HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso 2018-024 - General Plan amendments RESOLUTION NO. 2018-024
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
REDDING ADOPTING THE ADDENDUM TO THE NEGATIVE
DECLARATION ADOPTED FOR THE DOWNTOWN REDDING
SPECIFIC PLAN AND APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO
REDDING'S GENERAL PLAN (GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
APPLICATION GPA-2018-00047)
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Redding's General Plan on October 3, 2000; and
WHEREAS, the attached proposed amendments to the General Plan Diagram are desired
to allow for the adoption of the Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update; and
WHEREAS, on January 29, 2018, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public
hearing regarding the proposed amendments to the General Plan and on February 27, 2018, acted
by recommending that the City Council approve the proposed amendments; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed pertinent documents prepared in
accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act and
recommended that the Addendum to the Negative Declaration adopted for the Downtown
Redding Specific Plan be adopted for the proposed amendments to Redding's General Plan after
consideration of all testimonial and written evidence submitted prior to and during the
aforementioned public hearing;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Redding
as follows:
1. The above recitations are true and correct.
2. The City Council has reviewed the proposed Addendum to the Negative Declaration
adopted for the Downtown Redding Specific Plan and has determined that the actions
contemplated will not have an adverse impact on the environment.
3. The City Council hereby adopts the Addendum to the Negative Declaration adopted
for the Downtown Redding Specific Plan as referred to the City Council by the Planning
Commission.
4. The City Council hereby adopts the attached amendments to the General Plan
Diagram associated with the Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update as referred to the City
Council by the Planning Commission.
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a
regular meeting of the City Council on the 20th day of March, 2018, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: McElvain, Sullivan,Weaver,Winter, & Schreder
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
K0/4/16
RISTE SCHRE , Mayor
ATTEST: FORM APPROVED:
Ct/tG I
QUA ELA MIZ , City Clerk BARRY E. DeWAL , City Attorney
CITY OF CITY OF REDOING
REDK:Rfa" 777 CYPR[S$ AvcNU[, l2EDDING, CA 96001
%� ' y RO. 130X A96071, BEDDING, CA 96049-b071
C A 1,-'1- F CYJt-tri"=t'1�%
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
PLANNING DIVISION
ADDENDUM TO A NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update
Rezoning Application RZ-2018-00046
General Plan Amendment Application GPA-2018-00047
Specific Plan Amendment Application AMND-2018-00058
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Rezoning Application RZ-2018-00046, General Plan Amendment Application GPA-2018-
00047, and Specific Plan Amendment Application AMND-2018-00058 are associated with the
proposed update to the Downtown Redding Specific Plan ("Plan"), the preparation of which
commenced in September 2016.
The Plan was adopted in 2001 and amended in 2010. The vision of the update is to create a
revitalized Downtown Redding that is attractive, safe, economically vibrant, and respectful of
historical and natural resources, and which has a lively mix of pedestrian- and bicycle-oriented
shops, housing, workplaces, parks, and civic facilities, inviting to residents and visitors alike.
The update would modify the Specific Plan area boundary (see attached Location Map), change
the zoning and general plan land use classification of certain properties (see attached Zoning
Map and General Plan Map), and would modify the land use regulations, development standards,
parking requirements, design standards and guidelines, implementation action plan, and other
3f,
various provisions of the Specific Plan.
The adoption of a specific plan is established through the authority granted to the City of
Redding by the California Government Code, Title 7, Division 1, Chapter 3, Article 8, Sections
65450 through 65457 (Specific Plans). Specific plans may be adopted by resolution or by t
ordinance. This allows cities to choose whether their specific plans, or portions thereof, will be
policy-oriented or regulatory in nature. The Plan was adopted as a hybrid that included three
distinct zoning districts (Central Business District, Uptown Business District, and Southern
Gateway District) within a portion of the Plan area and provided the same regulatory structure,
such as permitted uses and development standards, as other zoning districts in the City. The
regulations of each of these districts were crafted specifically to address development issues
within the Plan area. The proposed Plan Update would simplify the zoning districts into two
districts that better match the existing and desired development in Downtown and cover the
entire Plan area. The goals, strategies, development standards, design guidelines and procedures
in the Plan Update provide direction as new development, redevelopment, future planning, and
public-improvement efforts occur within the Specific Plan area.
