Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso 94-143 - Approve entering into a standard agreement for Professional services between the City & Martin & Kane, Inc for engineering design services related to the Diestelhorst Bridge replacement project RESOLUTION NO. 94- 3 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING APPROVING ENTERING INTO A STANDARD AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY AND MARTIN & KANE, INC. FOR ENGINEERING DESIGN SERVICES RELATED TO THE DIESTELHORST BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT, IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $545,000; AND APPROPRIATING AN ADDITIONAL $15,000 FOR CONTINGENCIES. WHEREAS, on April 5, 1994, the City Council approved the selection of Martin & Kane, Inc. for the design of the Diestelhorst Bridge replacement project, and authorized the Director of Public Works to negotiate a contract; and WHEREAS, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference is the negotiated Standard Agreement for Professional Services, embodying the tasks required in the request for proposal, in an amount not to exceed $545,000; and WHEREAS, the negotiated contract price is within the range established by the City and Caltrans for a project of this complexity; and WHEREAS, this project is funded 80% under the Federal Bridge Replacement Program for replacement of the bridge itself and 200 feet each of the north and south street approaches, with the City' s share coming from traffic impact fees; and WHEREAS, adequate funds have been budgeted in the 1993-94 traffic impact fee account to cover the engineering design costs for this project; and WHEREAS, State regulations require Caltrans to perform a pre-award "desk audit" of the selected consultant; however, the City Council can expedite the progress of the project by awarding the contract subject to said desk audit and the City receiving Caltrans ' approval to execute the agreement with Martin & Kane, Inc. ; and WHEREAS, staff is requesting that at this time the City Council award the contract for this project to Martin & Kane, Inc. , not to exceed $545,000, plus a contingency fund of $15,000, SUBJECT TO CALTRANS PERFORMING A DESK AUDIT AND THE CITY RECEIVING CALTRANS' APPROVAL TO PROCEED WITH EXECUTION OF THE MARTIN & KANE, INC. AGREEMENT; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING AS FOLLOWS: 1 . The foregoing recitals are true and correct. 2. That the City Council hereby awards the contract for this project to Martin & Kane, Inc. , not to exceed $545 ,000, plus a contingency fund of $15, 000, SUBJECT TO CALTRANS PERFORMING A DESK AUDIT AND THE CITY RECEIVING CALTRANS' APPROVAL TO PROCEED WITH EXECUTION OF THE MARTIN & KANE, INC. AGREEMENT. 3 . When the City Council receives Caltrans ' approval to proceed with execution of the Agreement, the Mayor is authorized and directed to sign the Martin & Kane, Inc. Standard Agreement for Professional Services on behalf of the City; and the City Clerk is authorized and directed to attest the signature of the Mayor and to impress the official seal of the City of Redding thereto. I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was introduced, read, and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 17th day of MaY , 1994, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: P. Anderson, Kehoe, McGeorge, Murray, and R. Anderson NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None ROBERT C. ANDERSON, Mayor City of Redding A ST: FO APPROVED: CONNIE STROHMAYER, 69ity Clerk RANDALL A. HAYS, City Attorney 2 STANDARD AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES This AGREEMENT is between Martin & Kane, Inc. (the "ENGINEER") and the City of Redding (the "OWNER") for a PROJECT generally described as: Diestelhorst Bridge Replacement Article 1 - Scope of Services The Scope of Services is set forth in Attachment A. Articles 2 and 3 - Compensation and Terms of Payment ENGINEER'S compensation and terms of payment are set forth in Attachment B. Article 4 - Obligations of the Engineer Amendments to ARTICLE 4, if any are included in Attachment C. A. General The ENGINEER will serve as the OWNER's professional engineering representative under this AGREEMENT, providing professional engineering consultation and advice and furnishing customary services incidental thereto. B. Standard Care The standard of care applicable to ENGINEER's services will be the degree of skill and diligence normally employed by professional engineers or consultants performing the same or similar services at the time said services are performed. The ENGINEER will reperform any services not meeting this standard without additional compensation. C. Subsurface Investigations In soils, foundation, groundwater, and other subsurface investigations, the actual characteristics may vary significantly between successive test points and sample intervals and at locations other than where observations, explorations, and investigations have been made. Because of the inherent uncertainties in subsurface evaluations, changed or unanticipated underground conditions may occur that could affect total PROJECT cost and/or execution. These conditions and cost/execution effects are not the responsibility of the ENGINEER. Martin & Kane, Inc. Page I of 11 Standard Agreement- Professional Se*s Diestebot Bridge Replacement Project D. Engineer's Personnel At Construction Site The presence or duties of the ENGINEER's personnel at a construction site, whether as onsite representatives or otherwise, do not make the ENGINEER or ENGINEER's personnel in any way responsible for those duties that belong to the OWNER and/or the construction contractors or other entities, and do not relieve the construction contractors or any other entity of their obligations, duties, and responsibilities, including, but not limited to, all construction methods, means, techniques, sequences, and procedures necessary for coordinating and completing all portions of the construction work in accordance with the Contract Documents and any health or safety precautions required by such construction work. The ENGINEER and ENGINEER's personnel have no authority to exercise any control over any construction contractor or other entity or their employees in connection with their work or any health or safety precautions and have no duty for inspecting, noting, observing, correcting, or reporting on health or safety deficiencies of the construction contractor(s) or other entity or any other persons at the site except ENGINEER's own personnel. E. Opinions of Cost, Financial Considerations, and Schedules In providing opinions of costs, financial analyses, economic feasibility projections, and schedules for the PROJECT, the ENGINEER has no control over cost or price of labor and materials; unknown or latent conditions of existing equipment or structures that may affect operation or maintenance costs; competitive bidding procedures and market conditions; time or quality of performance by third parties; quality, type, management, or direction of operating personnel; and other economic and operational factors that may materially affect the ultimate PROJECT cost or schedule. Therefore, the ENGINEER makes no warranty that the OWNER's actual PROJECT costs, financial aspects, economic feasibility or schedules will not vary from the ENGINEER's opinions, analyses, projections, or estimates. When the OWNER requires the ENGINEER to prepare quantity and material take-offs and/or opinions of cost from plans and specifications that are less than 100 percent complete, the OWNER will hold the ENGINEER harmless from any and all loss, liability, or claims resulting from the incompleteness. F. Construction Progress Payments Recommendations by the ENGINEER to the OWNER for periodic construction progress payments to the construction contractor will be based on the ENGINEER's knowledge, information, and belief from selective sampling that the work has progressed to the point indicated. Such recommendations do not represent that continuous or detailed examinations have been made by the ENGINEER to ascertain that the construction contractor has completed the work in exact accordance with the contract documents, that the final work will be acceptable in all respects; that the ENGINEER has made an examination to ascertain how or for what purpose the construction contractor has used the moneys paid: that title to any of the work, materials, or equipment has passed to OWNER free and clear of liens, claims, security interest, or encumbrances; or, that there are not other matters at issue between OWNER and the construction contractor that affect the amount that should be paid. Martin & Kane, Inc. Page 2 of 11 Standard Agreement- Professional AS Diestes Bridge Replacement Project G. Record Drawings Record drawings, if required, will be prepared, in part, on the basis of information compiled and furnished by others, and may not always represent the exact location, type of various components, or exact manner in which the PROJECT was finally constructed. The ENGINEER is. not responsible for any errors or omissions in the information from others that is incorporated into the record drawings. Record drawings will consist only of the signed and sealed set of drawings in hard copy form. Any computer-generated files on diskettes or tapes furnished by the ENGINEER are for the OWNER and others' convenience and to be used at user's sole risk. H. Minority- and Women-Owned Business; OWNER-Specified Subcontractors ENGINEER will comply with OWNER's directives in utilizing the services of OWNER specified subcontractors and/or minority- and women-owned businesses on the PROJECT. Firms selected by the ENGINEER to meet said directives will be subject to approval of the OWNER. I. Access To Engineer's Accounting Records The ENGINEER will maintain accounting records, in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and practices, to substantiate all invoiced amounts. Said records will be available to OWNER during ENGINEER's normal business hours for a period of 1 year after ENGINEER's final invoice for examination to the extent required to verify the direct costs (excluding established or standard allowances and rates) incurred hereunder. The OWNER may only audit accounting records applicable to a cost-reimbursable type compensation. J. Engineer's Insurance ENGINEER shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the ENGINEER, his agents, representatives, or employees as follows: a. Worker's compensation and employer's liability insurance as required by the state or province where the work is performed. Employer's Liability insurance will have limits of no less than $1,000,000 per occurrence. b. Automobile Liability, covering owned, non-owned, or hired vehicles with limits no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage. Martin & Kane, Inc. Page 3 of 11 Standard Agreement-Professional Services Diestelhorst Bridge Replacement Project C. Commercial General Liability coverage at least as broad as Insurance Services Office Occurrence form CG 0001, with limits no less than $1,000,000 per occurrence/$2,000,000 general aggregate. d. Professional Liability insurance with limits no less than $1,000,000 per occurrence. Coverage should be endorsed to include contractual liability. e. Both General Liability and Automobile Liability policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain the following conditions. 1. The OWNER, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered as insureds as respects: liability arising out of work or operations performed by or on behalf of the ENGINEER; or automobiles owned, leased, hired, or borrowed by the ENGINEER. 