HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - City Council - unsigned - 1989-01-17 City Council, Regular Meeting Council Chambers Redding, California January 17, 1989 7:05 p.m.
The Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag was led by City Attorney
Hays.
The Invocation was offered by the Reverend Bill Burgess of the
Liberty Free Will Baptist Church.
The meeting was called to order by Mayor Johannessen with the
following Council Members present: Buffum, Dahl, and Fulton.
Council Member Carter was absent.
Also present were City Manager Christofferson, Director of Public
Works Galusha, Director of the Electric Utility Lindley, Director
of Planning and Community Development Perry, Chief of Police
Blankenship, Director of Finance Downing, Field Foreman of the
Electric Utility Smith, Supervising Associate Civil Engineer
Aasen, Associate Civil Engineer Hastings, Senior Planner Keaney,
Director of Information Systems Kelley, Director of
Utilities/Customer Service Vokal, Housing Administrator Maurer,
Convention and Visitors Bureau Director Heuer, Risk Manager
Kirkpatrick, Chief Planning Technician Warren, Systems Analyst
Erwin, Transportation Coordinator Duryee, Assistant City Clerk
Strohmayer, City Clerk Nichols, and Secretary to the City Council
Moscatello. Members of Boy Scout Troop 459 were also present.
CONSENT CALENDAR
The following matters were considered inclusively under the
Consent Calendar:
Approval of Minutes - Regular Meeting of December 20, 1988
Approval of Payroll and Accounts Payable Register
(B-130-110)
Recommend that Accounts Payable Register No. 13, check numbers
141121 through 141415 inclusive, in the amount of $1,383,232.74,
be approved and paid, and Payroll Register No. 14, check numbers
271966 through 272627 inclusive, in the amount of $653,894.06,
and Automatic Payroll Deposits in the amount of $114,365.02, for
the period December 25, 1988 through January 07, 1989, be
approved.
TOTAL: $2,151,491.82
Treasurer's Report - December 1988
(B-l30-l50)
Total Treasurer's Accountability - $19,357,128.40
Total City of Redding Funds, Funds Held in
Trust and Funds of Related Entities - $70,112,139.12
Set Public Hearing - Rezoning Application RZ-16-88, by Jeff Mora
(5323 Cedars Road)
(L-010-230)
It is the recommendation of the Planning Director that a public
hearing be set for 7:00 p.m., February 7, 1989, to consider
Rezoning Application RZ-16-88.
Set Public Hearing - Rezoning Application RZ-17-88, by City of
Redding (South of East Keswick Dam Road, east of Lake Boulevard,
north of Lake Forest Drive, and west of the Southern Pacific
Railroad)
(L-010-230)
It is the recommendation of the Planning Director that a public
hearing be set for 7:00 p.m., February 7, 1989, to consider Rezoning Application RZ-17-88. Resolution - State Deferred Payment Rehabilitation Loan Program
(G-100-200)
It is the recommendation of the Planning Director that Resolution
No. 89-17 be adopted, a resolution of the City Council of the
City of Redding authorizing the City Manager to file an
application with the State Department of Housing and Community
Development for deferred payment rehabilitation loan funds.
Resolution - Rental Rehabilitation Grant Program Application
(G-100-145)
It is the recommendation of the Planning Director that Resolution
No. 89-18 be adopted, a resolution of the City Council of the
City of Redding authorizing the City Manager to file an
application for funding under the Rental Rehabilitation Grant
Program in the amount of $200,000.00 with the Department of
Housing and Community Development.
Resolution - Amendment No. 1 to Agreement for Sale of Electric
Capacity and Energy by the PG&E to the City of Redding
(E-120)
It is the recommendation of the Electric Utility Commission and
the Electric Department that Resolution No. 89-19 be adopted, a
resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding approving
Amendment No. 1 dated January 17, 1989, to the Agreement for sale
of electric capacity and energy by Pacific Gas and Electric
Company to the City of Redding dated May 19, 1980. The Amendment
will provide the City with up to 159 MVA of power from PG&E.
Resolution - Purchase of PG&E Electric Facilities - Annexation
86-2, Oasis Road
(E-090-020 & A-150-182)
It is the recommendation of the Electric Department that
Resolution No. 89-20 be adopted, a resolution of the City Council
of the City of Redding approving the Purchase and Sale Agreement,
CDA No. 12820, between Pacific Gas and Electric Company and the
City of Redding covering the electric distribution facilities of
Pacific Gas and Electric Company within the unincorporated area
known as the "Oasis Road Area, Annexation No. 86-2," and
authorizing the Mayor to sign all necessary documentation.
The purchase price of these PG&E facilities is $18,831, including
$431 for severance, and funds are included in the 1985 Electric
System Project Financing Program for this purchase.
Award of Bid - Bid Schedule No. 2134, 3-Phase Padmount
Distribution Switches - Electric Department
(B-050-100)
It is the recommendation of the Electric Director that Bid
Schedule No. 2134, 3-phase padmount distribution switches, be
awarded to the evaluated low bidder, Graybar Electric Co., in the
amount of $32,303.29. Funds for this purchase are included in
the 1988/89 budget.
Award of Bid - Bid Schedule No. 2135, 3-Phase Padmount
Distribution Transformers - Electric Department
(B-050-100)
It is the recommendation of the Electric Director that Bid
Schedule No. 2135, 3-phase padmount distribution transformers, be
awarded to the evaluated low bidder, Westinghouse Electric Supply
Co., in the amount of $65,749.68. Funds for this purchase are
included in the 1988/89 budget.
Resolution - re Federal Aviation Administration Grant Monies to
Repair Runway 12/30 at Redding Municipal Airport and Obtain State Loan Matching Funds * (G-100-070-095 & S-050-100 & A-090-100)
It is the recommendation of the Airports Director that Resolution
No. 89-21 be adopted, a resolution of the City Council of the
City of Redding authorizing the filing of a pre-application with
the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) for grant monies to
repair Runway 12/30 at Redding Municipal Airport, and authorizing
the City Manager to execute the pre-application and all
subsequent documentation to obtain FAA Grant monies and State
Loan matching funds.
The construction costs are estimated at $215,492.00 and are
eligible for 90% FAA entitlement funds, and the remaining 10%
would be funded by Caltrans on a long term (25 year) loan. The
project should be completed prior to the Fall season of 1989.
Notice of Completion - Bid Schedule No. 2110, Sidewalk
Construction (North and South Sides of Hartnell Avenue west of
Bechelli Lane)
(B-050-020 & R-030-050-310 & S-070-100)
It is the recommendation of the Public Works Director that Bid
Schedule No. 2110 (Job No. 9965), sidewalk construction on
Hartnell Avenue, awarded to Arcadian Enterprises, be accepted as
satisfactorily completed, and the City Clerk be authorized to
file a Notice of Completion. The final contract price is $13,126
Notice of Completion - Bid Schedule No. 2101, Channel
Improvements (Little Churn Creek south of Hartnell Avenue)
(B-050-020 & S-070-300)
It is the recommendation of the Public Works Director that Bid
Schedule No. 2101 (Job No. 9888), channel improvements in Little
Churn Creek, awarded to Robert J. Frank, be accepted as
satisfactorily completed, and the City Clerk be authorized to
file a Notice of Completion. The final contract price is
$220,871.