Addendum to Negative Deelaratton-Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update Page 1
The boundaries of the Plan area are proposed to be reduced to better define the area considered
to be Downtown Redding. This revision would remove blocks in the north and east that are
residential and institutional, respectively, and have different character from the rest of
Downtown. The proposed Plan boundary is generally defined as the area from Riverside Drive
and Trinity Street to the north, Court Street to the west, Liberty Street and East Street to the east,
and Lincoln Street and Cypress Street to the south. The land use pattern south of Shasta Street
and north of South Street, between the Union Pacific Railroad tracks and East Street make up the
Downtown Core District. The proposed Downtown Core District (formerly Central Business
District) boundary represents the densest part of Downtown and aligns with the existing Highrise
Building Height Overlay District. Areas to the north, west, and south of the Downtown Core
District within the Plan area include less intensive land uses and buildings and are proposed to be
within the Downtown Mixed Use District.
ANALYSIS
Although land use regulations, development standards, parking requirements, entitlement
processes, and design standards and guidelines affecting properties within the proposed reduced
Plan area would be modified as a result of the Plan Update, the proposal would not allow urban
development to occur in any areas where the same or similar types of urban development are not
presently permitted. Two existing building height overlay districts apply to the Plan area, the
aforementioned Highrise Building Height Overlay District and the Midrise Building Height
Overlay Districts; the boundaries of the Highrise District coincide with the proposed Downtown
Core District and the Midrise District comprises a portion of the proposed Downtown Mixed Use
District. The Highrise District allows unlimited height, whereas the Midrise District allows
heights up to 75 feet.No changes in height limits would result from the proposed Plan Update.
Adoption of the Plan Update would not negatively impact the welfare of the citizens of Redding
and its surrounding region. There is no substantial evidence in light of the whole record that the
proposed Plan and amendments to Title 18 will have a significant effect on the environment.
Furthermore, there is no evidence in light of the whole record that the proposed amendments to
the General Plan Diagram will negatively impact the welfare of the citizens of Redding and its
surrounding region. The Plan reflects and implements the numerous General Plan goals and
policies pertaining to Downtown Redding as well as the Downtown Focus Area Development
Guidelines of the Community Development and Design Element. The adoption and
implementation of the Plan Update is anticipated to positively impact the welfare of the citizens
of Redding and its surrounding area by facilitating the achievement of the Plan's vision to
"...create a revitalized Downtown Redding that is attractive, safe, economically vibrant, and
respectful of historical and natural resources..." by having "...a lively mix of pedestrian- and
bicycle-oriented shops, housing, workplaces, parks, and civic facilities, inviting to residents and
visitors alike."
The Plan is necessary to properly implement the goals and policies of the General Plan. The
Implementation section of the General Plan identifies the adoption of a Specific Plan and
Development Guidelines for Downtown Redding to address the following: Appropriate land use
classifications; desired mixed-use concepts; public gathering places; building scale and mass;
facade and overhang treatments; Downtown circulation and streetscape; parking and parking
structures; and linkage to other districts. The Updated Plan addresses the aforementioned issues
relative to current conditions and the community's present long-term vision for Downtown
Redding. It is important to assess the adequacy of adopted specific plans from time to time to
ensure that they remain effective in implementing General Plan goals and policies and in
Addendum to Negative Declaration—Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update Page 2
3
achieving the community's evolving vision for specific plan areas. The intent of the Plan Update
is to improve upon the implementation of the General Plan goals and polices pertaining to
Downtown Redding.
