HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso 91-468 - Approve CO No. 003 for Environmental Services between COR & Fugro-McClelland (West), Inc to prepare EIR on Clear Creek Rd site for COR transfer station/recycling facility, and review Ph II A � •
Jt
RESOLUTION NO. Gl-7ld
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING
APPROVING CONTRACT MODIFICATION (CHANGE ORDER) NO. 003
TO THE CONTRACT FOR ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES BETWEEN THE
CITY OF REDDING AND FUGRO-McCLELLAND (WEST) , INC. TO
PREPARE AN EIR ON THE CLEAR CREEK ROAD SITE FOR THE
CITY OF REDDING TRANSFER STATION/RECYCLING FACILITY,
AND TO REVIEW PHASE II OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL SITE
ANALYSIS BY LAWRENCE & ASSOCIATES (TO BE INCLUDED IN
THE EIR) PURSUANT TO ITS PROPOSAL LETTER DATED
SEPTEMBER 26, 1991, IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED
$39,570.00, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE
THE NECESSARY DOCUMENTATION.
WHEREAS, the City of Redding entered into a Contract for
Environmental Services with McClelland Consultants (West) , Inc.
on September 6 , 1989 , to prepare an Alternative Site Analysis and
Environmental Impact Report for a City-operated Solid Waste
Transfer/Recycling Facility; and
WHEREAS, on February 6 , 1990 , by Resolution No. 90-84 , City
Council approved Contract Modification ( Change Order) No. 001,
Job No. 0901-9509, Bid Schedule No. C-2517 , and its attachments
in the amount of $10,910.00 for the preparation of a Feasibility
Study and EIR for the location of maintenance facilities for the
Redding Area Bus Authority; and
WHEREAS, on May 15 , 1990 , by Resolution No. 90-220 , City
Council approved Contract Modification (Change Order) No. 002,
Job No. 0901-9509, Bid Schedule No. C-2517 , and its attachments
in the amount of $47 ,054. 46 for the preparation of an additional
Feasibility Study on additional acreage at the Viking Way Site
and an EIR on the Viking Way Site-in Addition; and
WHEREAS, City Council has requested the preparation of an
EIR Study on a 40-acre parcel on Clear Creek Road ( adjacent and
south of the Redding Power Site) owned by the County of Shasta;
and the review of Phase II of the Environmental Site Analysis by
Lawrence & Associates ( to be included in the EIR) ; and
WHEREAS, staff has reviewed the possibility of soliciting
requests for proposal for these additional services ; however, it
is believed that delays in this Project will cost substantially
more than the potential savings of a lengthy request for proposal
process; and
WHEREAS, it is also believed that a benefit of having Fugro-
McClelland (West) , Inc. perform these additional services is the
continuity of the project due to their background knowledge of
the Transfer Station Project; and
WHEREAS, Fugro-McClelland (West) , Inc. has agreed to provide
these additional services at a cost not to exceed $39 , 570 . 00 ; and
WHEREAS, funds are available therefor in the Solid Waste
Fund; and
WHEREAS, presented herewith for Council' s consideration is a
Proposal Letter dated September 16, 1991, from Fugro-McClelland
(West) , Inc. , together with Contract Modification (Change Order)
No. 003 ;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of
the City of Redding that:
1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct.
2 . Council believes entering into Contract Modification
(Change Order) No. 003 with Fugro-McClelland (West) , Inc. will
benefit the City because of its familiarity with the Project; and
hereby waives its Policy No. 1501 pertaining to the selection of
technical consultants.
3 . Council hereby approves Contract Modification (Change
Order) No. 003, Job No. 0901-9509, Bid Schedule No. C-2517,
together with the attached Proposal letter and Table 1 dated
September 26 , 1991, in an amount not to exceed $39 ,570 .00 , for
the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report on the Clear
Creek Road Site and the review of Phase II of the Environmental
2
Site Analysis by Lawrence and Associates (to be included in the
Environmental Impact Report) .
