the hillside for a three unit structure on the lower level. Richard Bean conveyed that he is simply trying to create continuity and spread the density over the entire piece of property. He explained that, at the present time, without doing anything, he can build five units. He related that the tri-plex can be built without any significant impact on the hill. 50 01/21/92 In response to Mayor Dahl, Mr. Morgon stated that the bulk of the property is "Greenway," with the northern tip being "Residential, 3.5." Current zoning is a combination of "R-1" on the lower level and "R-9" on the upper level, which allows for one single family unit on the "R-1" piece and also a permit for a four-plex on the "R-9" piece. If there were five units or more under one roof, it would require a use permit which would invoke the General Plan, which allows for only one unit. Mr. Perry clarified that in order to build a single family unit and a four- plex, it would require a lot split. Mayor Dahl emphasized that Council should not deny Mr. Bean something he currently has a right to. Mayor Dahl determined that there was no additional people present who wished to speak on the issue. MOTION: Made by Council Member Arness, seconded by Council Member Moss, that Council make the following findings regarding General Plan Amendment GPA-12-91 and Rezoning Application RZ-9-91: 1. Project is compatible with the Redding General Plan; 2. Project will not significantly alter existing land form; 3. Project is compatible with surrounding land use; 4. Project is compatible with the Code of the City of Redding, California, and ratify the Negative Declaration authorized by the Planning Commission on November 26, 1991. Voting was as follows: Ayes: Council Members - Arness, Fulton, Moss and Dahl Noes: Council Members - Buffum Absent: Council Members - None MOTION: Made by Council Member Arness, seconded by Council Member Moss, that Council approve, General Plan Amendment GPA-12-91 for property owned by Richard Bean, the reclassification of the property to "Residential, 9.0 units per acre" and "Greenway;" and Rezoning Application RZ-9-91 for property owned by Richard Bean, the rezoning of the property to "RM-9-F" Multiple Family Residential District and "U-F" Unclassified District with site plan review criteria required, and the site plan review criteria for the "RM-9-F" amended to stipulate the maximum building height not exceed an elevation of 682 feet above mean sea level (MSL), in concept; and subsequent to the review by the Airports Land Use Commission (ALUC), direct staff to submit a resolution to amend the General Plan, and prepare an ordinance to implement the zone change. Voting was as follows: Ayes: Council Members - Arness, Fulton, Moss and Dahl Noes: Council Members - Buffum Absent: Council Members - None RESOLUTION - Annexation Agreement for Water Service, Annexation 90-16, Viking Way Area (A-150-238) Planning and Community Development Director Perry related that Council at its September 3, 1991 meeting adopted a resolution commencing annexation proceedings on Annexation 90-16, Viking Way Area. Subsequent to these actions, staff has received requests for City water service from the owners of four parcels located within the boundaries of the annexation. Each of the parcels is developed with a single family house served by a marginally effective well. Mr. Perry explained that the owners are requesting the City to enter into an Annexation Agreement to allow them permission to extend an 8-inch water line approximately 600 feet from its present location to the west in Tarmac Road to serve the parcels. The owners are also proposing to construct approximately 400 feet of 8-inch water line for fire service and install a fire hydrant. It is the recommendation of staff that Council adopt a resolution approving an Annexation Agreement and authorizing the Mayor to execute it with conditions related to the construction of water-system improvements before annexation. MOTION: Made by Council Member Moss, seconded by Council Member Buffum, that Resolution No. 92-34 be adopted, a resolution of the City Council of the City 51 01/21/92 of Redding approving the annexation agreement between the City of Redding and O. J. Williams and Ann Williams, Roy Van Sickle, and Redding Anesthesia Associates Medical Group Self-Employed Money Purchase Pension Plan for benefit of Delbert C. Sowerby, M. D., and authorizing the Mayor to sign same. Voting was as follows: Ayes: Council Members - Arness, Buffum, Fulton, Moss and Dahl Noes: Council Members - None Absent: Council Members - None Resolution No. 92-34 is on file in the office of the City Clerk. ANNEXATION OFFSET FEE FOR LOW PROPERTY TAX AREAS (T-010-650) Planning and Community Development Director Perry explained that as a product of the revised property tax exchange agreement with the County, the City will now have areas that pay different amounts of property tax to the City. For example, in areas in the City prior to January 1, 1992, out of every property tax dollar paid, the City received about $.175, with the remainder going to the County, schools, etc. Mr. Perry indicated that in those areas annexed after January 1, 1992, the City will receive about $.07 of the property tax dollar paid. Over time, this will represent a significant