Pursuant to Government Code Section 65454, the Plan Update is consistent with the General
Plan's goals and policies. Appendix A of the Plan Update identifies the goals and policies of the
Community Development and Design Element, Transportation Element, Natural Resources
Element, Health and Safety Element, Recreation Element, Economic Development Element,
Housing Element, Public Facilities and Services Element, and Air Quality Element of the
General Plan which pertain to Downtown Redding. For the following reasons, the Plan reflects
and implements the numerous General Plan goals and policies pertaining to Downtown Redding
as well as the Downtown Focus Area Development Guidelines of the Community Development
and Design Element:
1. The Community Development and Design Element provides guidance on development
with specific focus areas of the City, including the Downtown Focus Area. The General
Plan states that Downtown should present a more urban character than the rest of the City
in order to distinguish it from the City's other commercial districts. The land use
regulations, development standards, and design standards and guidelines of the Plan are
reflective of urban development patterns, concepts, and styles, which will further
distinguish the character of Downtown from the City's other commercial districts.
2. The Transportation Element and the Downtown Redding Community Based Transportation
Plan (DRTP) recognize the importance of creating a balanced transportation system in the
Downtown area. The Plan establishes a land use pattern for Downtown which supports the
balance between all modes of transportation and prioritizes the recommendations outlined
in the DRTP for implementation.
3. The Natural Resources Element promotes habitat restoration and enhancement and
improvement of the quality of stormwater runoff. The open space, streetscape, and
sustainable design implementation strategies of the Plan support the goals and policies of
the Natural Resources Element by considering the restoration and enhancement of creeks
within Downtown, promoting an integrative approach to improve stormwater
infrastructure, limiting impermeable surfaces to reduce stormwater runoff, and
recommending the use of permeable paving.
4. The Health and Safety Element promotes the reduction of criminal activity through proper
site design and land use planning and a safe and secure environment for people and
property in the community. The Plan directly supports the goals and policies of the Health
and Safety Element through its promotion of Crime Prevention Through Environmental
Design principles and active ground floors along street frontages, nighttime activities, and
residential uses to increase foot traffic and provide more eyes on the street and public
realm.
5. The goals and policies of the Recreation Element support the development of a citywide
recreational trail system, separating bicyclists and pedestrians from vehicular traffic and
pedestrian facilities from bicycle facilities whenever feasible, and increasing the acreage
and quality of developed park facilities. The open space, public realm, incentives for
activation, streetscape, bicycle, and wayfinding implementation strategies of the Plan
support the goals and policies of the Recreation Element through the establishment of new
Addendum to Negative Declaration—Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update Page 3
public parks and open spaces, activating parks and open spaces with public art, establishing
pedestrian and bicycle facility priorities, conceptual streetscape improvement cross
sections, a comprehensive wayfinding system, and plans for the safe and efficient
connectivity between Downtown, the recreational trail system, and other bicycle facilities
in the vicinity of Downtown.
6. The Plan directly supports the goals and policies of the Economic Development Element
through its economic development goals and implementation strategies and its
Implementation Action Plan. The Implementation Action Program includes measures
regarding business development services and training opportunities, establishment of a
Downtown Business Association, start-up business services and assistance, development of
an available sites and buildings inventory, provision of incentives to attract desired types of
development and businesses, and establishment of gap financing and micro-loan programs.
7. The goals and policies of the Housing Element promote infill development where adequate
public services exist, the facilitation of mixed-use development, and the provision of a wide
range of housing choices in the community. The appropriate mix of uses implementation
strategies of the Plan support the goals and policies of the Housing Element by allowing for
a mix of uses, including residential, throughout the entire Plan area, encouraging land uses
that attract residents to Downtown, and allowing for a variety of housing opportunities,
including mixed-use developments, loft apartments, and zero lot-line cottages and
townhomes.