Resolution - Master Water Plan Update Consultant Contract
(W-030-300)
It is the recommendation of the Public Works Director that
Resolution No. 89-22 be adopted, a resolution of the City Council
of the City of Redding approving the authorization for
professional services between the City of Redding and Ott Water
Engineers, Inc. for the preparation of the City of Redding Water
Master Plan Update, and authorizing the Mayor to sign. Ott Water
Engineer's proposal is in the amount of $55,000.
Resolution - Cooperative Agreement with Caltrans for State Route
273 and State Route 299 Traffic Controller Replacement
* (G-100-070-100 & S-050-100 & S-070-100)
It is the recommendation of the Public Works Director that
Resolution No. 89-23 be adopted, a resolution of the City Council
of the City of Redding approving Cooperative Agreement No. 02B615
for the upgrading of traffic signal controllers in the central
business district along State Routes 273 and 299, and authorizing
the Mayor to sign same.
The project will be designed, constructed, and administered by
Caltrans, and the City will pay a pro rata portion of the work.
Funding in the amount of $20,368 is included in City's 1988/89
budget. The State will contribute $149,640 and Federal Aid to
Urban (FAU) projects will contribute $87,992.
MOTION: Made by Council Member Dahl, seconded by Council Member Fulton, that all the foregoing items on the Consent Calendar be approved and adopted as recommended. Voting was as follows: Ayes: Council Members - Buffum, Dahl, Fulton, and Johannessen
Noes: Council Members - None
Absent: Council Members - Carter
Resolution Numbers 89-17, 89-18, 89-19, 89-20, 89-21, 89-22, and
89-23 are on file in the office of the City Clerk.
- - - - -
WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
Letter from the Salvation Army
(B-130-030)
A letter was received from the Salvation Army requesting funds in
the amount of $2000 to hire one part-time employee to serve at
the National Guard Armory which is providing emergency lodging
for Redding's homeless through April 15, 1989.
Council Member Fulton asked if the funds would come from the
General Fund.
City Manager Christofferson stated that it could come from
Housing funds and there are enough resources to help.
MOTION: Made by Council Member Fulton, seconded by Council
Member Buffum, to provide the Salvation Army with $2000, from
Housing funds, to hire a part-time person for the shelter for the
homeless. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes
ORDINANCE - Ordinance No. 1873 pertaining to Commercial Vehicles
on City Streets
(P-030-250)
MOTION: Made by Council Member Buffum, seconded by Council
Member Fulton, that the full reading of Ordinance No. 1873 be
waived and the City Attorney be instructed to read the full
title. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes
MOTION: Made by Council Member Dahl, seconded by Council Member
Fulton, that Ordinance No. 1873 be adopted, an ordinance of the
City Council of the City of Redding amending Chapter 11.24 of the
Redding Municipal Code by revising Section 11.24.070, commercial
vehicles on City streets.
Voting was as follows:
Ayes: Council Members - Buffum, Dahl, Fulton, and
Johannessen
Noes: Council Members - None
Absent: Council Members - Carter
Ordinance No. 1873 is on file in the office of the City Clerk.
ORDINANCE - Ordinance No. 1875 pertaining to Rezoning Application
RZ-13-88, by Shasta Enterprises (Redbank Subdivision)
(L-010-230)
MOTION: Made by Council Member Buffum, seconded by Council
Member Fulton, that the full reading of Ordinance No. 1875 be
waived and the City Attorney be instructed to read the full
title. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes
MOTION: Made by Council Member Dahl, seconded by Council Member Buffum, that Ordinance No. 1875 be adopted, an ordinance of the
City Council of the City of Redding amending Section 18.06.020 of the Redding Municipal Code relating to the rezoning of certain real property in the City of Redding (RZ-13-88)
Voting was as follows:
Ayes: Council Members - Buffum, Dahl, and Fulton
Noes: Council Members - None
Absent: Council Members - Carter
Abstain: Council Members - Johannessen
Ordinance No. 1875 is on file in the office of the City Clerk.
ORDINANCE - Ordinance No. 1876 pertaining to Administrative
Parcel Maps (Tentative Minor Parcel Maps, Chapters 17.13)
(L-010-150-500)
MOTION: Made by Council Member Fulton, seconded by Council
Member Buffum, that Council make the following findings re
Ordinance No. 1876:
l. Project is compatible with the Redding General Plan.
2. Project will not significantly alter existing land
form.
3. Project is compatible with surrounding land use.
4. Project is compatible with the Code of the City of
Redding, California.
and, ratify the Negative Declaration pertaining to Code
Amendments authorized by the Board of Administrative Review on
January 11, 1989. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes
MOTION: Made by Council Member Buffum, seconded by Council
Member Fulton, that the full reading of Ordinance No. 1876 be
waived and the City Attorney be instructed to read the full
title. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes
MOTION: Made by Council Member Fulton, seconded by Council Memb
er Buffum, that Ordinance No. 1876 be adopted, an ordinance of
the City Council of the City of Redding amending Redding
Municipal Code Title 17, Subdivision, by adding Chapter 17.13,
Administrative Parcel Maps.
Voting was as follows:
Ayes: Council Members - Buffum, Dahl, Fulton, and Johannessen
Noes: Council Members - None
Absent: Council Members - Carter
Ordinance No. 1876 is on file in the office of the City Clerk.
ORDINANCE - Ordinance No. 1877 pertaining to Home Occupations,
Administrative Use Permits and Zoning Exceptions
* (L-010-130 & L-010-390-100 & L-010-410-900)
MOTION: Made by Council Member Fulton, seconded by Council
Member Buffum, that Council make the following findings re
Ordinance No. 1877:
l. Project is compatible with the Redding General Plan.
2. Project will not significantly alter existing land
form.
3. Project is compatible with surrounding land use.
4. Project is compatible with the Code of the City of
Redding, California.
and, ratify the Negative Declaration pertaining to Code
Amendments authorized by the Board of Administrative Review on
January 11, 1989. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes
MOTION: Made by Council Member Buffum, seconded by Council
Member Fulton, that the full reading of Ordinance No. 1877 be
waived and the City Attorney be instructed to read the full title. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes MOTION: Made by Council Member Dahl, seconded by Council Member Fulton, that Ordinance No. 1877 be adopted, an ordinance of the
City Council of the City of Redding amending Title 18, Zoning, of
the Redding Municipal Code by adding Chapters 18.49, Home
Occupations; 18.51, Administrative Use Permits; and 18.73, Zoning
Exceptions.
Voting was as follows:
Ayes: Council Members - Buffum, Dahl, Fulton, and Johannessen
Noes: Council Members - None
Absent: Council Members - Carter
Ordinance No. 1877 is on file in the office of the City Clerk.
RESOLUTION
- Commending City of Frankfurt, et. al., for Their
Commendable Assistance to Ruth Butcher and the Late Ray Butcher
(A-050-060)
Council Member Buffum submitted the following resolution to
Council for consideration.
MOTION: Made by Council Member Buffum, seconded by Council
Member Dahl, that Resolution No. 89-24 be adopted, a resolution
of the City Council of the City of Redding thanking the Lord
Mayor, the City Council of Frankfurt, West Germany, Councilman
Helmut Heuser, the Musikzug Blau-Gold 1967 E.V.
Frankfurt/Schwanheim, and Host Reiner Sohn, for their commendable
assistance to Ruth Butcher and the Late Ray Butcher.
