HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso 1990-303 - Authorizing the mayor to sign the "standard form of agreement between owner and engineer 411
RESOLUTION NO. 9C/ -5G
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING
APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO SIGN THE "STANDARD
FORM OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN OWNER AND ENGINEER FOR STUDY AND
REPORT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES" BETWEEN THE CITY OF REDDING
AND CAMP DRESSER & MCKEE INC. IN CONNECTION WITH SITE
SAMPLING AND RISK ASSESSMENT TO EVALUATE POTENTIAL HEALTH
RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH ALTERNATIVE LAND USE OF THE ABANDONED
ENTERPRISE SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT, IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO
EXCEED $65 ,000 . 00 .
IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Redding as follows :
1 . That the City Council of the City of Redding hereby
approves the above-mentioned Agreement between the City of
Redding and Camp Dresser & Mckee Inc. , in an amount not to exceed
$65 ,000 . 00 , a true copy of which is attached hereto and incorpo-
rated herein by reference.
2 . That the Mayor of the City of Redding is hereby
authorized and directed to sign said Agreement on behalf of the
City Council of the City of Redding; and the City Clerk is hereby
authorized and directed to attest the signature of the Mayor and
to impress the official seal of the City of Redding thereto.
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was
introduced and read at a regular meeting of the City Council of
the City of Redding on the 19th day of June , 1990 , and was duly
adopted at said meeting by the following vote:
AYES : COUNCIL MEMBERS : Arness, Dahl , Fulton, Moss, Buffum
NOES : COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
Xt.:A
NANCY,' FFUM,/ ayor
City ' f Redding
ATTEST: FOR. APPROVED:
•
ETHEL A. NICHOLS, City Clerk RA DALL A. HAYS , City Attorney
AIL
IIP , 411
STANDARD FORM OF AGREEMENT
BETWEEN
CANER AND ENGINEER
FOR
STUDY AND REPORT
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
THIS IS AN AGREEMENT made as of June _, 1990, between the City of Redding,
California (OWNER) and Camp Dresser & Mckee Inc. (ENGINEER) .
OWNER employs ENGINEER to perform professional engineering services, to
serve as OWNER's professional engineering representative and to provide
professional engineering consultation and advice for a professional fee (as
set forth below) in connection with Site Sampling and Risk Assessment to
evaluate potential health risks associated with alternative land use of the
abandoned Enterprise Sewage Treatment Plant. Study will also include a
Liability Assessment to evaluate Owners's risk, if any, and a range of risk
reduction measures for the site. Findings will be presented in a Final
Report (the "Assignment") .
'I.
SECTION 1. BASIC SERVICES OF ENGINEER
1.1 ENGINEER shall perform the following professional services:
1.1.1 Consult with OWNER to clarify and define OWNER's require-
ments for the Assignment and review available data.
1.1.2 Advise OWNER as to the necessity of OWNER's providing or
obtaining from others special services and data required
in connection with the Assignment and assist OWNER in
obtaining such data and services.
1.1.3 Provide analyses of OWNER's needs with evaluation and
comparative studies of prospective solutions.
1.1.4 Prepare a report of ENGINEER's findings and recommenda-
tions, furnish 10 copies of the Report and review it in
person with OWNER.
1.2 The duties and responsibilities of ENGINEER described above are sup-
plemented and amended as indicated in Paragraph 1 of Exhibit A
"Further Description of Basic Services, Duties of Owner, Method of
Payment and Related Matters," which is attached to and made a part of
this Agreement.
Page 1 of 6
i � i
4111
SECTION 2. ADDITIONAL SERVICES
1 2.1 If authorized by OWNER additional tional services related to the Assignment
will be performed by ENGINEER for an additional professional fee as
the parties may subsequently agree.
SECTION 3. OWNER'S RESPONSIBILITIES
OWNER shall do the following in a timely manner so as not to delay the
services of ENGINEER.
3.1 Provide all criteria and full information as to OWNER's requirements
for the Assignment and designate in writing a person with authority
to act on OWNER's behalf on all matters concerning the Assignment.
3.2 Furnish to Engineer all existing studies, reports and other available
data pertinent to the Assignment, obtain or authorize ENGINEER to
obtain or provide additional reports and data as required, and fur-
nish to ENGINEER services of others required for the performance of
ENGINEER's services hereunder, and ENGINEER shall be entitled to use
and rely upon all such information and services provided by OWNER or
others in performing ENGINEER's services under this Agreement.