shortfall in City finances and the ability to provide basic services and capital improvements. Mr. Perry stated that one possible way to offset this loss of income would be to establish a one-time fee on new construction in the annexing areas that could be used to fund something like an endowment fund as a source of replacement income. He related that this idea came from discussions Council Member Moss had with developers who were being stymied by the County in their annexation efforts. In short, a fee would be collected from new construction in these areas and placed in a fund. The City would not be able to use the fee directly; rather, it could only use the interest or a portion of the interest from the investment to fund services. Over a period of years, the fund would grow to offset all or a part of the lost property tax revenue. It is the recommendation of staff that Council direct staff to submit a proposal and to research its legality. MOTION: Made by Council Member Moss, seconded by Council Member Buffum, to direct staff to submit a proposal regarding Annexation Offset Fees for low property tax areas and to research its legality. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes In response to Council Member Moss, Mr. Perry indicated that there is still sufficient time to alert individuals involved in pending annexations of the possibility of an Annexation Offset Fee for low property tax areas being adopted. MCCONNELL GRANT APPLICATION - re Office-Paper-Recycling Program (G-100 & S-020-550) Planning and Community Development Director Perry explained that Council at its January 7, 1992 meeting directed staff to submit five grant applications to the McConnell Foundation. Subsequent to that, the General Services Department has provided back-up information on a proposal to do an office- paper-recycling program. The proposal is to fund the program, which includes both equipment and labor, for one year for a projected cost of $73,693.00. Mr. Perry stated that the project is worthwhile from several perspectives: (1) Reduces trash being hauled to and being placed in the landfill; (2) Creates some employment for the Opportunity Center; (3) Better quantifies this segment of the solid waste stream; (4) Could create some income to offset program costs; (5) Establish if a program would pay for itself or need to be subsidized if carried forward; and (6) Determine if this is a worthwhile endeavor. It is, therefore, the recommendation of staff that Council authorize the submission of a grant application to the McConnell Foundation. MOTION: Made by Council Member Buffum, seconded by Council Member Moss, authorizing staff to submit a grant application to the McConnell Foundation for the Office-Paper-Recycling Program, in the amount of $73,693. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes THIRD BUILDING - NONPROFIT OFFICE PARK - Request for Co-Tenant 52 01/21/92 (C-070-100) Planning and Community Development Director Perry related that the third building in the Nonprofit Office Park is now out to bid, with occupants being the Grant Resource Center, the Red Cross, and Big Brothers/Big Sisters, Inc. Mr. Perry stated that Big Brother/Big Sisters, Inc. has submitted a letter requesting permission to share space with the Shasta County Child Abuse Prevention Council. Since the space does not appear to be overcrowded, it is the recommendation of staff that the request be approved with the stipulation that the maximum number of employees in the assigned space shall not exceed seven employees. MOTION: Made by Council Member Buffum, seconded by Council Member Moss, authorizing the Big Brothers/Big Sisters, Inc. to share office space in the Third Building of the Nonprofit Office Park with the Shasta County Child Abuse Prevention Council, with the stipulation that the maximum number of employees in the assigned space shall not exceed seven. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes S484 - Fisheries and Wildlife Restoration of Sacramento River (L-040-070 & W-030-550 & F-200-200-050) Electric Utility Operations Manager Ryan commented that the Electric Utility Commission (EUC) at its January 9, 1992 meeting was informed that, based on information from the Central Valley Project Customer Technical Committee (CVP Tech Committee) information, the present drafts of S484 and similar bills are too ill-defined for CVP customers, such as Redding, to be able to take a position on the bill(s) at this time. The CVP Tech Committee has, however, taken the position that the Sacramento River environment ought to be improved and that CVP water and power users should pay their "fair" share of environmental mitigation. Mr. Ryan stated that the Electric Department concurs with the CVP Tech Committee, and believes that S484 is not sufficiently developed to recommend support at this time. The EUC concluded that the Commission has not received enough information about S484 to be able to make a recommendation and requested that Council delay taking a position. Council Member Buffum commented that Council needs to seriously review S484 and possibly oppose it and endorse two other bills being proposed by Congressmen Seymour and Herger. She opined that a New Jersey Senator may not be as aware of what is occurring in California as the State's own elected representatives. Council Member Moss related that he would like to remain neutral until better information is available on the bill. MOTION: Made by Council Member Moss, seconded by Council Member Arness, to defer action until additional information is available. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes RESOLUTION - Sale of Redding Power Surplus Materials and Equipment (B-050-100-700 & E-120-300-700) Electric Utility Operations Manager Ryan related that the Electric Department has concluded that it is timely and necessary for the City to proceed with the sale of surplus material and equipment at Redding Power. It is the recommendation of both the Electric Utility Commission and staff that Council adopt a resolution authorizing staff to negotiate a contract for the sale of the surplus equipment and materials subject to the City Attorney's approval as to form and authorizing the Mayor to sign such a contract. MOTION: Made by Council Member Moss, seconded by Council Member Arness, that Resolution No. 92-35 be adopted, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding authorizing staff to negotiate a contract for the sale of Redding Power surplus materials and equipment, and authorizing the Mayor to sign the necessary documentation. Voting was as follows: Ayes: Council Members - Arness, Buffum, Fulton, Moss and Dahl Noes: Council Members - None Absent: Council Members - None Resolution No. 92-35 is on file in the office of the City Clerk. 53 01/21/92 RESOLUTION - Grant Application to FAA re Entitlement Funding for Capital Projects (G-100-070-095 & G-100-170-200 & A-090-100) Airports Director Ruff stated that the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has requested the City to submit a Grant Preapplication, no later than January 31, 1992, to secure the unencumbered balance of the City's Entitlement Funds, $292,227.00. Mr. Ruff recalled that a large amount of discretionary funds were unexpectedly made available to the City last (Federal Fiscal) year, however, was unable to provide as much as originally intended. The City has been asked to pull the Master Plan Update Project; however, the FAA has committed to cover it with discretionary funds during FFY 1992, which began October 1. The FAA will honor this commitment; however, the Preapplication for the Entitlement must be received prior to the commitment being honored. Mr. Ruff commented that 1992 is the expiration year for (the last amendment of) the Federal Act which governs all Federal Airport Funding. Exact action by Congress cannot be predicted and all FAA Airport District Offices are notifying their Airports to encumber, and thereby guarantee receipt and use of the earned Entitlement funding. Mr. Ruff stated that staff has worked diligently to provide a capital program which qualifies for this Preapplication. The Federal Funds will require a match of $32,473, which will be pursued through a State Airport Loan application. It is the recommendation of both the Airports Commission and staff that Council adopt a resolution authorizing the submittal of a Preapplication to the FAA for the project program as outlined in the Report to City Council dated January 15, 1992, incorporated herein by reference, and to file a State Airport Matching Fund Loan Application. MOTION: Made by Council Member Arness, seconded by Council Member Fulton, that Resolution No. 92-36 be adopted, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding authorizing the filing of a Federal Grant Preapplication for entitlement Airport Improvement Program (AIP) Grant monies to accomplish capital projects at Redding Municipal Airport, and authorizing the City Manager to execute the Preapplication and all subsequent documentation to obtain FAA Grant Monies and State Loan Matching Funds. Voting was as follows: Ayes: Council Members - Arness, Buffum, Fulton, Moss and Dahl Noes: Council Members - None Absent: Council Members - None Resolution No. 92-36 is on file in the office of the City Clerk. GRADING ORDINANCE (A-070-055) Assistant City Engineer Curtis recalled that the draft ordinance was submitted to Council for review at its January 7, 1992 meeting and indicated that since that time a request was received to add to the list of qualified professionals allowed to prepare erosion and sediment control plans. Mr. Curtis indicated the following significant changes to the ordinance: (1) Requirement for submitting an interim and final erosion control plan; (2) Removal of the Design Standards that were in the Ordinance under Sections 16.40.140, 150, 160, and 180; (3) New ordinance is raising the maximum penalty for violations from $1,000 to $5,000 in Section 16.40.280; (4) New paragraphs were added to Section 16.40.130 regarding action against security; and (5) To ensure maintenance of runoff and erosion control measures, Section 16.40.240 has been added, requiring the permittee to provide a contract to a qualified contractor to maintain final plan measures for a one-year period. It is the recommendation of staff that the ordinance be offered for first reading. Council Member Moss offered Ordinance 1986 for first reading, an ordinance of the City Council of the City of Redding amending Chapter 16.40 of the Redding Municipal Code pertaining to Clearing, Grading, Fills and