HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - City Council - 2005-07-05
164
City Council, Regular Meeting
Civic Center Council Chambers
777 Cypress Avenue,
Redding, California
July 5, 2005 7:00 p.m.
~
~~'
The Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag was led by Carl Arness.
The Invocation was offered by Police Chaplain Ben Adams.
The meeting was called to order by Mayor Mathena with the following Council Members
present: Dickerson, Murray, Pohlmeyer, and Stegall.
I
Also present were City Manager Warren, Assistant City Manager Perry, Assistant City
Manager Starman, City Attorney Duvernay, Development Services Director Hamilton,
Deputy City Manager Bachman, Community Services Director Niemer, Planning Manager
DeMallie, City Clerk Strohmayer, and Executive Assistant Stribley.
PRESENTATION - Shasta County Youth Violence Prevention Council
(A-050-060) _
Charlie Menoher, Executive Director for the Shasta County Youth Violence Prevention
Council (Youth Council), related that the mission of the Youth Council is to prevent youth
violence and promote a safe and healthy community. He provided a Powerpoint presentation
describing the programs available through the Youth Council such as Youth Peer Court,
Youth Pastors Alliance, Safe Schools Audit Teams, Graffiti Eradication, Fresh Start Youth
Endowment, and Tattoo Removal.
Mr. Menoher advised that the programs have been very succ~$sful pointing out that the
Youth Peer Court program is in its second year and has diverted 147 youths out of the
Juvenile Justice System. He thanked the City Council and the Redding Police Department I
for their support and assistance with these programs.
CONSENT CALENDAR
The following matters were considered inclusively under the Consent Calendar:
Approval of Minutes - Special Meeting ~f June 20, 2005, Regu\^\ll' and Special Meetings of
June 21,2005
Treasurer's Report - May 2005
(A-050-100-600)
Total Treasurer's Accountability
$128,647,894.87
I
Total City of Redding Funds, Funds Held in
Trust, and Funds of Related Entities
$199,763,955.95
ACR133 Report and Cash Reconciliation
(F-205-095-650)
It is the recommendation ofthe Deputy City Manager that the AGR133 Report and the Proof
of Cash Reconciliation for May 2005 be accepted.
7/5/2005
165
Ordinance - Amending the Zoning Ordinance of Red ding Municipal Code Section 18.11.090,
Appeals, completion of the administrative record prior to consideration of appeals
(E-010-500)
Itis the recommendation of the Development Services Director that Ordinance No. 2347 be
adopted, an ordinance of the City Council of the City of Redding, amending the Zoning
Ordinance of Redding Municipal Code Section 18.11.090, Appeals, completion of the
administrative record prior to consideration of appeals
I
Renewal Funding and Consulting Services Agreement - Economic Development Corporation
of Shasta County
(B-130-030-045)
It is the recommendation of the City Manager that the City Council approve renewal of the
2005-06 Funding and Consulting Services Agreement with the Economic Development
Corporation of Shasta County (EDC) in the amount of $140,000 annually.
Amendments to the Design Contracts - Crane Architectural Group and Purkiss Rose, rsi,
(R-050-690 & P-050-600-200)
It is the recommendation of the Assistant City Manager that the City Council authorize staff
to amend the Electrical Plans for the Design Contracts with Crane Architectural Group
($2,200) and Purkiss Rose, rsi ($2,400), for the soccer fields at the Sports Complex for a
total amount of $4,600 to provide an alternative location in the event the
Entry/Administration Building is not con~tructed.
'-~
Renewal of AgreeJ?ent - Redding Community Access Corporation
(T-040-350-200 & T-040,.350-700)
It is the recommendation of the SUPP9rt Services Director that the City Council approve the
renewal of the Agreement with Redding Community Access Corporation (RCAC)for Public
Access Channel 11 apd Tourism Promotion Channel 8 television services in the amount of
$6,885 for a term of five yel;lfs with one automatic one-year renewal, if mutually agreeable.
I
AmendmentNo. 3 to Consulting and Professional Servic~s Agreement - Sierra Research, Inc.
(E-120-150 & A-050-125-675)
It is the recommendation of the Electric Utility Director that the City Council authorize the
City Manager, or his designee, to execute an amendment to the Consulting and Professional
Services Agreement with Sierra Research, Inc. (C-3818), to allow uninterrupted provision
of services.
