HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - City Council - 2010-06-15117
City Council, Regular Meeting
Civic Center Council Chambers
777 Cypress Avenue
Redding, California
June 15,2010 6:00 p.m.
The Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag was led by Rob Burroughs.
I
The Invocation was offered by Vice Mayor Missy McArthur.
The meeting was called to order by Mayor Jones with the following Council Members
present: Bosetti, Dickerson, McArthur, and Stegall.
Also present were City Manager Starman, City Attorney Duvernay, Assistant City
Manager/Personnel Director Tippin, Transportation and Engineering Director Crane,
Assistant Development Services Director Nagel, City Clerk Mize, and Executive Assistant
Grimm. The City Manager noted that most Department Directors were in attendance.
-------------------
CONSENT CALENDAR
The following matters were considered inclusively under the Consent Calendar:
Approval of Minutes - Regular Meeting of May 18, 2010
I
Approval of Payroll and Accounts Payable Registers
[A-050-100-500]
It is the recommendation of the Finance Director that the City Council approve Accounts
Payable Register No. 23, for check numbers 883965 through 884344, inclusive, ACH
Transfer numbers 6907 through 6938, inclusive, and Wire Transfer numbers 2362 through
2412, inclusive, for a total of$10,836,506.32, for the period oOune 1,2010, through June
11, 2010; and Payroll Register No. 24, for electronic deposit transaction numbers 280164
through 281047, inclusive, and check numbers 546635 through 546727, inclusive, in the
amount of$2,537,686.59, for the period May 16, 2010, through May 29,2010.
TOTAL: $13,374,192.91
Ordinance - Amending Title 18-Zoning, Chapter 18.31-Residential Districts, relating to the
density of projects affordable to lower income households, as detailed in Rezoning
Application RZ-4-1 0
[L-OI0-230/C-II0-I00]
It is the recommendation of the Assistant Development Services Director that Ordinance No.
2461 be adopted, an ordinance of the City Council of the City of Redding amending Title 18
- Zoning, Chapter 18.31-Residential Districts, Section 18.31.030-Site Development
Regulations and Performance Standards, Schedule 18.31.030-B-Density Regulations-
Residential Uses, relating to the density of projects affordable to lower income households,.
as detailed in Rezoning Application RZ-4-1 O.
I
Resolution - Grant Application to the California State Department of Housing and
Community Development and Execution of a Standard Grant Agreement
[G-I00-170]
It is the recommendation of the Assistant City Manager that the City Council adopt
Resolution No. 2010-53, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding authorizing
staff to submit a grant application to the California State Department of Housing and
Community Development (HCD) for up to $1,000,000 in CalHome Program funds; and
authorize the execution of a standard grant agreement with HCD if selected for such funding
Grant Application - Transportation Infrastructure Generating Economic Recovery Phase II
(TIGER II) Grant Application for Reconstruction of the Oasis Road Interchange
[G-l 00-070/G-030-11 0]
It is the recommendation of the Transportation and Engineering Director that the City
Council authorize staff to submit an application to the Department of Transportation for a
National Transportation Infrastructure Investment discretionary grant under the FY 2010
Appropriations Act, aka "TIGER II Discretionary Grants", for reconstruction of the Oasis
06/15/2010
118
Road 'Interchange, and approve approximately $25,000 for staff and consultant support for
preparation of the application, which will be funded through the Citywide Traffic Impact Fee
Program.
Award of Bid - Schedule No. 4338 - Treated Wood Poles
[B-050-100]
It is the recommendation of the Electric Utility Director that the City Council award Bid
Schedule No. 4338 to Pacific Wood Preserving for furnishing treated wood poles on an as-
needed basis during the period July I, 2010, to June 30, 2011, for the bid unit amounts
shown on the tabulation of bids attached to the Report to City Council dated June 4, 2010,
incorporated herein by reference; and authorize the Purchasing Officer to extend the bid
annually, for up to two years, at the same prices, terms, and conditions if deemed prudent and
mutually agreeable.
I
Resolution - Authorizing acceptance of a Grant from the State of California Alcoholic
Beverage Control Department
[G-I 00-..1 70/P-150-150]
It is the recommendation of the Chief of Police that the City Council adopt Resolution No.
20 10-54, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding authorizing the acceptance
of a grant from the California Alcoholic Beverage Control Department in the amount of
$29,847, to pay for training, overtime, compensation and equipment designed to address
alcohol enforcement issues such as underage drinking and disturbances at on-sale
establishments.
Award of Bid - Schedule No. 4332 (Job No. 9381) - Benton Airpark Safety Overrun Project
[B-050-020/G-I 00-070-095/ A-090-020]
It is the recommendation of the Transportation and Engineering Director that the City
Council award Bid Schedule No. 4332 to Ford Construction Company, Inc., for extending
runway safety areas and replacement of a damaged storm drain at Benton Airpark, in the
amount of $1 ,023,421.50; that an additional $245,900 be approved for administration and
inspection fees and obtaining outside services for material testing; and that $102,378.50 be
approved to provide construction contingency funding, for a total of $1,371,700.
Authorization of Services Agreement - Mead & Hunt, Inc., for Construction Engineering
Services at Benton Airpark
[A-090-020/G-IOO-070-095]
It is the recommendation of the Transportation and Engineering Director that the City
Council approve Authorization of Service Agreement (AOS) No. 10-01 with Mead & Hunt,
Inc. (C-4389), in an amount not-to-exceed $182,100, for construction engineering services
for the first phase of the Benton Airpark Safety Overrun project.
I
Award of Bid - Schedule No. 4323 (Job No. 2306) - Foothill 30-inch Raw Water Pipe
Replacement Project
[B-050-0201W -030-425]
It is the recommendation of the Transportation and Engineering Director that the City
Council award Bid Schedule No. 4323 to Cox & Cox Construction, Inc., for pipe
replacement and valve appurtenances for the Foothill Water Treatment Plant and repaving
Foothill Boulevard following pipe installation, in the amount of $2,162,055.65; that an
additional $200,000 be approved for administration and inspection fees; and that $325,000
be approved to provide construction contingency funding, for a total of$2,687,055.65.
Notice of Completion - Bid Schedule No. 4269 (Job No. 2327) - Foothill Water Treatment
Plant Miscellaneous Improvements Project
[B-050-0201W -030-425]
It is the recommendation of the Transportation and Engineering Director that the City
Council accept the subject construction contract performed by R T A Construction/Ray Toney
J.V. as satisfactorily complete and authorize the City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion
with the Shasta County Recorder. Final cost was $684,000.
I
Grant Application - Safe Routes to School Program
[G-I 00-170/S-:070-285/S-070-1 00]
It is the recommendation of the Transportation and Engineering Director that the City
Council authorize staff to submit a grant application for state grant funds from the Safe
06/15/2010
119
Routes to School Program (SR2S) for projects proposed along Lorna Vista Drive and Locust
Street, to serve the students of Lassen View and Cypress Elementary schools.
I
Award of Bid - Schedule No. 4322 (Job No. 2229) - Oasis Road/Interstate' 5 Southbound
Loop On-Ramp and Off-Ramp Realignment Project
[B-050-020/G-030-110]
It is the recommendation of the Transportation and Engineering Director that the City
Council award Bid Schedule No. 4322 to J.F. Shea Construction, Inc., forrealignment of the
southbound freeway off-ramp from 1-5 to Oasis Road, a loop on-ramp from westbound Oasis
Road to southbound Interstate 5 (1-5), traffic signals at the ramp termini, and other
miscellaneous work, in the amount of $2,141,835.45; that an additional $100,000 be
approved for staff administration and surveying during construction; and that $100,000. be
approved to provide construction contingency funding, for a total of$2,341,835.45.
The Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
Council Members - Bosetti, Dickerson, McArthur, and Jones
Council Members - Stegall
Council Members - None
Council Members - None
Conflict of Interest Code - Biennial Review
[F-010-150]
It is the recommendation of the City Clerk that the City Council (1) give notice that, pursuant
to Government Code Section 87306.5, its Conflict of Interest Code is to be reviewed and
revised if necessary; (2) direct the City Clerk and advise all City departments to review the
current list of designated positions and disclosure categories to determine if any revisions are
necessary and to provide said revisions to the City Clerk by October 1, 2010; and (3) direct
the City Clerk to prepare and present any necessary revisions to the Code to the Council, or
advise the Council that no revisions are necessary, within 90 days of receiving said
notification(s).
I
A MOTION WAS MADE by Council Member McArthur, seconded by Council Member
Bosetti, that the foregoing items on the Consent Calendar be approved and adopted as
recommended with the exception of the item(s) approved by separate vote as indicated
above. The Vote:
AYES: Council Members - Bosetti, Dickerson, McArthur, Stegall, and Jones
NOES: Council Members - None
ABSTAIN: Council Members - None
ABSENT: Council Members - None
Ordinance No. 2461 and Resolution Nos. 2010-53 through 2010-54 are on file in the Office
of the City Clerk.
FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY - Update on Status of Floodplain
Remapping on Olney Creek
[F-200-090/S-060-150-550]
Council Member McArthur recused herself due to property ownership in the area.
I
Development Services Assistant Director Nagel and Transportation and Engineering Director
Crane summarized the Report to City Council (staff report) dated June 7,2010, with a Power
Point presentation, both incorporated herein by reference, including results of a hydrologic
analysis performed by Pacific Hydrologic, Inc. (PHI). Mr. Nagel outlined the City's "Next
Steps" that include further study and identification of funding sources for achieving Federal
Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) re-certification of the Olney Creek levee. He
recommended that the Council accept the status update related to FEMA action on the
remapping of the Olney Creek floodplain, and authorize continued work to refine the
engineering analysis of potential solutions to address flooding issues specifically associated
with obtaining Olney Creek levee re-certification, using approximately $10,000 in funding
remaining from the original $75,000 budget allocation.
Donna Briggs urged the Council to accept the PHI study and to take continued action to
resolve flooding issues identified in the study and impacting homeowners with property
located in revised Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map zones under FEMA's Flood Map
Modernization Program.
06/15/2010
120
Jim Pace supported continued effort to resolve potential flooding at Sacramento Drive and
the Olney Creek levee.
A MOTION WAS MADE by Council Member Stegall, seconded by Council Member
Bosetti, accepting staffs recommendation as detailed in the staffreport dated June 7, 2010,
accepting the status update related to FEMA action on the remapping of the Olney Cr~ek
flood plain and authorizing continued work to refine the engineering analysis of solutions to
address flooding issues specifically associated with obtaining Olney Creek levee re-
certification. The Vote:
AYES: Council Members - Bosetti, Dickerson, Stegall, and Jones
NOES: Council Members - None
ABSTAIN: Council Members - McArthur
ABSENT: Council Members - None
I
-------------------
PUBLIC HEARING - Consideration of a Resolution adjusting the City's Schedule of Fees
and Service Charges
[F-205-600]
Finance Director Strong summarized the Report to City Council (staff report) dated June 3,
2010, incorporated herein by reference, and noted an overall 1.7 percent increase based on
the Consumer Price Index for the 12-month period ended April 2010 for mid-size western
cities, with some exceptions as detailed in the staff report dated May, 14, 2010, and
submitted to Council on June 1,2010. He pointed out increases requested by solid waste,
development services, and support services/convention center and recommended that the
Council adopt the resolution to adjust the City's Schedule of Fees and Service Charges.
Staff responded to questions from Council Members.
At the hour of 6:40 p.m., Mayor Jones opened the public hearing to consider Proposed
Adjustments to the City's Schedule of Fees and Service Charges.
Affidavit of Publication - Notice of Public Hearing
I
The following documents are on file in the Office of the City Clerk:
No protests were received.
Kent Dagg requested that the Council postpone adoption of the proposed changes, to allow
for a more comprehensive review and opined that increased fees)can cause unpermitted work.
Council Members McArthur and Dickerson supported more review of the proposed three
percent increase to solid waste fees and the General Plan Amendment Text Fee, but deferred
to City Manager Starman's assertion that increases to the Convention Center Fee Schedule
needed to be implemented by July 1, 2010.
Mayor Jones determined that no other individual wished to address this matter and closed
the public hearing.
Mayor Jones stated he opposed increases to Convention Center fees and would not support
a resolution adjusting the City's fee schedule due to a global recession of an unprecedented
nature.
A MOTION WAS MADE by Council Member Stegall, seconded by Council Member
McArthur, approving amended Resolution No. 2010-55, a resolution of the City Council of
the City of Redding adjusting Convention Center fees, to become effective July 1,2010, and
continued the Public Hearing to consider all other proposed changes to the City's Schedule
of Fees and Service Charges to July 20,2010.
The Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
I
Council Members - Bosetti, Dickerson, McArthur, and Stegall
Council Members - Jones
Council Members - None
Council Members - None
Resolution No. 2010-55, as amended at this Council meeting and pertaining only to Redding
Convention Center fees, is on file in the Office of the City Clerk.
06/15/2010
121
PUBLIC HEARING - Salt Creek Heights Subdivision/Planned Development; and
RESOLUTION - Certifying Environmental Impact Report EIR-I-08; and
RESOLUTION - Approving Tentative Map Application S-15-07 and Planned Development
Plan Application PD-ll-07; and
ORDINANCE - Approving Rezoning Application RZ-6-07; and
ORDINANCE - Approving the Salt Creek Heights Subdivision Development Agreement
with Sierra Pacific Industries, Inc.
[S-1 01-135/L-Ol 0-211-043/^L-Ol 0-075/^L-Ol 0-230]
Council Member McArthur recused herself due to property ownership in the area.
I
Planning Manager DeMallie forwarded the Planning Commission's split-vote
recommendation to approve a 440 residential unit subdivision/planned development with a
13 .9-acre public park and 127 acres of natural open space on 272 acres between Eureka Way
and the Sacramento River and summarized the Report to City Council dated June 3, 2010,
incorporated herein by reference. He explained that the Commission's split vote centered
around six lots ("outpads"), identified as Lots 335, 336, 337, 338, 339 and 341, that are
located on the fringe of the development in an area currently designated as "Greenway" on
the General Plan (GP). Mr. DeMallie supported the overall design of the project and had
observed favorable public comment, with the exception of controversy related to fire safety,
conformance with GP greenway and open space policy, and environmental concerns over the
six outpads.
Mr. DeMallie pointed out that the project's north boundary borders Salt Creek and its east
boundary is defined by Gold Run Creek. He called out the "greenway" and the two land use
designations within the project area from a graphic of the General Plan map, noting that
current zoning density would allow construction of approximately 800 units. From the
Planned Development (PD) graphic, Mr. DeMallie highlighted the six outpads in the
greenway area. He provided a definition of "Greenway" and stated staff opposition to six of
the twelve proposed outpad building sites.
