Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - City Council - 2000-10-03 221 City Council, Regular Meeting Civic Center Council Chambers 777 Cypress Avenue, Redding, California October 3,2000, 7:00 p.m. The Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag was led by Vi Klasseen. I The Invocation was offered by Pastor Lane Zachary, First Church of the Nazarene The meeting was called to order by Mayor Anderson with the following Council Members present: Cibula, Kight, McGeorge, and Pohlmeyer. Also present were City Manager Warren, Assistant City Manager Perry, Deputy City Manager Starman, Assistant City Attorney Tranberg, Director of Development Services Hamilton, Acting Director of Community Services Niemer, Electric Utility Director Fieder, Police Chief Blankenship, Fire Chief Wagner, Fire Marshal Becker, Purchasing Officer Peer, City Treasurer Clark, Assistant City Engineer Russell, City Clerk Strohmayer, Assistant City Clerk Sherman, and Executive Secretary English. CONSENT CALENDAR The following matters were considered inclusively under the Consent Calendar: Approval of Minutes - Regular Meeting of September 5, 2000, and Special Meeting of September 7, 2000 I Approval of Payroll and Accounts Payable Register (A-050-100-500) It is recommended that Accounts Payable Register No. 06, check numbers 281731 through 282196 inclusive, in the amount of $2,571,029.42, for the period of September 19,2000, through September 28, 2000, be approved and paid, and that Payroll Register No. 06, check numbers 473950 through 475232 and electronic deposit transaction numbers 475233 through 475278 inclusive, in the amount of$1 ,590,774.67, both for the period of September 3,2000, through September 16, 2000, be approved. TOTAL: $4,161,804.09. Treasurer's Report - August 2000 (A-050-100-600) Total Treasurer's Accountability $87,156,530.51 Total City of Redding Funds, Funds Held in Trust, and Funds of Related Entities $127,829,039.81 I ACR133 and Cash Reconciliation Report - August 2000 (F-205-095-650) It is the recommendation ofthe Administrative Services Director that the City Council accept the ACR133 Report and the Proof of Cash Reconciliation for August 2000. Property Status Report (C-070) It is the recommendation of the Assistant City Manager that the City Council accept the Property Status Report as of September 22, 2000, which includes the following: (1) Surplus City Property, (2) Leases/Renewal of Leases of City Land, (3) Offers to sell land to the City, and (4) City-initiated purchases ofland. 10/03/2000 222 Award of Bid - Bid Schedule No. 3407, One 4-wheel Drive Auger-type Wheel Tractor Scraper for the West Central Landfill (B-050-l00 & S-020-900) It is the recommendation of the Assistant City Manager that the City Council award Bid Schedule No. 3407, one 4-wheel drive, auger-type wheel tractor scraper for the West Central Landfill, to Peterson Tractor Company in the amount of $478,357.45 delivered, which includes sales tax and a trade-in deduction of $85,000, as well as the extended five-year or 7,500 hour warranty. Contract Extension - Purchase of Wood Chips by Wheelabrator Shasta Energy Company (S-020-550) It is the recommendation of the Assistant City Manager that the City Council extend the contract with Wheelabrator Shasta Energy Company to purchase wood chips from the Solid Waste Utility for an additional three years at the current price of$9 per bone-dry ton. I Resolution - Authorizing Implementation of Amendments to the Emergency Repair Program (G-l 00-080-1 00) It is the recommendation of the Deputy City Manager that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2000-162, a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding authorizing the implementation of amendments to the Emergency Repair Program Policy designed to provide low- or no-interest loans of up to $2,500 to low-income homeowners and disabled tenants for the correction of basic health and safety problems, and to make the Program more responsive to current community needs and consistent with other City housing-related programs. Resolution - Proclaiming the Week of October 1-7,2000, as Public Power Week (A-050-060-600) It is the recommendation of the Electric Utility Director that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2000-163, a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding proclaiming October 1-7, 2000 as "Public Power Week" honoring the City of Redding Electric Utility, its consumer/owners, policy makers, and employees; and increasing the community's awareness of the benefits of owning a locally controlled, municipal electric utility. I Resolution - Authorizing 1915 Bond Act Foreclosure on Certain Delinquent Assessments (A-170) It is the recommendation of the City Treasurer that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2000-164, a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding (1) ordering the judicial foreclosure of delinquent bond assessments, pursuant to the Improvement Bond Act of 1915, (2) ordering that the Tax Collector be credited with those assessments which are the subject of a foreclosure action, and (3) directing the City Treasurer to execute the Notice of Intent to Remove Delinquent Assessment Installments from the Tax Rolls. Monthly Financial Report - General Fund (B-130-070) It is the recommendation of the Administrative Services Director that the City Council accept the General Fund's Monthly Financial Report for August 2000. Total revenue to date ($6.2 million) is $634,979 (11.3 percent) above staff s original cash flow projection. Expenditures to date (excluding encumbrances) total $6,660,289 or $681,803 (9.3 percent) below staffs original cash flow projection. Acceptance of Final Map - Stanford Hills Planned Development (PD-2-99), developed by Creative Living, South of Keswick Dam Road and East of Buenaventura Boulevard (L-01O-21O-704 & S-100-705-900) It is the recommendation of the Public Works Director that the City Council accept the final map for the Stanford Hills Planned Development (PD-2-99), authorize the Mayor to sign the subdivision agreement, and instruct the City Clerk to file the map with the Shasta County Recorder. I 10/03/2000 223 I Resolution - Allocation of Funds for the Acquisition of 2808 Victor Avenue for Needed Right-of-way to Widen Victor Avenue (B-130-070 & C-070-0 10) It is the recommendation of the Public Works Director that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2000-165, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding adopting the 53rd amendment to City Budget Resolution No. 99-93 appropriating $100,000 from the Traffic Impact Account to fund the acquisition of property located at 2808 Victor Avenue, as well as the demolition costs and escrow fees, in order to obtain