Monthly Financial Report - Electric Utility
(B-130-070)
It is the recommendation of the Electric Utility Director that the City Counc~l approve the
Electric Utility's Monthly Financial Report for May 2005. Retail power sales revenue was
2.8%, or $1,805,801 below projections. Operating revenue aft~r energy costs was
$1,885,910 or 6.9% above expect,ations. The total cost of electricity through May 2005 was
$28,160,732 or 48.8% above projections. The Utility's net operating results through May
was $5,045,850.
I
Monthly Financial Report - General Fund
(B-130-070) .
It is the recommendation of the Deputy City Manager that the City Council accept the
Gener~l Fund's Monthly Financial Report for May 2005. Total revenue at the end of May
is $63.9 million or $12,219,763 (23.6%) abpve staff's cash flow projection. Expenditures
at month end, excluding encumbrances, total $58,744,651 or $4,548,867 (7.2%) below staff's
original projection. Encum.brances total $4,059,039.
Consulting and Professional Services Contract and Authorization ofService#05-1 01 - Mead
and Hunt, mc. '. . ,'. """"", ".' . '
(A-090-100)
It is the r~commendation of th~ Deputy City Manager that the City Council approve the
Consulting and Professional Servi~es Con~~ct and Authorization of Service #05-101 with
Mead and Hunt, Inc. for architectural services to design the Air~raft Rescue and Firefighting
Facility (ARFF), Phase II remodeling ofth~ Redding Municipal Airport terminal building,
and Phase III of the Airport terminal building expansion in the amount of $156,834 to be
funded through the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) grants and Passenger Facility
Charges.
7/5/2005
166
First Amendment to Lease Agreement - John & Judy Goold, dba Cornucopia Enterprises
(C-070-100 & A-090-100)
It is the recommendation of the Deputy City Manager that the City Council approved the
First Amendment to the Lease Agreement with John & Judy Goold, dba Cornucopia
Enterprises, extending the term of the lease for an additional three years for office and
warehouse facilities located at 3710 Flight Avenue at Redding Municipal Airport in the
amount of $400 per month.
Resolution - Adopting an appropriation limit for fiscal year 2005-06
(B-130-070 & A-050-135)
It is the recommendation of the Deputy City Manager that Resolution No. 2005-81 be
adopted, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding establishing the
appropriation limit ($145,660,132) for fiscal year 2005-06 for the City.
I
Financial Support for the Northern California Veterans' Cemetery Endowment Fund
(B-130-030)
It is the recommendation of the Deputy City Manager that the City Council authorize a
donation of$IO,OOO to the Northern California Veteran's Cemetery Endowment Fund.
Award of Bid - Bid Schedule No. 3839,2005 Chum Creek Road Micro-surfacing
(B-050-020 & S-070-200)
It is the recommendation of the Development Services Direct that Bid Schedule No. 3839
(Job No. 2248), 2005 Chum Creek Road Micro-surfacing be awarded to Graham
Contractors, Inc. in the amount of$277,546.50, and that an additional $38,000 be approved
for contract administration and inspection fees, and an additional $25,000 for a construction
contingency fund for a total amount of $340,546.50.
Notice of Completion - Bid Schedule No. 3771, Mary Lake Walking Trails
(B-050-020 & P-050-460-250)
It is the recommendation ofthe Development Services Director that Bid Schedule No. 3771
(Job No. 2170), Mary Lake Walking Trails be awarded to Hutchins Paving and Engineering,
Inc. be accepted as satisfactorily completed and that the City Clerk be authorized to file a I
Notice of Completion with the Shasta County Recorder. The final price is $123,477.36.
Resolution - Authorizing destruction of certain inactive records
(A-050-055-750)
It is the recommendation of the City Clerk that Resolution No. 2005-82 be adopted, a
resolution ofthe City Council of the City of Redding authorizing the destruction of certain
inactive records which have met retention requirements and have been reviewed by the City
Attorney and appropriate departments.
