Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - City Council - unsigned - 1990-11-201 11/20/90 City Council, Regular Meeting Council Chambers Redding, California November 20, 1990 7:26 p.m. The Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag was led by City Attorney Hays. The Invocation was offered by Reverend Benjamin Pent of the Westside Church. The meeting was called to order by Mayor Buffum with the following Council Members present: Arness, Dahl, Fulton, Moss and Buffum. Also present were City Manager Christofferson, Assistant City Manager McMurry, City Attorney Hays, Electric Utility Director Lindley, Director of Planning and Community Development Perry, Director of Public Works Galusha, Chief of Police Blankenship, Electric Utility Operations Manager Ryan, Fire Chief Bailey, Electric Utility Resources Manager Coleman, Director of Community Services Gorman, Director of Finance Downing, Assistant City Engineer Aasen, Senior Planner Keaney, Principal Planner King, Director of Information Systems Kelley, Director of Utility Customer Service Vokal, Housing Manager Maurer, Airports Director Ruff, Transportation Coordinator Duryee, Assistant City Clerk Strohmayer, City Clerk Nichols, and Secretary to the City Council Moscatello. PRESENTATION OF PLAQUE - Chief of Police Blankenship and Redding Police Officers (A-050-270) Lou Moore, Director of the Regional Occupations Program for Law Enforcement, presented a plaque to Chief of Police Blankenship. Mr. Moore conveyed that Chief Blankenship has been a positive role model and provided outstanding service to the community's youth. Mr. Moore also presented a plaque to the men and women of the Redding Police Department in appreciation of their professionalism and high ethics. Mr. Moore noted that these men and women are very positive role models in a time when that is hard to find. RESOLUTION - In Appreciation of Namaste (A-050-060) Mayor Buffum, on behalf of the City Council, expressed appreciation to Namaste and his company, Namaste Productions, for donating his service to the City of Redding to video tape the City Council meetings for over the past year and replay the meetings on Public Access Television. MOTION: Made by Council Member Dahl, seconded by Council Member Moss, that Resolution No. 90-549 be adopted, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding commending Namaste and Namaste Productions for public service to the City of Redding. Voting was as follows: Ayes: Council Members - Arness, Dahl, Fulton, Moss, and Buffum Noes: Council Members - None Absent: Council Members - None Resolution No. 90-549 is on file in the office of the City Clerk. CONSENT CALENDAR The following matters were considered inclusively under the Consent Calendar: Approval of Minutes - Adjourned Regular Meeting of November 5, 1990 Regular Meeting of November 6, 1990 Adjourned Regular Meeting of November 13, 1990 Approval of Payroll and Accounts Payable Register (A-050-100-500) Recommend that Accounts Payable Register No. 09, check numbers 162410 through 162937 inclusive, in the amount of $3,780,687.23, be approved and paid, and Payroll Register No. 10, check numbers 306336 through 307032 inclusive, in the amount of $779,382.34, and Automatic Payroll Deposits in the amount of $196,754.32, for the period October 27, 1990, through November 10, 1990, be approved. 2 11/20/90 TOTAL: $4,756,823.89 Treasurer's Report - October 1990 (A-050-100-600) Total Treasurer's Accountability - $31,505,117.74 Total City of Redding Funds, Funds Held in Trust and Funds of Related Entities - $88,412,972.76 Resolution - Landscape Maintenance District No. 9, Hidden Hills Subdivision, by Mary Ann Fair (A-170-075-009) It is the recommendation of the Planning Director that Resolution No. 90-550 be adopted, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding amending Resolution 90-357, levying an assessment on City of Redding Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 for Fiscal Year 1990-91 to $0.00 per lot. Resolution Setting Public Hearing - Landscape Maintenance District No. 14, Quail Ridge Subdivision, Units 4 and 5 (A-170-075-014) It is the recommendation of the Planning Director that the Engineer's Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 14, Quail Ridge Subdivision, Units 4 and 5, be approved, and that Resolution No. 90-551 be adopted, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding ordering formation of territory into a Landscape Maintenance District, to be known as Landscape Maintenance District No. 14, and authorizing the levy and collection of assessments therein pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, and set a public hearing for consideration of levying fees for fiscal year 1991-92 on December 4, 1990. Resolution Setting Public Hearing - Landscape Maintenance District No. 15, Oak Mesa Estates, Unit 2 (A-170-075-015) It is the recommendation of the Planning Director that the Engineer's Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 15, Oak Mesa Estates, Unit 2, be approved, and that Resolution No. 90-552 be adopted, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding ordering formation of territory into a Landscape Maintenance District, to be known as Landscape Maintenance District No. 15, and authorizing the levy and collection of assessments therein pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, and set a public hearing for consideration of levying fees for fiscal year 1991-92 on December 4, 1990. Set Public Hearing - Rezoning Application RZ-17-90 by KSA Associates (19424 Posey Lane) (L-010-230) It is the recommendation of the Planning Director that a public hearing be set for 7:00 p.m., December 4, 1990, to consider RZ-17-90, a request to rezone 32,000 square feet of a 20-acre parcel from "R1-B15" Single Family Residential District to "R-2-F" Multiple Family Residential District. Annexation 90-15 - Tierra Oaks (A-150-237) It is the recommendation of the Planning Director that Annexation 90-15, Tierra Oaks, be referred to Departments for review and comment, and to the Board of Administrative Review for an environmental determination. Award of Bid - Bid Schedule No. 2406, One (1) 46,000 lb. GVW Chassis and Line Body with Digger Derrick (B-050-100) It is the recommendation of the Electric Utility Director that Bid Schedule No. 2406 (Job No. 9082-34), One (1) 46,000 lb. GVW Chassis and Line Body with Digger Derrick, be awarded to the low bidder, Altec Industries, for their alternative bid in the amount of $143,639.38. Funds for this purchase are included in the 1990/91 budget. Resolution - Equal Employment Opportunity Policy (P-100-060-150) It is the recommendation of the Personnel Director that Resolution No. 90-553 be adopted, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding approving an amendment to the Affirmative Action Policy of the City of Redding heretofore approved and adopted by Resolutions 74-178 and 77-61, and incorporating the Annual Utilization Analysis Report. 