Excavation. ORDINANCE - re Handbills (C-110-100) 54 01/21/92 City Attorney Hays related that the City currently has a Handbill Ordinance, which in its basic form, is in excess of 30 years old and contains a prohibition against the distribution of commercial handbills. He indicated that the current ordinance is suspect as to whether it could pass scrutiny regarding first amendment provisions. Mr. Hays explained that the proposed ordinance is an attempt to balance the goals of the community with regard to handbill distribution, principally relating to litter and law enforcement problems. Mr. Hays stated that he originally suggested that distribution times be between sunrise and sunset; however, at the request of Mayor Dahl, the time was changed to read from 5:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. 55 01/21/92 Council Member Fulton stated that the letters of protest which have been received seem to involve the extended time period and opined that the public might be more content with the original suggestion of less hours and less days. Mr. Hays related that one of the proposed revisions contained a distribution schedule of Sunday through Wednesday, sunrise to sunset, with the retrieval process to be undertaken and completed by Friday. The idea behind the sunrise to sunset distribution was to try and alleviate aggravated dogs, which is currently experienced with trash collection. Mayor Dahl opined that the 5:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. distribution is fair, instead of trying to determine sunrise and sunset times. If the times present a problem, the ordinance can be amended at a later date. Council Member Moss related that he has received calls from several people inquiring what can be done to ensure items are not distributed on their premises. He spoke in favor of developing a system whereby people can call the City and request their name be placed on a list which would be provided to the handbill distributor. Mr. Hays stated that the City Clerk's Office is the focus of individuals wanting to distribute handbills and acquiring the necessary license. If the City Clerk were to maintain a listing of individuals who have indicated they do not want to receive handbills, it could be distributed at the time the license was issued. Marcie Benson, 3618 Mt. Ashland Avenue, stated she strongly opposes amending the Handbill Ordinance. She stated that she is proud of living in a beautiful city, which compared to most, is very clean and unlittered. She opined that, if put to public vote, the new amendment would not pass. She expressed her concern over potential litter problems and the fact that many people take pride in their yards. She stated that she hopes Council will not be pressured into amending the current ordinance just because of the threat of a lawsuit. Mr. Hays stated that there are provisions in the amended ordinance which address the issue of litter by providing a provision for mandatory pick-up. In addition, multi-time distributors are required, on a quarterly basis, to provide a postage paid card for individuals to complete if they do not wish to continue receiving the literature. Larry Wakefield, Record Searchlight, stated that the community has a misconception and Mr. Hays just helped to clarify a few of the points in question. He opined that the proposed changes will make the Handbill Ordinance stronger and easier to enforce. Council Member Arness suggested that the distribution hours be amended, as it is both faster and safer to make deliveries during daylight hours. Council Member Arness offered Ordinance 1987 for first reading, an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Redding amending Redding Municipal Code Chapter 6.36 pertaining to Handbills, by amending Sections 6.36.020, 6.36.040, and 6.36.050, and adding Sections 6.36.100, 6.36.110, 6.36.120, 6.36.140, and 6.36.150, and amending the delivery time from between 5:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. to between sunrise and sunset. ROUTINE REPORTS AND COMMUNICATIONS Notice of Application by Greyhound Lines, Inc. with the California Public Service Commission to increase its Passenger Bus Fares and Restructure Manner in which fares are determined. (S-050-350) ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Fran Jenkins stated her disappointment with Council's decision in not taking action on S484. She indicated her willingness to provide Council with information she has acquired. She suggested that each member of Council who has not read S484 set aside time and read it. 56 01/21/92 Council Member Arness opined that the preponderance of Council is against the bill, however, has chosen to wait and see what additional information is received. Council Member Moss stated that Council is abiding by the recommendations of two commissions to defer action at the present time. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, at the hour of 10:15 p.m., Mayor Dahl declared the meeting adjourned to 5:15 p.m., January 28, 1992, in the United Way Building, 2280 Benton Drive, Redding, California, for a joint meeting with the Planning Commission and the Traffic and Parking Commission to discuss the Master Street Plan. APPROVED: _________________________________ Mayor ATTEST: ______________________________ City Clerk