2. For any claims relating to this project, the ENGINEER's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the OWNER, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the OWNER, its officers, officials, employees, or volunteers shall be excess of the ENGINEER's insurance and shall not contribute with it. 3. Each insurance policy shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be canceled except after 30 days prior written notice has been given to the OWNER. Article 5 - Obligations of the Owner Amendments to Article 5, if any, are included in Attachment C. A. Owner-Furnished Data The OWNER will provide to the ENGINEER all technical data in the OWNER's possession, including, but not limited to, previous reports, maps, surveys, borings, and all other information relating to the ENGINEER's services on the PROJECT. ENGINEER will reasonably rely upon the accuracy, timeliness, and completeness of the information provided by the OWNER. B. Access To Facilities And Property The OWNER will make its facilities accessible to ENGINEER as required for ENGINEER's performance of its services and will provide labor and safety equipment as required by ENGINEER for such access. OWNER will perform at no cost to ENGINEER such test of Martin & Kane, Inc. Page 4 of 11 Standard Agreement- Professional Services Diestelhorst Bridge Replacement Project equipment, machinery, pipelines, and other components to the OWNER's facilities as may be required in connection with ENGINEER's services, unless otherwise agreed to. OWNER will be responsible for all acts of OWNER's personnel. C. Advertisements, Permits, And Access Unless otherwise agreed to in the Scope of Services, the OWNER will obtain, arrange, and pay for all advertisements for bids; permits and licenses required by local, state, province, or federal authorities; and land, easements, rights-of-way, and access necessary for the ENGINEER's services or PROJECT construction. D. Timely Review The OWNER will examine the ENGINEER's studies, reports, sketches, drawings, specifications, proposals, and other documents; obtain advice of any attorney, insurance .counselor, accountant, auditor, and other consultants as OWNER deems appropriate; and render in writing decisions required of OWNER in a timely manner. E. Prompt Notice The OWNER will give prompt written notice to ENGINEER whenever OWNER observes or becomes aware of any development that affects the scope or timing of ENGINEER's services, or any defect in the work of the ENGINEER or construction contractors. F. Asbestos Or Hazardous Substances And Indemnification If asbestos or hazardous substances in any form are encountered or suspected, the ENGINEER will stop its own work in the affected portions of the PROJECT to permit testing and evaluation of the problem. If asbestos is suspected, the ENGINEER will, if requested, assist the OWNER in contacting regulatory agencies and in identifying asbestos testing laboratories and demolition/removal contractors or consultants. If asbestos is confirmed, the OWNER will engage a specialty consultant or contractor to study the affected portions of the work and perform all remedial measures. If hazardous substances other than asbestos are suspected, the ENGINEER will conduct tests to determine the extent of the problem and will perform the necessary studies and recommend the necessary remedial measures at an additional fee to be negotiated. G. Contractor Indemnification OWNER agrees to include the provisions of ARTICLE 41), ENGINEER's Personnel at Construction Site, and the following paragraph in all construction contracts associated with this PROJECT. Martin & Kane, Inc. Page 5 of 11 Standard Agreement- Professional AS Diesteov Bridge Replacement Project To the maximum extent permitted by law, the construction contractor will indemnify and defend OWNER and ENGINEER and their officers, employees, agents, and subcontractors, from all claims and losses, including attorney's fees and litigation costs, arising out of property losses or health, safety, personal injury, or death claims by construction contractors, their subcontractors of any tier, and their employees, agents, or invitees regardless of the fault, breach of contract, or negligence of OWNER or ENGINEER, excepting only such claims or losses that have been adjudicated to have been caused solely by the negligence of OWNER or ENGINEER and regardless of whether or not the construction contractor is or can be named a party in a litigation. The construction contractor will carry comprehensive general liability insurance naming OWNER and ENGINEER as additional insureds and including a contractual liability clause or endorsement covering the construction contractor's indemnity of OWNER and ENGINEER, and will provide OWNER and ENGINEER with a certificate of insurance showing compliance with the requirements of this paragraph prior to commencement of work. H. Exclusion of Contractor Claims OWNER agrees to include in all contracts with construction contractors and equipment or material suppliers an exclusion of those parties' right to make direct claims against the ENGINEER in the following form: In performing its obligations for the OWNER, the ENGINEER and its consultants may cause expense for the contractor or its subcontractors and equipment or material suppliers. However, those parties and their sureties shall maintain no direct action against the ENGINEER, its officers, employees, agents, and subcontractors, for any claim arising out of, in connection with, or resulting from the engineering services performed or required to be performed. Only the OWNER will be the beneficiary of any undertaking by the ENGINEER, its officers, employees, agents, and subcontractors. I. Owner's Insurance OWNER will have the construction contractor provide a Builders Risk All Risk insurance policy for the full replacement value of all physical facilities associated with the ENGINEER's services. Such policy will include, if available, physical damage perils otherwise insured under the Builders Risk policy which result from the contingencies of design error, faulty workmanship, and defects in materials and workmanship. The policy will provide a waiver of subrogation as to the ENGINEER and OWNER and the construction contractors, and their Martin& Kane, Inc. Page 6 of 11 Standard Agreement- Professional Selles Diestel-t Bridge Replacement Project respective officers, officials, employees, agents, subcontractors, and volunteers. OWNER will provide ENGINEER a copy of such policy. J. Litigation Support The Scope of Services does not include cost of the ENGINEER for required or requested assistance to support, prepare, document, bring, defend, or assist in litigation undertaken or defended by the OWNER. All such services required or requested of the ENGINEER, except for suits or claims between the parties to this AGREEMENT, will be reimbursed as mutually agreed, and payment for such services shall be in accordance with ARTICLE 3, unless and until there is a finding by a court or arbitrator that ENGINEER's sole negligence caused OWNER's damage. K. Changes The OWNER may make or approve changes within the general scope of services in this AGREEMENT. If such changes affect the ENGINEER's cost of or time required for performance of the services, an equitable adjustment will be made through a written amendment to this AGREEMENT. L. Services Of Engineer Unless this AGREEMENT is modified or terminated, the OWNER will have all services specified in this Agreement performed by the ENGINEER, employing ENGINEER's standard form and content of drawings, specifications, and contract documents. Any item in the nature of maps, drawings, specifications, etc., which are provided to OWNER under this AGREEMENT shall become the property of OWNER. Article 6 - General Legal Provisions Amendments to Article 6, if any, are included in Attachment C. A. Authorization To Proceed Execution of this AGREEMENT by the OWNER will be authorization for the ENGINEER to proceed with the work, unless otherwise provided for in this AGREEMENT. B. Reuse Of Project Documents All designs, drawings, specifications, documents, and other work products of the ENGINEER are instruments of service for this PROJECT, whether the PROJECT is completed or not. Reuse by the OWNER or by others acting through or on behalf of the OWNER of any such instruments of service without the written permission of the ENGINEER will be at the Martin & Kane, Inc. Page 7 of 11 Standard Agreement- Professional Sees Diestell�lst Bridge Replacement Project OWNER's sole risk. The OWNER agrees to indemnify and defend the ENGINEER from all claims, damages, losses, and expenses, including, but not limited to, direct, indirect, or consequential damages and attorney's fees arising out of or related to such unauthorized reuse. C. Force Majeure The ENGINEER is not responsible for damages or delay in performance caused by acts of God, strikes, lockouts, accidents, or other events beyond the control of the ENGINEER. D. Termination This AGREEMENT may be terminated for convenience on 30 days' written notice, or for cause if either party fails substantially to perform through no fault of the other and does not commence correction of such nonperformance within 5 days of written notice and diligently complete the correction thereafter. On termination, ENGINEER will be paid for all authorized work performed up to the termination date plus termination expenses, such as, but not limited to, reassignment of personnel, subcontract termination costs, and related closeout costs. On termination, ENGINEER shall turn over to OWNER all items of work for which received payment that are in the nature of, but not limited to, maps, drawings, calculations, etc. E. Suspension, Delay, Or Interruption Of Work The OWNER may suspend, delay, or interrupt the services of the ENGINEER for the convenience of the OWNER. In the event of force majeure or such suspension, delay, or interruption, an equitable adjustment in the PROJECT's schedule, commitment, and cost of ENGINEER's personnel and subcontractors, and ENGINEER's compensation will be made. F. No Third Party Beneficiaries This AGREEMENT gives no rights or benefits to anyone other than the OWNER and ENGINEER and has no third-party beneficiaries. G. Indemnification a. ENGINEER agrees to indemnify and defend OWNER from any loss, cost, or expense claimed by third parties for property damage and bodily injury, including death, caused solely by the negligence or willful misconduct of ENGINEER, its employees, or agents in connection with the PROJECT. Martin& Kane, Inc. Page 8 of 11 Standard Agreement- Professional Se)�es Diestes Bridge Replacement Project b. OWNER agrees to indemnify and defend the ENGINEER from any loss, cost, or expense claimed by third parties for property damage and bodily injury, including death, caused solely by the negligence or willful misconduct of OWNER, its employees, or agents in connection with the PROJECT. C. If the negligence or willful misconduct of both the ENGINEER and OWNER (or a person identified above for whom each is liable) is a cause of such damage or injury, the loss, cost, or expense shall be shared between ENGINEER and OWNER in proportion to their relative degrees of negligence or willful misconduct, and the right of indemnity shall apply for such proportion. H. Assignment Neither party will assign all or any part of this AGREEMENT without the prior written consent of the other party. I. Legal Action All legal actions by either party against the other arising from this AGREEMENT, or for the failure to perform in accordance with the applicable standard of care, or any other cause of action, will be barred 2 years from the date the claimant knew or should have known of its claim, but in any event no later than 4 years from the date of substantial completion of ENGINEER's