Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso 94-178 - Approving GPA-14-92, Upper Stillwater Area Plan, RESOLUTION NO. f4/—/ 7� A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING APPROVING GPA- 14-92, THE UPPER STILLWATER AREA PLAN, FINDING THAT, INTER ALIA, FINAL EIR- 4-92 ADEQUATELY ADDRESSES THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF THE UPPER STILLWATER AREA PLAN; AND ADOPTING (1) FINDINGS FOR THE PROJECT; (2) A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FOR THE PROJECT; AND (3) A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM FOR THE PROJECT. WHEREAS, on May 10, 1994 the Planning Commission of the City of Redding certified that Final Environmental Impact Report EIR-4-92 for the Upper Stillwater Area Plan (Project) meets the standards of adequacy established in the California Environmental Quality Act; and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed and considered the information contained in EIR-4-92 prior to approval of the Project; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Redding hereby approves GPA-14-92, the Upper Stillwater Area Plan and finds that EIR-4-92 adequately addresses the environmental impact of the Project, and that, for certain environmental areas as reflected in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof, changes or alterations have been required in or incorporated into said Project which mitigate or avoid the significant environmental effects thereof. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Redding hereby finds that for the reasons set forth in 'Exhibit "B" attached hereto and made a part hereof, specific economic, social, and other considerations of the project outweigh the unavoidable impacts of the Project in regard to School Facilities as identified in Exhibit "A." BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council hereby adopts Exhibits "A", "B", and "C" (Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program). I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was introduced and read at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the 21st day of June, 1994, and was duly adopted at said meeting by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILPUMERS: P. Anderson, Kehoe, McGeorge and R. Anderson NOES: COUNCILME.:MBERS: Murray ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: None �J ABSTAIN: COUNCIIDETMERS: None y RIC5bERT C. ANDERSON, Mayor ATTEST: dIV4,e,4� , (Iazi��� — CONNIE STROHMAYER, Clerk FORM APPROVED: ti RA DALL A. HAY , C' Attorney D:\RES 1\gpa 14-92.cc EXHIBIT "A" The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires that no public agency shall approve or carry out a project for which an environmental impact report has been completed which identifies one or more significant effects thereof unless such public agency makes one or more of the following findings: a. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, such project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects thereof as identified in the completed environmental impact report. b. Such changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public agency, and such changes have been adopted by such other agency or can and should be adopted by such other agency. C. Specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible the mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the environmental impact report. (Section 21081 of the California Environmental Quality Act) CEQA further requires that, where the decision of the public agency allows the occurrence of significant effects which are identified in the final EIR, but are not at least substantially mitigated, the agency shall state in writing the specific reasons to support its action based on the final EIR and/or other information in the record (Section 15093 of the CEQA Guidelines). STATEMENT OF FINDINGS - EIR-4-92 A. The Redding City Council and Redding Planning Commission, having reviewed and considered the information contained in Final EIR-4-92 for the Upper Stillwater Area Plan project and having reviewed and considered the record, find that measures have been incorporated into the project design which mitigate or avoid certain significant environmental effects associated with the project in the following environmental areas as identified in the text of the Final EIR and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the project: 1. Soils, Geology, & Seismic 2. Wildlife & Vegetation 3. Hydrology, Drainage and Flooding 4. Air Quality 5. Safety 6. Historical/Archeological 7. Traffic & Congestion 8. Public Services, excluding School Facilities 9. Noise B. Findings Concerning Impacts on School Facilities The school facilities impacts identified in EIR-4-92 that are significant or potentially significant without mitigation, the adopted mitigation measures, and findings of the Redding City Council regarding those impacts with the adopted mitigation, are as follows: EXHIBIT "A", continued Significant Impact 8.4: Overcrowding of existing school facilities due to growth in student population. Mitigation Adopted by City Council 8.4.a: Refer all subdivision proposals within the study area to affected school districts for review and comment. 