Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - City Council - unsigned - 1988-08-30 City Council, Adjourned Regular Meeting Redding Convention Center Redding, California August 30, 1988 The joint meeting of the Redding City Council and the Shasta County Board of Supervisors was called to order at the hour of 5:30 p.m. The Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag was led by City Attorney Hays. The following Council Members were present: Buffum, Carter, Dahl, Fulton, and Mayor Johannessen. The following Supervisors were present: Hathaway, Maddox, Peters, Reit, and Chairman Bosworth. Also present were the following City staff: City Manager Christofferson, Assistant City Manager McMurry, City Attorney Hays, Director of Public Works Galusha, Director of Planning and Community Development Perry, Director of Finance Downing, Director of General Services Masingale, Associate Civil Engineer Hastings, Assistant Director of General Services Kohn, Assistant City Clerk Strohmayer, Litter Abatement Officer Roach, and Secretary to the City Council Moscatello. Also present were the following County staff: County Administrative Officer Johnson, Assistant County Administrative Officer Albright, County Counsel Frank, Public Works Director Curry, Planning Director Hunter, Special Districts Manager Preston, Executive Director of the Community Action Agency Ware, and Clerk of the Board Vandevert. Chairman Bosworth noted that this meeting is a historical moment in the County of Shasta and signifies a new era of communication. He indicated that meetings will be held in the future to discuss common concerns and the best way to deal with those concerns. WEST CENTRAL LANDFILL (S-020-900) County Administrative Officer Johnson summarized the report to the Board of Supervisors regarding the operation of the West Central Landfill and recommended that the Board authorize Cha irman Bosworth to sign the notice of termination of the contract between the County and Shasta Bluff Disposal for operation of the West Central Landfill; and sign the Agreement between the County of Shasta and the City of Redding concerning use and operation of the County's West Central Landfill by the City. Mr. Johnson stated that both County and City staff have been working on the landfill issue for over a year. Of the available alternatives, the option for the County retaining sole ownership of the landfill with Redding operating the landfill, using its own equipment and personnel, is recommended for the following reasons: elimination of duplication of services; City operation of the landfill will reduce the County's overhead allocated to landfill operations; the County will maintain ownership of the property; the City's need to consume additional land for solid waste disposal and costs associated with developing another landfill will be eliminated; a single landfill site will minimize environmental impacts resulting from separate landfill operations; and the City will be able to operate the facility at substantial and long-term savings to all users. 8/30/88 Mr. Johnson stated that with regard to the Agreement, Page 1, under Operations - Regional Water Quality Control Board, nowhere in the Agreement is Local Enforcement Authority spelled out. He noted that it should be spelled out, with LEA in parentheses. City Manager Christofferson indicated that City staff concurs with the recommendation. He added that the Agreement is beneficial to both agencies and costs will be reduced for the people of Shasta County. Council Member Dahl emphasized that this Agreement presents a unique opportunity, and hopefully, one of many opportunities for the City and County to work together to maximize their resources. Council Member Dahl commended Chairman Bosworth for his leadership, and Chairman Bosworth noted that the landfill is a valuable resource. Council Member Carter pointed out that General Services Director Masingale has maintained some of the lowest disposal rates in the State of California; and with this track record, he is confident that the City can keep rates down. Board Member Maddox asked what the projected rate savings to the citizens will be. Public Works Director Curry conveyed that City Manager Christofferson believes the City can operate the landfill at $7-$8 per ton compared to $14 per ton with the current private operator. Board Member Peters asked which entity shall be responsible for maintaining permits and observing environmental concerns. Mr. Curry stated that the County, as the owner, would do that. In response to Board Member Peters question, Mr. Curry indicated t hat the County will be compensated for administrative costs from the overhead. Board Member Peters asked how the contingency funds will be administered. Mr. Curry explained through the annual budget by both parties. In response to Board Member Peters further questioning, Mr. Curry explained that the Agreement will not affect the City of Anderson in any way other than that rates will also drop. Board Member Maddox noted that closing landfill sites has become complex and costly. Mr. Curry stated that management of Replacement and Improvement Funds will be handled by the two agencies; and effective January 1, 1989, the State will require funds to be set aside for the permanent closure of the landfill. Council Member