3.3 Arrange for access to and make all provisions for ENGINEER to enter
upon public and private property as required for ENGINEER to perform
services hereunder.
3.4 Perform such other functions as are indicated in Paragraph 2 of
Exhibit A "Further Description of Basic Services, Duties of Owner,
Method of Payment and Related Matters."
3.5 Bear all costs incident to compliance with the requirements of this
Section 3.
SECTION 4. PERIOD OF SERVICE
4.1 ENGINEER's Basic Services will be performed and the Report submitted
within the time period or by the date stipulated in paragraph 3 of
Exhibit A "Further Description of Basic Services, Duties of Owner,
Method of Payment and Related Matters."
4.2 ENGINEER's Basic Services under this Agreement will be considered
complete at the earlier of (1) the date when the Report is accepted
by OWNER or (2) thirty days after the date when the Report is sub-
mitted for final acceptance, plus in each case, if applicable, such
additional time as may be considered reasonable for obtaining
approval of governmental authorities having jurisdiction to approve
the Report.
4.3 ENGINEER's Additional Services will be performed and completed within
the time period agreed to in writing by the parties at the time such
services are authorized.
Page 2 of 6
4.4 If an timeperiod within or date
y by which any of ENGINEER'S services
are to be completed is exceeded through no fault of ENGINEER, all
rates, measures and amounts of compensation and the time for comple-
tion of performance shall be subject to equitable adjustment.
1
SECTION 5. PAYMENTS TO ENGINEER
�j 5.1 OWNER shall pay ENGINEER for services rendered hereunder as indicated
in Paragraph 4 of Exhibit A "Further Description of Basic Services,
Duties of Owner, Method of Payment and Related Matters."
5.2 ENGINEER shall submit monthly statements for Basic and Additional
Services rendered. OWNER shall make prompt monthly payments in
response to ENGINEER's monthly statements.
5.3 ENGINEER's above charges are on the basis of prompt payment of state-
ments rendered and continuous progress of the work on the Assignment
until submission of the Report.
II
{ 5.4 If OWNER fails to make any payment due ENGINEER for services and
expenses within sixty days after receipt of ENGINEER'S statement
therefor, the amount due ENGINEER shall include a charge at the rate
of 1.0 percent per month from said sixtieth day, and in addition
ENGINEER may, after giving seven days' written notice to OWNER, sus-
pend services under this Agreement until ENGINEER has been paid in
full all amounts due for services, expenses and charges.
SECTION 6, COST CONTROL
6.1 ONNER's budgetary requirements and considerations in respect of the
Assignment are set forth in Paragraph 5 of Exhibit A "Further Des-
cription of Basic Services, Duties of Owner, Method of Payment and
Related Matters."
6.2 Opinions of probable construction cost, financial evaluations,
feasibility studies, economic analyses of alternate solutions and
utilitarian considerations of operations and maintenance costs pre-
pared by ENGINEER hereunder will be made on the basis of ENGINEER's
experience and qualifications and represent ENGINEER's best judgment
as an experienced and qualified design professional. It is recog-
nized, however, that ENGINEER does not have control over the cost of
labor, material, equipment or services furnished by others or over
market conditions or contractors' methods of determining their
prices, and that any utilitarian evaluation of any facility to be
constructed or work to be performed on the basis of the Report must
of necessity be speculative until completion of its detailed design.
Accordingly, ENGINEER does not guarantee that proposals, bids or
actual costs will not vary from opinions, evaluations or studies sub-
mitted by ENGINEER to OWNER hereunder.
SECTION 7. GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS
7.1 Ownership, Publication, Reproduction, and Use
A11 documents and materials prepared pursuant to this Agreement are
the property of the ONWER. The OWNER shall have the unrestricted
Page 3 of 6
authority to publish, disclose, distribute, and otherwise use, in
whole or in part, any reports, data, or other materials prepared
under this Agreement. The OWNER will give credit to the ENGINEER for
his engineering services in any public relations bulletin that may be
published concerning the project. Any reuse of documents and
materials without written verification or adaptation by ENGINEER for
the specific purpose intended will be at OWNER's sole risk and
without liability or legal exposure to ENGINEER, or to ENGINEER's
independent professional associates, subcontractors, or consultants,
1 and OWNER shall indemnify and hold harmless ENGINEER and ENGINEER's
independent professional associates, subcontractors, and consultants
from all claims, damages, losses and expenses including attorneys'
fees arising out of or resulting therefrom. Any such verification or
adaptation will entitle ENGINEER to further compensation at rates to
be agreed upon by OWNER and ENGINEER.