3 11/20/90 Award of Bid - Bid Schedule No. 2396, Computer Equipment Resolution - Appropriating Funds * (B-050-100 & B-130-070 & A-070-090) It is the recommendation of the Information Systems Director that Bid Schedule No. 2396, computer equipment, be awarded to the low bidder, JWP Information Systems, in the amount of $12,562.94. It is also recommended that Resolution No. 90-554 be adopted, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding approving and adopting the 20th Amendment to the City Budget Resolution No. 90-362 appropriating $15,000 for the purchase of computer equipment as provided in the C-Cap Grant. Award of Bid - Bid Schedule No. 2403, Drop Boxes Award of Bid - Bid Schedule No. 2404, Roll-Off Loader and Body Award of Bid - Bid Schedule No. 2405, Hydraulic Tarping Devices (B-050-100) It is the recommendation of the General Services Director that Bid Schedule No. 2403, drop boxes, be awarded to the low bidder, Dewald Northwest Company, with a net cost delivered of $84,075.63. It is also recommended that Bid Schedule No. 2404, roll-off loader and body, be awarded to the low bidder, F. B. Hart Company, with a net cost of $96,482.44. It is further recommended that Bid Schedule No. 2405, hydraulic tarping devices, be awarded to the low bidder, Heil West, Inc., with a net cost delivered of $17,212.50. Funds for these purchases are included in the 1990/91 budget. Purchase of Personal Computer and Accessories Resolution - Transferring Funds * (B-050-100, B-130-070, A-070-090 & A-070-400) It is the recommendation of the General Services Director to approve the purchase of a personal computer and pertinent accessories for use in the Solid Waste Division. It is also recommended that Resolution No. 90-555 be adopted, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding approving and adopting the 17th Amendment to the City Budget Resolution No. 90-362 transferring $6,000 for the acquisition of a personal computer for the Solid Waste Division. Downtown Mall Association - Statement of Income and Anticipated Expenditures (M-010-200-400) It is the recommendation of the City Clerk that the Summary Statement of Income and Anticipated Expenditures of the Downtown Mall Association for the period of May 1, 1990 to April 1, 1991 be accepted as filed. Award of Bid - Catering Services and/or Concession Services (B-050-100 & C-050-050) It is the recommendation of the Community Services Director that Bid Schedule No. 2372, Catering Services and/or Concession Services, be awarded to Paulson's Catering, and the Mayor be authorized to execute the appropriate contract documents when prepared. Resolution - Appropriating Funds for Change Order-Bid Schedule No. 2360, Sacramento River Trail, Phase 8 * (B-050-020, B-130,070, & P-050-460-700) It is the recommendation of the Public Works Director that Resolution No. 90- 556 be adopted, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding approving and adopting the 19th Amendment to the City Budget Resolution No. 90-362 appropriating $6,000 for additional work associated with Phase 8 of the Sacramento River Trail. Additional fill material was necessary to complete the abutments under the Market Street Bridge. Resolution - Traffic Signal Maintenance Agreement with County of Shasta (T-080-700 & B-050-020) It is the recommendation of the Public Works Director that Resolution No. 90- 557 be adopted, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding approving the Agreement between the City of Redding and the County of Shasta entitled "Agreement for Maintenance of Traffic Signals on Highways in the County of Shasta," and authorizing the Mayor to sign the same. 4 11/20/90 Resolution - Appropriating Funds Purchase of Pavement Striper Attachment (B-130-070 & B-050-100) It is the recommendation of the Public Works Director that Resolution No. 90- 558 be adopted, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding approving and adopting the 18th Amendment to the City Budget Resolution No. 90-362 appropriating $16,500 for the acquisition of a laser beam pointer device for the pavement striper equipment. It is also recommended that the bidding requirements be waived and the striper attachment be purchased from the sole source vendor, SFO Enterprises, Inc., in the amount of $15,937.50. This item was not included in the 1990-91 budget; however, funding is available from developer fees collected for striping modifications relating to development. Resolution - Abatement Proceedings - 2121 Terrace Street, owned by James William Kennedy (A-030-070) It is the recommendation of the City Attorney that Resolution No. 90-559 be adopted, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding of intention to begin legal proceedings of abatement under Chapter 9.36 of the Redding Municipal Code on certain real property in the City of Redding located at 2121 Terrace Street, owned by James William Kennedy. Resolution - Abatement Proceedings - 1753 Milo Avenue, owned by James Lee Newell (A-030-070) It is the recommendation of the City Attorney that Resolution No. 90-560 be adopted, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding of intention to begin legal proceedings of abatement under Chapter 9.36 of the Redding Municipal Code on certain real property in the City of Redding located at 1753 Milo Avenue, owned by James Lee Newell. MOTION: Made by Council Member Arness, seconded by Council Member Dahl, that all the foregoing items on the Consent Calendar be approved and adopted as recommended. Voting was as follows: Ayes: Council Members - Arness, Dahl, Fulton, and Buffum Noes: Council Members - None Absent: Council Members - None Abstain: Council Members - Moss Resolution Numbers 90-550, 90-551, 90-552, 90-553, 90-554, 90-555, 90-556, 90- 557, 90-558, 90-559, and 90-560 are on file in the office of the City Clerk. - - - - - WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS Letter from Department of Boating and Waterways (R-200-600) A letter was received from James DeBenedetti, Supervisor of the Boating Regulations Unit of the State Department of Boating and Waterways (DBW), requesting Council to postpone any action on the proposed ordinance pertaining to river regulations in the Sacramento River Area. Mr. DeBenedetti notes that the Department has requested advice on this matter from legal counsel and request postponement until they have received their counsel's comments. City Attorney Hays stated that the Harbors and Navigation Code grants local agencies the authority to adopt ordinances, laws, regulations, and rules which are not in conflict with the provisions of the State Code or regulations adopted by the Department. Mr. Hays stated that the City forwarded a copy of the proposed ordinance to the DBW and is in compliance with all respects of the Code. This was an information item and no action was taken. 5 11/20/90 CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING - Appeal of Negative Declaration for Country Oaks South Subdivision, S-33-90, by Lawrence Lake, et al. (S-100-110) The hour of 7:00 P.M., having arrived, Mayor Buffum opened the continued public hearing regarding the Appeal of Negative Declaration for Country Oaks South Subdivision. The following documents are on file in the office of the City Clerk: Affidavit of Continued Public Hearing Planning Department recommendation dated November 14, 1990 City Clerk Nichols advised that no protests were received. Planning and Community Development Director Perry conveyed that a letter was received from Lawrence Lake requesting a continuance of the continued public hearing to December 4, 1990. Mr. Lake states that he will be out of town on November 20, 1990, and he has not seen the project alternatives prepared by the developer. Mr. Perry stated that staff discussed the issues pertaining to wetlands with the Department of Fish and Game (DFG). Staff suggests that the conditions of approval be more explicit concerning meeting DFG's requirements for in-kind replacement of wetlands and recommends that permits be obtained from the Army Corps of Engineers and DFG, a complete wetlands-reclamation plan be submitted with the subdivision improvement plans, and grading shall not occur until the plan is approved by DFG. Council Member Fulton stated that he favors moving ahead with the proceedings tonight. Council Member Dahl stated that he would like to view the area once more. He explained that there are grading and erosion control issues to deal with. He also noted that the developer is not represented tonight. MOTION: Made by Council Member Dahl, seconded by Council Member Moss, to continue the continued public hearing regarding the Appeal of Negative Declaration for Country Oaks South Subdivision to December 4, 1990. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes PUBLIC HEARING - General Plan Amendment Application GPA-3-90, by Nolan Brewer and the City of Redding (North of Enterprise Skypark) (G-030-010) The hour of 7:00 P.M., having arrived, Mayor Buffum opened the public hearing regarding General Plan Amendment Application GPA-3-90. The following documents are on file in the office of the City Clerk: Affidavit of Mailing - Notice of Public Hearing Affidavit of Publication - Notice of Public Hearing Planning Commission recommendation dated November 14, 1990 City Clerk Nichols advised that protests were received from the Redding Area Pilots' Association, Warren Wedikind, Lois Van Zelf, and Donna Taylor. Planning and Community Developer Director Perry reported that the Planning Commission recommended denial of a request by Nolan Brewer to amend the general plan from "Airport Service" and "Greenway" to "Residential, 3.0 units per acre." A related general plan amendment application by George Farley for the reclassification of Enterprise Skypark was withdrawn; and in its place, the City initiated an amendment to the Skypark property to address the lack of improvements as required in the Columbia Area Plan. The Planning Commission also recommended denial of that request which proposed to reclassify the Enterprise Skypark from "Airport Service" to "Service Commercial" and "Residential, 9.0 units per acre." Mr. Perry reviewed the Report to City Council dated November 14, 1990, which is incorporated herein by reference. It is the recommendation of staff to continue 6 11/20/90 this matter for one month, until the meeting of January 2, 1991, to allow the civil issues to be resolved. Doug Balfour, 2336 Airstrip Road, stated that he is opposed to rezoning the property north of Enterprise Skypark to residential because this action would take the Skypark's safety factor away. Mr. Balfour pointed out that the developer, Mr. Brewer, was granted additional density on adjoining property to compensate for this property receiving the "Greenway" designation. He conveyed that it would be speculation for the Enterprise Flying Club to purchase the clear zone because whether or not the Airport will remain viable is unknown. Mr. Balfour added that the Skypark is inspected by Caltrans every year, and if it was not safe, it would be shut down. Tom Cross, 2360 Airstrip Road, Acting President of the Enterprise Flying Club, reiterated that Nolan Brewer was compensated for keeping the clear zone free, the property was designated multiple-family residential, and Mr. Brewer said if he received that designation, he would leave the clear zone free. Mayor Buffum recalled when she was on the Planning Commission, the Enterprise Flying Club was required to comply with the conditions of the Columbia Area Plan to continue operation of the Skypark. She asked what the status of the purchase of the Skypark by the Flying Club is. Mr. Cross said the Flying Club tried to buy the Skypark from Mr. Farley. He said it is difficult to make major improvements on the premises when the Flying Club does not own the property. The Flying Club has kept up the basic necessities. Lars Stratte, 265 Ashley, President of the Redding Area Pilots Association, stated that none of the process regarding development around the Enterprise Skypark has gone through the Airport Land Use Commission, and that process needs to be utilized. Mayor Buffum asked if the Planning Commission was satisfied with the status of the improvements the Flying Club has made. Mr. Perry conveyed that the Commission did not speak to that issue. They felt they could not approve a residential designation as long as the airport was there and the solution was to recommend denial, extend the time, and hope that things would come together. In response to Council Member Dahl's question, Senior Planner Keaney stated that several years ago it was not clear if the Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) had jurisdiction over private airports. The ALUC was not going to prepare airport plans and if any plans were prepared, it would have to be prepared by the operators, and in this case, the Flying Club. Until there was a plan to review, there was not going to be any jurisdiction, and it was determined that the County did not have the money or time to prepare the plan. Randy Thompson, 2403 Naomi Lane, stated that at the ALUC meeting, it was discussed that the Board had jurisdiction over private airports, but the issue was put aside until issues and problems were raised. Those issues have been coming up fairly consistently, and Mr. Stratte informed the ALUC of the Club's plight; however, the ALUC only meets once a year. He stated that the Planning Commission felt their decision to allow the Flying Club to operate until the end of the lease, the year 2003, would be final. Jack Brewer, 6957 Rivercrest Drive, Anderson, stated that he owns the clear zone and liability is a serious concern. Mr. Brewer pointed out that the area is growing and many subdivisions are being built. The Club has not purchased the property as was conditioned in the Columbia Area Plan, the City has not purchased the property, and Mr. Brewer is bearing the brunt of it. He has been forced to leave his property undeveloped and the offer to sell the property to the Club has not received a response. The Club has tried to wait out the system. Mr. Brewer said he should be compensated for use of the property and he should receive the same type of liability insurance as Mr. Farley is entitled to. Dennis Cowan, 1381 Edgewood Drive, representing the Enterprise Flying Club, stated that the Flying Club is in a state of flux because it is unknown what will happen to the airport. He added that the Club is not sure what the Judge will be requiring from the Flying Club pertaining to insurance. The Club has 7 11/20/90 the right of first refusal to purchase the property, and Mr. Farley has not allowed the Club that right. He added that the Flying Club would like to own this property. Mr. Cowan said it will be some time before these issues are resolved. He opined that the City needs three levels of airport service: the Municipal Airport offers high technology; Benton Airpark offers medium technology; and Enterprise Skypark meets the lower level needs. He added that the Enterprise Skypark is the only airport where 87 octane fuel is available for older airplanes, and the airport provides a valuable service to the community. Mr. Cowan stated that there is a need for this airport and additional subdivision activity is not needed. He observed that it would not be appropriate for the City to take sides in the dispute. Jim Wyatt, 2130 Eureka Way, pointed out that Mr. Cowan states that this issue is going to be embroiled in litigation and the City should basically do nothing. Mr. Wyatt noted that Mr. Farley is 86 years old and concerned about his estate. He explained that the rent the Flying Club pays is economically unrealistic, the parties are working off of a 1973 lease, and the property will be reappraised. Mr. Farley is trying to work within the terms of the lease, and Mr. Wyatt has serious doubts if this will take place. The Flying Club must change their insurance, the Club needs comprehensive general liability. Noting that this is an era of litigation, he pointed out that the Farleys stand in the shoes of the City of Redding. In the event of an accident, the Farleys can be sued. He added that the Flying Club has been given ample opportunity to purchase adequate insurance and they haven't. Mr. Wyatt