services. J. Interpretation Releases from, indemnities against, limitations on, and assumptions of liability and limitations on remedies expressed in this AGREEMENT shall apply even in the event of breach of contract or warranty, fault, tort including negligence, strict liability, statutory, or any other cause of action (except for willful or reckless disregard of obligations) of the party released or indemnified, or whose liability is limited or assumed, or against whom remedies are limited. Party, as used herein, includes the named parties, their officers, employees, agents, subcontractors, and affiliates. K. Jurisdiction The law of the State of California shall govern the validity of this AGREEMENT, its interpretation and performance, and any other claims related to it. Martin& Kane, Inc. Page 9 of 11 Standard Agreement- Professional Services Diestelhorst Bridge Replacement Project L. Severability and Survival If any of the provisions contained in this AGREEMENT are held for any reason to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable in any respect, such invalidity, illegality, or unenforceability will not affect any other provision, and this AGREEMENT shall be construed as if such invalid, illegal, or unenforceable provision had never been contained herein. Articles 4,5, and 6 shall survive termination of this AGREEMENT for any cause. (continued) Martin& Kane, Inc. Page 10 of 11 Standard Agreement- Professional Series Diestelf Bridge Replacement Project Article 7 - Attachments, Schedules, And Signatures This AGREEMENT, including its Attachments and Schedules, constitutes the entire AGREEMENT, supersedes all prior written or oral understandings, and may only be changed by a written amendment executed by both parties. The following Attachments and Schedules are hereby made a part of this AGREEMENT: Attachment A - Scope of Services Attachment B - Compensation and Terms of Payment IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties execute below: For the OWNER: CITY OF REDDING Dated this day of , 1994 By: Name/Title Attested By: Name/Title Form Approved By: Name/Title For the ENGINEER: MARTIN & KANE, INC. Dated this 1 Q—/2�day of /(.�' 1994 Name/Title acb:: B:STDAGREE.102 Martin & Kane, Inc. Page 11 of 11 ATTACHMENT A Attachment A to the AGREEMENT between Martin & Kane, Inc. (the "ENGINEER"), and the City of Redding (the "OWNER"), for a PROJECT generally described as: Diestelhorst Bridge Replacement Article 1 - Scope of Services PHASE 1 - DESIGN SERVICES TASK 1 - REVIEW OF PROJECT AND PROJECT MANAGEMENT The first order of work will be to meet with City and Caltrans staff at a kick-off meeting. The purpose of this meeting will be to thoroughly discuss the project concept, gather existing data, begin coordination with affected agencies, and develop project procedures which must be followed. 1.1 Project Concept Discussion The project concept, as envisioned by both the City and Caltrans, will be discussed with respective staff members. It is important that Martin&Kane understands the history, considerations, evaluations, compromises, etc., that have gone into developing the project to its current status. The specific issues which must be discussed are: 1.1.1 Scope of Work How does the City's and Caltran's projected scope of work compare to that which was proposed by Martin&Kane? The scope of work must be carefully defined in order to insure that the City's needs will be met. Our purpose, as an extension of the City's staff, is to provide the City the product the City needs, not what we, the consultant, thinks it needs. This initial discussion should fill in any gaps or eliminate any unneeded areas in the scope of work. Product: Detailed Scope of Work 1.1.2 Schedule There are two schedules of importance to this project. One will be the design schedule and the second will be the proposed construction schedule. The kickoff meeting will be an ideal time to discuss these schedules to insure the assumptions made in order to develop them accurately and to insure that they meet our client's needs. The construction schedule will be based on normal construction practices. Will this satisfy the City's needs or is a fast-track procedure needed? The kick-off meeting will help all parties to focus clearly on schedule priorities for this project. Product: Schedule of Deliverables 1.1.3 Design Standards Design standards will be discussed at the kick-off meeting. It is our understanding that Caltrans design standards will be used for the bridge and approach roadway design. This will be the ideal time to determine other standards (City of Redding design standards and standard drawings for all other civil design)which must be complied with and to gather the appropriate documentation. Product: Design Criteria Summary 1.1.4 Environmental Mitigation An EIR/EA has been produced for this project. This document has detailed several areas of mitigation which must be integrated into the project. These areas will be discussed at the kickoff meeting to insure their careful consideration and application. Product: Environmental Document Review 1.1.5 PS&E Requirements The detailed schedule and deliverables will be discussed to insure compliance with City and Caltrans needs. Each milestone deliverable,when it is due, how many copies are required,to whom the packages are to be transmitted, etc., will be discussed. It is important to come to an agreement early in the design process to either eliminate unrealistic expectations or provide advance warning of heavy manpower requirements. Product: Deliverables Review City of Redding - Diestelhorst Bridge Page AI Martin&Kane, Inc. 1.2 Gather Existing Data The work in this subtask involves collecting and researching existing data necessary to initiate work on the preliminary design. This includes as-built plans and maintenance reports for the existing Diestelhorst Bridge, the environmental document for the new Diestelhorst Bridge,existing City studies and mapping,etc. Product: As-Built Plans/Maps Review Bridge Maintenance Reports Review Existing Data Reviewed 1.3 Utility Coordination Existing utilities requiring relocation or modification should be identified along with coordination with the utilities companies at this early stage of the project. It is important to keep affected utility companies well informed as project development proceeds. Early consultation will better facilitate efficient relocation and/or redesign if necessary. Product: Agency Coordination Initiated 1.4 Project Procedures/Prof ctManagement The kickoff meeting will also be an ideal time to discuss the procedures to be followed during the project's course. In our years of working with Caltrans,we have developed a good working knowledge of their procedures. At the same time, the meeting will be used to review the procedures required by the City and how they blend with those of Caltrans. Administrative and technical contacts will be determined for use throughout the length of the project. The City's schedule will be reviewed with important milestones noted. Also, the budget will be reviewed, both design and construction. Progress and other periodic meetings will be scheduled. Reporting requirements will be determined. The information above will be used to supplement our project management approach in controlling the project. Specific Project Management Tasks assumed at this time follow. 1.4.1 Hold Monthly Project Progress Meetings Ten monthly meetings will be held in our Redding project office or in the City of Redding Public Works offices. These meetings will be used to discuss project progress (status and budget) to obtain City and Caltrans input on all important issues, to make decisions, to discuss issues that have the potential of affecting project budget, schedule, or product, and finally to insure good coordination and data transfer between all Team members. An agenda will be prepared for each meeting in consultation with the City Project Manager. This agenda will be distributed before each meeting. Minutes of each meeting will be taken and distributed to all participants after each meeting. This is a good procedure for documenting decisions/agreements made and for holding persons accountable to those agreements. Product: Monthly Progress Meeting 1.4.2 Monthly Progress Reports Prior to each progress meeting, monthly progress reports will be prepared and submitted to the City. These reports will address progress of work, project schedule, information or decisions needed to maintain the schedule and complete deliverables,potential problems with suggested solutions,and the anticipated work for the upcoming month. Product: Monthly Progress Report 1.4.3 Schedule A critical path schedule will be developed showing all project tasks with milestone deadlines clearly defined. This schedule will be in the form of a bar chart showing planned progress and actual progress. The schedule will be updated monthly. Product: CPM Schedule 1.4.4 Budget A budget will be developed at the beginning of the project which will be updated monthly, at a minimum. This budget will show the costs to the project, per task to date, and direct costs to the project. A comparison of the progress (percent complete)and the money expended to date is one indication of whether the project is healthy. Product: Budget 1.4.5 Cost-To-Complete Another tool used to indicate project progress is the cost-to-complete report. This report will be developed on a monthly basis. The report indicates the amount spent, to date, on each task and the projected cost to complete each task. The City of Redding - Diestelhorst Bridge Page A2 Martin&Kane,Inc. bottom line shows the projected costs to complete the project and the remaining budget. If there is not enough budget remaining compared to the combined cost to complete, then damage control is required. Product: Cost-To-Complete Report 1.4.6 Manpower Allocation The schedule and tasks are blended together into this report to determine the projected hours which must be expended, per month, on each task in order to stay on schedule. This tool is used to project future manpower needs in order to insure adequate personnel to complete each task on time and ultimately the project on time. Product: Monthly Manpower Allocation Report TASK 2 - TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEYS The topographic survey for this project will be performed using a combination of the aerial survey and digital terrain model prepared by the EIR/EA consultant supplemented by traditional ground survey methods in areas where planimetric features were not visible or where increased accuracy is required such as spot shots at the edge of pavements, inverts of drainage structures, valves, utilities, and trees. Horizontal and vertical alignment of potentially conflicting utilities or utilities to be tied to, including streets, will be determined(pot holing where required). 2.1 Ground Survey Cross-sections will be taken along Benton Drive to the Quartz Hill Road intersection and along the North Court Street Extension from the intersection of Eleventh Street through the old PG&E yard to the abandoned railroad. For the design of the north abutment additional spot shots are required to provide increased vertical accuracy for the DTM model and to tie-in pertinent features that will influence the placement, design, and detailing of the north abutment. A few of these salient features of both cultural and historical significance are the location of the river trail, concrete steps, rock walls, and existing drainage structures. The south abutment and the area comprising the North Court Street Extension contain numerous existing drainage facilities that are not adequately described by the existing mapping. Additional ground surveys will be required to locate and profile these areas so that the drainage design can be completed. A centerline survey with points located at every 100 feet horizontally will be developed along new alignments of roadway to allow the City to review future project in the field in order to define project limits. 