right-of-way for the future widening of Victor Avenue. MOTION: Made by Council Member Kight, seconded by Council Member PoWmeyer, that all the foregoing items on the Consent Calendar are approved and adopted as recommended. V oting was as follows: Ayes: Noes: Absent: Abstain: Council Members - Cibula, Kight, McGeorge, Pohlmeyer, and Anderson Council Members - None Council Members - None Council Members - None Resolution Nos. 2000-162,2000-163,2000-164, and 2000-165 are on file in the office of the City Clerk. I PUBLIC HEARING - Adopt the CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations for the 2000-2020 General Plan RESOLUTION - Certifying the Final Environmental Impact Report and Adopting the 2000- 2020 General Plan . (G-030 & L-01O-075) The hour of7:00 p.m. having arrived, Mayor Anderson opened the public hearing regarding a proposal to adopt the General Plan. The following document is on file in the office of the City Clerk: Affidavit of Publication - Notice of Public Hearing City Clerk Strohmayer advised that a written protest was received from John E. Elmore, Jr., d.b.a. Enterprise Mobilehome Park. Development Services Director Hamilton explained that the public hearing is the final step in the adoption of the new General Plan, which represents a broad consensus of the community and others who participated in its development. Mr. Hamilton outlined the Planning Commission's recommendation regarding the certification of the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and the adoption of the General Plan. I Mr. Hamilton pointed out that should the City Council decide to approve the Commission's recommendation, it must first make the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Findings of Fact and adopt the Statement of Overriding Considerations. He noted that with the exception of air quality impacts and loss of prime agricultural lands, the Fimil Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) has concluded that all impacts can be mitigated to a level that is less than significant. The Council should then certify the FEIR as adequate, pursuant to CEQA, and adopt the Plan. Development Services Director Hamilton addressed prevalent misconceptions regarding the two overriding environmental issues under consideration by the Council. The first issue deals with the loss of prime agricultural land. Any loss of prime agricultural land is considered a significant impact under CEQA, because once it is gone it cannot be replaced. He pointed out that the Plan under consideration results in a significant reduction in the amount ofland which would otherwise be lost under the current General Plan. He mentioned that the General Plan does not include development in the Chum Creek Bottom area. 10/03/2000 224 Mr. Hamilton related that any growth or development within the community will impact air quality, and he expressed his confidence that the Plan will result in significantly less impact on air quality than that which would occur under the current General Plan. Development Services Director Hamilton explained that by choosing to adopt the Statement of Overriding Considerations, the City Council will be balancing the benefits of well planned and fiscally-'sound growth with important environmental constraints. Mr. Hamilton indicated that adoption of this Plan will result in the City's existing zoning ordinance becoming inconsistent with the Plan, and anticipated returning to the City Council within 30-45 days with an interim zoning ordinance which will help bridge the gap until the draft zoning ordinance is complet~d. I It is the recommendation of the Development Services Director that the Council adopt the CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations, certify the FEIR, and adopt the General Plan. Council Member Cibula asked what the options and impacts would be with regard to air quality. Mr. Hamilton stated that options were considered as alternatives in the FEIR, and include staying within the current City-limit boundaries, moving forward with the recommended plan, or staying with the plan currently in place. He clarified that staying within the current City-limit boundaries assumes there will be no further growth within the City or community. However, the question is whether that would be a prudent decision for the Council to make. . Fred Weatherill, 2538 Old Alturas Road, explained that although he is currently a member of the City of Redding's Planning Commission, he was not representing the Commission during this meeting and any opinions expressed by him would be his own. Mr. Weatherill asserted that the Plan would needlessly sacrifice quality of life, as well as the legitimate interests of the present residents. He stated that in order to be successful, the Plan must include some form of enforceable timing and sequencing program for both residential and commercial-industrial growth. He recommended that the reasonable bounds of growth and development be set at a figure substantially below the Plan's 113,500 residents in an amount to be derived by the residents themselves. In light of his concerns, Mr. Weatherill suggested that the Council include 'a growth management policy in the Plan to protect the present residents from the consequences of growth planned and executed by others. He encouraged the City Council to implement the Plan as the public intended and ensure follow through. I Angre Benoit, 11358 Iron Mountain Road, expressed appreciation for the hard work that went into the development of the General Plan, as well as staffs efforts to notify and include public participation. He noted that while there are many promising ideas within this proposal (i.e., increased recreational opportunities, stream protection, and open space, and provisions for a variety of cOmIDercial services and centers), there are some items he did not see in the General Plan amendment that he fe~t warranted further consideration. Mr. Benoit admitted that he had not fully reviewed the General Plan document and that perhaps these areas of concern were addressed. Mayor Anderson remarked that most ofthe questions and concerns expressed by Mr. Benoit are addressed in the General Plan amendment, and requested that staff make this document available to him. Council Member Cibula suggested that staff is also available to answer any questions Mr. Benoit may have. I Mayor Anderson determined that there were no additional individuals wishing to speak on the issue and closed the public hearing. Senior Planner Manuel provided an overview of the public participation process for this project. Mr. Manuel concurred that issues raised by the speakers have been discussed and are addressed in the amendment to the General Plan. 10/03/2000 225 Vice Mayor McGeorge stressed that the General Plan must be flexible in order to accommodate future change. He thanked and recognized those members of the public who attended the meetings on this project, as well as the members of the General Plan Task Force, the Planning Commission, and staff for their hard work on this project. I MOTION: Made by Council Member McGeorge, seconded by Council Member Kight, that the City Council, having reviewed and considered the 2000-2020 General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report and all information in the record, finds that the benefits of adopting the Plan outweigh the effects that cannot be adequately mitigated and that the required CEQA Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations be adopted. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes. MOTION: Made by Council Member McGeorge, seconded by Council Member Kight, that Resolution No. 2000-166 be adopted, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding (1) certifying the Final Environmental Impact Report and all of its contents for the 2000-2020 General Plan as complete and adequate in addressing the environmental effects of the Plan and that said Final Environmental Impact Report has been completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the CEQA guidelines, and the City of Redding implementing procedures, and (2) adopting the 2000-2020 General Plan having reviewed the 2000-2020 General Plan text and diagrams, as well as all information in the record, and after receipt of public testimony in two properly noticed public hearings. V oting was as follows: Ayes: Noes: Absent: Abstain: Council Members - Cibula, Kight, McGeorge, Pohlmeyer, and Anderson Council Members - None Council Members - None Council Members - None I Resolution No. 2000-166 is on file in the office of the City Clerk. Mayor Anderson thanked the members of the General Plan Task Force for dedicating so many hours to this process. He said the General Plan is a good one which will help guide the direction of the City. Council Member Cibula thanked all those who participated in this process. In particular, he recognized Senior Planner Manuel for his outstanding work on this project, as well as Vice Mayor McGeorge for the time he invested in this process. PUBLIC HEARING - Rezoning Application RZ-1-00, by Colleen Bigham, 885 and 893 Lake Boulevard (L-01O-230) The hour of7:00 p.m. having arrived, Mayor Anderson opened the public hearing regarding Rezoning Application RZ-1-00. The following documents are on file in the office ofthe City Clerk: Affidavit of Mailing - Notice of Public Hearing Affidavit of Publication - Notice of Public Hearing City Clerk Strohmayer advised that no written protests were received. I Development Services Director Hamilton reported that Rezoning Application RZ-1-00 was initiated by Colleen Bigham in order to rezone property located at 885 and 893 Lake Boulevard consistent with the existing development on the parcels from "R-3-30-F" Multiple Family Residential District and Site Plan Review Combining District to "R-3-15-F" Multiple Family Residential District and Site Plan Review Combining District. Both parcels are approximately 6,000 square feet in size and were developed in 1985 and 1986 with a fourplex unit on each parcel. 10/03/2000 226 Mr. Hamilton recalled that at its meeting of August 8, 2000, the Planning Commission expanded the boundaries of the rezoning to include the adjoining five parcels to the north and east bounded by Lake Boulevard, StNicholas Avenue, and July Way and recommended approval of the" request. Mr. Hamilton pointed out that approval was subject to the condition that the rezoning would not become effective until adoption of the Draft General Plan. It is the recommendation of the Development Services Director that the City Council approve the rezoning request, adopt the environmental negative declaration, and offer the ordinance for first reading. I Mayor Anderson determined that no one present wished to address the matter and closed the public hearing. MOTION: Made by Council Member McGeorge; seconded by Council Member Kight, to approve the rezoning application as recommended, and make the following findings regarding Rezoning Application RZ-1-00: 1. Project is compatible with the Redding General Plan; 2. Project is compatible with the surrounding land use; 3. Project is compatible with the Code of the City of Redding, California; 4. Project will not significantly alter existing land form; and adopt the Negative Declaration authorized by the Planning Commission on August 8, 2000. Council Member McGeorge offered Ordinance No. 2275 for first reading, an ordinance of the City Council of the City of Redding amending Section 18.06.020 of the Redding Municipal Code relating to the rezoning of certain real property in the City of Redding (RZ-1-00) to "R-3-15-F" Multiple Family Residential District and Site Plan Review Combining District. I MOTION: Made by Council Member McGeorge, seconded by Council Member Kight, that the full reading of Ordinance No. 2275 be waived and the City Attorney be instructed to read the full title. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes. ORDINANCE - Amending Redding Municipal Code Section 2.73.020 regarding the Community Development Advisory Committee (B-080-600-100) Deputy City Manager Starman reported that the Community Development Advisory Committee (CDAC) consists of 13 members, and the primary function ofCDAC is to make recommendations to the City Council relative to the disbursement of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds each year. Mr. Starman related that during last year's application process, CDAC recommended amending Section 2.73.020 ofthe Redding Municipal Code pertaining to the Commission to (1) stagger the terms of CDAC members (the terms of current members expire December 1, 2000)to assure an ongoing mixture of new and experienced members, and (2) preclude CDAC members from serving two consecutiv~ years as chair in order to allow more members the opportunity to serve in this capacity. Deputy City Manager Starman suggested that the City Council may also want to consider (1) reducing the size of CDAC from "not less than 13 and not more than 15 persons" to nine persons in order to streamline the CDBG application process, and (2) eliminating the requirement that representatives from certain other commissions (Le., Planning Commission, Community Services Advisory Commission, and Redding Redevelopment Agency) serve on the committee. Mr. Starman explained that the need for representatives from these other commissions is no longer necessary, because CDAC no longer considers issues that have significant planning/development implications. I 10/03/2000 227 It is the