explained that when Mr. Farley could not negotiate the lease with the Flying Club, he tried to sell the property. The offer to sell included far more than the Flying Club site. He explained that no one would want to buy the five parcels which comprise the property. The only people who want those parcels are the Flying Club. The problem is that nobody can develop the property and there will never be a first right of refusal because nobody will offer to buy only the Club site. It will be very expensive to buy the liability insurance and pay rent that will provide the Farleys with a fair rate of return on the property. He asked Council not to let the private party's problems prevent Council from acting. Mayor Buffum asked if Mr. Wyatt believes that an airstrip in the heart of town is inappropriate. Mr. Wyatt explained that it will be very expensive to buy the necessary insurance and pay Mr. Farley a fair rent on the property. He said it may be appropriate, but it may not be feasible. Dick Oser, 2223 Airstrip Road, stated that George Farley used to do business with a handshake, but that was no longer the case. He can no longer speak with Mr. Farley, he must speak with his attorney. Mr. Oser stated that the airport should remain there as long as possible. Ken Kinder, 1359 Minder Drive, stated that he bought his property with the understanding that the airport was going to remain there. He noted that this type of airport is important to Redding, and it is providing a valuable service to the community. MOTION: Made by Council Member Arness, seconded by Council Member Fulton, that the public hearing be closed. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes Council Member Moss conveyed that the Club is a devoted group of flyers struggling to hold on in the face of growth of the City. He said he felt it was in the public's interest to maintain the airport; however, it will cost more than a flying club can afford. He suggested that the matter be referred to the Airports Commission to see if it is in the public interest to preserve this airport. Council Member Fulton suggested that the matter be referred back to the Planning Commission so it can review the new information provided by the property owner's attorney. Mayor Buffum concurred with the suggestion to refer this matter to the Airports Commission. She also suggested that the Flying Club apply for a Small Business Loan which would give them the ability to protect the airport. She stated that removing the airport and filling the area with houses is not the best idea. 8 11/20/90 Council Member Dahl said he had no problem referring the matter to the Airports Commission to look at the broader picture. He questioned, if the operation of the airport is not viable through the Flying Club, is the City willing to subsidize the operation. He pointed out that the City airports fund is in the red. MOTION: Made by Council Member Moss, seconded by Council Member Dahl, to refer to the Airports Commission the issue of land use compatibility of the Enterprise Skypark and for an overall look if it is in the public interest to maintain and protect the land use of that area. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes Council Member Dahl emphasized that the other issue is whether the airport will be subsidized by government and if funds are available. Council Member Arness asked if the Skypark is a legal nonconforming use. Mr. Perry conveyed that the airport is consistent with the Columbian Area Plan; however, it is not in conformance with some of the policies of the Plan. He explained that the Club does not hold fee title to the open space area, they do not have insurance holding the City and County harmless from airport related uses, and they have not submitted an airport master facility plan to the ALUC. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING - Appeal of Variance Application V-41-90 and Use Permit UP-88-90, by John Kucera (1416 West Street) (L-010-410 & L-010-390) The hour of 7:00 P.M., having arrived, Mayor Buffum opened the continued public hearing regarding the Appeal of Variance Application V-41-90 and Use Permit UP-88-90. The following documents are on file in the office of the City Clerk: Affidavit of Continued Public Hearing Planning Commission recommendation dated November 15, 1990 City Clerk Nichols advised that three protests were received. Planning and Community Development Director Perry reported that a letter was received dated November 20, 1990, from John Kucera withdrawing his appeal. Mr. Perry recalled that Council referred this matter to the Planning Commission for further review. It is the recommendation of the Planning Commission, as well as staff, to deny the variance and use permit. John Kucera, 1416 West Street, stated his intent to withdraw the appeal and stated that he would rather retain the variance application and use permit as first approved by the Planning Commission than have the variance and use permit denied. MOTION: Made by Council Member Dahl, seconded by Council Member Fulton, that the public hearing be closed. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes MOTION: Made by Council Member Arness, seconded by Council Member Moss, granting John Kucera permission to withdraw the appeal of Variance Application V-41-90 and Use Permit Application UP-88-90. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes PUBLIC HEARING - Rezoning Application RZ-18-90, by City of Redding (West of and adjacent to the Elks Club along the north bank of the Sacramento River) (L-010-230) The hour of 7:00 P.M., having arrived, Mayor Buffum opened the public hearing regarding Rezoning Application RZ-18-90. The following documents are on file in the office of the City Clerk: Affidavit of Mailing - Notice of Public Hearing Affidavit of Publication - Notice of Public Hearing Planning Commission recommendation dated November 14, 1990 City Clerk Nichols advised that no protests were received. 9 11/20/90 Planning and Community Development Director Perry reported that the Planning Commission approved a request to rezone 2.95 acres from "R-4-FP" Multiple Family Residential District to an "R-1-FP" Single Family Residential District. Mr. Perry explained that the rezoning would make the property consistent with the General Plan and with the adjoining residences in Lake Redding Estates. It is the recommendation of staff to approve the recommendation of the Planning Commission. Mr. Perry indicated that the issue of open-space dedication, the location of the River Trail, and archaeological resources would be addressed with a tentative subdivision map. Mayor Buffum determined that there were no comments from the floor. MOTION: Made by Council Member Arness, seconded by Council Member Moss, that the public hearing be closed. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes MOTION: Made by Council Member Dahl, seconded by Council Member Fulton, that Council make the following findings regarding Rezoning Application RZ-18-90: l. Project is compatible with the Redding General Plan. 2. Project will not significantly alter existing land form. 3. Project is compatible with surrounding land use. 4. Project is compatible with the Code of the City of Redding, California. and, ratify the Negative Declaration authorized by the Board of Administrative Review on October 23, 1990. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes Council Member Dahl offered Ordinance No. 1945 for first reading, an ordinance of the City Council of the City of Redding amending Section 18.06.020 of the Redding Municipal Code relating to the rezoning of certain real property in the City of Redding (RZ-18-90). CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING - Sign Ordinance (L-010-500-050 & C-110-100) The hour of 7:00 P.M., having arrived, Mayor Buffum opened the continued public hearing regarding revisions to the Sign Ordinance. The following documents are on file in the office of the City Clerk: Affidavit of Continued Public Hearing Planning Department recommendation dated November 15, 1990 City Clerk Nichols advised that no protests were received. Principal Planner King recalled that this public hearing was continued to allow staff time to modify the ordinance pertaining to office district signage and electronic message boards. Mr. King said it is the opinion of staff that the maximum sign area allowed under the current Sign Ordinance is too restrictive for large office development. The proposed ordinance would increase this allocation based on a sliding scale. Mr. King recalled that the Sign Committee recommended that small electronic message boards be allowed provided certain standards are met. He indicated that, based on Council's comments from the last meeting, staff has deleted those standards and added language to the proposed ordinance that prohibits all such signs. Raymond McHale, 1526 Canby Street, stated that there are two points in the proposed ordinance he would like changed. Mr. McHale said he does not think that roof signs should be prohibited entirely because a roof is sometimes the only feasible place for a sign. Mr. McHale also stated that electronic message boards should not be prohibited. John Lovett, 810 Twin View Boulevard, submitted a prepared statement pertaining to electronic message boards which is incorporated herein be reference. Mr. Lovett noted that Council has opted not to take the Sign Committee's recommendation to allow electronic message centers. Stating that the Committee's recommendation was based on the reaction to the incandescent lamp board on Cypress Avenue, Mr. Lovett exhibited a mini message center using flipper technology. He stated that flipper technology uses less energy, and concern about power consumption need not be a problem. He agreed that the 10 11/20/90 message board on Cypress Avenue is too large and the size of future electronic message boards should be restricted. Mr. Lovett suggested that the size be limited to 80 square feet and the message duration be not less than 20 seconds. Mr. Lovett stated that message centers are not traffic hazards, and he pointed out that the City of Los Angeles, the City of Redding, and Caltrans all use portable message centers to advise motorists of weather, traffic conditions, or speed, etc. Mr. Lovett opined that by prohibiting message boards, Council will not be allowing the business community to use effective point of purchase advertising. He requested that Council allow mini message centers in Redding. Mr. McHale recalled that the City considered placing an electronic message center at the Redding Convention Center. He said his dream is to be the best sign company and to get a message board at the Convention Center. He stated that activities at the Convention Center should be displayed. David Shoffner, 2035 Olive Street, expressed concern that the proposed ordinance would preclude the use of banners for advertising. He explained that he uses two 2x10 banners on the outside of the building which are consistent with the advertising policies of the chain of restaurants. Mr. King indicated that the proposed ordinance would allow one banner up to 24 square feet, without an administrative use permit, and may be displayed for no more than 30 consecutive days with no more than 90 cumulative days per calendar year. Council Member Moss asked if the proposed ordinance would allow two banners with no more than the recommended amount of square footage. Mr. King replied no, Council would have to change the text of the proposed ordinance. Jeff Zeller, 2450 North Bonnyview, stated that he likes most of the proposed ordinance. Mr. Zeller pointed out that many people cannot afford mini message centers and banners are the next best thing for advertising purposes. He pointed out that many fast food chains use this form of advertising. Mr. Zeller also expressed concern about the use of temporary window signage. He suggested that both window signage and banners be allowed for up to six months per calendar year; thus, allowing businesses the option of using either banners or window advertising during the year. MOTION: Made by Council Member Dahl, seconded by Council Member Fulton, that the public hearing be closed. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes In response to Council Member Dahl's question, Mr. King explained that the Sign Committee felt that banners were prevalent throughout the community, and they wanted to make a distinction between permanent and temporary signage. Council Member Dahl said it appears that the restrictions in the draft ordinance are a compromise. Council Member Arness asked if the banner was put behind glass would it be considered a permanent or temporary sign. Mr. King replied that it would be a permanent sign. Council Member Arness noted that Mr. Shoffner could put up two glass cases to hold the banners as long as his total square footage for signs was not exceeded. Council Member Fulton stated that the Sign Committee did an excellent job and the sign ordinance needs revision; however, the proposed ordinance is very restrictive. He opined that a limitation on the number of days banners may be used is not fair. He added that deleting electronic message boards is very restrictive and narrow minded. Council Member Fulton conveyed that it is a knee jerk reaction to the reader board sign on Cypress Avenue. He said he is not in favor of deleting electronic message boards. Council Member Moss stated that the suggestion to space electronic message centers 2000 feet apart is poor legislation. He added that it is logical to 11 11/20/90 allow banners on two sides of a building, and some latitude should be given as long as the maximum allowable signage is not exceeded. Council Member Dahl stated that he is pleased with the draft ordinance as submitted. He noted that Council already acted to ban electronic message boards and none should be allowed. He conveyed that he is ready to move ahead with the amended ordinance. MOTION: Made by Council Member Arness, seconded by Council Member Dahl, to not include standards for the use of electronic message boards in the draft ordinance. Voting was as follows: Ayes: Council Members - Arness, Dahl, and Buffum Noes: Council Members - Fulton and Moss Absent: Council Members - None MOTION: Made by Council Member Arness, seconded by Council Member Dahl, to accept the draft ordinance as written and direct the City Attorney to prepare an ordinance for adoption at the City Council meeting of December 4, 1990. Voting was as follows: Ayes: Council Members - Arness, Dahl, and Buffum Noes: Council Members - Fulton and Moss Absent: Council Members - None ORDINANCE NO. 1944 - Sacramento River Area Regulations (R-200-600) MOTION: Made by Council Member Dahl, seconded by Council Member Moss, that the full reading of Ordinance No. 1944 be waived and the City Attorney be instructed to read the full title. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes Council Member Fulton stated that Council should defer action on this ordinance until the opinion of the Department of Boating and Waterways pertaining to this matter has been received. Council Member Moss asked if the Department of Boating and Waterways has the authority to tell Council if the proposed ordinance is legal. City Attorney Hays stated that Department of Boating and Waterways may take the position that the ordinance is restrictive and goes beyond the Harbor and Navigation Code; however, whether or not they take that position is questionable. He added that the City has complied with all the requirements of the Harbor and Navigation Code. Mayor Buffum noted that six other cities in California have adopted this same type of regulation. She opined that the request to delay action on this matter by the Department of Boating and Waterways is not a valid request. MOTION: Made by Council Member Dahl, seconded by Council Member Moss, that Ordinance No. 1944 be adopted, an ordinance of the City Council of the City of Redding amending Title 10 of the Redding Municipal Code by adding Chapter 10.26, Sacramento River Area Regulations. Voting was as follows: Ayes: Council Members - Dahl, Moss, and Buffum Noes: Council Members - Arness and Fulton Absent: Council Members - None Ordinance No. 1944 is on file in the office of the City Clerk. ELECTRIC DEPARTMENT RESERVES (E-090 & B-130-070) Council Member Arness stated that the Electric Utility Commission (EUC) is concerned about the use of Electric Utility cash reserves for non-electric utility purposes. Council Member Arness reported that the EUC unanimously recommended that Council adopt a resolution establishing a policy regarding the use and pay back of Electric Utility cash reserves. Council Member Arness noted that staff is reviewing the general fund monies and City policy pertaining to borrowing from any of the City funds. He explained that he is not pushing hard for the adoption of this resolution because Council understands the purpose of not borrowing from any utility 12 11/20/90 fund. Council Member Arness expressed support for the policy; however, he suggested that Council hold off for one to two months until after staff has had an opportunity to look at how the City will fund the corporation yard, etc. Council Member Fulton noted that it has been very helpful for the City to be able to borrow money from the Electric Utility cash reserves. He expressed opposition to the resolution and noted that it is very restrictive. City Manager Christofferson explained that there is no plan to use electric utility reserve funds to finance capital improvements. He noted that staff is trying to put every enterprise on its own feet. Mayor Buffum suggested that this item be discussed further at a workshop. She added that it is time to put together a master plan for this City and figure out how the City will pay for it. She said she endorses the idea of the resolution; however, she is not prepared to adopt it tonight. Council Member Moss agreed and stated that it is not Council's intent to raid any utility's treasury. He added that if it is important to maintain that option, then he would be reluctant to cut loose of it. Council Member Dahl agreed that this should be discussed at a Council Workshop and directed staff to schedule this item for December 1, 1990. DOWNTOWN MALL - City Hall Site (C-050-025) Council Member Dahl stated that the possibility of placing City Hall at the Downtown Mall opened up some exciting opportunities. However, he said it will cost too much money to prepare an in-depth study of the Downtown Mall for that purpose and he cannot justify that expense. He said Council should meet to determine where City Hall should be sited, Benton Ranch or Parkview Avenue. Council Member Moss conveyed that the time to study the Downtown Mall was wisely invested. He noted that there was a substantial feeling that this was a good site for City Hall, and he expressed hope that the public gained an understanding of the situation. Council Member Moss pointed out that the offers to sell property in the Mall have been withdrawn. He said it would be a waste of time and money to study this any further. Council Member Fulton said the Downtown Mall is not an appropriate place for City Hall. Mayor Buffum agreed and said siting City Hall in the Mall is not cost effective over the long term. She noted that nature should take its own course with the Downtown Mall, and the Mall will continue to be rented out as office space and to businesses. MOTION: Made by Council Member Arness, seconded by Council Member Fulton, to discontinue the study of the Downtown mall as a site for City Hall. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes ELECTRIC DEPARTMENT LOCATION (C-050-025 & C-050-100-040) City Manager Christofferson recalled that Council postponed taking action on the proposed location of the Electric Department in the City Hall and Corporation Yard projects until tonight's meeting. He conveyed that staff recommends that the entire department be located at the Corporation Yard and distribution system planners be assigned to the one-stop center in City Hall. Noting that he asked for this item to be continued, Council Member Arness conveyed that he is satisfied with this arrangement. MOTION: Made by Council Member Arness, seconded by Council Member Dahl, to locate the Electric Department at the proposed Corporation Yard, with the assignment of distribution system planners at the new City Hall. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes 13 11/20/90 RESOLUTION - Memorandum of Understanding with the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Maintenance Unit (P-100-050-070) Assistant City Manager McMurry submitted the proposed two-year Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW) Maintenance Unit to Council for adoption. Mr. McMurry noted that the MOU was ratified by the IBEW Maintenance Unit employees and the MOU conforms to the guidelines set down by Council for City negotiators. It is the recommendation of staff to approve the MOU. MOTION: Made by Council Member Fulton, seconded by Council Member Moss, that Resolution No. 90-561 be adopted, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding approving the provisions of the Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Redding and the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local Union 1245 (other than certain employees of the Electric Utility Department of the City of Redding established as a separate bargaining unit of Local Union 1245, IBEW), effective October 28, 1990. Voting was as follows: Ayes: Council Members - Arness, Dahl, Fulton, Moss, and Buffum Noes: Council Members - None Absent: Council Members - None Resolution No. 90-561 is on file in the office of the City Clerk. TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP S-43-90 - The Dunfries Subdivision, by KSA Associates (S-l00-155) Council was advised that the Planning Commission has granted permission to subdivide 20.11 acres into 15 single-family residential lots and 23 multiple family lots, located north of Highway 299 and west of Twin Tower Drive, described as Tentative Subdivision Map S-43-90, The Dunfries Subdivision. A map of the area and a copy of the conditions of approval were submitted to Council. This was an information item. In response to Council Member Arness' question, Public Works Director Galusha conveyed that, on an interim basis, staff is not going to sign any more grading permits until there is a consensus within the agencies that approve those permits. The projects that have already received approval may move ahead. Staff will review the plans and go through the process, but the developer may not start until after April 15, 1991. Mr. Galusha explained that staff is working with Shasta County and the Departments of Water Quality and Fish and Game to develop some type of interim review of the grading process. He conveyed that the burden will be placed on the engineers who sign the final plans and the soil conservationist types that help develop the plans. EMINENT DOMAIN FOR TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAPS (C-070-010 & G-030-070 & S-100-055-300) Planning and Community Development Director Perry conveyed that the Planning Commission is currently reviewing a subdivision, Oasis Knolls, that, as submitted, necessitates the acquisition of a strip of land from adjoining property to obtain paved public street access. In this case, an alternate access can be developed subject to modification of the tentative map. Mr. Perry explained that he initially planned to present this item within the context of a specific instance; however, he stated that this is really a general policy question. Mr. Perry indicated that the issue before the Commission is occurring on two levels. The first is to establish the best long-term street plan for the area and the second is to work with individual property owners that in some cases work together and in other cases oppose each other. Mr. Perry relayed that the Commission would like to know if the Council wants the Commission making those types of decisions that could result in the use of eminent domain to further a subdivision. It is the recommendation of the Planning Director to direct the Planning Commission to use its best judgement within the context of the policies and standards adopted by the City Council in the Circulation Element. 