i
7.2 The obligation to provide further services under this Agreement may
be terminated by either party upon thirty days' written notice in the
event of substantial failure by the other party to perform in
accordance with the terms thereof through no fault of the terminating
party. In the event of any termination, ENGINEER will be paid for
all services rendered and reimbursable expenses incurred to the date
of termination and, in addition, all reimbursable expenses directly
attributable to termination.
7.3 OWNER and ENGINEER each is hereby bound and the partners, successors,
executors, administrators and legal representatives of OWNER and
ENGINEER (and to the extent permitted by paragraph 7.4 the assigns of
OWNER and ENGINEER) are hereby bound to the other party to this
Agreement and to the partners, successors, executors, administrators
and legal representatives (and said assigns) of such other party, in
respect of all covenants, agreements and obligations of this Agree-
ment.
7.4 Neither OWNER nor ENGINEER shall assign, sublet or transfer any
rights under or interest in (including, but without limitation,
'I. moneys that may become due or moneys that are due) this Agreement
( without the written consent of the other, except to the extent that
any assignment, subletting or transfer is mandated by law or the
effect of this limitation may be restricted by law. Unless speci-
fically stated to the contrary in any written consent to an assign-
ment, no assignment will release or discharge the assignor from any
duty or responsibility under this Agreement. Nothing contained in
this paragraph shall prevent ENGINEER from employing such independent
professional associates, subcontractors, and consultants as ENGINEER
may deem appropriate to assist in the performance of services here-
under.
7.5 Nothing under this Agreement shall be construed to give any rights or
benefits in this Agreement to anyone other than OWNER and ENGINEER,
and all duties and responsibilities undertaken pursuant to this
Agreement will be for the sole and exclusive benefit of OWNER and
ENGINEER and not for the benefit of any other party.
Page 4 of 6
f
I
7.6 Insurance
a. The ENGINEER shall procure and maintain during the entire
period of performance under this Agreement the following
minimum insurance coverage:
1. Comprehensive General Liability Insurance - five
hundred thousand dollars500 00
($ 0) combined
single limits.
! 2. Automotive Liability Insurance - five hundred
thousand dollars ($500,000) combined single
limits.
Prior to commencement of work, the ENGINEER shall furnish
to the City of Redding Risk Manager a certificate of
insurance showing the above required insurance coverages
are in effect and naming the City of Redding, its agents,
officers, and employees as additional insureds. The
' certificate shall guarantee the OWNER at least ten (10)
days' written notice of cancellation or reduction in
i
coverage.
b. The OWNER requires evidence of workers compensation
insurance, and it shall meet the minimum requirements of
II the California Labor Code. A certificate of insurance
shall be furnished to the OWNER or Redding Risk Manager and
shall guarantee the City at least ten (10) days' written
notice of cancellation or reduction in coverage.
7.7 Indemnification
ENGINEER agrees to protect, defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the
OWNER, its officers, agents, and employees from and against any and
I all liability, damages, claims, suits, liens, and judgments, of
whatever nature, including claims for contribution and/or indemnifi-
:1, cation, for injuries to or death of any person or persons, or damage •
1 to the property or other rights of any person or persons caused by
' errors, omissions, or negligent acts of ENGINEER, in the performance
of services under this contract. ENGINEER's obligation to protect,
defend indemnify, and hold harmless, as set forth hereinabove, shall .
C include any matter arising out of any actual or alleged infringement
of any patent, trademark, copyright, or service mark, or any actual
or alleged unfair competition, disparagement of product or service,
c or other business tort of any type whatsoever, or any actual or
alleged violation of trade regulations. ENGINEER further agrees to
protect, defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the OWNER, its
liability for compensation under the Workmen's Compensation Act
arising out of injuries sustained by any employee of ENGINEER.
7.8 This Agreement (consisting of page 1 to 6 inclusive) together with
Exhibit A constitute the entire Agreement between OWNER and ENGINEER
and supersede all prior written or oral understandings. This Agree-
ment and said Exhibit A may only be amended, supplemented, modified
or canceled by a duly executed written instrument.