I
Mr. DeMallie advised Council that, if approved as recommended by the Planning
Commission, the project would result in construction of homes in very high-fire hazard
severity zones, as determined by the state. He provided fire fuel reduction plan maps from
a report prepared by RBF Consulting, depicting cleared land based on original clearing
requirements, and recalled Redding Municipal Code (RMC) clearance requirements and
exceptions, which are subject to Fire Marshal approval. Mr. DeMallie relayed that the Fire
Marshal did not favor a reduction to the 200-foot City standard to allow 130-foot clearances
as proposed by a fire behavioral consultant hired by the developer, even though the Planning
Commission approved the modification.
City Attorney Duvernay interjected that subdivision development and applicable City
application and approval processes must be strictly followed in order for the City's decision
on the subdivision to be defensible in court. Mr. Duvernay pointed out that the draft
tentative map currently states a 200- foot clearance as a brush management condition. He
recognized that the applicant has an option to submit a study and request an exception, which
is subject to approval by the Fire Marshal and consistent with RMC. He emphasized that
Council must be cognizant of over-riding the existing delegation of authority to the Fire
Marshal and reiterated that since current law gives the fire department final approval of
exceptions, any other decision would not be defensible.
I
Mr. DeMallie touched on the adequacy of the Environmental Impact Report (EIR -1-08),
prepared by RBF Consulting, which demonstrates that any environmental impacts can be
mitigated and noted Planning Commission's unanimous approval ofthe EIR. Mr. DeMallie
cited the areas generating the most public comment were increased traffic, fire safety, and
Salt Creek biological resource protection. He deferred to Council to dispense with a detailed
verbal review of the EIR, opining that the staff report had voluminous detail and three public
hearings had been held, all of which provided ample opportunity for the public and Council
to understand the scope of the project. He recommended that the Council adopt a resolution
certifying the Environment Impact Report on the project.
Mr. DeMallie briefly explained the definition of the City's General Plan "Greenway".
designation, General Plan Policy CDD3A, and Planning Commission Interpretation 2001-3,
all relating to slope areas exceeding 20 percent. He relayed the Planning Commission's
opinions regarding Lots 335, 336, 337, 338, 339 and 341 (as detailed in the staffreport), and
06/15/2010
122
stated that staff recommended that the Council adopt a resolution approving Tentative Map
Application S-15-07 and Planned Development Plan Application PD-11-07, excluding the
six outpads highlighted in yellow on the PD graphic, due to inconsistency with General Plan
policies. Mr. DeMallie further recommended that the Council offer two ordinances, relating
to Rezoning Application RZ-6-07 and a Development Agreement with Sierra Pacific
Industries relative to the Salt Creek Heights subdivision, for first reading by title only and
waive the full reading.
At the hour of 7:21 p.m., Mayor Jones opened the public hearing to consider the Final
Environmental Impact Report ErR-1-08, the Tentative Subdivision Map Application S-15-
07, the Planned Development Plan Application PD-11-07, the Rezoning Application RZ-6-
07, and the Salt Creek Heights Development Agreement, all pertaining to the Salt Creek
Heights Subdivision/Planned Development.
I
The following documents are on file in the Office of the City Clerk:
Affidavit of Publication - Notice of Public Hearing
Affidavit of Mailing - Notice of Public Hearing
City Clerk Mize advised that eight protest letters had been received after the agenda was
distributed, which had been copied to all Council Members and made available for public
review, and were incorporated into the official record by reference.
Gary Blanc, Sierra Pacific Industries/Applicant representative, gave background on the
project since the property was purchased in December 2006. Mr. Blanc stated that members
ofthe Sierra Pacific Industries (SPI) development team personally walked the property to
get a feel for the land prior to any layout work being completed. In early 2007, team members
met with City planning, engineering, fire, and community services staff and CalTRANS, and
worked to develop a diversified plan that would comply with the General Plan and current
zoning requirements. He relayed that a neighborhood meeting, and a public scoping session
and public hearing were held before the Planning Commission to provide opportunity for
public comment on the project, with all efforts resulting in the proposed Salt Creek Heights
Subdivision/Planned Development being submitted for Council's approval. Mr. Blanc
described the project details, including 96 apartments, 96 single-family garden court units,
and 73 small/114 medium/49 large/12 custom single-family homes, with 46 percent open
space. He pointed out that conditions of the Tentative Map Application/Planned
Development Plan Application(s) were negotiated during the permit process and had
received Planning Commission majority approval. Mr. Blanc submitted SPI's strong
disagreement with staffs alternative recommendation to eliminate six outpads from the
project and their opinion that the proposed construction is inconsistent with General Plan
policies.
I
Mike Dormer, Sharrah/Dunlap/Sawyer (SDS) Principal and Project Manager, described
plotting the project on the City's topographic map to identify outpad sites and gave a
PowerPoint presentation, included herein by reference. Mr. Dormer showed the original and
current outpad layout plans, and explained that since site inspections did not match the aerial
topography, SDS was retained to conduct on-the-ground field surveys on every outpad
driveway. He maintained that, based on field survey findings, 12 building outpads/sites are
developable and meet greenway policy criteria. Mr. Dormer stated that stem-wall
construction would be used to minimize grading for the 80 x 80 foot building pads. He
illustrated the Best Management Practices (BMP) planned for erosion control by referring
to Highland Park Subdivision's positive results over the first winter using similar BMPs.
Mr. Dormer addressed fire safety issues by pointing out that the subdivision will be in a
specific Landscape Maintenance District (LMD), whose annual assessments will reflect the
City's costs to maintain fire defensible space. He observed that almost all of west Redding
is a high fire hazard severity zone and that older developments do not include defensible
space LMD assessments, which is the responsibility of those property owner( s). Mr. Dormer
emphasized that the existing development agreement has incorporated extra measures to
mitigate fire risks in areas adjacent to wild lands, such as 22-foot wide driveways that can
act as a firebreak and a fire hydrant and emergency vehicle turn-around at each home site.
He concluded that open space concerns were unfounded because 44 percent (or 140 acres)
of the project's 272 acres would remain open space, and that the project, as recommended
by the Planning Commission, conforms to the General Plan and the City's development
standards.
I
06/15/2010
123
Gary Blanc offered that additional progress had been made on Condition 109 of the proposed
Tentative Map Application/Planned Development Plan Application, relaying that SPI had
signed a non-binding Memorandum of Intent for the Bureau of Land Management to take
ownership of28 acres of open space between the project, Salt Creek, and the river trail for
environmental protection, with the ultimate intention of establishing one or more walking
trails on portions of that property, and showed an exhibit of possible locations of trails,
thereby allowing the land to remain in public ownership.
I
Responding to Mayor Jones, Mr. Blanc asserted that the City's long-standing practice of
requiring two, back-to-back, 100-foot fire clearance zones had no scientific basis, which
compelled SPI to retain a fire behavior specialist to perform a site-specific study and prepare
a report with SPI property-specific conditions thereon. He further responded that the outpad
sites were very significant to the project and essential to make it financially feasible, and
expressed confidence that they were defensible with 130-foot fire clearances as proposed.