WHEREAS, a group of 77 people from all walks of life in the
City of Frankfurt, West Germany, visited the Asphalt Cowboys and
host families in the City of Redding in May 1988, and
participated in the Redding Rodeo Week Celebration; and
WHEREAS, the group included Councilman Helmut Heuser from
the City of Frankfurt/Schwanheim; members of the Musikzug
Blau-Gold 1967 e.V. Frankfurt/Schwanheim; and a company of young
dancing girls; and
WHEREAS, friendships were established and goodwill was
furthered between our two Cities; and
WHEREAS, the Asphalt Cowboys and the host families wished to
extend the German-American friendship further, and in July of
1988 they, along with Council Member Nancy Buffum, travelled to
Frankfurt, the Capitol City of the State of Hessia, West Germany;
and
WHEREAS, Ray Butcher and his wife, Ruth, were among the
group scheduled to spend three weeks in Frankfurt; and
WHEREAS, during the visit to Frankfurt, Ray Butcher became
seriously ill, and was admitted to the intensive care unit of the
University Hospital in Frankfurt; and
WHEREAS, Ray Butcher lingered gravely ill in the intensive
care facility for some two months, before passing away in October
of 1988; and
WHEREAS, during his entire hospitalization, host Reiner Sohn
provided housing and care for Mrs. Butcher; and the members of
the Blau-Gold Band assisted wherever possible; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Butcher's medical insurance did not cover his
hospitalization expenses in West Germany, which were considerable, and WHEREAS, Councilman Helmut Heuser petitioned the Frankfurt City Council and the Lord Mayor to see if a way could be found to
assist with Mr. Butcher's medical expenses; and
WHEREAS, without fanfare, news was received that all bills
had been paid as a gesture of friendship to the Butcher family
and the City of Redding, and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Redding recognizes
that such gestures of friendship do much to promote the feeling
of worldwide community between our respective cities; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Redding, on behalf
of all the citizens of Redding, California, hereby expresses its
heartfelt thanks and appreciation to the Lord Mayor, the City
Council of Frankfurt, Councilman Helmut Heuser, the Musikzug
Blau-Gold 1967 e.V. Frankfurt/Schwanheim, and host Reiner Sohn
for their many kindnesses and generosity shown to the late Ray
Butcher, and his wife, Ruth.
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was
introduced and read at a regular meeting of the City Council of
the City of Redding on the 17th day of January, 1989, and was
duly adopted at said meeting by the following vote:
Ayes: Council Members - Buffum, Dahl, Fulton, and Johannessen
Noes: Council Members - None
Absent: Council Members - Carter
Resolution No. 89-24 is on file in the office of the City Clerk.
BENTON RANCH - Request for Meeting to Receive and Consider Benton
Ranch Analysis
(C-070-010-020)
City Manager Christofferson requested that Council set a meeting
date for a study session to receive and consider the Benton Ranch
site analysis. Mr. Christofferson noted that the architect's
analysis of the Benton Ranch site for its suitability as a site
for the Civic Center and related uses will be complete as of
January 22, 1989.
Council set a study session for 5:15 p.m., January 31, 1989, in
the City Council Chambers to receive and consider the Benton
Ranch site analysis.
REALIGNMENT OF TOURISM AND CONVENTION ORGANIZATION
* (A-050-040 & A-050-500)
City Manager Christofferson recalled that Council and the Tourism
and Convention Commission have indicated their desire to merge
the functions of the Convention Center with those of the
Convention and Visitors Bureau. Mr. Christofferson stated that
while several approaches have been advanced, none has been
satisfactory in all respects. He conveyed that Auditorium
Director Roy Montgomery has announced his retirement in mid-May,
and this development may lay the foundation for organizational
shifts which may be satisfactory to all.
Mr. Christofferson noted that all convention-related activities,
including the convention sales activities, as well as the
management of the facility, could be centralized under one individual, and that might be Tourism and Convention Director Heuer. He noted that some consolidation has occurred with the
two departments under the present budget and Assistant City Manager McMurry is heading the Department on a temporary basis. Mr. Christofferson said the position vacated by Mr. Montgomery
could be redefined to place emphasis on the tourism function.
The newly created tourism-focused position could also be
identified as the Department head, although Mr. Christofferson
noted that it may be necessary to increase the rate of pay for
the Department head position to recognize the broader
responsibilities and to attract the caliber of person both
Council and the Convention and Tourism Commission have indicated
their desire for. He stated that Council has many options and
perhaps Mr. Heuer could be designated Department head and the
tourism function assumed by another.
Council Member Dahl suggested that Council hold a joint meeting
with the Tourism and Convention Commission.
Mr. Christofferson said that a joint Council/Electric Utility
Commission meeting has been scheduled for Tuesday, February 14,
and it may be appropriate to revise the schedule and plan to meet
the Tourism and Convention Commission on that date. Mr.
Christofferson asked Council if there is any preliminary
information staff can prepare for the meeting.
Council Member Fulton suggested that job descriptions be
prepared. He asked if it is necessary to create a new department
and if other alternatives are available. Council Member Fulton
noted that Council is trying to keep expenses down. He requested
a cost breakdown to put this plan together and asked that all
options be available for discussion with the Commission.
Council Member Buffum stated that she is leaning toward
consolidation and fewer departments. She requested that flow
charts be prepared, and asked that two or three options regarding
the chain of command be prepared.
Council Member Dahl asked for a summary of the ideas the
Commission has been considering, such as privatization.
Council Member Buffum noted that the Commission's subcommittee
has almost completed its report and she asked that the report be
available by the meeting date.
Mayor Johannessen stated that Council will meet with the Tourism
and Convention Commission at 5:15 p.m., February 14, 1989, in the
City Hall Conference room to discuss the realignment of the
tourism and convention organization.
RESOLUTION - Budget Appropriation for Interim Space Requirements
at City Hall
AWARD OF BID - Bid Schedule No. 2139, Two Modular Office Units
* (B-130-070 & B-050-100 & C-050-100)
City Manager Christofferson reported that there is need for
additional office space at City Hall. Mr. Christofferson noted
that, while all Departments are experiencing reduced working
areas, the Recreation and Parks, Planning, and Public Works
Departments are overflowing. It is the recommendation of staff
to acquire two double-wide portables to be utilized by the
Planning Department for the Housing Program and by the Public
Works Department for the administrative functions of the Redding
Area Bus Authority. The Parks Department is also proposing to
acquire the used office unit owned by the Haven Humane Society. Mr. Christofferson conveyed that portable office buildings are
only an interim solution to the current space needs and is believed to provide the least amount of financial impact. Mr. Christofferson stated that funding will be from a combination
of the Redding Area Bus Authority, the Housing Authority, and
City funding. A lease arrangement through the Joint Powers
Financing Authority would be utilized to cover the City's share
of cost. Based on a cost of $38,000, the lease payment over a 48
month period is estimated to cost $950 or less per month
resulting in a total cost of $45,600.
It is recommended that Council adopt Option A in the Report to
Council dated January 13, 1989, and award Bid Schedule No. 2139,
two 24x60 modular units, to the low bidder, Mobile Modular
Management Corporation, in the amount of $82,025.80. It is also
recommended that Recreation and Parks acquire the 12x60 trailer
from the Haven Humane Society.
Mayor Johannessen asked if the Humane Society would provide the
trailer free of cost. Mr. Christofferson stated that staff could
approach the Humane Society with that proposal.
Council Member Fulton noted that the money spent now may be
recouped later when a new City Hall is built and the trailers
sold.