recommendation of the Deputy City Manager that the City Council offer the ordinance for first reading amending Section 2.73.020 of the Redding Municipal Code relative to CDAC by (1) staggering the terms of the CDAC members, (2) precluding CDAC members from serving as chair for two consecutive years, (3) reducing the size of the Committee to nine members, and (4) eliminating the requirement that representatives from certain other commissions serve on CDAC. I Fran Jenkins, 2652 Sharon Street, a current member of CDAC, expressed support for the recommendations of staff. However, she suggested that if the number of committee members is reduced, those who consistently attend the meetings should be given preference for reappointment In response to Council Member Kight, Deputy City Manager Starman clarified that the chair and vice chair of CDAC are currently appointed by the Mayor subject to approval by a majority of the City Council. Council Member Cibula spoke in support of staggered terms of the committee members, but opposed limiting the term of the chair to one year. Mr. Cibula also favored sharing knowledge between the different committees and leaving the numbers of committee members high to allow for more input. In his opinion, various areas of the community are better served by a higher number of committee members. Council Member Kight suggested that if the chair is elected by the committee, there is no need to limit the number of terms the chair may serve. He explained that if the chair is effective, the committee may choose to reappoint that person. He supported decreasing the number of members on CDAC, suggesting that smaller committees are more effective and streamlined. I MOTION: Made by Council Member Kight, seconded by Council Member Pohlmeyer, to (1) reduce the size of CDAC to nine members, (2) stagger the terms of CDAC members, (3) eliminate the requirement that representatives from other commissions must also serve on CDAC, and (4) selection of the Chair and Vice Chair of the Committee shall be made annually by a majority of the committee members. Voting was as follows: Ayes: Noes: Absent: Abstain: Council Members - Anderson, Kight, McGeorge, and Pohlmeyer Council Members - Cibula Council Members - None Council Members - None Council member Kight offered Ordinance No. 2276 for first reading, an ordinance of the City Council ofthe City of Redding amending Section 2.73.020 of the Redding Municipal Code regarding the composition of CDAC, as amended. MOTION: Made by Council Member Kight, seconded by Council Member Pohlmeyer, that the full reading of Ordinance No. 2276 be waived and the City Attorney be instructed to read the full title. Voting was as follows: I Ayes: Noes: Absent: Abstain: Council Members - Kight, McGeorge, Pohlmeyer, and Anderson Council Members - Cibula Council Members - None Council Members - None CIVIC CENTER UPDATE AND RECOMMENDA nON REGARDING THE ADDRESS SIGN. TRAFFIC SIGNAL POLES. AND GREAT CIRCLE FOUNTAIN (C-050-025) Assistant City Manager Perry presented a status report of items yet to be completed with regard to the Civic Center. He presented three items for the City Council to consider: (1) the conceptual design plan for the Great Circle Fountain; (2) the style ofthe traffic signal poles at Akard and Cypress Avenues; and (3) the style for the Civic Center address sign. 10/03/2000 228 Mr. Perry recalled that on Septemb~r 5, 2000, the City Council set aside $200,000 for the design and construction of the fountain, and on March 21,2000, $6,000 was set aside for an address sign when Cypress Avenue is improved. Assistant City Manager Perry submitted two alternative sketches offountains developed by the architect Nichols, Melberg, and Rossetto. He explained that the difference between the two is a modification of the planters attached to the fountain. The arms on one version are directly radi~l to the center of the fountain while the other design features curved arms. In response to Council Member Pohlmeyer, Assistant City Manager Perry inqicated that the cost of these ~lternatives should be approximately the same. He said that while funds have been budgeted, the cost estima~e for the work is still pending. If there is a difference between the budgeted funds and the pri~e, staff will bring the matter back to the Council for consideration. I Mayor Anderson expressed his preference for the fountain with the radial arms. Council Member Pohlmeyer expressed an appreciation for both versions, but he would support whichever version is more reasonably priced. Council Member Kight concurred that the most cost effective version should be selected. Mayor Anderson suggested that if there is a difference in cost, the matter could be brought back before the City Council. . Council Member Cibula indicated that he would be willing to defer this decision to the architect, if there is no significant difference in cost. In response to Council Member Kight, Assistant City Manager Perry clarified that staff can begin construction of the fountain once the cost estimate is received and it has been determined that the cost falls within the budget. I With regard to the traffic signal poles, Assistant City Manager Perry asked that Council determine which style it prefers f<?r use at Akard and Cypress Avenues. Mr. Perry suggested t4e use of powder coated poles and arms, with bases and streetlights to be consistent with those in use at the Civic Center, rather than galvanized poles and arms. Council Member Cibula stressed the importance of maintaining consistency in the styles used. He agreed with the concept of upgrading the poles while maintaining simplicity. Mayor Anderson suggested that this matter be brought back with a cost estimate of both styles of streetlights. Assistant City Manager Perry submitted design drawings of two styles of address signs to be constructe4 at the north entrance to the Civic Center. The first concept matches the colors used on the Civic Ce~ter, and the pole base matches those used along Cypress Avenue for traffic signals and streetlights. The second design concept is a monument style sign that matches the materials and color used on the Civic Center prepared by the architect. Mr. Perry estimated the first design concept would cost approximately $8,000 compared to approximately $12,000 for the architect's suggested sign. Council Member Cibula expressed a preference for the architect's proposed sign, but suggested that it be made more consistent with the "Welcome to Redding" signs, and match the Civic Center building. Mr. Cibula stressed the importance of making the selection cost effective. I Mayor Anderson and Council Members Kight and Pohlmeyer preferred the architect's proposal without any changes in the most cost effective manner. Council Member McGeorge also chose the architect's proposal with the addition of the City's logo. Council Member Cibula concurred. 