8.4.b: Include as a policy in the Upper Stillwater Area Plan a requirement to implement any policy that the City Council establishes on a citywide basis regarding school funding. Findings Concerning Adopted Mitigation Measures The City Council finds that the above-state mitigation measures are incorporated into the proposed Project. The City Council further finds that these mitigation measures are feasible, and will lessen, but not necessarily eliminate the potential adverse environmental effect associated with the Project. Because of its magnitude, the impact of potential development would still be significant after mitigation. Thus, this impact is significant and unavoidable. The City Council finds there are no other feasible mitigation measures or alternatives which the Council could adopt at this time which would reduce the impact to less than significant. To the extent that this adverse impact will not be substantially lessened or eliminated, the City Council finds that specific economic, social, or other considerations identified in the Statement of Overriding Considerations support approval of the Project and provide a basis for school planning. i EXHIBIT "B" STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS - EIR-4-92 The Redding City Council hereby finds that, for the reasons set forth below, the economic, social, and other considerations of the project, outweigh the unavoidable school facilities impacts identified in the findings. First, development of this area would, as a whole, be consistent with the City's objectives that provide for expanded urban growth. Population projections for the region show a continuous level of growth indicating a need for new housing opportunities for the expanding population. Secondly, the impact of development on the community's existing school facilities is viewed by the Council as a Countywide issue, not an issue to be addressed solely through the area plan process. Regional solutions are currently being sought through an interdisciplinary task force. Thirdly, in order to support regionwide goals for air quality, mixed use development as is proposed within the plan area must be considered. The mixed use concept requires a mix of residential densities rather than simply traditional single-family development on large rural lots. These higher densities have the potential to increase the plan area population, thereby adding to the area's student population. Fourthly, urban level densities are necessary to support the extension of the City sewer system, which provides far less impact to the area's water quality than do individual septic systems, and in the long-term will result in less sprawl for the community. Further, while it is recognized that all units of government face problems related to the funding of facilities, it is important to recognize that growth will occur within the metropolitan area, Shasta County, and the State as a whole. The data to support these overriding factors are found within Section III of the EIR, specifically, Sections III.D - Population, III.I - Hydrology, and III.K - Air Quality. EXHIBIT "C" CITY OF REDDING MITIGATION MONITORING/PERMIT COMPLIANCE CHECKLIST UPPER STILLWATER AREA PLAN Application/Permit Number: GPA-14-92 EIR Number: EIR-4-92 Type of EIR: Program Date EIR Certified: When Should Completed ;i EIR Refer CandEton/Mrtrgatian Department ;Person;; When Should M tRgat�or be (Date:& Name o IVo to be Monitored Agency Responsible:: Mit%gation Start Complete Responsible Person) Condition: SOIL EROSION, SURFACE WATER RUNOFF, AND SEDIMENT DISCHARGES INTO CREEKS Mitigation: 1.1.a Prior to project approval, a soils investigation shall be Public Works Grading/project Completion of review. conducted by a soils engineer analyzing the potential for soil Department/ design review. expansiveness and other geological hazards. Based upon the Developer report findings, specific mitigation measures will be formulated and implemented. 1.2.a All development proposals will conform to the requirements Planning/Public Grading/project Completion of review. of existing City policies, including the Subdivision Ordinance Works Department design review. (Chapters 17.04 - 17.72 of the Redding Municipal Code), the Grading Ordinance (Chapter 16.40 of the Redding Municipal Code), and the Floodplain Ordinance (Chapter 18.47 of the Redding Municipal Code). 1.2.b Standard erosion-preventative practices of the City of Public Works Grading/project Completion of Redding Erosion & Sediment Control Standards Design Department design review. construction. Manual will be followed. 