4. The City Manager of the City of Redding is hereby
authorized and directed to sign said Contract Modification
(Change Order) No. 003, and its attachments if necessary, on
behalf of the City of Redding; and the City Clerk is hereby
authorized and directed to attest the signature of the City
Manager and to impress the official seal of the City of Redding
to said documentation.
5 . A true copy of said Contract Modification ( Change
Order) No. 003, of which the Proposal Letter and Table 1 dated
September 26 , 1991, are a part, is attached hereto and incorpo-
rated herein by reference.
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was
introduced and read at a regular meeting of the City Council of
the City of Redding on the 5th day of November , 1991, and was
duly adopted at said meeting by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Arness, Buffum, Fulton, Moss & Dahl
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
MIKE DAHL, Mayor
City of Redding
ATTEST: FORM APPROVED:
ETHEL A. NICHOLS, City Clerk RAIMALL A. HAYS, City Attorney
3
c� a�j oQ • i
•
redddnO .
CONTRACT MODIFICATION (CHANGE ORDER)
CONTRACT MODIFICATION NO. 003 DATE 10-21-91
PROJECT NAME PREPARATION OF THE EIR FOR TH. E CITY OF REDDING PROJECT NO.0901-9509 _
TRANSFER STATION/RECYCLING FACILITY AT THE JOB NO. 9922-12
CLEAR-"CREEK- ROAD-STTE - �
CONTRACTOR FUG RQ-MC C�LELLAND»»LWESTI IT BID SCH.NO...S 1Z �-
1540 RIVER PARK DRIVE SUIT )
SACRAMENTO CA 95815
THE FOLLOWING MODIFICATIONS TO THE CONTRACT ARE HEREBY ORDERED: (USE ADDITIONAL PAGES IF F!73 RED)
PREPARE ACT REPORT ON THE CLEAR CREEK ROAD SITE FOR THE CITY
QR_MD -I jG TRANSFER STATION/RECYCLING FACILITY AND REVIEW PHASE II OF THE _
ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ANALYSIS BY LAWRENCE & ASSOCIATES (TO BE INCLUDED IN THE EIR) .
TIME AND FEES AS SHOWN IN THE ATTACHED TABLE 1 OF THE ATTACHED PROPOSAL DATED
/ T„ZMM2,6f/A,9,Al/.// OCTOBER 244._1991,__�, ---
CONTRACT.AMOUNT CONTRACT TIME(WORKING/CALENDAR)DAYS
ORIGINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT t- 61,440.00 ORIGINAL CONTRACT TIME DAYS
PREVIOUS CHANGE ORDERS(ADD/DEDUCT) $____5_74a _-4 6 PREVIOUS CHANGE ORDERS(ADD/DEDUCT) ..____n.» DAYS
THIS CHANGE ORDER(ADD/DEDUCT) i_ 39570 THIS CHANGE ORDER(ADD/DEDUCT) b_MO..a DAYS
REVISED CONTRACT AMOUNT s— 158974.46 REVISEDCONTRACTTIME DAYS
THE REVISED CONTRACT COMPLETION.DATE IS:
MAY 5-._ 19 _92—
OWNER
92—OWNER CONTRACTOR
CITY_OF REDDING__CITY MGR. FUGRO CC IVA_ND WEST)_,_jPQ. ��� APPROVED®®®E
By
Date---------»------------------------------------- Date_-_•- _�-�,--Z--�-1»>!�__--_.___.»_ —�
CITY LEGAL DE
DPW-28 (1-81)
oRo 1■ McClelland
FUGRO-McCLELLAND (WEST), INC.