2.2 Aerial Survey Our research regarding the adequacy of the existing mapping by the EIR/EA consultant has revealed that it was developed from high altitude aerial photos suitable for the preparation of mapping at a two-foot contour interval. This provides a vertical accuracy of +/- 1-foot. Providing the City obtains usable files containing the alignment data, planimetric features, and topographic information; the existing digital terrain model supplemented with the additional spot shots as described above will produce adequate results for the design of this project. 2.3 Utility Survey Utility information will be entered into the base mapping files for the project and coordinated with the associated utility companies such as PG&E, City of Redding Electric Department, City of Redding Department of Public Works, and Pac Bell Telephone. Each utility company will receive a copy of the base mapping for the project showing their existing facilities in "bold" with all other features "screened" to facilitate back-checking of the base mapping. Pertinent streets, drainage improvements, miscellaneous structures, fences, utilities, and significant trees will be located. CAD files will be provided to the City in a format compatible with the City's Autocad software. Products: Project base mapping; supplemented Digital Terrain Model, Planimetric file, utility mapping. TASK 3 - GEOMETRIC APPROVAL DRAWINGS(GADS) 3.1 Prepare Base Maps The ramdom point, breakline, and planimetric features file serves as the foundation for the base maps to be prepared during this task. This file is used for road design to create the three-dimensional ground terrain model of the project site. A metric"soft conversion"will be incorporated into the preparation of the project drawings on a limited basis. AUBEC& City of Redding - Diestelhorst Bridge Page A3 Martin&Kane, Inc. ASSOCIATES, Inc. will meet early-on with the City to establish the degree of soft conversion for incorporation into the Roadway Plans. Layout sheets will be prepared at a scale of V = 50' and construction detail drawings at a scale of V _ 20'. Base maps for the project will be created at the various scales required using screening techniques for all existing features. Information shown on the base maps will consist of existing utility information, planimetric features, existing contours when needed, drainage structures and facilities, signage, and significant trees and planted areas. More specifically, the existing Diestelhorst Bridge,bridge approaches, utilities, parking lots, trails and Benton and Court Streets will be verified in the field or located, if not found in the previous aerial survey. Existing information will be field verified as appropriate. A copy of the basemaps will be forwarded to each utility company for verification of existing utilities. Base maps (reference files) will be edited as required. Final base mapping will then be used to create the base plan for the design of the roadway improvements and parking lots. Product: Base Maps For Roadway Design Site Plan For Bridge Task 3.2 Preliminary Roadway Design During the Preliminary Roadway Design phase of the project, all major components of the roadway will be defined. The preliminary design will define the layout of the frontage improvements along the North Court Street Extension, impacts to Lake Redding - Caldwell Memorial Park, and will define the pavement delineation for the project. Potential utility relocations will be submitted to the respective utility companies impacted by the Project. Product: 30%Plans and Specs. (GADS) TASK 4 - HYDRAULIC STUDY REPORT 4.1 Field Trip/Data Collection A field trip will be conducted to survey stream cross-sections (at least two channel cross sections will be determined) for the backwater model, estimate stream and overbank roughness, identify potential problems affecting bridge hydraulics, collect streambed material samples for sieve analysis, take photographs, locate high water marks if possible, and collect minor data items if necessary(elevations, distances, etc.). Much of this information is readily available from local, State, and Federal agencies. Product: Field Review Collection of Data 4.2 Hydrology and Hydraulic Analysis The 50-year flood will be estimated and the flood of record identified, if possible, at the proposed bridge site (from nearby residents or high water marks). A backwater model for the bridge site will be developed and calibrated to high water marks if available. The overtopping flood if less than a 500-year flood will be determined. The design flood (50-year flood or overtopping flood) will be identified. The water surface elevation for the design flood will be identified. The appropriate soffit elevation considering potential drift will be determined. The appropriate bridge opening will be determined, to confirm conceptual design. As with the field trip / data collection task, much of this information is presently available. Product: Hydraulic Calculations 4.3 Geomorphic Consideration and Potential Scour We will attempt to determine if the river is degrading or aggrading using existing data, and we will determine the potential for bank migration. Potential contraction, pier and abutment scour will be calculated per Caltrans guidelines and FHWA Hydraulic Circular No. 18 "Evaluating Scour At Bridges." Product: River Migration Calculations 4.4 Report A Design Hydraulic Study (DHS) report including text, photographs and figures and addressing all appropriate concerns presented in the Caltrans Local Programs Manual will be prepared. Five copies of this Report which conforms to the Caltrans Local Programs Manual(LPM)Vol 1 Section 8,will be provided. Product: DHS City of Redding - Diestelhorst Bridge Page A4 Martin&Kane,Inc. TASK 5 - GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION 5.1 Bridge Investigation For the new bridge crossing, appropriate level of study is expected to include sampled/cored test borings at each of the proposed support locations. Boring depths are expected to be 50+/- ft - with 30+\- ft penetration into the underlying sandstone "bedrock". Selected soil/rock samples would be retained for laboratory testing/reference, as appropriate. Field and laboratory testing will be performed; allowance for specialized rock tests (e.g., triaxial shear, tensile strength, etc.) is not included in this scope,but could be added if appropriate. 5.1.1 Pier Location Borings The pier locations within the channel are proposed to be drilled utilizing an in-house shallow-draft barge with dismounted rotary drill. The launch facilities at Lake Redding Park-Caldwell Memorial are considered suitable for barge launching. If boat traffic on the lake is a concern, the barge could be anchored at the banks or near the launch ramp during non- drilling hours. It is anticipated that 1-1'/z days will be required for each of the four pier borings; assuming drilling to begin on a Monday, completion of the water borings could be expected by Friday of the same week. 5.1.2 Abutment Borings The abutment borings are expected to be drilled from the existing banks and extend to depths of 50+\- ft. Access is indicated to be available on the north bank via the existing bikeway/footpath and on the south along an unpaved access between the existing bridge and community garden area. 5.2 Roadway Investigation For the roadway/parking portion of the study,pavement/subgrade conditions will be evaluated by means of two short (15 - 25+\- ft deep) augered, sampled test borings - one in the vicinity of the Court Street Extension near the abandoned railroad grade and one in the vicinity of the proposed Benton Drive widening. Shallow bulk samples will be obtained in the area of the existing North Court Street tie for the south approach garden area. The borings will be logged, materials classified and bulk samples obtained of anticipated subgrade materials. Two "Resistance-value" tests will be made of anticipated subgrade material for use in design of new roadway structural sections. The 2:1 cut slopes in the Court Street extension area will also be evaluated for stability. Traffic control will be provided during the investigation procedures. 5.2.1 Structural Section Evaluation Also included as part of the roadway study would be two pavement cores through existing Benton Drive in evaluation of the existing structural section. Any borings within the existing pavement areas would be backfilled and sealed at the surface with AC upon completion. 5.2.2 Borrow Site Material Evaluation of borrow material for bridge approach fills would be made by obtaining bulk samples of near-surface materials in the vicinity of the proposed cuts for the Court Street extension. Laboratory testing is expected to include gradation, maximum dry density and"R" -value tests, as appropriate. Evaluation of off-site borrow sources for suitability as fill/subgrade material is not included in this scope,but could be added if desired. 5.3 Permits It is assumed that all necessary rights-of-entry for the proposed drilling will be provided. Drilling within the waterway is expected to require a Fish & Game permit, and a streambed alteration permit and allowance is included herein for obtaining these permits. No other permits are included for the drilling as described, except for an encroachment permit which is to be issued by the City at no cost to the Engineer. City's Project Engineer will assist in obtaining encroachment permit. 5.4 Geotechnical Reports The bridge foundation report will summarize all bridge data-- including the "Log of Test Borings" drawing - and make specific recommendations for type, elevation and loading of foundation elements. A separate report of roadway pavement/subgrade conditions will be submitted with recommendations regarding subgrade conditions/preparation and soils criteria for design of new structural sections. The report and drawing will be stamped and signed by either an Engineering Geologist or a Registered Professional Engineer. Product: Log of Test Borings Bridge Foundation Report Roadway Pavement/Subgrade Report City of Redding - Diestelhorst Bridge Page A5 Martin&Kane,Inc. TASK 6 - MITIGATION REPORT LOG AUBEC & ASSOCIATES, INC. will assist Martin & Kane to maintain a mitigation report log designed to track the compliance with mitigation measures documented in the Diestelhorst Bridge Replacement Mitigation Monitoring Program and Compliance Checklist dated February 21, 1994, provided by the City of Redding, Planning Department. Gregory Bickett,Roadway Project Engineer will compile and track the progress of the mitigation measures. Product: Mitigation Report Log TASK 7 - RIGHT-OF-WAY AND-PERMITTING 7.1 Right-of Way AUBEC & ASSOCIATES, INC. will coordinate with the City of Redding to identify the additional right-of-way required for this project. It is anticipated that there are two privately owned parcels to be purchased, namely the PG&E parcel and a portion of the abandoned railroad line. The City of Redding will appraise and acquire all right-of-way. AUBEC & ASSOCIATES, INC. will research the descriptions of each affected parcel and conduct field surveys of the boundaries. Current Title Reports for each parcel will be obtained and a property resolution may be performed. Property lines will then be tied to the control for the project and the additional right-of-way determined. A legal description describing the additional right-of-way will then be prepared and provided to the City for processing. Product: Title Reports Legal