1.2.c If development is to occur during the winter rainy season Planning/Public Grading/Project Completion of . (November through April), special erosion control measures Works Departments design review. construction. will be required to be implemented subject to approval of the Regional Water Quality Control Board and the Department of Fish and Game, and according to the City Grading Ordinance. 1.2.d The City of Redding is to follow "Best Management Public Works Grading permit Completion of Practices" to protect runoff water quality. At such time the Department review. completion. City comes under the jurisdiction of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES), runoff water quality monitoring will be required. EIR-4-92, City of Redding Mitigation Monitoring/Permit Compliance Checklist (Upper Stillwater Area Plan) Page 1 I Wien Should Com..p..[.eted EIR Refer. Condition/Mitigation Department ;Pierson>! When Should Mitigation;be {Date & Name of:: No, to be Monitored Agency Responsible Mitigation Start Complete Responsible;Person) Condition: VEGETATION AND WILDLIFE HABITAT AREA DISTURBANCE Mitigation: 2.1.a The requirements of all concerned government agencies Planning/Public Project design Completion of having permit authority over actions proposed which may Works Departments review. construction. affect on- and off-site hydrology and water quality shall be required to be met. 2.1.b All projects will conform to the requirements of existing City Planning/Public Project design Completion of review policies, including Council Policy 1704 addressing riparian Works Departments review. & construction. habitat and stream protection, as well as the Grading and Floodplain Ordinances (Chapter 16.40 and 18.47 of the Redding Municipal Code). 2.1.c Interim and final erosion control plans will be required for all Public Works Project design Completion of projects subject to the City of Redding Grading Ordinance. Department review. construction. 2.2.a If loss of an identified wetland area is unavoidable within a Planning Department Project design Completion of development proposal, mitigation measures imposed after review. construction. project review should strive for a goal of "no net loss" through the use of wetland banks, developer impact fees, and other like measures. 2.2.b All development proposals will be reviewed to ensure consis- Planning Department Project design Completion of tency with existing City policies related to habitat and open review. construction. space preservation, including those contained within the Conservation & Open Space Element of the General Plan, the Land Use Element of the General Plan, Council Policy 1704, the Subdivision Ordinance (Chapters 17.04 - 17.72 of the Redding Municipal Code), the Flood Plain Ordinance (Chapter 18.47 of the Redding Municipal Code), and those portions of the Zoning Ordinance addressing slopes in excess of 20% (portions of Chapter 18.32 of the Redding Municipal Code). Prior to project approval, developments which do not avoid Planning Department/ Design review. Completion of 2.6.a wetlands, vernal pools, or streambed floodplains will be sur- Developer construction. veyed by a qualified botanist to determine the presence or absence of endangered, sensitive, or rare plant communities. If such species are present and determined to be negatively impacted by the proposed development, appropriate mitiga- tion measures will be designed and adopted as part of the City permitting process. All development proposals will conform to the requirements Planning Department Design review. Completion of 2.6.b of the City's existing Tree Preservation Ordinance (Chapter construction. 18.65 of the Redding Municipal Code). EIR-4-92, City of Redding Mitigation Monitoring/Permit Compliance Checklist (Upper Stillwater Area Plan) Page 2 X ........................................................................................ ..........................................................................................................................................................I........................................................................................................................................................................................_......,_..............I..............................1...-......1...-.................................................................I.....—...............—...............I.......................................-................................1........I...I.......I......I.....,............................................... .................................................1..I... ...1..1...............-.......................­............................................... ..................................................................................................