8. The goals and policies of the Public Facilities and Services Element promote the provision
of facilities and amenities that enhance the unique character of Downtown and support its
role as the heart of the community, maintenance of a street system that allows all users to
travel smoothly and safely, and maintenance of a public park and recreation system suited
to the needs of residents and visitors. The open space, public realm, incentives for
activation, streetscape, bicycle, and wayfinding implementation strategies of the Plan
support the goals and policies of the Public Facilities and Services Element through the
establishment of new public parks and open spaces, establishing pedestrian and bicycle
facility priorities, conceptual streetscape improvement cross sections, a comprehensive
wayfinding system, and plans for the safe and efficient connectivity between Downtown,
the recreational trail system, and other bicycle facilities in the vicinity of Downtown.
it
9. The Plan directly supports the goal and related policies of the Air Quality Element to
reduce motor vehicle trips and vehicle miles traveled by allowing for increased mixed-use
development and residential densities and supporting a balance between all modes of
transportation, including active (non-motorized) transportation modes.
DETERMINATION
The City of Redding previously prepared a Negative Declaration for the Plan, which was E'
adopted on February 6, 2001. Based upon a review of the proposed amendments to the Plan, it
has been determined that an addendum to the previously adopted Negative Declaration is
appropriate because none of the following conditions (pursuant to CEQA Section 15162) have
occurred:
Addendum to Negative Declaration—Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update Page 4
1. Substantial changes are proposed for the project that will require major revision of the
previous Negative Declaration due to new, significant environmental effects or a
substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects.
2. Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is
undertaken that involve new, significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in
the severity of previously identified effects.
3. New information of substantial importance indicates that:
a. The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous
Negative Declaration.
b. Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown
in the previous Negative Declaration.
c. Mitigation measures previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and
would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the
project proponents decline to adopt them.
d. Mitigation measures that are considerably different from those analyzed in the
previous Negative Declaration would substantially reduce one or more significant
effects, but the project proponents decline to adopt them.
FINDINGS
1. The City of Redding has determined that an addendum is warranted,finding that none
of the above conditions are in evidence and that there is no substantial evidence, in light
of the whole record before the City, that the proposal will have a significant effect on the
en viro,unent.
2. The Addendum to the Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and
analysis of the City of Redding.
PUBLIC REVIEW DISTRIBUTION
Pursuant to Section 15164(c) of CEQA, an addendum does not require circulation for public
review.
