HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso 1990-245 - Approving the "agreement to furnish engineering and environmental services to the city of redding for diestelhorst bridge and approaches on benton dr" Ili
RESOLUTION NO. 910 %.45"
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING
APPROVING THE "AGREEMENT TO FURNISH ENGINEERING AND
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES TO THE CITY OF REDDING FOR
DIESTELHORST BRIDGE AND APPROACHES ON BENTON DRIVE, " AND
AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO SIGN.
{
BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Redding
hereby approves the "Agreement to Furnish Engineering and
Environmental Services to the City of Redding for Diestelhorst
Bridge and Approaches on Benton Drive" entered into between the
City of Redding and CH2M Hill California, Inc . , a true copy of
which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager of the City of
Redding is hereby authorized and directed to sign said Agreement
on behalf of the City Council of the City of Redding; and the
City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to attest the
signature of the City Manager and to impress the official seal of
the City of Redding thereto.
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was
introduced and read at a regular meeting of the City Council of
the City of Redding on the 15th day of May , 1990 , and was duly
adopted at said meeting by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Arness, Dahl , Fulton, Moss, Buffum
NOES : COUNCIL MEMBERS : None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
czL,
NTCY FUM, : or
ity Redding
ATTEST: - FORM PROVED:
(91til 0.77Aeird
ETHEL A. NICHOLS , City Clerk RA DALL A. HAYS , City Attorney
• Agree t No. 02-5068-90-01
l
AGREEMENT TO FURNISH ENGINEERING AND
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
TO THE CITY OF REDDING
ElEI1UU1U
FOR
«AY 0 2 993
DIESTELHORST BRIDGE
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND APPROACHES ON BENTON DRIVE
AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
For the consideration hereinafter set forth, the firm of CH2M HILL
CALIFORNIA, INC., P.O. Box 2088, Redding, California 96099, a professional
engineering corporation, hereinafter referred to as the ENGINEER, agrees to pro-
vide engineering and related environmental services as described herein to the City
of Redding, California, hereinafter referred to as the CITY, for a PROJECT gener-
ally described as the Diestelhorst Bridge replacement project, Bridge No. 6C-1.
ARTICLE 1. SCOPE OF SERVICES
The ENGINEER shall perform the services set forth as follows:
A. ENGINEERING STUDY SERVICES
Two alternative bridge alignments, two alternative southerly road alignments, and
three alternative bridge types will be studied. The existing bridge is to remain in
place and will not be studied for modification.
The alternative bridge alignments will include one upstream and one downstream of
the existing bridge. The two southerly road alignments will include two extensions
of North Court Street to the southern bridge approach. One Court Street
alternative will begin at a right angle to Court Street, and the other alternative will
be an extension of North Court Street. The types of bridges will include a five-span
arch, a four-span prestressed concrete box girder, and a three-span prestressed
haunched concrete box girder bridge.
The purpose of the engineering studies is to provide supporting documentation for
the environmental studies in sufficient detail so that reasonably accurate cost esti-
mates can be prepared and the alternatives studied can be implemented as envi-
sioned.
1
RDD\R36\024.51-1
1 • , . •
MONTHLY MEETINGS AND REPORTS
Progress meetings will be held, as needed, in the ENGINEER's office or at the
CITY's offices. An agenda will be prepared in consultation with the CITY's repre-
sentatives. Progress of the work will be discussed. Meeting minutes will be pre-
' pared and submitted to the CITY. The minutes and an updated project schedule
will constitute the progress report.
SURVEY AND MAPPING
Air photo control will be established, supplemental surveys will be performed, and
aerial photography covering the project site will be completed. A digital terrain
model will be developed to generate topographic information. Data from field
supplemental surveys taken in heavy ground cover areas will also be entered into
the model. A topographic map at 1"=100' with 2-foot contours and spot elevation
I will be prepared. The CITY will provide utility location data.
HYDROLOGIC STUDIES
Hydraulic design studies have already been conducted by ENGINEER for this
reach of the Sacramento River. The data from these studies will be used to
develop a location hydraulic study report on base flood and floodplain risk assess-
ment as required by the Caltrans Local Program Manual for federally funded
projects.
GEOTECHNICAL STUDY
A geotechnical reconnaissance study of the bridge and approaches will be
conducted by an engineering geologist. It will include the following tasks:
A literature review of available geotechnical and geologic information
including previous studies by the ENGINEER and local seismicity
data.
j • A field geologic survey of the project bridge and road sites. Potential
problems will be evaluated with regard to cuts, fills, and soil erosion.
• A geotechnical report summarizing results of the study. Preliminary
recommendations will be included for cut and fill slopes, and permis-
sible bearing in rock-supported foundations.
I '
2
RDD\R36\02451-2
II
• •
ALTERNATIVE ALIGNMENT STUDIES
Existing information will be reviewed and design criteria will be confirmed with the
CITY. A preliminary design and detailed cost estimates for two bridge alignments
and two Court Street extensions will be prepared.
Preliminary design of each alternative will include:
• Horizontal and vertical alignments
• Preliminary earthwork quantities
• Road connections at:
North Court Street conform
Riverside Drive
- Bike path and parking lots
- Senior Citizens Center and Caldwell Park
• Drainage
• Utility relocation requirements
• Staged construction
• Right-of-way requirements
• Quantity and cost estimates
• R/W cost estimates will be provided by the CITY
Deliverables will include:
• 1"=100' scale photo with alternative alignment plan on overlays
• Plan and profile sheet of each alternative
• Typical sections
• Special structure plan, if any
• Quantity list and preliminary cost estimate for each alternative
• Cost comparison of the alternatives
ALTERNATIVE BRIDGE TYPE STUDIES
Alternative bridge concepts will be developed in close consultation with the CITY.
A general plan and general plan estimate will be prepared for three alternative
I'i I bridge types including an arch bridge and two prestressed bridges. A cost compari-
son I' of the alternative bridge types will also be prepared. Design and details will be
in accordance with Caltrans Design Aids, Design Details, Design Specification, and
memorandum to designers manuals.
,I� I
it 3
{ RDD\R36\024.51-3
Iu
I,.
• •
B. ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
STATEMENT OF OBJEC'T'IVE AND SCOPE OF SERVICES
All of the environmental work will be performed by Jones & Stokes Associates, with
assistance from other subconsultants, Coyote and Fox Enterprises and Sites Pacific,
for the cultural and visual resources studies.
The City of Redding (CITY) requires the necessary environmental documents to
obtain clearance from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), the California
Department of Fish and Game (DFG), the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service
(USFWS), the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE), the U. S. Soil Conservation
Service (SCS), and the Calfiornia Regional Water Quality Control Board
(RWQCB), and other agencies for the replacement of the Diestelhorst Bridge
across the Sacramento River and the extension of North Court Street in Redding.
To meet the requirements of both the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) and the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), a combined environ-
mental impact report/environmental impact statement (EIR/EIS) document will be
prepared.
Several studies will be incorporated into the EIR/EIS. Coordination with the CITY
and other consultants will be necessary to incorporate information from studies that
have already been completed or are in progress. These studies include transporta-
tion, fisheries (including winter run salmon), hazardous waste, aesthetics (visual) and
cultural resources. Studies relating to air quality, noise, soils and geology, water
quality, vegetation, wildlife, wetlands, land use, growth inducement, socioeconomics,
public services and parklands issues will be conducted.
A joint EIR/EIS to analyze and identify significant impacts that would occur as a
result of the project will be prepared. If significant impacts are identified, appro-
priate and feasible mitigation measures will be recommended.
LEGAL ADEQUACY
Jones & Stokes Associates' management team will prepare an environmental
, document that satisfies the requirements of CEQA, the State CEQA Guidelines, the
City of Redding procedures, Caltrans environmental requirements, FHWA NEPA
requirements, and Council on Environmental Quality guidelines.
i The scope of environmental services will include preparation and mailing the
CEQA Notice of Preparation (NOP) and the NEPA Notice of Intent (NOI).
4
iI
RDD\R36\024.51-4
• •
FOCUSED REPORTS
The environmental reports will be designed so that interested public and reviewing
agencies will have full understanding of the environmental ramifications of the
project and its alternatives. The reports will focus on relevant issues and contain
comparative summaries to aid the reader. Technical information generally
unfamiliar to the public will be summarized in the body of the environmental
document and will be included in its entirety in an appendix for the benefit of
technical reviewing agencies.