I
! Page 5 of 6
. 0 �.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have made and executed this Agree-
r ment as of the day and year first above written.
OWNER ENGINEER
Ro•-rt .
Senior Vice President
Date/g/ G
452-PH-WNEW
4 3:10
Ih
1
is
1
•
•
•
Page 6 of 6
h
411 114
•
EXHIBIT A TO AGREEMENT
BETWEEN
OWNER AND ENGINEER
FOR
STUDY AND REPORT
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
FURTHER DESCRIPTION OF BASIC SERVICES, DUTIES OF OWNER,
METHOD OF PAYMENT AND RELATED SERVICES
This is an exhibit attached to and made a part of the Agreement dated
June , 1990, between the City of Redding (OWNER) and Camp Dresser & McKee
Inc. (ENGINEER) for study and report professional services.
1. The Basic Services of ENGINEER as described in Section 1 of said Agree-
, ment are amended and supplemented as follows:
The Scope of Services to be provided under this contract will include:
Procure services of drilling and laboratory subcontractors.
i ;.
Prepare a brief site sampling plan and health and safety
plan, which will specify the sampling and sample handling
procedures. Submit to the Cityfor review prior to
conducting sampling.
Conduct sampling of the site as described in letter to City
of Redding from CDM dated May 21, 1990 regarding revised
approach (Attachment 1 ) . A total of 54 soil samples will be
collected, from the surface and from various depths in
drilled boreholes. Samples will be analyzed for the
i ' compounds listed in the Scope of Work presented in CDM's
original proposal to the Owner (Attachment 2 ) . Samples will
be collected in pre-cleaned 8- ounce glass jars with
Teflon-lined lids provided by the laboratory, and placed in
I coolers. Samples will be preserved with ice until
hand-delivered to the laboratory. Sample analysis will be
requested on a 2-week turnaround.
Conduct the health risk assessment based on the results
received from the laboratory. Exposure scenarios will
consider long-term effects of soil ingestion for park and
residential housing site uses. Contaminants of concern will
be based on the results of the sample analyses. Both
carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic effects will be considered.
EPA and any available State of California guidance will be
1, followed. The result of the risk assessment will be a number
expressing the excess risk of contracting cancer or
j, non-carcinogenic diseases based on ingesting a given amount
of site soil. The site risks will be compared to risks
calculated for background soil samples. The assessment will
Page 1 of 3
•
I '' assume a no-action condition, that is, that those risks would
be present if the City did not change or remediate the site
in any way. If the risks appear to be significant, Engineer
will communicate this to Owner as soon as possible, to
determine if the scope of the Risk Assessment should be
increased to evaluate additional pathways or exposure
scenarios.
▪ Prepare a Liability Assessment. The liability assessment
H will look at the risks developed in the risk assessment,
compare them to risk levels employed by other regulatory
li agencies such as EPA, State of California, or other states
and present the comparison to help the City make a risk
management decision. A range of site remediation options
such as what would be prepared for an EPA study will be
developed. These options could include No Action,
grading/soil management, cover options, or complete soil
removal/offsite disposal. Order of magnitude costs will be
presented for each alternative described.
▪ Prepare a Draft Report. The findings of the Risk and
Liability Assessments (Tasks 1, 2, and 3) will be presented
in a Draft Report to the Owner. The Engineer will make a
presentation of the draft report findings to the City staff.
If appropriate, recommendations for any further study will be
made at that time. Engineer will finalize the draft Report
at the direction of the Owner, incorporating any changes or
comments as appropriate. The final report will be presented
in a way to clearly communicate the results of the Risk
Assessment to the City and the public.
• Project management, meetings and QA/QC. Two meetings at the
site are anticipated for the Engineer's Project Manager and
Risk Assessment Task manager. Time has been included for
review of the deliverable by CDM senior staff who have
expertise in this area. Brief monthly reports will be
submitted by Engineer to Owner discussing project status.
General administration of the contract and invoice
preparation has also been included in this task.
3. The time periods for the performance of ENGINEER's services as set
forth in Section 4 of said Agreement are amended and supplemented as
follows:
A draft report will be submitted to the OWNER within 120 calendar days
of execution of this Agreement. A final report will be submitted
promptly thereafter as soon as any changes or modifications are agreed
upon.