10/03/2000 229 Mayor Anderson suggested that staff return to the City Council with cost estimates for each . alternative address sign. Vi Klasseen suggested that the City Council utilize a citizen's committee if they wished additional input on this issue. I By consensus of the City Council, the following action was taken: (1) accepted the status report on the Civic Center; (2) approved the conceptual plan for the Great Circle fountain and directed staff to move forward with the most cost-effective design; (3) directed staff to utilize powder coating poles and arms with bases and streetlights to be consistent with the Civic Center; and (4) directed staff to return with cost estimates for each alternative design for the Civic Center address sign. MONTHLY FINANCIAL REPORT - Electric Utility (B-130-070) Electric Utility Director Fieder presented the Electric Utility's monthly financial report and Industry Activities Update for August 2000. He reported that retail power sales revenue billed through August is 8.1 percent, or $1,141,774, above projections, and wholesale power sales to date are 347.9 percent, or $18,196,160, above projections. Total operating expenses through August were 14.7 percent, or $247,738, below budget, and operating revenue after energy costs is 163.8 percent, or $13,453,889, above projections. The total cost of electricity through August 2000 is 52.9 percent, or $5,932,297, above plan. The Utility's earnings before interest, depreciation, and amortization are 209.8 percent, or $13,701,627, above plan. The current outstanding balance for the Debt Reduction Program is $91.2 million. It is the recommendation of Electric Utility Director Fieder that the City Council accept the Electric Utility's monthly financial report and Industry Activities Update for August 2000. I Council Member Cibula asked for clarification on the percentages of increases or decreases included in the Electric Utility's monthly financial report for August 2000, as well as how this ties into the City Council's latest decision to purchase electricity at a fixed rate. Electric Utility Director Fieder stated that the percentages in question reflect the City's business in the wholesale market. The City received more than 300 percent in wholesale revenues above that forecast by staff two years ago in the departmental budget, and indicated that this represents revenue that can be applied to long-term rate stability. He explained that this revenue increase is being driven by extremely high power rates and the summer's wholesale market. In order to make those sales, natural gas has been purchased to run the generators at Redding Electric Utility, and the price for natural gas has increased by three times.. He added that the City's recent purchase of electricity at a fixed rate is substantially lower than the current price. MOTION: Made by Council Member Pohlmeyer, seconded by Council Member Kight, accepting the Electric Utility's Monthly Financial Report for August 2000. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes. I RESOLUTION - Authorizing Redding Electric Utility to Reserve Funds from the California Energy Commission for Energy-Efficiency Retrofits (E-120-030) It is the recommendation of the Electric Utility Director that the City Council adopt a resolution authorizing Redding Electric Utility to reserve funds of up to $250,000, at an annual interest rate of 5.4 percent, from the California Energy Commission for energy- efficiency upgrades to Redding's Fire Stations 1 through 7, the Police Department, and the Downtown Redding Mall. Mr. Fieder estimated that annual energy expenditures could be reduced by approximately $30,000, or 13 percent, if all the identified retrofit projects are implemented at each of the locations. He added that the energy savings will provide a simple payback of the retrofit costs in 7-2 years. 10/03/2000 230 In response to Council Member Cibula, Electric Utility Director Fieder clarified that as the bidding process progresses, and prior to returning to the City Council, staff will study whether or not the proposed renovations to the Downtown Redding Mall mentioned in the staff report would be prudent. MOTION: Made by Council Member Kight, seconded by Council Member Pohlmeyer, th~t Resolution No. 2000-167 be adopted, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding authorizing Redding Electric Utility to apply for an energy-efficiency loan of up to $250,000, ~t ~ annual interest rate of 5.4 percent, from the California Energy Commission for Redding's Community Energy Improvement Project. Voting was as follows: I Ayes: Noes: Absent: Abstain: Council Members - Cibula, Kight, McGeorge, Pohlmeyer, and Anderson Council Members - None Council Members - None Council Members - None Resolution No. 2000-167 is on file in the office of the City Clerk. RESOLUTION - Authorizing Redding Electric Utility to Apply for an Energy-efficiency Loan from the California Energy Commission for Redding's Light Emitting Diode Traffic Light Conversion Project (E-120-030) It is the recommendation of the Electric Utility Director that the City Council adopt a resolution authorizing Redding Electric Utility to apply for an energy-efficiency loan of up to $650,000, at an annual interest rate of 5.4 percent, from the California Energy Commission for ~edding's light emitting diode (LED) traffic light conversion project. It is anticipated that a complete ':lpgrade of Redding' s traffic lights will pay for itself in 7.8 years. In response to Council Member Cibula, Electric Utility Director Fieder reported that staff proposes to contract with Energy Masters International (EMI) to develop and implement the proposed LED project in an amo~nt not to exceed $139,000. Mr. Fieder explained that this was not being performed in-hou~e, bec~use stafflimitations in Public Works would delay the completion of this project for a number of years. By contracting with EMI, the work can be . . finished within a matter of months and the City can begin incurring savings very quickly. The payback woul~ be 7.6 years, including the consultant fee. I MOTION: Made by Council Member Cibula, seconded by Council Member Kight, that Resolution No. 2000-168 be adopted, a resolution ofthe City Council ofthe City of Redding (1) authorizing the City, through its Electric Utility, to apply for an energy-efficiency loan of up to $650,000, at an annual interest rate of 5.4 percent, from the California Energy Commission for Redding's LED Traffic Light Conversion Project, and (2) authorizing the Electric Utility Director or his designee to enter into the necessary contracts with EMI to develop and implement the proposed LED Project, and (3) approving the use of Public Benefit Program funds to cover interest expenses. Voting was as follows: Ayes: Noes: Absent: Abstain: Council Members - Cibula, Kight, McGeorge, Pohlmeyer, and Anderson Council Members - None Council Members - None Council Members - None RENOVATION OF THE REDDING PLUNGE COMMUNITY SWIMMING POOL (P-050-700-600) City Manager Warren recalled that in June 1999 the City Council held a budget meeting, at which time they discussed the City swimming pool (The Plunge), as well as many other priorities. At that time, the City Council set aside $66,000 in the General Fund for renovation of the swimming pool and directed staff to return with options for further discussion prior to moving forward. I Resolution No. 2000-168 is on file in the office of the City Clerk. 