Craig Carter, a fire behavior analyst since 1984, retained by Sierra Pacific Industries to
specifically analyze this project, expressed that protection oflife and property is paramount
and asserted that 90-foot/30-foot clearing zones are sufficient based on weather, fuel
availability and type, non-flammablity of the proposed/involved structures, fire engine
turnarounds, "chimney" brush clearance, fire hydrants at outpads and other additional
mitigation measures included in the project plans. Mr. Carter responded to Council
Members Bosetti and Stegall regarding wildland/urban fires, site-specific fuel, two-zone
ideology, and sufficiency of road access. He concluded that a fire in the area was inevitable,
and that the object was to mitigate risk and minimize loss oflife/property when it occured.
I
Phil Paige, Redding Fire Marshal, informed Council that grade requirements allow access
in a normal fire situation and noted that a wildfire had burned 80 acres of the north end of
this area last year. He expressed reluctance specific to this project due to
proximity/infringement into wildland, limited air support due to power lines, and other
conditions that impact defensiblity of residential structures. Marshal Paige mentioned that
availability of fire-fighting resources is already stretched and provided a recent example of
one day that an off-duty firefighter had to contain a vehicle fire before it spread to a structure
because all the City's engines were tapped by a small, one-and-a-half acre fire and medical
calls, and City of Anderson, City of Shasta Lake, and Shasta County engines were already
engaged on stand-by for the two-alarm fire. He stated that resource availability was as
challenging as the natural environment in this instance. Responding to Council Member
Dickerson, Marshal Paige explained that typical developments cluster homes together and
separate them from wildland areas with wide expanses, and he confirmed that dual 1 OO-foot
zoning was the standard. He did not agree that SPI had sufficiently mitigated increased risks
and opposed the outpads.
Responding to Council Member Stegall, City Attorney Duvernay opined that due to broad
immunity given to cities under state law when determining appropriate levels of police and
fire protection, he was not concerned about City liability in the event of a natural catastrophe;
but reiterated his concern about deviating from existing Municipal Code delegation to the
Fire Marshal to determine acceptable conditions. Mr. Duvernay recalled that Condition 109
ofthe Tentative Map Application/Planned Development Plan Application offers SPI some
flexibility to modify fire setbacks if deemed acceptable by the Fire Marshal.
I
Gary Blanc, SPI, assured Council that notification to home buyers of the high-fire zone
designation is required under Condition 103A of the Tentative Map Application/Planned
Development Plan Application. He added that the 30/90 zone clearance proposed by Mr.
Carter was from the property boundary, not from the residence, thereby adding additional feet
of cleared space depending on the footprint of the home on the 80x80-foot 10t(s). He
expressed a commitment to work with the Fire Marshal to achieve appropriate fire danger
mitigation for the six controversial outpads. .
Todd Slaughter, David Fritchle, Doug Bennett, Jo Vayo, David Ledger, Melinda Brown,
Lang Dayton, Susan Weale, Cindy Crom, and Gary Cadd expressed concerns about traffic,
greenway infringement, walking trails, vegetation clearance, fire insurance, increased costs
for utility services, eco-system protection, legal challenges, sedimentation, use of tax-payer
money, and power lines.
06/15/2010
,.J, .
124
Mayor Jones determined that no other individual wished to address this matter and closed
the public hearing.
Mayor Jones made comments and expressed support for the project, subject to the Fire
Marshal's recommendations. Council Members Bosetti and Dickerson made additional
comments and also expressed support for the project as recommended by the Planning
Commission. Mr. Dickerson stated interest in conditional approval based on successful
negotiations between SPI and the Fire Marshal regarding mitigation measures for the
outpads.
Council Member Stegall made comments and expressed appreciation for the project but
opposed the outpads due to 20 percent slopes, high fire danger, proximity to wildlands,
greenway infringement/preservation of purity of community's open space philosophy, and
watershed concerns.
I
Planning Manager DeMallie interjected that, based on the City Attorney's counsel: Tentative
Map Application (S-15-07) / Planned Development Plan Application (PD-11-07) Condition
109 would need to be revised based on SPI's Memorandum ofIntent with the Bureau of
Land Management regarding dedication of a trail easement; and Condition 101 (a) regarding
fuel-reduction areas would also need to be revised.
A MOTION WAS MADE by Council Member Stegall, seconded by Council Member
Bosetti, adopting Resolution No. 2010-56, a resolution of the City Council of the City of
Redding certifying the completeness and adequacy of Environmental Impact Report EIR -1-
08 for the Salt Creek Heights Subdivision project. The Vote:
AYES: Council Members - Bosetti, Dickerson, Stegall, and Jones
NOES: Council Members - None
ABSTAIN: Council Members - McArthur
ABSENT: Council Members - None
Resolution No. 2010-56 is on file in the Office of the City Clerk.
A MOTION WAS MADE by Council Member Bosetti, seconded by Council Member
Dickerson, adopting Resolution No. 2010-57, a resolution of the City Council of the City of
Redding adopting findings and approving Tentative Subdivision Map Application S-15-07
and Planned Development Plan Application PD-11-07, subject to Fire Fuel Reduction Plan
approval by the City's Fire Marshal, and adopting the project mitigation and monitoring
program for Salt Creek Height Subdivision. The Vote:
AYES: Council Members - Bosetti, Dickerson, and Jones
NOES: Council Members - Stegall
ABSTAIN: Council Members - McArthur
ABSENT: Council Members - None
I
Resolution No; 2010-57 is on file in the Office of the City Clerk.
A MOTION WAS MADE by Council Member Bosetti, seconded by Council Member
Dickerson, introducing Ordinance No. 2462 by title only, an ordinance of the City Council
of the City of Redding amending the Zoning Map of the Redding .Municipal Code under
Rezoning Application RZ-6-07 relative to Salt Creek Heights Subdivision/Planned
Development; waiving the full reading ofthe Ordinance; and instructing the City Attorney
to read the full title. The Vote:
AYES: Council Members - Bosetti, Dickerson, and Jones
NOES: Council Members - Stegall
ABSTAIN: Council Members - McArthur
ABSENT: Council Members - None
I
City Attorney Duvernay read the full title of the uncodified ordinance.
A MOTION WAS MADE by Council Member Bosetti, seconded by Council Member
. .
Dickerson, introducing Ordinance No. 2463 by title only, an ordinance of the City Council
of the City of Redding approving the Salt Creek Heights Subdivision Development
Agreement; waiving the full reading of the Ordinance; and instructing the City Attorney to
read the full title.
06/15/2010
125
The Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABST AlN:
ABSENT:
Council Members - Bosetti, Dickerson, and Jones
Council Members - Stegall
Council Members - McArthur
Council Members - None
City Attorney Duvernay read the full title of the uncodified ordinance
I
ORAL PRESENTATION - Redding Community Access Corporation
[A-050-060/T -040-350-200/B-080-120]
Per Council Member McArthur's request, City Manager Starman introduced the topic for
discussion, and Support Services Director Kersten gave a primer on Public Education
Government (PEG) televison and fees and the City's relationship(s) with Charter
Communications (Charter) and Redding Community Access Corporation (RCAC) with a
PowerPoint presentation, incorporated herein by reference. Mr. Kersten explained the three
parts to providing public access television to Redding citizen's, which are: (1) enabling
federal legislation; (2) a cable franchise; and (3) a service agreement with RCAC. Mr.