1540 River Park Drive, Suite 117
Sacramento, California 95815
Tel. (916) 646-3535
FAX: (916) 646-3846
Mr. Larry Miralles October 24, 1991
City of Redding Project No. 0901-9509
General Services Department
Solid Waste Division
760 Parkview Avenue
Redding, CA 96001-3396
RE: PROPOSAL TO PREPARE THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE
CITY OF REDDING TRANSFER STATION/RECYCLING FACILITY AT THE CLEAR
CREEK ROAD SITE
Dear Mr. Miralles:
This letter proposal is submitted in response to your request for a work scope and bid
to prepare the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the City's transfer station/recycling
facility project. As outlined in this proposal, we can prepare the Administrative Draft, Draft,
Administrative Final and Final EIR for a cost not to exceed $39,570.00. Included is review and
incorporation of a Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) to be performed by a
separate contractor. Following is: our understanding of the project; proposed project approach
including work scope and project team members; a description of optional work tasks; and, a
cost schedule. Table 1, found at the end of this letter, summarizes the proposed work tasks
and cost schedule.
UNDERSTANDING OF THE PROJECT
The City of Redding General Services Department is requesting preparation of an
Environmental Impact Report (EIR)to identify and assess potential environmental impacts and
recommend necessary mitigation measures associated with the development of a Solid Waste
Transfer Station and Recycling Facility. This report will be prepared consistent with the
methodologies and detail contained in the City of Redding Solid Waste Transfer
Station/Recycling Facility and Redding Area Bus Authority Central Operations Hub project
Final EIR prepared by Fugro-McClelland (April 1991). The current project proposal is for a
site located on Clear Creek Road south of the property, commonly known as the. Redding
Power Site, in the southeast portion of the city. The current zoning for the site is Unclassified
and the General Plan designation is Industrial.
U.S. operating companies in California, Louisiana, Missouri, and Texas
International operating companies in Australia, Belgium, Brunei, Canada, Germany, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Japan,
Malaysia, The Netherlands, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, United Kingdom, and United Arab Emirates.
------
�UGRo 0 McClelland
FUGRO-McCLELLAND (WEST), INC. r" .
City of Redding Solid Waste Division October 24, 1991
Larry Miralles Page 2
The primary difference between the current proposal and the former project is that a
combined transfer station/RABA use is no longer being considered and that the facility would
be a cooperative enterprise with the County of Shasta. The facility's conceptual design would
remain relatively unchanged compared to the previous proposal. The refuse transfer building
itself will be a large industrial-type building with a through depressed roadway, two tipping
pads and a common tipping floor designed to accommodate 750 tons per day of refuse. The
City's current waste disposal demands are approximately 225 tons per day, while the County's
contracted hauler, Anderson Cottonwood Disposal, averages 100 tons per day. The public
resource recovery center and recycling center will remain as project features under the current
proposal.
The proposed site was formerly used for a variety of waste disposal/industrial activities.
Residual contamination from these past uses may exist at the site. Consequently, a Phase II
ESA is going to be completed by a separate firm. We propose to review and incorporate the
findings of this study in the EIR.
PROJECT APPROACH
As stated above, our project approach will be consistent with that used in preparation
of the City of Redding Solid Waste Transfer Station/Recycling Facility and Redding Area Bus
Authority Central Operations Hub project FEIR (April 1991). This proposal is for an EIR
which will evaluate the site design, engineering, and environmental concerns relating to the
project so that the proposed facility would best balance the City and County's needs with local
planning policies and environmental concerns. To this end, an EIR will be prepared in
compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) as amended and all
appropriate State, City and County requirements.
General Approach and Data Sources
The general approach will include literature and field research to obtain comparable
data for all potentially significant impact areas. The primary data source will be the existing
EIR (Fugro-McClelland, 1991). This information will be supplemented, where appropriate,
with library sources, agency archives, existing studies and data on file with private corporations
and public agencies including the City of Redding and County of Shasta. A Phase I ESA will
also be prepared for the project by an outside consultant under contract to the City and will
be utilized where appropriate when preparing the EIR.
oRo 0 McClelland
FUGRO-McCLELLAND (WEST), INC. �_n•
_
City of Redding Solid Waste Division October 24, 1991
Larry Miralles Page 3
Impacts will be quantified, where possible, and a determination of significance will be
made and substantiated based on predefined significance criteria. If available data is
inadequate, it may be possible to approximate the impacts through use of available
information, combined with a reasonable set of assumptions, to arrive at an answer. If
quantification is not possible, a thorough qualitative discussion of the expected impact will be
included. This discussion will describe how the project will influence the particular resource
category and the basis for the degree of impact. For all impact categories, the discussion will
be sufficiently detailed to support a finding on level of significance of impact. This conclusion
will be explicitly stated in the body and summary of the EIR along with the justification for the
conclusion.