Award of Bid - Bid Schedule No. 3846, Three (3) Regenerative Air Power Street Sweepers
(B-050-100 & S-070-200)
It is the recommendation of the Assistant City Manager that Bid Schedule No. 3846, Three
(3) Regenerative Air Power Street Sweepers be awarded to Municipal Maintenance
Equipment in the amount of$529,291.62.
Resolution - Adopting City Council Policy No. 217
(A-050-060-555 & L-040-070-040)
It is the recommendation of the City Attorney that Resolution No. 2005-83 be adopted, a
resolution ofthe City Council of the City of Redding adopting Americans with Disabilities
Act (ADA)- Title II, by establishing a complaint and grievance process to resolve issues I
related to access of City services and programs by persons with disabilities.
MOTION: Made by Council Member Stegall, seconded by Council Member Pohlmeyer,
that all the foregoing items on the Consent Calendar be approved and adopted as
recommended. The Vote:
AYES: Council Members - Dickerson, Murray, Pohlmeyer, Stegall and
Mathena
Council Members - None
Council Members - None
Council Members - None
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
Ordinance No. 2347 and Resolution Nos. 2005-81,2005-82, and 2005-83 are on file in the
Office of the City Clerk.
7/5/2005
167
I
PUBLIC HEARING - Tentative Subdivision Map Application S-7-03, General Plan
Ame~dment Application GP A-4-03, Planned Development Plan Application PD-5-04,
Rezoning Application RZ-8-03, and Development Agreement for Shastina Ranch
Subdivision
(S-1 01-057/G-030-01 O/L-Ol 0-211-012/L-OI0-230)
The hour of7:00 p.m. having arrived, Mayor Mathena opened the public hearing regarding
Tentative Subdivision Map ApplicatiQn S-7-03, General Plan Amendment Application GP A-
4-03, Pl~ed Developm~nt Plan Application PI;)-5-04, Rezoning Application RZ-g-03, and
a Development Agreement for the Shastina Ranch Subqivision on property located south of
Rancho Road on both sides of Clover Creek, by the Shastina Ranch Developme~t Company,
Inc. .
The following documents are on fil~ in the Office of the City Clerk:
Affidavit of Publication - Notice of Public Hearing
Affidavit of Mailing - Notice of Public Hearing
City Clerk ~trohmayer advised that no protests were received.
Planning Manager DeMallie provided highlights of the Report to City Council dated June
15, 2005, incorporated herein by reference, recalling that the Environmental Impact Report
for the Sl).astina Ranch Subdivision was adopted and certified at t);1,e City Council meeting
of April 15, 2005, but further action was deferre~ pending review and consideration by the
Shasta County Airports Land Use Commission (AL,UC). ALUC approved anaI?endment
to the Redding Airport Comprehensive L~d Use Plan (CLUP) on May 26, 2005, allowing
the project to move forward for final consideration by C.ouncil. He added that the Planning
Commission unanimously recommended the project for approval.
I
Mr. DeMallie relat~d th~t the Shastina Ranch S1;lbdivision is generally located south of
Rancho Road, east of Airport Road ~n both sides of Clover Creek and proposes to s.ubdivide
approximately 224 acres to create five neighborhoods (distinguished by lot and home size)
consisting of a tot,al of 446 single-family resiqential homes, a 7.6 acre public p~k, 61 acres
of open space, 20.9 acres of industrial land, and one and one-quarter mile of public trails.
General Plan Amendment Application GP A-4-03 proposes changing the General Plan
designation of property 109ated at 5370 Rancpp Vista Way from "Residential, 1 to 2 dwelling
units per llocre" to "Residential, 2 to 3.5 dwelling units per acre" and property located at 5490
Rancho Vista Way from "Gener.alIndustry" to "Resi.d~ntial, 2 to 3.5 dwelling units per acre"
and "General Industry." He stated that Rezoning Application RZ-8-03 and Planned
Development Application PD-5-04 proposed a rezoning for property located at 5370 Rancho
Vista Way to cpange from "RS-2" Residentil;ll Single Family District to "RS-3-PD"
Residential Single Family District with Planned Development Overlay Djstrict, 5490 Rancho
Vista Way from "RS-3" Re~idential Single Family District and "GI" General Industrial
District to "RS-3-PD" Residential Single Family Djstrict with Phpllled Development Overlay
District, "GI" Oeperal lI1d;ustrial District, and "OS" Open Space District, and property
located at 2961 Rancho Vista Way from "RS-3" Residential Single Family District to "RS-3-
PD" Residential Single Family District with Plapned Development Overlay District.