Descriptions 7.2 Permitting 7.2.1 Wetlands Assessment and Permitting The purpose of this task is to establish the extent of federal and state jurisdiction; quantify project impacts on jurisdictional features including wetlands and streambed; and document project compliance with the federal Clean Water Act Section 404 and State Fish and Game Code Section 1601. NSR wetland scientists will apply the method described in the Army Corps of Engineers (ACOS) Wetlands Delineation Manual (1987 Manual) to locate the boundaries of waters of the U.S., including wetlands, within the project site. NSR will use the preliminary wetlands delineation contained in the project EIR/EA as needed. NSR will discuss any potentially controversial issues with the City before representing the City's position to other agencies. Formal consultation with the National Marine Fisheries Service(NMFS)will be provided by the City. The following elements are included in Task 7.2.1: • Recorded,paired observations of diagnostic characteristics at up to five locations(up to ten data points); • Delineation of jurisdictional boundaries on 1:1,200-scale aerial photography, if suitable negatives exist; or on a 1:1,200-scale topographic base; • Attendance at field review(s)for the ACOE and the California Department of Fish and Game(DFG) (NSR to research issues so there is a very great chance that there will only be one field review); • Report summarizing study results and request for verification of the delineation submitted to ACOE. • Assessment of the cumulative total loss of waters due to project-related activities; if project meets ACOE criteria, a request for verification of project compliance with nationwide permits not requiring pre- discharge notification also will be submitted to the ACOE under this effort; • Preparation of submittals required for a Streambed Alteration Agreement with the DFG(for both design borings and construction); • Additional agency and client consultation,as required, relating to wetlands permitting. NSR assumes that the alternatives analysis which was completed for the project EIR/EA satisfies the requirements of the Clean Water Act Section 404 and/or the Rivers and Harbors Act Section 10. City of Redding - Diestelhorst Bridge Page A6 Martin&Kane, Inc. Typically, the ACOE requires compensatory mitigation for "losses" of jurisdictional waters that are greater than one acre and that cannot be practicably avoided. The DFG routinely requests that all losses be mitigated, regardless of the acreage of the loss. The preliminary wetlands delineation determined that the project would result in the loss of 0.01 acres of jurisdictional wetlands. If our delineation corroborates this estimate, then the level of effort required to identify compensatory mitigation is included in this cost estimate. If the loss of jurisdictional wetlands is greater than one acre, identification of compensation mitigation will require greater effort. Product: Delineation of Jurisdictional Boundaries/Report Streambed Alteration Permit Applications 7.2.2 Water Quality Permitting The purpose of this task is to comply with the federal Clean Water Act and state Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act. NSR water quality specialists will consult with the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board (CVRWQCB) regarding permitting to determine the required permit; Section 401 Certification, Waste Discharge Permit, or NPDES Permit. Based on the consultation, NSR will prepare submittals necessary to complete the permit application. The primary objective of the CVRQWCB permit will be to avoid or minimize impacts on the fishery. The permit will likely require water quality monitoring during construction to verify compliance with permit conditions. Product: Water Quality Permit Application 7.2.3 Preparation of Conceptual Habitat Mitigation and Monitoring Plan The purpose of this task is to implement the mitigation measures specified in the project EI;/EA to compensate for losses of Oak forest habitat, riparian vegetation, and Elderberry stems and potential Valley Elderberry Longhorn Beetle (VELB) habitat. NSR will prepare a conceptual habitat mitigation plan in consultation with the DFG and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). The plan will include: goals and objectives; mitigation site location; planting plan indicating species and density; irrigation; operation and maintenance; and short-term/long-term protection measures for VELB habitat areas. NSR will prepare a monitoring plan describing monitoring frequency, performance criteria, and remedial measures to be implemented if performance criteria are not achieved. Product: Conceptual Habitat Mitigation Plan Conceptual Habitat Monitoring Plan 7.2.4 Additional Permitting The purpose of this task is to comply with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the California Public Resources Code Title 2, Section 2001. NSR will prepare submittals required for Section 106 Consultation with the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation relating to the existing Diestelhorst Bridge. NSR will prepare submittals required for application for a General Permit from the State Lands Commission. Product: Additional Permit Applications 7.2.5 Aquatic Resources During the spring of 1994, Vogel Environmental Services(VES)will perform the following scope of work associated with the Diestelhorst bridge project: VES staff will meet with representatives of the California Department of Fish and Game and contact other appropriate natural resource agencies (e.g., National Marine Fisheries Service)to determine agency requirements to ensure avoidance of adverse impacts associated with test coring of the Sacramento River at the four in-river bridge pier locations. Following this meeting and discussions with the government agencies, VES will perform in-river surveys of the riverbed at the planned locations of the bridge piers. The surveys will be conducted by two SCUBA divers and a surface tender using a boat as a diver platform anchored immediately downstream of the existing Diestelhorst Bridge piers. The underwater surveys will be conducted immediately prior to mobilization of the test coring equipment to the Diestelhorst bridge site. It is anticipated that the initial surveys will take two days to complete. The locations of salmonid redds (nests) will be noted, if present, and the specific redd locations will be marked using a small anchor and float to allow locations to be seen by the coring crew from the surface. The entire area within the immediate vicinity of each planned bridge pier location will be thoroughly surveyed by the SCUBA divers. VES will work closely with the Project Team to ensure accurate survey mapping at the critical pier locations. If a redd is located, an assessment will be made to determine if the redd is of winter-run chinook salmon origin or of another run City of Redding - Diestelhorst Bridge Page A7 Martin&Kane,Inc. (e.g.,fall-run salmon redd where young fish would have already emerged from the river gravels). The SCUBA divers will also take underwater video footage of the areas surveyed to ensure that the fishery resource agencies are confident in the accuracy of the underwater surveys and to avoid unnecessary delays in the project. It is expected that if the time between the initial underwater surveys and the time of the test borings is more than one to two weeks, one follow-up survey in the same areas will be required and performed to ensure that no salmon spawning activity occurred during the interim period. If active winter-run salmon redds are located near the test boring sites, VES will meet with the fishery resource agencies to determine a protocol for the test borings to proceed. Product: Underwater Inspections/Surveys Agency Coordination/Negotiations TASK 8 - DESIGN OF BRIDGE STRUCTURE(NEW BRIDGE) 8.1 Preliminary Design At the concept level and in design development, at issue is the overall form of the bridge. The approved form is an open- single-rib arch with a wide cantilevered deck. But within this phrase only a small part of the design is described. Many questions need to be answered to complete the description. How will it be built? How will it carry loads? How does it meet performance criteria? How much extra will this all cost? For design of this arch bridge, an important step is to prepare concept alternatives. We will study cast-in-place, precast, and mixed cast-in-place+precast alternatives for the arch rib and the deck. We will design and evaluate the form of and demands on the arch rib, to refine its shape and section. We will study alternatives for the cantilevering deck overhangs. Foundations will be refined. The overall design of the bridge will be defined. 8.LI Cast-In-Place vs. Precast The final choice of precast vs. cast-in-place concrete for the Diestelhorst Bridge will require considering feasibility, economy,and aesthetics. Design alternative studies would consider: • If conventional precast segmental construction is used for the arch rib, the unreinforced joints may cause a seismic deficiency. The cast-in-place arch rib would require formwork over water, which can be expensive. Cast-in-place segmental construction may be considered for the arch rib, but the spans are fairly short for that. As another option, the arch rib for a span might be precast in two segments (about 60 ft long each). These segments,weighing about 120 tons each, could be cast off-site and trucked in, or cast on-site on one set of falsework on land, from where they could be moved to the piers and tied together. With adequate attention to details,this approach may prove economical and quick to build. • Function, serviceability, and ride quality of the deck are usually better for cast-in-place construction than for segmental construction. A cast-in-place deck could be very expensive, though, if it is formed from supports in the river. A number of alternatives may provide a better solution. Precast inverted-tee "wings" can provide self-supporting permanent structural forms for a cast-in-place deck. All cast-in- place cantilevers could be built from traveling forms supported off the arch rib. Other issues will also be studied, as discussed below. These alternative studies of precast vs. cast-in-place construction provide a forum for refining both types. Usually they result in a clear choice for the construction of the given bridge. We expect that to be the case here. 8.1.2 Deck Form Providing the best overall form for the wide, cantilevered bridge deck will require a keen sense of aesthetics, familiarity with construction capabilities,and an understanding of the deck's behavior in resisting loads. The concept of a flat, multi- cell box supporting wide, cantilevering, ribbed slabs might conceivably provide a system that can be built economically and meet performance requirements,but some other alternatives may provide a better solution: • The wide deck over the narrow arch rib creates a torsional demand in the deck, and the open-spandrel arch rib provides little resistance to this torsion. So, the deck has to carry the torsion all the way to the abutments. To achieve this with the most slender girder possible requires use of an optimal form; probably a single-cell box. Use of such a form, if properly detailed, does not rule out construction options for the deck. City of Redding - Diestelhorst Bridge Page A8 Martin&Kane,Inc. • The cantilevered slabs (about 14 ft wide) carry truck loads to the box. These loads can be carried by exposed transverse ribs. These ribs might harken to the floor beams of the old bridge, but they are not necessary and carry some liabilities. A ribless slab, or a "wing-girder" form might provide better alternatives. Both would provide a smooth form more in conformance with the overall design concept. Constructibility and aesthetics are the issues. Single-cell instead of multi-cell box girders have proved economical on a number of bridges. The studies here would be built on such experience as: • At Benicia, California (M. Ketchum was Project Manager and Lead Engineer, K. Cheng was Supervising Engineer), the initial twin-box solution was replaced by a single-cell box with wide cantilevers. This helped move the design from last place to first place toward the goal of minimum estimated cost. Ribbed decks are frequently evaluated and used, particularly if precasting is used. The studies here would be built on such experience as: • At Connaught Bridge in Vancouver, B.C., (K. Cheng was Project Manager and Lead Engineer), a number of deck alternatives were evaluated. Largely on the basis of aesthetics, efficiency and economy, a pretensioned precast deck cantilever with cast-in-place structural slab was used. This also provided the better ride quality of a cast-in-place surface. The final form chosen for the deck will be the one that best meets all design constraints. Providing a"bounce-free" deck surface will require advanced engineering capabilities. 