Cumulative impacts will be addressed by evaluating the impacts associated with a list
of related or similar projects to be provided by the City.
The discussion of mitigation measures is among the most important in the report and
will receive a significant level of effort. Where possible, the EIR will recommend specific -
mitigation measures for potentially significant impacts so that the measures may be
incorporated as specific conditions of approval. Because of the conceptual nature of the
project, where specific details are not known, mitigation will be presented in the form of
performance standards to allow for flexibility in final project design and implementation. An
analysis of each measure will include degree of effectiveness, residual and secondary impacts,
person/agency proposing measure, responsible parties, and methods of implementation and
monitoring. Cost estimates for necessary public improvements which are included in the EIR
will only be those provided by appropriate public agencies.
Mitigation measures that are clearly infeasible will receive less detailed treatment than
more feasible measures. The analysis will place the major emphasis on mitigation measures
that could potentially be utilized as conditions for later project approval.
Scope and Content
The EIR format and scope will be very similar to that used in preparation of the April
1991 FEIR. The following is a summary of the proposed format and scope.
The report will begin with an introduction which will briefly describe the subject, format
and use of the EIR. The use of CEQA Section 15150 (incorporation by reference) will be dis-
cussed. The database used for impact analyses will be described.
ORD ❑ McClelland
FUGRO-McCLELLAND (WEST), INC.
City of Redding Solid Waste Division October 24, 1991
Larry Miralles Page 4
The introduction section will be followed by a separate executive summary including an
illustrated project description,discussion of impacts,primary mitigation measures,and summary
of project alternatives/sites.
The summary will be followed by a thorough project description section and
environmental setting section. These sections will be followed by the main section of the EIR,
the environmental impact analysis section.
The environmental impact analysis for each issue area covered in the EIR will have
three subsections: setting, impacts, and mitigation measures. Each issue. evaluated will have
an introductory paragraph explaining the methodology used in assessing the impacts. The
impact analysis will address both site-specific and cumulative impacts in accordance with the
State CEOA Guidelines. The focus of the EIR will be potentially significant issues pertinent
to the proposed project and reviewing agencies. It is understood that the scope of work
includes an Administrative Draft, Draft EIR,Administrative Final and Final EIR. The report's
emphasis will concentrate on the following issues consistent with the previous EIR:
• Geologic Hazards
• Hydrology and Drainage
• Biological Resources
•
Transportation/Circulation
• Air Quality
• Noise
• Land Use Compatibility
• Agricultural Resources
• Visual Resources/Light and Glare
• Archaeological Resources
• Public Utilities (Water and Sewer, Telephone, Electricity and Fuel)
• Emergency Services (Police, Fire and medical)
• Nuisance (Vectors/Litter/Odor)
• Human Health/Risk of Upset
Impacts will be quantified, where possible, and a determination of significance will be
made and substantiated. Mitigation measures will be identified for each impact.
Following the impact analysis section will be other required CEQA sections including
irreversible commitments of natural resources and long-term versus short-term impacts on the
environment, and the unavoidable effects of growth-inducing impacts.
• •
-----------
1mRo ❑ McClelland
27 r1m
FUGRO-McCLELLAND (WEST), INC.
City of Redding Solid Waste Division October 24, 1991
Larry Miralles Page 5
The EIR will end with a project alternatives section followed by a persons and
organizations consulted and report preparers section. The alternatives section will present a
summary of those alternatives already studied in previous reports prepared for the project (the
March 1990 siting study and April 1991 FEIR). The Final EIR will be of the same format with
the exception of a response to comments section to be inserted following the alternatives
section.