The following focused reports will be provided by Jones & Stokes:
• 25 copies of a baseline report of approximately 100 pages each con-
sisting of environmental setting information for biological resources,
water quality, geology and soils, traffic and parking, air quality, noise,
and socioeconomics
• 25 copies of eight technical reports consisting of approximately 120
pages (combined total) describing impacts and mitigation measures
for biological resources (including Section 7 biological assessment),
Section 4(f) lands, water quality, geology and soils, traffic and parking,
air quality, noise and socieoeconomics
• 25 copies of the administrative draft EIR/EIS consisting of approxi-
mately 300 pages
• 25 copies of the Draft EIR/EIS consisting of approximately 300 pages
• 25 copies of the administrative final EIR/EIS consisting of approxi-
mately 125 pages
• 125 copies of the final EIRJEIS consisting of approximately 120 pages
ADEQUATE AND FEASIBLE MITIGATION
In preparing the Diestelhorst Bridge replacement project environmental document,
the importance of identifying and resolving environmental issues will be empha-
sized. Mitigation measures for environmental impacts will be identified that are
both cost effective and feasible. Measures for mitigation monitoring in accordance
with CEQA will be included.
5
(, ! RDD\R36\02451-5
• •
•
COMPARISON OF PROJECT ALTERNATIVES
The environmental document will be prepared to provide agency decision makers
and the public with a decision-oriented document that compares and contrasts the
impacts of each alternative. The document will be organized to facilitate this corn-
parison, and each technical specialist working on the report will be asked to under-
take a comparative evaluation.
REVIEW COMMENTS ON NOTICE OF PREPARATION/NOTICE OF INTENT
The comment letters received on the Notice of Preparation/Notice of Intent will be
reviewed and the CITY will be consulted to focus the scope of pertinent
environmental issues.
BASELINE ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
A baseline environmental report will be prepared containing a description of the
existing environmental conditions in the project area, addressing each of the
environmental resource topic areas described below. This information will identify
environmental constraints which might influence project design, and will be later
used as the environmental setting section of the subsequently prepared project
EIR/EIS.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
In addition to the resource analyses described below, a description of the project
will be prepared. It will be developed in conjunction with the CITY Planning and
Community Development Department and the ENGINEER It will address all
alternatives, to satisfy both NEPA and CEQA requirements. The description will
P
include a statement of the purpose and need for the project, location, drawings,
maps, and a list of agency approvals required for construction. It also will include a
description of construction activities and traffic disruption patterns.
The environmental impact analysis can begin as soon as the final description of
feasible alternatives is complete. Four alternatives will be analyzed, including the
No-Project Alternative.
The following task areas will be analyzed for the proposed project and its alterna-
tives in an equal level of detail, unless an alternative is dropped from consideration
before environmental studies begin.
6
, I RDD\R36\024.51.6
Socioeconomics
• Investigate the possibility for significant social or economic impacts as
a result of the proposed bridge construction and the north Court
Street extension
• Qualitatively discuss the potential issues relating to transients and
neighborhood concerns
•
Discuss all available, practicable measures that could effectively
mitigate identified impacts
It is assumed that no significant population, employment, housing, or income effects
are expected to occur as a result of the proposed project.
Land Use and Growth Inducement
• Conduct a site visit and identify land uses in the vicinity of the project
site
• Describe proposed or planned land use changes other than the
project in the site vicinity
• Describe land use changes likely to occur if the proposed project or
an alternative is implemented and discuss any potential land use con-
flicts
• Review relevant CITY policies and regulations, including the general
plan and zoning ordinances
• Review other state, regional, and local planning documents, as
applicable
• Consult County, CITY, and Caltrans staff and other land use planners
as needed
• Assess consistency of the project with relevant plans and policies
• Assess the growth-inducing potential and identify impacts
• Discuss all available, practicable measures that could effectively
mitigate identified impacts
7
RDD\R36\024.51-7
•
Public Services
• Summarize existing services and facilities
• Discuss deficiencies and planned improvements
• Evaluate the capacity of providers to serve projected growth
• Qualitatively assess the extent to which the project would increase
demand for services
• Assess the potential changes in distribution or travel routes for the
provision of public services
• Discuss all available, practicable measures that could effectively
mitigate identified impacts for each of the following:
Water supply and distribution
Wastewater collection and treatment
Natural gas supply and distribution
Solid waste disposal
Police and fire protection
Utilities
- Schools
- Parks and recreation
Soils and Geology
• Review and summarize results of the engineering geotechnical studies
• Describe the local geologic history and geomorphic features, including
depth to and type of bedrock
• Describe existing conditions and potential impacts relating to
seismicity, landslide susceptibility, or slope failure
• Describe the local soil types and their engineering properties related
to strength, compaction, shrink/swell potential, susceptibility to ero-
sion, permeability, and groundwater levels
• Recommend mitigation measures and their cost, if necessary
The Soils and Geology section of the environmental document will include input
from the project geologist.
8
RDD\R36\024.51-8
•
Air Quality
• Gather data from permanent air quality monitoring stations
• Describe existing conditions and standards
• Obtain existing and future year emission factors from EMFAC7PC or
EMFAC7D for the air quality impacts analysis
• Qualitatively assess construction-related impacts
• Compare existing and projected air pollutant concentrations to
ambient air quality standards
•
Determine the significance of air quality impacts
• Recommend mitigation measures, if needed
• Assess the consistency of the project and alternatives with the State
Implementation Plan
' I
The EMFAC7pc and EMFAC7D emission rate models and the CALINE3 and
CALINE4 carbon monoxide dispersion models, among other techniques, may be
used for analyzing the potential changes in carbon monoxide levels as a result of
project improvements. The additional cost for running the models will be $480.
The models will be run only if required by the City or State.
Noise
• Identify sensitive receptors
• Monitor existing noise levels at two locations (these locations will
include sensitive receptors and other representative locations along
roadways) location for receptors will be selected in consultation with
CITY and Caltrans staff
• Characterize existing noise levels in the project area
• Estimate projected 2010 peak-hour Leq noise levels
• Estimate the impact of project-related noise on properties adjoining
affected roadways, using the FHWA Noise Prediction Model and
California Vehicle Noise Emission Levels
ii
'
9
1' I, RDD\R36\024.51-9
P �.I
;
• Identify significant noise impacts, using federal, state, and local
standards as criteria for significance
• Assess the impacts of construction-related noise impacts
• Summarize results of the noise analysis in tabular and text format
•
If necessary, recommend mitigation measures
Vegetation and Wildlife
• Request information from the California Natural Diversity Data Base
to determine if the area supports any known populations of sensitive
plants or animals, acquire available maps and aerial photographs, and
coordinate with other team members to determine the appropriate
survey area
II • Coordinate with the CITY regarding previously completed studies on
the bald eagle, the peregrine falcon, and other special- status/interest
species in the project vicinity
• Contact the California Department of Fish and Game for a listing of
sensitive species, and the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, since
endangered species are an issue of concern
• Survey the project area to characterize the flora and fauna of the
area; map plant communities and wildlife habitats; determine the
approximate locations and extent of wetlands subject to regulation
under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act; search for sensitive plants
and animals or potential habitat for these species; supplement infor-
mation from the field survey with data from scientific literature, con-
sultation with experts in state and federal wildlife agencies, colleges,
and universities, and input from Caltrans' preliminary studies
Based on information from the field survey and other sources,
coordinate with the appropriate state and federal agencies to assess
compliance with state and federal laws pertaining to endangered spe-
cies and wetland protection
• Prepare a biological analysis that conforms to the Caltrans guidelines,
including a description of the project, a description of methods
employed for the field survey, and a summary of findings and recom-
mendations
' 10
RDDvR36\024.51-10
• •
• Provide a description of the natural communities and vegetation of
the project site, characteristic wildlife species, and a thorough eval-
uation of the potential for sensitive plant and animal species to occur
in the project area
• Report significance of impacts of the proposed project, identify any
sensitive habitats or species that might be affected, and recommend
mitigation measures to avoid or reduce the impacts, if necessary
•
Prepare a Biological Assessment that addresses impacts to federal- or
state-listed threatened or endangered species. The Biological Assess-
ment will include results of field surveys, an assessment of project
impacts, and adopted compensation measures. The document will
reflect careful coordination with responsible agency personnel. If
,I significant impacts to endangered species are identified, extensive and
detailed mitigation/compensation programs would be beyond the
scope of this proposal.