Kersten noted that PEG channels are not mandated by federal law. He relayed that the City
chose to "get out of the public access television business" for several reasons in 1996,
although they still chose to make PEG a requirement in Cable Franchise negotiations. Mr.
Kersten advised Council on the complexity and arcane nature of Federal Communications
Commission regulations, the Cable Act, and case law pertaining to public television. He
continued with details ofthe Servic.e Agreement with RCAC, commencing on February 15,
2005, that includes approximately $74,000 in PEG fees collected from cable subscribers
annually and "passed-through" the City to RCAC, pursuant to the Cable Franchise
Agreement with Charter. Mr. Kersten concluded with a description of Community Access
channels 8, 11, and 26, paying particular attention to channel 11, which is the public and
government channel that airs City Council meetings.
I
Suzie Evans-Wood, Charter Communications, affirmed details as presented by Mr. Kersten,
referenced Charter's 15-year contract with the City through 2019, and described Charter's
role related to public access television. She explained that Charter has no operational
involvement with RCAC, which is typical of cable operators across the country, primarily
due to liability issues involving content. Responding to Council Member McArthur, Ms.
Wood clarified that PEG fees can only be used for capital purposes and does not include rent
payments.
City Manager Starman offered further information regarding RCAC, a mid-1990's citizen
committee, the decision to privatize public access television, and the City's current position
on the topic.
Responding to Council Member Stegall, Council Member McArthur stated her intent for
. bringing this item before the Council was to spotlight the City's role on the controversial
subject and wondered about an opportunity for oversight.
Sharon Waranius, Mary Stephens, Leslie Brunett, Jo Vayo, Norman Nelson, Patricia
Heinsohn, Brenda Ballantine, Fred Chavez, Matthew Davison, Tim Pappas, Tonya Hamilton,
Rob McDonald, John Dixon, and Ed Ballentine commented on public access television,
RCAC, and their personal experiences.
I
Responding to Council Member McArthur, Ms. Evans-Wood confirmed that Charter does
have monitoring rights and that new/original/regular programming thresholds, as required
in the Franchise Agreement, have never occurred on the three city channels. She recognized
that the thresholds are very high and difficult to meet and emphasized Charter's interest in
having a healthy public access environment and availability as intended by the law.
Support Services Director Kersten explained the two types of funds the City receives from
Charter: (1) the franchise fee that Charter pays the City for use of publicly-owned right-of-
way, which goes to the General Fund; and (2) PEG fees, which subscribers pay and can only
be used for capital facility grants, that "passes through" the City to RCAC.
Mr. Starman responded to Council Member McArthur, observing that Redding Community
Access Corporation (RCAC) is a privately-held, not-for-profit corporation and noted that the
City has no control over their operations. He acknowledged the City's overseeing rights and
fiduciary responsibilities within the scope of the contract, but opposed appointing a standing
06/15/2010
126
city liaison due to potential liability issues related to first amendment rights and censorship.
He relayed that Mayor Jones and Mr. Kersten had attended a board meeting, an opportunity
that is available to city staff and Council Members at any time. Mr. Starman offered that
options available for providing public access could be explored, including Shasta County
Arts Council, Shasta County Office of Education, or issuance of a Request for Proposals.
No action was taken on this discussion item.
RESOLUTION - Special Measure on November 2,2010, Regular Election Ballot concerning
Funding of CalPERS Retirement Benefits
[A-050-060]
City Attorney Duvernay provided background on the Council majority's direction to prepare
a special measure for placement on the November 2, 2010, regular election ballot asking
voters to consider adoption of an ordinance concerning funding of CalPERS retirement
benefits for City employees. Mr. Duvernay read the wording for a ballot measure proposing
that a labor negotiations policy requiring City employees and City officials to pay the full
"employee contribution" of CalPERS pension benefits be phased in over a period not-to-
exceed four years. He expounded on how defined benefit plans like CalPERS function, the
three funding components, and relayed that the City had approached labor unions
approximately 30 years ago, asking to "pick up" the "employee contribution" share to
CalPERS in lieu of salary increases. Mr. Duvernay described the evolution of defined
contribution (401K) plans since IRS code changes in 1978, and provided an overview of
current opinion related to government and private sector retirement plans. He observed a
trend in the State for agencies to negotiate with employees to pay the employee contribution
to CalPERS going forward. Mr. Duvernay asserted that the proposed measure is legal, does
not impair existing contract rights, and respects the Myers/Milias/Brown Act requirements
for good faith negotiations. He pointed out that if voters approved the initiative, it would
establish a policy that would be binding on current and future Councils and obligates the City
to present an opening bargaining position as stated in the proposed ballot measure and
attached to the Report to City Council dated June 4, 2010, incorporated herein by reference.
He advised that it is not legally necessary and is atypical for General Law cities to have
compensation and retirement benefits on a ballot. Mr. Duvernay suggested that the current
Council appeared united in pursuing a common goal related to reducing retirement benefits
and only needed to determine if a ballot measure was an effective or ineffective way to
achieve the desired outcome.
I
I
Mr. Duvernay also outlined the subsequent agenda item regarding a second ballot measure
relating to City retiree health benefit funding. Coun~il' s discussion of both topics was
intermingled.
Council Member Dickerson confirmed that the ordinances would put an opening bargaining
position in place prior to good-faith bargaining, as required by state law, and suggested that
a Council consensus could achieve the same result without spending an estimated $50,000
on ballot measures.
Mr. Duvernay clarified that Council would be allowed to modify the opening bargaining
position and could also consider quid pro quo proposals offered as part of a good-faith
bargaining process.
Mr. Dickerson reiterated that the ballot measures would only establish opening bargaining
positions to be presented to each bargaining unit at the beginning of negotiations, and Mr.
Duvernay affirmed.
Tim Pappas, Phaedra Mitchell, and Gary Cadd expressed their opinions on the proposed
ballot measures.
I
Council Member Bosetti stated that he brought the ballot measures forward originally
because no permanent solution for the City's unfunded liability for retiree benefits was being
achieved through negotiations. Mr. Bosetti cited the need for increased funding from the
City to CalPERS and "a smoothing effect" that is expected to last three to four years or
beyond.
06/15/2010
127
City Manager Starman responded to Mr. Bosetti, clarifying that the Employer Paid Member
Contribution (EPMC) enhancement was negotiated with CalPERS in the late 1990's, and
highlighted its effect on a sample police retirement calculation.
Council Member Stegall stated full support of the need to remedy escalating funding
requirements and ongoing retirement benefit levels and asked if Council could just agree to
adopt this opening bargaining position, thus eliminating the perceived need for ballot
measures.
I
Mr. Bosetti stated his belief that a public mandate would protect the bargaining position,
suggested that Redding consider becoming a Charter city, and expounded on a cycle of
special interest candidates rewarding labor unions whose support they need for re~election.
Mayor Jones stated his concern over the unresolved Governmental Accounting Standards
Board's Statement 45 (GASB 45) liability, the need to "use all the tools" at his disposal, and
expressed support for the ballot measures.
Council Member Dickerson expressed strong opposition to the ballot measures.
A MOTION WAS MADE by Council Member McArthur, seconded by Council Member
Bosetti, adopting Resolution No. 2010-59, a resolution of the City Council of the City of
Redding placing a special measure on the November 2010 election ballot regarding funding
of CalPERS retirement benefits.
The Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
Council Members - Bosetti, McArthur, and Jones
Council Members - Dickerson and Stegall
Council Members - None
Council Members - None
Resolution No. 2010-59 is on file in the Office of the City Clerk.
I
RESOLUTION - Special Measure on the November 2,2010, concerning City Retiree Health
Benefits \
[A-050-060]
City Attorney Duvernay provided background on negotiations with the International
Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW) in 1979, related to allowing retirees to be eligible
for the same health benefits as active employees and paying half of the insurance premiums.
He stated that, at the time, Sacramento Municipal Utility District had agreed to this benefit
for their employees. Mr. Duvernay described the subsequent growth in the City's workforce
and the associated monthly health insurance premium/cost, and he detailed related GASB 45
funding liability disclosure requirements. Mr. Duvernay recalled negotiations resulting in
elimination of this benefit for new employees and honoring the promise to existing retirees
and employees. He acknowledged that experiences over the last five years had shown that
a two-tiered system was not the best way to reform retirement benefits, and reviewed a recent
labor negotiation position shift to a minimum vesting requirement for existing and new
employees with benefits based on years of service to the City and maintaining existing
benefits for existing retirees. Mr. Duvernay reiterated that the ballot measures are legal,
although not legally required because the same result could be achieved by a Council
consensus; that they would establish binding labor negotiation opening bargaining positions
on current and future Councils; and submitted the item for Council's determination regarding
the best course of action to achieve labor negotiation objectives.
I
Council discussion ensued as detailed under the immediately previous item heading.
A MOTION WAS MADE by Council Member McArthur, seconded by Council Member
Bosetti, adopting Resolution No. 2010-60, a resolution of the City Council of the City of
Redding placing a special measure on the November 2010 election ballot regarding City
Retiree health care benefits.
The Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
Council Members - Bosetti, McArthur, and Jones
Council Members - Dickerson and Stegall
Council Members - None
Council Members - None
Resolution No. 2010-60 is on file in the Office of the City Clerk.
06/15/2010
128
City Attorney Duvernay advised that ballot measure arguments in favor and in opposition
were due to the Clerk by 5 p.m. on July 16, 2010; and rebuttals were due on July 30,2010.
THIRD ADDENDUM TO GROUND LEASE - Turtle Bay Exploration Park
[C-070-250-250/E-050]
City Manager Starman briefly summarized the Report to City Council (staff report) dated
June 4, 2010, incorporated herein by reference, recalling that Turtle Bay Exploration Park
(Turtle Bay) had approached Council regarding building a hotel near their existing museum
complex. He reported that discussions related to the City regaining five acres ofland next
t6 Hwy 44 and/or any part of hotel revenue being directed to the City/Convention Center did
not produce a mutually acceptable agreement.. Mr. Starman relayed that Turtle Bay
abandoned their request for additional land and now requests an amendment to allow a hotel
as a permissible use. He recommended that the Council approved the third amendment to
the ground lease (C-2902) with Turtle Bay Exploration Park, allowing operation of a hotel
within the leasehold area and making minor modifications to the lease area boundaries. Mr.
Starman mentioned that language changes to explicitly describe limitations related to any
financing encumbrance/deed of trust arrangements and the City's fee interest were made
available to the Council and the public at this meeting.
I
Charles Alexander questioned the adequacy of the Planning Commission review and
incongruence between revenue sharing requirements for Turtle Bay and the proposed
Northern California Veterans Museum and Heritage Center.
Ken Powers, life member of the Redding Rodeo Association, expressed concerns and
opposition to lodging in the area of the Turtle Bay Museum complex.
Archer Pugh, Turtle Bay Exploration Park, stated that studies, conducted before the museum
was built, supported increased parking and traffic in the area, even beyond what is expected
with a hotel on the grounds. He reiterated that any financing entity could encumber only the
portion of the premises desc~bed and depicted on Exhibits B and B-1. H~ clarified that, as
conditions of the lease require, all net revenue from a hotel would be used to operate the
Turtle Bay Exploration Park (Museum) as a non-profit entity. Mr. Pugh outlined the
project's benefits to the City, such as property, sales, and transient occupancy tax revenues,
local job creation, and tourism spending at local businesses.
I
Mr. Pugh and James Theimer, Trilogy Architecture, responded to Council Members
questions regarding a master plan for the area, parking, future development, and revenue
sharing.
Ginne Mistal and Cameron Middleton supported having a master plan for the area that would
enhance and preserve it, with coordinated efforts to maximize the results of funding and
dev~lopment resources. Mr. Middleton suggested forming an ad-hoc committee.
Responding to Council Member Bosetti, Mr. Starman recalled that an estimate to complete
a master plan five years ago was $125,000, and opined that a citizen's group could make
some progress with staff support.
A MOTION WAS MADE by Council Member McArthur, seconded by Council Member
Stegall, accepting staff s recommendation as detailed in the staff report dated June 4, 2010,
approving the third Addendum to the ground lease (C-2902) with Turtle Bay Exploration
Park, to allow operation of a hotel within the leasehold area and making minor modifications
to the lease area boundaries.
The Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
Council Members - Bosetti, Dickerson, McArthur, and Stegall
Council Members - Jones
Council Members - None
Council Members - None
I
FUNDING AGREEMENT AND LEASE AGREEMENT - Shasta County Arts Council
[B-130-030/C-070-100/C-050-500]
City Manager Starman deferred to Council Member McArthur's request to discuss this item.
Ms. McArthur suggested appointing a resident volunteer to replace the city staff
representative on the board of the Shasta County Arts Council and asked Dena Brown, the
06/15/2010
I
I
I
129
new Executive Director, to come to the podium.
Ms. Brown introduced herself and shared her background, credentials and experience of25
years in various arts and administration, anq expressed anticipation and enthusiasm for
continued success in the community.
Mayor Jones stated that although he supported the work the Arts Council does, he opposed
the Funding Agreement, asserting that public safety funding is a priority.
A MOTION WAS MADE by Council Member Bosetti, seconded by Council Member
Stegall, (1) approving the Lease Agreement for the Shasta County Arts Council (SCAC);
(2) approving the Funding Agreement as amended, to instate a mayor-appointed citizen
volunteer position to serve on the SCAC Board of Directors as a City liaison; and (3)
authorizing the Mayor to sign both agreements.
The Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
Council Members - Bosetti, Dickerson, McArthur, and Stegall
Council Members - Jones
Council Members - None
Council Members - None
RESOLUTION - Certifying the Bikeway Action Plan for 2010-15
[T -100-050]
Community Services Director Niemer summarized the Report to City Council (staff report)
dated May 27,2010, incorporated herein by reference, and recommended that the Council
adopt the Bikeway Action Plan, also incorporated herein by reference, and adopt a resolution
certifying same.
A MOTION WAS MADE by Council Member McArthur, seconded by Council Member
Stegall, adopting the Bikeway Action Plan 2010-2015 and adopting Resolution No. 2010-61,
a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding certifying same.
The Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
Council Members - Bosetti, Dickerson, McArthur, Stegall, and Jones
Council Members - None
Council Members - None
Council Members - None
Resolution No. 2010-61 is on file in the Office of the City Clerk.
SER VICE AGREEMENT - Shasta Cascade Wonderland Association and Redding Tourism
Marketing Group, Inc.