Copies of the Addendum, the Negative Declaration, and related materials may be obtained at
the Planning Division of the Development Services Department, City of Redding, 777 Cypress
Avenue, Redding, CA 96001. Contact: Paul Hellman, Planning Manager, at(530) 646-3746.
]-ah 2tf zolg
Date Paul Hellman, Planning Manager
Addendum to Negative Declaration—Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update Page 5
* „ :,1 s . 1//1/14 v, ,-, ,
, \ si til •#* ,
%.* 414* -
r
figitt A - rCE S ! I
! 0MN
F,,/ I ‘,1`• , \
. --- rl
_____
,.. i_
�� t< ti'
TRINI7Yjli,�. .�.... ._ EUREKA WAY
f I 1i _
DIVISION ST
us __rill 11 1 a — ._._. SHASTA 8T '
SHASTA ST _ _
— MIL MI [ " _____. ,
-- 6, -- —mil
[—I
Wr_, 1
En
—� - I TEHAMA ST U _ _— _ Q F
I I I� I w STATE HWY 44 W
I
> Ns I -- 1: 1— I t "If
---�- I z
rT NI ■ i 1__NM I - I� I z
UTTE ST I : I E_ST
– I Ii I I
r-
i._ 1 — I L I L__� •
y ct YUBA ST "' _— —
$T L_l d F-- �_
LRL3_' 711-111 II
[ -- r
–r+n r� r I I – _ ._ _-1 L1 J { – –
I_,DI 1 ..- —. J ▪ T `— t- -, i r i— cn, ,_ PLACER ST
J I , �1 1 i' I
L- Kum 1 w I 1 41 Q
I I In SACRAMENTO ST 0 SACRAMENTO ST • 0 wo ¢�. -
1 up moor III ,
a cc
7-9 f W — - 1▪ 1 SOUTH ST 0
P ' ¢ FLORENCE STJQ
GOLD ST 0cc F _' I �� R. I w I L-q i I Lir b
wU 1-7 I GO'b ST r GOLD ST I I 9<< t LEE ST _ o
' i _i 1 ‘� > --
Q I 1 �_�
Goy I - ' ▪ -j LLN-, sir sFkvoo 1- i I a Fy ,
Sp U ' <O ,
wcc C''o �y L
NJ ti W O HIL 1 6,), /
L 1 Proposed Specific Plan Boundary y- / GIST y
._e: Q Q c
Existing Specific Plan Boundary c)44o
�c('
r
N GIS DIVISION LOCATION MAP MTG.DATE
IINFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT
rY DATE PRODUCED: ITEM
E JANUARY 24,2018
8 0 350 700 Feet DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN
ATTACHMENT:
P 11Downtown\MooDocuments\P,oposedDowndown5oec,f,cPIan LOC 01242018 mxd
�� �. \ - 'v-7„,‘( ', 14ilk '� .'"A- ,,Iiiiiihill 4*,_
6 ��
'( � � gyp" ���_�_
A RIVFRSlo�DR ----`
4� �1 Pp- _ ��
�i Req-1 u ` PRR A sr
.
10TH ST ` M 20 I-
I/ 14) 'a
\\
\ Lcn -- RM.zO
LLI -10
�� ��,� 4 z < cn
TRI I Y S I �F >-
ccw
__ * ` �� /% USD•SPGC-IN
- - lir,- �� EUREKA WAY I Li' ----i 1-----' ..
"WA c '-'1 i
II
rri
A
cv
r GC.gN m UeD.Sp gN Pp
4i� Lu
Wil IN . w
SHASTA ST— Y
1.— J IJ
_ • ai Li
�14-' �j W I 60.1/01N N
■r LL—Q���� EUui J I W
—_ ____ .�� = TEHAMAST Q I Z
_ ! ,.,..,... ■lieu D ' pF B STATE HWY 44 W
rill . Z ii
J BUTTE S1j G BU.ITEST.-1
72
-
II w I ' CgD•Sp.gN H
cc
k1-0 III
i ill_
YUBICST 1 I 1 z t
L GO-B/, ' + 11 .r ---.. _.__A a - .
Pp I
j J i P ).-
--, - PLACER ST _tv >
T r W NC GC. I 'r G I a z w I �—
C_ J
RS.q , . Q l ipk;7ji
ILBN I VAN Pp o Q �I
SACRAM NTO ST / it
SACRAMENTO STI GO I ¢o
CC H' 11II I I L_1Jy sG�u�I�s:G I
I /Z � J� 1 �
L.-i
w zi
10 t-
CC
� CO ;.bpRR
R4,..7„ z FLORENC�ST Q
LDSITI U F- i S ),� I�j •ANl w Li O
L Q U GOLD .T �— GD.SP.BN , �j a
�iI a ,
/l 1 t I > LEE ST cA
UJ Ji C•6 --a 1 11---.j j
•
'` ory ¢ _ RM 9 hINCOLN ST J ! � \�
III °` tO GO NoF R -s > `! • N w ,_ SGD•Sp ( I
l'O
om /_ w ow , /� ‘X/j,GO . :\
ST
Downtown Mixed Use District c J CC -9
1_ _ I Downtown Core District Lu
SONOMA ST roc
Zoning District RS.35 ��o4 off% GC.Vii. GSTST !', //'
6V9iF
N GIS DIVISION ZONING MAP MTG DATE
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT
W DATE PRODUCED ITEM
EJANUARY 24,2018
8 0 350 700 Feet DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN
MIXED USE & CORE DISTRICT ATTACHMENT
P:lPlannin➢1ESRI\NewDowntownCareMIxedUse Boundaries 01122018.mxd
'---,,,\ ply �� _•_?! vs.4- -._
r ..
