HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrd 2069 - Amending section 7.12.052 and Section 7.12.053 of the RMC pertaining to dangerous dogs ORDINANCE NO.
Ali ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF REDDING AMENDING SECTION 7 . 12 . 052 AND
SECTION 7 . 12 . 053 OF THE REDDING MUNICIPAL CODE
PERTAINING TO DANGEROUS DOGS.
The City Council of the City of Redding does hereby ordain as
follows :
Section 1 . Section 7 . 12 . 052 of the Redding Municipal Code
is hereby repealed, and the following added:
7 . 12 . 052 Hearing, determination and conditions of maintenance
of dangerous dog.
Upon reasonable information, the City Manager or person
designated by the City Manager as hearing officer may initiate
a hearing in accordance with the following procedures to
determine whether a dog is dangerous :
A. If the dog is not licensed, notice of the hearing shall
be personally served on the owner or custodian of the dog
not less than seven days prior to the hearing. If the
dog is licensed, in the alternative, notice of the
hearing may be served by letter addressed to the owner or
custodian of the dog at the address given on the license
application, deposited in the United States first-class
mail, not less than fourteen days prior to the hearing.
B. The owner or custodian of the dog and any interested
parties may present testimony and relevant evidence
helpful to a determination. The hearing shall be tape-
recorded. Following submission of all the evidence, the
hearing officer shall make a determination, which
decision shall be final and not subject to appeal except
by petition or application to a court of law. If the
hearing officer determines that the dog is dangerous, no
further administrative enforcement action shall occur
until twenty days have elapsed following the decision,
except that impoundment of the dog under Section 7 . 12 . 053
may be continued until a determination becomes final and
disposition of the dog is resolved. If legal proceedings
challenging the decision are instituted and a summons is
served before twenty days have elapsed, then
administrative enforcement shall be suspended pending a
final determination by the courts .
C. Upon any conviction of a violation of Sections 7 . 12 . 021B
or 7 . 12 . 054B, the determination by the court that a dog
meets the definitions of a dangerous dog under Section
7. 12 . 051 shall be conclusive.
D. If there has been a final determination pursuant to
subsection B or C of this section that the dog is a
dangerous dog, then the hearing officer shall order that
within thirty days the owner of the dangerous dog comply
with the conditions for maintenance and control of the
dog set forth in subsection E of this section.
E. No person shall own, maintain, or possess a dog
determined to be a dangerous dog, except upon one or more
following conditions that the hearing officer may
specify:
1. The dog shall not be permitted to be loose, or to
create any danger to the peace, health, or safety
of the people in the vicinity of the location where
it is kept or maintained.
2. If the dog is not kept securely within a cage or a
building or within a fenced area accessible only by
the dog' s owner or custodian, the premises where
the dog is maintained shall be posted to warn of
the presence of a dangerous dog. Signs shall be
placed at each point of access where the dog may be
present, or at fifty-foot intervals around the
perimeter of the area where the dog may be present
if the perimeter does not have fence or other
obstruction to access by human beings.
3 . The dog shall be provided with proper and adequate
food, water, ventilation, shelter, and care at all
times; the dog may not be subject to neglect,
suffering, cruelty, or abuse.
4 . The hearing officer shall be allowed at any
reasonable time to inspect the dangerous dog and
the conditions of care and maintenance of the
dangerous dog.
5 . The dog shall not be allowed to have contact with
children that are younger than eleven years of age
and not a resident on the premises where the dog is
kept.
6 . The owner of the dog shall be required to furnish
proof of general liability insurance covering the
owner and activities on the premises where the dog
is maintained, in a minimum amount of fifty
thousand dollars .
7. • A dangerous dog shall be spayed or neutered, at the
owner' s expense, within sixty days of a final
determination that the dog is dangerous .
8 . Such other conditions that the hearing officer may
specify if : the dog was determined to be a
dangerous dog under subsection B or C of this
section, and any of the above conditions for
maintenance and control of the dangerous dog were
violated, and the hearing officer exercised his
discretion under subsection F to not destroy the
dangerous dog.