4. The method of payment for services rendered by ENGINEER shall be as set
forth in the Billing Rate Schedule (Attachment 3) . ENGINEER estimates
that project costs shall not exceed $60,587, based on the labor and
expenses estimate included in Attachment 3 required to complete the
Scope of Basic Services. Any changes to the scope of work described in
Page 2 of 3
4IP
111
Exhibit A, Paragraph 1, agreed to by ENGINEER and OWNER, will be
reflected by a change in the Not To Exceed total, incorporated as a
change order to this contract.
5. OWNER has established the following special provisions and/or other
IIS
considerations or requirements in respect of the Assignment:
i. 452-PH41NEW
2:43
1 Page 3of 3
• ,
I 1 ATI2VZHNENT 1
I!'
li
I
I.
1.
I •
i i
C.,P13*41PV CAMP DRESSER & McKEE INC.
environmental engineers,scientists,
planners,4 management consultants One Walnut Creek Center
100 Pringle Avenue,Suite 300
Walnut Creek,California 94598
415 933-2900 Fax No. 415 933-4174
May 21, 1990
Mr. Steve Craig, Wastewater Superintendent
Mr. Tom Riley, Director - Recreation and Parks
r City of Redding
760 Parkview Avenue
Redding, CA 96001-3396
I!
I.
Follow-up to Proposal Presentation -
Revised Cost Estimate for Enterprise
Ponds Risk Assessment
Dear Messrs. Craig and Riley:
Camp Dresser & McKee Inc.
an
which
ieh you requested at ourinterviewed r present
ay, ay follow-up information
r
opportunity after the presentation to walk theEnterprise Ponds site7, 1990. We to
I. gain a better appreciation of the size of the site and the sampling
requirements. Based on our discussions with
have preparedyou and our site visi , we
necessary t° meetetheeCity$s objectivessste tflects the level of effort
sampling effort, and a corresponding This entails an increased
to account for the larger data baseg small expansion of the remaining tasks
Attached is a revised Section 6 from our proposal, Estimated
Essentially the number of samples Costs. •
address the concerns of has been increased from 22 to 54 to
potential contamination at depth.
Fifteen (15) of the samples
as depicted on the astewill
llrbe collected from five (5)
former 9u The soil borings, located linl ngs,
pond areas where the potential for downward the
is the greatest, will be drilled to a depth o f tiiof chemicals
migration
truck-mounted drilling rig. Samples will obtained us by
a small
a drive le
or split spoon sampling device. Samplessampler
(0-6"),lat spoon sampling
will be obtained from the surface
H
observed at the site which may the st in each ampling
Large cobbles were
exact depths will be dependent on the conditions encountered.some locations;
An additional six samples will be collected from 6 shallow
feet deep, in the area of the proposed single-familyborings, 2 to 3
These samples will also be obtained using the truck-mounted development.
purpose of these samples would be to determine mounncd ofg. The
contamination at the likely depth of construction excavatio of any
that area, excavation/grading in
The remainder of the samples will be collected
soil horizon (0-6 inches) over the remaining areas of the site.
(20) samples will be collected in this � hand from the surface
handled waste and Twentyh
which will also be , primarily from areas which
' high-use areas in the proposed park
i
1
411
CAMP DRESSER & McKEE INC
i ;' Messrs. Craig and Riley
May 21, 1990
Page 2 •
i'. plan. The rubble area will also be sampled, to determine the presence of
any undesirable materials in the various debris piles which will need to be
removed. Eight (8) background samples will be collected from outside the
site, in an area to be identified at the kick-off meeting, using the drill
rig. The background samples will be collected from 2 borings, at the
surface, and depths of 2 feet, 5 feet, and 10 feet, to provide a background
comparison for all horizons. Approximately 10 percent of the samples will
be split in the field to create field duplicates, as a quality control
check. This will bring the number of samples to 41 field samples, 8 background samples, and 5 duplicates, for a total of 54.
Laboratory costs have been revised to reflect a quantity discount (based on
costs provided by Eureka Laboratories of Sacramento). The new proposed
project total would be $58,387, with the expanded sampling and drilling
costs, and slight increases in the data analysis tasks. This total does
not include CDM's time or materials to prepare graphics or presentation
aids for a community meeting, although, as we discussed, we could prepare
such material as requested.
Thank you again for this opportunity to respond. We enjoyed our meeting
and look forward to the possibility of working together. Please don't
hesitate to call if you have further questions.