\ -\----::: r
f ir'.• 110 Ii
I 1IItoTi� Mairrii----
sr
o I. ' la 3° _: --,.....\\,,,a Ed
<• • ,..4& c o ^ ' �= I_
.__I ;,; NA
? i !
- ir:sc
v_.
•. ----III ..11
_ ri aillE IF-- r� _ ._ T
1i ' rIH 1 l II i is kii
; - -,.- -_,E1
- ' —_ SI 1
m...i.4.
a -_ ^ H-
■ L I _ _ w STATE HWY 44 W
;i .I. F1 • Pp., r
-�It ■ s- - I
IL MEM pi
= �� iii ` UIIIIIIIIIM
MEI
—/----B101 0 IBM II [1 L g ( ' =
NM e.' pi li --
'1-1
111 , Ir-- r ,i -
I1!
-_r---
a.
- 1 , Triiiiiiiii...!st _ ` _ Li as
Q!-! _ : x:11 E 11 _ . _ ---Fl t LI ■� 61, . a
, ---
W
- l
!LD ST U Lt.1 11111 f / - IBJ ] bEzr-
" i s-
4 IL DST E 11 T \- a E:
GO S GOLD
F.
fr
G . .. [ii -ONE i
R:k:: 06
I— �0 " \9
O '' PF/ 6te>' 4>.**:
o / -k.
, 4
.iee
cl` z_ • --:, A gr )- ° .ei,_
..,..
---",,,, • i., Lij 0 )... G• 10, \
0
g 11 SONOMA sr Y \ r' , �{
Mixed Use Core '
General Plan Land-Use o 3'5to s ,o �A�css ,� �� / '
-7 '/' '', /Q4j,, ,
ci
N GIS DIVISION GENERAL PLAN MAP MTG.DATE:
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT
W DATE PRODUCED•
E JANUARY 24,2018 REM:
5 0 350 700 Feet DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN
MIXED USE CORE AREA ATTACHMENT:
P 1Planning\ESRItNewDowntownCoreMaedUseBounderies 01122018 mxd
00p4•o CITY OF REDDING
Yrs
r '" r' P DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
�}
777 Cypress Avenue, Redding, CA 96001-2718
P.O. Box 496071, Redding, CA 96049-6071
530.225.4020 FAX 530.225.4495•
e-mall: Jhamilton@cl.redding.ca.us
PROPOSED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Downtown Redding Specific Plan
State Clearinghouse No. 2000102098
SUBJECT
Downtown Redding Specific Plan. The City of Redding is considering adoption of the Downtown
Redding Specific Plan(Plan). The Plan will implement the City's General Plan as it relates to Downtown.
The Plan,in concert with the General Plan,lays the foundation for the transformation of Downtown through
a number of policies geared to enhancing pedestrian orientation,encouraging residential development,and
investing in new development.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The Plan study area, comprising approximately 294 acres, is generally bounded on the north by the
Sacramento River;on the south by Lincoln Street and Cypress Avenue;on the west by Court Street;and on
the east by Continental Street and East Street. The Plan establishes revitalization goals in the-area of land
use,circulation and parking,park development,Mall redesign,public signage,building standards and design
guidelines, housing opportunities, and streetscape design. The Plan also recommends timing of
improvements, estimates project costs,and identifies potential funding sources. The Plan further proposes
the creation of three new zoning districts in Downtown to implement the Plan: "CBD"Central Business
District (most pedestrian-oriented district in the center of Downtown, in and around the Mall);
"UBD"Uptown Business District(north of the Mall,recognizes the auto-orientation of development in the
area); and "SGD" Southern Gateway District (south of the Mall, also recognizes the auto-orientation of
development).
ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
Existing land uses in the Downtown study area include a mix of retail and service commercial uses,
restaurants,professional and medical offices,hospital,banks,lodging,and older single-and multiple-family
residential. The Sacramento River forms the north boundary of the area. State Highways 299,273,and 44 l
traverse the area,and the Union Pacific Railroad cuts through the western one-third of the area.