I
Mr. DeMallie pointed o~t that a DevelopmeQ.t Agreemel)t is proposed to ensure completion
of the park area and public trails before builq out of the subdivision and provide the
developer wit4 In.-Li~u Park Fee credits. It would also allow the dev~loper to use City
property to construct ~n extension ofSpasta View Drive between Rancho and Airport Roads,
and it includes formation of a landscape Il1aint~nance district to maintain the park.
Mr. DeMallie explained that traffic improvement and associated financing was a primary
consideration throughout development of this project because of impacts to the intersection
of Chum Cre~k RoadNictor A venlJ.e/Rancho Ro~d, which he advised is currently operating
near the level to trigger signalization. Therefore, ~t pr9ject build out, signalization would
be necessary and would include reconstruction of the intersectton of Victor Avenue and
Rancho Road. He pointed out that becaus~ a potential deficiency at that intersectjon already
exists there must be a funding mec;;hanism to ensure proportionality for payment of the
intersection improvem~nts. He said, it is proposed that: 1) the developer pay the City-wide
Transportation Development Impact Fees, 2) prior to filing a final map, require p~icipation
in a f\mding mechanism at a level equivalent to the project's pro r~ta share of the traffic
improyements necessary to maintain ~ acceptable l~vel-of-service operation, 3) up to a
maximum of 120 lot~ may be developed and recorded on the east side of Clover Creek (sole
7/5/2005
168
access from Airport Road) prior to final establishment of the funding mechanism set forth
above, and 4) payment of a project-specific facility fee (established by the City Council)
equal to the project's pro rata share of the intersection improvements be made at the time a
building permit is issued. Mr. DeMallie clarified that this will require formation of a local
traffic improvement zone for the specific intersection such as was implemented in the Dana
Drive area. Because formation ofthe improvement district will take time, he advised that in
order to refrain from penalizing the developer, a portion of the development would be
allowed (120 homes) with an estimated fee paid at the time a building permit is issued. He
related these requirements would be accomplished through a development agreement with
the developer in addition to the conditions of approval set forth for the tentative map.
Mr. DeMallie recommended that the City Council make the necessary findings for the
Shastina Ranch Subdivision, adopt a resolution approving General Plan Amendments GP A-
4-03, adopt a resolution approving the Tentative Map Application S-7-03 and Planned
Development Application PD-5-04 for Shastina Ranch Subdivision, offer an ordinance for
first reading amending the Zoning Map to approve Rezoning Application RZ-8-03, and offer
an ordinance for first reading approving a development agreement with Shastina Ranch
Development Company, Inc. for development of the Shastina Ranch Subdivision.
I
Al Jensen, Redding resident, advised that he did not oppose the project but requested that
sewer lines and a fire hydrant be installed at the most northeastern tip of the development at
Rancho Vista Way near a fire access road. He said that he has been paying an assessment
on his property on Rancho Vista Way for sewer lines which have not been installed to date
and suggested that this would be an opportune time to complete the sewer extension.
Mayor Mathena determined that no other individual wished to address this matter and closed
the public hearing.
In response to Council Member Murray, Mr. Hamilton explained that, if approved, the local
traffic improvement fee paid by the developer for the first 120 homes is an estimated amount
that will be credited and/or billed to the developer through the permitting process of the
remaining lots. He clarified that the local traffic fee is in addition to the standard Traffic
Impact Fee. Mr. Hamilton added that participation in the local traffic fee district does not
require approval of future property owners but is entirely within the purview of the City
Council provided appropriate analysis and allocation of benefits of properties in that district
has been accomplished.