Aquatic Resources
• Conduct a water quality survey using existing federal and state data
bases and describe existing water quality and fisheries resources of the
Sacramento River in the project vicinity
• Consult with wildlife agencies and the RWQCB about the project's
potential impacts
• Qualitatively discuss the effects of construction-related impacts from
ground disturbance, runoff, and siltation that could result from project
construction, such as increases in turbidity and suspended solids or
release of chemical sediments
•
Incorporate results of completed fisheries studies into the environ-
mental document
• Coordinate with the Department of Fish and Game, the Regional
Water Quality Control Board, and the CITY to recommend mitiga-
tion measures for the project area and/or downstream area of poten-
t
tial impact, if necessary
Section 4(f) Lands Evaluation
• Describe the Section 4(f) property(ies) to be affected, including size,
tj location, ownership, function, access, and other special features
11
RDD\R36\024.51-11
•
• Discuss the impact on the Section 4(f) property(ies), including physi-
cal impacts and functions affected in the areas of air quality, noise,
aesthetics, etc.
• Identify and evaluate location and design alternatives that would
avoid impacts to the 4(f) property(ies)
Transportation, Parking, and Circulation
• Provide transportation analysis using data provided by CITY
Incorporate transportation-related studies that will be performed by
the CITY or its consultant into the environmental document
• Qualitatively assess potential conflicts between vehicular and
bicycle/pedestrian traffic
• Qualitatively discuss the impact of the project on parking lot access
near the bridge
• Recommend mitigation measures, if necessary
Hazardous Waste
• Consult with the CITY and Pacific Gas and Electric an ComP Y to
determine the potential for hazardous substances to occur on the
project site
• Identify the probability and types of hazardous substances that might
occur on the project site
• Include in the report mitigation measures provided by CITY.
• Review Southern Pacific and Health Department records for hazar-
dous materials spillage and underground tanks
Visual Resources
This scope includes participation in one public meeting, and attendance at up to
three team meetings in Redding.
The Federal Highway Administration's Visual Impact Assessment for highway
projects will be used as the method of analysis in this report. The method of
analysis is described as follows:
12
'II
RDD\R36\024.51-12
•
Define the Visual Environment. Define the physical limits of the affected
environment and develop a framework for the visual assessment to help locate
effects, compare alternatives, and propose appropriate mitigation. Describe the
regional landscape for the project. Subdivide the project into a hierarchy of
landscape units by examining the patterns of its landscape components. These land-
scape units will then be used for the comparison of the effects of the project, and to
develop appropriate mitigation. A composite viewshed map will be constructed by
combining the individual viewsheds for selected points along the project.
Depict Project Appearance. Prepare narrative descriptions of the visual
appearance of the project alternatives. Land uses, landscape units, viewsheds, and
key views will be shown graphically as well as described in text. Fifteen (15) black
and white line photomontages will illustrate the visual impacts within these units of
"Build" alternatives at key views. One key view graphic will be rendered in color.
Black and white photographs will illustrate the no build alternative.
Identify Key Views. The seven (7) key views to be addressed are Caldwell Park, the
Senior Citizens Center area, the overlook residences, the river, the bicycle trail
access, bicycle/pedestrian/motorist views on the bridge, and trail access below and
alongside the south side of the bridge.
The eight viewer groups that will be addressed are residential neighbors overlooking
the bridge, park users, Senior Citizens Center area users, boaters, pedestrians on
the bicycle trail, bicyclists on the bridge, motorists on the bridge, and motorists on
the south approach.
The exhibit for the public meetings will be a key view enlargement and up to five
color photocopies, mounted on 24" x 36" boards, and one key view location overlay
on a supplied 100-scale aerial photograph.
Analyze Existing Visual Resources and Viewer Response. Graphic inventories will
map individual features and views, and will be accompanied by narrative
descriptions of visual character and quality of view. Viewer response is greatly
determined by viewer group and exposure. Narrative descriptions of the major
viewer groups will describe their exposure and sensitivity.
Assess Project Impacts. Narrative descriptions of the visual character of alternatives
and their relative visual compatibility with the character of their landscape settings
will be based on the depiction of the project appearance after construction corn-
pared to existing visual quality and appearance for key views.
Mitigation. Visual mitigation measures will be written which address the specific
visual impacts or problems caused by project alternatives, including the "No-Build"
13
j ' RDD\R36\02451-13
• •
li alternative. Mitigation in narrative form will be supplemented with graphic images
where appropriate.
Cultural Resources
A pedestrian reconnaissance of exposed natural ground will be conducted within the
Area of Potential Effect (APE). All archaeological sites will be recorded using
standard California Archaeological Site Record forms, which include photographs
and a map of the site. Other cultural resources such as isolated artifacts and tea-
1
tures will be noted in the report. The required FHWA reports will be submitted
(including an Archaeological Survey Report (ASR), the Historic Properties Survey
Report (HPSR), and a Finding of Effect Report (FE). They will fulfill the
requirements of Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as
amended, and its implementing regulations set forth in 36 CFR 800. These reports
will include background information on the area (ethnographic, archaeological, and
historical), a description of methodology, a report of findings, and comments and
recommendations. Address bridge as cultural resource and effect of project
alternatives on the existing bridges in consultation with the visual resource
consultant.
Should no sites be found, or sites that are not determined eligible for the National
Register of Historic Places, this work will complete federal requirements. If, how-
ever, potentially significant sites are found during this survey, then further
archaeological requirements will be dependent on the extent of ground-disturbing
activities in the site area(s). Such additional effort will be negotiated as extra work.
Construction Impacts
Each of the resource issue chapters in the EIR/EIS will address any potentially
significant construction-related impacts, such as road and lane closures, noise, or
dust.
Cumulative Impacts
Cumulative impacts will be addressed quantitatively for traffic, air quality, and noise
issues, and qualitatively for all other resource issues and respond to comments.
I,I Public Hearings
Attend up to two public hearings to explain the report and answer questions about
environmental issues, and respond to comments.
SII
14
Ii
II [I RDD\R36\02451-14
•
Meetings
Attend scoping and progress meetings during the project initiation and environ-
mental phases of the work, as needed.
ARTICLE 2. BASIS OF COMPENSATION
As a consideration for providing the services enumerated in ARTICLE 1, the
COUNTY shall pay the ENGINEER in the following manner:
A. COMPENSATION ON A LUMP SUM BASIS
For services as enumerated in ARTICLE 1, the total lump sum amount of Two
Hundred Forty-Eight Thousand Dollars ($248,000).
The above total lump sum amount is based upon detailed manpower estimates for
the lump sum work in ARTICLE 1 and includes the ENGLN-EER's direct labor
cost, salary and general and administrative overhead costs, direct expenses, and fee.
This estimate and supporting information are included as Attachment A.
B. RENEGOTIATION OF COMPENSATION
Unless otherwise indicated in a supplemental agreement, the indicated compensa-
tion is based on ENGINEER's authorization to proceed by April 1, 1990. For any
delays to the schedule in excess of one month for causes beyond the ENGINEER's
control, the ENGINEER reserves the right to request renegotiation of those por-
tions of the lump sum fees affected by the time change.
C. EFFECT OF STATE AND FEDERAL REGULATIONS
It is agreed that the scope of services as defined in ARTICLE 1 and as may be
! modified by supplemental agreements is based on those Federal and State regula-
tions or requirements in effect on the date of execution of this AGREEMENT.
Regulations or requirements promulgated after the date of said execution shall be
incorporated by amendment to this AGREEMENT as required. If ENGINEER's
scope of services or level of effort is changed by these later regulations or
requirements, the basis of compensation as defined herein shall be subject to
renegotiation.
15
RDD\R36\024.51-15
t '
D. COST PRINCIPLES
The ENGINEER agrees that the Contract Cost Principles and Procedures, 48 CFR,
Federal Acquisition Regulations, Chapter 1, Part 31, shall be used to determine
allowability of individual items of cost.
ARTICLE 3. PAYMENT FOR SERVICES
Payment to the ENGINEER, prescribed in ARTICLE 2, shall be made as follows:
A. PAYMENT FOR LUMP SUM SERVICES
Monthly invoices will be issued by ENGINEER, based upon the ENGINEER's
estimate of the value of the work accomplished, less previous payments made.
Invoices are due and payable on receipt.
{ Upon completion of services enumerated in ARTICLE 1, the total lump sum
amount will be due upon receipt of the final invoice, less previous payments made.
i
j B. INTEREST
If payment of the amounts due, or any portion thereof, is not made within 30 days
of receipt of billing, interest on the unpaid balance thereof will accrue at the rate of
one and one-half percent (1-1/2%) per month and become due and payable at the
time said overdue payments are made, unless delay in payment is due to improper,
contested, or inadequate billing procedures followed by the ENGINEER. In the
event of disputed or contested billing, only that portion so contested shall be with-
,
j held, and the undisputed portion shall be paid in accordance with the payment pro-
, vision outlined herein. The CITY shall exercise reasonableness in contesting any
bill or portion thereof. Where usury limits are less than the stated interest rate
above, the maximum lawful interest rate shall apply to the unpaid balance.