Kickoff Meeting and Project Description
One week after contract authorization, an initial kickoff meeting will be held to assist
in defining the current project and adjusting the work scope, if necessary. To maximize the
utility of the Final EIR and ensure a timely and on-budget completion of the document, it will
be essential that an early consensus is reached for several key project details. Most
importantly, any changes from the former project and or new project components to be
addressed need to be identified and described. To this end, specific topics to be discussed at
the kickoff meeting include site design and layout as well as the County's involvement with the
project.
At the meeting, Fugro-McClelland will present a draft project description based on our
understanding of the current proposal and information contained in the April 1991 FEIR. This
preliminary project description will be reviewed in detail at the kickoff meeting by all parties
in attendance to assure the project is properly defined. Our work scope assumes that sufficient
detail will be provided by the existing project description and that the City will provide a draft
conceptual site plan which will preliminarily serve as the basis for impact assessment. Fugro-
McClelland's primary role in project description development will be in assimilating the new
pertinent information for presentation in the EIR. Based on preliminary environmental
analysis, the preliminay site plan could then be modified slightly in response to constraints
identified.
Immediately following the kickoff meeting,preparation of the Administrative Draft EIR
will commence. Within one week following the kickoff meeting, a revised project description
will be presented to the City for final review and approval. Following this approval, any
significant changes to the project description may require a change in scope and contract
renegotiation. Minor changes, which do not result in an appreciable change in the work effort,
are acceptable and will be completed gratis.
--
UNG 91 McClelland
FUGRO-McCLELLAND (WEST), INC.
City of Redding Solid Waste Division October 24, 1991
Larry Miralles Page 6
Deliverables and Scheduling
Five copies of the Administrative Draft EIR will be delivered approximately 12 weeks
after contract authorization. Within two weeks following review of the Administrative Draft
EIR by the City, the Draft EIR will be prepared, incorporating comments and/or corrections,
and 25 copies will be delivered to the City.
Fifteen working days after receipt of all comments on the Draft EIR, two copies of the
Administrative Final EIR will be submitted to the City for review and comment. A maximum
of 20 issue responses will be completed as a part of the fixed price bid. Additional work, if
required, will be negotiated on a time and materials basis.
Within 5 working days of receipt of all City comments on the Administrative Final, the
Final EIR will be prepared, incorporating comments and/or corrections, and 25 copies, one
(1) camera-ready copy, and a set of floppy disks will be delivered to the City.
Meetings
A total of 48 hours of professional time has been budgeted for meetings/hearings. A
kickoff meeting will be scheduled at the outset of the project. During the 45-day public review
period for the Draft EIR, two public hearings held by the Planning Commission can be
attended upon request. Should the need arise, time for one additional unscheduled meeting
is also included in the project budget.
Project Team Members
The Fugro-McClelland project team assembled for this proposal brings together the
resources and background of two firms, combining the expertise of land use/environmental
planning(Fugro-McClelland)and full-service traffic and transportation planning(Pacific Traffic
and Transportation Engineers). The key personnel of the project team, Chris Stabenfeldt and
Mark Morse, are familiar with the local conditions and issues surrounding this project. All
project EIR personnel, with the exception of Jeffrey Clark of PacTrans, are located in the
Sacramento office of Fugro-McClelland.
Chris Stabenfeldt will act as Project Director for the study. Mr. Stabenfeldt is Manager
of Environmental and Planning Services for the Sacramento office. As Project Director,
Mr. Stabenfeldt will be responsible for contract matters, provide senior level direction of
project activities, and provide quality assurance/quality control.
11 McClelland
FUGRO-McCLELLAND (WEST), INC.
City of Redding Solid Waste Division October 24, 1991
Larry Miralles Page 7
Mark Morse, Environmental Planner, will act as Project Manager for the project. Mr.