8.1.3 Seismic Resistance Seismic resistance will always be an issue for California bridge construction. We learn more in every earthquake. We now have a strong basis for providing seismic resistance in bridges. Our staff have had roles in developing that basis. Providing seismic resistance to the Diestelhorst Bridge will require an understanding of bridge performance in past earthquakes,and the ability to predict performance of non-standard forms. • For the Golden Gate Bridge seismic studies (M. Ketchum was Project Manager and Lead Investigator, K. Cheng was Supervising Engineer), the arch structure that spans Fort Point was evaluated using modern technology. We now know that arches resist earthquakes by combined compression and torsion, as compared to girder bridges that resist by bending and shear. This will require extrapolation of current design technology. The problem is to provide reliable, ductile performance under these loads, and is more an issue of providing capacities than of predicting demands. Careful detailing of all connections is essential. 8.1.4 Constructibility Constructibility will ultimately determine the success of the contractor on the project. Construction delays and cost over- runs have plagued modern bridge construction projects for which constructibility is not adequately considered. This is even more important for an unconventional structure such as the Diestelhorst Bridge because standard details will not be used. Constructibility considerations for the design of the Diestelhorst Bridge will focus on the river foundations, the arch rib and the deck. • Foundation type will be governed almost entirely by relative constructibility in the river waters. We expect that standard methods such as a cofferdam would be applicable and economical. • The arch rib could be either precast or cast-in-place. For the precast alternative, the merits of small-unit (many per span) and large-unit precasting (2 per span) will be compared. Site-casting may be another viable precasting solution. For the cast-in-place alternative, three methods are possible: use of formwork supported in the river, cast-in-place cantilevering, and use of a bow-string truss for forming, supported by the piers and above the water. • The deck can also be either precast or cast-in-place. City of Redding - Diestelhorst Bridge Page A9 Martin&Kane,Inc. 8.1.5 Aesthetics The value of the bridge to the community can be enhanced considerably, at little cost, by adequate consideration of aesthetics issues such as the form of the bottom of the deck, the shape of the guard rail (parapet), concrete finishes, and lighting. MacDonald Architects is particularly qualified to provide technical input, in collaboration with our engineering staff, that will result in a beautiful structure. • A ribbed or smooth deck undersurface will alter the appearance of the bridge from only a few locations. Each form has both structural and aesthetic pros and cons. • The outside form of the parapet railing can have subtle but significant influences on the overall perception of the bridge. For a bridge with a wide cantilevering slab, a precast rail offers some significant advantages, usually at low cost. • Concrete finishing can be used to increase and decrease the prominence of certain structural features, so that a more balanced and pleasing appearance is achieved. • Lighting can be an effective embellishment, even if it is used only on rare occasions. Several approaches could be used, such as outlining the bridge shape with light bulbs, or pointing light beams on the bridge to illuminate its form. This would be done in a way to complement the existing bridge, not to take away from its historic prominence. 8.1.6 Cost Estimating Cost Estimates will be required at all important milestones of the project. Initially, cost estimates of the various structural alternatives developed will be used as input for evaluation of each alternative. Other factors, such as adequacy of the structural system, aesthetics, constructibility, and maintenance costs will be considered in the evaluation as well. The relative importance of each factor will be subject to input from the City, and the alternative with the best overall evaluation will be recommended for final design. The following summarized scope of work will be performed in this phase of the project: Preliminary Design Alternatives ■ Longitudinal system design ■ Transverse system design ■ Structure aesthetics ■ Critical design details ■ Constructibility ■ Cost estimate of alternatives Type Selection Memo ■ Preparation and recommendations ■ type selection meeting Dimension Main Structural Elements ■ Abutments ■ Pier foundations ■ Arch ribs ■ Deck elements ■ Spine beam Develop Structural Models Post-Tensioning Layout and Details Equivalent Static Load EQ Analysis Independent Preliminary Design Check Products: Concept study and alternatives analysis report,presented to the City for review of the final selection or approval of the structural alternative for preliminary design. City of Redding - Diestelhorst Bridge Page A10 Martin&Kane,Inc. The Preliminary Design Report will contain the following items: 1. General Plan,Alternative Structural Systems as prescribed for each studied design alternative. 2. General Plan Estimates for each studied design alternative. 3. Vicinity Map 4. Hydrology Report 5. Bridge Foundation Report. 6. Type Selection Memo; Recommendations. 8.2 Final Design For final design, the issue is production of the Plans, Specifications and Special Provisions, and Construction Cost Estimates for the project. These are the bidding documents that will be responsible for the overall cost of the job. A successful final design phase requires a suitable preliminary design, an experienced group of engineers who have a mature working relationship, as well as strong management and quality control. All three are required; if anything is missing, the production will suffer. The objectives for the final design phase of the project are to complete the following tasks: 1. Finalization of a type, size, and location of Project, in response to review comments developed since approval of the Preliminary Design. 2. Preparation of bridge construction contract documents for structural and architectural works. The documents will consist of at least the following: • Project Plans for Structure • Project Specifications and Special Provisions • Schedule of Construction Quantities • Construction Cost Estimates 3. Preparation of construction sequence plans for the bridge: • Description of construction method, • Required equipment and facilities, • Construction schedule,and • Preliminary traffic management and diversion plan. 4. Estimation of project cost,consisting of: • Quantities of materials for main structural elements, • Unit costs for materials of these elements, • Costs of construction equipment such as traveling forms,and • Construction schedule used as a basis for the cost estimation. 5. Structural analysis, including analysis for at least the following: • Static analysis for service load conditions, • Static analysis for factored service load conditions, • Response spectrum dynamic analysis for seismic conditions, • Time-dependent analysis for construction and long-term conditions. The exact scope of final design can only be set after more is known about the bridge. However, the following points illustrate most aspects of the scope envisioned for this phase: 8.2.1 Development of Final Workplan and Schedule The final workplan and schedule will be developed in cooperation with the City of Redding.. The following milestone schedule is anticipated: Milestone Time From NTP Kickoff 0 months Preliminary Design Report Submittal 2 months Final type selection(CT Approval) 2 1/2 months 65%submittal 5 1/2 months 95%submittal 7 months City of Redding - Diestelhorst Bridge Page Al l Martin&Kane,Inc. 8.2.2 Establishment of Design Criteria and Technological Basis The design criteria will be finalized. For components that do not correspond to standard elements, project-specific criteria will be written. Some provisions of the design criteria may develop during the design process. The criteria document will be kept current with these developments, so that the final design basis for the bridge will be documented. 8.2.3 Bridge Design and Analysis The bridge design will progress through final design and checking through a rational procedure, developing drawings and calculations for the design and documentation of the bridge. The following engineering tasks are anticipated: Analysis: • Dead load and prestressing analysis moments, shears, and forces • Moment and shear envelopes under live load for deck and rib • Transverse and 3-dimensional analysis of deck • Rib shortening influences of creep and shrinkage • Thermal restraint stresses • Time dependent analysis for construction sequence • 3-D analysis of deck-rib joint • Seismic evaluation Detailing: • Tendon layouts and anchor details • Piers, arch ribs, and deck • Pier-footings-caissons • Rails, lighting, and drainage • Expansion joints • Hinges and diaphragms Contract documents: • Drawings • Specifications • Constructibility review • QA/QC and Independent Check • Cost estimate Final design will make use of refined engineering tools, to verify the design, ensure its constructibility, document its validity, and provide additional data for the contract documents. Some of these engineering tools will include: Elastic analysis of the cellular deck system under traffic loads,using MUPD 13. Time-dependent analysis for prestressing,creep and shrinkage,using SFRAME Seismic response spectrum analysis,using SAP90 8.2.4 Seismic Design and Analysis The seismic analyses will be based on standard Caltrans procedures. Geotechnical analyses will provide foundation properties. Caltrans ARS curves will be used to simulate ground motions. Some consideration will be made in this model of expansion joint slamming, any lock-up devices used at expansion joints, and of changes in response due to ductility demands on components. Special consideration will be made of seismic performance of the unconventional arch rib and deck components. 8.2.5 Independent Check of Design An independent check of all aspects of the design will be completed by a group of engineers, separate from the design group. The team has been designed so that in most cases, this independent check will be performed by a firm separate from the design engineering firm. This will establish the true independent nature of the check. 