I
MOTION: Made by Council Member Murray, seconded by Council Member Pohlmeyer,
adopting Resolution No. 2005-84, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding,
amending the General Plan Diagram ofthe City by adopting General Plan Amendment GP A-
4-03 and changing designations for real property located at 5370 Rancho Vista Way from
"Residential, 1 to 2 dwelling units per acre" to "Residential, 2 to 3.5 dwelling units per acre"
and property located at 5490 Rancho Vista Way from "General Industry" to "Residential, 2
to 3.5 dwelling units per acre" and "General Industry." The Vote:
AYES: Council Members - Dickerson, Murray, Pohlmeyer, Stegall, and
Mathena
Council Members - None
Council Members - None
Council Members - None
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
Resolution No. 2005-84 is on file in the Office of the City Clerk
MOTION: Made by Council Member Murray, seconded by Council Member Pohlmeyer,
approving amending the Redding Municipal Code Section 18.01.050, Zoning Map, by
approving Rezoning Application RZ-8-03 to rezone real property located at 5370 Rancho
Vista Way from "RS-2" Residential Single Family District to "RS-3-PD" Residential Single
Family District with Planned Development Overlay District, 5490 Rancho Vista Way from
"RS-3" Residential Single Family District and "GI" General Industrial District to "RS-3-PD"
Residential Single Family District with Planned Development Overlay District, "GI" General
Industrial District, and "OS" Open Space District, and property located at 2961 Rancho Vista
Way from "RS-3" Residential Single Family District to "RS-3-PD" Residential Single
Family District with Planned Development Overlay District for the Shastina Ranch
Subdivision Project on property located south of Rancho Road on both sides of Clover
Creek, by the Shastina Ranch Development Company, Inc.
The Vote: Unanimous Ayes
I
7/5/2005
I
I
I
169
Council M,emb~r Murray offered Ordinance No. 2348 for first reading, a.n ordinflIlce ofthe
City Council of tpe City of Redding amending the Zoning Map of the Re44ing Municipal
Code relating to the rezoning of cert(;iin real property as s~t forth above in R~zoning
AppHcation RZ-8-03. '
MOTIQN: Made by Council Member Murray, seconded by Council Member Pohlmeyer,
that the full reading of OrQinance No. 2348 be waived and that the City A~O):l1ey be
instructed to read the ordinanc~ by title only.
The Vote: Unanimol;ls Ayes
MOTION: Ma4e by Council Member Murr~y, seconded by Council Member Pohlmeyer,
adopting Resolution No. 2005-85, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding
finding that the project is withiIl the scope ,of Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR)
EIR-1-03 prepared for the Shastina Ranch Subdivision Project a.nd adopting the Mitigation
. . ... .' ~
Monitoring and Reporting Program ,included in the EIR; making findings that:
1. the Project is compatible with the Re~ding General Plan;
2. the Project will not significantly alter exis~il)g land form;
3. the Project is compatible with surrounding land ~se;
4. the Project site is suitable for the proposed subdivision;
5. the Project is. suitable (or the proposed density;
6. the Project is compatibl,e with the Code of the City of Redding, California;
7. the Project carries out the int~nt of the PI~Illled Development provisions; and
approving Tentative Subdivision Map Application S-7-03 a.nd Planned Development
Applica.tion PD-5-04, subject to conditions of approval, for the Sh~stina Ranch Su,bdivision
Project on property located south of Rancho Road on both sides of Clover Creek, by the
Shastina Ranch Development Company, Inc. subje,ct to condit~ons of approval, for
construction of 446 s~ng~e- family resi4entiall9t~ @d homes, a 7.6 acre park, 61 acres of open
space, and 20 acres of iI?-dustriallagd. The V q~e.:
AYES: Council Members' - Dickerson, Mu~ay, Pohlmeyer, Stegall, and
M~thena
Council Members - None
Counl;ilMembers - None
Coun,cil MC!llbers - None
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
Resolution No. 2005-:85 is on file in the Office of the City Clerk
MOTION: Made by Council Member Murray, s~conded by Council Member Pohlmeyer,
finding tha~ the Development Agreement with Shastina ~anch Development Company
relative to the development known as the Shastina Ranch Subd,ivision is consistent with the
objectives, polici~s, gen~ral'land uses, an,d programs of the Gep,eral Plan and all applic,able
specific plans, is in the ~est interest of the City, promotes the public interest and w~lfare of
. ., . . ". . ,
the City, is consistent with and cOl)forms to requirements of California Government Code
, '." \ .