MOTION: Made by Council Member Fulton, seconded by Council
Member Dahl, that Resolution No. 89-25 be adopted, a resolution
of the City Council of the City of Redding approving and adopting
the 37th Amendment to the City budget Resolution No. 88-235
appropriating $150,000 for purchase of three trailers, and
furnishings; adopting Option A which provides two 24x60 units for
the Public Works and Planning Departments and a 12x60 unit for
the Recreation and Parks Department; and awarding Bid Schedule
No. 2139, two modular office units, to the low bidder, Mobile
Modular Management Corporation, in the amount of $82,025.80.
Voting was as follows:
Ayes: Council Members - Buffum, Dahl, Fulton, and Johannessen
Noes: Council Members - None
Absent: Council Members - Carter
Resolution No. 89-25 is on file in the office of the City Clerk.
CORPORATION YARD SITE SELECTION
(C-070-010)
Planning and Community Development Director Perry reviewed the
Report to Council dated January 11, 1989 incorporated herein by
reference. Mr. Perry recalled that staff was authorized to
narrow possible corporation yard sites to three or four
locations, order appraisals, and hire a consultant to help select
a preferred site and develop conceptual site plans. Mr. Perry
explained that the site selection has been narrowed to six;
however, staff felt that the status of the project should be
reviewed by Council prior to further work.
Mr. Perry reviewed six possible sites located in the Highway 44
corridor. He conveyed that the issues before Council are: (1)
the number of sites to be designated for further study; (2) if
Council wishes to exchange surplus City property to reduce the
cost of site acquisition; (3) if Electrical System Financing
Funds should be used to finance the yard; and (4) the size of the
yard.
Mr. Perry explained that the Electric Department would be the first occupant in the yard; thus, Electrical System Financing Funds could be used for site acquisition with repayment from
other enterprise funds or the General Fund. He added that initially, staff was considering obtaining a site in the 25 to 30
acre range; but land values indicate that the City could consider
40 to 50 acres, depending on whether or not an land exchange is
involved and if the City wants to consider future growth and
expansion.
Mayor Johannessen asked if any of the parcels are large enough
for a joint County/City corporation yard. Mr. Perry indicated
that Sites 1 and 5 or Sites 5 and 6 together would be large
enough.
Council Member Fulton asked why the County would want to give up
their corporation yard. Mr. Perry indicated that cost sharing
for vehicle maintenance and warehousing are two advantages;
otherwise, the City and County would have separate facilities.
City Manager Christofferson stated that this was discussed
briefly with Mike Johnson, the County's Chief Executive Officer.
Mr. Christofferson conveyed that staff will consider this idea
and follow up with further discussions.
Council Member Dahl asked what the cost comparison would be for
two and four sites? Mr. Perry stated that the cost would be
similar, possibly under $5,000.
Mayor Johannessen asked if it would be prudent to wait to
determine what location is chosen for City Hall. He noted that
if the North Market Street site is selected, there may be no need
to move the corporation yard.
Mr. Perry conveyed that if the Parkview site is selected, the
Corporation Yard would have to be moved immediately. He added
that the Electric Department needs additional storage area now,
they are scattered over two and three sites. Mr. Perry stated
that selecting the North Market Street site for City Hall will
take pressure off the Streets Division, etc, but not the Electric
Department. Now is the time to relocate.
Mr. Perry explained that staff could prepare the proposals
in-house, but it may not save money because staff would be
diverted from their jobs and serving the public.
Noting that Sites 1 and 2 were preferred by staff, Council Member
Fulton suggested that only those two sites be compared by staff.
MOTION: Made by Council Member Buffum, seconded by Council
Member Fulton, directing staff to submit a proposal on
Corporation Yard Sites 1 and 2. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes
TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP S-17-88 - Mary Lake Subdivision, Units
7 and 8, by Robert Loring
(S-l00-454)
Planning and Community Development Director Perry advised Council
that the Planning Commission has granted permission to subdivide
13.5 acres into 42 single-family residential lots, located north
and west of Placer Road and Mary Lake Drive and south of Mary
Lake, described as Tentative Subdivision Map S-17-88. A map of
the area and a copy of the conditions of approval were submitted
to Council. This was an information item.
RESOLUTION - Abandonment A-4-82, by Dennis Thurber (Twin View
Blvd. adjacent to 787 and 811 Twin View Boulevard) (A-010-100)
Planning and Community Development Director Perry recalled that
at the Council meeting of September 20, 1982, the abandonment of
58 feet of street right-of-way at 787 and 811 Twin View Boulevard
was approved in concept and subject to the completion of certain
conditions. Mr. Perry explained that only the conditions that
apply to 811 Twin View Boulevard have been met, and the
resolution before Council for consideration applies only to that
portion of street right-of-way adjacent to 811 Twin View
Boulevard.
MOTION: Made by Council Member Dahl, seconded by Council Member
Fulton, that Resolution No. 98-26 be adopted, a resolution of the
City Council of the City of Redding ordering the vacation and
abandonment of a portion of Twin View Boulevard, adjacent to
property located at 811 Twin View Boulevard (A-4-82).
Voting was as follows:
Ayes: Council Members - Buffum, Dahl, Fulton, and Johannessen
Noes: Council Members - None
Absent: Council Members - Carter
Resolution No. 89-26 is on file in the office of the City Clerk.
RESOLUTION - Annexation 88-5, Country Oaks
(A-150-204)
Planning and Community Development Director Perry reported that
staff has received petitions requesting annexation from 85
property owners in the Country Oaks Subdivision representing 80%
of the total land area. Mr. Perry conveyed that the area
consists of a single-family subdivision under various stages of
development. The primary purpose of this annexation request is
to obtain City electric service; the subdivision currently
receives City water and sewer service. Mr. Perry also suggested
that Council ask LAFCO to waive the prezoning requirement because
there will be no change in the density or use of the land because
a subdivision has already been created.
In response to Council Member Fulton's inquiry, Mr. Perry stated
that this area is part of the Buckeye Water Assessment District
and the Twin View Sewer Assessment District.
MOTION: Made by Council Member Dahl, seconded by Council Member
Buffum, that Council make the following findings re Annexation
88-5:
l. Project is compatible with the Redding General Plan.
2. Project will not significantly alter existing land
form.
3. Project is compatible with surrounding land use.
4. Project is compatible with the Code of the City of
Redding, California.
and, ratify the Negative Declaration authorized by the Board of
Administrative Review on December 7, 1988. The Vote: Unanimous
Ayes
MOTION: Made by Council Member Dahl, seconded by Council Member
Buffum, that Resolution No. 89-27 be adopted, a resolution of the
City Council of the City of Redding of application by the City of
Redding requesting the Local Agency Formation Commission to take
proceedings for the annexation to the City of Redding of
inhabited territory designated City of Redding Annexation No.
88-5 (Country Oaks); and request that LAFCO waive the prezoning
requirement. Voting was as follows: Ayes: Council Members - Buffum, Dahl, Fulton, and Johannessen
Noes: Council Members - None
Absent: Council Members - Carter
Resolution No. 89-27 is on file in the office of the City Clerk.
PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MONTHLY STATUS
REPORTS
(A-050-025)
Planning and Community Development Director Perry submitted the
status reports for the following work areas:
1. Redevelopment activities
2. Housing activities
3. Annexations
4. Planning applications
5. Building applications
6. Cable activities
7. Other assignments
This was an information item and no action was required.