8.2.6 Production of Construction Estimates The production of construction estimates for this project will be based on the following procedures: City of Redding - Diestelhorst Bridge Page Al2 Martin&Kane, Inc. 1. Prepare labor,equipment, and material costs and prices. 2. Develop appropriate construction schemes and techniques, consistent with the following items: a. Contract plans and specifications. b. Reasonable level of contractor resources. c. Site location. d. Climatic conditions-wind, fog, current, etc. e. Other,e.g. Bureau of Reclamation,fish migrations,environmental considerations, etc. 3. Prepare a contractor's construction schedule. 4. Prepare a detailed construction cost estimate,consisting of the following items: a. Detailed quantity take-off b. Setting up construction crews for the phases of the work. c. Estimating productivity based on experience and historical records. d. Preparing contractor overhead and plant-cost estimates. e. Estimating special costs associated with the project. The following summarized scope of work will be performed in this phase of the project: Develop Structural Models ■ Static loads analysis ■ Time dependent analysis ■ Response spectrum analysis Transverse Design and Analysis Longitudinal Design and Analysis Arch Rib Design and Analysis ■ Linear dead load and live load forces ■ Non-linear dead load forces ■ Finite elements arch rib joints Post-Tension Design and Analysis Pier Design and Analysis Abutment Design and Analysis Pile Design and Analysis Expansion Joint Design and Analysis Bearing Design and Analysis Sidewalk and Barrier Design Deck Drainage Design Roadway Lighting Design Independent Final Design Check Quantities and Estimate Special Provisions Quality Control Constructibility Review Product: 65% and 95% progress submittals and final 100% submittal will consist of the following: • Structure Plans. • Project Special Provisions. • Schedule of Structure Quantities with Construction Cost Estimates. • Structure Erection Sequence and Method Plans. • Quantity Summary forms for piles,structure excavation and backfill,concrete,reinforcement, prestressing,miscellaneous metal,and others as required. • Final Design Calculations. • Final Design Check Calculations. • Reproducible and Blueline 4-scale Plans. City of Redding - Diestelhorst Bridge Page A13 Martin&Kane, Inc. • • Final Foundation Report. • Joint Movement Rating Calculations. • Earthquake Response and Resistance Report and Calculations. • Other material as directed by project contents. TASK 9 -DESIGN OF NORTH COURT STREET EXTENSION WIDENING OF BENTON DRIVE AND BRIDGE APPROACHES The design of the Court Street extension, widening of Benton Drive, and the Bridge approaches will be based upon the City of Redding Public Works Construction Standards. The plans will be arranged into the following sheets: Typical Cross Sections This sheet will include the typical cross sections for each specific location with a new section drawn for differing structural sections. This sheet will also include a civil legend and a list of abbreviations used throughout the roadway plan sheets. Plan &Profiles These sheets will be drawn at a horizontal scale of 1"=50' and will include roadway layout information, overall drainage plans, overall lighting plans, overall utility plans. In addition, these sheets will include profiles of roadway centerline and any utilities, including storm drains that are located parallel to the centerline of the roads. Construction Details The construction detail sheets will include detailed site plans at a scale of I"=20' and miscellaneous details sheets at an appropriate scale for each detail. Enlarged site plans will be provided for intersections,parking areas and other locations which require a greater level of detail from the Plan& Profile sheets. The information provided on these sheets will include detailed grading, drainage, utilities and lighting. Drainage Plans The drainage plan sheets will include profiles of storm drains which are not shown on the Plan & Profile sheets, detailed plans of the drainage retention basin for the bridge runoff and drainage details of inlet and outlet structures and other miscellaneous details relating to the drainage system. The drainage retention system will be fully defined by the City of Redding and will be designed based upon gravity flow without provisions for monitoring or automated controls. Utility Relocations The utility relocation sheets will include profiles and details of utilities to be relocated under this contract and information regarding coordination of utilities by others. Traffic Control Plan The traffic control plan will be a sheet showing the entire construction area and will locate traffic control features to be implemented throughout the construction. The sheet will be created with significant input from the City of Redding and will not include detailed information regarding contractors staging. The contractor will be responsible for detailed traffic control specific to his construction operations. Pavement Delineation and Signage The pavement delineation and signage sheets will be drawn to a horizontal scale of I"=50'. These sheets will be generated with significant input from the City of Redding. Erosion Control The erosion control sheets will be drawn at a horizontal scale of I"=50' and will be based upon the City of Redding Erosion Control Manual. This plan is intended to be a final erosion control plan. Detailed plans due to construction staging will be the responsibility of the contractor. City of Redding - Diestelhorst Bridge Page A14 Martin&Kane,Inc. Mitigation Measures The mitigation measures sheets will include a mitigation measure planting plan, landscape buffer along the park frontage and an irrigation plan for the park area. The mitigation measures planting plan will be generated as a product of the environmental portion of this project and will be drawn based upon that plan. The landscape and irrigation design along the park frontage will be designed with significant input from the City of Redding. These plans will be presented as a part of the following review packages with specific sheets for each submittal to be determined at a later date. Task 9.1 Final Roadway Design During the Final Roadway Design phase, the preliminary frontage improvements for the Project will be finalized, and construction detail sheets started. The design of the drainage details and lighting plans along with landscaping and irrigation will begin and the pavement delineation finalized. The design of the new structural sections for the widening of Benton Drive and the North Court Street Extension will be completed and the typical cross sections designed. Staged construction concepts will be defined and discussed with the City. Completion of the Final Roadway Design will constitute our 65% submittal to the City. Construction quantities for the widening, grading and frontage improvements will be estimated. Quantities will be calculated in accordance with Caltran's practice and segregated into Caltrans coded pay items. Caltrans standard special provisions and specifications will be marked-up in draft form and will accompany the 65%submittal package and estimate. Product: 65%PS &E Task 9.2 Detailed Roadway Design The Detailed Roadway Design phase will consist of completing construction details, drainage details and quantities, utility relocations, end of project erosion control plans and details, lighting quantities, landscape and irrigation details and quantities. Construction area signage will be developed with the close cooperation of the City of Redding. All final quantities will be calculated and included in a 95% estimate for the Project improvements. Sets of the 95% drawings, specifications and estimate will be assembled with the bridge PS&E for submittal to the City. Product: 95%PS&E Task 9.3 Roadway Design Final Revisions The final revisions will consist of incorporating the 95% review comments into the drawings and specifications and finalizing the estimate. Product: Final PS&E The final submittal to the City, through Martin&Kane, will consist of one complete set of ink-on-mylar Plans, one set of approved specifications, and one set of computer disks for both the drawings and specifications. The computer disks for the final plans will contain AutoCad files for each drawing. The specification diskettes will be WordPerfect 5.1 format. TASK 10 - DIESTELHORST BRIDGE INVESTIGATION AND REHABILITATION REPORT Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act(NHPA) requires that Federal agencies with jurisdiction over a project must take into account the effects of the project on the historic nature of the existing property. The Final Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Assessment (EIR/EA) addressees the historic impacts of this project on the existing bridge. Because of this existing bridge's historical significance, and the impacts of the new bridge project on the existing bridge, a Project Report for the Investigation and Rehabilitation of Donner Summit Bridge will be prepared under this Task. This report will insure that the EIR/EA provisions are met by the project. The summary of the scope follows: Task 10.1 A limited review of documents related to the history of the Diestelhorst Bridge. City of Redding - Diestelhorst Bridge Page A15 Martin&Kane, Inc. Task 10.2 Review of the procedures used for other bridge preservation projects. Develop proposed repair procedures prior to the start of field inspection. Task 10.3 It is assumed that the original drawings of the bridge will not be acceptable for the field survey. A new set of drawings will be developed from the original drawings. This set will be outline drawings, they will not be verified by a field survey,but they will be in sufficient detail for the contract documents and the bidding procedure. Task 10.4 A visual examination and close up inspection will be made of the bridge deck, railings, and accessible sections of the piers, arches, soffits and approach spans. Field testing of accessible sections include acoustic delamination test, verification of rebar locations and corrosion evaluation. A visual inspection only, with binoculars from below, will be made of the less accessible sections of the bridge. It is anticipated that this will include the bridge soffit and upper portions of the cross walls. Task 10.5 Concrete cores and/or samples will be removed for laboratory analysis and testing. The goal of the analysis will be to establish support for the selection of repair materials. It is anticipated that the bridge concrete is in good condition and that more extensive examination, such as petrographic and chemical analysis, will not be required. It is anticipated that special corrosion protection will not be required. Task 10.6 Design for the repair will be developed. Findings from the field survey will be presented in a preliminary report. (Recommendations for future maintenance of the bridge are not included.) Task 10.7 A review meeting with Caltrans and the City of Redding will be scheduled. Task 10.8 A simple seismic evaluation of the bridge to determine its susceptibility to earthquake damage will be made. Task 10.9 Preliminary repair quantities will be developed. Task 10.10 A final report will be developed which meets the requirements of the Secretary of Interior's standards for rehabilitation and guidelines for rehabilitating historic buildings and the National Preservation Act. Funding sources will be reconfirmed and a demolition cost estimate of the existing bridge will be provided for funding purposes. Task 10.11 Final contract drawings for the bridge rehabilitation will be developed. Task 10.12 Final quantities will be developed and a construction cost estimate will be provided. Task 10.13 Final specifications will