HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso.1988-397 - Lucky lane sewer assessment district no. 1988-1 ' • •
RESOLUTION NO. eFir`/ 9.7
RESOLUTION APPROVING REPORT AND ASSESSMENT
AND ORDERING IMPROVEMENT
LUCKY LANE SEWER ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1988-1
The City Council of the City of Redding resolves:
This City Council has taken a series of actions
preliminary to ordering the improvement in Lucky Lane Sewer
Assessment District No. 1988-1, City of Redding, Shasta County,
California, and now makes the following findings and orders:
1. The City Council adopted a map showing the boundaries
of the land benefited by the proposed improvement. A copy of the
boundary map was filed in the office of the County Recorder of the
County of Shasta in the Book of Maps of Assessment and Community
Facilities Districts.
2 . The City Council adopted its Resolution of Intention to
order the improvement described therein under the Municipal
Improvement Act of 1913 , and directed Robert W. Galusha, Director of
Public Works, as the Engineer of Work for the assessment district,
to prepare the report required by Section 10204 of the Streets and
Highways Code.
The improvement is generally described as follows:
Installation of sanitary sewage facilities to
all parcels within the proposed boundary.
3 . The Engineer of Work filed the report as directed, and
the City Council called a hearing on the report as required by
Section 10301 of the Streets and Highways Code. Notice of the
hearing was given by publication, by street posting and by mailing
ORIGINAL
• •
to affected property owners, all according to the Municipal
Improvement Act of 1913 . Affidavits of publication, posting and
mailing were filed with the City Clerk.
4. At the time and place for which notice was given, the
City Council conducted a public hearing and gave every interested
person an opportunity to object to the proposed improvement, the
extent of the assessment district, or the proposed assessment.
Following the hearing, at the direction of the City Council the
Engineer of Work filed an amended report.
5. The City Council finds that written protests against
the proposed improvement have not been made by owners representing
more than one-half of the area of the land to be assessed for the
improvement.
6. The documents and events described in paragraphs 1 to
4 , inclusive, are stated here in tabular form, with their dates and,
where appropriate, their numbers. All documents are now on file
with the City Clerk.
Document or Event Date Number
a. Resolution approving boundary map 04/19/88 88-165
b. Boundary map filed with County Recorder 04/20/88 Filed
c. Resolution of Intention 04/19/88 88-167
d. Filing of Engineer' s Report 09/20/88 Filed
e. Resolution accepting Report 09/20/88 88-344
f. Certificate of Mailing Notice of
Improvement 09/26/88 Dated
g. Affidavit of publication of Notice of
Improvement 10/07/88 Dated
h. Certificate of posting Notice of
Improvement 09/28/88 Dated
i. Public hearing conducted 11/01/88
• •
7. The City Council approves the Amended Engineer's Report
and each component part of it, including each exhibit incorporated
by reference in the report.
8. The City Council finds that the Engineer of Work, in
the Amended Engineer's Report has fairly and properly apportioned
the cost of the improvement to each parcel of land in the assessment
district in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by
each parcel, respectively, from the improvement. The City hereby
confirms and levies each individual assessment as stated in the
Amended Engineer's Report.
9. This City orders the improvement described in paragraph
2 and as detailed in the Amended Engineer' s Report.
10. Serial bonds representing unpaid assessments, and
bearing interest at a rate not to exceed twelve percent (12%) per
annum, will be issued in the manner provided by the Improvement Bond
Act of 1915 (Division 10, Streets and Highways Code) , and the last
installment of the bonds shall mature not to exceed twenty-four (24)
years from the second day of September next succeeding twelve (12)
months from their date.
11. According to Section 10603 of the Streets and Highways
Code, the City designates the City Treasurer to collect and receive
payment of the assessments. The property owners who elect to pay
their assessments in cash before the issuance of improvement bonds
will not be required to pay their pro rata share of the allowance
for special reserve fund, allowance for bond discount and allowance
for capitalized interest.
3
•
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was duly
and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Redding,
Shasta County, California, at a regular meeting thereof, held on the
1st day of November, 1988.
AYES: Councilmembers Buffum, Carter, Dahl , Fulton, & Johannessen
NOES: Councilmembers None
ABSENT: Councilmembers None
ETHEL A. NICHOLS, City Clerk,
City of Redding, Shasta County, California
By Z1�=fc )Zet_1...-6