14 11/20/90 Arch Pugh, 1300 West Street, conveyed that he is representing Norm Levenson. Mr. Pugh stated that he is not speaking specifically to the circumstances surrounding Oasis Knolls, but he is addressing the broader policy issue. Mr. Pugh explained that he has had to spend considerable time and effort to get this item heard. He stated that the Planning Commission was not going to automatically accept the map which would place Council in the posture of having to exercise eminent domain without it making that decision upfront. This leaves Mr. Levenson in the position of having the City, through delegation, making the determination of the location of the roadway without having Council make that decision. Mr. Pugh noted that by allowing a delegated body to make that decision early on, Council could be forced to go ahead with the eminent domain process later. He said the question is whether those decisions have already been reached by Council. He pointed out that the developer relies on that information, and the information needs to get to Council beforehand. Mr. Pugh said the question is who has the burden. He conveyed that his client has had the burden throughout this process. Mr. Pugh suggested that Council take staff's alternative number three, directing the Planning Commission to only make decisions regarding eminent domain if there is not an alternative means of access, if it is a mitigation measure listed in a final environmental impact report, or if it will result in improved traffic safety and staff's recommendation (number four), in conjunction. He said this would require the developers to justify their needs ahead of time. He reiterated that the burden should be on the developer and the City who wants the road to go there. Mayor Buffum asked if Mr. Pugh believes that eminent domain proceedings should not be at the Planning Commission level. Mr. Pugh said he is not sure that it should be at the Planning Commission level. He pointed out that the Commission does not make the findings, they only approve the map; and then, much later, it comes before Council. Mr. Perry indicated that the property owners have the right of appeal out of the Planning Commission; however, property owners must be paying attention to what is going on. Council Member Dahl asked if staff's recommendation is the status quo. Mr. Perry said yes. Council Member Arness noted that in days past, Council did not approve the tentative map until these questions had been processed at the Council level. Council Member Moss stated that considering the timeline, he does not have a problem with the Planning Commission dealing with eminent domain as long as it may be appealed at the Council level. He said the Commission would have made less mistakes if they had used eminent domain. MOTION: Made by Council Member Dahl, seconded by Council Member Arness, directing staff to prepare a policy statement for City Council's consideration stating that the Planning Commission will only make decisions pertaining to eminent domain for tentative subdivision maps if there is not an alternative means of access, if it is a mitigation measure listed in a final environmental impact report, or if it will result in improved traffic safety and direct the Planning Commission to use its best judgement within the context of the policies and standards adopted by the City Council in the Circulation Element. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes ANIMAL PERMIT APPLICATION AP-1-90 - by Carl Ebersole (752 Loma Vista) (A-130-140) Planning and Community Development Director Perry reported that the Board of Administrative Review recommended approval of Animal Permit Application AP-1- 90, by Carl Ebersole to maintain two horses on property located at 752 Loma Vista Drive in a single-family residential district. Mr. Perry conveyed that the approval is subject to certain conditions and an automatic six-month review. Council Member Moss stated that it is not appropriate to house large animals in an urban setting. He pointed out that flies, odor, and dust cannot be 15 11/20/90 controlled. He added that the horses should be penned 75 feet from the neighbors' fences, not their homes. Senior Planner Keaney stated that the horses have been at this location for approximately two months. He explained that the corrals were already there and horses used to be housed there. MOTION: Made by Council Member Fulton, seconded by Council Member Arness, to approve Animal Permit AP-1-89, by Carl Ebersole, as recommended by the Board of Administrative Review, with an automatic six-month review, and directing the City Manager to issue the permit. Voting was as follows: Ayes: Council Members - Arness, Dahl, Fulton, and Buffum Noes: Council Members - Moss Absent: Council Members - None URBAN DESIGN AWARDS PROGRAM (B-080-600-950) Planning and Community Development Director Perry submitted a list of eleven candidates for the Urban Design Award jury recommended for appointment by Mayor Buffum. Mr. Perry conveyed that the banquet committee is requesting that the awards program also include a single-family residential category and that the category be limited to licensed architects and building designers. MOTION: Made by Council Member Moss, seconded by Council Member Dahl, to appoint the following jury members for the 1988-90 Urban Design Award Program: Bernie Bryson, Dwayne Evans, Laurie Mayr, Arlene Stankus, Loralie Harris, Leonard Wingate, Charlie Gamble, Laura Charette, Ann Peterson, Jim Hastings, and Leonard Bandel; and include a single-family residential category limited to licensed architects and building designers to the awards program. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MONTHLY STATUS REPORT (A-050-250) Planning and Community Development Director Perry submitted the Monthly Status Report through October 1990 for the following work areas: (1) annexations; (2) planning and zoning; (3) building and population and (4) landscape design. This was an information item and no action was required. SURPLUS CITY PROPERTY - Airpark Drive and Sonoma Street (C-070-200) Planning and Community Development Director Perry recalled that Council authorized the reappraisal of City-owned surplus property located on the northeast corner of Airpark Drive and Sonoma Street. Mr. Perry conveyed that the property's appraised value is $620,000. He stated that Council's alternatives are to exchange the property for other property the City may be interested in; market the property as a single purchase, or in smaller increments to make it more attractive for a greater number of buyers. It is the recommendation of staff to offer the property for sale as a single purchase or in increments of four parcels. Mr. Perry conveyed that if the property is sold in increments, staff should be directed to process a subdivision, if necessary, and that the City would pay real estate commissions provided such fees are in addition to any base amount. Council Member Arness conveyed his preference to sell the parcel in one piece. Council Member Moss stated that the property should be sold for as much as possible. He stated that he does not have a problem subdividing the property. Council Member Dahl agreed. Mr. Perry indicated that the City must sell the property for its fair market value. MOTION: Made by Council Member Dahl, seconded by Council Member Moss, to offer City-owned property, located on Airpark Drive at Sonoma Street, for sale with the flexibility to either sell the property as a single purchase or in increments, with real estate commissions added to the sale price. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes 16 11/20/90 LEASE AMENDMENT WITH SHASTA ENTERPRISES - Sublease with International Air Services Company (C-070-100 & A-090-100) Airports Director Ruff relayed that Shasta Enterprises has reached an agreement with International Air Services Company under which International Air Services Company (IASCO) will sublease all of Shasta Enterprises facilities at the Municipal Airport. Mr. Ruff stated that this is a welcome development; however, the master lease between the City and Shasta Enterprises requires the City Council to approve any sublease of the facilities and the facility may be subleased only for specific and enumerated purposes and no other. Mr. Ruff conveyed that Shasta Enterprises has declined and refused to submit a copy of the sublease or lease agreement between IASCO and Shasta Enterprises. Shasta Enterprises has indicated that a Memorandum of Lease Agreement should suffice. The City Attorney and staff disagree. It is the recommendation of staff that Council instruct Shasta Enterprises to comply with its responsibilities under the master lease agreement and furnish to the City the required sublease with IASCO, or, in the alternative, the lease agreement with IASCO, and that Council instruct staff to review that agreement and negotiate any amendments to the master lease necessary to bring the proposed IASCO operation into compliance. Noting that Shasta Enterprises will not come to the bargaining table and IASCO would be an excellent FBO for the Municipal Airport, Council Member Fulton stated that the whole thing could go down the drain because of staff's insistence. Randall Memeo, 400 Redcliff Drive, representing Shasta Enterprises, stated that it is Shasta Enterprises' belief that an amendment to the lease agreement is not necessary. Mr. Memeo stated that a Memorandum of Lease Agreement is all that is necessary. He explained that the terms of the lease agreement with IASCO are subject to the terms of the master lease agreement. IASCO is a fixed base operator and will provide flight instruction similar to the operation currently doing business as Million Air. Mr. Memeo emphasized that many things need to be accomplished before the end of the month to make this a reality. Council Member Dahl asked if the Memorandum of Lease Agreement is legal. Mr. Memeo opined that it is legal, and he said that Shasta Enterprises would be held responsible if IASCO defaults. City Attorney Hays conveyed that staff made many phone calls to Shasta Enterprises about this matter. He conveyed that a sublease between Shasta Enterprises and IASCO does not exist. Mr. Hays emphasized that the Memorandum of Lease is nothing more than a "book report" stating what a document says. He explained that the purpose of the sublease is to enumerate the relationship of the parties. Council Member Dahl stated that the answer is to put together a sublease and amendment to the master lease. Mr. Memeo stated that Shasta Enterprises does not have the flexibility of time. Mr. Hays stated that the master lease was prepared in 1979 and does not provide for the operation of a flight school. He explained that one must look at the intent of the parties when this lease was prepared. Noting that Mr. Memeo states that Shasta Enterprises is on a strict timeline, Mr. Ruff pointed out that Shasta Enterprises asked staff last Tuesday to put this matter on tonight's agenda. He admonished Shasta Enterprises and said this put staff on the wire. Mr. Ruff explained that IASCO's student training program is contracted out and not available to the general public. It is a business in itself. Council Member Dahl suggested that a meeting be held next week to expedite this matter. Staff and Shasta Enterprises can work together to prepare the necessary documents. 17 11/20/90 MOTION: Made by Council Member Dahl, seconded by Council Member Moss, to continue the matter of the sublease of Shasta Enterprise facilities at the Municipal Airport to International Air Services Company to 5:15 p.m., November 27, 1990, at an adjourned regular meeting. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes Mr. Memeo stated that Shasta Enterprises would like an answer to their proposal to only submit a Memorandum of Lease. Council Member Moss indicated that requiring an Amendment to the Master Lease and approval of the Sublease is standard and Council would be delinquent if it did not insist on viewing and approving the sublease. Assistant City Manager McMurry stated that staff will prepare the Amendment to the Master Lease and make themselves available to Shasta Enterprises over the holiday weekend. City Attorney Hays noted that the sublease is between Shasta Enterprises and IASCO; therefore, Shasta Enterprises must prepare the sublease agreement. RESOLUTION - Clover Creek Sewer Assessment District Eminent Domain Proceedings (James D. Holden property) (C-070-010 & A-170-100-080) City Attorney Hays recommended that Council initiate eminent domain proceedings for the continued acquisition of right-of-way for the construction of the trunk sewer line within the Clover Creek Sewer Assessment District. Mr. Hays conveyed that the property owner did not request to appear before Council. MOTION: Made by Council Member Moss, seconded by Council Member Dahl, that Resolution No. 90-562 be adopted, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding finding that public convenience and necessity require the acquisition of a 20' permanent public service easement and a 30' temporary construction easement for public improvements, namely installation of sewer trunk lines for Clover Creek Sewer Assessment District No. 1987-2; Assessor's Parcel No. 054-050-26 (James D. Holden, owner). Voting was as follows: Ayes: Council Members - Arness, Dahl, Fulton, Moss, and Buffum Noes: Council Members - None Absent: Council Members - None Resolution No. 90-562 is on file in the office of the City Clerk. ROUTINE REPORTS AND COMMUNICATIONS Notice from Department of Conservation Regarding Prohibition on Sale of Ceramic Containers (S-050) Alcoholic Beverage License Applications (A-110-140) Parkview Market (Alec Thomas Hunter) 843 Parkview Avenue Subs to Go (David Robert Berkeley and Pauline and Robert William) 1675 Hilltop Drive, #M Doc's Skyroom (Doc's Skyroom, Inc.) 10 Hilltop Drive ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, at the hour of 11:45 p.m., Mayor Buffum adjourned the meeting to 5:15 p.m., November 27, 1990, at the City Hall Conference Room, 760 Parkview Avenue; and to 8:30 a.m., December 1, 1990, for an Adjourned Regular Meeting and Quarterly Workshop at the Redding Convention Center, 700 Auditorium Drive, Redding. APPROVED: __________________________________________ 18 11/20/90 Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Clerk