10/03/2000 231 City Manager Warren explained that no major improvements have been made to the facility during the last 50 years, and The Plunge is deteriorating at an alarming rate. The structural integrity of the pool, along with the antiquated filtration systems and changing rooms have raised concerns about the safety and sanitation of the facility. I City Manager W men further reported that following the City Council's direction to allocate funds for the renovation, the architectural firm of Nichols, Melberg and Rossetto, assisted by Aquatic Design of San Diego, prepared a feasibility study on the facility. During a series of meetings with a committee of community members, including Council Member Cibula, YMCA Director James Finck, two recreational swim team coaches, a local chiropractor, a Shasta College swim coach, and others, the committee defined the following objectives for the renovation project: (1) address code violations and Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) issues, (2) improve functionality for user groups, and (3) make it affordable to build. Three scenarios were produced outlining different levels of improvement ranging from an estimated cost of $2,077,000 to $3,254,000. City Manager Warren restated that the Community Services Commission informed the City Council of these alternatives in a November 1999 letter. Staff realized that there were insufficient funds to accommodate all of these options and sought a second opinion. The Beals Group was contracted to design four options which cover the most basic needs for repairs to the construction of two new pools. The consultant came back with the following four options: 1. Repair the existing pool - $1,099,000 2. Build a new 50-meter by 25-yard competition pool - $1,533,000 3. Repair the existing pool and build a new recreation pool - $2,000,000 4. Build a new competition pool and a new recreation pool - $2,705,000 I City Manager Warren anticipated the life span for any of the options to be approximately fifty years. Mr. Warren explained that Option No.1 only upgrades the existing swimming pool in terms of ADA code requirements and efficiencies. Option 2 completely replaces the 50-meter pool with enough features to allow swim meets of all kinds, but lacks an additional pool for recreation and would not produce the attendance figures or broaden the use that is desired for the community. Option 4 is ambitious with a complete new swimming pool for the swim teams and a recreation pool, but it is the most expensive option. City Manager Warren recommended that the City Council select Option 3, which is a complete renovation of the existing pool apd the addition of a recreation pool. This would allow the City to reach an even broader spectrum of the community. City Manager Warren noted that under any of the options, the storage building will be taken down and other improvements will be made, including enlarging the entire area for picnics and surface activity enjoyment. City Manager Warren stated that with Options 3 and 4 there is an opportunity to increase the revenue stream. Option 3 is supported by citizens who have committed to raising significant dollars for this option (more than $100,000), because they favor the accommodation of the swim teams and the recreation pool. I Ms. Niemer reported that The Redding Plunge opened in 1949 and has served the community well for the past 51 years. However, if remedial action is not taken, the facility will not be able to continue passing annual inspections performed by the Shasta County Health Department. The Plunge's operation could be subject to disruption in the near future due to health and safety code regulations, as well as ADA issues. Ms. Niemer stated that through discussions with the user groups and other cities, the following issues were consistently raised as priorities for this project: (1) Provide family fun in a safe, clean, and supervised environment with activities for all age groups; (2) serve both the competitive swim teams and the recreational users; (3) provide an affordable recreational opportunity; (4) provide a longer operating season; and (5) continue the revitalization of Caldwell Park. 10/03/2000 232 Ms. Niemer indicated that in addition to the $36,000 allocated by the City Council, as well as $30,000 already identified to provide for debt service on the pool's renovation, an additional $30,000 is available froIll Redding Electric Utility/Public Benefits (Solar Project), and $5,000 was donated by a number of local health clubs. Ms. Niemer identified other sources of funding, inclu~ing $750,000 maximum from the Park Bond, $3,000 maximum from the Park In-Lieu Fund for the Northwest Quadrant, $190,000 maximum in CDBG funding to address ADA issues, $175,000 estimat~d through donations and grants for Options 3 or 4, and $275,000 maximum from revenue offset for Options 3 or 4. She opined that by increasing gate admissions, concession sales, and swim lessons, the City will be able to break even on Option 3 in terms. of operating expenses. The City currently subsidizes The Plunge by $41,000 each summer. Ms. Niemer indicated that Shasta College has agreed to construct the concession stand during the Fall 2001 semester ($35,000), and The Plunge Alumni Association has agreed to renovate the change house ($150,000) with assistance of $40,000 in CDBG funds allocated last Spring. I In response to Council Member Cibula, Ms. Niemer clarified that by enhancing the recreation pool as suggested in Option 3, revenue would be increased to such an extent that the City would no longer find it necessary to subsidize The Plunge at the current level. Council Member Pohlmeyer asked ifthe life expectancy of a new pool would be significantly greater than simply remodeling the existing facility. Ms. Niemer anticipated an additional 10 years. Mark Wagner, 1929 Posey Street, predicted a greater economic benefit to the City with