Very truly yours,
CAMP DRESSER & MCKEE INC.
6 ;6ZAfriZ,
Sara R. Black
Enclosure: As noted
cc: W. Pickus
S. Klingensmith
412
8:6
I
j
0
A 2
I
I
I
1
I'
t
2. PROJECT APPROACH
CDM is proposing a phased project approach, based on the site conditions
the
and project budget. Phase I is
g geared as an initial risk assessment to
complement the City's currently approved budget for the project. Phase II
consists of optional tasks to supplement the site investigation should the
City request further study. Specific activities under both Phase I and
Phase II are discussed below under each task.
SCOPE OF WORK
Task 1 - Site Testing
j In order to characterize the Enterprise Ponds site to determine potential
risk, samples of the soil will be required. The site consists of
approximately 130 acres; laboratory analytical costs and the preliminary
budget constraints will by necessity limit the amount of sampling that can
be performed in Phase I. Soil testing data presented by J.H. Kleinfelder
in their site assessment reports (April and July, 1987) will be utilized by
CDM in Phase I. However, the Kleinfelder data covers only one of the
abandoned pond areas (Pond No. 1, east of the Victor Avenue extension, and
10 acres in size) , which was slated for school construction. Additionally,
this data does not provide information on many important contaminants, such
as organics, which are integral to a complete risk assessment. In order to
use analytical dollars in the most effective manner possible, CDM proposes
a biased sampling approach, which will sample the locations most likely to
.i.
have any potential contamination. Those areas of the site not sampled by
Kleinfelder will be ranked according to their potential for containing
chemicals of concern; areas with high potential will be sampled in Phase I.
It is anticipated that these areas will include the pond areas that
accepted raw sewage, the aeration basin, the evaporation/percolation
trenches, and the current rubble pile. The southern area of the site which
is currently leased for cattle grazing is anticipated to be a low priority
area for Phase I sampling.
2-1
• 411
In order to provide sufficient data for the Phase I risk assessment
process, while at the same time stretching the analytical budget, the
following list of analytes is proposed. The analytes have been selected
because they are typically listed on EPA and State of California sewage
sludge regulations; their selection is also based on their potential human
toxicity. The list may be altered after further review of the background
data for the Enterprise ponds:
• Metals (CAM TTLC) .
• Pesticides (EPA 614, 615) .
.d.
• Extractable Organics (PAHs) (EPA 610).
1 ' Dioxin (20% of the samples) (EPA 613).
PCBs (20% of the samples) (EPA 608) .
Analysis for volatile organics is a low priority in Phase I since it is
likely that volatiles would have left the sludge during the time since site
shutdown. Also, although there is a potential that plating chemicals may
be present, cyanide analysis was not considered a high priority in Phase I
since other metals such as chromium and copper which will be analyzed can
be used as indicators of plating processes. Sampling for human pathogens
such as viruses is an option for Phase II; it has not been included in
Phase I, since it is unlikely that pathogens would still be viable given
the time since system operation.
Sampling methodology in Phase I will consist of obtaining surface samples
from the upper 6 inches of soil from random locations at each selected
area. Twenty (20) samples and two (2) field duplicates will be collected,
for a total of 22 samples. Samples will be collected using a stainless
steel trowel. Pre-cleaned 8-ounce glass jars with teflon-lined lids will
be obtained from the laboratory. Sampling equipment will be thoroughly
cleaned between each sample using a detergent wash and deionized water
rinse. Laboratory analysis will be performed by a State-certified local
Redding-area laboratory, if possible. Samples will be hand-delivered to
2-2
•
the laboratory by CDM personnel. It is anticipated that analyses can be
completed by the lab in a 2- to 3-week period.
Probably the most important option to be considered by the City for Phase
II would be monitoring of the groundwater underlying the site to determine
if any site contaminants have entered the groundwater; this recommendation
will be dependent on the results of Task 1. Other Phase II studies could
include complete surface sampling of all areas within the 130-acre parcel;
sampling of subsurface soils (from 2 to 3 feet below grade) at selected
locations, to determine potential risks to workers involved in grading the
site. Costs for these potential Phase II tasks have not been included in
this proposal, but could be prepared at the City's request.