-.-...............1........1.........................1 ..... .......... ... .............................................. ..... .-.......................................................... .......''.............. .......­ . ... .. ................. ..... ... . .............. ........ ...... ....... . .... .Il.- .. ................................. .. ...... ...... ..................... ............. ............. ................. ............................ .Whim: Completed EIRRefer . . gationDepar mervtP&966When'ShouIdaft {Date af.. .. .......... .............-....................................................... ................. .......................................................... ........................................................ Agency ... '..b.....I................I M...............q...a....t...i..o...m...�.S­t..a..r..t ...............I.............CI.—. Q..—.M.......p.......I..V.....ti ...................Resp........r.... ..s....I6 ....1............:...:.P.......e.......r.....S.......O........ .n....). .. ..... ........- Condition: WATER QUALITY, HYDROLOGY & DRAINAGE Mitigation: 3.2.a Require all new development occurring within the City Public Works Design review. Completion of corporate limits to participate in sewer assessment districts Department construction. to finance the extension and improvement of the existing sewer system. 3.3.a Rezone the 100-year floodplain in the study area to include Planning Department. Upon Annexation. Completion of the "FP" Floodplain Combining District. annexation process. 3.3.b Prepare a Master Storm Drain Plan for the study area to Public Works Upon Annexation. Completion of coordinate drainage improvements as development occurs. Department. annexation process. 3.3.c Establish a financing mechanism, such as storm-drain benefit Public Works Upon Annexation. Completion of districts or a storm drain utility within the study area and Department. annexation process. collect equitable fees from each development that occurs within the study area for future storm drain improvements and to pay the cost of street sweeping services. 3.3.d Developments proposed within the watershed of the study Public Works Design review. Completion of area shall be required to prepare a drainage impact analysis. Department/ construction. Projects shall be designed to provide for no significant Developer. increase in peak discharge flows leaving the project site and/or the developer will be required to obtain a "drainage release" from affected property owners. 3.3.e Prior to the issuance of a building permit, a discharge permit Public Works Design review. Completion of review. from the Regional Water Quality Control Board will be Department/ required for any development determined to have the Developer. potential to contribute significant additional direct runoff to the East or West Fork of Stillwater Creek or Moody Creek. EIR-4-92, City of Redding Mitigation Monitoring/Permit Compliance Checklist (Upper Stillwater Area Plan) Page 3 ... __. ..... .._. _.. .. _._..... __. _. . . .. _ _.........._... . _..... _......_ ........... .............. ........._ ......... .... ..... ............. . . ........_._.. .......__.. _.. .... .._............__..... _ _.._ ......_..... ........_....... ._.. ... _..... ___. ......... .... ..... _ ......... ....... _......... ._...._ _ .. .. . .. . .. .. ....... ...._._. .._.....11 ......... .............. .................... ......_ ...... ...._ .... . ............._.. .......... ............. _........... _ ....... .......... ._.._..................._ ._............................._...._.. _. ..._.................... ...... .. ... ......... ......_....... Wh, Shdutd Completed EIR:Refer. Condition/Mtt gatron Department, Person,; When Should M tigatian be (gate & Name of.;; No to:be Monitored A enc' Res ons�ble: Mitigation Start Corn iete Res'onsible Person) Condition: AIR QUALITY Mitigation: 4.1.a Each discretionary permitted development project proposed Planning Department Design review. Completion of review. for the study area which is determined to generate 1,500 or more daily vehicle trips, or which has the potential to exceed a 25 pounds per day threshold for total organic gases, 25 pounds per day of nitrogen of oxides, or more than 80 pounds per day of inhalable particulate matter from either direct or indirect sources, as determined by the Air Quality Management District, shall be required to analyze the effect that the development shall have on air quality in accordance with the California Clean Air Act. The best available mitigation measures shall be required to be implemented by the developer in consultation with the Shasta County Air Quality Management Board. In addition, any project exceeding 137 pounds per day of TOG or NOX is considered significant from an air quality perspective as to require an environmental analysis and possibly an EIR and emission offsets as discussed in the Air Quality Element of the General Plan. 4.1.b Increase the availability of mass-transit services to the study RABA As development Ongoing. area. occurs. 