FINDINGS AND DETERMINATION
11
The City of Redding conducted an Initial Study/Environmental Assessment(attached), which determined
that the proposed project will not have significant environmental effects and that the preparation of an
environmental impact report will not be required. If there are substantial changes that alter the character or
impacts of the proposed project,another environmental impact determination will be necessary. If
I
Based on the Initial Study/Environmental Assessment,the City of Redding has determined that there
is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment.
The negative declaration and its supporting documentation reflects the independent judgment and
analysis of the lead agency,which is the City of Redding.
DOCUMENTATION
The attached Initial Study/Environmental Assessment documents the reasons to support the above
determination.
PUBLIC REVIEW DISTRIBUTION
Draft copies or notice of this negative declaration were distributed to:
• State Clearinghouse(October 26,2000-November 27,2000)(see attached notice)
• Shasta County Air Quality Mgmt District
• US Post Office
• Shasta County Superintendent of Schools
• Shasta Union High School District
• Shasta County Library
• Shasta County Dept of Resource Mgmt
• Charter Cable
• Redding Elementary Schools
• Union Pacific Railroad
• Shasta Builders'Exchange
RESULTS OF PUBLIC REVIEW
( ) No comments were received during the public review period.
( ) Comments were received but did not address the negative declaration findings or the
accuracy/completeness of the Initial Study/Environmental Assessment.No response is necessary.The
letters are attached.
}
( ) Comments addressing the findings of the negative declaration and/or accuracy or completeness of the
Initial Study/Environmental Assessment were received during the public review period. The letters
and responses follow(see Response to Comments attached).
Copies of the negative declaration and any Initial Study/Environmental Assessment materials may
be obtained at the PIanning Division of the Development Services Department, City of Redding,
777 Cypress Avenue,Redding, CA 96001. Contact: Larry Morgon, Senior Redevelopment Project
Coordinator at(530)225-4393.
}
fo z y /1/21°1°.
TftilIamilton,AICP Dat'of Draftrkeport
'Development Services Director
Date of anal Report
JH:amf
C:\D\NTC\NegdecDRSP.wpd
Attachments:
A. Location Map
B. State Clearinghouse Notice and Notice to Public
C. Initial Study/Environmental Assessment dated October 24,2000
ii
Proposed Negative Declaration Powwow Redding Specific Plan Page 2
#44..\ topo. ' ,,__. ,,,
.e.010 , RIVERS OFD
._ 2 ,?. m ,
,� t, r t R � \
r � P
F
,, � PRI NCE S
7tØ*
� o a a '1:
w m ,� r 1
``; GA k w ca TRIMIYbi e 1 >-
1 _ lor ~ G �� UBDSP 2 J GC..frR � r
a
\•► - IimireI- EUREKA WA_ I I -- ---rm
-
- I O)� GC i c". ��
.�R
_, d. - 'i I } GC.e` m _UeD-Sp,eN i I la u P
ll. W m D F
--in- I ; I _1 SHASTA S I 3
1
II Q >_. I cA
I F- -1Jwri I G BH g1
vim
NM 111.1 NI r
II fin mum
�ma TEHAMAST z Q 1 z iiiw
Hi
j O��1 I Pie O STATE HWY 44 W
o Go
BUTTE ST a I - z BUTTES BUTTE ST ,�
h'M. L ~ ''1, --- ' I CBo.SP. 1._J. i'
R/10/.9 mf gH
mum YUBA ST- 1Li z -- - BA I__
!r
FiG01 H ,f - --I I j i I - -1 _
cn '��� __ F _ _..,
I PLACER ST w w
J N >
1 J Q >
RS '' `!'■ r sii;1 Q C ��. GC'QH w —� r�r GC_V4 y PR a o a
i H-
j SACRAMENTO ST rte'. / U — SACRAMENTO STI GO
11[14
j 1 [ l cc
( r -'� -��
0
ix z ' Yso�.�Tr�sz RM.�oi I >
GO !JIM/ i .bpRR Rly FLORENCE ST Q
o. H r l_.� - o
GOLD ST O v L 1 G \ _ _-
a ,GOLD�,_T ,1 S O.SP_eH \* c7
J H - \ ----LEE-ST cn
Hav
611_____ii i 1 h----1 1 i
•
1 NCOLN ST - �� +' �
•..Al4 - 8 L GO HePP
M .`
R
ip g u SGOcs �� �� /
F ., LUQ rn _ G GO !�
e 1LIF ,i 0 1_c 1 -_y #j .��/ a y
Downtown Mixed Use District J ( 1--J ' \\� ��,�,�� �� / ,
1 - - - so Q 1 � . W � ��
1_ _ I Downtown Core District NOMAST � A �j,' ,4
�a
Zoning District RS.3-s ��� 2 , �<ss GC'VR 4 'a ,4
i___. G % z ♦ . \ I0.