Morse holds a Bachelor of Arts degree in Environmental Studies with a minor in City and
Regional Planning from the University of California, Santa Barbara, and has public and private
sector experience in both the planning and environmental impact analysis fields. Mr. Morse
will act as the principal investigator/liaison and will conduct the day-to-day management of the
project for Fugro-McClelland. Mr. Morse will also prepare the Air Quality, Land Use,
Agricultural Resources and Nuisance sections of the EIR.
Richard Meredith, Senior Environmental Scientist, will provide biological and wetlands
expertise to the project team and will prepare the Biological Resources section of the EIR.
Mr. Meredith has more than 10 years experience as a biologist/project manager on federal
public works, military, and regulatory programs.
James Robinson will be the Environmental Geologist assigned to the project team.
Mr. Robinson will prepare the Geology and Hydrology/Drainage sections of the EIR.
Tamara Mihm, Environmental Scientist, will prepare the Emergency Services and
Cultural Resources sections. Ms. Mihm holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Environmental
Policy Analysis and Planning, with an emphasis in Water Quality, from the University of
California, Davis.
Jeanie Shepard, Environmental Planner/Landscape Architect, will be assigned the
Visual Resources section. Ms. Shepard has extensive experience in conducting visual analyses
and has participated in the preparation of numerous environmental studies for projects
throughout California. In addition, Ms. Shepard has over seven years of experience as a
landscape designer with design experience in office and retail developments, parks, private
living communities, and custom residential homes. Ms. Shepard is a candidate for a Master's
Degree in Urban Planning from Cal Poly San Luis Obispo.
Wesley Ingram, Senior Environmental Scientist, will be assigned the Noise section and
would conduct the Fiscal study as an optional work task. Since joining Fugro-McClelland's
staff in 1990, Mr. Ingram has participated in the preparation of fiscal analyses for numerous
environmental studies. Prior to joining Fugro-McClelland, Mr. Ingram was an Environmental
Resources Planner with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. He has experience in public policy
analysis and research. Mr. Ingram has a Master of Arts degree in English from Washington
State University and is a Ph.D. candidate in Environmental Policy Analysis at the University
of California at Davis.
mon 0 McClelland
FUGRO-McCLELLAND (WEST), INC.
City of Redding Solid Waste Division October 24, 1991
Larry Miralles Page 8
The transportation/circulation and traffic analysis will be prepared by Jeffrey E. Clark,
P.E., Principal of Pacific Traffic and Transportation Engineers (PacTrans). PacTrans is a
Sacramento Valley-based engineering consultant firm providing a wide range of traffic
engineering and transportation planning services including traffic impact analysis and
transportation modeling evaluation; traffic signal evaluation and design; freeway interchange
analysis; roadway plan line and analysis; traffic safety studies and traffic control device
inventories; and parking lot design and analysis. PacTrans principals have provided consultant
services to numerous state and local authorities, as well as clients in the private sector and
have experience coordinating work efforts with civil engineering, land use, planning,
architectural and environmental analysis firms.
Jeffrey E. Clark, P.E., has more than 10 years of experience in the preparation of traffic
impact studies and transportation modeling projects. He has directed and served as project
engineer for major traffic impact studies in Vacaville, Sacramento, West Sacramento, Del
Norte County, Chico, El Dorado County and Stockton and conducted smaller projects
throughout California and Nevada. He has conducted traffic impact studies for major
residential subdivisions, planned communities, commercial developments and industrial/office
developments as well as transportation system management plans, safety studies, geometric
design, and traffic signal/system projects.
OPTIONAL WORK TASK
Fiscal Impact Study
At the request of the City, a fiscal impact study can also be completed for the project.
The fiscal analysis would present a relative cost comparison of implementing the project at the
Redding Power Site compared to the previously studied Viking Way and Eastside Road sites.
A general discussion of the economic consequences of adding the County waste stream to the
facility would be included in this study.