F. Upon reasonable information that the conditions of owning
or maintaining a dangerous dog have been violated, the
City Manager may cause a hearing to be initiated in
accordance with the procedures of subsections A and B of
this section to determine if the conditions of subsection
E of this section have been violated. If there is a
prosecution and conviction under sections 7 . 12 . 021A,
7. 12 . 021B, 7 . 12 . 054A or 7 . 12 . 054B, then such conviction
shall conclusively establish that the minimum conditions
of maintenance and control of the dangerous dog have been
violated. If there is a final determination, either by
administrative hearing or by court conviction as set
forth above, that any of the conditions of maintaining or
controlling a dangerous dog have been violated, then
after the time for appeal has lapsed, the hearing officer
has discretion to either release the dog to its owner or
custodian on such terms and conditions as the hearing
officer may specify to protect public safety and welfare
or order that the dangerous dog be humanely destroyed.
G. If pursuant to subsection F of this section the hearing
officer orders that the dangerous dog be destroyed, and
the dog has not been impounded under Section 7 . 12 . 053 ,
then the owner or custodian of the dog shall comply
within thirty days by either ( 1 ) delivering the dog to
the City for destruction, or ( 2 ) having the dog humanely
destroyed by a licensed veterinarian. If the dog is
destroyed by a veterinarian, then proof of destruction
shall be supplied by a declaration under penalty of
perjury signed by the veterinarian. Refusal to comply
with the order of the hearing officer shall be punishable
as a misdemeanor.
(Ord. 1951 &1 , 1991 ; Ord. 1829 & 1 (E) , 1987 . )
Section 2 . Section 7. 12. 053 of the Redding Municipal Code is
hereby repealed, and the following added:
7.12. 053 Attack by dog-Impoundment and disposition.
Any dog which bites, attacks, or causes injury to any
human being may be immediately seized and impounded pending a
hearing and determination pursuant to Section 7. 12 . 052 or
prosecution under Sections 7 . 12 . 021A, 7 . 12 . 021B, 7. 12 . 054A or
7 . 12 . 054B. The costs of any impoundment shall be paid by the
dog owner in addition to any fines imposed for violation of
this chapter.
A. If the purpose of the hearing is to determine whether or
not the dog is dangerous, or there is a prosecution under
Section 7 . 12 . 021B or 7 . 12 . 054B, and there is a final
determination that the dog is a dangerous dog, then the
dog shall be released to its owner or custodian upon
proof by such owner or custodian of present ability to
comply with all of the conditions set forth in Section
7. 12 . 052E. If the owner or custodian of the dangerous
dog cannot demonstrate the ability to comply with the
conditions of Section 7 . 12 . 052E within thirty days of a
final determination that the dog is dangerous, then the
dog shall be humanely destroyed.
B. If the hearing is initiated pursuant to Section 7 . 12 . 052F
to determine if conditions of maintenance or control of
a dangerous dog have been violated, or there is a
prosecution under Sections 7 . 12 . 021A or 7 . 12 . 054B, then
upon a final determination that Section 7 . 12 . 052C has
been violated and the time has lapsed for an appeal, the
hearing officer may either release the dog to its owner
or custodian on such terms and conditions as the hearing
officer may specify to protect public safety and welfare
or order the dog be humanely destroyed.
(Ord. 1829 & 1 (F) , 1987)
Section 3 . It has been determined that this matter is
categorically exempt from the provisions of the California
Environmental Quality Act.
Section 4 . The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of
this Ordinance and cause its publication according to law.
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced
and read at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Redding on the 16th day of November , 1993 , and
was duly read and adopted on the 7th day of December
1993 , at a regular meeting of the City Council by the following
vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Anderson, Kehoe, � ss and Arness l
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None /
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Dahl
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
CARL ARNESS, Mayor
City of Redding
ATTEST:
CONNIE STROHMAYER, Cqty glerk
FORM APPROVED:
R DALL A. 8 AY 9 , City Attorney