ARTICLE 4. OBLIGATIONS OF THE ENGINEER
A. AUTHORIZATION TO PROCEED
The ENGINEER will not begin work on any of the services listed in ARTICLE 1
'I I until the CITY directs it in writing to proceed.
rl
I
ii 16
I ' i RDD\R36\02451-16
410 •
B. SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATIONS
In soils, foundation, groundwater, and other subsurface investigations, the actual
characteristics may vary significantly between successive test points and sample
intervals and at locations other than where observations, explorations, and inves-
tigations have been made. Because of the inherent uncertainties in subsurface eval-
uations, changes or unanticipated underground conditions may occur that could
affect total PROJECT cost and/or execution. These conditions and cost/execution
effects are not the responsibility of the ENGINEER.
C. ENGINEER'S PERSONNEL AT CONSTRUCTION SITE
The presence or duties of the ENGINEER's personnel at a construction site,
whether as onsite representatives or otherwise, do not make the ENGINEER or its
personnel in any way responsible for those duties that belong to the CITY and/or
the construction contractors or other entities, and do not relieve the construction
contractors or any other entity of their obligations, duties, and responsibilities,
including, but not limited to, all construction methods, means, techniques,
sequences, and procedures necessary for coordinating and completing all portions of
the construction work in accordance with the Contract Documents and any health
or safety precautions required by such construction work. The ENGINEER and its
personnel have no authority to exercise any control over any construction contractor
or other entity or their employees in connection with their work or any health or
safety precautions and have no duty for inspecting, noting, observing, correcting, or
reporting on health or safety deficiencies of the construction contractor or other
entity or any other persons at the site except ENGINEER's own personnel.
D. COST ESTIMATES OR OPINIONS OF COST
Construction cost estimates or opinions of cost to be prepared under this
AGREEMENT are to be based upon presently available data, adjusted where nec-
essary to reflect anticipated future changes. In preparation of these cost estimates,
the ENGINEER will apply its experience and judgment, but since it has no control
over future changes or competitive bidding procedures and market conditions and
other factors affecting cost, no warranty is given as to the accuracy of said cost esti-
mates.
E. TIME OF BEGINNING AND COMPLETION OF SERVICES
Work on this PROJECT will begin no later than ten (10) calendar days after receipt
of a letter of notification to proceed. The ENGINEER shall make every reasonable
effort to schedule manpower and work elements in a diligent manner so as to sub-
stantially complete all services within the time schedule as shown on Attachment B,
except that the schedule shall be adjusted to reflect any delay in issuance of the
17
RDD\R36\024.51-17
II
notice to proceed; provided, however, that this section applies only if all reviews,
approvals, and information to be furnished and work to be performed by persons
and agencies not under the control of the ENGINEER are furnished and/or com-
pleted in accordance with the schedule. This Contract shall terminate January 31,
1992.
F. ACCESS TO RECORDS
The ENGINEER shall maintain books and accounts of PROJECT-related payroll
costs, travel, subsistence, field and incidental expenses, in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles and practices. Said books shall be available during
ENGINEER's normal business hours for the PROJECT duration and for a period
of three (3) years after completion thereof for examination by the CITY to the
extent required to verify the direct costs (excluding established or standard allow-
ances and rates) incurred hereunder.
Duly authorized representatives of the State, CITY, and Federal Highway Admin-
istration shall have right of access to the ENGINEER's technical plans, files, and
records relating to the project included in this AGREEMENT and may review the
work at appropriate stages during performance of the work.
G. STANDARD OF CARE
The ENGINEER shall be responsible, to the level of competence presently main-
tained by other practicing professional engineering organizations engaged in the
same type of professional services in the community, for the professional and tech-
nical adequacy and accuracy of designs, drawings, specifications, documents, and
other work products furnished under this AGREEMENT. The ENGINEER makes
no other warranty, expressed or implied.
H. ENGINEER'S INSURANCE
The ENGINEER will maintain throughout this AGREEMENT the following
insurance:
1. Worker's compensation and employer's liability insurance as required by the
state where the work is performed.
2. Comprehensive automobile and vehicle liability insurance covering claims for
injuries to members of the public and/or damages to property of others
arising from use of motor vehicles, including onsite and offsite operations,
and owned, nonowned, or hired vehicles, with $1,000,000 combined single
limits.
18
RDD'R36\024.51-18
II
110 •
•
3. Commercial general liability insurance covering claims for injuries to mem-
bers of the public or damage to property of others arising out of any covered
negligent act or omission of the ENGINEER or of any of its employees,
agents, or subcontractors, with $1,000,000 combined single limits.
4. CITY, its officers, agents, and employees will be named as an additional
insured with respect to ENGINEER's liabilities hereunder in insurance cov-
erage identified in Items 2 and 3 above, and ENGINEER waives subrogation
against CITY, its officers, agents, and employees as to said policies.
5. Prior to commencement of work, the contractor shall furnish to the City of
Redding, Risk Manager, a certificate of insurance showing the above
required insurance coverages are in effect. The certificate shall guarantee
the City at least ten (10) days written notice of cancellation or reduction in
coverage.
I. SUBCONTRACTING
Any Subcontract in excess of $25,000 as a result of this Contract shall contain all
the provisions stipulated in this AGREEMENT.
J. ENGINEER'S STAFF COMMITMENT
Following are the staff and subconsultants that will be assigned to the project. Sub-
stitutions will be made in consultation and concurrence with the CITY:
• Project Manager Tom Mlcoch CH2M HILL
• Bridge Engineers Joe Bender CH2M HILL
Bob Valentine Valentine, Inc.
• EIR/EIS Project Debra Loh Jones & Stokes
Manager
• Visual Consultant Marsha Mason Sites Pacific
• Cultural Resources Trudy Vaughn Coyote & Fox
II 19
ill
li RDD\R36\024.51-19
Il i
•
ARTICLE S. OBLIGATIONS OF THE CITY
A. AUTHORIZATION TO PROCEED
The CITY shall authorize the ENGINEER in writing to proceed prior to the
ENGINEER starting work on any of the services listed in ARTICLE 1.
B. CITY-FURNISHED DATA
The CITY shall provide to the ENGINEER all technical data in the CITY's
possession, including previous reports, maps, surveys, borings, and all other informa-
1
tion required by the ENGINEER and relating to the ENGINEER's work on the
PROJECT. Such information shall include the CITY's requirements for the
PROJECT, any design criteria or constraints, and copies of design and construction
details or standards which the CITY requires to be included. ENGINEER may rely
upon the accuracy, timeliness, and completeness of the information provided by the
CITY in performing ENGINEER's services to the CITY.
C. ADVERTISEMENTS, PERMITS, AND ACCESS
The CITY shall obtain permits and licenses that may be required by local, State, or
Federal authorities and shall secure the necessary land, easements, and rights-of-
way, and shall provide access as necessary for the ENGINEER to perform its
services on public or private property as required, unless as otherwise specified
herein.
,
D. LITIGATION AND ASSISTANCE
The scope and extent of engineering services to be provided under this
AGREEMENT do not include costs of the ENGINEER for required or requested
assistance to support, prepare, document, bring, defend, or assist in litigation
undertaken or defended by the CITY.
Payment for such services shall be made on a per diem basis in conformance with
ARTICLE 3 until and unless there is a finding by arbitration or a court of com-
petent jurisdiction that the ENGINEER is wholly or partly liable for damages to the
CITY for negligent acts of the ENGINEER.
20
pl
R DD\R36\024.51-20
4110
ARTICLE 6. GENERAL LEGAL PROVISIONS
A. CHANGES IN CHARACTER OR EXTENT OF WORK
No change in the character or extent of the work to be performed by the
ENGINEER shall be made except by supplemental agreement in writing between
the CITY and the ENGINEER. The supplemental agreement shall set forth the
proposed changes of work, adjustment of time, and adjustment of the fee to be paid
by the CITY to the ENGINEER, if any.
i
1 B. OWNERSHIP OF PROJECT DOCUMENTS
Tracings, plans, specifications, and maps prepared or obtained under the terms of
the AGREEMENT will be delivered to and become the property of the CITY.