COMMUNITY ACCESS CORPORATION BUDGET
(T-040-350-200)
Planning and Community Development Director Perry reported that
the Board of Directors of the Redding Community Access
Corporation (RCAC) recommended approval of the Community Access
budget for the first six months of 1989, the budget for fiscal
year 1989-90, and the goals and objectives for 1989-90.
Mr. Perry explained that RCAC has operated on a calendar year
budget; however; this has caused some problems, so a two-step
approach is recommended to convert from a calendar-year budget to
a fiscal-year budget. Viacom has been asked to approve the
change under the access agreement.
Mr. Perry explained that the budget is based on anticipated
revenue. He added that the main change in the budget is the
conversion of a part-time to a full-time studio technician
position to maintain and operate equipment and relieve the
Community Access Specialist. The budget also reflects a contract
with the City to operate the Tourist Channel. It is the
recommendation of staff and the Board of Directors that the
budget be approved.
MOTION: Made by Council Member Fulton, seconded by Council
Member Dahl, approving the Redding Community Access Budget for
the first six months of 1989, the budget for fiscal year 1989-90,
and the goals and objectives for 1989-90. The Vote: Unanimous
Ayes
SUNSET PLAZA PARTNERSHIP - Development Agreement Amendment
Request (corner of Highway 299 and Eureka Way)
(L-010-100-750)
Planning and Community Development Director Perry reported that a
letter was received from Jim Graves requesting an amendment to
the development agreement for the Sunset Plaza project. The
intent of the request is to extend some of the time lines in the
agreement. Mr. Graves has asked for an extension of the purchase
requirement until July 15, 1989, and to extend the
close-of-escrow date until August 31, 1989. It is the
recommendation of staff that a public hearing be set to modify
the agreement for the purpose of extending the ownership and close of escrow dates; establish a date to obtain a building permit, establish the minimum requirement on what to construct to
exercise the agreement; determine if Council wishes to deal with the owner or a potential developer, and other possible issues.
MOTION: Made by Council Member Dahl, seconded by Council Member
Fulton, to set a public hearing regarding amendments to the
development agreement for the Sunset Plaza project for 7:00 p.m.,
February 21, 1989. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes
SUNSET PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER - Interpretation of Roof Design
(L-010-390 & L-010-100-750)
Planning and Community Development Director Perry reviewed the
Report to Council dated December 28, 1988, incorporated by
reference herein. Mr. Perry recalled that Council approved a
development agreement, a General Plan Amendment, a rezoning, and
a street abandonment for development of a shopping center at the
corner of Buenaventura and Eureka Way. He conveyed that the use
permit is before the Board of Administrative Review for a
one-year extension. Mr. Perry explained that the issue before
Council is the interpretation of the roof style. Is it angled,
flat, flat with mansards, or angled with equipment wells? Mr.
Perry noted that the elevations submitted to Council during
initial consideration have been modified to relocate the market
next to Buenaventura and expand the market area by about 1,000
square feet.
Mr. Perry submitted the new plan. He stated that it was staff's
belief that the roof was angled, and Mr. Graves believes the roof
design is angled on all out-building and a flat roof with mansard
on the market. Mr. Perry conveyed that the Use Permit's
Conditions of Approval stated that all building will have angle
roofs. He indicated that Stone Ridge Partners believed that all
roofs were angled and bought the property above Sunset Plaza
based on that plan.
Council Member Fulton asked if all mechanical equipment would be
out of sight on a flat roof. Mr. Perry stated yes, but the issue
is the appearance of the roof from Eureka Way and Buenaventura
Avenue and the view from Stone Ridge Subdivision.
Jim Graves, 191 Hartnell Avenue, stated that it was always his
intent to have full roofs over the shops and a flat roof with
parapet over the market. Mr. Graves conveyed that he reviewed
the Minutes of the Planning Commission and Council when informed
of opposition to the mansard and parapet walls on the sides, and
although the Minutes indicate that the shops would have full
roofs, he never indicated that the market would have a full roof.
Mr. Graves explained that lighting and trash enclosures were
discussed, and he and then Council Member Gard discussed the
issues very thoroughly. Mr. Graves said that the elevation
drawing were submitted to the Board of Administrative Review and
Stone Ridge Partners had access to all drawings submitted.
Mr. Graves noted that he contacted the architect who drew the
elevation and asked him what the interpretation of the roof
design was. The architect indicated that the market was designed
with a flat roof and parapets. Mr. Graves explained that if a
4:12 pitch roof is constructed, the roof would exceed the 26 foot
height restriction as stated in the Conditions of Approval. He
explained that the project was designed based on that condition.
Mr. Graves referred to Condition No. 31 which refers to the
prohibition of roof signs other than those incorporated into a mansard. He explained that this Condition leads him to believe that a mansard roof is acceptable. Mr. Graves conveyed that all equipment will be in wells, and there will be no mechanical units
on the roof of the market, all units will be placed inside. He
noted that if a pitch roof was constructed, all equipment would
be placed outside, and although it would be screened, the noise
would be loud. Mr. Graves indicated that the plans have been
drawn and approved by the City of Redding. He opined that Stone
Ridge partners has selectively read and interpreted the
Conditions of Approval.
Mr. Graves reiterated that the plans were available for review,
and if Stone Ridge Partners is concerned about aesthetics, why
are they trying to rezone their property to strip commercial.
Mr. Graves indicated that he can construct a 4:12 pitch roof, but
it will be a composition roof and the equipment will be screened,
but noisy. He conveyed that he cannot afford a full tile roof.
Mr. Graves added that the Conditions of Approval would have to be
modified to extend the building height. He suggested that the
roofs on all shop building be angled, and the market roof be flat
with parapets and mansard roofing on the front of market.
Mr. Graves submitted an exhibit of the shopping center and the
sight line of the market from Stone Ridge Subdivision. He
indicated that only two homes in Stone Ridge would view the top
of the market.
Mayor Johannessen pointed out that the zoning was changed from
residential to commercial for the market. He recalled that his
interpretation of the market roof design was that it would have a
tile roof and the shopping center would be a college campus style
center. He indicated that the view from Stone Ridge must be
respected.
Council Member Fulton recalled that the important issue was
keeping the mechanical equipment out of site. He does not
remember mention of a tile roof. Council Member Fulton noted the
importance of putting mechanical equipment inside and reducing
the noise factor.
Mayor Johannessen conveyed that making the market attractive is
the key.
Al Shipman, 9904 Meadowlark Way, stated that he is one of four
partners who purchased the Knoll's Subdivision property from
Wilson and Gelonek. Mr. Shipman stated that he is not opposed to
the shopping center, but he is concerned with the Conditions of
Approval. Noting that the project was originally zoned
residential, he stated that it is proper for the City to protect
the residential area nearby. He explained that Mr. Gelonek was
concerned about the market before the property was rezoned. Mr.
Shipman said that Stone Ridge Partners believed the City felt
that the two projects could be compatible, and a town and country
style center with sloping roofs and the proper conditions and a
site plan sensitive to the aesthetics of the area would be
acceptable. He added that at the Board of Administrative Review
meeting, Planner DeMallie described Sunset Plaza as having stucco
walls with tile roofs.