Sections 65864 thro~gh 65869.5, ll;nd is within the scope.ofth~ EIR-1-03; and.approvingthe
Development Agreement and authorizing th~ M~yor'to execute the Developinent Agreement
and the Park DevelOPment and Park Facilities Imp~ct Fee Credi~ A~e~mynt atta,phed as
Exhibit A thereto.
The Vote: Unanimous Ayes
Council Member Murray offered Ordina.nce No. 2349 for first reading, an uncodified
ordinance ofthe City Council of the City of Redding approving the Development Agreement
with Shastina Ranch Dev~lopment Company rela~ive to the development known as the
Shastina Rancl~ Subdivision.' .
MOTI~N: Made by Council Member Murra.Y, seconded by Council Member Pohlmeyer,
that the full reading of Ordin;lllce No. 2349 be waived and the City Attorney be instructed
. to read the ordinance by title only.
. .
The Vote: Unanimous Ayes
APPOINTMENTS - California Horse Park Ad-Hoc Committee
(B-080-6,OO & E-050) ,
City Manager Warren recalled that at the City Council meeting of Jlme 21,2005, and as a
follow up to the Pri,orities Setting meeting of May 31, 2005, the City Council determined that
an ad.,.hoc committe~ should be empaneled to ~rther study the feasibility, ~osts, potential
7/5/2005
170
revenue and logistics of the proposed California Horse Park (Park). Mr. Warren said that
each Council Member was to select an appointee to serve on the California Horse Park Ad
Hoc Committee (Committee) along with appointees from other agencies and organizations.
He reported that the Redding Rodeo Association has selected Bruce Alexander to serve as
its committee member, Westwood Manor Village Homeowners Association has selected Don
Beatty, and Redding Rancheria chose Gary Hayward to serve. Appointees have yet to be
named by the Shasta County Board of Supervisors and the McConnell Foundation.
Mr. Warren stated that City Council Members submitted the following names for
consideration as appointees to the Committee: Gary Brickwood, Richard Downs, Ginne
Mistal, Mike Quinn and Dave Scott.
Mayor Mathena asked that the Shasta County Board of Supervisors be notified of the
appointments as soon as possible.
I
MOTION: Made by Council Member Stegall, seconded by Council Member Dickerson,
appointing Gary Brickwood, Richard Downs, Ginne Mistal, Mike Quinn, and Dave Scott to
serve on the California Horse Park Ad-Hoc Committee. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes
ELECTRIC UTILITY DIRECTOR SUPPLEMENTAL RETIREMENT
(A-050-125/P-1 00-230/P-1 00-050-1 00) .
City Manager Warren recalled that in March 2001, the City Council authorized the provision
of a supplemental retirement program for Electric Utility Director Jim Feider. Under the
terms of the Council provision, Mr. Feider was to receive an annual payment into an
allowable supplemental retirement plan of20 percent of his base salary for a period of four
years through 2004. Mr. Warren related that Electric Utility Director Feider has proven to
be an exemplary Director of the Redding Electric Utility and is viewed as a leader in the
power industry throughout California as well as Washington, D.C. Mr. Warren added that
Mr. Feider has been instrumental in generating tremendous savings in electric service and
reliable sources of energy for Redding.
Mr. Warren recommended that the City Council authorize continuation of the annual
payment of the supplemental retirement benefit (20% of the base salary) for Electric Utility
Director Feider.
I
Donna Jones, Redding resident, commented that the amount of the benefit seemed excessive
and urged Council to discontinue what she termed as an extravagant bonus.
While Redding resident Carl Arness acknowledged Mr. Feider's extensive contributions to
the City, he pointed to other incentives that attract employees to Redding such as the City's
excellent benefit package, recreational opportunities and quality of life. Mr. Arness also
acknowledged that there are many other high-performing City employees that should also
receive consideration. In response to Mr. Arness' question, he was advised that the $33,000
is in addition to Mr. Feider's annual salary of$168,000.00.
City Council Member Murray pointed out that when Mr. Feider's employment contract was
originally discussed, he was offered the choice of a higher salary, or a lower salary to include
deferred compensation. He added that prior to his employment with the City, Mr. F eider was
the Director of the Western Area Power Association (W AP A), and the City of Redding was
extremely fortunate to gain a man of his qualifications and experience. He also recalled that
at the time of the original contract negotiations, a study was performed throughout California
which indicated that Mr. Feider's counterparts were being paid $100,000 more annually than
the City's recommendation. Mr. Murray pointed out that such qualified directors are in high
demand in the state and competition is fierce for the services they offer.