4.1.c Promote the use of alternative means of transportation such RABA/Planning As development Ongoing. as mass-transit use, ride-sharing, and bicycling. Department occurs. 4.1.d As portions of the study area annex into the City, require the Public Works As development Completion of improvement of unpaved streets through the formation of Department occurs. construction. neighborhood assessment districts. 4.1.e Require new development to participate in the improvement Public Works As development Completion of of existing unpaved roadways impacted by the development. Department occurs. construction. 4.1.f When feasible, all discretionary permitted development Planning Department Design review. Completion of review. projects shall be subject to site plan criteria that incorporate pedestrian and/or transit-oriented development design. 4.1.g All development projects shall be subject to Standard Planning Department Design review. Completion of review. Mitigation Measures such as those contained in the Air Quality Element of the Redding General Plan. EIR-4-92, City of Redding Mitigation Monitoring/Permit Compliance Checklist (Upper Stillwater Area Plan) Page 4 When Should Completed EIRReferCandit'ron/Mitigation Department, Person, When Should Mitigation be (Date& Name of No to be Monitored Agencj Responsible Mitigation Start Complete Responsible:Person) Condition: SAFETY Mitigation: 5.1.a All development proposals will be subject to adopted policies Planning/Fire Design review. Completion of review. contained in the Safety Element of the Redding General Plan Departments and Fire Protection Standards as adopted by Shasta County. 5.1.b Construction will conform to all safety requirements Planning/Building Plan review. Completion of contained within the Uniform Building Code. construction. 5.1.c All fire protection agencies with responsibility for fire Fire Department Ongoing. Ongoing. suppression within the study area will strive for maximum cooperation among and between agencies. 5.1.d Proposals for new development within the study area must Planning/Fire Design review. Completion of review. incorporate design features, such as adequately sized water Departments lines and fire hydrants sufficient for optimum fire suppression. Proposals must contain assurances from the water service provider that water flow pressures are adequate for fire suppression. • EIR-4-92, City of Redding Mitigation Monitoring/Permit Compliance Checklist (Upper Stillwater Area Plan) Page 5 When Should Camplet,ed EIR;Refer ConditionfMitigation Department, Person, When Should Mitigation Ibe (Date& N:ame of< No. to be Monitored A enc Res onsible MitigatEon tart:SCom lete Res 'onsible Pers©nl Condition: HISTORICAL/ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES DISTURBANCE Mitigation: 6.1.a Require an archaeological reconnaissance on a project-by- Planning Department/ Project design Completion of review. project basis prior to approval of a development project. Developer review. 6.1.b Projects in areas of known heritage value, such as the Planning Department Review of Completion of review/ Church Rock site, shall be designed to minimize degradation subdivision map. recording of final map of these resources. Where conflicts are unavoidable, mitigation measures which reduce such impacts shall be implemented. Possible mitigation measures may include clustering, buffer zones, and building siting requirements. 6.1.c At the time of development, the sensitive site should be Planning Department/ At issuance of Completion of monitored by a qualified person with Native American Developer building permit. construction. cultural knowledge of the area during grading, earth removal, or earth disturbance. If any archaeological, historical, or paleontological resources are uncovered, construction activities in the affected area should cease and a qualified archaeologist should be contacted to review the site and advise the City of the site's significance. If the findings are deemed significant, appropriate mitigations should be required prior to resumption of work on the project. 