[B-130-030-700]
City Manager Starman summarized the Report to City Council (staff report) dated June 1,
2010, incorporated herein by reference, and described the proposed three-party contact
between the City, the Shasta Cascade Wonderland Association (SCW A) and the Redding
Tourism Marketing Group, Inc. (RTMG), to privatize the former Convention Center &
Visitor's Bureau operations. He highlighted the $750,000 annual compensation to be paid
in the first year, with a performance-based adjustment (increase or decrease) subject to the
actual year-over-year change in Transient Occupancy Tax revenue; the requirement that a
minimum of 25 percent of the compensation shall be allocated for direct advertising,
marketing opportunities, and public relations efforts specifically for the benefit of Redding;
and language that encourages collaboration between SCW A/RTMG and local non-profits,
including Turtle Bay Exploration Park, to maximize results of all tourism marketing efforts.
Per the staff report, the Community Services Advisory Commission (CSAC) and staff
. recommend approval of a services agreement with the Shasta Cascade Wonderland
Association and the Redding Tourism Marketing Group, Inc.
Staff responded to questions from Council Members Dickerson and McArthur regarding
contract language pertaining to the percentage of annual TOT adjustments and CSAC's
approval ofRTMG's inclusion as a party to the agreement.
A MOTION WAS MADE by Council Member McArthur, seconded by Council Member
Bosetti, approving a three-year service agreement with the Shasta Cascade Wonderland
Association and the Redding Tourism Marketing Group, Inc., for tourism promotion.
06/15/2010
130
The Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN :
ABSENT:
Council Members - Bosetti and McArthur
Council Members - Dickerson, Stegall, and Jones
Council Members - None
Council Members - None
Motion failed for lack of majority vote.
A MOTION WAS MADE by Council Member Stegall, seconded by Council Member
Dickerson, approving a five-year service agreement with the Shasta Cascade Wonderland
Association and the Redding Tourism Marketing Group, Inc., for tourism promotion and
visitor marketing services for the period July 1, 2010, through July 1, 2015, in the amount
of$750,000 in the first year with annual adjustments based on actual Transient Occupancy
Tax revenue. The Vote:
AYES: Council Members - Bosetti, Dickerson, McArthur, and Stegall
NOES: Council Members - Jones
ABSTAIN: Council Members - None
ABSENT: Council Members - None
I
FOURTH AMENDMENT TO LEASE AGREEMENT - Shasta Regional Soccer Association
[C-070-l00/P-050-690]
Community Services Director Niemer summarized the Report to City Council (staff report)
dated June 4, 2010, incorporated herein by reference, relating to changes to the lease
agreement (C-4401) with the Shasta Regional Soccer Association (SRSA). Ms. Niemer
explained that although there has been business growth year-over-year, revenue levels
anticipated in 2005 have not materialized, primarily due to lower than expected corporate
sponsorships and adult tournaments and referred Council to a detailed comparison attached
to the staff report. She relayed that lower than projected revenues have resulted in SRSA' s
inability to begin making quarterly payments to the Replacement Fund as scheduled for July
1,2010. She acknowledged the all-volunteer board for their professionalism and outstanding
service during both economic and operationally difficult times. She noted that all youth
soccer is occurring at the park, which includes 1,500 players from the Redding Youth Soccer
League alone plus the City's youth soccer program and many middle and high school teams,
far exceeding original expectations and proving the community's need for the facility. Ms.
Niemer also relayed concern expressed by the Community Services Advisory Commission
(CSAC) and their request for annual financial reports t6 ensure maximum contributions are
being made to the Replacement Fund, observing that an estimated 12 years remain on the
projected date funds may actually be needed. Ms. Niemer recommended that the Council
amend the lease agreement terms, per CSAC's recommendation, as detailed in the staff
report.
I
A MOTION WAS MADE by Council Member Stegall, seconded by Council Member
McArthur, approving the Fourth Amendment to the Soccer Lease (C-4401) with the Shasta
Regional Soccer Association for the Redding Soccer Park: (1) postponing the initial quarterly
payment in the amount of $65,700, due to the Replacement Fund on July 1, 2010, until
December 2011, changing the payment schedule from quarterly to annually, and changing
the annual payment amount as noted on Exhibit 5; (2) extending the term of the lease
agreement to 2024; and (3) increasing the threshold amount from $500,000 to $1 million of
gross receipts before percentage rent payments of six percent are required to be made to the
City, allowing SRSA to put these funds toward the Replacement Fund.
The Vote: Unanimous Ayes
GRANT APPLICATION - U.S. Department of Justice for Bulletproof Vests
[G-lOO-070/P-150-15Q]
Police Chief Hansen responded to Council Member McArthur's question regarding
extending the recycling of bulletproof vests beyond five years, stating that the vests must be
certified by the National Institute of Justice (NIJ), who oversees all body armor sold in the
United States. Chief Hansen explained that the vest fabric deteriorates, primarily due to
exposure to moisture, and the vests wear out after five years. He stated that replacement of
vests is required after five years to comply with Nil certification and manufacturer warranty
conditions. Chief Hansen pointed out that the Department of Justice Bulletproof Vest
program offers grant funds annually to law enforcement agencies that serve populations
under 100,000, to cover 50 percent of the cost of bulletproof vests for sworn officers.
I
06/15/2010
131
A MOTION WAS MADE by Council Member McArthur, seconded by Council Member
Stegall, approving submission of a grant application in the amount of approximately $23,000
to the U.S. Department of Justice for bulletproof vests.
The Vote: Unanimous Ayes
I
LETTER OF INTENT - Northern California Veterans Museum and Heritage Center
[C-070/ A-090-1 00]
Transportation and Engineering Director Crane summarized the Report to City Council (staff
report) dated June 4, 2010, incorporated herein by reference, regarding a request from Rob
Burroughs on March 16, 2010, for a letter of intent relating to a Veterans Museum at the
Redding Municipal Airport. Mr. Crane relayed that, after several meetings, two viable sites
had been identified, as detailed in the staff report. He described the purpose of the Letter of
Intent was to be used as a step in developing the project and conditions of a potential lease
agreement, and included the requirement for a detailed site plan and preliminary financial
plan to be provided by the Northern California Veterans Museum and Heritage Center
(NCVMHC) for the City to use to process an Airport Layout Plan Amendment Application
to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). Mr. Crane noted that the project would be
subject to FAA approval of the application. He requested Council's direction regarding the
term and financial terms of any future lease agreement for airport property, recognizing that
the Airports Fund is an Enterprise fund that must generate enough revenue to operate self-
sufficiently. Mr. Crane recommended executing a Letter ofIntent to enable both parties to
move forward and return to Council with a proposed lease agreement.
Rob Burroughs described the museum campus, designed to encompass 16.65 acres, and gave
a detailed explanation of the four-phase construction plan, as outlined in the staff report.
Christine Sullivan, Mary Machado, Dick Fyten, Ginne Mistal, and Gary Cadd supported the
project, and some expressed concerns related to location of the project, future airport
development, the Redding drag strip, revenue sharing and other financial terms.
I
Council Members addressed questions to various department staff and discussed aspects of
the proposed project and terminal lease.
A MOTION WAS MADE by Council Member McArthur, seconded by Council Member
Dickerson, authorizing issuance of a non-binding Letter ofIntent, without a revenue-sharing
stipulation, to the Northern California Veterans Museum and Heritage Center (Museum), to
better define the project and the relationship between the City and the Museum.