Basic survey notes and sketches, charts, computations, and other data prepared or
obtained under this AGREEMENT will be made available, upon request, to the
CITY for use on this project. Reuse by the CITY of any of the instruments of ser-
vice of the ENGINEER on extensions of this PROJECT or on any other project
without the written permission of the ENGINEER shall be at the CITY's sole risk
and without liability or legal expense to the ENGINEER. The CITY agrees to
defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the ENGINEER from all claims, damages,
losses, and expenses of any kind, including, but not limited to, attorney's fees and
court costs arising out of such unauthorized reuse of the ENGTVEER's instruments
of service by the CITY or by others acting through or on behalf of the CITY. The
ENGINEER shall not copyright any reports or material prepared in conjunction
with this AGREEMENT.
C. FORCE MAJEURE
Neither the CITY nor the ENGINEER shall hold the other responsible for
damages or delay in performance caused by acts of God, strikes, lockouts, accidents,
or other events beyond the control of the other or the other's employees and
agents.
D. INDEMNITY BY ENGINEER
IIS '
The ENGINEER will indemnify and hold the CITY harmless from and against all
Worker's Compensation and General Liability claims or demands arising out of the
ENGINEER's sole negligent performance of this AGREEMENT.
I1 ; 1 E. TERMINATION
This AGREEMENT may be terminated for convenience on 30 days'written notice,
or for cause if either party fails substantially to perform through no fault of the
11 1
21
1) 1 RDD\R36\024.51-21
• •
other and does not commence correction of such nonperformance within 5 days of
written notice and diligently complete the correction thereafter.
On termination, the ENGINEER will be paid for all authorized work performed up
to the termination date plus termination expenses, such as, but not limited to,
reassignment of personnel, subcontract termination costs, and related closeout
costs.
F. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY
The ENGINEER's liability to the CITY for any cause or combination of causes is,
in the aggregate, limited to an amount no greater than the total compensation actu-
ally paid to the ENGINEER under this AGREEMENT.
G. COMPLIANCE WITH TITLE VI OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964 FOR
FEDERAL AID CONTRACTS
During the performance of this Contract, the ENGINEER for itself, its assignees,
and successors in interest agrees as follows:
1. COMPLIANCE WITH REGULATIONS
The ENGINEER will comply with the Regulations of the Department of
Transportation relative to nondiscrimination in federally assisted programs of
the Department of Commerce (Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations,
Part 21, through Appendix H and 23 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR)
710.405(b), hereinafter referred to as the Regulations), which are herein
incorporated by reference and made a part of this Contract.
2. NONDISCRIMINATION
The ENGINEER, with regard to the work performed by it after award and
prior to completion of the contract work, will not discriminate on the ground
of race, color, or national origin in the selection and retention of subcontrac-
tors, including procurements of materials and leases of equipment. The
ENGINEER will not participate either directly or indirectly in the discrimi-
nation prohibited by Section 21.5 of the Regulations, including employment
practices, when the Contract covers a program set forth in Appendix B of
the Regulations.
22
RDD\R36\02451-22
�..
3. SOLICITATIONS FOR SUBCONTRACTS, INCLUDING PROCURE-
MENTS OF MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT
In all solicitations, either by competitive bidding or negotiation made by the
ENGINEER for work to be performed under a subcontract, including pro-
curements of materials or leases of equipment, each potential subcontractor
or supplier shall be notified by the ENGINEER of the ENGINEER's obliga-
tions under this Contract and the Regulations relative to nondiscrimination
on the ground of race, color, or national origin.
4. INFORMATION AND REPORTS
The ENGINEER will provide all information and reports required by the
Regulations, or orders and instructions issued pursuant thereto, and will
permit access to its books, records, other sources of information, and its
facilities as may be determined by the CITY, Caltrans, or the Federal
Highway Administration to be pertinent to the instructions. Where any
information required of the ENGINEER is in the exclusive possession of
another who fails or refuses to furnish this information, the ENGINEER
shall so certify to the CITY, Caltrans, or the Federal Highway Administra-
tion as appropriate, and shall set forth what efforts it has made to obtain the
information.
5. SANCTIONS FOR NONCOMPLIANCE
In the event of the ENGINEER's failures to comply with the nondiscrimin-
ation provisions of this Contract, the CITY shall impose such contract sanc-
tions as it or the Federal Highway Administration may determine to be
appropriate including, but not limited to:
a. Withholding of payments to the ENGINEER under the Contract until
the ENGINEER complies, and/or
b. Cancellation, termination, or suspension of the Contract, in whole or
in part.
6. INCORPORATION OF PROVISIONS
The ENGINEER will include the provisions of Subparagraphs 1 through 6 of
Paragraph G of this ARTICLE 6 in every subcontract, including procure-
ments of materials and leases of equipment, unless exempt by the Regula-
tions, order, or instruction issued pursuant thereto. The ENGINEER will
take such action with respect to any subcontractor or procurement as the
State Highway Department or the Federal Highway Administration may
23
RDDAR36102451-23
1 �
direct as a means of enforcing such provisions, including sanctions for non-
compliance. Provided, however, that in the event the ENGINEER becomes
involved in or is threatened with, litigation with a subcontractor or supplier
as a result of such direction, the ENGINEER may request the CITY to
enter into such litigation to protect the interests of the CITY, and in addi-
tion, the ENGINEER may request the United States to enter into such liti-
gation to protect the interest of the United States.
H. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR
The ENGINEER, in accordance with its status as an independent contractor, cove-
nants and agrees that it will conduct itself consistent with such status, that it will
neither hold itself out as nor claim to be an officer or employee of the CITY by
reason hereof, and that it will not by reason hereof, make any claim, demand, or
application to or for any right or privilege applicable to an officer or employee of
the CITY including, but not limited to, Worker's Compensation coverage, unem-
ployment insurance benefits, Social Security coverage, or retirement membership or
credit.
L COVENANT AGAINST CONTINGENT FEES
The ENGINEER warrants that it has not employed or retained any company or
person, other than a bona fide employee working for the ENGINEER, to solicit or
secure this AGREEMENT, and that it has not paid or agreed to pay any company
or person, other than a bona fide employee, any fee, commission, per- percentage,
brokerage fee, gift, or any other consideration, contingent upon or resulting from
the award of making this AGREEMENT. For breach or violation of this warranty,
the CITY shall have the right to annul this AGREEMENT without liability, or, in
its discretion, to deduct from the AGREEMENT price or consideration, or other-
wise recover the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee,
gift, or contingent fee.
J. SUSPENSION, DELAY, OR INTERRUPTION OF WORK
The CITY may suspend, delay, or interrupt the work of the ENGINEER on the
PROJECT for the convenience of the CITY or for reasons beyond the control of
the CITY or ENGINEER.
In the event of such suspension, delay, or interruption, an adjustment in compen-
sation due the ENGINEER shall be made for all increases in cost of the
ENGINEER's performance under this AGREEMENT, including personnel reloca-
tion and/or replacement costs, and all other identifiable labor and expense costs.
24
RDD\R36\024.51-23
ill •
K. NO THIRD-PARTY BENEFICIARIES
This AGREEMENT gives no rights or benefits to anyone other than the CITY and
ENGINEER and has no third-party beneficiaries.
L. ASSIGNMENT
Neither party will assign all or any part of the AGREEMENT without the prior
written consent of the other party.
M. LEGAL ACTION
All claims, counter-claims, disputes, and other matters in question between the
CITY and the ENGINEER arising out of or relating to this AGREEMENT or in
the breach thereof will be presented to the City Council of the CITY for con-
sideration. In the event that the City Council of the CITY cannot resolve the mat-
, ter or matters to the satisfaction of the ENGINEER, the ENGINEER may under-
take whatever legal actions against the CITY as are available to him as he deems
necessary.
I All legal actions by either party against the other arising from the AGREEMENT,
or for the failure to perform in accordance with the applicable standard of care, or
any other cause of action, will be barred 2 years from the date the claimant knew or
should have known of its claim, but in any event, no later than 4 years from the
date of substantial completion of ENGINEER's services.
, I
N. INTERPRETATION
Releases from, indemnities against, limitations on, and assumptions of liability and
limitations on remedies expressed in this AGREEMENT shall apply even in the
II event of breach of contract or warranty, fault, tort including negligence, strict lia-
bility, statutory, or any other cause of action (except for willful or reckless disregard
of obligations) of the party released or indemnified, or whose liability is limited or
assumed, or against whom remedies are limited. Party, as used herein, includes the
named parties, their officers, employees, agents, subcontractors, and affiliates.
O. GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 7550
The ENGINEER will comply with Government Code Section 7550:
"Any document or written report prepared for or under the direction of a state or
local agency, which is prepared in whole or in part by nonemployees of such agency,
shall contain the numbers and dollar amounts of all contracts and subcontracts
relating to the preparation of such document or written report; provided, however,
25
RDD\R36\024.51-25
•
that the total cost for work performed by nonemployees of the agency exceeds five
thousand dollars ($5,000). The contract and subcontract numbers and dollar
amounts shall be contained in a separate section of such document or written
report.
"When multiple documents or written reports are the subject or product of the con-
tract, the disclosure section may also contain a statement indicating that the total
contract amount represents compensation for multiple documents or written
reports."
P. SEVERABILITY AND SURVIVAL
If any of the provisions contained in this AGREEMENT are held for any reason to
be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable in any respect, such invalidity, illegality, or unen-
forceability will not affect any other provisions, and this AGREEMENT shall be
construed as if such invalid, illegal, or unenforceable provision had never been con-
tained herein.
ARTICLE 7. ATTACHMENTS, SCHEDULES, AND SIGNATURES
A. AGREEMENT DESCRIPTION
This AGREEMENT (consisting of pages 1 to 27, inclusive), together with the
ATTACHMENTS AND SCHEDULES identified hereinbefore, and the Certifica-
tion of Consultant and Certification of Local Agency's Highway Department
attached, constitutes the entire AGREEMENT between the CITY and the
ENGINEER and supersedes all prior written or oral understandings.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties execute below:
For the CITY OF REDDING,
dated this day of , 19_.
By:
City Manager
ATTESTED:
By:
26
RDD`R36\02451-26
• •
le' •
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By:
City Attorney
For the ENGINEER, CH2M HILL CALIFORNIA, INC.
dated this pia day of 1910
By:
=' a y71.:
Vice P esident and Regional Manager
APPROVED:
California Department of Transportation, dated this day
of , 19_.
By:
i Chief, Local Streets and Roads Engineer,
District 2
27
RDD\R36\024.51-27
•
CERTIFICATION OF LOCAL AGENCY'S
ROAD DEPARTMENT
I HEREBY CERTIFY that I am the Director of Public Works of the City of
Redding being the Local Agency representative for the City of Redding, and that
CH2M HILL or their representatives have not been required directly or indirectly
as an express or implied condition in connection with obtaining or carrying out this
Agreement to:
(a) employ or retain, or agree to employ or retain, any firm or person; or
(b) pay, or agree to pay, to any firm, person or organization, any fee,
contribution, donation or consideration of any kind;
except as herein expressly stated (if any):
I acknowledge that this certificate is to be furnished the State Department of
Transportation, in connection with this Agreement involving participation of
Federal-Aid Highway Funds, and is subject to applicable State and Federal law,
both criminal and civil.
City of Redding Public Works Department
Robert Galusha
Director of Public Works
By Date:
Robert Galusha
{ RDD/R240/003.50-28
•
CERTIFICATION OF CONSULTANT
I HEREBY CERTIFY that I am the Vice President and Regional Manager
and duly authorized representative of the firm of CH2M MIL, whose address is
Redding, California, and that neither I nor the above firm I here represent has:
(a) employed or retained for a commission, percentage, brokerage,
contingent fee, or other consideration, any firm or person (other than a bona fide
employee working solely for me or the above consultant) to solicit or secure this
agreement;
(b) agreed, as an express or implied condition for obtaining this contract
to employ or retain the services of any firm or person in connection with carrying
out the agreement; or
(c) paid, or agreed to pay, to any firm, organization, or person (other
than a bona fide employee working solely for me or the above consultant) any fee,
contribution, donation, or consideration of any kind for, or in connection with, pro-
curing or carrying out the agreement;
' I
except as herein expressly stated (if any):
I acknowledge that this certificate is to be furnished to the State Department
of Transportation in connection with this agreement involving participation of
Federal-aid highway funds, and is subject to applicable State and Federal laws, both
criminal and civil.
I.
aa- il
ate
Signat e
I
I
! i
RDD/R240/003.50-29
1
•
Attachment A
POLICIES AND PRACTICES
FOR ACCUMULATING INDIRECT COSTS
{
INDIRECT COSTS POLICY AND PRACTICES
Indirect costs are accumulated in accordance with generally accepted cost
accounting principles.
Overheads on direct labor are treated as direct labor salary cost. Included in this
cost are payroll taxes, workers' compensation, holidays, vacation, sick leave, and
other fringes applicable to direct labor.
Expenses which are not identifiable as specific project direct costs are classified as
General and Administrative expenses. Our accounting system accumulates all G&A
expenses in two ways: by expense type and by overhead cost center.
The expense type classifications are standard and include such accounts as indirect
salaries, office supplies, telephone, rent, repairs, insurance, taxes, interest, deprecia-
tion, etc. These expense types are set forth so as to clearly delineate between
allowable and unallowable costs. For this purpose, the Chart of Accounts contains
such accounts as advertising, bad debts, contributions, interest, entertainment, etc.
All items entering into the accounting system are identified as to source; the source
entries contain the information to trace back to the original supporting document.
Any items of cost, direct or indirect, are readily traceable from general ledger totals,
to cost reports, to supporting documents.
General and Administrative expense types are accumulated at a company level and
are expressed as a percentage of Direct Salary Cost.
it
COST POOLS AND BASES
The accounting system also groups expenses by overhead cost centers so that man-
agement or auditors may determine costs by function. For example, the overhead
cost center report for the accounting department would include salaries, supplies,
and other accounting department costs.
it
RDD/R240/003.50-30
• •
{
Attachment A
PREVIOUS AUDIT AND NEGOTIATIONS WITH FEDERAL AGENCIES
Effective July 1, 1985, the United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office
of the Inspector General, Western Division, Seattle, Washington, has assumed the
role as CH2M HILL's cognizant Federal audit agency. Prior to that date, our cog-
nizant audit agency had been the Seattle Branch of DCAA's San Francisco Region.
An audit of the Indirect Costs and Overheads current to the enterprise was com-
pleted
by DCAA in May 1985, and accepted by the U.S. EPA in July 1985.
PRICING AND ACCOUNTING FOR PRINCIPAL'S TIME
Corporate officers' salaries are treated in the same manner as other employees'
salaries. Only when the officer is directly and productively working on a specific
project is his time charged to direct labor. All other time of an officer is charged to
General and Administrative expense. The hourly charge rate is computed in the
same manner for all employees.
1 CH2M HILL, CALIFORNIA, INC.
B
Stanley Smith
Vice President and Regional Manager
i1
RDD/R240/003.50-31
•
Attachment A
CH2M HILL
ALLOWABLE OVERHEAD EXPENSES
FOR FEDERAL AGENCIES
As of May 1988, the United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of the
Inspector General for Audits, Western Division, San Francisco, California, has
reviewed and accepted the following forward pricing rates.
{
Percent of
Direct Labor -
Forward
Pricing Rate :L
Actual for 1988
1985 and Beyond = ""
Salary Overheads 41.0 43.0 _0
-
General and Administrative Overheads
(after adjustments for unallowables) 124.0 124.0
TOTAL 165.0 167.0 a►
These rates are currently acceptable for all federally funded contracts.
A breakdown of 1985 rates can be made available if required.
i 1 Forward pricing rates are provisional rates and are subject to adjustment following
audit. 57.;c:
CH2M HILL CALIFORNIA, INC.
BY
St ley A. Smith
Vice President and Regional Manager
II I E,32i
li
E.20►
RDDiR240/003.50-32
...._ l, . . ..2.. crc. ayc . ,ii .
Name of C`;E.a: • ;Services to be Furnished: •
Jones i Stokes Associates, Inc. :
I 4 ee Office Address: :EIR/EIS for Replacement of the
1725 - 23rd Street, Suite 100 ;Diestlehorst Bridge in Redding
{ Sacramento, CA 95916 :
�, ;:visions, Locations of Work: ;Total Amount of Proposal 1S:vt Solicitation No.