Fulton questioned what the mechanism is for terminating the contract with the current operator. County Counsel Frank explained that the County's contract with Shasta Bluff Disposal allows for termination of the contract for the convenience of the County with 90 day's notice. It is the County's intent to give 16 month's notice; thus, the City would begin operation of the landfill effective January 1, 1990. Council Member Buffum encouraged both the Board and Council to take action on this proposal tonight. Board Member Maddox stated that he is an advocate of the County and City working together to review duplication of services. He stated that the Board should have held a policy session to review the Agreement before asking the Board to take action. Board Member Maddox added that he is not opposed to the proposal, he is only interested in obtaining a clearer understanding of the issues. 8/30/88 Mayor Johannessen asked Council to take action and Council Members Dahl and Carter concurred. MOTION: Made by Council Member Dahl, seconded by Council Member Fulton, authorizing adoption of the Agreement between the County of Shasta and the City of Redding concerning the use and operation of the County's West Central Landfill. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes Chairman Bosworth stated that he supports moving ahead at this time; and if a minor adjustment is necessary at some future time, the City and County can work it out. Board Member Reit noted that the Redding must plan for a new landfill; the decision must be made now, or City staff will have to look elsewhere. He suggested the Board move ahead at this time. Board Member Maddox indicated his support for the idea in concept, but reiterated that it would have been appropriate to have had a policy session. He noted that as a representative of the people, he is not fulfilling his responsibilities to them without a thorough understanding of the issues. Board Member Hathaway noted that Board Members were given a memo from the County Administrative Officer which outlined the proposed agreement by the County and City and asked the supervisors for comment and questions. Board Member Peters concurred that an opportunity to review the agreement in a policy session would have been appropriate. However, he affirmed his faith and confidence in staff and expressed appreciation for the opportunity to meet with City and staff to address this topic. MOTION: Made by Supervisor Reit, seconded by Supervisor Hathaway, authorizing Chairman Bosworth to sign the notice of termination of contract between the County and Shasta Bluff Disposal for operation of the West Central Landfill. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes MOTION: Made by Supervisor Reit, seconded by Supervisor Peters, authorizing Chairman Bosworth to execute the Agreement between the County of Shasta and the City of Redding for the operation of the County's West Central Landfill. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes JOINT MEETINGS - Topics of Discussion (A-050-060) Council Member Dahl suggested that space and building needs, as well as joint dispatching and 911, and the regional firing range be discussed at the next meeting. He noted that it would be beneficial for Redding, Shasta County, and Anderson to meet. Chairman Bosworth enthusiastically supported discussion of the 911 system and suggested that the Fire Study and Animal Control be placed on the agenda. Mayor Johannessen suggested that economic development be prioritized, as well as 911 and the Fire Study. 8/30/88 Pointing out that all law enforcement agencies in the County are involved, Council Member Fulton suggested that the regional firing range be on the next agenda. City Manager Christofferson noted that staff was investigating property known as the L.C. Smith ranch to be used as a firing range, but that property has been sold to others. He conveyed that if the Board and Council consider this a high priority, staff would come back with an update on the latest findings on other available property. Board Member Peters stated that delivery of urban services outside the City limits needs to be discussed. Board and Council concurred that joint dispatching and 911 will be first priority, delivery of urban services outside the City limits will have second priority, and the Fire Study will have third priority at the next joint meeting. Mayor Johannessen suggested that a joint meeting be held in three months and then hold meetings on a quarterly basis. Noting that the County should meet with the City of Anderson, Board Member Peters proposed that the Board meet with Anderson within the next 30 days or six weeks, and then call a joint meeting with all three agencies in three months. Chairman Bosworth agreed with this suggestion and the Board concurred. City Council concurred with the suggestion to hold a joint meeting in three months. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business of the Redding City Council, at the hour of 6:40 p.m., Mayor Johannessen declared the meeting adjourned. There being no further business of the Shasta County Board of Supervisors, at the hour of 6:40 p.m., Chairman Bosworth declared the meeting adjourned. APPROVED: _____________________________ Mayor ATTEST: ___________________________________ City Clerk 8/30/88