construction of the only 50-meter competition-size pool from Sacramento to Redding. He suggested th~t natio~al swimming competitions could be held in Redding providing a boost to the loc~l economy with hotel/motel reservations, restaurants, and retail businesses realizing increased sales. James Fink, Chief Executive Officer with the YMCA, 709 Delta Street, commented that this project gives the City the flexibility to offer programs to all segments of the population from infant swim lessons to senior programs. Mr. Fink addressed the importance of this facility to the community. He encouraged the City Coun~il to approve Option 3, which he felt was most prudent. I Rick Bosetti, 1471 Arroyo Manor Drive, pointed out the opportunities that the children in the community would have to compete in regional swimming events as a result of this project. He explained the benefits of training in a long pool for competitions. While Mr. Bosetti expressed a preference for Option 4, he indicated that he would be satisfied with Option 3. Phoebe Natina, 3595 Ricardo Avenue, commented on the importance of children learning to swim for reasons of both physical and mental health, as well as safety, and that there are more swimmers representing the United States at the Olympic Games than any other sport. She stated that this facility has served as an integral part in the lives of many people within the community over the yec.rrs. Ms. Natina encouraged the City Council to support staffs recommendation. Mary Beaver, 2244 Venus Way, maintained that swimming improves the health of children, and anticipated that this project will bring economic benefit to the City. I Barbie Olsen, 3789 Main Street, Cottonwood, commented on the positive aspects of local teenagers serving as lifeguards at The Plunge. She also encouraged the City Council to adopt either Option 3 or 4. 10/03/2000 233 I Dr. Tom Andrews, 9358 Silver Bridge, Palo Cedro, indicated that if a new competition pool is constructed, masters level swim meets for adults could be held at The Plunge. He explained that he recommends swimming to his child patients diagnosed with Attention Deficit Syndrome, because this sport benefits both right and left brain activities, improves coordination, and aids in reducing some of the symptoms ofthis disease. Dr. Andrews stated that a pool with the qualities found in Options 3 or 4 would reach a wider and more diverse group. Mayor Anderson explained that although he had originally been in favor of Option 1, he was now leaning toward Options 3 or 4. Mayor Anderson requested additional information projecting the amount of economic benefit the City could expect as a result of selecting Option 4 rather than Option 3. Council Member Pohlmeyer concurred with the Mayor's comments and supported further exploration of Option 4 in order to make it fiscally feasible. Mr. Pohlmeyer was impressed with the revenue and expense figures cited in both Options 3 and 4, especially in light ofthe fact that the City is losing approximately $41,000 per year with the present operation of The Plunge. Council Member Kight agreed with the Mayor's request that the City Council look at Option 3, as well as Option 4 if there is an added economic benefit. Council Member McGeorge commented that if Council approved Option 3, many of the amenities could be added later. However, he did express his preference for Option 4 ifit can be proven to be economically viable. I Council Member Cibula explained that development of this project has been ongoing for more than a year. Mr. Cibula agreed that if Option 4 can be proven economically attainable, the City Council should consider its approval. Mayor Anderson thanked Council Member Cibula and all those involved in this project for , their commitment and hard work. By consensus of the City Council, staff was directed to return with cost estimates for the renovation of The Redding Plunge community swimming pool, and outline the various economic benefits realized from Option 4 (build a new competition pool and a new recreation pool) or Option 3 (repair the existing City pool and build a new recreation pool). I RESOLUTION - Amending the Schedule of Fees and Service Charges for Certain Fire Department Fire Prevention Activity Fees (F-205-600 & P-150-070) Fire Marshal Becker recalled that on September 19, 2000, Council requested further analysis on the sliding scale dollar amounts used to ensure that reasonable fees were being collected for fire prevention activities. Mr. Becker explained that a review of permit costs was conducted for the period of July 1, 1999 to June 30, 2000, and by applying the proposed sliding scale amounts, it was determined that the City would ,realize a 90 percent reimbursement for one Plan Review/Inspector position, or 90 percent of the cost of performing the service. Current service fees typically reimburse the City at a level of approximately 40 to 50 percent for the cost of the service. Mr. Becker advised that the proposed sliding scale has been revised to reflect the 40 to 50 percent level the City is accustomed to receiving. Fire Marshal Becker explained that last year the City received approximately $30,000 from fees at the current levels, and with the sliding scale it is anticipated that the City will receive approximately the same amount making the change revenue neutral. \ 10/03/2000 234 It is the recommendation of the Fire Marshal that the City Council adopt a resolution, which will revise, modify, and establish the Fire Department fire prevention activity fees. MOTION: Made by Council Member Pohlmeyer, seconded by Council Member Kight, that Resolution No. 2000-169 be adopted, resolution of the City Council ofthe City of Redding amending its Schedule of Fees and Service Charges for certain Fire Department Fire Prevention activity fees, as follows: 1. Revising its fee for plan checks and sprinkler plan checks from a flat fee to a sliding scale similar to what the Building Department currently uses based on valuation. I 2. Modifying the sprinkler system inspection from a flat fee to $50 per riser and .25~ per sprinkler head. 3. Establishing a $25 fee for business owners who do not correct fire code violations after two visits by the Fire Department. Voting was as follows: Ayes: Noes: Absent: Abstain: Council Members - Cibula, Kight, McGeorge, Pohlmeyer, and Anderson Council Members - None Council Members - None Council Members - None Resolution No. 2000-169 is on file in the office of the City Clerk. PROJECT STATUS REPORT - Extension of Shasta View Drive and Street Alignment Options (S-070-100-700) Assistant City Engineer Russell reported that on September 22, 2000, Mayor Anderson requested a status report and schedule for completion of Shasta View Drive between Galaxy Way and Leonard Street. Mr. Russell explained that this is a work in progress, and staff is attempting to find ways to fund and prioritize the project. I Mr. Russell explained that should the City be successful in acquiring the property for the Clover Creek Detention Basin Project, it is recommended that the City Council take the following actions to complete the project: 1. Contract out the environmental review to ECORP Consulting, Inc., the firm performing the environmental work for the Clover Creek Project, and the design work to Stantec Consulting, Inc., the firm designing the Clover Creek Project to allow integration of the road and park planning. 