Task 2 - Health Risk Assessment
The objective of the Phase I Health Risk Assessment (HRA) is to evaluate
potential health risks at the site. To accomplish the scope of this
project with the budget available, the Phase I HRA will be a preliminary
evaluation which will focus on risks associated with selected chemical
groups, exposure pathways, and land uses. The purpose of the Phase I HRA
is to provide the City of Redding with information necessary to evaluate
various site development options and the future costs, data requirements,
and potential liabilities that may be associated with those options. The
Phase I HRA will use soil contamination data generated in Task 1 to
evaluate potential health risks from using the land in its present
condition under the proposed land use alternatives. The Phase I HRA will
also identify any additional data which may be needed to more thoroughly
evaluate potential health risks at the site. This phased approach to
health-risk evaluation for this site is appropriate and cost effective, in
view of the present uncertainty regarding the extent and nature of
contamination at the site.
The budget available for measurement of soil contaminants is adequate only
for a screening-level analysis. This means that a relatively small number
of soil samples (22) will be analyzed for the presence of selected target
compounds. The health risk evaluation will be based on these compounds and
2-3
,4111
the assumption that no site remediation (i.e. , removal of residual sludge)
would occur. •
The scope of the Phase I HRA will be limited to a consideration of
potential health risks from exposure to soil at the site. Other possible
exposure pathways, such as groundwater and air, could be included in Phase
II.
The emphasis of the HRA will be on health effects associated with long-term
•
exposure to soil contaminants. Both carcinogenic and noncarcinogenic
health effects will be evaluated. Any subgroups of the population which
may be especially susceptible to specific adverse health effects from
specific target compounds will also be identified.
I
Risk assessment methods and assumptions for this HRA will
�P generally follow
most recent EPA guidance documents, especially as outlined in the Risk
Assessment Guidance for Superfund, Volume I: Human Health Evaluation, Part
A (1989) . CDM will consult with California Department of Health Services •
regarding exposure assumptions and toxicity criteria to be used in the HRA.
i..
Based on the results of the Phase I HRA, additional chemical data and
health risk analysis may be recommended for Phase II for all or parts of
the site. A discussion of health risk issues identified by the HRA will be
provided, along with different technical approaches which could be used to
provide a more thorough evaluation of potential health risks under various
land use options.
Task 3 - Liability Assessment
Although the site is exempt from any waste site closure regulations, there
is a slight potential that hazardous chemicals may be present that could
present a risk to future residents or park users. Under this task, CDM
will evaluate the results of Tasks 1 and 2, and develop several options for
site management which would reduce the City's liability. At this stage, it
is not possible to predict whether the risk is insignificant, or how
complicated the various remedial options may need to be. CDM's goal will
2-4
•
.•
be to provide information to the City so that informed decisions can be
made. Risk reduction options might include import of low permeability
soils or an impermeable membrane as a cap over the pond areas; excavation
and removal of contaminated soils and offsite disposal; or a system of
grading which would place contaminated soil below the level where it could
be contacted by future site uses. In particular, CDM will utilize its
expertise in sewage sludge management to suggest ways to eliminate
liability as a result of any residual sludges on site.
Task 4 - Final Report/Site Action Plan
A draft report will be prepared which will summarize the Phase I tasks
performed, including the field sampling, laboratory analytical results,
the results of the Phase I Health Risk Assessment, and the liability
assessment. CDM will present recommendations for any further work to
better define potential risks or site contaminants in Phase II.
Recommendations will also be made to the City as to options for management
of the site to reduce environmental liability. The draft report will be
presented to the City for review and comment. Comments from the City will
be incorporated into a Final Report for distribution.
Task 5 - Project Management/Meetings with the City
Activities under this task will include the initial kickoff meeting with
the City and a site visit for the Project Manager and the Risk Assessment
Task Manager. A final meeting with the City to present the results of the
project has also been budgeted. Costs are also included in this task for
ongoing communication between CDM and the City. Monthly reports to the
City are an option which CDM can prepare at the City's request, but they
are not included in this budget, given the relatively rapid project
1
schedule. Also included in this task are hours for technical review and
i " quality control activities to assure that the deliverable provided to the
City is technically sound and defensible.
2-5
AT 3
j'.
I'.
ly
I
I� ,
1
CAMP DRESSER & MCKEE INC.