I
MOTION: Made by Council Member Murray, seconded by Council Member Stegall,
authorizing continuation of an annual payment for supplemental retirement for Electric
Utility Director F eider equal to 20% ofhi~ base salary to be reviewed on a year-to-year basis.
The Vote: Unanimous Ayes
PUBLIC OPINION SURVEY UPDATE
(A-050-060)
City Manager Warren recalled that Council Member Stegall and Mayor Mathena were
appointed to serve as a Committee to work with the consulting firm of Fairbanks, Maslin,
7/5/2005
I
I
171
Maullin, & Associates, to prepare and conduct a Public Opinion Survey regarding a possible
sales tax increase and how that money should be used. To that end, the Committee an~ the
, '
cons,:!ltants developed questions to pose to members of the public, but have opted not to
divulge those questions at this time so that they will not prematurely affect the survey. He
stated that the survey will be performed during the summer of2005, and the results compiled
in a repqrt will be returned to the City Council for consideration.
No action was required on this inform~tional item.
COOPERATIVE PLANNING AGREEMENT - Shasta County
(T-01O-700 & T-01O-650)
Assistant City Manager Starman recalled that the Shasta County Board of Supervisors
offered two proposals to the City regarding a global tax sharing agr~ement. H~ related that
neither proposal was deemed appropriate by the City Council and staff was directed tp
contact other agencies to locate a cooperative agreement which included planning issues
between cities and counties and prepare a proposal for City Council consideration.
Mr. Starman advised that the proposed agreement includes the following key concepts:
1.
The City and Shasta County would work together to facilitate the development of
the Stillwater Business Park.
The City an,d County would share any sales tax revenue and transient occupancy tax
reven:ue in excess of a certain threshold amount on a "50/50" basis.
The City and County would share any property tax revenue associated with new
annexations on a "50/50" basis. '
The City would collect a County public facilities fee (PPP) within the City limits, and
the County would collect city PPPs (i.e. development impact fees) within the City's
sphere of influence.
The City and County would work togetper to protect and preserve the rural nature of
the Chum Creek Bottom area.
Existing property rights in the Chum Creek Bottom area would be protected (i.e.
Shasta County would adhere to its existing General Plan and zoning ordinance).
Shasta County and the three incorporated cities would work together on regional
planning issues that impact all four jurisdictions.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Mr. Starman explained that tht;"l proposal recommends a particular methodology for division
of sales tax revenue and transient occupancy tax (TOT) funds. The formula takes all sales
tax revenue and, TOT funds (excluding one-half of the TOT needed for promotion of
tourism) generated in the City and the unincorporated area ofthe County for fiscal year 2004-
05 and refers to that total as the "B~se Year." Mr. Starman stated that the Base Year total
would be allocat(;ld with 86% to the City and 14% to the Co:unty. The actual funds received
for the year would be the "Projected Revenue" for the next year and would incre~se by 4.25%
annually. He sa.id that any year the actual revenue received exceeded the Projected Revenue,
the overage would be divided 50/50 between the City and County for that year. Annexations
to other jurisdictions would cause the Projected Revenue to be adjusted accordingly. Mr.
Starman believed a 1 O-year term would be n(;lcessary to determine if the system was working
as planned and adjustmepts could be made each renewal period.
Mr. Starman outlined other issues within the proposal and advised that the City Council
could modify the proposal prior to forwarding it to the Shasta County Board of Supervisors
(Board) for consideration. However, st~ff anticipatt;"ls tha.t the Board may wish to modify the
proposal, therefore, it might be advantageous to defer in-depth discussions until after the
Board reviews the document.
I
Mr. Starman recommended that the City Council forward the proposal to the Shasta County
Board of Supervisors for consideration and input.
Mayor Mathena suggested that a Council sub-committee submit the proposal to the Board
in order to explain (l,I1d negotiate issues and return to the next City Council meeting for
consideration. He suggested that he, Council Member Dickerson, and Assistant City
Manager Starman present the proposal to the Board and be available for questions.