N GIS DIVISION ZONING MAP MTG.DATE:
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT
tiV�= DATE PRODUCED ITEM:
E JANUARY 24,2018
S 0 350 700 Feet DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN
MIXED USE & CORE DISTRICT ATTACHMENT:
P:\Planning\ESRItNewDowntownCoteMetedUse Boundanes 01122018 mid
;,;i0 * PK
ci.:Ni<7. , il,..41, fr•.).,
. ..d. e. , ' 1111 14*•-.1111111k 4P.'
• rip,,. . i \\I%i .
Iiii,„# * \ grr"--in-,-, .,,—,,,
' u', \ zvto
—
3
., �' a I- --1 I i_ -
U
4---Arkiiiiii. CO _J
S, w w j'[.-1-1- ,,,
`•� z J TRIN'fIYJI }
���<,,A U ¢ Q } J
<, . ,
. ,
- - -
I. EKA WAY
. i _ _F-- , ,r-� i i r i r —i c�a -_��
• — J DIVISION ST — ■ —�_ PF./
I— _ii _-■
LEI
Q SHASTA ST , a SHASTA T-
GC i z • • Gp
".[:::
-- - HAMA T v I
F. A
___,_.
En
Ill iii �� I 14-' 1 L.:
~ I—
EU aiHUC - — _ - o
3 1,- E _g
1 Y rBA ST �_
---AR/C 1.III LI rr mj , ., -
■ _ m —7 —
ilLIp J
co ! - G{ GO
1 7j
---
J �F F- u) PLACER ST
>-
1111i1119-11 ~ }
' GC z --- I F 1 W Pp4 J ; w
to ■ 1NI l -
GO U --` SACRAMENTO ST a o
¢ J SOUTH ST j-1 L_ 1--I , I 4 ! > }-
111 Y f ��cn •'pRR. L_ I- 6 tp 1Q �� FLORENCE ST Q
rt GOLD ST O H _ tOf 4 - I >
0 U
¢ GODS a - ....
`�
L.., NC _ G 9(( LEE ST co-
__
• , _
...„, ,. _1
/� I CO NCOLN ST _ l 9(;' ,( C� 3.$to 6
z T —
OO6SP, m PP-/ 6to /o - �� co(� ��NK
y.y •S terki Q t, 1/
_____ i, i\-71)‘• ‘-c. \,,# si-- ,
9 S6ntr„ c. Ocr. SO c- w f------7" (OCGST �((�j ,�, ''
Mixed Use Core NOM/sr Y \ 01 . �v �
General Plan Land-Use Q 3.5 to 6 ���o �s 9 �y �,,'� .
•
N GIS DIVISION GENERAL PLAN MAP MTG.DATE:
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT
W DATE PRODUCED
E JANUARY 24 2018
S 0 350 700 Feet DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN
MIXED USE CORE AREA ATTACHMENT
P:\Plannind1ESRIINewDowntownCoreMmed UseBoundanes 01122018.mzd