6.1.d In the event that human remains are observed during Planning Department/ At issuance of Completion of construction activities, all excavation or disturbance of the Developer building permit. construction. site should be halted until the County Coroner has been informed. If the remains are of Native American origin, the Native American Heritage Commission should be notified within 24 hours. EIR-4-92, City of Redding Mitigation Monitoring/Permit Compliance Checklist (Upper Stillwater Area Plan) Page 6 When Should ':C e&' EIR Re#er. ConditionWitigation Department, Person,.. When Shau.ld Mitigation be (Date i&' Nameof No to be Monitored Agent} Responsible MitEgation Start Complete Responsible Perso.r} Condition: TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION INADEQUACIES Planning/Public At time of Prior to completion of Works Departments development. development. Mitigation: 7.1.a Extend East Stillwater Way north to connect with Paso Planning/Public At time of Prior to completion of Robles Avenue. Works Departments development. development. 7.1.b Extend Paso Robles Avenue easterly. Planning/Public At time of Prior to completion of Works Departments development. development. 7.1.c Widen Old Oregon Trail at SR 299E to 6 lanes, add dual left Planning/Public At time of Prior to completion of at west bound off ramp and dual right turn lanes, and Works Departments development. development. coordinate interchange signals. Prior to completion of 7.1.d Relocate Shasta College Main entrance 800 feet north to Planning/Public At time of development. provide "tee" intersection, signalize and provide special turn Works Departments development. lanes; or, limit enrollment or provide another junior college in the City. 7.1.e Realign Old Oregon Trail between Bear Mountain Road and Planning/Public At time of Prior to completion of Paso Robles Avenue. Works Departments development. development. 7.1.f Signalize the intersection of Old Oregon Trail at Planning/Public At time of Prior to completion of Collyer/Shasta College main driveway. Works Departments development. development. 7.1.g Widen Old Oregon Trail to a four-lane urban arterial. Planning/Public At time of Prior to completion of Works Departments development. development. 7.1.h Widen SR 299E from two lanes to a four-lane expressway Planning/Public At time of Prior to completion of with access control from Stillwater Creek to Deschutes Works Departments development. development. Road. 7.1.i Add center two-way left turn lane at Collyer Drive from Old Planning/Public At time of Prior to completion of Oregon Trail to Churn Creek Road. Works Departments development. development. 7.1.j Plan line studies of arterials shall be completed prior to or as Public Works Ongoing. Ongoing. a product of development to insure efficient and consistent Department alignments. 7.1.k Increase the availability of mass-transit services to the study RABA Ongoing. Ongoing. area along high density development corridors. EIR-4-92, City of Redding Mitigation Monitoring/Permit Compliance Checklist (Upper Stillwater Area Plan) Page 7 X ....................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................... ....................................................................... .... ...�.�...........1.....1.....1...........1.........................................i .....,...............'. :......-.... .... ................"............................................I... ......,.................-....................... ................................................I................. .......... . .......I.......... ...... ...............................'.....................................­._......1.................................................. ............................. ... . ........................................................... .. ....................................... .....................I.........�................ ... ................................ .. ................ ............. ........ ., .... .... ......... .._­...... ..... ........... ....... ........... .......... ......... .......... . ...... ........ .. ... ......... ......... .... ......... ........ ... .. ....... ....... .......... ............. .... ...... ... .......................x...............1................. . ........ ...... . ...... ......... ... ..... ... ......... .............. . EIRRefer . ShouId C I t d No. C90ditipn/MItwet Department Person . . Mitigation (Date:AxName xoV Aoxbe Monit Agency esponstbleMtldatlbh�St6rtet ResponsiblejPersonI ...... .... 7.1.1 At the time of review of development proposals, benefit Public Works At the time of Ongoing. studies shall be undertaken to identify benefits from study Department development. area street improvements and transit system enhancements, and responsibility for participation in the financing and construction of the improvements. 7.1.m Promote the use of alternative means of transportation such Planning/Public Ongoing. Ongoing. as mass-transit use, ride-sharing, and bicycling. Works/BABA 7.1.n Determination of consistency with the Shasta County Planning Department Design review. Completion of review. Congestion Management Program shall be made on a project- by-project basis as development proposals are evaluated within the study area. Pursuant to the Congestion Management Plan, a land-use impact analysis may be required. 