Sacramento : $104,601 :SQA
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF COST ELEMENTS :Est. Cost : TOTAL :REFERENCE
:. DIRECT MATERIAL : : i. COST ;
a. Purchased Parts : :ffffffffff:
b. Subcontracted Items : :ffffffffff;
c. Other ; :ffffffffff;
1 ' TOTAL DIRECT MATERIAL:fffi+ifffi; 0 ;
I � 2. MATERIAL OVERHEAD 0 1
S. DIRECT LABOR :Est. Hours:Rata/Hour :Est. Cost :ffffffffff;
A. Herson ; 16 : 35.64 : 570 :ffffffffff;
D. Loh 1 114 : 25.96 : 2,959 :uffffffff:
E. Nelson : 340 : 22.60 ; 7,684 :ffffffffff;
N. Islay : 300 1 15.21 1 4,563 :ffffffffff;
R. Trott ; 32 : 18.91 1 605 ;ffffffffff;
P. Cylinder ; 92 ; 16.79 : 1,545 :fiiiffffff; .
E. Whisler : 84 : 13.24 1 1,112 :ffffffffff;
D. Leonhardt 1 140 : 17.13 : 2,398 :fffifffffe:
M. lanoli : 120 : 19.68 : 2,262 :ffffffffff:
S. Page : 76 : 12.73 : 967 ;ffffffffff;
W. Shijo : 68 : 23.51 : 1,599 :ffffffffff;
R. Sculley : 160 : 23.05 1 3,688 :ffffffffff:
1I S. Centervall 1 60 : 15.21 1 913 :ffffffffff;
' Word Proc ; 125 1 11.30 : 1,413 :ffffffffff;
Editor : 52 : 11.30 1 588 :ffffffffff:
Graphics : 44 : 11.76 : 517 :ffffffffff:
{ Clerk : 14 : 7.25 : 102 ;ffffffffff;
: : ; :fiffffftf}:
(51) 1991 Inflation Allowance 1 : 326 :ffffffffff:
TOTAL DIRECT LABOR ;iffitfffff:fiffifffff;ffifffffff: 33,921 1
4. LABOR OVERHEAD :0. H. Rate: I Base : :Est. Cost ;ffffffffff;
i : 143.912:33,920.85 1 48,815 :ffffffffff;
TOTAL LABOR OVERHEAD:fffff$$$$$:ffffffffff;ffffififff; 48,815 :
5. SPECIAL TESTING ; 0 ;
6. SPECIAL EQUIPMENT - See attached schedule for cost element 6 1 1,262 1
7. TRAVEL
0I :Est. Cost :ffffffffff;
' a. Transportation - Mileage E 5.25/mi. (6,400 mi.): 1,600 :ffffffffff;
{, b. Per Diem or Subsistence 16 days - 8 $83/da
Y y 1,328 ,ffffffffff,
TOTAL TRAVEL :ffffffffff: 2,928 1
II '. , 8. CONSULTANTS - None :Est. Cost :ffffffffff;
' 1 ;ffffffffff;
TOTAL CONSULTANTS ;ffiffififi: 0 :
9. OTHER DIRECT COSTS - Set at:achru x1iruu.: iv!' cost eiement 9 1 2,120 1
10. TOTAL DIRECT COST AND OVERHEAD : 89,046 :
! 11. SENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSE ( 6.79Z I Cost Element 10) 1 6,046 1
! 12. ROYALTIES : 0 ;
13. TOTAL ESTIMATED COST 1 95,092 :
upiiunai tor& Du rage L ut c
This proposal is submitted forAillg in connection with and in response to:
City of Redding request for colWroposalCo for environmental studies for Diestlillirst Bridge
1. tt replacement in Redding, Shasta County and reflects our best estimates as of date, in
accordance with instructions and footnotes.
Typed Name and Title: Signature
Curtis E. Spencer, President :
I
Name of Firm: Jones & Stokes Associates, Inc :Date of Submission
1725 - 23rd Street, Suite 100, Sacramento, CA 95816 : 2/2/90
EXHIBIT A - SUPPORTING SCHEDULE
COST EL NO : Item Description 1 EST COST ($)
:
II 6 : SPECIAL EQUIPMENT :
I 1 ::u,21, er ; 61 hours @ $12/hr. 1 732
:Air Quality Modeling Computer Time: 40 hours @ $12/hr. : 480
:Noise Meter: 2 days e $25/day : 50
: Total : 1,262
1 1
9 : DIRECT COSTS 1
,
:Printing Costs: t :
' ' � Baseline Report (100 pg. rept., 25 copies @ $.08/pg.) : 200
I ' : 8 Technical Reports (120 pg. rpt., 25 copies ea. @ $.08/pg. 240
: Admin Draft EIR/EIS (300 pg. rpt., 25 copies @ $.08/pg.) : 600
! 1 Draft EIR/EIS (300 pg. rpt., 25 copies @ $.08/pg.) 1 600
i1 : Adain Final EIR/EIS (120 pg. rpt., 25 copies @ $.08/pg.) 1 240
: Final EIR/EIS (120 pg. rpt., 25 copies @ $.08/pg.) : 240
ij ,
, I : Total : 2,120
:
I 1* Assumes City handles all public and agency mailings :
I Has any executive agency of the United States Government performed any review of
your accounts or records in connection with any other government prime contract
or subcontract within the past twelve months?
YES X NO
Name of Reviewing office and individual: Daryl L. Petrig, DCAA,:Telephone Number/Ext.
Aerojet General Corporation, Sacramento, CA :916/355-2621
Will you require the use of any Government property in the performance of this proposed contract?
II YES NO X
Do you require Government contract financing to perform the proposed contract?.
I . ; YES NO X
Do you hold any contract for the same or similar work as this contract?
I YES NO X
II ; {: Does this cost summary conform with the cost principles set forth in the regulations?
II I YES X NO
II
1'
i 1 _
11 I
I
�= •
� Y N N� n .p . A.. W - - - n M1-r V R — S 'A'
O
r.
0. •
I
.sis us sr en On
- • •I1
•
�"
• ••
•
W N
I
17; <
VI es
e s
{ V 1A -
1011.
1
s
I
w •
N
a •
I C W
I ` U _
N
OD
1 s
O
a
- 101 .0 0 u w e- ^ — — - .• ,n ▪ «• 0ee —o _ o—
< =
— r N
-
e • es
e • h •
r
• 0 .
Tc.
n
�
... W
u
v W H vs
H
IOC .un n e. - 0
1 Z{ l «
N
e v.O H •
r• = 0 —•
N
1 o ass h
p <
0 —
< S N
• to
M 2 h H — N H
r — I.
0
' r sr. K N fOn b - —
vs
n 0 ..
i Se
m
•
Y 2 W
0 67.3 re—
•
N - sr
IV m H 01
•
.44
— N N
H a H• s•esr m N
es
1C • ri
I so
•
'u
II Q
en
e
Illi ' .� sre.
es 0
•
= ' - ^ — •PN N OO
C5 lN — mi 1 _ en —
h
JO m 01. b - - .O O — m O b se 7—
•
ii Z H N •
G
....
es en O
sae
= •—
II
I
II
Y a
.a _ S
— C a ss
64.
^ G —
C %J r
I H r ` > .a•
O
Z
H 2 O ' N N O b< _ of O V N .' N ` .-
> — Y r
0.
I — = Q . •M H r .� Y C •— Y 4 LO S ` 2so
2 Y a 1. y
I O O O s U m •a• s — �.. 2 — � 2 2 r S
I. N i b r. < Z N ...r «C..0. .. ..
s r 2 sc D O 0 v < .. L A
Cc Oc t
CC = t t 2 �
O e 0 0 O O Y
s.1
i
. „ 0 ,-, , I. ,-..1',. .CI..'"%.4.--. k,.., 1 ,e-t-
. • ' Draft Cost Proposal -Base
I
DIRECT LABOR i Mason Ransbury Burk Willeford
' . $16.85 $13.00 $16.00 $10.00
Graphics: '"" _....._...._.. _ .. ..�_........_ _
'Key View/Landscape Unit Mao ( 100 scale mylar) 1.6
lar)shed Map (100 scale m
I mglar) :_. __ __, =_Z4_._._..��.�______71
Exhibits ;Land Use/View _.__�..�
Key Views _ 104 _
:Charts ___ _ 4
___. .
eeti
cis:
Ii MPublic Meeting Fl y i n for 1 overnight i n Reddi nq t 16 __.W .._.._ "._ ��
_Monthly Team Meeti nos 3 each i n Redding—._ . A8 _ ._M,,.._ " ___ , _..
Field Work: .._._._"..�.. _ ..__._...._. �. ..___ ... _�
li p people, rniq�t _ _ _.__ _0_ .r._ _
1tri x 2 ave Z0 ..._...______.._.__
1 trip x 1 person 16 ..__ _ ......