COST AND OFFER
Fugro-McClelland (West), Inc. will prepare the Environmental Impact Report (EIR)
for the project in accordance with our proposed scope of services, for a fee not to exceed
$39,570.00. Table 1 is a detailed breakdown of the proposed costs by major work item. The
not-to-exceed cost includes preparation of the Administrative Draft,Draft,Administrative Final
and Final EIR. Attendance at public hearings beyond those hours identified in the work scope
non 0 McClelland
FUGRO-McCLELLAND (WEST), INC.
r
City of Redding Solid Waste Division October 24, 1991
Larry Miralles Page 9
will be billed on a time and materials basis. A contingency of $4,000.00 (10%) is
recommended to allow flexibility in the event of additional work requirements.
The proposed scope of services and associated costs are fully negotiable to meet the
requirements of the City. It should be noted that the cost for responding to comments is
intended for addressing issues within the scope of work presented here. Any deviations from
this scope requiring additional research or analysis will necessitate renegotiation. Additional
work, not included within our proposed work program, will be completed upon City
authorization, in accordance with our "Standard Fees and General Conditions." You should
note that the fee indicated above pays for our professional services and does not provide for
insuring the entire project. Therefore, because of the limited nature of our fee relative to the
value of this project, it is necessary that we limit the extent of our professional liability as
described in the General Conditions for Professional Services, paragraph 4, attached.
Fugro-McClelland prefers a monthly billing schedule. Ten or 20 percent could be
retained by the City until completion of the Final EIR for security. This method of billing
allows reimbursement commensurate with cost incurred as typically 50-75 percent of the
expense occurs during preparation of the Administrative Draft EIR. We are flexible on billing
methods and would be available to discuss a mutually acceptable payment schedule.
This offer for professional services will remain in effect for a period of 90 days from the
date of the proposal. During this period, questions regarding our proposed scope of services
may be directed to Mr. Chris Stabenfeldt, Project Director and Manager of Environmental and
Planning Services, or Mark Morse, the Project Manager assigned to this project.
If you have any questions or comments regarding this proposal, please don't hesitate to
call Mark or myself at (916) 646-3535.
Sincerely,
FUGRO-McCLELLAND (WEST), INC.
L�
Chris Stabenfeldt
Manager, Planning and
Environmental Services
� 8
O M
U ...... ..... .................. .....;
oD
..... .....
............. ... .....
c
a H o
° v o
U
3
�.
I........... ..... ......
...... ............ ..... .....
.............
c o ............
............. ..... ......
............ ....
....>
o
0
/+ h
C
U U O O
N
61 u
W
C C_
C
CG y •� 8
C O O M 00 'IT ems-+ 00 " 00 00 00 0 N 00 "
wb �° LLy O 69
C 0.y
r--i- �.•i . O
v
W x z
M V� N
3 u 12
IVI
�.
U
to
o
o 0
00 N
U n ..
..
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o g o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .. o o o
`O 00 7 N 7 �O 7 W GD N 7 7 00 00 00 O GD 00 7 7 00 C Iv.^. O
7 N 00 l— N Q 7
�p 69 69 69 69 69 �j 69 69 69 s9 69 69 s9 69 �,j 69 69 M 69 s9 69 —
_V4 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 N v9 x V)
UGS
00
:: N 00 N V N a0 00 00 oo V
.....
L
In
Q
a a a
� M
o �
< U T •� V1 � `/ � W � U �
w U Q � �d °' � O ❑ N w v
.o � •� C V o � � � O' .u�i c .0 � u � � `�-' `� Qtr �i (�L��. F w
/yO w z
M 4 6 n 00 Q+
U
cn
c
ov S o ;......:.....
3
o
L
N
° s
u oWo
a o
Q c
c
v
0
� Q
L
W
cC
a
Z a
G
z o z
o ° 8 o
C 'C •� �' C V
U a a
W
.. ..
C 'L .
N
69
U o o 00
m o o o
4r 64 69 69 M 44 69
r 69 f9 K
U
c
E
h
Ln
o
W b 3