The Vote: Unanimous Ayes
I
ORDINANCE - Amending Redding Municipal Code Title 14 - Utilities, Chapter 14.16 -
Sewers, by amending Sections 14.16.020, 14.16.445, and 14.16.564 ; and
RESOLUTION - Adopting a Revised Enforcement Response Plan (ERP)
[W -010-200]
Transportation and Engineering Director Crane summarized the Report to City Council (staff
report) dated June 2, 2010, incorporated herein by reference, relating to revision ofthe City's
Enforcement Response Plan (ERP) and associated amendments to Redding Municipal Code
(RfylC) Chapter 14.16. Mr. Crane mentioned that a water quality control review in March
2009 revealed areas of the RMC that needed clarification, primarily regarding the definition
of Organic Treatment Capacity, and language relating to Significant Non-Compliance,
record keeping, and analytical test procedures. Mr. Crane recommended that the Council
approve an amendment to RMC Chapter 14.16 to include changes required by the Central
Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board, offer an ordinance for first reading, and adopt
a resolution adopting the revised ERP and rescinding the existing ERP.
A MOTION WAS MADE by Council Member McArthur, seconded by Council Member
Dickerson, accepting staffs recommendation as detailed in the staff report dated June 2,
2010: (1) approving an amendment to Redding Municipal Code Title 14 - Utilities, Chapter
14.16 - Sewers, by amending Sections 14.16.020, 14.16.445, and 14.16.564, to include
changes required by the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board, all pertaining
to sewers; (2) introducing Ordinance No. 2464 by title only, an ordinance ofthe City Council
of the City of Redding amending Redding Municipal Code Title 14 as noted above, to
conform with current federal standards; waiving the full reading of the Ordinance; and
instructing the City Attorney to read the full title; and (3) adopting Resolution No. 2010-62,
a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding adopting its Enforcement Response
Plan (ERP) pertaining to industrial user compliance with wastewater discharge as required
06/15/2010
132
by Redding Municipal Code Chapter 14.16, and rescinding the previous ERP that was
adopted by Resolution No. 93-242. The Vote:
AYES: Council Members - Bosetti, Dickerson, McArthur, Stegall, and Jones
NOES: Council Members - None
ABSTAIN: Council Members - None
ABSENT: Council Members - None
City Attorney Duvernay read the full title of the uncodified ordinance.
At the hour ofl :26 a.m., Vice Mayor/Agency Chair McArthur convened the Special Meeting
of the Redding Redevelopment Agency RRA for a joint meeting with the City Council.
I
PUBLIC HEARING - Proposed Sale of Agency-owned Property located within the Market
Street Redevelopment Project Area at 1613, 1625, and 1637 Pine Street to Weaver Contract
Services, Inc., and Associated Disposition and Development Agreement; and
RESOLUTION - Approving Disposition of Noted Properties, accepting Summary Report and
making Findings
[R-030-1 00-033/R-030-1 00-055]
Assistant City Manager Tippin briefly outlined background on the item and recommended
that the Council consider approval of the project.
Steve Bade, Redding Redevelopment Agency Associate Redevelopment/Community Project
Manager, summarized the Report to City Council (staff report) dated June 4, 2010,
incorporated herein by reference, regarding an Exclusive NegotiatingAgreement with Brent
Weaver of Weaver Contract Services Inc.. related to acquiring Agency-owned property
located within the Market Street Redevelopment Project area, specifically 1613, 1625, and
1637 Pine Street (aka Parking Lot No.3), for development of a multi-story, mixed-use,
mixed-income project. Mr. Bade noted that the key points ofthe agreement include:
.
Weaver Contract Services Inc. (WCS) purchasing the properties for the fair market
value of$210,000.
Construction of a 17,000 square foot, three-story, mixed-use building that will
include approximately 5,700 square feet of commercial space, a manager's office,
residential laundry facilities, and storage space on the first floor, and 11,400 square
feet of residential space (consisting of eight one-bedroom and six two-bedroom units)
on the second and third floors, of which eight would be market-rate units and six
would be available to and occupied by very-low or low-income households and
subject to covenants maintaining affordability for 55 years.
I
.
Mr. Bade relayed that the project is expected to cost $2,230,000, of which approximately
$407,500 is ascribed to the commercial portion of the project and $1,822,500 to the
residential portion. He reported that the project financing plan is comprised of an owner-
equity contribution of$223,000 from WCS and their commercial real estate loan funding in
the amount of $1,220,000. As the project relates to residential affordable housing, WCS is
requesting a gap financing loan in the amount of $787,000 from the Agency's Low- and
Moderate-Income Housing Fund, to be amortized at one percent interest for a 35-year term,
with repayment deferred for 15 years and monthly loan payments beginning in the 16th year.
At the hour of 1 :44 a.m., Mayor Jones opened the public hearing to consider the proposed
sale of property located at 1613, 1625, and 1637 Pine Street, Assessor's Parcel Numbers
101-620-030, 101-620-031, and 101-620-032.
The following documents are on file in the Office of the City Clerk:
Affidavit of Publication - Notice of Public Hearing
I
No protests were received.
Mayor Jones determined that no one present wished to address this matter and closed the
public hearing.
06/15/2010
133
I
A MOTION WAS MADE by Council Member Stegall, seconded by Council Member
McArthur, accepting staffs recommendation as detailed in the staff report dated June 4,
2010, adopting Resolution No. 2010-58, a resolution of the City Council of the City of
Redding approving the disposition of the Redding Redevelopment Agency's property located
at 1613, 1625 and 1637 Pine Street to Weaver Contract Services, Inc., accepting the
Summary Report pursuant to Section 33433 ofthe Health imd Safety Code; and finding that
the disposition of the property will assist in the elimination of blight, is consistent with the
Implementation Plan for the Market Street Project Area, and that the consideration for the
property is not less than the fair reuse value of the property at the use and with the covenants
and conditions and development costs authorized by the sale.
The Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
Council Members - Bosetti, Dickerson, McArthur, Stegall, and Jones
Council Members - None
Council Members - None
Council Members - None
RRA Members Stegall and Bosetti motioned and seconded the same, Agency Members voted
unanimous approval, and Vice Mayor/Agency Chair McArthur adjourned the special meeting
of the Redding Redevelopment Agency.
CLOSED SESSION
At the hour of J :46 a.m., Mayor Jones announced that Council would adjourn to Closed
Session.
Atthe hour of2: 13 a.m., Mayor Jones reconvened the Regular Meeting to Open Session and
reported on:
I
Closed session pursuant to.California Government Code Section 54956.9(b)(3)(E):
CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL-ANTICIPATED LITIGATION
The City Council will discuss with its attorney a threat of litigation from a developer
regarding the Oasi~ Towne Center project. Documentation of the threat is available for
public inspection in the Office of the City Clerk pursuant to Section 54957.5
[L-100]
The City Council did not take any reportable action on this item.
Closed seqssion pursuant to California Government Code Section 54957.6:
CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR
Designated Agency Representative: Assistant City Manager Tippin
Employee Organization: RPOA-Miscellaneous and IBEW-Maintenance
[P-l 00-050-l20/P-l 00-050-070]
The City Council did not take any reportable action on this item.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, Mayor Jones declared the meeting adjourned at the hour of
2:13 a.m.
I
ATTEST:
(~CtwJ",- ~
City Clerk
06/15/2010