BILLING RATE SCHEDULE
Effective April 2, 1990
PROFESSIONAL AND SUPPORT SERVICES HOURLY RATES
Vice President/Senior Vice President $35.00 - $70.00
Associate & Principal Engineer/Scientist (Grade 7) 25.00 - 38.00
Senior Engineer/Scientist (Grade 6) 24.00 - 35.00
Construction Resident Engineer 17.00 - 33.00
Construction Resident Inspector 17.00 - 30.00
Associate Engineer/Scientist (Grade 4 & 5) 17.00 - 30.00
Staff Engineer/Scientist (Grade 1, 2, 3) 12.00 - 25.00
Draftsperson/Designer 12.00 - 28.00
Contract Administrator 15.00 - 23.00
Technical Editor 12.00 - 20.00
Administrative Assistant 9.00 - 15.00
Secretary/Word Processor 9.00 - 15.00
Technician/Clerk 7.00 - 14.00
Hourly rates will be multiplied by 3.25 for billing purposes.
The above are based on regular rates current at the time of execution of
this Agreement. If the regular rates of the employee are increased during
the life of this Agreement, billing and payment will be at the increased
regular rates for the applicable period of time.
OTHER DIRECT COSTS
Other reimbursable direct costs shall be billed at 1.1 times actual cost to
cover the cost of general administrative expenses and handling. These
reimbursable costs include, but are not limited to:
Travel: Air Fare, Auto Rental, Local Mileage ($0.26/mile)
Subsistence: Lodging and Meals
Communications: Long Distance Telephone, Postage and Federal Express
Printing: Internal Reproduction ($0.08/sheet); Outside Printing Services
Computer and Word Processing Services
Consultant and Subcontracted Services
Equipment Rental
APPROVED
�• t D. . Mo
111
ATS 3 (continued)
NOT TO EXCEED ESTIMATE
Task 1 — Site Testing
Labor Hours Billing Rate Labor Cost
T. Ervin 30 $78/hr $2,340
Field Technician 30 $45/hr 1,350
S. Black 2 $87/hr 174
$3,864
Other Direct Costs
Mileage @ $0.26/mi. $130
Motel & Meals 250
Field Equipment (disposables) 100
Telephone 25
$505 x 10% markup = $ 555
Outside Consultants
Laboratory Cost (includes laboratory discount):
Metals (ICP) $ 150/sample
Pesticides 230/sample
Extractable, Organics 80/sample
PCBs (20% of samples) 35/sample
Dioxin (20% of samples) 450/sample
80% of samples @ $460 = 19,780
20% of samples @ $945 = 10,395
Total Laboratory $30,175
Drilling Cost:
Mobilization/demobilization $ 500
Drilling (assume $150 per hour) 1,200
Total Drilling $ 1,700
TASK 1 TOTAL $36,294
Task 2 — Health Risk Assessment
Labor Hours Billing Rate Labor Cost
S. Klingensmith 62 $100/hr $ 6,200
II' P. Billig $79/hr 40 3,160
S. Black 4 $87/hr 348
Clerical 10 $48/hr 480
$10,188
2
l
. iil 110
ATTACHMENT 3 (continued)
NOT TO EXCEED ESTIMATE
Other Direct Costs
i,
Telephone $ 50
Mail/Fax 50
$100 x 10% markup = 110
TASK 2 TOTAL $10,298
Task 3 - Liability Assessment
14
lil Labor Hours Billing Rate Labor Cost
W. Pickus 28 $94/hr $2,632
S. Black 15 $87/hr 1,305
$3,937
Task 4 - Final Report
I ; Labor Hours Billing Rate Labor Cost
I
S. Black 24 $87/hr $2,088
S. Klingensmith 8 $100/hr 800
II Clerical 20 $48/hr 960
,i Drafting 12 $60/hr 720
$4,56$
Task 5 - Project Management/Meetings/DA
Labor Hours Billing Rate Labor Cost
S. Black 12 $87/hr $1,044
S. Klingensmith 10 $100/hr 1,000
J. Donovan 2 $111/hr 222
W. Lyman 2 $122/hr 244
J. Burgh 2 $134/hr 268
A. Weitz 2 $ 95/hr 190
Contract Admin. 2 $ 65/hr 130
Administrative Asst. 4 $ 48/hr 192
$3,290
Other Direct Costs
j Travel to site for meetings $1,600
H : Telephone 100
Mail/Fax 100
Supplies 200
, ,
$2,000 x 10% markup $2,200
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST $60,587
4 52—PH-WNEW
2:41
3
1
1