Mr. Shipman explained that no other residential area in the City
will look down on a commercial area. He stated that the plans
are vague and inadequate, and show no cut sections. Mr. Shipman
referred to a letter from Planning Director Perry to Mr. Graves
stating that even staff was unclear as to what kind of roof was planned for the building. He stated that he has reviewed the
plans; and although no equipment shows, if the roof is flat and hot mopped, there is no way it will always look good. Mr. Shipman stated that the partners request that Condition No. 5 be modified to raise the roof to 34 feet.
Mr. Shipman noted that Stone Ridge entered into an agreement with
Mr. Graves regarding easements and access which was subsequently
terminated. Mr. Shipman requested that all roofs be sloped,
equipment screened, and that both properties have joint access.
Council Member Buffum asked Mr. Shipman if Stone Ridge Partners
is asking for strip commercial; and if so, would they agree to
the same restrictions?
Mr. Shipman said it is not their intent to develop their property
into a strip shopping center; the intent is to build some type of
office buildings. He conveyed that they would agree to the
sloping roof restriction.
Dennis Mihalka, 16439 Plateau Circle, stated that Stone Ridge
Partners believes Sunset Plaza is a good project. He added that
down lighting, sloping roofs, curfews, and hours of operation are
the conditions Mr. Gelonek found acceptable. Mr. Mihalka stated
that Condition No. 32 does not say flat or mansard roof, it says
angled at a slope of not less than 4:12.
Mr. Mihalka stated that Stone Ridge Partners and Mr. Graves
entered into a verbal agreement to provide access to both
properties which was later withdrawn. A written agreement was
later entered into which went into escrow and it was withdrawn.
Mr. Mihalka said Stone Ridge Partners would prefer to see the
height limit extended, rather than a flat roof on the market.
Eihnard Diaz, 223 Ashley Court, stated that he is not the
engineer of the project, nor does he have anything to do with the
project. Mr. Diaz stated that Mr. Graves' record stands on its
own. He explained that Mr. Graves does fine work, and the
offices constructed on Hartnell and the Sunset West housing
subdivision are excellent projects. Mr. Diaz reiterated that the
zoning ordinance specifies a 32 foot height. Mr. Diaz asked that
Council let Mr. Graves' projects speak for him.
Mayor Johannessen noted that both sides need to cooperate for
mutual benefit. He asked if a roof of that magnitude could be
built to be aesthetically pleasing. Mr. Perry responded yes. He
added that he would prefer a hip, rather than a gable roof.
Mayor Johannessen noted that the ordinance limiting the building
height was amended by Council. Mr. Perry explained how building
height is now gauged, and stated that the peak of the building
could exceed the height stated in the Conditions of Approval. He
noted, however, that the ordinance was not amended at the time
these conditions were written.
Mr. Graves indicated that when viewed from Eureka Way, one could
not say for certain if the market had a sloping roof or a
mansard. He pointed out that the plans have been approved. Mr.
Graves conveyed that the escrow was cancelled due to overriding
financial circumstances with the sub-tenant and United Grocers.
Mr. Graves conveyed that Mr. Gelonek never mentioned or opposed
the roof. He added that Caltrans required that the right-of-way
be irrigated and landscaped. He said that from the beginning,
the architectural style has been town and country, not college
campus. Mr. Mihalka stated that the market roof will be visible from six to eight houses in Stone Ridge. He claimed that he did not support the flat roof.
Council Member Dahl noted that at the time Council considered the
shopping center, the controversy surrounded the zoning and its
possible impact on the downtown area, not the roof style. He
noted that both arguments are quite convincing and sincere.
Council Member Dahl emphasized that Mr. Graves would violate
Condition No. 5 if a 4:12 pitch roof was required and asked why
that Condition would have been included. He added that Mr.
Graves' projects are aesthetically pleasing, and the plans were
available for review. He concurred with Mr. Graves'
interpretation and recommended that Council adopt staff's
alternative no. 5.
City Attorney Hays recommended that the word "angle" be changed
to "pitch" in alternative no. 5. He explained that angle means
mansard.
Council Member Buffum explained that she did not sit on the
Council at the time this was considered, but she was on the
Planning Commission. She noted that the most important issue at
that time was the zoning. Council Member Buffum pointed out that
Stone Ridge recently appeared before Council asking for special
consideration, and Council tried to be as fair and generous as
possible. She added that Council should offer those same type of
benefits to Mr. Graves. Council Member Buffum pointed out that
the Conditions of Approval are ambiguous; otherwise, this
situation would not exist. She commented that she is not fond of
flat roofs; however, Mr. Graves does commendable work. She asked
Mr. Graves to try hard to make the market look good and perhaps
offer some compensation regarding access to Stone Ridge Partners.
Council Member Buffum emphasized that Sunset Plaza should not
impact Stone Ridge.
Mayor Johannessen stated that he has supported this project from
the beginning; however, his understanding was that the roof would
be pitched and tiled. He explained that this was a mitigating
factor. Mayor Johannessen expressed his hope that no matter what
the outcome, an exchange of easements would be forthcoming.
MOTION: Made by Council Member Dahl, seconded by Council Member
Buffum, that the roofs of all shop buildings in the Sunset Plaza
Subdivision are to be pitched, but the market may be flat with
parapets; and the exhibit dated May 18, 1988, submitted by Mr.
Graves is the elevation to be used. (Exhibit on file in the
office of the Planning Director)
Voting was as follows:
Ayes: Council Members - Buffum, Dahl, and Fulton
Noes: Council Members - Johannessen
Absent: Council Members - Carter
RESOLUTION - State Department of Education Child Care Local
Coordination Grant Application
(G-100-170)
Housing Administrator Maurer reported that grant money is
available from the State Department of Education Child Care
Development Division for the planning and coordination of
activities within local government to facilitate the availability
of child development services. Ms. Maurer conveyed that staff
has met with representatives of the Shasta County Office of
Education and Shasta County to discuss the possibility of a joint
venture project to study current child care needs throughout the County by forming a Task Force comprised of agency members and other community groups. The goal is to formulate a long-term
child care plan to be used for planning purposes by both the City
and County.
Ms. Maurer stated that both the City and County would apply for
$25,000 grant monies and contribute a 25% "match" of either cash
or in-kind services. She indicated that the City would be
responsible for a closing audit at the completion of the project
which will be considered as part of the in-kind services. The
City and County would act as grant recipients and contract with
the Shasta County Office of Education to staff and carry out the
project. It is the recommendation of staff that the resolution
be adopted authorizing the City Manager to apply for the grant,
the City subcontract with Shasta County Office of Education to
administer the program if approved, and provide an in-kind
commitment of $2,925 that will be charged to the administrative
portion of the Community Development Block Grant program.
MOTION: Made by Council Member Fulton, seconded by Council
Member Buffum, that Resolution No. 89-28 be adopted, a resolution
of the City Council of the City of Redding authorizing the City
Manager to apply for a State Department of Education Child Care
Local Coordination Grant; and subcontract with the Shasta County
Office of Education to administer the program and provide an
in-kind commitment of $2,925 to be charged to the Community
Development Block Grant Program.
Voting was as follows:
Ayes: Council Members - Buffum, Dahl, Fulton, and Johannessen
Noes: Council Members - None
Absent: Council Members - Carter
Resolution No. 89-28 is on file in the office of the City Clerk.
AS/400 COMPUTER PURCHASE
(A-070-090)
Director of Information Systems Kelley recalled that the City
purchased an IBM System 38 in 1981; and since that time, many
changes and upgrades have been incorporated to meet the needs of
the City's information system. Mr. Kelley explained that the
City is expanding at a fast rate and additional demand is being
placed upon the computer system which it cannot effectively
support.