Victor Ogrey, President of the Chum Creek Bottoms Homeowners Association, thanked the
City Council for the proposed cooperative planning agreement which indicated concern for
the Chum Creek Bottom area. He believed the document was a step in the right direction for
maintaining open space and the quality of life in th(;l area.
7/5/2005
172
MOTION: Made by Council Member Pohlmeyer, seconded by Council Member Stegall,
appointing Mayor Mathena, Council Member Dickerson, and Assistant City Manager
Starman to present the proposed "Cooperative Planning Agreement" to the Shasta County
Board of Supervisors for consideration.
The Vote: Unanimous Ayes
LEASE AGREEMENT - Shasta Regional Soccer Association for operation of the Soccer
Park at the Sports Complex, and
AUTHORIZATION TO INITIATE THE BID PROCESS - Sports Complex Soccer Park
(P-050-690 & P-050-600-200)
Community Services Director Niemer advised that the Sports Complex Soccer Park
construction documents are ready for the bid process and staff has prepared a Lease
Agreement with the Shasta Regional Soccer Association (SRSA).
I
Ms. Niemer outlined key provisions of the proposed Lease Agreement with the SRSA as
follows:
7/5/2005
1.
2.
A 10-year term with an option for a 5-year extension, if mutually agreeable;
Tenant to make quarterly payments beginning 2008, to a capital replacement fund for
fields and buildings;
Once gross revenues exceed $500,000 (excluding replacement fund), tenant is to pay
6% rent to the City for use of the facility; when gross revenues exceed $2 million,
rent will be 8%.
Tenant to provide annual statement of revenues.
City to construct the project and also provide an allowance for fixtures, furnishings,
and equipment if funds are available. Within the first three years, any faulty
construction or needed repair due to such construction is to be repaired by the City.
Tenant to fund all operations costs and provide insurance. ,
City may terminate the lease without cause with 90 days written notice or if costs
exceed available funds.
City may use the facility up to four days per year.
No alcohol sales except by special permit.
Shared parking with Big League Dreams.
Tenant to meet all requirement of the use permit for the project.
Tenant can terminate the lease if the project does not include entry/administration
building or lighting for four fields.
I
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Ms. Niemer advised that because the bid process is not complete, actual costs are unknown
and this has left the construction of the administration building in doubt.
Assistant City Manager Perry added that the issue of the administration building has been
discussed with the SRSA and dependent on the type of administration building, they have
the option to withdraw from the lease if the bids do not allow funding ofthe administration
building. He pointed out that it is expedient to proceed in this manner because construction
costs increase daily.
Ms. Niemer recommended that the City Council authorize staff to begin the bid process for
the Soccer Park at the Sports Complex and that the Mayor be authorized to execute the Lease
Agreement with the SRSA.
In response to Council Member Murray, Mr. Perry explained that although a Letter oflntent
could be utilized, it was difficult for a prospective tenant to obtain insurance and funding
without a proper lease.
I
Eric Johnson, Steering Committee member of the SRSA, assured the City Council that it is
prepared to move forward with the lease although a letter of intent would be acceptable.
Mr. Perry stated that the issue of the administration building would be determined before the
award of bid around September or October, but SRSA expressed a willingness to move
forward with a smaller building and possibly make other arrangements in the event funding
would not cover construction of even a smaller building.
MOTION: Made by Council Member Pohlmeyer, seconded by Council Member Murray,
authorizing staff to begin the bid process for the Soccer Park at the Sports Complex and the
Mayor to execute the Lease Agreement with the Shasta Regional Soccer Association.
The Vote: Unanimous Ayes
173
PUBLIC COMMENT
(A-050-060 & B-130-030)
Glen Miller, Chair of the Northern California Veterans Cemetery Endowment Committee,
on behalf of all Northstate veterans, thanked the City Council for its approval of a $10,000
donation to the Endowment Fund for the Veterans Cemetery and the people of Redding for
their contribution.
Mayor Mathena announced that additional contributions could be made to the Shasta
Regional Committee Foundation for the Northern California Veterans Cemetery Endowment
Fund.
I
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, at the hour of 8:45 p.m., Mayor Mathena declared the
meeting adjourned.
APPROVED
ATTEST:
I
C~/~
I
7/5/2005