be developed. Product: Bridge Investigation and Rehabilitation Report TASK 11 - FURNISHING OF CONTRACT DOCUMENTS FOR ADVERTISING After the City and Caltrans have both approved the Final PS&E for advertising, seventy five (75) sets of reduced (I V x 17")plans and specifications will be furnished to the City for bidding purposes. Product: 75 Sets of Plans and Specifications TASK 12 - ASSISTANCE DURING BIDDING We will assist the City during the advertising period by answering questions to clarify the plans and specifications; issue addenda as required;coordinate and schedule a pre-bid meeting; and make a recommendation on award of contract. Product: Pre-bid Meeting Attendance Consultation City of Redding - Diestelhorst Bridge Page A16 Martin&Kane,Inc. TASK 13 - MAN HOUR ACCOUNTING SUMMARY Following the award of the construction contract, Martin & Kane will submit two copies of a Man-Hour Accounting Summary to the City. This accounting will summarize all man-hours expended in producing the bridge portion of the PS&E. This accounting will detail hours for design, check, detailing, estimating, specification writing, project management and quality control. Also, the hours expended in the geotechnical and hydrological investigations and reports will be reported. This can easily be handled using our CFMS (Computerized Financial Management System) accounting software. Each of our projects is set up by dedicating specific labor codes to each task. A report is normally generated on a monthly basis to provide the Project Manager with a tool to control the project. Product: Man-Hour Accounting Summary PRASE 2 - CONSTRUCTION SERVICES TASK 1 - ENGINEERING SERVICES DURING CONSTRUCTION This task includes the attendance at a preconstruction meeting, submittal of two copies each of the Structure Bid Analysis Report and Square Foot Cost Analysis,on-going interpretation of contract documents, comment on monthly percentage of work completed, review of contract change orders, preparation of plan and specification revisions due to change orders, general construction engineering assistance to Resident Engineer, and finally, review and approval of all submittals, shop drawings, falsework design and traffic detour plans. Within two months of completion of construction, Martin & Kane, based upon information provided by the Resident Engineer, will prepare the as-built plans and deliver to the City. One hard copy set of plans and the AutoCADD file on diskette will be delivered. These services will be provided on a time and materials basis as extra work. Product: Pre-Construction Meeting Attendance Interpretation of Contract Documents Monthly Percent Complete Report Review of Contract Change Orders Plan and Specification Revisions Shop Plan Review and Approval Falsework Design Check Traffic Detour Plan Review As-Built Plans Structure Bid Analysis Report Square Foot Cost Analysis City of Redding - Diestelhorst Bridge Page A17 Martin&Kane,Inc. ATTACHMENT B Attachment B to the AGREEMENT between Martin & Kane, Inc. (the "ENGINEER"), and the City of Redding (the "OWNER"), for a PROJECT generally described as: Diestelhorst Bridge Replacement Article 2 - Compensation Compensation by the OWNER to ENGINEER will be as follows: A. Cost Reimbursable - Cost Plus Fixed Fee For services enumerated in ARTICLE 1, except for services during construction (Phase 2, Task 1), ENGINEER's Direct Salaries expended for the service, plus a percentage of Direct Salaries for Salary Overhead, plus a percentage of Direct Salaries for General Overhead, plus Direct Expenses, plus a Fixed Dollar Profit (Fee), plus applicable sales, use, value-added, business transfer, gross receipts, or other similar taxes. The Cost for preparing PS&E packages represented by Direct Salaries, plus Salary and General Overheads and Direct Expense charges shall not exceed the following specified total amount without a formal amendment to this AGREEMENT. Total Cost Not-To-Exceed: Five hundred forty-five thousand and 00/dollars ($545,000), of which eighteen thousand five hundred fifty six and 00/100 dollars($18556.00) is a fixed dollar profit. The fixed dollar profit for preparing separate PS&E packages may not be increased, except in the case of an amendment to this AGREEMENT that recognizes an increase in the scope of work. For purposes of monthly payments, ENGINEER's Provisional Overhead rates shall be used. The Fixed Dollar Profit shall be prorated, based on the percentage of Direct Salaries expended, plus Provisional Salary and General Overheads, plus Direct Expense charges, all compared to the Cost Budget. B. Cost Reimbursable - Per Diem (Time and Expense) For services enumerated in ARTICLE 1 for services during construction (Phase 2, Task 1), ENGINEER's Per Diem Rates, plus Direct Expenses, plus a service charge of 10 percent of Direct Expenses, plus applicable sales, use, value-added, business transfer, gross receipts, or other similar taxes. City of Redding-Diestelhorst Bridge Page B1 Martin & Kane, Inc. r Initial Per Diem Rates for 1994 are: Personal Grade Per Hour Rate Principal Engineer 130.00 Sr. Project Manager 125.00 Sr. Project Engineer 112.50 Project Engineer 90.00 Design Engineer 70.00 Assistant Engineer 55.00 Sr. CAD Operator 60.00 CAD Operator 45.00 Sr. Technician 70.00 Technician 45.00 Clerical 38.50 Per Diem Rates Per Diem Rates are those hourly or daily rates charged for work performed on the PROJECT by ENGINEER's employees of the indicated classifications. These rates are subject to annual calendar year adjustments; include all allowances for salary, overheads and fees; but do not include allowances for Direct Expenses. Direct Expenses Direct Expenses are those necessary costs and charges incurred for the PROJECT including, but not limited to: (1) the direct costs of transportation, meals and lodging, mail, subcontracts and outside services; special OWNER-approved PROJECT specific insurance, letters of credit, bonds, and equipment and supplies; (2) ENGINEER's current standard rate charges for direct use of ENGINEER's vehicles, computing systems, laboratory test and analysis, word processing, printing and reproduction services, and certain field equipment; and (3) ENGINEER's standard project charges for special health and safety requirements of OSHA and telecommunications services. This Attachment B supersedes all prior written or oral understandings of the Compensation, and may only be changed by a written amendment executed by both parties. Article 3 - Terms of Payment Payment to the ENGINEER will be made as follows: A. Invoices and Time of Payment Monthly invoices will be issued by ENGINEER for all work performed under this AGREEMENT. Invoices are due and payable on receipt. Upon completion of services enumerated in ARTICLE 1, the final amount will be due upon receipt of the final invoice, including all Fixed Dollar Profit not previously paid. City of Redding-Diestelhorst Bridge Page B2 Martin & Kane, Inc. B. Interest Interest at the rate of 1 percent per month will be charged on all past-due accounts, starting 45 days after date of invoice. Payments will first be credited to interest and then to principal. This Attachment B supersedes all prior written or oral understandings of the Compensation and Terms of Payment, and may only be changed by a written amendment executed by both parties. City of Redding-Diestelhorst Bridge Page B3 Martin& Kane, Inc. Revised 4129194 REVISED COST PROPOSAL SUMMARY (Based Upon Attached Labor Cost Worksheet) DIRECT LABOR Staff Hours Rate Total Ron Rivett 234 45.67 10686.78 (Sr. Project Manager) Dr. John Clark 112 46.87 5249.44 (Principal Engineer) Steve Mellon 302 40.87 12342.74 (Sr. Project Engineer) Joyce Lem 446 25.79 11502.34 (Project Engineer) Dr. Spiro Vrontinos 646 24.50 15827.00 (Design Engineer) William Yusavage 56 30.00 1680.00 (Sr. Technician) Larry Atchison 774 20.00 15480.00 (Sr. CAD Operator) Alice Brown 104 14.00 1456.00 (Clerical) Total Direct Labor 2674 $ 74224.30 Overhead (1.50 multiplier on Direct Labor) $111336.45 DIRECT COSTS Quantity Cost Per Unit Total In-House-Direct Costs: Computer/CADD 300 Hours $10/Hour $ 3000.00 Travel Lump Sum 2000.00 Plots 250 Sheets $3/Sheet 750.00 Mylar 49 Sheets $15/Sheet 735.00 Miscellaneous 1110.00 Subtotal In-House Direct Costs $7595.00 Outside Direct Costs: Telephone/Fax Lump Sum 50.00 Express Mail Lump Sum 200.00 Reduced Plans/Specs 75 Sets $25/Set 1875.00 4-Scale 10 Sheets $20/Sheet 200.00 Subtotal Outside Direct Costs $2325.00 CITY OF REDDING-DIESTFlNORST BRIDGE PAGE I OF 2 MARTIN K,4 NF INS'. Revised 4/29/94 SUBCONSULTANTS AUBEC $ 124000.00 OPAC 110471.00 NSR 7000.00 VES 5000.00 Taber Consultants 38790.89 Norman Braithwaite 4000.00 Edwin McNinch 4000.00 WJE 30268.00 Donald MacDonald Architects 7425.00 Subtotal Subconsultants $330954.89 TOTAL DIRECT COSTS $340874.89 FIXED FEE Direct Labor (10% x 185560.75) 18556.08 TOTAL FIXED FEE $_18556.08 TOTAL COST (NOT-TO-EXCEED) $144991-72 C17Y OF REDDING-DIESTELHORST BRIDGE PAGE 2 OF 2 MARTIN& K,4 NF. INC. CERTIFICATION OF CONSULTANT I HEREBY CERTIFY that I am the Vice President of Transportation and duly authorized representative of the firm of MARTIN & KANE, whose address is Citrus Heights, California, and that neither I nor the above firm I here represent has: (a) employed or retained for a commission, percentage, brokerage, contingent fee, or other consideration, and firm or person (other than a bona fide employee working solely for me or the above consultant) to solicit or secure this agreement; (b) agreed, as an express or implied condition for obtaining this contract to employ or retain the services of any firm or person in connection with carrying out the agreement; or (c) paid, or agreed to pay, to any firm, organization, or person (other than a bona fide employee working solely for me or the above consultant) any fee, contribution, donation, or consideration of any kind for, or in connection with, procuring or carrying out the agreement; except as herein expressly stated (if any): None I acknowledge that this certificate is to be furnished to the State Department of Transportation in connection with this agreement involving participation of Federal-Aid highway funds, and is subject to applicable State and Federal laws, both criminal and civil. By: X�L4�Z Date: ,5-110 9 4 Ronald L. Rivett, Vice President TITLE 49, CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS, PART 29 DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION CERTIFICATION The Prime Consultant, under penalty of perjury, certifies that, except as noted below, he/she or any person associated therewith in the capacity of owner, partner, director, officer, manager: is not currently under suspension, debarment, voluntary exclusion, or determination of ineligibility by any federal agency; has not been suspended, debarred, voluntarily excluded or determined ineligible by any federal agency within the past 3 years; does not have a proposed debarment pending; and has not been indicted, convicted, or had a civil judgment rendered against it by a court of competent jurisdiction in any matter involving fraud or official misconduct within the past 3 years. If there are any exceptions to this certification, insert the exceptions in the following space: NONE Exceptions will not necessarily result in denial of award, but will be considered in determining Consultant responsibility. For any exception noted above, indicate below to whom it applies, initiating agency, and dates of action. Note: Providing false information may result in criminal prosecution or administrative sanctions. The above certification is part of the Proposal. Signing this Proposal on the signature portion thereof shall constitute signature of this Certification. Ronald L. Rivett, Vice President Martin & Kane, Inc.