7.1.o A zone of benefit overlay for reconstruction of the SR Public Works By 2000. Ongoing. 299E/Old Oregon Trail interchange shall be established. Department • EIR-4-92, City of Redding Mitigation Monitoring/Permit Compliance Checklist (Upper Stillwater Area Plan) Page 8 EIR;Refer. Wien Shoi�ltl Completed No. Condition/Mitigation Depart nentr Berson, When Should MitIgation be (Date &.N;ame of #o be Monitored A enc` Res ons�ble Mi#,gation Start Com fete Responsible Persons Condition: ADEQUACY OF POLICE AND FIRE SERVICES, UTILITIES, PARKS AND RECREATION FACILITIES, AND SCHOOLS Mitigation: 8.1.a Construct Fire Station No. 8 within seven years of the City of Redding Ongoing. By 2000. dedication or upon completion of the 143rd dwelling unit within the Tierra Oaks Planned Development, whichever occurs first. 8.1.b All annexation applications will be subject to review by the Fire/Planning/Police Review of Completion of City Fire Marshall and Police Department, and where Departments annexation annexation. significant impacts upon existing services are identified, application. appropriate mitigations will be developed and imposed as conditions of annexation. 8.1.c All tentative subdivision maps will be subject to review by Fire/Planning/Police Conditions of Completion of the City Fire Marshall and Police Department, and where Departments Subdivision map. construction. significant impacts upon existing services are identified, appropriate mitigations will be developed and imposed as conditions of approval. 8.2.a Upon annexation and as a condition of annexation, all Planning/Public Review of Completion of subdivision development proposals occurring within the Works Departments annexation annexation. study area where sewer services are not available will be application. required to construct the necessary improvements or enter into a reimbursement agreement with the City which will 41 cover the cost of extending sewer trunk lines to the development. In addition, developers will participate in the formation of special assessment districts specifically for the proposed development or on a larger regional basis to ensure the availability of sewer services to the proposed residential units. 8.2.b Upon annexation and as a condition of annexation, any Public Works Review of Completion of existing development wishing to access the City's sewer Department annexation annexation. system must finance the necessary infrastructure expansion application. and/or improvements. EIR-4-92, City of Redding Mitigation Monitoring/Permit Compliance Checklist (Upper Stillwater Area Plan) Page 9 When Should Completed EIR F3efer Gonditian/Mrtigation Department, Person When Should Mitgattort be (4ate.....&.".........Name of No to be:Mon�tored Ageney Responsible Mitigation Start Compete Responsible Person? 8.3.a Adhere to existing requirements contained in the City's Planning Department Conditions of Recording of Subdivision Ordinance regarding park land dedication and subdivision map. subdivision map. developer's in-lieu fees (Chapter 17.42). 8.3.b Assist the County to implement policies similar to the City's Planning Department Ongoing. Ongoing. regarding in-lieu park fees and park land dedications applicable to all new residential developments of 5+ units within the study area. 8.4.a Refer all subdivision proposals within the study area to Planning Department Design & review Completion of review affected school districts for review and comment. of subdivision. process. 8.4.b Include as a policy in the Upper Stillwater Area Plan a Planning Department Ongoing. Ongoing. requirement to implement any policy that the City Council establishes on a citywide basis regarding school funding. Condition: NOISE Mitigation: 9.1.a In the event of annexation to the City, any existing industrial Planning Department Review of Completion of operation including but not limited to auto dismantling yards, annexation annexation. shall enter into a contract to upgrade their facilities to the application. noise standards contained in the Noise Element of the City's General Plan over a period of five years with improvements to take place every year. 9.1.b Where feasible, require deeper lots (130 to 150 feet) along Planning Department Design review. Completion of review major streets, including Old Oregon Trail, Bear Mountain process. Road, and State Route 299. 9.1.c Noise analysis studies shall be required of new development Planning Department/ Review & Completion of review in the study area adjacent to State Route 299 to determine if Developer conditioning of process. further noise mitigations are necessary to achieve compliance projects. with current State standards. a:mitmontr.tbl ' EIR-4-92, City of Redding Mitigation Monitoring/Permit Compliance Checklist (Upper Stillwater Area Plan) Page 10 k