Draft Technical Resort Text r, 88 80_" _ 80 _
Review Revisions 1 ". ' I 16 ,1
40 32 �^
Review Revisions *2 _16 12 _ 4
Coordination _ 64 __ _."8_"��_
; •� r
' TOTAL HOURS _ 308 276 24112
$3,348.00
720
i ,TIMES HOURLY RATE _____t5.,18980 $3,388_00 $:84..00�$i .120.00 _1_281
.50 0,
i
OVERHEAD& FRINGE (93.3%){ ,� _ �w"_•._ __._$9,592.92r
} (repro.key view drawings +one !;j view ._
overlau on the LOU_ scale aerial photo, up to five ~ � _ ___ _�
j 8-1/2 x 11 color xerox,all mounted on ___ _ _ __ _.. "__.,,__^_„�
24 x 36 Team core) i
**Caltrans Provisional Rate
DIRECT COSTS
/Fed EI _ $2 603.65
' Postagex _ $120.00 ��"�
, Film (3 rolls • $15) ' $45.00 I _
FAX ($3 send, $1 receive) $60.00
L.D. phone $40.00
Muter photo repro for key view maps _ _ $50. 00 _
Air Fare _ __$204.00 „�
' i Mileage (5 x 180 x $.24) w $216.00 •
Foam core $15.00
Xerox 11x17 $15.20 I __
Blueline checkprints _ ~$5.25 : _ _._ "_
Laser printing ._____�,_$150.00
Computer service center $1 383.20
8. Lyons Planner $300.00 i _•
To{.a.� Go ��- :SUBTOTAL $221478.
,
Ii
' il .
1 - A 1 iikCt,ME1.)i A
110 . III
111
ARCHAEOLOGICAL RECONNAISSANCE OF PROPOSED SACRAMENTO RIVER BRIDGE
CROSSING ADJACENT TO DIESTLEHORST BRIDGE
PRICING PROPOSAL
LABOR
' I Prefield research and administrative
time (Vaughan)
H 3 days @ $160/day $ 480 .00
Fieldwork
Survey
2 days @ 160/day (Vaughan) 320 .00
3 days @ 91 .50/day (McGann) 274 . 50
($10 .00/hr plus costs)
Site recording ( if sites found)
2 days @ 91 .50/day (McGann) 183 .00
ij . Report preparation (Vaughan)
Draft reports
6 days @ 160/day 960 .00
3 days @ 91 . 50/day 274 .50
Editing and final
2 days @ 160/day 320 .00
Clerical help ( 2 days @ 55/day) 110. 00
($6/hr plus costs)
$2 ,922.00
MILEAGE, SUPPLIES AND OTHER COSTS
0 .
i Mileage @ $ . 25/mile 12.50
Film and processing 30. 00
Copies and report binding 50.00
Misc. supplies 20.00
Telephone 10.00
1 122.50
SUBTOTAL $ 3 )044 .50
15% OVERHEAD 456 .68
GRAND TOTAL $ 3 , 501 . 18
; `
II .
ri?1)9 \Col'
3
I
1„!
4110
•
'+} A
I
,LD. r _
• a
Z D ._ .
I mol
•
N i . La caO
a
Is'
Lri ID a.Z
J
Iul
. . . - [I iii '... . .
a O n 1-
J _ 0 - - - oo w
in
.Z I ! J
LO a
<, I 4 z w
j --Y, Z z - �--1 c
`�-w ------ -- LO ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ w
O I,LJ 2
-- _ (ii... W D CJ
- 0 0 0 0 0 Cr O LC
�� o o�=�o) m w o) o) o) 0 0 0 0 00 o a 0 0 0 0 -'c
--^ al In'_;ril In m (n 01 (.0 ill01 (.0 T PI UI U1 11) UI UI 01 U) U) 01 L11 Ul U) 01 LT 0 vn O 0 UO O 0 LL CY CD
! Q? w w� _,w w w w w < III Q Q < < < 21 Li EU) u u w 7c I)) IL.)L a a 2/ iii i iii a s `a a OCU
L._ W:_1 I.L ly l._ LL LL Z w M. S S. S_ Z. Z
WLL In U).=•Ln In Ln U1 Ln Q m N 111 P) n) < , VI O O C) < f S ) O (1 C) '7 C) C) -)in , I- I- L-
ILL..
(U N lU )') v in to . m co LI) -C a) -. .-. t\
O C'_:O O O O O O 0 MC) �-) 0 0 0 (7 0 0 0 0 0 -•
LJ CJ
I
' U(t Z D'-: �1 Z 01 Z Z Z U) ))) U1 01 Cl 01 UI UI (n U) U: til U) UI CI -• -) •• (IIa) U) U1 Ur UI CD O 0 I.
¢a a ^ c
< Q G a Lt CC LL It U: Cr C L7 U. 1� U Z (D LI) Cr Y U) ) (u m (n U) U` UI
a)' 7 - 7 -7 'C 'C 'C 'C 'C t Q a Q 11 Ll i O W w' O W a W W LJ (J U U U Z Z Z
W V) Ul Lo I_.Ln Ln Ln U] Ln m m (D S S 2 a Q .- a U) c u O in IL W Q S o O (W7 O O Li Li L 1J-
- -. rt.) LLl N - N V ).`-. -• -..) -) -. 0
i �) U ur u1 0) . N m rfl
U V lU
j a 0 0Ic•
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 w
Li)- 0 0:` 0 0 0 0 0
J r� n N- Co to (JD In - Lf) - 0 0 0 0 0 ^ 0 0 0 0
O LL.
0 0 o a m e In m o m
i U)
LOCE Li•
m _- 0 1i m 0 0 Q 0 O O O O O 0 O rJ1C) N CI _ O J) CD c-.
CO (� O f.) rpt n) N N v
iU J "„ (V (U fU N 'T O O O N Ln �:.
I •• U C
cn L� C)
II I U) W I a
�I rr C`) yI 'Li :.••-
0
CC
1
J T
:. = W U •
u• i • O
In I. >t O C v - l."• 11.
L.1
U
rt w I,11 !z Ii1 u L
_ m a
...2 L7 - OJ : .U. 3 y n: 'J 1 s w \ O U a Y `„ 0 CO L.7 J
lU C O I' CJ I,. ` w LI) s• rJ ) U) Q LJ)
LJ Cr LC':' a "" O >- U) > = 1.. _ UI .I LL UJ - U L. �''' U 2 '--"' .
.-..,y Q 111 \ ti w O m Vl U U W Ln •e s W Ll _ (Y W IL ',.-L.,-,'
a -J S \ W _
Ir C •_ - U L.._ LJ 0 O h-- Q >.- w CL Li CC . C) - W Cr Iii o O Ln O .
.-2 `' a -I O O Z IJ o i� o f - 01 w �') ,) w cl z o �, -
L O - - R IU O W C7 IU O LL < I IJ - 1- 1ij I- J O -
aW U _ O L-) _J U O J ) V) J I 7 l� U: •- LI Li _1 II. 7 J IJ t I LSI C 1- CL 1 41 -
Q _ U F.
1.1 f J 111 '- - - 11. lU < C R
I' O u < a W O c_ 41 I)' l 1n . I I . L1 ..I 1 t
- Q > 3 Vi Z 3 LL Q OZ L`J 2 > 7 U z w U CJ LL) U 1:1 J O -IJ l 1 LJ O ..� 7 LLL .0 n
Li U w V I L-I lJ J Q c V O.
-.
0O
•
f
1
H a V O
(- U:
1- O O C _) p O O 00 O O O O O O O O c n O O O O 0 " O O O r
•
U 1U -. - IV N r...?, 7 UI (n I I.1 Ill •1 L) 11) lI ul 11 - O L'J LO O O Ln O N C.
i Q U u L' L u u Li Li u Li ti .-. U fU lu IV _- . .-. ... ... u IV C) (C C1 .. Lu -' ^ -LUI o_
U U a R < < a < a < Q
! a) (� u) m CO CO ry CO
,Ilf
j
II 1
•
. . 0
• •
1
; z R • eirR
Q - -1 a
r �aJ - -H
E I:-�✓ JET p -
T^ ` y-
"tna
S. o c
Z
o r-
m :'
to
I
I-
I
-
P1
2 n
o n
53 4-f
nto --t
S1 o
Lfl F
1:,11:
nc0im r
L-_, I 7 1 O } £
r_ � o ! TX
r
r-
t ;
z i,
i
, a ! -
-OO
-O u _
i
.F D
OD 1
O
017;2 CI cT
'I �n ~COM
i '
•
I: 1 a n«
i 1 z pry
j ' ' z F � a
II ' j ' F :-.1
_
I Co
o
' c
Z
c
r
P
II