2. Utilize Federal funds for the project, as programmed, and support with other funds, if possible, which would require a construction date of the summer 2002. 3. Select a curved alignment to eliminate the drag strip syndrome. This would also provide additional area for separation between the roadway and the homes to the west. 4. Make the initial road four lanes and defer the question of medians until the design phase begins in order to determine the effect intersecting streets or driveways will have on the practicality of medians. I 10/03/2000 235 Assistant City Engineer Russell stated that if the City Council concurs with this recommendation, staffwill work with the consultants to complete the environmental review and design work and continue to expedite the federal aid process to complete the project as soon as possible. I Mayor Anderson asked if the City has the right-of-way for much of the curved road. Assistant City Engineer Russell clarified that the City will receive the entire right-of-way with purchase of the Clover Creek Project property. Council Member Cibula disagreed with staffs recommendation to defer medians. He contended that medians can be positive aspects of this type of work if done correctly. Assistant City Engineer Russell acknowledged the positive aspect of medians, but expressed concerned about the cost of such work clarifying staffs plans to review the feasibility of medians in the design work. Assistant City Manager Perry stated that this would also give staff time to find additional funds to move forward with the next step in the development of the road. Council Member Kight asked if there would be any safety issues involved in eliminating medians on this road. Assistant City Engineer Russell explained that there should not be any major safety issues, because instead of a lane there would be a two-way left turn. Vice Mayor McGeorge suggested that a left-turn lane is a better safety feature than a median. Council Member Pohlmeyer, while sympathetic to safety issues, was reluctant to spend extra money to create curves in a road. I Assistant City Manager Perry explained that this project is now in the pre-design phase, so staff can only provide an educated guess as to numbers. Any information garnered from the City Council will allow staff to define the scope of work for the consultant. Mr. Perry clarified that staffis seeking direction from the City Council to move forward with the design and environmental review of the project. City Manager Warren stated that curved roads in general are not any more expensive unless a right-of-way must be obtained. In this case, the City will own the right-of-way, so this expense will not be an issue. Mr. Warren believed that if staff can slow down traffic with the curved road alternative for $10,000 to $20,000, it would be well worth the money. Council Member Kight opined that curving would not only calm traffic, it would also add a nice quality to the area. . Mayor Anderson commented that the cost of such work could make a difference in the City Council's decision. City Manager Warren stressed the importance of moving forward with this project, and suggested that the City Council authorize staff to do so with a maximum dollar amount that cannot be exceeded. I City Manager Warren clarified that if the dollar amount is more than $30,000, staff will either return the project to the City Council or go with a straight alignment design. MOTION: Made by Council Member Kight, seconded by Council Member Pohlmeyer, directing staff to negotiate with consultants to complete the environmental review and design work for the extension of Shasta View Drive and street alignment options, and place a $30,000 differential cap on construction of a curved section of road through Shasta View Drive. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes. 10/03/2000 236 ORAL COMMUNICA nONS (G-030/T -080-100) Cindy Elmore, representing her father John Elmore, both co-owners of the Enterprise Mobilehome Park located at 1463 Hartnell A venue, explained that this property has been rezoned to apartments. She and her father are attempting to sell their property and have received an offer based upon the previous zoning. I;3ecause the prospective buyers intended to construct storage units on the unused land, the offer was with~rawn when the rezoning was identified. Ms. Elmore stated that an auto wrecking yard is located directly behind the property, which produces a great deal of noise, dust, rats, mosquitos, and fumes from gasoline and oil. She pointed out that a sewage pumping plant would be needed to route the sewage from the apartment units to Hartnell Avenue, because no other sewer access is available. Ms. Elmore anticipated a significant increase in the traffic in this area if this rezoning is allowed. She suggested that her property be rezoned for storage units in order to avoid these potential problems. I Mayor Anderson explained that the City Council approved the 2000-2020 General Plan earlier this evening, and asked if Ms. Elmore's property had been affected by this action. Development Services Director Hamilton explained that this property is zoned for multiple family uses, and a long-term General Plan land use designation would result in the removal of the auto wrecking yard from that location. Mayor Anderson referred the matter to Mr. Hamilton requesting that he address the issues brought up by Ms. Elmore. Linda Terry, 1873 Conifer Way, Apartment #12, explained that her daughter attends the Redding 7th Day Adventist School located on Cypress Avenue and walks or rides her bicycle to and from school every day. Ms. Terry expressed a serious need for a crosswalk and law enforcement on Alfredo and Cypress due to what she felt were unsafe traffic conditions. Mayor Anderson referred this matter to staff to be brought back before the City Council only if it is determined necessary. I ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, at the hour of 9:26 p.m., Mayor Anderson declared the meeting adjourned. . APPROVED 4k#j?~ Mayor r-- ATTEST: tL4'~~ $~ City Clerk r I I 10/03/2000