Mr. Kelley stated that additional enhancements are included in
the Fiscal Year 1988-89 budget; however, IBM recently announced
developments in the computer industry which will impact the
addition of more enhancements to the System 38. IBM has
indicated that no more enhancements to the System 38 are
expected; thus, there is little growth potential remaining for
the System. Mr. Kelley conveyed that IBM introduced the AS 400
computer, a mid-range computer, and it is the recommendation of
staff that an AS 400 be acquired and installed at City Hall. He
explained that the AS 400 will provide City Hall with current
technology to take advantage of new and faster ways to produce
programs and the System 38 will provide future growth and
expansion for the Police and Customer Service Departments.
Mr. Kelley relayed that $400,000 is included in the Equipment
Financing Bond Issue for the lease/purchase of an additional
computer system. The annual IBM Maintenance Agreement costs of
$5,822.88 per year for five years are not eligible for inclusion
in the Equipment Financing proposal; however, funds previously
budgeted for computer enhancements could be used. It is recommended that a second computer be acquired at a cost of
$87,667.22 per year for four years, and $5,822.88 in the fifth and final year, for a total cost of $356,491.86. Council Member Dahl asked if a supplemental appropriation will be
required. Mr. Kelley stated that funds are available this fiscal
year, but Information System's budget will be larger in the next
and following years.
In response to Council Member Fulton's inquiry, Mr. Kelley stated
that the System 38 will be viable for another ten years; however,
no further enhancements will be available and the City will
eventually outgrow the system.
Mayor Johannessen asked if Redding is coordinating its computer
system with Shasta County and Anderson. Mr. Kelley responded
affirmatively, and stated that communiciations will be possible
with new proposed hardware.
Mayor Johannessen asked if Redding, Shasta County, and Anderson
may, within seven to ten years, be able to develop a joint
computer center.
Mr. Kelley conveyed that 911 emergency services may be
coordinated, but other programs such as payroll or the County's
court system will remain separate.
MOTION: Made by Council Member Buffum, seconded by Council
Member Dahl, approving the lease/purchase of an AS 400 System
computer to be installed at City Hall as outlined herein before,
and authorizing the City Manager to sign any and all documents
associated with the financing. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes
CLOVER CREEK SEWER ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
* (W-010-560 & A-170-100-080)
Public Works Director Galusha reviewed the Report to Council
dated January 10, 1989, incorporated herein be reference. Mr.
Galusha reported that 50.1% of the property owners in the Clover
Creek Assessment District have signed or committed to sign
petitions in favor of formation of the sewer assessment district.
Mr. Galusha explained that opposition to the district comes from
small, as well as large land owners. He explained that small
land owners with single family homes feel they are being forced
into the district by the owners of large undeveloped properties,
and the owners of large parcels are worried about their ability
to pay the assessment lien payments when they become due and
payable.
Mr. Galusha stated that both large and small property owners are
opposed to the City's method of sharing the cost of the Clover
Creek trunk line and feel they are paying a disproportionate
share of the cost. Property owners feel that the cost of the
Clover Creek trunk line should be shared on the basis of actual
flow contributed, or the proportional flow method. It is
suggested that the City and the district share the cost of the
trunk line equally on the basis of the flow contributed by each.
Mr. Galusha conveyed that under this alternative, it is more
likely that the City would obtain 60+% support. The City's cost
would be increased by $2,240,000, and bond underwriters,
Shearson, Lehman & Hutton, have indicated that because of the
current drop in interest rates, the additional financing would
not necessitate any change in the sewer rate structure previously
approved by Council. It is the recommendation of staff that Council approve Alternative 2 and initiate assessment district proceedings with the current level of support, but modify the cost sharing formula
to the proportional method. If Council concurs, staff would then
give CH2M Hill the notice to proceed to begin the final design of
the Stillwater project.
In response to Council Member Dahl's inquiry, Mr. Galusha
clarified that using the proportional method will not necessitate
a rate increase. He stated that the completion of the Stillwater
Plant will be delayed approximately six months.
Council Member Dahl questioned how long the interest rates are
expected to remain low. Mr. Galusha stated that that is an
unknown, but interest rates have been going down, not up.
Council Member Fulton indicated that he has been through many
assessments districts, and he has never sent one through with
50.1%. He stated that it is ludicrous and uncertain.
Mr. Galusha conveyed that if the cost sharing formula is changed,
staff expects more property owners to sign the petition.
Kati Neubert, 3360 Lyal Lane, explained that she has lived on
Lyal Lane for 15 years and moved there because it is in the
country. She indicated that her sewer assessment is $17,000, and
she was also told that she could subdivide her property into 1/2
acre lots. Ms. Neubert stated that she addressed 200 letters to
large and small property owners in the district asking their
opinion of the assessment district.
Ms. Neubert stated that she received 100 letters in return. The
letters in opposition were not the big landowners, but those with
twenty to thirty acres down to five acre parcels whose life
savings are in jeopardy. She explained that the developers want
the trunk line because they will make money, but there are many
small land owners and senior citizens who cannot afford the
assessment. She asked that Council not force the assessment
district on these property owners. Ms. Neubert opined that staff
does not really know how much this project is going to cost. She
noted that the original estimate for the outfall line four years
ago was $270,000, and now that line will cost $1.3 million.
Ms. Neubert stated that the assessments are much more than most
can pay. She stated that if the developers want to construct the
trunk line, that is fine. Ms. Neubert indicated that she wants
Redding to grow, but not at the expense of the small land owner.
She indicated that in America, it is one man, one vote.
Mr. Galusha indicated that the original estimates for the outfall
line were based on preliminary engineering; and since that time,
the Fish and Game Department asked the City to extend the line
further downstream to protect the fisheries. It is a different
project now.
Council Member Dahl questioned what would happen if there were
cost overruns.
Mr. Galusha explained that the first assessment estimates are
based on preliminary engineering. After the district is formed
and the construction bids opened, the true assessment will be
based on the bid, but the assessment cannot be raised higher than
the original assessment, it can only remain the same or be
lowered. Tony Zitek, 3164 Rancho Vista, stated that no one has told him how the trunk line can be tapped for sewer service. Mr. Zitek explained that he received an estimate of $20,000 to extend the sewer line from his street to Rancho Road one-quarter mile away.
Mr. Galusha explained that it is not necessary to hook into the
sewer line at this time; it is only necessary to pay for the
trunk line, and he could later extend the sewer line to serve his
property.
Council Member Dahl asked what impact sewer service will have on
property value, and Mr. Galusha conveyed that construction of the
trunk line will increase property value.
Dave Godfrey, Hayfork, stated that he owns ten acres in the area
and cannot afford the sewer assessment in the amount of $18,000.
Dick Heil, 7135 Tarmac Road, stated that the plan approved by
Council is no longer valid. The sewer plan prepared by Pace
Engineering stated that expanding the Clear Creek plant would
cost $28 million in upgrades. The Stillwater Plant is now
estimated to cost $24+ million. Mr. Heil relayed the history of
the selection of the Stillwater Plant site and stated that the
conditions that led to the selection of the current plant site
have changed and the selected site is wrong.
Mayor Johannessen stated that site selection is no longer in
question, and Council is dealing with the Clover Creek Assessment
District tonight.
Mr. Heil pointed out that the District will pay for a portion of
the Stillwater plant.
Jim Shurance, 4084 Christopher Lane, stated that he is not a
Redding City resident. Mr. Shurance stated that people in the
District felt they were being taken. He noted that the district
has been redesigned and if enough people are cut out of the
District, there will eventually be enough people who agree. Mr.
Shurance stated that the proportional formula will be more
equitable. He pointed out that the established subdivisions were
excluded from the district and said everyone who will use the
pipe line, should pay for it.
Mr. Galusha stated that the City is picking up the cost of the
oversizing. All those in the District will be treated equally,
and if those outside the District want sewer service later,
another District will have to be formed.
Luvern Woods, 2341 Marlene Avenue, stated that the large property
owners and the City of Redding want sewer service so the property
around the Airport can be developed. Meanwhile, the small
property owners are being stuck with large assessments they are
unable to pay. Mr. Woods suggested that the large property
owners pay for the sewer. He explained that he does not want to
subdivide his property, but if his heirs want to subdivide and
sell the property later, then let them pay for the sewer then.
He stated that if the City does not have the money to pay for the
sewer, he can sympathize, because he does not have the money to
pay for it either.
Dave Knable stated that he has lived in the County 28 years. Mr.
Knable asked why the Wooded Acres subdivision was not included
and why his area was not represented by their Shasta County
Supervisor. He stated that the City has chosen a small area because the developers want it. John Sharrah, Sharrah Dunlap and Associates, reiterated that the
District is currently at 50%, but an additional 180 acres are conditional. Mr. Sharrah stated that some property is subject to
the Airport Land Use Commission, and there are other property
owners that may be interested. He explained that these home
owners are concerned about affordability, and he will approach
them with the proportional flow formula. Mr. Sharrah explained
that the plant will be completed in 1992, and then the first
assessments will be due.
Mr. Sharrah expressed doubted that there would be over a 40%
protest. He conveyed that property north of Rancho Road is an
absolute known. He recommended that property in the flight zone
be assessed to reflect how the land can be developed and,
therefore, experience a reduction in the household equivalent.
Mr. Sharrah explained that because of the flight zone clear area,
there are three solid blocks of opposition on Freeman Road
between Rancho Vista and Goodwater. He explained that there are
two to five acre parcels in the area of Lyal Lane which have dirt
roads; and if they divide their property, there will be
tremendous street costs and it will be a long time before
infrastructure will be there.
Council Member Dahl noted that there are still some questions and
misunderstandings. He stated that there will be a public hearing
and more access to information. Mr. Sharrah conveyed that
property owners can contact him.
Mr. Sharrah explained that the three subdivisions, Argyle
Estates, Wooded Acres, and Little Pickford, were complete
projects with full services reviewed and approved by the County.
At the time they were built, there was no mention of a sewer
system that would serve the area. All infrastructure was
included in the subdivisions, and those parcels can no longer be
divided. Sewer service would only be required if the Health
Department determined it was necessary. Mr. Sharrah explained
that streets and curbs would have to be removed to place sewer
lines.
Alan Hill, 6870 Churn Creek Road, stated that the reorganization
of costs represents a far more fair and equitable assessment in
the district and will be beneficial to property owners.
Council Member Buffum expressed her support for the proportional
formula for assessing property.
Mr. Galusha reiterated that staff is recommending approval of the
proportional flow method of assessing, requesting authorization
for staff to initiate assessment proceedings, and to give CH2M
Hill the notice to proceed with the final design plans for the
Stillwater plant.
Council Member Dahl opined that the 50.1% approval will grow
significantly. He stated that it is important for Council to
move ahead now. The Stillwater plant is a high priority.
Council Member Fulton conveyed that he is uneasy with only 50%
approval of the Clover Creek District. He explained that these
people are concerned about how they can meet these obligations,
and he does not want to run roughshod over the small property
owner. Council Member Fulton explained that until there is 60%,
he cannot support the District.
Associate Civil Engineer Hastings stated that staff will be
requesting Council authorization for the sale of revenue bonds for the Stillwater Treatment Plant, but the Clover Creek
Assessment District bonds will not be sold until after the public hearing. MOTION: Made by Council Member Buffum, seconded by Council
Member Dahl, approving Alternate No. 2 adopting the proportional
method of determining assessments in the Clover Creek Sewer
Assessment District, initiating assessment district proceedings,
and authorizing staff to give CH2M Hill the notice to proceed on
the final design of the Stillwater project.
Voting was as follows:
Ayes: Council Members - Buffum, Dahl, and Johannessen
Noes: Council Members - Fulton
Absent: Council Members - Carter
ADJOURNMENT
At the hour of 10:45 p.m., Mayor Johannessen announced that
Council will adjourn to hold a Redding Joint Powers Financing
Authority meeting.
At the hour of 10:49 p.m., Mayor Johannessen reconvened the City
Council meeting.
RESOLUTION - Supplemental Appropriation for Street Division
Overtime
* (B-130-070 & S-070-200)
Public Works Director Galusha explained that recent snowstorms
and related weather conditions have cost approximately $6,700 in
Street Division overtime. Consequently, only $4,200 remains in
the overtime fund balance. Mr. Galusha conveyed that this may
not be enough to cover normal overtime and special overtime
throughout the remaining fiscal year. It is the recommendation
of staff that the supplemental appropriation be adopted providing
funds for services, if the need arises.
In response to Mayor Johannessen's inquiry, City Manager
Christofferson stated that the money will revert back to the
originating fund should those funds go unused.
MOTION: Made by Council Member Dahl, seconded by Council Member
Fulton, that Resolution No. 89-29 be adopted, a resolution of the
City Council of the City of Redding approving and adopting the
36th Amendment to the City Budget Resolution No. 88-235
transferring $6,500 from Right-of-Way Acquisition to the Street
Overtime account for emergency services provided for the three
snow storms in December, 1988.
Voting was as follows:
Ayes: Council Members - Buffum, Dahl, Fulton, and Johannessen
Noes: Council Members - None
Absent: Council Members - Carter
Resolution No. 89-29 is on file in the office of the City Clerk.
CLOSED SESSION
(C-090-020)
At the hour of 10:58 p.m., Mayor Johannessen stated that Council
will adjourn to closed session pursuant to California Government
Code Section 54956.9(b) to discuss the settlement of a claim for
property damage filed by Pacific Bell; Claim No. 88-051-851.
At the hour of 11:10 .p.m., Mayor Johannessen reconvened the
regular meeting of the City Council. ROUTINE REPORTS AND COMMUNICATIONS Letter from Bev Tennant supporting the construction of City Hall at
Parkview Avenue
(C-050-025)
Alcoholic Beverage License Applications
(A-110-140)
JB's Place (Alice D. and Clarence Boyles)
3320 Railroad Avenue
Lyon's Restaurants, Inc. (Lyon's Acquisition Corp.)
501 East Cypress
Public Utilities Commission
(S-050-350)
Redding Cellular Partnership request to construct and operate a
domestic public cellular radio telecommunications service
ADJOURNMENT
At the hour of 11:15 p.m., Mayor Johannessen declared the meeting
adjourned to 5:15 p.m., Thursday, January 26, 1989, at the City
Hall Conference Room to meet with Dr. Michael Nash regarding the
Classification and Compensation Study
APPROVED:
______________________
Mayor
ATTEST:
__________________________________
City Clerk
1-17-89